1 I haven't been able to access the sources for the tsunamis. According to Amiran et. al (1994) one reference is
Rabbi Joseph the Scribe experienced this severe tsunami while traveling by ship from Constantinople to Beirut. Cf. translation of his letter by B.A. Friedmann, Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly (1914), p. 67.biblicalstudies.org.uk lists the reference as Rabbu Joseph the Scribe, "Praises of the Land of Israel," Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly Statement 46.2 (April 1914): 67-83. but does not have an online version.
Text (with hotlink) | Original Language | Biographical Info | Religion | Date of Composition | Location Composed | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Letter from the French Consulate in Saida (Sidon) | French |
Background
|
Christian | Dec. 1759 CE | Saida (Sidon) |
Account
A two part letter written in late December 1759 CE and a bit later from a French Consular official in Saida (Sidon) provided an extensive description of seismic effects from the two earthquakes.
The first earthquake struck at 345 am on 30 Oct. 1759 CE. It was followed by continuing aftershocks until a second stronger and longer quake struck on 25 November. The two earthquakes |
Archbishop of Saida Boutros Jalfaq | Arabic ? |
Biography
|
Christian Melkite | December 1759 CE | Sidon |
Account
An extensive account of the earthquakes of 1759 CE is to be found in a letter written in December 1759 by
Boutros Jalfaq (aka Basile Jelghaf?) the
Archbishop of Saida (Sidon). The letter dates the earthquakes to
30 Oct. and 25 Nov. 1759 CE and contains an extensive list of seismic effects, some of which may be co-mingled, as well as locations where there was damage or fatalities. The 30 Oct. 1759 CE earthquake
is said to have been particularly severe in Safed where 2000 were reported dead. Curiously, the area surrounding Safed was said to be |
Petition from Saida (Sidon) | Arabic | 5 Dec. 1759 CE | Saida (Sidon) |
Ayalon (2014:94) reports that after the earthquakes, a petition dated to 5 December 1759
was sent from Saida (Sidon) to Istanbul, asking for tax reductions for that year and the next. The petition was approved six weeks later. |
||
Patrick Russell | English |
Biography
|
Christian | 2 Dec. 1759 CE & 29 March 1760 CE | Aleppo |
Account
Patrick Russell, who was both a physician and a naturalist/scientist,
wrote a detailed contemporaneous account of both earthquakes in two letters. The first longer letter was written about 5 ½ weeks after the 30 Oct. Safed Quake and almost
two weeks after the 25 Nov. Baalbek Quake. The extract from the second letter was much shorter and written almost 4 months after the first. Russell provided detailed descriptions of the
nature and duration of the seismic shocks he experienced in Aleppo. |
The London Chronicle 1760 | English |
Background
|
December 1760 CE | London | The London Chronicle contains a brief mention of a dreadful earthquakewhich had affected Damascus. |
|
La Gazette de France 1760 | French |
Background
|
March 1760 CE | Paris |
Account
In 1760 CE, La Gazette de France reported on the earthquakes of 1759 CE twice in Issues 9 and 10. In Issue 9 (1 March 1760 CE),
a report from Marseilles on 22 Feb. 1760 which was sourced from letters from Constantinople dated at the beginning of January 1760 CE stated that a great earthquake was experienced in the Levant.
Safed was overthrown as wells as Antioch, Damascus, Tiberias and Jaffa. Tripoli, Seyde [Sidon], and Saint-Jean d'Acre were badly damaged. Several houses were knocked down there,
and others sunk several feet. In Issue 10 (8 March 1760 CE), a report from Paris on 8 March 1760 which was sourced from letters from various places in Syria, spoke of repeated earthquakes
which destroyed most of the towns in the region. The first earthquake struck at 345 am on 30 Oct. 1759 CE and the second earthquake struck at 715 pm on 25 November 1759 CE. Aftershocks were
|
|
Ottoman Work Orders in Damascus | Turkish ? | 1760 CE | Istanbul |
Account
Ayalon (2014:96-99) reports that Ottoman work orders compiled in 1760 CE for rebuilding efforts in Damascus listed
|
||
al-Budayr | Arabic |
Biography
|
Muslim | 1762 CE | Damascus |
Account
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - awaiting translation from Arabic. |
Mikha’il Burayk | Arabic |
Biography
|
Greek Orthodox Christian | ~1782 CE | Damascus |
Account
In Ayalon (2014:61)'s paraphrase of Mikha’il Burayk's (1982:78-80) earthquake narrative, a powerful earthquake was described as striking Damascus three hours before sunrise on 30 Oct. 1759 CE. The earthquake led to the destruction of houses, parts of the Umayyad Mosque, as well as other Mosques in Damascus. A month later (the exact date was not specified in the paraphrased re-telling) a “strong and frightening earthquake” hit Damascus late in the evening. It was reported that “walls were torn down, foundations weakened, minarets collapsed, and the Umayyad mosque with its minarets, domes and baths was destroyed.” Many other buildings were also destroyed among them the Greek Orthodox Church. Fires broke out in many quarters and, in the aftermath, city residents slept in gardens surrounding the city. |
de Volney | French |
Biography
|
Atheist | 1787 CE | France |
Account
de Volney included a brief passage about an earthquake in 1759 CE in a book written about his travels to the region after the earthquakes struck. He reports that it is said that more than 20,000 people died in the valley of Baalbek due to the earthquake and he indicated that some structural damage remained unrepaired. He also reported that 3 months of aftershocks drove many in Lebanon to live in tents. He did not differentiate between the 30 Oct. Safed Quake and the 25 Nov. Baalbek Quake. |
Giovanni Mariti | Italian |
Biography
|
1787 CE | possibly Florence | Giovanni Mariti wrote a brief passage in a travelogue where he said that strong earthquakes caused immense damage in Syria in 1759 CE. | |
John Bramsen | French |
Biography
|
1818 CE | John Bramsen wrote a short passage stating that Acre suffered greatly due to an earthquakein 1759 CE and when he visited the place in 1814 CE, one could still see remains of the destruction. |
||
Burton and Drake (1872) | English |
Biography
|
1872 CE |
Account
Burton and Drake (1872) reproduced a letter written by Isabel Burton in 1870 CE and a notice written by J.D. Crace in The Builder which state that the Keystone in the soffit of the Temple of Jupiter in Baalbek slipped during an earthquake in 1759 and three columns in the peristyle of the Temple of Jupiter also fell during an earthquake in the same year. Presumably the earthquake would be the 25 Nov. Baalbek Quake. |
||
Other Authors | ||||||
Text (with hotlink) | Original Language | Biographical Info | Religion | Date of Composition | Location Composed | Notes |
THE SEYDE EARTHQUAKE IN 1759
From the gardens of Seyde, December 28, 1769.
GENTLEMEN,
Since October 30, a furious shock at 3:45 in the morning made us fear a fate like the one in Lisbon [JW: the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake]. We feel the continuing tremors day and night. There was another one on November 25, which was stronger and longer than the first. The two earthquakes ruined the city of Seyde, such that I doubt she can recover, given the poverty of the country and the unhelpful and unwilling government. There is no house that has not been completely or partially destroyed. The Khan was extremely damaged, especially on the sunset and midday side; it is uninhabitable here and in many other places. My house is in the same condition; all rooms were damaged. Several houses had to be demolished; some were damaged. We all left town on October 30 to take refuge in the countryside, under tents that the Pasha loaned me. We spent 48 days there and, obliged to return the tents to the Pasha, we did with recognition of about two hundred piastres. We had huts built, which were very costly, and in which we will have to winter, albeit with much inconvenience and risk due to the plague, which is now in Acre and environs, and will surely soon come here.
I have already had the honor of pointing out to you that the earthquakes still continue. We haven't had a 24 hour stretch without tremors and today we felt some. These tremors are felt throughout Syria. You know from the other partners(?) what happened there. I will confine myself to telling you that, in this department, which seems to have suffered the most, Acre was damaged a bit less than Seyde. Baruth (Beirut), Rame, Jerusalem and Jane felt it, but with less damage. Safed and Nablus have been completely ruined and overthrown. Damascus is three quarters destroyed and famous Baalbek is completely destroyed. Several villages were damaged in the mountains. Large fissures opened up in the earth on the Baalbek side and it is said that these cracks extend more than 20 leagues (~110 km.). Finally, it is assumed that more than thirty thousand people died in Syria.[Historical archives of the Chamber of Commerce of Marseilles, A.A. 340].
Thank God none of us got hurt. But, we all had a beautiful scare. Happy to still be here! We believe that the dryness of the earth contributed to these shocks; we sigh after the rain. The rains are heavy, with continuous thunderstorms and for four days, the earth won't stop shaking. We are in even more disorder than the earth. All our cabins are flooded. One cabin longer than a square plank is slightly less flooded and is all the shelter I have for myself, my wife, my four children, including one on the breast, and my servants. One cannot imagine a more unfortunate situation.
LE TREMBLEMENT DE TERRE DE SEYDE EN 1759
« Des jardins de Seyde, le 28 décembre 1769.
« MESSIEURS,
« Depuis le 30 octobre, qu'une furieuse secousse à trois heures trois quarts du matin nous fit craindre un sort pareil à celui de Lisbonne, nous n'avons cessé jour et nuit de ressentir jusqu'à ce jour des tremblements de terre continuels. 11 y en eut un le 25 novembre, qui a été et plus fort et plus long encore que le premier. Les deux secousses ont ruiné la ville de Seyde, de façon que je doute qu'elle s'en puisse relever, vu la misère du pays et le gouvernement peu disposé à la diminuer. Il n'y a point de maison qui n'ait été écroulée en tout ou en partie. Le Khan a été extrêmement maltraité, surtout du côté du couchant et du midi; il est inhabitable clans cette partie et dans beaucoup d'autres. Ma maison est dans le même état ; tous les appartements ont été endommagés. Il a fallu en démolir plusieurs ; quelques-uns ont été abîmés Nous avons tous abandonné la ville dès le 30 octobre pour nous réfugier à la campagne, sous des tentes que le Pacha m'avait fait prêter. Nous y avons passé quarantehuit jours et, ayant été obligés de rendre les tentes au Pacha, ce que nous avons fait avec une reconnaissance d'environ deux cents piastres, nous nous sommes fait construire des cabanes, qui nous coûtent incroyablement et sous lesquelles il nous faudra hiverner, quoiqu'avec beaucoup d'incommodité pour le lieu et pour la saison et beaucoup de risque du côté de la peste, qui vdent de se manifester à Acre et dans son voisinage, et qui infailliblement sera bientôt ici. »
« J'ai déjà eu l'honneur de vous marquer que les tremblements de terre continuent toujours. Nous n'en avons pas encore été exempts pendant vingt-quatre heures et aujourd'hui encore nous en aA7ons ressenti des secousses. Ces tremblements sont généraux par toute la Syrie. Vous saurez des autres Échelles ce qui y est arrivé. Je me bornerai à vous dire que, dans ce département, qui paraît avoir été la partie la plus souffrante, Acre a été à peu près comme Seyde, mais un peu moins mal. Baruth (Beyrouth), Rame, Jérusalem et Jane l'ont ressenti, mais av-ec moins de dommage. Safed et Napoulouse ont été entièrement ruinées et renversées. Damas l'est aux trois quarts et le fameux Balbek est entièrement détruit. Plusieurs villages ont été abîmés dans les montagnes. Il s'est fait des ouvertures considérables à la terre du côté de Balbek et l'on dit que ces abîmes durent plus de 20 lieues. Enfin l'on suppose qu'il a péri jusqu'à ce jouiplus de trente mille personnes dans la Syrie.
Grâces à Dieu, personne des nôtres n'a pris mal. Mais nous avons tous eu une belle peur. Heureux encore de pouvoir l'avoir ! Nous croyions que la sécheresse de la terre contribuait à ces ébranlements ; nous soupirions après la pluie. Il en fait de très abondantes, avec des orages continuels, depuis quatre jours, sans que la terre en soit plus stable ; et nous n'en sommes que plus en désordre : toutes nos cabanes sont inondées ; une seule, grande de la longueur d'une planche en carré, l'est un peu moins et fait tout l'abri que j'ai pour moi, nia femme, quatre enfants dont un à la mamelle, et pour mes domestiques. On ne peut voir de situation plus fâcheuse. »
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
3:45 am 30 Oct. 1759 CE | October 30, a furious shock at 3:45 in the morning | none |
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
25 Nov. 1759 CE | There was another one on November 25 | none |
Daeron et al (2005:529-530) presented surface faulting evidence that suggested younger less weathered fault scarplets on the Rachaıya-Serghaya faults and fresh mole-tracks on the Rachaıya fault [both closer to Baalbek] were associated with one of the 1759 CE fault breaks while older more weathered faults scarplets on the Yammouneh fault [farther from Baalbek] were associated with one of the the 1202 CE earthquakes. At the time of publication, they were only able to access a single line from the French Consul's report which was somewhat ambiguously worded. Nonetheless, they were able to ascertain from the sentence that the ~80 km. earth fissure was probably reported on the eastern Baalbek side of the Beqaa Valley in agreement with their scarplet observations. This contradicted previous speculation by Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) that the 25 Nov. 1759 CE fault break was on the Yammouneh fault on the west side of the Beqaa Valley. The fuller account from the French Consul's office of Saida presented here shows that the earth fissure was observed on the east side of the Beqaa Valley (i.e., the Baalbek side).
Daeron et al (2005:530) suggested that
the wording [in the account by the French consul in Saida] suggests that this rupture took place on one side of the Beqaa, and the mention of
Baalbek points to the east side, thus to the Serghaya fault.
Daeron et al (2005:529-530) presented surface faulting evidence that suggested
younger less weathered fault scarplets on the Rachaıya-Serghaya faults and fresh mole-tracks on the Rachaıya fault [both closer to Baalbek] were associated with one
of the 1759 CE fault breaks while older more weathered faults scarplets on the Yammouneh fault [farther from Baalbek] were associated with one of the the 1202 CE
earthquakes.
On pretend que [...] du cote de Balbec en tirans vers la plaine la terre s’est entrouverte de plus de trois toises et que cette ouverture dure plus de vingt lieues. (Archives Nationales, Paris, B1/1032/1959-60)
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
30 Oct. 1759 CE (Gregorian Calendar) | 19 Oct. 1759 (Julian Calendar) | none |
|
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
25 Nov. 1759 CE (Gregorian Calendar) | 14 Nov. 1759 (Julian Calendar) | none |
|
Ayalon (2014:94) reports that after the earthquakes, a petition dated 15 Rabi‘ al-Thani 1173 (5 December 1759)
was sent from Saida (Sidon) to Istanbul, asking for tax reductions for that year and the next
. The petition was approved six weeks
later (BOA, C. DH., 11626).
L11. An Account of the late Earthquakes in Syria : In a Letter from Dr. Patrick Russell, to his Brother, Alexander Russell, M . D. F. R. S
L11. Extract from another Letter of Dr. Patrick Russell, to Dr. Alexander Russell, dated at Aleppo, 29 March 1760
L11. An Account of the late Earthquakes
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
morning 10 June 1759 CE | On the morning of the 10th of June | none |
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Main shock at ~4 am 30 Oct. 1759 CE | October the 30th, about four in the morning 1759 AD | none | |
Aftershock at ~410 am 30 Oct. 1759 CE | In about ten minutes after this first, there was a second shock; but the tremulous motion was less violent, and did not last above fifteen seconds | none |
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Main shock at ~730 pm 25 Nov. 1759 CE | About half an hour after seven at night [on} the 25th of November 1759 AD | none | |
Aftershock at ~740 pm 25 Nov. 1759 CE | In about eight minutes after this [main shock] was over, a slight shock, of a few seconds duration, succeeded [on} the 25th of November 1759 AD | none | |
Aftershock at ~415 am 26 Nov. 1759 CE | At a quarter after four next morning, we had another shock, which lasted somewhat less than a minute, and was hardly so strong as that of the preceding night | none | |
Aftershock at 900 pm 26 Nov. 1759 CE | At nine o’clock we had a slight shock, of a few seconds | none | |
Additional 4-5 Aftershocks after midnight 25 Nov. 1759 CE until the morning of 28 Nov. 1759 CE | From midnight of the 25th, besides these now mentioned, four or five slighter shocks were felt but I myself was sensible of none till the morning of the 28th, when we had a short pulsatory shock | none | |
Aftershock at ~2 pm on 28 Nov. 1759 CE | The same day [28 Nov.], at two o’clock, we had a pretty smart shock, lasting about forty seconds | none | |
Daily aftershocks after ~2 pm on 28 Nov. 1759 CE | Since the afternoon of the 28th, several slight shocks have been every day felt | none | |
Aftershock at evening 5 Dec. 1759 CE | the evening of the 5th, which was pretty strong, but lasted not above twenty seconds | none | |
Aftershocks in Dec. 1759 CE and Jan. 1760 CE | There were several other shocks in December, and a few very slight ones in January : since which time, all has been quiet | none |
25 Nov. 1759 CE EarthquakeFootnotes* Although Russell reported the destruction of Safed on 25 Nov, Safed suffered destruction on 30 Oct. 1759 CE. The nature of communication at the time is likely what caused Patrick Russell to lump it in with the 25 Nov. Earthquake
25 Nov. 1759 CE EarthquakeFootnotes* Although Russell reported the destruction of Safed on 25 Nov, Safed suffered destruction on 30 Oct. 1759 CE. The nature of communication at the time is likely what caused Patrick Russell to lump it in with the 25 Nov. Earthquake
The London Chronicle or, Universal Evening Post Vol. VIII No. 615 from Tuesday, December 2, to Thursday, December 4, 1760
De Marseille, le 22 Février 1760.
Les lettres arrivée depuis peu de divers lieux de
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
345 am 30 Oct. 1759 CE | last October 30, at three-quarters past three in the morning | none |
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
715 pm 25 Nov. 1759 CE | November 25, at a quarter past seven at night | none |
Soon after the chain of earthquakes in Damascus ended, the state launched an ambitious plan to rebuild the city. The project was remarkable both in its scope and in the amount of documentation it generated. The records on it include the first 40 pages of a 900-page register as well as various other loose documents, individual orders, and petitions sent from Damascus to Istanbul and preserved in the Ottoman archives.Ayalon (2014:98) described the 40 page work file as follows
The forty-page file mentioned previously comprises a set of work instructions issued to officials who were present in or sent to Damascus for the purpose. The three most frequently mentioned buildings are the Umayyad, Selimiye, and Süleymaniye mosques. At least one of the three is featured in each of the work orders copied into the file, and many entries discuss the need to renovate all three, or other, smaller, mosques.121 In addition to mosques, the Ottomans planned the reconstruction of madrasas and soup kitchens, both institutions that served Muslims only and were usually located in complexes that also included a mosque and sometimes a hospital.122 ...Ayalon (2014:99) provided some details of the requested work
Appended to the work orders was a list of no fewer than 430 structures that needed full or partial repair, to be financed by the Ottoman treasury.124Footnotes121 For entries that mention the three mosques, see BOA, MMD, 3160: 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 14. For the Umayyad Mosque only, see 10, 13. For the Süleymaniye Mosque, see 13. For the Selimiye Mosque, see 7.
122 For religious schools, see ibid., 5, 8.
124 The list appears in BOA, MMD, 3160: 2–4, 6–7, 9–12. It contains 487 entries, but 57 of them are duplicates.
The first of these is the Süleymaniye mosque. It has seventy-three entries: fifteen relating to the mosque itself; twenty-four to sections of the mosque or adjacent buildings, such as walls (divar), corridors (dehliz), gates (kapı), and domes (kubbe); two to religious schools; two to soup kitchens; and the rest to parts of unspecified buildings.125 Next are the Selimiye and its environs. Of eighty-seven structures, thirty were directly related to the mosque; seventeen to adjacent walls, gates, and domes; three to soup kitchens; six to the nearby Muhyi al-Din al- ‘Arabi (Ibn ‘Arabi) tomb; and the rest unspecified.126 The part of the register dealing with the Umayyad mosque and its surroundings contains 148 entries, of which 97 deal specifically with the mosque. Most of the rest probably relate to it as well, although this is not explicitly specified.127 On the whole, a sizable segment – possibly a majority – of the works to be carried out according to the register focused on mosques and structures related to them.Footnotes125 BOA, MMD, 3160: 2-3.
126 BOA, MMD, 3160: 3–4.
127 BOA, MMD, 3160: 10–13.
Aliases | Arabic |
---|---|
Ahmed al-Budayyri | |
Shihabaddin Ahmad Ibn Budayr | |
al-Budayyri | |
al-Budayri | |
Ahmad al-Budayri al-Hallaq | |
Shihab al-Din Ahmad Ibn Budayr al-Hallaq | |
Ibn Budayr |
‘Abdallah Pasha ordered a three day fast and invited everyone to participate in a mass prayer
al-Dimashqi described the earthquake to have occurred at night between the 18th and 19th of October. See pp. 78-80. This may not be in al-Budayr's book. The dates suggest the Julian Calendar for the 30 Oct. 1759 CE earthquake.
In October, when no drop of rain had fallen so far..., a slight tremor was felt in Damascus followed by a second, then the earth shook violently,... The upper parts of almost all minarets of the mosques of Damascus fell,..., there was a lot of destruction and victims in Damascus and in the surrounding villages. The tremors followed one another... few trees remained standing. An epidemic broke out, the upper parts of the east and west minarets of the Umayyad Mosque fell. The tremors continued which caused the collapse of the eastern and northern walls of the eastern minaret the Umayyad mosque... around fifteen mosques are mentioned by name; the eastern wall of the Mosque "Al-MAZBOUR" cracked,..., last night, the earth shook in Safad, most of its inhabitants have perished ; a large part of Nablus was destroyed, and there were many casualties; a part of the tower of Acre fell into the Sea, Tiberias, Deir Hanna, the citadel of Al-Jandal, the country of Chouf and all the coastal cities, Sidon, Beirut, Tripoli, Latakia, Jaffa, Haifa, were affected, no villages in the Jabal-Druze were spared from the damage, the inhabitants of the coastal cities and the western zone took refuge in Damascus,..., then, on the evening of Monday, the 6th of the month Rabi II (Nov 25, 1759), the earthquake occurred. supreme, never known in the past,..., the eastern minaret we mentioned fell, on the side of the mosque, by destroying part of the 3 "Mihrabs", the majestic dome of the eagle fell as well as the entire northern part of the mosque, despite its well-built columns,...; there were a lot of victims this night in Damascus as well as in the villages of the surroundings in Tell there were victims; people have left Damascus and stayed 3 months in tents,..., the Umayyad mosque contains 3 minarets including the eastern called minaret of Isa (Jesus) son of Mary, peace be upon him..., the tremor of 30 OCT lasted 2 to 3 minutes,... that of 25 NOV lasted 4 minutes..., (TAHA)
The following Arabic text was hand typed and graciously provided by Dr. Dana Sajdi from an original manuscript. Some notes accompanying the text are shown below:
This is a typed transcription of the text that begins in the Hijri year 1172 (September 1758) on folio 91a. The description of the earthquakes begins in the highlighted section on folio 92b and continues intermittently through to highlighted section on folio 94a. It so happens that the manuscript abruptly ends shortly after the last mention of an earthquake. I kept those pages because there is mention of the reconstruction efforts.
Please be advised that the name of the author is not al-Budayri, but Shihab al-Din Ahmad Ibn Budayr (died after 1762). Al-Budayri was inexplicably given to him by a 19th century editor.
Also, please make sure to quote the correct folio numbers rather than the pages of this document. The manuscript should be quoted as follows:
Shihab al-Din Ahmad Ibn Budayr al-Hallaq, Hawadith Dimashq al-Sham al-yawmiyya min sanat 1154 ila sanat 1176, (the Daily Events of Damascus From the Year 1154 to the Year 1176), MS Chester Beatty, Ar 3551/2, Dublin.
Finally, I would advise that you warn the translators that they will find the language odd and unusual. The barber wrote in a very colloquial style with some attempt at flourishes that sometimes do not make sense to the modern reader. And if the translator is someone who is not used to Ottoman history, they will find unfamiliar terms and descriptions.
91أ- اثنين و سبعين و ماية و الف و كان المتسلم في الشام من قبل عبد الله باشا و قيم مقام سليمان اغا و كان طلما غاشما على ما نقلوا عنه و كان مجي جوقدار الحاج في يوم ( تاسع و عشرين خلا من محرم ) و كان سردار الجرده عبد الرحمن باشا باشة طرابلس و جاء الحاج الشريف في خمسة ايام خلت من شهر صفر الخير و كانت سنة حجتها مريحة و قتل فيها الباشا بين الحرمين من العرب شي كثير و قتل شيخ العرب و جاء التقرير الى الباشا قبل وصوله الى الشام و استقام عبد الله باشا والي الشام السنة الثانية و عدل و احسن لكن الغلا مغلق في الشام في ساير الاسعار كما مر و الفلوس كل اربعة و عشرين بمصرية و كانت هلة رمضان المبارك ليلة السبت في ثلث الليل ضربت المدافع و البعض اصبح مفطر ذلك اليوم و كان عيد الفطر في يوم الاحد و ثبتوه انه نهار العيد في وقت الظهر ضربوا له المدافع و فطرة الناس الظهر و صلى صلاه العيد قبل الظهر و كان توجيه امير الحاج عبد الله باشا الشتجي في يوم ( سادس عشر من شهر شوال ) و كان معه ساير في الركب الشامي سعد الدين باشا ابن العظم و مرافقه واليا الى جده و كان منصبه و كان معهما عساكر كثيرة غزيرة خيفة من العرب بين الحرمين على ما سبق من فعل عبد الله باشا فيهم و قتل شيخهم و كان مجي جوقدار الحاج الشريف يوم الاربعا في ( سابع و عشرين من شهر محرم ) و كانت عظيمة و كان رخا و كل شي موجود ما صار الا كل خير لاكن صار نقص في الماء و نقص في الدواب و غير عبد الله باشا الشتجي والي الشام شريف مكه و اسما مساعد فعزله و اوقف الى اخيه و كان اسمه جعفر و رجع ثم ان الحاج رجع الى مكه على درب يقال له درب ست زبيده و كانت وقفة الحاج على عرفات نهار الجمعه و دخل الحاج الى دمشق الشام
نهار السبت في سابع يوم خلا من شهر صفر الخير و لما وصل الباشا الى الشام ثم.
91ب- اقام نادى منادي برفع الظلم و العدوان و صار يتبدل و بدور و ما عاد احد عمل زور و انعدمت اهل الفجور و بطلت الشرور و الى الله عاقبة الامور و كان الباشا قد قطع خرج غالب عسكره و ( غير مقروء ) برحيلهم من الشام و ان لا يبقي ( غير مقروء ) و لا غريب إكت و رحل خلق كثير و ارسل جميع ماله الى حماه و كان ذلك من لطف الله تعالى و صار الغلا زايد في جميع البضايع و الخبز رطله بستت مصاري و بسبعه و اللحم الرطل بقرش و الرز باثنا عشر مصرية و الدبس الرطل بنصف قرش و الثمن الرطل بقرش و نصف حتى الثوم رطله بنصف قرش و كان قاضي الشام في ذلك العام قوي ( غير مقروء ) و في كل يوم يدور بنفسه و ببعير على السوقه و الموازين و الارطال و الاواق و كل من في ارطاله و اواقه نقص يضربه علقه و الذي يرى اواقه و ارطاله سوي يعطيه مصرية فضة و دام على ذلك الافعال حتى عزل ولاكن ما تعرض الى شي في الاسعار و لا نقص و لا زيد في الاثمان و هذا شي ما يشفي غليل و لا يبري عليل الا فعل الملك الجليل و دخل شهر ربيع الاول و لم يجي مقرر و لا نزل من السماء قطرات مطر و قد دخل تشرين الثاني و في ليلة الثلاثه ( ثامن ربيع الاول ) في شهر تشرين الثاني في محل المراسله و المذنون في المواذن صارت زلزلة خفيفة و تبعها واحد اقوى بشيء قليل و ثالثة بعدها كانت مهولة لم يرى في دمشق الشام مثلها هدمت غالب روس مواذن الشام و دور و جوامع و اماكن حتى قبة النصرالذي اعلا جبل قاسيون زلزلتها و ارمت نصفها و اما قرا الشام فكان فيهم الهدم و القتل اكثر شيء يجل عن وصفه الواصفون و يحير بصر الناظرون و صارت ايضا الزلزلة ثاني ليلة في الوقت الماضي و صارت في وقت صلاة الصبح ايضا و صارت بالنهار و لا زلات تكرر مرارا لاكنها اخفف من الاولين و قد .
ب- مع مدرسة الكلاسة و باب البريد و ابراج القلعه و غالب دور دمشق و الذي سلم من الوقوع تناثر من بعضه البعض و قتل خلق كثيرا خصوصا في القرايا و رحلت الخلايق للبساتين و الله المعين والي الجبال و الجبانات و نسل الله تعالى العنايات في ساير الاوقات و الساعات و نصبت الناس الخيام و ناموا الليالي مع ايام و مع ذلك لم يبطل للزلزلة الرجفان لا ليلا و لا نهارا و نادى المنادي ان تصوم الناس لله تعالى ثلاثة ايام و يخرجوا للدعا الى المصلى بامر والي الشام الحاج عبد الله باشا وفقه الله تعالى فخرجت الناس من كل فج عميق الى المصلى و ان هذا المكان مشهور باجابت الدعا عند اهل دمشق الشام و من قصده و جدّ في الدعا عنده فانه يستجاب له و هو من الاثار الذي بدمشق يستجاب بها الدعا و يقصدونه الناس في جميع مهماتهم و خرج حضرة الوزير معهم و جميع الاكابر و خرج المفتي و القاضي و خرجت العلما و اهل الطرق و الصوفية و النسا و الاولاد و لازموا الدعا على ثلاثة ايام و صارلهم ضجيج و بكا و خشوع و صات هذه الايام كل يوم مثل يوم القيامة فاجاب الله لهم الدعا و ما عاد صار مثل الاول بل عاملهم الله بالتخفيف و صارت الارض تختلج اختلاج خفيف من الارض و الناس مستقيمة في البساتين حتى نزل عليهم المطر و الثلج و صار الجليد و صار على الخلق امر شديد و ان الله تعالى يفعل ما يريد انه روف بالعبيد و مع ذلك الغلا صاير في جميع البضايع و الاسعار و الناس منتظرين الفرج من خالق الليل و النهار و انه قادر قهار و في اواسط جمادى الاول قدم القاضي الى دمشق الشام و اسمه رضى افندي من الدولة العلية و جلس في منصبه و لم يحرك ساكن و في نهار السبت ( ثامن عشر جمادى الثاني ) ظهر الخبر بدمشق الشام ان عبد الله باشا والي الشام.
93أ- معزول و في يوم الخميس ثالث عشر جمادى الاول اوقفت اغاوات الشام متسلم عوضا عن محمد باشا الشاك المنفصل عن طرابلس اغات القبقول فظلم و جار و فرض مظالم على بعض قتلا قتلت في دمشق الشام سابقا منهم اثنين في طاحونة الشيخ سراج رضي الله عنه و فرض على اهل الارض خساره و لم يفتش على الغريم و قتل مسلم و نصراني في ارض الشاغور و لم يعلم له غريم فحبس جماعه من اهل الارض و فرض عليهم مال كثير و حصل لهم انزعاج كثير و صار خوف للناس و فزع و ارتجت البلد ارتجاج عظيم و من اذان المغرب تسكر البلد جميعا حتى لا ترى من اذان المغرب احد في الاسواق يلوح و تسكر الناس كل باب مفتوح و يزيد الخوف و الارتعاب و في يوم الخميس ( ثاني و عشرين جمادى الثاني ) رحل الحاج عبد الله باشا الشتجي من الشام الى منصبه ديار بكر على ما قيل و حسبي الله تعالى و نعم الوكيل و في ليلة الاثنين خامس و عشرين خلت من شهر جمادى الثاني قبيل السحر انهزت البلاد بالزلزلة و كانت لطيفه الطف من الذين تقدموا و كانت بعض الناس قد رجعت من البساتين الى دورهم و اماكنهم فلما راوا ذلك الهزة ارتدوا على بعضهم بعضا و صار الخوف و الوجل و ظهر الخبر بين الناس و شاع انه يظهر زلزلة عظيمة فزعت الناس فزعا عظيما و رجعوا الى ما كانوا فيه من الخوف و الفزع و الخروج الى البساتين و الله تعالى هو المعين وفي يوم الاثنين ( غرة شهر رجب الفرد المبارك ) دخل محمد باشا شالك ابن بولاد باشا الى دمشق الشام و كان دخوله ضحا النهار بالاي العظيم و خرجت لملاقاته الاكابر و الاعيان و الافندية و الاغاوات و خرجت الانكشارية بالخيل و العدد المطليه و الدروع .
93أ- معزول و في يوم الخميس ثالث عشر جمادى الاول اوقفت اغاوات الشام متسلم عوضا عن محمد باشا الشاك المنفصل عن طرابلس اغات القبقول فظلم و جار و فرض مظالم على بعض قتلا قتلت في دمشق الشام سابقا منهم اثنين في طاحونة الشيخ سراج رضي الله عنه و فرض على اهل الارض خساره و لم يفتش على الغريم و قتل مسلم و نصراني في ارض الشاغور و لم يعلم له غريم فحبس جماعه من اهل الارض و فرض عليهم مال كثير و حصل لهم انزعاج كثير و صار خوف للناس و فزع و ارتجت البلد ارتجاج عظيم و من اذان المغرب تسكر البلد جميعا حتى لا ترى من اذان المغرب احد في الاسواق يلوح و تسكر الناس كل باب مفتوح و يزيد الخوف و الارتعاب و في يوم الخميس ( ثاني و عشرين جمادى الثاني ) رحل الحاج عبد الله باشا الشتجي من الشام الى منصبه ديار بكر على ما قيل و حسبي الله تعالى و نعم الوكيل و في ليلة الاثنين خامس و عشرين خلت من شهر جمادى الثاني قبيل السحر انهزت البلاد بالزلزلة و كانت لطيفه الطف من الذين تقدموا و كانت بعض الناس قد رجعت من البساتين الى دورهم و اماكنهم فلما راوا ذلك الهزة ارتدوا على بعضهم بعضا و صار الخوف و الوجل و ظهر الخبر بين الناس و شاع انه يظهر زلزلة عظيمة فزعت الناس فزعا عظيما و رجعوا الى ما كانوا فيه من الخوف و الفزع و الخروج الى البساتين و الله تعالى هو المعين وفي يوم الاثنين ( غرة شهر رجب الفرد المبارك ) دخل محمد باشا شالك ابن بولاد باشا الى دمشق الشام و كان دخوله ضحا النهار بالاي العظيم و خرجت لملاقاته الاكابر و الاعيان و الافندية و الاغاوات و خرجت الانكشارية بالخيل و العدد المطليه و الدروع .
94أ- الدولة كشاف على الجامع الاموي و جاء معه معمر باشي و فعاله و رجال لاجل الاشتغال في عمارة الجامع و في ( العشر الاخر من شهر رجب المبارك ) صار ريح لم يرى مثله ايام متواليه و جاء معه مطر غزير استقام ليلا و نهار و جاء معه ثلج و اهول و كان ذلك في ايام الحسوم فاستعنا بالله الحي القيوم الذي هو مقد الاشياء قبل ان تكون و في ( عشرة خلا من شهر شعبان ) سار والي الشام محمد باشا الشالك الى الدوره و اخذ معه احمد باشا ابن القلطقجي و كان جاء معه جماعه من الانكشارية الهاربين منهم محمد اغا بن والي و ابن بكماز و سارومعه الى الدوره و احمد باشا ابن القلطقجي مات معه و هو في بلاد نابلس و كان ابتدا الطاعون من شهر جمادى الثاني و استقام في الشام في شعبان و رجب و رمضان و شوال و ذا القعدة و نصف ذي الحجة لكن صار فيه موت ما روى من عهد فناء الغراب و كان ذلك الطاعون عام في جميع البلاد و مع ذلك الزلزال و الغلا ما بطل و في يوم ( التاسع و العشرون من شهر رمضان ) و يوم الثلاثون و يوم العيد الفطر و يوم ثاني العيد الف من كل باب من ابواب المدينة يخرج من كل باب كل يوم الف و صار نقص ذلك العام ايضا في الفاكهة حتى انباعة وقية الجانرك بمصريتين و صار رطل المشمش باربعه و عشرين مصرية و رطل التوت بثمان مصاري و رطل التفاح باربعة و عشرين مصرية و الانجاص رطله بثلاثين مصرية و الثوم بثلاثين مصرية و البصل بسبعة مصاري و رطل الدبس بنص قرش و رطل السمن بقرشين و رطل الرز بثلث قرش ورطل اللحم بنصف ريال و وقية الليمون بعشرة مصاري و طال الامر و كثر القهر و بطل السرور و زادة البغضا و الشرور و لله عاقبة الامور و لم يجد الانسان اين يدور من شدة البكا و النفور .
94ب- و كان هلال صوم شهر رمضان في ذلك العام نهار الخميس و فطروا الناس يوم الجمعه و سار الحاج يوم (السابع عشر من شهر شوال ) و الباشا يوم الجمعه الخامس عشر بالركب الشامي الى الارض الحجازية المرضيه و جاء عثمان باشا و كان والي في مدينة طرابلس سردار بالجرده و كان نزوله مدة اقامته في قرية من غير اسف و لا ندم و سار مسافرا في ذي الحجة مع كوخي صيدا و نابلس و في ( نصف ذي الحجة ) توفي احمد ابن سوار شيخ المحيا الشريف و كان عالم وقته و زمانه و كان له شجاعه زايده و براعه في العلوم متزايده و صار له مشهد عظيم و جفن في تربة قبر السيدة عاتكة رضي الله عنها و بعده توفي ابن عمه الحسيب النسيب الجليل الشيخ سليمان و كان يعمل المحيا في جامع الاموي و في جامع البزور الذي في محلتهم و في نصف ذا الحجة توفي الحسيب النسيب العالم العلامة صاحب الهمة العلية و الاخلاق الرضيه مفتي الساده المالكيه السيد يوسف افندي المالكي و صار له مشهد عظيم و دفن في مرج الدحداح رحمه الله تعالى كان محبا لنا و محسنا و كان سلس اللسان و كان صاحب صفا و محبة و اخوان و كان هلال سنة اربع و سبعين نهار الثلاثا ( غرة شهر محرم الحرام المبارك) و كانت تلك السنة كثيرة الحر و صار فيها امراض كثيرة و كان مجي جوقدار الحاج الشريف يوم ( سبعه و عشرون من شهر محرم ) خلت منه قبيل غياب الشمس و دخل كتاب الحجة يوم الجمعه قبيل غياب الشمس و اخبر ان الحج حج حجة مليحة و حصل لهم حسن راحه و جا الحاج من درب الدوره و لما التقوا بالجرده فوجدوا عثمان باشا قد سبقهم و في انتظارهم له احدى عشر يوم مستقيم في هديه و هذا ما سبق لاحد قبله و اخبروا انه عمل اكرام كثير مع الحاج و الجرده و انه سقا العطشان و اطعم الجيعان .
95أ- و ركب العيان و كسا العريان و كان رحمه الله تعالى صاحب احسان و قد وصل اخبار افعاله الى الدوله العليه وجهوا عليه امارات الشام المرضيه صانها الله تعالى من بليه و رزيه بجاه محمد خير البريه ووجهوا الى ولده محمد باشا مدينة طرابلس الشهية و عزلوا محمد باشا الشالك من الشام المحمية و كان ذلك نهار الاربعا ( سابع و عشرين خلت من شهر ربيع الاول ) الانور و في تلك الايام استغلوا بعمارة الجامع الاموي جميع النجارين و المعمارية و الدهانين و الحجارين و هم مسكرين ابواب الجامع لا يفتحوها الا في وقت الصلوات و العمارة مشتغة ايضا في بنا قلعه الشام من قبل عمارة الجامع و الغلا واقع في جميع البضايع و الحق في الناس ضايع و الامر الى الله تعالى راجع و قد اخبر عثمان باشا الدولة العلية المحفوظه من كل بليه بان بقى معه من مال الجرد ماتين كيس فشكروه على ذلك و وجهوه عليه منصب الشام ووجهوا على ولده محمد باشا انعام منصب طرابلس الشام فارسل عمل متسلم سليمان بيك و السلام و تمت عمارة القلعه في شهر ( رجب المبارك ) سنة تاريخه و الجامع الشريف الاموي بنى احسن بنا و ثم مع بنا منبره و القبه تم بناه ثم انهم جددوا قبة من خشب و عملوا لها قبوين من خشب فوق حضرة مقام نبي الله السيد يحيى الحصور عليه السلام و كان فراغهم من ذلك العمارة في شهر ( رمضان المبارك ) و بقي عمارة المشهد الشرقي مع ماذنة الشرقية و دامت العمارة بهم و في ذلك العام سار عثمان باشا الى الدوره ( قبيل شهر رجب المبارك ) و فتح فيها قلعه طرطورة و كانت ذللك القلعه في حكم طرف الظاهر عمر و قتل و نهب و لما رجع عنها عثمان باشا جيش عليها الظاهر عمر رجال و اخذها من حطهم فيها عثمان باشا و في تلك السنة صار المطر غزير و الطاعون المفرط .
95ب- و الوبا زايد الحد و كانت الفاكهة قليلة انباعت الرمانة الواحدة بثمان مصاري و وقية التفاح بسبع مصاري و رطل الفحم بخمسة عشر مصرية و وقية الدبس بمصريتين و وقية السمن بسبع مصاري و الرز الوقية بمصرية و اللحم رطله بقرش و مصريتين و الزيت بثلاث مصاري و وقية العسل بخمسة مصاري و اما القيمق صار رطله بريا و لا بقا للفرا حال من الاحوال و على الله المتكال انه عالم بجميع الاحوال و في ( اثنين و عشرين شهر شعبان ) جاء الباشا من الدوره و احواله مسروره و كان هلال شهر رمضان المبارك نهار الاثنين و صارت زلزلة مزعجة في ليلة الاربعا و كانت الناس في صلاة التروايح ( خلا من شهر رمضان اربع و عشرين ) و تهاربت الناس من الجوامع و دعست الناس بعضها بعضا و ذهبت لهم بعض اواعيهم مثل بنشاتهم و تراجيلهم و لم يعي احد على طرف من اطرافه و انزهلت منهم العقول نسال الله اللطف بجاه الرسول و ثاني ليلة صارت زلزلة اخرى كانت اخف من الاولى في محل اذان الثاني و دامت رجات لا تدرك الا بالحس في الاماكن العالية نسال الله العفو و العافية و ان يا من خوفنا مما يخيفنا و ان يجعل التمام الى خير بجاه محمد صلى الله عليه و سلم المبعوث بالامن و الخير و في سنة خمسة و سبعين و ماية و الف حج الوزير عثمان باشا و كانت تلك حجة عظيمة ارتاح بها الحجاج راحة عظيمة و في تلك السنة جاء قبجي بالزينة العظيما و نادى عثمان باشا كل من عنده ملعوب او فرجة يقملها ولو كانت من الطين و الخشب و له عندي البخشيش فبذل مال له جانب و اعطا و بخشش و دارت الحرف و العرايض الذي لم
96أ- الفاخرة نسال الله تعالى اللطف في احوالنا في الدنيا و الاخرة و في تلك السنة حج عثمان باشا بالركب الشامي و صار امن و امان في تلك السنة و صار رخص و ما احد انهان ببركة رسول الله سيد الاكوان عليه الصلاة و السلام في كل وقت و اوان و في تلك السنة ركب عثمان باشا والي الشام على قلعه صهيون و بقوة الله كل امر يهون و فتحها و أمن الخايف و قلت الرواجف و في تلك السنة جاء خبر الى الشام بقتل عبد الله باشا الشتجي و ضبط ماله و نواله و راح كانه ما كان سبحان منلا يخلو منه ما كان وفي سنة ( ستة و سبعون و ماية و الف ) حج عثمان باشا والي الشام بالركب الشامي و كانت سنة حجوا بها الحجاج حجة مريحة و ما حصل لهم بها مشقة و كانت وقفت الحجاج على عرفات يوم الجمعه و في مجيئه جاو دار الدوره و جاء على احسن حال و سبحان مول الاحوال و لما دخل عثمان باشا الى الشام فرحت به الاعوام و كان خروجه الى الحج من الشام يوم الجمعه و وقف على عرفه يوم الجمعه و دخل الى الشام يوم الجمعه و كان هذا اتفاق عجيب ما سمعنا به قط و جاء في تلك الايام خبر الى دمشق الشام ان سعد الدين باشا ابن العظم مات في ديار بكر و ضبطوا ماله و راح جاهه و حاله و طلع عنده مال عظيم و لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله العلي العظيم وصار في مدة الوزير عثمان باشا والي الشام عدل و عدالات و كان كيخيته سليمان بيك مملوك سليمان باشا ابن العظم و كان في موت بيت العظم قد قاسا اهوال سبحان الله الفعال .
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
nighttime 30 Oct. 1759 CE |
Ayalon (2008:238 n. 56) wrote that al-Dimashqi described the earthquake to have occurred at night between the 18th and 19th of October. See pp. 78-80 |
none |
|
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
25 Nov. 1759 CE | none |
1 Sections of this chapter are taken from my IJMES article, “Ottoman urban privacy.
2 Mikha’il Burayk, Ta’rikh al-sham (Damascus: Dar Qutayba, 1982), 78–80.
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
three hours before sunrise 30 Oct. 1759 CE (Gregorian Calendar) | three hours before sunrise 19 Oct. 1759 (Julian Calendar) | none |
|
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Nov. 1759 CE | The next month, late in the evening | none |
In 1759, there happened an [earthquake] that caused the greatest devastation: it is said that more than twenty thousand souls perished in the valley of Baalbek, and the damage there remains unrepaired. For three months, the aftershocks pestered the inhabitants of Lebanon, to the point that they abandoned their homes, and lived in tents.
En 1759, il en est arrivé un qui a câusé les plus grands ravages: on prétend qu'il tua dans la vallée de Balbek plus de vingt mille ames, dont la perte ne s'est point réparée. Pendant trois mois, ses secousses inquiéterent les habitans du Liban , au point qu'ils abandonnerent leurs maisons , & demeurerent sous des tentes.
En 1759, il en est arrivé un qui a câusé
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1759 CE | 1759 | none |
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1759 CE | 1759 | none |
1 This passage is is a section where the author described a port call in Acre
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1759 CE | 1759 | none |
For some months past my husband has been making interest with Rashid Pasha, the Wali, or Governor-general of Syria, to take certain precautionary steps for the conservation of old Heliopolis. ... nothing has been done to arrest the fall of the celebrated keystone in the soffit, which began to slip about 1759; which falls lower with every slight earthquake ( we had one at 6.15 P.M. on June 24, 1870), and which, if left unsupported, will bring down with it the other five monoliths of the lintel and sides, thus destroying one of, if not the grandest of ancient entrances the world can show.
For some months past my husband
Those even who know Ba'albak only by pictures will remember that, occupying the most conspicuous place on the great platform, six gigantic columns, surmounted by an entablature, tower high above all others, and stand boldly out in deep golden contrast to the lilac, snow-streaked range of Lebanon. These six columns are all that remain of the fifty four which composed the peristyle of the Great Temple [Temple of Jupiter]. Three fell in 1759. The columns have a height of 75 feet, and a diameter of 7 feet 3 inches.
Those even who know Ba'albak only by pictures
Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1759 CE | 1759 CE | none |
the celebrated keystone in the soffitof the the Temple of Jupiter in Baalbek began to slip in 1759 and
falls lower with every slight earthquake
Footnotes1 Based on the discussion of fallen columns, the original writer is referring to the Temple of Jupiter.
Al Bidiri (eyewitness) writes:
At the beginning of Rabia' II (Tishrin II), not a drop of water had fallen from the sky. The night of Tuesday 8 Rabia' II,
in the last third of the night, the muezzins launched the call to prayer from the minarets and then came
a slight earthquake, followed by a second tremor, then a third. Then, in Damascus,
the earthquake was enormous, and the Damascenes believed the last hour had come.
There was very significant destruction of houses and mosques.
Most minarets lost their tops throughout Syria.
We cannot count the damaged houses and other places in all
the country. Even the dome of An-Naçr, which stood atop Mount
Qassiun was shaken and half destroyed. In the villages of Syria,
there was a lot of rubble, burying countless victims.
The second night1a, the earth shook at the same moment as the day before and in the morning
the earthquake continued, and during the day too, it continued again, several times,
but lighter than the first two shocks. Panic and dismay were
their height. People evacuated their homes and they slept in the alleys, the gardens,
the cemeteries and tombs, the plantations, and the courtyard of the Umayyad mosque.
During this earthquake, the Qunaytira hotel fell
on its occupants, and there were few survivors among the animals
and travelers. The same disaster occurred at the Khan of Sa'asa'.
News came to Damascus that the towns and villages
of Syria had collapsed on their inhabitants without sparing any survivors.
On Tuesday night, at the tenth hour of the night,
On the 5th of Rabia' II, the sky parted, and we heard cries, rolling noises,
thunderclaps, and horror. Illuminated people saw the ceilings
rise, the stars appear, and the ceilings return to their
place.
News came that mountains had collided, imprisoning
villages which disappeared without any trace of them being found.
On the night of Friday 18 Rabia' I, at the time of the twilight prayer, a shooting star
crossed the sky from west to east, illuminating the mountains and houses. Then it fell
and we heard a huge sound, louder than a cannon shot, and we saw lightning. During the
first shocks, an enormous rock fell into the Qanawat river, which it blocked and the city waited for water for 11 days.
It took 11 days to cut this rock and let the river water pass through.
People endured two misfortunes: the earthquake and the water cut.
On the night of Monday 6 Rabia' II, at the fifth hour, a prodigious earthquake occurred, with a power of
several degrees. There were terrible tremors. The rest of the minarets collapsed. The great lady
of the Umayyad Mosque collapsed, as well as the entire North Pillar, the Madrasa Al
Kallasata was also destroyed, as was the Al-Barid gate and the towers of the citadel, and most
houses of Damascus. Those which had not fallen had nevertheless been badly damaged.
Many victims were killed in the villages, people evacuated their houses to escape and
take refuge in orchards, plantations, and cemeteries. They pitched tents in the
fields and took refuge there with their families. Despite this, the shaking did not stop,
during neither the day nor the night. Then the governor of Syria Abd-Allah Bacha-Achataji ordered that
everyone shout together for 3 days in the great mosque for a solemn prayer, the
Friday, because we knew that God was not deaf to the invocations that rose from the mosque (Al Muçlaa).
People went to the mosque. Then the governor joined them,
with the notables, the muphti and the judge. The scholars followed,
women and children. They spent 3 days in prayers, supplications,
implorations, like the day of Arafat, as one can imagine the
Last Day.
God merciful more than the Clements forgave, the tremors diminished,
became lighter. The people stayed in the orchards and
meadows, not very reassured, until the snow and rain. So they returned,
still not very reassured.
On 8 Djumada II, news came from Damascus that Abd-Allah Bacha-Achataji had fallen
disgrace, and on 22 Djumada II, the governor was transferred to Diyar Baqr.
On the night of Monday 25 Djumada II, before dawn, an earthquake occurred in Syria, lighter than the previous one.
Rumors circulated, announcing more violent earthquakes, people gave in to panic,
went out again to the cemeteries and gardens, imploring her, mercy of God.
On the first Monday of Rajeb, the new governor Muhammad Pasha-ach-châlik ibn Bulaîd-Pasha made his entry.
In the middle of the month of Rajeb, intense winds blew for 4 days and 4 nights,
destroying many places, leaving very few trees standing. The tremors were incessant, night and day.
Prices soared, even those of vegetables. The historians testify:
The poor man had no more resources, the rubble from the earthquakes constantly accumulated. The townspeople sought refuse in the countryside:During the day of Saturday 22 Rajeb, an architect specializing (in domes) came from Constantinople. His name was Sabaniah Zada. He examines the Umayyad mosque, to reconstruct the dome and its northern pillar, the minarets damaged by the earthquake. With him was a site manager, workers, men to undertake the repairs to the mosque.
I will forget all the good times of the broken,When the governor of Damascus, ach-Chitadjî, made the report of the events at the Sublime Porte (in Constantinople) where he had informed the Sultan on the state of the Umayyad mosque, the citadel of Damascus, and other destroyed places, he asked him where were the repairers.
I will never forget the night of the earthquake,
yes reminds us of the cradle,
and shows us the dance of the mountains,
makes us see the palaces cradled like a child.
He made him who was standing sit down, andThe people were overwhelmed, women, children, animals. We heard various voices, haunting like the sound of waterfalls, which lasted until morning. We gathered for prayer in a garden outside the village. It was the garden of the heirs of the late 'Agha al-Warana. We stayed there three days and three nights, the earthquake continued night and day. People brought us news of Damascus and Salahya. Some people told us that the top of the minaret East of the Umayyad Mosque had fallen. It was called the minaret of Our Lord Jesus, according to Tradition which says that Jesus will descend at the end of time on the white minaret east of Damascus, at the time of Lord Muhammad al-Mahdy. It will be brought by a cloud, with an angel on his right and an angel on his left, his face will be covered with sweat. It is indeed this minaret, no one has confused it with the one yes is also located east of Damascus, on the square of the Orient Gate.
wake the sleeper,
the earth was shaken with its inhabitants,
the one who lived righteously and the one who was in the wrong.
On the al—Barid gate, I wanted to cry(he asks the Sublime Porte to repair the damage).
His solitary door to the mosque was closed
I implore God to come to his aid,
On the mail horses.
The Umayyad mosque cries with sadness,I then arrived at the Djirun gate, to the north, there my my approach was weighed down by sadness, my eyes watered. I repeated: Everything happened by the will of God. I found the neighborhood deserted, the cafes emptied of their customers. Where were the companions? Absent or returned to dust? No seats around the pool. The thermal baths were also not very lively only graves.
She was like the head of the other mosques,
The destruction has weakened its minarets,
She lost the 'Aârous,
Its dome of Naçr fell to the ground,
She humbly greets the class location.
The minarets of the mosques have fallen in prostration,The hammams were also affected:
their head has joined their foot,
By seeing people prostrate themselves,
The stones followed suit.
The Dome of Naçr fell to the groundAlso destroyed:
to respectfully salute the study.
He did not hold very firmly in his faction, which made the Yurlyya gain importance, and the quarrel developed, although it had previously remained unnoticed. Inflation and famine appeared in Damascus, the inhabitants complained troubles arose, the situation deteriorated; Yurlyya sects, Qaby Qu1 and others among the factions of Kurdish soldiers, events happened like this, from quarrel to civil war, even during the month of Ramadan, stubborn tyrants continued murder and violence, after which an epidemic of plague occurred, tremors of earth, these are the events of this time, plague, tremors of land, quarrels, wars, go beyond the possibilities of description.It seems that the earthquake occurred in Châm between 1171 and 1173, under the mandate of 'Abd Allah Pasha-Chitaji, and about whom Al Muradi reports:
It occurred in Damascus1n in 1173, on Tuesday night 8 Rabiaâ I, shortly before dawn; it spread towards Jerusalem, Gaza, Sayda, Safad, all the countries on the Syrian coast, Hums, Ramat, Caesarea, Hiçn al A'krad, Antioch, Aleppo, with 2 or 3 tremors per week, until the night of Monday 6 Rabia'a II at the time mentioned, at the end of the twilight prayer, and it reached in Damascus 3 degrees, by ravaging Damascus, Antioch, Sayda, Qàl'at al Burayj, Hisyya, the pillar North of the Umayyad mosque was destroyed, the great lady too. the northern minaret, the Bâb al Barid market was ruined, most of the houses in Damascus were demolished, the mosques too; the shaking continued until the end of the year mentioned. Then in Damascus, before the end of the year, an epidemic occurred; most mosques were rebuilt thanks to funds donated by wills of the dead and the great mosque of Damascus, the citadel, Latakia Sulaymanyya. were rebuilt with funds from the Ottoman state.In the biography of Mustafa Al-'Alwâny, we are told that he composed a poem about earthquakes, dedicated to. Al Murâdt, mufti of Syria, father of our chronicler. This piece mentions the destruction of the Damascus mosque, undermined by the earthquakes and the last verse allows us to date the disaster:
The Umayyad Mosque was destroyed by the earthquakes, and Mustafa, the famous king, rebuilt itAMAWY JILAQ AN HAWYYA 'ZALAZIL
My heart is at peace thanks to the God of Truth, he stripped away the fear that the tremor inspired in him earthen.In the dictionaries of Al Muràdi's biographies, there is no mention of the victims of the earthquake, as usual, apart from the indication contained in the note on Asa 'ad Al Mujallid:
When the earthquake occurred in Damascus and throughout the region in 1173, he was half paralyzed as a result of the wall which had fallen on his body, and he lay on his back until he died, occurred in Ramadan 1180.Raslàn b-Yahya Al Qary1o writes these sentences in his work:
1a Taher, B.E.O., 1975, p.99.
1b Al Bidiri, Hawadith, p.228.
2a B.E.O., 1975, P.P. 72-76.
1c Dussand, T.H.S.A.M., p.393.
1d Dozy, supt. t. II, p.296.
2b Dozy, sup. t. I, p.734.
1e See An Nu'ymi, ad Daris, 2/395.
1f He was born in the year 1115 AH.
2c Cf. Taher, B.E.O., 1975, P.P.80-94.
1g Yaqût, Mu'djam, 1/563.
2d Tarikh madinat Dimsshq, éd. Al Minadjid, 2/100.
1h Kurd Ali, Khitat ac-Cham.
1i Kurd Ali, Khitat ac-Cham.
1j Ibn Abd al Hady, Thimar, 224.
? Al Minadjed, Wolat Dimachq, p.89.
1k Herzfeld, Studies, dans Ars Islamics, IX 1942, 46-49; Creswell, Cairene Madrasas, dans B.IFAO XXI, 1923, 6-12.
2e Creswell, Cairene Madrasas, BIFAO XXI, 27.
3a Sauvaget, Perles choisies, 111; Ibn Khallikân Biographical Dictionary, 11, 32-36.
1l AL Nu'imi, ad daris, 2/368.
1m Taher, B.E.O., 1975, p.p. 102-104
1n Volney, Voyage en Egypte et en Syrie, p.166
1o Volney, Voyage en Egypte et en Syrie, p.105; Kitab al Wozara, p.82,83.
Al-Bidiri1 writes:
On the third night of Ramadan, at the time of twilight prayer, a terrible earthquake occurred. The people cut prayer short and fled in an abominable stampede. They lost their minds. They also lost clothes. The next night passed in the same way.
1 Hawadith, p.229; Taher, B.E.O., 1975, p.101.
28 As noted above We revived the study a few months before what turned out to be Prof Ellenblum’s early passing Hence we
could not locate all of Ronnie’s sources and did not verify all statements
29 A summary of this account was first published by Dahman, Muhammad Ahmad. Zilzal Sanat 1173, Al- Mashriq. Beirut 42
(1948): 332–347
30 Ibn al- Qalānisī. The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades, extracted and translated from the Chronicle of Ibn al- Qalānisī.
Trans H A R Gibb (London, 1932), 98
31 Poirier, J.P., and Taher, M.A.Historical Seismicity in the Near and Middle East, North Africa, and Spain from Arabic Docu
ments (VIIth –XVIIIth century) Seismological Society of America Bulletin 70 (1980): 2192
32 Lewis, N.N.Baalbek Before and after the Earthquake of 1759: the Drawings of James Bruce. Levant 31 (1999): 241–253
33 Woods, R.The Ruins of Palmyra and Baalbek Ed Benjamin Anderson (London, 2021) Wood and Dawkins made no less
than 44 drawings of the temple and its architectural details, based on accurate measurements that show these columns were
still standing
34 Royal Collection Trust James Bruce of Kinnard (1730–94) Temple at Baalbec RCIN 911626 James Bruce of Kinnaird
(1730–94) — Temple at Baalbec (rct uk) Royal Collection Trust Luigi Balugani (1737–70) The Temple of Venus at Baalbek
c 1767 RCIN 911627 Luigi Balugani (1737–70) — The Temple of Venus at Baalbek (rct uk)
35 For a recent translation see: Daëron, M., Klinger, Y., Tapponnier, P., Elias, A., Jacques, E. and Sursock, A.Sources of the large
A D 1202 and 1759 Near East earthquakes Geology 33 (July, 2005): 529–530
For an earlier, less accurate, translation see Ambraseys and Barazangi, The 1759 earthquake: 4010 And see our reference to
them in Ellenblum et al , Crusader castle torn apart
36 Gomez, F , Meghraoui, M , Darkal, A N , Sbeinati, R , Darawcheh, R , Tabet, C , Khawlie, M , Charabe, M , Khair, K and
Barazangi, M.Coseismic Displacements along the Serghaya Fault: an Active Branch of the Dead Sea Fault System in Syria and
Lebanon Journal of the Geological Society, London 158/3 (2001): 405–408; Gomez, F , Meghraoui, M , Darkal, A N , Hijazi,
F., Mouty, M., Suleiman, Y., Sbeinati, R., Darawcheh, R., Al- Ghazzi, R. and Barazangi, M.Holocene faulting and earthquake
recurrence along the Serghaya branch of the Dead Sea fault system in Syria and Lebanon Geophysical Journal International,
153/3 (2003): 658–674. Nemer, T., Meghraoui, M. and Khair, K.The Rachaya-Serghaya Fault System (Lebanon): Evidence of
Coseismic Ruptures, and the AD 1759 Earthquake Sequence Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113 B5 (2008)
37 Marco, S., Rockwell, T.K., Heimann, A., Frieslander, U. and Agnon, A.Late Holocene Activity of the Dead Sea Trans
form Revealed in 3D Palaeoseismic Trenches on the Jordan Gorge Segment Earth and Planetary Science Letters 234/1–2
(2005):189–205
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Tel Ateret aka Vadun Jacob | possible | ≥7 or ≥8 |
Ottoman Mosque Earthquake
Ellenblum et al (1998:305) described archaeoseismic evidence from Mamluk and Ottoman mosques built on the site as follows: In the northern part of the castle, we also unearthed a Muslim mosque whose northern wall is displaced sinistrally by 0.5 m. A mikhrab (the Muslim praying apse) is well preserved in the southern wall. According to the study of the pottery, the mosque was built, destroyed, and rebuilt at least twice: the initial structure was built in the Muslim period (12th century) and later rebuilt once or twice during the Turkish Ottoman period (1517-1917). The 0.5 m displacement is observed in the northern wall of the latest building phase. The repetitive building of this site might be due to earthquakes.The latest rebuilding phase was not dated. Ellenblum et al (2015) suggested that the 30 October 1759 CE Safed Quake was responsible while Ellenblum et al (1998:305) and Marco et al (1997) entertained the possibility that the 1837 CE Safed Quake is also a possible candidate. |
Baalbek | probable | 9 or 10 | Drawings and descriptions before and after the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek Earthquake indicate that, at a minimum, 3 columns of the peristyle of the Great Temple (aka the Temple of Jupiter) fell and the keystone of the soffit of the door of the lesser Temple dropped. Further damage, including to the 'Round Temple' is likely but not well-documented. Due to reports of continual decay, vandalism, stone-robbing, etc. to the Ruins of Baalbek during this time, it is difficult to identify all of the potential seismic damage. |
Nimrod Fortress | possible to probable | ≥8 | As this site has not been systematically excavated, the date of the observed seismic damage is conjectural. It happened sometime after the fortress was built in the 13th century CE. However, the 1759 CE Safed and Baalbek Quakes are promising candidates, particularly the 1759 CE Safed Quake which Daeron et al (20015) suggests broke the Rachaiya Fault a mere 2.5 km. away. In addition, the Nimrod Fortress is optimally oriented to experience seismic amplification due to a Ridge Effect from fault breaks on the Rachaiya Fault. Hinzen et al (2016) examined 95 instances of arch deformations on the site and concluded that a preferred damage orientation was not present on the site overall but was present in the Gate Tower and the secret passage in the Gate Tower. Hinzen et al (2016)'s orientation results, however, may suggest the possibility that more than one earthquake damaged the site (e.g., the 30 Oct 1759 CE Safed Quake, the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek Quake, and/or the 1837 CE Safed Quake). The Earthquake Archaeological Effects Chart suggests a minimum Intensity of 8 and a Discontinuous Deformation Analysis by Kamai and Hatzor (2007) suggests a local Intensity of about 9. Attenuation relationships using postulated Magnitudes and Epicenters from Daeron et al (20015) suggest that site Intensity was between 9 and 11 for the 1759 CE Safed Quake and 7.5 and 11 for the 1759 CE Baalbek Quake. |
Dharih | possible | 18th century CE Earthquake -
Al-Muheisen and Villeneuve (2000) assert that
a final earthquake (which could be placed in the 18th century, by reference to those of Baalbek)brought down a new part of the temple and its facade. The earthquake they refer to is one of the 1759 CE Safed and Baalbek Quakes. |
|
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Minimum PGA (g) | Likely PGA (g) | Likely Intensity1 | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Safed | probable | n/a | n/a | ≥7 | Katz and Crouvi (2007) undertook a GIS based slope stability analysis of Safed in order to estimate current hazard due to seismically induced landslides. They used the 1759 CE Safed Quake and 1837 CE Safed Quake as calibrating events for their model. Their analysis coupled with observations of active creep within in the city suggest that a thick anthropogenic talus has created conditions ripe for slope instability. This in turn suggests that seismic damage in Safed due to the 1759 CE Safed Quake and the 1837 CE Safed Quake was largely due to landslides. However, since the slopes are weak, the minimum Intensity required to induce slope failure is relatively low and, therefore, not very diagnostic of the maximum Intensity experienced in the city due to either of these seismic events. |
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Minimum PGA (g) | Likely PGA (g) | Likely Intensity1 | Comments |
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Taninim Creek Dam | possible |
Flame structures - ~1500-~1900 CE
Marco et al (2014) observed zigzaged flame structures atop a permeable lacustrine unit wedged between
two impermeable units. They interpreted the flame structures to be a result of overpressures or liquefaction. They surmised that the liquefaction was either induced directly by seismic shaking or by loading from a
tsunami that breached the dam and placed a load of ~3 m of (additional ?) sloshing water above the sediment-water interface. Stone displacements observed on the northern part of the dam along with the
spatial distribution and the zigzaged nature of the flame structures (indicating shearing) led them to favor the tsunamogenic interpretation. If correct, a tsunamogenic interpretation suggests an
offshore slope failure during the causitive earthquake as active faults are not known to be present in this part of the coast. |
|
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tekieh Trenches | probable | ≥ 7 |
Event A
Gomez et. al. (2003:15) dated Event A to between
1650 CE and the present and suggested that it was caused by the 1705 or 1759 CE earthquakes.
Daëron et al (2005:531) proposed We interpret the occurrence of two events in 1759 and the month long delay between them as a classic earthquake triggering example. Such triggered delayed rupture may be due to the presence of the Mount Hermon asymmetric push-up jog, a geometric irregularity that prevented immediate rupture propagation along the entire Rachaıya Serghaya fault system. Though not unique, this scenario is in keeping with scaling laws (Wells and Coppersmith, 1994; Ambraseys and Jackson, 1998) that predict (2-sigma) magnitudes of 6.4–7.3 and 7.0–8.0 respectively, compatible with those derived from historical accounts (6.6 and 7.4; Ambraseys and Barazangi, 1989) and from the ~2 m stream channel offset attributed to the last event on the Serghaya fault at Zebadani [i.e., Tekieh trenches] (7.0–7.2 for the November 1759 event; Gomez et al., 2003).Event A is estimated to have created 2 - 2.5 meters of left lateral strike slip displacement which translates to an estimated Magnitude between 7.0 and 7.4. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jarmaq Trench | possible | ≥ 7 | Nemer and Meghraoui (2006) date Event Z to after 84-239 CE. They suggested the Safed Earthquake of 1837 CE as the most likely candidate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faqaa Trench and Deir El-Achayer Excavation | probable | ≥ 7 | Nemer et al (2008) dated the most recent event (aka the Last Event) in the Faqaa Trench to between 1686 and 1924 CE and suggested it was most likely caused by the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek earthquake. They also noted that the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek earthquake may have been responsible for a seismic event observed in the Deir El-Achayer Excavation although the dating for this event is fraught with uncertainty. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bet Zayda | probable | ≥ 7 | Marco et al (2005) dated Event E.H. 2 to after 1415 CE and suggested that it was was caused by the 1759 CE Safed Quake but considered other possibilities such as the 1546 CE and 1837 CE earthquakes. Marco et al (2005) estimated a Magnitude between 6.6. and 6.9 for Event E.H. 2 based on 0.5 m of offset. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taninim Creek Dam | possible |
Flame structures - ~1500-~1900 CE
Marco et al (2014) observed zigzaged flame structures atop a permeable lacustrine unit wedged between
two impermeable units. They interpreted the flame structures to be a result of overpressures or liquefaction. They surmised that the liquefaction was either induced directly by seismic shaking or by loading from a
tsunami that breached the dam and placed a load of ~3 m of (additional ?) sloshing water above the sediment-water interface. Stone displacements observed on the northern part of the dam along with the
spatial distribution and the zigzaged nature of the flame structures (indicating shearing) led them to favor the tsunamogenic interpretation. If correct, a tsunamogenic interpretation suggests an
offshore slope failure during the causitive earthquake as active faults are not known to be present in this part of the coast. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jordan Valley - Tell Saidiyeh and Ghor Kabed Trenches | possible | ≥ 7 | Ferry et al (2011) detected 12 surface rupturing seismic events in 4 trenches (T1-T4) in Tell Saidiyeh and Ghor Kabed; 10 of which were prehistoric. The tightest chronology came from the Ghor Kabed trenches (T1 and T2) where Events Y and Z were constrained to between 560 and 1800 CE. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dead Sea - Seismite Types | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dead Sea - En Gedi | possible | see table |
Potential Seismites in En Gedi
Migowski et. al. (2004) identified several seismites from around this time.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dead Sea - Nahal Ze 'elim | possible | n/a |
Potential Seismites at site ZA-1
At site ZA-1, Ken-Tor et al (2001a) identified two seismites from around this time. Event H was higher up in the section.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Araba - Introduction | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Araba - Qasr Tilah | possible | ≥ 7 | Haynes et al. (2006) dated Event I to between 1515 and 1918 CE and suggested it was most likely a result of the 1546 CE earthquake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Araba - Taybeh Trench | possible | ≥ 7 | LeFevre et al. (2018) dated Event E1 to 1744 CE ± 56. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Araba - Taba Sabhka Trench | possible | ≥ 7 | Allison (2013) dated Event EQ1 to after the 16th-17th century CE. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
Gomez et. al. (2003:15) dated Event A to between
1650 CE and the present and suggested that it was caused by the 1705 or 1759 CE earthquakes.
Daëron et al (2005:531) proposed that the 30 October 1759 earthquake was caused
by slip on the shorter (50 km) Rachaya fault, and the larger magnitude 25 November event was caused by slip on the longer (130
km) Serghaya fault, in keeping with the evidence of recent movement on both (Tapponnier et al., 2001), and the French consul’s letter from Saida
.
This, in turn, they said resolved the ambiguity of Event A in the Tekieh Trench. It was, according to
Daëron et al (2005:531), caused by the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek Quake.
Daëron et al (2005:531) discussed the triggered earthquakes of 1759 CE as follows:
We interpret the occurrence of two events in 1759 and the month long delay between them as a classic earthquake triggering example. Such triggered delayed rupture may be due to the presence of the Mount Hermon asymmetric push-up jog, a geometric irregularity that prevented immediate rupture propagation along the entire Rachaıya Serghaya fault system. Though not unique, this scenario is in keeping with scaling laws (Wells and Coppersmith, 1994; Ambraseys and Jackson, 1998) that predict (2-sigma) magnitudes of 6.4–7.3 and 7.0–8.0 respectively, compatible with those derived from historical accounts (6.6 and 7.4; Ambraseys and Barazangi, 1989) and from the ~2 m stream channel offset attributed to the last event on the Serghaya fault at Zebadani [i.e., Tekieh trenches] (7.0–7.2 for the November 1759 event; Gomez et al., 2003).Event A is estimated to have created 2 - 2.5 meters of left lateral strike slip displacement which translates to an estimated Magnitude between 7.0 and 7.4.
Nemer and Meghraoui (2006) date Event Z to after 84-239 CE. They suggested the
Safed Earthquake of 1837 CE as the most likely candidate.
Nemer et al (2008) dated the most recent event (aka the Last Event) in the Faqaa Trench to between 1686 and 1924 CE
and suggested it was most likely caused by the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek earthquake. They also noted that the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek earthquake may have been responsible for a
seismic event observed in the Deir El-Achayer Excavation although the dating for this event is fraught with uncertainty.
Marco et al (2005) dated Event E.H. 2 to after 1415 CE and suggested that it was
was caused by the 1759 CE Safed Quake but considered other possibilities such as the 1546 CE and 1837 CE earthquakes. Marco et al (2005)
estimated a Magnitude between 6.6. and 6.9 for Event E.H. 2 based on 0.5 m of offset.
Ferry et al (2011) detected 12 surface rupturing seismic events in 4 trenches (T1-T4) in Tell Saidiyeh and Ghor Kabed; 10 of which were prehistoric. The tightest chronology came from the Ghor Kabed trenches
(T1 and T2) where Events Y and Z were constrained to between 560 and 1800 CE.
Note: Although
Ferry et al (2011) combined archaeoseismic interpretations, their paleoseismic evidence, and entries from earthquake catalogs to produce earthquake dates and some overly
optimistic probabilities, only the paleoseismic data is presented here.
Ferry et al (2011)'s archaeoseismic data was researched and is treated separately.
Migowski et. al. (2004) identified several seismites from around this time.
Depth (cm.) | Thickness (cm.) | Seismite Type | Min. Intensity | Max. Intensity | Quake Assignment (Migowski) | Quake Assignment (Williams) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-13 | 10 | 4 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 1927 CE | not assigned |
3 | 3 | 4 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 1837 CE | 1834 CE |
8 | 3 | 4 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 1822 CE | not assigned - 1822 CE Quake unlikely - too far away |
22 | 2 | 4 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 1759 CE | not assigned |
27 | 12 | 4 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 1712 CE | not assigned |
41 | 4.8 | 4 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 1656 CE | not assigned |
52 | 1 | 1 | 5.6 | 7.0 | 1588 CE | not assigned |
At site ZA-1, Ken-Tor et al (2001a) identified two seismites from around this time. Event H was higher up in the section.
Event | Thickness (cm.) | Seismite Type | Modeled Age (± 2σ) | Intensities | Quake Assignment (Ken-Tor) | Quake Assignment (Williams) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G | 50 | Liquefied Sand | 1815 CE ± 145 | unavailable for now - different mechanism | 1834 CE Quake | not assigned |
H | 30 | Liquefied Sand | 1595 CE ± 75 | unavailable for now - different mechanism | 1927 CE Quake | not assigned |
Haynes et al. (2006) dated Event I to between 1515 and 1918 CE and suggested it was most likely a result of the 1546 CE earthquake.
LeFevre et al. (2018) dated Event E1 to 1744 CE ± 56.
Allison (2013)
dated Event EQ1 to after the 16th-17th century CE.
AD 1759 Oct 30 Safad
The first shock occurred at dawn on Tuesday 30 October
1759 (N.S.), some time between 03 h 45 m and 04 h local
time. Arabic sources give different dates, between 6 and
8 Rabi I, but they all agree that the earthquake happened
on a Tuesday during the last quarter of the night or just
before dawn, so there can be no doubt that the correct
date is 30 October 1759.
The maximum effects of the earthquake were
experienced in the region of Safed and to the northeast
of the town. Safed was almost totally destroyed, together
with its six synagogues, with the loss of 120 Jews and an
unknown number of other inhabitants. It is said that
Metawali villages in the mountains north of Safed about
2000 Ismailis and Amriyyas were killed.
The region demarcated by Safed, Khirbet Qasiun,
Jisr Banat Yaqub and Nuaran as far as Qunaitra was
almost totally destroyed and the caravanserai of Qunaitra
collapsed with the loss of many lives and animals.
Damage extended to Saida, where a few houses
collapsed and many suffered minor damage; no one was
killed but the town was abandoned by its inhabitants, who
camped at some distance from the town.
Acre, Hamat and Sassaa also suffered some damage
and at the latter place the caravanserai was shattered,
without casualties.
In Nazaret the shock was particularly severe and
caused considerable damage locally. Damage in Nablus
and Hamat was probably due to ground failures rather
than to severe shaking. Also in Tiberias many houses
sank into their foundations, and, with the exception of
the church, which is located to the west of the town, near
the lake, all buildings were damaged.
In Damascus one or two houses collapsed completely,
a few were damaged and many were badly
cracked. Arab writers give a long list of public buildings
that after the earthquake were in need of restoration, particularly
minarets, the top parts of which were dislodged
or shattered by the shock. As a result of the earthquake
a rock fall blocked the Qanawat water channel, leaving
the city with a much reduced water supply for almost two
weeks. In the densely inhabited plain of Ghutah around
Damascus the shock ruined a few houses but otherwise
caused little, if any, damage.
In Tripoli the shock caused some concern but
apparently no damage; the earthquake was of rather long
duration, causing water to slosh out of basins and ponds.
In Beiruth, some of the monasteries in the
Kesrawan, in the district of Hisn al Akrad, Homs and
Caesaraea, experienced similar effects. The shock was
widely felt in Jerusalem, Hama, Antioch and Ladhkiya, in
the latter causing some panic but no damage. In Aleppo
ground movements persisted for almost one minute,
causing little alarm. The shock was felt in Gaza, but not
in Cairo or Cyprus.
The earthquake was felt very violently on board
a sailing ship a day's sailing from Beiruth. A seismic sea
wave flooded Acre to a height of about 2.5 m above normal
sea level, as well as the docks of Tripoli, without causing
any damage.
Fig. 2. Intensity distribution of the main shock of November 25, 1759.
Intensities in the MSK scale. The shock was felt as far as Alexandria
and the Nile Delta in the southwest, Karamania in Turkey in the northwest,
and Nakhichevan in the Caucasus in the northeast.
(from Ambraseys and Barazangi, 1989)
AD 1759 Nov 25 Litani
The main shock occurred early on Sunday night on
25 November 1759. All occidental sources give the same
date for the earthquake, which occurred at 19 h 23 m local
time, and give in detail the dates of all foreshocks and
aftershocks. Arabic sources agree that the shock occurred
during the first quarter of the night of Monday, reckoning
from Sunday at sunset, but differ with respect to the date,
which they place, either vaguely at the end of Rabi I, or
on 4, 6 or 16 Rabi II a.H. 1173. It is significant that European
sources do not mention any shocks that correspond
to the alternative dates mentioned in Arabic documents,
which must be misprints of the correct date 5 Rabi II a.H.
1173.
The epicentral region of the earthquake extended
the region of the foreshock to the north, comprising a narrow
zone that ran in a northeasterly direction for 120 km
along the Litani and Bekaa valleys to the upper reaches
of the Orontes River.
Much of the heavy damage and loss of life caused
to the mountainous Metwali settlements in the southern
part of the region was cumulative and includes the effects
of the foreshock of 30 October, which was serious in this
region.
Villages in the northern part of al-Hulah were
totally destroyed and the citadel of Shakif Arnun was
shattered. The large villages of Marjuyun, Kaukaba
and Zebdin and the caravanserai of Nabatiya collapsed.
Hasbaiya was almost totally destroyed, together with
its caravanserai, where many people were killed. The
churches of Birteh were ruined and Kafr Hatta was
totally destroyed with the loss of 55 Metwalis. The Greek
village of Qeitule was ruined and three people were
killed. Also Joun was destroyed, its churches were damaged,
and part of the nearby monastery of the Sisters of
Mary collapsed.
Many small Christian villages, including
Mukhtara, and the residence of the local ruler collapsed,
with casualties. The large village of Dair Qamar,
its churches, serais and many small settlements up the
Fereida were almost totally ruined, with heavy loss of
life.
Heavy damage extended to the district of
Kesrawan, where many churches and houses belonging
to the Christian community were also destroyed as far as
Tannurin, Akura and Afka. The staging posts of Shaad
and Labweh were shattered and Ras Baalbek was totally
destroyed with loss of life. Baalbek and its castle were
ruined and in part collapsed, with the loss of the whole
population, except the sheikh and another person. Some
of its ancient ruins were also affected: of the remaining
standing columns of the peristyle of the Great Temple,
three fell in the earthquake.
Sergaya, Zebedani, Hasaya and other smaller villages
in the hills on either side of the Barada valley were
either damaged beyond repair or destroyed, and 500 people
and many animals were killed. Maithalun and its caravanserai
were heavily damaged, and Saasaa and Qatana,
including a number of substantial structures, were completely
destroyed. In Beit Jann the earthquake and the
fire that followed totally destroyed the village, in which
many people perished. In the district of Sahra some villages
between Daraiya and Dair al-Ashair were ruined
and thereafter abandoned by their inhabitants.
Within this area of maximum damage the earthquake
triggered many slides and rock falls, and caused
changes in the stream and spring water. The stream that
supplied water to Baalbek was dammed up by slides, and
dried up for several days, while the source of the Maaser
ash-Shuf dried up permanently.
Massive rock falls from cliffs and rockslides into
ravines were reported from many places in the Lebanon,
and landslides were abundant in the Anti-Lebanon
and the Hermon. The largest rockslides were triggered
from the Jabal Niha near Fareida and from above
Mukhtara, where in large cracks running some distance
opened up on the mountainside. The largest landslides
occurred near Beit Jann and in the Barada valley above
Hasaya.
As a result of the earthquake a series of ground
ruptures many metres wide formed, running continuously
along the southwestern side of the Bekaa Valley from
northwest of Baalbek to as far as opposite Tripoli in the
north, and from southwest of Baalbek to the plain of
Satern(?), a total distance of about 100 km. These observations
suggest that the earthquake was associated with a
surface fault break at least 100 km long along the Bekaa
valley, the exact location and attitude of which it is not
possible to ascertain today. Field evidence, however, suggests
surface faulting perhaps associated with this and the
earthquake of 1759.
Further away from the epicentral region, damage
was less serious but varied erratically from place to place
and depended not only on the degree of shaking but also
on the vulnerability of houses, which had been increased
by the foreshock of 30 October and local soil conditions.
Thus Safed, which had just been repaired after the first
shock, whereafter most of its inhabitants had moved to
Acre, was almost totally destroyed and about 70 Jews
were killed. In contrast, neighbouring al-Rama and Deir
Hanna suffered little, if any, damage. In Acre scarcely a
house escaped without cracks in its walls and only a few
dwellings, including part of the fortification towers, fell
into the sea, without casualties. On the land side the rampart
slid into the fosse. The town was evacuated for some
time.
Villages along the coast suffered some damage,
and in Saida many dwellings, including the quarter of the
Europeans, storehouses and the citadel, were damaged
and a few collapsed, killing about 20 people. As a result
of the earthquake the harbour became unserviceable and
the town was abandoned for many months, its inhabitants
taking refuge in the plain behind the town.
The monastery of Dair al-Mukhalles and its
dependencies suffered some reparable damage, and in
Beirut, although many houses were badly damaged, none
collapsed. The storehouse of the European merchants
sustained some losses, as did their khan and residences.
The effects of the shock on the coastal area of the
Kesrawan district were not very serious, but in Tripoli a
few dwellings and three minarets collapsed without casualties.
However, many houses were cracked and the town
was evacuated for some time. East of Tripoli, at Qusair,
a few dwellings collapsed without loss of life, but the post
houses of Zeraa, al-Gaa and Hermel were ruined.
In the densely populated district of Damascus
damage was extremely non-uniform. At Saidnaya a few
walls fell over and some houses were shattered without
loss of life. However, the nearby villages of Maara and
Tell, which had been damaged by the foreshock, were
totally destroyed and the mosques and water mills damaged,
with the loss of 425 lives. In contrast, damage was
far less serious at nearby Darij. In Halboun and Mnin no
one was killed but many houses were ruined, mosques
damaged and bath houses destroyed. At Dimas the caravanserai
and at Barzeh a few houses, including the
mosque, suffered some damage. Mazza also was damaged
but not as much as Dummar, which was ruined. At Arbin
the baths collapsed and the walls of the mosque was badly
cracked. Most of the houses in Harasta, together with
the mosque and watermills, were damaged. The shock
caused the collapse of the bath house at Douma and much
of Khan al-Qusair. At Adhra and Maydas the walls of
houses were fissured, and at Abadeh and Nashbiyeh a few
houses, the mosque and the olive press were damaged.
A noticeable effect of the earthquake in the plain
of Ghutah was the collapse of well shafts and slumping
of the ground. In Damascus the shock caused great.
panic, several casualties and considerable but reparable
damage to houses that had already been affected by the
foreshock. Of the 15 000, chiefly adobe, houses in the
city, very few collapsed completely but many were badly
cracked. The exception was in the large suburb of Salihiye,
which is situated to the northwest of the city on high
ground, where damage was exceptionally severe, particularly
to houses that had been weakened by the earthquake
of 30 October.
In Damascus a considerable number of public
buildings, such as the Umayyad Mosque, other mosques
and medrasas, gates, baths and walls, suffered various
degrees of damage, some of it serious enough to lead to
later collapse. A few minarets collapsed, causing additional
damage to adjacent buildings, and many others
were badly cracked. Part of the citadel crumbled into the
Banas canal, damming its flow, and narrow streets were
blocked by the collapse of high adobe fencing walls.
Further to the southwest, Quneitra, which had
been damaged already by the foreshock and partly evacuated,
was totally destroyed. In Nablus and Nazaret many
houses that had been damaged by the foreshock collapsed,
in Nablus killing a few people. In contrast, in
Hamat, Dair Hanna, Caesarea and Haifa there were no
casualties and relatively few houses needed repairs.
A part of the citadel of Tiberias, already in a parlous
state, was ruined. In the region of Homs, Hama
and Shaizar, with the exception of Qalat al-Burayj and
Kara, where walls of houses were cracked, the earthquake
caused considerable concern but no other damage.
Further away the earthquake was felt strongly, at
al-Arish, Gaza, Jerusalem and Jafa. In Ladikiya ground
motions lasted for a long time, causing panic and generating
cracks in a few walls. Near there the shock triggered
a massive landslide that destroyed the old village of Shilfatiya.
In Antioch one or two old houses, a khan and part
of the bazaar collapsed, killing a few people, but elsewhere
there was no damage to speak of. In the densely
settled region of Aleppo the shock was of long duration.
In the city, except for a few old houses, none of the
buildings and of the oldest minarets were actually thrown
down, but the walls of a few dwellings were fissured.
Similar effects were reported from the southwest,
from Jaba Druz and Tarba, where only a few hans were
damaged.
The earthquake was widely felt in Alexandria for
about two minutes, with slow oscillation of the ground.
The following day the sea was discoloured over a large
area.
There are many published and unpublished documents
about this earthquake, the most important of
which are given below.
[1] ACCM Archives de la Chambre de Commerce de
Marseilles; ACCM AA:340 (Seyde) 17.12.59; 28.12.59;
22.01.60.
[2] AGS Archivo General de Simancas: Seccion Estado, leg.
5875, piez. 14:7.2.1760.
[3] ANF AE Archives Nationales: Arch. Affaires Etrangeres
Paris; Bi/99 (Alexandrette) 24.12.59; Bi/1032.223-230
(Seyde) 22.12.59; Bi/1032. 246-247(Seyde) 28.12.59;
Bi/1032. 248 (Seyde) 04.01.60; Bi/1032.285-290 (Seyde)
27.03.60; Bi/1120.14-26 (Tripoli) 04.02.60;Bi/1120. 46-
47 (Tripoli) 12.08.60; Bi/88.132-134 (Alep) 11.12.59;
Bi/88.157-158 (Alep) 24.12.59; Bi/88.136-137 (Alep)
14.01.60; Bi/436.345-347 (Istanbul) 29.12.59; Bi/5 (Larnaka)
1759.
[4] ANR Annual Register, London 1760, 86; 1761, 96-98;
1764, 102-106.
[5]AMAE CADN: Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres,
Centre des Archives Diplomatiques de Nantes Turquie
(Alep 4). 21.11.1759; 07.12.1759; 12.12.1759; 24.12.1759;
28.01.1760; 19.04.1760; Turquie (Seyde) 07.12.1759;
17.12.1759; Turquie (Tripoli) 18.12.1759, 18.01.1760;
Turquie (Jerusalem) 25.02.1760; 31.03.1760; 22.03.1760.
[6] ARG Allgemein. Rijksarch. 'S Gravenhage Legatie Turkije
393 (Aleppo) 11.12.59.
[7]BBA Basbakanlik Arivi Istanbul; BBA Ahkam D Sam-i
serif 195; BBA D B5 M; BNE Bab-i Defteri, Bina Emini
15914; BBA CD Cevdet Dahiliye 1181 (20.05.1173); BBA
CE Cevdet Evkaf Tasnifi 1823 (11.1173); 1596 (n.d.); 1823
(03.12.1173); 2219 (08.12.1773); BBA CM Cevdet Maliye
28549, 29081; BBA CN Cevdet Nafia 1038 (05.01.1172);
BBA MD Miihimme Defteri 162:77-78 (04.1174); BBA
MMD Maliyeden Miidevver Defterler 19198 6-8; 3160.2,
4-6, 7-9, 11-19, 29 30, 218, 282, 300-302, 542, 906 9999.272
(10.03.1184).
[8]BN Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris BN NAF 20236:115.
[9]PRO FO Public Records Office, Foreign Office Special
Papers, London; SP.110/36, 42, 47 (Aleppo) 22.12.1759; SP
110/36, 39 (Aleppo) 04.12.1759; SP 110/36, 41 (Aleppo)
22.12.1759; SP 110/36, 42 (Aleppo) 22.12.1759; SP 110/36,
44 (Aleppo) 22.12.1759; SP 110/36, 45 (Aleppo) 22.12.1759.
[10] WIL WMS Ar. 274, fol. 166ab.
[11] Press reports: PAN 1760, 86-87; 1761, 96-98, 1764, 102-
106; PES 1760, 358-360; PGF 1760, 105-106; PHB 1760, 13;
PLC 1760, 249, 550; PMDF 1760, 3:210-211; PMHP 1760,
2:141, 3:240-242; Nederlandsch Post-Ryder 1760, 229-232,
349-350; PNP 1760, 229-232, 349-350.
[12] Papers: Albini and Stucchi (1992), Ambraseys and
Barazangi (1989), Anonymous (1760a, b, c), Anonymous
(1787), Anonymous (1956), Bachiene (1766), al-
Bidiri, in Taher (1974), Bramsen (1818), Braik (1982),
al-Budayiri (1959), Burton and Drake (1872, i. 37, 96),
Charles-Roux (1928), Clouzot (1914), Cousinery (1760),
Daeron et al. (2005), Dahmaan (1948, 1982), Dienner
(1886), Donati (1759), F.CH.R. (1927), Findikli (1978),
Golubovich (1922), Guys (1822), Hakobyan (1956), Ibn
al-Ghazzi (1948), Kitto (1844, i. 89-90), Lemmens (1898,
1304-307, 337-342), Maas (1775, iv. 134), Mariti (1792,
i. 352-354), al-Muradi 83), Paulian (1761, iii. 341),
Rabbi Simha (1946, 382-423), Rabbi Yosef (1971, 286-
301), Rafeq (1966, 227), Rivkind (1928, 124-125), Russell
(1769, 529-531), Skaf (1975, 286-287), Squire (1820,
304-307), Taher (1974/5, 52-108), Thiollet (1977, 176), al'Umari
(f. 242v), Vasif (Tarih, i. 177-178), Volney (1787,
i. 304, ii. 187, 212, 238-47, 269-271) and Yaari (1946, 382-
423; 1951, 28, 349-363).
1759 Oct 30 (03:45)
Time Uncertainty n/a
Type of Quake Foreshock (Single?)
Reliability Very High
Zone central (Israel and southern Lebanon), North (northern Lebanon and Syria)
Most Damaged or felt locations Safed
Strong shock in northern Israel-Southern Lebanon in the
area confined to Safed-Tiberias-Benot Ya'akov bridge
and Quneitra. Ambraseys (2009): Probably a foreshock of the Nov 25
earthquake. Daeron et al. (2005) claim that this is not a foreshock but
rather separate earthquake acting on the Rachaya
segment.
Reported damaged localities
Akko
Quneitra
Benot Yaaqov Bridge
Sassa
Nazareth
Safed
Tiberias
Nablus
Estimated magnitude in previous studies
Ms ~ 6.6 Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989)
6.5 Ben-Menahem (1991)
Average magnitude 6.5
Size degree Str
Casualties >10
1759 Nov 25 (19:23)
Time Uncertainty n/a
Type of Quake Foreshock, Main and Aftershock
Reliability Very High
Zone Central (Israel and southern Lebanon), North (northern Lebanon and Syria)
Most Damaged or felt locations Litany, Northern Palestine
A most destructive earthquake that (Ambraseys, 2009) generated
landslides, changes in water course and ground
breakage in south Lebanon and northern Galilee (Ambraseys, 2009).
Many reporting sources. Migowski et al. (2004) suggest it was recorded in
lacustrine sediments along the Dead Sea shores
Reported damaged localities
Hula
Deir Hanna
Safed, Nabatiya
Nablus
Sassa
Hermon Mt.
Akko
Beit-Jann
Hasbaya
Deir Hanna
Quneitra
Caesarea
Marjuyun
Tiberias
Haifa
el-Rama
Estimated magnitude in previous studies
7.4 Migowski et al. (2004)
MS ~ 7.4 Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989)
Ms = 7.4 Ambraseys and Jackson (1998), Wells and Coppersmith (1994)
7 <= M <= 7.2 Gomez et al. (2003)
7.4 Ben-Menahem (1991)
Average magnitude 7.3
Size degree Maj
Casualties >10
1759 10 30 03:45 LT: Sea wave flooded Acre and docks at Tripoli
According to Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) and
Ambraseys (2009), this earthquake was felt onboard
ships a days sailing from Beirut and caused a seismic
sea wave that flooded Acre to a height of 2.5 m above
normal sea level and the docks at Tripoli, but there was
no apparent damage. The tsunami is also mentioned
by Shalem (1956), Ambraseys (1962), and Amiran
et al. (1994), who located it along the coasts of Israel
and Lebanon and note that in Acre The water rose
to 8' ...
(~2.5 m). This is the only case where the
inundation height (height of the flooding water above
sea level) is documented in historical sources. Unfortunately,
this cannot be simply interpreted as the actual
inundation depth (height of the tsunami above the
ground) because the location and height of the flooded
area above sea level are not mentioned.
The cause of the tsunami was attributed to an
MS ~6.6 earthquake in southern Lebanon and northern
Israel (Ambraseys and Barazangi, 1989; Amiran et al.,
1994). Ben-Menahem (1991) mentions a seiche in the
Sea of Galilee. A paleoseismic study by Gomez et al.
(2001, 2003), later interpreted by Daeron et al. (2005),
relates the earthquake to the Rachaiya fault, Syria, and
paleo- and archaeoseismic investigations by Marco et
al. (1997, 2005) and Ellenblum et al. (1998), suggest
the surface rupture extended southwards to the Jordan
gorge segment.
Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) describe a tsunami
for each of the two earthquakes in this sequence
(October 30 and November 25), while Amiran et al.
(1994) and Soloviev et al. (2000) determine that a
tsunami followed the first earthquake only.
1759 11 25 19:23 LT: Sea wave in Acre and as far as the Nile Delta
For the second earthquake in this sequence, Ambraseys
and Barazangi (1989) mention a seismic sea wave
that was noted as far south as the Nile Delta, where the
sea was discolored for many days, but no damage occurred.
In Acre, ships were thrown onto the shore, and
there were some casualties. Ambraseys (2009), however,
notes that the sea in Alexandria was discolored
over a large area the day after the earthquake, without
mentioning the tsunami and other effects. Amiran et al.
(1994) and Soloviev et al. (2000) do not list a tsunami
for the November event.
A destructive earthquake in southern Lebanon and
northern Israel likely caused this tsunami. This is described
by Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989):
A series of ground ruptures many yards wide were formed¦ along the Bekaa Valley, from Baalbek to opposite Tripoli to the plain of Satern... a total distance of about 100 km. Most probably however, the displacement occurred along the Yammouneh fault.Gomez et al. (2001) and Daeron et al. (2005), however, suspect the rupture was along the Serghaya fault, based on paleoseismic evidence. The magnitude estimate given by Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) was MS = 7.4, Ambraseys and Jackson (1998), assumed this was a large event, and Ambraseys (2006) estimated MS = 7.5.
〈143〉 1759 October 30, 03:45 (local time)
Ambraseys and Jackson (1998) listed a surface fault break for the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek Quake.
Name | Date | Lat.(°N) | Long.(°E) | MS | Azimuth (°) | Mechanism | Length (km.) | Location | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baalbek Quake | 25 Nov. 1759 | 33.7 | 35.9 | 7.4 | 20 | Left-Lateral | 100 | Bekaa | Lebanon |
The MS ≈ 7+ earthquake on November 25, 1759, almost certainly produced surface faulting probably along the Yammouneh fault in the Bekaa valleyIn their Magnitude estimates for this earthquake, Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) assumed a Rupture Length of 100 km. Later in their paper, Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989:4010) cite an unnamed source for the surface faulting evidence .
It is said that as a result of the earthquake, a series of ground ruptures many yards wide were formed running continuously along the Bekaa valley, to the north of Baalbek as far as opposite Tripoli and to the southwest to the plain of Satern, a total distance of about 100 km. This and other contemporary descriptions of the effects of the earthquake clearly suggest faulting, at least 100 km long, the exact location and attitude of which is not possible to ascertain today. Most probably, however, the displacement occurred along the Yammouneh fault, which runs along the total length of the Bekaa valley (see Figure lb).Daeron et al (2005) may have solved the mystery of Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989:4010)'s mysterious source. Daeron et al (2005:530) discussed this as follows:
Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989, p. 4010) mentioned 100-km-long surface ruptures in the Beqaa in November 1759, but stated thatAlthough this potential fault break reported by Ambraseys and Jackson (1998) may seem dubious, their assumption that the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek Quake created surface faulting seems to be correct. They just assumed that it broke the wrong fault. Daeron et al (2005:529-530) presented surface faulting evidence that suggested younger less weathered fault scarplets on the Rachaıya-Serghaya faults and fresh mole-tracks on the Rachaıya fault [both closer to Baalbek] were associated with one of the 1759 CE fault breaks while older more weathered faults scarplets on the Yammouneh fault [farther from Baalbek] were associated with one of the the 1202 CE earthquakes.the exact location and attitude of (these ruptures) is [sic] not possible to ascertain today.Nevertheless, they inferred the Yammouneh fault to be the most likely candidate. Building on this inference, Ellenblum et al. (1998) referred to Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) as quoting a description of ground breaks on the Yammouneh fault by the French ambassador in Beirut. Our own investigation of the French sources cited by Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989, p. 4010) yielded only a second-hand account by the French consul in Saida:The wording suggests that this rupture took place on one side of the Beqaa, and the mention of Baalbek points to the east side, thus to the Serghaya fault.English from Daeron et al (2005:530)One claims that [ . . . ] on the Baalbek side (or possibly: near Baalbek) pulling toward the plain the earth cracked open by more than [~6 m] and that this crack extends for over twenty leagues (~80 km) (Archives Nationales, Paris, B1/1032/1959-60).
French from Daeron (2005:120 n.1)On pretend que [...] du cote de Balbec en tirans vers la plaine la terre s’est entrouverte de plus de trois toises et que cette ouverture dure plus de vingt lieues. (Archives Nationales, Paris, B1/1032/1959-60 provided by Daeron, 2005:120 n.1)
For Surface Magnitude (MS) and Moment Magnitude (MW) estimates based on Rupture Length (L) in km.,
Ambraseys and Jackson (1998) presented the following equations:
MS = 5.13 + 1.14 log(L) (2)
MS = 5.27 + 1.04 log(L) (3)
MW = 4.9 + 1.33 log(L) (11)note
while noting that Equation (3) is almost identical to that derived by Wells and Coppersmith (1994). These equations are coded into calculators below.
Ambraseys and Jackson (1998:397) noted the following
it is important, particularly for palaeoseismological investigations, to have some indication of whether the rupture length and offset estimated from historical sources are likely to be seriously under- or overestimated, given the magnitude of the event. This is a principal use of magnitude—length relationships. For an assessment of individual events or particular regions, it may be more informative to make such estimates from a combination of first principles and more closely constrained empirical relationships, along the following lines:The advantage of this approach over some global empirical relationship is that it is more explicit where the assumptions are: A is known to vary regionally (Ekstrom & Dziewonski 1988) and so is d. Moreover, for earthquakes in which the fault length is small compared with the seismogenic thickness, the relationships between moment and magnitude and between moment and fault length are both known to be different from those given above, such that B≈1.0 (Ekstrom and Dziewonski 1988) and Mo is proportional to L3. Thus a single relationship over the whole magnitude range of Fig. 3 (and over the magnitude ranges discussed by Wells & Coppersmith 1994) is not likely to be valid anyway. The explicit approach illustrated here is therefore more likely to be useful for detailed palaeoseismological investigation of specific events.
- for earthquakes that rupture the entire thickness (d) of the seismogenic upper crust, the downdip width of the fault is d/sinϴ, where ϴ is the fault dip, and the moment is then
Mo = (μcd/sin ϴ)L2 (8)
where
- µ is the rigidity modulus
- c is the ratio of average displacement (u) to fault length (L), which is observed to be close to 5 x 10-5 for intracontinental earthquakes (Scholz 1982; Scholz et al. 1986)
- both observationally and theoretically it is known that for such earthquakes the relationship between moment and magnitude (M, whether MS or MW ) is of the form
log(Mo)= A + BM (9)
where A and B are constants, with B ≈ 1.5 (e.g. Kanamori and Anderson 1975; Ekstrom and Dziewonski 1988))
- combining these expressions gives a relationship between moment and fault length of the form
M = (1/B) log(µcd/sin ϴ) — (A/B) + (2/B) (log L) (10)
For illustration, if we take
- µ=3 x 1010 N m-2
- c = 5 x 10-5
- A = 9.0 (for Mo in units of N m, see Ekstrom and Dziewonski 1988)
- B=1.5
then for a seismogenic layer of thickness d=15 km and a vertical strike-slip fault (ϴ = 90°), the relationship is
MW = 4.9+1.33L (11)
with L in kilometres, which is similar to the empirical relationships given above and in Wells & Coppersmith (1994) and is a reasonable fit to the earthquakes of M ≥ 6.0 in Fig. 3
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Rupture Length | ||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Surface Magnitude |
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Rupture Length | ||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Surface Magnitude |
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Rupture Length | ||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Moment Magnitude |
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Rupture Length | ||
km. | Rupture Thickness | ||
degrees | Dip Angle | ||
constant | |||
constant | |||
N m-2 | Rigidity Modulus | ||
ratio of average displacement (u) to fault length (L) | |||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Magnitude |
Ambraseys and Jackson (1998) produced an equation to estimate
Surface Magnitude (MS) from the average radii of isoseismals (ri) at a specific value of Intensity (Ii).
MS = −1.54+0.65(Ii)+0.0029(Ri)+2.14 log(Ri)+0.32p (1)
where
with few exceptions, macroseismic data for the historical period are scanty and the magnitudes that can be calculated from eq. (1) are rather uncertain. They suggested in such cases to use the magnitude estimate to
group earthquakes into three broad categories
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Mean isoseismal radius for a given Intensity I | ||
unitless | The given Intensity | ||
unitless | p=0 for mean values. p=1 for 84 percentile values (Ambraseys, 1992) | ||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Surface Magnitude |
Fig. 11. During the earthquake of November 25, 1759
(ML = 7.4), three columns of the collonade
of the Temple of "Jupiter Heliopolitanus" at Baalbeck
(Lebanon) fell or were dislodged. One of these is seen
here. JW: He's right that 3 columns likely fell but this
photo does not capture the correct column.
(from Ben-Menahem, 1991)
Name | Date (1759 CE) |
Lat. (°N) |
Long. (°E) |
I0 | ML | Discussion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Safed Quake | 30 Oct. | 33.7 | 35.9 | n/a | 6.5 | City walls [of Tiberias] overthrown. Great damage. Tsunami in the Sea of Galilee. Many casualties. This event preceded the major earthquake of November 25, 1759 which caused much less damage at Tiberias. |
Baalbek Quake | 25 Nov. | 33.7 | 35.9 | 10-11 | 7.4 | Great destruction at Baalbek. A part of Damascus destroyed. Damage area extends to Antioch and Jaffa. Safed. Many thousands perished in the Beka'a. A foreshock occurred on October 30. Only six columns of the colonnade of the temple of "Jupiter Heliopolitanus" at Baalbeck (the biblical Baalgad mentioned in Josh II, 17) remained standing after this earthquake. This temple was built by Emperor Antonius Pius in 150. It had originally 54 columns (h = 18.3 m, D = 2.5 m). Two fell during the local earthquake of 565 (ML = 6.7), one fell as a result of the local earthquake of 991 (ML = 6.5), 11 fell by the earthquakes of 1157 (Δ = 120 km) and 1170 (Δ = 90 km). Finally, 31 columns fell as a result of the local earthquake of 1202 (ML = 7.5), and three fell due to the 1759 event (ML = 7.4) (Figure 11). |
Name | Type of Shock | Date | Local Time | MS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Safed Quake | Foreshock | 30 Oct. 1759 CE | 0345 | ≈ 6.6 |
Baalbek Quake | Main shock | 25 Nov. 1759 CE | 1923 | ≈ 7.4 |
Sources of information included
It affected the region of Safad and a mountain area to the northeast where many villages were destroyed with the loss of about 2000 lives, mainly among the Metwalis and Amriyyas. Safad and Qunaitra (see Figures 1 and 2) were almost totally ruined, and many of the inhabitants were killed, while others left the towns. Damage extended to Saida, where a few houses collapsed, as well as to Saasaa, Nazareth, and Acre, where private and public buildings were ruined, but without casualties. In Damascus (one of the largest population centers in the region) and in the surrounding plain of Ghutah, the shock caused considerable concern and widespread minor damage. One or two houses collapsed, a few were damaged, and many were cracked. Many public buildings, particularly minarets (of mosques) and tall buildings, were damaged to the extent that repairs were needed after the earthquake, and the water supply of the city was affected by rock falls that blocked the Qanawat water supply channel. Farther away, damage was widespread, in Tiberias (see Figure 2) mainly because of foundation failures of houses built on soft ground and elsewhere because of landslides, but without loss of life. The shock was rather strongly felt as far as Antioch, Aleppo, Jerusalem, and Gaza (see Figure 2), and it was reported by sailing boats between Cyprus and Beirut. A seismic sea wave flooded Acre and the docks at Tripoli, but there was no apparent damage. This earthquake was followed by a series of strong aftershocks, some of which were felt as far as Aleppo, that added to the damage.
It was of long duration, about 50 s, and almost totally destroyed all villages in a narrow zone extending to the northeast for about 120 km along
the Litani and the Bekaa valleys into the upper reaches of the Orontes river in northwest Syria. The epicentral region of this earthquake comprised
the meizoseismal area of the foreshock of October 30, where the destruction was cumulative. Contemporary sources mention over 100 places for which an
assessment of damage can be made, on which basis Figure 2 was drawn. Safed, rebuilt after the first shock but with a much reduced population, was
almost totally destroyed with loss of life. The Metwali settlements to the north were razed to the ground, and those in Bshara and in the Shouf
region suffered likewise. Here many monasteries and cloisters were destroyed, and near Mukhtara and Mar Djordjos rock falls and landslides added
to the damage. Destruction was equally heavy in the upper reaches of the Barada river at Serghaya and Hasbaya, and Baalbek was totally destroyed
with great loss of life (see Figure 2). The stream that supplied water to Baalbek was dammed up, presumably by slides, and dried up for several days.
Heavy damage extended to Ras Baalbek. The available evidence suggests that within this area of maximum damage the earthquake was associated with
extensive faulting. It is said that as a result of the earthquake, a series of ground ruptures many yards wide were formed running continuously
along the Bekaa valley, to the north of Baalbek as far as opposite Tripoli and to the southwest to the plain of Satern, a total distance
of about 100 km. This and other contemporary descriptions of the effects of the earthquake clearly suggest faulting, at least 100 km long,
the exact location and attitude of which is not possible to ascertain today. Most probably, however, the displacement occurred along the
Yammouneh fault, which runs along the total length of the Bekaa valley (see Figure lb).
Farther away, damage was serious but nonuniform. Some of the places that had been damaged by the earthquake of October 30 were ruined,
and others suffered varying degrees of damage, particularly the densely populated district of Damascus. Here, villages in the Ghutah and Marj
around Damascus suffered mainly from foundation failures, a noticeable effect of the earthquake being the collapse of well shafts in the plains.
In Damascus the shock caused great panic, several casualties, and considerable, but generally reparable, damage. Of the approximately 15,000 mainly
adobe houses in the city, very few collapsed completely, but many were badly cracked. A large number of public
buildings, the Umayyad mosque, other mosques and medreses (i.e., schools), gates, baths, and walls suffered different degrees of damage,
some of them serious and leading to partial collapse. A few minarets were thrown down causing additional damage to adjacent houses,
and many others were badly cracked. Part of the citadel in the center of the city crumbled into the Banas canal damming its flow,
and narrow streets were blocked by the collapse of high adobe fencing walls. Many of the buildings that suffered most had already
been damaged by the foreshock, particularly minarets and large domes of mosques. On higher ground, in the district of Salihiyeh
(a suburb of Damascus), damage was more serious. However, overall damage and loss of life in the city seems to have been far less
serious than some of the local reports imply. More sober accounts written by European consuls estimate the loss of life in
Damascus at a few hundred lives, as compared to 6000-20,000 given by local sources, and internal evidence in these sources suggests
that the shock was not in fact all that destructive. For example, the day after the earthquake the people were ordered to gather
in mosques for prayers, and many camped on the roofs of their houses, an indication that most buildings remained intact.
The earthquake was strongly felt in Antioch and Ladhikiya (see Figure 2), causing some panic and the collapse of a number of old houses.
In Aleppo, where the shock lasted almost 2 min, a few walls were fissured. Similar effects were reported from Tarba, Gaza, and Al Arish
(Figure 2), and a few old khans (caravan stations) were damaged.
The shock was felt throughout Anatolia as far as Nakhichevan, 1100 km away, and in Egypt. A seismic sea wave associated with the earthquake
was noted as far south as the Nile Delta, where the sea was discolored for many days, but it caused no damage there. In Acre, ships were
thrown onto the shore, and there were some casualties.
The number of people killed in this earthquake is difficult to assess. Estimates made by various contemporary writers vary between
10,000 and 40,000. It is said that in the Bekaa valley alone 20,000 people were killed and as many in the Ghutah region of Damascus.
Some of these figures refer only to losses of men, excluding women and children, and others refer generally to more than one district.
It is reasonable to assume that the total loss of life was very considerable.
Aftershocks continued to be felt till August 1760. Of these, the shocks of November 26 and December 5, 12, and 30 caused additional
damage and loss of life, mainly in the region of Baalbek, Tripoli, and Homs, and slight damage as far as Aleppo.
Figure 2 shows the generalized isoseismal map of the earthquake of November 25, 1759. Its epicentral region and probable fault break coincide
with the stepover of the north-south trending Dead Sea fault system and also with the epicentral region of the earlier earthquake of May 20, 1202 (see Figure la).
JW: Sample numbers from Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) below are for the 25 Nov. Baalbek Quake. Calculators are seeded with values to reproduce their assessment
but input values can be adjusted allowing for experimentation. Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989)'s Magnitude assessment now follows:
No earthquake of comparable magnitude has occurred in this part of the Middle East during the present century that can be used to
calibrate the magnitude of the 1759 event. However, if we assume that this earthquake was associated with a 100-km-long, strike-slip
fault break, we may assess the surface wave magnitude of the event from
MS = 4.63 + 1.43 log(L) (1)
where L is the observed or inferred length of faulting in km derived for earthquakes in the Middle East [Ambraseys, 1988].
In the present case, equation (1) predicts MS = 7.5. Alternatively, we may use the calibration formula based
on the average radii of isoseismals Ri (in km) of intensity Ii (MSK) derived for Turkey, i.e.,
MF = —0.53 + 0.58(Ii) + 1.96x10-3(Ri) + 1.831 log(Ri) (2)
where MF is the equivalent felt magnitude to MS [Ambraseys and Finkel, 1987]. From the isoseismals in
Figure 2 and using equation (2) we find the average magnitude to be MS = 7.2. Noticing that the isoseismals
in Figure 2 are likely to be underestimated in an east-west direction because of the lack of data, an average value of
MS = 7.4 seems reasonable. Equations (1) and (2) have also been used to assess magnitudes for the earthquakes
shown in Table 1. We must add a word of warning. In deriving equation (2) the data from earthquakes in southeastern Turkey
are very limited, so that this equation may not so accurately predict the attenuation of intensity in the northern part
of the Dead Sea fault system. The indication from limited macro-seismic data for MS LT 6.5 in the southern part
of the Dead Sea fault system is that attenuation there is slower than that given by equation (2) and that this equation
may overestimate magnitudes by perhaps as much as 0.3 on average.
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Rupture Length | ||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Surface Magnitude |
Variable | Input | Units | Variable Name |
---|---|---|---|
km. | Average radii of isoseismals | ||
unitless | for a given Intensity | ||
Variable | Output | Units | Notes |
unitless | Felt Magnitude |
**G = 30 OCT. 1759, and 25 NOV 1759
A well documented crisis ...
- TAHA (pp 233-265), descriptions shock by shock...In October, when no drop of rain had fallen so far..., a slight tremor was felt in Damascus followed by a second, then the earth shook violently,... The upper parts of almost all minarets of the mosques of Damascus fell,..., there was a lot of destruction and victims in Damascus and in the surrounding villages. The tremors followed one another... few trees remained standing. An epidemic broke out, the upper parts of the east and west minarets of the Umayyad Mosque fell. The tremors continued which caused the collapse of the eastern and northern walls of the eastern minaret the Umayyad mosque... around fifteen mosques are mentioned by name; the eastern wall of the Mosque "Al-MAZBOUR" cracked,..., last night, the earth shook in Safad, most of its inhabitants have perished ; a large part of Nablus was destroyed, and there were many casualties; a part of the tower of Acre fell into the Sea, Tiberias, Deir Hanna, the citadel of Al-Jandal, the country of Chouf and all the coastal cities, Sidon, Beirut, Tripoli, Latakia, Jaffa, Haifa, were affected, no villages in the Jabal-Druze were spared from the damage, the inhabitants of the coastal cities and the western zone took refuge in Damascus,..., then, on the evening of Monday, the 6th of the month Rabi II (Nov 25, 1759), the earthquake occurred. supreme, never known in the past,..., the eastern minaret we mentioned fell, on the side of the mosque, by destroying part of the 3 "Mihrabs", the majestic dome of the eagle fell as well as the entire northern part of the mosque, despite its well-built columns,...; there were a lot of victims this night in Damascus as well as in the villages of the surroundings in Tell there were victims; people have left Damascus and stayed 3 months in tents,..., the Umayyad mosque contains 3 minarets including the eastern called minaret of Isa (Jesus) son of Mary, peace be upon him..., the tremor of 30 OCT lasted 2 to 3 minutes,... that of 25 NOV lasted 4 minutes..., (TAHA)numerous testimonies in TAHA, including that of an Archbishop... letter published in a newspaper etc..., also clarifications thanks to similar testimonies in the annals of Ksara (1956)..., 2,000 dead in Safad but the surrounding countryside is unscathed, several hundred dead in Damascus; in Baalbek, victims and damaged monuments... all the villages listed were also those more affected by the earthquake of March 16, 1956 (we will come back to this)...
Various phenomena that accompanied earthquakes...
- a haze of dust emanated from the land which had suffered an abnormal drought this year
- the spring of Maaser-Ech-Chouf has dried up
- in the Jebal Miha above Mukhatara, the rocks have cracked
- the fire would have "fallen" on the village of Beit Jinn (..., a village located 1 km from a volcano crater quaternary)..." (Ann. KSARA 1956)
- ..., a large number of less strong tremors followed one another until JANUARY 1760 with probable displacement of the epicenter north to the country of Antioch. (Ann. KSARA 1956).
Estimated Seismic Parameters from Ben-Menahem (1979) Date Lat. Long. I0 ML Source 30 OCT. 1759 33°N 35.5° E XI 6.5 BMl (Ben-Menahem, 1979) 25 NOV. 1759 33.8° N 36.2° E X-XI 6.8 BMl (Ben-Menahem, 1979)
- 7 shocks are mentioned in PTAH between OCT. 1759 and APR. 1760, Damascus (X - XI), then Quneitra, Homs, Antioch and 3 times Damascus without mention of intensity. We emphasize that this set of earthquakes was preceded by an abnormal drought (we will come back to this). Jackson et al. (1984), citing a personal communication from Ambraseys, mentions this event which would be associated with 100 km of surface rupture; the date given by these authors (1756) is incorrect.French** G = 30 OCT. 1759, et 25 NOV 1759
Une crise sur laquelle nous sommes particulièrement bien documentés...
- TAHA (pp 233-265), descriptions choc par choc...En octobre, alors qu'aucune goutte de pluie n'était tombée jusque là..., une secousse légère a été ressentie à Damas suivie d'une deuxième, puis la terre a tremblé violemment,... Les parties supérieures de la quasi-totalité des minarets des mosquées de Damas sont tombées,..., il y a eu beaucoup de destructions et de victimes à Damas et dans les villages alentour. Les secousses se sont succédées... peu d'arbres sont restés debout. Une épidémie s'est déclarée, les parties supérieures des minarets Est et Ouest de la mosquée Ommeyade sont tombés. Les secousses se sont poursuivies ce qui a causé l'effondrement des murs Est et Nord du minaret oriental de la mosquée Ommeyade... une quinzaine de Mosquées sont nommément citées ; le mur oriental de la Mosquée "Al-MAZBOUR" s'est fissurée,..., cette nuit, la terre a tremblé à Safad, la majeure partie de ses habitants ont péri ; une grande partie de Naplouse a été détruite, et il y a eu beaucoup de victimes ; une partie de la tour d'Acre est tombée en Mer, Tiberias, Deir Hanna, la citadelle de Al-Jandal, le pays du Chouf et toutes les villes côtières, Sidon, Beyrouth, Tripoli, Lattaquié, Jaffa, Haifa, ont été touchés, aucun village du Jabal-Ed-Druz n'a été épargné par les dégâts, les habitants des villes côtières et de la zone occidentale se sont réfugiés à Damas,..., puis, le soir du lundi 6 du mois Rabi II (25 Nov 1759), survint la secousse s uprême, jamais connue dans le passé,..., le minaret oriental que nous avons mentionné est tombé, du côté de la mosquée, en détruisant une partie des 3 "Mihrabs", la majestueuse coupole de l'aigle est tombée ainsi que toute la partie Nord de la mosquée, malgré ses colonnes bien construites,... ; il y a eu beaucoup de victimes cette nuit à Damas ainsi que dans les villages des environs à Tell il y a eu des victimes ; les gens ont quitté Damas et sont restés 3 mois dans les tentes,..., la mosquée ommeyade contient 3 minarets dont l'oriental appelé minaret de Isa (Jésus) fils de Marie, que la paix soit avec lui l..., la secousse du 30 OCT a duré de 2 à 3 minutes,... celle du 25 NOV a duré 4 minutes..., (TAHA)témoignages très nombreux dans TAHA, y compris celui d'un Archevêque... lettre publiée dans un journal etc..., également des précisions grâce à des témoignages similaires dans les annales de Ksara (1956)..., 2000 morts à Safad mais la campagne environnante est indemne, plusieurs centaine de morts à Damas ; à Baalbek, victimes et monuments endommagés... tous les villages énumérés ont été également les plus atteints par le séisme du 16 Mars 1956 (nous y reviendrons)...
Phénomènes divers ayant accompagné les séismes...
- une brume de poussière s'est dégagée de la terre qui avait subi cette année' une sècheresse anormale
- la source de Maaser-Ech-Chouf s'est tarie
- dans le Jebal Miha au dessus de Mukhatara, les roches se sont crevassées
- le feu serait "tombé" sur le village de Beit Jinn (..., village situé à 1 km d'un cratère de volcan quaternaire)..." (Ann. KSARA 1956),..., un grand nombre de secousses moins fortes se sont succédées jusqu'en JANVIER 1760 avec déplacement probable de l'épicentre vers le Nord jusqu'au pays d'Antioche. (Ann. KSARA 1956).
- 7 chocs sont mentionnés dans PTAH entre OCT. 1759 et AVR. 1760, Damas (X - XI), puis Quneitra, Homs, Antioche et 3 fois Damas sans mention d'intensité. Nous soulignons que cet ensemble de séismes a été précédé par une sècheresse anormale (nous y reviendrons). Jackson et al. (1984), citant une communication personnelle d'Ambraseys, mentionne cet événement qui serait associé à 100 km de rupture de surface ; la date donnée par ces auteurs (1756) est erronée.
Date Lat. Long. I0 ML Source 30 OCT. 1759 33° N 35°,5 E XI 6,5 BMl (Ben-Menahem, 1979) 25 NOV. 1759 33°,8 N 36°,2 E X-XI 6,8 BMl (Ben-Menahem, 1979)
184 More details, Texts, ed. Taher, BEO, Damascus, 1975; Volney, Journey to Egypt and Syria, p. 166.
185 A1-Haweidith, p. 229: Texts, ed. Taher, ibid., p. 101.
Al Bidiri (eyewitness) writes:
At the beginning of Rabia' II (Tishrin II), not a drop of water had fallen from the sky. The night of Tuesday 8 Rabia' II,
in the last third of the night, the muezzins launched the call to prayer from the minarets and then came
a slight earthquake, followed by a second tremor, then a third. Then, in Damascus,
the earthquake was enormous, and the Damascenes believed the last hour had come.
There was very significant destruction of houses and mosques.
Most minarets lost their tops throughout Syria.
We cannot count the damaged houses and other places in all
the country. Even the dome of An-Naçr, which stood atop Mount
Qassiun was shaken and half destroyed. In the villages of Syria,
there was a lot of rubble, burying countless victims.
The second night1a, the earth shook at the same moment as the day before and in the morning
the earthquake continued, and during the day too, it continued again, several times,
but lighter than the first two shocks. Panic and dismay were
their height. People evacuated their homes and they slept in the alleys, the gardens,
the cemeteries and tombs, the plantations, and the courtyard of the Umayyad mosque.
During this earthquake, the Qunaytira hotel fell
on its occupants, and there were few survivors among the animals
and travelers. The same disaster occurred at the Khan of Sa'asa'.
News came to Damascus that the towns and villages
of Syria had collapsed on their inhabitants without sparing any survivors.
On Tuesday night, at the tenth hour of the night,
On the 5th of Rabia' II, the sky parted, and we heard cries, rolling noises,
thunderclaps, and horror. Illuminated people saw the ceilings
rise, the stars appear, and the ceilings return to their
place.
News came that mountains had collided, imprisoning
villages which disappeared without any trace of them being found.
On the night of Friday 18 Rabia' I, at the time of the twilight prayer, a shooting star
crossed the sky from west to east, illuminating the mountains and houses. Then it fell
and we heard a huge sound, louder than a cannon shot, and we saw lightning. During the
first shocks, an enormous rock fell into the Qanawat river, which it blocked and the city waited for water for 11 days.
It took 11 days to cut this rock and let the river water pass through.
People endured two misfortunes: the earthquake and the water cut.
On the night of Monday 6 Rabia' II, at the fifth hour, a prodigious earthquake occurred, with a power of
several degrees. There were terrible tremors. The rest of the minarets collapsed. The great lady
of the Umayyad Mosque collapsed, as well as the entire North Pillar, the Madrasa Al
Kallasata was also destroyed, as was the Al-Barid gate and the towers of the citadel, and most
houses of Damascus. Those which had not fallen had nevertheless been badly damaged.
Many victims were killed in the villages, people evacuated their houses to escape and
take refuge in orchards, plantations, and cemeteries. They pitched tents in the
fields and took refuge there with their families. Despite this, the shaking did not stop,
during neither the day nor the night. Then the governor of Syria Abd-Allah Bacha-Achataji ordered that
everyone shout together for 3 days in the great mosque for a solemn prayer, the
Friday, because we knew that God was not deaf to the invocations that rose from the mosque (Al Muçlaa).
People went to the mosque. Then the governor joined them,
with the notables, the muphti and the judge. The scholars followed,
women and children. They spent 3 days in prayers, supplications,
implorations, like the day of Arafat, as one can imagine the
Last Day.
God merciful more than the Clements forgave, the tremors diminished,
became lighter. The people stayed in the orchards and
meadows, not very reassured, until the snow and rain. So they returned,
still not very reassured.
On 8 Djumada II, news came from Damascus that Abd-Allah Bacha-Achataji had fallen
disgrace, and on 22 Djumada II, the governor was transferred to Diyar Baqr.
On the night of Monday 25 Djumada II, before dawn, an earthquake occurred in Syria, lighter than the previous one.
Rumors circulated, announcing more violent earthquakes, people gave in to panic,
went out again to the cemeteries and gardens, imploring her, mercy of God.
On the first Monday of Rajeb, the new governor Muhammad Pasha-ach-châlik ibn Bulaîd-Pasha made his entry.
In the middle of the month of Rajeb, intense winds blew for 4 days and 4 nights,
destroying many places, leaving very few trees standing. The tremors were incessant, night and day.
Prices soared, even those of vegetables. The historians testify:
The poor man had no more resources, the rubble from the earthquakes constantly accumulated. The townspeople sought refuse in the countryside:During the day of Saturday 22 Rajeb, an architect specializing (in domes) came from Constantinople. His name was Sabaniah Zada. He examines the Umayyad mosque, to reconstruct the dome and its northern pillar, the minarets damaged by the earthquake. With him was a site manager, workers, men to undertake the repairs to the mosque.
I will forget all the good times of the broken,When the governor of Damascus, ach-Chitadjî, made the report of the events at the Sublime Porte (in Constantinople) where he had informed the Sultan on the state of the Umayyad mosque, the citadel of Damascus, and other destroyed places, he asked him where were the repairers.
I will never forget the night of the earthquake,
yes reminds us of the cradle,
and shows us the dance of the mountains,
makes us see the palaces cradled like a child.
He made him who was standing sit down, andThe people were overwhelmed, women, children, animals. We heard various voices, haunting like the sound of waterfalls, which lasted until morning. We gathered for prayer in a garden outside the village. It was the garden of the heirs of the late 'Agha al-Warana. We stayed there three days and three nights, the earthquake continued night and day. People brought us news of Damascus and Salahya. Some people told us that the top of the minaret East of the Umayyad Mosque had fallen. It was called the minaret of Our Lord Jesus, according to Tradition which says that Jesus will descend at the end of time on the white minaret east of Damascus, at the time of Lord Muhammad al-Mahdy. It will be brought by a cloud, with an angel on his right and an angel on his left, his face will be covered with sweat. It is indeed this minaret, no one has confused it with the one yes is also located east of Damascus, on the square of the Orient Gate.
wake the sleeper,
the earth was shaken with its inhabitants,
the one who lived righteously and the one who was in the wrong.
On the al—Barid gate, I wanted to cry(he asks the Sublime Porte to repair the damage).
His solitary door to the mosque was closed
I implore God to come to his aid,
On the mail horses.
The Umayyad mosque cries with sadness,I then arrived at the Djirun gate, to the north, there my my approach was weighed down by sadness, my eyes watered. I repeated: Everything happened by the will of God. I found the neighborhood deserted, the cafes emptied of their customers. Where were the companions? Absent or returned to dust? No seats around the pool. The thermal baths were also not very lively only graves.
She was like the head of the other mosques,
The destruction has weakened its minarets,
She lost the 'Aârous,
Its dome of Naçr fell to the ground,
She humbly greets the class location.
The minarets of the mosques have fallen in prostration,The hammams were also affected:
their head has joined their foot,
By seeing people prostrate themselves,
The stones followed suit.
The Dome of Naçr fell to the groundAlso destroyed:
to respectfully salute the study.
He did not hold very firmly in his faction, which made the Yurlyya gain importance, and the quarrel developed, although it had previously remained unnoticed. Inflation and famine appeared in Damascus, the inhabitants complained troubles arose, the situation deteriorated; Yurlyya sects, Qaby Qu1 and others among the factions of Kurdish soldiers, events happened like this, from quarrel to civil war, even during the month of Ramadan, stubborn tyrants continued murder and violence, after which an epidemic of plague occurred, tremors of earth, these are the events of this time, plague, tremors of land, quarrels, wars, go beyond the possibilities of description.It seems that the earthquake occurred in Châm between 1171 and 1173, under the mandate of 'Abd Allah Pasha-Chitaji, and about whom Al Muradi reports:
It occurred in Damascus1n in 1173, on Tuesday night 8 Rabiaâ I, shortly before dawn; it spread towards Jerusalem, Gaza, Sayda, Safad, all the countries on the Syrian coast, Hums, Ramat, Caesarea, Hiçn al A'krad, Antioch, Aleppo, with 2 or 3 tremors per week, until the night of Monday 6 Rabia'a II at the time mentioned, at the end of the twilight prayer, and it reached in Damascus 3 degrees, by ravaging Damascus, Antioch, Sayda, Qàl'at al Burayj, Hisyya, the pillar North of the Umayyad mosque was destroyed, the great lady too. the northern minaret, the Bâb al Barid market was ruined, most of the houses in Damascus were demolished, the mosques too; the shaking continued until the end of the year mentioned. Then in Damascus, before the end of the year, an epidemic occurred; most mosques were rebuilt thanks to funds donated by wills of the dead and the great mosque of Damascus, the citadel, Latakia Sulaymanyya. were rebuilt with funds from the Ottoman state.In the biography of Mustafa Al-'Alwâny, we are told that he composed a poem about earthquakes, dedicated to. Al Murâdt, mufti of Syria, father of our chronicler. This piece mentions the destruction of the Damascus mosque, undermined by the earthquakes and the last verse allows us to date the disaster:
The Umayyad Mosque was destroyed by the earthquakes, and Mustafa, the famous king, rebuilt itAMAWY JILAQ AN HAWYYA 'ZALAZIL
My heart is at peace thanks to the God of Truth, he stripped away the fear that the tremor inspired in him earthen.In the dictionaries of Al Muràdi's biographies, there is no mention of the victims of the earthquake, as usual, apart from the indication contained in the note on Asa 'ad Al Mujallid:
When the earthquake occurred in Damascus and throughout the region in 1173, he was half paralyzed as a result of the wall which had fallen on his body, and he lay on his back until he died, occurred in Ramadan 1180.Raslàn b-Yahya Al Qary1o writes these sentences in his work:
1a Taher, B.E.O., 1975, p.99.
1b Al Bidiri, Hawadith, p.228.
2a B.E.O., 1975, P.P. 72-76.
1c Dussand, T.H.S.A.M., p.393.
1d Dozy, supt. t. II, p.296.
2b Dozy, sup. t. I, p.734.
1e See An Nu'ymi, ad Daris, 2/395.
1f He was born in the year 1115 AH.
2c Cf. Taher, B.E.O., 1975, P.P.80-94.
1g Yaqût, Mu'djam, 1/563.
2d Tarikh madinat Dimsshq, éd. Al Minadjid, 2/100.
1h Kurd Ali, Khitat ac-Cham.
1i Kurd Ali, Khitat ac-Cham.
1j Ibn Abd al Hady, Thimar, 224.
? Al Minadjed, Wolat Dimachq, p.89.
1k Herzfeld, Studies, dans Ars Islamics, IX 1942, 46-49; Creswell, Cairene Madrasas, dans B.IFAO XXI, 1923, 6-12.
2e Creswell, Cairene Madrasas, BIFAO XXI, 27.
3a Sauvaget, Perles choisies, 111; Ibn Khallikân Biographical Dictionary, 11, 32-36.
1l AL Nu'imi, ad daris, 2/368.
1m Taher, B.E.O., 1975, p.p. 102-104
1n Volney, Voyage en Egypte et en Syrie, p.166
1o Volney, Voyage en Egypte et en Syrie, p.105; Kitab al Wozara, p.82,83.
Al-Bidiri1 writes:
On the third night of Ramadan, at the time of twilight prayer, a terrible earthquake occurred. The people cut prayer short and fled in an abominable stampede. They lost their minds. They also lost clothes. The next night passed in the same way.
1 Hawadith, p.229; Taher, B.E.O., 1975, p.101.
Yaari, A. (1951), ‘The Safed earthquake of 1759’, Sinai, 28,
349–363.
[1] ACCM Archives de la Chambre de Commerce de Marseilles
Albini, P., Stucchi, M. (1992), ‘A document from the Archivo
General de Simancas about the 1759 earthquake in
Syria’, Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on
Archaeoseismicity in the Mediterranean Region,
Damascus, pp. 60–61.
Anonymous (1760a), ‘Lettre d’un negocient Francais’, Gazette
de France, no. 9, pp. 1–4.
Anonymous (1760b), ‘Lettres de divers lieues de la Syrie’,
Gazette de France, no. 10, pp. 118–120.
La Gazette de France 1759
La Gazette de France 1760
Anonymous (1760c), Correspondence, The London Chronicle,
no. 501, pp. 249, 550, London.
Anonymous (1787), Viaggio da Gerusaleme per le coste della
Soria 1767, vol. 1, Livorno, p. 114
Anonymous (1956), Note d’histoire seismique; les seismes de ´
1759 au Liban, Ksara: Observatoire de Ksara
Bachiene W. A. (1766–75), Historische und geographische
Beschreibung von Palastina, 7 volumes, Leipzig.
al- Bidiri, in Taher (1974)
Taher, M. A. (1974), ‘Traite de la fortification des demeures ´
contre l’horreur des seismes’, ´ Annales Islamologiques,
12, 131–159
Bramsen vid (1818), Promenades d’un voyageur prussien,
vol. 1, Paris
Braik, Mikha’il (1982), Ta’rikh al-Sham 1720–1782, Damascus,
pp. 78–82.
al-Budayyri, Ahmed, al-Hallaq, Hawadith Dimashq
al-yawmiyah, ed. A. I. Abd al-Karim, Cairo, 1959, pp.
222–227, 233
Burton, R., Drake, C. F. (1872), Unexplored Syria, London
Burton, R., Drake, C. F. (1872), Unexplored Syria, London
Charles-Roux, C. (1928), Les echelles de Syrie et de Palestine au ´
XVIII-e siecle ` , pp. 209–211, Paris
Clouzot, E. (1914), ‘Une enquete seismologique au XVIII ´
siecle’, ` La Geographie ´ , 29, 1–22
Cousinery, M. (1760), ‘Sur un tremblement de terre en Syrie’,
Hist. Acad. Royal Sci. 23, 4; also Coll. Academ., 12, 97,
1786
Dahmaan, M. A. (1948), ‘Les tremblements de terre de
1173/1759 a Damas et dans ses environs’, ` al-Mashriq,
42, 333–347.
Dahmaan, M. A. (1982), Fi rihab Dimashk, Damascus: Dar
al-Fukr.
Dienner, C. (1886), Libanon, Grudlinien der physischen
Geographie etc., Vienna: A. Holder, pp. 255–262
Donati, V. (1759), Giornale del viaggio fatto in Levante
nell’anno 1759, MS Biblioteca Reale di Torino, varie
291, vol. 1, fols. 67–72.
F.Ch.R. (1927), ‘Le tremblement de terre de Syrie en 1759’,
Revue de l'Histoire des Colonies Francaises 15, 591–594.
Findikli, Suleyman Efendi, Semdanizadeh, ¨ Mur ’it-Tevanli ¨ , BL
MS f. 429a, modern Turkish text, ed. M. Aktepe,
vol. 2A, p. 34, Istanbul, 1978
Golubovich, G. (1922), Biblioteca bio-bibliographica della
Terra Santa e dell’Oriente Francescano, vol. 1,
Florence, p. 175.
Guys, C. E. (1822), ‘Le tremblement de terre qui a bouleverse´
la Haute-Syrieen aout 1822’, ˆ Bull. Soc. Geogr ´ ., 1,
301–305.
Hakobyan, V. A. (1951, 1956), Manr zamanakagrut’yunner
XIII–XVIII dar (Armenian short chronicles,
thirteenth–eighteenth centuries), 2 volumes, Erevan
Ibn al-Ghazzi (n.d.), Nahr al-dhahab fi ta’rikh Halab, 3:302,
Aleppo
Kitto, J. (1844), History of Palestine and the Holy Land, vol. 1,
London, pp. 89–90. - lots of excerpts starting on page lxxxix
Lemmens, H. J. (1898), ‘Al-zalazal fi Suriyah’, al-Mashriq, 1,
304–307, 337–342.
Maas, G. A. (1775), Historische Beschreibung von Palastina ¨ ,
vol. 4, p. 13.
Mariti, G. (1792), Travels through Cyprus, Syria and Palestine,
vol. 1, Dublin, pp. 352–354.
al-Muradi, U., Silk al-durr, iii.83, in Damaan, 1982
Paulian, A. H. (1761), Dictionnaire de physique, vol. 3,
Avignon, p. 341.
Rabbi Simha b. Yehosjua (1946), Travels, ed. A. Yaari,
pp. 382–423.
Rabbi Yosef Sofer (1971), Iqrot Eretz Israel, ed. A. Yaari,
Massada: Ramat-Gan, pp. 286–301.
Rafeq (1966, 227)
Rivkind, Y. (1928), Dapim Bodedim, Jerusalem, pp. 124–125.
Russell, P. (1760), ‘An account of the late earthquake in Syria’,
Phil. Trans. 51, 529–534.
Skaf, A. (1975), ‘Fi zikra al-zalzala’, al-Rissala al-Muhallisiya,
24, 286–287.
Squire Col. (1820), Travels through Part of the Ancient Syria
and Syria Salutaris, London: R. Walpole
Taher, M. A. (1974), ‘Traite de la fortification des demeures ´
contre l’horreur des seismes’, ´ Annales Islamologiques,
12, 131–159
Thiollet, D. (1977), La nation francaise de Tripoli au XVIIe et
XVIIIe siecles, These, Universite de Paris V.
[al-‘Umari, Muhammad Amin, Manhal al-auliya (M), ed. Sa’id
Diwahchi, Mosul, 1967.]
al-‘Umari, Yasin al-Khatib, Al-athar al-jaliya fi ’l-hawadith
al-ardiya, MS, Iraq Academy, Baghdad; also BL Or.
6300.
Vasif, Ahmed, Mehasin al-asar ve hakaik al-ahbar, 4 volumes,
MS, Hazine 1405, Topkapi Sarayi, Istanbul and ed. M.
Ilgurel, Istanbul, 1978, also MS TY 5979, UIL, ¨
Istanbul.
Volney, C. F. (1787), Voyage en Syrie et en Egypte 1783–5,
vol. 1, p. 304; vol. 2, pp. 187, 212, 238–247, 269–271. - ck also p 178
[Rabbi Simha b. Yehosjua (1946), Travels, ed. A. Yaari,
pp. 382–423]
Yaari, A. (1946), Masaot Eretz-Israel, Tel-Aviv: Gazit,
pp. 382–423.
Yaari, A. (1951), ‘The Safed earthquake of 1759’, Sinai, 28,
349–363.
Antonopolous (1980) cites Mercure de France for a tsunami and/or earthquake report on 30 Oct. 1759 CE. His catalog entry is as follows
21. 1759 October 30. Coasts of Israel and Lebanon Acre (H = 2.50 m) (M = IV)The Gazette de France issues are in the textual evidence section but I could not easily find the earthquake and/or tsunami reports in the Mercure de France issues. The relevant Mercure de France issues are in the collapsible panels below as embedded scrollable documents.
Ref: Mercure de France, Paris (December 1759), Gazette de France, Paris (March 1st, 8th, 1760), Mercure de France, Paris (February 1769).