| Text (with hotlink) | Original Language | Religion | Date of Composition | Location Composed | Notes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dates from various authors for The Great Plague in Rome and the Earthquake in Cyprus | Seutonius probably provides the most reliable date for the Great Plague in Rome and the Syballine Oracles may provide the most reliable date for the Earthquakes in Cyprus. Seutonius dates the Great Plague to the reign of Titus (24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE) and the Syballine Oracles appears to date the Earthquake in Cyprus to the reign of Titus (24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE). | ||||||||||
| Chronicon by Eusebius | Greek translated to Latin by Jerome | Christian | Early 4th century CE | Caesarea | States that an earthquake destroyed 3 cities in Cyprus between 1 July 77 CE and 30 June 78 CE (the 1st year of 214th Olympiad). Says the earthquake struck in the same year as a great plague in Rome. Suetonius, likely the most reliable source for the date of the plague, says the plague in Rome occurred during the the reign of Titus - i.e., from 24 June 79 to 13 September 81 CE. | ||||||
| The Life of the Caesars by Suetonius | Latin | 121 CE | Background info - Suetonius does not mention the earthquake but he does mention a plague in Rome during the reign of Titus who ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE. | ||||||||
| Epitome de Caesaribus attributed to Aurelius Victor | Latin | Likely a Pagan | end of the 4th century CE | Background info - Does not mention the earthquake. Mentions a plague in Rome during the reign of Titus who ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE. | |||||||
| The Life of Apollonius of Tyana by Philostratus | Greek | between 217 and 238 CE | likely Rome, possibly Athens | Violent seismic shaking may have been reported in Tarsus some time in the 70s CE. | |||||||
| History Against the Pagans by Orosius | Latin | Christian | ~416-417 CE | Palestine and/or Gallaecia (northwest Hispania) and/or places between. | States that an earthquake destroyed 3 cities in Cyprus and there was a plague in Rome during the 9th year of Vespasian's reign (1 July 77 and 30 June 78 CE). Suetonius, who is probably the most reliable source for the date of the Great Plague in Rome, dates the plague to the reign of Titus, Vespasian's son and successor, who ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE. | ||||||
| Sibylline Oracles | Greek | Jewish or possibly a Jewish Christian. | The final form of the book was likely finished in the 6th century CE. | Presents what appears to be reliable
ex eventu prophecy in poetic form.
Says that an earthquake overthrewSalamis and Paphos on Cyprus and appears to date this to during the reign of Emperor Titus who ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE. Mention of dark water washing over Cyprus may be an allusion to an associated tsunami (or a storm). Because other sources mention that three cities in Cyprus were destroyed and Salamis and Paphos are at either end of the island, Ambraseys (2009) speculated that, if the Sibylline Oracles can be trusted, the third city that was destroyed was probably Citium. |
|||||||
| The Chronicle of Georgius Syncellus | Greek | Orthodox (Byzantine rite) | 808-810 CE ( Adler and Tuffin, 2002:lxx) | Vicinity of Constantinople | Mentions the Great Plague in Rome and that in Cyprus, three cities collapsed in an earthquakeduring the same year. Dates these to A.M.a 5564 (25 Mar. 71 to 24 Mar. 72 CE). Includes other historical markers in his account which are chronologically inconsistent with this date. |
||||||
| Chronography by Elias of Nisibis | Syriac and Arabic | Church of the East | Early 11th c. | Nusaybin, Turkey |
Elias of Nisibis, citing Eusebius, states that there was an earthquake in Cypruswhere for three days there were collapses. Again citing Eusebius, he says that in the following year there was a plague in Rome such that more than 10,000 died in a dayHe supplied a range of dates.
|
||||||
| Opus Chronologicum by Calvisius | Latin | 1605 CE | probably Leipzig, Germany | very late source which cites Eusebius and states that an earthquake affected 3 cities in Cyprus. Among them was Salamis. Dates presented use a different method of reckoning the Anno Mundi calendar than I am familiar with and will not be explored here because this source adds no new information. |
|||||||
| Transfer of the Roman Mint | Amandry (1993) notes that the Mint which was moved to Cyprus in 76 CE was moved back to Antioch in 80 CE. He suggests an earthquake in 78 CE was the reason for the move back to Antioch noting that the scarcity of coins produced in the 10th year of Vespasian’s reign (78/79 CE), the absence of coins from the first year of Titus’ reign (79/80 CE), and the reappearance of coins in the next year of Titus’ reign (80/81 CE) was likely due to interrupted production after the earthquake. Vespasian's reign ended when he died on 24 June 79 CE. Based on Amandry (1993), this would place the earthquake sometime in the year prior to 24 June 79 CE (e.g., June 78 - June 79 CE). Antonopoulos (1980) and later Ambraseys (2009) provide a different less credible argument that the transfer of the mint supports a 76 CE date for the earthquake. | ||||||||||
| Antonopoulos (1980) | Antonopoulos (1980) created an extensive writeup about this earthquake with numerous sources and what appears to be a flawed exegeses of the sources. This, in turn, appears to have directly influenced Ambraseys(2009) in his writeup about this earthquake. | ||||||||||
| Vita Hilarion by Jerome | Latin | Christian | 390 CE | Bethlehem | No mention of the earthquake or plague in Rome despite Antonopoulos (1980:148 n.1) stating that it referred to both. | ||||||
| Chronicon Paschale | Greek | Christian | about 630 CE | possibly Constantinople | Antonopoulos (1980:148 n.1) reported that Chronicon Paschale (p. 248D) contained a reference to this earthquake and the Great Plague in Rome. However, I cannot find anything in a Latin translation by Dindorf (1832) which refers to the earthquake or the plague. Perhaps, it's in the original Greek. | ||||||
| Text (with hotlink) | Original Language | Religion | Date of Composition | Location Composed | Notes |
A summary of dates from the sources which provided dates for the Plague in Rome and the Earthquake in Cyprus is provided below. Seutonius probably provides the most reliable date for the Great Plague in Rome and the Syballine Oracles may provide the most reliable date for the Earthquakes in Cyprus. Seutonius dates the Great Plague to the reign of Titus (24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE) and the Syballine Oracles appears to date the Earthquake in Cyprus to the reign of Titus (24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE). The tables are arranged in order of composition.
| Date Range | Source | Date of Composition | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE (during the reign of Titus) | The Life of the Caesars by Suetonius | 121 CE | Probably the most reliable source for the date of the plague due to his studious nature, the date of composition, and his connections to Roman aristocracy. |
| 1 July 77 - 30 June 78 CE | Chronicon by Eusebius | Early 4th century CE | Original Greek text is lost. All we have are translations from the original text (e.g., Jerome's Latin translation) |
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE (during the reign of Titus) | Epitome de Caesaribus attributed to Aurelius Victor | end of the 4th century CE | may have been written by an anonymous Pagan author. |
| 1 July 77 and 30 June 78 CE | History Against the Pagans by Orosius | ~416-417 CE | |
| 25 Mar. 71 to 24 Mar. 72 CE - | The Chronicle of Georgius Syncellos | 808-810 CE | Chronologically inconsistent. Dates are unreliable |
| 1 Oct. 76 to 30 June 77 CE | Chronography by Elias of Nisibis | Early 11th c. | Listed his sources as Chronicon by Eusebius and Chronologue of Andronicus although he provided a different date range for the plague than the Latin translation of Chronicon by Eusebius provided by Jerome. |
| Date Range | Source | Date of Composition | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE (during the reign of Titus) | Sibylline Oracles | ? | |
| 1 July 77 - 30 June 78 CE | Chronicon by Eusebius | Early 4th century CE | Original Greek text is lost. All we have are translations from the original text (e.g., Jerome's Latin translation) |
| 1 July 77 and 30 June 78 CE | History Against the Pagans by Orosius | ~416-417 CE | |
| 25 Mar. 71 to 24 Mar. 72 CE | The Chronicle of Georgius Syncellos | 808-810 CE | Chronologically inconsistent. Dates are unreliable |
| 1 Oct. 73 - 30 Sept. 76 CE | Chronography by Elias of Nisibis | Early 11th c. | Listed his source as Chronicon by Eusebius although he provided a different date range for the earthquake than the Latin translation of Chronicon by Eusebius provided by Jerome. |
Tres civitates Cypri terrae motu conruerunt.
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 77 CE to 30 June 78 CE | Eusebius dates this section to the first year of the 214th Olympiad | none | Calculated with CHRONOS |
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE | Same year that A massive plague happened at Rome |
none | Suetonius who is probably the most reliable source for the date of the Great Plague in Rome dates the plague to the reign of Titus who ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE. |
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE | plague in Rome during the reign of Titus | none | Titus ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE |
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE | plague and fire in Rome during the reign of Titus | none | Titus ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE |
The Roman Empire in 69 CE
[6.38] The ruler of Syria
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70s CE | various parts of the text - see Notes | none | Philostratus is not specific about the date. Two earlier passages locate Apollonius in Tarsus - one in ~69 CE1 and another sometime later2.
Two later passages places Apollonius in Tarsus3 sometime on or after 81 CE4. In the interim, Apollonius is reported
to have wandered5 to a variety of locales around the Mediterranean (Phoenicia,
Cilicia, Ionia,
Achaea, and Italy).
The synchronicity of the earthquake with a feud initiated by the ruler of Syria would place Apollonius
in Cilicia or less likely in Phoenicia.6 Although Philostratus does not specify a date,
it seems likely that the earthquake was felt in the 70’s CE.
Footnotes
1 Book 6 Section 30 recounts a meeting between Apollonius and future Roman Emperor Titus in Tarsus. During the interview, Titus claims to be co ruling with his father Vespasian at the start of Vespasian’s reign when Titus was 30 years old and Vespasian was 60 which consistently places the meeting in 69 CE.
English - Book 6 Section 30
[6.30] And after Titus had been proclaimed autocrat in Rome and rewarded with the meed of his valor, he went away to become the colleague in empire of his father;
but he did not forget Apollonius, and thinking that even a short interview with him would be precious to himself, he besought him to come to Tarsus; and when he
arrived he embraced him, saying: "My father has told me by letter everything in respect of which he consulted you; and lo, here is his letter, in which you are
described as his benefactor and the being to whom we owe all that we are. Now though I am only just thirty years of age, I am held worthy of the same privileges
which my father only attained at the age of sixty. I am called to the throne and to rule, perhaps before I have learned myself to obey, and I therefore dread
lest I am undertaking a task beyond my powers."
English - Book 6 Section 34
[6.34] Now the inhabitants of Tarsus had previously detested Apollonius, because of the violent reproaches which he addressed to them, owing to the fact that
through their languid indifference and sensual indolence they could not put up with the vigor of his remarks. But on this occasion they became such devoted
admirers of our hero as to regard him as their second founder and the mainstay of their city.
English - Book 6 Section 43
[6.43] Here too is a story which they tell of him in Tarsus. A mad dog had attacked a lad, and as a result of the bite the lad behaved
exactly like a dog, for he barked and howled and went on all four feet using his hands as such, and ran about in that manner. And he
had been ill in this way for thirty days, when Apollonius, who had recently come to Tarsus, met him and ordered a search to be made
for the dog which had done the harm.
English - Book 6 Section 42
[6.42] The emperor Domitian about the same time passed a law against making men eunuchs, and against planting fresh vineyards, and also in favor of
cutting down vineyards already planted, whereon Apollonius, who was visiting the Ionians, remarked: "These rescripts do not concern me, for I,
alone perhaps of mankind, require neither to beget my kind nor to drink wine; but our egregious sovereign seems not aware that he is sparing
mankind, while he eunuchises the earth."[The castration edict was promulgated in 82 or 83; the edict on the vitculture dates to the early 90's.]
English - Book 6 Section 35
[6.35] So many were the races which they say Apollonius had visited until then, eager and zealous for others as they for him.
But his subsequent journeys abroad, though they were numerous, were yet not so many as before, nor did he go to fresh districts
which he was not already acquainted with; for when he came down from Ethiopia he made a long stay on the sea-board of Egypt,
and then he returned to Phoenicia and Cilicia, and to Ionia and Achaea, and Italy, never failing anywhere to show himself the same as ever. |
[6.34] Now the inhabitants of Tarsus had previously detested Apollonius, because of the violent reproaches which he addressed to them, owing to the fact that
through their languid indifference and sensual indolence they could not put up with the vigor of his remarks. But on this occasion they became such devoted
admirers of our hero as to regard him as their second founder and the mainstay of their city.
For on one occasion the Emperor was offering a sacrifice in public, when the whole body of citizens met and presented a petition to him asking for certain
great favors; and he replied that he would mention the matter to his father, and be himself their ambassador to procure them what they wanted; whereupon
Apollonius stepped forward and said: "Supposing I convicted some who are standing here of being your own and your father's enemies, and of having sent
legates to Jerusalem to excite a rebellion, and of being the secret allies of your most open enemies, what would happen to them?"
"Why, what else," said the Emperor, "than instant death?"
"Then is it not disgraceful," replied Apollonius, "that you should be instant in demanding their punishment, and yet dilatory in conferring a boon; and
be ready yourself to undertake the punishment, but reserve the benefaction until you can see and consult your father?"
But the king, over-delighted with this remark, said: "I grant the favors they ask for, for my father will not be annoyed at my yielding to truth and to yourself."
[6.42] The emperor Domitian about the same time passed a law against making men eunuchs, and against planting fresh vineyards, and also in favor of cutting
down vineyards already planted, whereon Apollonius, who was visiting the Ionians, remarked: "These rescripts do not concern me, for I, alone perhaps of
mankind, require neither to beget my kind nor to drink wine; but our egregious sovereign seems not aware that he is sparing mankind, while he eunuchises
the earth." note
This witticism emboldened the Ionians to send a deputation to the emperor in behalf of their vines, and ask for a repeal of the law which ordered the earth to be laid waste and not planted.
Nono autem imperii eius anno tres civitates Cypri terrae motu corruerunt et Romae magna pestilentia fuit.
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 77 to 30 June 78 CE | the ninth year of this emperor's [Vespasian] reign | none | Calculated with CHRONOS. Vespasian's rule began on 1 July 69 CE |
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE | at Rome there was a great plague | none | Suetonius who is probably the most reliable source for the date of the Great Plague in Rome dates the plague to the reign of Titus who ruled from 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE. |
w. The reference is most probably to the Romans, but possibly to the Zealots.
x. Nero. The emperor committed suicide in A.D. 68, but there was a widespread belief that he had fled to the Parthians and would return. See further vs. 138.
y. Nero had his mother put to death (Suetonius, Nero 34; cf. 39).
z. A reference to the rapid succession of emperors, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, and Vespasian, and the accompanying strife.
a2. Titus.
b2. The eruption of Vesuvius which destroyed Pompeii in A.D. 79.
c2. The legend of Nero's return arose from the
belief that he had fled to the Parthians and was boosted
by a series of impostors who claimed to be the returned
emperor. At least two such impostors are known, one
in A.D. 69 (Tacitus, Historiae 2.8, 9; Dio Cassius
64.9) and the other about twenty years later (Suetonius, Nero 57). At first Nero was believed to be still
alive and operating on a human level. In the Jewish
tradition, however, he is mythicized and even identified with Belial in SibOr 3.63-74 and Ascenls 4:1-2.
d2. This should not be interpreted with Lanchester
as a reference to a specific event. As in the parallel
Sibylline passages, it attests the common Asiatic hope
for vengeance on Rome. See the Introduction to SibOr
3 on vss. 350-80.
115 ἥξει καὶ Σολύμοισι καχὴ πολέμοιο ϑύελλα
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 June 79 – 13 September 81 CE | An exegesis from Terry (1890)'s translation may suggest that the earthquake in Cyprus happened during the reign of Titus who ruled from 24 June 79 to 13 September 81 CE | none |
|
AM 5564
2 Cf. Eutrop. 7.16-18.
3 Text: EKTEAEcapTa. Possibly emend to EKTEAEOOVTa ('in order to conclude').
4 Cf. Philost. Apollonios 5.27, 41; Suet. Vesp. 7.1.
5 That is, Cerealis.
6 Eus. 2.187a. Cf. HE 3.5.4-5; Jos. jW 6.428.
7 Jos. JW 6.421-8.
8 Cf. Eus. 2.186i, 188ab
9 Above, p. 402 (= Moss. 333.15), Synk. states that the Colossus of
Rhodes collapsed much earlier in an earthquake; he apparently confused the
Colossus of Rhodes with the colossus in Rome set up along the 'Sacred
Way' and completed by the emperor Vespasian. Originally dedicated to
Nero, it was rededicated to the sun. For the confusion of this colossus with
the Colossus of Rhodes, see also Chron. pasch. 464.13-14; Kedr. i.
377.15-16. For a description of Vespasian's colossus, see Suet. Vesp. 18;
Pliny, NH 34.18.45; Cass. Dio 66.15.1. Cf. also the parallel notice in Eus.
2.188d: 'Colossus erectus habens altitudinis pedes CVII' (but '128 Ellen' in
Eus.Arm 2.217.
10 Cf. Eus. 2.I88hg.
11 Cf. Eus. 2.I88i; Cass. Dio 66.17.1-3; Suet. Vesp. 24.
12 Cf. Eus. 2.I86f, 194h (40 years); [Greek Text] 74.26 (32 years).
| Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Mar. 71 to 24 Mar. 72 CE | A.M.a 5564 | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| 25 March 72 to 24 March 73 CE | Divine incarnation year 64 | none. | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| 23/24 June 79 CE | Same A.M.a as the death of Vespasian | none. | |
| ~80 CE | Same A.M.a as when "Vespasian restored the Capitol, which had been set on fire" | none. | Apparently Titus, Vespasian's son and successor, restored the Capitol (Rome) in 80 CE. |
3 Ma'nu V; 7 ans, de 50 a 57 ap. J.C. [Rubens Duval, op. cit., p. 204.]
4 Ma'nu VI; 14 ans, de 57 a 71 ap. J.C. [Rubens Duval, op. cit., p. 204.]
CCXIIIe Olympiade. — An 385
| Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 73 - 30 June 77 CE | 213th Olympiad | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. Jerome's translation of Chronicon by Eusebius places the Sybil Quake during the 214th Olympiad. |
| 1 Oct. 73 to 30 Sept. 74 CE | A.G. 385 | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| 1 Oct. 74 to 30 Sept. 75 CE | A.G. 386 | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| 1 Oct. 75 to 30 Sept. 76 CE | A.G. 387 | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| Date | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 73 - 30 June 77 CE | 213th Olympiad | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| 1 Oct. 76 to 30 Sept. 77 CE | A.G. 388 | none | Calculated using CHRONOS. |
| Date Range | Event |
|---|---|
| 1 July 73 - 30 June 77 CE | Earthquake in Cyprus |
| 1 July 73 to 30 Sept. 77 CE | Plague in Rome |
| Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ? | A.M. 4026 | none | Anno Mundi 4026 results in a year in the middle of the 2nd millennium BCE using Alexandrian or Byzantine reckoning. Thus, Calvisius must have been employing a different system of reckoning. |
| 77 CE ? | Poft C.77 | none | Poft C.77 may refer to 77 CE. |
Amandry (1993)
notes that the Mint which was moved to Cyprus in 76 CE was moved back to
Antioch in 80 CE. He suggests an earthquake in 78 CE was the reason for the move back to Antioch noting that the scarcity of coins produced in the 10th year of
Vespasian’s reign (78/79 CE), the absence of coins from the first year of Titus’ reign (79/80 CE), and the reappearance of coins in the second year of Titus’
reign (80/81 CE) was likely due to interrupted production after the earthquake. Vespasian's reign ended when he died on 24 June 79 CE.
Based on Amandry (1993), this would place the earthquake sometime in the year prior to 24 June 79 CE (i.e., June 78 - June 79 CE).
Antonopoulos (1980) and later
Ambraseys (2009)
present a less credible argument that the Romans transferred their mint
to Cyprus in 76 CE1 as part of a probable relief effort to support earthquake and tsunami survivors.
They opine that this supports a 76 CE rather than a 77 CE date for the earthquake since if the earthquake occurred in 77 CE,
there was no apparent reason to transfer the mint in 76 CE.
1 the first coins minted were dated to July 76 CE, August 77 CE and September 78 CE according to Antonopoulos (1980). Antonopoulos (1980) cites Hill (1940:234) for this but does not list Hill in his references. In all likelihood the reference is Hill, G. F. (1905). "A Catalogue of the Greek Coins in the British Museum: Cyprus." Journal of Hellenic Studies 25: 188. Sometimes this reference is listed as Hill (1904) suggesting that Antonopoulos made a typographic error transposing the 4 and 0 to arrive at Hill (1940) instead of Hill (1904).
Although he did not cite him,
Ambraseys (2009) catalog
entry appears to be largely derived and sometimes directly quoted from Antonopoulos (1980:148-150).
Ambraseys (2009)
included Antonopoulos' (1980:148-150) apparently flawed analysis
for dating the earthquake based on moving of the Roman Mint. In his acknowledgments,
Antonopoulos' (1980:157) noted that he had been
much assisted by Professor N. Ambraseys of the Imperial College — University of London
with whose
invaluable help
, he (Antonopoulos) could not have carried out his work. Thus, it is entirely possible that this section
of Antonopoulos (1980) was authored or co-authored by N.N. Ambraseys.
Antonopoulos (1980:148-150) entry, which includes a wealth of valuable references, is
quoted in its entirety below.
3. 76* AD. Cyprus. Cition, Paphos and Salamis.
References
- 39 (p. 139) - OBERHUMMER, E., 1903. - Die Insel Cypem. Eine Landeskunde auf Historischer Grundlage. Ed. Th. Ackermann, München.
- 44 (p. 775) - SIEBERG, A., 1932. - Die Erdbeben. In B. Gutenberg's Handbuch der Geophysik, vol. 4, Berlin, Ed. G. Borntraeger.
- 15 (vii) - HIERONYMOS.
- 18 (P. 342) - SYNCELLOS.
- 20 (P. 277) - EUSEBIOS, PAMPHILIOS, c. 330 A.D. - Armenian Text: in C. Coenobi's « Chronicon », Ed. Aaronis, Venice, 1868.
- 14 (P. 54) - ELIAS NISIBINOS.
- 22 (vii, 9.11) - OROSIUS, PAULUS, 416 A.D. - Historiae adversum paganos libri vii. In C. Zangenmeister's Edition, Ausburg 1570; also in BSGR, PCCL, and in « King Alfred's Anglo-Saron version of the history by Orosius », translated by J. Bosworth, Longman's Edition, London 1859.
- 30 (p. 459) - BURSIAN, C., 1862. - Geograplie von Griechenland. Ed. Teubner, 2, p. 522, Leipzig.
- 9 (P. 248) - CEDRINOS - Chronicon Paschale.
A disastrous earthquake occurred in Cyprus in 76 or 77 AD. This earthquake is generally dated together with a pestilence in Rome, in 77 AD, but early chroniclers differ in it slightly1. We are inclined to think rather of 76 AD as the year for this earthquake because this was the year at which the Romans transferred their mint to Cyprus and the first coins minted there are dated July 76, August 77 and September 78 (Hill 1940, p. 234). It is not improbable that this transfer of the mint was connected with the measures taken to relieve the island after the earthquake which is generally dated 767 AD but may have taken place a year earlier. Some few early chroniclers may have put the earthquake in 77 AD in order to synchronise it with the pestilence in Rome.
The facts about the particular places in Cyprus which were destroyed by this earthquake and the seismic sea-wave which is supposed to have accompanied this earthquake, are very obscure. If we trust the allusion in the Sibyllina Oracula (lib. iv, lines 125, 126, 140, 141), the places in Cyprus which suffered most should have been Salamis, Paphos and Cition, but it is questionable whether these places suffered from the 76 AD earthquake or from a later shock. It seams probable, from the slight indications, mostly inferences from statements at a later date, that, with the possible exception of Cition, Salamis and Paphos should have been damaged to some extent by the 76 AD earthquake. The chroniclers were evidently not quite certain of the particular places in Cyprus which were damaged by this earthquake.
The Sibyllina Oracula prophesies also a destructive seismic sea-wave (lib. iv, lines 126, 140; lib. v, lines 450-453; lib. vii, line 5). This prophesy constitutes the sole authority upon which Oberhummer (1903, p. 139)2 and after him many authors have based their arguments for the 76 AD seismic sea-wave in Cyprus. But we find no mention of such an event in the narrations of early chroniclers3, and we feel that should an event such as a catastrophic seismic sea-wave had in fact accompanied this earthquake, it should have been most certainly included by these chroniclers in their description of the seismic events of 76 AD.
Whether, in this instance, the Sibyllina Oracula can be trusted as a source of authentic historical information, and if so, whether the seismic sea-wave in Cyprus which is mentioned in the text refers to the earthquake of 76 AD, all yet remains to be investigated. No other data worthy of any confidence has come to our attention.Footnotes1 Hieronymos (Vita Hilarion, § 7), Svngelos (p. 342), St. Jerome, Chron. Paschale (p. 248D), Orosius (lib. vii, § 9.11), Calvisius (p. 459) place the pestilence in Rome and the earthquake in Cyprus in 77 AD, Eusebios (Armenian Text, Chron. p. 277) and Elias Nisibinus (Chron. transl. by De-laporte, p. 54) place the pestilence in this year but the earthquake between July 75 and July 76 AD. Suetonius (Titus ch. 8) and Victor (Epit. p. 367) refer this to the reign of Titus.
2 The Greek text of the Oracle (lib. iv, lines 140, 141) which appears in Obernummer's work (p. 139, lines 10 and 11) should read:
Aι. αι, Κυπ[ς]ε ταλαινα σε δε πλατυ χυυιια θαλασσης line 140
ριψει, χειμεριησιν ανα[ςς]ιφθεισαν αεληαιζ line 141
(= Alas suffering Cyprus, you shall be laid waste by the broad whirling waves of the sea which are tossed up in the winter) and not
Aι. αι, Κυπ[ς]ε τααλινα σε δε πλατυ χυιια θαλασσης
χρνψει, χειμεριησιν ανα[ςς]ιφθεισαν αελλαιζ
(= Alas suffering Cyprus, the broad waves of the sea which are tossed up whirling in the winter will cover over you).
3 The difference is very important wince now this oracle does not seem to refer to a seismic sea-wave, but rather to one of the hurricanes which are known to have burst over the island during its early history Casola (1498), Anonymous (1546 a,b) Lusignan (1580) and others.
Also Oberhummer's standard pagination of the oracles is throughout by three lines too high.
Having then entered Paphos, the city of Cyprus renowned in the songs of the poets, the ruins of whose temples after frequent earthquakes are the only evidences at the present day of its former grandeur, he began to live in obscurity about two miles from the city, and rejoiced in having a few days rest.
At that time there was an earthquake over the whole world, following on the death of Julian, which caused the sea to burst its bounds, and left ships hanging on the edge of mountain steeps. It seemed as though God were threatening a second deluge, or all things were returning to original chaos. When the people of Epidaurus saw this, I mean the roaring waves and heaving waters and the swirling billows mountain-high dashing on the shore, fearing that what they saw had happened elsewhere might befall them and their town be utterly destroyed, they made their way to the old man, and as if preparing for a battle placed him on the shore.
| Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paphos | needs investigation | ||
| Kition | needs investigation | ||
| Salamis | needs investigation | ||
| Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
| Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dead Sea - Seismite Types | n/a | n/a |
The table below shows projected PGA and Intensity at 3 Dead Sea Sites
and 2 Araba sites for an earthquake in Cyprus with a Magnitude varying from 6.5-7.5. The estimated Intensity (IEst.) from
seismic evidence at the sites whose ages were close to the Sybil Quake are also
shown. Considering that
Lu et al (2020a) estimated a minimum PGA of 0.13 g and
Williams (2004) estimated a
minimum PGA of 0.23 g to generate a seismite in the Dead Sea, it seems that the
Sibyl Quake would have had to have been very powerful
(M ≥ 7.5) to entertain the possibility of leaving a mark in the Dead Sea and would not have left a mark in the Araba under any conditions. A calculator is provided for experimentation.
Seismic Attenuation
Approximate distances to Cyprus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dead Sea - En Feshka | possible | 7.9 - 8.8 | Kagan et. al. (2011) identified a 1 cm. thick Type 4 seismite at a depth of 338 cm. with modeled ages of 63 CE ± 38 (1σ) and 61 CE ± 81 (2σ) which they assigned to the Jerusalem Quake - a more likely candidate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dead Sea - En Gedi | possible | 7.9 - 8.8 | Migowski et. al. (2004) assigned a 0.4 cm. thick Type 4 seismite at a depth of 268.2 cm. (2.682 m) to a date of 76 CE. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dead Sea - Nahal Ze 'elim | unlikely to possible | 8.0 - 8.9 | At site ZA-2, Kagan et al (2011) assigned a 4 cm. thick Type 4 seismite at a depth of 470 cm. (Modeled Ages 1σ - 52 CE ± 40 and 2σ - 56 CE ± 76) to a date of 33 CE which in this case is shorthand for the Jerusalem Quake - a more likely candidate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Araba - Introduction | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Araba - Taybeh Trench | unlikely | ≥ 7 | LeFevre et al. (2018) identified a seismic event (E4) in the Taybeh trench with a modeled age of 111 CE ± 31 which was associated with the early 2nd century CE Incense Road Earthquake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Araba - Qatar Trench | unlikely | ≥ 7 | Klinger et. al. (2015) identified a seismic event (E6) in a trench near Qatar, Jordan in the Araba which they modeled between 9 BCE and 492 CE. The large spread in age caused them to consider two possible earthquakes as the cause; the early 2nd century CE Incense Road Quake and the southern Cyril Quake of 363 CE. They preferred the Cyril Quake of 363 CE based on weighing other evidence not related to their paleoseismic study and noted that further investigation was required. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Location (with hotlink) | Status | Intensity | Notes |
Kagan et. al. (2011) identified a 1 cm. thick Type 4 seismite at a depth of
338 cm. with modeled ages of 63 CE ± 38 (1σ) and 61 CE ± 81 (2σ) which they assigned to the
Jerusalem Quake - a more likely candidate.
Migowski et. al. (2004) assigned a 0.4 cm. thick Type 4 seismite at a depth of 268.2 cm. (2.682 m) to a date of 76 CE.
At site ZA-2, Kagan et al (2011) assigned a 4 cm. thick Type 4 seismite at
a depth of 470 cm. (Modeled Ages 1σ - 52 CE ± 40 and 2σ - 56 CE ± 76) to a date of 33 CE which in this case is shorthand for the
Jerusalem Quake - a more likely candidate.
LeFevre et al. (2018)
identified a seismic event (E4) in the Taybeh trench with a modeled age of 111 CE ± 31 which was associated with the
early 2nd century CE Incense Road Earthquake.
Klinger et. al. (2015) identified a seismic event (E6) in a trench near Qatar, Jordan in the
Araba which they modeled between 9 BCE and 492 CE. The large spread in age caused them to consider two possible earthquakes as the cause; the
early 2nd century CE Incense Road Quake
and the southern Cyril Quake of 363 CE.
They preferred the Cyril Quake of 363 CE based on weighing
other evidence
not related to their paleoseismic study and noted that further investigation was required.
AD 76 Cyprus
An earthquake destroyed three cities in Cyprus: probably Salamis, Paphos and Citium. The shock, which was felt in
Antioch at about the same time and caused considerable concern, was perhaps the same event.
Damage in Cyprus was so severe that Rome transferred its mint to the island as a relief measure.
Many chroniclers record this earthquake. Saint Jerome writes that in Ol.CCXIX.9 (77) ‘in Cyprus three cities collapsed in an earthquake’, dating it
to the seventh year of the Emperor Vespasian’s reign, which began on 21 December AD 75. Eusebius says the same. Orosius synchronizes the earthquake
with the Roman plague of AD 77/78. Others even try to tie it in with the eruption of Vesuvius in the reign of Titus.
The decisive factor in dating this earthquake to AD 76 is the fact that the Roman mint was transferred to Cyprus in this year,
the first coins being struck in July (Hill 1940, 234). Clearly this was a measure taken to bring relief to the island,
helping to pay for repairs: if the earthquake had not occurred until AD 77, the motive for transferring the mint a year
earlier would be quite obscure.
According to the Sibylline Oracles, ‘then indeed an earthquake will destroy Salamis together with Paphos, when dark [waves of]
water should beat down on famous Cyprus’, which could refer to this event.
Although the Oracles are supposedly prophetic texts,
they were compiled between the fourth century BC and the third or fourth century AD, first by Jewish and then by Christian
writers, and became a kind of chronicle, since events were inserted after they had actually happened. If the Oracles are indeed
referring to this event when they mention the destruction of Paphos and Salamis, then the identity of two of the cities destroyed
is known; the third has, however, still to be identified. Because Paphos and Salamis are at opposite ends of Cyprus, it
must have been a city in between the two, probably Citium.
Finally, the record of the earthquake in Antioch comes from Philostratus. It apparently frightened the population,
who were in dispute with each other at the time, but did no damage.One can deduce from other passages in Philostratus’s
account that Apollonius was near Cyprus in AD 76 (Philostr. VA VI. 34, VI. 42), thus there is a possibility that, if the
account of this earthquake is not fictitious, it may be the same as the Cyprus earthquake of AD 76,Antioch being near the island.
It is probable that this earthquake was associated with a seismic sea wave at Salamis and Paphos but it is not certain whether
this was the result of this or of another earthquake (Terry 1890, 120–121).
‘Ol.CCIX.9: Three cities in Cyprus collapsed in an earthquake.’ (Hieron. Hist.188).
‘Ol.CCXIV.8/a.A.2092: In Cyprus three cities collapsed in an earthquake.’ (Eus. Hist.158).
‘a.M. 5564/div.Inc.64: In Cyprus three cities collapsed in an earthquake.’ (Georg. Sync.342/647).
‘But in the ninth year of his reign three cities in Cyprus collapsed and there was a great plague at Rome.’ (Oros. VII. ix. 11).
‘And then an earthquake will destroy Salamis together with Paphos, when black water floods renowned Cyprus.’ (Orac. Sibyll. IV. 125).
‘The ruler of Syria had plunged Antioch into a feud, by disseminating among the citizens suspicions such that when they met in assembly they all quarrelled with one another. But a violent earthquake happening to occur, they were all cowering, and as is usual in the case of heavenly portents, praying for one another.’ (Philostr. VA VI. 38/LCL. ii. 130).
(101) 77 Cyprus sources 1
"Three towns in Cyprus were reduced to ruins by an earthquake".Paulus Orosius writes:
Tres civitates Cypri terrae motu conruerunt.
"In the ninth year of the reign [of Vespasian], three towns in Cyprus were reduced to ruins in an earthquake, and there was a great plague in Rome".
Nono autem imperii eius anno tres civitates Cypri terrae motu corruerunt et Romae magna pestilentia fuit.
Although he did not cite him,
Ambraseys (2009) catalog
entry appears to be largely derived and sometimes directly quoted from Antonopoulos (1980:148-150).
Ambraseys (2009)
included Antonopoulos' (1980:148-150) apparently flawed analysis
for dating the earthquake based on moving of the Roman Mint. In his acknowledgments,
Antonopoulos' (1980:157) noted that he had been
much assisted by Professor N. Ambraseys of the Imperial College — University of London
with whose
invaluable help
, he (Antonopoulos) could not have carried out his work. Thus, it is entirely possible that this section
of Antonopoulos (1980) was authored or co-authored by N.N. Ambraseys.
Antonopoulos (1980:148-150) entry, which includes a wealth of valuable references, is
quoted in its entirety below.
3. 76* AD. Cyprus. Cition, Paphos and Salamis.
References
- 39 (p. 139) - OBERHUMMER, E., 1903. - Die Insel Cypem. Eine Landeskunde auf Historischer Grundlage. Ed. Th. Ackermann, München.
- 44 (p. 775) - SIEBERG, A., 1932. - Die Erdbeben. In B. Gutenberg's Handbuch der Geophysik, vol. 4, Berlin, Ed. G. Borntraeger.
- 15 (vii) - HIERONYMOS.
- 18 (P. 342) - SYNCELLOS.
- 20 (P. 277) - EUSEBIOS, PAMPHILIOS, c. 330 A.D. - Armenian Text: in C. Coenobi's « Chronicon », Ed. Aaronis, Venice, 1868.
- 14 (P. 54) - ELIAS NISIBINOS.
- 22 (vii, 9.11) - OROSIUS, PAULUS, 416 A.D. - Historiae adversum paganos libri vii. In C. Zangenmeister's Edition, Ausburg 1570; also in BSGR, PCCL, and in « King Alfred's Anglo-Saron version of the history by Orosius », translated by J. Bosworth, Longman's Edition, London 1859.
- 30 (p. 459) - BURSIAN, C., 1862. - Geograplie von Griechenland. Ed. Teubner, 2, p. 522, Leipzig.
- 9 (P. 248) - CEDRINOS - Chronicon Paschale.
A disastrous earthquake occurred in Cyprus in 76 or 77 AD. This earthquake is generally dated together with a pestilence in Rome, in 77 AD, but early chroniclers differ in it slightly1. We are inclined to think rather of 76 AD as the year for this earthquake because this was the year at which the Romans transferred their mint to Cyprus and the first coins minted there are dated July 76, August 77 and September 78 (Hill 1940, p. 234). It is not improbable that this transfer of the mint was connected with the measures taken to relieve the island after the earthquake which is generally dated 767 AD but may have taken place a year earlier. Some few early chroniclers may have put the earthquake in 77 AD in order to synchronise it with the pestilence in Rome.
The facts about the particular places in Cyprus which were destroyed by this earthquake and the seismic sea-wave which is supposed to have accompanied this earthquake, are very obscure. If we trust the allusion in the Sibyllina Oracula (lib. iv, lines 125, 126, 140, 141), the places in Cyprus which suffered most should have been Salamis, Paphos and Cition, but it is questionable whether these places suffered from the 76 AD earthquake or from a later shock. It seams probable, from the slight indications, mostly inferences from statements at a later date, that, with the possible exception of Cition, Salamis and Paphos should have been damaged to some extent by the 76 AD earthquake. The chroniclers were evidently not quite certain of the particular places in Cyprus which were damaged by this earthquake.
The Sibyllina Oracula prophesies also a destructive seismic sea-wave (lib. iv, lines 126, 140; lib. v, lines 450-453; lib. vii, line 5). This prophesy constitutes the sole authority upon which Oberhummer (1903, p. 139)2 and after him many authors have based their arguments for the 76 AD seismic sea-wave in Cyprus. But we find no mention of such an event in the narrations of early chroniclers3, and we feel that should an event such as a catastrophic seismic sea-wave had in fact accompanied this earthquake, it should have been most certainly included by these chroniclers in their description of the seismic events of 76 AD.
Whether, in this instance, the Sibyllina Oracula can be trusted as a source of authentic historical information, and if so, whether the seismic sea-wave in Cyprus which is mentioned in the text refers to the earthquake of 76 AD, all yet remains to be investigated. No other data worthy of any confidence has come to our attention.Footnotes1 Hieronymos (Vita Hilarion, § 7), Svngelos (p. 342), St. Jerome, Chron. Paschale (p. 248D), Orosius (lib. vii, § 9.11), Calvisius (p. 459) place the pestilence in Rome and the earthquake in Cyprus in 77 AD, Eusebios (Armenian Text, Chron. p. 277) and Elias Nisibinus (Chron. transl. by De-laporte, p. 54) place the pestilence in this year but the earthquake between July 75 and July 76 AD. Suetonius (Titus ch. 8) and Victor (Epit. p. 367) refer this to the reign of Titus.
2 The Greek text of the Oracle (lib. iv, lines 140, 141) which appears in Obernummer's work (p. 139, lines 10 and 11) should read:
Aι. αι, Κυπ[ς]ε ταλαινα σε δε πλατυ χυυιια θαλασσης line 140
ριψει, χειμεριησιν ανα[ςς]ιφθεισαν αεληαιζ line 141
(= Alas suffering Cyprus, you shall be laid waste by the broad whirling waves of the sea which are tossed up in the winter) and not
Aι. αι, Κυπ[ς]ε τααλινα σε δε πλατυ χυιια θαλασσης
χρνψει, χειμεριησιν ανα[ςς]ιφθεισαν αελλαιζ
(= Alas suffering Cyprus, the broad waves of the sea which are tossed up whirling in the winter will cover over you).
3 The difference is very important wince now this oracle does not seem to refer to a seismic sea-wave, but rather to one of the hurricanes which are known to have burst over the island during its early history Casola (1498), Anonymous (1546 a,b) Lusignan (1580) and others.
Also Oberhummer's standard pagination of the oracles is throughout by three lines too high.
77 AD
Καὶ τότε δὴ Σαλαμίνα Πάφον [θ]᾽ἅμα σεισμὸς ὀλέσει,ibid. 143 s.:
Κύπρον δι᾽ ἂν πολύχλυστον ὑπερκλονέῃ μέλαν ὕδωρ,
Αϊ αϊ, Κύπρε τάλαινα, σὲ δὲ πλατὺ κῦμα θαλάσσηςand Cramer, Anecd. Gr. Paris. I 334:
κρύψει, χειμερίησιν ἀναρριφ[θ]εῖσαν ἀέλλαις,
Αϊ αϊ, Κύπρε τάλαινα, σὲ δὲ μέγα χῦμα χαλύψειWe learn the names from the first oracle of two of the three cities, which according to the chronographs were destroyed by that earthquake, namely Salamis and Paphos; the third seems to be Kition based on one I published Consecration inscription3. By the way, do not take the third city too seriously; certainly more cities were affected, but only three of the most distinguished [or well known] cities, in which the effects of the earthquake were probably particularly noticeable, were emphatically highlighted. Furthermore, we learn from the second, Prophecy handed down in a double version that C. [Cyprus ?] was also devastated by a massive earthquake flood at the same time. It remains to be seen whether this is related to the events of the year 77 or is to be associated with a somewhat later event4b.
ἥμασι χειμερίῃσιν ὀρινομένη τε [θ]άλασσα.
4a S. Euseb. chron. ed. Schoene II 158 s.
5 Of Vespasian.
1 What Gaudry Mém. 235 and following him Unger 61 wrote about a report.
These chroniclers speak of a volcanic eruption on C. [Cyprus ?] which is based on
confusion [conflation] with the well-known large eruption of Vesuvius (Mons
Vespius at Mar. Sc.) during the reign of Emperor Titus.
2 See Friedlieb S. XLI f. his edition and , because of the time of composition, Bernhardy II 1 446 and Christ. 584.
3 Sitzungsber. d. K. bay. Ak. d. Wiss. 1888 S. 309f.
4b Both prophecies are based on a description of the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 CE,
separated from Antioch u. C. (Skyros? V. 142) due to warlike devastation
77 n. Ch.
Καὶ τότε δὴ Σαλαμίνα Πάφον [θ]᾽ἅμα σεισμὸς ὀλέσει,dazu ib. 143 s.:
Κύπρον δι᾽ ἂν πολύχλυστον ὑπερκλονέῃ μέλαν ὕδωρ,
Αϊ αϊ, Κύπρε τάλαινα, σὲ δὲ πλατὺ κῦμα θαλάσσηςund Cramer, Anecd. Gr. Paris. I 334:
κρύψει, χειμερίησιν ἀναρριφ[θ]εῖσαν ἀέλλαις,
Αϊ αϊ, Κύπρε τάλαινα, σὲ δὲ μέγα χῦμα χαλύψειWir erfahren aus dem ersten Orakel zunächst die Namen zweier von den drei Städten, welche nach den Chronographen durch jenes Erdbeben zerstört wurden , nemlich Salamis und Paphos; die dritte scheint nach einer von mir herausgegebenen Weihinschrift Kition zu sein3. Man wird übrigens die Zahl drei nicht allzugenau nehmen dürfen; gewiss wurden noch mehr Städte in Mitleidenschaft gezogen, aber nur drei der vornehmsten, in denen wohl die Wirkungen des Erdbebens besonders fühlbar waren, aus drücklich hervorgehoben. Weiterhin erfahren wir aus der zweiten, in doppelter Fassung überlieferten Weissagung, dass C. damals auch durch eine gewaltige Erdbebenflut verwüstet wurde; es bleibt dahin gestellt , ob dieselbe mit den Vorgängen des J. 77 oder einem etwas späteren Ereignis in Zusammenhang zu bringen ist4b.
ἥμασι χειμερίῃσιν ὀρινομένη τε [θ]άλασσα.
4a S. Euseb. chron. ed. Schoene II 158 s.
5 Des Vespasianus.
1 Was Gaudry Mém. 235 u. ihm folgend Unger 61 über einen Bericht
dieses Chronisten von einem vulkanischen Ausbruch auf C. sagen , beruht auf
einer Verwechslung mit dem bekannten grossen Ausbruch des Vesuv (Mons
Vespius bei Mar. Sc.) unter Kaiser Titus.
2 Vgl. hiezu Friedlieb S. XLI f. seiner Ausg. u. , wegen der Abfassungszeit, Bernhardy II 1 446 u. Christ. 584.
3 Sitzungsber. d. K. bay. Ak. d. Wiss. 1888 S. 309f.
4b sind beide Weissagungen durch Schilderung des Vesuvausbruches vom J. 79 u,
kriegerischer Verwüstung von Antiochia u. C. (Skyros ? V. 142) getrennt,