Open this page in a new tab

Tekieh Trenches

Tekieh Trench Seismic Events Figure 13

Summary of events observed in the trenches and the interpreted palaeoseismic history of the Serghaya fault. Colluvial wedge deposits post-date palaeoseismic events. Stratigraphic ties provide additional constraint on the relative timing of events. Ages represent calendar corrected radiocarbon ages for given features (2 σ uncertainties provided).

Gomez et al (2003)


Maps, Aerial Views, Trench Logs, Summaries, Plots, Models, and Photos
Maps, Aerial Views, Trench Logs, Summaries, Plots, Models, and Photos

Maps and Aerial Views

Normal Size

  • Fig. 2 Tectonic Location Map from Gomez et al. (2003)
  • Fig. 3 Geologic Location Map from Gomez et al. (2003)
  • Tekieh Trenches in Google Earth

Magnified

  • Fig. 2 Tectonic Location Map from Gomez et al. (2003)
  • Fig. 3 Geologic Location Map from Gomez et al. (2003)

Trench Logs

Location Map

Normal Size


Fig. 5a

Map of trench site. 1 m relative contours are based on mapping with a total station. See Fig. 3 for location.

Gomez et al (2003)


Enlarged


Fig. 5c

Enlarged map of the trench site depicting the positions of the present channel (C1) and the precise locations of the buried channels (C2 and C3). Solid black lines indicate where the buried channels were observed and dashed lines indicate where buried channels were inferred. The patterns are consistent with Fig. 5(a).

Gomez et al (2003)


3D Cross-Section of Trench Site


Fig. 12

Schematic block diagram illustrating the 3-D relationships of the features exposed in the trenches. A stratigraphic tie between the filling deposit of Channel C2 with the down-slope equivalent of Wedge 4 can be observed.

Gomez et al (2003)


Topographic Profile and Cross-Section of Trench Site


Fig. 5b

Topographic profile and cross-section illustrating composite fault scarp approximately 4.5 m in height

Gomez et al (2003)


Annotated Photo of Trench Site


Fig. 6

Photograph of the trench site facing SE. Note the position of the trench system relative to the fault scarp and the small drainage. See Fig. 3 for location

Gomez et al (2003)


Trench 1

Trench Log


Fig. 8

Trench log for the northern wall of Trench 1 (see Fig. 7), exposing colluvial wedges, undifferentiated alluvium and Late Pleistocene lake sediments. Calibrated radiocarbon ages are shown.

Gomez et al (2003)


Photomosaic


Fig. 7

Photomosaic of the north wall of Trench 1.

Gomez et al (2003)


Schematic reconstruction of the past 5 events in Trench 1


Fig. 11

Cross-sections showing schematic reconstruction of the past five palaeoseismic events indicated in Trench 1. Numbers correspond to colluvial wedges 2-6. Bold lines depict the most recent fault splay in each stage; dashed lines denote restored faults.

  • ls = lacustrine sediment
  • a =undifferentiated alluvium


Gomez et al (2003)


Trench 2

Trench Log


Fig. 10

Trench log for the east wall of Trench 2. A sequence of three incised and filled channels is shown, with a northward sense of younging. Black discs denote the positions of samples for radiocarbon dating. The profile above the trench log depicts the hillslope channel morphology east of the fault zone. The relative positions of the channel mouth and the buried channels were mapped using a total station. Apparent offsets of the buried channels are shown.

Gomez et al (2003)


Photo of incised and filled channel exposed in Trench 2


Fig. 9

Photo of incised and filled channel exposed in Trench 2. Channel C3 is incised into the older alluvium (unit a) and filled with clast-supported cobble, gravel, and sand. White string grid has 1 m spacing.

Gomez et al (2003)


Chronological Summary of Seismic Events

Tekieh Trench Seismic Events Figure 13

Summary of events observed in the trenches and the interpreted palaeoseismic history of the Serghaya fault. Colluvial wedge deposits post-date palaeoseismic events. Stratigraphic ties provide additional constraint on the relative timing of events. Ages represent calendar corrected radiocarbon ages for given features (2 σ uncertainties provided).

Gomez et al (2003)


Plot of offset versus age for buried channels


Fig. 14

Plot of offset versus age for buried channels. The 2 m displacement of the youngest channel corresponds to a historically documented earthquake in the early or mid 18th century. The slope of the linear fit is the average Holocene slip rate for the Serghaya fault.

Gomez et al (2003)


Geometrical models for DST restraining bend


Fig. 15

Two simplined geometrical models for the restraining bend of the Dead Sea fault system and the role of the Serghaya fault. Predicted plate motion is based on the GPS-derived regional plate model of McClusky et al (2003, in press)

  • Decomposing the predicted plate motion into N20E strike-slip fault and orthogonal shortening, the 1.4 mm/yr of slip on the Serghaya fault accounts for ~30 % of the expected strike-slip movement on faults striking N20E. The orthogonal shortening would be accommodated in the Mt Lebanon and/or AntiLebanon Mountains
  • An alternative model in which the Serghaya fault acts as an oblique back-stop behind the Palmyride fold belt and contributes to internal deformation of the Arabian plate. The remaining portion of Arabian-African plate motion may then be composed into strike-slip movement (N20E faults) and orthogonal shortening.


Gomez et al (2003)


Photo of Displaced Stream Channel

 Fig. 4

An example of a small, displaced drainage crossing the Serghaya fault. The minimum offset is 2.3 - 2.5 m. The view is facing west; see Fig. 3 for location.

Gomez et al (2003)


Chronology
Event A - probably 25 Nov. 1759 CE

Gomez et. al. (2003:15) dated Event A to between 1650 CE and the present and suggested that it was caused by the 1705 or 1759 CE earthquakes. Daëron et al (2005:531) proposed that the 30 October 1759 earthquake was caused by slip on the shorter (50 km) Rachaya fault, and the larger magnitude 25 November event was caused by slip on the longer (130 km) Serghaya fault, in keeping with the evidence of recent movement on both (Tapponnier et al., 2001), and the French consul’s letter from Saida. This, in turn, they said resolved the ambiguity of Event A in the Tekieh Trench. It was, according to Daëron et al (2005:531), caused by the 25 Nov. 1759 CE Baalbek Quake. Daëron et al (2005:531) discussed the triggered earthquakes of 1759 CE as follows:

We interpret the occurrence of two events in 1759 and the month long delay between them as a classic earthquake triggering example. Such triggered delayed rupture may be due to the presence of the Mount Hermon asymmetric push-up jog, a geometric irregularity that prevented immediate rupture propagation along the entire Rachaıya Serghaya fault system. Though not unique, this scenario is in keeping with scaling laws (Wells and Coppersmith, 1994; Ambraseys and Jackson, 1998) that predict (2-sigma) magnitudes of 6.4–7.3 and 7.0–8.0 respectively, compatible with those derived from historical accounts (6.6 and 7.4; Ambraseys and Barazangi, 1989) and from the ~2 m stream channel offset attributed to the last event on the Serghaya fault at Zebadani [i.e., Tekieh trenches] (7.0–7.2 for the November 1759 event; Gomez et al., 2003).
Event A is estimated to have created 2 - 2.5 meters of left lateral strike slip displacement which translates to an estimated Magnitude between 7.0 and 7.4.

Master Seismic Events Table
Master Seismic Events Table

Calculator
Calculator - Moment Magnitude from strike slip displacement

Variable Input Units Notes
m Strike-Slip displacement
m Strike-Slip displacement
Variable Output - not considering a Site Effect Units Notes
unitless Moment Magnitude for Avg. Displacement
unitless Moment Magnitude for Max. Displacement
  

References
References