Transliterated Name | Source | Name |
---|---|---|
Tel Rehov | Hebrew | תל רחוב |
Tell es-Sarem | Arabic | تل الصارم |
Ro-ob | Greek | Pσωβ |
Rihib |
Tel Rehov (Tell es-Sarem), the largest mound in the alluvial Beth-Shean Valley, is located about 6 km west of the Jordan River, 3 km east of the Gilboa Ridge, and 5 km south of Tel Beth-Shean. Rehov dominated the north–south road through the Jordan Valley. The site comprises an upper mound and a lower mound to its north, each covering about 12 a. The upper mound rises to 20 m above the surrounding plain, while the lower mound stands about 8 m above the plain; the summit of the upper mound is at an absolute elevation of 116 m below sea level. A ravine separates the two mounds; a gate may have been located in this ravine on the eastern side of the mound. The closest water source is a spring near the northeastern corner of the mound. Additional springs are found at short distances from the site.
The excavations at Tel Rehov were directed by A. Mazar on behalf of the Institute of Archaeology of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and sponsored by J. Camp. The first six seasons took place between 1997 and 2003. Three excavation areas (A, B, H) were opened on the upper mound, and five (C, D, E, F, G) on the lower mound. Geophysical and geological surveys were also conducted. The number of strata varies in certain areas or sub-areas, and the correlation between them is tentative in certain cases. Yet an attempt was made to correlate local strata dating from the late Iron Age I and onwards in each of the excavation areas with seven general strata (VII–I), which also remain tentative in certain cases.
The Beth-Shean Valley [BSV] is bounded by four fault systems (Fig. 2.6). Its eastern boundary is a morphotectonic escarpment 20-40 m high that marks the trace of the Western Marginal Fault (WMF) of the DSR [Dead Sea Rift] (Gardosh and Bruner 1998; Bruner et al. 2002: Zilberman et al. 2004; Meiler et al. 2008). The north-south-oriented escarpment of the marginal fault runs between Sede Trumot in the south and the Nahal Harod stream in the north.
The WMF of the DSR forms a prominent morphological escarpment 20-40 m high that separates the BSV [Beth-Shean Valley] from the CJV [Central Jordan Valley]. This escarpment is underlain by a system of deep-seated fault belts several hundred meters wide, encountered in several seismic reflection lines (Gardosh and Bruner 1998; Bruner et al. 2002; Meiler et al. 2008) (Figs. 2.5-2.7). The faults are inclined eastward towards the deep Kinnarot-CJV basin (Meiler et al. 2008) that is bounded in the east by the DST [Dead Sea Transform].
The paleoseismic analyses of the tectonic activity along the WMF illustrates only part of the tectonic activity in this region, which is induced by the left lateral movement along the DST that runs in this area along the eastern margin of the DSR. The most prominent feature related to this activity is the escarpment that separates the BSV from the CJV. This fault escarpment is underlain by a deep-seated, east-dipping fault belt dominated by vertical displacement, which accommodates the subsidence of the Kinnarot-CJV basin (Meiler et al. 2008).
Tel Rehov is located 4 km south of Beth-Shean on the tectonic and morphological boundary between the Beth-Shean and the Central Jordan Valleys (Figs. 2.1, 2.5, 2.7a). The tell is separated from the tufa plateau of Moshav Rehov in the south by a narrow valley occupied today by an artificial drainage canal and from the northern tufa plateau by a valley, probably a route of an ancient spring, occupied today by dense vegetation indicating a high ground-water level. To the east, the tell rises above a flat east-descending surface underlain by tufa near the marginal fault and by lacustrine sediments of the Lisan Formation further eastward (Rozenbaum 2009).
The subsurface relief of Tel Rehov is hidden at present under the anthropogenic sediments of the mound. In order to evaluate the relief of the underlying terrain and to examine the relations between its morphology and the fault system in this area, several high resolution seismic lines were shot by the GII across the mound (Fig. 2.10), applying a combination of reflection and refraction wave methods (for details, see Zilberman et al. 2002). Mapping of seismic reflectors and velocity estimation along them based on refraction waves is carried out in three stages (Fig. 2.11):
Age | Dates | Comments |
---|---|---|
Early Bronze IA-B | 3300-3000 BCE | |
Early Bronze II | 3000-2700 BCE | |
Early Bronze III | 2700-2200 BCE | |
Middle Bronze I | 2200-2000 BCE | EB IV - Intermediate Bronze |
Middle Bronze IIA | 2000-1750 BCE | |
Middle Bronze IIB | 1750-1550 BCE | |
Late Bronze I | 1550-1400 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIA | 1400-1300 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIB | 1300-1200 BCE | |
Iron IA | 1200-1150 BCE | |
Iron IB | 1150-1100 BCE | |
Iron IIA | 1000-900 BCE | |
Iron IIB | 900-700 BCE | |
Iron IIC | 700-586 BCE | |
Babylonian & Persian | 586-332 BCE | |
Early Hellenistic | 332-167 BCE | |
Late Hellenistic | 167-37 BCE | |
Early Roman | 37 BCE - 132 CE | |
Herodian | 37 BCE - 70 CE | |
Late Roman | 132-324 CE | |
Byzantine | 324-638 CE | |
Early Arab | 638-1099 CE | Umayyad & Abbasid |
Crusader & Ayyubid | 1099-1291 CE | |
Late Arab | 1291-1516 CE | Fatimid & Mameluke |
Ottoman | 1516-1917 CE | |
Phase | Dates | Variants |
---|---|---|
Early Bronze IA-B | 3400-3100 BCE | |
Early Bronze II | 3100-2650 BCE | |
Early Bronze III | 2650-2300 BCE | |
Early Bronze IVA-C | 2300-2000 BCE | Intermediate Early-Middle Bronze, Middle Bronze I |
Middle Bronze I | 2000-1800 BCE | Middle Bronze IIA |
Middle Bronze II | 1800-1650 BCE | Middle Bronze IIB |
Middle Bronze III | 1650-1500 BCE | Middle Bronze IIC |
Late Bronze IA | 1500-1450 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIB | 1450-1400 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIA | 1400-1300 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIB | 1300-1200 BCE | |
Iron IA | 1200-1125 BCE | |
Iron IB | 1125-1000 BCE | |
Iron IC | 1000-925 BCE | Iron IIA |
Iron IIA | 925-722 BCE | Iron IIB |
Iron IIB | 722-586 BCE | Iron IIC |
Iron III | 586-520 BCE | Neo-Babylonian |
Early Persian | 520-450 BCE | |
Late Persian | 450-332 BCE | |
Early Hellenistic | 332-200 BCE | |
Late Hellenistic | 200-63 BCE | |
Early Roman | 63 BCE - 135 CE | |
Middle Roman | 135-250 CE | |
Late Roman | 250-363 CE | |
Early Byzantine | 363-460 CE | |
Late Byzantine | 460-638 CE | |
Early Arab | 638-1099 CE | |
Crusader & Ayyubid | 1099-1291 CE | |
Late Arab | 1291-1516 CE | |
Ottoman | 1516-1917 CE | |
Although
Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:1) noted that continuous occupation was detected in Area D from Late Bronze I to Iron IIA,
a time span of some 600 years
and that no major destruction events were identified between the strata
, there are a number of descriptions
of potentially seismically induced structural damage in their report on Area D. It may be the case that in some parts of Mazar et. al. (2020)'s
Final Report, destruction is defined solely as destruction due to military conquest.
Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:57) report that Iron IIA strata in Area D (D-2 and younger) were very damaged,
apparently due to erosion.
it remains unclear whether a human or natural agent initiated the collapse of the building.Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:20) later noted that
There is no clear evidence for a sudden or violent destruction of this building, although very little of its interior was excavated. It is possible that the building went out of use due to deterioration, damage by earthquakes or other natural causes. It is also possible that the building was abandoned as part of socio-political changes in the city during the transition between the 14th and 13th centuries BCE.Stratum D-10 was dated to LB IIA in the 14th century BCE
two units, either rooms or courtyardsin D-9b Building DB
were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31)while noting that Wall 9923
sloped considerably to the east, with a difference of up to 0.4 m in elevation of the lower level over its length.They noted the presence of
other tilted features in this areawhich
possibly resulted from young [er?] tectonic activity. They also noted that
the wall ended abruptly on the east, without a clear edge, and with a slight protrusion to the south, the nature of which remained unclear.
were slightly tilted to the east, in accordance with Floor 9925 and Wall 9923.
three lamp-and-bowl foundation depositsassociated with Wall 7906,
each comprised of one lamp and one bowl, the latter usually placed above the former.A deposit labeled as the
second deposit (No. 6, Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14) was found immediately to the south of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 in the eastern portion of Square M/5. It is possible that this foundation deposit had shifted slightly from its original position, as the lamp and bowl were found at an angle and not horizontally laid.
80.84–81.05 m along the 2.3 m exposed part of the wall).
made of basalt and limestone fieldstones, cobbles and pebbles, with occasional basalt grinding stone fragments, sloped to the east
(80.92–81.07 m), in accordance with the foundations of Walls 7906 (eastern part) and 8917, possibly due to post-depositional processes, such as young tectonic activities.
Building DC of Stratum D-7a collapsed and the occupation layers were covered by brick debris, although no evidence for a violent destruction and fire was found. The collapse layer, ranging in depth from 0.3 m to 1.2 m, was excavated as different loci in the various parts of the building: 2843 in the southwestern unit, 7945 in the southeastern unit, 7935/8903 in the southern and western parts of Square N/5, and 4847/4817/4812 in the northwestern part. The collapse contained brick fragments of both the typical yellowish bricks of the initial phase of Stratum D-7a and other types of bricks (white, gray, brown, reddish) used in this stratum and its later phase. These collapse layers were found immediately below topsoil in Squares M–N/4 and below floor levels related to Stratum D-6b in Squares M–N/5. In the main part of Square N/5, installations of Stratum D-6b penetrated considerably into the earlier deposits (Figs. 15.20– 15.21), removing much of the brick debris of Stratum D-7.4Strata D-7a and D-7b were dated to Iron IA [12th century BCE until ca. 1130 BCE(?)].
The pottery assemblage of Stratum D-7a–b is similar to that of Strata S-4 and S-3 at Beth-Shean (TBS III: Chapter 5) and should be dated to the 12th century BCE (Iron IA).Footnotes4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.
Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.
East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.
West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.
This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.
... No evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum D-5 was detected. It seems that the buildings went out of use due to either deterioration or earthquake damage and were rebuilt in the following Stratum D-4. The pottery and artifacts from Stratum D-5 point to their date in Iron IB, perhaps the early part of the 11th century BCE.
from Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15) report collapse debris at various locations in Area D within Stratum D-4. Consult the Final Report (2020) for details. Relevant sections of this report is reproduced in the References section for the Stratum VI and V earthquakes and the Stratum IV Destruction Layer.
Relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts
Absolute dating based on radiometric data
Historical considerations
there were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings by an earthquake, including layers of complete fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of the buildings which would have buried vessels, and perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of debris. Rather, they state,
it could have been an earthquake that was strong enough to cause severe damage to the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of Stratum C-1b.Complete fallen bricks were found in
most of the rooms( Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al., 2020 v.2:23).
1 Active Faults under Tel Rehov were identified and mapped based on seismic surveys (and presumably some aerial photos). This is discussed
in The Geology and Geophysics section of this web page which, in turn, comes from the Chapter 2 of the Final Excavation Report
(The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and
Tel Rehov by Zilberman in Mazar et. al., 2020 v. 1). The possibility that these active faults slipped during one of the Iron Age earthquakes
is discussed sporadically in the Final Report and
Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:187)
observed a tilt from west to east/southeast
in all strata at Tel Rehov
which may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity
during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures
.
The term Iron IIA has been employed in different ways in the archaeology of Israel. G.E. Wright (1961: 97-99) used it to describe the period between 900-730/700 BCE, while he termed the 10th century BCE "Iron IC". Initially, Israeli archaeologists used the term to denote the 10th century BCE, equaling the time of the United Monarchy (e.g., Aharoni 1979 [first published in Hebrew in 1963] and in subsequent editions; NEAEHL: 1529; Mazar 1990: 30) and this terminology was widely accepted (e.g., King and Stager 2001: XXIII). According to this system, the 9th century BCE was included in the Iron IIB, together with the 8th century. Finkelstein (1996) and Sharon et al. (2007) suggested to lower the transition from Iron I/Iron IIA to the late 10th century BCE (see above) and dated the Iron IIA to the 9th century BCE. I suggested a Modified Conventional Chronology, which broadly accepted the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century, based on the finds from Jezreel and Tel Rehov, yet I claimed that the period began well in the 10th century (Coldstream and Mazar 2003: 40-45; Mazar 2005). Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006; 2011) accepted this chronological framework, but went one step further by suggesting a division of the Iron IIA into two sub-periods: Early Iron IIA and Late Iron IIA, the former dated to the 10th century and the latter to the 9th. This suggestion is now accepted by many archaeologists in Israel, although the details of absolute dating of each phase remain unresolved. In this publication, we refer to Iron Age IIA as a period starting sometime during the first half of the 10th century BCE (ca. 980 BCE?) and ending during the second half of the 9th century, probably following severe destructions caused by Aramean conquests led by Hazael (see below for a detailed chronological and historical discussion).
The Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov are characterized by several architectural features which are unknown elsewhere in Israel (see discussion at the end of Chapter 12). The first is the virtually exclusive use of mudbricks as building material. Stones were used only in exceptional places for constructing cobblestone floors and installations (as in Area F: Fig. 19.4, Photo 19.6), pillar bases (rarely; e.g., Area C, Building CX) and working surfaces.
8 During a visit to the site by Prof. D. Yankelevsky and other experts from the National Building Research Institute of the Technion, Haifa, this explanation was accepted as the most reasonable. They mentioned the current use of steel rolls in foundations of highly sensitive structures, such as nuclear reactors, as a device providing flexibility in the event of an earthquake.
The dates of the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov, as well as the other sites, depend upon a combination of relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts, and absolute dating based on radiometric data combined with historical considerations. In this section, the first two issues are discussed, while historical considerations will be surveyed in the following section.
As explained above, there are two Iron IIA ceramic horizons at Tel Rehov:
20 Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE) suggested by him for the end of this period. It seems that the motivation behind this suggestion is to justify the idea that Hazor Stratum VIII was an Aramean city built by Hazael, yet I see no reason to refute the excavators' attribution of Stratum VIII to the days of Ahab.
The absolute chronology of the Iron IIA strata is a subject of ongoing debate, based on radiometric dates and historical considerations, although it seems that by now, agreement has been reached on some major issues. The original Low Chronology date of the beginning of Iron IIA strata to ca. 900 BCE proved to be wrong, based on radiocarbon dating. On the other hand, the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century is certainly correct, as it is anchored in the evidence from Jezreel, where the royal enclosure cannot predate Ahab [r. c. 871 - c. 852 BCE]. According to the modified chronology which I have suggested since 2003, Iron IIA started during the first half of the 10th century BCE and continued until sometime in the second half of the 9th century (Table 4.3). This approach was basically backed up by numerous radiocarbon dates, although there are different views concerning the precise time span and absolute dates of each of the two Iron IIA phases (for summaries and earlier literature, see Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011b).
I am convinced that 14C is the most wonderful tool for archaeology, when its inherent uncertainty is properly respected. Unfortunately, pushing its use beyond these limitations puts "oil into the fire" of those who mistrust the 14C method altogether .....23These words are very true when we deal with Iron Age chronology, particularly in the 10th-9th centuries BCE.
21 As mentioned above, Samples R31-R34 from Locus 2425 in Building CG
are excluded from this discussion, although it seems more viable
that this context should be attributed to Stratum V. See discussion in Chapter 48.
22 Note that Tofollo et al. 2014 omit sample 3949 in their tables. It does appear,
however in Gilboa, Sharon and Boaretto 2013.
23 Sent to me via an e-mail correspondence in 2008.
In the following, I will survey some of the historical questions related to the 10th-9th centuries BCE that are relevant for the results of the Tel Rehov excavations (see also Mazar 2016a). It should be recalled that the city is mentioned in only one written source from these centuries: the Sheshonq I list (see Chapter 3). In this section, I will use the assumed ancient name Rehob.
Who were the people who inhabited the large and opulent city of Rehob and what was its geo-political status in Iron Age IIA?
What was the geo-political status of Rehob and its vicinity (including Beth-Shean) in the 10th century BCE? The question of the historicity of the biblical concept of a United Monarchy during the 10th century BCE is one of the most debated issues regarding biblical history during the last generation, and this is not the place for a detailed discussion of this issue. Some scholars maintain the biblical concept as valid (e.g., Millard and Dever in Handy 1997; Ben-Tor 2000; Stager 2003; Dietrich 2007; Blum 2010; Faust 2010; Lemaire 2010), while many others either negate the historicity of such a kingdom altogether or diminish its territory to Jerusalem and its close vicinity (e.g., Finkelstein 1996,2010 and many other publications; Na'aman, Knauf, Niemann, Lemche in Handy 1997; Grabbe 2007: 111-115; Frevel 2016: 108-148; Garfinkel, Kreimerman and Zilberg 2016: 225-232; Sergi 2017; for a recent survey and earlier literature, see Na'aman 2019). Still others attempt to find middle ground (e.g., Miller in Handy 1997).
Rehob, in Sheshonq I's list mentioned aside Beth-Shean, can safely be identified with Tel Rehov (Chapter 3). The precise date of the raid is unknown and depends on two debated factors: the accession year of Sheshonq I and the time of the raid within his 21-year reign. The accession year is calculated by most scholars to ca. 945/940 BCE (e.g., Kitchen 2000: 50; Shortland 2005); a lower date ca. 934/929 was suggested by Ben-Dor Evian (2011), who also suggested that the raid occurred early in his reign, while most other scholars attribute it to the last years of his reign. All in all, the raid probably occurred between ca. 930 and 915 BCE.24 Assessments of the impact of Sheshonq's raid vary (Helck 1971: 240; Na'aman 1998; 2007: 404-405; Rainey and Notley 2006: 186; Finkelstein 2013: 41-48). Traditionally, scholars tended to attribute destruction layers to this raid, assuming that the Egyptian army destroyed the places mentioned in the Karnak list. However, as first suggested by Na'aman, this assumption should not be taken for granted and it must be taken into account that toponyms are mentioned in the list just because they surrendered to the Egyptian army during the raid or since the Egyptian army passed through them or ruled them for a while without causing destruction. The inclusion of a toponym in this list means only that the place existed during Sheshonq's raid and was known to the Egyptians.
24 The date ca. 915 BCE would fit the accession date as suggested by Ben-Dor Evian and the attribution of the raid to the late years of Sheshonq as suggested by most scholars; however, the precise date of the raid remains unknown.
The question when did Rehob become part of the northern Kingdom of Israel is somewhat controversial (Mazar 2016a: 98-100). Arie (2017: 14-15) emphasized the unique components at Tel Rehov and its dissimilarity to what he termed "regular" Israelite traits, and suggested that Rehob was a local Canaanite city-state until the end of Stratum V and was annexed to Israel only in Stratum IV, during the Omride era [~876-~842 BCE] and after the foundation of Jezreel.25 Finkelstein went even further and suggested that both Strata V and IV were non-Israelite, Rehob being a local "late-Canaanean city state at the southwestern edge of the Aramean culture sphere of influence" (2017: 181; for an earlier version, see 2013: 120-122). Based on a Bayesian model of 14C dates published before 2005, he dated the destruction of Stratum IV between 875-849 CalBC and suggested that both Strata V and IV were destroyed by Omride assaults. In my view, both these suggestions are unacceptable. Arie's distinction between Strata V and IV as pre-Israelite versus Israelite contradicts the identical material culture in both these strata. As said, the destruction at the end of Stratum V is limited to part of Area C, while in all the other excavated areas, no such destruction was observed and the city of Stratum V appears to have been continuously developed with some architectural changes in the following Stratum IV. In fact, these two strata comprise two phases in the life of the same city. Finkelstein's statement that "the material culture of Tel Rehov differs from that of the Israelite centers in the Jezreel Valley - for instance Megiddo - in almost every respect" (2017: 180) cannot be accepted. Although there are exceptional traits in the local material culture of Tel Rehov compared to other Israelite sites (such as the building techniques and house plans) there are also many similarities, for example, in the pottery assemblage (cf., Tell el-Far'ah North, Jezreel, Megiddo and Horbat Rosh Zayit), clay figurines, seals, pottery altars ("cult stands"), and other material-culture components. In addition, similarity to Megiddo can be found in the fact that both cities lacked a city wall in Iron IIA and in the resemblance between Building CF at Tel Rehov and Building 2081 at Megiddo, as explained above. In contrast to Finkelstein, I cannot discern any Aramean components at Tel Rehov. The claim that such components exist in the inscriptions is unfounded, except perhaps in the case of the component sqy in inscription No. 5 (Chapter 29A). In my view, both Strata V and IV represent a city that was under the hegemony of the northern Kingdom of Israel right from its inception.
The appearance of the name nms (Nimshi) in two inscriptions from Tel Rehov, in both Strata V and IV, as well as on a jar from Tel 'Amal, led me to suggest that the prosperous Iron Age IIA city Rehob was the hometown of the Nimshi family (Mazar 2016a: 110). This was perhaps a strong and powerful family or clan who might have owned a large portion of the city's resources, including the apiary of Stratum V, in which one of the jars with this family name was found. Perhaps this was one of the indigenous families, rooted in the local Canaanite population, as described above. Nimshi is mentioned in the Bible as the father or grandfather of Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], whose rise to power brought about the fall of the Omride dynasty in 842 BCE (1 Kgs 19:16; 2 Kgs 9:2, 14, 20). Thus Jehu must have belonged to the Nimshi family, and perhaps he was born and raised at Rehob. His coup and the establishment of a new dynasty which ruled northern Israel for almost 100 years may be understood as a shift of power in the kingdom from the Omride dynasty which originated in the Samaria hills to the local descendants of Canaanite families in the northern valleys.
26 In addition to the views expressed in Chapter 29A, I should note the Ph.D.
dissertation by H.D.D. Parker (2018) which reached me after the completion of
Chapter 29A. She rejects our reading and reads the second letter as cayin rather
than lamed (p. 191). However, this letter is open on its upper part, unlike the
cayin at the end of the name, and probably had an extension beyond the fragment
line, as explained in Chapter 29A. The reading cayin would make no sense.
27 See for example Ghantous (2013) who views the redaction of the Elisha-Elijah
stories as having taken place in the 4th century BCE, but, unlike the Elijah
stories that he considers late (i.e., 5th century BCE), "the Elisha tradition...
originated in the eighth century and continued to evolve independently until
the fifth century BCE" (p. 128).
28 Miller and Hayes (1986: 290) suggested that the stories relating to the
early years of Elisha (2 Kg 2, 4:1-8:15) should be attributed to Jehu's reign
rather than to that of Ahab and Jehoram, as the Bible puts it.
The destruction of Stratum IV marks a dramatic point in the history of the city. Evidence for fierce fire and severe devastation was found in all the excavation areas. People left their belongings in the houses and probably fled, or were deported, or slaughtered. In one case, a human skeleton may be attributed to this destruction layer in Area C (Chapter 46B). Following the destruction, the lower city was abandoned and only the upper mound was resettled in the following Iron IIB. It appears that this destruction resulted from a military conquest rather than an earthquake, though no direct evidence such as multiple arrowheads or sling stones were detected. The date of the destruction and the identity of the conqueror can be suggested on the basis of three parameters: pottery typology, historical considerations and radiocarbon dates.
This was a rectangular building in Squares S–T/3–4
(external measurements 5.2×6.2 m). All of its walls
were composed of hard yellow bricks and were
very well preserved to a height of more than 1.0 m.
No entrance to this building was located, suggesting that it had been entered from above. Its plan
consisted of two small rooms on the west and
two somewhat larger rooms on the east, and it
might have served a storage function. It was constructed above a thin layer of fill (8408) that served
to level the remains of Stratum C-3a Building CS
below it.
The northern wall (4438) was preserved nine
courses high on the west, but much less on the east,
so much so that it was not clear whether there had
been an entranceway here or whether the bricks
were missing due to damage. Stratum C-1b Walls
1464 and 1524 superimposed it, but there was no
C-3 wall below it; Wall 8503 adjoined it on the
north. The western wall (4440), constructed right
on top of Wall 8418 of Stratum C-3a (Photos 12.12–
12.13), was preserved 11–12 courses high; its width
was unknown, since C-1b Wall 1523 covered its
western face. The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not
known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo
12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses
high and was poorly preserved, especially on the
northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that
the main damage to the building, whatever the
cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the
northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6
m, although a thickening identified in its lower
courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m.
There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern
wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems
that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of
the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role
during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).
The two eastern rooms were similar to each
other in size, as were the two western rooms. Their
internal measurements were: Room 4429 in the
northeast (2.0×2.4 m; 4.8 sq m), Room 4420 in the
southeast (1.9×2.0 m; 3.8 sq m), Room 4426 in the
southwest (1.3×2.0 m; 2.6 sq m) (Photo 12.29), and
Room 4409 in the northwest (1.1×2.0 m; 2.2 sq m);
the total floor space of this building was only 13.4
sq m. Two intersecting inner partition walls separated these rooms: east–west Wall 2509 and north–
south Wall 2493, with its northern continuation,
4407. An entranceway in the eastern end of Wall
2509 joined the two eastern rooms, while an
opening in Wall 2509, just to the west of its corner
with Wall 2493, joined the two western rooms.
However, it seems that at some point, this latter
opening was blocked, as a brick course spanned its
top. No entrance was found in Walls 2493 or 4407,
leaving the eastern and western chambers inaccessible from each other; it is possible that the rooms
were entered from above. Their small size, and the
fact that some grain was found in the southwestern
room, indicate the possibility that they were used
for grain storage.
The rooms were found full of complete fallen
yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash,
and brown soil. There were relatively few finds,
mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs.
13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact
bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt
grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426
(Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C
analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18),
yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ)
CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in
Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were
made of beaten earth and for the most part, their
level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible
makeup.
The nature and function of this building
remained unclear. There was no evidence for
domestic activity or storage, such as cooking
facilities, installations or storage jars. Perhaps it
was related to grain storage, possibly with some
administrative function. To some extent, this
building recalls the eastern part of Building 200 in
Hazor Strata X–IX (Hazor III–IV: Plans VIII–X),
which was also comprised of a series of small
chambers.
A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining
the southern part of the eastern wall of Building
CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3
m and was composed of the same hard yellow
bricks as the other walls in this building, although
here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were
laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved
on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses
of its eastern face protruding; this might have been
the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).
The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was
not certain; it abutted the southern half of the
poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA
(4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated
abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where
it was abutted by an open area in which cooking
and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and
C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a
retainer built to buttress the southern part of the
eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum
C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the
southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the
northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building
CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b
Building CD, terminated just at the point where the
northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting
that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern
closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b
(Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:
The major component of Building CB was a large,
roughly rectangular space which underwent minor
changes during the course of its existence (Figs.
12.9–12.10; Photo 12.30). This large room (1520)
was perhaps a major living room or reception hall
in a larger architectural complex, which continued
to the east and perhaps, south.
The external measurements of this hall were
5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its
walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the
northern wall) were constructed directly on top of
the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3
Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall
was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG
(Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were:
1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses;
Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved
to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east
(preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located
at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture
with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this
building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall,
preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate
numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which
was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo
12.35); the western half was designated 1442 and
the eastern half, 1483. An entrance in Wall 1483
was located 1.0 m to the west of its corner with Wall
2505. An intact oil lamp with soot on its nozzle was
found in a niche in the eastern door jamb, one
course below the top (Photo 12.36). This entrance
led to the north, where an open area with cooking
facilities was found in Squares T/3-4, although note
that this opening was partially blocked on the north
by Wall 1506, probably during a later phase of
Stratum C-2, as described above. Wall 1483 continued to the east past its corner with Wall 2505 into
Squares T–Y/3, where it was designated Wall 2481
(Photo 12.38). All four walls of Room 1520 were
composed of hard yellow bricks, although note the
gray bricks of the earlier C-3 wall incorporated into
the lower courses of Wall 1470, as described above;
several dark brown bricks joined these gray bricks
in what might be a repair in the center of this wall
(Photo 12.34).
The two entrances that accessed this hall from
the east and the north were used concurrently. Both
were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is
clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact
(Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the
top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was
subjected to some damage, particularly on its
western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was
built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).
The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash
layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from
84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474,
2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these
striations represented the accumulation of floors in
this hall, although it was difficult to separate these
thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels
might have been a fill. Some layers contained large
patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes,
such as one long, rope-like configuration found
lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just
above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers,
most of which were sherds or fragments of small
vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots,
kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs.
13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking
facilities were found here.
A large, roughly squared mizi limestone
(0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south
of the entranceway in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35,
12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently
from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end
higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we
assume that the smooth bottom side had originally
been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in
this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers
were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position
of this large stone in front of the entranceway in
Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this
was not its original position and that it had tumbled
over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and
served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location
during the assumed earthquake that terminated this
occupation phase.
Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5
m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks
(1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were
identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a
sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and
other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the
end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake,
either during the time it was still in use or some
time after the building was abandoned.
Although it was considered that this room
could have been a basement, this possibility was
ruled out since there was no constructed element
above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran
beneath the later Building CG
Excavation to the east of Wall 2505 exposed its
eastern face with the entranceway. The top of the
wall had been damaged and leveled when the
wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was
built (Photos 12.32–12.33), protruding 0.45 m to
the east of the face of Wall 2505. The top of a
yellow brick wall (4503) that cornered with Wall
2505 was revealed 1.0 m to the north of the
entranceway; its eastern continuation was cut by
the foundations of Building CG and only its
southern face could be seen, as Wall 2429 of
Stratum C-1b was built above it. This wall was preserved much lower than Wall 2505 due to the
damage caused when the deep and massive wooden
and brick foundations of Building CG were laid
(see below). Thus, the only possible Stratum C-2
debris that could be isolated here was Locus 4500
to the south of Wall 4503.
Some 1.4 m to the north of Wall 4503 was Wall
2481, the eastern continuation of Wall 1442/1483,
which was revealed in a small probe under the floor
of Building CG (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38). The
eastern part of a north–south wall (5476) was
exposed 2.5 m to the east of Wall 2505, directly
under the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall
2411 (Photo 12.39), which had cut the top of Wall
5476 in a step-like manner, descending from north
to south, so that it was preserved five courses high
on the north and only two on the south. This
appears to have been the eastern closing wall of a
room bordered by Walls 2481 on the north, 2505 on
the west, and 4503 on the south. A small area was
excavated in this room (2469), although a floor was
not reached (Figs. 12.77, 12.79). Still another
north–south wall (5491) abutted Wall 5476 on the
east, on the level of its lowest course (85.25 m);
only one brick course of this wall was preserved,
with an offset that protruded 0.35 m to the east,
located just about on the same line as Wall 2481 to
its west (Photo 12.39). Wall 5491 might have been
a bench attached to Wall 5476 or a poorly preserved
part of the unit uncovered in Squares Y/3–4 (see
below).
Abutting the eastern face of Wall 5491 was a
beaten-earth floor (5494; Fig. 12.79) that was bordered
on the south by an east–west row of four flattopped stones, which may have been pillar bases
(Photo 12.21). The floor and the stones were laid
directly above Stratum C-3 Room 9441. All other
remains of Stratum C-2 to the south of these stones
were obliterated when Building CH and the apiary
were constructed in Stratum C-1b. The northern
border of this activity remained unknown, since it
was covered by later Stratum C-2 architecture,
described below.
Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 was founded in Stratum C-2 and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Strata C-1b and C-1a. This is one of the few instances where more or less the same building continued in all three main strata. The unit was composed of a broad room on the south and rooms or open spaces, to its north (Fig. 12.12); the relationship between the two components was not clear, due to the partial exposure.
Three walls of this room, preserved to a height of
0.7–1.25 m and built of the typical hard yellow
bricks of Stratum C-2, were revealed in Squares T–
Y/4, directly below the later walls: 6441 on the
east, 6460 on the south, and 6504 on the north
(Photos 12.40–12.41). The western part of the room
remained unexcavated and it seems that the
entrance to the room had been on this side. An
interesting feature of the eastern wall (6441) was
the damage wrought by the builders of C-1b when
they set the wooden foundations for their wall
(2454) above it; they cut back the western face and
the top of the earlier wall, whose original face protruded some 0.2 m to the west, three courses below
the cut (Photo 12.40). In the corner of the southern
and eastern walls was an offset that protruded 0.3 m
into the room (Photo 12.42).
A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443)
that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray
ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls
(Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b
Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504)
was floating above this floor, although a protruding
course of bricks found just about on level with
Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this
wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation
of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded
a layer of sandy material with some brick debris
(6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460.
Three spaces were attributed to this building in
Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between
them was found, due to overlying elements that
remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43).
Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.
The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5
was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1
Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east–
west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The
area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of
debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).
The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square
Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433)
and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south)
and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall
6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship
between these walls. At some later stage, east–west
Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added,
dividing the space into two; in the north were the
upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall
was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear
whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later
phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).
Part of a finely constructed building was excavated
in the northeastern corner of Area C, in Squares A–
C/5–6. It continued to the north, beyond the limit of
the excavation area. Building CY covered a
Stratum C-3 stone floor and installation (Fig. 12.6)
and was sealed by Strata C-1a–b Building CW.
The external measurements of the building
were 10.2 m from east to west and at least 6.3 m
from north to south. It contained a central space,
most probably a courtyard (7512), flanked on the
west and east by rooms; the two southern rooms
were exactly symmetric, but the northernmost
room on the east differed from its equivalent on the
west. The main entrance to the building was probably in the
unexcavated area to the north and perhaps led directly into the central space.
The western wall (8457), preserved 1.0 m high,
was superimposed by Wall 6408 of Strata C-1a–b.
Its entire eastern face was exposed, and also the
northern part of its western face, which served as
the border of the assumed entrance corridor leading
to Building CU; its southern part ran parallel to
Wall 6520, the eastern wall of that building. The
southern wall (7511), preserved 0.7 m high, was
known only on its northern face, since it was
covered by Wall 6444 of Building CW in Strata
C-1a–b (Figs. 12.34, 12.56) which was not dismantled. The wooden beams in the foundation of Wall
6444 were laid directly on top of Wall 7511 (Photos
12.22, 12.59–12.61). Wall 7511 was preserved at a
tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly
the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of
this wall was built of segments, with two vertical
seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a
mode of construction which might have been aimed
at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake.
Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which
closed the building on the east.
The central courtyard was 3.1 m wide and at least
5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig.
12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505)
resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level
85.15–85.25 m. In the debris was a relatively large
amount of red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well
as red-painted pottery (Figs. 13.34–13.37) and
sherds of a Late Philistine Decorated Ware (Ashdod
Ware) vessel (Fig. 13.37:8). Two clay figurine fragments, one a human head and the other a horse head
(Chapter 34, Nos. 22, 35), were found together in
the eastern part of the space, to the north of Oven
8461. Near the figurines were two sherds with letters, one with an ayin and a yod in ink, and the other
with an incised lamed (Fig. 13.37:2–3; Ahituv and
Mazar 2014: 40–42; Chapter 29A, Nos. 1, 3). Elements on Floor 7512 included:
Room 6506, the southern room, was bordered by
Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506
on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the
floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern
end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square
(2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellowearth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of
fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount
of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This
room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1
Building CW.
Room 8470, the northern room, was bordered
on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the
northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the
northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was
beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly
like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had
a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner,
leading from the central courtyard. A smooth
yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16
m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three
nicely worked limestones were set in a row along
Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones
along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of
dark organic material, similar to that in the southern
room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW
(Fig. 12.55).
Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room
6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered
by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458
on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide
entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway
into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m,
was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the
tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14;
Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not
proceed down below the floor, it seems that this
was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that
under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer
above the floor (8466) included complete fallen
yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much
pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34–
13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones,
including horns.
North of Room 8488 was a narrow space
(8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls
8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the
eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by
bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that
made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479
impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b
Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space
was what looked like an intentional blockage on its
western end that was composed of three parts
(Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide),
spanning the entrance from the central space, and
preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second
component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was
not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks
laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m
to their east was yet another apparent blockage
(8485), although it was more typical of a regularly
built wall in width, preserved five to six courses
high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide.
None of these rows of bricks bonded with either
Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the
south. No clear floor level was identified in this
narrow space, although it was excavated down to
the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of
the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material
(phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern
face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this
narrow space was a staircase leading to a second
story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the
foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation
is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.
To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two
walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued
to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west.
The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow
row of bricks, identical to the westernmost
blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor
(8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just
inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds
and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the
floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was
located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the
outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined
Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the
continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper
story.
We have no way of knowing to what extent
Building CY continued to the north. One possibility
is that the northern outer wall was close to the excavation limit; in that case, the building had a central
courtyard flanked by two rooms on the west and
two rooms on the east. Another possibility is that
the building was much larger and included additional rooms on each side of the courtyard. In any
event, the entrance would have been from the north
directly into the central courtyard. The flat stones
along the walls of the courtyard and the narrow corridor or staircase (8479) are exceptional features in
the Iron IIA architecture at Tel Rehov.
Building CY is one of the few examples in Iron
Age IIA Tel Rehov of a courtyard house. The plan
is somewhat similar to that of Building CZ in
Squares A–C/2–3, 10 m to the south, assigned to
Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.48). It recalls, to some
extent, Iron Age II houses known from Hazor Area
B (next to the citadel), Samaria and Megiddo. Such
structures were explained by Yeivin, followed by
Herzog, as representing officials’ houses, and were
dubbed “scribes’ chambers” (Herzog 1992: 229–
230, with references)
In Square R/4, above C-2 Room 1555, two main phases were attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a; the latter was the clearest and best preserved, found just below topsoil and containing destruction debris and restorable vessels on a floor. Traces of additional narrow brick walls and restorable pottery revealed in the topsoil to the north and south of Square R/4, and in Square Q/4 of Area D, indicated that domestic occupation in the Iron Age IIA reached the western perimeter of the tell, with no evidence for any fortification wall.
Several phases of construction were found in this
room (Fig. 12.24).
The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b was 1557,
which continued the northern line of Wall 1413 that
ran the entire length of Area C on the west (see
details below); it seems that Wall 1557 was not
used in Stratum C-1a. Parallel to it and 3.1 m to its
west was Wall 1563, which apparently continued to
be in use from Stratum C-2. In the initial phase of
Stratum C-1b, a pink plaster floor (4483) passed
below Walls 2416 and 4457, and possibly related to
Wall 1557 on the east. At this stage, Wall 1568,
which abutted the southern continuation of Wall
1557, was most probably the southern wall of the
room, while its northern wall was beyond the excavation area. In a later phase of C-1b, Wall 2416 was
built against the western face of Wall 1557; on the
south, it abutted Wall 1568. In the center of the
room, a narrow north–south wall (4457; Photo
12.64), preserved only one course high, made a
corner on the south with Wall 4458, which was first
built in Stratum C-2 (see above, Room 1555). In
Stratum C-1b, its eastern part was covered by Floor
4483; a small round posthole was found on the
northeastern end of this floor. The addition of Wall
4457 formed a narrow space (0.9 m wide) on the
western side of the room. While Floor 4483 ran
below the secondary walls (2416, 4457), the occupation debris above the floor abutted these walls.
To the west of Wall 4457, Floor 4488, made of
plaster with a layer of striations above it, penetrated
below Wall 4457. In the second phase, a higher
floor (4464) was laid, 0.1 m above the latter, abutting Walls 4457 and 4458. To this same phase, and
perhaps to the same building, we attributed several
walls surrounding a courtyard with ovens found in
Square Q/4, which was part of Area D (Chapter 15;
see also Fig. 12.24). The density of construction
and layers points to the intensive activity in this
area on the cusp of the mound during the course of
Stratum C-1b.
A new room was built above the C-1b remains in
this square, reusing Wall 2416 and adding new
walls on the south (2423), west (1554) and north
(1552) (Fig. 12.25). Wall 1558 was a short segment
that seemed to corner with Wall 1552; perhaps it
was the original western wall of the room that was
removed at one point and replaced by Wall 1554,
slightly to the west. A concentration of stones
(2450), some of which were grinding stone
fragments, was found in the southwestern corner of
the square. These might have been part of a pavement which had continued to the west, but was
eroded down the slope. A north–south row of
three stones, running along the western face of
Wall 1554, may have belonged to a room in Square
Q/4 (Area D), bounded by Walls 1816 and 1808
(Figs. 12.19, 12.25). This space, poorly preserved
due to the severe erosion on the slope of the mound,
may have belonged to the same building as Room
2442.
Inside the room was a 0.4 m-deep layer of burnt
destruction debris (2405) on a beaten-earth floor
(2442, 87.56 m); part of this floor was a rectangular
patch of hard plaster (2438) which abutted the
northern face of Wall 2423 (Photo 12.65). It sloped
slightly down to the north (0.18 m over 1.2 m) and
might have served for some liquid-related activity;
this plaster had been repaired with a whitish lime
substance at one time during its use. In the burnt
debris was an assemblage of restorable vessels
(Figs. 13.68–13.70). One sherd of an imported
Greek bowl was found as well (Fig. 13.70:22; see
Chapter 28A). The smaller vessels in this room
were found just below topsoil, in a layer above two
parallel rows of storage jars that rested directly on
the floor, one running along Wall 2416 and the
other near Wall 1554 on the west. Most of the jars
were fallen with their rims to the north; under several of the jars was a burnt patch with phytolith,
suggesting that they had been set on some organic
material, such as reed mats or wood.
Above the elements attributed to Stratum C-2 to the
north of Building CA in Squares R–S/4 was the
southern end of a room or a courtyard located in
front of Building CD (Fig. 12.24). Although not
well preserved, a gap in its southern wall (1524)
was probably an entrance, on line with the entrance
to Building CD, thus linking the two units. Wall
1524 was built on top of a thin fill laid on Stratum
C-2 Wall 8503; it ran flush against Wall 1464 of
Building CD, creating a wide double wall (Fig.
12.66). The western end of Wall 1524 continued
westward to abut (but not to join) the eastern face of
Wall 2416, and was abutted on the north by Wall
1557. Several bricks with two marginal bosses on
each end were incorporated in Wall 1524. Such protrusions must have been part of the brick mold and
their function might have been to improve the grip
of the mud plaster that covered the walls. Alternatively, it could have been intended as a decorative
element, as no traces of plaster were found. Bricks
with similar protrusions were also found in walls of
Stratum C-1b in Buildings CE and CF (see below).
On the east, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 2501,
although this corner was disturbed. On the west,
Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 1557, the northern
end of long backbone Wall 1413. All three walls
were abutted by occupation debris (1512) and a
floor (2494, 86.75 m), which contained an oven
(2496) and a stone basin in the northern balk
(unnumbered). The floor (4491) in the western part
of this space was set on a bedding of small stones
that raised it slightly higher than the floor level to
the east.
No architecture that could be attributed to
Stratum C-1a was found here and the same loose
debris, possibly a disturbance, that covered
Building CD, also covered these remains (Fig.
12.25).
This building in Squares S/3–4 (Fig. 12.24; Photo
12.2) was, in fact, a renovation of Stratum C-2
Building CA. The outer walls were rebuilt along
the same lines, but the inner division was canceled,
thus creating a large, roughly rectangular space; the
external measurements were 5.0×6.2 m and the
floor space, ca. 20 sq m.
All the outer walls of C-2 Building CA were
rebuilt with a new type of brick made of light gray,
dark gray and light brown clay. The demarcation
between the previous walls and the rebuild was
very clear and a distinct line of a fill or repair was
visible, especially in the northern, eastern and
southern walls (Figs. 12.65–12.67; Photos 12.28,
12.66). This was a layer of light brownish-gray clay
(similar to the brick material) that was packed
down on top of the damaged C-2 walls, leveling
them in preparation for the rebuild.
On the north, Wall 1464 replaced C-2 Wall
4438; the entrance into the new building was now
located nearer to the center of the northern wall,
through an opening in the double wall (1524/1464).
Wall 1464 was deliberately cut on its western end,
as can be seen in the western balk of Square S/4
(Fig. 12.66). On the west, Wall 1523 replaced C-2
Wall 4440 (Fig. 12.67); it was poorly preserved and
tilted severely towards the east, especially in its
northern part. This wall ran along the eastern face
of Wall 1413, with the latter continuing further to
the south and north to enclose additional units. On
the south, Wall 1448 replaced C-2 Wall 4439; the
repair line between the two walls was clearest here
(Photo 12.28). On the east, Wall 2495 replaced C-2
Wall 4434 (Fig. 12.66; Photo 12.66); however, the
former was traced only in Square S/4 and did not
continue to the south. This may be due to its state of
preservation or, as suggested above, Wall 1506,
possibly built at the end of Stratum C-2 as a buttress
for the damaged eastern wall of Building CA, continued in Stratum C-1b as the southeastern wall of
Building CD (Fig. 12.68). As noted above, it is possible that Wall 1506 had been first built in Stratum
C-1b, although this seems less likely. This rather
makeshift arrangement would have lent a slipshod
look to this part of the building, which contrasts
with the otherwise well-built walls. The eastern
side of Building CD was less well preserved, just
like in its predecessor, Building CA.
The inner division of the previous Building CA
was cancelled. The inner walls were deliberately
removed, so that five to six cut courses were
detected close to their juncture with the external
walls of the building: Wall 2509 of the previous
building was cut 0.35 m to the east of its corner
with Wall 4440 and Wall 2493 was cut 0.15 m to the
north of its corner with Wall 4439 (Photo 12.28).
The reason for the deliberate razing of these inner
partition walls was not clear; perhaps they were in
such a poor state of preservation following the
destruction of Building CA that they required
removal before the leveling and rebuilding could
take place.3 Indeed, below the lowest floor of
Building CD were layers of brick debris interspersed with layers of red clay and ashy gray
striations, which might be understood as a fill
(2491 in Square S/4, 2485 in Square S/3) laid on top
of the previous building, serving to level off the
razed walls. These layers yielded sherds and partial
vessels, including red-slipped and hand-burnished
bowls and jugs (Fig. 13.41).
On top of this debris/fill were successive occupation layers, with a total thickness of 0.6–0.8 m,
rich in sherds and bones: 2486, 1485 and 1466 in
Square S/4, and 1474 in Square S/3. While these
layers were stratified, it was difficult to clearly
identify a floor. Two flat-topped stones were found
near the northeastern and northwestern corners of
the building, relating to Locus 2486. Their function
was not clear, as they were too close to the wall to
have served as pillar bases, recalling the stones
along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 (see
discussion above).
The only internal construction in the new
building was a row of crumbly gray bricks (0.5–0.6
m wide) added along the northern face of Wall
1448, covering the cut southern end of Stratum C-2
Wall 2493. This element (2484) was preserved 0.4–
0.6 m high and 3.4 m long; it might have been a
bench along Wall 1448.
The end of Building CD was not violent and no
traces of sudden destruction were found. The
building was not renovated in Stratum C-1a, when
its southern part was covered by the northern end of
Piazza CK and its northern part was covered by a
layer of loose debris (1412, 1417) that appeared to
have been a disturbance of some sort.
In Stratum C-1a, Building CD went out of use and a
large open area, denoted Piazza CK, replaced it
(Squares S–T/2–3). This courtyard included the
open area to the south of Building CD, as well as
the cooking area described above. It was bordered
on the south by Wall 1437 (the northern wall of
Building CJ) and an additional stub of a wall
(1415), on the east by Wall 1416 (the western wall
of Building CG), and on the west by Wall 1413 (the
long backbone wall running along the entire area).
On the northeastern end of this space was a short
wall (1457) that seemed to be a continuation of the
northern wall of Building CG; it was preserved
only one course high and ended abruptly after 2.0
m, on line with Wall 1415 on the south. It is possible that these were stubs of walls that had been
dismantled or otherwise damaged. Thus, the width
of Piazza CK ranged from 7.0 m on the south to 8.0
m on the north, and its length was at least 13 m, as
the northern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. The total area was at least 97 sq m,
making this one of the largest open areas in all
strata in Area C, which was, for the most part,
densely built up. Access into the piazza must have
been from the north.
In the enclosure formed by these walls, the
northwestern quadrant (Square S/4) contained a
layer of soft earth and eroded brick debris (1417,
1412, 1439) that might have been a late disturbance, while in the rest of the area, very burnt and
vitrified brick debris resting on a hard-packed
white floor (1418, 1422, 1428) was revealed under
topsoil (Figs. 12.65, 12.69). Running through the
center of this courtyard on a north–south axis and
abutted on the east, south and west by the destruction debris and white floor, was a concentration of
stones, several of which were grinding stone fragments, and brick fragments (1427) (Photo 12.70).
This element was roughly L-shaped, with a plastered, right-angled niche in its western face, which
contained part of a smashed storage jar (unrestored); another storage jar (Fig. 13.72:9) abutted
the installation on its south, and yet another one
(Fig. 13.72:10) was found to its north. Another concentration of basalt stones was found 0.5 m to the
south of 1427, designated 1496; they most likely
comprised parts of the same element, perhaps with
a stone missing in the middle. Two cooking pots
(Fig. 13.71:7, 9) were found against the western
face of these stones (Photo 12.71). An additional
element was a brick block (1458), 1.0 m long, 0.5 m
wide and preserved to one or two courses, located
just to the west of the southern end of 1427 (Fig.
12.69). This might have been a work surface or,
perhaps, a space divider.
Wall 1413, that bordered Piazza CK on the west, ran for 19.7 m on a slightly southeast–northwest line along the western end of the entire area and continued beyond the limits of the excavation to both the north and the south (Photos 12.2–12.5). In Square R/4, Wall 1413 abutted the western end of Wall 1524. The continuation of its line to the north was denoted 1557 (Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.8). The southern part of Wall 1413 was made of hard yellow bricks, typical of Stratum C-2, as opposed to the light gray bricks of the rest of the wall, typical of Strata C-1b and C-1a. This was the only place in this wall where two phases were discerned: in the earlier phase (Stratum C-1b), the wall was termed 2432 and the later phase, 1431 (Stratum C-1a). Wall 1413 was constructed slightly above and west of Stratum C-2 Buildings CA and CB (Figs. 12.16, 12.69). In Stratum C-1b, its lower part adjoined the western wall of Building CD and it served as the western border of the space south of Building CD, of the unit north of Building CD, and of Building CJ. In Stratum C-1a, it was the western border of Building CJ and Piazza CK. In Square R/4, the structures of both Strata C-1b and C-1a (described above) were attached to its western face. Wall 1413 was unique in its length and multiple-use in several units during the course of two strata, making it a prime example of the integrated urban planning that characterized this area.
Building CE was located in Squares T–Y/4–6, to the east of the cooking area in Square T/4. The building was composed of a broad room in the south and an area to its north, of which a strip, 2.0 m wide and 10 m long, was excavated (Photo 12.75). The broad room was a rebuild of an earlier structure, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.9–12.10); it had two phases, while the area to the north had three. In Stratum C-1b, the building suffered a destruction, after which it was renovated in Stratum C-1a and continued to be used with various changes, mainly in its northern part, until its final destruction.
Room 2489 was a rectangular room (internal measurements 2.0×4.8 m; 9.6 sq m) with an entrance
just east of the center of the northern wall (1491);
the threshold was paved with a wooden plank (Fig.
12.27; Photo 12.76). Inside the entrance were a
bowl and a cup-and-saucer (Figs. 13.44:4,
13.45:12). The southern wall of this room (1473)
ran parallel to the northern wall of Building CG
(see below), separated by a 0.10 m gap, which contained a large amount of sherds, possibly a fill. The
eastern end of Wall 1473 dog-legged 0.3 m to the
north, exactly following the line of the C-2 wall
here. The eastern wall (2454) was part of a long
wall that enclosed the entire building on the east.
Note that Wall 2454 was oriented due north–south,
while the rest of the room was angled towards the
west, so that this wall was not parallel to the
western wall of the building (1487), lending a
somewhat crooked look to room. Wall 2454 was
built flush against the western wall of Building CF;
together, they were 1.1 m wide. At its southern end,
Wall 2454 made a corner with Wall 4479, the
northern wall of Building CM to the south in
Stratum C-1b, which created a double wall with the
southern wall of Building CF. This construction
method well demonstrates the closely interrelated
character of the architecture of the buildings in this
northeastern insula.
All the walls were composed of hard graybrown bricks, with light-colored mortar lines; they
were burnt to black in some instances, particularly
in the east. The western face of Wall 2454 and the
southern face of Wall 1491 included bricks with
marginal bosses composed of two vertical protrusions on each end of the brick (Fig. 12.29; Photos
12.77–12.78), identical to those found in other
buildings in the north-central part of Area C in
Stratum C-1b, including the unit north of Building
CD, described above, and Building CF; they were
also found in the walls of the rooms to the north of
the broad room in Building CE (Photo 12.83).
Walls 2454 and 1491 contained a thick and intricate
construction of perpendicular and parallel wooden
beams in their foundations (Fig. 12.29; Photos
12.77–12.78). The beams, like the bricks, were
very burnt.
The smooth reddish-brown beaten-earth floor
(2489, 86.30 m) was coated by a thick layer of
black ash (2458; Fig. 12.64), covering mostly the
eastern half of the room (Photo 12.76). A small
square plastered brick (2477; 0.45 x.0.45 m, 0.45 m
high) was attached to Wall 1491, just east of the
entrance and opposite the offset in Wall 1473. It had
a slight depression on top which contained some
light gray ash, although it is possible that it had
served as a jar support. Underneath it was an intact
juglet in a small pit (Fig. 13.45:10), apparently
placed there as a foundation deposit before the
brick was laid.
Following the destruction of C-1b, the broad room continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a with the same walls (Fig. 12.28), although there was a visible repair in the upper courses of the western wall (1487), composed of light gray bricks (Photos 12.76, 12.79). Above the burnt debris on the floor of C-1b was a layer of hard brick debris (2443) that supported an earthen floor (1471) at level 86.65 m, which was covered by a layer of decayed brick debris with some ash (Fig. 12.64; Photo 12.79).
Remains of rooms and possibly a courtyard were found in Squares Y/5–6 to the north of the broad room (Photos 12.80–12.84). It seems that these were part of Building CE, particularly due to the shared walls and similar construction techniques, although no entrance was found to join them in the limited excavated area. Each of these components had two phases, attributed to C-1b and C-1a, while the northern courtyard contained yet an additional phase.
Two narrow rooms (6448, 6449) were excavated to
the north of the eastern side of the broad room; no
entrance joined them. The eastern wall of both
rooms was the continuation of Wall 2454, indicating that the northern rooms and the broad room
to the south were part of the same building.
Like in its southern end, the foundations of the
entire length of Wall 2454 contained a thick and
intricate composition of wooden beams, both perpendicular and parallel to the lower course of bricks
(Figs. 12.30, 12.62). Wooden beams, all charred,
were found below the floors of the two rooms as
well (Photos 12.80–12.81). All of the wood was set
into a distinct layer of soft reddish earth (6426,
6486; Fig. 12.32); such a construction of wooden
beams in a reddish fill was a feature found in the
foundations of other Stratum C-1b buildings as
well.
The western wall of the two northern rooms
was Wall 6452; only its eastern face was uncovered. This wall cornered with Wall 1491 on the
south, just east of the entranceway in that wall. Wall
6452 also had many wooden beams in and
adjoining its foundation (Figs. 12.30, 12.62–
12.63). Walls 2454 and 6452 ran for 7.0 m and two
east–west cross walls (6447 and 7445) divided this
space into two identical rooms (6448 on the north
and 6449 on the south), each 3.1 m long and
between 1.6–1.8 m wide. The difference in width
was due to the angle of Wall 6452, which ran
slightly southeast to northwest, as opposed to the
straight north–south line of Wall 2454. Wall 6447,
which separated the two rooms, had wood in its
foundation, but Wall 7445, the northern wall of
Room 6448), did not. As they had no entrances, it is
possible that these rooms served as storage spaces,
accessed from above. All the walls of these rooms,
aside from 7445, which was poorly preserved,
included bricks with marginal bosses composed of
thin vertical protrusions on both ends, which were
hallmarks of Stratum C-1b in this part of the area,
as noted above (Figs. 12.29, 12.63; Photo 12.83).
The southern room had a patchy beaten-earth
floor at level 86.12 m (6449), on which were vessels and sherds,
among them three complete chalices (Fig. 13.44:10–11, 13), as well as loomweights
and a concentration of burnt grain against Wall
1491. Four 14C measurements of this grain (Chapter
48, Sample R24) provided a calibrated average date
between 902–843 BCE (1σ) and 920–830 BCE
(2σ).
Two large bricks set near the corner of Walls
6452 and 1491 might have served as a kind of
podium or shelf, possibly for the chalices found
nearby (Photo 12.82). Room 6448 contained a similar floor in its southern part, while its northern part
contained a concentration of stones that might have
been a disturbed stone floor (7451), including two
broken upper grinding stones. The stones were covered by a thin layer of debris (7446) with some
sherds and bones.
Rooms 6448 and 6449 were covered by a fill
(6432), which leveled them in preparation for the
renovation that took place in Stratum C-1a.
To the north of Wall 7445 in Square Y/6 was an
open space, continuing the activity that was here in
Stratum C-2. This space is described here as part of
Building CE, although, in fact, no entrance to the
two southern rooms was found, and it might represent the southern part of an open space to the north
of this building. The two phases identified in this
space were both attributed to Stratum C-1b, as they
covered the Stratum C-2 activity and were sealed
by the Stratum C-1a courtyard floor.
The courtyard surface was composed of red and
gray striations (7427) that were a direct continuation of those found here in Stratum C-2 and their
attribution to two sub-phases of C-1b was based on
their relation to related installations. The lowest
layer was related to three poorly preserved installations, whose function remained unknown (Fig.
12.31): a ring of brown clay (7463), almost directly
underneath C-1b Oven 7443, and two semi-circles
of soft red clay (7464, 7465), filled with light gray
ash. These installations seem to each have been
used only for a short time and cut each other in a
haphazard manner.
In the later phase of Stratum C-1b, the uppermost layer of the red and gray striations contained
one poorly preserved oven (7443) and several
shallow red-clay circles (7433, 7437, 7438), similar
to those of the previous sub-phase. In both phases,
only a few sherds and bones were found.
The center and southeastern part of these
remains were cut by Pit 6498 (Photo 12.87).
A reddish clay floor (6433, 5415) in Square Y/5
was laid at level 86.75 m, above a fill covering
C-1b Rooms 6448 and 6449. Thus, the entire area
north of Wall 1491 and west of Wall 2454 became
an open area, at least 10 m long and continuing to
the north beyond the excavation area. The reddish
clay floor was covered by a soft burnt layer just
under topsoil. The floor and burnt debris abutted
the rather poorly preserved upper courses of Walls
2454 and 1491, which were rebuilt after the C-1b
destruction. Below Floor 5415 was a layer of
wooden beams that both penetrated underneath the
foundation of the C-1a rebuild of Wall 2454 here
and extended into part of the room. This wood was
laid in two layers: an east–west upper layer and a
north–south lower layer (Fig. 12.32). This was one
of the few instances where wood was used in construction in Stratum C-1a.
A number of installations were set on this floor.
In the southeastern corner was a mud-plastered clay
ring (5436) containing a large lower grinding stone
inside; an upper grinding stone was found below
this and another such grinding stone rested on top
of the clay ring. This is similar to grinding installations found in other Stratum C-1a buildings, such as
Buildings CF, CQ1, CQ2 and CP. The southern part
of a similar ring (5438) was found in the northwestern corner of Square Y/5, although it did not
contain any grinding stones. Three bricks were
found to the west of 5436 and one to its north. The
southern part of the space was covered with a layer
of burnt destruction debris containing pottery and
loomweights (Photo 12.84), while the northern part
was less burnt.
On the northern end of this open area (Square
Y/6) was a layer of brick debris and collapse, with
some ash and charcoal (7404), abutting Wall 4422
and the northern end of Wall 2454. Although no
clear floor level was discerned, this layer clearly
covered the Stratum C-1b activity below. Three
intact vessels (Fig. 13.76:6, 10–11), one jug and
two juglets, were found in this debris layer.
Building CR was the southern part of a building in Squares Y–Z/6 that continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.43, 12.86) and was, in fact, a rebuild of Stratum C-2 Building CT; this was one of the few instances of continuity between all the Iron Age IIA strata in Area C. Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. The southern wall of Building CR was also the northern wall of Building CF and its eastern wall was the western boundary of the entrance into that building (Photo 12.86). The southwestern corner of this building was cut by Pit 6498 (Photos 12.43, 12.48, 12.87).
Building CF in Squares Y–A/4–6 was one of the
largest and most interesting structures in Area C. Its
unique plan, fine construction, and exceptional
finds point to its importance. The building was initially constructed in Stratum C-1b and, following a
destruction, was renovated and reused until its final
destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. Its external
measurements were 8.7×11.3 m (excluding Wall
2454 on the west and the entrance corridor) and its
floor space was 50.46 sq m in Stratum C-1b and
52.89 sq m in C-1a. This latter phase was the best
known, as it was exposed just below topsoil and
destroyed in a fierce conflagration, after which the
building was abandoned. Although the remains of
Stratum C-1b were not as well preserved, they
were sufficient to define a separate building phase,
with finds attributed to its floors. Both phases
will be described together, emphasizing the stratigraphic considerations that led to the division
between the two. Building CF was built over
Stratum C-2 Building CU (Photos 12.85, 12.100–
12.104); although both buildings were of the same
orientation, they were two entirely different structures.
Building CF contained an entrance corridor in
the northeast and three main components: a rectangular space on the north, with a western and an
eastern wing to its south. Each of these wings was
enclosed by separate walls that adjoined each other
to form double walls, so that each was both independent and united. Double walls also surrounded
the building on the west, south and east; these walls
had a total width of 1.0–1.1 m. This, along with the
well-built straight walls, lent the structure a sturdy
look and also raises the possibility that the building
had an upper floor. Thus, Building CF, although a
unique and independent structure, was an integral
part of a well-planned quarter that was densely built
in both Strata C-1b and C-1a (Photos 12.6–12.7,
12.91–12.92; 12.169).
The entrance into the building in both strata was in its northeastern corner, through a passageway which continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. The entrance was bordered on the east by Wall 6408 in both strata and on the west by the eastern end of Building CR (Wall 7458 in the early phase of Stratum C-1b, brick rows 6512 in the later phase of C-1b, and Wall 6419 in Stratum C-1a). This formed a 2.0 m-wide corridor which was narrower only in the latter part of Stratum C-1b, when 6512 occupied part of its western side. Three phases were discerned in the entrance, one attributed to the construction of the building and the other two to Strata C-1b and C-1a.
This wing was composed of a large room on the north and a smaller room to its south; the latter was accessed only through the former. In Stratum C-1b, the larger northern room of this wing was separated from the northern rectangular space described above by a wall, making it a separate room. In Stratum C-1a, when this wall was removed, these two spaces were united and were accessed directly from the entrance in the northeast of the building. On the other hand, the southern room remained the same in both strata. The description below follows these developments: the two phases in the northern room are described separately (C-1b and C-1a), and the two phases in the southern room are described together.
In both Strata C-1b and C-1a, the western wing of
the building (Squares Y–Z/4–6) was composed of a
long rectangular space. In Stratum C-1b, there was
a small niche or cell on the north and the rest was
one long hall, while in Stratum C-1a, the hall was
divided into four consecutive rooms, including the
small niche/cell on the north, and three small rooms
to its south (Photos 12.92, 12.101).
This wing was bordered on three sides by
double walls that remained the same in both strata:
on the west by Walls 4422 and 2454, on the south
by Walls 4413 and 4479, and on the east by Walls
5414 and 5454. In Stratum C-1b, the northern
border of this wing was a single wall (6533), while
in Stratum C-1a, it was composed of a double wall:
Wall 6409 was built alongside Wall 6410, the
southern wall of Building CR.
This was a small room (internal measurements 1.5×3.1 m; 4.65 sq m) built above the
small chamber/nich, 7409, of Stratum C-1b. On the
north, west and south, the tops of the C-1b walls
(6533, 6534, 6535) were visible in the floor
makeup of the new room. Although they lined the
walls, they were different from the other benches in
this wing, as they did not rise above the floor level,
and they continued down to be abutted by the C-1b
rubble rather than built above it.
The room was entered from the broad space to
the east. The beaten-earth floor (6435, level 86.85
m) was 0.35 m higher than Floor 6427 to the east,
which would have necessitated some kind of small
step to join them. A large grinding stone installation
(6406) occupied its southeastern part. On the floor
was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401)
that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an
exceptionally large amount considering the small
space (Figs. 13.80–13.96; Photos 12.106–12.107).
Just below topsoil were fragments of an elaborate
horned pottery altar with mold-made female figures
(Photo 12.108; Chapter 35, No. 5). The impression
was that the numerous finds here were in storage
and not found as used, since they were densely
packed in this small area, around the grinding stone
installation (6406) that took up part of the room as
well (Photos 12.106–12.107, 12.109–12.110).
Installation 6406 was comprised of a finely
made oval, round-topped clay parapet, 0.4 m high,
enclosing a large lower grinding stone, on top of
which was a complete upper grinding stone lying
on its eastern end. The large lower grinding stone
was somewhat raised above the floor of the
installation and tilted down from west to east, so as
to facilitate the gathering of the grain into a small
depression between the western end of the lower
grinding stone and the parapet. Curiously, the
installation, built against the eastern end of Wall
5464, was situated so that its eastern end partially
blocked the entrance to the room to the south. It is
either possible that this was a later addition to the
room or that, despite its position, it was not considered as an obstacle. This installation was similar to
the one found in Room 5498 of the eastern wing of
Building CF, as well as in Building CQ1 and possibly, Buildings CQ2, CP and CE; one was found in
Area G as well (Chapter 20). The clay parapets of
these grinding stone installations enabled flour to
be easily collected and to prevent grain from being
scattered. It seems that the grinder would have
worked from the higher (western) side of the installation, so as to use gravity when pushing the upper
grinding stone (as in Photo 12.110), although this
was quite a cramped space to crouch in.
The second room from the north, built
above C-1b burnt debris 5478 (Figs. 12.59–12.60),
was the largest (internal measurements 2.4×2.7 m;
6.48 sq m). Destruction debris (5425 on the east and
5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and
the benches (Photo 12.111). The northern wall
(5464) was built on top of a wider wall (5474) that
protruded on its southern face, creating a kind of
narrow bench; a shallow niche created in Wall 5464
widened this bench to 0.3 m. Abutting the western
wall (4422) was a line of bricks that cornered with
5474 and created a bench (5472). A similar situation existed on the east, where Bench 5473 abutted
Wall 5414; this bench continued south into the
other rooms as well and cornered on the north with
5474. No bench lined the southern wall.
Among the many finds was a Hippo storage jar
with an inscription reading לשקינמש, Isqymns (Fig.
13.91:2; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 303–304; Ahituv
and Mazar 2014: 44–45; Chapter 29A, No. 6). It
was found in Locus 5425, along with another 40
vessels, several of them intact (Figs. 13.80–13.87,
13.89, 13.91–13.93, 13.95–13.96); most were concentrated in the southeastern part of the room, near
the entrance leading south to Room 5445 (Photo
12.111). Among them was a unique shovel (Fig.
13.96:1; Chapter 35, No. 49).
The middle room, built above C-1b
burnt debris 5479, was the smallest (internal measurements 1.2×2.7 m; 3.24 sq. m). Its northern wall
(5431) was built on top of a slightly wider wall/
bench (5484), so that only 0.2 m of the latter protruded into the room on the south, but not at all on
the north. On the west, Bench 5485 cornered with
5484. On the east, the situation was somewhat
ambivalent: it seems that 5473, the eastern bench of
Room 5460 to the north, continued to the south into
Room 5445 as well. However, an additional row of
bricks, identical to Bench 5473, adjoined it on the
west. Above this western row of bricks was a line
composed of large chunks of burnt bricks. This feature (5458), 0.3 m wide and 1.5 m long, stood two
courses high and blocked the entrance into this room,
as well as the entrance into the southernmost room
(Photo 12.111). However, although it appears to have
been built as a blockage, it is possible to understand it
as the collapse of bricks from one of the walls that
happened to land on this line inside the room.
Room 5445 was filled with burnt destruction
debris (5421, 5467) that covered and abutted the
benches and rested on Floor 5445; however, as
opposed to the other rooms in this building, it was
virtually empty, with only a small amount of
sherds, mostly concentrated on the eastern bench
(Figs. 13.81–13.82). Among the sherds was a fragment of a Greek bowl (Fig. 13.96:9; Chapter 28A).
This room, built above C-1b burnt
debris 5463 (Fig. 12.60) was the southernmost and
innermost room in the western wing (internal
measurements 1.8×2.7 m; 4.86 sq m) (Photos
12.112–12.113). Its northern wall (5497) was built
on top of a wider wall that served as a narrow bench
on the south (5471); a niche cut out of the southern
face of the wall exposed 0.5 m of this bench,
although on the eastern and western ends, where
there was no niche, only 0.1 m of it protruded. This
arrangement was almost identical to that in the
northern end of the northernmost room. This small
room was found full of extremely burnt destruction
debris (4414) on the white lime floor with some ash
(5444), including many fallen bricks that had been
fired almost to the consistency of pottery. Thirteen
vessels from this room were restored (Figs. 13.80–
13.81, 13.83–13.84, 13.86, 13.90–13.96). Several
of these were found on (or partly on) the benches,
including a Hippo storage jar on the eastern bench
(Fig. 13.91:4), another storage jar (Fig. 13.90:9) on
the eastern end of the northern bench, just where
the entrance was, and a very large krater (Fig.
13.92:7) on the southern bench. A unique find was a
large, heavy clay box with a matching lid (Fig.
13.96a:10) in the northwestern corner of the room
(Photo 12.112). This box, very distorted by fire, ca.
0.55 m wide, 0.65 m long and 0.45 m high, was set
on a protrusion in the corner of Benches 5469 and
5471, composed of bricks identical to those of the
benches, apparently deliberately built to accommodate the box (Photo 12.113). The lid of the box was
found overturned just to its east, above a bowl (Fig.
13.80:6) and an intact juglet (Fig. 13.95:11) was
found just below the box’s southwestern corner; the
only finds inside the box was a small fragment of a
very worn female figurine (Chapter 34, No. 13).
The location of this room in the deep interior of
the western wing of Building CF, which was
surrounded on three sides by double walls and
accessed only through the other rooms of the
western wing, as well as the unique pottery box and
ceramic assemblage, indicated that it had some special function, perhaps some sort of a treasury.
The architecture and contents of Building CF are
unique in many ways. Although the grinding installations, oven and many loomweights found in this
building in Stratum C-1a are typical of household
activity, the plan of this building, the double walls,
and the unique finds make it exceptional.
The net floor space is not exceptional and
should be regarded as modest compared to other
Iron Age II houses (Table 12.13; Schloen 2001:
165–183; Mazar 2008; see summary below),
although it was larger than most other buildings
excavated at Tel Rehov. Based on the width of the
walls, we may assume that the house had a second
story, although no evidence for a staircase was
found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been
located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor.
Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that
all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on
the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the
debris. Although one may surmise that the large
northeastern space (5498) in Stratum C-1a was an
open courtyard, this does not seem feasible, in spite
of the fact that an oven was located at the northern
end of this space. Air and light could be obtained
through the main entrance on the north and windows in the southern wall of the building, since all
other walls bordered neighboring buildings.
The most outstanding feature in this building
was the row of small rooms in the western wing in
Stratum C-1a, with benches along the walls. The
consecutive arrangement of four rooms entered
successively by way of the previous room, lined
with benches along most of the walls, is virtually
unparalleled in the Iron Age architecture in Israel
(see further below). The small size of these rooms
and the fact that the two inner ones could not get
direct light or air except from the room to the north,
emphasize their unique function. The inscribed jar
with the inscription — לשקינמש, lšqynmš — found
in the largest of these rooms, and the massive pottery box with the lid found in the southern room,
allude to a special function of this wing. We can
suggest that these were the offices of an important
personality, perhaps a merchant or a clan leader,
and that the box served as a ‘treasury’ of some kind.
The unique model shrine, decorated altar facade,
and so-called ‘footbath’ (the function of which
remains enigmatic), as well as the presence of two
elaborate grinding stone installations, a loom, and
other rich finds from this building, are evidence of
this special function.
The construction of this building in Stratum
C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as
Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. The integration
of Building CF with the buildings surrounding it
during both strata is typical of the architectural and
occupational nature of the Iron Age IIA at Tel
Rehov. One possible reason for such dense and
crowded construction may be related to efforts to
stabilize the structures in light of the seismic sensitivity in this region. This may also be related to
local architectural traditions that continued during
all of Iron IIA, perhaps with earlier origins, and
were special markers of the inhabitants’ cultural
identity.
An interesting parallel to the plan of this
building can be seen at Megiddo in Stratum VA–
IVB Building 2081 (Loud 1948: 44–46, plan: Fig.
388, reconstructed plan: Fig. 100). This building
comprised a large courtyard (2081). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a cult corner
containing two stone horned altars, two pottery
stands and additional objects (Zevit 2001: 220–
225). From the courtyard, an entrance led into a unit
that resembled Building CF, with a rectangular hall
containing an inner chamber. From the front part of
the hall, an entrance led into a narrow side chamber,
which, in turn, led into two additional rooms
arranged in a similar manner as those in Building
CF, with entrances located at the end of the walls. It
may be suggested that a room at the southwestern
corner of this building was also part of this chain of
rooms, since the walls were preserved lower than
the floor and the location of entrances could not be
determined with any certainty in this place. The
size of this building fits that of Building CF. It differed in having an additional western wing, the
long hall 2163. However, no entrance connecting
the eastern to the western wing was found and thus,
it is difficult to say whether it belonged to the same
building. Another exceptional feature was the two
pillar bases at the front part of the main hall. These
have no parallels in Building CF, unless we consider the large stone found near Wall 6455 in
Stratum C-1b and a second large stone found
nearby in Stratum C-1a as pillar bases found out of
their original position. It should be noted that the
rooms of the eastern wing of Building 2081 at
Megiddo were not numbered and no finds were
published from them. However, the cult corner in
Courtyard 2081 included pottery similar to that
from Tel Rehov Strata IV–V (C-1a–b). It may be
suggested that these two buildings might have had
similar functions, perhaps serving as dwellings of
elite families who incorporated commercial activities
in their household and had their own cult corners and
paraphernalia (see Chapter 4; Fig. 4.12).
Building CW (Squares A–C/6) was constructed
above Stratum C-2 Building CY (Photo 12.114)
and to a large extent, is a rebuild of the latter,
retaining much of its layout. Like Building CY, it
was only partly excavated and continued to the
north beyond the limit of the excavation area. Two
phases were defined in this building, attributed to
Strata C-1b and C-1a, yet in the second phase
(C-1a), changes occurred mainly in the courtyard
and the eastern part of the building, while the two
rooms in the west remained unchanged; thus, they
appear in the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.
Since the differentiation between the two phases
was not emphatic, both are described together.
The building adjoined the entrance corridor and
northern space of Building CF on the west and the
northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 on the
south (Photos 12.92, 12.114). Its outer width from
east to west was 10.4 m and its known length was
5.8 m, although it extended to the north beyond the
limits of the excavation area. Unlike most other
Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this appears to
have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a
large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least
on one side. See also Building CY in Stratum C-2
and Building CZ in Stratum C-1b for a similar concept.
The southern border of the building was Wall
6444, which ran parallel and adjacent to the
northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (6407),
forming a double wall, 1.1 m wide. Wall 6444
contained wooden beams typical of Stratum C-1b in its
foundation; these were round, ca. 0.05–0.07 m in
diameter, closely spaced, and placed perpendicular
to the wall’s foundation (Photos 12.59–12.61). The
western wall 6408 continued to the south where it
was the western wall of Building CQ1. It is thus
clear that Building CW was built together with
Building CQ1, and probably with CQ2 as well. The
eastern wall in Stratum C-1b (8491) was replaced
in C-1a by Wall 8424.
In Stratum C-1b, the spacious courtyard was 6.0 m
wide and at least 5.5 m long. Its western border was
Wall 6420 and its northern continuation, Wall 6476.
The border on the east was Wall 8491; a segment of
an additional wall (8476) was attached to its
western face for 2.5 m; north of this, in its stead,
was a north–south row of rather large (ca. 0.3×0.4
m each) roughly rectangular stones (8499), three of
which were placed together and a fourth slightly to
the north, running into the northern balk (Photo
12.63). These stones adjoined Wall 8491 and thus
could not have served as pillar bases; they recall the
stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum
C-2 and elsewhere and perhaps served as solid
bases for jars or other objects. In Stratum C-1a,
Wall 8476 and the stones were removed, and substantial changes were made in the eastern part of the
courtyard (see below).
Only a single floor was found in the courtyard
(7471, level 86.29 m) (Photo 12.114), laid on a 0.4
m-thick fill of soft brown earth (7501, 8462) that
covered the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CY
(Fig. 12.55). This fill layer is shown in the plan of
Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.35), as we assume that it was
laid at that time, in preparation for the laying of the
floor; it is possible that an earlier floor of C-1b was
removed when Floor 7471 was laid, leaving only
the fill. The floor (shown on the plan of Stratum
C-1a; Figs. 12.36, 12.38) was composed of soft
reddish-brown earth, its central and southeastern parts
burnt black, with some light gray ashy patches and
flecks of charcoal throughout. The floor dipped
down in the northwest, visible in the northern section of Square B/6 (Fig. 12.55); in this shallow
depression was a complete Hippo jar (Fig. 13.99:7).
It was not clear whether this depression was intentional
(a pit?) or whether it represented a postdepositional phenomenon. A concentration of black
ash found to the west of this dip, against Wall 6476,
contained two cooking pots (Fig. 13.98:1, 3) and a
loomweight. Along the western end of the courtyard was a strip of small stones (7479) set closely
together, although rather haphazardly, with a lower
layer of stones in its central part. The stones ran
parallel to Wall 6420 (Photo 12.114) and may have
been a remnant of a poorly preserved stone pavement. The stones ended in the north close to the
abovementioned dip in the floor; they recall those
found in the northwestern part of Building CX,
described below.
The main change in the courtyard, attributed to
the transition from C-1b to C-1a, took place in its
eastern part and included the replacement of Wall
8491 with Wall 8424 and the addition of an installation that covered Wall 8476 and Stones 8499. Wall
8424 was poorly preserved and it is not clear if it
was cut on its northern end or whether there had
been an entrance there.
The installation included Wall 8426, an east–
west wall, preserved along 2.2 m and 0.15 m high,
that extended from the center of Wall 8424 and
served as a divider between two spaces that were
open to the west (Photo 12.115). The floors of these
spaces (8423, 8430 in the north, 8420 in the south)
were covered with plaster that lipped up to the faces
of the wall in a manner that created shallow channels, which were burnt on their western ends. The
northern end of the northern space contained a concentration of stones, east of which were three jugs
and one juglet (Fig. 13.101:2–3, 6, 12). On its
western end, Wall 8426 joined a shallow north–
south channel that terminated on the north near a
large lower grinding stone embedded in the floor,
and on the south at the center of the southern space.
Two stone mortars, one particularly large and the
other smaller, flanked the northern end of the
channel on the west and east, respectively. The
function of these elements remained unclear; it is
possible that some substance was drained from the
plastered floors into the shallow channel on their
west, and that the grinding stone and mortars were
used in conjunction with this activity.
A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401),
revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire
courtyard area, comprising hard burnt brick debris
with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash.
Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97–
13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and
two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig.
13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table
12.16).
This room was bordered by Walls 6408 on the west,
6429 on the north and 6420 on the east (internal
measurements 2.1×3.0 m; 6.3 sq. m). An
entranceway in the southern end of Wall 6420 led to
the room from the courtyard. The only floor found
in this room (6411) was made of pink plaster laid
above a layer of earth and brick debris (6451) that
appears to have been a fill above Building CY,
similar to the situation in the courtyard to the east.
Brick benches (6457, 6458 and 6496) were
constructed along the western, eastern and southern
walls of the room respectively. The benches were
0.35 m wide and 0.35 m high, recalling those in
Building CF, although in this case, they were built
against the walls and not under them. Placed on top
of each end of the western and eastern benches
(6457, 6458) were flat-topped stones, perhaps
serving as solid supports for jars or other objects
(Photo 12.116). In the southwestern corner of the
room was an L-shaped brick that formed a niche in
which an intact juglet (Fig. 13.101:11) was placed.
The room was full of heavily burnt destruction
debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the
benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris,
including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs,
juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig.
13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in
the debris above the benches that lined the walls
(Photo 12.117). A concentration of ten clay
loomweights was found on the western end of this
bench (Photo 12.118). Other finds in this room
included three scale weights and a bronze
scale pan, as well as a seal and iron tools (Table
12.16).
This room, located in the northwestern part of the
building, was bordered by Walls 6429 on the south,
6497 on the west and 6476 on the east. The internal
width was 2.5 m and it was at least 1.4 m long, as its
northern border was beyond the limit of the excavation area, with an entrance probably in its northeastern corner. Although the eastern and western
walls continued the lines of those of Room 6411 to
the south, they were not one and the same, as they
abutted the northern face of Wall 6429, but did not
bond with it. It is possible that this room had been
accessed from the courtyard on the east at a spot
further to the north, beyond the limits of the excavation. Just as in Room 6411, a layer of debris that
might have been a fill (6462) was found above the
C-2 remains and was covered by the floor and
benches in this room, so it is assumed that it, like
the room to its south, had only one phase of use.
Benches (6480, 6481) lined the western and
eastern walls (but not the southern wall), continuing the line of the benches in Room 6411 to the
south. Here too, stones were found on top of their
southern and northern ends (Photo 12.116). The
room was full of burnt destruction debris; eight vessels rested on Floor 6438 at level 86.50 m.
A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city
To the south of Building CW and the east of
Building CF were two virtually twin buildings,
termed CQ1 and CQ2, adjoined by a double wall
(Squares A–C/4–5). Both buildings were enclosed
on the north by Wall 6407, which was attached to
Wall 6444 of Building CW, together creating a
double wall, 1.1 m wide (Photo 12.120). On the
west, Building CQ1 adjoined Building CF with a
double wall, although in Stratum C-1a, with the
removal of the inner wall of the northeastern part of
Building CF, a double wall was left only in the
south and the two buildings shared a wall in the
north. Thus, it can be seen how Buildings CQ1 and
CQ2 were not only related to each other, but were
also a part of the northeastern insula, all the units of
which must have been built together according to
an integrated plan. On the south, the buildings were
closed by a single wall and fronted by a street. The
eastern border of Building CQ2 was also a single
wall; although unexcavated, it is possible that a
north–south street ran here and continued to the
north alongside Building CW.
Both buildings were small and comprised three
rooms each: a rectangular room on the south and
two small rooms on the north, one larger than the
other. Yet another building with the same plan was
found to the south of Building CQ1, termed
Building CQ3. The entrance to Building CQ1 was
in its southeastern corner (opposite the entrance of
Building CQ3), but curiously, no entrance into CQ2
could be identified. While Building CQ1 was built
on a north–south axis, its eastern side ran on a
slightly northwest–southeast line, which dictated
the orientation of the adjoining Building CQ2; in
fact, the eastern wall of the latter building was even
more skewed, lending it a trapezoidal shape.
Similar to Building CW to the immediate north
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 had one main phase, with
burnt destruction debris under topsoil down to the
floors and only ephemeral indications of an earlier
occupation in Stratum C-1b. Both buildings were
built above remains attributed to Stratum C-2 in
Squares A–B/4–5. The most likely explanation is
that the buildings were constructed in Stratum C-1b
and continued to be in use until the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. The wood in the
foundations of the walls points to this option, as this
was a typical C-1b feature. Thus, the buildings
appear on the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.
A narrow area to the south of Buildings CQ1
and CQ2, as well as Building CF to their west
(Photos 12.120, 12.122), appears to have been an
east–west street, some 1.4 m wide, that ran between
the block of Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the
north and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south,
merging into Piazza 2417 on the west in Stratum
C-1a.
The buildings are described below as found in
Stratum C-1a, noting the very minor remains of the
sporadically detected earlier (C-1b) phase.
The external measurements of Building CQ1 were 5.2–5.5×6.4 m (floor space, ca. 19 sq m). It included one large room (6483) that spanned the width of the building and two smaller rooms (6436, 7447) to its north. The southern wall was Wall 6445, which continued the line of Wall 5455, the southern inner wall of Building CF. On the west, the building was closed by Wall 6408, which continued to the north, where it was the western wall of Building CW and abutted the eastern wall of Building CF on the south (Photos 12.121–12.122). The eastern wall (7416) created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast.
The southern and largest space of the building was
apparently a roofed room, measuring internally
2.8×4.3 m (floor space, 12.04 sq m). The entrance
into this room, and, in fact, into the building itself,
was in its southeastern corner. The entrance was 1.2
m wide and had a brick threshold at 86.12 m; it
opened to the street that ran along the southern
façade of the building, although the excavated level
of the street surface was higher by ca. 0.7 m than
the threshold. This would have required few steps
or a ladder to access the building from the street,
whether into Room 6483 or to a second story.
The floor was composed of two parts: on the
west was a stone floor (6472) that ran up to the line
of the entranceway in Wall 6446, containing
closely laid basalt stones and limestones, as well as
some broken upper grinding stones and mortars.
Underneath the stone pavement were two large
stones that apparently served to buttress it. Such a
stone floor was rare at Tel Rehov in Iron IIA and
was found only in Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and perhaps CJ in Stratum C-1a.
The stone floor was abutted on the east by a
smooth reddish clay floor (7450 in the east, 6483 in
the west); patches of this matrix were also found
between the stones, so that it apparently had covered them as well. In the central-eastern part of
Floor 6483 was a round, flat-topped stone that
appears to have been a pillar base; it was encircled
by several small stones that included two
loomweights, one of stone and one of clay.
Between this pillar base and Wall 7454 on the north
was a patch of hard plaster.
The floor was covered with a layer of
extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris
(6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen
bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster
fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly
an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo
12.121). In the northwestern part of the room, near
the southern face of Wall 6446, was a grinding
stone installation (6453), like those found in Buildings CF and CE; it was not very well preserved
(Photo 12.122). The lower grinding stone of the
installation was installed on a brick base, which
raised it to ca. 0.4 m above the floor; underneath the
stone was an antler. This room contained 26 vessels
(Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects
(Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights.
The reddish clay matrix of Floor 6483 rested on
a 0.15 m-deep layer of red, gray and white striations
(also numbered 6483) that abutted the lowest
courses of the surrounding walls, which contained
wooden beams in their foundations. These
striations penetrated below the stone floor in the
western half of the room and they may have
belonged to the initial use of this room in Stratum
C-1b.
The small northwestern room (6436; measuring internally 1.9×2.35 m, 4.46 sq m) was bordered on the east by Wall 6422 and on the south by Wall 6446; in the eastern end of the latter wall was a narrow entrance, 0.5 m wide. The floor was made of smooth reddish clay (level 86.00 m), identical to that of the large room to the south. The wood in the foundations of the surrounding walls protruded somewhat into the room below the floor, embedded in a matrix of reddish clay (6477) that was similar to the floor makeup itself. This sub-floor material with wood was laid on top of Wall 6501 and Locus 6502, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.12). A wooden beam was found in the entranceway itself, possibly a threshold. On the floor was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17).
The northeastern room (7447; measuring internally 1.3×2.0 m, 2.6 sq m) was separated from the room to its west by Wall 6422. This small narrow room was entered from the larger southern room by way of an opening, 0.8–0.9 m wide, in its southern wall (7454); this opening had a brick threshold that was, in fact, the continuation of Wall 7454, on the level of the floor. A row of bricks (7448) ran along the northern wall of this room just on the floor level and might have been a bench. Like in the room to the west, the wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6422 protruded into the sub-floor makeup of reddish clay. The reddish clay floor was identical to that of the other rooms and was covered by very burnt complete fallen bricks and ceiling material (7426); on it were six pottery vessels and other objects (Table 12.17)
Adjoining Building CQ1 on the east was an almost
identical, slightly larger unit, termed Building CQ2
(Photos 12.120, 12.123) (external measurements
5.6–6.0×6.3 m; floor space, ca. 21 sq m). As noted
above, the southern part of the western wall was
slightly skewed, and the entire eastern wall (8405)
was even more so, and thus, the building was somewhat trapezoidal (Photo 12.123).
The problem of the entrance to this building
remains unresolved. If we duplicate the plan of
Building CQ1, the entrance should have been close
to the eastern end of Wall 8434 and thus, exactly
opposite the entrance into C-1a Building CX to the
south. However, the wall here stood up to 1.0 m
above the floor level inside the building and did not
show any signs of a gap or a blockage. Note the
suggestion that the street level to the south of
Building CQ2, which was ca. 1.0 m higher than the
floor inside the building, might have served to
directly access an upper floor.
Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an
extremely large amount for such a small building,
even when taking into account the existence of a
second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same
size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in
Chapter 45.
The southern and largest room of this building
(7500) spanned its entire width. Due to the angle of
the eastern wall (8405), it was trapezoidal (internal
measurements 2.6×4.5–4.9 m; 12.2 sq m). The
floor of this room was identical to that of Room
6483 in Building CQ1: a stone pavement (7503) on
the west and soft reddish clay on the east (7500), on
line with the entrance into Room 7490. The pavement was nicely laid, with small stones filling the
gaps between the flat-topped stones, which incorporated several broken and complete upper
grinding stones. A large lower grinding stone was
found in the southwestern part of the room, some
0.3 m above the stone floor. It is possible that this
had belonged to a grinding stone installation similar to those found in Building CQ1, CF and CE, as
chunks of hard clay found scattered nearby might
have been part of its surrounding parapet. Attached
to the center of the southern wall was a bin (7508),
0.8 m wide and 1.5 m long, with narrow clay walls
that also ran partially along the southern wall. A
stone mortar was found on the northeastern end of
this bin with an upper grinding stone inside it.
Underneath the reddish clay floor in the southeastern corner of this room was a rather large
smooth pink mizi limestone resting on a layer of red
and gray striations (8445), similar to those in
Building CQ1; a juglet (Fig. 13.118:11) was found
in this layer. This stone was very similar to that
found in the Stratum C-1b phase of Building CF,
described above. Like in Room 6483 in Building
CQ1, this layer ran to the west under the stone floor
and it is possible that it represented the Stratum
C-1b occupation. The foundations of both the
southern and eastern walls of Building CQ2 were
not reached and it is possible that an earlier phase is
yet to be exposed.
Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt
destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos
12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels
(Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of
fine small closed vessels. Several other objects
were found as well (Table 12.18). An interesting
find was a concentration of some 20 small polished
black and gray wadi pebbles found on the floor, as
well as inside an intact juglet (Fig. 13.118:17).
These were weighed in order to ascertain if they
had significance as weights, but it seems that this
was not their main function, as they did not yield
any known value (pers. comm., Raz Kletter).
The northwestern room (internal measurements
2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m), was slightly wider than its
counterpart in Building CQ1. On the east, it was
closed by Wall 7406 and on the south by Wall 7459,
in which a 0.75 m-wide entrance was located on its
eastern end. Wooden beams were incorporated in
the foundations of the walls in this room (Photo
12.125) and the entrance had a fine brick threshold
with a plank of wood found in situ. An exceptional
recess was located in the outer eastern side of the
entrance in Wall 8411, a detail somewhat similar to
the rounded recesses in two of the entrances in
Building CP (11440, 11446), described below. Two
brick courses were missing from this wall in its
center (Photo 12.126); this appears to have been a
kind of window or niche between this room and the
one to its south.
The reddish clay floor (7490) in this room was
exactly the same as the floors in Building CQ1. The
top of Stratum C-2 Wall 7492 (Photo 12.125) protruded into the floor, running along the northern
wall of the room, 0.2 m above the floor, and might
have been used as a bench.
This room was filled with burnt destruction
debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo
12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete
vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds
(Table 12.18). A complete baking tray (Fig.
13.112:1), made of non-cooking pot fabric, a rare
item in the Iron Age IIA pottery assemblage of Tel
Rehov, was one of the finds in this room.
The northeastern room was the smallest; its trapezoid shape was due to the angle of the eastern wall
(8405) (internal measurements 1.2–1.4×2.1; ca. 3.0
sq m). A row of bricks (8412) ran along the
southern face of Wall 6407 in the northern part of
this room, continuing the line of 7492 from the
adjacent room, but standing much higher, almost on
the level of the tops of the surrounding walls. Since
excavation did not proceed below the floor, it is not
known whether this was the upper part of an earlier
wall, like Wall 7492. The entrance to the room on
the southeast, 0.7–0.8 m wide, contained a curious
feature composed of four narrow bricks that formed
a square, enclosing a small area of softer debris
(8446). To the south of the southern brick was an
upper grinding stone, parallel to the threshold; it is
difficult to say whether it was deliberately placed
there or was fallen. The presence of this bin-like
element just where one would step into the room
through the threshold is enigmatic. It is possible
that it was a Stratum C-1b element that slightly protruded into the floor here, or that it was somehow
related to the function of the room.
Room 8431 was full of burnt destruction debris
and fallen bricks, yielding seven vessels and several other objects (Table 12.18).
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to
the south, see below) are exceptional among the
Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small
overall size and the even smaller size of the inner
rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms.
It may be assumed that these houses had a second
story, thus their functional space could have been
double, although no evidence for steps was found
and access must have been from the outside of the
building. This possibility may explain the lack of
an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the
lower storey of this building was entered by a
wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a
hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact,
there was such an entrance in Building CQ1,
despite the higher street level to its south. Notably,
the buildings contained very large amounts of pottery, as well as a range of other finds, that might
point to them having been dwellings. On the other
hand, they lacked cooking facilities, such as ovens,
although cooking pots and one baking tray were
found.
These buildings can be compared to small
houses found in Area C at Hazor, dating to the
13th–11th centuries BCE (Yadin et al. 1960: 98, Pl.
208), in Tell Abu Hawam Stratum IV (Hamilton
1935: Plate IV), Aphek Stratum X11 (Gadot and
Yadin 2009: 90––93, Figs. 6.2, 6.4), and perhaps
also Building 442 in Stratum VIA at Tel Batash,
although it was not fully uncovered and appears to
have been larger (Mazar 1997: 76–79; list cited
from Gadot and Yadin 2009: 93, with Egyptian parallels as well). However, all these examples are
much earlier (13th–11th centuries BCE), while no
similar houses are known in Iron Age II Israel.
Building CG (Squares T–Y/2–4) was a narrow rectangular structure, measuring externally 3.4×8.9 m,
with massive walls wider than those of other buildings (recalling the double walls of back-to-back
units) (Photos 12.5, 12.8, 12.127). Both the
external and the internal walls were 0.9 m wide,
composed of two rows of bricks, one laid
widthwise and one lengthwise, a building technique found so far almost exclusively in this
building. The walls were composed of hard-packed
light and dark gray bricks and were exposed just
under topsoil.
The building contained three small square
rooms that had no entrances and were apparently
accessed from above. The floor space of each room
was 2.5–2.7 sq m. It is possible that this building
had a second story. Although the amount of debris
and fallen bricks found here did not seem to justify
this, we must take into account that much of this
material was eroded and disappeared from this high
point of the lower mound.
The only discernible change in this building
between Strata C-1b and C-1a took place in its
southernmost room, while only one phase was
detected in the other two rooms. The buildings
adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the
east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the
southeast, and the open area south of Building CD
on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still
adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to
the east and west of Building CG became open
spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to
the west).
The two outer walls on the west and east (1416,
2411) ran parallel to each other on an almost
straight north–south line, while the northern (2453)
and southern (2439) walls of the building were
slightly skewed, running on a southwest–northeast
line; on the north, this was the same angle as that of
Building CE, which adjoined it. The sharp angles of
the short walls (especially in the northern part of
the structure) give the plan a slightly irregular
shape.
The building was constructed on top of the
ruins of Building CB of Stratum C-2: the western
wall (1416) was built over Wall 2505, 0.3 m to its
east (Figs. 12.16, 12.68–12.69, Photos 12.31–
12.34) and the southern wall (2439) was built over
the southern part of the entrance in Wall 2505
(Photo 12.32). Room 2444 covered Wall 2481 of C2 (Photo 12.38). All the walls were preserved ca.
ten courses high and had wooden beams in their
foundations (Photos 12.128–12.133). The massive
construction of the interior and exterior walls was
apparently related to the surmised function as a granary or storage building.
The northernmost room (internal measurements
1.5–1.6×1.6 m; ca. 2.56 sq m) contained fallen
ceiling material and hard vitrified brick debris
(2449), some of it burnt to a powdery lime, to a total
depth of 1.2 m above the assumed floor at level
86.40 m. Although excavation proceeded past the
foundation level of the walls, no clear floor matrix
was detected and the assumed floor (2460) was
determined only on the basis of the location of the
finds and the floating level of the walls (Fig. 12.76).
Unlike the other rooms in this building, no charred
wood was found here below the floor level.
This small room contained 22 vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), many of them very
burnt. Twenty-eight stone loomweights were
found, concentrated mainly in the southwestern
corner of the room. No grain was found in this
room, although a large amount was found in the
other two rooms. The small size of this chamber
and the lack of an entrance indicated that this large
collection of varied pottery vessels and objects was
apparently stored here, perhaps close to the time of
destruction. As we assume that all three chambers
in this building served as a granary, the use of this
chamber for storage appears to be secondary, at a
time when no grain was stored here.
The middle room of the building (2444) measured
almost exactly the same as Room 2460 to its north
(internal measurements 1.5×1.6 m; 2.4 sq m). Its
southern wall (2429) had a 0.7 m wide gap in its
five upper courses (not shown on the plan; Photo
12.127), although its southern face and bottom
courses clearly showed that this was a solid wall.
This gap appears to have been intentional, perhaps
used as a storage niche or it was an elevated
opening, similar to those in the square granary
rooms at Tel Hadar (Kochavi 1999: 181, Fig. 2).
A light-colored clay layer which appears to
have been the floor (2444, 86.60 m) was defined as
such mainly based on its position at the foundation
of the walls, the wooden beams underneath it, and
the destruction debris (2425) resting on it,
including a large amount of grain. Just below the
floor level, a round wooden beam was incorporated
in the foundation of Wall 1416, running 1.3 m from
the northwestern corner of the room to the south,
where it branched out to protrude into the room for
0.25 m. Round wooden beams (average diameter
0.10–0.15 m) were also placed in the foundation of
Wall 2411 on the east (Fig. 12.77). However, as
opposed to the beam in Wall 1416, these were laid
perpendicular to the wall and protruded into the
room up to 1.5 m, just below the floor level; they
included tree trunks and branches, as well as some
worked beams (Fig. 12.41; Photo 12.130). As noted
above, these same wooden beams were visible in
the eastern face of Wall 2411. It thus can be seen
that the wood was laid in preparation for the construction of the walls and floors and constituted a
well-planned system. Under the charred wood that
extended from the foundation of Wall 2411 into the
room was a single course of bricks (2478) running
north–south, serving as a kind of support, above
which a shallow fill was laid. These bricks
appeared to have been intentionally removed from
C-2 Wall 2481, which ran under the northern end of
this room, and served as a sub-floor constructional
element (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38).
The room was full of fallen ceiling material and
extremely burnt debris, including ashes and complete fallen bricks, burnt to white and yellow vitrification and to a powdery consistency (2425), which
were found especially in the southwestern part of
the room, at a total depth of 1.0 m. At 86.80–86.90
m, a large concentration of charred grain (about 2.0
kg) was found in the southwestern corner and
against the northern face of Wall 2429. The only
other finds in this room were fragments of a bowl
(Fig. 13.52:10) and sherds of a large Hippo storage
jar (Fig. 13.55:18), indicating that its main function
might have been grain storage, used as a kind of a
‘chamber-bin’. The grains were identified as wheat
(Chapter 53) and were subjected to a series of 14C
dating. One measurement from Locus 2444
(Sample R30) provided the dates 928–858 BCE
(1σ) and 970–846 BCE (2σ); a second date appears
to be too high. Samples R31–R34 from Locus 2425
were measured with 21 repetitions in four laboratories; the average calibrated date was 898–844 BCE
(1σ) and 906–837 BCE (2σ) (see data and discussion in Chapter 48).
The southern room is reconstructed as having been
identical to the two complete northern rooms. With
the reconstructed southeastern corner, Room 2441
measured internally ca. 1.6×1.7 m (2.7 sq m), very
similar to the room to its north. However, most of
the eastern and southern walls of this room had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72;
Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m
long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall
2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the
eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a
straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This
straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a
door jamb of an opening leading to the room from
Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen
fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to
Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed
entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in
Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain.
Both the floor and the walls of this room were
constructed above a 1.3 m-deep layer of fill and
wood which apparently was laid as a leveler and
stabilizer on top of the C-2 remains below (Photos
12.128–12.129). This deep wooden construction
was composed of four to five layers of alternating
lengthwise and widthwise wooden beams (2470,
2471, 4421; Fig. 12.42a–c; Photos 12.131–12.133).
The upper layer of wood, with nicely worked
rounded beams, some reaching over 1.0 m long,
was mostly laid on a north–south axis (2470; Photo
12.143). The two lowest layers of this wood (2471,
4421) were mostly laid on an east–west axis (Photo
12.133). Notably, most of the lower level of this
sub-floor wooden construction was horizontal, as
opposed to the higher levels of the wood, which
sloped down towards the east, having collapsed
with the southeastern corner of the room. Although
the lower layers of wood under the floor penetrated
down deeper than the wood in the foundations of
Walls 1416 and 2439, and were found on the level
of the entranceway in C-2 Wall 2505 (Photos
12.32–12.33, 12.128–12.129), they should be
attributed to the construction of Building CG in
Stratum C-1b. The reasons for this are:
Since the two northern rooms of Building CG did
not suffer the same severe collapse as Room 2441,
the possibility exists that they continued to be in
use during Stratum C-1a (Fig. 12.50). An indication
for this is the fact that Piazza 2417 on the east and
Piazza CK on the west, both of Stratum C-1a,
abutted this building. The floors of the courtyards
were at levels 87.55–87.75 m, 1.2–1.4 m higher
than the original floors inside these two chambers.
There are two possibilities to explain this stratigraphic
situation. The first is that the floors of
Stratum C-1b continued to be in use in Stratum
C-1a and the rooms were approached from above,
as in the previous occupation level. In that case, the
destruction debris in Rooms 2460 and 2444, with
its pottery and the charred grain that was measured
for 14C dates, would be explained as belonging to
the last use of the rooms in Stratum C-1a. The other
possibility is that a new floor was constructed in
Stratum C-1a above this destruction debris, which
would then be attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b
in these two rooms. Such a floor, which was not
preserved, would have been at a level higher than
87.70 m (the preserved top of the walls) and might
have disappeared due to erosion. We thus leave this
question open, although it is of crucial importance
for dating, due to the large number of 14C dates
from the central room (Loci 2425, 2444) mentioned
above. It should be noted that the loci numbers of
floors and destruction layers appear only in the plan
of Stratum C-1b, thus accepting the second possibility;
the first possibility would require presenting
these numbers in the plan of Stratum C-1a as well.
However, since a final verdict is impossible, the
loci in these two rooms are tentatively defined as
belonging to Stratum C-1b, although we are aware
of the alternative.
Evidence for partial rebuild of the southern
room (2441) in Stratum C-1a can possibly be seen
in the two upper courses of Wall 2441 close to its
southern end; while the entire wall suffered from
severe slippage of the bricks, these two upper
course were not burnt and were laid horizontally
above the burnt and tilted courses below (Photos
12.127, 12.131–12.132, 12.159, 12.160). This
raises the possibility that these two courses
represent a rebuild of the wall in Stratum C-1a. It should,
however, be emphasized that there are no other
stratigraphic indications for such a phase in this
room, such as a higher floor, although such a
floor could have existed close to topsoil and had
been eroded away, as possible in the two northern
rooms.
In the area east of Building CG, and above the
collapse from this building that sealed the apiary, a
leveling fill (5430, 4408; Squares Y/1–2) was laid
in preparation for the construction of Building CL
in Stratum C-1a; Wall 4443 of that building had a
foundation trench that cut this fill (Fig. 12.74;
Photos 12.135, 12.144). This stratigraphic evidence
to the east of Building CG, but clearly related to it,
supports our conclusion that the building was
founded in Stratum C-1b, destroyed at the end of
this stratum, along with Building CH and the
apiary, and reused (partially?) in Stratum C-1a.
Building CM (Squares Y–Z/3) was a unit to the
south of Building CF and to the east of Building CG
(Photo 12.127), built above the C-2 remains here. It
adjoined the apiary on the north and, since the partition
wall between them was quite flimsy, it is possible that Building CM was related to the apiary in
some functional way, despite the difference in floor
levels: 86.20 m in the northern and central part of
Building CM and 84.55–84.60 m in the northern
part of the apiary. It seems that Wall 9453 of
Building CZ (exposed only along its eastern face in
Squares A/2–3) was the eastern border of Building
CM. The floor inside the western part of Building
CZ (84.90 m) was lower by 0.35 m than that in the
eastern part of Building CM (85.20 m) and 1.35 m
lower than that identified in the western part of
Building CM (86.20 m), and it is possible that there
was a terraced effect here, following a natural
downslope from west to east.
The external measurements of Building CM
were ca. 7.8 m×9.0 m, depending on the western
and eastern boundaries, which were not entirely
clear. It included a small room (4446) in its northwestern corner, a larger space to its south (4445)
and possibly an open space (5441, 5442) in its east.
Access to the building was most likely from the
western end of the street that we assume ran in
Squares Z, A–C/4 to the northeast of the building.
Building CM ended in a fierce fire. It went out
of use in Stratum C-1a and was covered by a courtyard (2417), whose floor was 1.35 m higher than
the floors in this building. It is noteworthy that this
was one of the few places where a clear distinction
could be made between Strata C-2, C-1b and C-1a.
The northwestern room (4446) was poorly preserved (internal measurements 2.0×2.9 m, 5.8 sq
m) (Photos 12.136–12.138). Its walls were composed of crumbly brownish-gray bricks with light
gray mortar lines. The western wall of the room
(4432) was built above Stratum C-2 Wall 4516
(Fig. 12.75), but continued further to the south, running a total of 4.0 m until it terminated rather
abruptly just past its corner with Wall 4411. It ran
parallel to the eastern face of Wall 2411 of Building
CG, with a 0.2 m gap between them; the foundation
heights of the two walls were identical, suggesting
that they were constructed together. Yet, unlike
Wall 2411, which was standing to a height of 1.5 m,
due to its being in continuous use in both Strata
C-1b and C-1a, Wall 4432 was preserved only
0.25–0.35 m high, aside from a lone stump that was
0.65 m higher than the rest of the wall (Photo
12.136); this stump was located precisely in the
balk between Squares Y/3 and Y/4. It is not clear
why it was left standing so high, when the rest of
the wall was razed.
Along the eastern face of Wall 2411 was a row
of nine chalices (4424) (Fig. 13.49:9–17; Photo
12.138). Two (one intact) were found near the
northern end of Wall 4432 (just north of the
abovementioned stump), while six more were
found running 2.0 m to the south. The chalices were
revealed just at the level of the preserved top of
Wall 4432, leading to the conclusion that they were
placed there following the razing of this wall. Their
position exactly in the gap between Walls 4432 and
2411, as well as the higher preservation of the
stump, suggests that they might have been a deliberate
deposit, perhaps related to some ritual following the destruction of Stratum C-1b.
The northern wall of the building (4479) created a
double wall with Wall 4413 of Building CF.
Wall 4479 was 8.7 m long, preserved to a height of
1.3 m, and was very burnt. The northwestern corner
of Building CM was part of a massive construction,
where the corners of four buildings (CE, CF, CG
and CM) met. This dense corner in Square Y/4 was
a meeting point between Walls 1473, 4479, 4432
and 2454; each of these walls had its own end or
face and they abutted one another, indicating that
although each belonged to separate buildings, all
were built in consideration of each other. As in
most other Stratum C-1b walls, wooden beams
were incorporated in the foundations of Walls 4432
and 4479. While only a few pieces were noted in
the northern end of Wall 4432, the wood in the
foundation of Wall 4479 was dense and composed
of small rounded beams laid perpendicular to the
line of the wall at closely spaced intervals (Photos
12.136–12.137); see Wall 6444 in Building CW and
Wall 1437 in Building CH for a similar configuration (Fig. 12.46; Photo 12.145). A unique feature of
the wood in Wall 4479 was that it was laid above
the lowest two brick courses, rather than at the very
bottom of the wall. This somewhat recalls the situation with Wall 2411 in Building CG, where the
wooden beams in its foundation were laid on bricks
(2478), as described above.
The eastern wall of the room in Stratum C-1b
was Wall 4433, which abutted Wall 4479. This wall
was 0.8 m wide and was composed of a row of
bricks laid lengthwise and one row widthwise,
recalling the walls in Building CG. The wall was
poorly preserved on both its southern end and its
eastern face; it seems that it terminated just about at
the line of the balk between Squares Y/3–4, and it is
possible that its southern end originally had an
entrance that led into the room. The southern
closing wall of this room (4411) was very poorly
preserved. The room contained several layers of
debris (4417, 4430, 4446). While no clear floor was
detected, its lowest layer (4446) was on the same
level (86.19 m) as Floor 4445 to the south of Wall
4411. These loci, which lacked traces of destruction, might have been a fill that leveled off the area
in preparation for the construction of Piazza 2417
in Stratum C-1a.
In the area to the east of Room 4446 was a floor (5441, 5442) at level 86.25–86.30 m. In the north, Floor 5442 contained a concentration of crushed travertine in its center. In the south, Floor 5441 was made of soft pink plaster; a smooth flat-topped pink mizi limestone and a complete storage jar (Fig. 13.51:3) turned upside down were found on this floor. While the northern end of this floor was horizontal, it sloped down towards the south (Fig. 12.78); this slope may possibly be related to the lower southern end of the building, described below. As noted above, it is not known whether this space continued to the east up to Building CZ, as the area between them remained mostly unexcavated (Square Z/3). It might have been an open courtyard, although enclosing walls may be hidden in the unexcavated area in Squares Z/3–4.
To the south of Wall 4411 was a space (4445;
Photos 12.127, 12.139–12.142) that ran 3.2 m to the
south until Wall 8469, the flimsy narrow wall that
bordered the apiary (Fig. 12.78). An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the
south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end
of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered
Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the
result of the same seismic activity that caused the
collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG,
described above. The wooden beams laid in the
foundation of Wall 2411 that were visible in the
matrix of 4445, penetrated under the wall into
Building CG to the west, as described above.
The northern and central part of Room 4445
contained very burnt brick debris (4441) on top of a
beaten-earth floor (4445, level 86.20 m) (Photo
12.139). An oval-shaped installation built of hard
dark gray clay (4448) was built on this floor, just
against the southern face of Wall 4411; the gray
clay of the installation continued along the southern
face of Wall 4411, indicating their contemporaneity. The installation was ca. 0.7 m long, 0.4
m wide, preserved 0.28 m high; it contained a
complete cooking jug (Fig. 13.50:4; Photos
12.139–12.140). Another installation related to
Floor 4445 was a small bin made of reddish clay
and lined with wood (4449) in the southwestern
part of this area, built against the eastern face of
Wall 2411 (Photo 12.139).
From the line of Installation 4449 until the
southern end of the building, the floor was not clear
and, in its stead, was a dense concentration of
charred wood, 1.0 m wide (4456, 8443, 8447),
abutting Wall 8469. Just north of this pile, and east
of Installation 4449, was a large stone (Photos
12.139, 12.141–12.142). This strip of charred
wood, composed mostly of tree trunks and
branches, was set into a reddish layer (8471) (Fig.
12.78). The bottom of this reddish layer (85.30 m)
was 0.9 m lower than the floor in the northern part
of this room, suggesting that this area might have
been dug out to accommodate the wood pile. This
strip of charred wood might have been either part of
a sub-floor construction or was related to the construction of Wall 8469, which enclosed the apiary
to the south (see below). The goal of this wood was
perhaps to support the gap created by the 1.6 m
height difference between the floor of this space
and that of the apiary to the south. Thus, the strip of
wood, together with Wall 8469, may be explained
as a kind of revetment for the lower terrace on
which the apiary was constructed to the south. The
eastern part of the wood concentration (8443, 8447)
contained many fallen bricks, burnt debris and a
thick layer of phytolith (Photo 12.142), inside of
which was the lower part of a very large krater (Fig.
13.50:1) and several loomweights.
At the eastern end of Room 4445 was a short
north–south line of bricks (8441) standing only two
courses high; its northern end terminated in a complete brick, while its southern end appears to have
been cut (Photo 12.142). Although these bricks
were on line with the middle row of hives in the
apiary to the south, no connection between them
was found. This segment of bricks could have been
a low partition or part of a wall that had been dismantled.
To the east of Wall 8441, a probe in the eastern part of Square Z/3 revealed a layer of destruction debris, fallen bricks, wood and phytolith (11429) that rested on a reddish layer (11450) at 85.20 m and abutted Wall 8469 (very poorly preserved here; Photo 12.160), a sequence similar to that in the south of Room 4445. It seems that this was the continuation of the wood and reddish debris layer in the south of that room and might have been related to the eastern row of hives in the apiary, revealed to its south. Most probably, this matrix abutted the western face of Wall 9453 and its corner with Wall 8469, although the point of contact remained unexcavated.
Building CH was comprised of two excavated
rooms (2455, 2451) that adjoined Building CG on
the south (Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20) (Photo 12.143);
its southern part was beyond the limit of the excavation
and to its east was the apiary. This structure
apparently functioned as a service wing for the
apiary, perhaps used for the processing of the
products and/or for administrative work (Fig. 12.47).
Its floors were ca. 1.75 m higher than those of
the apiary itself, although both were contemporary
and related. All the walls of this building were
composed of light and dark gray bricks, incorporating
sporadic yellow bricks. Along the eastern edge of
the two rooms was a sub-floor construction of
wooden beams laid in two to three layers that joined
the rooms to the apiary floor below, described
below.
The western wall (1438) of Building CH,
which was also the eastern wall of Building CJ, was
exposed along 7.5 m and continued to the south
beyond the limit of the excavation. It was built on
top of C-2 Wall 2468 (Photos 12.45, 12.143) and
had wooden beams incorporated in its foundation,
mostly in its northern part (Figs. 12.72–12.74). The
northern wall (1437) was the continuation of the
northern wall of Building CJ. It terminated on the
east just on line with the southern wall (2439) of
Building CG, which it abutted. To the east of this
was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down
towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the
southeastern corner of Building CG, as described
above. Wall 1437 had many small round wooden
beams in its foundation, set perpendicular to the
wall in two layers, above the preserved top of C-3
Wall 4495 (Fig. 12.72; Photos 12.144–12.145).
The eastern part of Building CH collapsed
down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the
southeastern end of Building CG to the north. This
collapsed eastern part of Building CH was superimposed by the western wing of Building CL of
Stratum C-1a (Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–
12.147, 12.149). Although none was found, it is
possible that there had been an eastern closing wall
to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood,
that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden
partition might have closed off this end of the room
that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that
the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a
higher level than the apiary floor below.
The two excavated rooms of Building CH were
separated by Wall 2426, which extended 3.0 m to
the east of Wall 1438, until it was cut by the foundation trench of Wall 2413, the western wall of
Building CL (Photos 12.146–12.147, 12.149). No
entrance between the two rooms was found; perhaps such a connection had been located further to
the east, or each was accessed separately from the
apiary by way of wooden ladders or brick steps.
Wall 2426 was built on top of the northern face of
C-2 Wall 2465 (Photo 12.148). It was horizontal on
its western end, but 1.0 m from its corner with Wall
1438, it collapsed towards the east at an acute
angle; the difference between the level and fallen
parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos
12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto
the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on
their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a,
as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this
area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b.
While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western
part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that
was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. However, Wall 1438, the
western wall of the building, continued to be in use
in Stratum C-1a as the eastern wall of Building CJ
(described above).
Below the destruction debris in the eastern part of
the rooms was a unique construction of wood, two
to three layers deep, 1.4 m wide, and running north
to south along 10 m, the entire exposed length of
the building, from the southern balk of Square Y/1
(where it continued to the south beyond the limit of
the excavation) up to Wall 1437 and the subsidiary
balk to its east in Square Y/2, where it intersected
with the perpendicular beams in the foundation of
Wall 1437 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.3,
12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148–12.149). The wood
continued to the north under Wall 1437
and apparently ran under Wall 2439 (collapsed at this point)
to join with the sub-floor wood in Room 2441 in
Building CG, showing that the two buildings had
been constructed at the same time.
The wood that ran along the eastern edge of
Rooms 2451 and 2455 was obviously constructed
before the floors were laid and before Wall 2426
was built. Just north of Wall 2426, the strip of wood
cut C-2 Wall 2465. The eastern part of the wooden
construction sloped down towards the east, particularly in the southern part (Square Y/1); the height of
the top of the wood in the west was 86.25 m, while
the height of its top in the east was 85.50 m, a 0.75
m difference over 1.4 m. The wood was comprised
mostly of tree trunks and branches, all found
charred and carbonized.
In the northern room (2455), the wood was laid
in two layers, with a 0.2 m-deep reddish fill
between them; the uppermost layer ran north–south
and was composed of relatively large beams, while
the layer below, less well defined, ran both north–
south and east–west, creating a kind of a weave.
There was a 1.0 m gap between this strip of wood
and the wood in the foundation of Wall 1438 (Figs.
12.45–12.46; Photos 12.144, 12.148). No wood
was found to the east of this strip and it was laid on
top of layer of whitish material, possibly very burnt
wood or bricks, located directly above the preserved tops of Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496. It
is suggested that these walls served as a support for
the wood (see further below).
In the southern room (2451), the wood construction consisted of three tiers whose eastern part
was markedly stepped (Photo 12.149). Like in
Room 2455, the wood was laid alternately north–
south and east–west (Fig. 12.45) and did not join
with the wood in Wall 1438, except for one beam
that protruded from the wall in the northwestern corner of the room. Like in the northern
room, underneath the wood was a white layer
which was laid on top of a Stratum C-3 gray-brick
wall (4480).
Two alternatives are suggested to explain this
construction. The first is that this descent could
have been wooden steps, wood that supported brick
steps, or a sloping ramp, leading down to the apiary
floor on the east. This suggestion is supported by
the relatively orderly manner in which the tiers of
wood were laid (Fig. 12.45; Photos 12.143–12.144,
12.146, 12.148). The alternative explanation is that
the wood, as found, was fallen, and that originally it
had served as a roof and support beams of a hollow
space below it, forming a basement in Building CH.
Such a basement may have been bordered on the
west by re-used C-3 Wall 4495 and perhaps by a
wood construction built on that wall, while in the
east, it could have been left open towards the
apiary, with only a few wooden posts supporting
the roof (see suggested reconstruction in Fig.
12.47c). The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have
been partly built above this basement, which would
explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a
level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74).
The destruction of this structure and the bricks of
Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created
the slope of this layer as found. The height of this
basement can be calculated by comparing the floor
to the west (2451, 1515, levels 86.20–86.40 m) to
the top level of the gray walls of Stratum C-3 (4480,
4495, 4496) that were found below the charred
beams (85.14–84.85 m), since we surmise that
these walls served as a support for this basement.
This difference in levels (maximum 1.55 m) should
also include the floor of the basement and the thickness of the wood construction that supported the
floor above it, that later collapsed. Thus, the subfloor space itself could not have been more than ca.
1.0 m high. According to this reconstruction, this
basement could have had two components: 1)
underneath the northern room (2455), a narrow
space located in the area above Stratum C-3 Walls
4495 and 4496 (Fig. 12.47a) and 2) underneath the
southern room (2451), a narrow space that would
have been open towards the apiary (Fig. 12.47b).
Alternatively, it is possible that this entire area was
one long space, possibly continuing to the north
into Building CG, as suggested above (Fig.
12.47d). The roof of this alcove would have been
the collapsed tiers of wood on the eastern end of the
wooden construction in the south. The low ceiling
of this basement would suggest that these spaces
could have served for storage of commodities in
containers. The postulated space below Room 2441
of Building CG (described above) might have been
a continuation of the same phenomenon.
The southern room (2451) was at least 3.3 m from
north to south, as its southern border was beyond
the limits of the excavation (Photos 12.143,
12.149). Like the room to the north, the eastern end
collapsed to the east and was covered by Stratum
C-1a Building CL.
The floor of this room was identical to that of
Room 2455, both in its composition of burnt powdery white lime and the reddish sub-floor material,
as well as the strip of wooden beams on its eastern
end. Here too, it is surmised that below the floor in
this room there was a basement, as described
above.
On the floor was a thick layer of destruction
debris with fallen bricks, ceiling material, charcoal
and ash, concentrated mainly in the west and south
of the room. Fifteen vessels were found in this
room (of which only a part was excavated), as well
as other finds (Table 12.21).
The area to the east of Building CH in Squares Y– Z, A/1–2, 20 was occupied by an apiary of industrial scope, which included three north–south rows of unfired clay hives, separated by elongated aisles. The stratigraphy and general spatial organization of the apiary will be described below, while the structure and makeup of the hives, as well as additional details and illustrations, are presented in Chapter 14A. Three scientific studies of the apiary are presented in Chapters 14B–14D, and discussions of the apiary’s operation, historical context, and ethnographic comparisons are presented in Chapter 14E.
Due to the broad expanse of this space, as well as
the very nature of the industry, which contained
over a million bees, we assume that this had been an
open area, although it is probable that each row of
hives was roofed with thatch or other material, such
as cloth or clay, to shield them from the intense heat
in the summer or from the rains in the winter.
The apiary was bordered by Wall 9453 on the
east, Building CH on the west, and Wall 8469 of
Building CM on the north. It extended to the south
beyond the limit of the excavation in Square Z/20
and thus, it measured 9.0–9.5 m from east to west
and at least 13.0 m from north to south, an area of
117–123.5 sq m
The eastern wall of the apiary was Wall 9453, which was on line with Wall 6408 of the northeastern complex (Squares A/4–5; Fig. 12.18), demonstrating the integral city plan of Stratum C-1b. It was a well-built wall, preserved to five courses and very burnt, that ran for 16.4 m, serving as both the eastern wall of the apiary and the western wall of Building CP (early phase), while on its northern end (preserved to ten courses, not burnt), it was both the western wall of Building CZ and, most likely, the eastern wall of Building CM. Above it was C-1a Wall 9406, that served as the western wall of both Buildings CP and CQ3 (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 9453 was abutted on the west by the destruction debris and floor of the apiary (9451); a perpendicular wooden beam in its foundation extended into the floor. The southern end (in Square A/1; Fig. 12.39) contained a section with some irregular bricks, possibly an entrance leading to the lower phase of Building CP on the east (Photos 12.153, 12.234). Just at this point, it was abutted by a 2.0 m-long strip of narrow bricks fronted by a patch of small stones on the floor level that might have served as a step up to this entrance. The western face of the wall was covered with a hard brownish-yellow mud plaster, while its bricks were mostly brown and gray and of a very hard consistency, possibly due to the fire that engulfed this area
Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition, perhaps constructed in conjunction with the deep strip of wood to its north (at the southern end of Building CM) described above, which both abutted the northern side of this wall and penetrated down to a level below its foundation (Fig. 12.78; Photos 12.142, 12.151, 12.154, 12.160). The wall was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). The highest level of its central segment was just about on line with the highest preserved top of the hives (Photos 12.151, 12.156–12.157). Between the floating level of this wall and the apiary floor was a 0.15 m thick layer of brown-earth fill that also filled a narrow channel that ran along the southern face of the wall (Photos 12.151, 12.156, 12.159). The eastern end of Wall 8469, north of the eastern row of hives, was so poorly preserved that only a narrow strip of pulverized pinkish material could be identified, although a few complete fallen bricks to the west and east of these hives might have belonged to it (Photo 12.157). As mentioned above, Wall 8469 was most likely not a free-standing element, but rather a kind of buttress attached to the wood construction to its north, both creating a single, quite massive construction that separated Building CM on the north from the apiary to the south. This might have been due to the difference in level of 1.3–1.5 m between these two units, with Wall 8469 and the wood construction serving as kind of terrace or retaining wall between them.
The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary.
Building CH bordered the
apiary on the west, to the south of the aforementioned corner of Building CG. As described in
detail above, its walls and floors were on a higher
level than the apiary floor by some 1.7 m, built
above a wooden construction that was founded on
Stratum C-3 gray-brick walls (4480, 4495, 4496),
creating a roofed area below Building CH, perhaps
open towards the apiary on the east (Fig. 12.47c).
The apiary floor ran up to the eastern faces of Walls
4480 and 4496 (Figs. 12.72–12.73; Photos 12.17,
12.158), and possibly to Wall 5483 on the south. A
thin layer of eroded gray debris (4499) from these
walls was found right on top of the floor (4469,
5440, 7481) in this southwestern section of the
apiary (Figs. 12.86–12.87). It is surmised that when
the builders of Building CH and the apiary dug
down to this level, they encountered these earlier
walls and reused them as a support for the wooden
construction that bordered the building on the east
and as the western edge of the apiary. In spite of the
differences in the floor level of ca. 1.7 m, the apiary
was most likely related to Building CH, which
might have served as its service wing, as proposed
above.
Thus, the apiary was surrounded (at least) on
three sides by built units, and was established on a
lower level than those structures on its west and
north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining
units were built more or less on the same level,
judging by the floor levels.
As noted above, no remains of Stratum C-2 were
identified in the probe made below the apiary floor
(Figs. 12.80, 12.82), and, in fact, C-3 walls were
found directly relating to this floor (Figs. 12.72–
12.73). The reason for the lack of C-2 remains was
most likely related to the low level of the apiary; it
appears that the builders dug down to this level to
create this broad cavity for their industry, obliterating all traces of the previous phase, until they
encountered remains of an even earlier occupation,
C-3, which they utilized to some degree, as
described in detail above and below. It should be
noted that Stratum C-2 remains were revealed east
of the apiary under Building CZ (in Squares A–
C/2–3 (Figs. 12.7, 12.15). Wall 11471 of Stratum
C-2 was cut in this place by Wall 9453, which
served as the eastern boundary of the apiary. Thus,
Stratum C-2 remains were found to the north, west
and east of the apiary, but not within its confines.
The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the
western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b
Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to
east, while the same level of destruction debris
found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos
12.150–12.151). Stratum C-1a Building CL was
built directly above this ca. 1.0 m-deep layer of collapsed bricks and burnt destruction debris that covered the apiary (Photo 12.146) and thus, the
attribution of the apiary to Stratum C-1b is secure.
The level of the apiary floor ranged from 84.50–
84.70 m. It was composed of three different
matrices (Photos 12.150–12.152, 12.158), all of
which were covered by the same destruction debris
and collapse (Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.81, 12.83–
12.87).
The first type of floor was made of dark red
smooth clay, found in the space between Wall 9453
and the eastern row of hives (8482, 9451; 84.55–
84.60 m) (Photos 12.152–12.158). It had many
black burnt patches, especially on its northern end.
In the center of this part of the floor was a hive
(8500) that appeared to have fallen from the eastern
row.
The second type of floor was made of very
hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick,
found in the aisle between the eastern and middle
rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle
between the middle and western rows of hives
(Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). This floor was
covered in part by a thin layer of soft reddish material,
identical to the fill in other Stratum C-1b buildings in
which the wood was set. It is notable that the
hives were set ca. 0.15–0.3 m above this hard white
floor and red layer, on top of a loose brown-earth
fill that included many bones, some sherds and
pieces of wood (Fig. 12.81; Photos 12.152,
12.156). This was the same material seen under the
foundation of the northern wall (8469) and in a
narrow channel running along its southern face
(Photos 12.151, 12.159). The destruction debris in
the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed
bricks, rested directly on this floor. The very hard
and thick matrix of this floor seems to have served a
purpose related to the work in the hives, since it
was concentrated mainly in that area. The reason
for the fill between the floor and bottom of the
hives must have been technical, related to drainage
and ventilation; perhaps the large amount of bones
in this fill served this purpose. In several places,
particularly in the middle row of hives, we found
evidence for charred beams that separated the hives
from the floor, suggesting that in some places, the
hives were located on a level raised by wood.
Another interesting feature in the hard white floor
between the middle and eastern rows (8436) was a
sunken area adjoining the floating level of the
three northernmost hives in the middle row and
abutting the floating level of Wall 8469 to its north
(Photos 12.156, 12.159). This sunken area measured 0.6×1.2 m and was 0.1 m deep; it was lined
with the same hard white material as the floor
showing that they were constructed together, and
was filled with the same loose brown fill as the
channel that ran alongside Wall 8469 and that was
placed under the hives.
An enigmatic feature identified under the
southern end of the middle row of hives (seen in the
northern balk of Square Z/1) was a round area of
eroded gray brick material, 0.5 m in diameter,
which was cut into the hard white floor and penetrated into the upper pink layer of the Stratum C-3
accumulation under the apiary (Photo 12.20). It is
possible that this was a pit, related in some way to
the construction of the hives. This further supports
the relationship between the hard white floor and
the hives themselves.
The third floor type was a soft powdery matrix
of vivid red color, found in the southwestern part of
the apiary (Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.152, 12.158). It
merged with the hard white floor just south of the
western row of hives and west of the southern part
of the middle row of hives (4469); it continued to
the southwest (7481) to abut Walls 4495 and 4480,
as well as to the southern part of the apiary in
Squares Y–Z/20 (5440, 9455, 9458). In the probes
excavated below the apiary floor in the area south
of the three rows of hives (Squares Y–Z/1; Figs.
12.4, 12.82; Photos 12.19–12.20), it was seen that
this red powdery layer continued to the east and
south underneath the hard white tufa floor
described above. It thus seems (as suggested above)
that the tufa floor was laid above the soft red floor
of Stratum C-3, possibly to provide a substantial,
non-permeable surface for the hives and the related
activity, while in the west, where there were no
hives, there was no need for such a surface. The
question remains whether the builders of the apiary
reused the Stratum C-3 floor that they encountered
(along with the gray-brick walls) when digging
down to the level on which they intended to establish the apiary, or whether this was a new floor laid
in Stratum C-1b when the apiary was built. Since
there was no other floor below that abutted the C-3
gray walls, it seems that the former possibility is
more viable. What is clear is that both types of
floors — the hard white and the soft red — were
used together for the duration of the operation of
the apiary and were found covered with the same
layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and pottery.
To the west of the middle row
of hives in Squares Y–Z/1–2 were a number of pits
that were dug from this red floor, as most of them
were lined with this same material (Photos 12.150–
12.152, 12.158–12.159). Very little pottery was
recovered from these pits (Fig. 12.62:4–13), aside
from 8496, which contained a large amount of redpainted pottery and a few red-slipped and handburnished sherds. It is difficult to phase these pits
and, ultimately, it depends whether the red floor
was a Stratum C-1b addition or was originally laid
in Stratum C-3 and reused.
These pits included (from north to south):
This building, only party excavated in Squares A–
C/2–3, was composed of a central space flanked by
two rooms on the western side and at least one
room on the eastern side; it might be considered a
variation of a courtyard house. Its borders on the
north and east were beyond the limit of the excavation, yet it appears that it was bordered on the north
by an unexcavated earlier phase of the Stratum
C-1a street. In that case, it may be assumed that the
building could not be much larger than the parts
excavated. On the west, it was probably attached to
Building CM, and its southwestern corner abutted
the northeastern corner of the apiary. On the south,
the neighboring building was the early phase of
Building CP, with a double wall between the two
(Photo 12.161). Its external measurements were at
least ca. 7.5×12 m. In the southeastern corner of
Building CZ was an opening leading south into
Building CP (early phase) (Photos 12.165, 12.168).
The walls of Building CZ, built of gray and
brown bricks, were well preserved in the western
part, up to a height of up ten courses above the
floors (Photo 12.163).
The central space of this building was bounded on
the south by Wall 11421, on the southeast by Wall
10500, on the west by Wall 11407, and on the north
probably by the continuation of Wall 11455, which
is known only in the western part of the building.
Since Wall 10500 cornered with Wall 10518 and
did not continue to the north (Photos 12.161–
12.162, 12.164), a large L-shaped space was created, most likely an unroofed courtyard, which was
6.2 m from north to south, 3.6 m wide at its
southern part, and at least 7.5 m from east to west in
its northern part; it thus measured at least 41 sq. m.
Wall 11421 was first built in Stratum C-2 (see
above) and was reused in Stratum C-1b, since the
debris and floor (11422, 11442) related to this
stratum abutted it above the debris attributed to
Stratum C-2, some 0.5 m lower. The northern wall
(11458) of the adjacent Building CP was built flush
against Wall 11421; it was preserved three courses
higher than Wall 11421 (Photos 12.165, 12.168)
and, in fact, the layer of fallen bricks and debris that
filled the courtyard abutted these top courses, as
well as the top courses of Wall 11421. It seems that,
at one point, the upper part of Wall 11421 had been
removed in its center and eastern end, revealing the
northern face of Wall 11458 and making it the
southern border of this space.
The floor identified in the central part of the
courtyard (11422, 11426, 11442) was composed of
somewhat patchy red and gray striations that sloped
down from east to west in the southern part near
Wall 11421, but were horizontal in the northern part
(north of the line of Wall 10518). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard, just east of the
entrance into Room 11449 was a pit (11456) lined
with very hard gray mud plaster; it contained only a
few sherds. In the area to the north of Wall 10518
(the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a
0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris
(11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone
fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds,
many of them red slipped and hand burnished.
There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor
level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by
the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower
level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a
Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and,
in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX
were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of
the courtyard (Photo 12.167).
In the southeastern part of this building was Room
11404 (internal measurements 2.1×3.25 m; 6.8 sq
m) (Photos 12.162, 12.165). The room was
bounded on the south by Wall 11421 and on the
north and west by Walls 10500 (1.3 m long) and
10518 (2.4 m long), the latter revealed directly
below the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX
(Photos 12.176, 12.180–12.181). The eastern wall
was not revealed, but it was most likely located
close to the edge of the excavation, just below C-1a
Wall 10490, continuing the line of the short segment of a wall (11479) revealed to the south in
Square C/2, belonging to the early phase of
Building CP (Fig. 12.39; Photos 12.165, 12.168).
This small room had three entrances. The
western entrance, 0.8 m wide, led to the room from
the southern part of the courtyard. The other two,
also 0.8 m wide, were opposite each other on the
eastern ends of Walls 10518 and 11421. The former
led to the northeastern part of the L-shaped courtyard, while the latter led to Building CP (early
phase) by way of an identical entrance in Wall
11458, the northern wall of that building (Photos
12.165, 12.168). The room with three openings is
unparalleled in other buildings and may indicate
some special function, possibly for transit between
Buildings CZ and CP.
This room contained a large amount of fallen
bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor
was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the
north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of
the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls
The western wing of this unit contained two square
rooms of identical size: Room 11449 on the south
and Room 11457 on the north, each with internal
measurements of 2.4×2.4 m; 5.8 sq. m (Photos
12.161, 12.163). The western boundary of both
rooms was the northern continuation of Wall 9453,
which was the wall between the apiary and the early
phase of Building CP. A distinct fill (0.08 m thick)
separated this wall from the Stratum C-1a wall
above it (9406) (Fig. 12.95; Photo 12.163). Wall
11412 separated the two rooms and Wall 11407
bordered both on the east; openings in both ends of
this wall led to the courtyard on the east. Wall
11455 bordered the northern room on the north and
Wall 11427 on the south; both were superimposed
by Stratum C-1a Walls 10472 and 10482 of
Building CQ3, respectively (Photo 12.164).
The floors in the two western rooms were made
of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in
the eastern part of the building. They were covered
by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen
bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room
and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with
large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of
sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished
sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively
large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron
Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the
fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of
Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. After removal of the
floor of Room 11449, the top of an earlier wall
(11471) built of hard yellow bricks was uncovered
at level 84.85 m and attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig.
12.14; Photo 12.163).
The floors of C-1a Building CQ3, located 1.45
m above those of Stratum C-1b, sealed the debris
and the tops of the walls in these rooms (Photos
12.171, 12.173, 12.176). Notably, the floor level in
these two rooms (84.85–84.90 m) was only 0.15–
0.2 m higher than the floor of the apiary that abutted
the eastern face of Wall 9453, showing that this
building was built on the same low level as the
apiary, as opposed to the higher elevation of Buildings CM, CG and CH to its north and west.
It was deliberated whether Building CZ might
be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. In
favor of this assessment were the following arguments: 1.) the building’s walls were preserved to
11–12 courses, just like other Stratum C-2 structures to the north and west (e.g., Building CB);
2.) its levels and stratigraphic situation were similar
to those of nearby Room 6515 and other remains in
Squares A–B/4–5, which we attributed to Stratum
C-2 (Figs. 12.7, 12.12), although they were found
right below C-1a Building CQ1, just as Building
CZ was found just below C-1a Building CX;
3.) Building CZ was filled with fallen bricks and
relatively empty of finds, like most C-2 structures.
In contrast, the following arguments were in favor
of the attribution of Building CZ to Stratum C-1b:
1.) it shared a wall (9453) with the apiary of
Stratum C-1b; 2.) we assume that Building CX
above it was founded in Stratum C-1a, since no
traces of an earlier phase were identified in that
building; 3.) while the walls of Stratum C-2 were
composed of distinct hard yellow bricks, the walls
of Building CZ were built of the typical gray and
brown bricks found in Stratum C-1b; 4.) Wall
11471, found below the floor of the southeastern
room of Building CZ (Fig. 12.15; Photo 12.163),
was constructed of the C-2 brick type and apparently penetrated below Wall 9453 to its west.
This dilemna remains unsolved and both possibilities pose questions. If we attribute Building CZ
to Stratum C-2, we would need to understand Wall
9453, the eastern boundary of the apiary, as a
reused C-2 wall, and this has no other support, particularly in light of the lack of C-2 elements in the
area of the apiary. We would also have to assume
that either Building CZ continued to be in use in
Stratum C-1b with insignificant changes, or that
Building CX (the building above Building CZ) was
first erected in Stratum C-1b, which too, lacks evidence (although we suggested the same concerning
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 which, in our view, were
in use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, based on elements such as wood in the foundations and subfloor striations that abutted the walls). The relatively small amount of pottery recovered from
Building CZ is of types that exist in both Strata C-2
and C-1b, and thus does not help to decide the
issue. Thus, we attribute Building CZ to Stratum
C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence.
Building CQ3 (Squares A/2–3) was built above the
western wing of Building CZ. It was bounded on
the north by the street in Squares A–B/4, on the
west by Piazza 2417, on the east by Building CX
(with which it shared a wall) and on the south by
Building CP (partly by a shared wall and partly by a
double wall). It was designated Building CQ3 due
to the similarity of its plan and dimensions to
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2. The external measurements of this building were 5.6×7.2–7.4 m
(including all walls) and its net floor space was ca.
23.5 sq m.
Like Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, CQ3 was
composed of a single large room (10494) and two
small back rooms (10452, 10460). As opposed to
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, there were two
entranceways in this building; one in its northeastern corner and one in the middle of its western
wall, both 1.2 m wide. The northern entrance
(Photo 12.171) led to the street and was located
directly opposite the entrance into Building CQ1.
The western entranceway led to Piazza 2417; it was
partially paved with bricks, in the foundation of
which was a plank of wood with small round
wooden beams set perpendicularly above it (Photo
12.172). This arrangement was unknown in any
other entranceway and represents a rare use of
wooden beams in Stratum C-1a.
The western wall of this building was Wall
9406 (Fig. 12.95; Photos 12.162–12.163), whose
southern part served as the western wall of Building
CP, indicating that the two buildings were constructed at the same time. The southern wall was
composed of two abutting segments: 9415 on the
west, which was shared with the northwestern room
of Building CP, and 10482 on the east, which
formed a double wall with the northern wall
(10409) of Building CP at this point; this is the only
double wall in the entire southeastern complex in
Stratum C-1a. Wall 10482 had small round wooden
beams in its foundation, similar to those in the
western threshold of the building, and was built
above C-1b Wall 11427 (Photo 12.164). Walls
10482 and 10409 abutted, but did not bond with,
Wall 9448 on their west; this was a constructional
feature and not the result of sub-phasing.
Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of
Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were
preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room
10460 and were flush with the floor level in
Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170,
12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls
were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could
have been done at some point during the lifetime of
the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such
an opening was part of the original plan of both
buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall
10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo
12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3
was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of
C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately
left at a low level in order to allow for passage
between the buildings; see also Wall 10464
(described below). According to A. Mazar, the low
levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part)
resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this
corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely
damaged during the final destruction of this
building or suffered from a late intrusion which
could not be observed in the excavation. According
to this explanation, there had been no passage
between Buildings CP and CQ3.
The northern room’s inner measurements were 3.1×4.4 m; 13.6 sq m (Photo 12.170). As noted above, it had entrances on the north and on the west, as well as two entrances leading to the rooms on its south. The walls, preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). Almost all of the western part of this room was occupied by a unique installation (10505).
The southern end of this installation was composed of a narrow parapet made of
hard-packed brick material, 2.0 m long, 0.2 m wide
and ca. 0.5 m high (Photos 12.170, 12.174–12.175).
Its western end was built on top of a large stone and
was attached to the door jamb of Wall 9406, so that
it bordered the western entrance into the room on its
north.
Attached to the southeastern end of the parapet
was a large gray brick. The area left to the south of
the parapet must have been used as a narrow passageway into the building from the western
entrance, as well as into Room 10452 to the south.
In the floor foundation to the southwest of the brick
parapet was a patch composed of small stones and
chunks of hard brick material (11424; 0.6×0.8 m),
as well as fragments of a lower grinding stone and a
basalt mortar in secondary use. The brick parapet
was built on top of the northern end of these stones
(Photos 12.175–12.176).
To the north of the brick parapet, and occupying the northwestern corner of the room, was a
squarish (1.5×1.7 m) patch of gravelly earth and
reddish brick material, found very burnt. This
square was surrounded by brick material similar to
that of the parapet on its south, while its center contained a paving of sherds and small travertine
stones. On this paving was a storage jar, with its top
half apparently deliberately removed (Fig.
13.133:5; Photo 12.174), containing a large amount
of gray ash; a few scattered loomweights were
found here as well.
The function of this installation remains enigmatic, but the fact that it occupied the western part
of the room points to it having been a major feature
of Building CQ3.
The southwestern room (10452; internal measurements 2.0×2.6 m; 5.2 sq m) (Photo 12.170) was
accessed from the southwestern part of Room
10494 through a 1.2 m-wide entrance in Wall
10417, the northern wall of the room (Photos
12.176–12.177). The room was bordered on the
west by Wall 9406, which was also the western wall
of Building CP to the south, and on the south by
Wall 9415, which was the northern wall of the
western part of Building CP; this demonstrates the
close relationship between the buildings in this
sector. On the east was Wall 10407. All the walls
were covered with a high-quality mud plaster
(Photos 12.177–12.179), similar in makeup to that
found on the walls of Building CP.
The floor (10452) was composed of red clay
interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris
and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or
almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs.
13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored
from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription
on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of)
Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011:
304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A,
No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen
bricks was found against the southern and eastern
walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo
12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular
plastered depression located along the center of the
southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo
12.179).
The southeastern room (10460) was the smallest
(internal measurements 1.8×2.6 m; 4.68 sq m). It
was accessed from Room 10494 through a 1.0 m
wide entrance (Photo 12.170). The room was bordered on the north by Wall 10483, on the west by
Wall 10407, on the south by Wall 10482, and on the
east by Wall 10464, which was also the western
wall of Building CX. A curious feature of the
eastern wall (10464) was its ‘stepped’ preservation.
On the southern end, at its corner with Wall 10482,
it was preserved only 0.15 m above the floor of
Room 10460 along 1.5 m, while halfway through
the room, the wall was preserved some 0.2 m
higher, up to its corner with Wall 10483 (Photos
12.170, 12.173, 12.180); north of this, in Room
10494, the wall was preserved much higher. This
low preservation of the southern end of the wall in
Room 10460 was similar to that of the southern
wall of this room (10482) and western end of Wall
10409 of the adjacent Building CP to the south,
described above. As in that situation, here, too, it
may be asked whether these walls were deliberately
razed in order to allow passage from Room 10460
into the southern part of Building CX on the east,
thus effectively joining these two buildings at one
point during their lifetime. Alternatively, this low
level might be the result of poor preservation,
caused by the destruction of the buildings, which
might have been particularly heavy in the southeastern corner of Building CQ3.
The floor was less well preserved than in the
other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The
room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt
brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds
included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a
storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights
that were concentrated mainly along the western
wall and near the entrance.
Building CP in Stratum C-1a was a large structure
with a unique plan, located in the southeastern
corner of Area C in Squares A–C/20, 1–2 (Photos
12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190). The remains
attributed to Stratum C-1b, which were only partly
excavated, were, in fact, an early phase of the
building, with only minor differences in the walls
discerned in the part of the earlier building that was
exposed, as described above (Photo 12.189). Some
of the walls (e.g., 11477/10457 in the south and
11479/10490 in the east) were, in fact, the same,
with the upper courses of the previous building
reused in Stratum C-1a, now covered with a thick
fine mud plaster, and with new floors laid against
them (Photos 12.193–12.194, 12.196). The eastern
wall of the central rooms (10462, 10485) was new,
built above a gap with fill laid above the earlier wall
(11473) that served as a threshold in the
entranceways in the new wall (Photos 12.191,
12.195). The western wall of the central rooms
(9448, 10480) was also new, built above the earlier
wall (with no gap or fill); here too, the earlier wall
(11470) served as a threshold in the entrances in the
C-1a wall (Photos 12.191, 12.196, 12.219). An
additional difference was the nature and size of the
bricks in the early building, which were larger and
of an extremely hard consistency and gray-white
color; these early walls were not plastered, while
those in the C-1a phase were coated with a fine
thick mud plaster.
In Stratum C-1a, Building CP adjoined
Building CL on the east and Buildings CQ3 and CX
on the south, sharing walls with these buildings
(Photos 12.169–12.170), indicating that all were
built, and possibly functioned, together.
This building was excavated in its entirety
(Squares A–C/20, 1–2). Its external measurements
were 9.2–9.7×12.3 m (ca. 112 sq. m, including
walls) and its internal floor space (including the
benches along the walls) totaled 71.84 sq m. The
walls stood to a height of 1.2 m (on the west) to 0.75
m (on the east) above the floors, and were exposed
just below topsoil.
Building CP was unique in its plan and flow of
internal circulation. Its plan consisted of eight
rooms: two large rectangular central ones (10458,
10476) flanked by three small rooms on the east
(10510, 11441, 11451) and three small rooms on
the west (9449, 9450, 10506). The three eastern
rooms had entrances in their northwestern corners
that accessed the central rooms. Two of these
(11441, 11451) also had entrances in their northeastern corners (on line with the western
entrances), leading in from an assumed street or
courtyard on the east; all these entrances were 1.3
m wide, except for the western one in the middle
room, which was 1.1 m wide. Thus, each of the central rooms could be approached separately from
outside the building, as well as from the inside. The
three small rooms in the western wing were accessible from the two large central rooms: two of them
(10506, 9450) were entered from the southern
central room (10476), while the northern one
(9449) was entered from the northern central room
(10458). Rooms 9449 and 9450 were joined by an
entrance, thus enabling circulation between the
southern and the northern wings of the building via
these two small rooms. On the other hand, the
southwestern small room (10506) could be
accessed only through the southern central room
(10476), and the northeastern small room (10510)
could be accessed only through the northern central
room (10458), creating a symmetry to the building
that was marred only by the difference of accessibility in the eastern rooms and minor differences in
room sizes. It is notable that six of the seven
entrances found in this building were located in the
corners of the rooms; the only entrance located in
the center of a wall was the one connecting Rooms
9450 and 9449 in the western wing.
All the walls were covered with plaster and the
floors were made of fine red clay mixed with
smooth black burnt material. In Rooms 10458,
10506, and the southeastern part of 11451, the
floors were set on a mud-plaster bedding (Photos
12.207–12.209) and in Rooms 10506, 10476 and
10510, they were set on a sub-floor brick construction (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.194,
12.200, 12.219).
A wide range of many complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.143–13.160) and numerous
objects (Table 12.24), as well as a large amount of
grain, were found in the 0.8 m-deep destruction
debris on the floors, as detailed below and in
Chapter 45.
The northern room of the eastern wing (Photos
12.197–12.198, 12.200) measured internally
2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m. Its eastern wall (10490) was
built above C-1b Wall 11479, while its northern
wall (10409) was built above C-1b Wall 11458
(Photo 12.193). This room was accessed only
through an entrance in Wall 10462 that led from the
northern central room (10458).
The floor in this room was identical to the
others throughout Building CP, composed of red
clay mixed with black burnt material. It sloped
down from west to east, from 86.20 to 85.98 m; the
western elevation was higher than the other floors
in the building, perhaps because just underneath the
burnt floor makeup on the west were two concentrations of bricks, one in the southwestern corner of
the room and the other in the northwestern corner,
just inside the entrance (Fig. 12.52c). The latter
(11478) was a rectangle measuring 0.6×1.2 m, ca.
0.1 m high. The bricks in the southwestern corner
were more sporadic (Photos 12.189–12.190,
12.197). These are understood as a sub-floor construction, similar to those found in the southwestern
part of the building, described below.
The room was full of burnt destruction debris
(10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact
four-legged incense burner with a matching lid
(Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds
(Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was
found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458,
apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items
were found above the sub-floor brick construction
in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the
room.
The middle room of the eastern wing measured internally 2.2×2.8 m (6.16 sq m) (Photos 12.197, 12.200, 12.202). Like the southern room, it had entrances in its northeastern and northwestern corners. The floor (11441) was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl.
The southern room of the eastern wing (internal measurements 2.6×2.8 m; 7.28 sq m) had an entrance in its northeastern corner and another one opposite it that led into Room 10476 on the west (Photos 12.197, 12.202–12.203). A notable feature of the eastern entrance was the molding of the door jambs; the inner (western) northern end of Wall 11440 was nicely molded to a curved shape (Photo 12.204) and the southern end of Wall 11417 that faced the entrance was also curved, although less well preserved. The walls in this part of the room were covered with fine gray-whitish plaster, somewhat different from the light brown mud plaster that coated the other walls of this building. The floor of this room was composed of red clay interspersed with smooth black burnt material. The southeastern part of the floor contained a layer of plaster, identical to that on the walls, below the red and black floor makeup. Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206).
The central part of the building included two large rectangular rooms of similar size: Room 10458 on the north and Room 10476 on the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190, 12.207).
The northern central room measured internally
4.0×4.7 m; 19 sq m (Photo 12.208). The main
entrance to this room was from Room 11411 on the
east, while two other entrances led into Rooms
10510 and 9449, the latter creating a connection to
the southern wing of the building. The floor was
higher by 0.25–0.35 m than that in Room 9449 to
the west and Room 11441 to the east, but was
almost the same as that of Room 10510 on the
northeast.
The preservation of the northern and eastern
walls was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north
(which was also the southern wall of Building CX)
was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length,
but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m
before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference
was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush
with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower
western end adjoined the southern face of Wall
10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved
to the same low height. As mentioned above in the
discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to
explain this feature: either there was a deliberate
lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458
into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation
was due to damage caused by the destruction or by
some unrecognized later intrusion. A 0.4 m wide
bench (10463), composed of terre pisé and partially
plastered, was built along the southern face of
Wall 10409, running 2.4 m from exactly where
Wall 10409 was cut on the west, almost up to the
entrance into Room 10510 on the east (Photo
12.208). Two bricks laid on the western end of
Bench 10463 were on the same low level as the
western end of Wall 10409; their function is not
known. Following a 0.7 m gap was yet another
brick, set into the corner of Walls 9448 and 10409,
found floating 0.1 m above the level of the plastered floor in the western part of this room (10498)
(Photo 12.209). The low western end of Wall 10409
abutted, but did not bond with, the western wall
(9448) of the room.
The eastern wall (10462) of Room 10458 was
different than the others in its composition, being
built of similar terre pisé as Bench 10463. It was
preserved to only 0.20 above the floor in the south
and 0.40 m in the north. The corner of Wall 10462
with Wall 10405 (the southern wall of the room)
was not well bonded; the latter was preserved to a
height of 0.65 m, similar to that of the northern wall
of this room.
Running along the eastern face of Wall 9448
and ending on the north at the entrance into Room
9449, was yet another bench (10454), built of
crumbly yellow bricks, 0.5 m wide, 1.6 m long and
ca. 0.2 m high (Photos 12.208–12.209).
The floor of the room (10458) was composed
of reddish-brown earth mixed with black ash; in the
western part of the room, it was laid 0.05–0.08 m
above a layer of hard mud plaster (10498) (Photos
12.208–12.209). This plaster was identical to that
found under the floor of Rooms 10506 and 11451,
as well as on most of the walls in this building; it
was concentrated in the area between the lower
western end of Wall 10409 on the north and along
the line of Oven 10430, just north of Wall 10405, on
the south (the contours of this plaster are marked on
the plan; Fig. 12.52a). Depressions in the plaster
accommodated the rounded contour of the stone
mortar, as well as two of the pottery vessels just
north of Oven 10430. The plaster-bedding layer
was laid on top of a layer of soft light brown earth
with very few sherds (11461), which seems to have
been a leveling fill laid above the C-1b remains.
The room was full of a layer of burnt
destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded
brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed
ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained
23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels
and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower
grinding stone was found just to the southwest of
the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration
of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the
northwestern corner of the room, above the lower
western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the
brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo
12.214); a few additional loomweights were found
dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454
along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found
upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and
a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this
bench was a dense concentration of finds that
included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos
(Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it
(Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a
large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a
smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down
towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a
group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars
(Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand
adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35,
No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding
stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into
the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north
(Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498)
in the western part of the room included a few small
upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well
as several loomweights and sherds.
The southern central room measured internally
3.6×4.6 m (16.6 sq m) (Photo 12.215). The main
entrance to this room was from Room 11451 on the
east, while two other entrances led into Rooms
10506 and 9450, the latter creating a connection to
the northern wing of the building (Photos 12.189–
190, 12.203, 12.215). Since Room 9450 was joined
to Room 9449, one could pass between the southern
and northern parts of the building by way of these
two small rooms.
Room 10476 was bordered on the east by the
southern end of Wall 10462 and its continuation to
the south, which was designated a separate number
(10485) because it was built of discernible bricks,
as opposed to the terre pisé of 10462; it was preserved
higher than the latter and its northern end
was covered with molded plaster (Photo 12.216).
The southern wall of the room (10457) ran along
12.2 m; it was located 0.5 m north of the southern
wall of adjoining Building CL on the west, indicating that although they ran more or less along the
same line, these were two separate walls. The
northern wall (10405) separated the two large central rooms. All these walls were found standing to a
height of 0.6–1.0 m and were covered with mud
plaster.
The floor was made of soft reddish-brown
earth, interspersed with black ash. Just below the
floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of
closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of
the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219).
Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part,
most of the bricks were missing, although it is not
clear whether this area had never been constructed
or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On
the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and,
in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls
belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo
12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top
of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b
Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468
was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like
the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms
10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to
have been a building technique intended to provide
reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to
protect against rodents in certain places (compare a
similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room
8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in
this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig.
13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a
unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor
above it (Photo 12.221).
Benches were constructed along the northern
and western walls. Bench 10466, 3.6 m long, 0.6
wide and ca. 0.25 m high, ran along the northern
wall (10405); the plaster on this wall joined the
plaster that covered the bench. This bench was built
directly above C-1b Wall 11472, utilizing the top of
this wall as its foundation. On this bench were three
cooking pots (Figs. 13.147:1, 3; 13.149:6), one jug
(Fig. 13.155:4), four juglets (Fig. 13.156:19, 24–
25) and two loomweights (Photo 12.217). Bench
10467, 1.7 m long, 0.5 m wide and ca. 0.15 m high,
was rather poorly preserved along the western wall
(10480); a jug (Fig. 13.155:7), a seal (Chapter 30,
No. 32), a bead, a loomweight and a scoria scraper
were found on it (Photo 12.218). In the northeastern
corner of the room, Installation 10468 was composed of bricks set on their narrow side around a
circular mud-plastered receptacle (Photo 12.217).
Inside the plastered depression were two cooking
pots stacked together, a very small one (Fig.
13.148:9) on the bottom and a medium-sized one
(Fig. 13.148:4) on top of it.
Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction
debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster,
ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of
ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the
room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix
(Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the
destruction debris were found in situ (some intact)
on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds
(Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the
southern half of the room (10493) contained much
less pottery than in the north and center, mostly
concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A
unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall
10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room
10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the
same wall in the southwestern corner of Room
10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos
12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its
top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with
0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup.6 It
was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base,
and contained a large amount of charred grain
(Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large
pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its
upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221–
12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and
against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the
east of the pithos was a concentration of 85
loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a
concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains
of charred wood here might represent a loom. A
few vessels were found in the entrance leading
from the east, mostly against the plastered southern
doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large
and heavy stone was found upside down, just under
topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction
debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451
(Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small
depression carved out of part of its top, in which
some substance was probably ground, judging by
the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the
roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room
11451 to the east, described above.
This was the northern room in the western wing
(internal measurements 2.3×2.8 m; 6.4 sq m)
(Photos 12.207, 12.225). The northern wall (9415)
was also the southern wall of Building CQ3; it cornered with Wall 9406 on the west and with Wall
9448 on the east. Notably, this wall was not on line
with the northern wall (10409) of the large room to
the east, but ran 0.25 m to its north. A 0.5 m-wide
and 0.35 m-high brick bench (9443) was attached to
the southern face of Wall 9415, which was, in fact,
the direct continuation of the line of Wall 10409. Its
top level was ca. 0.1 m lower than the western end
of this wall and it is possible that it constituted the
(as of yet unexposed) western end of Stratum C-1b
Wall 11458 (Fig. 12.48), whose extant top was used
as a bench in this room. At its juncture with Wall
9406, the bench had an extension, protruding to the
south, 0.4×0.6 m, 0.35 m high, with slightly
sloping sides. The walls of the room, as well as the
bench and its extension, were all covered with the
same fine mud plaster. The eastern face of Wall
9406 in this room was very damaged and burnt, as
opposed to its excellent preservation further to the
north (in Building CQ3) and south, as well as on its
western face in Building CL, as described below.
The room had two entrances. A 1.0-m-wide
entrance in the southern end of the eastern wall
(9448) connected this room with the large room
(10458) on the east (Photos 12.189–191, 12.196).
Since the floor of the room to the east was 0.35–0.4
m higher than that of Room 9449, there was a small
step here (Photos 12.196, 12.207). Some charred
wooden pieces found in the entranceway might be
remnants of a step, doorjamb or door. The bench
(10454) with the pottery altar and bowl in Room
10458 to the east adjoined the southern doorjamb of
this entrance. A second entrance, 0.9 m-wide, was
located in the middle of the southern wall, connecting this room with Room 9450. The floor of the
room (9449) was composed of red clay mixed with
soft black burnt material.
The room was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of
dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling
material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418,
9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were
found in this small room, among them 11 storage
jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have
been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east,
but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell
from a second floor. A special find in this room was
an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the
name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307;
Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See
Table 12.24 for other finds.
The middle room in the western wing (internal
measurements 2.4×2.4; 5.76 sq m) was accessed
both from Room 9449 to its north and from the
large room to the east (10476) through a 1.0 m-wide entrance in its southeastern corner (Photo
12.207). The walls were covered with fine mud
plaster. The floor (9450) was composed of red clay
mixed with soft black burnt material. In the southwestern corner of the room was a square brick bin
(9434) (internal measurements 1.0 sq m; 0.6 m
high) (Photos 12.226–12.227). It was coated with a
fine plaster that continued from the surrounding
walls down to line the floor as well. Inside was an
intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in
Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside
another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig.
13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10,
13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone
scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar
was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample
R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812
BCE (2σ).
The entire room was filled with very burnt
destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many
complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling
material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43
restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage
jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room
were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig.
13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of
the pottery in this room, in particular the storage
jars (like in the previous room), were found
smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above
the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ
on the floor. This situation may hint that much of
this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher
shelves. A special item in this room was a horned
pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken
in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo
12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar
was a complete brick, but it appears that this was
fallen and not meant as a support. For additional
finds from this room, see Table 12.24.
The southern room of the western wing (internal
measurements 2.15×2.5 m; 5.4 sq m) (Photos
12.215, 12.229–12.230) could be entered only from
the large room to its east (10476) (Photos 12.203,
12.229). An intact juglet (Fig. 13.156:18) found
leaning against the threshold just inside the room
appeared to have been intentionally placed there
before the floor was laid (Photo 12.233). The
western wall of the room (10513) was the poorly
preserved continuation of Wall 9406 to its north.
The other walls, 9421 on the north, 10457 on the
south and 10480 on the east, were well preserved;
all the walls were covered with fine mud plaster
(Photo 12.229–12.231).
The floor was composed of soft dark earth,
except for the northwestern part, which was composed of the same mud plaster as the surrounding
walls, recalling the plaster in the western part of
Room 10458. This plastered area was 0.15 m
higher than the rest of the room (Photos 12.229–
12.230). Below the earthen floor in the southeastern part of the room, against Wall 10457 and
just underneath the floor where the pottery bin and
pottery ‘bucket’ were found (see below), was a
brick construction (11464), similar to the sub-floor
bricks found in Rooms 10510 and 10476 (Fig.
12.52c). Like in those rooms, this seems to have
been an element related to the construction phase of
the building. A low (0.1 m high) bench (10504)
composed of crumbly brown bricks was built along
part of the western wall (Photo 12.230).
A pottery bin (10501) was set in the southwestern corner of the room (Photos 12.215, 12.223,
12.229–12.232); it was very similar to Bin 10488 in
Room 10476, 3.0 m to its east and set against the
same wall (10457). It stood 0.75 m high, which was
shorter than the other bin; 0.15 m of its base was
sunk into the floor makeup. Like the latter bin, it
was made with thick slabs and restoration showed it
to be trapezoid, with the wider part on top (Photo
12.232; Fig. 13.160:12); it had no base or lid,
although 0.1 m above its bottom was a layer of low-fired clay that was laid down as a kind of floor.
Inside the bin (capacity-93 liters) was a small
amount of burnt grain.
Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt
destruction debris (10484), including complete
fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery
vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red
juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery
items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed
against the center of the southern wall (Photos
12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round
container with a matching lid to its east (Fig.
13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to
the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken.
Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a
naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those
found attached to the altar fragment from Building
CF.
Building CP, with its eight rooms, was the largest and most complex building excavated at Tel Rehov. Many unique features characterized its plan, including the two eastern entrances, the symmetric division into a western and eastern wing flanking central rooms, the plan of circulation, the benches along the walls, the sub-floor brick constructions and the molded plaster on the doorjambs. It contained a large amount of unique pottery items, such as two altars, the Elisha ostracon, containers with lids, a ‘bucket’, a strainer, two free-standing bins, a figurine mold, a stand with petals, and an incense burner with a lid, as well as more than 230 pottery vessels of a wide variety of types (see Chapters 24, 45), all indicating that this building had some special function. The integral relation of Building CP to the smaller buildings to its north (CQ3, CX) and the spacious Building CL to its west, shows that it was part of a greater complex. For further discussion and interpretation, see Mazar (2015) and Chapter 4.
Building CL was constructed above the fallen
bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos
12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235)
and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73–
12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144,
12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner
of this building was built above a leveling fill
(4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the
C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This
was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence
for two superimposed destructions in Area C.
Building CL was composed of two wings, each
comprising two rooms: the external measurements
of the western wing were 3.3×6.5 m (not including
Wall 4443) and those of the eastern wing were
6.5×11.5 m (including walls). The total floor space
was 63 sq m. Although the walls were found
standing to a height of 1.2–1.5 m, no entrances were
located. A passage from the western wing to the
eastern wing may have existed in Wall 4443, close
to its corner with Wall 4481, since here the former
wall was preserved very low. In such a case, the
threshold would have been 0.3 m above the floor.
However, this cannot be determined with certainty
and the location of entrances in this building
remained enigmatic. This building was excavated
in parts during several seasons; the excavated parts
were removed in order to reach Stratum C-1b
below and thus, no general photograph could be
taken.
The southern wall of Building CL ran 0.5 m to
the south of the line of that of Building CP.
However, since the two buildings shared a wall
(9406), it is likely that they were built together. All
the walls of Building CL were founded 0.4–1.0 m
lower than the foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall
1438 in Squares Y/1–2 to the west. This might be
explained by the fact that they were built above the
apiary, which was on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. Perhaps the deeper foundations
were also the result of the need to stabilize these
walls, which were built directly above the collapsed
bricks and burnt debris that covered the destroyed
apiary.
The area to the west and north of Building CL
remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west
(Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer
of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep,
covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of
Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417.
The western wing of the building was about half the
size of the eastern wing, and adjoined only its
southern part. It was composed of a long room on
the north (4435; internal measurements 2.7×3.5 m;
9.45 sq m) and a broad room on the south (5432;
internal measurements 1.5×2.9 m; 4.35 sq m). As
noted above, there was no entrance between the
two.
The western wall (2413) ran for 6.5 m and was
preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed
directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and
collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235)
and also cut the eastern end of Wall 2426 of
Building CH (Figs. 12.73–12.74; Photos 12.146–
12.147). The northern wall (2504) was 3.2 m long;
its eastern end was preserved almost 1.0 m higher
than Wall 4443 with which it cornered on the east
(Photos 12.235–12.236); the reason for this was not
clear. The southern wall (5423 on the west, 9424 on
the east; Photo 12.237) was also the southern wall
of the eastern wing; it was exposed over 7.6 m and
apparently continued to the east to corner with Wall
10513, although this end remained unexcavated.
Wall 4443, joining the eastern and western
wings, ran along 11 m and was preserved to a
height of 1.5 m on its northern half, although up to
only 0.5 m on the south (Squares Y/1, 20) (Photos
12.236, 12.238). The foundation level of this wall
(85.40 m) was 0.3–0.4 m lower than that of Walls
2413 and 2504 (Figs. 12.73, 12.86–12.87). Wall
4481, which separated the two rooms in this wing,
was built directly on top of the concentration of cult
objects (the pottery altar and petal chalice) in the
apiary below.
Both rooms had a distinct floor (4435 in the
northern room, 5432 in the southern room) made of
a 0.3-m-thick layer of soft light-red clay at levels
86.20–85.90 m (Fig. 12.86). A clay female figurine
that most probably had belonged to an altar was
found on the floor in the northeastern corner of
Room 5432. An almost identical figurine was
found in Locus 5446 in the northwestern part of the
eastern wing (Chapter 35, Nos. 6a–b); it is possible
that these two figurines had originally belonged to
the same altar. Room 4435 was filled with burnt
debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of
cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig.
13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room
was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed
with some whitish material, that was concentrated
mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84,
12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall
4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing
(Photo 12.236). This was further evidence that the
southern end of this wall had been deliberately
razed during the course of the use of Building CL,
thus joining the two southern spaces. Alternatively,
the southern end of Wall 4443 had been originally
built as a low screen wall.
The eastern wing was composed of two large rooms
or open spaces: 5449 on the north (measuring internally 5.0×5.35 m; ca. 27 sq. m) and 5482 on the
south (measuring internally 4.2×5.3 m; 22.2 sq m).
Wall 5418, the northern wall, was well preserved to
11 courses, built of gray, brown and yellow bricks
(Photo 12.142), yet it was found severely tilted to
the south, perhaps due to seismic activity (Photos
12.150, 12.152). As noted above, the southern wall
of the eastern wing (9424) continued that of the
western wing. The eastern wall (9406) was also the
western wall of adjoining Buildings CP and CQ3
(Photo 12.192). This latter wall, preserved 14
courses high on its western face, was built directly
above the eastern closing wall (9453) of the
Stratum C-1b apiary (Photos 12.152–12.153,
12.234). Wall 5453, a well-built wall preserved
nine courses high (Photos 12.150–12.153), separated the northern from the southern room, with no
entrance joining them.
The floor of both rooms was made of the same
soft red clay as the western rooms; it was 0.4 m
thick in the north and center (85.70–86.10 m), but
only 0.1 m thick near Wall 5453 (85.65 m) (Figs.
12.83–12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.150–12.151,
12.239). The floor in the southern room (5482), at
levels 85.60–85.70 m, sealed the fallen bricks and
destruction debris of the apiary (Fig. 12.83; Photo
12.150). As noted above, the same black burnt oily
substance mixed with white material that was
found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the
southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in
the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of
Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237–
12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually
large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a
selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray
ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended
near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the
northern part of Room 5449 not burnt.
Both rooms were full of a thick layer of
destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body
sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly
unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs.
13.127–13.128), as were several other objects
(Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated
in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick
with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239).
A curious feature found in the eastern wing of
Building CL was a 0.7–1.1 m-thick layer of light
gray debris (5419 in Square Z/2 and 5427 in Square
Z/1) that sloped down from south to north (Fig.
12.83; Photos 12.150, 12.152). This layer, revealed
just under topsoil, was virtually sterile. It appears to
be either an intentional fill placed in the room following its destruction or possibly, erosion following the destruction and abandonment of the
lower city; the latter explanation seems to be more
plausible. In the topsoil (5402) just above this layer
in Square Z/2 was a fragment of a very large pottery
altar horn (Chapter 35, No. 28).
One has to question whether the two eastern
spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern
room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m,
appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar
bases or any other roof support were found, it may
be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed.
The unique plan of Building CL and lack of domestic installations rule out it having been a dwelling, and it most likely served for some administrative, industrial or storage function. The large amount of bones, as well as their special nature, might allude to some relationship to the cultic practices in the adjacent Building CP. It is difficult to explain the lack of entrances in this building, especially in light of the fact that in the adjacent buildings to the east, entrances were found in all the rooms. A similar lack of entrances was also observed in Building CG (possibly a granary) and in the outer walls of Building CQ2. One possibility is that the excavated rooms were part of a basement floor, entered from a higher level. But such a hypothesis is contradicted by the level of the floors in the adjacent buildings on the east (CQ3, CX, CP), which were only slightly higher than the floors in Building CL. Alternatively, the rooms were entered from the roof by way of ladders or from the roofs of the adjacent buildings. In such a case, the entire ground floor of this building would have been sealed from the outside. All these features indicate the exceptional function of this building.
The architectural sequence of Strata C-4 to C-1a,
ranging from the 11th to the 9th centuries BCE,
demonstrated both continuity and change. This
sequence, however, was not necessarily related to
destruction episodes, as some buildings continued
almost unchanged following their destruction,
while others were demolished and new ones built in
their stead. On the one hand, the use of brick as the
only building material, the general orientation of
the units, the rebuilding of some walls on the same
line, and the density of construction, are continuing
features. On the other hand, innovations included
changes in the type of bricks (but rarely the size)
and the introduction of wooden beams for the construction of wall and floor foundations in Stratum
C-1b.
The substantial and well-preserved building
remains of the two phases of Stratum C-3 in
Squares S/2–4, attributed to Iron IB, are evidence
for a well-constructed and planned city, as also
found in Strata D-5 and D-4 in Area D (Chapter
15). No evidence for a violent destruction of this
level was found. A number of Stratum C-3 walls,
characterized by gray bricks and light-colored
mortar, were rebuilt in Stratum C-2 of the early Iron
IIA on the same lines, but with hard yellow bricks,
as in the cases of Walls 2507, 2506 and 8418 in
Squares S/2–4. This indicates urban continuity
from the late Iron I to the early Iron IIA.
The two pits found in Square R/4 recall a similar feature in Area D (Stratum D-3) in Squares N,
P/4–5 and Q/4, where ca. 45 pits were found above
and cutting through Stratum D-4 architecture; they
were explained as a local feature in this area. Such
pits were not found in any other part of Area C,
except for a few in the apiary (Squares Y/1–2) in
relation to a floor which appears to have originally
belonged to Stratum C-3. Thus, the two pits in
Square R/4 are understood to have belonged to the
same phenomenon as those in Area D at the end of
Iron IB. Above the pits and the floor was a thin
layer of debris, followed by Locus 1555b, a pottery
concentration in the lowest level of a room attributed to a Stratum C-2 (see above).
The division of the Iron IIA into three strata
(C-2, C-1b, C-1a) was first and foremost based on a
clear differentiation between Strata C-2 and C-1 in
terms of overall plan and building techniques. The
well-preserved walls of Stratum C-2 (general
Stratum VI), sometimes standing to a height of 18
courses, were made of typical hard-packed yellow
bricks, differing in their texture from the bricks of
Strata C-1b and C-1a (Tables 12.28–12.30). The
lack of stone foundations and the almost total
absence of wood in the construction were also typical of this stratum. In certain places, we observed
architectural continuity between Strata C-2 and
C-1b, such as in the transition from Building CA to
Building CD, in some of the walls of Building CE,
and, to some extent, between the upper phases of
Building CT, as well as one wall in Building CZ. In
other places, the builders of Stratum C-1b ignored
the earlier walls of Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.16).
In the area of Building CH and the apiary in
Squares T–Z/1–2, Stratum C-1b units were founded
right on top of Stratum C-3 structures of Iron IB,
and even reused walls and floors from this period.
This seems to have occurred due to the intentional
removal of building remains of Stratum C-2 by the
builders of the apiary, who sought to establish it on
a lower level than the rest of the buildings in the
area to its west (CG and CH) and north (CM).
The differentiation between Strata C-1b and
C-1a (general Strata V and IV) was clear in some
cases and unclear in others. These two stratum
numbers refer to the same city that underwent local
destruction and rebuilding in certain places. A
major feature of Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in the foundations of walls
and floors. Often these beams were laid directly on
top of Stratum C-2 structures. Buildings CJ, CF,
CW, CQ1, CQ2 and CG, as well as the room in
Square R/4, were founded, in our view, in Stratum
C-1b, and continued to be in use with only few or
no changes in Stratum C-1a. In contrast, Building
CH and the apiary were used only in Stratum C-1b
and, following a severe destruction, were replaced
by Building CL. Building CD of Stratum C-1b went
out of use and was replaced by an open area in
Stratum C-1a. Likewise, Building CM was
destroyed at the end of C-1b and was replaced by
Piazza 2417 in C-1a. In the southeastern block,
Building CZ of Stratum C-1b went out of use and
was replaced in Stratum C-1a by two new buildings
(CQ3, CX). As discussed in detail above, the possibility that Building CZ could be attributed to
Stratum C-2 was considered, particularly due to the
similarity of its levels to those of the remains under
Building CQ1 to its south that we ascribed to
Stratum C-2. If this was the case, then Building
CQ3 and CX too would have been established in
Stratum C-1b and continued unchanged into
Stratum C-1a, although there is no tangible evidence for this, such as wooden foundations (except
in their thresholds) or floor raisings. Ultimately, we
rejected this possibility and prefer to attribute
Building CZ to Stratum C-1b. To its south,
Building CP of Stratum C-1a was a rebuild of an
earlier building of Stratum C-1b, although this
early stage is insufficiently known due to lack of
excavation.
In a few instances, an extra phase was discerned,
demonstrating the complexity of the stratigraphy in the three main Iron IIA levels. For
example, an earlier phase of Building CR (Squares
Y–Z/6) in Stratum C-1b was detected above the
well-preserved remains of C-2 Building CT. A later
phase was identified in the remains east of Stratum
C-2 Building CB (Squares Y–Z/4). Additional
phases in the courtyard devoted to cooking activity
in Square T/4 were a typical feature of such an open
area. This diversity indicates that each building had
its own history; some continued with no change
from Stratum C-1b to C-1a and others underwent
modifications of varying degrees. The clearest
change between these two strata was in the vicinity
of the apiary and its surroundings in the southeastern part of Area C.
No evidence for violent destruction was found at
the end of Strata C-3 and C-2, and therefore most of
the floors of these levels were found virtually
lacking complete vessels (except in the case of
Locus 1555b in Square R/4). There were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings
by an earthquake, including layers of complete
fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of
the buildings which would have buried vessels, and
perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of
debris. Rather, it could have been an earthquake
that was strong enough to cause severe damage to
the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the
inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and
return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of
Stratum C-1b.
Evidence of severe destruction by fire in
Stratum C-1b was found in the apiary and in
Buildings CH, CG (the southern room), CM, CF and CE.
In Building CG, it remained unclear whether the
destruction of the northern rooms should be attributed
to Stratum C-1b or C-1a. All of these buildings,
except for CF and CE, contained large
amounts of in situ pottery and other objects.
Notably, these structures were located along a
north-south axis running through the center of Area
C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’,
as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation
areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning.
Perhaps the heavy destruction noted in these buildings was caused by a local event, such as deliberate
or unintentional burning by human agency, or by an
earthquake. The latter possibility is suggested in
Chapter 54, based on paleomagnetic testing.
As opposed to this, Stratum C-1a came to an
end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a
fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. The
temperature must have been more than 500
degrees, since it caused partial firing of the brick
courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In
several cases, pottery vessels cracked and became
distorted, with much calcification; for example, the
large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted
by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore.
The incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other
objects found in the houses indicates the sudden
destruction, although a human skeleton was found
in only one place. There was no activity in this area
following the destruction, except one deep pit
(6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the
Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of
finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.
An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris
and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The
walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m
above the floors and their tops were discovered flat
and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil.
While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were
found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem
that there would have been a larger quantity if they
had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and
perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the
disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted
from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower
mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were
probably washed to the southeast towards the
gulley that separates the upper from the lower
mound. A less feasible explanation would be that
bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of
the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the
upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification
wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).
Area C was densely built in all three Iron Age IIA strata, C-2, C-1b and C-1, with houses attached to one another in what can be defined as pre-planned insulae, separated by only a few open spaces.
An open space in Squares S–T/3–4 in Stratum C-2 was at least partly occupied by Building CM in Stratum C-1b (although the eastern part of this area remained unexcavated). In Stratum C-1b, an open area was located south of Building CD, above Building CB of Stratum C-2. In Stratum C-1a, this latter area was expanded and to its east, beyond Building CG, another piazza was created, with a 3.0-m-wide street leading into it from the east, and a somewhat irregular alley from the south. These open spaces seem not to have been related to an individual unit, but rather served as small piazzas surrounded by several buildings. Few installations were located in these open courtyards, for example, ovens found in the cooking area in Square T/4, which was in use throughout all three strata, and a stone formation in the center of Piazza CK in Stratum C-1a.
Evidence for central urban planning can be seen
mainly in the plan of Strata C-1b and C-1a. Two
major walls traverse the entire area from south to
north in a straight line: on the west was Wall 1413,
which ran along 19.8 m and continued both to the
south and the north of the excavated area. In the
eastern part of the area (along the line of Squares
A/20, 1–6), Walls 9453/9406+6408+6497 created
a continuous straight line, intersected by the street
in Squares Z, A–C/4. These two long backbone
walls were not parallel to one another: the western
one ran on a northwest–southeast alignment, while
the eastern wall was due north–south. The distance
between them (outer faces) was 19 m on the south
and 21.5 m along the northern line of Squares R–Z,
A/4, ca. 20 m to the north.
The blocks of houses in all three strata were oriented along virtually the same lines: almost exactly
east–west and north–south, with minor deviations
in the western part of the area, causing trapezoidshaped spaces in the seam between the eastern and
western parts, such as the alley between Walls 2413
and 1438 in Squares T–Y/1–2 in Stratum C-1a or
the passage from the open area in Squares S–T/2–3
to the north, towards the cooking area in Squares S–
T/4 in Stratum C-1b. Evidence of central planning
is also seen in the sharing of walls and the back-toback construction of many units, as discussed in the
next section.
No evidence for the existence of fortifications was found along the western perimeter of the mound in Areas C and D, nor along the northern perimeter, where a probe was excavated in Square Y/9. The westernmost structures of all Iron IIA strata continued into Squares Q/4–5 of Area D (defined there as Strata D-1a, D-1b and D-2), located on the upper slope of the mound, where they disappeared with the erosion line. Although the slope of the mound suffered from severe erosion, as shown by the fact that the eastern sides of the buildings in Area D were missing, it is improbable that an entire city wall was eroded away, and we thus concluded that the city remained unfortified during this entire period.
Throughout all three main Iron IIA strata, a notable
characteristic is the uniqueness of the architecture.
Not only are the buildings quite unlike most of the
typical Iron Age structures known from proximate,
as well as more distant regions, but they also do not
resemble each other. While certain technical features
are repeated, such as size and type of bricks
and the use of double walls, each unit was unique in
its plan, except for three very similar buildings
(CQ1, CQ2, CQ3).
In the discussion of individual buildings, we
presented several parallels: Building CF was compared to part of Building 2081 at Megiddo Stratum
VA–IVB, and Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 were
compared to several buildings from 13th–11th centuries BCE contexts at Hazor Stratum XIII, Tell
Abu-Hawam Stratum IV, Tel Batash Stratum VI
and Aphek Stratum X11. Building CA was compared to part of Building 200 at Hazor Strata X–IX,
and Building CY (and to some extent, also Building
CZ) to a type of building with a central space
flanked by rooms on two sides, known from Hazor,
Samaria and Megiddo in the Iron Age II.
Although individual parallels such as these
may be cited, the general concept of the architecture, in both building techniques and plans, as well
as in architectural details, deviates from the
common architecture in Iron Age II Israelite cities.
Notably, none of these buildings recall the so-called
‘Four-Room’ or ‘Three-Room’ houses or pillared
buildings that were so typical. No stone pillars were
found and wooden posts were used only in the case
of Building CX and seen in scant remains of
Stratum C-2 under Building CZ.
An unresolved question is whether the buildings had a second story. The double walls, up to 1.1
in width, could easily have supported a second
story, but even the narrow walls of 0.6 m width
could have been used for such a purpose. Evidence
for staircases was not found, except perhaps in the
case of the eastern part of Building CY of Stratum
C-2. In other buildings, wooden ladders could have
led to upper stories or to the roofs, where daily
activities could have taken place, such as in the case
of Building CP, where large grinding stones were
found fallen from a second story or a roof.
Table 12.26 compares the external dimensions
and floor space of the buildings excavated in Area
C, showing the diversity, which might have had
social and cultural implications. The larger buildings, CF and CP, had an average floor space of ca.
62 sq m, while Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 had
an average floor space of ca. 20 sq m. Building CX
contained 34 sq m. In case of the existence of a
second story, these numbers should be potentially
doubled.
The number of persons that such houses could
accommodate can only be guessed, based on various analyses. Narroll’s (1962) often-cited coefficient of 10 sq m per person would suggest two to
five inhabitants in such houses if they had one story
and four to ten persons if they had two. Yet, there
are different variables that should be considered,
and it is doubtful whether Narroll’s coefficient can
be taken for granted. Thus, Schloen (e.g., 2001:
180) suggested a coefficient of 8.0 sq m per person
in Israelite houses; following a detailed discussion,
he estimated that the average Israelite “jointfamily” included seven to ten persons (Schloen
2001: 135–183). It seems that the larger houses,
such as Building CY in Stratum C-2, as well as
Buildings CW, CF and CP in Stratum C-1a, were
inhabited by families of eight to twelve persons,
while the smaller houses, such as Building CA in
Stratum C-2 and CQ1, C2 and CQ3 in Stratum
C-1a, served much smaller units, perhaps nuclear
families or other social groups. It should be noted,
however, that the function of these buildings as regular
dwellings is not obvious; several of the buildings, such as CA in Stratum C-2 and CF and CP in
Strata C-1a–b, may have had special functions,
based on their plans and assemblages of finds.
Building CF could have been an elite residence that
incorporated administrative, domestic and cultic
activities. Building CP in Stratum C-1a may have
served specific functions related to religious rituals,
such as shared meals/feasts and perhaps, the
activity of a “man of god”, such as the biblical
Elisha. The possible special functions of Buildings
CF and CP are further discussed in Chapter 4 and
Mazar 2015: 103–117. The small buildings, CQ1,
CQ2 and CQ3, and perhaps also CX, may have
belonged to groups or families of special status,
perhaps related to or under the control of the elites
in Buildings CF and CP. It should be noted that all
these buildings yielded large numbers of finds,
including an incredible amount of pottery vessels,
considering the size of the buildings. In each
building there was at least one loom and one or
more grinding installations. Yet, cooking facilities
were found only in Buildings CF and CP, as well as
in the open piazza to the west. This, again, may
emphasize the different status of the residents of the
small houses, such as CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3.
Several buildings in Area C certainly served
functions other than dwelling. Thus, Stratum C-2
Building CB, with its large hall, could have had
some public function. Building CG in Stratum C-1
is interpreted as a granary, and Building CL as a
storage facility or an or industrial structure, possibly servicing other buildings in the eastern
quarter.
The clustering of the buildings in Stratum C-1a
is a notable feature. An interesting configuration is
the group of small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3,
and Building CW, flanking an east–west street, as
well as the location of larger buildings, CF and CP,
adjoining and beyond this cluster. This arrangement may reflect social ranking of some sort.
Differences in the founding levels of various
buildings in the different strata were noted. In Stratum
C-2, Wall 8467 in Building CY in the northeastern
corner of the area was founded at 85.00 m, while
the southwesternmost wall (1470) was founded at
85.57 m. The westernmost wall (1563 in Square
R/4) was founded at 85.61 m and the easternmost
wall (8467 in Square C/6), at 85.00 m. In Stratum
C-1b, the foundations of all the buildings, except
the apiary and Building CZ, ranged between 85.90
m in the northeastern corner of the area to 86.50 m
in the southwestern corner, over a distance of 39 m.
In Stratum C-1a, there was a 1.0 m difference
between the foundation level of the northeastern
wall (8424; 86.10 m) as opposed to the southwestern wall (1431; 87.10 m), and a 1.6 m difference between the westernmost wall (1413; 87.60
m) and the easternmost wall (10490; 86.00 m)
along Squares S–Z, A–C/2. The difference in level
of almost 1.7 m between Buildings CG, CH, CM
and the apiary was a deliberate choice, as discussed
in detail above.
A tilt from west to east/southeast was defined in
all strata at Tel Rehov, and may have been the result
of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts
even inside structures.
In many cases, adjacent buildings had their own outer walls, even when they were attached to one another, so that back-to-back double walls were created, with total thickness reaching 1.0–1.1 m. This feature can be seen in many of the units in all three strata, although the buildings in the southeastern block, CQ3, CX, CP and CL, had shared walls of regular width (0.5 m), perhaps reflecting their construction as one integral unit for social or functional reasons. The existence of an individual outer wall for each house, even in cases of attached buildings, may have had practical, as well as symbolic social meaning. Practically, it may represent building phases, indicating that each building was constructed independently, perhaps at a somewhat different time, and then, an adjacent unit was added. Double walls added to the strength of the buildings and their resistivity to earthquakes, as well as facilitating the construction of a second story. Faust (2012: 39–117) noted the rarity of double walls in Israelite domestic architecture and the social significance of this feature: individual walls for each house that create double walls together appear mainly in houses of elite families. This may be the case at Tel Rehov as well, where double walls were much more common than in any other known Iron Age II city
All the Iron Age IIA buildings were constructed
exclusively of bricks, with no stone foundations.
This is an unusual feature in the Land of Israel,
where most brick walls were laid on stone socles.
At Tel Rehov itself, stone socles for brick walls
were common in Late Bronze IIB and Iron Age I,
and the lack of such foundations in Iron IIA is an
unusual feature that remains unexplained.
Most of the bricks were made of brown, gray or
yellow clay. In Stratum C-3, all of the walls were
constructed with distinct gray bricks of friable consistency, laid with a light-colored mortar between
them and covered with a plaster of the same composition as the mortar. In the walls of Strata C-1b and
C-1a, a wider variety of bricks was used; in most
cases, they were made of light gray-brown clay, and
more rarely, of a dark brown soil taken from the
nearby colluvium. See Tables 12.27–12.30 for
details of brick sizes and materials in most of the
walls. The size deviations are small, indicating a
great deal of standardization in the size and manufacturing technique, if not the composition, of the
bricks.
In some cases, mud plaster was preserved on
walls, some 0.02–0.03 m thick and sometimes
nicely smoothed. Whitish plaster of higher quality
than the mud plaster was used only in the entrance
to the southeastern room of Building CP, where the
plaster was molded to a rounded profile.
The use of wood for wall and floor foundations at Tel Rehov is a unique feature. This is a novelty of Stratum C-1b, but there is one such case in Stratum C-2 (Building CU) and isolated cases in Stratum C-1a (e.g., Building CQ3). A similar construction technique was found in two buildings of Stratum B-5 in Area B, as well as in a building in Area G, attributed to Stratum G-1b. Hence, this technique appears to have been utilized contemporaneously in various buildings throughout the city. The purpose of this wood construction is as yet to be clarified. One possible explanation is that it was intended to stabilize the buildings in the event of earthquakes. This might have been the outcome of what we surmise was the cause of the destruction of Stratum C-2, namely, seismic activity. This function of the wood is illustrated mainly by the way circular beams (their charred remains usually no more than .05–0.1 m in diameter) were often laid at intervals of 0.1–0.2 m, perpendicular to the brick wall, below its lowest brick course. In several cases (i.e., Wall 1438), two or more layers of such beams were found. In this way, the wood could serve as a ‘shock absorber’. Prof. David Yankelevsky, head of the National Building Research Institute in the Technion, Haifa, who visited the site, compared this building technique to modern engineering, when steel cylinders are laid below the foundations of massive structures where the danger of damage by earthquakes is at high risk, such as in nuclear plants. This explanation, if accepted, would point to a technological innovation intended to protect structures against the hazards of earthquakes in a location so close to the Syro-African fault, where the threat of such activity was more acute than anywhere else in the country.
In most cases, floors were composed of beaten
earth or clay. In Stratum C-1b, wooden branches
and beams were incorporated into the foundation of
some floors; these were usually arranged rather
haphazardly below the earth floor. The wood itself
was embedded into a matrix of soft red clay that
was often similar to, or served as, the floor makeup
itself. Stone floors were found only in Buildings
CQ1 and CQ2, and perhaps Building CJ, all in
Stratum C-1a. In a few places, floors incorporated
pebbly gravel, such as in the western part of C-1a
Building CX, or in the open space in Stratum C-1a
Building CW. In Building CP, as well as in two
rooms in Building CY of Stratum C-2, a brick construction was found under the red clay floors in a
few rooms, while in other rooms, a mud-plaster
foundation was laid under these floors.
The distinct composition of the floor of the
Stratum C-1b apiary should be mentioned. It was
composed of three different matrices, each apparently serving a different purpose, particularly the
very hard thick white tufa floor surrounding the
hives, most likely meant to be a permeable surface
to protect against spillage or to possibly fend off
rodents and insects.
The use of wooden posts on unworked stone bases was a rare feature that was found only in Building CX of Stratum C-1a, where there was a line of five post-holes above stone bases, and in the Stratum C-2 level under Building CZ.
Benches built of bricks or terre pisé were found in several instances in Stratum C-1 buildings. In Building CF of Stratum C-1a, they were found along almost all the walls of the three western chambers. In Building CW of Strata C-1a–b, they were located along the walls of the western rooms. Benches ran along some of the walls of the inner rooms of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as in Buildings CX and CP, where benches were located along the walls of four of the rooms. The benches could be used for sitting, but their main purpose was probably placement of items. A number of vessels were found on Benches 10466 and 10467 in Building CP, including a very large cooking pot. A pottery altar and bowl were found on Bench 10454 in this building.
Several storage installations made of packed-clay
walls or bricks were found. In Building CP of
Stratum C-1a, a corner of Room 9450 was enclosed
by two narrow walls, creating a bin (9434) which
contained an intact Hippo jar full of grain, as well
as other finds. Other storage installations were Silo
7514 in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and plastered
Pit 11456 in Building CZ of Stratum C-1b. An
exceptional feature was the two rectangular pottery
bins, made without a base and standing on their
narrow side against the southern wall of Building
CP. These bins, found with grain, have no parallels
elsewhere.
The installation occupying the western part of
the northern room of Building CQ3 in Stratum C-1a
(10505) is unusual in its size and shape, although its
function could not be determined; it seems that it had
some industrial role. Yet another installation with a
hard plaster surface was found against the southern
wall of the southwestern room in this building, but
it was too damaged to determine its function. Other
installations include a mud-plastered semi-circle
(11452) attached to the wall inside the western
entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP in
Stratum C-1a, and a brick with a depression on top
inside the entrance to Room 2489 in Building CE in
Stratum C-1b (2477); both were possibly used as
stands for vessels, perhaps for drinking, positioned
just inside the entrance to the rooms.
Twenty-two ovens were excavated in Area C. Such ovens (tannur, often denoted ‘tabun’) were found in many houses, as well as in open areas. The ovens were always circular, 0.4–0.6 m in diameter; in most cases, only the lower part was preserved. Ovens were constructed with a clay wall ca. 4–5 cm thick, that was, in many cases, coated with pottery sherds on the outside. The most outstanding example is Oven 7428 in Building CU of Stratum C-2, which was completely preserved from base to rim, with an opening at the bottom and an incised mark on its exterior (Fig. 12.13). It was 0.56 m in diameter at its base, 0.56 m tall, with a 0.3 m-wide opening at its top and a small opening at its bottom, used for inserting fuel. It was coated on the outside by large sherds of restorable pottery vessels, a feature found in other ovens, but not as well preserved as this one (Mazar 2011). Ovens were also found in Stratum C-2 Building CY and in the rooms north of Building CA (Stratum C-2) and Building CD (Stratum C-1b), as well as in Buildings CF, CJ, and CP of Stratum C-1a. In several of these cases, the spaces where the ovens were found could have been unroofed areas (e.g., Buildings CY and CU), although this could not be determined with certainty. In certain cases, the location of the oven was quite certainly inside a roofed space (e.g., Building CF). An open space containing a succession of ovens throughout all the Iron IIA strata was found in Square T/4. The lack of ovens in certain buildings should be noted, in particular, Stratum C-1a Buildings CX, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3. It is assumed that residents of these houses shared ovens located in open spaces, or that they belonged to a specific social organization in which people cooked and ate together, for example, in Building CP, where the evidence points to communal meals.
In several cases, flat stones were located on the
floor or on benches along and close to walls. The
latter was the case in Building CY of Stratum C-2,
where 13 such stones were found along the walls,
and in its successor, Building CW of Stratum C-1a,
where eight such stones were found in the western
rooms, placed on top of the benches lining the
walls. It is difficult to explain them as a constructional feature; perhaps they were used as solid
bases for objects such as water or oil jars, leather
containers, etc.
Another feature was isolated cases of hard mizi
stones of considerable size inside buildings. Examples include the very large stone found in Building
CB of Stratum C-2, two large stones found in
Building CF (one in the large hall in the eastern
wing in Stratum C-1b and the second in the
entrance corridor in Stratum C-1a, possibly used as
a butcher block), a stone in the southern part of
Building CM in Stratum C-1b and stones in Buildings CQ2 and CX of Stratum C-1a. Notable also is a
large smoothed-top limestone placed at an angle to
the east of the oven in the large northern room of
Building CP in Stratum C-1a. Such stones could
have served as working surfaces in places where a
hard surface was needed. They are outstanding in
light of the relatively rare use of stones in Iron Age
IIA contexts at the site.
Slab-shaped lower grinding stones, loaf-shaped upper grinding stones, hammerstones, pestles, and mortars were numerous in Area C (see Chapter 43). A notable feature in Stratum C-1a were grinding installations of two basic types. The first comprised a large lower grinding stone enclosed by a low hard-clay rounded parapet; the slab is tilted towards a low area on the edge into which the ground flour could be collected; loaf-shaped upper grinding stones were found in association with it. Two very well-preserved installations of this type were found in Building CF and less well-preserved examples in Buildings CE, CQ1, and CQ2. The second type of grinding installation comprised a similar large lower grinding stone set at a slight angle and directed to a hard clay round receptacle, which was most likely meant to contain the ground flour. In Building CX, where two such installations were found, the better-preserved example had a narrow brick bordering the grinding stone on one side and built against the wall on the other. Upper grinding stones were found in association with the lower stone. In Building CP, very large lower and upper grinding stones were found in the destruction debris, 0.8 m above the floor of Room 11451, most probably fallen from the roof or an upper story of the building. Likewise, a very large stone with a small depression in its top that was smoothed from use, and might have been used as a mortar, was found just under topsoil and above the thick destruction debris in this room, suggesting that it, too, originally had been positioned on the roof or upper story.
Numerous loom weights, mostly made of stone and less so, of clay, were found in concentrations in most of the Stratum C-1a buildings; many of these contained dozens of loom weights each. Remains of charred wood in proximity to such caches, such as in Buildings CP, CR, CX, CF and CE, indicate the presence of one or two looms in the houses. See details and discussion in Chapter 39.
1 The terminology in this chapter follows Mazar 1990: 30 and NEAEHL: 1529. The period Iron IA (first half of the 12th century BCE) is called Late Bronze III by several scholars in recent years. See discussion in Chapter 4 and by Mazar in TBS III: 23–24.
Stratum D-11 is known only from the three probes (I–III) in Squares L–M/4–5, where a 1.0 m-thick deposit of occupation debris and architectural elements (walls, installations, fireplaces and floor patches) was found above bedrock and below the tufa fill that was ascribed to Stratum D-10. Two phases were determined here, termed D-11b and D-11a.
Stratum D-11b was the earliest occupation phase detected in Area D (Fig. 15.3). In Probe I (Square L/4, 1.0×2.0 m), the lowest levels excavated (76.47–76.95 m, Locus 2839) may belong to this phase. In Probe II (Square M/4, 1.0×ca. 1.3 m; Photo 15.12), Locus 9931, in the western half of the probe, consisted of a 0.6 m-deep accumulation of dark brown earth containing meager finds, at levels 76.41–77.00 m. A few consolidated tufa chunks in the center of the probe (unnumbered) might have formed part of a wall or installation.
Immediately above the remains of Stratum D-11b and sealed below the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10, an upper building phase was detected in Probes II and III, designated Stratum D-11a (Figs. 15.4, 15.18a–b). It consisted of brick walls (1923, 1929, 1930), creating at least two units (1913, 9917), which were partly excavated.
The 0.7 m-wide trench dug in the northern edge of Squares K–M/5 was intended to answer the question whether the thick tufa fill below the floor of Stratum D-10 was a natural or anthropogenic feature (see below). Earlier work in Probe I raised the hypothesis that the tufa layer was created in a water body (pond or small lake), above deposition of dark earth within a paludal environment (a marsh) (Mazar 1999: 11; see also Rozenbaum 2009 for the high frequency of such environments in the BethShean Valley during the Holocene). The backhoe trench described above, which preceded the manual excavation of Probes II–III, revealed anthropogenic layers below the thick tufa fill of D10 (2814). This was an accumulation of layered, finely sorted silts and clays of alternating gray and brown, totaling ca. 1.0 m in thickness (7923, 9910, 9911, 9913; Fig. 15.17b). No architectural elements were noted in these layers and no sub-phases were observed. This area may have been part of a large open space. The finds included sherds, bones, flints, oven fragments, a broken bronze earring and an almost complete ceramic plaque figurine (Chapter 33; Fig. 33.1).
Stratum D-10 constituted the earliest architectural phase detected on a relatively large scale in Area D, consisting of a large brick building (DA), apparently of public nature, erected simultaneously with the placement of massive constructional fills which elevated the ground level by some 2.0 m compared with the top level of the accumulation associated with Stratum D-11. The building and its related fills were exposed over an area of ca. 125 sq m in Squares L–M/4–5 and in the western half of Squares N/4–5. The building extended beyond the excavation area to the north, east and south, while the western part is probably missing due to young tectonic activity along the fault line, discussed above. Based on the associated ceramic assemblage and other finds, Stratum D-10 was dated to the LB IIA (14th century BCE).
The exposed portion of Building DA was composed of three integrated walls (8942, 2886, 2890), each 1.1 m wide and constructed of rectangular bricks which varied in dimensions, hardness, color, and manner of placement. These massive well-built walls were preserved 2.2–2.5 m high (16–18 courses). Their foundations were slightly embedded in the upper part of the Stratum D-11 accumulation or laid directly on top of earlier walls (as was the case of Walls 2886 and 2890, which were built on top of Walls 1929 and 1930 respectively). Three buttresses were constructed along Walls 2886 and 8942, facing the open space to their west (Photos 15.8, 15.10, 15.14–15.15, 15.18, 15.21– 15.24). Two of them, 1902 and 2889, protruded northwards from Wall 2886; in fact, 1902 continued the line of Wall 2890, which continued southwards beyond the excavated area. A third buttress (8938) projected westwards from Wall 8942 opposite Buttress 9929 (see further discussion of 9929 below). All the buttresses shared the exact same dimensions, protruding 0.85 m from the wall face and measuring 1.1 m in width, equal to the width of the walls. They were rather evenly spaced: Buttress 8938 was located 2.25 m to the north of the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942, while Buttress 2889 was located 2.4 m to the west of the aforementioned corner. Buttress 1902 was located 2.7 m farther to the west from 2889. It should be emphasized that the buttresses were bonded with the walls and thus, both elements were erected simultaneously. An additional possible buttress was 1903 (Square L/4), although it can also be regarded as the western end of Wall 2886. It was identical in dimensions to the other three buttresses and appears to have had a similar function. Nevertheless, it can be argued that 1903 may have functioned as a pier flanking an entrance, the parallel pier of which is to be found further to the west. As such a parallel pier was not found in Square L/4, this hypothesis can be maintained only if assuming an entrance of at least 3.0 m wide. The first option — viewing 1903 as a fourth buttress — is thus preferable (but see below). Two architectural elements were located east of Wall 8942. The first was Buttress 9929, which adjoined the eastern face of Wall 8942 immediately opposite Buttress 8938, and had exactly the same dimensions as the other buttresses. The second, 2.2 m to its south, was the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 (unnumbered), which protruded ca. 1.05 from the eastern line of Wall 8942. It seems likely that this feature was not a buttress, but rather, a pier flanking a doorway within the building, the opposite pier of which lies beyond the excavated area. A narrow wall (1937) extending to the south of this pier is the only inner partition wall uncovered within the building.
The area bounded by Walls 2886 and 8942 on the south and east respectively was an open courtyard, covering at least 6.0×8.0 m and extending to the north and west beyond the limits of the excavation. Immediately after the erection of the wall system, the area of the courtyard was covered with a ca. 2.0 m-deep constructional fill (2814) made of two distinct layers of tufa (2814a and 2814b), each ca. 1.0 m thick (Figs. 15.5, 15.17–15.19a; Photos 15.8, 15.10–15.11, 15.13–15.14). This fill was excavated manually in Probes I (1.0×2.0 m) and III (ca. 9.0 sq m), as well as in a shallower probe west of Buttresses 1902 and 1903 in Square L/4 (ca. 4.0 sq m).2 In addition, this fill was uncovered in the long backhoe trench, where it extended ca. 12 m to the west of Wall 8942, before being eroded and replaced with deposits associated with the nearby field (Fig. 15.17a–b). The erosion line was found 3.0 m east of the geological fault described above, and it is probable that the western part of the courtyard disappeared due to young tectonic activity along this fault.
2 Note that the locus number 2814 refers to the same fill
in all three probes.
3 One more argument may be raised against the ‘pond
hypothesis’. The possible time span for the deposition
of the tufa can be no longer than 100 years, when comparing the pottery assemblages from below and above it,
and not 200–300 years as previously assumed (see
Mazar 1999: 11; Zilberman et al. 2004: 19). This time
span is too short for the deposition of 2.0 m-thick tufa
sediments or even of the lower layer alone (compare the
1m/1000 years sedimentation rate for the Beth-Shean
tufa given in Zilberman et al. 2004: 27).
The area south of Wall 2886, designated 8939, was bordered by Wall 2890 on the west and by a narrow partition wall (1937) on the east. The latter differed considerably from all other D-10 walls: it was 0.55 m thick, built of a western row of dark gray bricks laid on their narrow side and an eastern row of mixed bricks laid as stretchers. The wall was traced ca. 1.7 m southwards of Wall 2886, below Wall 1904 and Oven 9918 of Stratum D-9b. Only the uppermost courses of the wall were excavated. Space 8939, which was 7.2 long and at least 3.0 m wide, was excavated over most of the area down to the floor level at 79.10 m, except in Probe II (Square M/4), where the deep foundations of Walls 2886 and 2890 were exposed (Fig. 15.18b). The foundation levels of both walls were abutted by a thick sequence of gray sediments (9905, 9914), which were composed of various matrices of brick material, containing very few sherds and other finds (Photos 15.19–15.20). The total thickness of these sediments, which sealed the Stratum D-11 accumulation of 9917, reached 1.74 m near Wall 2886. The top level of Locus 9905 sloped down from north to south (79.04 m to 78.66 m near the southern section), perhaps due to young tectonic activity (Photos 15.12, 15.19). The layers in Loci 9914 and 9905 may be explained as a constructional fill, intended to elevate the level of Building DA, resembling in function the tufa fill (2814) north of Wall 2886, although composed of different material.
Building DA, with its massive sub-floor fills, wide walls, deep foundations and elaborate arrangement of buttresses, must have been a public structure of some sort, whether a palace or an administrative building. It appears that the excavated remains constituted just a small part of a much larger LB IIA building, which extended in all directions, whose nature and size remain mostly unknown.
Following the apparent abandonment of the monumental Building DA of Stratum D-10, the area underwent a major change, albeit with some continuation in architectural orientation. Strata D-9b and D-9a, together with Stratum D-8, form a complex and dense stratigraphic sequence, in which different lines of development can be traced in each excavated unit. The remains were excavated mainly in four squares (M–N/4–5), as well as in the southeastern part of Square L/4 (Stratum D-9b only). The sequence was dated to the Late Bronze IIB (13th century BCE) based on the associated finds.
In Stratum D-9b, a new building complex (Building DB) was erected on the ruins of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Fig. 15.7). The building was composed of two adjacent units, separated by a long north–south wall (8943). The eastern unit was partially divided into two sub-units (9927, 9925), while the western unit was probably a spacious courtyard which was divided into an open area in the north (7951) and a roofed area in the south (8919).
Two units, either rooms or courtyards, were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31). The eastern and northern walls were not found, probably located beyond the borders of the excavated area. Wall 8943 crossed the excavated area on a slightly northwest to southeast line and was mostly preserved only at the stone-foundation level. The northern part of Wall 8943 was built above Wall 8942 of Stratum D-10 and its stones were embedded into the latter, as if using the earlier massive brick wall as a stabilizer. On the southernmost end, the lowermost course of the brick superstructure of Wall 8943 was preserved, made of one row of bricks laid as headers. The stone foundation, preserved one to two courses high, was made of two rows of medium-sized limestone and basalt stones, with some small stones to fill the gaps. Some parts of the foundation, mainly in the southern portion, were missing, probably due to ancient robbing.
In the western part of Building DB was a large courtyard, 0.7 m above that of Stratum D-10 Building DA. As no openings connecting the eastern unit with this courtyard were identified, the linkage between them is only tentative; the opening might have been north of the limit of the excavated area. The courtyard (7951, 8919) was excavated in an area of 8.0×9.0 m, between Wall 8943 and the erosion line to the west. Its northern boundary was beyond the excavated area, while its southern limit was Wall 2816 and a line of pillar bases to its east. South of this wall and pillar bases there was an additional space (8919), ca. 2.5 m wide and at least 9.0 m long, bounded on the south by Wall 1906 that protruded along the southern section of Squares M– N/4.
This area, to the south of Courtyard 7951, was separated from it by two different features, both located on top of the earlier Stratum D-10 architecture. In the western part (Squares L–M/4), Walls 2816 and 2892 appeared to be an attempt to rebuild Wall 2886 and Buttresses 1902 and 1903 (Photos 15.23, 15.25–15.26, 15.37). Wall 2816, preserved along 4.3 m and one course high, was constructed of small- and medium-sized tufa stones. It was built directly on top of Wall 2886 and Buttress 1903 in its eastern part and on top of the tufa fill 2814 in its western part, where it continued westwards beyond the limits of the erosion line. It seems that when the D-9b walls were built, the architectural elements of Stratum D-10 were shaved to a relatively low level (79.05–79.10 m), essentially to that of the thick tufa fill (2814). Wall 2816 was abutted by 2892, made of larger tufa stones, which was built over Buttress 1902 of Stratum D-10. Although these two features constituted an attempt to rebuild part of Building DA of Stratum D-10, their peculiar construction, and the fact that Wall 2816 extended further to the west, indicated changes compared with the original plan of the building in D-10. Wall 2816 must have supported a brick superstructure. The reason for it being lower by 0.8–0.9 m than the line of pillar bases to its east (8935, see below) was perhaps due to the way this part of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Wall 2886, Buttresses 1902, 1903) was destroyed; these elements were possibly damaged more than the eastern part, so that the builders of Stratum D-9b found a depression or step in the ruined wall which they used as foundations for their new construction.
In Stratum D-9a, Building DB was replaced by new architectural features which partially preserved the outline of previous elements, although the overall plan and nature of this stratum was fairly different (Fig. 15.8). It seems that the builders of Stratum D9a were very familiar with the previous stratum and utilized earlier constructions. They may even have been partly responsible for the dismantling and removal of the brick superstructure of the Stratum D-9b walls, as no brick debris was found in the deserted units of the latter. Stratum D-9a was a kind of transitional phase in the process of deterioration in this area, from the elaborate architecture of Stratum D-10, through the less substantial Stratum D-9b building, to the large open area of the following Stratum D-8.
Stratum D-7b signifies the first occupation phase related to the Iron Age IA in Area D (Fig. 15.12). It comprised a few installations and pits related to floor patches spread over the four excavated squares (M–N/4–5), without any walls or other architectural elements. The relatively thin accumulation associated with this stratum was quickly replaced by a new building phase (Stratum D-7a), to which much more substantial remains were assigned. Thus, it seems that Stratum D-7b constituted a rather ephemeral occupation that will not necessarily be found in other parts of the site. See Photo 15.45 for a general view of the area and accumulation in the section up to Stratum D-7a.
In an excavated area of ca. 80 sq m, three units built of brick walls with stone foundations were found, denoted Building DC, although their attribution to a single building remains uncertain (Fig. 15.13). All brick superstructures except one (2842) were built of one row of gritty yellowish bricks laid as headers, with thin (0.02 m) gray mortar between them. This type of brick, which had similar dimensions in most walls (0.58×0.36×0.12 m), was unique to Stratum D-7a. The brick superstructure rested on top of a one-course stone foundation which was made of two rows of stones with a gap between them, filled with gray-brown debris. The stone foundations were slightly wider than the brick superstructure, measuring 0.75 m as opposed to the 0.6 m-wide brick wall, and thus, they protruded on both faces. The stones were mediumsized basalt and limestone and included occasional basalt grinding stone fragments in secondary use. Floors were found to abut the top level of the stone foundation or the lower courses of the brick superstructure.
This unit was bounded by Wall 7906 to the north and Walls 4856 and 8917 to the south (Fig. 15.13). The western boundary was eroded, while the eastern one was beyond the excavation area.
The opening between Walls 8917 and 4856 led to the southeastern unit, characterized by a rather thick floor build-up (8907, levels 81.45–81.60 m) that was related to a dense concentration of installations (Fig. 15.13). The floor was ca. 0.3–0.4 m higher than Floor 7902/9902 of the northern unit and this gap was bridged by a step built of two bricks (levels 81.35–81.60 m) which were found immediately to the southwest of Wall 8917 (shown on the plan of Stratum D-7a', Fig. 15.14), although it is unclear whether these two bricks were placed during the initial construction phase of Stratum D-7a or during the later phase, D-7a'. Floor 8907 extended 4.2 m to the south of Wall 8917 up to the southern section of Square N/4, and 3.5–4.0 m on an east–west axis from Wall 2842 to the eastern section. This appears to have been an open courtyard, although two medium-sized stones with flat tops embedded in the upper part of the floor striations, 2.4–2.5 m to the south of Wall 8917, may have served as pillar bases for a lightweight roof.
Room 2871 was bounded by Walls 2842, 4856 and 1818 (Photo 15.57, upper right); its western boundary was eroded away (Fig. 15.13). The room measured 3.1 m in width (north–south) and at least 3.8 m in length (east–west). A marked peculiarity in Room 2871 was the significant difference in wall foundation levels and, as a result, the irregular relationship between the walls, an issue which clearly pertains to the history of the room’s construction. Wall 1818 was the deepest of the three. Its stone foundation, 0.7–0.9 m wide, was carefully built of two rows of medium- and large-sized flat stones, the largest of which were in the western portion of the foundation. The foundation extended 3.6 m from the erosion line to the east, where it abruptly ended ca. 0.4 m west of Wall 2842, while its brick superstructure abutted the latter wall. Two foundation deposits were found below the northern row of stones: the western one (No. 2; Fig. 16.24:4–6; see Fig. 15.20, Photo 15.54a), placed below a large flat limestone, was composed of two bowls placed rim to-rim, enclosing a lamp. The second deposit (No. 3; Fig. 16.24:9–10, Photo 15.54b) was ca. 1.5 m to the east of the former and consisted of one lamp and one bowl. The brick superstructure built on top of the stone foundation was preserved five to six courses high (0.8–0.9 m), composed of the typical yellowish gritty bricks of Stratum D-7a, on top of which three to five courses of gray-brown friable bricks were placed (top preserved level: 82.50 m). The upper part resembled Wall 2842 and was probably erected with the latter. It should be noted that the lower part of the brick superstructure of Wall 1818 was built of different-sized bricks compared to other Stratum D-7a walls, placed as either headers or stretchers; the overall width of the wall ranged from 0.55 m in the east to 0.7 m in the west.
Minor changes in the northeastern part of the excavated area were attributed to this phase (Fig. 15.4); these changes might correspond to the upper layers of the floor build-up that accumulated in the other spaces in Stratum D-7a, discussed above.
4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.
Possibly the most complicated stratigraphic sequence in the western part of Area D was found above Stratum D-7a and below the Iron IB Strata D-5–D-4. Inside this 1.5 m-deep accumulation, excavated over an area of approximately 60 sq m (in Squares M/5, N/4–5, and the southwestern portion of P/4), numerous installations and built elements were uncovered, each with a different foundation and preservation level. In-between these installations, as well as partly above and below several of them, was a thick accumulation of striations, found in all areas except for the western and northern portions of Squares M–N/5. These striations, which totaled ca. 0.9 m (82.10–83.00 m), represented both floor build-up and natural accumulation of layered sediments. However, the distinction between different depositional processes during the excavation was impossible due to the overall homogenous nature of the striations and the absence of concentrations of material remains within the sequence. The striations must have accumulated during a relatively long time-span, in which man-made features were built and went out of use intermittently. The correlation of different features found at various elevations along the sequence was often complicated. We tentatively divided this stratum into two main phases, although in certain places, this division was arbitrary: a lower phase (D-6b; Fig. 15.15) and an upper phase (D-6a; Fig. 15.16).
The lowest level in which the striated accumulation appeared in Square N/4 was 82.10–82.20 m, designated Locus 1876 (above brick debris 7936 of Stratum D-7a; Figs. 15.19–15.21). In Loci 7935 and 7950, excavated at the same levels in Square N/5, no clear continuation of these striations was observed and, instead, the top of the brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' was found (Fig. 15.21). Only in the southeastern corner of Square N/5, within Locus 7935 (82.10–82.23 m), a local layered accumulation was noted, which included large cattle bones and an associated gray-ash accumulation.
The later phase of Stratum D-6 was characterized by the continued accumulation of striations in Square N/4 (the top of 1876, Photo 15.60), as well as in the southern (7921) and eastern (7922) parts of Square N/5, at levels 82.80–83.00 m (Fig. 15.6).
Architectural remains attributed to Stratum D-5 included Buildings DD and DE in the east, bordered on the west by a north–south street, and partially preserved elements to the west of the street that could have been either part of a unit presently eroded away or a subterranean support for the architecture above it. Based on the founding levels of the walls flanking the street, it seems that the buildings of this stratum were terraced to some extent, with an upper terrace to the east of the street and a lower one to its west, following the gradient of the slope.
Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.
Between Wall 2882 on the west and Building DD on the east ran a north–south street for 9.25 m; it continued into the northern and southern balks. Its width in the south was 1.0–1.2 m, while in the north it was ca. 2.35 m (between Walls 2882 and 8878 in Square P/5).
The eastern unit in Stratum D-5 was not fully exposed, since some of the walls of Stratum D-4 which were built directly on top of Stratum D-5 structures were not dismantled. The exposed remains were sufficient to show that these were massive buildings that housed special activity. The area was divided into two units: Building DE in the north and DD to its south (Photos 15.69–15.77). The northern unit included two rooms with an unclear connection between them; both continued to the north and east beyond the border of the excavation. The southern unit comprised two large rooms paved with well-preserved brick floors. The exact relationship between the two units remained obscure, since the juncture between them was covered by later walls that were not dismantled.
Building DE was comprised of two rooms, separated by north–south Wall 8861, preserved to five brick courses. The upper two courses were built of dark gray friable bricks, the two courses below them of white bricks, and the lowermost course was again dark gray. The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same wall was typical of this stratum, such as in Walls 8884 and 8854 of Building DD, described below. Later walls covered the northern and southern ends of Wall 8861, but it is most likely that it had cornered with Wall 8884 on the south.
East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.
West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.
This was part of a massive building whose eastern and western walls were 1.25 m wide each, composed of two rows of bricks. While the eastern wall (8848) was comprised of two rows, the western wall seems to have been made of two adjoining walls (8855, 2881) which were constructed separately: the eastern side (8855) had a stone foundation which was lacking in the western side (2881). Wall 2881 apparently continued to be in use in the subsequent stratum, D-4b, when it abutted the newly built Wall 1860 on the west (see below). Wall 2881 was poorly preserved, perhaps since it was in use longer than Wall 8855. The northern wall (8884) was apparently just as wide as the western and eastern walls, based on a small part of its northern face exposed in Square P/5; the rest of the northern part of the wall was covered by D-4b walls. The eastern wall (8848) appeared to have been the outer wall of the entire building, although this could not be ascertained due to the limited excavation area. If this is correct, then the external width of the building was ca. 6.7 m (for the possibility that this complex continued to the east into Area C, see below). It seems that the southern wall (8852) of the eastern room was an internal wall, since the parallel room to the west continued south beyond the border of the excavation. Thus, the length of the building was at least 6.0 m and it probably continued beyond the southern limit of the area.
This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.
Room 8871 was the western room of Building DD (Photos 15.69, 15.76–15.77). Its inner size was ca. 2.0×at least 5.2 m, as its southern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. In the north, the excavation almost reached the presumed southern face of Wall 8884. The floor (levels 83.55–83.74 m) was made of four to five rows of bricks, like the floor of Room 8867 to its east. It abutted Walls 8855 and 8854. The bricks of the floor were covered by 0.25 m-deep striated layers of soft earth and plaster, which were sealed by Floor 8816 of Stratum D-4b. Although the level of the floor in this room was 0.5–0.6 m higher than that in the eastern room, it was clear that the two rooms belonged to the same building. A similar situation was observed in Stratum D-4b Building DG (see below).
The building remains of Stratum D-5, although limited, indicated dense urban planning and the existence of well-planned structures. Wall 2882, which crossed the entire area from north to south, represented a degree of central planning, although it remained unclear as to what unit it had been belonged. Initially, it had been considered that this wall was a foundation intended to support the slope during the construction of Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. According to this suggestion, Building DF would have been founded in Stratum D-5 and continued to be in use, with slight changes, in Strata D-4b and D-4a. However, it was finally decided in favor of the stratigraphic separation as suggested here, namely, that Wall 2882 represented an independent phase, attributed to Stratum D-5, and that it was an isolated element, with no structural remains belonging to this stratum to its west.
Stratum D-4 was the most extensively exposed stratum in Area D, revealed in six excavation squares (N–P–Q/4–5). Although new structures replaced the massive Buildings DD and DE of Stratum D-5, and Building DF was built west of the street, the general outline of Stratum D-5 was maintained, with the north–south street continuing to separate the eastern and the western units.
To the best of our understanding, Building DF was built in Stratum D-4, although as explained above, there was a slight possibility that it was founded already in Stratum D-5 (see above). The building included two rows of rooms running parallel to the slope of the mound west of the street and comprised two terraces, separated by Wall 4866 and its possible southern extension (Photos 15.78–15.82). The eastern line of rooms included 4839, 1845 and 2840 and the western line included 4871 and 4879; the latter were destroyed by erosion and only their eastern ends were preserved. It is not certain that all these rooms belonged to the same building, but it is clear that this was a well-planned structure adjoining the north–south street on its west.
Walls 1811, 2822 and 2846 created the northern end of a 2.5 m-wide room that continued to the south (Squares N–P/4). They were a rebuild of the walls found in the same place in Stratum D-6a, described above (Room 4848). East–west Wall 1811 in Squares N–P/4 was comprised of two rows of bricks, 1.0 m wide and well preserved for the most part. The wall had a stone foundation comprised of small- and medium-sized stones, with one row seen along the northern face, although these stones were not visible under the southern face; the foundation was dug into the brick collapse (1855) below. Inside this room was a hard-packed earth floor (2840; level 84.08 m) set on a bedding of pebbles. A shallow pit (2828) was partially excavated in the northwestern part of the room. The floor of this room was raised and a higher floor (2823) was constructed at level 84.20 m in Stratum D-4a.
The space between the rooms on the north and the south was probably a courtyard, paved with stones (1845), with a series of plaster floors accumulated above it (1836) (Squares N–P/4–5; Photos 15.80– 15.82). This space was 4.0 m long and at least 3.0 m wide. It was bordered on the east by Wall 1883, on the west by the supposed continuation of Wall 4866 along the erosion line of the slope, on the south by Wall 1811, and on the north by Wall 4813. Wall 1883 was built above Wall 2882 of Stratum D-5. It had a three-course stone foundation that protruded beyond the face of the wall towards the east and seven courses of its brick superstructure were preserved; the uppermost three tilted strongly to the west (Fig. 15.33). From its corner with Wall 1811, the wall continued ca. 7.5 m to the north, running into the balk. The southern end of the wall (termed 2846) was slightly curved and served as the eastern wall of Room 2840.
In Square N/5 were remains of one complete room (4839) and segments of two additional rooms (4879, 4871), arranged on two levels, with a floorlevel difference of 0.65 m: Room 4839 on an upper terrace, which was on the same level as 1845 and 2840 to its south, and Rooms 4879 and 4871 on a lower terrace to the west. Wall 4866, 1.0 m wide, which was common to all these rooms, served as a retaining wall for the terrace above it. The latter wall was not preserved entirely, but most likely had cornered with Wall 4861.
The north–south street of Stratum D-5 in Squares P/4–5 continued to be in use through Stratum D-4, when it was ca. 1.85–2.0 m wide (Photos 15.83– 15.84). The street surface was gradually raised, with striations accumulating between Wall 1883 (which stood to a height of 1.5 m) in the west and the western walls of Buildings DH and DG (in Stratum D-4b) and DJ (in Stratum D-4a).
To the east of the street were two units, Buildings DG and DH, attributed to Stratum D-4b, built above D-5 Building DG.
This building comprised three rooms, two of which were completely excavated, and part of a fourth unexcavated room which continued into the eastern balk (Photo 15.85). The excavated part measured 5.8×6.9 m, but the building apparently continued to the east and perhaps also to the south, beyond the limit of the excavation area.
The western room in the building (inner dimensions 2.0×4.7 m, 9.4 sq m) was a rebuild of the previous Room 8871 of Stratum D-5. Each of its four well-preserved walls was built of dark gray bricks with distinctive whitish mortar between them (recalling the Stratum C-3 bricks in Area C; see Chapter 12). The western wall of the room (1860) was founded directly on top of Wall 8855 of Stratum D-5, but about 0.5 m north of the entrance, there was an earth layer separating these two walls. The entrance into Room 8816 was through an opening in the southern part of Wall 1860. West of the entrance was a plastered stone step, 0.75 m long (2866) at level 84.46 m, constructed above the stump of D-5 Wall 2881, leading from the street into the room.
The southeastern space in Building DG was perhaps an open courtyard, 3.5 m wide and at least 3.5 m long (at least 12.25 sq m); it continued eastward beyond the limit of the excavated area and thus, its full length could not be determined. Its northern wall (4859) was composed of white bricks and had an opening leading to Room 8830 to its north. The southern wall (4862), also built of white bricks, was exposed only along 1.5 m, since its western part was disturbed; there could have been an opening here leading to another room in the south.
This small room (inner dimensions 1.45×1.9 m) was entered from Space 8841 to its south. Its northern, eastern and southern walls were built of white bricks, while on the west it was bounded by Wall 4878, built of dark gray bricks. The 0.6 m-wide corner entrance had a brick threshold at level 84.44 m. It is notable that such a corner entrance was also found in Room 8816 and perhaps also in 8841.
It remained unclear whether the three rooms described above (and the fourth unexcavated one) belonged to the same unit. Since no entrance leading from Room 8816 to the eastern rooms was found, it may be that this room was independent and accessed directly from the street, perhaps serving as a storage space or workshop, while Rooms 8841 and 8830 belonged to a separate building entered from the east or the south. Space 8841 could be part of an open courtyard, while Room 8830 and the unexcavated room to its east could be small living spaces.
The northern building in the eastern unit comprised two rooms and perhaps a third unexcavated room on the east. Its southern wall (8821) adjoined Building DG on the south.
The inner dimensions of this room were 1.80×2.55 m (4.6 sq m, including the area of Bench 8860). A corner entrance with a brick threshold at level 84.29 m at the northern end of Wall 8849 connected Rooms 8844 and 8842. Another opening (8886) was detected in the eastern wall of the room (7851), just on line with the latter entrance. The opening in Wall 7851 was preserved to its full height, standing 1.25 m high and 0.8 m wide. The beaten-earth floor of this room (8844) covered a strip of bricks (8870) that ran along the western face of Wall 7851; these bricks were wider than the wall and were possibly placed in order to support the floor near the entrance. Wall 7851 was preserved to a height of 16 courses and continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a. Wall 8860 was a line of bricks adjoining the northern face of Wall 8821; yet, while Wall 8821 was preserved to a height of four courses, 8860 was preserved to only one course and was abutted by Floor 8844. Thus, 8860 was interpreted as a bench.
Room 8842 was the western room of Building DH (Photos 15.63, 15.73, 15.92). This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.6×1.8 m, 2.88 sq m) had a beaten-earth floor (8842) abutting the walls at levels 84.28–84.34 m. A row of five stones (8856) lined the western side of the room; to its west was Installation 8810 (Photos 15.63, 15.66, 15.73, 15.92). This enigmatic feature included three large flat pinkish limestone blocks and a large basalt basin, located east of the street, on the same line as the supposed western wall of Room 8842 and above D-5 Wall 8878. The southernmost limestone was a large rectangular block (0.3×0.6×0.97 m). The middle limestone was whitish/pinkish and almost square (0.3×0.6×0.6 m). The northernmost stone was 0.5 m wide and at least 0.5 m long. A basalt basin (8807) was located south of and on the same line as these three stones. This was a large oval-shaped basalt stone, 0.8–0.9 m in diameter, with a rounded shallow flat depression in its center, 0.5 m in diameter and 0.12 m deep. Grinding marks could be seen inside the depression. A flat limestone was found to the south of this basin. The tops of these stones were at levels 84.56–84.66 m, ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor of Stratum D-5 Room 8874 and 0.3–0.4 m above the floor of Room 8842 of Stratum D-4b, both to the east of the stones. The street west of this installation was wider than it was further to the south, thus providing convenient access to the installation.
The term Building DJ refers to the area of Buildings DG and DH, which underwent several major internal changes. Although no opening was found to connect the southern and northern wings, some of the renovations indicate that the entire area was considered as part of one architectural system. Many of the previous walls continued to be in use (4859, southern part of 4878, 4862, 1884, 1860, 4876, 8828, 8834), while others were cancelled or replaced. Thus, the double wall separating Building DG from DH in Stratum D-4b (8821, 8828) was replaced by a single wall (8828/8834) and the eastern wall (7851) of D-4b Room 8844 was extended to the south (denoted here 7848), cancelling the earlier wall (8805) to its west and becoming the eastern wall of the new room (7855), thus widening D-4b Room 8830 by 0.9 m. In the center of the building, Wall 7852 was built directly over Wall 8849 of D-4b, abutting the northern wall of D-4b Building DG (8828, 8834), which continued to be in use. At this time, the western part of Wall 8821 was cancelled, so that the previous space of Room 8842 was enlarged, but was now divided by a narrow wall (4877) into two separate chambers (4858, 4872). On the west, Wall 8850 was constructed above Installation 8810 and served as the western wall of the building, facing the street.
This room of Building DH in Stratum D-4b continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a, with the same floor and walls on the north and east. However, architectural changes occurred in the other two walls; on the west, a new wall (7852) was constructed on top of Wall 8849, preserved to seven courses. On the south, Wall 8821 of Stratum D-4b was cancelled and the room was now bordered by Wall 8828, which continued to be in use from Stratum D-4b. The inner dimensions of the new room were 2.4×2.6 (6.24 sq m). All the walls’ interiors were coated with a thick layer of white plaster. Floor 8844, attributed to D-4b and probably continuing in D-4a, was covered by destruction debris (8833) and fallen roof material (8829), the latter covered by a layer of brick debris (7853) reaching an uppermost level of 85.64 m, 1.25 m above the original floor.
D-4b Room 8842 was now extended to the south and divided into two chambers by a narrow partition wall (4877) (Photos 15.94–15.97). To the north, Room 4858 was a narrow space with inner dimensions of 1.0×2.3 m. Traces of thick white plaster were preserved on Walls 4876, 7852 and 4877. No floor was traced, but since Wall 4877 floated at level 85.07 m, almost 0.8 m above the floor of the Stratum D-4b, such a floor must have existed.
Replacing D-4b Room 8830 of Building DG was a new room that was enlarged to the east (inner dimensions 1.4×2.8 m, 3.92 sq m), entered from the south through the same entrance used in D-4b. No floor was detected in this room. The brick debris layer in this room (7855, 8806) was cut by Stratum D-3 Pits (7858, 7860, 7863).
This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.25×1.45 m, 1.8 sq m) was created by constructing a narrow partition wall (1868) in the northern part of D-4b Room 8816. The eastern wall (7861), composed of dark gray bricks and coated on the exterior with a layer of unique white bricks, was preserved to a height of six courses. This outer coating of bricks decreased the room’s length by ca. 0.3 m. This chamber had a stone floor at level 84.80 m (0.1 m above Floor 8816 of D-4b), covered by a beatenearth floor (8820) at level 84.83 m, about 0.3 m higher than D-4b floor in the same location. Along the western side of the chamber was a brick bench or installation (8859), composed of three white bricks. The northern one was 0.4×0.5 m and the narrow middle brick (0.3×0.45 m) was laid with its long side against the northern brick. The southernmost brick had the same dimensions as the northern one, with a round depression in its southern part (diameter 0.4 m) which could have served as a base for a jar. The installation/bench was surrounded by ashy material and a large amount of charred olive pits.
The previous Space 8841, possibly an open courtyard, continued with almost no change in Stratum D-4a. No floor was detected in this later phase, although it probably existed, since a large oven (4851) was found in the northwestern corner of the room with a foundation level at 84.75 m, ca. 0.5 m above the floor of Stratum D-4b. Three stones running on a diagonal line at levels 84.70–84.81 m were found in the northeastern part of the room (8838).
This room (inner dimensions 2.1×3.0 m, 6.3 sq m) was the southern part of D-4b Room 8816, after its division by a narrow partition wall (1868) (Photos 15.98–15.99). Its walls were covered with white plaster. The western wall (1860) was preserved to six to seven courses, the southern wall (1884) to at least nine courses, and the northern wall (1868) up to seven courses in the west, yet its eastern part was severely damaged by Stratum D-3 pits (see below).
In Stratum D-4b, the general layout of the excavated area continued from Stratum D-5, but substantial changes occurred in each individual building. West of the street, Building DF was founded at this stage, although the possibility that it was founded in Stratum D-5 should not be ruled out. East of the street, the massive Buildings DD and DE of the previous stratum were replaced by new buildings (DG and DH). Building DG appeared to have contained a square courtyard surrounded by rooms at least on the north and west (although no entrance from the courtyard to the western rooms was found); its full plan on the east and south remained unknown. The northern building, DH, included only two rooms entered from the east, although they may have been part of a larger building extending to the east and perhaps to the north.
Stratum D-3 was characterized by a series of 45 pits found in an open area in Squares N–P–Q/4–5 between levels 84.95–86.60 m. They post-dated Stratum D-4 elements and pre-dated the construction of Walls 1809, 1820 and 2820 of Stratum D-2. However, they could have been either contemporary with or earlier than Walls 4808 and 4809, attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/5, since the latter had deep foundations on the same level and even lower than the pits and rest on top of Stratum D-4 walls and debris (see further on this subject below). Two additional pits were located in Square R/4 in Area C (Stratum C-3; Chapter 12), thus establishing a good correlation between the stratigraphic sequences in these two areas.
In Square Q/4, just north of the southern balk, Pit 2833 was a deep pit that was not completely excavated. It cut Pit 2868 to its east. East of these pits, 2804 cut into Pits 4815 and 4834. Further east was Pit 2829, continuing into the eastern section, with Pit 4841 below it. Pit 2834 differed from the other pits, being larger (diameter 1.9 m) and amorphic in shape. This pit was cut by a plastered pit (2844).
Eight pits in Square Q/4 were unplastered (4805, 4806, 4814, 4815, 4821, 4834, 4835, 4865). Most of these belonged to the lower layer of pits (Table 15.3; Fig. 15.26). Some of them contained organic material, such as (in order of frequency) olive stones, wood charcoal, charred grain and chickpeas. In some of the pits were large sherds, including bases of jars (e.g., 4814).
The numerous pits in Stratum D-3 were bounded on the north by the line of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 in the middle of Squares P–Q/5. North of this line, no pits nor any other elements of Stratum D-3 were found and the structures of Stratum D-2 were built right on top of D-4 elements. It should be noted that the foundations of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 (=VI) were sunk to levels 85.20–85.50 m, which corresponded to the level of the pits. This wall was constructed on top of Stratum D-4a Building DJ. Similarly, the foundation of Stratum C-2 (=VI) Wall 1563 in the balk between Squares Q–R/4 was at level 85.70 m, which fits the upper level of most of the pits. However, elsewhere in Area C, no such pits were found in contexts dated to the transition from Iron I to Iron IIA, and architectural continuity predominated.
Several architectural features were assigned to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/4–5 that were interpreted as being later than the D-3 pits of Iron IB and preceding the Stratum D-1a–c architecture found in Square Q/5 (an alternative interpretation is suggested below). These remains are thought to be contemporary with those of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and thus are shown on the same plan (Chapter 12; Figs. 12.7–12.8).
Three narrow brick walls (1820, 1809, 4827) created a small chamber in Square P/4 (4826; 1.7 m wide, length unknown), close to the erosion line which cut it on the west. This room (Photo 15.108) was built above a layer of D-4a burnt brick debris and collapse (1850) which seems to have been levelled in preparation for the construction of the new building and above the D-3 pits. A fragmentary floor (4826) was found at level 86.08 m, continuing below Wall 4827 to the north (4825) and thus, the wall was probably a secondary partition constructed on top of the floor. Floor 4825 was cut in a straight line by Trench 4860, which was either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal trench burrowed from the nearby slope on the west; the latter possibility is more plausible. The southern and eastern walls, preserved up to four courses high and lacking stone foundations, were covered with mud plaster — Wall 1809 on both faces and Wall 1820 on the northern face only. To the east of the chamber, a floor (1886) abutted Wall 1809 at 86.34 m, higher than the floor inside the chamber. The mud plaster on Wall 1809 continued down to coat one of the bricks below this floor level as well.
In Squares P–Q/5, two walls (4808, 4819), preserved to 1.15–1.6 m, formed part of a unit that continued to the east. Trench 4860 to the south of these walls cut the remains of Phase D-4. As mentioned above, this could be either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal burrow. A layer of reed impressions in clay found below the foundation of Wall 4808 (Photo 15.111) may be explained as either related to the construction of this wall or as the roof collapse of Building DJ of Stratum D-4 (the top of the latter’s walls were ca. 0.5 m lower). A third wall (4869), observed in the topsoil of Square P/6 north of the limits of the excavation area, seems to have belonged to the same building as Walls 4808 and 4819, creating a space 3.25 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Inside this space was a brick debris layer (4828) that rested on a possible floor at level 86.08 m. This was exactly the same level as the floor in Room 4826 to the south. If this indeed was the floor, then the foundations of the walls consisted of six to seven brick courses below the floor level, with no stone foundation. These deep foundations imply that this had been a sturdy, well-built structure. The light yellow and compacted matrix of the bricks of these walls was typical of Stratum VI construction elsewhere in the site. The pottery recovered from Locus 4828 included some red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, typical of this stratum. Thus, this room might be correlated on the basis of architectural, stratigraphic and pottery indicators to Stratum C-2 (=VI); see, however an alternative interpretation below.
Dismantling the balk between Squares Q/4 and R/4 revealed Wall 1563, a north–south wall preserved to a height of 1.6 m; its foundation was at levels 85.61–85.70 m, higher than that of Wall 4808 in Square P/5 (Fig. 15.28). Wall 1563 was built of the same yellowish bricks typical of Stratum VI and was found tilted to the east (in the opposite direction of the nearby slope of the mound), perhaps due to seismic damage. It was the western wall of a room of Stratum VI exposed in Area C, Square R/4, whose floor was at level 85.60 m (Chapter 12, Fig. 12.9). It made a corner on the south with Wall 1572, which was preserved only four courses high and to a length of ca. 1.0 m. Abutting Wall 1563 on the west was a layer of debris on an earthen layer (1556) at level 85.70 m, which may have been a floor, although this identification remained unsure. The eastern half of a pit (1567) was uncovered, dug into Floor 1556. The relationship between this floor and the deep debris of Locus 1837 to its west (see above) remained unclear, since the levels of 1837 and the foundations of Wall 2820 further to the west were higher than the supposed floor (1556). These discrepancies may be explained as a result of the layers tilting towards the east, as observed in several strata at Tel Rehov. As noted, Debris 1837 may have been a constructional fill for Stratum D-1 floors, which may explain its rather high level compared to Floor 1556. A third possible explanation is that Floor 1556 (if indeed correctly identified as a floor) belonged to a late phase of Stratum D-3 and was not related to Wall 1563 (although this was not the impression during the excavation).
Yael Rotem, field supervisor of Area D East, suggested that the northern structure in Stratum D-2 (Walls 4808, 4819, 4869) was contemporary with the Stratum D-3 pits, based on the fact that none of the D-3 pits were found below or north of Wall 4808 and that the latter wall was founded just above Stratum D-4a walls and occupation debris. In its center, Wall 4808 stands to a height of up to 1.6 m between levels 85.27 and 87.06 m, while the pits were between levels 85.23 and 86.50 m, corresponding to the lower part of this wall. Thus, the possibility that the pits and the wall were contemporary should not be ruled out. In that case, the walls belonging to this unit should be attributed to Stratum D-3 at the end of the Iron Age I. This is not contradicted by the few sherds that were related to these walls.
Several fragmentary architectural elements at the top of the slope in Squares P–Q/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-1 (Strata V and IV). Although they were close to topsoil and the erosion line and were poorly preserved, they indicated dense building activity which can be divided into three phases, denoted D-1c, D-1b and D-1a; these can be correlated with similar phases uncovered in the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C (Chapter 12). Like in Area D, the lower two levels in the latter square were identical in terms of architecture and the difference between them was only in floor raising, while the upper phase, C-1a, showed a substantial change in terms of plan and architecture. This similarity between the two adjacent squares enabled a secure correlation between the two areas.
This phase comprised several architectural features in Squares Q/4–5, which superimposed Stratum D-2 architecture (Fig. 15.29; Photos 15.115– 15.116). The walls appeared to belong to one building, the western part of which was destroyed by erosion.
Stratum D-1b refers to a later phase of the previous occupation, when the buildings continued to be in use, but slight changes were made in floors and installations (Fig. 15.30; Photos 15.117–15.120). In Square Q/5, two phases of partially preserved ovens (7825, 7817) were found east of Wall 7811, related to a floor (7812). Their foundations were at levels 86.87 m and 86.78 m respectively, ca. 0.3 m above the floor of Stratum D-1c. Two intact oil lamps (Fig. 16.61:8–9) were found in the debris (7809) west of the ovens. In the corner of Walls 4809 and 7811, a thin clay floor (7827) was found at level 86.71 m.
In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.
In Square P/5, a burial of an adult (4829) was dug into D-1c–b Wall 4809. The grave was covered with a line of bricks taken from the wall. The body was lying on its back, the skull in the northeast and the feet in the southwest. The skull was slightly tilted, with the eye sockets facing the feet, approximately towards the south. No finds were found in relation to this burial. This was most probably an Islamic burial, similar to the ones found in Area B (Chapter 8).
It should be recalled that only a limited area of ca. 150 sq m, and in many cases much less, was excavated in Area D in each phase. This is a very tiny sample compared to the entire area of the site, which is ca. 100,000 sq m; thus, the available sample comprised only ca. 0.15%. Since the Late Bronze/Iron I sequence was hardly excavated in other parts of the tell, caution must be exercised when making generalizations based on the available data. Phases with poor architectural remains should not be taken as representing the entire site. For example, although the building remains of Strata D-2 and D-1 were fragmentary and unimpressive, we know that they belonged to a densely built and well-planned Iron IIA city, as uncovered in the adjacent Area C and other excavation areas.
The most prominent result of the excavation in Area D was the observation of continued occupation throughout the 600 years spanning Late Bronze I to Iron IIA. Eleven main strata from this time span were defined and several of them have two sub-phases (D-11, D-9, D-7, D-6, D-4) or even three sub-phases (D-1). No major widespread destruction layers were detected in the entire sequence in Area D; an occupation gap may have separated Stratum D-8 from D-7b, as evidenced by the 0.5 m thick accumulation between these two strata, yet this could not be confirmed. Thick accumulations of floor striations in open areas and streets in most strata were evidence for continued activity over a long time. In terms of architecture, the large public building of Stratum D-10 (14th century BCE) and the urban planning and architecture of Strata D-5 and D-4 of Iron IB, should be noted.
The foundation of the city in Late Bronze I (Stratum D-11b) is an exceptional phenomenon in the Southern Levant, as there are almost no new cities founded in this period, which is considered as a period of decline following the Egyptian conquest of Canaan. The low elevation of the earliest stratum compared to the present-day field west of the mound shows that the level of the colluvial field must have risen considerably during the historical periods. It is hypothesized that the earliest settlement was founded at approximately the same level as the adjacent field, or somewhat higher than the field west of the mound, while young tectonic activities were responsible for later geomorphological processes in this area. This, again, is an exceptional feature in Canaanite cities, which were most often located on raised topography. This earliest occupation had a later phase, denoted D-11a, although both these phases are little known, due to limited exposure.
A thick accumulation separated the open area of Stratum D-8 from that of the subsequent Stratum D-7b which can be securely dated to the early 12th century BCE. One small pit contained a cache of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapters 4, 39). In the following phase (D-7a), the area was redesigned as a dwelling with a stone floor and several installations, some of which were densely concentrated in one of its units; a prominent feature in this phase was the six foundation deposits of the lampand-bowl type (see discussion below). In part of the area, a still higher phase was detected (D-7a'), when a new line of pillar bases was built above the previous stone pavement.
Iron IB Strata D-5 and D-4 were preserved only in Squares N–Q/5 in the eastern part of the area. In both, a street crossed the area from north to south. The street surfaces were raised during the course of Strata D-5 and D-4 by almost 1.0 m, evidence for continuous intensive use and dumping of refuse into the street. Substantial buildings flanked the street on the east and west. Building DD of Stratum D-5 was a massive structure with elongated rooms and brick floors. It appeared to have had some public or administrative function, perhaps storage. A room to the north of this building may have been used for domestic cult.
Strata D-2 and D-1 of the Iron IIA were preserved only on the upper part of the slope (Squares Q/4–5 and the eastern side of P/4–5). Stratum D-2 is correlated with Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and marks the westernmost structures of this well-planned Early Iron IIA city, well known in Area C (Table 15.1 and Chapter 12). In the north of the area were remains of a substantial building and in the south were fragmentary structures and an open area with pits (for an alternative proposal which would combine the building in Squares P–Q/5 and the pits of Stratum D-3 into a single stratum; see above).
The excavation in Area D provided important information concerning the impact of environmental factors, such as erosion and tectonic movements, on site formation. The lower (western) edge of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium created during the last three thousand years. Each of the strata was damaged by erosion, although its extent is unknown; it may have demolished only narrow parts of the western slope or, combined with tectonic movements, a somewhat larger part. Nevertheless, it seems likely that erosion could not have been so extensive, and that there were no fortifications during the periods excavated in Area D. This was confirmed also along the northern edge of the mound in Areas C and E concerning the Iron IIA strata.
No evidence for violent destruction was found in any of the strata in Area D, except in part of Building DJ, Stratum D-4a, where limited ash debris and restorable pottery in situ were detected. It appeared that the transition between strata was peaceful and was the result of damage caused by prolonged use, earthquakes, etc. In spite of marked changes between strata, there was continuity in the outlines of buildings, continuous use of certain walls and installations, and the construction of new ovens more or less in the same location of earlier ones.
The walls of the Late Bronze Strata D-11 and D-10 were constructed of bricks without stone foundations; Stratum D-11b Wall 1927 might have been made of packed-earth construction (pisé). In Strata D-9–D-4, most walls had stone foundations of one or two courses that bore a brick superstructure. In the Iron IIA strata (D-2 and D-1), brick walls were constructed without stone foundations, as in contemporary strata in the other excavation areas across the mound.
Two main types of archaeological deposits were found in all the strata: debris related to the collapse of brick walls and occupation debris composed of thin accumulated layers, sometimes laminated in appearance (denoted ‘striations’) that contained many pottery sherds and animal bones. Such striations were especially common in the street layers of Strata D-5 and D-4 and open spaces in Strata D-8 to D-6. These layers are explained as resulting from intentional raising of floor levels and dumping refuse into open spaces.5
5 Natural causes for the creation of such layers were also considered, such as water flow and the deposition of chemical sediments (e.g., evaporites) or silts and clays which originated from nearby exposures of earlier strata, in a mechanism resembling ‘winter-wash’ deposits accumulating inside the squares between the excavation seasons. Based on field observations only, it seems that continuous human activity was the main cause for these laminations.
Eight foundation deposits of the lamp-and-bowl type were found in Area D. The subject was discussed by Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993), who cited all examples known at the time of writing (for two additional ones from a 12th century BCE context at Tel Beth-Shean, see TBS III: 19); the earliest known examples are dated to the 13th century BCE. Our example from Stratum D-9b is tentatively dated to the late 14th or early 13th century BCE and thus, is one of the oldest known deposits of this type. It included a basalt bowl (unlike all the later foundation deposits that have a ceramic bowl) and a single lamp. Six deposits were discovered in Stratum D-7a Building DC of the 12th century, the heyday of this phenomenon, representing one of the densest concentrations of such deposits to be found in a single structure. A single deposit found in Stratum D-4 is one of the latest, dating to the late 11th century BCE. Our deposits contain either one bowl and one lamp or two bowls placed rim to rim, with a lamp between them. No other finds or material such as ash were detected in these deposits. Most of these were located either below a wall or close to its foundation (Fig. 15.13) and must have been related to the construction of the building. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993: 123) emphasized the southern distribution of such deposits (Shephelah, western Negev, southern coastal plain and Egyptian fortresses in northern Sinai and Gaza). The only northern site they could cite was Pella. The examples from Tel Beth-Shean and Tel Rehov enlarge this distribution map to include the Beth-Shean Valley. However, the lack of such deposits in major northern sites such as Dan, Hazor and Megiddo remains a fact. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni defined the phenomenon as “an Egyptian inspired local Canaanite custom”, which appeared mainly during the height of Egyptian control in Canaan, as well as in the Philistine city, Ekron (Tel Miqne). These foundation deposits must have been an expression of beliefs related to the construction of buildings, perhaps to ward off evil spirits.
Two hearths, a cooking installation and 16 ovens (tabuns) were found in Area D.
Various additional installations were found in Area D.
Pits are a common feature in any excavation and their function for refuse, drainage or storage often remains obscure. In Area D, single pits were found in Strata D-7b and D-7a in open areas. In Strata D-5 and D-4, several pits of various sizes were found inside massive buildings. In Building DD, one large and three small pits were dug from the brick floors and in Building 8816 of Stratum D-4b, a large pit was located in the inner courtyard and two smaller pits in Room DG. These pits must have functioned in the house when it was in use, perhaps for refuse or to drain sewage.
Building EA included all the structural remains in Squares E–F/13–14, although the possibility exists that these remains may have belonged to two or three independent buildings, as described below This complex existed in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, with some architectural changes made between them. The topsoil in this area descended to the south, towards the ravine that separated the lower from the upper mound. There was a distinct difference between the preservation in Squares F/13–14, as opposed to E/13–14. While the building remains in F/13–14 were found just below topsoil and were well preserved to a height of ca. 0.8 m, those in Squares E/13–14 were poorly preserved on a much lower level and were covered by a thick layer of eroded wash. Thus, the difference in the height of the top of Wall 1689 in E/13 (71.32 m) and Wall 1629 in F/13 (72.27 m) was 1.07 m, although they were only 3.0 m apart. This lower preservation of the walls in Squares E–F/13 seems to have been caused by severe erosion towards the ravine south of the excavation area, as well as due to a violent destruction in this area, as evidenced by the fallen bricks in Squares E–F/13. It seems that the walls uncovered in the southern part of Square E/13 belonged to Stratum E-1b only and that almost no remains of E-1a were preserved in this square, due to erosion.
In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north.
Room 1701 (Square F/13) had inner dimensions of ca. 2.4 sq m (Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.14–17.15). Its four walls (1628, 1619, 1618, 1629) were identical in their construction technique, including the samesize light yellow bricks. The walls appeared ca. 0.2 m below the topsoil and were preserved to a height of five courses (0.7–0.8 m). A 0.8 m-wide entrance led to the room from Room 1664 on the west. Another entrance in the western end of the southern wall (1629) was found blocked by bricks laid lengthwise (Photo 17.15), yet the door jambs of this blocked entrance could be easily detected. The blocking of the entrance may have taken place between Strata E-1b and E-1a. In the eastern part of this room were two storage compartments (1666 and 1700), created by narrow walls (up to 0.1 m wide) made of whitish clay (Photos 17.14–17.15). The northern compartment (1666) was almost square (inner dimensions 0.9×1.0 m), while the southern one (1700) was rectangular (inner dimensions 1.0×1.4 m). A small hole (ca. 0.11 m in diameter) in the partition between the northern compartment and the western part of Room 1701 was located somewhat above the floor level. The compartments may have served as grain bins; the lack of plaster and the very thin walls precluded their use to store liquids.
The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.
The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665.
We assume that the southern part of the building continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, yet erosion destroyed much of the evidence.
The southeastern part of Area E was densely built up and the architectural remains belonged perhaps to two or three independent buildings, attached to one another and forming one complex. This area was first built in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use, with modifications, in Stratum E-1a. This unit continued beyond the limits of the excavation area to the east and south, where its possible continuation can be determined in Area F (Fig. 17.1).
Building ED, attributed to E-1b (and possibly to E-2), pertains to a partly uncovered structure located in Squares D–E/15, below Building EB of Stratum E-1a.
Excavation along the northern and eastern faces of Platform 1624 in Square E/15 (the focal point of the sanctuary of Stratum E-1a, see below) revealed earlier wall lines (4623, 4624) attributed to Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.34, 17.37). They appeared at levels 71.75–71.81 m and stood one or two courses high. These two walls were slightly to the north and east of the outer lines of the Stratum E-1a platform. Hardly any brick lines could be detected in the northern wall (4624) and it is possible that it was constructed of compacted mud. These walls were most probably contemporary with Room 4653 further to the west and with the early phase of the open space to the north and east, including the circular installations found in the eastern part of Square E/15, Oven 1649, and the layers in the lower part of Locus 1647, all attributed to Stratum E-1b (see below). A shallow debris layer separated the top of these walls from the bottom of the E-1a platform. A major question is whether these two walls belonged to an earlier platform. In order to clarify this point, we dismantled most of the platform (except for the area of the standing stones). The excavation reached level 71.64 m (5623), 0.85 m below the top of the brick platform of E-1a, revealing only brick debris and a large number of random bricks, mostly haphazardly placed (Photo 17.21). No evidence for an earlier platform was found and thus, the function of Walls 4623 and 4624 remained enigmatic.
A 1.5×2.5 m probe conducted below Floor 4654 of E-1a Building EB contained fallen and decayed bricks (5629) attributed to E-1b. The excavation stopped at level 71.69 m, almost 1.0 m below the top of 4654. Among the finds from this lower layer was a sherd of a Greek Late Protogeometric/SubProtogeometric krater (Fig. 18.2:12).
Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 was founded in Stratum E-1a. The northern room (2629) was built above Room 4653 of E-2/E-1b Building ED and the platform in the northeastern corner of the building was higher than the E-1b floors to its north and east. The outer measurements of the building were 7.7×9.8 m and it comprised a central space with an enclosed room or alcove at its eastern end, a rectangular room at the southern side and a smaller room in the northwestern corner. A unique feature in this building was the design of its northeastern corner, which included a rectangular brick platform (2654) topped by a smaller stone platform with standing stones (1624), facing a courtyard to its north and east. This platform was the focal point of what we identify as an open-air sanctuary, which included Building EB and a spacious courtyard with installations to its north and east.
This is the central space in the building (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.
This room (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).
This small rectangular room (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.
This was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.
The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).
The plan of Building EB is exceptional. Although in its size and building techniques, it does not differ from dwellings at Tel Rehov, its unique plan was apparently suited to a specific function related to the open-air sanctuary of which it was a part, with the platform and standing stones occupying the northeastern corner of this structure. The decorated plaster found at the entrance to the southern elongated room emphasizes the importance of this room, which was perhaps the seat of a priest, scribe or other functionaries related to the cultic activity in this area.
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).
The eastern part of a dwelling of Stratum E-1a, denoted Building EC, was excavated west of and attached to Building EB, in Squares C/14–16. The excavated part included a courtyard (5637), a room to its southeast (5613), and two corners of additional rooms on the west. Like the others in Area E, this building was also oriented northwest–southeast. It was built as an independent building and thus, most of its eastern wall (2647) was attached to Wall 2546 of Building EB (with a slight gap between them), thus creating a double wall, like in many other buildings of this period at Tel Rehov.
This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens.
Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room.
Locus 5639 represented the northeastern corner of a room in Building EC, west of Room 5613 (Square C/15). It was bounded by Walls 5640 on the north and 5606 on the east. This small area was excavated to 72.82 m, revealing a layer of brown earth (Photo 17.59).
1 For negation of the Lachish Stratum V cult room as
such, see Ussishkin 2003.
2 The ethnic affiliation of the temple at Khirbet 'Atarus
('Atarot) should be addressed. If this is the town
mentioned in the Mesha inscription (lines 10–11) as
being part of the land of Gad and built by the king of
Israel, then it could be that the temple belonged to an
Israelite or Israelite-related population
1 A narrow cylindrical gap in the middle of Wall 4060 had remains of plaster. This was interpreted during the excavation as a channel conducting liquids from the room to the west into the installation. However, the parallels to the grinding installations in Area C are more convincing and we tend to reconstruct 4064 as such.
The earth’s magnetic field and its elements (after Ben-Yosef et al. 2008)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Schematic illustration of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied
to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov, Stratum C-1b (V)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2454
(eastern wall of Building CE, Square Y/4, looking east). The intense fire of Stratum C-1b is
indicated by the color of the mud bricks.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2411 (eastern
wall of Building CG, Square Y/3 looking west). The
strong tilt to the south is clearly visible.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Zijderveld diagrams (or vector end-point diagrams; see Tauxe 2010: 172)
of the AF demagnetization of samples from Tel Rehov
All samples, except C3 and C6, present one component stable magnetization.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Equal area projection (lower hemisphere) of measured
directions from Buildings CE (squares) and CG (diamonds). The mean direction is represented
by circles and is statistically the same for both buildings.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Equal area projection (lower hemisphere) of measured
directions from Buildings CE (squares) and CG (diamonds) after tilt correction.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
The architectural remains uncovered at Tel Rehov throughout the occupation history of the site (15th—8th centuries BCE) are dominated by mudbricks; during the Iron Age IIA (Strata VI-IV, 10th-9th centuries BCE), the brick walls typically lack stone foundations. In Stratum V of Iron IIA, wooden beams were used on a large-scale as foundations for the walls or were incorporated in the floor makeup. A destruction that involved intense fire was identified at the end of Stratum V (local Stratum C-1b) in the eastern and northern parts of Area C: Buildings CG, CH, CM, and CE (see Chapter 12), but not in other parts of the area. A later violent destruction of Stratum IV (local Stratum C-1a) was found across the entire site (Mazar 2003; 2008; Chapter 4 and various stratigraphic chapters).
1 The measurements were done with the help of R. Granot.
The case study presented in this paper belongs to the wider field of archaeomagnetism — the application of paleomagnetic methods in archaeology, which consists of various techniques. Some are aimed solely to reconstruct the geomagnetic field itself during archaeological times (e.g., Korte et al. 2011) and others, to answer archaeological questions, mostly by using archaeomagnetic data as a dating tool (e.g., Eighmy and Sternberg 1990; Lanos 2003; Pavon-Carrasco et al. 2011). The most typical recorders of the geomagnetic field in archaeological contexts are heat-impacted clayey materials (e.g., pottery, kilns and ovens, mudbricks and metallurgical installations). The full vector information of the geomagnetic field (declination, inclination and intensity; Fig. 54.1) might be retrieved by sampling materials found in their original cooling position. In addition to reconstructing the properties of the geomagnetic field, the experiments are designed to evaluate the reliability of the material as a geomagnetic recorder (Tauxe 2010); they also provide information regarding the thermal history of the samples.
The earth’s magnetic field and its elements (after Ben-Yosef et al. 2008)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Schematic illustration of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied
to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov, Stratum C-1b (V)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2454
(eastern wall of Building CE, Square Y/4, looking east). The intense fire of Stratum C-1b is
indicated by the color of the mud bricks.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2411 (eastern
wall of Building CG, Square Y/3 looking west). The
strong tilt to the south is clearly visible.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
2 The options that the fire occurred later than and independent of the earthquake (archaeomagnetically
indistinguishable from option 1), or that the fire caused the tilting (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable
from option 2) are much less likely and are not discussed here.
3 The mudbricks were too fragile for drilling, thus an alternative sampling method was improvised.
Both walls are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall of Building CE towards the north and the wall of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold.
AF demagnetization of eight of the ten samples from the two tilted mudbrick walls in Buildings CE and CG (Stratum V, C-1b) demonstrated stable, single-component magnetization, indicating a simple thermal history of only one major heating event. This result is an objective and conclusive confirmation of the field observation that both walls were subjected to the same intense fire.4 The directions retrieved from the samples indicate that the fire took place after or simultaneously with the tilting. We therefore argue that the simplest explanation for the destruction process of Stratum V is an earthquake that triggered an intense fire (option [1] above). The symmetric anticlinal structure observed in the deformed structures of both walls (~18° each flank), together with the discrete quality of the damage (destruction is observed only in certain locations in Area C), supports destruction by the on-fault effect of an earthquake, as classified by Rodríguez-Pascua et al. (2011: 22). Area C is located directly on a fault line (Zilberman, Chapter 2) and the deformation caused by the fault scarp is expressed by the tilting (folding); the ductile reaction of the structures (rather than brittle, e.g., Altunel 1998: Fig. 5), is most probably the result of the quality of building materials and construction techniques, including the use of wooden beams. Finally, the possibility that an earthquake occurred after and independently from the fire (option [2] above) is entirely excluded by the magnetic results (Fig. 54.2b).
4 The most common carrier of magnetic remanence in baked clay is magnetite; thus, most probably both walls were subjected
to at least 585°C, the temperature at which magnetite loses its permanent magnetization (Curie temperature).
5 At an earlier stage of the research, A. Mazar suggested attributing the destruction of Stratum V to the military campaign of
Pharaoh Shoshenq I to Canaan around 925 BCE (Mazar 2003: 317). This destruction date and its cause were challenged by
Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2003), who argued for a later date and rejected the destructive quality of Shoshenq I's campaign
to the region. Later excavation seasons since 2003 made it clear that the violent destruction of Stratum V occurred only
in a certain part of Area C, and this result led to the reevaluation of the previous conclusions (see Chapters 4 and 12).
If, indeed, an earthquake was the cause of the partial destruction of Stratum V in Area C, it excludes the possibility
that the destruction was caused by the campaign of Shoshenq I.
A thick mudbrick collapse, with many whole bricks, was found above the floor, although there was no evidence of fire. This severe collapse may be evidence of an earthquake. Another hint of seismic activity is a split or seam in the northern wall of the hall, suggesting that the wall was torn into two.78They also stated
Stratum VI; the western wall was constructed above a wall of Stratum VII. The poor preservation of the walls, showing signs of brick slippage and cracks, indicate that the building might have been damaged by an earthquake.79The site is also known for its Iron Age buildings, without stone foundations, and instead often employ wood foundations and walls which are a common feature, especially in stratum V.80 Mazar is well known for his careful and well respected excavations and further study and excavation should clarify the damage that appears to be caused by an earthquake. A better understanding of the patterning of the brick fall and the types of cracks in the walls should help clarify the damage.81
78 Amihai Mazar, “The 1997-1998 Excavations at Tel Rehov: Preliminary Report,” IEJ 49 (1999): 1-42. In stratum C-1, Mazar, 21-22, suggested that charred timber could be the remains of seismic retrofitting,
A common feature of these rooms is the use of wooden logs or beams as a foundation for the walls and floors. The wood was sometimes found to have been laid in several superimposed and interspersed layers. Such wood was also found in the southern compartment room described above. All the beams were carbonised, and in the southern part of the area they were found tilted at a sharp angle down to the east (Fig. 10). The trees used for this construction were identified by Dr. U. Baruch (Israel Antiquities Authority) as belonging to various species, such as elm, olive, acacia, Judas tree, Syrian ash and mulberry. This type of wooden construction serving as a foundation for both mudbrick walls and clay and plaster floors is unusual, and unparalleled elsewhere in the Levant. It may have been intended to protect the building against earthquakes, which present a hazard in the Jordan Valley, or it could be the roof of a basement, still unexcavated.See also, the summary of the earthquake damage listed on the Tel Rehov project website
No evidence for violent destruction of this city was found, yet thick mud-brick debris, intact fallen bricks and cracks in the walls allude to destruction or severe damage caused by an earthquake.Herzog and Singer-Avitz, “Sub-dividing the Iron Age IIA,” 177.
- Amihai Mazar, “Tel Rehov Summary,” n.p. [Cited 18 March 2012]. Online link [JW: The link is broken. This website was taken down but parts of it have been archived on the wayback machine]
Period | Age | Site | Damage Description |
---|---|---|---|
Iron IIA | 1000-900 BCE | Rehov | thick mudbrick debris, intact fallen brick walls (Area C, Stratum VI) suggest an earthquake (Mazar 2008: 2015). Based on a preliminary paleomagnetic fold test, Ben-Yosef and Ron (2016: 4-7) suggested that the tilted wall (Area C, Stratum V) was the result of an earthquake. |
Relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts
Absolute dating based on radiometric data
Historical considerations
Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, 2020 v. 1:119 n. 20 noted the following
Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE)Finkelstein (2013:7)'s Table 1 is shown below:
heavy destructionand fire in
the central part of Area C. Archaeoseismic evidence on the site is fairly extensive and includes collapsed and tilted walls, fallen ceilings, broken pottery (some apparently found in fallen position), and debris. Although earlier papers ( Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar, 2003a; 2003b) suggested that the destruction layer was a result of Sheshonq I's invasion (around 925 BCE), a paleomagnetic study of two tilted mudbrick walls by Ben-Yosef and Ron in Chapter 54 of Volume V of the Final Report indicates that the walls tilted before a fire struck the site and not after. This is thought to eliminate the possibility that an earthquake tilted the walls well after an invasion force torched Area C. Thus, the fire was likely caused by an earthquake which is dated to the the late 10th until the early 9th century BCE.
1 Active Faults under Tel Rehov were identified and mapped based on seismic surveys (and presumably some aerial photos). This is discussed
in The Geology and Geophysics section of this web page which, in turn, comes from the Chapter 2 of the Final Excavation Report
(The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and
Tel Rehov by Zilberman in Mazar et. al., 2020 v. 1). The possibility that these active faults slipped during one of the Iron Age earthquakes
is discussed sporadically in the Final Report and
Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:187)
observed a tilt from west to east/southeast
in all strata at Tel Rehov
which may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity
during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures
.
Additional Note - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:186) observed
that the most severely damaged structures were located along a north-south axis running through the center
of Area C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’, as well as Stratum V buildings in other
excavation areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning.
However, in my site visit and examination of the Final Report
for Areas C, D, E, and G, it appears that there is archaeoseismic evidence for this event in Areas D and E and
it appears that the axis of deformation in Area C ran east-west - i.e. there was vertical uplift along an east west axis which could
coincide with some of the on-site active faults mapped by
Zilberman in Mazar et al. (2020 v. 1).
The term Iron IIA has been employed in different ways in the archaeology of Israel. G.E. Wright (1961: 97-99) used it to describe the period between 900-730/700 BCE, while he termed the 10th century BCE "Iron IC". Initially, Israeli archaeologists used the term to denote the 10th century BCE, equaling the time of the United Monarchy (e.g., Aharoni 1979 [first published in Hebrew in 1963] and in subsequent editions; NEAEHL: 1529; Mazar 1990: 30) and this terminology was widely accepted (e.g., King and Stager 2001: XXIII). According to this system, the 9th century BCE was included in the Iron IIB, together with the 8th century. Finkelstein (1996) and Sharon et al. (2007) suggested to lower the transition from Iron I/Iron IIA to the late 10th century BCE (see above) and dated the Iron IIA to the 9th century BCE. I suggested a Modified Conventional Chronology, which broadly accepted the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century, based on the finds from Jezreel and Tel Rehov, yet I claimed that the period began well in the 10th century (Coldstream and Mazar 2003: 40-45; Mazar 2005). Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006; 2011) accepted this chronological framework, but went one step further by suggesting a division of the Iron IIA into two sub-periods: Early Iron IIA and Late Iron IIA, the former dated to the 10th century and the latter to the 9th. This suggestion is now accepted by many archaeologists in Israel, although the details of absolute dating of each phase remain unresolved. In this publication, we refer to Iron Age IIA as a period starting sometime during the first half of the 10th century BCE (ca. 980 BCE?) and ending during the second half of the 9th century, probably following severe destructions caused by Aramean conquests led by Hazael (see below for a detailed chronological and historical discussion).
The Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov are characterized by several architectural features which are unknown elsewhere in Israel (see discussion at the end of Chapter 12). The first is the virtually exclusive use of mudbricks as building material. Stones were used only in exceptional places for constructing cobblestone floors and installations (as in Area F: Fig. 19.4, Photo 19.6), pillar bases (rarely; e.g., Area C, Building CX) and working surfaces.
8 During a visit to the site by Prof. D. Yankelevsky and other experts from the National Building Research Institute of the Technion, Haifa, this explanation was accepted as the most reasonable. They mentioned the current use of steel rolls in foundations of highly sensitive structures, such as nuclear reactors, as a device providing flexibility in the event of an earthquake.
The dates of the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov, as well as the other sites, depend upon a combination of relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts, and absolute dating based on radiometric data combined with historical considerations. In this section, the first two issues are discussed, while historical considerations will be surveyed in the following section.
As explained above, there are two Iron IIA ceramic horizons at Tel Rehov:
20 Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE) suggested by him for the end of this period. It seems that the motivation behind this suggestion is to justify the idea that Hazor Stratum VIII was an Aramean city built by Hazael, yet I see no reason to refute the excavators' attribution of Stratum VIII to the days of Ahab.
The absolute chronology of the Iron IIA strata is a subject of ongoing debate, based on radiometric dates and historical considerations, although it seems that by now, agreement has been reached on some major issues. The original Low Chronology date of the beginning of Iron IIA strata to ca. 900 BCE proved to be wrong, based on radiocarbon dating. On the other hand, the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century is certainly correct, as it is anchored in the evidence from Jezreel, where the royal enclosure cannot predate Ahab [r. c. 871 - c. 852 BCE]. According to the modified chronology which I have suggested since 2003, Iron IIA started during the first half of the 10th century BCE and continued until sometime in the second half of the 9th century (Table 4.3). This approach was basically backed up by numerous radiocarbon dates, although there are different views concerning the precise time span and absolute dates of each of the two Iron IIA phases (for summaries and earlier literature, see Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011b).
I am convinced that 14C is the most wonderful tool for archaeology, when its inherent uncertainty is properly respected. Unfortunately, pushing its use beyond these limitations puts "oil into the fire" of those who mistrust the 14C method altogether .....23These words are very true when we deal with Iron Age chronology, particularly in the 10th-9th centuries BCE.
21 As mentioned above, Samples R31-R34 from Locus 2425 in Building CG
are excluded from this discussion, although it seems more viable
that this context should be attributed to Stratum V. See discussion in Chapter 48.
22 Note that Tofollo et al. 2014 omit sample 3949 in their tables. It does appear,
however in Gilboa, Sharon and Boaretto 2013.
23 Sent to me via an e-mail correspondence in 2008.
In the following, I will survey some of the historical questions related to the 10th-9th centuries BCE that are relevant for the results of the Tel Rehov excavations (see also Mazar 2016a). It should be recalled that the city is mentioned in only one written source from these centuries: the Sheshonq I list (see Chapter 3). In this section, I will use the assumed ancient name Rehob.
Who were the people who inhabited the large and opulent city of Rehob and what was its geo-political status in Iron Age IIA?
What was the geo-political status of Rehob and its vicinity (including Beth-Shean) in the 10th century BCE? The question of the historicity of the biblical concept of a United Monarchy during the 10th century BCE is one of the most debated issues regarding biblical history during the last generation, and this is not the place for a detailed discussion of this issue. Some scholars maintain the biblical concept as valid (e.g., Millard and Dever in Handy 1997; Ben-Tor 2000; Stager 2003; Dietrich 2007; Blum 2010; Faust 2010; Lemaire 2010), while many others either negate the historicity of such a kingdom altogether or diminish its territory to Jerusalem and its close vicinity (e.g., Finkelstein 1996,2010 and many other publications; Na'aman, Knauf, Niemann, Lemche in Handy 1997; Grabbe 2007: 111-115; Frevel 2016: 108-148; Garfinkel, Kreimerman and Zilberg 2016: 225-232; Sergi 2017; for a recent survey and earlier literature, see Na'aman 2019). Still others attempt to find middle ground (e.g., Miller in Handy 1997).
Rehob, in Sheshonq I's list mentioned aside Beth-Shean, can safely be identified with Tel Rehov (Chapter 3). The precise date of the raid is unknown and depends on two debated factors: the accession year of Sheshonq I and the time of the raid within his 21-year reign. The accession year is calculated by most scholars to ca. 945/940 BCE (e.g., Kitchen 2000: 50; Shortland 2005); a lower date ca. 934/929 was suggested by Ben-Dor Evian (2011), who also suggested that the raid occurred early in his reign, while most other scholars attribute it to the last years of his reign. All in all, the raid probably occurred between ca. 930 and 915 BCE.24 Assessments of the impact of Sheshonq's raid vary (Helck 1971: 240; Na'aman 1998; 2007: 404-405; Rainey and Notley 2006: 186; Finkelstein 2013: 41-48). Traditionally, scholars tended to attribute destruction layers to this raid, assuming that the Egyptian army destroyed the places mentioned in the Karnak list. However, as first suggested by Na'aman, this assumption should not be taken for granted and it must be taken into account that toponyms are mentioned in the list just because they surrendered to the Egyptian army during the raid or since the Egyptian army passed through them or ruled them for a while without causing destruction. The inclusion of a toponym in this list means only that the place existed during Sheshonq's raid and was known to the Egyptians.
24 The date ca. 915 BCE would fit the accession date as suggested by Ben-Dor Evian and the attribution of the raid to the late years of Sheshonq as suggested by most scholars; however, the precise date of the raid remains unknown.
The question when did Rehob become part of the northern Kingdom of Israel is somewhat controversial (Mazar 2016a: 98-100). Arie (2017: 14-15) emphasized the unique components at Tel Rehov and its dissimilarity to what he termed "regular" Israelite traits, and suggested that Rehob was a local Canaanite city-state until the end of Stratum V and was annexed to Israel only in Stratum IV, during the Omride era [~876-~842 BCE] and after the foundation of Jezreel.25 Finkelstein went even further and suggested that both Strata V and IV were non-Israelite, Rehob being a local "late-Canaanean city state at the southwestern edge of the Aramean culture sphere of influence" (2017: 181; for an earlier version, see 2013: 120-122). Based on a Bayesian model of 14C dates published before 2005, he dated the destruction of Stratum IV between 875-849 CalBC and suggested that both Strata V and IV were destroyed by Omride assaults. In my view, both these suggestions are unacceptable. Arie's distinction between Strata V and IV as pre-Israelite versus Israelite contradicts the identical material culture in both these strata. As said, the destruction at the end of Stratum V is limited to part of Area C, while in all the other excavated areas, no such destruction was observed and the city of Stratum V appears to have been continuously developed with some architectural changes in the following Stratum IV. In fact, these two strata comprise two phases in the life of the same city. Finkelstein's statement that "the material culture of Tel Rehov differs from that of the Israelite centers in the Jezreel Valley - for instance Megiddo - in almost every respect" (2017: 180) cannot be accepted. Although there are exceptional traits in the local material culture of Tel Rehov compared to other Israelite sites (such as the building techniques and house plans) there are also many similarities, for example, in the pottery assemblage (cf., Tell el-Far'ah North, Jezreel, Megiddo and Horbat Rosh Zayit), clay figurines, seals, pottery altars ("cult stands"), and other material-culture components. In addition, similarity to Megiddo can be found in the fact that both cities lacked a city wall in Iron IIA and in the resemblance between Building CF at Tel Rehov and Building 2081 at Megiddo, as explained above. In contrast to Finkelstein, I cannot discern any Aramean components at Tel Rehov. The claim that such components exist in the inscriptions is unfounded, except perhaps in the case of the component sqy in inscription No. 5 (Chapter 29A). In my view, both Strata V and IV represent a city that was under the hegemony of the northern Kingdom of Israel right from its inception.
The appearance of the name nms (Nimshi) in two inscriptions from Tel Rehov, in both Strata V and IV, as well as on a jar from Tel 'Amal, led me to suggest that the prosperous Iron Age IIA city Rehob was the hometown of the Nimshi family (Mazar 2016a: 110). This was perhaps a strong and powerful family or clan who might have owned a large portion of the city's resources, including the apiary of Stratum V, in which one of the jars with this family name was found. Perhaps this was one of the indigenous families, rooted in the local Canaanite population, as described above. Nimshi is mentioned in the Bible as the father or grandfather of Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], whose rise to power brought about the fall of the Omride dynasty in 842 BCE (1 Kgs 19:16; 2 Kgs 9:2, 14, 20). Thus Jehu must have belonged to the Nimshi family, and perhaps he was born and raised at Rehob. His coup and the establishment of a new dynasty which ruled northern Israel for almost 100 years may be understood as a shift of power in the kingdom from the Omride dynasty which originated in the Samaria hills to the local descendants of Canaanite families in the northern valleys.
26 In addition to the views expressed in Chapter 29A, I should note the Ph.D.
dissertation by H.D.D. Parker (2018) which reached me after the completion of
Chapter 29A. She rejects our reading and reads the second letter as cayin rather
than lamed (p. 191). However, this letter is open on its upper part, unlike the
cayin at the end of the name, and probably had an extension beyond the fragment
line, as explained in Chapter 29A. The reading cayin would make no sense.
27 See for example Ghantous (2013) who views the redaction of the Elisha-Elijah
stories as having taken place in the 4th century BCE, but, unlike the Elijah
stories that he considers late (i.e., 5th century BCE), "the Elisha tradition...
originated in the eighth century and continued to evolve independently until
the fifth century BCE" (p. 128).
28 Miller and Hayes (1986: 290) suggested that the stories relating to the
early years of Elisha (2 Kg 2, 4:1-8:15) should be attributed to Jehu's reign
rather than to that of Ahab and Jehoram, as the Bible puts it.
The destruction of Stratum IV marks a dramatic point in the history of the city. Evidence for fierce fire and severe devastation was found in all the excavation areas. People left their belongings in the houses and probably fled, or were deported, or slaughtered. In one case, a human skeleton may be attributed to this destruction layer in Area C (Chapter 46B). Following the destruction, the lower city was abandoned and only the upper mound was resettled in the following Iron IIB. It appears that this destruction resulted from a military conquest rather than an earthquake, though no direct evidence such as multiple arrowheads or sling stones were detected. The date of the destruction and the identity of the conqueror can be suggested on the basis of three parameters: pottery typology, historical considerations and radiocarbon dates.
This was a rectangular building in Squares S–T/3–4
(external measurements 5.2×6.2 m). All of its walls
were composed of hard yellow bricks and were
very well preserved to a height of more than 1.0 m.
No entrance to this building was located, suggesting that it had been entered from above. Its plan
consisted of two small rooms on the west and
two somewhat larger rooms on the east, and it
might have served a storage function. It was constructed above a thin layer of fill (8408) that served
to level the remains of Stratum C-3a Building CS
below it.
The northern wall (4438) was preserved nine
courses high on the west, but much less on the east,
so much so that it was not clear whether there had
been an entranceway here or whether the bricks
were missing due to damage. Stratum C-1b Walls
1464 and 1524 superimposed it, but there was no
C-3 wall below it; Wall 8503 adjoined it on the
north. The western wall (4440), constructed right
on top of Wall 8418 of Stratum C-3a (Photos 12.12–
12.13), was preserved 11–12 courses high; its width
was unknown, since C-1b Wall 1523 covered its
western face. The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not
known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo
12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses
high and was poorly preserved, especially on the
northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that
the main damage to the building, whatever the
cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the
northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6
m, although a thickening identified in its lower
courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m.
There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern
wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems
that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of
the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role
during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).
The two eastern rooms were similar to each
other in size, as were the two western rooms. Their
internal measurements were: Room 4429 in the
northeast (2.0×2.4 m; 4.8 sq m), Room 4420 in the
southeast (1.9×2.0 m; 3.8 sq m), Room 4426 in the
southwest (1.3×2.0 m; 2.6 sq m) (Photo 12.29), and
Room 4409 in the northwest (1.1×2.0 m; 2.2 sq m);
the total floor space of this building was only 13.4
sq m. Two intersecting inner partition walls separated these rooms: east–west Wall 2509 and north–
south Wall 2493, with its northern continuation,
4407. An entranceway in the eastern end of Wall
2509 joined the two eastern rooms, while an
opening in Wall 2509, just to the west of its corner
with Wall 2493, joined the two western rooms.
However, it seems that at some point, this latter
opening was blocked, as a brick course spanned its
top. No entrance was found in Walls 2493 or 4407,
leaving the eastern and western chambers inaccessible from each other; it is possible that the rooms
were entered from above. Their small size, and the
fact that some grain was found in the southwestern
room, indicate the possibility that they were used
for grain storage.
The rooms were found full of complete fallen
yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash,
and brown soil. There were relatively few finds,
mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs.
13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact
bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt
grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426
(Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C
analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18),
yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ)
CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in
Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were
made of beaten earth and for the most part, their
level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible
makeup.
The nature and function of this building
remained unclear. There was no evidence for
domestic activity or storage, such as cooking
facilities, installations or storage jars. Perhaps it
was related to grain storage, possibly with some
administrative function. To some extent, this
building recalls the eastern part of Building 200 in
Hazor Strata X–IX (Hazor III–IV: Plans VIII–X),
which was also comprised of a series of small
chambers.
A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining
the southern part of the eastern wall of Building
CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3
m and was composed of the same hard yellow
bricks as the other walls in this building, although
here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were
laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved
on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses
of its eastern face protruding; this might have been
the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).
The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was
not certain; it abutted the southern half of the
poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA
(4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated
abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where
it was abutted by an open area in which cooking
and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and
C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a
retainer built to buttress the southern part of the
eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum
C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the
southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the
northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building
CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b
Building CD, terminated just at the point where the
northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting
that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern
closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b
(Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:
The major component of Building CB was a large,
roughly rectangular space which underwent minor
changes during the course of its existence (Figs.
12.9–12.10; Photo 12.30). This large room (1520)
was perhaps a major living room or reception hall
in a larger architectural complex, which continued
to the east and perhaps, south.
The external measurements of this hall were
5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its
walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the
northern wall) were constructed directly on top of
the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3
Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall
was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG
(Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were:
1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses;
Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved
to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east
(preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located
at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture
with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this
building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall,
preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate
numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which
was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo
12.35); the western half was designated 1442 and
the eastern half, 1483. An entrance in Wall 1483
was located 1.0 m to the west of its corner with Wall
2505. An intact oil lamp with soot on its nozzle was
found in a niche in the eastern door jamb, one
course below the top (Photo 12.36). This entrance
led to the north, where an open area with cooking
facilities was found in Squares T/3-4, although note
that this opening was partially blocked on the north
by Wall 1506, probably during a later phase of
Stratum C-2, as described above. Wall 1483 continued to the east past its corner with Wall 2505 into
Squares T–Y/3, where it was designated Wall 2481
(Photo 12.38). All four walls of Room 1520 were
composed of hard yellow bricks, although note the
gray bricks of the earlier C-3 wall incorporated into
the lower courses of Wall 1470, as described above;
several dark brown bricks joined these gray bricks
in what might be a repair in the center of this wall
(Photo 12.34).
The two entrances that accessed this hall from
the east and the north were used concurrently. Both
were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is
clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact
(Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the
top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was
subjected to some damage, particularly on its
western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was
built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).
The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash
layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from
84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474,
2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these
striations represented the accumulation of floors in
this hall, although it was difficult to separate these
thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels
might have been a fill. Some layers contained large
patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes,
such as one long, rope-like configuration found
lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just
above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers,
most of which were sherds or fragments of small
vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots,
kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs.
13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking
facilities were found here.
A large, roughly squared mizi limestone
(0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south
of the entranceway in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35,
12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently
from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end
higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we
assume that the smooth bottom side had originally
been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in
this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers
were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position
of this large stone in front of the entranceway in
Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this
was not its original position and that it had tumbled
over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and
served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location
during the assumed earthquake that terminated this
occupation phase.
Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5
m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks
(1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were
identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a
sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and
other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the
end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake,
either during the time it was still in use or some
time after the building was abandoned.
Although it was considered that this room
could have been a basement, this possibility was
ruled out since there was no constructed element
above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran
beneath the later Building CG
Excavation to the east of Wall 2505 exposed its
eastern face with the entranceway. The top of the
wall had been damaged and leveled when the
wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was
built (Photos 12.32–12.33), protruding 0.45 m to
the east of the face of Wall 2505. The top of a
yellow brick wall (4503) that cornered with Wall
2505 was revealed 1.0 m to the north of the
entranceway; its eastern continuation was cut by
the foundations of Building CG and only its
southern face could be seen, as Wall 2429 of
Stratum C-1b was built above it. This wall was preserved much lower than Wall 2505 due to the
damage caused when the deep and massive wooden
and brick foundations of Building CG were laid
(see below). Thus, the only possible Stratum C-2
debris that could be isolated here was Locus 4500
to the south of Wall 4503.
Some 1.4 m to the north of Wall 4503 was Wall
2481, the eastern continuation of Wall 1442/1483,
which was revealed in a small probe under the floor
of Building CG (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38). The
eastern part of a north–south wall (5476) was
exposed 2.5 m to the east of Wall 2505, directly
under the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall
2411 (Photo 12.39), which had cut the top of Wall
5476 in a step-like manner, descending from north
to south, so that it was preserved five courses high
on the north and only two on the south. This
appears to have been the eastern closing wall of a
room bordered by Walls 2481 on the north, 2505 on
the west, and 4503 on the south. A small area was
excavated in this room (2469), although a floor was
not reached (Figs. 12.77, 12.79). Still another
north–south wall (5491) abutted Wall 5476 on the
east, on the level of its lowest course (85.25 m);
only one brick course of this wall was preserved,
with an offset that protruded 0.35 m to the east,
located just about on the same line as Wall 2481 to
its west (Photo 12.39). Wall 5491 might have been
a bench attached to Wall 5476 or a poorly preserved
part of the unit uncovered in Squares Y/3–4 (see
below).
Abutting the eastern face of Wall 5491 was a
beaten-earth floor (5494; Fig. 12.79) that was bordered
on the south by an east–west row of four flattopped stones, which may have been pillar bases
(Photo 12.21). The floor and the stones were laid
directly above Stratum C-3 Room 9441. All other
remains of Stratum C-2 to the south of these stones
were obliterated when Building CH and the apiary
were constructed in Stratum C-1b. The northern
border of this activity remained unknown, since it
was covered by later Stratum C-2 architecture,
described below.
Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 was founded in Stratum C-2 and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Strata C-1b and C-1a. This is one of the few instances where more or less the same building continued in all three main strata. The unit was composed of a broad room on the south and rooms or open spaces, to its north (Fig. 12.12); the relationship between the two components was not clear, due to the partial exposure.
Three walls of this room, preserved to a height of
0.7–1.25 m and built of the typical hard yellow
bricks of Stratum C-2, were revealed in Squares T–
Y/4, directly below the later walls: 6441 on the
east, 6460 on the south, and 6504 on the north
(Photos 12.40–12.41). The western part of the room
remained unexcavated and it seems that the
entrance to the room had been on this side. An
interesting feature of the eastern wall (6441) was
the damage wrought by the builders of C-1b when
they set the wooden foundations for their wall
(2454) above it; they cut back the western face and
the top of the earlier wall, whose original face protruded some 0.2 m to the west, three courses below
the cut (Photo 12.40). In the corner of the southern
and eastern walls was an offset that protruded 0.3 m
into the room (Photo 12.42).
A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443)
that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray
ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls
(Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b
Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504)
was floating above this floor, although a protruding
course of bricks found just about on level with
Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this
wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation
of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded
a layer of sandy material with some brick debris
(6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460.
Three spaces were attributed to this building in
Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between
them was found, due to overlying elements that
remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43).
Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.
The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5
was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1
Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east–
west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The
area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of
debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).
The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square
Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433)
and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south)
and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall
6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship
between these walls. At some later stage, east–west
Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added,
dividing the space into two; in the north were the
upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall
was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear
whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later
phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).
Part of a finely constructed building was excavated
in the northeastern corner of Area C, in Squares A–
C/5–6. It continued to the north, beyond the limit of
the excavation area. Building CY covered a
Stratum C-3 stone floor and installation (Fig. 12.6)
and was sealed by Strata C-1a–b Building CW.
The external measurements of the building
were 10.2 m from east to west and at least 6.3 m
from north to south. It contained a central space,
most probably a courtyard (7512), flanked on the
west and east by rooms; the two southern rooms
were exactly symmetric, but the northernmost
room on the east differed from its equivalent on the
west. The main entrance to the building was probably in the
unexcavated area to the north and perhaps led directly into the central space.
The western wall (8457), preserved 1.0 m high,
was superimposed by Wall 6408 of Strata C-1a–b.
Its entire eastern face was exposed, and also the
northern part of its western face, which served as
the border of the assumed entrance corridor leading
to Building CU; its southern part ran parallel to
Wall 6520, the eastern wall of that building. The
southern wall (7511), preserved 0.7 m high, was
known only on its northern face, since it was
covered by Wall 6444 of Building CW in Strata
C-1a–b (Figs. 12.34, 12.56) which was not dismantled. The wooden beams in the foundation of Wall
6444 were laid directly on top of Wall 7511 (Photos
12.22, 12.59–12.61). Wall 7511 was preserved at a
tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly
the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of
this wall was built of segments, with two vertical
seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a
mode of construction which might have been aimed
at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake.
Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which
closed the building on the east.
The central courtyard was 3.1 m wide and at least
5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig.
12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505)
resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level
85.15–85.25 m. In the debris was a relatively large
amount of red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well
as red-painted pottery (Figs. 13.34–13.37) and
sherds of a Late Philistine Decorated Ware (Ashdod
Ware) vessel (Fig. 13.37:8). Two clay figurine fragments, one a human head and the other a horse head
(Chapter 34, Nos. 22, 35), were found together in
the eastern part of the space, to the north of Oven
8461. Near the figurines were two sherds with letters, one with an ayin and a yod in ink, and the other
with an incised lamed (Fig. 13.37:2–3; Ahituv and
Mazar 2014: 40–42; Chapter 29A, Nos. 1, 3). Elements on Floor 7512 included:
Room 6506, the southern room, was bordered by
Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506
on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the
floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern
end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square
(2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellowearth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of
fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount
of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This
room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1
Building CW.
Room 8470, the northern room, was bordered
on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the
northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the
northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was
beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly
like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had
a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner,
leading from the central courtyard. A smooth
yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16
m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three
nicely worked limestones were set in a row along
Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones
along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of
dark organic material, similar to that in the southern
room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW
(Fig. 12.55).
Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room
6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered
by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458
on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide
entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway
into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m,
was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the
tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14;
Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not
proceed down below the floor, it seems that this
was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that
under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer
above the floor (8466) included complete fallen
yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much
pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34–
13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones,
including horns.
North of Room 8488 was a narrow space
(8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls
8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the
eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by
bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that
made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479
impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b
Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space
was what looked like an intentional blockage on its
western end that was composed of three parts
(Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide),
spanning the entrance from the central space, and
preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second
component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was
not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks
laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m
to their east was yet another apparent blockage
(8485), although it was more typical of a regularly
built wall in width, preserved five to six courses
high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide.
None of these rows of bricks bonded with either
Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the
south. No clear floor level was identified in this
narrow space, although it was excavated down to
the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of
the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material
(phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern
face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this
narrow space was a staircase leading to a second
story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the
foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation
is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.
To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two
walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued
to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west.
The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow
row of bricks, identical to the westernmost
blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor
(8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just
inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds
and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the
floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was
located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the
outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined
Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the
continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper
story.
We have no way of knowing to what extent
Building CY continued to the north. One possibility
is that the northern outer wall was close to the excavation limit; in that case, the building had a central
courtyard flanked by two rooms on the west and
two rooms on the east. Another possibility is that
the building was much larger and included additional rooms on each side of the courtyard. In any
event, the entrance would have been from the north
directly into the central courtyard. The flat stones
along the walls of the courtyard and the narrow corridor or staircase (8479) are exceptional features in
the Iron IIA architecture at Tel Rehov.
Building CY is one of the few examples in Iron
Age IIA Tel Rehov of a courtyard house. The plan
is somewhat similar to that of Building CZ in
Squares A–C/2–3, 10 m to the south, assigned to
Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.48). It recalls, to some
extent, Iron Age II houses known from Hazor Area
B (next to the citadel), Samaria and Megiddo. Such
structures were explained by Yeivin, followed by
Herzog, as representing officials’ houses, and were
dubbed “scribes’ chambers” (Herzog 1992: 229–
230, with references)
In Square R/4, above C-2 Room 1555, two main phases were attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a; the latter was the clearest and best preserved, found just below topsoil and containing destruction debris and restorable vessels on a floor. Traces of additional narrow brick walls and restorable pottery revealed in the topsoil to the north and south of Square R/4, and in Square Q/4 of Area D, indicated that domestic occupation in the Iron Age IIA reached the western perimeter of the tell, with no evidence for any fortification wall.
Several phases of construction were found in this
room (Fig. 12.24).
The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b was 1557,
which continued the northern line of Wall 1413 that
ran the entire length of Area C on the west (see
details below); it seems that Wall 1557 was not
used in Stratum C-1a. Parallel to it and 3.1 m to its
west was Wall 1563, which apparently continued to
be in use from Stratum C-2. In the initial phase of
Stratum C-1b, a pink plaster floor (4483) passed
below Walls 2416 and 4457, and possibly related to
Wall 1557 on the east. At this stage, Wall 1568,
which abutted the southern continuation of Wall
1557, was most probably the southern wall of the
room, while its northern wall was beyond the excavation area. In a later phase of C-1b, Wall 2416 was
built against the western face of Wall 1557; on the
south, it abutted Wall 1568. In the center of the
room, a narrow north–south wall (4457; Photo
12.64), preserved only one course high, made a
corner on the south with Wall 4458, which was first
built in Stratum C-2 (see above, Room 1555). In
Stratum C-1b, its eastern part was covered by Floor
4483; a small round posthole was found on the
northeastern end of this floor. The addition of Wall
4457 formed a narrow space (0.9 m wide) on the
western side of the room. While Floor 4483 ran
below the secondary walls (2416, 4457), the occupation debris above the floor abutted these walls.
To the west of Wall 4457, Floor 4488, made of
plaster with a layer of striations above it, penetrated
below Wall 4457. In the second phase, a higher
floor (4464) was laid, 0.1 m above the latter, abutting Walls 4457 and 4458. To this same phase, and
perhaps to the same building, we attributed several
walls surrounding a courtyard with ovens found in
Square Q/4, which was part of Area D (Chapter 15;
see also Fig. 12.24). The density of construction
and layers points to the intensive activity in this
area on the cusp of the mound during the course of
Stratum C-1b.
A new room was built above the C-1b remains in
this square, reusing Wall 2416 and adding new
walls on the south (2423), west (1554) and north
(1552) (Fig. 12.25). Wall 1558 was a short segment
that seemed to corner with Wall 1552; perhaps it
was the original western wall of the room that was
removed at one point and replaced by Wall 1554,
slightly to the west. A concentration of stones
(2450), some of which were grinding stone
fragments, was found in the southwestern corner of
the square. These might have been part of a pavement which had continued to the west, but was
eroded down the slope. A north–south row of
three stones, running along the western face of
Wall 1554, may have belonged to a room in Square
Q/4 (Area D), bounded by Walls 1816 and 1808
(Figs. 12.19, 12.25). This space, poorly preserved
due to the severe erosion on the slope of the mound,
may have belonged to the same building as Room
2442.
Inside the room was a 0.4 m-deep layer of burnt
destruction debris (2405) on a beaten-earth floor
(2442, 87.56 m); part of this floor was a rectangular
patch of hard plaster (2438) which abutted the
northern face of Wall 2423 (Photo 12.65). It sloped
slightly down to the north (0.18 m over 1.2 m) and
might have served for some liquid-related activity;
this plaster had been repaired with a whitish lime
substance at one time during its use. In the burnt
debris was an assemblage of restorable vessels
(Figs. 13.68–13.70). One sherd of an imported
Greek bowl was found as well (Fig. 13.70:22; see
Chapter 28A). The smaller vessels in this room
were found just below topsoil, in a layer above two
parallel rows of storage jars that rested directly on
the floor, one running along Wall 2416 and the
other near Wall 1554 on the west. Most of the jars
were fallen with their rims to the north; under several of the jars was a burnt patch with phytolith,
suggesting that they had been set on some organic
material, such as reed mats or wood.
Above the elements attributed to Stratum C-2 to the
north of Building CA in Squares R–S/4 was the
southern end of a room or a courtyard located in
front of Building CD (Fig. 12.24). Although not
well preserved, a gap in its southern wall (1524)
was probably an entrance, on line with the entrance
to Building CD, thus linking the two units. Wall
1524 was built on top of a thin fill laid on Stratum
C-2 Wall 8503; it ran flush against Wall 1464 of
Building CD, creating a wide double wall (Fig.
12.66). The western end of Wall 1524 continued
westward to abut (but not to join) the eastern face of
Wall 2416, and was abutted on the north by Wall
1557. Several bricks with two marginal bosses on
each end were incorporated in Wall 1524. Such protrusions must have been part of the brick mold and
their function might have been to improve the grip
of the mud plaster that covered the walls. Alternatively, it could have been intended as a decorative
element, as no traces of plaster were found. Bricks
with similar protrusions were also found in walls of
Stratum C-1b in Buildings CE and CF (see below).
On the east, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 2501,
although this corner was disturbed. On the west,
Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 1557, the northern
end of long backbone Wall 1413. All three walls
were abutted by occupation debris (1512) and a
floor (2494, 86.75 m), which contained an oven
(2496) and a stone basin in the northern balk
(unnumbered). The floor (4491) in the western part
of this space was set on a bedding of small stones
that raised it slightly higher than the floor level to
the east.
No architecture that could be attributed to
Stratum C-1a was found here and the same loose
debris, possibly a disturbance, that covered
Building CD, also covered these remains (Fig.
12.25).
This building in Squares S/3–4 (Fig. 12.24; Photo
12.2) was, in fact, a renovation of Stratum C-2
Building CA. The outer walls were rebuilt along
the same lines, but the inner division was canceled,
thus creating a large, roughly rectangular space; the
external measurements were 5.0×6.2 m and the
floor space, ca. 20 sq m.
All the outer walls of C-2 Building CA were
rebuilt with a new type of brick made of light gray,
dark gray and light brown clay. The demarcation
between the previous walls and the rebuild was
very clear and a distinct line of a fill or repair was
visible, especially in the northern, eastern and
southern walls (Figs. 12.65–12.67; Photos 12.28,
12.66). This was a layer of light brownish-gray clay
(similar to the brick material) that was packed
down on top of the damaged C-2 walls, leveling
them in preparation for the rebuild.
On the north, Wall 1464 replaced C-2 Wall
4438; the entrance into the new building was now
located nearer to the center of the northern wall,
through an opening in the double wall (1524/1464).
Wall 1464 was deliberately cut on its western end,
as can be seen in the western balk of Square S/4
(Fig. 12.66). On the west, Wall 1523 replaced C-2
Wall 4440 (Fig. 12.67); it was poorly preserved and
tilted severely towards the east, especially in its
northern part. This wall ran along the eastern face
of Wall 1413, with the latter continuing further to
the south and north to enclose additional units. On
the south, Wall 1448 replaced C-2 Wall 4439; the
repair line between the two walls was clearest here
(Photo 12.28). On the east, Wall 2495 replaced C-2
Wall 4434 (Fig. 12.66; Photo 12.66); however, the
former was traced only in Square S/4 and did not
continue to the south. This may be due to its state of
preservation or, as suggested above, Wall 1506,
possibly built at the end of Stratum C-2 as a buttress
for the damaged eastern wall of Building CA, continued in Stratum C-1b as the southeastern wall of
Building CD (Fig. 12.68). As noted above, it is possible that Wall 1506 had been first built in Stratum
C-1b, although this seems less likely. This rather
makeshift arrangement would have lent a slipshod
look to this part of the building, which contrasts
with the otherwise well-built walls. The eastern
side of Building CD was less well preserved, just
like in its predecessor, Building CA.
The inner division of the previous Building CA
was cancelled. The inner walls were deliberately
removed, so that five to six cut courses were
detected close to their juncture with the external
walls of the building: Wall 2509 of the previous
building was cut 0.35 m to the east of its corner
with Wall 4440 and Wall 2493 was cut 0.15 m to the
north of its corner with Wall 4439 (Photo 12.28).
The reason for the deliberate razing of these inner
partition walls was not clear; perhaps they were in
such a poor state of preservation following the
destruction of Building CA that they required
removal before the leveling and rebuilding could
take place.3 Indeed, below the lowest floor of
Building CD were layers of brick debris interspersed with layers of red clay and ashy gray
striations, which might be understood as a fill
(2491 in Square S/4, 2485 in Square S/3) laid on top
of the previous building, serving to level off the
razed walls. These layers yielded sherds and partial
vessels, including red-slipped and hand-burnished
bowls and jugs (Fig. 13.41).
On top of this debris/fill were successive occupation layers, with a total thickness of 0.6–0.8 m,
rich in sherds and bones: 2486, 1485 and 1466 in
Square S/4, and 1474 in Square S/3. While these
layers were stratified, it was difficult to clearly
identify a floor. Two flat-topped stones were found
near the northeastern and northwestern corners of
the building, relating to Locus 2486. Their function
was not clear, as they were too close to the wall to
have served as pillar bases, recalling the stones
along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 (see
discussion above).
The only internal construction in the new
building was a row of crumbly gray bricks (0.5–0.6
m wide) added along the northern face of Wall
1448, covering the cut southern end of Stratum C-2
Wall 2493. This element (2484) was preserved 0.4–
0.6 m high and 3.4 m long; it might have been a
bench along Wall 1448.
The end of Building CD was not violent and no
traces of sudden destruction were found. The
building was not renovated in Stratum C-1a, when
its southern part was covered by the northern end of
Piazza CK and its northern part was covered by a
layer of loose debris (1412, 1417) that appeared to
have been a disturbance of some sort.
In Stratum C-1a, Building CD went out of use and a
large open area, denoted Piazza CK, replaced it
(Squares S–T/2–3). This courtyard included the
open area to the south of Building CD, as well as
the cooking area described above. It was bordered
on the south by Wall 1437 (the northern wall of
Building CJ) and an additional stub of a wall
(1415), on the east by Wall 1416 (the western wall
of Building CG), and on the west by Wall 1413 (the
long backbone wall running along the entire area).
On the northeastern end of this space was a short
wall (1457) that seemed to be a continuation of the
northern wall of Building CG; it was preserved
only one course high and ended abruptly after 2.0
m, on line with Wall 1415 on the south. It is possible that these were stubs of walls that had been
dismantled or otherwise damaged. Thus, the width
of Piazza CK ranged from 7.0 m on the south to 8.0
m on the north, and its length was at least 13 m, as
the northern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. The total area was at least 97 sq m,
making this one of the largest open areas in all
strata in Area C, which was, for the most part,
densely built up. Access into the piazza must have
been from the north.
In the enclosure formed by these walls, the
northwestern quadrant (Square S/4) contained a
layer of soft earth and eroded brick debris (1417,
1412, 1439) that might have been a late disturbance, while in the rest of the area, very burnt and
vitrified brick debris resting on a hard-packed
white floor (1418, 1422, 1428) was revealed under
topsoil (Figs. 12.65, 12.69). Running through the
center of this courtyard on a north–south axis and
abutted on the east, south and west by the destruction debris and white floor, was a concentration of
stones, several of which were grinding stone fragments, and brick fragments (1427) (Photo 12.70).
This element was roughly L-shaped, with a plastered, right-angled niche in its western face, which
contained part of a smashed storage jar (unrestored); another storage jar (Fig. 13.72:9) abutted
the installation on its south, and yet another one
(Fig. 13.72:10) was found to its north. Another concentration of basalt stones was found 0.5 m to the
south of 1427, designated 1496; they most likely
comprised parts of the same element, perhaps with
a stone missing in the middle. Two cooking pots
(Fig. 13.71:7, 9) were found against the western
face of these stones (Photo 12.71). An additional
element was a brick block (1458), 1.0 m long, 0.5 m
wide and preserved to one or two courses, located
just to the west of the southern end of 1427 (Fig.
12.69). This might have been a work surface or,
perhaps, a space divider.
Wall 1413, that bordered Piazza CK on the west, ran for 19.7 m on a slightly southeast–northwest line along the western end of the entire area and continued beyond the limits of the excavation to both the north and the south (Photos 12.2–12.5). In Square R/4, Wall 1413 abutted the western end of Wall 1524. The continuation of its line to the north was denoted 1557 (Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.8). The southern part of Wall 1413 was made of hard yellow bricks, typical of Stratum C-2, as opposed to the light gray bricks of the rest of the wall, typical of Strata C-1b and C-1a. This was the only place in this wall where two phases were discerned: in the earlier phase (Stratum C-1b), the wall was termed 2432 and the later phase, 1431 (Stratum C-1a). Wall 1413 was constructed slightly above and west of Stratum C-2 Buildings CA and CB (Figs. 12.16, 12.69). In Stratum C-1b, its lower part adjoined the western wall of Building CD and it served as the western border of the space south of Building CD, of the unit north of Building CD, and of Building CJ. In Stratum C-1a, it was the western border of Building CJ and Piazza CK. In Square R/4, the structures of both Strata C-1b and C-1a (described above) were attached to its western face. Wall 1413 was unique in its length and multiple-use in several units during the course of two strata, making it a prime example of the integrated urban planning that characterized this area.
Building CE was located in Squares T–Y/4–6, to the east of the cooking area in Square T/4. The building was composed of a broad room in the south and an area to its north, of which a strip, 2.0 m wide and 10 m long, was excavated (Photo 12.75). The broad room was a rebuild of an earlier structure, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.9–12.10); it had two phases, while the area to the north had three. In Stratum C-1b, the building suffered a destruction, after which it was renovated in Stratum C-1a and continued to be used with various changes, mainly in its northern part, until its final destruction.
Room 2489 was a rectangular room (internal measurements 2.0×4.8 m; 9.6 sq m) with an entrance
just east of the center of the northern wall (1491);
the threshold was paved with a wooden plank (Fig.
12.27; Photo 12.76). Inside the entrance were a
bowl and a cup-and-saucer (Figs. 13.44:4,
13.45:12). The southern wall of this room (1473)
ran parallel to the northern wall of Building CG
(see below), separated by a 0.10 m gap, which contained a large amount of sherds, possibly a fill. The
eastern end of Wall 1473 dog-legged 0.3 m to the
north, exactly following the line of the C-2 wall
here. The eastern wall (2454) was part of a long
wall that enclosed the entire building on the east.
Note that Wall 2454 was oriented due north–south,
while the rest of the room was angled towards the
west, so that this wall was not parallel to the
western wall of the building (1487), lending a
somewhat crooked look to room. Wall 2454 was
built flush against the western wall of Building CF;
together, they were 1.1 m wide. At its southern end,
Wall 2454 made a corner with Wall 4479, the
northern wall of Building CM to the south in
Stratum C-1b, which created a double wall with the
southern wall of Building CF. This construction
method well demonstrates the closely interrelated
character of the architecture of the buildings in this
northeastern insula.
All the walls were composed of hard graybrown bricks, with light-colored mortar lines; they
were burnt to black in some instances, particularly
in the east. The western face of Wall 2454 and the
southern face of Wall 1491 included bricks with
marginal bosses composed of two vertical protrusions on each end of the brick (Fig. 12.29; Photos
12.77–12.78), identical to those found in other
buildings in the north-central part of Area C in
Stratum C-1b, including the unit north of Building
CD, described above, and Building CF; they were
also found in the walls of the rooms to the north of
the broad room in Building CE (Photo 12.83).
Walls 2454 and 1491 contained a thick and intricate
construction of perpendicular and parallel wooden
beams in their foundations (Fig. 12.29; Photos
12.77–12.78). The beams, like the bricks, were
very burnt.
The smooth reddish-brown beaten-earth floor
(2489, 86.30 m) was coated by a thick layer of
black ash (2458; Fig. 12.64), covering mostly the
eastern half of the room (Photo 12.76). A small
square plastered brick (2477; 0.45 x.0.45 m, 0.45 m
high) was attached to Wall 1491, just east of the
entrance and opposite the offset in Wall 1473. It had
a slight depression on top which contained some
light gray ash, although it is possible that it had
served as a jar support. Underneath it was an intact
juglet in a small pit (Fig. 13.45:10), apparently
placed there as a foundation deposit before the
brick was laid.
Following the destruction of C-1b, the broad room continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a with the same walls (Fig. 12.28), although there was a visible repair in the upper courses of the western wall (1487), composed of light gray bricks (Photos 12.76, 12.79). Above the burnt debris on the floor of C-1b was a layer of hard brick debris (2443) that supported an earthen floor (1471) at level 86.65 m, which was covered by a layer of decayed brick debris with some ash (Fig. 12.64; Photo 12.79).
Remains of rooms and possibly a courtyard were found in Squares Y/5–6 to the north of the broad room (Photos 12.80–12.84). It seems that these were part of Building CE, particularly due to the shared walls and similar construction techniques, although no entrance was found to join them in the limited excavated area. Each of these components had two phases, attributed to C-1b and C-1a, while the northern courtyard contained yet an additional phase.
Two narrow rooms (6448, 6449) were excavated to
the north of the eastern side of the broad room; no
entrance joined them. The eastern wall of both
rooms was the continuation of Wall 2454, indicating that the northern rooms and the broad room
to the south were part of the same building.
Like in its southern end, the foundations of the
entire length of Wall 2454 contained a thick and
intricate composition of wooden beams, both perpendicular and parallel to the lower course of bricks
(Figs. 12.30, 12.62). Wooden beams, all charred,
were found below the floors of the two rooms as
well (Photos 12.80–12.81). All of the wood was set
into a distinct layer of soft reddish earth (6426,
6486; Fig. 12.32); such a construction of wooden
beams in a reddish fill was a feature found in the
foundations of other Stratum C-1b buildings as
well.
The western wall of the two northern rooms
was Wall 6452; only its eastern face was uncovered. This wall cornered with Wall 1491 on the
south, just east of the entranceway in that wall. Wall
6452 also had many wooden beams in and
adjoining its foundation (Figs. 12.30, 12.62–
12.63). Walls 2454 and 6452 ran for 7.0 m and two
east–west cross walls (6447 and 7445) divided this
space into two identical rooms (6448 on the north
and 6449 on the south), each 3.1 m long and
between 1.6–1.8 m wide. The difference in width
was due to the angle of Wall 6452, which ran
slightly southeast to northwest, as opposed to the
straight north–south line of Wall 2454. Wall 6447,
which separated the two rooms, had wood in its
foundation, but Wall 7445, the northern wall of
Room 6448), did not. As they had no entrances, it is
possible that these rooms served as storage spaces,
accessed from above. All the walls of these rooms,
aside from 7445, which was poorly preserved,
included bricks with marginal bosses composed of
thin vertical protrusions on both ends, which were
hallmarks of Stratum C-1b in this part of the area,
as noted above (Figs. 12.29, 12.63; Photo 12.83).
The southern room had a patchy beaten-earth
floor at level 86.12 m (6449), on which were vessels and sherds,
among them three complete chalices (Fig. 13.44:10–11, 13), as well as loomweights
and a concentration of burnt grain against Wall
1491. Four 14C measurements of this grain (Chapter
48, Sample R24) provided a calibrated average date
between 902–843 BCE (1σ) and 920–830 BCE
(2σ).
Two large bricks set near the corner of Walls
6452 and 1491 might have served as a kind of
podium or shelf, possibly for the chalices found
nearby (Photo 12.82). Room 6448 contained a similar floor in its southern part, while its northern part
contained a concentration of stones that might have
been a disturbed stone floor (7451), including two
broken upper grinding stones. The stones were covered by a thin layer of debris (7446) with some
sherds and bones.
Rooms 6448 and 6449 were covered by a fill
(6432), which leveled them in preparation for the
renovation that took place in Stratum C-1a.
To the north of Wall 7445 in Square Y/6 was an
open space, continuing the activity that was here in
Stratum C-2. This space is described here as part of
Building CE, although, in fact, no entrance to the
two southern rooms was found, and it might represent the southern part of an open space to the north
of this building. The two phases identified in this
space were both attributed to Stratum C-1b, as they
covered the Stratum C-2 activity and were sealed
by the Stratum C-1a courtyard floor.
The courtyard surface was composed of red and
gray striations (7427) that were a direct continuation of those found here in Stratum C-2 and their
attribution to two sub-phases of C-1b was based on
their relation to related installations. The lowest
layer was related to three poorly preserved installations, whose function remained unknown (Fig.
12.31): a ring of brown clay (7463), almost directly
underneath C-1b Oven 7443, and two semi-circles
of soft red clay (7464, 7465), filled with light gray
ash. These installations seem to each have been
used only for a short time and cut each other in a
haphazard manner.
In the later phase of Stratum C-1b, the uppermost layer of the red and gray striations contained
one poorly preserved oven (7443) and several
shallow red-clay circles (7433, 7437, 7438), similar
to those of the previous sub-phase. In both phases,
only a few sherds and bones were found.
The center and southeastern part of these
remains were cut by Pit 6498 (Photo 12.87).
A reddish clay floor (6433, 5415) in Square Y/5
was laid at level 86.75 m, above a fill covering
C-1b Rooms 6448 and 6449. Thus, the entire area
north of Wall 1491 and west of Wall 2454 became
an open area, at least 10 m long and continuing to
the north beyond the excavation area. The reddish
clay floor was covered by a soft burnt layer just
under topsoil. The floor and burnt debris abutted
the rather poorly preserved upper courses of Walls
2454 and 1491, which were rebuilt after the C-1b
destruction. Below Floor 5415 was a layer of
wooden beams that both penetrated underneath the
foundation of the C-1a rebuild of Wall 2454 here
and extended into part of the room. This wood was
laid in two layers: an east–west upper layer and a
north–south lower layer (Fig. 12.32). This was one
of the few instances where wood was used in construction in Stratum C-1a.
A number of installations were set on this floor.
In the southeastern corner was a mud-plastered clay
ring (5436) containing a large lower grinding stone
inside; an upper grinding stone was found below
this and another such grinding stone rested on top
of the clay ring. This is similar to grinding installations found in other Stratum C-1a buildings, such as
Buildings CF, CQ1, CQ2 and CP. The southern part
of a similar ring (5438) was found in the northwestern corner of Square Y/5, although it did not
contain any grinding stones. Three bricks were
found to the west of 5436 and one to its north. The
southern part of the space was covered with a layer
of burnt destruction debris containing pottery and
loomweights (Photo 12.84), while the northern part
was less burnt.
On the northern end of this open area (Square
Y/6) was a layer of brick debris and collapse, with
some ash and charcoal (7404), abutting Wall 4422
and the northern end of Wall 2454. Although no
clear floor level was discerned, this layer clearly
covered the Stratum C-1b activity below. Three
intact vessels (Fig. 13.76:6, 10–11), one jug and
two juglets, were found in this debris layer.
Building CR was the southern part of a building in Squares Y–Z/6 that continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.43, 12.86) and was, in fact, a rebuild of Stratum C-2 Building CT; this was one of the few instances of continuity between all the Iron Age IIA strata in Area C. Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. The southern wall of Building CR was also the northern wall of Building CF and its eastern wall was the western boundary of the entrance into that building (Photo 12.86). The southwestern corner of this building was cut by Pit 6498 (Photos 12.43, 12.48, 12.87).
Building CF in Squares Y–A/4–6 was one of the
largest and most interesting structures in Area C. Its
unique plan, fine construction, and exceptional
finds point to its importance. The building was initially constructed in Stratum C-1b and, following a
destruction, was renovated and reused until its final
destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. Its external
measurements were 8.7×11.3 m (excluding Wall
2454 on the west and the entrance corridor) and its
floor space was 50.46 sq m in Stratum C-1b and
52.89 sq m in C-1a. This latter phase was the best
known, as it was exposed just below topsoil and
destroyed in a fierce conflagration, after which the
building was abandoned. Although the remains of
Stratum C-1b were not as well preserved, they
were sufficient to define a separate building phase,
with finds attributed to its floors. Both phases
will be described together, emphasizing the stratigraphic considerations that led to the division
between the two. Building CF was built over
Stratum C-2 Building CU (Photos 12.85, 12.100–
12.104); although both buildings were of the same
orientation, they were two entirely different structures.
Building CF contained an entrance corridor in
the northeast and three main components: a rectangular space on the north, with a western and an
eastern wing to its south. Each of these wings was
enclosed by separate walls that adjoined each other
to form double walls, so that each was both independent and united. Double walls also surrounded
the building on the west, south and east; these walls
had a total width of 1.0–1.1 m. This, along with the
well-built straight walls, lent the structure a sturdy
look and also raises the possibility that the building
had an upper floor. Thus, Building CF, although a
unique and independent structure, was an integral
part of a well-planned quarter that was densely built
in both Strata C-1b and C-1a (Photos 12.6–12.7,
12.91–12.92; 12.169).
The entrance into the building in both strata was in its northeastern corner, through a passageway which continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. The entrance was bordered on the east by Wall 6408 in both strata and on the west by the eastern end of Building CR (Wall 7458 in the early phase of Stratum C-1b, brick rows 6512 in the later phase of C-1b, and Wall 6419 in Stratum C-1a). This formed a 2.0 m-wide corridor which was narrower only in the latter part of Stratum C-1b, when 6512 occupied part of its western side. Three phases were discerned in the entrance, one attributed to the construction of the building and the other two to Strata C-1b and C-1a.
This wing was composed of a large room on the north and a smaller room to its south; the latter was accessed only through the former. In Stratum C-1b, the larger northern room of this wing was separated from the northern rectangular space described above by a wall, making it a separate room. In Stratum C-1a, when this wall was removed, these two spaces were united and were accessed directly from the entrance in the northeast of the building. On the other hand, the southern room remained the same in both strata. The description below follows these developments: the two phases in the northern room are described separately (C-1b and C-1a), and the two phases in the southern room are described together.
In both Strata C-1b and C-1a, the western wing of
the building (Squares Y–Z/4–6) was composed of a
long rectangular space. In Stratum C-1b, there was
a small niche or cell on the north and the rest was
one long hall, while in Stratum C-1a, the hall was
divided into four consecutive rooms, including the
small niche/cell on the north, and three small rooms
to its south (Photos 12.92, 12.101).
This wing was bordered on three sides by
double walls that remained the same in both strata:
on the west by Walls 4422 and 2454, on the south
by Walls 4413 and 4479, and on the east by Walls
5414 and 5454. In Stratum C-1b, the northern
border of this wing was a single wall (6533), while
in Stratum C-1a, it was composed of a double wall:
Wall 6409 was built alongside Wall 6410, the
southern wall of Building CR.
This was a small room (internal measurements 1.5×3.1 m; 4.65 sq m) built above the
small chamber/nich, 7409, of Stratum C-1b. On the
north, west and south, the tops of the C-1b walls
(6533, 6534, 6535) were visible in the floor
makeup of the new room. Although they lined the
walls, they were different from the other benches in
this wing, as they did not rise above the floor level,
and they continued down to be abutted by the C-1b
rubble rather than built above it.
The room was entered from the broad space to
the east. The beaten-earth floor (6435, level 86.85
m) was 0.35 m higher than Floor 6427 to the east,
which would have necessitated some kind of small
step to join them. A large grinding stone installation
(6406) occupied its southeastern part. On the floor
was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401)
that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an
exceptionally large amount considering the small
space (Figs. 13.80–13.96; Photos 12.106–12.107).
Just below topsoil were fragments of an elaborate
horned pottery altar with mold-made female figures
(Photo 12.108; Chapter 35, No. 5). The impression
was that the numerous finds here were in storage
and not found as used, since they were densely
packed in this small area, around the grinding stone
installation (6406) that took up part of the room as
well (Photos 12.106–12.107, 12.109–12.110).
Installation 6406 was comprised of a finely
made oval, round-topped clay parapet, 0.4 m high,
enclosing a large lower grinding stone, on top of
which was a complete upper grinding stone lying
on its eastern end. The large lower grinding stone
was somewhat raised above the floor of the
installation and tilted down from west to east, so as
to facilitate the gathering of the grain into a small
depression between the western end of the lower
grinding stone and the parapet. Curiously, the
installation, built against the eastern end of Wall
5464, was situated so that its eastern end partially
blocked the entrance to the room to the south. It is
either possible that this was a later addition to the
room or that, despite its position, it was not considered as an obstacle. This installation was similar to
the one found in Room 5498 of the eastern wing of
Building CF, as well as in Building CQ1 and possibly, Buildings CQ2, CP and CE; one was found in
Area G as well (Chapter 20). The clay parapets of
these grinding stone installations enabled flour to
be easily collected and to prevent grain from being
scattered. It seems that the grinder would have
worked from the higher (western) side of the installation, so as to use gravity when pushing the upper
grinding stone (as in Photo 12.110), although this
was quite a cramped space to crouch in.
The second room from the north, built
above C-1b burnt debris 5478 (Figs. 12.59–12.60),
was the largest (internal measurements 2.4×2.7 m;
6.48 sq m). Destruction debris (5425 on the east and
5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and
the benches (Photo 12.111). The northern wall
(5464) was built on top of a wider wall (5474) that
protruded on its southern face, creating a kind of
narrow bench; a shallow niche created in Wall 5464
widened this bench to 0.3 m. Abutting the western
wall (4422) was a line of bricks that cornered with
5474 and created a bench (5472). A similar situation existed on the east, where Bench 5473 abutted
Wall 5414; this bench continued south into the
other rooms as well and cornered on the north with
5474. No bench lined the southern wall.
Among the many finds was a Hippo storage jar
with an inscription reading לשקינמש, Isqymns (Fig.
13.91:2; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 303–304; Ahituv
and Mazar 2014: 44–45; Chapter 29A, No. 6). It
was found in Locus 5425, along with another 40
vessels, several of them intact (Figs. 13.80–13.87,
13.89, 13.91–13.93, 13.95–13.96); most were concentrated in the southeastern part of the room, near
the entrance leading south to Room 5445 (Photo
12.111). Among them was a unique shovel (Fig.
13.96:1; Chapter 35, No. 49).
The middle room, built above C-1b
burnt debris 5479, was the smallest (internal measurements 1.2×2.7 m; 3.24 sq. m). Its northern wall
(5431) was built on top of a slightly wider wall/
bench (5484), so that only 0.2 m of the latter protruded into the room on the south, but not at all on
the north. On the west, Bench 5485 cornered with
5484. On the east, the situation was somewhat
ambivalent: it seems that 5473, the eastern bench of
Room 5460 to the north, continued to the south into
Room 5445 as well. However, an additional row of
bricks, identical to Bench 5473, adjoined it on the
west. Above this western row of bricks was a line
composed of large chunks of burnt bricks. This feature (5458), 0.3 m wide and 1.5 m long, stood two
courses high and blocked the entrance into this room,
as well as the entrance into the southernmost room
(Photo 12.111). However, although it appears to have
been built as a blockage, it is possible to understand it
as the collapse of bricks from one of the walls that
happened to land on this line inside the room.
Room 5445 was filled with burnt destruction
debris (5421, 5467) that covered and abutted the
benches and rested on Floor 5445; however, as
opposed to the other rooms in this building, it was
virtually empty, with only a small amount of
sherds, mostly concentrated on the eastern bench
(Figs. 13.81–13.82). Among the sherds was a fragment of a Greek bowl (Fig. 13.96:9; Chapter 28A).
This room, built above C-1b burnt
debris 5463 (Fig. 12.60) was the southernmost and
innermost room in the western wing (internal
measurements 1.8×2.7 m; 4.86 sq m) (Photos
12.112–12.113). Its northern wall (5497) was built
on top of a wider wall that served as a narrow bench
on the south (5471); a niche cut out of the southern
face of the wall exposed 0.5 m of this bench,
although on the eastern and western ends, where
there was no niche, only 0.1 m of it protruded. This
arrangement was almost identical to that in the
northern end of the northernmost room. This small
room was found full of extremely burnt destruction
debris (4414) on the white lime floor with some ash
(5444), including many fallen bricks that had been
fired almost to the consistency of pottery. Thirteen
vessels from this room were restored (Figs. 13.80–
13.81, 13.83–13.84, 13.86, 13.90–13.96). Several
of these were found on (or partly on) the benches,
including a Hippo storage jar on the eastern bench
(Fig. 13.91:4), another storage jar (Fig. 13.90:9) on
the eastern end of the northern bench, just where
the entrance was, and a very large krater (Fig.
13.92:7) on the southern bench. A unique find was a
large, heavy clay box with a matching lid (Fig.
13.96a:10) in the northwestern corner of the room
(Photo 12.112). This box, very distorted by fire, ca.
0.55 m wide, 0.65 m long and 0.45 m high, was set
on a protrusion in the corner of Benches 5469 and
5471, composed of bricks identical to those of the
benches, apparently deliberately built to accommodate the box (Photo 12.113). The lid of the box was
found overturned just to its east, above a bowl (Fig.
13.80:6) and an intact juglet (Fig. 13.95:11) was
found just below the box’s southwestern corner; the
only finds inside the box was a small fragment of a
very worn female figurine (Chapter 34, No. 13).
The location of this room in the deep interior of
the western wing of Building CF, which was
surrounded on three sides by double walls and
accessed only through the other rooms of the
western wing, as well as the unique pottery box and
ceramic assemblage, indicated that it had some special function, perhaps some sort of a treasury.
The architecture and contents of Building CF are
unique in many ways. Although the grinding installations, oven and many loomweights found in this
building in Stratum C-1a are typical of household
activity, the plan of this building, the double walls,
and the unique finds make it exceptional.
The net floor space is not exceptional and
should be regarded as modest compared to other
Iron Age II houses (Table 12.13; Schloen 2001:
165–183; Mazar 2008; see summary below),
although it was larger than most other buildings
excavated at Tel Rehov. Based on the width of the
walls, we may assume that the house had a second
story, although no evidence for a staircase was
found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been
located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor.
Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that
all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on
the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the
debris. Although one may surmise that the large
northeastern space (5498) in Stratum C-1a was an
open courtyard, this does not seem feasible, in spite
of the fact that an oven was located at the northern
end of this space. Air and light could be obtained
through the main entrance on the north and windows in the southern wall of the building, since all
other walls bordered neighboring buildings.
The most outstanding feature in this building
was the row of small rooms in the western wing in
Stratum C-1a, with benches along the walls. The
consecutive arrangement of four rooms entered
successively by way of the previous room, lined
with benches along most of the walls, is virtually
unparalleled in the Iron Age architecture in Israel
(see further below). The small size of these rooms
and the fact that the two inner ones could not get
direct light or air except from the room to the north,
emphasize their unique function. The inscribed jar
with the inscription — לשקינמש, lšqynmš — found
in the largest of these rooms, and the massive pottery box with the lid found in the southern room,
allude to a special function of this wing. We can
suggest that these were the offices of an important
personality, perhaps a merchant or a clan leader,
and that the box served as a ‘treasury’ of some kind.
The unique model shrine, decorated altar facade,
and so-called ‘footbath’ (the function of which
remains enigmatic), as well as the presence of two
elaborate grinding stone installations, a loom, and
other rich finds from this building, are evidence of
this special function.
The construction of this building in Stratum
C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as
Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. The integration
of Building CF with the buildings surrounding it
during both strata is typical of the architectural and
occupational nature of the Iron Age IIA at Tel
Rehov. One possible reason for such dense and
crowded construction may be related to efforts to
stabilize the structures in light of the seismic sensitivity in this region. This may also be related to
local architectural traditions that continued during
all of Iron IIA, perhaps with earlier origins, and
were special markers of the inhabitants’ cultural
identity.
An interesting parallel to the plan of this
building can be seen at Megiddo in Stratum VA–
IVB Building 2081 (Loud 1948: 44–46, plan: Fig.
388, reconstructed plan: Fig. 100). This building
comprised a large courtyard (2081). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a cult corner
containing two stone horned altars, two pottery
stands and additional objects (Zevit 2001: 220–
225). From the courtyard, an entrance led into a unit
that resembled Building CF, with a rectangular hall
containing an inner chamber. From the front part of
the hall, an entrance led into a narrow side chamber,
which, in turn, led into two additional rooms
arranged in a similar manner as those in Building
CF, with entrances located at the end of the walls. It
may be suggested that a room at the southwestern
corner of this building was also part of this chain of
rooms, since the walls were preserved lower than
the floor and the location of entrances could not be
determined with any certainty in this place. The
size of this building fits that of Building CF. It differed in having an additional western wing, the
long hall 2163. However, no entrance connecting
the eastern to the western wing was found and thus,
it is difficult to say whether it belonged to the same
building. Another exceptional feature was the two
pillar bases at the front part of the main hall. These
have no parallels in Building CF, unless we consider the large stone found near Wall 6455 in
Stratum C-1b and a second large stone found
nearby in Stratum C-1a as pillar bases found out of
their original position. It should be noted that the
rooms of the eastern wing of Building 2081 at
Megiddo were not numbered and no finds were
published from them. However, the cult corner in
Courtyard 2081 included pottery similar to that
from Tel Rehov Strata IV–V (C-1a–b). It may be
suggested that these two buildings might have had
similar functions, perhaps serving as dwellings of
elite families who incorporated commercial activities
in their household and had their own cult corners and
paraphernalia (see Chapter 4; Fig. 4.12).
Building CW (Squares A–C/6) was constructed
above Stratum C-2 Building CY (Photo 12.114)
and to a large extent, is a rebuild of the latter,
retaining much of its layout. Like Building CY, it
was only partly excavated and continued to the
north beyond the limit of the excavation area. Two
phases were defined in this building, attributed to
Strata C-1b and C-1a, yet in the second phase
(C-1a), changes occurred mainly in the courtyard
and the eastern part of the building, while the two
rooms in the west remained unchanged; thus, they
appear in the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.
Since the differentiation between the two phases
was not emphatic, both are described together.
The building adjoined the entrance corridor and
northern space of Building CF on the west and the
northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 on the
south (Photos 12.92, 12.114). Its outer width from
east to west was 10.4 m and its known length was
5.8 m, although it extended to the north beyond the
limits of the excavation area. Unlike most other
Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this appears to
have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a
large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least
on one side. See also Building CY in Stratum C-2
and Building CZ in Stratum C-1b for a similar concept.
The southern border of the building was Wall
6444, which ran parallel and adjacent to the
northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (6407),
forming a double wall, 1.1 m wide. Wall 6444
contained wooden beams typical of Stratum C-1b in its
foundation; these were round, ca. 0.05–0.07 m in
diameter, closely spaced, and placed perpendicular
to the wall’s foundation (Photos 12.59–12.61). The
western wall 6408 continued to the south where it
was the western wall of Building CQ1. It is thus
clear that Building CW was built together with
Building CQ1, and probably with CQ2 as well. The
eastern wall in Stratum C-1b (8491) was replaced
in C-1a by Wall 8424.
In Stratum C-1b, the spacious courtyard was 6.0 m
wide and at least 5.5 m long. Its western border was
Wall 6420 and its northern continuation, Wall 6476.
The border on the east was Wall 8491; a segment of
an additional wall (8476) was attached to its
western face for 2.5 m; north of this, in its stead,
was a north–south row of rather large (ca. 0.3×0.4
m each) roughly rectangular stones (8499), three of
which were placed together and a fourth slightly to
the north, running into the northern balk (Photo
12.63). These stones adjoined Wall 8491 and thus
could not have served as pillar bases; they recall the
stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum
C-2 and elsewhere and perhaps served as solid
bases for jars or other objects. In Stratum C-1a,
Wall 8476 and the stones were removed, and substantial changes were made in the eastern part of the
courtyard (see below).
Only a single floor was found in the courtyard
(7471, level 86.29 m) (Photo 12.114), laid on a 0.4
m-thick fill of soft brown earth (7501, 8462) that
covered the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CY
(Fig. 12.55). This fill layer is shown in the plan of
Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.35), as we assume that it was
laid at that time, in preparation for the laying of the
floor; it is possible that an earlier floor of C-1b was
removed when Floor 7471 was laid, leaving only
the fill. The floor (shown on the plan of Stratum
C-1a; Figs. 12.36, 12.38) was composed of soft
reddish-brown earth, its central and southeastern parts
burnt black, with some light gray ashy patches and
flecks of charcoal throughout. The floor dipped
down in the northwest, visible in the northern section of Square B/6 (Fig. 12.55); in this shallow
depression was a complete Hippo jar (Fig. 13.99:7).
It was not clear whether this depression was intentional
(a pit?) or whether it represented a postdepositional phenomenon. A concentration of black
ash found to the west of this dip, against Wall 6476,
contained two cooking pots (Fig. 13.98:1, 3) and a
loomweight. Along the western end of the courtyard was a strip of small stones (7479) set closely
together, although rather haphazardly, with a lower
layer of stones in its central part. The stones ran
parallel to Wall 6420 (Photo 12.114) and may have
been a remnant of a poorly preserved stone pavement. The stones ended in the north close to the
abovementioned dip in the floor; they recall those
found in the northwestern part of Building CX,
described below.
The main change in the courtyard, attributed to
the transition from C-1b to C-1a, took place in its
eastern part and included the replacement of Wall
8491 with Wall 8424 and the addition of an installation that covered Wall 8476 and Stones 8499. Wall
8424 was poorly preserved and it is not clear if it
was cut on its northern end or whether there had
been an entrance there.
The installation included Wall 8426, an east–
west wall, preserved along 2.2 m and 0.15 m high,
that extended from the center of Wall 8424 and
served as a divider between two spaces that were
open to the west (Photo 12.115). The floors of these
spaces (8423, 8430 in the north, 8420 in the south)
were covered with plaster that lipped up to the faces
of the wall in a manner that created shallow channels, which were burnt on their western ends. The
northern end of the northern space contained a concentration of stones, east of which were three jugs
and one juglet (Fig. 13.101:2–3, 6, 12). On its
western end, Wall 8426 joined a shallow north–
south channel that terminated on the north near a
large lower grinding stone embedded in the floor,
and on the south at the center of the southern space.
Two stone mortars, one particularly large and the
other smaller, flanked the northern end of the
channel on the west and east, respectively. The
function of these elements remained unclear; it is
possible that some substance was drained from the
plastered floors into the shallow channel on their
west, and that the grinding stone and mortars were
used in conjunction with this activity.
A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401),
revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire
courtyard area, comprising hard burnt brick debris
with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash.
Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97–
13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and
two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig.
13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table
12.16).
This room was bordered by Walls 6408 on the west,
6429 on the north and 6420 on the east (internal
measurements 2.1×3.0 m; 6.3 sq. m). An
entranceway in the southern end of Wall 6420 led to
the room from the courtyard. The only floor found
in this room (6411) was made of pink plaster laid
above a layer of earth and brick debris (6451) that
appears to have been a fill above Building CY,
similar to the situation in the courtyard to the east.
Brick benches (6457, 6458 and 6496) were
constructed along the western, eastern and southern
walls of the room respectively. The benches were
0.35 m wide and 0.35 m high, recalling those in
Building CF, although in this case, they were built
against the walls and not under them. Placed on top
of each end of the western and eastern benches
(6457, 6458) were flat-topped stones, perhaps
serving as solid supports for jars or other objects
(Photo 12.116). In the southwestern corner of the
room was an L-shaped brick that formed a niche in
which an intact juglet (Fig. 13.101:11) was placed.
The room was full of heavily burnt destruction
debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the
benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris,
including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs,
juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig.
13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in
the debris above the benches that lined the walls
(Photo 12.117). A concentration of ten clay
loomweights was found on the western end of this
bench (Photo 12.118). Other finds in this room
included three scale weights and a bronze
scale pan, as well as a seal and iron tools (Table
12.16).
This room, located in the northwestern part of the
building, was bordered by Walls 6429 on the south,
6497 on the west and 6476 on the east. The internal
width was 2.5 m and it was at least 1.4 m long, as its
northern border was beyond the limit of the excavation area, with an entrance probably in its northeastern corner. Although the eastern and western
walls continued the lines of those of Room 6411 to
the south, they were not one and the same, as they
abutted the northern face of Wall 6429, but did not
bond with it. It is possible that this room had been
accessed from the courtyard on the east at a spot
further to the north, beyond the limits of the excavation. Just as in Room 6411, a layer of debris that
might have been a fill (6462) was found above the
C-2 remains and was covered by the floor and
benches in this room, so it is assumed that it, like
the room to its south, had only one phase of use.
Benches (6480, 6481) lined the western and
eastern walls (but not the southern wall), continuing the line of the benches in Room 6411 to the
south. Here too, stones were found on top of their
southern and northern ends (Photo 12.116). The
room was full of burnt destruction debris; eight vessels rested on Floor 6438 at level 86.50 m.
A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city
To the south of Building CW and the east of
Building CF were two virtually twin buildings,
termed CQ1 and CQ2, adjoined by a double wall
(Squares A–C/4–5). Both buildings were enclosed
on the north by Wall 6407, which was attached to
Wall 6444 of Building CW, together creating a
double wall, 1.1 m wide (Photo 12.120). On the
west, Building CQ1 adjoined Building CF with a
double wall, although in Stratum C-1a, with the
removal of the inner wall of the northeastern part of
Building CF, a double wall was left only in the
south and the two buildings shared a wall in the
north. Thus, it can be seen how Buildings CQ1 and
CQ2 were not only related to each other, but were
also a part of the northeastern insula, all the units of
which must have been built together according to
an integrated plan. On the south, the buildings were
closed by a single wall and fronted by a street. The
eastern border of Building CQ2 was also a single
wall; although unexcavated, it is possible that a
north–south street ran here and continued to the
north alongside Building CW.
Both buildings were small and comprised three
rooms each: a rectangular room on the south and
two small rooms on the north, one larger than the
other. Yet another building with the same plan was
found to the south of Building CQ1, termed
Building CQ3. The entrance to Building CQ1 was
in its southeastern corner (opposite the entrance of
Building CQ3), but curiously, no entrance into CQ2
could be identified. While Building CQ1 was built
on a north–south axis, its eastern side ran on a
slightly northwest–southeast line, which dictated
the orientation of the adjoining Building CQ2; in
fact, the eastern wall of the latter building was even
more skewed, lending it a trapezoidal shape.
Similar to Building CW to the immediate north
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 had one main phase, with
burnt destruction debris under topsoil down to the
floors and only ephemeral indications of an earlier
occupation in Stratum C-1b. Both buildings were
built above remains attributed to Stratum C-2 in
Squares A–B/4–5. The most likely explanation is
that the buildings were constructed in Stratum C-1b
and continued to be in use until the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. The wood in the
foundations of the walls points to this option, as this
was a typical C-1b feature. Thus, the buildings
appear on the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.
A narrow area to the south of Buildings CQ1
and CQ2, as well as Building CF to their west
(Photos 12.120, 12.122), appears to have been an
east–west street, some 1.4 m wide, that ran between
the block of Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the
north and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south,
merging into Piazza 2417 on the west in Stratum
C-1a.
The buildings are described below as found in
Stratum C-1a, noting the very minor remains of the
sporadically detected earlier (C-1b) phase.
The external measurements of Building CQ1 were 5.2–5.5×6.4 m (floor space, ca. 19 sq m). It included one large room (6483) that spanned the width of the building and two smaller rooms (6436, 7447) to its north. The southern wall was Wall 6445, which continued the line of Wall 5455, the southern inner wall of Building CF. On the west, the building was closed by Wall 6408, which continued to the north, where it was the western wall of Building CW and abutted the eastern wall of Building CF on the south (Photos 12.121–12.122). The eastern wall (7416) created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast.
The southern and largest space of the building was
apparently a roofed room, measuring internally
2.8×4.3 m (floor space, 12.04 sq m). The entrance
into this room, and, in fact, into the building itself,
was in its southeastern corner. The entrance was 1.2
m wide and had a brick threshold at 86.12 m; it
opened to the street that ran along the southern
façade of the building, although the excavated level
of the street surface was higher by ca. 0.7 m than
the threshold. This would have required few steps
or a ladder to access the building from the street,
whether into Room 6483 or to a second story.
The floor was composed of two parts: on the
west was a stone floor (6472) that ran up to the line
of the entranceway in Wall 6446, containing
closely laid basalt stones and limestones, as well as
some broken upper grinding stones and mortars.
Underneath the stone pavement were two large
stones that apparently served to buttress it. Such a
stone floor was rare at Tel Rehov in Iron IIA and
was found only in Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and perhaps CJ in Stratum C-1a.
The stone floor was abutted on the east by a
smooth reddish clay floor (7450 in the east, 6483 in
the west); patches of this matrix were also found
between the stones, so that it apparently had covered them as well. In the central-eastern part of
Floor 6483 was a round, flat-topped stone that
appears to have been a pillar base; it was encircled
by several small stones that included two
loomweights, one of stone and one of clay.
Between this pillar base and Wall 7454 on the north
was a patch of hard plaster.
The floor was covered with a layer of
extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris
(6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen
bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster
fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly
an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo
12.121). In the northwestern part of the room, near
the southern face of Wall 6446, was a grinding
stone installation (6453), like those found in Buildings CF and CE; it was not very well preserved
(Photo 12.122). The lower grinding stone of the
installation was installed on a brick base, which
raised it to ca. 0.4 m above the floor; underneath the
stone was an antler. This room contained 26 vessels
(Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects
(Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights.
The reddish clay matrix of Floor 6483 rested on
a 0.15 m-deep layer of red, gray and white striations
(also numbered 6483) that abutted the lowest
courses of the surrounding walls, which contained
wooden beams in their foundations. These
striations penetrated below the stone floor in the
western half of the room and they may have
belonged to the initial use of this room in Stratum
C-1b.
The small northwestern room (6436; measuring internally 1.9×2.35 m, 4.46 sq m) was bordered on the east by Wall 6422 and on the south by Wall 6446; in the eastern end of the latter wall was a narrow entrance, 0.5 m wide. The floor was made of smooth reddish clay (level 86.00 m), identical to that of the large room to the south. The wood in the foundations of the surrounding walls protruded somewhat into the room below the floor, embedded in a matrix of reddish clay (6477) that was similar to the floor makeup itself. This sub-floor material with wood was laid on top of Wall 6501 and Locus 6502, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.12). A wooden beam was found in the entranceway itself, possibly a threshold. On the floor was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17).
The northeastern room (7447; measuring internally 1.3×2.0 m, 2.6 sq m) was separated from the room to its west by Wall 6422. This small narrow room was entered from the larger southern room by way of an opening, 0.8–0.9 m wide, in its southern wall (7454); this opening had a brick threshold that was, in fact, the continuation of Wall 7454, on the level of the floor. A row of bricks (7448) ran along the northern wall of this room just on the floor level and might have been a bench. Like in the room to the west, the wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6422 protruded into the sub-floor makeup of reddish clay. The reddish clay floor was identical to that of the other rooms and was covered by very burnt complete fallen bricks and ceiling material (7426); on it were six pottery vessels and other objects (Table 12.17)
Adjoining Building CQ1 on the east was an almost
identical, slightly larger unit, termed Building CQ2
(Photos 12.120, 12.123) (external measurements
5.6–6.0×6.3 m; floor space, ca. 21 sq m). As noted
above, the southern part of the western wall was
slightly skewed, and the entire eastern wall (8405)
was even more so, and thus, the building was somewhat trapezoidal (Photo 12.123).
The problem of the entrance to this building
remains unresolved. If we duplicate the plan of
Building CQ1, the entrance should have been close
to the eastern end of Wall 8434 and thus, exactly
opposite the entrance into C-1a Building CX to the
south. However, the wall here stood up to 1.0 m
above the floor level inside the building and did not
show any signs of a gap or a blockage. Note the
suggestion that the street level to the south of
Building CQ2, which was ca. 1.0 m higher than the
floor inside the building, might have served to
directly access an upper floor.
Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an
extremely large amount for such a small building,
even when taking into account the existence of a
second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same
size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in
Chapter 45.
The southern and largest room of this building
(7500) spanned its entire width. Due to the angle of
the eastern wall (8405), it was trapezoidal (internal
measurements 2.6×4.5–4.9 m; 12.2 sq m). The
floor of this room was identical to that of Room
6483 in Building CQ1: a stone pavement (7503) on
the west and soft reddish clay on the east (7500), on
line with the entrance into Room 7490. The pavement was nicely laid, with small stones filling the
gaps between the flat-topped stones, which incorporated several broken and complete upper
grinding stones. A large lower grinding stone was
found in the southwestern part of the room, some
0.3 m above the stone floor. It is possible that this
had belonged to a grinding stone installation similar to those found in Building CQ1, CF and CE, as
chunks of hard clay found scattered nearby might
have been part of its surrounding parapet. Attached
to the center of the southern wall was a bin (7508),
0.8 m wide and 1.5 m long, with narrow clay walls
that also ran partially along the southern wall. A
stone mortar was found on the northeastern end of
this bin with an upper grinding stone inside it.
Underneath the reddish clay floor in the southeastern corner of this room was a rather large
smooth pink mizi limestone resting on a layer of red
and gray striations (8445), similar to those in
Building CQ1; a juglet (Fig. 13.118:11) was found
in this layer. This stone was very similar to that
found in the Stratum C-1b phase of Building CF,
described above. Like in Room 6483 in Building
CQ1, this layer ran to the west under the stone floor
and it is possible that it represented the Stratum
C-1b occupation. The foundations of both the
southern and eastern walls of Building CQ2 were
not reached and it is possible that an earlier phase is
yet to be exposed.
Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt
destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos
12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels
(Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of
fine small closed vessels. Several other objects
were found as well (Table 12.18). An interesting
find was a concentration of some 20 small polished
black and gray wadi pebbles found on the floor, as
well as inside an intact juglet (Fig. 13.118:17).
These were weighed in order to ascertain if they
had significance as weights, but it seems that this
was not their main function, as they did not yield
any known value (pers. comm., Raz Kletter).
The northwestern room (internal measurements
2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m), was slightly wider than its
counterpart in Building CQ1. On the east, it was
closed by Wall 7406 and on the south by Wall 7459,
in which a 0.75 m-wide entrance was located on its
eastern end. Wooden beams were incorporated in
the foundations of the walls in this room (Photo
12.125) and the entrance had a fine brick threshold
with a plank of wood found in situ. An exceptional
recess was located in the outer eastern side of the
entrance in Wall 8411, a detail somewhat similar to
the rounded recesses in two of the entrances in
Building CP (11440, 11446), described below. Two
brick courses were missing from this wall in its
center (Photo 12.126); this appears to have been a
kind of window or niche between this room and the
one to its south.
The reddish clay floor (7490) in this room was
exactly the same as the floors in Building CQ1. The
top of Stratum C-2 Wall 7492 (Photo 12.125) protruded into the floor, running along the northern
wall of the room, 0.2 m above the floor, and might
have been used as a bench.
This room was filled with burnt destruction
debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo
12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete
vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds
(Table 12.18). A complete baking tray (Fig.
13.112:1), made of non-cooking pot fabric, a rare
item in the Iron Age IIA pottery assemblage of Tel
Rehov, was one of the finds in this room.
The northeastern room was the smallest; its trapezoid shape was due to the angle of the eastern wall
(8405) (internal measurements 1.2–1.4×2.1; ca. 3.0
sq m). A row of bricks (8412) ran along the
southern face of Wall 6407 in the northern part of
this room, continuing the line of 7492 from the
adjacent room, but standing much higher, almost on
the level of the tops of the surrounding walls. Since
excavation did not proceed below the floor, it is not
known whether this was the upper part of an earlier
wall, like Wall 7492. The entrance to the room on
the southeast, 0.7–0.8 m wide, contained a curious
feature composed of four narrow bricks that formed
a square, enclosing a small area of softer debris
(8446). To the south of the southern brick was an
upper grinding stone, parallel to the threshold; it is
difficult to say whether it was deliberately placed
there or was fallen. The presence of this bin-like
element just where one would step into the room
through the threshold is enigmatic. It is possible
that it was a Stratum C-1b element that slightly protruded into the floor here, or that it was somehow
related to the function of the room.
Room 8431 was full of burnt destruction debris
and fallen bricks, yielding seven vessels and several other objects (Table 12.18).
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to
the south, see below) are exceptional among the
Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small
overall size and the even smaller size of the inner
rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms.
It may be assumed that these houses had a second
story, thus their functional space could have been
double, although no evidence for steps was found
and access must have been from the outside of the
building. This possibility may explain the lack of
an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the
lower storey of this building was entered by a
wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a
hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact,
there was such an entrance in Building CQ1,
despite the higher street level to its south. Notably,
the buildings contained very large amounts of pottery, as well as a range of other finds, that might
point to them having been dwellings. On the other
hand, they lacked cooking facilities, such as ovens,
although cooking pots and one baking tray were
found.
These buildings can be compared to small
houses found in Area C at Hazor, dating to the
13th–11th centuries BCE (Yadin et al. 1960: 98, Pl.
208), in Tell Abu Hawam Stratum IV (Hamilton
1935: Plate IV), Aphek Stratum X11 (Gadot and
Yadin 2009: 90––93, Figs. 6.2, 6.4), and perhaps
also Building 442 in Stratum VIA at Tel Batash,
although it was not fully uncovered and appears to
have been larger (Mazar 1997: 76–79; list cited
from Gadot and Yadin 2009: 93, with Egyptian parallels as well). However, all these examples are
much earlier (13th–11th centuries BCE), while no
similar houses are known in Iron Age II Israel.
Building CG (Squares T–Y/2–4) was a narrow rectangular structure, measuring externally 3.4×8.9 m,
with massive walls wider than those of other buildings (recalling the double walls of back-to-back
units) (Photos 12.5, 12.8, 12.127). Both the
external and the internal walls were 0.9 m wide,
composed of two rows of bricks, one laid
widthwise and one lengthwise, a building technique found so far almost exclusively in this
building. The walls were composed of hard-packed
light and dark gray bricks and were exposed just
under topsoil.
The building contained three small square
rooms that had no entrances and were apparently
accessed from above. The floor space of each room
was 2.5–2.7 sq m. It is possible that this building
had a second story. Although the amount of debris
and fallen bricks found here did not seem to justify
this, we must take into account that much of this
material was eroded and disappeared from this high
point of the lower mound.
The only discernible change in this building
between Strata C-1b and C-1a took place in its
southernmost room, while only one phase was
detected in the other two rooms. The buildings
adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the
east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the
southeast, and the open area south of Building CD
on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still
adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to
the east and west of Building CG became open
spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to
the west).
The two outer walls on the west and east (1416,
2411) ran parallel to each other on an almost
straight north–south line, while the northern (2453)
and southern (2439) walls of the building were
slightly skewed, running on a southwest–northeast
line; on the north, this was the same angle as that of
Building CE, which adjoined it. The sharp angles of
the short walls (especially in the northern part of
the structure) give the plan a slightly irregular
shape.
The building was constructed on top of the
ruins of Building CB of Stratum C-2: the western
wall (1416) was built over Wall 2505, 0.3 m to its
east (Figs. 12.16, 12.68–12.69, Photos 12.31–
12.34) and the southern wall (2439) was built over
the southern part of the entrance in Wall 2505
(Photo 12.32). Room 2444 covered Wall 2481 of C2 (Photo 12.38). All the walls were preserved ca.
ten courses high and had wooden beams in their
foundations (Photos 12.128–12.133). The massive
construction of the interior and exterior walls was
apparently related to the surmised function as a granary or storage building.
The northernmost room (internal measurements
1.5–1.6×1.6 m; ca. 2.56 sq m) contained fallen
ceiling material and hard vitrified brick debris
(2449), some of it burnt to a powdery lime, to a total
depth of 1.2 m above the assumed floor at level
86.40 m. Although excavation proceeded past the
foundation level of the walls, no clear floor matrix
was detected and the assumed floor (2460) was
determined only on the basis of the location of the
finds and the floating level of the walls (Fig. 12.76).
Unlike the other rooms in this building, no charred
wood was found here below the floor level.
This small room contained 22 vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), many of them very
burnt. Twenty-eight stone loomweights were
found, concentrated mainly in the southwestern
corner of the room. No grain was found in this
room, although a large amount was found in the
other two rooms. The small size of this chamber
and the lack of an entrance indicated that this large
collection of varied pottery vessels and objects was
apparently stored here, perhaps close to the time of
destruction. As we assume that all three chambers
in this building served as a granary, the use of this
chamber for storage appears to be secondary, at a
time when no grain was stored here.
The middle room of the building (2444) measured
almost exactly the same as Room 2460 to its north
(internal measurements 1.5×1.6 m; 2.4 sq m). Its
southern wall (2429) had a 0.7 m wide gap in its
five upper courses (not shown on the plan; Photo
12.127), although its southern face and bottom
courses clearly showed that this was a solid wall.
This gap appears to have been intentional, perhaps
used as a storage niche or it was an elevated
opening, similar to those in the square granary
rooms at Tel Hadar (Kochavi 1999: 181, Fig. 2).
A light-colored clay layer which appears to
have been the floor (2444, 86.60 m) was defined as
such mainly based on its position at the foundation
of the walls, the wooden beams underneath it, and
the destruction debris (2425) resting on it,
including a large amount of grain. Just below the
floor level, a round wooden beam was incorporated
in the foundation of Wall 1416, running 1.3 m from
the northwestern corner of the room to the south,
where it branched out to protrude into the room for
0.25 m. Round wooden beams (average diameter
0.10–0.15 m) were also placed in the foundation of
Wall 2411 on the east (Fig. 12.77). However, as
opposed to the beam in Wall 1416, these were laid
perpendicular to the wall and protruded into the
room up to 1.5 m, just below the floor level; they
included tree trunks and branches, as well as some
worked beams (Fig. 12.41; Photo 12.130). As noted
above, these same wooden beams were visible in
the eastern face of Wall 2411. It thus can be seen
that the wood was laid in preparation for the construction of the walls and floors and constituted a
well-planned system. Under the charred wood that
extended from the foundation of Wall 2411 into the
room was a single course of bricks (2478) running
north–south, serving as a kind of support, above
which a shallow fill was laid. These bricks
appeared to have been intentionally removed from
C-2 Wall 2481, which ran under the northern end of
this room, and served as a sub-floor constructional
element (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38).
The room was full of fallen ceiling material and
extremely burnt debris, including ashes and complete fallen bricks, burnt to white and yellow vitrification and to a powdery consistency (2425), which
were found especially in the southwestern part of
the room, at a total depth of 1.0 m. At 86.80–86.90
m, a large concentration of charred grain (about 2.0
kg) was found in the southwestern corner and
against the northern face of Wall 2429. The only
other finds in this room were fragments of a bowl
(Fig. 13.52:10) and sherds of a large Hippo storage
jar (Fig. 13.55:18), indicating that its main function
might have been grain storage, used as a kind of a
‘chamber-bin’. The grains were identified as wheat
(Chapter 53) and were subjected to a series of 14C
dating. One measurement from Locus 2444
(Sample R30) provided the dates 928–858 BCE
(1σ) and 970–846 BCE (2σ); a second date appears
to be too high. Samples R31–R34 from Locus 2425
were measured with 21 repetitions in four laboratories; the average calibrated date was 898–844 BCE
(1σ) and 906–837 BCE (2σ) (see data and discussion in Chapter 48).
The southern room is reconstructed as having been
identical to the two complete northern rooms. With
the reconstructed southeastern corner, Room 2441
measured internally ca. 1.6×1.7 m (2.7 sq m), very
similar to the room to its north. However, most of
the eastern and southern walls of this room had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72;
Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m
long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall
2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the
eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a
straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This
straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a
door jamb of an opening leading to the room from
Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen
fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to
Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed
entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in
Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain.
Both the floor and the walls of this room were
constructed above a 1.3 m-deep layer of fill and
wood which apparently was laid as a leveler and
stabilizer on top of the C-2 remains below (Photos
12.128–12.129). This deep wooden construction
was composed of four to five layers of alternating
lengthwise and widthwise wooden beams (2470,
2471, 4421; Fig. 12.42a–c; Photos 12.131–12.133).
The upper layer of wood, with nicely worked
rounded beams, some reaching over 1.0 m long,
was mostly laid on a north–south axis (2470; Photo
12.143). The two lowest layers of this wood (2471,
4421) were mostly laid on an east–west axis (Photo
12.133). Notably, most of the lower level of this
sub-floor wooden construction was horizontal, as
opposed to the higher levels of the wood, which
sloped down towards the east, having collapsed
with the southeastern corner of the room. Although
the lower layers of wood under the floor penetrated
down deeper than the wood in the foundations of
Walls 1416 and 2439, and were found on the level
of the entranceway in C-2 Wall 2505 (Photos
12.32–12.33, 12.128–12.129), they should be
attributed to the construction of Building CG in
Stratum C-1b. The reasons for this are:
Since the two northern rooms of Building CG did
not suffer the same severe collapse as Room 2441,
the possibility exists that they continued to be in
use during Stratum C-1a (Fig. 12.50). An indication
for this is the fact that Piazza 2417 on the east and
Piazza CK on the west, both of Stratum C-1a,
abutted this building. The floors of the courtyards
were at levels 87.55–87.75 m, 1.2–1.4 m higher
than the original floors inside these two chambers.
There are two possibilities to explain this stratigraphic
situation. The first is that the floors of
Stratum C-1b continued to be in use in Stratum
C-1a and the rooms were approached from above,
as in the previous occupation level. In that case, the
destruction debris in Rooms 2460 and 2444, with
its pottery and the charred grain that was measured
for 14C dates, would be explained as belonging to
the last use of the rooms in Stratum C-1a. The other
possibility is that a new floor was constructed in
Stratum C-1a above this destruction debris, which
would then be attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b
in these two rooms. Such a floor, which was not
preserved, would have been at a level higher than
87.70 m (the preserved top of the walls) and might
have disappeared due to erosion. We thus leave this
question open, although it is of crucial importance
for dating, due to the large number of 14C dates
from the central room (Loci 2425, 2444) mentioned
above. It should be noted that the loci numbers of
floors and destruction layers appear only in the plan
of Stratum C-1b, thus accepting the second possibility;
the first possibility would require presenting
these numbers in the plan of Stratum C-1a as well.
However, since a final verdict is impossible, the
loci in these two rooms are tentatively defined as
belonging to Stratum C-1b, although we are aware
of the alternative.
Evidence for partial rebuild of the southern
room (2441) in Stratum C-1a can possibly be seen
in the two upper courses of Wall 2441 close to its
southern end; while the entire wall suffered from
severe slippage of the bricks, these two upper
course were not burnt and were laid horizontally
above the burnt and tilted courses below (Photos
12.127, 12.131–12.132, 12.159, 12.160). This
raises the possibility that these two courses
represent a rebuild of the wall in Stratum C-1a. It should,
however, be emphasized that there are no other
stratigraphic indications for such a phase in this
room, such as a higher floor, although such a
floor could have existed close to topsoil and had
been eroded away, as possible in the two northern
rooms.
In the area east of Building CG, and above the
collapse from this building that sealed the apiary, a
leveling fill (5430, 4408; Squares Y/1–2) was laid
in preparation for the construction of Building CL
in Stratum C-1a; Wall 4443 of that building had a
foundation trench that cut this fill (Fig. 12.74;
Photos 12.135, 12.144). This stratigraphic evidence
to the east of Building CG, but clearly related to it,
supports our conclusion that the building was
founded in Stratum C-1b, destroyed at the end of
this stratum, along with Building CH and the
apiary, and reused (partially?) in Stratum C-1a.
Building CM (Squares Y–Z/3) was a unit to the
south of Building CF and to the east of Building CG
(Photo 12.127), built above the C-2 remains here. It
adjoined the apiary on the north and, since the partition
wall between them was quite flimsy, it is possible that Building CM was related to the apiary in
some functional way, despite the difference in floor
levels: 86.20 m in the northern and central part of
Building CM and 84.55–84.60 m in the northern
part of the apiary. It seems that Wall 9453 of
Building CZ (exposed only along its eastern face in
Squares A/2–3) was the eastern border of Building
CM. The floor inside the western part of Building
CZ (84.90 m) was lower by 0.35 m than that in the
eastern part of Building CM (85.20 m) and 1.35 m
lower than that identified in the western part of
Building CM (86.20 m), and it is possible that there
was a terraced effect here, following a natural
downslope from west to east.
The external measurements of Building CM
were ca. 7.8 m×9.0 m, depending on the western
and eastern boundaries, which were not entirely
clear. It included a small room (4446) in its northwestern corner, a larger space to its south (4445)
and possibly an open space (5441, 5442) in its east.
Access to the building was most likely from the
western end of the street that we assume ran in
Squares Z, A–C/4 to the northeast of the building.
Building CM ended in a fierce fire. It went out
of use in Stratum C-1a and was covered by a courtyard (2417), whose floor was 1.35 m higher than
the floors in this building. It is noteworthy that this
was one of the few places where a clear distinction
could be made between Strata C-2, C-1b and C-1a.
The northwestern room (4446) was poorly preserved (internal measurements 2.0×2.9 m, 5.8 sq
m) (Photos 12.136–12.138). Its walls were composed of crumbly brownish-gray bricks with light
gray mortar lines. The western wall of the room
(4432) was built above Stratum C-2 Wall 4516
(Fig. 12.75), but continued further to the south, running a total of 4.0 m until it terminated rather
abruptly just past its corner with Wall 4411. It ran
parallel to the eastern face of Wall 2411 of Building
CG, with a 0.2 m gap between them; the foundation
heights of the two walls were identical, suggesting
that they were constructed together. Yet, unlike
Wall 2411, which was standing to a height of 1.5 m,
due to its being in continuous use in both Strata
C-1b and C-1a, Wall 4432 was preserved only
0.25–0.35 m high, aside from a lone stump that was
0.65 m higher than the rest of the wall (Photo
12.136); this stump was located precisely in the
balk between Squares Y/3 and Y/4. It is not clear
why it was left standing so high, when the rest of
the wall was razed.
Along the eastern face of Wall 2411 was a row
of nine chalices (4424) (Fig. 13.49:9–17; Photo
12.138). Two (one intact) were found near the
northern end of Wall 4432 (just north of the
abovementioned stump), while six more were
found running 2.0 m to the south. The chalices were
revealed just at the level of the preserved top of
Wall 4432, leading to the conclusion that they were
placed there following the razing of this wall. Their
position exactly in the gap between Walls 4432 and
2411, as well as the higher preservation of the
stump, suggests that they might have been a deliberate
deposit, perhaps related to some ritual following the destruction of Stratum C-1b.
The northern wall of the building (4479) created a
double wall with Wall 4413 of Building CF.
Wall 4479 was 8.7 m long, preserved to a height of
1.3 m, and was very burnt. The northwestern corner
of Building CM was part of a massive construction,
where the corners of four buildings (CE, CF, CG
and CM) met. This dense corner in Square Y/4 was
a meeting point between Walls 1473, 4479, 4432
and 2454; each of these walls had its own end or
face and they abutted one another, indicating that
although each belonged to separate buildings, all
were built in consideration of each other. As in
most other Stratum C-1b walls, wooden beams
were incorporated in the foundations of Walls 4432
and 4479. While only a few pieces were noted in
the northern end of Wall 4432, the wood in the
foundation of Wall 4479 was dense and composed
of small rounded beams laid perpendicular to the
line of the wall at closely spaced intervals (Photos
12.136–12.137); see Wall 6444 in Building CW and
Wall 1437 in Building CH for a similar configuration (Fig. 12.46; Photo 12.145). A unique feature of
the wood in Wall 4479 was that it was laid above
the lowest two brick courses, rather than at the very
bottom of the wall. This somewhat recalls the situation with Wall 2411 in Building CG, where the
wooden beams in its foundation were laid on bricks
(2478), as described above.
The eastern wall of the room in Stratum C-1b
was Wall 4433, which abutted Wall 4479. This wall
was 0.8 m wide and was composed of a row of
bricks laid lengthwise and one row widthwise,
recalling the walls in Building CG. The wall was
poorly preserved on both its southern end and its
eastern face; it seems that it terminated just about at
the line of the balk between Squares Y/3–4, and it is
possible that its southern end originally had an
entrance that led into the room. The southern
closing wall of this room (4411) was very poorly
preserved. The room contained several layers of
debris (4417, 4430, 4446). While no clear floor was
detected, its lowest layer (4446) was on the same
level (86.19 m) as Floor 4445 to the south of Wall
4411. These loci, which lacked traces of destruction, might have been a fill that leveled off the area
in preparation for the construction of Piazza 2417
in Stratum C-1a.
In the area to the east of Room 4446 was a floor (5441, 5442) at level 86.25–86.30 m. In the north, Floor 5442 contained a concentration of crushed travertine in its center. In the south, Floor 5441 was made of soft pink plaster; a smooth flat-topped pink mizi limestone and a complete storage jar (Fig. 13.51:3) turned upside down were found on this floor. While the northern end of this floor was horizontal, it sloped down towards the south (Fig. 12.78); this slope may possibly be related to the lower southern end of the building, described below. As noted above, it is not known whether this space continued to the east up to Building CZ, as the area between them remained mostly unexcavated (Square Z/3). It might have been an open courtyard, although enclosing walls may be hidden in the unexcavated area in Squares Z/3–4.
To the south of Wall 4411 was a space (4445;
Photos 12.127, 12.139–12.142) that ran 3.2 m to the
south until Wall 8469, the flimsy narrow wall that
bordered the apiary (Fig. 12.78). An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the
south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end
of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered
Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the
result of the same seismic activity that caused the
collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG,
described above. The wooden beams laid in the
foundation of Wall 2411 that were visible in the
matrix of 4445, penetrated under the wall into
Building CG to the west, as described above.
The northern and central part of Room 4445
contained very burnt brick debris (4441) on top of a
beaten-earth floor (4445, level 86.20 m) (Photo
12.139). An oval-shaped installation built of hard
dark gray clay (4448) was built on this floor, just
against the southern face of Wall 4411; the gray
clay of the installation continued along the southern
face of Wall 4411, indicating their contemporaneity. The installation was ca. 0.7 m long, 0.4
m wide, preserved 0.28 m high; it contained a
complete cooking jug (Fig. 13.50:4; Photos
12.139–12.140). Another installation related to
Floor 4445 was a small bin made of reddish clay
and lined with wood (4449) in the southwestern
part of this area, built against the eastern face of
Wall 2411 (Photo 12.139).
From the line of Installation 4449 until the
southern end of the building, the floor was not clear
and, in its stead, was a dense concentration of
charred wood, 1.0 m wide (4456, 8443, 8447),
abutting Wall 8469. Just north of this pile, and east
of Installation 4449, was a large stone (Photos
12.139, 12.141–12.142). This strip of charred
wood, composed mostly of tree trunks and
branches, was set into a reddish layer (8471) (Fig.
12.78). The bottom of this reddish layer (85.30 m)
was 0.9 m lower than the floor in the northern part
of this room, suggesting that this area might have
been dug out to accommodate the wood pile. This
strip of charred wood might have been either part of
a sub-floor construction or was related to the construction of Wall 8469, which enclosed the apiary
to the south (see below). The goal of this wood was
perhaps to support the gap created by the 1.6 m
height difference between the floor of this space
and that of the apiary to the south. Thus, the strip of
wood, together with Wall 8469, may be explained
as a kind of revetment for the lower terrace on
which the apiary was constructed to the south. The
eastern part of the wood concentration (8443, 8447)
contained many fallen bricks, burnt debris and a
thick layer of phytolith (Photo 12.142), inside of
which was the lower part of a very large krater (Fig.
13.50:1) and several loomweights.
At the eastern end of Room 4445 was a short
north–south line of bricks (8441) standing only two
courses high; its northern end terminated in a complete brick, while its southern end appears to have
been cut (Photo 12.142). Although these bricks
were on line with the middle row of hives in the
apiary to the south, no connection between them
was found. This segment of bricks could have been
a low partition or part of a wall that had been dismantled.
To the east of Wall 8441, a probe in the eastern part of Square Z/3 revealed a layer of destruction debris, fallen bricks, wood and phytolith (11429) that rested on a reddish layer (11450) at 85.20 m and abutted Wall 8469 (very poorly preserved here; Photo 12.160), a sequence similar to that in the south of Room 4445. It seems that this was the continuation of the wood and reddish debris layer in the south of that room and might have been related to the eastern row of hives in the apiary, revealed to its south. Most probably, this matrix abutted the western face of Wall 9453 and its corner with Wall 8469, although the point of contact remained unexcavated.
Building CH was comprised of two excavated
rooms (2455, 2451) that adjoined Building CG on
the south (Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20) (Photo 12.143);
its southern part was beyond the limit of the excavation
and to its east was the apiary. This structure
apparently functioned as a service wing for the
apiary, perhaps used for the processing of the
products and/or for administrative work (Fig. 12.47).
Its floors were ca. 1.75 m higher than those of
the apiary itself, although both were contemporary
and related. All the walls of this building were
composed of light and dark gray bricks, incorporating
sporadic yellow bricks. Along the eastern edge of
the two rooms was a sub-floor construction of
wooden beams laid in two to three layers that joined
the rooms to the apiary floor below, described
below.
The western wall (1438) of Building CH,
which was also the eastern wall of Building CJ, was
exposed along 7.5 m and continued to the south
beyond the limit of the excavation. It was built on
top of C-2 Wall 2468 (Photos 12.45, 12.143) and
had wooden beams incorporated in its foundation,
mostly in its northern part (Figs. 12.72–12.74). The
northern wall (1437) was the continuation of the
northern wall of Building CJ. It terminated on the
east just on line with the southern wall (2439) of
Building CG, which it abutted. To the east of this
was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down
towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the
southeastern corner of Building CG, as described
above. Wall 1437 had many small round wooden
beams in its foundation, set perpendicular to the
wall in two layers, above the preserved top of C-3
Wall 4495 (Fig. 12.72; Photos 12.144–12.145).
The eastern part of Building CH collapsed
down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the
southeastern end of Building CG to the north. This
collapsed eastern part of Building CH was superimposed by the western wing of Building CL of
Stratum C-1a (Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–
12.147, 12.149). Although none was found, it is
possible that there had been an eastern closing wall
to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood,
that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden
partition might have closed off this end of the room
that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that
the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a
higher level than the apiary floor below.
The two excavated rooms of Building CH were
separated by Wall 2426, which extended 3.0 m to
the east of Wall 1438, until it was cut by the foundation trench of Wall 2413, the western wall of
Building CL (Photos 12.146–12.147, 12.149). No
entrance between the two rooms was found; perhaps such a connection had been located further to
the east, or each was accessed separately from the
apiary by way of wooden ladders or brick steps.
Wall 2426 was built on top of the northern face of
C-2 Wall 2465 (Photo 12.148). It was horizontal on
its western end, but 1.0 m from its corner with Wall
1438, it collapsed towards the east at an acute
angle; the difference between the level and fallen
parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos
12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto
the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on
their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a,
as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this
area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b.
While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western
part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that
was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. However, Wall 1438, the
western wall of the building, continued to be in use
in Stratum C-1a as the eastern wall of Building CJ
(described above).
Below the destruction debris in the eastern part of
the rooms was a unique construction of wood, two
to three layers deep, 1.4 m wide, and running north
to south along 10 m, the entire exposed length of
the building, from the southern balk of Square Y/1
(where it continued to the south beyond the limit of
the excavation) up to Wall 1437 and the subsidiary
balk to its east in Square Y/2, where it intersected
with the perpendicular beams in the foundation of
Wall 1437 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.3,
12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148–12.149). The wood
continued to the north under Wall 1437
and apparently ran under Wall 2439 (collapsed at this point)
to join with the sub-floor wood in Room 2441 in
Building CG, showing that the two buildings had
been constructed at the same time.
The wood that ran along the eastern edge of
Rooms 2451 and 2455 was obviously constructed
before the floors were laid and before Wall 2426
was built. Just north of Wall 2426, the strip of wood
cut C-2 Wall 2465. The eastern part of the wooden
construction sloped down towards the east, particularly in the southern part (Square Y/1); the height of
the top of the wood in the west was 86.25 m, while
the height of its top in the east was 85.50 m, a 0.75
m difference over 1.4 m. The wood was comprised
mostly of tree trunks and branches, all found
charred and carbonized.
In the northern room (2455), the wood was laid
in two layers, with a 0.2 m-deep reddish fill
between them; the uppermost layer ran north–south
and was composed of relatively large beams, while
the layer below, less well defined, ran both north–
south and east–west, creating a kind of a weave.
There was a 1.0 m gap between this strip of wood
and the wood in the foundation of Wall 1438 (Figs.
12.45–12.46; Photos 12.144, 12.148). No wood
was found to the east of this strip and it was laid on
top of layer of whitish material, possibly very burnt
wood or bricks, located directly above the preserved tops of Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496. It
is suggested that these walls served as a support for
the wood (see further below).
In the southern room (2451), the wood construction consisted of three tiers whose eastern part
was markedly stepped (Photo 12.149). Like in
Room 2455, the wood was laid alternately north–
south and east–west (Fig. 12.45) and did not join
with the wood in Wall 1438, except for one beam
that protruded from the wall in the northwestern corner of the room. Like in the northern
room, underneath the wood was a white layer
which was laid on top of a Stratum C-3 gray-brick
wall (4480).
Two alternatives are suggested to explain this
construction. The first is that this descent could
have been wooden steps, wood that supported brick
steps, or a sloping ramp, leading down to the apiary
floor on the east. This suggestion is supported by
the relatively orderly manner in which the tiers of
wood were laid (Fig. 12.45; Photos 12.143–12.144,
12.146, 12.148). The alternative explanation is that
the wood, as found, was fallen, and that originally it
had served as a roof and support beams of a hollow
space below it, forming a basement in Building CH.
Such a basement may have been bordered on the
west by re-used C-3 Wall 4495 and perhaps by a
wood construction built on that wall, while in the
east, it could have been left open towards the
apiary, with only a few wooden posts supporting
the roof (see suggested reconstruction in Fig.
12.47c). The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have
been partly built above this basement, which would
explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a
level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74).
The destruction of this structure and the bricks of
Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created
the slope of this layer as found. The height of this
basement can be calculated by comparing the floor
to the west (2451, 1515, levels 86.20–86.40 m) to
the top level of the gray walls of Stratum C-3 (4480,
4495, 4496) that were found below the charred
beams (85.14–84.85 m), since we surmise that
these walls served as a support for this basement.
This difference in levels (maximum 1.55 m) should
also include the floor of the basement and the thickness of the wood construction that supported the
floor above it, that later collapsed. Thus, the subfloor space itself could not have been more than ca.
1.0 m high. According to this reconstruction, this
basement could have had two components: 1)
underneath the northern room (2455), a narrow
space located in the area above Stratum C-3 Walls
4495 and 4496 (Fig. 12.47a) and 2) underneath the
southern room (2451), a narrow space that would
have been open towards the apiary (Fig. 12.47b).
Alternatively, it is possible that this entire area was
one long space, possibly continuing to the north
into Building CG, as suggested above (Fig.
12.47d). The roof of this alcove would have been
the collapsed tiers of wood on the eastern end of the
wooden construction in the south. The low ceiling
of this basement would suggest that these spaces
could have served for storage of commodities in
containers. The postulated space below Room 2441
of Building CG (described above) might have been
a continuation of the same phenomenon.
The southern room (2451) was at least 3.3 m from
north to south, as its southern border was beyond
the limits of the excavation (Photos 12.143,
12.149). Like the room to the north, the eastern end
collapsed to the east and was covered by Stratum
C-1a Building CL.
The floor of this room was identical to that of
Room 2455, both in its composition of burnt powdery white lime and the reddish sub-floor material,
as well as the strip of wooden beams on its eastern
end. Here too, it is surmised that below the floor in
this room there was a basement, as described
above.
On the floor was a thick layer of destruction
debris with fallen bricks, ceiling material, charcoal
and ash, concentrated mainly in the west and south
of the room. Fifteen vessels were found in this
room (of which only a part was excavated), as well
as other finds (Table 12.21).
The area to the east of Building CH in Squares Y– Z, A/1–2, 20 was occupied by an apiary of industrial scope, which included three north–south rows of unfired clay hives, separated by elongated aisles. The stratigraphy and general spatial organization of the apiary will be described below, while the structure and makeup of the hives, as well as additional details and illustrations, are presented in Chapter 14A. Three scientific studies of the apiary are presented in Chapters 14B–14D, and discussions of the apiary’s operation, historical context, and ethnographic comparisons are presented in Chapter 14E.
Due to the broad expanse of this space, as well as
the very nature of the industry, which contained
over a million bees, we assume that this had been an
open area, although it is probable that each row of
hives was roofed with thatch or other material, such
as cloth or clay, to shield them from the intense heat
in the summer or from the rains in the winter.
The apiary was bordered by Wall 9453 on the
east, Building CH on the west, and Wall 8469 of
Building CM on the north. It extended to the south
beyond the limit of the excavation in Square Z/20
and thus, it measured 9.0–9.5 m from east to west
and at least 13.0 m from north to south, an area of
117–123.5 sq m
The eastern wall of the apiary was Wall 9453, which was on line with Wall 6408 of the northeastern complex (Squares A/4–5; Fig. 12.18), demonstrating the integral city plan of Stratum C-1b. It was a well-built wall, preserved to five courses and very burnt, that ran for 16.4 m, serving as both the eastern wall of the apiary and the western wall of Building CP (early phase), while on its northern end (preserved to ten courses, not burnt), it was both the western wall of Building CZ and, most likely, the eastern wall of Building CM. Above it was C-1a Wall 9406, that served as the western wall of both Buildings CP and CQ3 (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 9453 was abutted on the west by the destruction debris and floor of the apiary (9451); a perpendicular wooden beam in its foundation extended into the floor. The southern end (in Square A/1; Fig. 12.39) contained a section with some irregular bricks, possibly an entrance leading to the lower phase of Building CP on the east (Photos 12.153, 12.234). Just at this point, it was abutted by a 2.0 m-long strip of narrow bricks fronted by a patch of small stones on the floor level that might have served as a step up to this entrance. The western face of the wall was covered with a hard brownish-yellow mud plaster, while its bricks were mostly brown and gray and of a very hard consistency, possibly due to the fire that engulfed this area
Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition, perhaps constructed in conjunction with the deep strip of wood to its north (at the southern end of Building CM) described above, which both abutted the northern side of this wall and penetrated down to a level below its foundation (Fig. 12.78; Photos 12.142, 12.151, 12.154, 12.160). The wall was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). The highest level of its central segment was just about on line with the highest preserved top of the hives (Photos 12.151, 12.156–12.157). Between the floating level of this wall and the apiary floor was a 0.15 m thick layer of brown-earth fill that also filled a narrow channel that ran along the southern face of the wall (Photos 12.151, 12.156, 12.159). The eastern end of Wall 8469, north of the eastern row of hives, was so poorly preserved that only a narrow strip of pulverized pinkish material could be identified, although a few complete fallen bricks to the west and east of these hives might have belonged to it (Photo 12.157). As mentioned above, Wall 8469 was most likely not a free-standing element, but rather a kind of buttress attached to the wood construction to its north, both creating a single, quite massive construction that separated Building CM on the north from the apiary to the south. This might have been due to the difference in level of 1.3–1.5 m between these two units, with Wall 8469 and the wood construction serving as kind of terrace or retaining wall between them.
The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary.
Building CH bordered the
apiary on the west, to the south of the aforementioned corner of Building CG. As described in
detail above, its walls and floors were on a higher
level than the apiary floor by some 1.7 m, built
above a wooden construction that was founded on
Stratum C-3 gray-brick walls (4480, 4495, 4496),
creating a roofed area below Building CH, perhaps
open towards the apiary on the east (Fig. 12.47c).
The apiary floor ran up to the eastern faces of Walls
4480 and 4496 (Figs. 12.72–12.73; Photos 12.17,
12.158), and possibly to Wall 5483 on the south. A
thin layer of eroded gray debris (4499) from these
walls was found right on top of the floor (4469,
5440, 7481) in this southwestern section of the
apiary (Figs. 12.86–12.87). It is surmised that when
the builders of Building CH and the apiary dug
down to this level, they encountered these earlier
walls and reused them as a support for the wooden
construction that bordered the building on the east
and as the western edge of the apiary. In spite of the
differences in the floor level of ca. 1.7 m, the apiary
was most likely related to Building CH, which
might have served as its service wing, as proposed
above.
Thus, the apiary was surrounded (at least) on
three sides by built units, and was established on a
lower level than those structures on its west and
north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining
units were built more or less on the same level,
judging by the floor levels.
As noted above, no remains of Stratum C-2 were
identified in the probe made below the apiary floor
(Figs. 12.80, 12.82), and, in fact, C-3 walls were
found directly relating to this floor (Figs. 12.72–
12.73). The reason for the lack of C-2 remains was
most likely related to the low level of the apiary; it
appears that the builders dug down to this level to
create this broad cavity for their industry, obliterating all traces of the previous phase, until they
encountered remains of an even earlier occupation,
C-3, which they utilized to some degree, as
described in detail above and below. It should be
noted that Stratum C-2 remains were revealed east
of the apiary under Building CZ (in Squares A–
C/2–3 (Figs. 12.7, 12.15). Wall 11471 of Stratum
C-2 was cut in this place by Wall 9453, which
served as the eastern boundary of the apiary. Thus,
Stratum C-2 remains were found to the north, west
and east of the apiary, but not within its confines.
The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the
western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b
Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to
east, while the same level of destruction debris
found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos
12.150–12.151). Stratum C-1a Building CL was
built directly above this ca. 1.0 m-deep layer of collapsed bricks and burnt destruction debris that covered the apiary (Photo 12.146) and thus, the
attribution of the apiary to Stratum C-1b is secure.
The level of the apiary floor ranged from 84.50–
84.70 m. It was composed of three different
matrices (Photos 12.150–12.152, 12.158), all of
which were covered by the same destruction debris
and collapse (Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.81, 12.83–
12.87).
The first type of floor was made of dark red
smooth clay, found in the space between Wall 9453
and the eastern row of hives (8482, 9451; 84.55–
84.60 m) (Photos 12.152–12.158). It had many
black burnt patches, especially on its northern end.
In the center of this part of the floor was a hive
(8500) that appeared to have fallen from the eastern
row.
The second type of floor was made of very
hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick,
found in the aisle between the eastern and middle
rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle
between the middle and western rows of hives
(Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). This floor was
covered in part by a thin layer of soft reddish material,
identical to the fill in other Stratum C-1b buildings in
which the wood was set. It is notable that the
hives were set ca. 0.15–0.3 m above this hard white
floor and red layer, on top of a loose brown-earth
fill that included many bones, some sherds and
pieces of wood (Fig. 12.81; Photos 12.152,
12.156). This was the same material seen under the
foundation of the northern wall (8469) and in a
narrow channel running along its southern face
(Photos 12.151, 12.159). The destruction debris in
the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed
bricks, rested directly on this floor. The very hard
and thick matrix of this floor seems to have served a
purpose related to the work in the hives, since it
was concentrated mainly in that area. The reason
for the fill between the floor and bottom of the
hives must have been technical, related to drainage
and ventilation; perhaps the large amount of bones
in this fill served this purpose. In several places,
particularly in the middle row of hives, we found
evidence for charred beams that separated the hives
from the floor, suggesting that in some places, the
hives were located on a level raised by wood.
Another interesting feature in the hard white floor
between the middle and eastern rows (8436) was a
sunken area adjoining the floating level of the
three northernmost hives in the middle row and
abutting the floating level of Wall 8469 to its north
(Photos 12.156, 12.159). This sunken area measured 0.6×1.2 m and was 0.1 m deep; it was lined
with the same hard white material as the floor
showing that they were constructed together, and
was filled with the same loose brown fill as the
channel that ran alongside Wall 8469 and that was
placed under the hives.
An enigmatic feature identified under the
southern end of the middle row of hives (seen in the
northern balk of Square Z/1) was a round area of
eroded gray brick material, 0.5 m in diameter,
which was cut into the hard white floor and penetrated into the upper pink layer of the Stratum C-3
accumulation under the apiary (Photo 12.20). It is
possible that this was a pit, related in some way to
the construction of the hives. This further supports
the relationship between the hard white floor and
the hives themselves.
The third floor type was a soft powdery matrix
of vivid red color, found in the southwestern part of
the apiary (Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.152, 12.158). It
merged with the hard white floor just south of the
western row of hives and west of the southern part
of the middle row of hives (4469); it continued to
the southwest (7481) to abut Walls 4495 and 4480,
as well as to the southern part of the apiary in
Squares Y–Z/20 (5440, 9455, 9458). In the probes
excavated below the apiary floor in the area south
of the three rows of hives (Squares Y–Z/1; Figs.
12.4, 12.82; Photos 12.19–12.20), it was seen that
this red powdery layer continued to the east and
south underneath the hard white tufa floor
described above. It thus seems (as suggested above)
that the tufa floor was laid above the soft red floor
of Stratum C-3, possibly to provide a substantial,
non-permeable surface for the hives and the related
activity, while in the west, where there were no
hives, there was no need for such a surface. The
question remains whether the builders of the apiary
reused the Stratum C-3 floor that they encountered
(along with the gray-brick walls) when digging
down to the level on which they intended to establish the apiary, or whether this was a new floor laid
in Stratum C-1b when the apiary was built. Since
there was no other floor below that abutted the C-3
gray walls, it seems that the former possibility is
more viable. What is clear is that both types of
floors — the hard white and the soft red — were
used together for the duration of the operation of
the apiary and were found covered with the same
layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and pottery.
To the west of the middle row
of hives in Squares Y–Z/1–2 were a number of pits
that were dug from this red floor, as most of them
were lined with this same material (Photos 12.150–
12.152, 12.158–12.159). Very little pottery was
recovered from these pits (Fig. 12.62:4–13), aside
from 8496, which contained a large amount of redpainted pottery and a few red-slipped and handburnished sherds. It is difficult to phase these pits
and, ultimately, it depends whether the red floor
was a Stratum C-1b addition or was originally laid
in Stratum C-3 and reused.
These pits included (from north to south):
This building, only party excavated in Squares A–
C/2–3, was composed of a central space flanked by
two rooms on the western side and at least one
room on the eastern side; it might be considered a
variation of a courtyard house. Its borders on the
north and east were beyond the limit of the excavation, yet it appears that it was bordered on the north
by an unexcavated earlier phase of the Stratum
C-1a street. In that case, it may be assumed that the
building could not be much larger than the parts
excavated. On the west, it was probably attached to
Building CM, and its southwestern corner abutted
the northeastern corner of the apiary. On the south,
the neighboring building was the early phase of
Building CP, with a double wall between the two
(Photo 12.161). Its external measurements were at
least ca. 7.5×12 m. In the southeastern corner of
Building CZ was an opening leading south into
Building CP (early phase) (Photos 12.165, 12.168).
The walls of Building CZ, built of gray and
brown bricks, were well preserved in the western
part, up to a height of up ten courses above the
floors (Photo 12.163).
The central space of this building was bounded on
the south by Wall 11421, on the southeast by Wall
10500, on the west by Wall 11407, and on the north
probably by the continuation of Wall 11455, which
is known only in the western part of the building.
Since Wall 10500 cornered with Wall 10518 and
did not continue to the north (Photos 12.161–
12.162, 12.164), a large L-shaped space was created, most likely an unroofed courtyard, which was
6.2 m from north to south, 3.6 m wide at its
southern part, and at least 7.5 m from east to west in
its northern part; it thus measured at least 41 sq. m.
Wall 11421 was first built in Stratum C-2 (see
above) and was reused in Stratum C-1b, since the
debris and floor (11422, 11442) related to this
stratum abutted it above the debris attributed to
Stratum C-2, some 0.5 m lower. The northern wall
(11458) of the adjacent Building CP was built flush
against Wall 11421; it was preserved three courses
higher than Wall 11421 (Photos 12.165, 12.168)
and, in fact, the layer of fallen bricks and debris that
filled the courtyard abutted these top courses, as
well as the top courses of Wall 11421. It seems that,
at one point, the upper part of Wall 11421 had been
removed in its center and eastern end, revealing the
northern face of Wall 11458 and making it the
southern border of this space.
The floor identified in the central part of the
courtyard (11422, 11426, 11442) was composed of
somewhat patchy red and gray striations that sloped
down from east to west in the southern part near
Wall 11421, but were horizontal in the northern part
(north of the line of Wall 10518). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard, just east of the
entrance into Room 11449 was a pit (11456) lined
with very hard gray mud plaster; it contained only a
few sherds. In the area to the north of Wall 10518
(the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a
0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris
(11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone
fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds,
many of them red slipped and hand burnished.
There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor
level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by
the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower
level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a
Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and,
in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX
were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of
the courtyard (Photo 12.167).
In the southeastern part of this building was Room
11404 (internal measurements 2.1×3.25 m; 6.8 sq
m) (Photos 12.162, 12.165). The room was
bounded on the south by Wall 11421 and on the
north and west by Walls 10500 (1.3 m long) and
10518 (2.4 m long), the latter revealed directly
below the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX
(Photos 12.176, 12.180–12.181). The eastern wall
was not revealed, but it was most likely located
close to the edge of the excavation, just below C-1a
Wall 10490, continuing the line of the short segment of a wall (11479) revealed to the south in
Square C/2, belonging to the early phase of
Building CP (Fig. 12.39; Photos 12.165, 12.168).
This small room had three entrances. The
western entrance, 0.8 m wide, led to the room from
the southern part of the courtyard. The other two,
also 0.8 m wide, were opposite each other on the
eastern ends of Walls 10518 and 11421. The former
led to the northeastern part of the L-shaped courtyard, while the latter led to Building CP (early
phase) by way of an identical entrance in Wall
11458, the northern wall of that building (Photos
12.165, 12.168). The room with three openings is
unparalleled in other buildings and may indicate
some special function, possibly for transit between
Buildings CZ and CP.
This room contained a large amount of fallen
bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor
was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the
north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of
the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls
The western wing of this unit contained two square
rooms of identical size: Room 11449 on the south
and Room 11457 on the north, each with internal
measurements of 2.4×2.4 m; 5.8 sq. m (Photos
12.161, 12.163). The western boundary of both
rooms was the northern continuation of Wall 9453,
which was the wall between the apiary and the early
phase of Building CP. A distinct fill (0.08 m thick)
separated this wall from the Stratum C-1a wall
above it (9406) (Fig. 12.95; Photo 12.163). Wall
11412 separated the two rooms and Wall 11407
bordered both on the east; openings in both ends of
this wall led to the courtyard on the east. Wall
11455 bordered the northern room on the north and
Wall 11427 on the south; both were superimposed
by Stratum C-1a Walls 10472 and 10482 of
Building CQ3, respectively (Photo 12.164).
The floors in the two western rooms were made
of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in
the eastern part of the building. They were covered
by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen
bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room
and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with
large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of
sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished
sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively
large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron
Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the
fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of
Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. After removal of the
floor of Room 11449, the top of an earlier wall
(11471) built of hard yellow bricks was uncovered
at level 84.85 m and attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig.
12.14; Photo 12.163).
The floors of C-1a Building CQ3, located 1.45
m above those of Stratum C-1b, sealed the debris
and the tops of the walls in these rooms (Photos
12.171, 12.173, 12.176). Notably, the floor level in
these two rooms (84.85–84.90 m) was only 0.15–
0.2 m higher than the floor of the apiary that abutted
the eastern face of Wall 9453, showing that this
building was built on the same low level as the
apiary, as opposed to the higher elevation of Buildings CM, CG and CH to its north and west.
It was deliberated whether Building CZ might
be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. In
favor of this assessment were the following arguments: 1.) the building’s walls were preserved to
11–12 courses, just like other Stratum C-2 structures to the north and west (e.g., Building CB);
2.) its levels and stratigraphic situation were similar
to those of nearby Room 6515 and other remains in
Squares A–B/4–5, which we attributed to Stratum
C-2 (Figs. 12.7, 12.12), although they were found
right below C-1a Building CQ1, just as Building
CZ was found just below C-1a Building CX;
3.) Building CZ was filled with fallen bricks and
relatively empty of finds, like most C-2 structures.
In contrast, the following arguments were in favor
of the attribution of Building CZ to Stratum C-1b:
1.) it shared a wall (9453) with the apiary of
Stratum C-1b; 2.) we assume that Building CX
above it was founded in Stratum C-1a, since no
traces of an earlier phase were identified in that
building; 3.) while the walls of Stratum C-2 were
composed of distinct hard yellow bricks, the walls
of Building CZ were built of the typical gray and
brown bricks found in Stratum C-1b; 4.) Wall
11471, found below the floor of the southeastern
room of Building CZ (Fig. 12.15; Photo 12.163),
was constructed of the C-2 brick type and apparently penetrated below Wall 9453 to its west.
This dilemna remains unsolved and both possibilities pose questions. If we attribute Building CZ
to Stratum C-2, we would need to understand Wall
9453, the eastern boundary of the apiary, as a
reused C-2 wall, and this has no other support, particularly in light of the lack of C-2 elements in the
area of the apiary. We would also have to assume
that either Building CZ continued to be in use in
Stratum C-1b with insignificant changes, or that
Building CX (the building above Building CZ) was
first erected in Stratum C-1b, which too, lacks evidence (although we suggested the same concerning
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 which, in our view, were
in use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, based on elements such as wood in the foundations and subfloor striations that abutted the walls). The relatively small amount of pottery recovered from
Building CZ is of types that exist in both Strata C-2
and C-1b, and thus does not help to decide the
issue. Thus, we attribute Building CZ to Stratum
C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence.
Building CQ3 (Squares A/2–3) was built above the
western wing of Building CZ. It was bounded on
the north by the street in Squares A–B/4, on the
west by Piazza 2417, on the east by Building CX
(with which it shared a wall) and on the south by
Building CP (partly by a shared wall and partly by a
double wall). It was designated Building CQ3 due
to the similarity of its plan and dimensions to
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2. The external measurements of this building were 5.6×7.2–7.4 m
(including all walls) and its net floor space was ca.
23.5 sq m.
Like Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, CQ3 was
composed of a single large room (10494) and two
small back rooms (10452, 10460). As opposed to
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, there were two
entranceways in this building; one in its northeastern corner and one in the middle of its western
wall, both 1.2 m wide. The northern entrance
(Photo 12.171) led to the street and was located
directly opposite the entrance into Building CQ1.
The western entranceway led to Piazza 2417; it was
partially paved with bricks, in the foundation of
which was a plank of wood with small round
wooden beams set perpendicularly above it (Photo
12.172). This arrangement was unknown in any
other entranceway and represents a rare use of
wooden beams in Stratum C-1a.
The western wall of this building was Wall
9406 (Fig. 12.95; Photos 12.162–12.163), whose
southern part served as the western wall of Building
CP, indicating that the two buildings were constructed at the same time. The southern wall was
composed of two abutting segments: 9415 on the
west, which was shared with the northwestern room
of Building CP, and 10482 on the east, which
formed a double wall with the northern wall
(10409) of Building CP at this point; this is the only
double wall in the entire southeastern complex in
Stratum C-1a. Wall 10482 had small round wooden
beams in its foundation, similar to those in the
western threshold of the building, and was built
above C-1b Wall 11427 (Photo 12.164). Walls
10482 and 10409 abutted, but did not bond with,
Wall 9448 on their west; this was a constructional
feature and not the result of sub-phasing.
Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of
Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were
preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room
10460 and were flush with the floor level in
Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170,
12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls
were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could
have been done at some point during the lifetime of
the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such
an opening was part of the original plan of both
buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall
10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo
12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3
was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of
C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately
left at a low level in order to allow for passage
between the buildings; see also Wall 10464
(described below). According to A. Mazar, the low
levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part)
resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this
corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely
damaged during the final destruction of this
building or suffered from a late intrusion which
could not be observed in the excavation. According
to this explanation, there had been no passage
between Buildings CP and CQ3.
The northern room’s inner measurements were 3.1×4.4 m; 13.6 sq m (Photo 12.170). As noted above, it had entrances on the north and on the west, as well as two entrances leading to the rooms on its south. The walls, preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). Almost all of the western part of this room was occupied by a unique installation (10505).
The southern end of this installation was composed of a narrow parapet made of
hard-packed brick material, 2.0 m long, 0.2 m wide
and ca. 0.5 m high (Photos 12.170, 12.174–12.175).
Its western end was built on top of a large stone and
was attached to the door jamb of Wall 9406, so that
it bordered the western entrance into the room on its
north.
Attached to the southeastern end of the parapet
was a large gray brick. The area left to the south of
the parapet must have been used as a narrow passageway into the building from the western
entrance, as well as into Room 10452 to the south.
In the floor foundation to the southwest of the brick
parapet was a patch composed of small stones and
chunks of hard brick material (11424; 0.6×0.8 m),
as well as fragments of a lower grinding stone and a
basalt mortar in secondary use. The brick parapet
was built on top of the northern end of these stones
(Photos 12.175–12.176).
To the north of the brick parapet, and occupying the northwestern corner of the room, was a
squarish (1.5×1.7 m) patch of gravelly earth and
reddish brick material, found very burnt. This
square was surrounded by brick material similar to
that of the parapet on its south, while its center contained a paving of sherds and small travertine
stones. On this paving was a storage jar, with its top
half apparently deliberately removed (Fig.
13.133:5; Photo 12.174), containing a large amount
of gray ash; a few scattered loomweights were
found here as well.
The function of this installation remains enigmatic, but the fact that it occupied the western part
of the room points to it having been a major feature
of Building CQ3.
The southwestern room (10452; internal measurements 2.0×2.6 m; 5.2 sq m) (Photo 12.170) was
accessed from the southwestern part of Room
10494 through a 1.2 m-wide entrance in Wall
10417, the northern wall of the room (Photos
12.176–12.177). The room was bordered on the
west by Wall 9406, which was also the western wall
of Building CP to the south, and on the south by
Wall 9415, which was the northern wall of the
western part of Building CP; this demonstrates the
close relationship between the buildings in this
sector. On the east was Wall 10407. All the walls
were covered with a high-quality mud plaster
(Photos 12.177–12.179), similar in makeup to that
found on the walls of Building CP.
The floor (10452) was composed of red clay
interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris
and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or
almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs.
13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored
from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription
on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of)
Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011:
304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A,
No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen
bricks was found against the southern and eastern
walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo
12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular
plastered depression located along the center of the
southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo
12.179).
The southeastern room (10460) was the smallest
(internal measurements 1.8×2.6 m; 4.68 sq m). It
was accessed from Room 10494 through a 1.0 m
wide entrance (Photo 12.170). The room was bordered on the north by Wall 10483, on the west by
Wall 10407, on the south by Wall 10482, and on the
east by Wall 10464, which was also the western
wall of Building CX. A curious feature of the
eastern wall (10464) was its ‘stepped’ preservation.
On the southern end, at its corner with Wall 10482,
it was preserved only 0.15 m above the floor of
Room 10460 along 1.5 m, while halfway through
the room, the wall was preserved some 0.2 m
higher, up to its corner with Wall 10483 (Photos
12.170, 12.173, 12.180); north of this, in Room
10494, the wall was preserved much higher. This
low preservation of the southern end of the wall in
Room 10460 was similar to that of the southern
wall of this room (10482) and western end of Wall
10409 of the adjacent Building CP to the south,
described above. As in that situation, here, too, it
may be asked whether these walls were deliberately
razed in order to allow passage from Room 10460
into the southern part of Building CX on the east,
thus effectively joining these two buildings at one
point during their lifetime. Alternatively, this low
level might be the result of poor preservation,
caused by the destruction of the buildings, which
might have been particularly heavy in the southeastern corner of Building CQ3.
The floor was less well preserved than in the
other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The
room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt
brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds
included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a
storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights
that were concentrated mainly along the western
wall and near the entrance.
Building CP in Stratum C-1a was a large structure
with a unique plan, located in the southeastern
corner of Area C in Squares A–C/20, 1–2 (Photos
12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190). The remains
attributed to Stratum C-1b, which were only partly
excavated, were, in fact, an early phase of the
building, with only minor differences in the walls
discerned in the part of the earlier building that was
exposed, as described above (Photo 12.189). Some
of the walls (e.g., 11477/10457 in the south and
11479/10490 in the east) were, in fact, the same,
with the upper courses of the previous building
reused in Stratum C-1a, now covered with a thick
fine mud plaster, and with new floors laid against
them (Photos 12.193–12.194, 12.196). The eastern
wall of the central rooms (10462, 10485) was new,
built above a gap with fill laid above the earlier wall
(11473) that served as a threshold in the
entranceways in the new wall (Photos 12.191,
12.195). The western wall of the central rooms
(9448, 10480) was also new, built above the earlier
wall (with no gap or fill); here too, the earlier wall
(11470) served as a threshold in the entrances in the
C-1a wall (Photos 12.191, 12.196, 12.219). An
additional difference was the nature and size of the
bricks in the early building, which were larger and
of an extremely hard consistency and gray-white
color; these early walls were not plastered, while
those in the C-1a phase were coated with a fine
thick mud plaster.
In Stratum C-1a, Building CP adjoined
Building CL on the east and Buildings CQ3 and CX
on the south, sharing walls with these buildings
(Photos 12.169–12.170), indicating that all were
built, and possibly functioned, together.
This building was excavated in its entirety
(Squares A–C/20, 1–2). Its external measurements
were 9.2–9.7×12.3 m (ca. 112 sq. m, including
walls) and its internal floor space (including the
benches along the walls) totaled 71.84 sq m. The
walls stood to a height of 1.2 m (on the west) to 0.75
m (on the east) above the floors, and were exposed
just below topsoil.
Building CP was unique in its plan and flow of
internal circulation. Its plan consisted of eight
rooms: two large rectangular central ones (10458,
10476) flanked by three small rooms on the east
(10510, 11441, 11451) and three small rooms on
the west (9449, 9450, 10506). The three eastern
rooms had entrances in their northwestern corners
that accessed the central rooms. Two of these
(11441, 11451) also had entrances in their northeastern corners (on line with the western
entrances), leading in from an assumed street or
courtyard on the east; all these entrances were 1.3
m wide, except for the western one in the middle
room, which was 1.1 m wide. Thus, each of the central rooms could be approached separately from
outside the building, as well as from the inside. The
three small rooms in the western wing were accessible from the two large central rooms: two of them
(10506, 9450) were entered from the southern
central room (10476), while the northern one
(9449) was entered from the northern central room
(10458). Rooms 9449 and 9450 were joined by an
entrance, thus enabling circulation between the
southern and the northern wings of the building via
these two small rooms. On the other hand, the
southwestern small room (10506) could be
accessed only through the southern central room
(10476), and the northeastern small room (10510)
could be accessed only through the northern central
room (10458), creating a symmetry to the building
that was marred only by the difference of accessibility in the eastern rooms and minor differences in
room sizes. It is notable that six of the seven
entrances found in this building were located in the
corners of the rooms; the only entrance located in
the center of a wall was the one connecting Rooms
9450 and 9449 in the western wing.
All the walls were covered with plaster and the
floors were made of fine red clay mixed with
smooth black burnt material. In Rooms 10458,
10506, and the southeastern part of 11451, the
floors were set on a mud-plaster bedding (Photos
12.207–12.209) and in Rooms 10506, 10476 and
10510, they were set on a sub-floor brick construction (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.194,
12.200, 12.219).
A wide range of many complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.143–13.160) and numerous
objects (Table 12.24), as well as a large amount of
grain, were found in the 0.8 m-deep destruction
debris on the floors, as detailed below and in
Chapter 45.
The northern room of the eastern wing (Photos
12.197–12.198, 12.200) measured internally
2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m. Its eastern wall (10490) was
built above C-1b Wall 11479, while its northern
wall (10409) was built above C-1b Wall 11458
(Photo 12.193). This room was accessed only
through an entrance in Wall 10462 that led from the
northern central room (10458).
The floor in this room was identical to the
others throughout Building CP, composed of red
clay mixed with black burnt material. It sloped
down from west to east, from 86.20 to 85.98 m; the
western elevation was higher than the other floors
in the building, perhaps because just underneath the
burnt floor makeup on the west were two concentrations of bricks, one in the southwestern corner of
the room and the other in the northwestern corner,
just inside the entrance (Fig. 12.52c). The latter
(11478) was a rectangle measuring 0.6×1.2 m, ca.
0.1 m high. The bricks in the southwestern corner
were more sporadic (Photos 12.189–12.190,
12.197). These are understood as a sub-floor construction, similar to those found in the southwestern
part of the building, described below.
The room was full of burnt destruction debris
(10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact
four-legged incense burner with a matching lid
(Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds
(Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was
found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458,
apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items
were found above the sub-floor brick construction
in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the
room.
The middle room of the eastern wing measured internally 2.2×2.8 m (6.16 sq m) (Photos 12.197, 12.200, 12.202). Like the southern room, it had entrances in its northeastern and northwestern corners. The floor (11441) was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl.
The southern room of the eastern wing (internal measurements 2.6×2.8 m; 7.28 sq m) had an entrance in its northeastern corner and another one opposite it that led into Room 10476 on the west (Photos 12.197, 12.202–12.203). A notable feature of the eastern entrance was the molding of the door jambs; the inner (western) northern end of Wall 11440 was nicely molded to a curved shape (Photo 12.204) and the southern end of Wall 11417 that faced the entrance was also curved, although less well preserved. The walls in this part of the room were covered with fine gray-whitish plaster, somewhat different from the light brown mud plaster that coated the other walls of this building. The floor of this room was composed of red clay interspersed with smooth black burnt material. The southeastern part of the floor contained a layer of plaster, identical to that on the walls, below the red and black floor makeup. Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206).
The central part of the building included two large rectangular rooms of similar size: Room 10458 on the north and Room 10476 on the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190, 12.207).
The northern central room measured internally
4.0×4.7 m; 19 sq m (Photo 12.208). The main
entrance to this room was from Room 11411 on the
east, while two other entrances led into Rooms
10510 and 9449, the latter creating a connection to
the southern wing of the building. The floor was
higher by 0.25–0.35 m than that in Room 9449 to
the west and Room 11441 to the east, but was
almost the same as that of Room 10510 on the
northeast.
The preservation of the northern and eastern
walls was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north
(which was also the southern wall of Building CX)
was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length,
but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m
before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference
was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush
with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower
western end adjoined the southern face of Wall
10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved
to the same low height. As mentioned above in the
discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to
explain this feature: either there was a deliberate
lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458
into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation
was due to damage caused by the destruction or by
some unrecognized later intrusion. A 0.4 m wide
bench (10463), composed of terre pisé and partially
plastered, was built along the southern face of
Wall 10409, running 2.4 m from exactly where
Wall 10409 was cut on the west, almost up to the
entrance into Room 10510 on the east (Photo
12.208). Two bricks laid on the western end of
Bench 10463 were on the same low level as the
western end of Wall 10409; their function is not
known. Following a 0.7 m gap was yet another
brick, set into the corner of Walls 9448 and 10409,
found floating 0.1 m above the level of the plastered floor in the western part of this room (10498)
(Photo 12.209). The low western end of Wall 10409
abutted, but did not bond with, the western wall
(9448) of the room.
The eastern wall (10462) of Room 10458 was
different than the others in its composition, being
built of similar terre pisé as Bench 10463. It was
preserved to only 0.20 above the floor in the south
and 0.40 m in the north. The corner of Wall 10462
with Wall 10405 (the southern wall of the room)
was not well bonded; the latter was preserved to a
height of 0.65 m, similar to that of the northern wall
of this room.
Running along the eastern face of Wall 9448
and ending on the north at the entrance into Room
9449, was yet another bench (10454), built of
crumbly yellow bricks, 0.5 m wide, 1.6 m long and
ca. 0.2 m high (Photos 12.208–12.209).
The floor of the room (10458) was composed
of reddish-brown earth mixed with black ash; in the
western part of the room, it was laid 0.05–0.08 m
above a layer of hard mud plaster (10498) (Photos
12.208–12.209). This plaster was identical to that
found under the floor of Rooms 10506 and 11451,
as well as on most of the walls in this building; it
was concentrated in the area between the lower
western end of Wall 10409 on the north and along
the line of Oven 10430, just north of Wall 10405, on
the south (the contours of this plaster are marked on
the plan; Fig. 12.52a). Depressions in the plaster
accommodated the rounded contour of the stone
mortar, as well as two of the pottery vessels just
north of Oven 10430. The plaster-bedding layer
was laid on top of a layer of soft light brown earth
with very few sherds (11461), which seems to have
been a leveling fill laid above the C-1b remains.
The room was full of a layer of burnt
destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded
brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed
ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained
23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels
and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower
grinding stone was found just to the southwest of
the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration
of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the
northwestern corner of the room, above the lower
western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the
brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo
12.214); a few additional loomweights were found
dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454
along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found
upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and
a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this
bench was a dense concentration of finds that
included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos
(Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it
(Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a
large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a
smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down
towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a
group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars
(Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand
adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35,
No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding
stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into
the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north
(Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498)
in the western part of the room included a few small
upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well
as several loomweights and sherds.
The southern central room measured internally
3.6×4.6 m (16.6 sq m) (Photo 12.215). The main
entrance to this room was from Room 11451 on the
east, while two other entrances led into Rooms
10506 and 9450, the latter creating a connection to
the northern wing of the building (Photos 12.189–
190, 12.203, 12.215). Since Room 9450 was joined
to Room 9449, one could pass between the southern
and northern parts of the building by way of these
two small rooms.
Room 10476 was bordered on the east by the
southern end of Wall 10462 and its continuation to
the south, which was designated a separate number
(10485) because it was built of discernible bricks,
as opposed to the terre pisé of 10462; it was preserved
higher than the latter and its northern end
was covered with molded plaster (Photo 12.216).
The southern wall of the room (10457) ran along
12.2 m; it was located 0.5 m north of the southern
wall of adjoining Building CL on the west, indicating that although they ran more or less along the
same line, these were two separate walls. The
northern wall (10405) separated the two large central rooms. All these walls were found standing to a
height of 0.6–1.0 m and were covered with mud
plaster.
The floor was made of soft reddish-brown
earth, interspersed with black ash. Just below the
floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of
closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of
the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219).
Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part,
most of the bricks were missing, although it is not
clear whether this area had never been constructed
or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On
the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and,
in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls
belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo
12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top
of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b
Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468
was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like
the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms
10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to
have been a building technique intended to provide
reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to
protect against rodents in certain places (compare a
similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room
8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in
this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig.
13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a
unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor
above it (Photo 12.221).
Benches were constructed along the northern
and western walls. Bench 10466, 3.6 m long, 0.6
wide and ca. 0.25 m high, ran along the northern
wall (10405); the plaster on this wall joined the
plaster that covered the bench. This bench was built
directly above C-1b Wall 11472, utilizing the top of
this wall as its foundation. On this bench were three
cooking pots (Figs. 13.147:1, 3; 13.149:6), one jug
(Fig. 13.155:4), four juglets (Fig. 13.156:19, 24–
25) and two loomweights (Photo 12.217). Bench
10467, 1.7 m long, 0.5 m wide and ca. 0.15 m high,
was rather poorly preserved along the western wall
(10480); a jug (Fig. 13.155:7), a seal (Chapter 30,
No. 32), a bead, a loomweight and a scoria scraper
were found on it (Photo 12.218). In the northeastern
corner of the room, Installation 10468 was composed of bricks set on their narrow side around a
circular mud-plastered receptacle (Photo 12.217).
Inside the plastered depression were two cooking
pots stacked together, a very small one (Fig.
13.148:9) on the bottom and a medium-sized one
(Fig. 13.148:4) on top of it.
Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction
debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster,
ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of
ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the
room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix
(Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the
destruction debris were found in situ (some intact)
on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds
(Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the
southern half of the room (10493) contained much
less pottery than in the north and center, mostly
concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A
unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall
10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room
10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the
same wall in the southwestern corner of Room
10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos
12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its
top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with
0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup.6 It
was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base,
and contained a large amount of charred grain
(Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large
pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its
upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221–
12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and
against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the
east of the pithos was a concentration of 85
loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a
concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains
of charred wood here might represent a loom. A
few vessels were found in the entrance leading
from the east, mostly against the plastered southern
doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large
and heavy stone was found upside down, just under
topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction
debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451
(Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small
depression carved out of part of its top, in which
some substance was probably ground, judging by
the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the
roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room
11451 to the east, described above.
This was the northern room in the western wing
(internal measurements 2.3×2.8 m; 6.4 sq m)
(Photos 12.207, 12.225). The northern wall (9415)
was also the southern wall of Building CQ3; it cornered with Wall 9406 on the west and with Wall
9448 on the east. Notably, this wall was not on line
with the northern wall (10409) of the large room to
the east, but ran 0.25 m to its north. A 0.5 m-wide
and 0.35 m-high brick bench (9443) was attached to
the southern face of Wall 9415, which was, in fact,
the direct continuation of the line of Wall 10409. Its
top level was ca. 0.1 m lower than the western end
of this wall and it is possible that it constituted the
(as of yet unexposed) western end of Stratum C-1b
Wall 11458 (Fig. 12.48), whose extant top was used
as a bench in this room. At its juncture with Wall
9406, the bench had an extension, protruding to the
south, 0.4×0.6 m, 0.35 m high, with slightly
sloping sides. The walls of the room, as well as the
bench and its extension, were all covered with the
same fine mud plaster. The eastern face of Wall
9406 in this room was very damaged and burnt, as
opposed to its excellent preservation further to the
north (in Building CQ3) and south, as well as on its
western face in Building CL, as described below.
The room had two entrances. A 1.0-m-wide
entrance in the southern end of the eastern wall
(9448) connected this room with the large room
(10458) on the east (Photos 12.189–191, 12.196).
Since the floor of the room to the east was 0.35–0.4
m higher than that of Room 9449, there was a small
step here (Photos 12.196, 12.207). Some charred
wooden pieces found in the entranceway might be
remnants of a step, doorjamb or door. The bench
(10454) with the pottery altar and bowl in Room
10458 to the east adjoined the southern doorjamb of
this entrance. A second entrance, 0.9 m-wide, was
located in the middle of the southern wall, connecting this room with Room 9450. The floor of the
room (9449) was composed of red clay mixed with
soft black burnt material.
The room was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of
dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling
material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418,
9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were
found in this small room, among them 11 storage
jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have
been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east,
but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell
from a second floor. A special find in this room was
an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the
name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307;
Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See
Table 12.24 for other finds.
The middle room in the western wing (internal
measurements 2.4×2.4; 5.76 sq m) was accessed
both from Room 9449 to its north and from the
large room to the east (10476) through a 1.0 m-wide entrance in its southeastern corner (Photo
12.207). The walls were covered with fine mud
plaster. The floor (9450) was composed of red clay
mixed with soft black burnt material. In the southwestern corner of the room was a square brick bin
(9434) (internal measurements 1.0 sq m; 0.6 m
high) (Photos 12.226–12.227). It was coated with a
fine plaster that continued from the surrounding
walls down to line the floor as well. Inside was an
intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in
Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside
another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig.
13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10,
13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone
scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar
was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample
R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812
BCE (2σ).
The entire room was filled with very burnt
destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many
complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling
material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43
restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage
jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room
were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig.
13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of
the pottery in this room, in particular the storage
jars (like in the previous room), were found
smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above
the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ
on the floor. This situation may hint that much of
this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher
shelves. A special item in this room was a horned
pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken
in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo
12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar
was a complete brick, but it appears that this was
fallen and not meant as a support. For additional
finds from this room, see Table 12.24.
The southern room of the western wing (internal
measurements 2.15×2.5 m; 5.4 sq m) (Photos
12.215, 12.229–12.230) could be entered only from
the large room to its east (10476) (Photos 12.203,
12.229). An intact juglet (Fig. 13.156:18) found
leaning against the threshold just inside the room
appeared to have been intentionally placed there
before the floor was laid (Photo 12.233). The
western wall of the room (10513) was the poorly
preserved continuation of Wall 9406 to its north.
The other walls, 9421 on the north, 10457 on the
south and 10480 on the east, were well preserved;
all the walls were covered with fine mud plaster
(Photo 12.229–12.231).
The floor was composed of soft dark earth,
except for the northwestern part, which was composed of the same mud plaster as the surrounding
walls, recalling the plaster in the western part of
Room 10458. This plastered area was 0.15 m
higher than the rest of the room (Photos 12.229–
12.230). Below the earthen floor in the southeastern part of the room, against Wall 10457 and
just underneath the floor where the pottery bin and
pottery ‘bucket’ were found (see below), was a
brick construction (11464), similar to the sub-floor
bricks found in Rooms 10510 and 10476 (Fig.
12.52c). Like in those rooms, this seems to have
been an element related to the construction phase of
the building. A low (0.1 m high) bench (10504)
composed of crumbly brown bricks was built along
part of the western wall (Photo 12.230).
A pottery bin (10501) was set in the southwestern corner of the room (Photos 12.215, 12.223,
12.229–12.232); it was very similar to Bin 10488 in
Room 10476, 3.0 m to its east and set against the
same wall (10457). It stood 0.75 m high, which was
shorter than the other bin; 0.15 m of its base was
sunk into the floor makeup. Like the latter bin, it
was made with thick slabs and restoration showed it
to be trapezoid, with the wider part on top (Photo
12.232; Fig. 13.160:12); it had no base or lid,
although 0.1 m above its bottom was a layer of low-fired clay that was laid down as a kind of floor.
Inside the bin (capacity-93 liters) was a small
amount of burnt grain.
Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt
destruction debris (10484), including complete
fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery
vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red
juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery
items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed
against the center of the southern wall (Photos
12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round
container with a matching lid to its east (Fig.
13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to
the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken.
Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a
naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those
found attached to the altar fragment from Building
CF.
Building CP, with its eight rooms, was the largest and most complex building excavated at Tel Rehov. Many unique features characterized its plan, including the two eastern entrances, the symmetric division into a western and eastern wing flanking central rooms, the plan of circulation, the benches along the walls, the sub-floor brick constructions and the molded plaster on the doorjambs. It contained a large amount of unique pottery items, such as two altars, the Elisha ostracon, containers with lids, a ‘bucket’, a strainer, two free-standing bins, a figurine mold, a stand with petals, and an incense burner with a lid, as well as more than 230 pottery vessels of a wide variety of types (see Chapters 24, 45), all indicating that this building had some special function. The integral relation of Building CP to the smaller buildings to its north (CQ3, CX) and the spacious Building CL to its west, shows that it was part of a greater complex. For further discussion and interpretation, see Mazar (2015) and Chapter 4.
Building CL was constructed above the fallen
bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos
12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235)
and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73–
12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144,
12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner
of this building was built above a leveling fill
(4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the
C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This
was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence
for two superimposed destructions in Area C.
Building CL was composed of two wings, each
comprising two rooms: the external measurements
of the western wing were 3.3×6.5 m (not including
Wall 4443) and those of the eastern wing were
6.5×11.5 m (including walls). The total floor space
was 63 sq m. Although the walls were found
standing to a height of 1.2–1.5 m, no entrances were
located. A passage from the western wing to the
eastern wing may have existed in Wall 4443, close
to its corner with Wall 4481, since here the former
wall was preserved very low. In such a case, the
threshold would have been 0.3 m above the floor.
However, this cannot be determined with certainty
and the location of entrances in this building
remained enigmatic. This building was excavated
in parts during several seasons; the excavated parts
were removed in order to reach Stratum C-1b
below and thus, no general photograph could be
taken.
The southern wall of Building CL ran 0.5 m to
the south of the line of that of Building CP.
However, since the two buildings shared a wall
(9406), it is likely that they were built together. All
the walls of Building CL were founded 0.4–1.0 m
lower than the foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall
1438 in Squares Y/1–2 to the west. This might be
explained by the fact that they were built above the
apiary, which was on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. Perhaps the deeper foundations
were also the result of the need to stabilize these
walls, which were built directly above the collapsed
bricks and burnt debris that covered the destroyed
apiary.
The area to the west and north of Building CL
remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west
(Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer
of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep,
covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of
Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417.
The western wing of the building was about half the
size of the eastern wing, and adjoined only its
southern part. It was composed of a long room on
the north (4435; internal measurements 2.7×3.5 m;
9.45 sq m) and a broad room on the south (5432;
internal measurements 1.5×2.9 m; 4.35 sq m). As
noted above, there was no entrance between the
two.
The western wall (2413) ran for 6.5 m and was
preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed
directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and
collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235)
and also cut the eastern end of Wall 2426 of
Building CH (Figs. 12.73–12.74; Photos 12.146–
12.147). The northern wall (2504) was 3.2 m long;
its eastern end was preserved almost 1.0 m higher
than Wall 4443 with which it cornered on the east
(Photos 12.235–12.236); the reason for this was not
clear. The southern wall (5423 on the west, 9424 on
the east; Photo 12.237) was also the southern wall
of the eastern wing; it was exposed over 7.6 m and
apparently continued to the east to corner with Wall
10513, although this end remained unexcavated.
Wall 4443, joining the eastern and western
wings, ran along 11 m and was preserved to a
height of 1.5 m on its northern half, although up to
only 0.5 m on the south (Squares Y/1, 20) (Photos
12.236, 12.238). The foundation level of this wall
(85.40 m) was 0.3–0.4 m lower than that of Walls
2413 and 2504 (Figs. 12.73, 12.86–12.87). Wall
4481, which separated the two rooms in this wing,
was built directly on top of the concentration of cult
objects (the pottery altar and petal chalice) in the
apiary below.
Both rooms had a distinct floor (4435 in the
northern room, 5432 in the southern room) made of
a 0.3-m-thick layer of soft light-red clay at levels
86.20–85.90 m (Fig. 12.86). A clay female figurine
that most probably had belonged to an altar was
found on the floor in the northeastern corner of
Room 5432. An almost identical figurine was
found in Locus 5446 in the northwestern part of the
eastern wing (Chapter 35, Nos. 6a–b); it is possible
that these two figurines had originally belonged to
the same altar. Room 4435 was filled with burnt
debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of
cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig.
13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room
was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed
with some whitish material, that was concentrated
mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84,
12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall
4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing
(Photo 12.236). This was further evidence that the
southern end of this wall had been deliberately
razed during the course of the use of Building CL,
thus joining the two southern spaces. Alternatively,
the southern end of Wall 4443 had been originally
built as a low screen wall.
The eastern wing was composed of two large rooms
or open spaces: 5449 on the north (measuring internally 5.0×5.35 m; ca. 27 sq. m) and 5482 on the
south (measuring internally 4.2×5.3 m; 22.2 sq m).
Wall 5418, the northern wall, was well preserved to
11 courses, built of gray, brown and yellow bricks
(Photo 12.142), yet it was found severely tilted to
the south, perhaps due to seismic activity (Photos
12.150, 12.152). As noted above, the southern wall
of the eastern wing (9424) continued that of the
western wing. The eastern wall (9406) was also the
western wall of adjoining Buildings CP and CQ3
(Photo 12.192). This latter wall, preserved 14
courses high on its western face, was built directly
above the eastern closing wall (9453) of the
Stratum C-1b apiary (Photos 12.152–12.153,
12.234). Wall 5453, a well-built wall preserved
nine courses high (Photos 12.150–12.153), separated the northern from the southern room, with no
entrance joining them.
The floor of both rooms was made of the same
soft red clay as the western rooms; it was 0.4 m
thick in the north and center (85.70–86.10 m), but
only 0.1 m thick near Wall 5453 (85.65 m) (Figs.
12.83–12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.150–12.151,
12.239). The floor in the southern room (5482), at
levels 85.60–85.70 m, sealed the fallen bricks and
destruction debris of the apiary (Fig. 12.83; Photo
12.150). As noted above, the same black burnt oily
substance mixed with white material that was
found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the
southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in
the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of
Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237–
12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually
large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a
selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray
ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended
near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the
northern part of Room 5449 not burnt.
Both rooms were full of a thick layer of
destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body
sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly
unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs.
13.127–13.128), as were several other objects
(Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated
in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick
with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239).
A curious feature found in the eastern wing of
Building CL was a 0.7–1.1 m-thick layer of light
gray debris (5419 in Square Z/2 and 5427 in Square
Z/1) that sloped down from south to north (Fig.
12.83; Photos 12.150, 12.152). This layer, revealed
just under topsoil, was virtually sterile. It appears to
be either an intentional fill placed in the room following its destruction or possibly, erosion following the destruction and abandonment of the
lower city; the latter explanation seems to be more
plausible. In the topsoil (5402) just above this layer
in Square Z/2 was a fragment of a very large pottery
altar horn (Chapter 35, No. 28).
One has to question whether the two eastern
spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern
room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m,
appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar
bases or any other roof support were found, it may
be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed.
The unique plan of Building CL and lack of domestic installations rule out it having been a dwelling, and it most likely served for some administrative, industrial or storage function. The large amount of bones, as well as their special nature, might allude to some relationship to the cultic practices in the adjacent Building CP. It is difficult to explain the lack of entrances in this building, especially in light of the fact that in the adjacent buildings to the east, entrances were found in all the rooms. A similar lack of entrances was also observed in Building CG (possibly a granary) and in the outer walls of Building CQ2. One possibility is that the excavated rooms were part of a basement floor, entered from a higher level. But such a hypothesis is contradicted by the level of the floors in the adjacent buildings on the east (CQ3, CX, CP), which were only slightly higher than the floors in Building CL. Alternatively, the rooms were entered from the roof by way of ladders or from the roofs of the adjacent buildings. In such a case, the entire ground floor of this building would have been sealed from the outside. All these features indicate the exceptional function of this building.
The architectural sequence of Strata C-4 to C-1a,
ranging from the 11th to the 9th centuries BCE,
demonstrated both continuity and change. This
sequence, however, was not necessarily related to
destruction episodes, as some buildings continued
almost unchanged following their destruction,
while others were demolished and new ones built in
their stead. On the one hand, the use of brick as the
only building material, the general orientation of
the units, the rebuilding of some walls on the same
line, and the density of construction, are continuing
features. On the other hand, innovations included
changes in the type of bricks (but rarely the size)
and the introduction of wooden beams for the construction of wall and floor foundations in Stratum
C-1b.
The substantial and well-preserved building
remains of the two phases of Stratum C-3 in
Squares S/2–4, attributed to Iron IB, are evidence
for a well-constructed and planned city, as also
found in Strata D-5 and D-4 in Area D (Chapter
15). No evidence for a violent destruction of this
level was found. A number of Stratum C-3 walls,
characterized by gray bricks and light-colored
mortar, were rebuilt in Stratum C-2 of the early Iron
IIA on the same lines, but with hard yellow bricks,
as in the cases of Walls 2507, 2506 and 8418 in
Squares S/2–4. This indicates urban continuity
from the late Iron I to the early Iron IIA.
The two pits found in Square R/4 recall a similar feature in Area D (Stratum D-3) in Squares N,
P/4–5 and Q/4, where ca. 45 pits were found above
and cutting through Stratum D-4 architecture; they
were explained as a local feature in this area. Such
pits were not found in any other part of Area C,
except for a few in the apiary (Squares Y/1–2) in
relation to a floor which appears to have originally
belonged to Stratum C-3. Thus, the two pits in
Square R/4 are understood to have belonged to the
same phenomenon as those in Area D at the end of
Iron IB. Above the pits and the floor was a thin
layer of debris, followed by Locus 1555b, a pottery
concentration in the lowest level of a room attributed to a Stratum C-2 (see above).
The division of the Iron IIA into three strata
(C-2, C-1b, C-1a) was first and foremost based on a
clear differentiation between Strata C-2 and C-1 in
terms of overall plan and building techniques. The
well-preserved walls of Stratum C-2 (general
Stratum VI), sometimes standing to a height of 18
courses, were made of typical hard-packed yellow
bricks, differing in their texture from the bricks of
Strata C-1b and C-1a (Tables 12.28–12.30). The
lack of stone foundations and the almost total
absence of wood in the construction were also typical of this stratum. In certain places, we observed
architectural continuity between Strata C-2 and
C-1b, such as in the transition from Building CA to
Building CD, in some of the walls of Building CE,
and, to some extent, between the upper phases of
Building CT, as well as one wall in Building CZ. In
other places, the builders of Stratum C-1b ignored
the earlier walls of Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.16).
In the area of Building CH and the apiary in
Squares T–Z/1–2, Stratum C-1b units were founded
right on top of Stratum C-3 structures of Iron IB,
and even reused walls and floors from this period.
This seems to have occurred due to the intentional
removal of building remains of Stratum C-2 by the
builders of the apiary, who sought to establish it on
a lower level than the rest of the buildings in the
area to its west (CG and CH) and north (CM).
The differentiation between Strata C-1b and
C-1a (general Strata V and IV) was clear in some
cases and unclear in others. These two stratum
numbers refer to the same city that underwent local
destruction and rebuilding in certain places. A
major feature of Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in the foundations of walls
and floors. Often these beams were laid directly on
top of Stratum C-2 structures. Buildings CJ, CF,
CW, CQ1, CQ2 and CG, as well as the room in
Square R/4, were founded, in our view, in Stratum
C-1b, and continued to be in use with only few or
no changes in Stratum C-1a. In contrast, Building
CH and the apiary were used only in Stratum C-1b
and, following a severe destruction, were replaced
by Building CL. Building CD of Stratum C-1b went
out of use and was replaced by an open area in
Stratum C-1a. Likewise, Building CM was
destroyed at the end of C-1b and was replaced by
Piazza 2417 in C-1a. In the southeastern block,
Building CZ of Stratum C-1b went out of use and
was replaced in Stratum C-1a by two new buildings
(CQ3, CX). As discussed in detail above, the possibility that Building CZ could be attributed to
Stratum C-2 was considered, particularly due to the
similarity of its levels to those of the remains under
Building CQ1 to its south that we ascribed to
Stratum C-2. If this was the case, then Building
CQ3 and CX too would have been established in
Stratum C-1b and continued unchanged into
Stratum C-1a, although there is no tangible evidence for this, such as wooden foundations (except
in their thresholds) or floor raisings. Ultimately, we
rejected this possibility and prefer to attribute
Building CZ to Stratum C-1b. To its south,
Building CP of Stratum C-1a was a rebuild of an
earlier building of Stratum C-1b, although this
early stage is insufficiently known due to lack of
excavation.
In a few instances, an extra phase was discerned,
demonstrating the complexity of the stratigraphy in the three main Iron IIA levels. For
example, an earlier phase of Building CR (Squares
Y–Z/6) in Stratum C-1b was detected above the
well-preserved remains of C-2 Building CT. A later
phase was identified in the remains east of Stratum
C-2 Building CB (Squares Y–Z/4). Additional
phases in the courtyard devoted to cooking activity
in Square T/4 were a typical feature of such an open
area. This diversity indicates that each building had
its own history; some continued with no change
from Stratum C-1b to C-1a and others underwent
modifications of varying degrees. The clearest
change between these two strata was in the vicinity
of the apiary and its surroundings in the southeastern part of Area C.
No evidence for violent destruction was found at
the end of Strata C-3 and C-2, and therefore most of
the floors of these levels were found virtually
lacking complete vessels (except in the case of
Locus 1555b in Square R/4). There were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings
by an earthquake, including layers of complete
fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of
the buildings which would have buried vessels, and
perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of
debris. Rather, it could have been an earthquake
that was strong enough to cause severe damage to
the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the
inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and
return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of
Stratum C-1b.
Evidence of severe destruction by fire in
Stratum C-1b was found in the apiary and in
Buildings CH, CG (the southern room), CM, CF and CE.
In Building CG, it remained unclear whether the
destruction of the northern rooms should be attributed
to Stratum C-1b or C-1a. All of these buildings,
except for CF and CE, contained large
amounts of in situ pottery and other objects.
Notably, these structures were located along a
north-south axis running through the center of Area
C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’,
as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation
areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning.
Perhaps the heavy destruction noted in these buildings was caused by a local event, such as deliberate
or unintentional burning by human agency, or by an
earthquake. The latter possibility is suggested in
Chapter 54, based on paleomagnetic testing.
As opposed to this, Stratum C-1a came to an
end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a
fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. The
temperature must have been more than 500
degrees, since it caused partial firing of the brick
courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In
several cases, pottery vessels cracked and became
distorted, with much calcification; for example, the
large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted
by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore.
The incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other
objects found in the houses indicates the sudden
destruction, although a human skeleton was found
in only one place. There was no activity in this area
following the destruction, except one deep pit
(6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the
Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of
finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.
An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris
and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The
walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m
above the floors and their tops were discovered flat
and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil.
While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were
found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem
that there would have been a larger quantity if they
had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and
perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the
disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted
from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower
mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were
probably washed to the southeast towards the
gulley that separates the upper from the lower
mound. A less feasible explanation would be that
bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of
the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the
upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification
wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).
Area C was densely built in all three Iron Age IIA strata, C-2, C-1b and C-1, with houses attached to one another in what can be defined as pre-planned insulae, separated by only a few open spaces.
An open space in Squares S–T/3–4 in Stratum C-2 was at least partly occupied by Building CM in Stratum C-1b (although the eastern part of this area remained unexcavated). In Stratum C-1b, an open area was located south of Building CD, above Building CB of Stratum C-2. In Stratum C-1a, this latter area was expanded and to its east, beyond Building CG, another piazza was created, with a 3.0-m-wide street leading into it from the east, and a somewhat irregular alley from the south. These open spaces seem not to have been related to an individual unit, but rather served as small piazzas surrounded by several buildings. Few installations were located in these open courtyards, for example, ovens found in the cooking area in Square T/4, which was in use throughout all three strata, and a stone formation in the center of Piazza CK in Stratum C-1a.
Evidence for central urban planning can be seen
mainly in the plan of Strata C-1b and C-1a. Two
major walls traverse the entire area from south to
north in a straight line: on the west was Wall 1413,
which ran along 19.8 m and continued both to the
south and the north of the excavated area. In the
eastern part of the area (along the line of Squares
A/20, 1–6), Walls 9453/9406+6408+6497 created
a continuous straight line, intersected by the street
in Squares Z, A–C/4. These two long backbone
walls were not parallel to one another: the western
one ran on a northwest–southeast alignment, while
the eastern wall was due north–south. The distance
between them (outer faces) was 19 m on the south
and 21.5 m along the northern line of Squares R–Z,
A/4, ca. 20 m to the north.
The blocks of houses in all three strata were oriented along virtually the same lines: almost exactly
east–west and north–south, with minor deviations
in the western part of the area, causing trapezoidshaped spaces in the seam between the eastern and
western parts, such as the alley between Walls 2413
and 1438 in Squares T–Y/1–2 in Stratum C-1a or
the passage from the open area in Squares S–T/2–3
to the north, towards the cooking area in Squares S–
T/4 in Stratum C-1b. Evidence of central planning
is also seen in the sharing of walls and the back-toback construction of many units, as discussed in the
next section.
No evidence for the existence of fortifications was found along the western perimeter of the mound in Areas C and D, nor along the northern perimeter, where a probe was excavated in Square Y/9. The westernmost structures of all Iron IIA strata continued into Squares Q/4–5 of Area D (defined there as Strata D-1a, D-1b and D-2), located on the upper slope of the mound, where they disappeared with the erosion line. Although the slope of the mound suffered from severe erosion, as shown by the fact that the eastern sides of the buildings in Area D were missing, it is improbable that an entire city wall was eroded away, and we thus concluded that the city remained unfortified during this entire period.
Throughout all three main Iron IIA strata, a notable
characteristic is the uniqueness of the architecture.
Not only are the buildings quite unlike most of the
typical Iron Age structures known from proximate,
as well as more distant regions, but they also do not
resemble each other. While certain technical features
are repeated, such as size and type of bricks
and the use of double walls, each unit was unique in
its plan, except for three very similar buildings
(CQ1, CQ2, CQ3).
In the discussion of individual buildings, we
presented several parallels: Building CF was compared to part of Building 2081 at Megiddo Stratum
VA–IVB, and Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 were
compared to several buildings from 13th–11th centuries BCE contexts at Hazor Stratum XIII, Tell
Abu-Hawam Stratum IV, Tel Batash Stratum VI
and Aphek Stratum X11. Building CA was compared to part of Building 200 at Hazor Strata X–IX,
and Building CY (and to some extent, also Building
CZ) to a type of building with a central space
flanked by rooms on two sides, known from Hazor,
Samaria and Megiddo in the Iron Age II.
Although individual parallels such as these
may be cited, the general concept of the architecture, in both building techniques and plans, as well
as in architectural details, deviates from the
common architecture in Iron Age II Israelite cities.
Notably, none of these buildings recall the so-called
‘Four-Room’ or ‘Three-Room’ houses or pillared
buildings that were so typical. No stone pillars were
found and wooden posts were used only in the case
of Building CX and seen in scant remains of
Stratum C-2 under Building CZ.
An unresolved question is whether the buildings had a second story. The double walls, up to 1.1
in width, could easily have supported a second
story, but even the narrow walls of 0.6 m width
could have been used for such a purpose. Evidence
for staircases was not found, except perhaps in the
case of the eastern part of Building CY of Stratum
C-2. In other buildings, wooden ladders could have
led to upper stories or to the roofs, where daily
activities could have taken place, such as in the case
of Building CP, where large grinding stones were
found fallen from a second story or a roof.
Table 12.26 compares the external dimensions
and floor space of the buildings excavated in Area
C, showing the diversity, which might have had
social and cultural implications. The larger buildings, CF and CP, had an average floor space of ca.
62 sq m, while Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 had
an average floor space of ca. 20 sq m. Building CX
contained 34 sq m. In case of the existence of a
second story, these numbers should be potentially
doubled.
The number of persons that such houses could
accommodate can only be guessed, based on various analyses. Narroll’s (1962) often-cited coefficient of 10 sq m per person would suggest two to
five inhabitants in such houses if they had one story
and four to ten persons if they had two. Yet, there
are different variables that should be considered,
and it is doubtful whether Narroll’s coefficient can
be taken for granted. Thus, Schloen (e.g., 2001:
180) suggested a coefficient of 8.0 sq m per person
in Israelite houses; following a detailed discussion,
he estimated that the average Israelite “jointfamily” included seven to ten persons (Schloen
2001: 135–183). It seems that the larger houses,
such as Building CY in Stratum C-2, as well as
Buildings CW, CF and CP in Stratum C-1a, were
inhabited by families of eight to twelve persons,
while the smaller houses, such as Building CA in
Stratum C-2 and CQ1, C2 and CQ3 in Stratum
C-1a, served much smaller units, perhaps nuclear
families or other social groups. It should be noted,
however, that the function of these buildings as regular
dwellings is not obvious; several of the buildings, such as CA in Stratum C-2 and CF and CP in
Strata C-1a–b, may have had special functions,
based on their plans and assemblages of finds.
Building CF could have been an elite residence that
incorporated administrative, domestic and cultic
activities. Building CP in Stratum C-1a may have
served specific functions related to religious rituals,
such as shared meals/feasts and perhaps, the
activity of a “man of god”, such as the biblical
Elisha. The possible special functions of Buildings
CF and CP are further discussed in Chapter 4 and
Mazar 2015: 103–117. The small buildings, CQ1,
CQ2 and CQ3, and perhaps also CX, may have
belonged to groups or families of special status,
perhaps related to or under the control of the elites
in Buildings CF and CP. It should be noted that all
these buildings yielded large numbers of finds,
including an incredible amount of pottery vessels,
considering the size of the buildings. In each
building there was at least one loom and one or
more grinding installations. Yet, cooking facilities
were found only in Buildings CF and CP, as well as
in the open piazza to the west. This, again, may
emphasize the different status of the residents of the
small houses, such as CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3.
Several buildings in Area C certainly served
functions other than dwelling. Thus, Stratum C-2
Building CB, with its large hall, could have had
some public function. Building CG in Stratum C-1
is interpreted as a granary, and Building CL as a
storage facility or an or industrial structure, possibly servicing other buildings in the eastern
quarter.
The clustering of the buildings in Stratum C-1a
is a notable feature. An interesting configuration is
the group of small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3,
and Building CW, flanking an east–west street, as
well as the location of larger buildings, CF and CP,
adjoining and beyond this cluster. This arrangement may reflect social ranking of some sort.
Differences in the founding levels of various
buildings in the different strata were noted. In Stratum
C-2, Wall 8467 in Building CY in the northeastern
corner of the area was founded at 85.00 m, while
the southwesternmost wall (1470) was founded at
85.57 m. The westernmost wall (1563 in Square
R/4) was founded at 85.61 m and the easternmost
wall (8467 in Square C/6), at 85.00 m. In Stratum
C-1b, the foundations of all the buildings, except
the apiary and Building CZ, ranged between 85.90
m in the northeastern corner of the area to 86.50 m
in the southwestern corner, over a distance of 39 m.
In Stratum C-1a, there was a 1.0 m difference
between the foundation level of the northeastern
wall (8424; 86.10 m) as opposed to the southwestern wall (1431; 87.10 m), and a 1.6 m difference between the westernmost wall (1413; 87.60
m) and the easternmost wall (10490; 86.00 m)
along Squares S–Z, A–C/2. The difference in level
of almost 1.7 m between Buildings CG, CH, CM
and the apiary was a deliberate choice, as discussed
in detail above.
A tilt from west to east/southeast was defined in
all strata at Tel Rehov, and may have been the result
of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts
even inside structures.
In many cases, adjacent buildings had their own outer walls, even when they were attached to one another, so that back-to-back double walls were created, with total thickness reaching 1.0–1.1 m. This feature can be seen in many of the units in all three strata, although the buildings in the southeastern block, CQ3, CX, CP and CL, had shared walls of regular width (0.5 m), perhaps reflecting their construction as one integral unit for social or functional reasons. The existence of an individual outer wall for each house, even in cases of attached buildings, may have had practical, as well as symbolic social meaning. Practically, it may represent building phases, indicating that each building was constructed independently, perhaps at a somewhat different time, and then, an adjacent unit was added. Double walls added to the strength of the buildings and their resistivity to earthquakes, as well as facilitating the construction of a second story. Faust (2012: 39–117) noted the rarity of double walls in Israelite domestic architecture and the social significance of this feature: individual walls for each house that create double walls together appear mainly in houses of elite families. This may be the case at Tel Rehov as well, where double walls were much more common than in any other known Iron Age II city
All the Iron Age IIA buildings were constructed
exclusively of bricks, with no stone foundations.
This is an unusual feature in the Land of Israel,
where most brick walls were laid on stone socles.
At Tel Rehov itself, stone socles for brick walls
were common in Late Bronze IIB and Iron Age I,
and the lack of such foundations in Iron IIA is an
unusual feature that remains unexplained.
Most of the bricks were made of brown, gray or
yellow clay. In Stratum C-3, all of the walls were
constructed with distinct gray bricks of friable consistency, laid with a light-colored mortar between
them and covered with a plaster of the same composition as the mortar. In the walls of Strata C-1b and
C-1a, a wider variety of bricks was used; in most
cases, they were made of light gray-brown clay, and
more rarely, of a dark brown soil taken from the
nearby colluvium. See Tables 12.27–12.30 for
details of brick sizes and materials in most of the
walls. The size deviations are small, indicating a
great deal of standardization in the size and manufacturing technique, if not the composition, of the
bricks.
In some cases, mud plaster was preserved on
walls, some 0.02–0.03 m thick and sometimes
nicely smoothed. Whitish plaster of higher quality
than the mud plaster was used only in the entrance
to the southeastern room of Building CP, where the
plaster was molded to a rounded profile.
The use of wood for wall and floor foundations at Tel Rehov is a unique feature. This is a novelty of Stratum C-1b, but there is one such case in Stratum C-2 (Building CU) and isolated cases in Stratum C-1a (e.g., Building CQ3). A similar construction technique was found in two buildings of Stratum B-5 in Area B, as well as in a building in Area G, attributed to Stratum G-1b. Hence, this technique appears to have been utilized contemporaneously in various buildings throughout the city. The purpose of this wood construction is as yet to be clarified. One possible explanation is that it was intended to stabilize the buildings in the event of earthquakes. This might have been the outcome of what we surmise was the cause of the destruction of Stratum C-2, namely, seismic activity. This function of the wood is illustrated mainly by the way circular beams (their charred remains usually no more than .05–0.1 m in diameter) were often laid at intervals of 0.1–0.2 m, perpendicular to the brick wall, below its lowest brick course. In several cases (i.e., Wall 1438), two or more layers of such beams were found. In this way, the wood could serve as a ‘shock absorber’. Prof. David Yankelevsky, head of the National Building Research Institute in the Technion, Haifa, who visited the site, compared this building technique to modern engineering, when steel cylinders are laid below the foundations of massive structures where the danger of damage by earthquakes is at high risk, such as in nuclear plants. This explanation, if accepted, would point to a technological innovation intended to protect structures against the hazards of earthquakes in a location so close to the Syro-African fault, where the threat of such activity was more acute than anywhere else in the country.
In most cases, floors were composed of beaten
earth or clay. In Stratum C-1b, wooden branches
and beams were incorporated into the foundation of
some floors; these were usually arranged rather
haphazardly below the earth floor. The wood itself
was embedded into a matrix of soft red clay that
was often similar to, or served as, the floor makeup
itself. Stone floors were found only in Buildings
CQ1 and CQ2, and perhaps Building CJ, all in
Stratum C-1a. In a few places, floors incorporated
pebbly gravel, such as in the western part of C-1a
Building CX, or in the open space in Stratum C-1a
Building CW. In Building CP, as well as in two
rooms in Building CY of Stratum C-2, a brick construction was found under the red clay floors in a
few rooms, while in other rooms, a mud-plaster
foundation was laid under these floors.
The distinct composition of the floor of the
Stratum C-1b apiary should be mentioned. It was
composed of three different matrices, each apparently serving a different purpose, particularly the
very hard thick white tufa floor surrounding the
hives, most likely meant to be a permeable surface
to protect against spillage or to possibly fend off
rodents and insects.
The use of wooden posts on unworked stone bases was a rare feature that was found only in Building CX of Stratum C-1a, where there was a line of five post-holes above stone bases, and in the Stratum C-2 level under Building CZ.
Benches built of bricks or terre pisé were found in several instances in Stratum C-1 buildings. In Building CF of Stratum C-1a, they were found along almost all the walls of the three western chambers. In Building CW of Strata C-1a–b, they were located along the walls of the western rooms. Benches ran along some of the walls of the inner rooms of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as in Buildings CX and CP, where benches were located along the walls of four of the rooms. The benches could be used for sitting, but their main purpose was probably placement of items. A number of vessels were found on Benches 10466 and 10467 in Building CP, including a very large cooking pot. A pottery altar and bowl were found on Bench 10454 in this building.
Several storage installations made of packed-clay
walls or bricks were found. In Building CP of
Stratum C-1a, a corner of Room 9450 was enclosed
by two narrow walls, creating a bin (9434) which
contained an intact Hippo jar full of grain, as well
as other finds. Other storage installations were Silo
7514 in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and plastered
Pit 11456 in Building CZ of Stratum C-1b. An
exceptional feature was the two rectangular pottery
bins, made without a base and standing on their
narrow side against the southern wall of Building
CP. These bins, found with grain, have no parallels
elsewhere.
The installation occupying the western part of
the northern room of Building CQ3 in Stratum C-1a
(10505) is unusual in its size and shape, although its
function could not be determined; it seems that it had
some industrial role. Yet another installation with a
hard plaster surface was found against the southern
wall of the southwestern room in this building, but
it was too damaged to determine its function. Other
installations include a mud-plastered semi-circle
(11452) attached to the wall inside the western
entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP in
Stratum C-1a, and a brick with a depression on top
inside the entrance to Room 2489 in Building CE in
Stratum C-1b (2477); both were possibly used as
stands for vessels, perhaps for drinking, positioned
just inside the entrance to the rooms.
Twenty-two ovens were excavated in Area C. Such ovens (tannur, often denoted ‘tabun’) were found in many houses, as well as in open areas. The ovens were always circular, 0.4–0.6 m in diameter; in most cases, only the lower part was preserved. Ovens were constructed with a clay wall ca. 4–5 cm thick, that was, in many cases, coated with pottery sherds on the outside. The most outstanding example is Oven 7428 in Building CU of Stratum C-2, which was completely preserved from base to rim, with an opening at the bottom and an incised mark on its exterior (Fig. 12.13). It was 0.56 m in diameter at its base, 0.56 m tall, with a 0.3 m-wide opening at its top and a small opening at its bottom, used for inserting fuel. It was coated on the outside by large sherds of restorable pottery vessels, a feature found in other ovens, but not as well preserved as this one (Mazar 2011). Ovens were also found in Stratum C-2 Building CY and in the rooms north of Building CA (Stratum C-2) and Building CD (Stratum C-1b), as well as in Buildings CF, CJ, and CP of Stratum C-1a. In several of these cases, the spaces where the ovens were found could have been unroofed areas (e.g., Buildings CY and CU), although this could not be determined with certainty. In certain cases, the location of the oven was quite certainly inside a roofed space (e.g., Building CF). An open space containing a succession of ovens throughout all the Iron IIA strata was found in Square T/4. The lack of ovens in certain buildings should be noted, in particular, Stratum C-1a Buildings CX, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3. It is assumed that residents of these houses shared ovens located in open spaces, or that they belonged to a specific social organization in which people cooked and ate together, for example, in Building CP, where the evidence points to communal meals.
In several cases, flat stones were located on the
floor or on benches along and close to walls. The
latter was the case in Building CY of Stratum C-2,
where 13 such stones were found along the walls,
and in its successor, Building CW of Stratum C-1a,
where eight such stones were found in the western
rooms, placed on top of the benches lining the
walls. It is difficult to explain them as a constructional feature; perhaps they were used as solid
bases for objects such as water or oil jars, leather
containers, etc.
Another feature was isolated cases of hard mizi
stones of considerable size inside buildings. Examples include the very large stone found in Building
CB of Stratum C-2, two large stones found in
Building CF (one in the large hall in the eastern
wing in Stratum C-1b and the second in the
entrance corridor in Stratum C-1a, possibly used as
a butcher block), a stone in the southern part of
Building CM in Stratum C-1b and stones in Buildings CQ2 and CX of Stratum C-1a. Notable also is a
large smoothed-top limestone placed at an angle to
the east of the oven in the large northern room of
Building CP in Stratum C-1a. Such stones could
have served as working surfaces in places where a
hard surface was needed. They are outstanding in
light of the relatively rare use of stones in Iron Age
IIA contexts at the site.
Slab-shaped lower grinding stones, loaf-shaped upper grinding stones, hammerstones, pestles, and mortars were numerous in Area C (see Chapter 43). A notable feature in Stratum C-1a were grinding installations of two basic types. The first comprised a large lower grinding stone enclosed by a low hard-clay rounded parapet; the slab is tilted towards a low area on the edge into which the ground flour could be collected; loaf-shaped upper grinding stones were found in association with it. Two very well-preserved installations of this type were found in Building CF and less well-preserved examples in Buildings CE, CQ1, and CQ2. The second type of grinding installation comprised a similar large lower grinding stone set at a slight angle and directed to a hard clay round receptacle, which was most likely meant to contain the ground flour. In Building CX, where two such installations were found, the better-preserved example had a narrow brick bordering the grinding stone on one side and built against the wall on the other. Upper grinding stones were found in association with the lower stone. In Building CP, very large lower and upper grinding stones were found in the destruction debris, 0.8 m above the floor of Room 11451, most probably fallen from the roof or an upper story of the building. Likewise, a very large stone with a small depression in its top that was smoothed from use, and might have been used as a mortar, was found just under topsoil and above the thick destruction debris in this room, suggesting that it, too, originally had been positioned on the roof or upper story.
Numerous loom weights, mostly made of stone and less so, of clay, were found in concentrations in most of the Stratum C-1a buildings; many of these contained dozens of loom weights each. Remains of charred wood in proximity to such caches, such as in Buildings CP, CR, CX, CF and CE, indicate the presence of one or two looms in the houses. See details and discussion in Chapter 39.
1 The terminology in this chapter follows Mazar 1990: 30 and NEAEHL: 1529. The period Iron IA (first half of the 12th century BCE) is called Late Bronze III by several scholars in recent years. See discussion in Chapter 4 and by Mazar in TBS III: 23–24.
Stratum D-11 is known only from the three probes (I–III) in Squares L–M/4–5, where a 1.0 m-thick deposit of occupation debris and architectural elements (walls, installations, fireplaces and floor patches) was found above bedrock and below the tufa fill that was ascribed to Stratum D-10. Two phases were determined here, termed D-11b and D-11a.
Stratum D-11b was the earliest occupation phase detected in Area D (Fig. 15.3). In Probe I (Square L/4, 1.0×2.0 m), the lowest levels excavated (76.47–76.95 m, Locus 2839) may belong to this phase. In Probe II (Square M/4, 1.0×ca. 1.3 m; Photo 15.12), Locus 9931, in the western half of the probe, consisted of a 0.6 m-deep accumulation of dark brown earth containing meager finds, at levels 76.41–77.00 m. A few consolidated tufa chunks in the center of the probe (unnumbered) might have formed part of a wall or installation.
Immediately above the remains of Stratum D-11b and sealed below the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10, an upper building phase was detected in Probes II and III, designated Stratum D-11a (Figs. 15.4, 15.18a–b). It consisted of brick walls (1923, 1929, 1930), creating at least two units (1913, 9917), which were partly excavated.
The 0.7 m-wide trench dug in the northern edge of Squares K–M/5 was intended to answer the question whether the thick tufa fill below the floor of Stratum D-10 was a natural or anthropogenic feature (see below). Earlier work in Probe I raised the hypothesis that the tufa layer was created in a water body (pond or small lake), above deposition of dark earth within a paludal environment (a marsh) (Mazar 1999: 11; see also Rozenbaum 2009 for the high frequency of such environments in the BethShean Valley during the Holocene). The backhoe trench described above, which preceded the manual excavation of Probes II–III, revealed anthropogenic layers below the thick tufa fill of D10 (2814). This was an accumulation of layered, finely sorted silts and clays of alternating gray and brown, totaling ca. 1.0 m in thickness (7923, 9910, 9911, 9913; Fig. 15.17b). No architectural elements were noted in these layers and no sub-phases were observed. This area may have been part of a large open space. The finds included sherds, bones, flints, oven fragments, a broken bronze earring and an almost complete ceramic plaque figurine (Chapter 33; Fig. 33.1).
Stratum D-10 constituted the earliest architectural phase detected on a relatively large scale in Area D, consisting of a large brick building (DA), apparently of public nature, erected simultaneously with the placement of massive constructional fills which elevated the ground level by some 2.0 m compared with the top level of the accumulation associated with Stratum D-11. The building and its related fills were exposed over an area of ca. 125 sq m in Squares L–M/4–5 and in the western half of Squares N/4–5. The building extended beyond the excavation area to the north, east and south, while the western part is probably missing due to young tectonic activity along the fault line, discussed above. Based on the associated ceramic assemblage and other finds, Stratum D-10 was dated to the LB IIA (14th century BCE).
The exposed portion of Building DA was composed of three integrated walls (8942, 2886, 2890), each 1.1 m wide and constructed of rectangular bricks which varied in dimensions, hardness, color, and manner of placement. These massive well-built walls were preserved 2.2–2.5 m high (16–18 courses). Their foundations were slightly embedded in the upper part of the Stratum D-11 accumulation or laid directly on top of earlier walls (as was the case of Walls 2886 and 2890, which were built on top of Walls 1929 and 1930 respectively). Three buttresses were constructed along Walls 2886 and 8942, facing the open space to their west (Photos 15.8, 15.10, 15.14–15.15, 15.18, 15.21– 15.24). Two of them, 1902 and 2889, protruded northwards from Wall 2886; in fact, 1902 continued the line of Wall 2890, which continued southwards beyond the excavated area. A third buttress (8938) projected westwards from Wall 8942 opposite Buttress 9929 (see further discussion of 9929 below). All the buttresses shared the exact same dimensions, protruding 0.85 m from the wall face and measuring 1.1 m in width, equal to the width of the walls. They were rather evenly spaced: Buttress 8938 was located 2.25 m to the north of the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942, while Buttress 2889 was located 2.4 m to the west of the aforementioned corner. Buttress 1902 was located 2.7 m farther to the west from 2889. It should be emphasized that the buttresses were bonded with the walls and thus, both elements were erected simultaneously. An additional possible buttress was 1903 (Square L/4), although it can also be regarded as the western end of Wall 2886. It was identical in dimensions to the other three buttresses and appears to have had a similar function. Nevertheless, it can be argued that 1903 may have functioned as a pier flanking an entrance, the parallel pier of which is to be found further to the west. As such a parallel pier was not found in Square L/4, this hypothesis can be maintained only if assuming an entrance of at least 3.0 m wide. The first option — viewing 1903 as a fourth buttress — is thus preferable (but see below). Two architectural elements were located east of Wall 8942. The first was Buttress 9929, which adjoined the eastern face of Wall 8942 immediately opposite Buttress 8938, and had exactly the same dimensions as the other buttresses. The second, 2.2 m to its south, was the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 (unnumbered), which protruded ca. 1.05 from the eastern line of Wall 8942. It seems likely that this feature was not a buttress, but rather, a pier flanking a doorway within the building, the opposite pier of which lies beyond the excavated area. A narrow wall (1937) extending to the south of this pier is the only inner partition wall uncovered within the building.
The area bounded by Walls 2886 and 8942 on the south and east respectively was an open courtyard, covering at least 6.0×8.0 m and extending to the north and west beyond the limits of the excavation. Immediately after the erection of the wall system, the area of the courtyard was covered with a ca. 2.0 m-deep constructional fill (2814) made of two distinct layers of tufa (2814a and 2814b), each ca. 1.0 m thick (Figs. 15.5, 15.17–15.19a; Photos 15.8, 15.10–15.11, 15.13–15.14). This fill was excavated manually in Probes I (1.0×2.0 m) and III (ca. 9.0 sq m), as well as in a shallower probe west of Buttresses 1902 and 1903 in Square L/4 (ca. 4.0 sq m).2 In addition, this fill was uncovered in the long backhoe trench, where it extended ca. 12 m to the west of Wall 8942, before being eroded and replaced with deposits associated with the nearby field (Fig. 15.17a–b). The erosion line was found 3.0 m east of the geological fault described above, and it is probable that the western part of the courtyard disappeared due to young tectonic activity along this fault.
2 Note that the locus number 2814 refers to the same fill
in all three probes.
3 One more argument may be raised against the ‘pond
hypothesis’. The possible time span for the deposition
of the tufa can be no longer than 100 years, when comparing the pottery assemblages from below and above it,
and not 200–300 years as previously assumed (see
Mazar 1999: 11; Zilberman et al. 2004: 19). This time
span is too short for the deposition of 2.0 m-thick tufa
sediments or even of the lower layer alone (compare the
1m/1000 years sedimentation rate for the Beth-Shean
tufa given in Zilberman et al. 2004: 27).
The area south of Wall 2886, designated 8939, was bordered by Wall 2890 on the west and by a narrow partition wall (1937) on the east. The latter differed considerably from all other D-10 walls: it was 0.55 m thick, built of a western row of dark gray bricks laid on their narrow side and an eastern row of mixed bricks laid as stretchers. The wall was traced ca. 1.7 m southwards of Wall 2886, below Wall 1904 and Oven 9918 of Stratum D-9b. Only the uppermost courses of the wall were excavated. Space 8939, which was 7.2 long and at least 3.0 m wide, was excavated over most of the area down to the floor level at 79.10 m, except in Probe II (Square M/4), where the deep foundations of Walls 2886 and 2890 were exposed (Fig. 15.18b). The foundation levels of both walls were abutted by a thick sequence of gray sediments (9905, 9914), which were composed of various matrices of brick material, containing very few sherds and other finds (Photos 15.19–15.20). The total thickness of these sediments, which sealed the Stratum D-11 accumulation of 9917, reached 1.74 m near Wall 2886. The top level of Locus 9905 sloped down from north to south (79.04 m to 78.66 m near the southern section), perhaps due to young tectonic activity (Photos 15.12, 15.19). The layers in Loci 9914 and 9905 may be explained as a constructional fill, intended to elevate the level of Building DA, resembling in function the tufa fill (2814) north of Wall 2886, although composed of different material.
Building DA, with its massive sub-floor fills, wide walls, deep foundations and elaborate arrangement of buttresses, must have been a public structure of some sort, whether a palace or an administrative building. It appears that the excavated remains constituted just a small part of a much larger LB IIA building, which extended in all directions, whose nature and size remain mostly unknown.
Following the apparent abandonment of the monumental Building DA of Stratum D-10, the area underwent a major change, albeit with some continuation in architectural orientation. Strata D-9b and D-9a, together with Stratum D-8, form a complex and dense stratigraphic sequence, in which different lines of development can be traced in each excavated unit. The remains were excavated mainly in four squares (M–N/4–5), as well as in the southeastern part of Square L/4 (Stratum D-9b only). The sequence was dated to the Late Bronze IIB (13th century BCE) based on the associated finds.
In Stratum D-9b, a new building complex (Building DB) was erected on the ruins of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Fig. 15.7). The building was composed of two adjacent units, separated by a long north–south wall (8943). The eastern unit was partially divided into two sub-units (9927, 9925), while the western unit was probably a spacious courtyard which was divided into an open area in the north (7951) and a roofed area in the south (8919).
Two units, either rooms or courtyards, were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31). The eastern and northern walls were not found, probably located beyond the borders of the excavated area. Wall 8943 crossed the excavated area on a slightly northwest to southeast line and was mostly preserved only at the stone-foundation level. The northern part of Wall 8943 was built above Wall 8942 of Stratum D-10 and its stones were embedded into the latter, as if using the earlier massive brick wall as a stabilizer. On the southernmost end, the lowermost course of the brick superstructure of Wall 8943 was preserved, made of one row of bricks laid as headers. The stone foundation, preserved one to two courses high, was made of two rows of medium-sized limestone and basalt stones, with some small stones to fill the gaps. Some parts of the foundation, mainly in the southern portion, were missing, probably due to ancient robbing.
In the western part of Building DB was a large courtyard, 0.7 m above that of Stratum D-10 Building DA. As no openings connecting the eastern unit with this courtyard were identified, the linkage between them is only tentative; the opening might have been north of the limit of the excavated area. The courtyard (7951, 8919) was excavated in an area of 8.0×9.0 m, between Wall 8943 and the erosion line to the west. Its northern boundary was beyond the excavated area, while its southern limit was Wall 2816 and a line of pillar bases to its east. South of this wall and pillar bases there was an additional space (8919), ca. 2.5 m wide and at least 9.0 m long, bounded on the south by Wall 1906 that protruded along the southern section of Squares M– N/4.
This area, to the south of Courtyard 7951, was separated from it by two different features, both located on top of the earlier Stratum D-10 architecture. In the western part (Squares L–M/4), Walls 2816 and 2892 appeared to be an attempt to rebuild Wall 2886 and Buttresses 1902 and 1903 (Photos 15.23, 15.25–15.26, 15.37). Wall 2816, preserved along 4.3 m and one course high, was constructed of small- and medium-sized tufa stones. It was built directly on top of Wall 2886 and Buttress 1903 in its eastern part and on top of the tufa fill 2814 in its western part, where it continued westwards beyond the limits of the erosion line. It seems that when the D-9b walls were built, the architectural elements of Stratum D-10 were shaved to a relatively low level (79.05–79.10 m), essentially to that of the thick tufa fill (2814). Wall 2816 was abutted by 2892, made of larger tufa stones, which was built over Buttress 1902 of Stratum D-10. Although these two features constituted an attempt to rebuild part of Building DA of Stratum D-10, their peculiar construction, and the fact that Wall 2816 extended further to the west, indicated changes compared with the original plan of the building in D-10. Wall 2816 must have supported a brick superstructure. The reason for it being lower by 0.8–0.9 m than the line of pillar bases to its east (8935, see below) was perhaps due to the way this part of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Wall 2886, Buttresses 1902, 1903) was destroyed; these elements were possibly damaged more than the eastern part, so that the builders of Stratum D-9b found a depression or step in the ruined wall which they used as foundations for their new construction.
In Stratum D-9a, Building DB was replaced by new architectural features which partially preserved the outline of previous elements, although the overall plan and nature of this stratum was fairly different (Fig. 15.8). It seems that the builders of Stratum D9a were very familiar with the previous stratum and utilized earlier constructions. They may even have been partly responsible for the dismantling and removal of the brick superstructure of the Stratum D-9b walls, as no brick debris was found in the deserted units of the latter. Stratum D-9a was a kind of transitional phase in the process of deterioration in this area, from the elaborate architecture of Stratum D-10, through the less substantial Stratum D-9b building, to the large open area of the following Stratum D-8.
Stratum D-7b signifies the first occupation phase related to the Iron Age IA in Area D (Fig. 15.12). It comprised a few installations and pits related to floor patches spread over the four excavated squares (M–N/4–5), without any walls or other architectural elements. The relatively thin accumulation associated with this stratum was quickly replaced by a new building phase (Stratum D-7a), to which much more substantial remains were assigned. Thus, it seems that Stratum D-7b constituted a rather ephemeral occupation that will not necessarily be found in other parts of the site. See Photo 15.45 for a general view of the area and accumulation in the section up to Stratum D-7a.
In an excavated area of ca. 80 sq m, three units built of brick walls with stone foundations were found, denoted Building DC, although their attribution to a single building remains uncertain (Fig. 15.13). All brick superstructures except one (2842) were built of one row of gritty yellowish bricks laid as headers, with thin (0.02 m) gray mortar between them. This type of brick, which had similar dimensions in most walls (0.58×0.36×0.12 m), was unique to Stratum D-7a. The brick superstructure rested on top of a one-course stone foundation which was made of two rows of stones with a gap between them, filled with gray-brown debris. The stone foundations were slightly wider than the brick superstructure, measuring 0.75 m as opposed to the 0.6 m-wide brick wall, and thus, they protruded on both faces. The stones were mediumsized basalt and limestone and included occasional basalt grinding stone fragments in secondary use. Floors were found to abut the top level of the stone foundation or the lower courses of the brick superstructure.
This unit was bounded by Wall 7906 to the north and Walls 4856 and 8917 to the south (Fig. 15.13). The western boundary was eroded, while the eastern one was beyond the excavation area.
The opening between Walls 8917 and 4856 led to the southeastern unit, characterized by a rather thick floor build-up (8907, levels 81.45–81.60 m) that was related to a dense concentration of installations (Fig. 15.13). The floor was ca. 0.3–0.4 m higher than Floor 7902/9902 of the northern unit and this gap was bridged by a step built of two bricks (levels 81.35–81.60 m) which were found immediately to the southwest of Wall 8917 (shown on the plan of Stratum D-7a', Fig. 15.14), although it is unclear whether these two bricks were placed during the initial construction phase of Stratum D-7a or during the later phase, D-7a'. Floor 8907 extended 4.2 m to the south of Wall 8917 up to the southern section of Square N/4, and 3.5–4.0 m on an east–west axis from Wall 2842 to the eastern section. This appears to have been an open courtyard, although two medium-sized stones with flat tops embedded in the upper part of the floor striations, 2.4–2.5 m to the south of Wall 8917, may have served as pillar bases for a lightweight roof.
Room 2871 was bounded by Walls 2842, 4856 and 1818 (Photo 15.57, upper right); its western boundary was eroded away (Fig. 15.13). The room measured 3.1 m in width (north–south) and at least 3.8 m in length (east–west). A marked peculiarity in Room 2871 was the significant difference in wall foundation levels and, as a result, the irregular relationship between the walls, an issue which clearly pertains to the history of the room’s construction. Wall 1818 was the deepest of the three. Its stone foundation, 0.7–0.9 m wide, was carefully built of two rows of medium- and large-sized flat stones, the largest of which were in the western portion of the foundation. The foundation extended 3.6 m from the erosion line to the east, where it abruptly ended ca. 0.4 m west of Wall 2842, while its brick superstructure abutted the latter wall. Two foundation deposits were found below the northern row of stones: the western one (No. 2; Fig. 16.24:4–6; see Fig. 15.20, Photo 15.54a), placed below a large flat limestone, was composed of two bowls placed rim to-rim, enclosing a lamp. The second deposit (No. 3; Fig. 16.24:9–10, Photo 15.54b) was ca. 1.5 m to the east of the former and consisted of one lamp and one bowl. The brick superstructure built on top of the stone foundation was preserved five to six courses high (0.8–0.9 m), composed of the typical yellowish gritty bricks of Stratum D-7a, on top of which three to five courses of gray-brown friable bricks were placed (top preserved level: 82.50 m). The upper part resembled Wall 2842 and was probably erected with the latter. It should be noted that the lower part of the brick superstructure of Wall 1818 was built of different-sized bricks compared to other Stratum D-7a walls, placed as either headers or stretchers; the overall width of the wall ranged from 0.55 m in the east to 0.7 m in the west.
Minor changes in the northeastern part of the excavated area were attributed to this phase (Fig. 15.4); these changes might correspond to the upper layers of the floor build-up that accumulated in the other spaces in Stratum D-7a, discussed above.
4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.
Possibly the most complicated stratigraphic sequence in the western part of Area D was found above Stratum D-7a and below the Iron IB Strata D-5–D-4. Inside this 1.5 m-deep accumulation, excavated over an area of approximately 60 sq m (in Squares M/5, N/4–5, and the southwestern portion of P/4), numerous installations and built elements were uncovered, each with a different foundation and preservation level. In-between these installations, as well as partly above and below several of them, was a thick accumulation of striations, found in all areas except for the western and northern portions of Squares M–N/5. These striations, which totaled ca. 0.9 m (82.10–83.00 m), represented both floor build-up and natural accumulation of layered sediments. However, the distinction between different depositional processes during the excavation was impossible due to the overall homogenous nature of the striations and the absence of concentrations of material remains within the sequence. The striations must have accumulated during a relatively long time-span, in which man-made features were built and went out of use intermittently. The correlation of different features found at various elevations along the sequence was often complicated. We tentatively divided this stratum into two main phases, although in certain places, this division was arbitrary: a lower phase (D-6b; Fig. 15.15) and an upper phase (D-6a; Fig. 15.16).
The lowest level in which the striated accumulation appeared in Square N/4 was 82.10–82.20 m, designated Locus 1876 (above brick debris 7936 of Stratum D-7a; Figs. 15.19–15.21). In Loci 7935 and 7950, excavated at the same levels in Square N/5, no clear continuation of these striations was observed and, instead, the top of the brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' was found (Fig. 15.21). Only in the southeastern corner of Square N/5, within Locus 7935 (82.10–82.23 m), a local layered accumulation was noted, which included large cattle bones and an associated gray-ash accumulation.
The later phase of Stratum D-6 was characterized by the continued accumulation of striations in Square N/4 (the top of 1876, Photo 15.60), as well as in the southern (7921) and eastern (7922) parts of Square N/5, at levels 82.80–83.00 m (Fig. 15.6).
Architectural remains attributed to Stratum D-5 included Buildings DD and DE in the east, bordered on the west by a north–south street, and partially preserved elements to the west of the street that could have been either part of a unit presently eroded away or a subterranean support for the architecture above it. Based on the founding levels of the walls flanking the street, it seems that the buildings of this stratum were terraced to some extent, with an upper terrace to the east of the street and a lower one to its west, following the gradient of the slope.
Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.
Between Wall 2882 on the west and Building DD on the east ran a north–south street for 9.25 m; it continued into the northern and southern balks. Its width in the south was 1.0–1.2 m, while in the north it was ca. 2.35 m (between Walls 2882 and 8878 in Square P/5).
The eastern unit in Stratum D-5 was not fully exposed, since some of the walls of Stratum D-4 which were built directly on top of Stratum D-5 structures were not dismantled. The exposed remains were sufficient to show that these were massive buildings that housed special activity. The area was divided into two units: Building DE in the north and DD to its south (Photos 15.69–15.77). The northern unit included two rooms with an unclear connection between them; both continued to the north and east beyond the border of the excavation. The southern unit comprised two large rooms paved with well-preserved brick floors. The exact relationship between the two units remained obscure, since the juncture between them was covered by later walls that were not dismantled.
Building DE was comprised of two rooms, separated by north–south Wall 8861, preserved to five brick courses. The upper two courses were built of dark gray friable bricks, the two courses below them of white bricks, and the lowermost course was again dark gray. The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same wall was typical of this stratum, such as in Walls 8884 and 8854 of Building DD, described below. Later walls covered the northern and southern ends of Wall 8861, but it is most likely that it had cornered with Wall 8884 on the south.
East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.
West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.
This was part of a massive building whose eastern and western walls were 1.25 m wide each, composed of two rows of bricks. While the eastern wall (8848) was comprised of two rows, the western wall seems to have been made of two adjoining walls (8855, 2881) which were constructed separately: the eastern side (8855) had a stone foundation which was lacking in the western side (2881). Wall 2881 apparently continued to be in use in the subsequent stratum, D-4b, when it abutted the newly built Wall 1860 on the west (see below). Wall 2881 was poorly preserved, perhaps since it was in use longer than Wall 8855. The northern wall (8884) was apparently just as wide as the western and eastern walls, based on a small part of its northern face exposed in Square P/5; the rest of the northern part of the wall was covered by D-4b walls. The eastern wall (8848) appeared to have been the outer wall of the entire building, although this could not be ascertained due to the limited excavation area. If this is correct, then the external width of the building was ca. 6.7 m (for the possibility that this complex continued to the east into Area C, see below). It seems that the southern wall (8852) of the eastern room was an internal wall, since the parallel room to the west continued south beyond the border of the excavation. Thus, the length of the building was at least 6.0 m and it probably continued beyond the southern limit of the area.
This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.
Room 8871 was the western room of Building DD (Photos 15.69, 15.76–15.77). Its inner size was ca. 2.0×at least 5.2 m, as its southern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. In the north, the excavation almost reached the presumed southern face of Wall 8884. The floor (levels 83.55–83.74 m) was made of four to five rows of bricks, like the floor of Room 8867 to its east. It abutted Walls 8855 and 8854. The bricks of the floor were covered by 0.25 m-deep striated layers of soft earth and plaster, which were sealed by Floor 8816 of Stratum D-4b. Although the level of the floor in this room was 0.5–0.6 m higher than that in the eastern room, it was clear that the two rooms belonged to the same building. A similar situation was observed in Stratum D-4b Building DG (see below).
The building remains of Stratum D-5, although limited, indicated dense urban planning and the existence of well-planned structures. Wall 2882, which crossed the entire area from north to south, represented a degree of central planning, although it remained unclear as to what unit it had been belonged. Initially, it had been considered that this wall was a foundation intended to support the slope during the construction of Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. According to this suggestion, Building DF would have been founded in Stratum D-5 and continued to be in use, with slight changes, in Strata D-4b and D-4a. However, it was finally decided in favor of the stratigraphic separation as suggested here, namely, that Wall 2882 represented an independent phase, attributed to Stratum D-5, and that it was an isolated element, with no structural remains belonging to this stratum to its west.
Stratum D-4 was the most extensively exposed stratum in Area D, revealed in six excavation squares (N–P–Q/4–5). Although new structures replaced the massive Buildings DD and DE of Stratum D-5, and Building DF was built west of the street, the general outline of Stratum D-5 was maintained, with the north–south street continuing to separate the eastern and the western units.
To the best of our understanding, Building DF was built in Stratum D-4, although as explained above, there was a slight possibility that it was founded already in Stratum D-5 (see above). The building included two rows of rooms running parallel to the slope of the mound west of the street and comprised two terraces, separated by Wall 4866 and its possible southern extension (Photos 15.78–15.82). The eastern line of rooms included 4839, 1845 and 2840 and the western line included 4871 and 4879; the latter were destroyed by erosion and only their eastern ends were preserved. It is not certain that all these rooms belonged to the same building, but it is clear that this was a well-planned structure adjoining the north–south street on its west.
Walls 1811, 2822 and 2846 created the northern end of a 2.5 m-wide room that continued to the south (Squares N–P/4). They were a rebuild of the walls found in the same place in Stratum D-6a, described above (Room 4848). East–west Wall 1811 in Squares N–P/4 was comprised of two rows of bricks, 1.0 m wide and well preserved for the most part. The wall had a stone foundation comprised of small- and medium-sized stones, with one row seen along the northern face, although these stones were not visible under the southern face; the foundation was dug into the brick collapse (1855) below. Inside this room was a hard-packed earth floor (2840; level 84.08 m) set on a bedding of pebbles. A shallow pit (2828) was partially excavated in the northwestern part of the room. The floor of this room was raised and a higher floor (2823) was constructed at level 84.20 m in Stratum D-4a.
The space between the rooms on the north and the south was probably a courtyard, paved with stones (1845), with a series of plaster floors accumulated above it (1836) (Squares N–P/4–5; Photos 15.80– 15.82). This space was 4.0 m long and at least 3.0 m wide. It was bordered on the east by Wall 1883, on the west by the supposed continuation of Wall 4866 along the erosion line of the slope, on the south by Wall 1811, and on the north by Wall 4813. Wall 1883 was built above Wall 2882 of Stratum D-5. It had a three-course stone foundation that protruded beyond the face of the wall towards the east and seven courses of its brick superstructure were preserved; the uppermost three tilted strongly to the west (Fig. 15.33). From its corner with Wall 1811, the wall continued ca. 7.5 m to the north, running into the balk. The southern end of the wall (termed 2846) was slightly curved and served as the eastern wall of Room 2840.
In Square N/5 were remains of one complete room (4839) and segments of two additional rooms (4879, 4871), arranged on two levels, with a floorlevel difference of 0.65 m: Room 4839 on an upper terrace, which was on the same level as 1845 and 2840 to its south, and Rooms 4879 and 4871 on a lower terrace to the west. Wall 4866, 1.0 m wide, which was common to all these rooms, served as a retaining wall for the terrace above it. The latter wall was not preserved entirely, but most likely had cornered with Wall 4861.
The north–south street of Stratum D-5 in Squares P/4–5 continued to be in use through Stratum D-4, when it was ca. 1.85–2.0 m wide (Photos 15.83– 15.84). The street surface was gradually raised, with striations accumulating between Wall 1883 (which stood to a height of 1.5 m) in the west and the western walls of Buildings DH and DG (in Stratum D-4b) and DJ (in Stratum D-4a).
To the east of the street were two units, Buildings DG and DH, attributed to Stratum D-4b, built above D-5 Building DG.
This building comprised three rooms, two of which were completely excavated, and part of a fourth unexcavated room which continued into the eastern balk (Photo 15.85). The excavated part measured 5.8×6.9 m, but the building apparently continued to the east and perhaps also to the south, beyond the limit of the excavation area.
The western room in the building (inner dimensions 2.0×4.7 m, 9.4 sq m) was a rebuild of the previous Room 8871 of Stratum D-5. Each of its four well-preserved walls was built of dark gray bricks with distinctive whitish mortar between them (recalling the Stratum C-3 bricks in Area C; see Chapter 12). The western wall of the room (1860) was founded directly on top of Wall 8855 of Stratum D-5, but about 0.5 m north of the entrance, there was an earth layer separating these two walls. The entrance into Room 8816 was through an opening in the southern part of Wall 1860. West of the entrance was a plastered stone step, 0.75 m long (2866) at level 84.46 m, constructed above the stump of D-5 Wall 2881, leading from the street into the room.
The southeastern space in Building DG was perhaps an open courtyard, 3.5 m wide and at least 3.5 m long (at least 12.25 sq m); it continued eastward beyond the limit of the excavated area and thus, its full length could not be determined. Its northern wall (4859) was composed of white bricks and had an opening leading to Room 8830 to its north. The southern wall (4862), also built of white bricks, was exposed only along 1.5 m, since its western part was disturbed; there could have been an opening here leading to another room in the south.
This small room (inner dimensions 1.45×1.9 m) was entered from Space 8841 to its south. Its northern, eastern and southern walls were built of white bricks, while on the west it was bounded by Wall 4878, built of dark gray bricks. The 0.6 m-wide corner entrance had a brick threshold at level 84.44 m. It is notable that such a corner entrance was also found in Room 8816 and perhaps also in 8841.
It remained unclear whether the three rooms described above (and the fourth unexcavated one) belonged to the same unit. Since no entrance leading from Room 8816 to the eastern rooms was found, it may be that this room was independent and accessed directly from the street, perhaps serving as a storage space or workshop, while Rooms 8841 and 8830 belonged to a separate building entered from the east or the south. Space 8841 could be part of an open courtyard, while Room 8830 and the unexcavated room to its east could be small living spaces.
The northern building in the eastern unit comprised two rooms and perhaps a third unexcavated room on the east. Its southern wall (8821) adjoined Building DG on the south.
The inner dimensions of this room were 1.80×2.55 m (4.6 sq m, including the area of Bench 8860). A corner entrance with a brick threshold at level 84.29 m at the northern end of Wall 8849 connected Rooms 8844 and 8842. Another opening (8886) was detected in the eastern wall of the room (7851), just on line with the latter entrance. The opening in Wall 7851 was preserved to its full height, standing 1.25 m high and 0.8 m wide. The beaten-earth floor of this room (8844) covered a strip of bricks (8870) that ran along the western face of Wall 7851; these bricks were wider than the wall and were possibly placed in order to support the floor near the entrance. Wall 7851 was preserved to a height of 16 courses and continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a. Wall 8860 was a line of bricks adjoining the northern face of Wall 8821; yet, while Wall 8821 was preserved to a height of four courses, 8860 was preserved to only one course and was abutted by Floor 8844. Thus, 8860 was interpreted as a bench.
Room 8842 was the western room of Building DH (Photos 15.63, 15.73, 15.92). This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.6×1.8 m, 2.88 sq m) had a beaten-earth floor (8842) abutting the walls at levels 84.28–84.34 m. A row of five stones (8856) lined the western side of the room; to its west was Installation 8810 (Photos 15.63, 15.66, 15.73, 15.92). This enigmatic feature included three large flat pinkish limestone blocks and a large basalt basin, located east of the street, on the same line as the supposed western wall of Room 8842 and above D-5 Wall 8878. The southernmost limestone was a large rectangular block (0.3×0.6×0.97 m). The middle limestone was whitish/pinkish and almost square (0.3×0.6×0.6 m). The northernmost stone was 0.5 m wide and at least 0.5 m long. A basalt basin (8807) was located south of and on the same line as these three stones. This was a large oval-shaped basalt stone, 0.8–0.9 m in diameter, with a rounded shallow flat depression in its center, 0.5 m in diameter and 0.12 m deep. Grinding marks could be seen inside the depression. A flat limestone was found to the south of this basin. The tops of these stones were at levels 84.56–84.66 m, ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor of Stratum D-5 Room 8874 and 0.3–0.4 m above the floor of Room 8842 of Stratum D-4b, both to the east of the stones. The street west of this installation was wider than it was further to the south, thus providing convenient access to the installation.
The term Building DJ refers to the area of Buildings DG and DH, which underwent several major internal changes. Although no opening was found to connect the southern and northern wings, some of the renovations indicate that the entire area was considered as part of one architectural system. Many of the previous walls continued to be in use (4859, southern part of 4878, 4862, 1884, 1860, 4876, 8828, 8834), while others were cancelled or replaced. Thus, the double wall separating Building DG from DH in Stratum D-4b (8821, 8828) was replaced by a single wall (8828/8834) and the eastern wall (7851) of D-4b Room 8844 was extended to the south (denoted here 7848), cancelling the earlier wall (8805) to its west and becoming the eastern wall of the new room (7855), thus widening D-4b Room 8830 by 0.9 m. In the center of the building, Wall 7852 was built directly over Wall 8849 of D-4b, abutting the northern wall of D-4b Building DG (8828, 8834), which continued to be in use. At this time, the western part of Wall 8821 was cancelled, so that the previous space of Room 8842 was enlarged, but was now divided by a narrow wall (4877) into two separate chambers (4858, 4872). On the west, Wall 8850 was constructed above Installation 8810 and served as the western wall of the building, facing the street.
This room of Building DH in Stratum D-4b continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a, with the same floor and walls on the north and east. However, architectural changes occurred in the other two walls; on the west, a new wall (7852) was constructed on top of Wall 8849, preserved to seven courses. On the south, Wall 8821 of Stratum D-4b was cancelled and the room was now bordered by Wall 8828, which continued to be in use from Stratum D-4b. The inner dimensions of the new room were 2.4×2.6 (6.24 sq m). All the walls’ interiors were coated with a thick layer of white plaster. Floor 8844, attributed to D-4b and probably continuing in D-4a, was covered by destruction debris (8833) and fallen roof material (8829), the latter covered by a layer of brick debris (7853) reaching an uppermost level of 85.64 m, 1.25 m above the original floor.
D-4b Room 8842 was now extended to the south and divided into two chambers by a narrow partition wall (4877) (Photos 15.94–15.97). To the north, Room 4858 was a narrow space with inner dimensions of 1.0×2.3 m. Traces of thick white plaster were preserved on Walls 4876, 7852 and 4877. No floor was traced, but since Wall 4877 floated at level 85.07 m, almost 0.8 m above the floor of the Stratum D-4b, such a floor must have existed.
Replacing D-4b Room 8830 of Building DG was a new room that was enlarged to the east (inner dimensions 1.4×2.8 m, 3.92 sq m), entered from the south through the same entrance used in D-4b. No floor was detected in this room. The brick debris layer in this room (7855, 8806) was cut by Stratum D-3 Pits (7858, 7860, 7863).
This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.25×1.45 m, 1.8 sq m) was created by constructing a narrow partition wall (1868) in the northern part of D-4b Room 8816. The eastern wall (7861), composed of dark gray bricks and coated on the exterior with a layer of unique white bricks, was preserved to a height of six courses. This outer coating of bricks decreased the room’s length by ca. 0.3 m. This chamber had a stone floor at level 84.80 m (0.1 m above Floor 8816 of D-4b), covered by a beatenearth floor (8820) at level 84.83 m, about 0.3 m higher than D-4b floor in the same location. Along the western side of the chamber was a brick bench or installation (8859), composed of three white bricks. The northern one was 0.4×0.5 m and the narrow middle brick (0.3×0.45 m) was laid with its long side against the northern brick. The southernmost brick had the same dimensions as the northern one, with a round depression in its southern part (diameter 0.4 m) which could have served as a base for a jar. The installation/bench was surrounded by ashy material and a large amount of charred olive pits.
The previous Space 8841, possibly an open courtyard, continued with almost no change in Stratum D-4a. No floor was detected in this later phase, although it probably existed, since a large oven (4851) was found in the northwestern corner of the room with a foundation level at 84.75 m, ca. 0.5 m above the floor of Stratum D-4b. Three stones running on a diagonal line at levels 84.70–84.81 m were found in the northeastern part of the room (8838).
This room (inner dimensions 2.1×3.0 m, 6.3 sq m) was the southern part of D-4b Room 8816, after its division by a narrow partition wall (1868) (Photos 15.98–15.99). Its walls were covered with white plaster. The western wall (1860) was preserved to six to seven courses, the southern wall (1884) to at least nine courses, and the northern wall (1868) up to seven courses in the west, yet its eastern part was severely damaged by Stratum D-3 pits (see below).
In Stratum D-4b, the general layout of the excavated area continued from Stratum D-5, but substantial changes occurred in each individual building. West of the street, Building DF was founded at this stage, although the possibility that it was founded in Stratum D-5 should not be ruled out. East of the street, the massive Buildings DD and DE of the previous stratum were replaced by new buildings (DG and DH). Building DG appeared to have contained a square courtyard surrounded by rooms at least on the north and west (although no entrance from the courtyard to the western rooms was found); its full plan on the east and south remained unknown. The northern building, DH, included only two rooms entered from the east, although they may have been part of a larger building extending to the east and perhaps to the north.
Stratum D-3 was characterized by a series of 45 pits found in an open area in Squares N–P–Q/4–5 between levels 84.95–86.60 m. They post-dated Stratum D-4 elements and pre-dated the construction of Walls 1809, 1820 and 2820 of Stratum D-2. However, they could have been either contemporary with or earlier than Walls 4808 and 4809, attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/5, since the latter had deep foundations on the same level and even lower than the pits and rest on top of Stratum D-4 walls and debris (see further on this subject below). Two additional pits were located in Square R/4 in Area C (Stratum C-3; Chapter 12), thus establishing a good correlation between the stratigraphic sequences in these two areas.
In Square Q/4, just north of the southern balk, Pit 2833 was a deep pit that was not completely excavated. It cut Pit 2868 to its east. East of these pits, 2804 cut into Pits 4815 and 4834. Further east was Pit 2829, continuing into the eastern section, with Pit 4841 below it. Pit 2834 differed from the other pits, being larger (diameter 1.9 m) and amorphic in shape. This pit was cut by a plastered pit (2844).
Eight pits in Square Q/4 were unplastered (4805, 4806, 4814, 4815, 4821, 4834, 4835, 4865). Most of these belonged to the lower layer of pits (Table 15.3; Fig. 15.26). Some of them contained organic material, such as (in order of frequency) olive stones, wood charcoal, charred grain and chickpeas. In some of the pits were large sherds, including bases of jars (e.g., 4814).
The numerous pits in Stratum D-3 were bounded on the north by the line of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 in the middle of Squares P–Q/5. North of this line, no pits nor any other elements of Stratum D-3 were found and the structures of Stratum D-2 were built right on top of D-4 elements. It should be noted that the foundations of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 (=VI) were sunk to levels 85.20–85.50 m, which corresponded to the level of the pits. This wall was constructed on top of Stratum D-4a Building DJ. Similarly, the foundation of Stratum C-2 (=VI) Wall 1563 in the balk between Squares Q–R/4 was at level 85.70 m, which fits the upper level of most of the pits. However, elsewhere in Area C, no such pits were found in contexts dated to the transition from Iron I to Iron IIA, and architectural continuity predominated.
Several architectural features were assigned to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/4–5 that were interpreted as being later than the D-3 pits of Iron IB and preceding the Stratum D-1a–c architecture found in Square Q/5 (an alternative interpretation is suggested below). These remains are thought to be contemporary with those of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and thus are shown on the same plan (Chapter 12; Figs. 12.7–12.8).
Three narrow brick walls (1820, 1809, 4827) created a small chamber in Square P/4 (4826; 1.7 m wide, length unknown), close to the erosion line which cut it on the west. This room (Photo 15.108) was built above a layer of D-4a burnt brick debris and collapse (1850) which seems to have been levelled in preparation for the construction of the new building and above the D-3 pits. A fragmentary floor (4826) was found at level 86.08 m, continuing below Wall 4827 to the north (4825) and thus, the wall was probably a secondary partition constructed on top of the floor. Floor 4825 was cut in a straight line by Trench 4860, which was either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal trench burrowed from the nearby slope on the west; the latter possibility is more plausible. The southern and eastern walls, preserved up to four courses high and lacking stone foundations, were covered with mud plaster — Wall 1809 on both faces and Wall 1820 on the northern face only. To the east of the chamber, a floor (1886) abutted Wall 1809 at 86.34 m, higher than the floor inside the chamber. The mud plaster on Wall 1809 continued down to coat one of the bricks below this floor level as well.
In Squares P–Q/5, two walls (4808, 4819), preserved to 1.15–1.6 m, formed part of a unit that continued to the east. Trench 4860 to the south of these walls cut the remains of Phase D-4. As mentioned above, this could be either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal burrow. A layer of reed impressions in clay found below the foundation of Wall 4808 (Photo 15.111) may be explained as either related to the construction of this wall or as the roof collapse of Building DJ of Stratum D-4 (the top of the latter’s walls were ca. 0.5 m lower). A third wall (4869), observed in the topsoil of Square P/6 north of the limits of the excavation area, seems to have belonged to the same building as Walls 4808 and 4819, creating a space 3.25 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Inside this space was a brick debris layer (4828) that rested on a possible floor at level 86.08 m. This was exactly the same level as the floor in Room 4826 to the south. If this indeed was the floor, then the foundations of the walls consisted of six to seven brick courses below the floor level, with no stone foundation. These deep foundations imply that this had been a sturdy, well-built structure. The light yellow and compacted matrix of the bricks of these walls was typical of Stratum VI construction elsewhere in the site. The pottery recovered from Locus 4828 included some red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, typical of this stratum. Thus, this room might be correlated on the basis of architectural, stratigraphic and pottery indicators to Stratum C-2 (=VI); see, however an alternative interpretation below.
Dismantling the balk between Squares Q/4 and R/4 revealed Wall 1563, a north–south wall preserved to a height of 1.6 m; its foundation was at levels 85.61–85.70 m, higher than that of Wall 4808 in Square P/5 (Fig. 15.28). Wall 1563 was built of the same yellowish bricks typical of Stratum VI and was found tilted to the east (in the opposite direction of the nearby slope of the mound), perhaps due to seismic damage. It was the western wall of a room of Stratum VI exposed in Area C, Square R/4, whose floor was at level 85.60 m (Chapter 12, Fig. 12.9). It made a corner on the south with Wall 1572, which was preserved only four courses high and to a length of ca. 1.0 m. Abutting Wall 1563 on the west was a layer of debris on an earthen layer (1556) at level 85.70 m, which may have been a floor, although this identification remained unsure. The eastern half of a pit (1567) was uncovered, dug into Floor 1556. The relationship between this floor and the deep debris of Locus 1837 to its west (see above) remained unclear, since the levels of 1837 and the foundations of Wall 2820 further to the west were higher than the supposed floor (1556). These discrepancies may be explained as a result of the layers tilting towards the east, as observed in several strata at Tel Rehov. As noted, Debris 1837 may have been a constructional fill for Stratum D-1 floors, which may explain its rather high level compared to Floor 1556. A third possible explanation is that Floor 1556 (if indeed correctly identified as a floor) belonged to a late phase of Stratum D-3 and was not related to Wall 1563 (although this was not the impression during the excavation).
Yael Rotem, field supervisor of Area D East, suggested that the northern structure in Stratum D-2 (Walls 4808, 4819, 4869) was contemporary with the Stratum D-3 pits, based on the fact that none of the D-3 pits were found below or north of Wall 4808 and that the latter wall was founded just above Stratum D-4a walls and occupation debris. In its center, Wall 4808 stands to a height of up to 1.6 m between levels 85.27 and 87.06 m, while the pits were between levels 85.23 and 86.50 m, corresponding to the lower part of this wall. Thus, the possibility that the pits and the wall were contemporary should not be ruled out. In that case, the walls belonging to this unit should be attributed to Stratum D-3 at the end of the Iron Age I. This is not contradicted by the few sherds that were related to these walls.
Several fragmentary architectural elements at the top of the slope in Squares P–Q/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-1 (Strata V and IV). Although they were close to topsoil and the erosion line and were poorly preserved, they indicated dense building activity which can be divided into three phases, denoted D-1c, D-1b and D-1a; these can be correlated with similar phases uncovered in the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C (Chapter 12). Like in Area D, the lower two levels in the latter square were identical in terms of architecture and the difference between them was only in floor raising, while the upper phase, C-1a, showed a substantial change in terms of plan and architecture. This similarity between the two adjacent squares enabled a secure correlation between the two areas.
This phase comprised several architectural features in Squares Q/4–5, which superimposed Stratum D-2 architecture (Fig. 15.29; Photos 15.115– 15.116). The walls appeared to belong to one building, the western part of which was destroyed by erosion.
Stratum D-1b refers to a later phase of the previous occupation, when the buildings continued to be in use, but slight changes were made in floors and installations (Fig. 15.30; Photos 15.117–15.120). In Square Q/5, two phases of partially preserved ovens (7825, 7817) were found east of Wall 7811, related to a floor (7812). Their foundations were at levels 86.87 m and 86.78 m respectively, ca. 0.3 m above the floor of Stratum D-1c. Two intact oil lamps (Fig. 16.61:8–9) were found in the debris (7809) west of the ovens. In the corner of Walls 4809 and 7811, a thin clay floor (7827) was found at level 86.71 m.
In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.
In Square P/5, a burial of an adult (4829) was dug into D-1c–b Wall 4809. The grave was covered with a line of bricks taken from the wall. The body was lying on its back, the skull in the northeast and the feet in the southwest. The skull was slightly tilted, with the eye sockets facing the feet, approximately towards the south. No finds were found in relation to this burial. This was most probably an Islamic burial, similar to the ones found in Area B (Chapter 8).
It should be recalled that only a limited area of ca. 150 sq m, and in many cases much less, was excavated in Area D in each phase. This is a very tiny sample compared to the entire area of the site, which is ca. 100,000 sq m; thus, the available sample comprised only ca. 0.15%. Since the Late Bronze/Iron I sequence was hardly excavated in other parts of the tell, caution must be exercised when making generalizations based on the available data. Phases with poor architectural remains should not be taken as representing the entire site. For example, although the building remains of Strata D-2 and D-1 were fragmentary and unimpressive, we know that they belonged to a densely built and well-planned Iron IIA city, as uncovered in the adjacent Area C and other excavation areas.
The most prominent result of the excavation in Area D was the observation of continued occupation throughout the 600 years spanning Late Bronze I to Iron IIA. Eleven main strata from this time span were defined and several of them have two sub-phases (D-11, D-9, D-7, D-6, D-4) or even three sub-phases (D-1). No major widespread destruction layers were detected in the entire sequence in Area D; an occupation gap may have separated Stratum D-8 from D-7b, as evidenced by the 0.5 m thick accumulation between these two strata, yet this could not be confirmed. Thick accumulations of floor striations in open areas and streets in most strata were evidence for continued activity over a long time. In terms of architecture, the large public building of Stratum D-10 (14th century BCE) and the urban planning and architecture of Strata D-5 and D-4 of Iron IB, should be noted.
The foundation of the city in Late Bronze I (Stratum D-11b) is an exceptional phenomenon in the Southern Levant, as there are almost no new cities founded in this period, which is considered as a period of decline following the Egyptian conquest of Canaan. The low elevation of the earliest stratum compared to the present-day field west of the mound shows that the level of the colluvial field must have risen considerably during the historical periods. It is hypothesized that the earliest settlement was founded at approximately the same level as the adjacent field, or somewhat higher than the field west of the mound, while young tectonic activities were responsible for later geomorphological processes in this area. This, again, is an exceptional feature in Canaanite cities, which were most often located on raised topography. This earliest occupation had a later phase, denoted D-11a, although both these phases are little known, due to limited exposure.
A thick accumulation separated the open area of Stratum D-8 from that of the subsequent Stratum D-7b which can be securely dated to the early 12th century BCE. One small pit contained a cache of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapters 4, 39). In the following phase (D-7a), the area was redesigned as a dwelling with a stone floor and several installations, some of which were densely concentrated in one of its units; a prominent feature in this phase was the six foundation deposits of the lampand-bowl type (see discussion below). In part of the area, a still higher phase was detected (D-7a'), when a new line of pillar bases was built above the previous stone pavement.
Iron IB Strata D-5 and D-4 were preserved only in Squares N–Q/5 in the eastern part of the area. In both, a street crossed the area from north to south. The street surfaces were raised during the course of Strata D-5 and D-4 by almost 1.0 m, evidence for continuous intensive use and dumping of refuse into the street. Substantial buildings flanked the street on the east and west. Building DD of Stratum D-5 was a massive structure with elongated rooms and brick floors. It appeared to have had some public or administrative function, perhaps storage. A room to the north of this building may have been used for domestic cult.
Strata D-2 and D-1 of the Iron IIA were preserved only on the upper part of the slope (Squares Q/4–5 and the eastern side of P/4–5). Stratum D-2 is correlated with Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and marks the westernmost structures of this well-planned Early Iron IIA city, well known in Area C (Table 15.1 and Chapter 12). In the north of the area were remains of a substantial building and in the south were fragmentary structures and an open area with pits (for an alternative proposal which would combine the building in Squares P–Q/5 and the pits of Stratum D-3 into a single stratum; see above).
The excavation in Area D provided important information concerning the impact of environmental factors, such as erosion and tectonic movements, on site formation. The lower (western) edge of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium created during the last three thousand years. Each of the strata was damaged by erosion, although its extent is unknown; it may have demolished only narrow parts of the western slope or, combined with tectonic movements, a somewhat larger part. Nevertheless, it seems likely that erosion could not have been so extensive, and that there were no fortifications during the periods excavated in Area D. This was confirmed also along the northern edge of the mound in Areas C and E concerning the Iron IIA strata.
No evidence for violent destruction was found in any of the strata in Area D, except in part of Building DJ, Stratum D-4a, where limited ash debris and restorable pottery in situ were detected. It appeared that the transition between strata was peaceful and was the result of damage caused by prolonged use, earthquakes, etc. In spite of marked changes between strata, there was continuity in the outlines of buildings, continuous use of certain walls and installations, and the construction of new ovens more or less in the same location of earlier ones.
The walls of the Late Bronze Strata D-11 and D-10 were constructed of bricks without stone foundations; Stratum D-11b Wall 1927 might have been made of packed-earth construction (pisé). In Strata D-9–D-4, most walls had stone foundations of one or two courses that bore a brick superstructure. In the Iron IIA strata (D-2 and D-1), brick walls were constructed without stone foundations, as in contemporary strata in the other excavation areas across the mound.
Two main types of archaeological deposits were found in all the strata: debris related to the collapse of brick walls and occupation debris composed of thin accumulated layers, sometimes laminated in appearance (denoted ‘striations’) that contained many pottery sherds and animal bones. Such striations were especially common in the street layers of Strata D-5 and D-4 and open spaces in Strata D-8 to D-6. These layers are explained as resulting from intentional raising of floor levels and dumping refuse into open spaces.5
5 Natural causes for the creation of such layers were also considered, such as water flow and the deposition of chemical sediments (e.g., evaporites) or silts and clays which originated from nearby exposures of earlier strata, in a mechanism resembling ‘winter-wash’ deposits accumulating inside the squares between the excavation seasons. Based on field observations only, it seems that continuous human activity was the main cause for these laminations.
Eight foundation deposits of the lamp-and-bowl type were found in Area D. The subject was discussed by Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993), who cited all examples known at the time of writing (for two additional ones from a 12th century BCE context at Tel Beth-Shean, see TBS III: 19); the earliest known examples are dated to the 13th century BCE. Our example from Stratum D-9b is tentatively dated to the late 14th or early 13th century BCE and thus, is one of the oldest known deposits of this type. It included a basalt bowl (unlike all the later foundation deposits that have a ceramic bowl) and a single lamp. Six deposits were discovered in Stratum D-7a Building DC of the 12th century, the heyday of this phenomenon, representing one of the densest concentrations of such deposits to be found in a single structure. A single deposit found in Stratum D-4 is one of the latest, dating to the late 11th century BCE. Our deposits contain either one bowl and one lamp or two bowls placed rim to rim, with a lamp between them. No other finds or material such as ash were detected in these deposits. Most of these were located either below a wall or close to its foundation (Fig. 15.13) and must have been related to the construction of the building. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993: 123) emphasized the southern distribution of such deposits (Shephelah, western Negev, southern coastal plain and Egyptian fortresses in northern Sinai and Gaza). The only northern site they could cite was Pella. The examples from Tel Beth-Shean and Tel Rehov enlarge this distribution map to include the Beth-Shean Valley. However, the lack of such deposits in major northern sites such as Dan, Hazor and Megiddo remains a fact. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni defined the phenomenon as “an Egyptian inspired local Canaanite custom”, which appeared mainly during the height of Egyptian control in Canaan, as well as in the Philistine city, Ekron (Tel Miqne). These foundation deposits must have been an expression of beliefs related to the construction of buildings, perhaps to ward off evil spirits.
Two hearths, a cooking installation and 16 ovens (tabuns) were found in Area D.
Various additional installations were found in Area D.
Pits are a common feature in any excavation and their function for refuse, drainage or storage often remains obscure. In Area D, single pits were found in Strata D-7b and D-7a in open areas. In Strata D-5 and D-4, several pits of various sizes were found inside massive buildings. In Building DD, one large and three small pits were dug from the brick floors and in Building 8816 of Stratum D-4b, a large pit was located in the inner courtyard and two smaller pits in Room DG. These pits must have functioned in the house when it was in use, perhaps for refuse or to drain sewage.
Building EA included all the structural remains in Squares E–F/13–14, although the possibility exists that these remains may have belonged to two or three independent buildings, as described below This complex existed in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, with some architectural changes made between them. The topsoil in this area descended to the south, towards the ravine that separated the lower from the upper mound. There was a distinct difference between the preservation in Squares F/13–14, as opposed to E/13–14. While the building remains in F/13–14 were found just below topsoil and were well preserved to a height of ca. 0.8 m, those in Squares E/13–14 were poorly preserved on a much lower level and were covered by a thick layer of eroded wash. Thus, the difference in the height of the top of Wall 1689 in E/13 (71.32 m) and Wall 1629 in F/13 (72.27 m) was 1.07 m, although they were only 3.0 m apart. This lower preservation of the walls in Squares E–F/13 seems to have been caused by severe erosion towards the ravine south of the excavation area, as well as due to a violent destruction in this area, as evidenced by the fallen bricks in Squares E–F/13. It seems that the walls uncovered in the southern part of Square E/13 belonged to Stratum E-1b only and that almost no remains of E-1a were preserved in this square, due to erosion.
In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north.
Room 1701 (Square F/13) had inner dimensions of ca. 2.4 sq m (Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.14–17.15). Its four walls (1628, 1619, 1618, 1629) were identical in their construction technique, including the samesize light yellow bricks. The walls appeared ca. 0.2 m below the topsoil and were preserved to a height of five courses (0.7–0.8 m). A 0.8 m-wide entrance led to the room from Room 1664 on the west. Another entrance in the western end of the southern wall (1629) was found blocked by bricks laid lengthwise (Photo 17.15), yet the door jambs of this blocked entrance could be easily detected. The blocking of the entrance may have taken place between Strata E-1b and E-1a. In the eastern part of this room were two storage compartments (1666 and 1700), created by narrow walls (up to 0.1 m wide) made of whitish clay (Photos 17.14–17.15). The northern compartment (1666) was almost square (inner dimensions 0.9×1.0 m), while the southern one (1700) was rectangular (inner dimensions 1.0×1.4 m). A small hole (ca. 0.11 m in diameter) in the partition between the northern compartment and the western part of Room 1701 was located somewhat above the floor level. The compartments may have served as grain bins; the lack of plaster and the very thin walls precluded their use to store liquids.
The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.
The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665.
We assume that the southern part of the building continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, yet erosion destroyed much of the evidence.
The southeastern part of Area E was densely built up and the architectural remains belonged perhaps to two or three independent buildings, attached to one another and forming one complex. This area was first built in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use, with modifications, in Stratum E-1a. This unit continued beyond the limits of the excavation area to the east and south, where its possible continuation can be determined in Area F (Fig. 17.1).
Building ED, attributed to E-1b (and possibly to E-2), pertains to a partly uncovered structure located in Squares D–E/15, below Building EB of Stratum E-1a.
Excavation along the northern and eastern faces of Platform 1624 in Square E/15 (the focal point of the sanctuary of Stratum E-1a, see below) revealed earlier wall lines (4623, 4624) attributed to Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.34, 17.37). They appeared at levels 71.75–71.81 m and stood one or two courses high. These two walls were slightly to the north and east of the outer lines of the Stratum E-1a platform. Hardly any brick lines could be detected in the northern wall (4624) and it is possible that it was constructed of compacted mud. These walls were most probably contemporary with Room 4653 further to the west and with the early phase of the open space to the north and east, including the circular installations found in the eastern part of Square E/15, Oven 1649, and the layers in the lower part of Locus 1647, all attributed to Stratum E-1b (see below). A shallow debris layer separated the top of these walls from the bottom of the E-1a platform. A major question is whether these two walls belonged to an earlier platform. In order to clarify this point, we dismantled most of the platform (except for the area of the standing stones). The excavation reached level 71.64 m (5623), 0.85 m below the top of the brick platform of E-1a, revealing only brick debris and a large number of random bricks, mostly haphazardly placed (Photo 17.21). No evidence for an earlier platform was found and thus, the function of Walls 4623 and 4624 remained enigmatic.
A 1.5×2.5 m probe conducted below Floor 4654 of E-1a Building EB contained fallen and decayed bricks (5629) attributed to E-1b. The excavation stopped at level 71.69 m, almost 1.0 m below the top of 4654. Among the finds from this lower layer was a sherd of a Greek Late Protogeometric/SubProtogeometric krater (Fig. 18.2:12).
Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 was founded in Stratum E-1a. The northern room (2629) was built above Room 4653 of E-2/E-1b Building ED and the platform in the northeastern corner of the building was higher than the E-1b floors to its north and east. The outer measurements of the building were 7.7×9.8 m and it comprised a central space with an enclosed room or alcove at its eastern end, a rectangular room at the southern side and a smaller room in the northwestern corner. A unique feature in this building was the design of its northeastern corner, which included a rectangular brick platform (2654) topped by a smaller stone platform with standing stones (1624), facing a courtyard to its north and east. This platform was the focal point of what we identify as an open-air sanctuary, which included Building EB and a spacious courtyard with installations to its north and east.
This is the central space in the building (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.
This room (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).
This small rectangular room (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.
This was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.
The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).
The plan of Building EB is exceptional. Although in its size and building techniques, it does not differ from dwellings at Tel Rehov, its unique plan was apparently suited to a specific function related to the open-air sanctuary of which it was a part, with the platform and standing stones occupying the northeastern corner of this structure. The decorated plaster found at the entrance to the southern elongated room emphasizes the importance of this room, which was perhaps the seat of a priest, scribe or other functionaries related to the cultic activity in this area.
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).
The eastern part of a dwelling of Stratum E-1a, denoted Building EC, was excavated west of and attached to Building EB, in Squares C/14–16. The excavated part included a courtyard (5637), a room to its southeast (5613), and two corners of additional rooms on the west. Like the others in Area E, this building was also oriented northwest–southeast. It was built as an independent building and thus, most of its eastern wall (2647) was attached to Wall 2546 of Building EB (with a slight gap between them), thus creating a double wall, like in many other buildings of this period at Tel Rehov.
This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens.
Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room.
Locus 5639 represented the northeastern corner of a room in Building EC, west of Room 5613 (Square C/15). It was bounded by Walls 5640 on the north and 5606 on the east. This small area was excavated to 72.82 m, revealing a layer of brown earth (Photo 17.59).
1 For negation of the Lachish Stratum V cult room as
such, see Ussishkin 2003.
2 The ethnic affiliation of the temple at Khirbet 'Atarus
('Atarot) should be addressed. If this is the town
mentioned in the Mesha inscription (lines 10–11) as
being part of the land of Gad and built by the king of
Israel, then it could be that the temple belonged to an
Israelite or Israelite-related population
1 A narrow cylindrical gap in the middle of Wall 4060 had remains of plaster. This was interpreted during the excavation as a channel conducting liquids from the room to the west into the installation. However, the parallels to the grinding installations in Area C are more convincing and we tend to reconstruct 4064 as such.
The earth’s magnetic field and its elements (after Ben-Yosef et al. 2008)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Schematic illustration of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied
to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov, Stratum C-1b (V)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2454
(eastern wall of Building CE, Square Y/4, looking east). The intense fire of Stratum C-1b is
indicated by the color of the mud bricks.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2411 (eastern
wall of Building CG, Square Y/3 looking west). The
strong tilt to the south is clearly visible.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Zijderveld diagrams (or vector end-point diagrams; see Tauxe 2010: 172)
of the AF demagnetization of samples from Tel Rehov
All samples, except C3 and C6, present one component stable magnetization.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Equal area projection (lower hemisphere) of measured
directions from Buildings CE (squares) and CG (diamonds). The mean direction is represented
by circles and is statistically the same for both buildings.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Equal area projection (lower hemisphere) of measured
directions from Buildings CE (squares) and CG (diamonds) after tilt correction.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
The architectural remains uncovered at Tel Rehov throughout the occupation history of the site (15th—8th centuries BCE) are dominated by mudbricks; during the Iron Age IIA (Strata VI-IV, 10th-9th centuries BCE), the brick walls typically lack stone foundations. In Stratum V of Iron IIA, wooden beams were used on a large-scale as foundations for the walls or were incorporated in the floor makeup. A destruction that involved intense fire was identified at the end of Stratum V (local Stratum C-1b) in the eastern and northern parts of Area C: Buildings CG, CH, CM, and CE (see Chapter 12), but not in other parts of the area. A later violent destruction of Stratum IV (local Stratum C-1a) was found across the entire site (Mazar 2003; 2008; Chapter 4 and various stratigraphic chapters).
1 The measurements were done with the help of R. Granot.
The case study presented in this paper belongs to the wider field of archaeomagnetism — the application of paleomagnetic methods in archaeology, which consists of various techniques. Some are aimed solely to reconstruct the geomagnetic field itself during archaeological times (e.g., Korte et al. 2011) and others, to answer archaeological questions, mostly by using archaeomagnetic data as a dating tool (e.g., Eighmy and Sternberg 1990; Lanos 2003; Pavon-Carrasco et al. 2011). The most typical recorders of the geomagnetic field in archaeological contexts are heat-impacted clayey materials (e.g., pottery, kilns and ovens, mudbricks and metallurgical installations). The full vector information of the geomagnetic field (declination, inclination and intensity; Fig. 54.1) might be retrieved by sampling materials found in their original cooling position. In addition to reconstructing the properties of the geomagnetic field, the experiments are designed to evaluate the reliability of the material as a geomagnetic recorder (Tauxe 2010); they also provide information regarding the thermal history of the samples.
The earth’s magnetic field and its elements (after Ben-Yosef et al. 2008)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Schematic illustration of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied
to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov, Stratum C-1b (V)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2454
(eastern wall of Building CE, Square Y/4, looking east). The intense fire of Stratum C-1b is
indicated by the color of the mud bricks.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2411 (eastern
wall of Building CG, Square Y/3 looking west). The
strong tilt to the south is clearly visible.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
2 The options that the fire occurred later than and independent of the earthquake (archaeomagnetically
indistinguishable from option 1), or that the fire caused the tilting (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable
from option 2) are much less likely and are not discussed here.
3 The mudbricks were too fragile for drilling, thus an alternative sampling method was improvised.
Both walls are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall of Building CE towards the north and the wall of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold.
AF demagnetization of eight of the ten samples from the two tilted mudbrick walls in Buildings CE and CG (Stratum V, C-1b) demonstrated stable, single-component magnetization, indicating a simple thermal history of only one major heating event. This result is an objective and conclusive confirmation of the field observation that both walls were subjected to the same intense fire.4 The directions retrieved from the samples indicate that the fire took place after or simultaneously with the tilting. We therefore argue that the simplest explanation for the destruction process of Stratum V is an earthquake that triggered an intense fire (option [1] above). The symmetric anticlinal structure observed in the deformed structures of both walls (~18° each flank), together with the discrete quality of the damage (destruction is observed only in certain locations in Area C), supports destruction by the on-fault effect of an earthquake, as classified by Rodríguez-Pascua et al. (2011: 22). Area C is located directly on a fault line (Zilberman, Chapter 2) and the deformation caused by the fault scarp is expressed by the tilting (folding); the ductile reaction of the structures (rather than brittle, e.g., Altunel 1998: Fig. 5), is most probably the result of the quality of building materials and construction techniques, including the use of wooden beams. Finally, the possibility that an earthquake occurred after and independently from the fire (option [2] above) is entirely excluded by the magnetic results (Fig. 54.2b).
4 The most common carrier of magnetic remanence in baked clay is magnetite; thus, most probably both walls were subjected
to at least 585°C, the temperature at which magnetite loses its permanent magnetization (Curie temperature).
5 At an earlier stage of the research, A. Mazar suggested attributing the destruction of Stratum V to the military campaign of
Pharaoh Shoshenq I to Canaan around 925 BCE (Mazar 2003: 317). This destruction date and its cause were challenged by
Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2003), who argued for a later date and rejected the destructive quality of Shoshenq I's campaign
to the region. Later excavation seasons since 2003 made it clear that the violent destruction of Stratum V occurred only
in a certain part of Area C, and this result led to the reevaluation of the previous conclusions (see Chapters 4 and 12).
If, indeed, an earthquake was the cause of the partial destruction of Stratum V in Area C, it excludes the possibility
that the destruction was caused by the campaign of Shoshenq I.
Period | Age | Site | Damage Description |
---|---|---|---|
Iron IIA | 1000-900 BCE | Rehov | thick mudbrick debris, intact fallen brick walls (Area C, Stratum VI) suggest an earthquake (Mazar 2008: 2015). Based on a preliminary paleomagnetic fold test, Ben-Yosef and Ron (2016: 4-7) suggested that the tilted wall (Area C, Stratum V) was the result of an earthquake. |
Relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts
Absolute dating based on radiometric data
Historical considerations
Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, 2020 v. 1:119 n. 20 noted the following
Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE)Finkelstein (2013:7)'s Table 1 is shown below:
Stratum C-1a [equivalent to Stratum IV] came to an end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil.Temperatures were thought to exceed 500°C,
since it caused partial firing of the brick courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls.In several cases, they report that
pottery vessels cracked and became distorted, with much calcification. As an example, they noted that
the large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore.
the incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other objects found in the houses. Only one skeleton was found which might suggest an earthquake which struck during the daytime. No activity on the site was detected after the Stratum IV (C-1a) destruction except for
one deep pit (6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.The site appears to have been abandoned after the earthquake.
An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m above the floors and their tops were discovered flat and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil. While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem that there would have been a larger quantity if they had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were probably washed to the southeast towards the gulley that separates the upper from the lower mound. A less feasible explanation would be that bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).
The term Iron IIA has been employed in different ways in the archaeology of Israel. G.E. Wright (1961: 97-99) used it to describe the period between 900-730/700 BCE, while he termed the 10th century BCE "Iron IC". Initially, Israeli archaeologists used the term to denote the 10th century BCE, equaling the time of the United Monarchy (e.g., Aharoni 1979 [first published in Hebrew in 1963] and in subsequent editions; NEAEHL: 1529; Mazar 1990: 30) and this terminology was widely accepted (e.g., King and Stager 2001: XXIII). According to this system, the 9th century BCE was included in the Iron IIB, together with the 8th century. Finkelstein (1996) and Sharon et al. (2007) suggested to lower the transition from Iron I/Iron IIA to the late 10th century BCE (see above) and dated the Iron IIA to the 9th century BCE. I suggested a Modified Conventional Chronology, which broadly accepted the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century, based on the finds from Jezreel and Tel Rehov, yet I claimed that the period began well in the 10th century (Coldstream and Mazar 2003: 40-45; Mazar 2005). Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006; 2011) accepted this chronological framework, but went one step further by suggesting a division of the Iron IIA into two sub-periods: Early Iron IIA and Late Iron IIA, the former dated to the 10th century and the latter to the 9th. This suggestion is now accepted by many archaeologists in Israel, although the details of absolute dating of each phase remain unresolved. In this publication, we refer to Iron Age IIA as a period starting sometime during the first half of the 10th century BCE (ca. 980 BCE?) and ending during the second half of the 9th century, probably following severe destructions caused by Aramean conquests led by Hazael (see below for a detailed chronological and historical discussion).
The Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov are characterized by several architectural features which are unknown elsewhere in Israel (see discussion at the end of Chapter 12). The first is the virtually exclusive use of mudbricks as building material. Stones were used only in exceptional places for constructing cobblestone floors and installations (as in Area F: Fig. 19.4, Photo 19.6), pillar bases (rarely; e.g., Area C, Building CX) and working surfaces.
8 During a visit to the site by Prof. D. Yankelevsky and other experts from the National Building Research Institute of the Technion, Haifa, this explanation was accepted as the most reasonable. They mentioned the current use of steel rolls in foundations of highly sensitive structures, such as nuclear reactors, as a device providing flexibility in the event of an earthquake.
The dates of the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov, as well as the other sites, depend upon a combination of relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts, and absolute dating based on radiometric data combined with historical considerations. In this section, the first two issues are discussed, while historical considerations will be surveyed in the following section.
As explained above, there are two Iron IIA ceramic horizons at Tel Rehov:
20 Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE) suggested by him for the end of this period. It seems that the motivation behind this suggestion is to justify the idea that Hazor Stratum VIII was an Aramean city built by Hazael, yet I see no reason to refute the excavators' attribution of Stratum VIII to the days of Ahab.
The absolute chronology of the Iron IIA strata is a subject of ongoing debate, based on radiometric dates and historical considerations, although it seems that by now, agreement has been reached on some major issues. The original Low Chronology date of the beginning of Iron IIA strata to ca. 900 BCE proved to be wrong, based on radiocarbon dating. On the other hand, the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century is certainly correct, as it is anchored in the evidence from Jezreel, where the royal enclosure cannot predate Ahab [r. c. 871 - c. 852 BCE]. According to the modified chronology which I have suggested since 2003, Iron IIA started during the first half of the 10th century BCE and continued until sometime in the second half of the 9th century (Table 4.3). This approach was basically backed up by numerous radiocarbon dates, although there are different views concerning the precise time span and absolute dates of each of the two Iron IIA phases (for summaries and earlier literature, see Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011b).
I am convinced that 14C is the most wonderful tool for archaeology, when its inherent uncertainty is properly respected. Unfortunately, pushing its use beyond these limitations puts "oil into the fire" of those who mistrust the 14C method altogether .....23These words are very true when we deal with Iron Age chronology, particularly in the 10th-9th centuries BCE.
21 As mentioned above, Samples R31-R34 from Locus 2425 in Building CG
are excluded from this discussion, although it seems more viable
that this context should be attributed to Stratum V. See discussion in Chapter 48.
22 Note that Tofollo et al. 2014 omit sample 3949 in their tables. It does appear,
however in Gilboa, Sharon and Boaretto 2013.
23 Sent to me via an e-mail correspondence in 2008.
In the following, I will survey some of the historical questions related to the 10th-9th centuries BCE that are relevant for the results of the Tel Rehov excavations (see also Mazar 2016a). It should be recalled that the city is mentioned in only one written source from these centuries: the Sheshonq I list (see Chapter 3). In this section, I will use the assumed ancient name Rehob.
Who were the people who inhabited the large and opulent city of Rehob and what was its geo-political status in Iron Age IIA?
What was the geo-political status of Rehob and its vicinity (including Beth-Shean) in the 10th century BCE? The question of the historicity of the biblical concept of a United Monarchy during the 10th century BCE is one of the most debated issues regarding biblical history during the last generation, and this is not the place for a detailed discussion of this issue. Some scholars maintain the biblical concept as valid (e.g., Millard and Dever in Handy 1997; Ben-Tor 2000; Stager 2003; Dietrich 2007; Blum 2010; Faust 2010; Lemaire 2010), while many others either negate the historicity of such a kingdom altogether or diminish its territory to Jerusalem and its close vicinity (e.g., Finkelstein 1996,2010 and many other publications; Na'aman, Knauf, Niemann, Lemche in Handy 1997; Grabbe 2007: 111-115; Frevel 2016: 108-148; Garfinkel, Kreimerman and Zilberg 2016: 225-232; Sergi 2017; for a recent survey and earlier literature, see Na'aman 2019). Still others attempt to find middle ground (e.g., Miller in Handy 1997).
Rehob, in Sheshonq I's list mentioned aside Beth-Shean, can safely be identified with Tel Rehov (Chapter 3). The precise date of the raid is unknown and depends on two debated factors: the accession year of Sheshonq I and the time of the raid within his 21-year reign. The accession year is calculated by most scholars to ca. 945/940 BCE (e.g., Kitchen 2000: 50; Shortland 2005); a lower date ca. 934/929 was suggested by Ben-Dor Evian (2011), who also suggested that the raid occurred early in his reign, while most other scholars attribute it to the last years of his reign. All in all, the raid probably occurred between ca. 930 and 915 BCE.24 Assessments of the impact of Sheshonq's raid vary (Helck 1971: 240; Na'aman 1998; 2007: 404-405; Rainey and Notley 2006: 186; Finkelstein 2013: 41-48). Traditionally, scholars tended to attribute destruction layers to this raid, assuming that the Egyptian army destroyed the places mentioned in the Karnak list. However, as first suggested by Na'aman, this assumption should not be taken for granted and it must be taken into account that toponyms are mentioned in the list just because they surrendered to the Egyptian army during the raid or since the Egyptian army passed through them or ruled them for a while without causing destruction. The inclusion of a toponym in this list means only that the place existed during Sheshonq's raid and was known to the Egyptians.
24 The date ca. 915 BCE would fit the accession date as suggested by Ben-Dor Evian and the attribution of the raid to the late years of Sheshonq as suggested by most scholars; however, the precise date of the raid remains unknown.
The question when did Rehob become part of the northern Kingdom of Israel is somewhat controversial (Mazar 2016a: 98-100). Arie (2017: 14-15) emphasized the unique components at Tel Rehov and its dissimilarity to what he termed "regular" Israelite traits, and suggested that Rehob was a local Canaanite city-state until the end of Stratum V and was annexed to Israel only in Stratum IV, during the Omride era [~876-~842 BCE] and after the foundation of Jezreel.25 Finkelstein went even further and suggested that both Strata V and IV were non-Israelite, Rehob being a local "late-Canaanean city state at the southwestern edge of the Aramean culture sphere of influence" (2017: 181; for an earlier version, see 2013: 120-122). Based on a Bayesian model of 14C dates published before 2005, he dated the destruction of Stratum IV between 875-849 CalBC and suggested that both Strata V and IV were destroyed by Omride assaults. In my view, both these suggestions are unacceptable. Arie's distinction between Strata V and IV as pre-Israelite versus Israelite contradicts the identical material culture in both these strata. As said, the destruction at the end of Stratum V is limited to part of Area C, while in all the other excavated areas, no such destruction was observed and the city of Stratum V appears to have been continuously developed with some architectural changes in the following Stratum IV. In fact, these two strata comprise two phases in the life of the same city. Finkelstein's statement that "the material culture of Tel Rehov differs from that of the Israelite centers in the Jezreel Valley - for instance Megiddo - in almost every respect" (2017: 180) cannot be accepted. Although there are exceptional traits in the local material culture of Tel Rehov compared to other Israelite sites (such as the building techniques and house plans) there are also many similarities, for example, in the pottery assemblage (cf., Tell el-Far'ah North, Jezreel, Megiddo and Horbat Rosh Zayit), clay figurines, seals, pottery altars ("cult stands"), and other material-culture components. In addition, similarity to Megiddo can be found in the fact that both cities lacked a city wall in Iron IIA and in the resemblance between Building CF at Tel Rehov and Building 2081 at Megiddo, as explained above. In contrast to Finkelstein, I cannot discern any Aramean components at Tel Rehov. The claim that such components exist in the inscriptions is unfounded, except perhaps in the case of the component sqy in inscription No. 5 (Chapter 29A). In my view, both Strata V and IV represent a city that was under the hegemony of the northern Kingdom of Israel right from its inception.
The appearance of the name nms (Nimshi) in two inscriptions from Tel Rehov, in both Strata V and IV, as well as on a jar from Tel 'Amal, led me to suggest that the prosperous Iron Age IIA city Rehob was the hometown of the Nimshi family (Mazar 2016a: 110). This was perhaps a strong and powerful family or clan who might have owned a large portion of the city's resources, including the apiary of Stratum V, in which one of the jars with this family name was found. Perhaps this was one of the indigenous families, rooted in the local Canaanite population, as described above. Nimshi is mentioned in the Bible as the father or grandfather of Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], whose rise to power brought about the fall of the Omride dynasty in 842 BCE (1 Kgs 19:16; 2 Kgs 9:2, 14, 20). Thus Jehu must have belonged to the Nimshi family, and perhaps he was born and raised at Rehob. His coup and the establishment of a new dynasty which ruled northern Israel for almost 100 years may be understood as a shift of power in the kingdom from the Omride dynasty which originated in the Samaria hills to the local descendants of Canaanite families in the northern valleys.
26 In addition to the views expressed in Chapter 29A, I should note the Ph.D.
dissertation by H.D.D. Parker (2018) which reached me after the completion of
Chapter 29A. She rejects our reading and reads the second letter as cayin rather
than lamed (p. 191). However, this letter is open on its upper part, unlike the
cayin at the end of the name, and probably had an extension beyond the fragment
line, as explained in Chapter 29A. The reading cayin would make no sense.
27 See for example Ghantous (2013) who views the redaction of the Elisha-Elijah
stories as having taken place in the 4th century BCE, but, unlike the Elijah
stories that he considers late (i.e., 5th century BCE), "the Elisha tradition...
originated in the eighth century and continued to evolve independently until
the fifth century BCE" (p. 128).
28 Miller and Hayes (1986: 290) suggested that the stories relating to the
early years of Elisha (2 Kg 2, 4:1-8:15) should be attributed to Jehu's reign
rather than to that of Ahab and Jehoram, as the Bible puts it.
The destruction of Stratum IV marks a dramatic point in the history of the city. Evidence for fierce fire and severe devastation was found in all the excavation areas. People left their belongings in the houses and probably fled, or were deported, or slaughtered. In one case, a human skeleton may be attributed to this destruction layer in Area C (Chapter 46B). Following the destruction, the lower city was abandoned and only the upper mound was resettled in the following Iron IIB. It appears that this destruction resulted from a military conquest rather than an earthquake, though no direct evidence such as multiple arrowheads or sling stones were detected. The date of the destruction and the identity of the conqueror can be suggested on the basis of three parameters: pottery typology, historical considerations and radiocarbon dates.
This was a rectangular building in Squares S–T/3–4
(external measurements 5.2×6.2 m). All of its walls
were composed of hard yellow bricks and were
very well preserved to a height of more than 1.0 m.
No entrance to this building was located, suggesting that it had been entered from above. Its plan
consisted of two small rooms on the west and
two somewhat larger rooms on the east, and it
might have served a storage function. It was constructed above a thin layer of fill (8408) that served
to level the remains of Stratum C-3a Building CS
below it.
The northern wall (4438) was preserved nine
courses high on the west, but much less on the east,
so much so that it was not clear whether there had
been an entranceway here or whether the bricks
were missing due to damage. Stratum C-1b Walls
1464 and 1524 superimposed it, but there was no
C-3 wall below it; Wall 8503 adjoined it on the
north. The western wall (4440), constructed right
on top of Wall 8418 of Stratum C-3a (Photos 12.12–
12.13), was preserved 11–12 courses high; its width
was unknown, since C-1b Wall 1523 covered its
western face. The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not
known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo
12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses
high and was poorly preserved, especially on the
northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that
the main damage to the building, whatever the
cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the
northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6
m, although a thickening identified in its lower
courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m.
There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern
wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems
that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of
the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role
during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).
The two eastern rooms were similar to each
other in size, as were the two western rooms. Their
internal measurements were: Room 4429 in the
northeast (2.0×2.4 m; 4.8 sq m), Room 4420 in the
southeast (1.9×2.0 m; 3.8 sq m), Room 4426 in the
southwest (1.3×2.0 m; 2.6 sq m) (Photo 12.29), and
Room 4409 in the northwest (1.1×2.0 m; 2.2 sq m);
the total floor space of this building was only 13.4
sq m. Two intersecting inner partition walls separated these rooms: east–west Wall 2509 and north–
south Wall 2493, with its northern continuation,
4407. An entranceway in the eastern end of Wall
2509 joined the two eastern rooms, while an
opening in Wall 2509, just to the west of its corner
with Wall 2493, joined the two western rooms.
However, it seems that at some point, this latter
opening was blocked, as a brick course spanned its
top. No entrance was found in Walls 2493 or 4407,
leaving the eastern and western chambers inaccessible from each other; it is possible that the rooms
were entered from above. Their small size, and the
fact that some grain was found in the southwestern
room, indicate the possibility that they were used
for grain storage.
The rooms were found full of complete fallen
yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash,
and brown soil. There were relatively few finds,
mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs.
13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact
bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt
grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426
(Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C
analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18),
yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ)
CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in
Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were
made of beaten earth and for the most part, their
level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible
makeup.
The nature and function of this building
remained unclear. There was no evidence for
domestic activity or storage, such as cooking
facilities, installations or storage jars. Perhaps it
was related to grain storage, possibly with some
administrative function. To some extent, this
building recalls the eastern part of Building 200 in
Hazor Strata X–IX (Hazor III–IV: Plans VIII–X),
which was also comprised of a series of small
chambers.
A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining
the southern part of the eastern wall of Building
CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3
m and was composed of the same hard yellow
bricks as the other walls in this building, although
here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were
laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved
on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses
of its eastern face protruding; this might have been
the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).
The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was
not certain; it abutted the southern half of the
poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA
(4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated
abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where
it was abutted by an open area in which cooking
and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and
C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a
retainer built to buttress the southern part of the
eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum
C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the
southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the
northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building
CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b
Building CD, terminated just at the point where the
northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting
that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern
closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b
(Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:
The major component of Building CB was a large,
roughly rectangular space which underwent minor
changes during the course of its existence (Figs.
12.9–12.10; Photo 12.30). This large room (1520)
was perhaps a major living room or reception hall
in a larger architectural complex, which continued
to the east and perhaps, south.
The external measurements of this hall were
5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its
walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the
northern wall) were constructed directly on top of
the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3
Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall
was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG
(Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were:
1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses;
Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved
to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east
(preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located
at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture
with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this
building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall,
preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate
numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which
was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo
12.35); the western half was designated 1442 and
the eastern half, 1483. An entrance in Wall 1483
was located 1.0 m to the west of its corner with Wall
2505. An intact oil lamp with soot on its nozzle was
found in a niche in the eastern door jamb, one
course below the top (Photo 12.36). This entrance
led to the north, where an open area with cooking
facilities was found in Squares T/3-4, although note
that this opening was partially blocked on the north
by Wall 1506, probably during a later phase of
Stratum C-2, as described above. Wall 1483 continued to the east past its corner with Wall 2505 into
Squares T–Y/3, where it was designated Wall 2481
(Photo 12.38). All four walls of Room 1520 were
composed of hard yellow bricks, although note the
gray bricks of the earlier C-3 wall incorporated into
the lower courses of Wall 1470, as described above;
several dark brown bricks joined these gray bricks
in what might be a repair in the center of this wall
(Photo 12.34).
The two entrances that accessed this hall from
the east and the north were used concurrently. Both
were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is
clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact
(Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the
top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was
subjected to some damage, particularly on its
western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was
built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).
The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash
layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from
84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474,
2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these
striations represented the accumulation of floors in
this hall, although it was difficult to separate these
thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels
might have been a fill. Some layers contained large
patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes,
such as one long, rope-like configuration found
lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just
above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers,
most of which were sherds or fragments of small
vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots,
kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs.
13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking
facilities were found here.
A large, roughly squared mizi limestone
(0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south
of the entranceway in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35,
12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently
from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end
higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we
assume that the smooth bottom side had originally
been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in
this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers
were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position
of this large stone in front of the entranceway in
Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this
was not its original position and that it had tumbled
over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and
served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location
during the assumed earthquake that terminated this
occupation phase.
Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5
m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks
(1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were
identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a
sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and
other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the
end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake,
either during the time it was still in use or some
time after the building was abandoned.
Although it was considered that this room
could have been a basement, this possibility was
ruled out since there was no constructed element
above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran
beneath the later Building CG
Excavation to the east of Wall 2505 exposed its
eastern face with the entranceway. The top of the
wall had been damaged and leveled when the
wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was
built (Photos 12.32–12.33), protruding 0.45 m to
the east of the face of Wall 2505. The top of a
yellow brick wall (4503) that cornered with Wall
2505 was revealed 1.0 m to the north of the
entranceway; its eastern continuation was cut by
the foundations of Building CG and only its
southern face could be seen, as Wall 2429 of
Stratum C-1b was built above it. This wall was preserved much lower than Wall 2505 due to the
damage caused when the deep and massive wooden
and brick foundations of Building CG were laid
(see below). Thus, the only possible Stratum C-2
debris that could be isolated here was Locus 4500
to the south of Wall 4503.
Some 1.4 m to the north of Wall 4503 was Wall
2481, the eastern continuation of Wall 1442/1483,
which was revealed in a small probe under the floor
of Building CG (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38). The
eastern part of a north–south wall (5476) was
exposed 2.5 m to the east of Wall 2505, directly
under the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall
2411 (Photo 12.39), which had cut the top of Wall
5476 in a step-like manner, descending from north
to south, so that it was preserved five courses high
on the north and only two on the south. This
appears to have been the eastern closing wall of a
room bordered by Walls 2481 on the north, 2505 on
the west, and 4503 on the south. A small area was
excavated in this room (2469), although a floor was
not reached (Figs. 12.77, 12.79). Still another
north–south wall (5491) abutted Wall 5476 on the
east, on the level of its lowest course (85.25 m);
only one brick course of this wall was preserved,
with an offset that protruded 0.35 m to the east,
located just about on the same line as Wall 2481 to
its west (Photo 12.39). Wall 5491 might have been
a bench attached to Wall 5476 or a poorly preserved
part of the unit uncovered in Squares Y/3–4 (see
below).
Abutting the eastern face of Wall 5491 was a
beaten-earth floor (5494; Fig. 12.79) that was bordered
on the south by an east–west row of four flattopped stones, which may have been pillar bases
(Photo 12.21). The floor and the stones were laid
directly above Stratum C-3 Room 9441. All other
remains of Stratum C-2 to the south of these stones
were obliterated when Building CH and the apiary
were constructed in Stratum C-1b. The northern
border of this activity remained unknown, since it
was covered by later Stratum C-2 architecture,
described below.
Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 was founded in Stratum C-2 and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Strata C-1b and C-1a. This is one of the few instances where more or less the same building continued in all three main strata. The unit was composed of a broad room on the south and rooms or open spaces, to its north (Fig. 12.12); the relationship between the two components was not clear, due to the partial exposure.
Three walls of this room, preserved to a height of
0.7–1.25 m and built of the typical hard yellow
bricks of Stratum C-2, were revealed in Squares T–
Y/4, directly below the later walls: 6441 on the
east, 6460 on the south, and 6504 on the north
(Photos 12.40–12.41). The western part of the room
remained unexcavated and it seems that the
entrance to the room had been on this side. An
interesting feature of the eastern wall (6441) was
the damage wrought by the builders of C-1b when
they set the wooden foundations for their wall
(2454) above it; they cut back the western face and
the top of the earlier wall, whose original face protruded some 0.2 m to the west, three courses below
the cut (Photo 12.40). In the corner of the southern
and eastern walls was an offset that protruded 0.3 m
into the room (Photo 12.42).
A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443)
that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray
ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls
(Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b
Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504)
was floating above this floor, although a protruding
course of bricks found just about on level with
Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this
wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation
of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded
a layer of sandy material with some brick debris
(6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460.
Three spaces were attributed to this building in
Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between
them was found, due to overlying elements that
remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43).
Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.
The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5
was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1
Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east–
west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The
area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of
debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).
The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square
Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433)
and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south)
and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall
6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship
between these walls. At some later stage, east–west
Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added,
dividing the space into two; in the north were the
upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall
was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear
whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later
phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).
Part of a finely constructed building was excavated
in the northeastern corner of Area C, in Squares A–
C/5–6. It continued to the north, beyond the limit of
the excavation area. Building CY covered a
Stratum C-3 stone floor and installation (Fig. 12.6)
and was sealed by Strata C-1a–b Building CW.
The external measurements of the building
were 10.2 m from east to west and at least 6.3 m
from north to south. It contained a central space,
most probably a courtyard (7512), flanked on the
west and east by rooms; the two southern rooms
were exactly symmetric, but the northernmost
room on the east differed from its equivalent on the
west. The main entrance to the building was probably in the
unexcavated area to the north and perhaps led directly into the central space.
The western wall (8457), preserved 1.0 m high,
was superimposed by Wall 6408 of Strata C-1a–b.
Its entire eastern face was exposed, and also the
northern part of its western face, which served as
the border of the assumed entrance corridor leading
to Building CU; its southern part ran parallel to
Wall 6520, the eastern wall of that building. The
southern wall (7511), preserved 0.7 m high, was
known only on its northern face, since it was
covered by Wall 6444 of Building CW in Strata
C-1a–b (Figs. 12.34, 12.56) which was not dismantled. The wooden beams in the foundation of Wall
6444 were laid directly on top of Wall 7511 (Photos
12.22, 12.59–12.61). Wall 7511 was preserved at a
tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly
the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of
this wall was built of segments, with two vertical
seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a
mode of construction which might have been aimed
at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake.
Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which
closed the building on the east.
The central courtyard was 3.1 m wide and at least
5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig.
12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505)
resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level
85.15–85.25 m. In the debris was a relatively large
amount of red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well
as red-painted pottery (Figs. 13.34–13.37) and
sherds of a Late Philistine Decorated Ware (Ashdod
Ware) vessel (Fig. 13.37:8). Two clay figurine fragments, one a human head and the other a horse head
(Chapter 34, Nos. 22, 35), were found together in
the eastern part of the space, to the north of Oven
8461. Near the figurines were two sherds with letters, one with an ayin and a yod in ink, and the other
with an incised lamed (Fig. 13.37:2–3; Ahituv and
Mazar 2014: 40–42; Chapter 29A, Nos. 1, 3). Elements on Floor 7512 included:
Room 6506, the southern room, was bordered by
Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506
on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the
floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern
end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square
(2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellowearth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of
fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount
of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This
room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1
Building CW.
Room 8470, the northern room, was bordered
on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the
northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the
northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was
beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly
like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had
a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner,
leading from the central courtyard. A smooth
yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16
m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three
nicely worked limestones were set in a row along
Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones
along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of
dark organic material, similar to that in the southern
room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW
(Fig. 12.55).
Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room
6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered
by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458
on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide
entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway
into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m,
was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the
tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14;
Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not
proceed down below the floor, it seems that this
was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that
under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer
above the floor (8466) included complete fallen
yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much
pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34–
13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones,
including horns.
North of Room 8488 was a narrow space
(8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls
8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the
eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by
bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that
made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479
impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b
Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space
was what looked like an intentional blockage on its
western end that was composed of three parts
(Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide),
spanning the entrance from the central space, and
preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second
component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was
not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks
laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m
to their east was yet another apparent blockage
(8485), although it was more typical of a regularly
built wall in width, preserved five to six courses
high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide.
None of these rows of bricks bonded with either
Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the
south. No clear floor level was identified in this
narrow space, although it was excavated down to
the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of
the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material
(phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern
face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this
narrow space was a staircase leading to a second
story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the
foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation
is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.
To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two
walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued
to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west.
The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow
row of bricks, identical to the westernmost
blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor
(8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just
inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds
and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the
floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was
located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the
outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined
Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the
continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper
story.
We have no way of knowing to what extent
Building CY continued to the north. One possibility
is that the northern outer wall was close to the excavation limit; in that case, the building had a central
courtyard flanked by two rooms on the west and
two rooms on the east. Another possibility is that
the building was much larger and included additional rooms on each side of the courtyard. In any
event, the entrance would have been from the north
directly into the central courtyard. The flat stones
along the walls of the courtyard and the narrow corridor or staircase (8479) are exceptional features in
the Iron IIA architecture at Tel Rehov.
Building CY is one of the few examples in Iron
Age IIA Tel Rehov of a courtyard house. The plan
is somewhat similar to that of Building CZ in
Squares A–C/2–3, 10 m to the south, assigned to
Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.48). It recalls, to some
extent, Iron Age II houses known from Hazor Area
B (next to the citadel), Samaria and Megiddo. Such
structures were explained by Yeivin, followed by
Herzog, as representing officials’ houses, and were
dubbed “scribes’ chambers” (Herzog 1992: 229–
230, with references)
In Square R/4, above C-2 Room 1555, two main phases were attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a; the latter was the clearest and best preserved, found just below topsoil and containing destruction debris and restorable vessels on a floor. Traces of additional narrow brick walls and restorable pottery revealed in the topsoil to the north and south of Square R/4, and in Square Q/4 of Area D, indicated that domestic occupation in the Iron Age IIA reached the western perimeter of the tell, with no evidence for any fortification wall.
Several phases of construction were found in this
room (Fig. 12.24).
The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b was 1557,
which continued the northern line of Wall 1413 that
ran the entire length of Area C on the west (see
details below); it seems that Wall 1557 was not
used in Stratum C-1a. Parallel to it and 3.1 m to its
west was Wall 1563, which apparently continued to
be in use from Stratum C-2. In the initial phase of
Stratum C-1b, a pink plaster floor (4483) passed
below Walls 2416 and 4457, and possibly related to
Wall 1557 on the east. At this stage, Wall 1568,
which abutted the southern continuation of Wall
1557, was most probably the southern wall of the
room, while its northern wall was beyond the excavation area. In a later phase of C-1b, Wall 2416 was
built against the western face of Wall 1557; on the
south, it abutted Wall 1568. In the center of the
room, a narrow north–south wall (4457; Photo
12.64), preserved only one course high, made a
corner on the south with Wall 4458, which was first
built in Stratum C-2 (see above, Room 1555). In
Stratum C-1b, its eastern part was covered by Floor
4483; a small round posthole was found on the
northeastern end of this floor. The addition of Wall
4457 formed a narrow space (0.9 m wide) on the
western side of the room. While Floor 4483 ran
below the secondary walls (2416, 4457), the occupation debris above the floor abutted these walls.
To the west of Wall 4457, Floor 4488, made of
plaster with a layer of striations above it, penetrated
below Wall 4457. In the second phase, a higher
floor (4464) was laid, 0.1 m above the latter, abutting Walls 4457 and 4458. To this same phase, and
perhaps to the same building, we attributed several
walls surrounding a courtyard with ovens found in
Square Q/4, which was part of Area D (Chapter 15;
see also Fig. 12.24). The density of construction
and layers points to the intensive activity in this
area on the cusp of the mound during the course of
Stratum C-1b.
A new room was built above the C-1b remains in
this square, reusing Wall 2416 and adding new
walls on the south (2423), west (1554) and north
(1552) (Fig. 12.25). Wall 1558 was a short segment
that seemed to corner with Wall 1552; perhaps it
was the original western wall of the room that was
removed at one point and replaced by Wall 1554,
slightly to the west. A concentration of stones
(2450), some of which were grinding stone
fragments, was found in the southwestern corner of
the square. These might have been part of a pavement which had continued to the west, but was
eroded down the slope. A north–south row of
three stones, running along the western face of
Wall 1554, may have belonged to a room in Square
Q/4 (Area D), bounded by Walls 1816 and 1808
(Figs. 12.19, 12.25). This space, poorly preserved
due to the severe erosion on the slope of the mound,
may have belonged to the same building as Room
2442.
Inside the room was a 0.4 m-deep layer of burnt
destruction debris (2405) on a beaten-earth floor
(2442, 87.56 m); part of this floor was a rectangular
patch of hard plaster (2438) which abutted the
northern face of Wall 2423 (Photo 12.65). It sloped
slightly down to the north (0.18 m over 1.2 m) and
might have served for some liquid-related activity;
this plaster had been repaired with a whitish lime
substance at one time during its use. In the burnt
debris was an assemblage of restorable vessels
(Figs. 13.68–13.70). One sherd of an imported
Greek bowl was found as well (Fig. 13.70:22; see
Chapter 28A). The smaller vessels in this room
were found just below topsoil, in a layer above two
parallel rows of storage jars that rested directly on
the floor, one running along Wall 2416 and the
other near Wall 1554 on the west. Most of the jars
were fallen with their rims to the north; under several of the jars was a burnt patch with phytolith,
suggesting that they had been set on some organic
material, such as reed mats or wood.
Above the elements attributed to Stratum C-2 to the
north of Building CA in Squares R–S/4 was the
southern end of a room or a courtyard located in
front of Building CD (Fig. 12.24). Although not
well preserved, a gap in its southern wall (1524)
was probably an entrance, on line with the entrance
to Building CD, thus linking the two units. Wall
1524 was built on top of a thin fill laid on Stratum
C-2 Wall 8503; it ran flush against Wall 1464 of
Building CD, creating a wide double wall (Fig.
12.66). The western end of Wall 1524 continued
westward to abut (but not to join) the eastern face of
Wall 2416, and was abutted on the north by Wall
1557. Several bricks with two marginal bosses on
each end were incorporated in Wall 1524. Such protrusions must have been part of the brick mold and
their function might have been to improve the grip
of the mud plaster that covered the walls. Alternatively, it could have been intended as a decorative
element, as no traces of plaster were found. Bricks
with similar protrusions were also found in walls of
Stratum C-1b in Buildings CE and CF (see below).
On the east, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 2501,
although this corner was disturbed. On the west,
Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 1557, the northern
end of long backbone Wall 1413. All three walls
were abutted by occupation debris (1512) and a
floor (2494, 86.75 m), which contained an oven
(2496) and a stone basin in the northern balk
(unnumbered). The floor (4491) in the western part
of this space was set on a bedding of small stones
that raised it slightly higher than the floor level to
the east.
No architecture that could be attributed to
Stratum C-1a was found here and the same loose
debris, possibly a disturbance, that covered
Building CD, also covered these remains (Fig.
12.25).
This building in Squares S/3–4 (Fig. 12.24; Photo
12.2) was, in fact, a renovation of Stratum C-2
Building CA. The outer walls were rebuilt along
the same lines, but the inner division was canceled,
thus creating a large, roughly rectangular space; the
external measurements were 5.0×6.2 m and the
floor space, ca. 20 sq m.
All the outer walls of C-2 Building CA were
rebuilt with a new type of brick made of light gray,
dark gray and light brown clay. The demarcation
between the previous walls and the rebuild was
very clear and a distinct line of a fill or repair was
visible, especially in the northern, eastern and
southern walls (Figs. 12.65–12.67; Photos 12.28,
12.66). This was a layer of light brownish-gray clay
(similar to the brick material) that was packed
down on top of the damaged C-2 walls, leveling
them in preparation for the rebuild.
On the north, Wall 1464 replaced C-2 Wall
4438; the entrance into the new building was now
located nearer to the center of the northern wall,
through an opening in the double wall (1524/1464).
Wall 1464 was deliberately cut on its western end,
as can be seen in the western balk of Square S/4
(Fig. 12.66). On the west, Wall 1523 replaced C-2
Wall 4440 (Fig. 12.67); it was poorly preserved and
tilted severely towards the east, especially in its
northern part. This wall ran along the eastern face
of Wall 1413, with the latter continuing further to
the south and north to enclose additional units. On
the south, Wall 1448 replaced C-2 Wall 4439; the
repair line between the two walls was clearest here
(Photo 12.28). On the east, Wall 2495 replaced C-2
Wall 4434 (Fig. 12.66; Photo 12.66); however, the
former was traced only in Square S/4 and did not
continue to the south. This may be due to its state of
preservation or, as suggested above, Wall 1506,
possibly built at the end of Stratum C-2 as a buttress
for the damaged eastern wall of Building CA, continued in Stratum C-1b as the southeastern wall of
Building CD (Fig. 12.68). As noted above, it is possible that Wall 1506 had been first built in Stratum
C-1b, although this seems less likely. This rather
makeshift arrangement would have lent a slipshod
look to this part of the building, which contrasts
with the otherwise well-built walls. The eastern
side of Building CD was less well preserved, just
like in its predecessor, Building CA.
The inner division of the previous Building CA
was cancelled. The inner walls were deliberately
removed, so that five to six cut courses were
detected close to their juncture with the external
walls of the building: Wall 2509 of the previous
building was cut 0.35 m to the east of its corner
with Wall 4440 and Wall 2493 was cut 0.15 m to the
north of its corner with Wall 4439 (Photo 12.28).
The reason for the deliberate razing of these inner
partition walls was not clear; perhaps they were in
such a poor state of preservation following the
destruction of Building CA that they required
removal before the leveling and rebuilding could
take place.3 Indeed, below the lowest floor of
Building CD were layers of brick debris interspersed with layers of red clay and ashy gray
striations, which might be understood as a fill
(2491 in Square S/4, 2485 in Square S/3) laid on top
of the previous building, serving to level off the
razed walls. These layers yielded sherds and partial
vessels, including red-slipped and hand-burnished
bowls and jugs (Fig. 13.41).
On top of this debris/fill were successive occupation layers, with a total thickness of 0.6–0.8 m,
rich in sherds and bones: 2486, 1485 and 1466 in
Square S/4, and 1474 in Square S/3. While these
layers were stratified, it was difficult to clearly
identify a floor. Two flat-topped stones were found
near the northeastern and northwestern corners of
the building, relating to Locus 2486. Their function
was not clear, as they were too close to the wall to
have served as pillar bases, recalling the stones
along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 (see
discussion above).
The only internal construction in the new
building was a row of crumbly gray bricks (0.5–0.6
m wide) added along the northern face of Wall
1448, covering the cut southern end of Stratum C-2
Wall 2493. This element (2484) was preserved 0.4–
0.6 m high and 3.4 m long; it might have been a
bench along Wall 1448.
The end of Building CD was not violent and no
traces of sudden destruction were found. The
building was not renovated in Stratum C-1a, when
its southern part was covered by the northern end of
Piazza CK and its northern part was covered by a
layer of loose debris (1412, 1417) that appeared to
have been a disturbance of some sort.
In Stratum C-1a, Building CD went out of use and a
large open area, denoted Piazza CK, replaced it
(Squares S–T/2–3). This courtyard included the
open area to the south of Building CD, as well as
the cooking area described above. It was bordered
on the south by Wall 1437 (the northern wall of
Building CJ) and an additional stub of a wall
(1415), on the east by Wall 1416 (the western wall
of Building CG), and on the west by Wall 1413 (the
long backbone wall running along the entire area).
On the northeastern end of this space was a short
wall (1457) that seemed to be a continuation of the
northern wall of Building CG; it was preserved
only one course high and ended abruptly after 2.0
m, on line with Wall 1415 on the south. It is possible that these were stubs of walls that had been
dismantled or otherwise damaged. Thus, the width
of Piazza CK ranged from 7.0 m on the south to 8.0
m on the north, and its length was at least 13 m, as
the northern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. The total area was at least 97 sq m,
making this one of the largest open areas in all
strata in Area C, which was, for the most part,
densely built up. Access into the piazza must have
been from the north.
In the enclosure formed by these walls, the
northwestern quadrant (Square S/4) contained a
layer of soft earth and eroded brick debris (1417,
1412, 1439) that might have been a late disturbance, while in the rest of the area, very burnt and
vitrified brick debris resting on a hard-packed
white floor (1418, 1422, 1428) was revealed under
topsoil (Figs. 12.65, 12.69). Running through the
center of this courtyard on a north–south axis and
abutted on the east, south and west by the destruction debris and white floor, was a concentration of
stones, several of which were grinding stone fragments, and brick fragments (1427) (Photo 12.70).
This element was roughly L-shaped, with a plastered, right-angled niche in its western face, which
contained part of a smashed storage jar (unrestored); another storage jar (Fig. 13.72:9) abutted
the installation on its south, and yet another one
(Fig. 13.72:10) was found to its north. Another concentration of basalt stones was found 0.5 m to the
south of 1427, designated 1496; they most likely
comprised parts of the same element, perhaps with
a stone missing in the middle. Two cooking pots
(Fig. 13.71:7, 9) were found against the western
face of these stones (Photo 12.71). An additional
element was a brick block (1458), 1.0 m long, 0.5 m
wide and preserved to one or two courses, located
just to the west of the southern end of 1427 (Fig.
12.69). This might have been a work surface or,
perhaps, a space divider.
Wall 1413, that bordered Piazza CK on the west, ran for 19.7 m on a slightly southeast–northwest line along the western end of the entire area and continued beyond the limits of the excavation to both the north and the south (Photos 12.2–12.5). In Square R/4, Wall 1413 abutted the western end of Wall 1524. The continuation of its line to the north was denoted 1557 (Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.8). The southern part of Wall 1413 was made of hard yellow bricks, typical of Stratum C-2, as opposed to the light gray bricks of the rest of the wall, typical of Strata C-1b and C-1a. This was the only place in this wall where two phases were discerned: in the earlier phase (Stratum C-1b), the wall was termed 2432 and the later phase, 1431 (Stratum C-1a). Wall 1413 was constructed slightly above and west of Stratum C-2 Buildings CA and CB (Figs. 12.16, 12.69). In Stratum C-1b, its lower part adjoined the western wall of Building CD and it served as the western border of the space south of Building CD, of the unit north of Building CD, and of Building CJ. In Stratum C-1a, it was the western border of Building CJ and Piazza CK. In Square R/4, the structures of both Strata C-1b and C-1a (described above) were attached to its western face. Wall 1413 was unique in its length and multiple-use in several units during the course of two strata, making it a prime example of the integrated urban planning that characterized this area.
Building CE was located in Squares T–Y/4–6, to the east of the cooking area in Square T/4. The building was composed of a broad room in the south and an area to its north, of which a strip, 2.0 m wide and 10 m long, was excavated (Photo 12.75). The broad room was a rebuild of an earlier structure, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.9–12.10); it had two phases, while the area to the north had three. In Stratum C-1b, the building suffered a destruction, after which it was renovated in Stratum C-1a and continued to be used with various changes, mainly in its northern part, until its final destruction.
Room 2489 was a rectangular room (internal measurements 2.0×4.8 m; 9.6 sq m) with an entrance
just east of the center of the northern wall (1491);
the threshold was paved with a wooden plank (Fig.
12.27; Photo 12.76). Inside the entrance were a
bowl and a cup-and-saucer (Figs. 13.44:4,
13.45:12). The southern wall of this room (1473)
ran parallel to the northern wall of Building CG
(see below), separated by a 0.10 m gap, which contained a large amount of sherds, possibly a fill. The
eastern end of Wall 1473 dog-legged 0.3 m to the
north, exactly following the line of the C-2 wall
here. The eastern wall (2454) was part of a long
wall that enclosed the entire building on the east.
Note that Wall 2454 was oriented due north–south,
while the rest of the room was angled towards the
west, so that this wall was not parallel to the
western wall of the building (1487), lending a
somewhat crooked look to room. Wall 2454 was
built flush against the western wall of Building CF;
together, they were 1.1 m wide. At its southern end,
Wall 2454 made a corner with Wall 4479, the
northern wall of Building CM to the south in
Stratum C-1b, which created a double wall with the
southern wall of Building CF. This construction
method well demonstrates the closely interrelated
character of the architecture of the buildings in this
northeastern insula.
All the walls were composed of hard graybrown bricks, with light-colored mortar lines; they
were burnt to black in some instances, particularly
in the east. The western face of Wall 2454 and the
southern face of Wall 1491 included bricks with
marginal bosses composed of two vertical protrusions on each end of the brick (Fig. 12.29; Photos
12.77–12.78), identical to those found in other
buildings in the north-central part of Area C in
Stratum C-1b, including the unit north of Building
CD, described above, and Building CF; they were
also found in the walls of the rooms to the north of
the broad room in Building CE (Photo 12.83).
Walls 2454 and 1491 contained a thick and intricate
construction of perpendicular and parallel wooden
beams in their foundations (Fig. 12.29; Photos
12.77–12.78). The beams, like the bricks, were
very burnt.
The smooth reddish-brown beaten-earth floor
(2489, 86.30 m) was coated by a thick layer of
black ash (2458; Fig. 12.64), covering mostly the
eastern half of the room (Photo 12.76). A small
square plastered brick (2477; 0.45 x.0.45 m, 0.45 m
high) was attached to Wall 1491, just east of the
entrance and opposite the offset in Wall 1473. It had
a slight depression on top which contained some
light gray ash, although it is possible that it had
served as a jar support. Underneath it was an intact
juglet in a small pit (Fig. 13.45:10), apparently
placed there as a foundation deposit before the
brick was laid.
Following the destruction of C-1b, the broad room continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a with the same walls (Fig. 12.28), although there was a visible repair in the upper courses of the western wall (1487), composed of light gray bricks (Photos 12.76, 12.79). Above the burnt debris on the floor of C-1b was a layer of hard brick debris (2443) that supported an earthen floor (1471) at level 86.65 m, which was covered by a layer of decayed brick debris with some ash (Fig. 12.64; Photo 12.79).
Remains of rooms and possibly a courtyard were found in Squares Y/5–6 to the north of the broad room (Photos 12.80–12.84). It seems that these were part of Building CE, particularly due to the shared walls and similar construction techniques, although no entrance was found to join them in the limited excavated area. Each of these components had two phases, attributed to C-1b and C-1a, while the northern courtyard contained yet an additional phase.
Two narrow rooms (6448, 6449) were excavated to
the north of the eastern side of the broad room; no
entrance joined them. The eastern wall of both
rooms was the continuation of Wall 2454, indicating that the northern rooms and the broad room
to the south were part of the same building.
Like in its southern end, the foundations of the
entire length of Wall 2454 contained a thick and
intricate composition of wooden beams, both perpendicular and parallel to the lower course of bricks
(Figs. 12.30, 12.62). Wooden beams, all charred,
were found below the floors of the two rooms as
well (Photos 12.80–12.81). All of the wood was set
into a distinct layer of soft reddish earth (6426,
6486; Fig. 12.32); such a construction of wooden
beams in a reddish fill was a feature found in the
foundations of other Stratum C-1b buildings as
well.
The western wall of the two northern rooms
was Wall 6452; only its eastern face was uncovered. This wall cornered with Wall 1491 on the
south, just east of the entranceway in that wall. Wall
6452 also had many wooden beams in and
adjoining its foundation (Figs. 12.30, 12.62–
12.63). Walls 2454 and 6452 ran for 7.0 m and two
east–west cross walls (6447 and 7445) divided this
space into two identical rooms (6448 on the north
and 6449 on the south), each 3.1 m long and
between 1.6–1.8 m wide. The difference in width
was due to the angle of Wall 6452, which ran
slightly southeast to northwest, as opposed to the
straight north–south line of Wall 2454. Wall 6447,
which separated the two rooms, had wood in its
foundation, but Wall 7445, the northern wall of
Room 6448), did not. As they had no entrances, it is
possible that these rooms served as storage spaces,
accessed from above. All the walls of these rooms,
aside from 7445, which was poorly preserved,
included bricks with marginal bosses composed of
thin vertical protrusions on both ends, which were
hallmarks of Stratum C-1b in this part of the area,
as noted above (Figs. 12.29, 12.63; Photo 12.83).
The southern room had a patchy beaten-earth
floor at level 86.12 m (6449), on which were vessels and sherds,
among them three complete chalices (Fig. 13.44:10–11, 13), as well as loomweights
and a concentration of burnt grain against Wall
1491. Four 14C measurements of this grain (Chapter
48, Sample R24) provided a calibrated average date
between 902–843 BCE (1σ) and 920–830 BCE
(2σ).
Two large bricks set near the corner of Walls
6452 and 1491 might have served as a kind of
podium or shelf, possibly for the chalices found
nearby (Photo 12.82). Room 6448 contained a similar floor in its southern part, while its northern part
contained a concentration of stones that might have
been a disturbed stone floor (7451), including two
broken upper grinding stones. The stones were covered by a thin layer of debris (7446) with some
sherds and bones.
Rooms 6448 and 6449 were covered by a fill
(6432), which leveled them in preparation for the
renovation that took place in Stratum C-1a.
To the north of Wall 7445 in Square Y/6 was an
open space, continuing the activity that was here in
Stratum C-2. This space is described here as part of
Building CE, although, in fact, no entrance to the
two southern rooms was found, and it might represent the southern part of an open space to the north
of this building. The two phases identified in this
space were both attributed to Stratum C-1b, as they
covered the Stratum C-2 activity and were sealed
by the Stratum C-1a courtyard floor.
The courtyard surface was composed of red and
gray striations (7427) that were a direct continuation of those found here in Stratum C-2 and their
attribution to two sub-phases of C-1b was based on
their relation to related installations. The lowest
layer was related to three poorly preserved installations, whose function remained unknown (Fig.
12.31): a ring of brown clay (7463), almost directly
underneath C-1b Oven 7443, and two semi-circles
of soft red clay (7464, 7465), filled with light gray
ash. These installations seem to each have been
used only for a short time and cut each other in a
haphazard manner.
In the later phase of Stratum C-1b, the uppermost layer of the red and gray striations contained
one poorly preserved oven (7443) and several
shallow red-clay circles (7433, 7437, 7438), similar
to those of the previous sub-phase. In both phases,
only a few sherds and bones were found.
The center and southeastern part of these
remains were cut by Pit 6498 (Photo 12.87).
A reddish clay floor (6433, 5415) in Square Y/5
was laid at level 86.75 m, above a fill covering
C-1b Rooms 6448 and 6449. Thus, the entire area
north of Wall 1491 and west of Wall 2454 became
an open area, at least 10 m long and continuing to
the north beyond the excavation area. The reddish
clay floor was covered by a soft burnt layer just
under topsoil. The floor and burnt debris abutted
the rather poorly preserved upper courses of Walls
2454 and 1491, which were rebuilt after the C-1b
destruction. Below Floor 5415 was a layer of
wooden beams that both penetrated underneath the
foundation of the C-1a rebuild of Wall 2454 here
and extended into part of the room. This wood was
laid in two layers: an east–west upper layer and a
north–south lower layer (Fig. 12.32). This was one
of the few instances where wood was used in construction in Stratum C-1a.
A number of installations were set on this floor.
In the southeastern corner was a mud-plastered clay
ring (5436) containing a large lower grinding stone
inside; an upper grinding stone was found below
this and another such grinding stone rested on top
of the clay ring. This is similar to grinding installations found in other Stratum C-1a buildings, such as
Buildings CF, CQ1, CQ2 and CP. The southern part
of a similar ring (5438) was found in the northwestern corner of Square Y/5, although it did not
contain any grinding stones. Three bricks were
found to the west of 5436 and one to its north. The
southern part of the space was covered with a layer
of burnt destruction debris containing pottery and
loomweights (Photo 12.84), while the northern part
was less burnt.
On the northern end of this open area (Square
Y/6) was a layer of brick debris and collapse, with
some ash and charcoal (7404), abutting Wall 4422
and the northern end of Wall 2454. Although no
clear floor level was discerned, this layer clearly
covered the Stratum C-1b activity below. Three
intact vessels (Fig. 13.76:6, 10–11), one jug and
two juglets, were found in this debris layer.
Building CR was the southern part of a building in Squares Y–Z/6 that continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.43, 12.86) and was, in fact, a rebuild of Stratum C-2 Building CT; this was one of the few instances of continuity between all the Iron Age IIA strata in Area C. Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. The southern wall of Building CR was also the northern wall of Building CF and its eastern wall was the western boundary of the entrance into that building (Photo 12.86). The southwestern corner of this building was cut by Pit 6498 (Photos 12.43, 12.48, 12.87).
Building CF in Squares Y–A/4–6 was one of the
largest and most interesting structures in Area C. Its
unique plan, fine construction, and exceptional
finds point to its importance. The building was initially constructed in Stratum C-1b and, following a
destruction, was renovated and reused until its final
destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. Its external
measurements were 8.7×11.3 m (excluding Wall
2454 on the west and the entrance corridor) and its
floor space was 50.46 sq m in Stratum C-1b and
52.89 sq m in C-1a. This latter phase was the best
known, as it was exposed just below topsoil and
destroyed in a fierce conflagration, after which the
building was abandoned. Although the remains of
Stratum C-1b were not as well preserved, they
were sufficient to define a separate building phase,
with finds attributed to its floors. Both phases
will be described together, emphasizing the stratigraphic considerations that led to the division
between the two. Building CF was built over
Stratum C-2 Building CU (Photos 12.85, 12.100–
12.104); although both buildings were of the same
orientation, they were two entirely different structures.
Building CF contained an entrance corridor in
the northeast and three main components: a rectangular space on the north, with a western and an
eastern wing to its south. Each of these wings was
enclosed by separate walls that adjoined each other
to form double walls, so that each was both independent and united. Double walls also surrounded
the building on the west, south and east; these walls
had a total width of 1.0–1.1 m. This, along with the
well-built straight walls, lent the structure a sturdy
look and also raises the possibility that the building
had an upper floor. Thus, Building CF, although a
unique and independent structure, was an integral
part of a well-planned quarter that was densely built
in both Strata C-1b and C-1a (Photos 12.6–12.7,
12.91–12.92; 12.169).
The entrance into the building in both strata was in its northeastern corner, through a passageway which continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. The entrance was bordered on the east by Wall 6408 in both strata and on the west by the eastern end of Building CR (Wall 7458 in the early phase of Stratum C-1b, brick rows 6512 in the later phase of C-1b, and Wall 6419 in Stratum C-1a). This formed a 2.0 m-wide corridor which was narrower only in the latter part of Stratum C-1b, when 6512 occupied part of its western side. Three phases were discerned in the entrance, one attributed to the construction of the building and the other two to Strata C-1b and C-1a.
This wing was composed of a large room on the north and a smaller room to its south; the latter was accessed only through the former. In Stratum C-1b, the larger northern room of this wing was separated from the northern rectangular space described above by a wall, making it a separate room. In Stratum C-1a, when this wall was removed, these two spaces were united and were accessed directly from the entrance in the northeast of the building. On the other hand, the southern room remained the same in both strata. The description below follows these developments: the two phases in the northern room are described separately (C-1b and C-1a), and the two phases in the southern room are described together.
In both Strata C-1b and C-1a, the western wing of
the building (Squares Y–Z/4–6) was composed of a
long rectangular space. In Stratum C-1b, there was
a small niche or cell on the north and the rest was
one long hall, while in Stratum C-1a, the hall was
divided into four consecutive rooms, including the
small niche/cell on the north, and three small rooms
to its south (Photos 12.92, 12.101).
This wing was bordered on three sides by
double walls that remained the same in both strata:
on the west by Walls 4422 and 2454, on the south
by Walls 4413 and 4479, and on the east by Walls
5414 and 5454. In Stratum C-1b, the northern
border of this wing was a single wall (6533), while
in Stratum C-1a, it was composed of a double wall:
Wall 6409 was built alongside Wall 6410, the
southern wall of Building CR.
This was a small room (internal measurements 1.5×3.1 m; 4.65 sq m) built above the
small chamber/nich, 7409, of Stratum C-1b. On the
north, west and south, the tops of the C-1b walls
(6533, 6534, 6535) were visible in the floor
makeup of the new room. Although they lined the
walls, they were different from the other benches in
this wing, as they did not rise above the floor level,
and they continued down to be abutted by the C-1b
rubble rather than built above it.
The room was entered from the broad space to
the east. The beaten-earth floor (6435, level 86.85
m) was 0.35 m higher than Floor 6427 to the east,
which would have necessitated some kind of small
step to join them. A large grinding stone installation
(6406) occupied its southeastern part. On the floor
was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401)
that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an
exceptionally large amount considering the small
space (Figs. 13.80–13.96; Photos 12.106–12.107).
Just below topsoil were fragments of an elaborate
horned pottery altar with mold-made female figures
(Photo 12.108; Chapter 35, No. 5). The impression
was that the numerous finds here were in storage
and not found as used, since they were densely
packed in this small area, around the grinding stone
installation (6406) that took up part of the room as
well (Photos 12.106–12.107, 12.109–12.110).
Installation 6406 was comprised of a finely
made oval, round-topped clay parapet, 0.4 m high,
enclosing a large lower grinding stone, on top of
which was a complete upper grinding stone lying
on its eastern end. The large lower grinding stone
was somewhat raised above the floor of the
installation and tilted down from west to east, so as
to facilitate the gathering of the grain into a small
depression between the western end of the lower
grinding stone and the parapet. Curiously, the
installation, built against the eastern end of Wall
5464, was situated so that its eastern end partially
blocked the entrance to the room to the south. It is
either possible that this was a later addition to the
room or that, despite its position, it was not considered as an obstacle. This installation was similar to
the one found in Room 5498 of the eastern wing of
Building CF, as well as in Building CQ1 and possibly, Buildings CQ2, CP and CE; one was found in
Area G as well (Chapter 20). The clay parapets of
these grinding stone installations enabled flour to
be easily collected and to prevent grain from being
scattered. It seems that the grinder would have
worked from the higher (western) side of the installation, so as to use gravity when pushing the upper
grinding stone (as in Photo 12.110), although this
was quite a cramped space to crouch in.
The second room from the north, built
above C-1b burnt debris 5478 (Figs. 12.59–12.60),
was the largest (internal measurements 2.4×2.7 m;
6.48 sq m). Destruction debris (5425 on the east and
5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and
the benches (Photo 12.111). The northern wall
(5464) was built on top of a wider wall (5474) that
protruded on its southern face, creating a kind of
narrow bench; a shallow niche created in Wall 5464
widened this bench to 0.3 m. Abutting the western
wall (4422) was a line of bricks that cornered with
5474 and created a bench (5472). A similar situation existed on the east, where Bench 5473 abutted
Wall 5414; this bench continued south into the
other rooms as well and cornered on the north with
5474. No bench lined the southern wall.
Among the many finds was a Hippo storage jar
with an inscription reading לשקינמש, Isqymns (Fig.
13.91:2; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 303–304; Ahituv
and Mazar 2014: 44–45; Chapter 29A, No. 6). It
was found in Locus 5425, along with another 40
vessels, several of them intact (Figs. 13.80–13.87,
13.89, 13.91–13.93, 13.95–13.96); most were concentrated in the southeastern part of the room, near
the entrance leading south to Room 5445 (Photo
12.111). Among them was a unique shovel (Fig.
13.96:1; Chapter 35, No. 49).
The middle room, built above C-1b
burnt debris 5479, was the smallest (internal measurements 1.2×2.7 m; 3.24 sq. m). Its northern wall
(5431) was built on top of a slightly wider wall/
bench (5484), so that only 0.2 m of the latter protruded into the room on the south, but not at all on
the north. On the west, Bench 5485 cornered with
5484. On the east, the situation was somewhat
ambivalent: it seems that 5473, the eastern bench of
Room 5460 to the north, continued to the south into
Room 5445 as well. However, an additional row of
bricks, identical to Bench 5473, adjoined it on the
west. Above this western row of bricks was a line
composed of large chunks of burnt bricks. This feature (5458), 0.3 m wide and 1.5 m long, stood two
courses high and blocked the entrance into this room,
as well as the entrance into the southernmost room
(Photo 12.111). However, although it appears to have
been built as a blockage, it is possible to understand it
as the collapse of bricks from one of the walls that
happened to land on this line inside the room.
Room 5445 was filled with burnt destruction
debris (5421, 5467) that covered and abutted the
benches and rested on Floor 5445; however, as
opposed to the other rooms in this building, it was
virtually empty, with only a small amount of
sherds, mostly concentrated on the eastern bench
(Figs. 13.81–13.82). Among the sherds was a fragment of a Greek bowl (Fig. 13.96:9; Chapter 28A).
This room, built above C-1b burnt
debris 5463 (Fig. 12.60) was the southernmost and
innermost room in the western wing (internal
measurements 1.8×2.7 m; 4.86 sq m) (Photos
12.112–12.113). Its northern wall (5497) was built
on top of a wider wall that served as a narrow bench
on the south (5471); a niche cut out of the southern
face of the wall exposed 0.5 m of this bench,
although on the eastern and western ends, where
there was no niche, only 0.1 m of it protruded. This
arrangement was almost identical to that in the
northern end of the northernmost room. This small
room was found full of extremely burnt destruction
debris (4414) on the white lime floor with some ash
(5444), including many fallen bricks that had been
fired almost to the consistency of pottery. Thirteen
vessels from this room were restored (Figs. 13.80–
13.81, 13.83–13.84, 13.86, 13.90–13.96). Several
of these were found on (or partly on) the benches,
including a Hippo storage jar on the eastern bench
(Fig. 13.91:4), another storage jar (Fig. 13.90:9) on
the eastern end of the northern bench, just where
the entrance was, and a very large krater (Fig.
13.92:7) on the southern bench. A unique find was a
large, heavy clay box with a matching lid (Fig.
13.96a:10) in the northwestern corner of the room
(Photo 12.112). This box, very distorted by fire, ca.
0.55 m wide, 0.65 m long and 0.45 m high, was set
on a protrusion in the corner of Benches 5469 and
5471, composed of bricks identical to those of the
benches, apparently deliberately built to accommodate the box (Photo 12.113). The lid of the box was
found overturned just to its east, above a bowl (Fig.
13.80:6) and an intact juglet (Fig. 13.95:11) was
found just below the box’s southwestern corner; the
only finds inside the box was a small fragment of a
very worn female figurine (Chapter 34, No. 13).
The location of this room in the deep interior of
the western wing of Building CF, which was
surrounded on three sides by double walls and
accessed only through the other rooms of the
western wing, as well as the unique pottery box and
ceramic assemblage, indicated that it had some special function, perhaps some sort of a treasury.
The architecture and contents of Building CF are
unique in many ways. Although the grinding installations, oven and many loomweights found in this
building in Stratum C-1a are typical of household
activity, the plan of this building, the double walls,
and the unique finds make it exceptional.
The net floor space is not exceptional and
should be regarded as modest compared to other
Iron Age II houses (Table 12.13; Schloen 2001:
165–183; Mazar 2008; see summary below),
although it was larger than most other buildings
excavated at Tel Rehov. Based on the width of the
walls, we may assume that the house had a second
story, although no evidence for a staircase was
found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been
located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor.
Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that
all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on
the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the
debris. Although one may surmise that the large
northeastern space (5498) in Stratum C-1a was an
open courtyard, this does not seem feasible, in spite
of the fact that an oven was located at the northern
end of this space. Air and light could be obtained
through the main entrance on the north and windows in the southern wall of the building, since all
other walls bordered neighboring buildings.
The most outstanding feature in this building
was the row of small rooms in the western wing in
Stratum C-1a, with benches along the walls. The
consecutive arrangement of four rooms entered
successively by way of the previous room, lined
with benches along most of the walls, is virtually
unparalleled in the Iron Age architecture in Israel
(see further below). The small size of these rooms
and the fact that the two inner ones could not get
direct light or air except from the room to the north,
emphasize their unique function. The inscribed jar
with the inscription — לשקינמש, lšqynmš — found
in the largest of these rooms, and the massive pottery box with the lid found in the southern room,
allude to a special function of this wing. We can
suggest that these were the offices of an important
personality, perhaps a merchant or a clan leader,
and that the box served as a ‘treasury’ of some kind.
The unique model shrine, decorated altar facade,
and so-called ‘footbath’ (the function of which
remains enigmatic), as well as the presence of two
elaborate grinding stone installations, a loom, and
other rich finds from this building, are evidence of
this special function.
The construction of this building in Stratum
C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as
Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. The integration
of Building CF with the buildings surrounding it
during both strata is typical of the architectural and
occupational nature of the Iron Age IIA at Tel
Rehov. One possible reason for such dense and
crowded construction may be related to efforts to
stabilize the structures in light of the seismic sensitivity in this region. This may also be related to
local architectural traditions that continued during
all of Iron IIA, perhaps with earlier origins, and
were special markers of the inhabitants’ cultural
identity.
An interesting parallel to the plan of this
building can be seen at Megiddo in Stratum VA–
IVB Building 2081 (Loud 1948: 44–46, plan: Fig.
388, reconstructed plan: Fig. 100). This building
comprised a large courtyard (2081). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a cult corner
containing two stone horned altars, two pottery
stands and additional objects (Zevit 2001: 220–
225). From the courtyard, an entrance led into a unit
that resembled Building CF, with a rectangular hall
containing an inner chamber. From the front part of
the hall, an entrance led into a narrow side chamber,
which, in turn, led into two additional rooms
arranged in a similar manner as those in Building
CF, with entrances located at the end of the walls. It
may be suggested that a room at the southwestern
corner of this building was also part of this chain of
rooms, since the walls were preserved lower than
the floor and the location of entrances could not be
determined with any certainty in this place. The
size of this building fits that of Building CF. It differed in having an additional western wing, the
long hall 2163. However, no entrance connecting
the eastern to the western wing was found and thus,
it is difficult to say whether it belonged to the same
building. Another exceptional feature was the two
pillar bases at the front part of the main hall. These
have no parallels in Building CF, unless we consider the large stone found near Wall 6455 in
Stratum C-1b and a second large stone found
nearby in Stratum C-1a as pillar bases found out of
their original position. It should be noted that the
rooms of the eastern wing of Building 2081 at
Megiddo were not numbered and no finds were
published from them. However, the cult corner in
Courtyard 2081 included pottery similar to that
from Tel Rehov Strata IV–V (C-1a–b). It may be
suggested that these two buildings might have had
similar functions, perhaps serving as dwellings of
elite families who incorporated commercial activities
in their household and had their own cult corners and
paraphernalia (see Chapter 4; Fig. 4.12).
Building CW (Squares A–C/6) was constructed
above Stratum C-2 Building CY (Photo 12.114)
and to a large extent, is a rebuild of the latter,
retaining much of its layout. Like Building CY, it
was only partly excavated and continued to the
north beyond the limit of the excavation area. Two
phases were defined in this building, attributed to
Strata C-1b and C-1a, yet in the second phase
(C-1a), changes occurred mainly in the courtyard
and the eastern part of the building, while the two
rooms in the west remained unchanged; thus, they
appear in the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.
Since the differentiation between the two phases
was not emphatic, both are described together.
The building adjoined the entrance corridor and
northern space of Building CF on the west and the
northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 on the
south (Photos 12.92, 12.114). Its outer width from
east to west was 10.4 m and its known length was
5.8 m, although it extended to the north beyond the
limits of the excavation area. Unlike most other
Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this appears to
have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a
large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least
on one side. See also Building CY in Stratum C-2
and Building CZ in Stratum C-1b for a similar concept.
The southern border of the building was Wall
6444, which ran parallel and adjacent to the
northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (6407),
forming a double wall, 1.1 m wide. Wall 6444
contained wooden beams typical of Stratum C-1b in its
foundation; these were round, ca. 0.05–0.07 m in
diameter, closely spaced, and placed perpendicular
to the wall’s foundation (Photos 12.59–12.61). The
western wall 6408 continued to the south where it
was the western wall of Building CQ1. It is thus
clear that Building CW was built together with
Building CQ1, and probably with CQ2 as well. The
eastern wall in Stratum C-1b (8491) was replaced
in C-1a by Wall 8424.
In Stratum C-1b, the spacious courtyard was 6.0 m
wide and at least 5.5 m long. Its western border was
Wall 6420 and its northern continuation, Wall 6476.
The border on the east was Wall 8491; a segment of
an additional wall (8476) was attached to its
western face for 2.5 m; north of this, in its stead,
was a north–south row of rather large (ca. 0.3×0.4
m each) roughly rectangular stones (8499), three of
which were placed together and a fourth slightly to
the north, running into the northern balk (Photo
12.63). These stones adjoined Wall 8491 and thus
could not have served as pillar bases; they recall the
stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum
C-2 and elsewhere and perhaps served as solid
bases for jars or other objects. In Stratum C-1a,
Wall 8476 and the stones were removed, and substantial changes were made in the eastern part of the
courtyard (see below).
Only a single floor was found in the courtyard
(7471, level 86.29 m) (Photo 12.114), laid on a 0.4
m-thick fill of soft brown earth (7501, 8462) that
covered the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CY
(Fig. 12.55). This fill layer is shown in the plan of
Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.35), as we assume that it was
laid at that time, in preparation for the laying of the
floor; it is possible that an earlier floor of C-1b was
removed when Floor 7471 was laid, leaving only
the fill. The floor (shown on the plan of Stratum
C-1a; Figs. 12.36, 12.38) was composed of soft
reddish-brown earth, its central and southeastern parts
burnt black, with some light gray ashy patches and
flecks of charcoal throughout. The floor dipped
down in the northwest, visible in the northern section of Square B/6 (Fig. 12.55); in this shallow
depression was a complete Hippo jar (Fig. 13.99:7).
It was not clear whether this depression was intentional
(a pit?) or whether it represented a postdepositional phenomenon. A concentration of black
ash found to the west of this dip, against Wall 6476,
contained two cooking pots (Fig. 13.98:1, 3) and a
loomweight. Along the western end of the courtyard was a strip of small stones (7479) set closely
together, although rather haphazardly, with a lower
layer of stones in its central part. The stones ran
parallel to Wall 6420 (Photo 12.114) and may have
been a remnant of a poorly preserved stone pavement. The stones ended in the north close to the
abovementioned dip in the floor; they recall those
found in the northwestern part of Building CX,
described below.
The main change in the courtyard, attributed to
the transition from C-1b to C-1a, took place in its
eastern part and included the replacement of Wall
8491 with Wall 8424 and the addition of an installation that covered Wall 8476 and Stones 8499. Wall
8424 was poorly preserved and it is not clear if it
was cut on its northern end or whether there had
been an entrance there.
The installation included Wall 8426, an east–
west wall, preserved along 2.2 m and 0.15 m high,
that extended from the center of Wall 8424 and
served as a divider between two spaces that were
open to the west (Photo 12.115). The floors of these
spaces (8423, 8430 in the north, 8420 in the south)
were covered with plaster that lipped up to the faces
of the wall in a manner that created shallow channels, which were burnt on their western ends. The
northern end of the northern space contained a concentration of stones, east of which were three jugs
and one juglet (Fig. 13.101:2–3, 6, 12). On its
western end, Wall 8426 joined a shallow north–
south channel that terminated on the north near a
large lower grinding stone embedded in the floor,
and on the south at the center of the southern space.
Two stone mortars, one particularly large and the
other smaller, flanked the northern end of the
channel on the west and east, respectively. The
function of these elements remained unclear; it is
possible that some substance was drained from the
plastered floors into the shallow channel on their
west, and that the grinding stone and mortars were
used in conjunction with this activity.
A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401),
revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire
courtyard area, comprising hard burnt brick debris
with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash.
Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97–
13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and
two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig.
13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table
12.16).
This room was bordered by Walls 6408 on the west,
6429 on the north and 6420 on the east (internal
measurements 2.1×3.0 m; 6.3 sq. m). An
entranceway in the southern end of Wall 6420 led to
the room from the courtyard. The only floor found
in this room (6411) was made of pink plaster laid
above a layer of earth and brick debris (6451) that
appears to have been a fill above Building CY,
similar to the situation in the courtyard to the east.
Brick benches (6457, 6458 and 6496) were
constructed along the western, eastern and southern
walls of the room respectively. The benches were
0.35 m wide and 0.35 m high, recalling those in
Building CF, although in this case, they were built
against the walls and not under them. Placed on top
of each end of the western and eastern benches
(6457, 6458) were flat-topped stones, perhaps
serving as solid supports for jars or other objects
(Photo 12.116). In the southwestern corner of the
room was an L-shaped brick that formed a niche in
which an intact juglet (Fig. 13.101:11) was placed.
The room was full of heavily burnt destruction
debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the
benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris,
including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs,
juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig.
13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in
the debris above the benches that lined the walls
(Photo 12.117). A concentration of ten clay
loomweights was found on the western end of this
bench (Photo 12.118). Other finds in this room
included three scale weights and a bronze
scale pan, as well as a seal and iron tools (Table
12.16).
This room, located in the northwestern part of the
building, was bordered by Walls 6429 on the south,
6497 on the west and 6476 on the east. The internal
width was 2.5 m and it was at least 1.4 m long, as its
northern border was beyond the limit of the excavation area, with an entrance probably in its northeastern corner. Although the eastern and western
walls continued the lines of those of Room 6411 to
the south, they were not one and the same, as they
abutted the northern face of Wall 6429, but did not
bond with it. It is possible that this room had been
accessed from the courtyard on the east at a spot
further to the north, beyond the limits of the excavation. Just as in Room 6411, a layer of debris that
might have been a fill (6462) was found above the
C-2 remains and was covered by the floor and
benches in this room, so it is assumed that it, like
the room to its south, had only one phase of use.
Benches (6480, 6481) lined the western and
eastern walls (but not the southern wall), continuing the line of the benches in Room 6411 to the
south. Here too, stones were found on top of their
southern and northern ends (Photo 12.116). The
room was full of burnt destruction debris; eight vessels rested on Floor 6438 at level 86.50 m.
A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city
To the south of Building CW and the east of
Building CF were two virtually twin buildings,
termed CQ1 and CQ2, adjoined by a double wall
(Squares A–C/4–5). Both buildings were enclosed
on the north by Wall 6407, which was attached to
Wall 6444 of Building CW, together creating a
double wall, 1.1 m wide (Photo 12.120). On the
west, Building CQ1 adjoined Building CF with a
double wall, although in Stratum C-1a, with the
removal of the inner wall of the northeastern part of
Building CF, a double wall was left only in the
south and the two buildings shared a wall in the
north. Thus, it can be seen how Buildings CQ1 and
CQ2 were not only related to each other, but were
also a part of the northeastern insula, all the units of
which must have been built together according to
an integrated plan. On the south, the buildings were
closed by a single wall and fronted by a street. The
eastern border of Building CQ2 was also a single
wall; although unexcavated, it is possible that a
north–south street ran here and continued to the
north alongside Building CW.
Both buildings were small and comprised three
rooms each: a rectangular room on the south and
two small rooms on the north, one larger than the
other. Yet another building with the same plan was
found to the south of Building CQ1, termed
Building CQ3. The entrance to Building CQ1 was
in its southeastern corner (opposite the entrance of
Building CQ3), but curiously, no entrance into CQ2
could be identified. While Building CQ1 was built
on a north–south axis, its eastern side ran on a
slightly northwest–southeast line, which dictated
the orientation of the adjoining Building CQ2; in
fact, the eastern wall of the latter building was even
more skewed, lending it a trapezoidal shape.
Similar to Building CW to the immediate north
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 had one main phase, with
burnt destruction debris under topsoil down to the
floors and only ephemeral indications of an earlier
occupation in Stratum C-1b. Both buildings were
built above remains attributed to Stratum C-2 in
Squares A–B/4–5. The most likely explanation is
that the buildings were constructed in Stratum C-1b
and continued to be in use until the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. The wood in the
foundations of the walls points to this option, as this
was a typical C-1b feature. Thus, the buildings
appear on the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.
A narrow area to the south of Buildings CQ1
and CQ2, as well as Building CF to their west
(Photos 12.120, 12.122), appears to have been an
east–west street, some 1.4 m wide, that ran between
the block of Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the
north and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south,
merging into Piazza 2417 on the west in Stratum
C-1a.
The buildings are described below as found in
Stratum C-1a, noting the very minor remains of the
sporadically detected earlier (C-1b) phase.
The external measurements of Building CQ1 were 5.2–5.5×6.4 m (floor space, ca. 19 sq m). It included one large room (6483) that spanned the width of the building and two smaller rooms (6436, 7447) to its north. The southern wall was Wall 6445, which continued the line of Wall 5455, the southern inner wall of Building CF. On the west, the building was closed by Wall 6408, which continued to the north, where it was the western wall of Building CW and abutted the eastern wall of Building CF on the south (Photos 12.121–12.122). The eastern wall (7416) created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast.
The southern and largest space of the building was
apparently a roofed room, measuring internally
2.8×4.3 m (floor space, 12.04 sq m). The entrance
into this room, and, in fact, into the building itself,
was in its southeastern corner. The entrance was 1.2
m wide and had a brick threshold at 86.12 m; it
opened to the street that ran along the southern
façade of the building, although the excavated level
of the street surface was higher by ca. 0.7 m than
the threshold. This would have required few steps
or a ladder to access the building from the street,
whether into Room 6483 or to a second story.
The floor was composed of two parts: on the
west was a stone floor (6472) that ran up to the line
of the entranceway in Wall 6446, containing
closely laid basalt stones and limestones, as well as
some broken upper grinding stones and mortars.
Underneath the stone pavement were two large
stones that apparently served to buttress it. Such a
stone floor was rare at Tel Rehov in Iron IIA and
was found only in Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and perhaps CJ in Stratum C-1a.
The stone floor was abutted on the east by a
smooth reddish clay floor (7450 in the east, 6483 in
the west); patches of this matrix were also found
between the stones, so that it apparently had covered them as well. In the central-eastern part of
Floor 6483 was a round, flat-topped stone that
appears to have been a pillar base; it was encircled
by several small stones that included two
loomweights, one of stone and one of clay.
Between this pillar base and Wall 7454 on the north
was a patch of hard plaster.
The floor was covered with a layer of
extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris
(6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen
bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster
fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly
an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo
12.121). In the northwestern part of the room, near
the southern face of Wall 6446, was a grinding
stone installation (6453), like those found in Buildings CF and CE; it was not very well preserved
(Photo 12.122). The lower grinding stone of the
installation was installed on a brick base, which
raised it to ca. 0.4 m above the floor; underneath the
stone was an antler. This room contained 26 vessels
(Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects
(Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights.
The reddish clay matrix of Floor 6483 rested on
a 0.15 m-deep layer of red, gray and white striations
(also numbered 6483) that abutted the lowest
courses of the surrounding walls, which contained
wooden beams in their foundations. These
striations penetrated below the stone floor in the
western half of the room and they may have
belonged to the initial use of this room in Stratum
C-1b.
The small northwestern room (6436; measuring internally 1.9×2.35 m, 4.46 sq m) was bordered on the east by Wall 6422 and on the south by Wall 6446; in the eastern end of the latter wall was a narrow entrance, 0.5 m wide. The floor was made of smooth reddish clay (level 86.00 m), identical to that of the large room to the south. The wood in the foundations of the surrounding walls protruded somewhat into the room below the floor, embedded in a matrix of reddish clay (6477) that was similar to the floor makeup itself. This sub-floor material with wood was laid on top of Wall 6501 and Locus 6502, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.12). A wooden beam was found in the entranceway itself, possibly a threshold. On the floor was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17).
The northeastern room (7447; measuring internally 1.3×2.0 m, 2.6 sq m) was separated from the room to its west by Wall 6422. This small narrow room was entered from the larger southern room by way of an opening, 0.8–0.9 m wide, in its southern wall (7454); this opening had a brick threshold that was, in fact, the continuation of Wall 7454, on the level of the floor. A row of bricks (7448) ran along the northern wall of this room just on the floor level and might have been a bench. Like in the room to the west, the wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6422 protruded into the sub-floor makeup of reddish clay. The reddish clay floor was identical to that of the other rooms and was covered by very burnt complete fallen bricks and ceiling material (7426); on it were six pottery vessels and other objects (Table 12.17)
Adjoining Building CQ1 on the east was an almost
identical, slightly larger unit, termed Building CQ2
(Photos 12.120, 12.123) (external measurements
5.6–6.0×6.3 m; floor space, ca. 21 sq m). As noted
above, the southern part of the western wall was
slightly skewed, and the entire eastern wall (8405)
was even more so, and thus, the building was somewhat trapezoidal (Photo 12.123).
The problem of the entrance to this building
remains unresolved. If we duplicate the plan of
Building CQ1, the entrance should have been close
to the eastern end of Wall 8434 and thus, exactly
opposite the entrance into C-1a Building CX to the
south. However, the wall here stood up to 1.0 m
above the floor level inside the building and did not
show any signs of a gap or a blockage. Note the
suggestion that the street level to the south of
Building CQ2, which was ca. 1.0 m higher than the
floor inside the building, might have served to
directly access an upper floor.
Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an
extremely large amount for such a small building,
even when taking into account the existence of a
second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same
size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in
Chapter 45.
The southern and largest room of this building
(7500) spanned its entire width. Due to the angle of
the eastern wall (8405), it was trapezoidal (internal
measurements 2.6×4.5–4.9 m; 12.2 sq m). The
floor of this room was identical to that of Room
6483 in Building CQ1: a stone pavement (7503) on
the west and soft reddish clay on the east (7500), on
line with the entrance into Room 7490. The pavement was nicely laid, with small stones filling the
gaps between the flat-topped stones, which incorporated several broken and complete upper
grinding stones. A large lower grinding stone was
found in the southwestern part of the room, some
0.3 m above the stone floor. It is possible that this
had belonged to a grinding stone installation similar to those found in Building CQ1, CF and CE, as
chunks of hard clay found scattered nearby might
have been part of its surrounding parapet. Attached
to the center of the southern wall was a bin (7508),
0.8 m wide and 1.5 m long, with narrow clay walls
that also ran partially along the southern wall. A
stone mortar was found on the northeastern end of
this bin with an upper grinding stone inside it.
Underneath the reddish clay floor in the southeastern corner of this room was a rather large
smooth pink mizi limestone resting on a layer of red
and gray striations (8445), similar to those in
Building CQ1; a juglet (Fig. 13.118:11) was found
in this layer. This stone was very similar to that
found in the Stratum C-1b phase of Building CF,
described above. Like in Room 6483 in Building
CQ1, this layer ran to the west under the stone floor
and it is possible that it represented the Stratum
C-1b occupation. The foundations of both the
southern and eastern walls of Building CQ2 were
not reached and it is possible that an earlier phase is
yet to be exposed.
Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt
destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos
12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels
(Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of
fine small closed vessels. Several other objects
were found as well (Table 12.18). An interesting
find was a concentration of some 20 small polished
black and gray wadi pebbles found on the floor, as
well as inside an intact juglet (Fig. 13.118:17).
These were weighed in order to ascertain if they
had significance as weights, but it seems that this
was not their main function, as they did not yield
any known value (pers. comm., Raz Kletter).
The northwestern room (internal measurements
2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m), was slightly wider than its
counterpart in Building CQ1. On the east, it was
closed by Wall 7406 and on the south by Wall 7459,
in which a 0.75 m-wide entrance was located on its
eastern end. Wooden beams were incorporated in
the foundations of the walls in this room (Photo
12.125) and the entrance had a fine brick threshold
with a plank of wood found in situ. An exceptional
recess was located in the outer eastern side of the
entrance in Wall 8411, a detail somewhat similar to
the rounded recesses in two of the entrances in
Building CP (11440, 11446), described below. Two
brick courses were missing from this wall in its
center (Photo 12.126); this appears to have been a
kind of window or niche between this room and the
one to its south.
The reddish clay floor (7490) in this room was
exactly the same as the floors in Building CQ1. The
top of Stratum C-2 Wall 7492 (Photo 12.125) protruded into the floor, running along the northern
wall of the room, 0.2 m above the floor, and might
have been used as a bench.
This room was filled with burnt destruction
debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo
12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete
vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds
(Table 12.18). A complete baking tray (Fig.
13.112:1), made of non-cooking pot fabric, a rare
item in the Iron Age IIA pottery assemblage of Tel
Rehov, was one of the finds in this room.
The northeastern room was the smallest; its trapezoid shape was due to the angle of the eastern wall
(8405) (internal measurements 1.2–1.4×2.1; ca. 3.0
sq m). A row of bricks (8412) ran along the
southern face of Wall 6407 in the northern part of
this room, continuing the line of 7492 from the
adjacent room, but standing much higher, almost on
the level of the tops of the surrounding walls. Since
excavation did not proceed below the floor, it is not
known whether this was the upper part of an earlier
wall, like Wall 7492. The entrance to the room on
the southeast, 0.7–0.8 m wide, contained a curious
feature composed of four narrow bricks that formed
a square, enclosing a small area of softer debris
(8446). To the south of the southern brick was an
upper grinding stone, parallel to the threshold; it is
difficult to say whether it was deliberately placed
there or was fallen. The presence of this bin-like
element just where one would step into the room
through the threshold is enigmatic. It is possible
that it was a Stratum C-1b element that slightly protruded into the floor here, or that it was somehow
related to the function of the room.
Room 8431 was full of burnt destruction debris
and fallen bricks, yielding seven vessels and several other objects (Table 12.18).
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to
the south, see below) are exceptional among the
Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small
overall size and the even smaller size of the inner
rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms.
It may be assumed that these houses had a second
story, thus their functional space could have been
double, although no evidence for steps was found
and access must have been from the outside of the
building. This possibility may explain the lack of
an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the
lower storey of this building was entered by a
wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a
hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact,
there was such an entrance in Building CQ1,
despite the higher street level to its south. Notably,
the buildings contained very large amounts of pottery, as well as a range of other finds, that might
point to them having been dwellings. On the other
hand, they lacked cooking facilities, such as ovens,
although cooking pots and one baking tray were
found.
These buildings can be compared to small
houses found in Area C at Hazor, dating to the
13th–11th centuries BCE (Yadin et al. 1960: 98, Pl.
208), in Tell Abu Hawam Stratum IV (Hamilton
1935: Plate IV), Aphek Stratum X11 (Gadot and
Yadin 2009: 90––93, Figs. 6.2, 6.4), and perhaps
also Building 442 in Stratum VIA at Tel Batash,
although it was not fully uncovered and appears to
have been larger (Mazar 1997: 76–79; list cited
from Gadot and Yadin 2009: 93, with Egyptian parallels as well). However, all these examples are
much earlier (13th–11th centuries BCE), while no
similar houses are known in Iron Age II Israel.
Building CG (Squares T–Y/2–4) was a narrow rectangular structure, measuring externally 3.4×8.9 m,
with massive walls wider than those of other buildings (recalling the double walls of back-to-back
units) (Photos 12.5, 12.8, 12.127). Both the
external and the internal walls were 0.9 m wide,
composed of two rows of bricks, one laid
widthwise and one lengthwise, a building technique found so far almost exclusively in this
building. The walls were composed of hard-packed
light and dark gray bricks and were exposed just
under topsoil.
The building contained three small square
rooms that had no entrances and were apparently
accessed from above. The floor space of each room
was 2.5–2.7 sq m. It is possible that this building
had a second story. Although the amount of debris
and fallen bricks found here did not seem to justify
this, we must take into account that much of this
material was eroded and disappeared from this high
point of the lower mound.
The only discernible change in this building
between Strata C-1b and C-1a took place in its
southernmost room, while only one phase was
detected in the other two rooms. The buildings
adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the
east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the
southeast, and the open area south of Building CD
on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still
adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to
the east and west of Building CG became open
spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to
the west).
The two outer walls on the west and east (1416,
2411) ran parallel to each other on an almost
straight north–south line, while the northern (2453)
and southern (2439) walls of the building were
slightly skewed, running on a southwest–northeast
line; on the north, this was the same angle as that of
Building CE, which adjoined it. The sharp angles of
the short walls (especially in the northern part of
the structure) give the plan a slightly irregular
shape.
The building was constructed on top of the
ruins of Building CB of Stratum C-2: the western
wall (1416) was built over Wall 2505, 0.3 m to its
east (Figs. 12.16, 12.68–12.69, Photos 12.31–
12.34) and the southern wall (2439) was built over
the southern part of the entrance in Wall 2505
(Photo 12.32). Room 2444 covered Wall 2481 of C2 (Photo 12.38). All the walls were preserved ca.
ten courses high and had wooden beams in their
foundations (Photos 12.128–12.133). The massive
construction of the interior and exterior walls was
apparently related to the surmised function as a granary or storage building.
The northernmost room (internal measurements
1.5–1.6×1.6 m; ca. 2.56 sq m) contained fallen
ceiling material and hard vitrified brick debris
(2449), some of it burnt to a powdery lime, to a total
depth of 1.2 m above the assumed floor at level
86.40 m. Although excavation proceeded past the
foundation level of the walls, no clear floor matrix
was detected and the assumed floor (2460) was
determined only on the basis of the location of the
finds and the floating level of the walls (Fig. 12.76).
Unlike the other rooms in this building, no charred
wood was found here below the floor level.
This small room contained 22 vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), many of them very
burnt. Twenty-eight stone loomweights were
found, concentrated mainly in the southwestern
corner of the room. No grain was found in this
room, although a large amount was found in the
other two rooms. The small size of this chamber
and the lack of an entrance indicated that this large
collection of varied pottery vessels and objects was
apparently stored here, perhaps close to the time of
destruction. As we assume that all three chambers
in this building served as a granary, the use of this
chamber for storage appears to be secondary, at a
time when no grain was stored here.
The middle room of the building (2444) measured
almost exactly the same as Room 2460 to its north
(internal measurements 1.5×1.6 m; 2.4 sq m). Its
southern wall (2429) had a 0.7 m wide gap in its
five upper courses (not shown on the plan; Photo
12.127), although its southern face and bottom
courses clearly showed that this was a solid wall.
This gap appears to have been intentional, perhaps
used as a storage niche or it was an elevated
opening, similar to those in the square granary
rooms at Tel Hadar (Kochavi 1999: 181, Fig. 2).
A light-colored clay layer which appears to
have been the floor (2444, 86.60 m) was defined as
such mainly based on its position at the foundation
of the walls, the wooden beams underneath it, and
the destruction debris (2425) resting on it,
including a large amount of grain. Just below the
floor level, a round wooden beam was incorporated
in the foundation of Wall 1416, running 1.3 m from
the northwestern corner of the room to the south,
where it branched out to protrude into the room for
0.25 m. Round wooden beams (average diameter
0.10–0.15 m) were also placed in the foundation of
Wall 2411 on the east (Fig. 12.77). However, as
opposed to the beam in Wall 1416, these were laid
perpendicular to the wall and protruded into the
room up to 1.5 m, just below the floor level; they
included tree trunks and branches, as well as some
worked beams (Fig. 12.41; Photo 12.130). As noted
above, these same wooden beams were visible in
the eastern face of Wall 2411. It thus can be seen
that the wood was laid in preparation for the construction of the walls and floors and constituted a
well-planned system. Under the charred wood that
extended from the foundation of Wall 2411 into the
room was a single course of bricks (2478) running
north–south, serving as a kind of support, above
which a shallow fill was laid. These bricks
appeared to have been intentionally removed from
C-2 Wall 2481, which ran under the northern end of
this room, and served as a sub-floor constructional
element (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38).
The room was full of fallen ceiling material and
extremely burnt debris, including ashes and complete fallen bricks, burnt to white and yellow vitrification and to a powdery consistency (2425), which
were found especially in the southwestern part of
the room, at a total depth of 1.0 m. At 86.80–86.90
m, a large concentration of charred grain (about 2.0
kg) was found in the southwestern corner and
against the northern face of Wall 2429. The only
other finds in this room were fragments of a bowl
(Fig. 13.52:10) and sherds of a large Hippo storage
jar (Fig. 13.55:18), indicating that its main function
might have been grain storage, used as a kind of a
‘chamber-bin’. The grains were identified as wheat
(Chapter 53) and were subjected to a series of 14C
dating. One measurement from Locus 2444
(Sample R30) provided the dates 928–858 BCE
(1σ) and 970–846 BCE (2σ); a second date appears
to be too high. Samples R31–R34 from Locus 2425
were measured with 21 repetitions in four laboratories; the average calibrated date was 898–844 BCE
(1σ) and 906–837 BCE (2σ) (see data and discussion in Chapter 48).
The southern room is reconstructed as having been
identical to the two complete northern rooms. With
the reconstructed southeastern corner, Room 2441
measured internally ca. 1.6×1.7 m (2.7 sq m), very
similar to the room to its north. However, most of
the eastern and southern walls of this room had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72;
Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m
long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall
2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the
eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a
straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This
straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a
door jamb of an opening leading to the room from
Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen
fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to
Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed
entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in
Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain.
Both the floor and the walls of this room were
constructed above a 1.3 m-deep layer of fill and
wood which apparently was laid as a leveler and
stabilizer on top of the C-2 remains below (Photos
12.128–12.129). This deep wooden construction
was composed of four to five layers of alternating
lengthwise and widthwise wooden beams (2470,
2471, 4421; Fig. 12.42a–c; Photos 12.131–12.133).
The upper layer of wood, with nicely worked
rounded beams, some reaching over 1.0 m long,
was mostly laid on a north–south axis (2470; Photo
12.143). The two lowest layers of this wood (2471,
4421) were mostly laid on an east–west axis (Photo
12.133). Notably, most of the lower level of this
sub-floor wooden construction was horizontal, as
opposed to the higher levels of the wood, which
sloped down towards the east, having collapsed
with the southeastern corner of the room. Although
the lower layers of wood under the floor penetrated
down deeper than the wood in the foundations of
Walls 1416 and 2439, and were found on the level
of the entranceway in C-2 Wall 2505 (Photos
12.32–12.33, 12.128–12.129), they should be
attributed to the construction of Building CG in
Stratum C-1b. The reasons for this are:
Since the two northern rooms of Building CG did
not suffer the same severe collapse as Room 2441,
the possibility exists that they continued to be in
use during Stratum C-1a (Fig. 12.50). An indication
for this is the fact that Piazza 2417 on the east and
Piazza CK on the west, both of Stratum C-1a,
abutted this building. The floors of the courtyards
were at levels 87.55–87.75 m, 1.2–1.4 m higher
than the original floors inside these two chambers.
There are two possibilities to explain this stratigraphic
situation. The first is that the floors of
Stratum C-1b continued to be in use in Stratum
C-1a and the rooms were approached from above,
as in the previous occupation level. In that case, the
destruction debris in Rooms 2460 and 2444, with
its pottery and the charred grain that was measured
for 14C dates, would be explained as belonging to
the last use of the rooms in Stratum C-1a. The other
possibility is that a new floor was constructed in
Stratum C-1a above this destruction debris, which
would then be attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b
in these two rooms. Such a floor, which was not
preserved, would have been at a level higher than
87.70 m (the preserved top of the walls) and might
have disappeared due to erosion. We thus leave this
question open, although it is of crucial importance
for dating, due to the large number of 14C dates
from the central room (Loci 2425, 2444) mentioned
above. It should be noted that the loci numbers of
floors and destruction layers appear only in the plan
of Stratum C-1b, thus accepting the second possibility;
the first possibility would require presenting
these numbers in the plan of Stratum C-1a as well.
However, since a final verdict is impossible, the
loci in these two rooms are tentatively defined as
belonging to Stratum C-1b, although we are aware
of the alternative.
Evidence for partial rebuild of the southern
room (2441) in Stratum C-1a can possibly be seen
in the two upper courses of Wall 2441 close to its
southern end; while the entire wall suffered from
severe slippage of the bricks, these two upper
course were not burnt and were laid horizontally
above the burnt and tilted courses below (Photos
12.127, 12.131–12.132, 12.159, 12.160). This
raises the possibility that these two courses
represent a rebuild of the wall in Stratum C-1a. It should,
however, be emphasized that there are no other
stratigraphic indications for such a phase in this
room, such as a higher floor, although such a
floor could have existed close to topsoil and had
been eroded away, as possible in the two northern
rooms.
In the area east of Building CG, and above the
collapse from this building that sealed the apiary, a
leveling fill (5430, 4408; Squares Y/1–2) was laid
in preparation for the construction of Building CL
in Stratum C-1a; Wall 4443 of that building had a
foundation trench that cut this fill (Fig. 12.74;
Photos 12.135, 12.144). This stratigraphic evidence
to the east of Building CG, but clearly related to it,
supports our conclusion that the building was
founded in Stratum C-1b, destroyed at the end of
this stratum, along with Building CH and the
apiary, and reused (partially?) in Stratum C-1a.
Building CM (Squares Y–Z/3) was a unit to the
south of Building CF and to the east of Building CG
(Photo 12.127), built above the C-2 remains here. It
adjoined the apiary on the north and, since the partition
wall between them was quite flimsy, it is possible that Building CM was related to the apiary in
some functional way, despite the difference in floor
levels: 86.20 m in the northern and central part of
Building CM and 84.55–84.60 m in the northern
part of the apiary. It seems that Wall 9453 of
Building CZ (exposed only along its eastern face in
Squares A/2–3) was the eastern border of Building
CM. The floor inside the western part of Building
CZ (84.90 m) was lower by 0.35 m than that in the
eastern part of Building CM (85.20 m) and 1.35 m
lower than that identified in the western part of
Building CM (86.20 m), and it is possible that there
was a terraced effect here, following a natural
downslope from west to east.
The external measurements of Building CM
were ca. 7.8 m×9.0 m, depending on the western
and eastern boundaries, which were not entirely
clear. It included a small room (4446) in its northwestern corner, a larger space to its south (4445)
and possibly an open space (5441, 5442) in its east.
Access to the building was most likely from the
western end of the street that we assume ran in
Squares Z, A–C/4 to the northeast of the building.
Building CM ended in a fierce fire. It went out
of use in Stratum C-1a and was covered by a courtyard (2417), whose floor was 1.35 m higher than
the floors in this building. It is noteworthy that this
was one of the few places where a clear distinction
could be made between Strata C-2, C-1b and C-1a.
The northwestern room (4446) was poorly preserved (internal measurements 2.0×2.9 m, 5.8 sq
m) (Photos 12.136–12.138). Its walls were composed of crumbly brownish-gray bricks with light
gray mortar lines. The western wall of the room
(4432) was built above Stratum C-2 Wall 4516
(Fig. 12.75), but continued further to the south, running a total of 4.0 m until it terminated rather
abruptly just past its corner with Wall 4411. It ran
parallel to the eastern face of Wall 2411 of Building
CG, with a 0.2 m gap between them; the foundation
heights of the two walls were identical, suggesting
that they were constructed together. Yet, unlike
Wall 2411, which was standing to a height of 1.5 m,
due to its being in continuous use in both Strata
C-1b and C-1a, Wall 4432 was preserved only
0.25–0.35 m high, aside from a lone stump that was
0.65 m higher than the rest of the wall (Photo
12.136); this stump was located precisely in the
balk between Squares Y/3 and Y/4. It is not clear
why it was left standing so high, when the rest of
the wall was razed.
Along the eastern face of Wall 2411 was a row
of nine chalices (4424) (Fig. 13.49:9–17; Photo
12.138). Two (one intact) were found near the
northern end of Wall 4432 (just north of the
abovementioned stump), while six more were
found running 2.0 m to the south. The chalices were
revealed just at the level of the preserved top of
Wall 4432, leading to the conclusion that they were
placed there following the razing of this wall. Their
position exactly in the gap between Walls 4432 and
2411, as well as the higher preservation of the
stump, suggests that they might have been a deliberate
deposit, perhaps related to some ritual following the destruction of Stratum C-1b.
The northern wall of the building (4479) created a
double wall with Wall 4413 of Building CF.
Wall 4479 was 8.7 m long, preserved to a height of
1.3 m, and was very burnt. The northwestern corner
of Building CM was part of a massive construction,
where the corners of four buildings (CE, CF, CG
and CM) met. This dense corner in Square Y/4 was
a meeting point between Walls 1473, 4479, 4432
and 2454; each of these walls had its own end or
face and they abutted one another, indicating that
although each belonged to separate buildings, all
were built in consideration of each other. As in
most other Stratum C-1b walls, wooden beams
were incorporated in the foundations of Walls 4432
and 4479. While only a few pieces were noted in
the northern end of Wall 4432, the wood in the
foundation of Wall 4479 was dense and composed
of small rounded beams laid perpendicular to the
line of the wall at closely spaced intervals (Photos
12.136–12.137); see Wall 6444 in Building CW and
Wall 1437 in Building CH for a similar configuration (Fig. 12.46; Photo 12.145). A unique feature of
the wood in Wall 4479 was that it was laid above
the lowest two brick courses, rather than at the very
bottom of the wall. This somewhat recalls the situation with Wall 2411 in Building CG, where the
wooden beams in its foundation were laid on bricks
(2478), as described above.
The eastern wall of the room in Stratum C-1b
was Wall 4433, which abutted Wall 4479. This wall
was 0.8 m wide and was composed of a row of
bricks laid lengthwise and one row widthwise,
recalling the walls in Building CG. The wall was
poorly preserved on both its southern end and its
eastern face; it seems that it terminated just about at
the line of the balk between Squares Y/3–4, and it is
possible that its southern end originally had an
entrance that led into the room. The southern
closing wall of this room (4411) was very poorly
preserved. The room contained several layers of
debris (4417, 4430, 4446). While no clear floor was
detected, its lowest layer (4446) was on the same
level (86.19 m) as Floor 4445 to the south of Wall
4411. These loci, which lacked traces of destruction, might have been a fill that leveled off the area
in preparation for the construction of Piazza 2417
in Stratum C-1a.
In the area to the east of Room 4446 was a floor (5441, 5442) at level 86.25–86.30 m. In the north, Floor 5442 contained a concentration of crushed travertine in its center. In the south, Floor 5441 was made of soft pink plaster; a smooth flat-topped pink mizi limestone and a complete storage jar (Fig. 13.51:3) turned upside down were found on this floor. While the northern end of this floor was horizontal, it sloped down towards the south (Fig. 12.78); this slope may possibly be related to the lower southern end of the building, described below. As noted above, it is not known whether this space continued to the east up to Building CZ, as the area between them remained mostly unexcavated (Square Z/3). It might have been an open courtyard, although enclosing walls may be hidden in the unexcavated area in Squares Z/3–4.
To the south of Wall 4411 was a space (4445;
Photos 12.127, 12.139–12.142) that ran 3.2 m to the
south until Wall 8469, the flimsy narrow wall that
bordered the apiary (Fig. 12.78). An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the
south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end
of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered
Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the
result of the same seismic activity that caused the
collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG,
described above. The wooden beams laid in the
foundation of Wall 2411 that were visible in the
matrix of 4445, penetrated under the wall into
Building CG to the west, as described above.
The northern and central part of Room 4445
contained very burnt brick debris (4441) on top of a
beaten-earth floor (4445, level 86.20 m) (Photo
12.139). An oval-shaped installation built of hard
dark gray clay (4448) was built on this floor, just
against the southern face of Wall 4411; the gray
clay of the installation continued along the southern
face of Wall 4411, indicating their contemporaneity. The installation was ca. 0.7 m long, 0.4
m wide, preserved 0.28 m high; it contained a
complete cooking jug (Fig. 13.50:4; Photos
12.139–12.140). Another installation related to
Floor 4445 was a small bin made of reddish clay
and lined with wood (4449) in the southwestern
part of this area, built against the eastern face of
Wall 2411 (Photo 12.139).
From the line of Installation 4449 until the
southern end of the building, the floor was not clear
and, in its stead, was a dense concentration of
charred wood, 1.0 m wide (4456, 8443, 8447),
abutting Wall 8469. Just north of this pile, and east
of Installation 4449, was a large stone (Photos
12.139, 12.141–12.142). This strip of charred
wood, composed mostly of tree trunks and
branches, was set into a reddish layer (8471) (Fig.
12.78). The bottom of this reddish layer (85.30 m)
was 0.9 m lower than the floor in the northern part
of this room, suggesting that this area might have
been dug out to accommodate the wood pile. This
strip of charred wood might have been either part of
a sub-floor construction or was related to the construction of Wall 8469, which enclosed the apiary
to the south (see below). The goal of this wood was
perhaps to support the gap created by the 1.6 m
height difference between the floor of this space
and that of the apiary to the south. Thus, the strip of
wood, together with Wall 8469, may be explained
as a kind of revetment for the lower terrace on
which the apiary was constructed to the south. The
eastern part of the wood concentration (8443, 8447)
contained many fallen bricks, burnt debris and a
thick layer of phytolith (Photo 12.142), inside of
which was the lower part of a very large krater (Fig.
13.50:1) and several loomweights.
At the eastern end of Room 4445 was a short
north–south line of bricks (8441) standing only two
courses high; its northern end terminated in a complete brick, while its southern end appears to have
been cut (Photo 12.142). Although these bricks
were on line with the middle row of hives in the
apiary to the south, no connection between them
was found. This segment of bricks could have been
a low partition or part of a wall that had been dismantled.
To the east of Wall 8441, a probe in the eastern part of Square Z/3 revealed a layer of destruction debris, fallen bricks, wood and phytolith (11429) that rested on a reddish layer (11450) at 85.20 m and abutted Wall 8469 (very poorly preserved here; Photo 12.160), a sequence similar to that in the south of Room 4445. It seems that this was the continuation of the wood and reddish debris layer in the south of that room and might have been related to the eastern row of hives in the apiary, revealed to its south. Most probably, this matrix abutted the western face of Wall 9453 and its corner with Wall 8469, although the point of contact remained unexcavated.
Building CH was comprised of two excavated
rooms (2455, 2451) that adjoined Building CG on
the south (Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20) (Photo 12.143);
its southern part was beyond the limit of the excavation
and to its east was the apiary. This structure
apparently functioned as a service wing for the
apiary, perhaps used for the processing of the
products and/or for administrative work (Fig. 12.47).
Its floors were ca. 1.75 m higher than those of
the apiary itself, although both were contemporary
and related. All the walls of this building were
composed of light and dark gray bricks, incorporating
sporadic yellow bricks. Along the eastern edge of
the two rooms was a sub-floor construction of
wooden beams laid in two to three layers that joined
the rooms to the apiary floor below, described
below.
The western wall (1438) of Building CH,
which was also the eastern wall of Building CJ, was
exposed along 7.5 m and continued to the south
beyond the limit of the excavation. It was built on
top of C-2 Wall 2468 (Photos 12.45, 12.143) and
had wooden beams incorporated in its foundation,
mostly in its northern part (Figs. 12.72–12.74). The
northern wall (1437) was the continuation of the
northern wall of Building CJ. It terminated on the
east just on line with the southern wall (2439) of
Building CG, which it abutted. To the east of this
was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down
towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the
southeastern corner of Building CG, as described
above. Wall 1437 had many small round wooden
beams in its foundation, set perpendicular to the
wall in two layers, above the preserved top of C-3
Wall 4495 (Fig. 12.72; Photos 12.144–12.145).
The eastern part of Building CH collapsed
down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the
southeastern end of Building CG to the north. This
collapsed eastern part of Building CH was superimposed by the western wing of Building CL of
Stratum C-1a (Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–
12.147, 12.149). Although none was found, it is
possible that there had been an eastern closing wall
to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood,
that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden
partition might have closed off this end of the room
that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that
the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a
higher level than the apiary floor below.
The two excavated rooms of Building CH were
separated by Wall 2426, which extended 3.0 m to
the east of Wall 1438, until it was cut by the foundation trench of Wall 2413, the western wall of
Building CL (Photos 12.146–12.147, 12.149). No
entrance between the two rooms was found; perhaps such a connection had been located further to
the east, or each was accessed separately from the
apiary by way of wooden ladders or brick steps.
Wall 2426 was built on top of the northern face of
C-2 Wall 2465 (Photo 12.148). It was horizontal on
its western end, but 1.0 m from its corner with Wall
1438, it collapsed towards the east at an acute
angle; the difference between the level and fallen
parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos
12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto
the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on
their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a,
as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this
area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b.
While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western
part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that
was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. However, Wall 1438, the
western wall of the building, continued to be in use
in Stratum C-1a as the eastern wall of Building CJ
(described above).
Below the destruction debris in the eastern part of
the rooms was a unique construction of wood, two
to three layers deep, 1.4 m wide, and running north
to south along 10 m, the entire exposed length of
the building, from the southern balk of Square Y/1
(where it continued to the south beyond the limit of
the excavation) up to Wall 1437 and the subsidiary
balk to its east in Square Y/2, where it intersected
with the perpendicular beams in the foundation of
Wall 1437 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.3,
12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148–12.149). The wood
continued to the north under Wall 1437
and apparently ran under Wall 2439 (collapsed at this point)
to join with the sub-floor wood in Room 2441 in
Building CG, showing that the two buildings had
been constructed at the same time.
The wood that ran along the eastern edge of
Rooms 2451 and 2455 was obviously constructed
before the floors were laid and before Wall 2426
was built. Just north of Wall 2426, the strip of wood
cut C-2 Wall 2465. The eastern part of the wooden
construction sloped down towards the east, particularly in the southern part (Square Y/1); the height of
the top of the wood in the west was 86.25 m, while
the height of its top in the east was 85.50 m, a 0.75
m difference over 1.4 m. The wood was comprised
mostly of tree trunks and branches, all found
charred and carbonized.
In the northern room (2455), the wood was laid
in two layers, with a 0.2 m-deep reddish fill
between them; the uppermost layer ran north–south
and was composed of relatively large beams, while
the layer below, less well defined, ran both north–
south and east–west, creating a kind of a weave.
There was a 1.0 m gap between this strip of wood
and the wood in the foundation of Wall 1438 (Figs.
12.45–12.46; Photos 12.144, 12.148). No wood
was found to the east of this strip and it was laid on
top of layer of whitish material, possibly very burnt
wood or bricks, located directly above the preserved tops of Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496. It
is suggested that these walls served as a support for
the wood (see further below).
In the southern room (2451), the wood construction consisted of three tiers whose eastern part
was markedly stepped (Photo 12.149). Like in
Room 2455, the wood was laid alternately north–
south and east–west (Fig. 12.45) and did not join
with the wood in Wall 1438, except for one beam
that protruded from the wall in the northwestern corner of the room. Like in the northern
room, underneath the wood was a white layer
which was laid on top of a Stratum C-3 gray-brick
wall (4480).
Two alternatives are suggested to explain this
construction. The first is that this descent could
have been wooden steps, wood that supported brick
steps, or a sloping ramp, leading down to the apiary
floor on the east. This suggestion is supported by
the relatively orderly manner in which the tiers of
wood were laid (Fig. 12.45; Photos 12.143–12.144,
12.146, 12.148). The alternative explanation is that
the wood, as found, was fallen, and that originally it
had served as a roof and support beams of a hollow
space below it, forming a basement in Building CH.
Such a basement may have been bordered on the
west by re-used C-3 Wall 4495 and perhaps by a
wood construction built on that wall, while in the
east, it could have been left open towards the
apiary, with only a few wooden posts supporting
the roof (see suggested reconstruction in Fig.
12.47c). The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have
been partly built above this basement, which would
explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a
level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74).
The destruction of this structure and the bricks of
Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created
the slope of this layer as found. The height of this
basement can be calculated by comparing the floor
to the west (2451, 1515, levels 86.20–86.40 m) to
the top level of the gray walls of Stratum C-3 (4480,
4495, 4496) that were found below the charred
beams (85.14–84.85 m), since we surmise that
these walls served as a support for this basement.
This difference in levels (maximum 1.55 m) should
also include the floor of the basement and the thickness of the wood construction that supported the
floor above it, that later collapsed. Thus, the subfloor space itself could not have been more than ca.
1.0 m high. According to this reconstruction, this
basement could have had two components: 1)
underneath the northern room (2455), a narrow
space located in the area above Stratum C-3 Walls
4495 and 4496 (Fig. 12.47a) and 2) underneath the
southern room (2451), a narrow space that would
have been open towards the apiary (Fig. 12.47b).
Alternatively, it is possible that this entire area was
one long space, possibly continuing to the north
into Building CG, as suggested above (Fig.
12.47d). The roof of this alcove would have been
the collapsed tiers of wood on the eastern end of the
wooden construction in the south. The low ceiling
of this basement would suggest that these spaces
could have served for storage of commodities in
containers. The postulated space below Room 2441
of Building CG (described above) might have been
a continuation of the same phenomenon.
The southern room (2451) was at least 3.3 m from
north to south, as its southern border was beyond
the limits of the excavation (Photos 12.143,
12.149). Like the room to the north, the eastern end
collapsed to the east and was covered by Stratum
C-1a Building CL.
The floor of this room was identical to that of
Room 2455, both in its composition of burnt powdery white lime and the reddish sub-floor material,
as well as the strip of wooden beams on its eastern
end. Here too, it is surmised that below the floor in
this room there was a basement, as described
above.
On the floor was a thick layer of destruction
debris with fallen bricks, ceiling material, charcoal
and ash, concentrated mainly in the west and south
of the room. Fifteen vessels were found in this
room (of which only a part was excavated), as well
as other finds (Table 12.21).
The area to the east of Building CH in Squares Y– Z, A/1–2, 20 was occupied by an apiary of industrial scope, which included three north–south rows of unfired clay hives, separated by elongated aisles. The stratigraphy and general spatial organization of the apiary will be described below, while the structure and makeup of the hives, as well as additional details and illustrations, are presented in Chapter 14A. Three scientific studies of the apiary are presented in Chapters 14B–14D, and discussions of the apiary’s operation, historical context, and ethnographic comparisons are presented in Chapter 14E.
Due to the broad expanse of this space, as well as
the very nature of the industry, which contained
over a million bees, we assume that this had been an
open area, although it is probable that each row of
hives was roofed with thatch or other material, such
as cloth or clay, to shield them from the intense heat
in the summer or from the rains in the winter.
The apiary was bordered by Wall 9453 on the
east, Building CH on the west, and Wall 8469 of
Building CM on the north. It extended to the south
beyond the limit of the excavation in Square Z/20
and thus, it measured 9.0–9.5 m from east to west
and at least 13.0 m from north to south, an area of
117–123.5 sq m
The eastern wall of the apiary was Wall 9453, which was on line with Wall 6408 of the northeastern complex (Squares A/4–5; Fig. 12.18), demonstrating the integral city plan of Stratum C-1b. It was a well-built wall, preserved to five courses and very burnt, that ran for 16.4 m, serving as both the eastern wall of the apiary and the western wall of Building CP (early phase), while on its northern end (preserved to ten courses, not burnt), it was both the western wall of Building CZ and, most likely, the eastern wall of Building CM. Above it was C-1a Wall 9406, that served as the western wall of both Buildings CP and CQ3 (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 9453 was abutted on the west by the destruction debris and floor of the apiary (9451); a perpendicular wooden beam in its foundation extended into the floor. The southern end (in Square A/1; Fig. 12.39) contained a section with some irregular bricks, possibly an entrance leading to the lower phase of Building CP on the east (Photos 12.153, 12.234). Just at this point, it was abutted by a 2.0 m-long strip of narrow bricks fronted by a patch of small stones on the floor level that might have served as a step up to this entrance. The western face of the wall was covered with a hard brownish-yellow mud plaster, while its bricks were mostly brown and gray and of a very hard consistency, possibly due to the fire that engulfed this area
Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition, perhaps constructed in conjunction with the deep strip of wood to its north (at the southern end of Building CM) described above, which both abutted the northern side of this wall and penetrated down to a level below its foundation (Fig. 12.78; Photos 12.142, 12.151, 12.154, 12.160). The wall was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). The highest level of its central segment was just about on line with the highest preserved top of the hives (Photos 12.151, 12.156–12.157). Between the floating level of this wall and the apiary floor was a 0.15 m thick layer of brown-earth fill that also filled a narrow channel that ran along the southern face of the wall (Photos 12.151, 12.156, 12.159). The eastern end of Wall 8469, north of the eastern row of hives, was so poorly preserved that only a narrow strip of pulverized pinkish material could be identified, although a few complete fallen bricks to the west and east of these hives might have belonged to it (Photo 12.157). As mentioned above, Wall 8469 was most likely not a free-standing element, but rather a kind of buttress attached to the wood construction to its north, both creating a single, quite massive construction that separated Building CM on the north from the apiary to the south. This might have been due to the difference in level of 1.3–1.5 m between these two units, with Wall 8469 and the wood construction serving as kind of terrace or retaining wall between them.
The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary.
Building CH bordered the
apiary on the west, to the south of the aforementioned corner of Building CG. As described in
detail above, its walls and floors were on a higher
level than the apiary floor by some 1.7 m, built
above a wooden construction that was founded on
Stratum C-3 gray-brick walls (4480, 4495, 4496),
creating a roofed area below Building CH, perhaps
open towards the apiary on the east (Fig. 12.47c).
The apiary floor ran up to the eastern faces of Walls
4480 and 4496 (Figs. 12.72–12.73; Photos 12.17,
12.158), and possibly to Wall 5483 on the south. A
thin layer of eroded gray debris (4499) from these
walls was found right on top of the floor (4469,
5440, 7481) in this southwestern section of the
apiary (Figs. 12.86–12.87). It is surmised that when
the builders of Building CH and the apiary dug
down to this level, they encountered these earlier
walls and reused them as a support for the wooden
construction that bordered the building on the east
and as the western edge of the apiary. In spite of the
differences in the floor level of ca. 1.7 m, the apiary
was most likely related to Building CH, which
might have served as its service wing, as proposed
above.
Thus, the apiary was surrounded (at least) on
three sides by built units, and was established on a
lower level than those structures on its west and
north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining
units were built more or less on the same level,
judging by the floor levels.
As noted above, no remains of Stratum C-2 were
identified in the probe made below the apiary floor
(Figs. 12.80, 12.82), and, in fact, C-3 walls were
found directly relating to this floor (Figs. 12.72–
12.73). The reason for the lack of C-2 remains was
most likely related to the low level of the apiary; it
appears that the builders dug down to this level to
create this broad cavity for their industry, obliterating all traces of the previous phase, until they
encountered remains of an even earlier occupation,
C-3, which they utilized to some degree, as
described in detail above and below. It should be
noted that Stratum C-2 remains were revealed east
of the apiary under Building CZ (in Squares A–
C/2–3 (Figs. 12.7, 12.15). Wall 11471 of Stratum
C-2 was cut in this place by Wall 9453, which
served as the eastern boundary of the apiary. Thus,
Stratum C-2 remains were found to the north, west
and east of the apiary, but not within its confines.
The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the
western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b
Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to
east, while the same level of destruction debris
found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos
12.150–12.151). Stratum C-1a Building CL was
built directly above this ca. 1.0 m-deep layer of collapsed bricks and burnt destruction debris that covered the apiary (Photo 12.146) and thus, the
attribution of the apiary to Stratum C-1b is secure.
The level of the apiary floor ranged from 84.50–
84.70 m. It was composed of three different
matrices (Photos 12.150–12.152, 12.158), all of
which were covered by the same destruction debris
and collapse (Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.81, 12.83–
12.87).
The first type of floor was made of dark red
smooth clay, found in the space between Wall 9453
and the eastern row of hives (8482, 9451; 84.55–
84.60 m) (Photos 12.152–12.158). It had many
black burnt patches, especially on its northern end.
In the center of this part of the floor was a hive
(8500) that appeared to have fallen from the eastern
row.
The second type of floor was made of very
hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick,
found in the aisle between the eastern and middle
rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle
between the middle and western rows of hives
(Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). This floor was
covered in part by a thin layer of soft reddish material,
identical to the fill in other Stratum C-1b buildings in
which the wood was set. It is notable that the
hives were set ca. 0.15–0.3 m above this hard white
floor and red layer, on top of a loose brown-earth
fill that included many bones, some sherds and
pieces of wood (Fig. 12.81; Photos 12.152,
12.156). This was the same material seen under the
foundation of the northern wall (8469) and in a
narrow channel running along its southern face
(Photos 12.151, 12.159). The destruction debris in
the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed
bricks, rested directly on this floor. The very hard
and thick matrix of this floor seems to have served a
purpose related to the work in the hives, since it
was concentrated mainly in that area. The reason
for the fill between the floor and bottom of the
hives must have been technical, related to drainage
and ventilation; perhaps the large amount of bones
in this fill served this purpose. In several places,
particularly in the middle row of hives, we found
evidence for charred beams that separated the hives
from the floor, suggesting that in some places, the
hives were located on a level raised by wood.
Another interesting feature in the hard white floor
between the middle and eastern rows (8436) was a
sunken area adjoining the floating level of the
three northernmost hives in the middle row and
abutting the floating level of Wall 8469 to its north
(Photos 12.156, 12.159). This sunken area measured 0.6×1.2 m and was 0.1 m deep; it was lined
with the same hard white material as the floor
showing that they were constructed together, and
was filled with the same loose brown fill as the
channel that ran alongside Wall 8469 and that was
placed under the hives.
An enigmatic feature identified under the
southern end of the middle row of hives (seen in the
northern balk of Square Z/1) was a round area of
eroded gray brick material, 0.5 m in diameter,
which was cut into the hard white floor and penetrated into the upper pink layer of the Stratum C-3
accumulation under the apiary (Photo 12.20). It is
possible that this was a pit, related in some way to
the construction of the hives. This further supports
the relationship between the hard white floor and
the hives themselves.
The third floor type was a soft powdery matrix
of vivid red color, found in the southwestern part of
the apiary (Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.152, 12.158). It
merged with the hard white floor just south of the
western row of hives and west of the southern part
of the middle row of hives (4469); it continued to
the southwest (7481) to abut Walls 4495 and 4480,
as well as to the southern part of the apiary in
Squares Y–Z/20 (5440, 9455, 9458). In the probes
excavated below the apiary floor in the area south
of the three rows of hives (Squares Y–Z/1; Figs.
12.4, 12.82; Photos 12.19–12.20), it was seen that
this red powdery layer continued to the east and
south underneath the hard white tufa floor
described above. It thus seems (as suggested above)
that the tufa floor was laid above the soft red floor
of Stratum C-3, possibly to provide a substantial,
non-permeable surface for the hives and the related
activity, while in the west, where there were no
hives, there was no need for such a surface. The
question remains whether the builders of the apiary
reused the Stratum C-3 floor that they encountered
(along with the gray-brick walls) when digging
down to the level on which they intended to establish the apiary, or whether this was a new floor laid
in Stratum C-1b when the apiary was built. Since
there was no other floor below that abutted the C-3
gray walls, it seems that the former possibility is
more viable. What is clear is that both types of
floors — the hard white and the soft red — were
used together for the duration of the operation of
the apiary and were found covered with the same
layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and pottery.
To the west of the middle row
of hives in Squares Y–Z/1–2 were a number of pits
that were dug from this red floor, as most of them
were lined with this same material (Photos 12.150–
12.152, 12.158–12.159). Very little pottery was
recovered from these pits (Fig. 12.62:4–13), aside
from 8496, which contained a large amount of redpainted pottery and a few red-slipped and handburnished sherds. It is difficult to phase these pits
and, ultimately, it depends whether the red floor
was a Stratum C-1b addition or was originally laid
in Stratum C-3 and reused.
These pits included (from north to south):
This building, only party excavated in Squares A–
C/2–3, was composed of a central space flanked by
two rooms on the western side and at least one
room on the eastern side; it might be considered a
variation of a courtyard house. Its borders on the
north and east were beyond the limit of the excavation, yet it appears that it was bordered on the north
by an unexcavated earlier phase of the Stratum
C-1a street. In that case, it may be assumed that the
building could not be much larger than the parts
excavated. On the west, it was probably attached to
Building CM, and its southwestern corner abutted
the northeastern corner of the apiary. On the south,
the neighboring building was the early phase of
Building CP, with a double wall between the two
(Photo 12.161). Its external measurements were at
least ca. 7.5×12 m. In the southeastern corner of
Building CZ was an opening leading south into
Building CP (early phase) (Photos 12.165, 12.168).
The walls of Building CZ, built of gray and
brown bricks, were well preserved in the western
part, up to a height of up ten courses above the
floors (Photo 12.163).
The central space of this building was bounded on
the south by Wall 11421, on the southeast by Wall
10500, on the west by Wall 11407, and on the north
probably by the continuation of Wall 11455, which
is known only in the western part of the building.
Since Wall 10500 cornered with Wall 10518 and
did not continue to the north (Photos 12.161–
12.162, 12.164), a large L-shaped space was created, most likely an unroofed courtyard, which was
6.2 m from north to south, 3.6 m wide at its
southern part, and at least 7.5 m from east to west in
its northern part; it thus measured at least 41 sq. m.
Wall 11421 was first built in Stratum C-2 (see
above) and was reused in Stratum C-1b, since the
debris and floor (11422, 11442) related to this
stratum abutted it above the debris attributed to
Stratum C-2, some 0.5 m lower. The northern wall
(11458) of the adjacent Building CP was built flush
against Wall 11421; it was preserved three courses
higher than Wall 11421 (Photos 12.165, 12.168)
and, in fact, the layer of fallen bricks and debris that
filled the courtyard abutted these top courses, as
well as the top courses of Wall 11421. It seems that,
at one point, the upper part of Wall 11421 had been
removed in its center and eastern end, revealing the
northern face of Wall 11458 and making it the
southern border of this space.
The floor identified in the central part of the
courtyard (11422, 11426, 11442) was composed of
somewhat patchy red and gray striations that sloped
down from east to west in the southern part near
Wall 11421, but were horizontal in the northern part
(north of the line of Wall 10518). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard, just east of the
entrance into Room 11449 was a pit (11456) lined
with very hard gray mud plaster; it contained only a
few sherds. In the area to the north of Wall 10518
(the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a
0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris
(11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone
fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds,
many of them red slipped and hand burnished.
There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor
level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by
the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower
level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a
Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and,
in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX
were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of
the courtyard (Photo 12.167).
In the southeastern part of this building was Room
11404 (internal measurements 2.1×3.25 m; 6.8 sq
m) (Photos 12.162, 12.165). The room was
bounded on the south by Wall 11421 and on the
north and west by Walls 10500 (1.3 m long) and
10518 (2.4 m long), the latter revealed directly
below the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX
(Photos 12.176, 12.180–12.181). The eastern wall
was not revealed, but it was most likely located
close to the edge of the excavation, just below C-1a
Wall 10490, continuing the line of the short segment of a wall (11479) revealed to the south in
Square C/2, belonging to the early phase of
Building CP (Fig. 12.39; Photos 12.165, 12.168).
This small room had three entrances. The
western entrance, 0.8 m wide, led to the room from
the southern part of the courtyard. The other two,
also 0.8 m wide, were opposite each other on the
eastern ends of Walls 10518 and 11421. The former
led to the northeastern part of the L-shaped courtyard, while the latter led to Building CP (early
phase) by way of an identical entrance in Wall
11458, the northern wall of that building (Photos
12.165, 12.168). The room with three openings is
unparalleled in other buildings and may indicate
some special function, possibly for transit between
Buildings CZ and CP.
This room contained a large amount of fallen
bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor
was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the
north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of
the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls
The western wing of this unit contained two square
rooms of identical size: Room 11449 on the south
and Room 11457 on the north, each with internal
measurements of 2.4×2.4 m; 5.8 sq. m (Photos
12.161, 12.163). The western boundary of both
rooms was the northern continuation of Wall 9453,
which was the wall between the apiary and the early
phase of Building CP. A distinct fill (0.08 m thick)
separated this wall from the Stratum C-1a wall
above it (9406) (Fig. 12.95; Photo 12.163). Wall
11412 separated the two rooms and Wall 11407
bordered both on the east; openings in both ends of
this wall led to the courtyard on the east. Wall
11455 bordered the northern room on the north and
Wall 11427 on the south; both were superimposed
by Stratum C-1a Walls 10472 and 10482 of
Building CQ3, respectively (Photo 12.164).
The floors in the two western rooms were made
of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in
the eastern part of the building. They were covered
by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen
bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room
and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with
large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of
sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished
sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively
large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron
Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the
fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of
Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. After removal of the
floor of Room 11449, the top of an earlier wall
(11471) built of hard yellow bricks was uncovered
at level 84.85 m and attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig.
12.14; Photo 12.163).
The floors of C-1a Building CQ3, located 1.45
m above those of Stratum C-1b, sealed the debris
and the tops of the walls in these rooms (Photos
12.171, 12.173, 12.176). Notably, the floor level in
these two rooms (84.85–84.90 m) was only 0.15–
0.2 m higher than the floor of the apiary that abutted
the eastern face of Wall 9453, showing that this
building was built on the same low level as the
apiary, as opposed to the higher elevation of Buildings CM, CG and CH to its north and west.
It was deliberated whether Building CZ might
be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. In
favor of this assessment were the following arguments: 1.) the building’s walls were preserved to
11–12 courses, just like other Stratum C-2 structures to the north and west (e.g., Building CB);
2.) its levels and stratigraphic situation were similar
to those of nearby Room 6515 and other remains in
Squares A–B/4–5, which we attributed to Stratum
C-2 (Figs. 12.7, 12.12), although they were found
right below C-1a Building CQ1, just as Building
CZ was found just below C-1a Building CX;
3.) Building CZ was filled with fallen bricks and
relatively empty of finds, like most C-2 structures.
In contrast, the following arguments were in favor
of the attribution of Building CZ to Stratum C-1b:
1.) it shared a wall (9453) with the apiary of
Stratum C-1b; 2.) we assume that Building CX
above it was founded in Stratum C-1a, since no
traces of an earlier phase were identified in that
building; 3.) while the walls of Stratum C-2 were
composed of distinct hard yellow bricks, the walls
of Building CZ were built of the typical gray and
brown bricks found in Stratum C-1b; 4.) Wall
11471, found below the floor of the southeastern
room of Building CZ (Fig. 12.15; Photo 12.163),
was constructed of the C-2 brick type and apparently penetrated below Wall 9453 to its west.
This dilemna remains unsolved and both possibilities pose questions. If we attribute Building CZ
to Stratum C-2, we would need to understand Wall
9453, the eastern boundary of the apiary, as a
reused C-2 wall, and this has no other support, particularly in light of the lack of C-2 elements in the
area of the apiary. We would also have to assume
that either Building CZ continued to be in use in
Stratum C-1b with insignificant changes, or that
Building CX (the building above Building CZ) was
first erected in Stratum C-1b, which too, lacks evidence (although we suggested the same concerning
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 which, in our view, were
in use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, based on elements such as wood in the foundations and subfloor striations that abutted the walls). The relatively small amount of pottery recovered from
Building CZ is of types that exist in both Strata C-2
and C-1b, and thus does not help to decide the
issue. Thus, we attribute Building CZ to Stratum
C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence.
Building CQ3 (Squares A/2–3) was built above the
western wing of Building CZ. It was bounded on
the north by the street in Squares A–B/4, on the
west by Piazza 2417, on the east by Building CX
(with which it shared a wall) and on the south by
Building CP (partly by a shared wall and partly by a
double wall). It was designated Building CQ3 due
to the similarity of its plan and dimensions to
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2. The external measurements of this building were 5.6×7.2–7.4 m
(including all walls) and its net floor space was ca.
23.5 sq m.
Like Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, CQ3 was
composed of a single large room (10494) and two
small back rooms (10452, 10460). As opposed to
Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, there were two
entranceways in this building; one in its northeastern corner and one in the middle of its western
wall, both 1.2 m wide. The northern entrance
(Photo 12.171) led to the street and was located
directly opposite the entrance into Building CQ1.
The western entranceway led to Piazza 2417; it was
partially paved with bricks, in the foundation of
which was a plank of wood with small round
wooden beams set perpendicularly above it (Photo
12.172). This arrangement was unknown in any
other entranceway and represents a rare use of
wooden beams in Stratum C-1a.
The western wall of this building was Wall
9406 (Fig. 12.95; Photos 12.162–12.163), whose
southern part served as the western wall of Building
CP, indicating that the two buildings were constructed at the same time. The southern wall was
composed of two abutting segments: 9415 on the
west, which was shared with the northwestern room
of Building CP, and 10482 on the east, which
formed a double wall with the northern wall
(10409) of Building CP at this point; this is the only
double wall in the entire southeastern complex in
Stratum C-1a. Wall 10482 had small round wooden
beams in its foundation, similar to those in the
western threshold of the building, and was built
above C-1b Wall 11427 (Photo 12.164). Walls
10482 and 10409 abutted, but did not bond with,
Wall 9448 on their west; this was a constructional
feature and not the result of sub-phasing.
Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of
Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were
preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room
10460 and were flush with the floor level in
Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170,
12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls
were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could
have been done at some point during the lifetime of
the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such
an opening was part of the original plan of both
buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall
10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo
12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3
was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of
C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately
left at a low level in order to allow for passage
between the buildings; see also Wall 10464
(described below). According to A. Mazar, the low
levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part)
resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this
corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely
damaged during the final destruction of this
building or suffered from a late intrusion which
could not be observed in the excavation. According
to this explanation, there had been no passage
between Buildings CP and CQ3.
The northern room’s inner measurements were 3.1×4.4 m; 13.6 sq m (Photo 12.170). As noted above, it had entrances on the north and on the west, as well as two entrances leading to the rooms on its south. The walls, preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). Almost all of the western part of this room was occupied by a unique installation (10505).
The southern end of this installation was composed of a narrow parapet made of
hard-packed brick material, 2.0 m long, 0.2 m wide
and ca. 0.5 m high (Photos 12.170, 12.174–12.175).
Its western end was built on top of a large stone and
was attached to the door jamb of Wall 9406, so that
it bordered the western entrance into the room on its
north.
Attached to the southeastern end of the parapet
was a large gray brick. The area left to the south of
the parapet must have been used as a narrow passageway into the building from the western
entrance, as well as into Room 10452 to the south.
In the floor foundation to the southwest of the brick
parapet was a patch composed of small stones and
chunks of hard brick material (11424; 0.6×0.8 m),
as well as fragments of a lower grinding stone and a
basalt mortar in secondary use. The brick parapet
was built on top of the northern end of these stones
(Photos 12.175–12.176).
To the north of the brick parapet, and occupying the northwestern corner of the room, was a
squarish (1.5×1.7 m) patch of gravelly earth and
reddish brick material, found very burnt. This
square was surrounded by brick material similar to
that of the parapet on its south, while its center contained a paving of sherds and small travertine
stones. On this paving was a storage jar, with its top
half apparently deliberately removed (Fig.
13.133:5; Photo 12.174), containing a large amount
of gray ash; a few scattered loomweights were
found here as well.
The function of this installation remains enigmatic, but the fact that it occupied the western part
of the room points to it having been a major feature
of Building CQ3.
The southwestern room (10452; internal measurements 2.0×2.6 m; 5.2 sq m) (Photo 12.170) was
accessed from the southwestern part of Room
10494 through a 1.2 m-wide entrance in Wall
10417, the northern wall of the room (Photos
12.176–12.177). The room was bordered on the
west by Wall 9406, which was also the western wall
of Building CP to the south, and on the south by
Wall 9415, which was the northern wall of the
western part of Building CP; this demonstrates the
close relationship between the buildings in this
sector. On the east was Wall 10407. All the walls
were covered with a high-quality mud plaster
(Photos 12.177–12.179), similar in makeup to that
found on the walls of Building CP.
The floor (10452) was composed of red clay
interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris
and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or
almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs.
13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored
from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription
on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of)
Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011:
304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A,
No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen
bricks was found against the southern and eastern
walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo
12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular
plastered depression located along the center of the
southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo
12.179).
The southeastern room (10460) was the smallest
(internal measurements 1.8×2.6 m; 4.68 sq m). It
was accessed from Room 10494 through a 1.0 m
wide entrance (Photo 12.170). The room was bordered on the north by Wall 10483, on the west by
Wall 10407, on the south by Wall 10482, and on the
east by Wall 10464, which was also the western
wall of Building CX. A curious feature of the
eastern wall (10464) was its ‘stepped’ preservation.
On the southern end, at its corner with Wall 10482,
it was preserved only 0.15 m above the floor of
Room 10460 along 1.5 m, while halfway through
the room, the wall was preserved some 0.2 m
higher, up to its corner with Wall 10483 (Photos
12.170, 12.173, 12.180); north of this, in Room
10494, the wall was preserved much higher. This
low preservation of the southern end of the wall in
Room 10460 was similar to that of the southern
wall of this room (10482) and western end of Wall
10409 of the adjacent Building CP to the south,
described above. As in that situation, here, too, it
may be asked whether these walls were deliberately
razed in order to allow passage from Room 10460
into the southern part of Building CX on the east,
thus effectively joining these two buildings at one
point during their lifetime. Alternatively, this low
level might be the result of poor preservation,
caused by the destruction of the buildings, which
might have been particularly heavy in the southeastern corner of Building CQ3.
The floor was less well preserved than in the
other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The
room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt
brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds
included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a
storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights
that were concentrated mainly along the western
wall and near the entrance.
Building CP in Stratum C-1a was a large structure
with a unique plan, located in the southeastern
corner of Area C in Squares A–C/20, 1–2 (Photos
12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190). The remains
attributed to Stratum C-1b, which were only partly
excavated, were, in fact, an early phase of the
building, with only minor differences in the walls
discerned in the part of the earlier building that was
exposed, as described above (Photo 12.189). Some
of the walls (e.g., 11477/10457 in the south and
11479/10490 in the east) were, in fact, the same,
with the upper courses of the previous building
reused in Stratum C-1a, now covered with a thick
fine mud plaster, and with new floors laid against
them (Photos 12.193–12.194, 12.196). The eastern
wall of the central rooms (10462, 10485) was new,
built above a gap with fill laid above the earlier wall
(11473) that served as a threshold in the
entranceways in the new wall (Photos 12.191,
12.195). The western wall of the central rooms
(9448, 10480) was also new, built above the earlier
wall (with no gap or fill); here too, the earlier wall
(11470) served as a threshold in the entrances in the
C-1a wall (Photos 12.191, 12.196, 12.219). An
additional difference was the nature and size of the
bricks in the early building, which were larger and
of an extremely hard consistency and gray-white
color; these early walls were not plastered, while
those in the C-1a phase were coated with a fine
thick mud plaster.
In Stratum C-1a, Building CP adjoined
Building CL on the east and Buildings CQ3 and CX
on the south, sharing walls with these buildings
(Photos 12.169–12.170), indicating that all were
built, and possibly functioned, together.
This building was excavated in its entirety
(Squares A–C/20, 1–2). Its external measurements
were 9.2–9.7×12.3 m (ca. 112 sq. m, including
walls) and its internal floor space (including the
benches along the walls) totaled 71.84 sq m. The
walls stood to a height of 1.2 m (on the west) to 0.75
m (on the east) above the floors, and were exposed
just below topsoil.
Building CP was unique in its plan and flow of
internal circulation. Its plan consisted of eight
rooms: two large rectangular central ones (10458,
10476) flanked by three small rooms on the east
(10510, 11441, 11451) and three small rooms on
the west (9449, 9450, 10506). The three eastern
rooms had entrances in their northwestern corners
that accessed the central rooms. Two of these
(11441, 11451) also had entrances in their northeastern corners (on line with the western
entrances), leading in from an assumed street or
courtyard on the east; all these entrances were 1.3
m wide, except for the western one in the middle
room, which was 1.1 m wide. Thus, each of the central rooms could be approached separately from
outside the building, as well as from the inside. The
three small rooms in the western wing were accessible from the two large central rooms: two of them
(10506, 9450) were entered from the southern
central room (10476), while the northern one
(9449) was entered from the northern central room
(10458). Rooms 9449 and 9450 were joined by an
entrance, thus enabling circulation between the
southern and the northern wings of the building via
these two small rooms. On the other hand, the
southwestern small room (10506) could be
accessed only through the southern central room
(10476), and the northeastern small room (10510)
could be accessed only through the northern central
room (10458), creating a symmetry to the building
that was marred only by the difference of accessibility in the eastern rooms and minor differences in
room sizes. It is notable that six of the seven
entrances found in this building were located in the
corners of the rooms; the only entrance located in
the center of a wall was the one connecting Rooms
9450 and 9449 in the western wing.
All the walls were covered with plaster and the
floors were made of fine red clay mixed with
smooth black burnt material. In Rooms 10458,
10506, and the southeastern part of 11451, the
floors were set on a mud-plaster bedding (Photos
12.207–12.209) and in Rooms 10506, 10476 and
10510, they were set on a sub-floor brick construction (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.194,
12.200, 12.219).
A wide range of many complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.143–13.160) and numerous
objects (Table 12.24), as well as a large amount of
grain, were found in the 0.8 m-deep destruction
debris on the floors, as detailed below and in
Chapter 45.
The northern room of the eastern wing (Photos
12.197–12.198, 12.200) measured internally
2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m. Its eastern wall (10490) was
built above C-1b Wall 11479, while its northern
wall (10409) was built above C-1b Wall 11458
(Photo 12.193). This room was accessed only
through an entrance in Wall 10462 that led from the
northern central room (10458).
The floor in this room was identical to the
others throughout Building CP, composed of red
clay mixed with black burnt material. It sloped
down from west to east, from 86.20 to 85.98 m; the
western elevation was higher than the other floors
in the building, perhaps because just underneath the
burnt floor makeup on the west were two concentrations of bricks, one in the southwestern corner of
the room and the other in the northwestern corner,
just inside the entrance (Fig. 12.52c). The latter
(11478) was a rectangle measuring 0.6×1.2 m, ca.
0.1 m high. The bricks in the southwestern corner
were more sporadic (Photos 12.189–12.190,
12.197). These are understood as a sub-floor construction, similar to those found in the southwestern
part of the building, described below.
The room was full of burnt destruction debris
(10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact
four-legged incense burner with a matching lid
(Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds
(Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was
found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458,
apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items
were found above the sub-floor brick construction
in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the
room.
The middle room of the eastern wing measured internally 2.2×2.8 m (6.16 sq m) (Photos 12.197, 12.200, 12.202). Like the southern room, it had entrances in its northeastern and northwestern corners. The floor (11441) was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl.
The southern room of the eastern wing (internal measurements 2.6×2.8 m; 7.28 sq m) had an entrance in its northeastern corner and another one opposite it that led into Room 10476 on the west (Photos 12.197, 12.202–12.203). A notable feature of the eastern entrance was the molding of the door jambs; the inner (western) northern end of Wall 11440 was nicely molded to a curved shape (Photo 12.204) and the southern end of Wall 11417 that faced the entrance was also curved, although less well preserved. The walls in this part of the room were covered with fine gray-whitish plaster, somewhat different from the light brown mud plaster that coated the other walls of this building. The floor of this room was composed of red clay interspersed with smooth black burnt material. The southeastern part of the floor contained a layer of plaster, identical to that on the walls, below the red and black floor makeup. Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206).
The central part of the building included two large rectangular rooms of similar size: Room 10458 on the north and Room 10476 on the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190, 12.207).
The northern central room measured internally
4.0×4.7 m; 19 sq m (Photo 12.208). The main
entrance to this room was from Room 11411 on the
east, while two other entrances led into Rooms
10510 and 9449, the latter creating a connection to
the southern wing of the building. The floor was
higher by 0.25–0.35 m than that in Room 9449 to
the west and Room 11441 to the east, but was
almost the same as that of Room 10510 on the
northeast.
The preservation of the northern and eastern
walls was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north
(which was also the southern wall of Building CX)
was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length,
but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m
before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference
was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush
with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower
western end adjoined the southern face of Wall
10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved
to the same low height. As mentioned above in the
discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to
explain this feature: either there was a deliberate
lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458
into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation
was due to damage caused by the destruction or by
some unrecognized later intrusion. A 0.4 m wide
bench (10463), composed of terre pisé and partially
plastered, was built along the southern face of
Wall 10409, running 2.4 m from exactly where
Wall 10409 was cut on the west, almost up to the
entrance into Room 10510 on the east (Photo
12.208). Two bricks laid on the western end of
Bench 10463 were on the same low level as the
western end of Wall 10409; their function is not
known. Following a 0.7 m gap was yet another
brick, set into the corner of Walls 9448 and 10409,
found floating 0.1 m above the level of the plastered floor in the western part of this room (10498)
(Photo 12.209). The low western end of Wall 10409
abutted, but did not bond with, the western wall
(9448) of the room.
The eastern wall (10462) of Room 10458 was
different than the others in its composition, being
built of similar terre pisé as Bench 10463. It was
preserved to only 0.20 above the floor in the south
and 0.40 m in the north. The corner of Wall 10462
with Wall 10405 (the southern wall of the room)
was not well bonded; the latter was preserved to a
height of 0.65 m, similar to that of the northern wall
of this room.
Running along the eastern face of Wall 9448
and ending on the north at the entrance into Room
9449, was yet another bench (10454), built of
crumbly yellow bricks, 0.5 m wide, 1.6 m long and
ca. 0.2 m high (Photos 12.208–12.209).
The floor of the room (10458) was composed
of reddish-brown earth mixed with black ash; in the
western part of the room, it was laid 0.05–0.08 m
above a layer of hard mud plaster (10498) (Photos
12.208–12.209). This plaster was identical to that
found under the floor of Rooms 10506 and 11451,
as well as on most of the walls in this building; it
was concentrated in the area between the lower
western end of Wall 10409 on the north and along
the line of Oven 10430, just north of Wall 10405, on
the south (the contours of this plaster are marked on
the plan; Fig. 12.52a). Depressions in the plaster
accommodated the rounded contour of the stone
mortar, as well as two of the pottery vessels just
north of Oven 10430. The plaster-bedding layer
was laid on top of a layer of soft light brown earth
with very few sherds (11461), which seems to have
been a leveling fill laid above the C-1b remains.
The room was full of a layer of burnt
destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded
brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed
ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained
23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels
and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower
grinding stone was found just to the southwest of
the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration
of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the
northwestern corner of the room, above the lower
western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the
brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo
12.214); a few additional loomweights were found
dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454
along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found
upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and
a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this
bench was a dense concentration of finds that
included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos
(Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it
(Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a
large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a
smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down
towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a
group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars
(Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand
adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35,
No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding
stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into
the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north
(Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498)
in the western part of the room included a few small
upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well
as several loomweights and sherds.
The southern central room measured internally
3.6×4.6 m (16.6 sq m) (Photo 12.215). The main
entrance to this room was from Room 11451 on the
east, while two other entrances led into Rooms
10506 and 9450, the latter creating a connection to
the northern wing of the building (Photos 12.189–
190, 12.203, 12.215). Since Room 9450 was joined
to Room 9449, one could pass between the southern
and northern parts of the building by way of these
two small rooms.
Room 10476 was bordered on the east by the
southern end of Wall 10462 and its continuation to
the south, which was designated a separate number
(10485) because it was built of discernible bricks,
as opposed to the terre pisé of 10462; it was preserved
higher than the latter and its northern end
was covered with molded plaster (Photo 12.216).
The southern wall of the room (10457) ran along
12.2 m; it was located 0.5 m north of the southern
wall of adjoining Building CL on the west, indicating that although they ran more or less along the
same line, these were two separate walls. The
northern wall (10405) separated the two large central rooms. All these walls were found standing to a
height of 0.6–1.0 m and were covered with mud
plaster.
The floor was made of soft reddish-brown
earth, interspersed with black ash. Just below the
floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of
closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of
the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219).
Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part,
most of the bricks were missing, although it is not
clear whether this area had never been constructed
or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On
the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and,
in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls
belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo
12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top
of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b
Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468
was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like
the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms
10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to
have been a building technique intended to provide
reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to
protect against rodents in certain places (compare a
similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room
8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in
this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig.
13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a
unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor
above it (Photo 12.221).
Benches were constructed along the northern
and western walls. Bench 10466, 3.6 m long, 0.6
wide and ca. 0.25 m high, ran along the northern
wall (10405); the plaster on this wall joined the
plaster that covered the bench. This bench was built
directly above C-1b Wall 11472, utilizing the top of
this wall as its foundation. On this bench were three
cooking pots (Figs. 13.147:1, 3; 13.149:6), one jug
(Fig. 13.155:4), four juglets (Fig. 13.156:19, 24–
25) and two loomweights (Photo 12.217). Bench
10467, 1.7 m long, 0.5 m wide and ca. 0.15 m high,
was rather poorly preserved along the western wall
(10480); a jug (Fig. 13.155:7), a seal (Chapter 30,
No. 32), a bead, a loomweight and a scoria scraper
were found on it (Photo 12.218). In the northeastern
corner of the room, Installation 10468 was composed of bricks set on their narrow side around a
circular mud-plastered receptacle (Photo 12.217).
Inside the plastered depression were two cooking
pots stacked together, a very small one (Fig.
13.148:9) on the bottom and a medium-sized one
(Fig. 13.148:4) on top of it.
Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction
debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster,
ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of
ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the
room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix
(Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the
destruction debris were found in situ (some intact)
on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds
(Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the
southern half of the room (10493) contained much
less pottery than in the north and center, mostly
concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A
unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall
10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room
10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the
same wall in the southwestern corner of Room
10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos
12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its
top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with
0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup.6 It
was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base,
and contained a large amount of charred grain
(Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large
pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its
upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221–
12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and
against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the
east of the pithos was a concentration of 85
loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a
concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains
of charred wood here might represent a loom. A
few vessels were found in the entrance leading
from the east, mostly against the plastered southern
doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large
and heavy stone was found upside down, just under
topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction
debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451
(Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small
depression carved out of part of its top, in which
some substance was probably ground, judging by
the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the
roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room
11451 to the east, described above.
This was the northern room in the western wing
(internal measurements 2.3×2.8 m; 6.4 sq m)
(Photos 12.207, 12.225). The northern wall (9415)
was also the southern wall of Building CQ3; it cornered with Wall 9406 on the west and with Wall
9448 on the east. Notably, this wall was not on line
with the northern wall (10409) of the large room to
the east, but ran 0.25 m to its north. A 0.5 m-wide
and 0.35 m-high brick bench (9443) was attached to
the southern face of Wall 9415, which was, in fact,
the direct continuation of the line of Wall 10409. Its
top level was ca. 0.1 m lower than the western end
of this wall and it is possible that it constituted the
(as of yet unexposed) western end of Stratum C-1b
Wall 11458 (Fig. 12.48), whose extant top was used
as a bench in this room. At its juncture with Wall
9406, the bench had an extension, protruding to the
south, 0.4×0.6 m, 0.35 m high, with slightly
sloping sides. The walls of the room, as well as the
bench and its extension, were all covered with the
same fine mud plaster. The eastern face of Wall
9406 in this room was very damaged and burnt, as
opposed to its excellent preservation further to the
north (in Building CQ3) and south, as well as on its
western face in Building CL, as described below.
The room had two entrances. A 1.0-m-wide
entrance in the southern end of the eastern wall
(9448) connected this room with the large room
(10458) on the east (Photos 12.189–191, 12.196).
Since the floor of the room to the east was 0.35–0.4
m higher than that of Room 9449, there was a small
step here (Photos 12.196, 12.207). Some charred
wooden pieces found in the entranceway might be
remnants of a step, doorjamb or door. The bench
(10454) with the pottery altar and bowl in Room
10458 to the east adjoined the southern doorjamb of
this entrance. A second entrance, 0.9 m-wide, was
located in the middle of the southern wall, connecting this room with Room 9450. The floor of the
room (9449) was composed of red clay mixed with
soft black burnt material.
The room was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of
dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling
material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418,
9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were
found in this small room, among them 11 storage
jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have
been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east,
but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell
from a second floor. A special find in this room was
an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the
name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307;
Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See
Table 12.24 for other finds.
The middle room in the western wing (internal
measurements 2.4×2.4; 5.76 sq m) was accessed
both from Room 9449 to its north and from the
large room to the east (10476) through a 1.0 m-wide entrance in its southeastern corner (Photo
12.207). The walls were covered with fine mud
plaster. The floor (9450) was composed of red clay
mixed with soft black burnt material. In the southwestern corner of the room was a square brick bin
(9434) (internal measurements 1.0 sq m; 0.6 m
high) (Photos 12.226–12.227). It was coated with a
fine plaster that continued from the surrounding
walls down to line the floor as well. Inside was an
intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in
Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside
another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig.
13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10,
13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone
scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar
was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample
R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812
BCE (2σ).
The entire room was filled with very burnt
destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many
complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling
material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43
restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage
jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room
were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig.
13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of
the pottery in this room, in particular the storage
jars (like in the previous room), were found
smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above
the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ
on the floor. This situation may hint that much of
this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher
shelves. A special item in this room was a horned
pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken
in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo
12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar
was a complete brick, but it appears that this was
fallen and not meant as a support. For additional
finds from this room, see Table 12.24.
The southern room of the western wing (internal
measurements 2.15×2.5 m; 5.4 sq m) (Photos
12.215, 12.229–12.230) could be entered only from
the large room to its east (10476) (Photos 12.203,
12.229). An intact juglet (Fig. 13.156:18) found
leaning against the threshold just inside the room
appeared to have been intentionally placed there
before the floor was laid (Photo 12.233). The
western wall of the room (10513) was the poorly
preserved continuation of Wall 9406 to its north.
The other walls, 9421 on the north, 10457 on the
south and 10480 on the east, were well preserved;
all the walls were covered with fine mud plaster
(Photo 12.229–12.231).
The floor was composed of soft dark earth,
except for the northwestern part, which was composed of the same mud plaster as the surrounding
walls, recalling the plaster in the western part of
Room 10458. This plastered area was 0.15 m
higher than the rest of the room (Photos 12.229–
12.230). Below the earthen floor in the southeastern part of the room, against Wall 10457 and
just underneath the floor where the pottery bin and
pottery ‘bucket’ were found (see below), was a
brick construction (11464), similar to the sub-floor
bricks found in Rooms 10510 and 10476 (Fig.
12.52c). Like in those rooms, this seems to have
been an element related to the construction phase of
the building. A low (0.1 m high) bench (10504)
composed of crumbly brown bricks was built along
part of the western wall (Photo 12.230).
A pottery bin (10501) was set in the southwestern corner of the room (Photos 12.215, 12.223,
12.229–12.232); it was very similar to Bin 10488 in
Room 10476, 3.0 m to its east and set against the
same wall (10457). It stood 0.75 m high, which was
shorter than the other bin; 0.15 m of its base was
sunk into the floor makeup. Like the latter bin, it
was made with thick slabs and restoration showed it
to be trapezoid, with the wider part on top (Photo
12.232; Fig. 13.160:12); it had no base or lid,
although 0.1 m above its bottom was a layer of low-fired clay that was laid down as a kind of floor.
Inside the bin (capacity-93 liters) was a small
amount of burnt grain.
Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt
destruction debris (10484), including complete
fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery
vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red
juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery
items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed
against the center of the southern wall (Photos
12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round
container with a matching lid to its east (Fig.
13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to
the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken.
Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a
naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those
found attached to the altar fragment from Building
CF.
Building CP, with its eight rooms, was the largest and most complex building excavated at Tel Rehov. Many unique features characterized its plan, including the two eastern entrances, the symmetric division into a western and eastern wing flanking central rooms, the plan of circulation, the benches along the walls, the sub-floor brick constructions and the molded plaster on the doorjambs. It contained a large amount of unique pottery items, such as two altars, the Elisha ostracon, containers with lids, a ‘bucket’, a strainer, two free-standing bins, a figurine mold, a stand with petals, and an incense burner with a lid, as well as more than 230 pottery vessels of a wide variety of types (see Chapters 24, 45), all indicating that this building had some special function. The integral relation of Building CP to the smaller buildings to its north (CQ3, CX) and the spacious Building CL to its west, shows that it was part of a greater complex. For further discussion and interpretation, see Mazar (2015) and Chapter 4.
Building CL was constructed above the fallen
bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos
12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235)
and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73–
12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144,
12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner
of this building was built above a leveling fill
(4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the
C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This
was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence
for two superimposed destructions in Area C.
Building CL was composed of two wings, each
comprising two rooms: the external measurements
of the western wing were 3.3×6.5 m (not including
Wall 4443) and those of the eastern wing were
6.5×11.5 m (including walls). The total floor space
was 63 sq m. Although the walls were found
standing to a height of 1.2–1.5 m, no entrances were
located. A passage from the western wing to the
eastern wing may have existed in Wall 4443, close
to its corner with Wall 4481, since here the former
wall was preserved very low. In such a case, the
threshold would have been 0.3 m above the floor.
However, this cannot be determined with certainty
and the location of entrances in this building
remained enigmatic. This building was excavated
in parts during several seasons; the excavated parts
were removed in order to reach Stratum C-1b
below and thus, no general photograph could be
taken.
The southern wall of Building CL ran 0.5 m to
the south of the line of that of Building CP.
However, since the two buildings shared a wall
(9406), it is likely that they were built together. All
the walls of Building CL were founded 0.4–1.0 m
lower than the foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall
1438 in Squares Y/1–2 to the west. This might be
explained by the fact that they were built above the
apiary, which was on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. Perhaps the deeper foundations
were also the result of the need to stabilize these
walls, which were built directly above the collapsed
bricks and burnt debris that covered the destroyed
apiary.
The area to the west and north of Building CL
remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west
(Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer
of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep,
covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of
Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417.
The western wing of the building was about half the
size of the eastern wing, and adjoined only its
southern part. It was composed of a long room on
the north (4435; internal measurements 2.7×3.5 m;
9.45 sq m) and a broad room on the south (5432;
internal measurements 1.5×2.9 m; 4.35 sq m). As
noted above, there was no entrance between the
two.
The western wall (2413) ran for 6.5 m and was
preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed
directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and
collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235)
and also cut the eastern end of Wall 2426 of
Building CH (Figs. 12.73–12.74; Photos 12.146–
12.147). The northern wall (2504) was 3.2 m long;
its eastern end was preserved almost 1.0 m higher
than Wall 4443 with which it cornered on the east
(Photos 12.235–12.236); the reason for this was not
clear. The southern wall (5423 on the west, 9424 on
the east; Photo 12.237) was also the southern wall
of the eastern wing; it was exposed over 7.6 m and
apparently continued to the east to corner with Wall
10513, although this end remained unexcavated.
Wall 4443, joining the eastern and western
wings, ran along 11 m and was preserved to a
height of 1.5 m on its northern half, although up to
only 0.5 m on the south (Squares Y/1, 20) (Photos
12.236, 12.238). The foundation level of this wall
(85.40 m) was 0.3–0.4 m lower than that of Walls
2413 and 2504 (Figs. 12.73, 12.86–12.87). Wall
4481, which separated the two rooms in this wing,
was built directly on top of the concentration of cult
objects (the pottery altar and petal chalice) in the
apiary below.
Both rooms had a distinct floor (4435 in the
northern room, 5432 in the southern room) made of
a 0.3-m-thick layer of soft light-red clay at levels
86.20–85.90 m (Fig. 12.86). A clay female figurine
that most probably had belonged to an altar was
found on the floor in the northeastern corner of
Room 5432. An almost identical figurine was
found in Locus 5446 in the northwestern part of the
eastern wing (Chapter 35, Nos. 6a–b); it is possible
that these two figurines had originally belonged to
the same altar. Room 4435 was filled with burnt
debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of
cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig.
13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room
was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed
with some whitish material, that was concentrated
mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84,
12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall
4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing
(Photo 12.236). This was further evidence that the
southern end of this wall had been deliberately
razed during the course of the use of Building CL,
thus joining the two southern spaces. Alternatively,
the southern end of Wall 4443 had been originally
built as a low screen wall.
The eastern wing was composed of two large rooms
or open spaces: 5449 on the north (measuring internally 5.0×5.35 m; ca. 27 sq. m) and 5482 on the
south (measuring internally 4.2×5.3 m; 22.2 sq m).
Wall 5418, the northern wall, was well preserved to
11 courses, built of gray, brown and yellow bricks
(Photo 12.142), yet it was found severely tilted to
the south, perhaps due to seismic activity (Photos
12.150, 12.152). As noted above, the southern wall
of the eastern wing (9424) continued that of the
western wing. The eastern wall (9406) was also the
western wall of adjoining Buildings CP and CQ3
(Photo 12.192). This latter wall, preserved 14
courses high on its western face, was built directly
above the eastern closing wall (9453) of the
Stratum C-1b apiary (Photos 12.152–12.153,
12.234). Wall 5453, a well-built wall preserved
nine courses high (Photos 12.150–12.153), separated the northern from the southern room, with no
entrance joining them.
The floor of both rooms was made of the same
soft red clay as the western rooms; it was 0.4 m
thick in the north and center (85.70–86.10 m), but
only 0.1 m thick near Wall 5453 (85.65 m) (Figs.
12.83–12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.150–12.151,
12.239). The floor in the southern room (5482), at
levels 85.60–85.70 m, sealed the fallen bricks and
destruction debris of the apiary (Fig. 12.83; Photo
12.150). As noted above, the same black burnt oily
substance mixed with white material that was
found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the
southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in
the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of
Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237–
12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually
large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a
selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray
ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended
near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the
northern part of Room 5449 not burnt.
Both rooms were full of a thick layer of
destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body
sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly
unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs.
13.127–13.128), as were several other objects
(Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated
in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick
with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239).
A curious feature found in the eastern wing of
Building CL was a 0.7–1.1 m-thick layer of light
gray debris (5419 in Square Z/2 and 5427 in Square
Z/1) that sloped down from south to north (Fig.
12.83; Photos 12.150, 12.152). This layer, revealed
just under topsoil, was virtually sterile. It appears to
be either an intentional fill placed in the room following its destruction or possibly, erosion following the destruction and abandonment of the
lower city; the latter explanation seems to be more
plausible. In the topsoil (5402) just above this layer
in Square Z/2 was a fragment of a very large pottery
altar horn (Chapter 35, No. 28).
One has to question whether the two eastern
spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern
room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m,
appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar
bases or any other roof support were found, it may
be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed.
The unique plan of Building CL and lack of domestic installations rule out it having been a dwelling, and it most likely served for some administrative, industrial or storage function. The large amount of bones, as well as their special nature, might allude to some relationship to the cultic practices in the adjacent Building CP. It is difficult to explain the lack of entrances in this building, especially in light of the fact that in the adjacent buildings to the east, entrances were found in all the rooms. A similar lack of entrances was also observed in Building CG (possibly a granary) and in the outer walls of Building CQ2. One possibility is that the excavated rooms were part of a basement floor, entered from a higher level. But such a hypothesis is contradicted by the level of the floors in the adjacent buildings on the east (CQ3, CX, CP), which were only slightly higher than the floors in Building CL. Alternatively, the rooms were entered from the roof by way of ladders or from the roofs of the adjacent buildings. In such a case, the entire ground floor of this building would have been sealed from the outside. All these features indicate the exceptional function of this building.
The architectural sequence of Strata C-4 to C-1a,
ranging from the 11th to the 9th centuries BCE,
demonstrated both continuity and change. This
sequence, however, was not necessarily related to
destruction episodes, as some buildings continued
almost unchanged following their destruction,
while others were demolished and new ones built in
their stead. On the one hand, the use of brick as the
only building material, the general orientation of
the units, the rebuilding of some walls on the same
line, and the density of construction, are continuing
features. On the other hand, innovations included
changes in the type of bricks (but rarely the size)
and the introduction of wooden beams for the construction of wall and floor foundations in Stratum
C-1b.
The substantial and well-preserved building
remains of the two phases of Stratum C-3 in
Squares S/2–4, attributed to Iron IB, are evidence
for a well-constructed and planned city, as also
found in Strata D-5 and D-4 in Area D (Chapter
15). No evidence for a violent destruction of this
level was found. A number of Stratum C-3 walls,
characterized by gray bricks and light-colored
mortar, were rebuilt in Stratum C-2 of the early Iron
IIA on the same lines, but with hard yellow bricks,
as in the cases of Walls 2507, 2506 and 8418 in
Squares S/2–4. This indicates urban continuity
from the late Iron I to the early Iron IIA.
The two pits found in Square R/4 recall a similar feature in Area D (Stratum D-3) in Squares N,
P/4–5 and Q/4, where ca. 45 pits were found above
and cutting through Stratum D-4 architecture; they
were explained as a local feature in this area. Such
pits were not found in any other part of Area C,
except for a few in the apiary (Squares Y/1–2) in
relation to a floor which appears to have originally
belonged to Stratum C-3. Thus, the two pits in
Square R/4 are understood to have belonged to the
same phenomenon as those in Area D at the end of
Iron IB. Above the pits and the floor was a thin
layer of debris, followed by Locus 1555b, a pottery
concentration in the lowest level of a room attributed to a Stratum C-2 (see above).
The division of the Iron IIA into three strata
(C-2, C-1b, C-1a) was first and foremost based on a
clear differentiation between Strata C-2 and C-1 in
terms of overall plan and building techniques. The
well-preserved walls of Stratum C-2 (general
Stratum VI), sometimes standing to a height of 18
courses, were made of typical hard-packed yellow
bricks, differing in their texture from the bricks of
Strata C-1b and C-1a (Tables 12.28–12.30). The
lack of stone foundations and the almost total
absence of wood in the construction were also typical of this stratum. In certain places, we observed
architectural continuity between Strata C-2 and
C-1b, such as in the transition from Building CA to
Building CD, in some of the walls of Building CE,
and, to some extent, between the upper phases of
Building CT, as well as one wall in Building CZ. In
other places, the builders of Stratum C-1b ignored
the earlier walls of Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.16).
In the area of Building CH and the apiary in
Squares T–Z/1–2, Stratum C-1b units were founded
right on top of Stratum C-3 structures of Iron IB,
and even reused walls and floors from this period.
This seems to have occurred due to the intentional
removal of building remains of Stratum C-2 by the
builders of the apiary, who sought to establish it on
a lower level than the rest of the buildings in the
area to its west (CG and CH) and north (CM).
The differentiation between Strata C-1b and
C-1a (general Strata V and IV) was clear in some
cases and unclear in others. These two stratum
numbers refer to the same city that underwent local
destruction and rebuilding in certain places. A
major feature of Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in the foundations of walls
and floors. Often these beams were laid directly on
top of Stratum C-2 structures. Buildings CJ, CF,
CW, CQ1, CQ2 and CG, as well as the room in
Square R/4, were founded, in our view, in Stratum
C-1b, and continued to be in use with only few or
no changes in Stratum C-1a. In contrast, Building
CH and the apiary were used only in Stratum C-1b
and, following a severe destruction, were replaced
by Building CL. Building CD of Stratum C-1b went
out of use and was replaced by an open area in
Stratum C-1a. Likewise, Building CM was
destroyed at the end of C-1b and was replaced by
Piazza 2417 in C-1a. In the southeastern block,
Building CZ of Stratum C-1b went out of use and
was replaced in Stratum C-1a by two new buildings
(CQ3, CX). As discussed in detail above, the possibility that Building CZ could be attributed to
Stratum C-2 was considered, particularly due to the
similarity of its levels to those of the remains under
Building CQ1 to its south that we ascribed to
Stratum C-2. If this was the case, then Building
CQ3 and CX too would have been established in
Stratum C-1b and continued unchanged into
Stratum C-1a, although there is no tangible evidence for this, such as wooden foundations (except
in their thresholds) or floor raisings. Ultimately, we
rejected this possibility and prefer to attribute
Building CZ to Stratum C-1b. To its south,
Building CP of Stratum C-1a was a rebuild of an
earlier building of Stratum C-1b, although this
early stage is insufficiently known due to lack of
excavation.
In a few instances, an extra phase was discerned,
demonstrating the complexity of the stratigraphy in the three main Iron IIA levels. For
example, an earlier phase of Building CR (Squares
Y–Z/6) in Stratum C-1b was detected above the
well-preserved remains of C-2 Building CT. A later
phase was identified in the remains east of Stratum
C-2 Building CB (Squares Y–Z/4). Additional
phases in the courtyard devoted to cooking activity
in Square T/4 were a typical feature of such an open
area. This diversity indicates that each building had
its own history; some continued with no change
from Stratum C-1b to C-1a and others underwent
modifications of varying degrees. The clearest
change between these two strata was in the vicinity
of the apiary and its surroundings in the southeastern part of Area C.
No evidence for violent destruction was found at
the end of Strata C-3 and C-2, and therefore most of
the floors of these levels were found virtually
lacking complete vessels (except in the case of
Locus 1555b in Square R/4). There were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings
by an earthquake, including layers of complete
fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of
the buildings which would have buried vessels, and
perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of
debris. Rather, it could have been an earthquake
that was strong enough to cause severe damage to
the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the
inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and
return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of
Stratum C-1b.
Evidence of severe destruction by fire in
Stratum C-1b was found in the apiary and in
Buildings CH, CG (the southern room), CM, CF and CE.
In Building CG, it remained unclear whether the
destruction of the northern rooms should be attributed
to Stratum C-1b or C-1a. All of these buildings,
except for CF and CE, contained large
amounts of in situ pottery and other objects.
Notably, these structures were located along a
north-south axis running through the center of Area
C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’,
as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation
areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning.
Perhaps the heavy destruction noted in these buildings was caused by a local event, such as deliberate
or unintentional burning by human agency, or by an
earthquake. The latter possibility is suggested in
Chapter 54, based on paleomagnetic testing.
As opposed to this, Stratum C-1a came to an
end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a
fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. The
temperature must have been more than 500
degrees, since it caused partial firing of the brick
courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In
several cases, pottery vessels cracked and became
distorted, with much calcification; for example, the
large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted
by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore.
The incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other
objects found in the houses indicates the sudden
destruction, although a human skeleton was found
in only one place. There was no activity in this area
following the destruction, except one deep pit
(6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the
Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of
finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.
An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris
and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The
walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m
above the floors and their tops were discovered flat
and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil.
While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were
found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem
that there would have been a larger quantity if they
had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and
perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the
disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted
from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower
mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were
probably washed to the southeast towards the
gulley that separates the upper from the lower
mound. A less feasible explanation would be that
bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of
the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the
upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification
wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).
Area C was densely built in all three Iron Age IIA strata, C-2, C-1b and C-1, with houses attached to one another in what can be defined as pre-planned insulae, separated by only a few open spaces.
An open space in Squares S–T/3–4 in Stratum C-2 was at least partly occupied by Building CM in Stratum C-1b (although the eastern part of this area remained unexcavated). In Stratum C-1b, an open area was located south of Building CD, above Building CB of Stratum C-2. In Stratum C-1a, this latter area was expanded and to its east, beyond Building CG, another piazza was created, with a 3.0-m-wide street leading into it from the east, and a somewhat irregular alley from the south. These open spaces seem not to have been related to an individual unit, but rather served as small piazzas surrounded by several buildings. Few installations were located in these open courtyards, for example, ovens found in the cooking area in Square T/4, which was in use throughout all three strata, and a stone formation in the center of Piazza CK in Stratum C-1a.
Evidence for central urban planning can be seen
mainly in the plan of Strata C-1b and C-1a. Two
major walls traverse the entire area from south to
north in a straight line: on the west was Wall 1413,
which ran along 19.8 m and continued both to the
south and the north of the excavated area. In the
eastern part of the area (along the line of Squares
A/20, 1–6), Walls 9453/9406+6408+6497 created
a continuous straight line, intersected by the street
in Squares Z, A–C/4. These two long backbone
walls were not parallel to one another: the western
one ran on a northwest–southeast alignment, while
the eastern wall was due north–south. The distance
between them (outer faces) was 19 m on the south
and 21.5 m along the northern line of Squares R–Z,
A/4, ca. 20 m to the north.
The blocks of houses in all three strata were oriented along virtually the same lines: almost exactly
east–west and north–south, with minor deviations
in the western part of the area, causing trapezoidshaped spaces in the seam between the eastern and
western parts, such as the alley between Walls 2413
and 1438 in Squares T–Y/1–2 in Stratum C-1a or
the passage from the open area in Squares S–T/2–3
to the north, towards the cooking area in Squares S–
T/4 in Stratum C-1b. Evidence of central planning
is also seen in the sharing of walls and the back-toback construction of many units, as discussed in the
next section.
No evidence for the existence of fortifications was found along the western perimeter of the mound in Areas C and D, nor along the northern perimeter, where a probe was excavated in Square Y/9. The westernmost structures of all Iron IIA strata continued into Squares Q/4–5 of Area D (defined there as Strata D-1a, D-1b and D-2), located on the upper slope of the mound, where they disappeared with the erosion line. Although the slope of the mound suffered from severe erosion, as shown by the fact that the eastern sides of the buildings in Area D were missing, it is improbable that an entire city wall was eroded away, and we thus concluded that the city remained unfortified during this entire period.
Throughout all three main Iron IIA strata, a notable
characteristic is the uniqueness of the architecture.
Not only are the buildings quite unlike most of the
typical Iron Age structures known from proximate,
as well as more distant regions, but they also do not
resemble each other. While certain technical features
are repeated, such as size and type of bricks
and the use of double walls, each unit was unique in
its plan, except for three very similar buildings
(CQ1, CQ2, CQ3).
In the discussion of individual buildings, we
presented several parallels: Building CF was compared to part of Building 2081 at Megiddo Stratum
VA–IVB, and Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 were
compared to several buildings from 13th–11th centuries BCE contexts at Hazor Stratum XIII, Tell
Abu-Hawam Stratum IV, Tel Batash Stratum VI
and Aphek Stratum X11. Building CA was compared to part of Building 200 at Hazor Strata X–IX,
and Building CY (and to some extent, also Building
CZ) to a type of building with a central space
flanked by rooms on two sides, known from Hazor,
Samaria and Megiddo in the Iron Age II.
Although individual parallels such as these
may be cited, the general concept of the architecture, in both building techniques and plans, as well
as in architectural details, deviates from the
common architecture in Iron Age II Israelite cities.
Notably, none of these buildings recall the so-called
‘Four-Room’ or ‘Three-Room’ houses or pillared
buildings that were so typical. No stone pillars were
found and wooden posts were used only in the case
of Building CX and seen in scant remains of
Stratum C-2 under Building CZ.
An unresolved question is whether the buildings had a second story. The double walls, up to 1.1
in width, could easily have supported a second
story, but even the narrow walls of 0.6 m width
could have been used for such a purpose. Evidence
for staircases was not found, except perhaps in the
case of the eastern part of Building CY of Stratum
C-2. In other buildings, wooden ladders could have
led to upper stories or to the roofs, where daily
activities could have taken place, such as in the case
of Building CP, where large grinding stones were
found fallen from a second story or a roof.
Table 12.26 compares the external dimensions
and floor space of the buildings excavated in Area
C, showing the diversity, which might have had
social and cultural implications. The larger buildings, CF and CP, had an average floor space of ca.
62 sq m, while Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 had
an average floor space of ca. 20 sq m. Building CX
contained 34 sq m. In case of the existence of a
second story, these numbers should be potentially
doubled.
The number of persons that such houses could
accommodate can only be guessed, based on various analyses. Narroll’s (1962) often-cited coefficient of 10 sq m per person would suggest two to
five inhabitants in such houses if they had one story
and four to ten persons if they had two. Yet, there
are different variables that should be considered,
and it is doubtful whether Narroll’s coefficient can
be taken for granted. Thus, Schloen (e.g., 2001:
180) suggested a coefficient of 8.0 sq m per person
in Israelite houses; following a detailed discussion,
he estimated that the average Israelite “jointfamily” included seven to ten persons (Schloen
2001: 135–183). It seems that the larger houses,
such as Building CY in Stratum C-2, as well as
Buildings CW, CF and CP in Stratum C-1a, were
inhabited by families of eight to twelve persons,
while the smaller houses, such as Building CA in
Stratum C-2 and CQ1, C2 and CQ3 in Stratum
C-1a, served much smaller units, perhaps nuclear
families or other social groups. It should be noted,
however, that the function of these buildings as regular
dwellings is not obvious; several of the buildings, such as CA in Stratum C-2 and CF and CP in
Strata C-1a–b, may have had special functions,
based on their plans and assemblages of finds.
Building CF could have been an elite residence that
incorporated administrative, domestic and cultic
activities. Building CP in Stratum C-1a may have
served specific functions related to religious rituals,
such as shared meals/feasts and perhaps, the
activity of a “man of god”, such as the biblical
Elisha. The possible special functions of Buildings
CF and CP are further discussed in Chapter 4 and
Mazar 2015: 103–117. The small buildings, CQ1,
CQ2 and CQ3, and perhaps also CX, may have
belonged to groups or families of special status,
perhaps related to or under the control of the elites
in Buildings CF and CP. It should be noted that all
these buildings yielded large numbers of finds,
including an incredible amount of pottery vessels,
considering the size of the buildings. In each
building there was at least one loom and one or
more grinding installations. Yet, cooking facilities
were found only in Buildings CF and CP, as well as
in the open piazza to the west. This, again, may
emphasize the different status of the residents of the
small houses, such as CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3.
Several buildings in Area C certainly served
functions other than dwelling. Thus, Stratum C-2
Building CB, with its large hall, could have had
some public function. Building CG in Stratum C-1
is interpreted as a granary, and Building CL as a
storage facility or an or industrial structure, possibly servicing other buildings in the eastern
quarter.
The clustering of the buildings in Stratum C-1a
is a notable feature. An interesting configuration is
the group of small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3,
and Building CW, flanking an east–west street, as
well as the location of larger buildings, CF and CP,
adjoining and beyond this cluster. This arrangement may reflect social ranking of some sort.
Differences in the founding levels of various
buildings in the different strata were noted. In Stratum
C-2, Wall 8467 in Building CY in the northeastern
corner of the area was founded at 85.00 m, while
the southwesternmost wall (1470) was founded at
85.57 m. The westernmost wall (1563 in Square
R/4) was founded at 85.61 m and the easternmost
wall (8467 in Square C/6), at 85.00 m. In Stratum
C-1b, the foundations of all the buildings, except
the apiary and Building CZ, ranged between 85.90
m in the northeastern corner of the area to 86.50 m
in the southwestern corner, over a distance of 39 m.
In Stratum C-1a, there was a 1.0 m difference
between the foundation level of the northeastern
wall (8424; 86.10 m) as opposed to the southwestern wall (1431; 87.10 m), and a 1.6 m difference between the westernmost wall (1413; 87.60
m) and the easternmost wall (10490; 86.00 m)
along Squares S–Z, A–C/2. The difference in level
of almost 1.7 m between Buildings CG, CH, CM
and the apiary was a deliberate choice, as discussed
in detail above.
A tilt from west to east/southeast was defined in
all strata at Tel Rehov, and may have been the result
of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts
even inside structures.
In many cases, adjacent buildings had their own outer walls, even when they were attached to one another, so that back-to-back double walls were created, with total thickness reaching 1.0–1.1 m. This feature can be seen in many of the units in all three strata, although the buildings in the southeastern block, CQ3, CX, CP and CL, had shared walls of regular width (0.5 m), perhaps reflecting their construction as one integral unit for social or functional reasons. The existence of an individual outer wall for each house, even in cases of attached buildings, may have had practical, as well as symbolic social meaning. Practically, it may represent building phases, indicating that each building was constructed independently, perhaps at a somewhat different time, and then, an adjacent unit was added. Double walls added to the strength of the buildings and their resistivity to earthquakes, as well as facilitating the construction of a second story. Faust (2012: 39–117) noted the rarity of double walls in Israelite domestic architecture and the social significance of this feature: individual walls for each house that create double walls together appear mainly in houses of elite families. This may be the case at Tel Rehov as well, where double walls were much more common than in any other known Iron Age II city
All the Iron Age IIA buildings were constructed
exclusively of bricks, with no stone foundations.
This is an unusual feature in the Land of Israel,
where most brick walls were laid on stone socles.
At Tel Rehov itself, stone socles for brick walls
were common in Late Bronze IIB and Iron Age I,
and the lack of such foundations in Iron IIA is an
unusual feature that remains unexplained.
Most of the bricks were made of brown, gray or
yellow clay. In Stratum C-3, all of the walls were
constructed with distinct gray bricks of friable consistency, laid with a light-colored mortar between
them and covered with a plaster of the same composition as the mortar. In the walls of Strata C-1b and
C-1a, a wider variety of bricks was used; in most
cases, they were made of light gray-brown clay, and
more rarely, of a dark brown soil taken from the
nearby colluvium. See Tables 12.27–12.30 for
details of brick sizes and materials in most of the
walls. The size deviations are small, indicating a
great deal of standardization in the size and manufacturing technique, if not the composition, of the
bricks.
In some cases, mud plaster was preserved on
walls, some 0.02–0.03 m thick and sometimes
nicely smoothed. Whitish plaster of higher quality
than the mud plaster was used only in the entrance
to the southeastern room of Building CP, where the
plaster was molded to a rounded profile.
The use of wood for wall and floor foundations at Tel Rehov is a unique feature. This is a novelty of Stratum C-1b, but there is one such case in Stratum C-2 (Building CU) and isolated cases in Stratum C-1a (e.g., Building CQ3). A similar construction technique was found in two buildings of Stratum B-5 in Area B, as well as in a building in Area G, attributed to Stratum G-1b. Hence, this technique appears to have been utilized contemporaneously in various buildings throughout the city. The purpose of this wood construction is as yet to be clarified. One possible explanation is that it was intended to stabilize the buildings in the event of earthquakes. This might have been the outcome of what we surmise was the cause of the destruction of Stratum C-2, namely, seismic activity. This function of the wood is illustrated mainly by the way circular beams (their charred remains usually no more than .05–0.1 m in diameter) were often laid at intervals of 0.1–0.2 m, perpendicular to the brick wall, below its lowest brick course. In several cases (i.e., Wall 1438), two or more layers of such beams were found. In this way, the wood could serve as a ‘shock absorber’. Prof. David Yankelevsky, head of the National Building Research Institute in the Technion, Haifa, who visited the site, compared this building technique to modern engineering, when steel cylinders are laid below the foundations of massive structures where the danger of damage by earthquakes is at high risk, such as in nuclear plants. This explanation, if accepted, would point to a technological innovation intended to protect structures against the hazards of earthquakes in a location so close to the Syro-African fault, where the threat of such activity was more acute than anywhere else in the country.
In most cases, floors were composed of beaten
earth or clay. In Stratum C-1b, wooden branches
and beams were incorporated into the foundation of
some floors; these were usually arranged rather
haphazardly below the earth floor. The wood itself
was embedded into a matrix of soft red clay that
was often similar to, or served as, the floor makeup
itself. Stone floors were found only in Buildings
CQ1 and CQ2, and perhaps Building CJ, all in
Stratum C-1a. In a few places, floors incorporated
pebbly gravel, such as in the western part of C-1a
Building CX, or in the open space in Stratum C-1a
Building CW. In Building CP, as well as in two
rooms in Building CY of Stratum C-2, a brick construction was found under the red clay floors in a
few rooms, while in other rooms, a mud-plaster
foundation was laid under these floors.
The distinct composition of the floor of the
Stratum C-1b apiary should be mentioned. It was
composed of three different matrices, each apparently serving a different purpose, particularly the
very hard thick white tufa floor surrounding the
hives, most likely meant to be a permeable surface
to protect against spillage or to possibly fend off
rodents and insects.
The use of wooden posts on unworked stone bases was a rare feature that was found only in Building CX of Stratum C-1a, where there was a line of five post-holes above stone bases, and in the Stratum C-2 level under Building CZ.
Benches built of bricks or terre pisé were found in several instances in Stratum C-1 buildings. In Building CF of Stratum C-1a, they were found along almost all the walls of the three western chambers. In Building CW of Strata C-1a–b, they were located along the walls of the western rooms. Benches ran along some of the walls of the inner rooms of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as in Buildings CX and CP, where benches were located along the walls of four of the rooms. The benches could be used for sitting, but their main purpose was probably placement of items. A number of vessels were found on Benches 10466 and 10467 in Building CP, including a very large cooking pot. A pottery altar and bowl were found on Bench 10454 in this building.
Several storage installations made of packed-clay
walls or bricks were found. In Building CP of
Stratum C-1a, a corner of Room 9450 was enclosed
by two narrow walls, creating a bin (9434) which
contained an intact Hippo jar full of grain, as well
as other finds. Other storage installations were Silo
7514 in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and plastered
Pit 11456 in Building CZ of Stratum C-1b. An
exceptional feature was the two rectangular pottery
bins, made without a base and standing on their
narrow side against the southern wall of Building
CP. These bins, found with grain, have no parallels
elsewhere.
The installation occupying the western part of
the northern room of Building CQ3 in Stratum C-1a
(10505) is unusual in its size and shape, although its
function could not be determined; it seems that it had
some industrial role. Yet another installation with a
hard plaster surface was found against the southern
wall of the southwestern room in this building, but
it was too damaged to determine its function. Other
installations include a mud-plastered semi-circle
(11452) attached to the wall inside the western
entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP in
Stratum C-1a, and a brick with a depression on top
inside the entrance to Room 2489 in Building CE in
Stratum C-1b (2477); both were possibly used as
stands for vessels, perhaps for drinking, positioned
just inside the entrance to the rooms.
Twenty-two ovens were excavated in Area C. Such ovens (tannur, often denoted ‘tabun’) were found in many houses, as well as in open areas. The ovens were always circular, 0.4–0.6 m in diameter; in most cases, only the lower part was preserved. Ovens were constructed with a clay wall ca. 4–5 cm thick, that was, in many cases, coated with pottery sherds on the outside. The most outstanding example is Oven 7428 in Building CU of Stratum C-2, which was completely preserved from base to rim, with an opening at the bottom and an incised mark on its exterior (Fig. 12.13). It was 0.56 m in diameter at its base, 0.56 m tall, with a 0.3 m-wide opening at its top and a small opening at its bottom, used for inserting fuel. It was coated on the outside by large sherds of restorable pottery vessels, a feature found in other ovens, but not as well preserved as this one (Mazar 2011). Ovens were also found in Stratum C-2 Building CY and in the rooms north of Building CA (Stratum C-2) and Building CD (Stratum C-1b), as well as in Buildings CF, CJ, and CP of Stratum C-1a. In several of these cases, the spaces where the ovens were found could have been unroofed areas (e.g., Buildings CY and CU), although this could not be determined with certainty. In certain cases, the location of the oven was quite certainly inside a roofed space (e.g., Building CF). An open space containing a succession of ovens throughout all the Iron IIA strata was found in Square T/4. The lack of ovens in certain buildings should be noted, in particular, Stratum C-1a Buildings CX, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3. It is assumed that residents of these houses shared ovens located in open spaces, or that they belonged to a specific social organization in which people cooked and ate together, for example, in Building CP, where the evidence points to communal meals.
In several cases, flat stones were located on the
floor or on benches along and close to walls. The
latter was the case in Building CY of Stratum C-2,
where 13 such stones were found along the walls,
and in its successor, Building CW of Stratum C-1a,
where eight such stones were found in the western
rooms, placed on top of the benches lining the
walls. It is difficult to explain them as a constructional feature; perhaps they were used as solid
bases for objects such as water or oil jars, leather
containers, etc.
Another feature was isolated cases of hard mizi
stones of considerable size inside buildings. Examples include the very large stone found in Building
CB of Stratum C-2, two large stones found in
Building CF (one in the large hall in the eastern
wing in Stratum C-1b and the second in the
entrance corridor in Stratum C-1a, possibly used as
a butcher block), a stone in the southern part of
Building CM in Stratum C-1b and stones in Buildings CQ2 and CX of Stratum C-1a. Notable also is a
large smoothed-top limestone placed at an angle to
the east of the oven in the large northern room of
Building CP in Stratum C-1a. Such stones could
have served as working surfaces in places where a
hard surface was needed. They are outstanding in
light of the relatively rare use of stones in Iron Age
IIA contexts at the site.
Slab-shaped lower grinding stones, loaf-shaped upper grinding stones, hammerstones, pestles, and mortars were numerous in Area C (see Chapter 43). A notable feature in Stratum C-1a were grinding installations of two basic types. The first comprised a large lower grinding stone enclosed by a low hard-clay rounded parapet; the slab is tilted towards a low area on the edge into which the ground flour could be collected; loaf-shaped upper grinding stones were found in association with it. Two very well-preserved installations of this type were found in Building CF and less well-preserved examples in Buildings CE, CQ1, and CQ2. The second type of grinding installation comprised a similar large lower grinding stone set at a slight angle and directed to a hard clay round receptacle, which was most likely meant to contain the ground flour. In Building CX, where two such installations were found, the better-preserved example had a narrow brick bordering the grinding stone on one side and built against the wall on the other. Upper grinding stones were found in association with the lower stone. In Building CP, very large lower and upper grinding stones were found in the destruction debris, 0.8 m above the floor of Room 11451, most probably fallen from the roof or an upper story of the building. Likewise, a very large stone with a small depression in its top that was smoothed from use, and might have been used as a mortar, was found just under topsoil and above the thick destruction debris in this room, suggesting that it, too, originally had been positioned on the roof or upper story.
Numerous loom weights, mostly made of stone and less so, of clay, were found in concentrations in most of the Stratum C-1a buildings; many of these contained dozens of loom weights each. Remains of charred wood in proximity to such caches, such as in Buildings CP, CR, CX, CF and CE, indicate the presence of one or two looms in the houses. See details and discussion in Chapter 39.
1 The terminology in this chapter follows Mazar 1990: 30 and NEAEHL: 1529. The period Iron IA (first half of the 12th century BCE) is called Late Bronze III by several scholars in recent years. See discussion in Chapter 4 and by Mazar in TBS III: 23–24.
Stratum D-11 is known only from the three probes (I–III) in Squares L–M/4–5, where a 1.0 m-thick deposit of occupation debris and architectural elements (walls, installations, fireplaces and floor patches) was found above bedrock and below the tufa fill that was ascribed to Stratum D-10. Two phases were determined here, termed D-11b and D-11a.
Stratum D-11b was the earliest occupation phase detected in Area D (Fig. 15.3). In Probe I (Square L/4, 1.0×2.0 m), the lowest levels excavated (76.47–76.95 m, Locus 2839) may belong to this phase. In Probe II (Square M/4, 1.0×ca. 1.3 m; Photo 15.12), Locus 9931, in the western half of the probe, consisted of a 0.6 m-deep accumulation of dark brown earth containing meager finds, at levels 76.41–77.00 m. A few consolidated tufa chunks in the center of the probe (unnumbered) might have formed part of a wall or installation.
Immediately above the remains of Stratum D-11b and sealed below the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10, an upper building phase was detected in Probes II and III, designated Stratum D-11a (Figs. 15.4, 15.18a–b). It consisted of brick walls (1923, 1929, 1930), creating at least two units (1913, 9917), which were partly excavated.
The 0.7 m-wide trench dug in the northern edge of Squares K–M/5 was intended to answer the question whether the thick tufa fill below the floor of Stratum D-10 was a natural or anthropogenic feature (see below). Earlier work in Probe I raised the hypothesis that the tufa layer was created in a water body (pond or small lake), above deposition of dark earth within a paludal environment (a marsh) (Mazar 1999: 11; see also Rozenbaum 2009 for the high frequency of such environments in the BethShean Valley during the Holocene). The backhoe trench described above, which preceded the manual excavation of Probes II–III, revealed anthropogenic layers below the thick tufa fill of D10 (2814). This was an accumulation of layered, finely sorted silts and clays of alternating gray and brown, totaling ca. 1.0 m in thickness (7923, 9910, 9911, 9913; Fig. 15.17b). No architectural elements were noted in these layers and no sub-phases were observed. This area may have been part of a large open space. The finds included sherds, bones, flints, oven fragments, a broken bronze earring and an almost complete ceramic plaque figurine (Chapter 33; Fig. 33.1).
Stratum D-10 constituted the earliest architectural phase detected on a relatively large scale in Area D, consisting of a large brick building (DA), apparently of public nature, erected simultaneously with the placement of massive constructional fills which elevated the ground level by some 2.0 m compared with the top level of the accumulation associated with Stratum D-11. The building and its related fills were exposed over an area of ca. 125 sq m in Squares L–M/4–5 and in the western half of Squares N/4–5. The building extended beyond the excavation area to the north, east and south, while the western part is probably missing due to young tectonic activity along the fault line, discussed above. Based on the associated ceramic assemblage and other finds, Stratum D-10 was dated to the LB IIA (14th century BCE).
The exposed portion of Building DA was composed of three integrated walls (8942, 2886, 2890), each 1.1 m wide and constructed of rectangular bricks which varied in dimensions, hardness, color, and manner of placement. These massive well-built walls were preserved 2.2–2.5 m high (16–18 courses). Their foundations were slightly embedded in the upper part of the Stratum D-11 accumulation or laid directly on top of earlier walls (as was the case of Walls 2886 and 2890, which were built on top of Walls 1929 and 1930 respectively). Three buttresses were constructed along Walls 2886 and 8942, facing the open space to their west (Photos 15.8, 15.10, 15.14–15.15, 15.18, 15.21– 15.24). Two of them, 1902 and 2889, protruded northwards from Wall 2886; in fact, 1902 continued the line of Wall 2890, which continued southwards beyond the excavated area. A third buttress (8938) projected westwards from Wall 8942 opposite Buttress 9929 (see further discussion of 9929 below). All the buttresses shared the exact same dimensions, protruding 0.85 m from the wall face and measuring 1.1 m in width, equal to the width of the walls. They were rather evenly spaced: Buttress 8938 was located 2.25 m to the north of the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942, while Buttress 2889 was located 2.4 m to the west of the aforementioned corner. Buttress 1902 was located 2.7 m farther to the west from 2889. It should be emphasized that the buttresses were bonded with the walls and thus, both elements were erected simultaneously. An additional possible buttress was 1903 (Square L/4), although it can also be regarded as the western end of Wall 2886. It was identical in dimensions to the other three buttresses and appears to have had a similar function. Nevertheless, it can be argued that 1903 may have functioned as a pier flanking an entrance, the parallel pier of which is to be found further to the west. As such a parallel pier was not found in Square L/4, this hypothesis can be maintained only if assuming an entrance of at least 3.0 m wide. The first option — viewing 1903 as a fourth buttress — is thus preferable (but see below). Two architectural elements were located east of Wall 8942. The first was Buttress 9929, which adjoined the eastern face of Wall 8942 immediately opposite Buttress 8938, and had exactly the same dimensions as the other buttresses. The second, 2.2 m to its south, was the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 (unnumbered), which protruded ca. 1.05 from the eastern line of Wall 8942. It seems likely that this feature was not a buttress, but rather, a pier flanking a doorway within the building, the opposite pier of which lies beyond the excavated area. A narrow wall (1937) extending to the south of this pier is the only inner partition wall uncovered within the building.
The area bounded by Walls 2886 and 8942 on the south and east respectively was an open courtyard, covering at least 6.0×8.0 m and extending to the north and west beyond the limits of the excavation. Immediately after the erection of the wall system, the area of the courtyard was covered with a ca. 2.0 m-deep constructional fill (2814) made of two distinct layers of tufa (2814a and 2814b), each ca. 1.0 m thick (Figs. 15.5, 15.17–15.19a; Photos 15.8, 15.10–15.11, 15.13–15.14). This fill was excavated manually in Probes I (1.0×2.0 m) and III (ca. 9.0 sq m), as well as in a shallower probe west of Buttresses 1902 and 1903 in Square L/4 (ca. 4.0 sq m).2 In addition, this fill was uncovered in the long backhoe trench, where it extended ca. 12 m to the west of Wall 8942, before being eroded and replaced with deposits associated with the nearby field (Fig. 15.17a–b). The erosion line was found 3.0 m east of the geological fault described above, and it is probable that the western part of the courtyard disappeared due to young tectonic activity along this fault.
2 Note that the locus number 2814 refers to the same fill
in all three probes.
3 One more argument may be raised against the ‘pond
hypothesis’. The possible time span for the deposition
of the tufa can be no longer than 100 years, when comparing the pottery assemblages from below and above it,
and not 200–300 years as previously assumed (see
Mazar 1999: 11; Zilberman et al. 2004: 19). This time
span is too short for the deposition of 2.0 m-thick tufa
sediments or even of the lower layer alone (compare the
1m/1000 years sedimentation rate for the Beth-Shean
tufa given in Zilberman et al. 2004: 27).
The area south of Wall 2886, designated 8939, was bordered by Wall 2890 on the west and by a narrow partition wall (1937) on the east. The latter differed considerably from all other D-10 walls: it was 0.55 m thick, built of a western row of dark gray bricks laid on their narrow side and an eastern row of mixed bricks laid as stretchers. The wall was traced ca. 1.7 m southwards of Wall 2886, below Wall 1904 and Oven 9918 of Stratum D-9b. Only the uppermost courses of the wall were excavated. Space 8939, which was 7.2 long and at least 3.0 m wide, was excavated over most of the area down to the floor level at 79.10 m, except in Probe II (Square M/4), where the deep foundations of Walls 2886 and 2890 were exposed (Fig. 15.18b). The foundation levels of both walls were abutted by a thick sequence of gray sediments (9905, 9914), which were composed of various matrices of brick material, containing very few sherds and other finds (Photos 15.19–15.20). The total thickness of these sediments, which sealed the Stratum D-11 accumulation of 9917, reached 1.74 m near Wall 2886. The top level of Locus 9905 sloped down from north to south (79.04 m to 78.66 m near the southern section), perhaps due to young tectonic activity (Photos 15.12, 15.19). The layers in Loci 9914 and 9905 may be explained as a constructional fill, intended to elevate the level of Building DA, resembling in function the tufa fill (2814) north of Wall 2886, although composed of different material.
Building DA, with its massive sub-floor fills, wide walls, deep foundations and elaborate arrangement of buttresses, must have been a public structure of some sort, whether a palace or an administrative building. It appears that the excavated remains constituted just a small part of a much larger LB IIA building, which extended in all directions, whose nature and size remain mostly unknown.
Following the apparent abandonment of the monumental Building DA of Stratum D-10, the area underwent a major change, albeit with some continuation in architectural orientation. Strata D-9b and D-9a, together with Stratum D-8, form a complex and dense stratigraphic sequence, in which different lines of development can be traced in each excavated unit. The remains were excavated mainly in four squares (M–N/4–5), as well as in the southeastern part of Square L/4 (Stratum D-9b only). The sequence was dated to the Late Bronze IIB (13th century BCE) based on the associated finds.
In Stratum D-9b, a new building complex (Building DB) was erected on the ruins of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Fig. 15.7). The building was composed of two adjacent units, separated by a long north–south wall (8943). The eastern unit was partially divided into two sub-units (9927, 9925), while the western unit was probably a spacious courtyard which was divided into an open area in the north (7951) and a roofed area in the south (8919).
Two units, either rooms or courtyards, were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31). The eastern and northern walls were not found, probably located beyond the borders of the excavated area. Wall 8943 crossed the excavated area on a slightly northwest to southeast line and was mostly preserved only at the stone-foundation level. The northern part of Wall 8943 was built above Wall 8942 of Stratum D-10 and its stones were embedded into the latter, as if using the earlier massive brick wall as a stabilizer. On the southernmost end, the lowermost course of the brick superstructure of Wall 8943 was preserved, made of one row of bricks laid as headers. The stone foundation, preserved one to two courses high, was made of two rows of medium-sized limestone and basalt stones, with some small stones to fill the gaps. Some parts of the foundation, mainly in the southern portion, were missing, probably due to ancient robbing.
In the western part of Building DB was a large courtyard, 0.7 m above that of Stratum D-10 Building DA. As no openings connecting the eastern unit with this courtyard were identified, the linkage between them is only tentative; the opening might have been north of the limit of the excavated area. The courtyard (7951, 8919) was excavated in an area of 8.0×9.0 m, between Wall 8943 and the erosion line to the west. Its northern boundary was beyond the excavated area, while its southern limit was Wall 2816 and a line of pillar bases to its east. South of this wall and pillar bases there was an additional space (8919), ca. 2.5 m wide and at least 9.0 m long, bounded on the south by Wall 1906 that protruded along the southern section of Squares M– N/4.
This area, to the south of Courtyard 7951, was separated from it by two different features, both located on top of the earlier Stratum D-10 architecture. In the western part (Squares L–M/4), Walls 2816 and 2892 appeared to be an attempt to rebuild Wall 2886 and Buttresses 1902 and 1903 (Photos 15.23, 15.25–15.26, 15.37). Wall 2816, preserved along 4.3 m and one course high, was constructed of small- and medium-sized tufa stones. It was built directly on top of Wall 2886 and Buttress 1903 in its eastern part and on top of the tufa fill 2814 in its western part, where it continued westwards beyond the limits of the erosion line. It seems that when the D-9b walls were built, the architectural elements of Stratum D-10 were shaved to a relatively low level (79.05–79.10 m), essentially to that of the thick tufa fill (2814). Wall 2816 was abutted by 2892, made of larger tufa stones, which was built over Buttress 1902 of Stratum D-10. Although these two features constituted an attempt to rebuild part of Building DA of Stratum D-10, their peculiar construction, and the fact that Wall 2816 extended further to the west, indicated changes compared with the original plan of the building in D-10. Wall 2816 must have supported a brick superstructure. The reason for it being lower by 0.8–0.9 m than the line of pillar bases to its east (8935, see below) was perhaps due to the way this part of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Wall 2886, Buttresses 1902, 1903) was destroyed; these elements were possibly damaged more than the eastern part, so that the builders of Stratum D-9b found a depression or step in the ruined wall which they used as foundations for their new construction.
In Stratum D-9a, Building DB was replaced by new architectural features which partially preserved the outline of previous elements, although the overall plan and nature of this stratum was fairly different (Fig. 15.8). It seems that the builders of Stratum D9a were very familiar with the previous stratum and utilized earlier constructions. They may even have been partly responsible for the dismantling and removal of the brick superstructure of the Stratum D-9b walls, as no brick debris was found in the deserted units of the latter. Stratum D-9a was a kind of transitional phase in the process of deterioration in this area, from the elaborate architecture of Stratum D-10, through the less substantial Stratum D-9b building, to the large open area of the following Stratum D-8.
Stratum D-7b signifies the first occupation phase related to the Iron Age IA in Area D (Fig. 15.12). It comprised a few installations and pits related to floor patches spread over the four excavated squares (M–N/4–5), without any walls or other architectural elements. The relatively thin accumulation associated with this stratum was quickly replaced by a new building phase (Stratum D-7a), to which much more substantial remains were assigned. Thus, it seems that Stratum D-7b constituted a rather ephemeral occupation that will not necessarily be found in other parts of the site. See Photo 15.45 for a general view of the area and accumulation in the section up to Stratum D-7a.
In an excavated area of ca. 80 sq m, three units built of brick walls with stone foundations were found, denoted Building DC, although their attribution to a single building remains uncertain (Fig. 15.13). All brick superstructures except one (2842) were built of one row of gritty yellowish bricks laid as headers, with thin (0.02 m) gray mortar between them. This type of brick, which had similar dimensions in most walls (0.58×0.36×0.12 m), was unique to Stratum D-7a. The brick superstructure rested on top of a one-course stone foundation which was made of two rows of stones with a gap between them, filled with gray-brown debris. The stone foundations were slightly wider than the brick superstructure, measuring 0.75 m as opposed to the 0.6 m-wide brick wall, and thus, they protruded on both faces. The stones were mediumsized basalt and limestone and included occasional basalt grinding stone fragments in secondary use. Floors were found to abut the top level of the stone foundation or the lower courses of the brick superstructure.
This unit was bounded by Wall 7906 to the north and Walls 4856 and 8917 to the south (Fig. 15.13). The western boundary was eroded, while the eastern one was beyond the excavation area.
The opening between Walls 8917 and 4856 led to the southeastern unit, characterized by a rather thick floor build-up (8907, levels 81.45–81.60 m) that was related to a dense concentration of installations (Fig. 15.13). The floor was ca. 0.3–0.4 m higher than Floor 7902/9902 of the northern unit and this gap was bridged by a step built of two bricks (levels 81.35–81.60 m) which were found immediately to the southwest of Wall 8917 (shown on the plan of Stratum D-7a', Fig. 15.14), although it is unclear whether these two bricks were placed during the initial construction phase of Stratum D-7a or during the later phase, D-7a'. Floor 8907 extended 4.2 m to the south of Wall 8917 up to the southern section of Square N/4, and 3.5–4.0 m on an east–west axis from Wall 2842 to the eastern section. This appears to have been an open courtyard, although two medium-sized stones with flat tops embedded in the upper part of the floor striations, 2.4–2.5 m to the south of Wall 8917, may have served as pillar bases for a lightweight roof.
Room 2871 was bounded by Walls 2842, 4856 and 1818 (Photo 15.57, upper right); its western boundary was eroded away (Fig. 15.13). The room measured 3.1 m in width (north–south) and at least 3.8 m in length (east–west). A marked peculiarity in Room 2871 was the significant difference in wall foundation levels and, as a result, the irregular relationship between the walls, an issue which clearly pertains to the history of the room’s construction. Wall 1818 was the deepest of the three. Its stone foundation, 0.7–0.9 m wide, was carefully built of two rows of medium- and large-sized flat stones, the largest of which were in the western portion of the foundation. The foundation extended 3.6 m from the erosion line to the east, where it abruptly ended ca. 0.4 m west of Wall 2842, while its brick superstructure abutted the latter wall. Two foundation deposits were found below the northern row of stones: the western one (No. 2; Fig. 16.24:4–6; see Fig. 15.20, Photo 15.54a), placed below a large flat limestone, was composed of two bowls placed rim to-rim, enclosing a lamp. The second deposit (No. 3; Fig. 16.24:9–10, Photo 15.54b) was ca. 1.5 m to the east of the former and consisted of one lamp and one bowl. The brick superstructure built on top of the stone foundation was preserved five to six courses high (0.8–0.9 m), composed of the typical yellowish gritty bricks of Stratum D-7a, on top of which three to five courses of gray-brown friable bricks were placed (top preserved level: 82.50 m). The upper part resembled Wall 2842 and was probably erected with the latter. It should be noted that the lower part of the brick superstructure of Wall 1818 was built of different-sized bricks compared to other Stratum D-7a walls, placed as either headers or stretchers; the overall width of the wall ranged from 0.55 m in the east to 0.7 m in the west.
Minor changes in the northeastern part of the excavated area were attributed to this phase (Fig. 15.4); these changes might correspond to the upper layers of the floor build-up that accumulated in the other spaces in Stratum D-7a, discussed above.
4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.
Possibly the most complicated stratigraphic sequence in the western part of Area D was found above Stratum D-7a and below the Iron IB Strata D-5–D-4. Inside this 1.5 m-deep accumulation, excavated over an area of approximately 60 sq m (in Squares M/5, N/4–5, and the southwestern portion of P/4), numerous installations and built elements were uncovered, each with a different foundation and preservation level. In-between these installations, as well as partly above and below several of them, was a thick accumulation of striations, found in all areas except for the western and northern portions of Squares M–N/5. These striations, which totaled ca. 0.9 m (82.10–83.00 m), represented both floor build-up and natural accumulation of layered sediments. However, the distinction between different depositional processes during the excavation was impossible due to the overall homogenous nature of the striations and the absence of concentrations of material remains within the sequence. The striations must have accumulated during a relatively long time-span, in which man-made features were built and went out of use intermittently. The correlation of different features found at various elevations along the sequence was often complicated. We tentatively divided this stratum into two main phases, although in certain places, this division was arbitrary: a lower phase (D-6b; Fig. 15.15) and an upper phase (D-6a; Fig. 15.16).
The lowest level in which the striated accumulation appeared in Square N/4 was 82.10–82.20 m, designated Locus 1876 (above brick debris 7936 of Stratum D-7a; Figs. 15.19–15.21). In Loci 7935 and 7950, excavated at the same levels in Square N/5, no clear continuation of these striations was observed and, instead, the top of the brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' was found (Fig. 15.21). Only in the southeastern corner of Square N/5, within Locus 7935 (82.10–82.23 m), a local layered accumulation was noted, which included large cattle bones and an associated gray-ash accumulation.
The later phase of Stratum D-6 was characterized by the continued accumulation of striations in Square N/4 (the top of 1876, Photo 15.60), as well as in the southern (7921) and eastern (7922) parts of Square N/5, at levels 82.80–83.00 m (Fig. 15.6).
Architectural remains attributed to Stratum D-5 included Buildings DD and DE in the east, bordered on the west by a north–south street, and partially preserved elements to the west of the street that could have been either part of a unit presently eroded away or a subterranean support for the architecture above it. Based on the founding levels of the walls flanking the street, it seems that the buildings of this stratum were terraced to some extent, with an upper terrace to the east of the street and a lower one to its west, following the gradient of the slope.
Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.
Between Wall 2882 on the west and Building DD on the east ran a north–south street for 9.25 m; it continued into the northern and southern balks. Its width in the south was 1.0–1.2 m, while in the north it was ca. 2.35 m (between Walls 2882 and 8878 in Square P/5).
The eastern unit in Stratum D-5 was not fully exposed, since some of the walls of Stratum D-4 which were built directly on top of Stratum D-5 structures were not dismantled. The exposed remains were sufficient to show that these were massive buildings that housed special activity. The area was divided into two units: Building DE in the north and DD to its south (Photos 15.69–15.77). The northern unit included two rooms with an unclear connection between them; both continued to the north and east beyond the border of the excavation. The southern unit comprised two large rooms paved with well-preserved brick floors. The exact relationship between the two units remained obscure, since the juncture between them was covered by later walls that were not dismantled.
Building DE was comprised of two rooms, separated by north–south Wall 8861, preserved to five brick courses. The upper two courses were built of dark gray friable bricks, the two courses below them of white bricks, and the lowermost course was again dark gray. The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same wall was typical of this stratum, such as in Walls 8884 and 8854 of Building DD, described below. Later walls covered the northern and southern ends of Wall 8861, but it is most likely that it had cornered with Wall 8884 on the south.
East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.
West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.
This was part of a massive building whose eastern and western walls were 1.25 m wide each, composed of two rows of bricks. While the eastern wall (8848) was comprised of two rows, the western wall seems to have been made of two adjoining walls (8855, 2881) which were constructed separately: the eastern side (8855) had a stone foundation which was lacking in the western side (2881). Wall 2881 apparently continued to be in use in the subsequent stratum, D-4b, when it abutted the newly built Wall 1860 on the west (see below). Wall 2881 was poorly preserved, perhaps since it was in use longer than Wall 8855. The northern wall (8884) was apparently just as wide as the western and eastern walls, based on a small part of its northern face exposed in Square P/5; the rest of the northern part of the wall was covered by D-4b walls. The eastern wall (8848) appeared to have been the outer wall of the entire building, although this could not be ascertained due to the limited excavation area. If this is correct, then the external width of the building was ca. 6.7 m (for the possibility that this complex continued to the east into Area C, see below). It seems that the southern wall (8852) of the eastern room was an internal wall, since the parallel room to the west continued south beyond the border of the excavation. Thus, the length of the building was at least 6.0 m and it probably continued beyond the southern limit of the area.
This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.
Room 8871 was the western room of Building DD (Photos 15.69, 15.76–15.77). Its inner size was ca. 2.0×at least 5.2 m, as its southern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. In the north, the excavation almost reached the presumed southern face of Wall 8884. The floor (levels 83.55–83.74 m) was made of four to five rows of bricks, like the floor of Room 8867 to its east. It abutted Walls 8855 and 8854. The bricks of the floor were covered by 0.25 m-deep striated layers of soft earth and plaster, which were sealed by Floor 8816 of Stratum D-4b. Although the level of the floor in this room was 0.5–0.6 m higher than that in the eastern room, it was clear that the two rooms belonged to the same building. A similar situation was observed in Stratum D-4b Building DG (see below).
The building remains of Stratum D-5, although limited, indicated dense urban planning and the existence of well-planned structures. Wall 2882, which crossed the entire area from north to south, represented a degree of central planning, although it remained unclear as to what unit it had been belonged. Initially, it had been considered that this wall was a foundation intended to support the slope during the construction of Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. According to this suggestion, Building DF would have been founded in Stratum D-5 and continued to be in use, with slight changes, in Strata D-4b and D-4a. However, it was finally decided in favor of the stratigraphic separation as suggested here, namely, that Wall 2882 represented an independent phase, attributed to Stratum D-5, and that it was an isolated element, with no structural remains belonging to this stratum to its west.
Stratum D-4 was the most extensively exposed stratum in Area D, revealed in six excavation squares (N–P–Q/4–5). Although new structures replaced the massive Buildings DD and DE of Stratum D-5, and Building DF was built west of the street, the general outline of Stratum D-5 was maintained, with the north–south street continuing to separate the eastern and the western units.
To the best of our understanding, Building DF was built in Stratum D-4, although as explained above, there was a slight possibility that it was founded already in Stratum D-5 (see above). The building included two rows of rooms running parallel to the slope of the mound west of the street and comprised two terraces, separated by Wall 4866 and its possible southern extension (Photos 15.78–15.82). The eastern line of rooms included 4839, 1845 and 2840 and the western line included 4871 and 4879; the latter were destroyed by erosion and only their eastern ends were preserved. It is not certain that all these rooms belonged to the same building, but it is clear that this was a well-planned structure adjoining the north–south street on its west.
Walls 1811, 2822 and 2846 created the northern end of a 2.5 m-wide room that continued to the south (Squares N–P/4). They were a rebuild of the walls found in the same place in Stratum D-6a, described above (Room 4848). East–west Wall 1811 in Squares N–P/4 was comprised of two rows of bricks, 1.0 m wide and well preserved for the most part. The wall had a stone foundation comprised of small- and medium-sized stones, with one row seen along the northern face, although these stones were not visible under the southern face; the foundation was dug into the brick collapse (1855) below. Inside this room was a hard-packed earth floor (2840; level 84.08 m) set on a bedding of pebbles. A shallow pit (2828) was partially excavated in the northwestern part of the room. The floor of this room was raised and a higher floor (2823) was constructed at level 84.20 m in Stratum D-4a.
The space between the rooms on the north and the south was probably a courtyard, paved with stones (1845), with a series of plaster floors accumulated above it (1836) (Squares N–P/4–5; Photos 15.80– 15.82). This space was 4.0 m long and at least 3.0 m wide. It was bordered on the east by Wall 1883, on the west by the supposed continuation of Wall 4866 along the erosion line of the slope, on the south by Wall 1811, and on the north by Wall 4813. Wall 1883 was built above Wall 2882 of Stratum D-5. It had a three-course stone foundation that protruded beyond the face of the wall towards the east and seven courses of its brick superstructure were preserved; the uppermost three tilted strongly to the west (Fig. 15.33). From its corner with Wall 1811, the wall continued ca. 7.5 m to the north, running into the balk. The southern end of the wall (termed 2846) was slightly curved and served as the eastern wall of Room 2840.
In Square N/5 were remains of one complete room (4839) and segments of two additional rooms (4879, 4871), arranged on two levels, with a floorlevel difference of 0.65 m: Room 4839 on an upper terrace, which was on the same level as 1845 and 2840 to its south, and Rooms 4879 and 4871 on a lower terrace to the west. Wall 4866, 1.0 m wide, which was common to all these rooms, served as a retaining wall for the terrace above it. The latter wall was not preserved entirely, but most likely had cornered with Wall 4861.
The north–south street of Stratum D-5 in Squares P/4–5 continued to be in use through Stratum D-4, when it was ca. 1.85–2.0 m wide (Photos 15.83– 15.84). The street surface was gradually raised, with striations accumulating between Wall 1883 (which stood to a height of 1.5 m) in the west and the western walls of Buildings DH and DG (in Stratum D-4b) and DJ (in Stratum D-4a).
To the east of the street were two units, Buildings DG and DH, attributed to Stratum D-4b, built above D-5 Building DG.
This building comprised three rooms, two of which were completely excavated, and part of a fourth unexcavated room which continued into the eastern balk (Photo 15.85). The excavated part measured 5.8×6.9 m, but the building apparently continued to the east and perhaps also to the south, beyond the limit of the excavation area.
The western room in the building (inner dimensions 2.0×4.7 m, 9.4 sq m) was a rebuild of the previous Room 8871 of Stratum D-5. Each of its four well-preserved walls was built of dark gray bricks with distinctive whitish mortar between them (recalling the Stratum C-3 bricks in Area C; see Chapter 12). The western wall of the room (1860) was founded directly on top of Wall 8855 of Stratum D-5, but about 0.5 m north of the entrance, there was an earth layer separating these two walls. The entrance into Room 8816 was through an opening in the southern part of Wall 1860. West of the entrance was a plastered stone step, 0.75 m long (2866) at level 84.46 m, constructed above the stump of D-5 Wall 2881, leading from the street into the room.
The southeastern space in Building DG was perhaps an open courtyard, 3.5 m wide and at least 3.5 m long (at least 12.25 sq m); it continued eastward beyond the limit of the excavated area and thus, its full length could not be determined. Its northern wall (4859) was composed of white bricks and had an opening leading to Room 8830 to its north. The southern wall (4862), also built of white bricks, was exposed only along 1.5 m, since its western part was disturbed; there could have been an opening here leading to another room in the south.
This small room (inner dimensions 1.45×1.9 m) was entered from Space 8841 to its south. Its northern, eastern and southern walls were built of white bricks, while on the west it was bounded by Wall 4878, built of dark gray bricks. The 0.6 m-wide corner entrance had a brick threshold at level 84.44 m. It is notable that such a corner entrance was also found in Room 8816 and perhaps also in 8841.
It remained unclear whether the three rooms described above (and the fourth unexcavated one) belonged to the same unit. Since no entrance leading from Room 8816 to the eastern rooms was found, it may be that this room was independent and accessed directly from the street, perhaps serving as a storage space or workshop, while Rooms 8841 and 8830 belonged to a separate building entered from the east or the south. Space 8841 could be part of an open courtyard, while Room 8830 and the unexcavated room to its east could be small living spaces.
The northern building in the eastern unit comprised two rooms and perhaps a third unexcavated room on the east. Its southern wall (8821) adjoined Building DG on the south.
The inner dimensions of this room were 1.80×2.55 m (4.6 sq m, including the area of Bench 8860). A corner entrance with a brick threshold at level 84.29 m at the northern end of Wall 8849 connected Rooms 8844 and 8842. Another opening (8886) was detected in the eastern wall of the room (7851), just on line with the latter entrance. The opening in Wall 7851 was preserved to its full height, standing 1.25 m high and 0.8 m wide. The beaten-earth floor of this room (8844) covered a strip of bricks (8870) that ran along the western face of Wall 7851; these bricks were wider than the wall and were possibly placed in order to support the floor near the entrance. Wall 7851 was preserved to a height of 16 courses and continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a. Wall 8860 was a line of bricks adjoining the northern face of Wall 8821; yet, while Wall 8821 was preserved to a height of four courses, 8860 was preserved to only one course and was abutted by Floor 8844. Thus, 8860 was interpreted as a bench.
Room 8842 was the western room of Building DH (Photos 15.63, 15.73, 15.92). This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.6×1.8 m, 2.88 sq m) had a beaten-earth floor (8842) abutting the walls at levels 84.28–84.34 m. A row of five stones (8856) lined the western side of the room; to its west was Installation 8810 (Photos 15.63, 15.66, 15.73, 15.92). This enigmatic feature included three large flat pinkish limestone blocks and a large basalt basin, located east of the street, on the same line as the supposed western wall of Room 8842 and above D-5 Wall 8878. The southernmost limestone was a large rectangular block (0.3×0.6×0.97 m). The middle limestone was whitish/pinkish and almost square (0.3×0.6×0.6 m). The northernmost stone was 0.5 m wide and at least 0.5 m long. A basalt basin (8807) was located south of and on the same line as these three stones. This was a large oval-shaped basalt stone, 0.8–0.9 m in diameter, with a rounded shallow flat depression in its center, 0.5 m in diameter and 0.12 m deep. Grinding marks could be seen inside the depression. A flat limestone was found to the south of this basin. The tops of these stones were at levels 84.56–84.66 m, ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor of Stratum D-5 Room 8874 and 0.3–0.4 m above the floor of Room 8842 of Stratum D-4b, both to the east of the stones. The street west of this installation was wider than it was further to the south, thus providing convenient access to the installation.
The term Building DJ refers to the area of Buildings DG and DH, which underwent several major internal changes. Although no opening was found to connect the southern and northern wings, some of the renovations indicate that the entire area was considered as part of one architectural system. Many of the previous walls continued to be in use (4859, southern part of 4878, 4862, 1884, 1860, 4876, 8828, 8834), while others were cancelled or replaced. Thus, the double wall separating Building DG from DH in Stratum D-4b (8821, 8828) was replaced by a single wall (8828/8834) and the eastern wall (7851) of D-4b Room 8844 was extended to the south (denoted here 7848), cancelling the earlier wall (8805) to its west and becoming the eastern wall of the new room (7855), thus widening D-4b Room 8830 by 0.9 m. In the center of the building, Wall 7852 was built directly over Wall 8849 of D-4b, abutting the northern wall of D-4b Building DG (8828, 8834), which continued to be in use. At this time, the western part of Wall 8821 was cancelled, so that the previous space of Room 8842 was enlarged, but was now divided by a narrow wall (4877) into two separate chambers (4858, 4872). On the west, Wall 8850 was constructed above Installation 8810 and served as the western wall of the building, facing the street.
This room of Building DH in Stratum D-4b continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a, with the same floor and walls on the north and east. However, architectural changes occurred in the other two walls; on the west, a new wall (7852) was constructed on top of Wall 8849, preserved to seven courses. On the south, Wall 8821 of Stratum D-4b was cancelled and the room was now bordered by Wall 8828, which continued to be in use from Stratum D-4b. The inner dimensions of the new room were 2.4×2.6 (6.24 sq m). All the walls’ interiors were coated with a thick layer of white plaster. Floor 8844, attributed to D-4b and probably continuing in D-4a, was covered by destruction debris (8833) and fallen roof material (8829), the latter covered by a layer of brick debris (7853) reaching an uppermost level of 85.64 m, 1.25 m above the original floor.
D-4b Room 8842 was now extended to the south and divided into two chambers by a narrow partition wall (4877) (Photos 15.94–15.97). To the north, Room 4858 was a narrow space with inner dimensions of 1.0×2.3 m. Traces of thick white plaster were preserved on Walls 4876, 7852 and 4877. No floor was traced, but since Wall 4877 floated at level 85.07 m, almost 0.8 m above the floor of the Stratum D-4b, such a floor must have existed.
Replacing D-4b Room 8830 of Building DG was a new room that was enlarged to the east (inner dimensions 1.4×2.8 m, 3.92 sq m), entered from the south through the same entrance used in D-4b. No floor was detected in this room. The brick debris layer in this room (7855, 8806) was cut by Stratum D-3 Pits (7858, 7860, 7863).
This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.25×1.45 m, 1.8 sq m) was created by constructing a narrow partition wall (1868) in the northern part of D-4b Room 8816. The eastern wall (7861), composed of dark gray bricks and coated on the exterior with a layer of unique white bricks, was preserved to a height of six courses. This outer coating of bricks decreased the room’s length by ca. 0.3 m. This chamber had a stone floor at level 84.80 m (0.1 m above Floor 8816 of D-4b), covered by a beatenearth floor (8820) at level 84.83 m, about 0.3 m higher than D-4b floor in the same location. Along the western side of the chamber was a brick bench or installation (8859), composed of three white bricks. The northern one was 0.4×0.5 m and the narrow middle brick (0.3×0.45 m) was laid with its long side against the northern brick. The southernmost brick had the same dimensions as the northern one, with a round depression in its southern part (diameter 0.4 m) which could have served as a base for a jar. The installation/bench was surrounded by ashy material and a large amount of charred olive pits.
The previous Space 8841, possibly an open courtyard, continued with almost no change in Stratum D-4a. No floor was detected in this later phase, although it probably existed, since a large oven (4851) was found in the northwestern corner of the room with a foundation level at 84.75 m, ca. 0.5 m above the floor of Stratum D-4b. Three stones running on a diagonal line at levels 84.70–84.81 m were found in the northeastern part of the room (8838).
This room (inner dimensions 2.1×3.0 m, 6.3 sq m) was the southern part of D-4b Room 8816, after its division by a narrow partition wall (1868) (Photos 15.98–15.99). Its walls were covered with white plaster. The western wall (1860) was preserved to six to seven courses, the southern wall (1884) to at least nine courses, and the northern wall (1868) up to seven courses in the west, yet its eastern part was severely damaged by Stratum D-3 pits (see below).
In Stratum D-4b, the general layout of the excavated area continued from Stratum D-5, but substantial changes occurred in each individual building. West of the street, Building DF was founded at this stage, although the possibility that it was founded in Stratum D-5 should not be ruled out. East of the street, the massive Buildings DD and DE of the previous stratum were replaced by new buildings (DG and DH). Building DG appeared to have contained a square courtyard surrounded by rooms at least on the north and west (although no entrance from the courtyard to the western rooms was found); its full plan on the east and south remained unknown. The northern building, DH, included only two rooms entered from the east, although they may have been part of a larger building extending to the east and perhaps to the north.
Stratum D-3 was characterized by a series of 45 pits found in an open area in Squares N–P–Q/4–5 between levels 84.95–86.60 m. They post-dated Stratum D-4 elements and pre-dated the construction of Walls 1809, 1820 and 2820 of Stratum D-2. However, they could have been either contemporary with or earlier than Walls 4808 and 4809, attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/5, since the latter had deep foundations on the same level and even lower than the pits and rest on top of Stratum D-4 walls and debris (see further on this subject below). Two additional pits were located in Square R/4 in Area C (Stratum C-3; Chapter 12), thus establishing a good correlation between the stratigraphic sequences in these two areas.
In Square Q/4, just north of the southern balk, Pit 2833 was a deep pit that was not completely excavated. It cut Pit 2868 to its east. East of these pits, 2804 cut into Pits 4815 and 4834. Further east was Pit 2829, continuing into the eastern section, with Pit 4841 below it. Pit 2834 differed from the other pits, being larger (diameter 1.9 m) and amorphic in shape. This pit was cut by a plastered pit (2844).
Eight pits in Square Q/4 were unplastered (4805, 4806, 4814, 4815, 4821, 4834, 4835, 4865). Most of these belonged to the lower layer of pits (Table 15.3; Fig. 15.26). Some of them contained organic material, such as (in order of frequency) olive stones, wood charcoal, charred grain and chickpeas. In some of the pits were large sherds, including bases of jars (e.g., 4814).
The numerous pits in Stratum D-3 were bounded on the north by the line of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 in the middle of Squares P–Q/5. North of this line, no pits nor any other elements of Stratum D-3 were found and the structures of Stratum D-2 were built right on top of D-4 elements. It should be noted that the foundations of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 (=VI) were sunk to levels 85.20–85.50 m, which corresponded to the level of the pits. This wall was constructed on top of Stratum D-4a Building DJ. Similarly, the foundation of Stratum C-2 (=VI) Wall 1563 in the balk between Squares Q–R/4 was at level 85.70 m, which fits the upper level of most of the pits. However, elsewhere in Area C, no such pits were found in contexts dated to the transition from Iron I to Iron IIA, and architectural continuity predominated.
Several architectural features were assigned to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/4–5 that were interpreted as being later than the D-3 pits of Iron IB and preceding the Stratum D-1a–c architecture found in Square Q/5 (an alternative interpretation is suggested below). These remains are thought to be contemporary with those of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and thus are shown on the same plan (Chapter 12; Figs. 12.7–12.8).
Three narrow brick walls (1820, 1809, 4827) created a small chamber in Square P/4 (4826; 1.7 m wide, length unknown), close to the erosion line which cut it on the west. This room (Photo 15.108) was built above a layer of D-4a burnt brick debris and collapse (1850) which seems to have been levelled in preparation for the construction of the new building and above the D-3 pits. A fragmentary floor (4826) was found at level 86.08 m, continuing below Wall 4827 to the north (4825) and thus, the wall was probably a secondary partition constructed on top of the floor. Floor 4825 was cut in a straight line by Trench 4860, which was either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal trench burrowed from the nearby slope on the west; the latter possibility is more plausible. The southern and eastern walls, preserved up to four courses high and lacking stone foundations, were covered with mud plaster — Wall 1809 on both faces and Wall 1820 on the northern face only. To the east of the chamber, a floor (1886) abutted Wall 1809 at 86.34 m, higher than the floor inside the chamber. The mud plaster on Wall 1809 continued down to coat one of the bricks below this floor level as well.
In Squares P–Q/5, two walls (4808, 4819), preserved to 1.15–1.6 m, formed part of a unit that continued to the east. Trench 4860 to the south of these walls cut the remains of Phase D-4. As mentioned above, this could be either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal burrow. A layer of reed impressions in clay found below the foundation of Wall 4808 (Photo 15.111) may be explained as either related to the construction of this wall or as the roof collapse of Building DJ of Stratum D-4 (the top of the latter’s walls were ca. 0.5 m lower). A third wall (4869), observed in the topsoil of Square P/6 north of the limits of the excavation area, seems to have belonged to the same building as Walls 4808 and 4819, creating a space 3.25 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Inside this space was a brick debris layer (4828) that rested on a possible floor at level 86.08 m. This was exactly the same level as the floor in Room 4826 to the south. If this indeed was the floor, then the foundations of the walls consisted of six to seven brick courses below the floor level, with no stone foundation. These deep foundations imply that this had been a sturdy, well-built structure. The light yellow and compacted matrix of the bricks of these walls was typical of Stratum VI construction elsewhere in the site. The pottery recovered from Locus 4828 included some red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, typical of this stratum. Thus, this room might be correlated on the basis of architectural, stratigraphic and pottery indicators to Stratum C-2 (=VI); see, however an alternative interpretation below.
Dismantling the balk between Squares Q/4 and R/4 revealed Wall 1563, a north–south wall preserved to a height of 1.6 m; its foundation was at levels 85.61–85.70 m, higher than that of Wall 4808 in Square P/5 (Fig. 15.28). Wall 1563 was built of the same yellowish bricks typical of Stratum VI and was found tilted to the east (in the opposite direction of the nearby slope of the mound), perhaps due to seismic damage. It was the western wall of a room of Stratum VI exposed in Area C, Square R/4, whose floor was at level 85.60 m (Chapter 12, Fig. 12.9). It made a corner on the south with Wall 1572, which was preserved only four courses high and to a length of ca. 1.0 m. Abutting Wall 1563 on the west was a layer of debris on an earthen layer (1556) at level 85.70 m, which may have been a floor, although this identification remained unsure. The eastern half of a pit (1567) was uncovered, dug into Floor 1556. The relationship between this floor and the deep debris of Locus 1837 to its west (see above) remained unclear, since the levels of 1837 and the foundations of Wall 2820 further to the west were higher than the supposed floor (1556). These discrepancies may be explained as a result of the layers tilting towards the east, as observed in several strata at Tel Rehov. As noted, Debris 1837 may have been a constructional fill for Stratum D-1 floors, which may explain its rather high level compared to Floor 1556. A third possible explanation is that Floor 1556 (if indeed correctly identified as a floor) belonged to a late phase of Stratum D-3 and was not related to Wall 1563 (although this was not the impression during the excavation).
Yael Rotem, field supervisor of Area D East, suggested that the northern structure in Stratum D-2 (Walls 4808, 4819, 4869) was contemporary with the Stratum D-3 pits, based on the fact that none of the D-3 pits were found below or north of Wall 4808 and that the latter wall was founded just above Stratum D-4a walls and occupation debris. In its center, Wall 4808 stands to a height of up to 1.6 m between levels 85.27 and 87.06 m, while the pits were between levels 85.23 and 86.50 m, corresponding to the lower part of this wall. Thus, the possibility that the pits and the wall were contemporary should not be ruled out. In that case, the walls belonging to this unit should be attributed to Stratum D-3 at the end of the Iron Age I. This is not contradicted by the few sherds that were related to these walls.
Several fragmentary architectural elements at the top of the slope in Squares P–Q/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-1 (Strata V and IV). Although they were close to topsoil and the erosion line and were poorly preserved, they indicated dense building activity which can be divided into three phases, denoted D-1c, D-1b and D-1a; these can be correlated with similar phases uncovered in the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C (Chapter 12). Like in Area D, the lower two levels in the latter square were identical in terms of architecture and the difference between them was only in floor raising, while the upper phase, C-1a, showed a substantial change in terms of plan and architecture. This similarity between the two adjacent squares enabled a secure correlation between the two areas.
This phase comprised several architectural features in Squares Q/4–5, which superimposed Stratum D-2 architecture (Fig. 15.29; Photos 15.115– 15.116). The walls appeared to belong to one building, the western part of which was destroyed by erosion.
Stratum D-1b refers to a later phase of the previous occupation, when the buildings continued to be in use, but slight changes were made in floors and installations (Fig. 15.30; Photos 15.117–15.120). In Square Q/5, two phases of partially preserved ovens (7825, 7817) were found east of Wall 7811, related to a floor (7812). Their foundations were at levels 86.87 m and 86.78 m respectively, ca. 0.3 m above the floor of Stratum D-1c. Two intact oil lamps (Fig. 16.61:8–9) were found in the debris (7809) west of the ovens. In the corner of Walls 4809 and 7811, a thin clay floor (7827) was found at level 86.71 m.
In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.
In Square P/5, a burial of an adult (4829) was dug into D-1c–b Wall 4809. The grave was covered with a line of bricks taken from the wall. The body was lying on its back, the skull in the northeast and the feet in the southwest. The skull was slightly tilted, with the eye sockets facing the feet, approximately towards the south. No finds were found in relation to this burial. This was most probably an Islamic burial, similar to the ones found in Area B (Chapter 8).
It should be recalled that only a limited area of ca. 150 sq m, and in many cases much less, was excavated in Area D in each phase. This is a very tiny sample compared to the entire area of the site, which is ca. 100,000 sq m; thus, the available sample comprised only ca. 0.15%. Since the Late Bronze/Iron I sequence was hardly excavated in other parts of the tell, caution must be exercised when making generalizations based on the available data. Phases with poor architectural remains should not be taken as representing the entire site. For example, although the building remains of Strata D-2 and D-1 were fragmentary and unimpressive, we know that they belonged to a densely built and well-planned Iron IIA city, as uncovered in the adjacent Area C and other excavation areas.
The most prominent result of the excavation in Area D was the observation of continued occupation throughout the 600 years spanning Late Bronze I to Iron IIA. Eleven main strata from this time span were defined and several of them have two sub-phases (D-11, D-9, D-7, D-6, D-4) or even three sub-phases (D-1). No major widespread destruction layers were detected in the entire sequence in Area D; an occupation gap may have separated Stratum D-8 from D-7b, as evidenced by the 0.5 m thick accumulation between these two strata, yet this could not be confirmed. Thick accumulations of floor striations in open areas and streets in most strata were evidence for continued activity over a long time. In terms of architecture, the large public building of Stratum D-10 (14th century BCE) and the urban planning and architecture of Strata D-5 and D-4 of Iron IB, should be noted.
The foundation of the city in Late Bronze I (Stratum D-11b) is an exceptional phenomenon in the Southern Levant, as there are almost no new cities founded in this period, which is considered as a period of decline following the Egyptian conquest of Canaan. The low elevation of the earliest stratum compared to the present-day field west of the mound shows that the level of the colluvial field must have risen considerably during the historical periods. It is hypothesized that the earliest settlement was founded at approximately the same level as the adjacent field, or somewhat higher than the field west of the mound, while young tectonic activities were responsible for later geomorphological processes in this area. This, again, is an exceptional feature in Canaanite cities, which were most often located on raised topography. This earliest occupation had a later phase, denoted D-11a, although both these phases are little known, due to limited exposure.
A thick accumulation separated the open area of Stratum D-8 from that of the subsequent Stratum D-7b which can be securely dated to the early 12th century BCE. One small pit contained a cache of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapters 4, 39). In the following phase (D-7a), the area was redesigned as a dwelling with a stone floor and several installations, some of which were densely concentrated in one of its units; a prominent feature in this phase was the six foundation deposits of the lampand-bowl type (see discussion below). In part of the area, a still higher phase was detected (D-7a'), when a new line of pillar bases was built above the previous stone pavement.
Iron IB Strata D-5 and D-4 were preserved only in Squares N–Q/5 in the eastern part of the area. In both, a street crossed the area from north to south. The street surfaces were raised during the course of Strata D-5 and D-4 by almost 1.0 m, evidence for continuous intensive use and dumping of refuse into the street. Substantial buildings flanked the street on the east and west. Building DD of Stratum D-5 was a massive structure with elongated rooms and brick floors. It appeared to have had some public or administrative function, perhaps storage. A room to the north of this building may have been used for domestic cult.
Strata D-2 and D-1 of the Iron IIA were preserved only on the upper part of the slope (Squares Q/4–5 and the eastern side of P/4–5). Stratum D-2 is correlated with Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and marks the westernmost structures of this well-planned Early Iron IIA city, well known in Area C (Table 15.1 and Chapter 12). In the north of the area were remains of a substantial building and in the south were fragmentary structures and an open area with pits (for an alternative proposal which would combine the building in Squares P–Q/5 and the pits of Stratum D-3 into a single stratum; see above).
The excavation in Area D provided important information concerning the impact of environmental factors, such as erosion and tectonic movements, on site formation. The lower (western) edge of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium created during the last three thousand years. Each of the strata was damaged by erosion, although its extent is unknown; it may have demolished only narrow parts of the western slope or, combined with tectonic movements, a somewhat larger part. Nevertheless, it seems likely that erosion could not have been so extensive, and that there were no fortifications during the periods excavated in Area D. This was confirmed also along the northern edge of the mound in Areas C and E concerning the Iron IIA strata.
No evidence for violent destruction was found in any of the strata in Area D, except in part of Building DJ, Stratum D-4a, where limited ash debris and restorable pottery in situ were detected. It appeared that the transition between strata was peaceful and was the result of damage caused by prolonged use, earthquakes, etc. In spite of marked changes between strata, there was continuity in the outlines of buildings, continuous use of certain walls and installations, and the construction of new ovens more or less in the same location of earlier ones.
The walls of the Late Bronze Strata D-11 and D-10 were constructed of bricks without stone foundations; Stratum D-11b Wall 1927 might have been made of packed-earth construction (pisé). In Strata D-9–D-4, most walls had stone foundations of one or two courses that bore a brick superstructure. In the Iron IIA strata (D-2 and D-1), brick walls were constructed without stone foundations, as in contemporary strata in the other excavation areas across the mound.
Two main types of archaeological deposits were found in all the strata: debris related to the collapse of brick walls and occupation debris composed of thin accumulated layers, sometimes laminated in appearance (denoted ‘striations’) that contained many pottery sherds and animal bones. Such striations were especially common in the street layers of Strata D-5 and D-4 and open spaces in Strata D-8 to D-6. These layers are explained as resulting from intentional raising of floor levels and dumping refuse into open spaces.5
5 Natural causes for the creation of such layers were also considered, such as water flow and the deposition of chemical sediments (e.g., evaporites) or silts and clays which originated from nearby exposures of earlier strata, in a mechanism resembling ‘winter-wash’ deposits accumulating inside the squares between the excavation seasons. Based on field observations only, it seems that continuous human activity was the main cause for these laminations.
Eight foundation deposits of the lamp-and-bowl type were found in Area D. The subject was discussed by Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993), who cited all examples known at the time of writing (for two additional ones from a 12th century BCE context at Tel Beth-Shean, see TBS III: 19); the earliest known examples are dated to the 13th century BCE. Our example from Stratum D-9b is tentatively dated to the late 14th or early 13th century BCE and thus, is one of the oldest known deposits of this type. It included a basalt bowl (unlike all the later foundation deposits that have a ceramic bowl) and a single lamp. Six deposits were discovered in Stratum D-7a Building DC of the 12th century, the heyday of this phenomenon, representing one of the densest concentrations of such deposits to be found in a single structure. A single deposit found in Stratum D-4 is one of the latest, dating to the late 11th century BCE. Our deposits contain either one bowl and one lamp or two bowls placed rim to rim, with a lamp between them. No other finds or material such as ash were detected in these deposits. Most of these were located either below a wall or close to its foundation (Fig. 15.13) and must have been related to the construction of the building. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993: 123) emphasized the southern distribution of such deposits (Shephelah, western Negev, southern coastal plain and Egyptian fortresses in northern Sinai and Gaza). The only northern site they could cite was Pella. The examples from Tel Beth-Shean and Tel Rehov enlarge this distribution map to include the Beth-Shean Valley. However, the lack of such deposits in major northern sites such as Dan, Hazor and Megiddo remains a fact. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni defined the phenomenon as “an Egyptian inspired local Canaanite custom”, which appeared mainly during the height of Egyptian control in Canaan, as well as in the Philistine city, Ekron (Tel Miqne). These foundation deposits must have been an expression of beliefs related to the construction of buildings, perhaps to ward off evil spirits.
Two hearths, a cooking installation and 16 ovens (tabuns) were found in Area D.
Various additional installations were found in Area D.
Pits are a common feature in any excavation and their function for refuse, drainage or storage often remains obscure. In Area D, single pits were found in Strata D-7b and D-7a in open areas. In Strata D-5 and D-4, several pits of various sizes were found inside massive buildings. In Building DD, one large and three small pits were dug from the brick floors and in Building 8816 of Stratum D-4b, a large pit was located in the inner courtyard and two smaller pits in Room DG. These pits must have functioned in the house when it was in use, perhaps for refuse or to drain sewage.
Building EA included all the structural remains in Squares E–F/13–14, although the possibility exists that these remains may have belonged to two or three independent buildings, as described below This complex existed in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, with some architectural changes made between them. The topsoil in this area descended to the south, towards the ravine that separated the lower from the upper mound. There was a distinct difference between the preservation in Squares F/13–14, as opposed to E/13–14. While the building remains in F/13–14 were found just below topsoil and were well preserved to a height of ca. 0.8 m, those in Squares E/13–14 were poorly preserved on a much lower level and were covered by a thick layer of eroded wash. Thus, the difference in the height of the top of Wall 1689 in E/13 (71.32 m) and Wall 1629 in F/13 (72.27 m) was 1.07 m, although they were only 3.0 m apart. This lower preservation of the walls in Squares E–F/13 seems to have been caused by severe erosion towards the ravine south of the excavation area, as well as due to a violent destruction in this area, as evidenced by the fallen bricks in Squares E–F/13. It seems that the walls uncovered in the southern part of Square E/13 belonged to Stratum E-1b only and that almost no remains of E-1a were preserved in this square, due to erosion.
In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north.
Room 1701 (Square F/13) had inner dimensions of ca. 2.4 sq m (Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.14–17.15). Its four walls (1628, 1619, 1618, 1629) were identical in their construction technique, including the samesize light yellow bricks. The walls appeared ca. 0.2 m below the topsoil and were preserved to a height of five courses (0.7–0.8 m). A 0.8 m-wide entrance led to the room from Room 1664 on the west. Another entrance in the western end of the southern wall (1629) was found blocked by bricks laid lengthwise (Photo 17.15), yet the door jambs of this blocked entrance could be easily detected. The blocking of the entrance may have taken place between Strata E-1b and E-1a. In the eastern part of this room were two storage compartments (1666 and 1700), created by narrow walls (up to 0.1 m wide) made of whitish clay (Photos 17.14–17.15). The northern compartment (1666) was almost square (inner dimensions 0.9×1.0 m), while the southern one (1700) was rectangular (inner dimensions 1.0×1.4 m). A small hole (ca. 0.11 m in diameter) in the partition between the northern compartment and the western part of Room 1701 was located somewhat above the floor level. The compartments may have served as grain bins; the lack of plaster and the very thin walls precluded their use to store liquids.
The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.
The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665.
We assume that the southern part of the building continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, yet erosion destroyed much of the evidence.
The southeastern part of Area E was densely built up and the architectural remains belonged perhaps to two or three independent buildings, attached to one another and forming one complex. This area was first built in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use, with modifications, in Stratum E-1a. This unit continued beyond the limits of the excavation area to the east and south, where its possible continuation can be determined in Area F (Fig. 17.1).
Building ED, attributed to E-1b (and possibly to E-2), pertains to a partly uncovered structure located in Squares D–E/15, below Building EB of Stratum E-1a.
Excavation along the northern and eastern faces of Platform 1624 in Square E/15 (the focal point of the sanctuary of Stratum E-1a, see below) revealed earlier wall lines (4623, 4624) attributed to Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.34, 17.37). They appeared at levels 71.75–71.81 m and stood one or two courses high. These two walls were slightly to the north and east of the outer lines of the Stratum E-1a platform. Hardly any brick lines could be detected in the northern wall (4624) and it is possible that it was constructed of compacted mud. These walls were most probably contemporary with Room 4653 further to the west and with the early phase of the open space to the north and east, including the circular installations found in the eastern part of Square E/15, Oven 1649, and the layers in the lower part of Locus 1647, all attributed to Stratum E-1b (see below). A shallow debris layer separated the top of these walls from the bottom of the E-1a platform. A major question is whether these two walls belonged to an earlier platform. In order to clarify this point, we dismantled most of the platform (except for the area of the standing stones). The excavation reached level 71.64 m (5623), 0.85 m below the top of the brick platform of E-1a, revealing only brick debris and a large number of random bricks, mostly haphazardly placed (Photo 17.21). No evidence for an earlier platform was found and thus, the function of Walls 4623 and 4624 remained enigmatic.
A 1.5×2.5 m probe conducted below Floor 4654 of E-1a Building EB contained fallen and decayed bricks (5629) attributed to E-1b. The excavation stopped at level 71.69 m, almost 1.0 m below the top of 4654. Among the finds from this lower layer was a sherd of a Greek Late Protogeometric/SubProtogeometric krater (Fig. 18.2:12).
Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 was founded in Stratum E-1a. The northern room (2629) was built above Room 4653 of E-2/E-1b Building ED and the platform in the northeastern corner of the building was higher than the E-1b floors to its north and east. The outer measurements of the building were 7.7×9.8 m and it comprised a central space with an enclosed room or alcove at its eastern end, a rectangular room at the southern side and a smaller room in the northwestern corner. A unique feature in this building was the design of its northeastern corner, which included a rectangular brick platform (2654) topped by a smaller stone platform with standing stones (1624), facing a courtyard to its north and east. This platform was the focal point of what we identify as an open-air sanctuary, which included Building EB and a spacious courtyard with installations to its north and east.
This is the central space in the building (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.
This room (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).
This small rectangular room (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.
This was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.
The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).
The plan of Building EB is exceptional. Although in its size and building techniques, it does not differ from dwellings at Tel Rehov, its unique plan was apparently suited to a specific function related to the open-air sanctuary of which it was a part, with the platform and standing stones occupying the northeastern corner of this structure. The decorated plaster found at the entrance to the southern elongated room emphasizes the importance of this room, which was perhaps the seat of a priest, scribe or other functionaries related to the cultic activity in this area.
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).
The eastern part of a dwelling of Stratum E-1a, denoted Building EC, was excavated west of and attached to Building EB, in Squares C/14–16. The excavated part included a courtyard (5637), a room to its southeast (5613), and two corners of additional rooms on the west. Like the others in Area E, this building was also oriented northwest–southeast. It was built as an independent building and thus, most of its eastern wall (2647) was attached to Wall 2546 of Building EB (with a slight gap between them), thus creating a double wall, like in many other buildings of this period at Tel Rehov.
This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens.
Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room.
Locus 5639 represented the northeastern corner of a room in Building EC, west of Room 5613 (Square C/15). It was bounded by Walls 5640 on the north and 5606 on the east. This small area was excavated to 72.82 m, revealing a layer of brown earth (Photo 17.59).
1 For negation of the Lachish Stratum V cult room as
such, see Ussishkin 2003.
2 The ethnic affiliation of the temple at Khirbet 'Atarus
('Atarot) should be addressed. If this is the town
mentioned in the Mesha inscription (lines 10–11) as
being part of the land of Gad and built by the king of
Israel, then it could be that the temple belonged to an
Israelite or Israelite-related population
1 A narrow cylindrical gap in the middle of Wall 4060 had remains of plaster. This was interpreted during the excavation as a channel conducting liquids from the room to the west into the installation. However, the parallels to the grinding installations in Area C are more convincing and we tend to reconstruct 4064 as such.
The earth’s magnetic field and its elements (after Ben-Yosef et al. 2008)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Schematic illustration of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied
to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov, Stratum C-1b (V)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2454
(eastern wall of Building CE, Square Y/4, looking east). The intense fire of Stratum C-1b is
indicated by the color of the mud bricks.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2411 (eastern
wall of Building CG, Square Y/3 looking west). The
strong tilt to the south is clearly visible.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Zijderveld diagrams (or vector end-point diagrams; see Tauxe 2010: 172)
of the AF demagnetization of samples from Tel Rehov
All samples, except C3 and C6, present one component stable magnetization.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Equal area projection (lower hemisphere) of measured
directions from Buildings CE (squares) and CG (diamonds). The mean direction is represented
by circles and is statistically the same for both buildings.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Equal area projection (lower hemisphere) of measured
directions from Buildings CE (squares) and CG (diamonds) after tilt correction.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
The architectural remains uncovered at Tel Rehov throughout the occupation history of the site (15th—8th centuries BCE) are dominated by mudbricks; during the Iron Age IIA (Strata VI-IV, 10th-9th centuries BCE), the brick walls typically lack stone foundations. In Stratum V of Iron IIA, wooden beams were used on a large-scale as foundations for the walls or were incorporated in the floor makeup. A destruction that involved intense fire was identified at the end of Stratum V (local Stratum C-1b) in the eastern and northern parts of Area C: Buildings CG, CH, CM, and CE (see Chapter 12), but not in other parts of the area. A later violent destruction of Stratum IV (local Stratum C-1a) was found across the entire site (Mazar 2003; 2008; Chapter 4 and various stratigraphic chapters).
1 The measurements were done with the help of R. Granot.
The case study presented in this paper belongs to the wider field of archaeomagnetism — the application of paleomagnetic methods in archaeology, which consists of various techniques. Some are aimed solely to reconstruct the geomagnetic field itself during archaeological times (e.g., Korte et al. 2011) and others, to answer archaeological questions, mostly by using archaeomagnetic data as a dating tool (e.g., Eighmy and Sternberg 1990; Lanos 2003; Pavon-Carrasco et al. 2011). The most typical recorders of the geomagnetic field in archaeological contexts are heat-impacted clayey materials (e.g., pottery, kilns and ovens, mudbricks and metallurgical installations). The full vector information of the geomagnetic field (declination, inclination and intensity; Fig. 54.1) might be retrieved by sampling materials found in their original cooling position. In addition to reconstructing the properties of the geomagnetic field, the experiments are designed to evaluate the reliability of the material as a geomagnetic recorder (Tauxe 2010); they also provide information regarding the thermal history of the samples.
The earth’s magnetic field and its elements (after Ben-Yosef et al. 2008)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Schematic illustration of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied
to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov, Stratum C-1b (V)
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2454
(eastern wall of Building CE, Square Y/4, looking east). The intense fire of Stratum C-1b is
indicated by the color of the mud bricks.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Location of samples from Wall 2411 (eastern
wall of Building CG, Square Y/3 looking west). The
strong tilt to the south is clearly visible.
Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
2 The options that the fire occurred later than and independent of the earthquake (archaeomagnetically
indistinguishable from option 1), or that the fire caused the tilting (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable
from option 2) are much less likely and are not discussed here.
3 The mudbricks were too fragile for drilling, thus an alternative sampling method was improvised.
Both walls are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall of Building CE towards the north and the wall of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold.
AF demagnetization of eight of the ten samples from the two tilted mudbrick walls in Buildings CE and CG (Stratum V, C-1b) demonstrated stable, single-component magnetization, indicating a simple thermal history of only one major heating event. This result is an objective and conclusive confirmation of the field observation that both walls were subjected to the same intense fire.4 The directions retrieved from the samples indicate that the fire took place after or simultaneously with the tilting. We therefore argue that the simplest explanation for the destruction process of Stratum V is an earthquake that triggered an intense fire (option [1] above). The symmetric anticlinal structure observed in the deformed structures of both walls (~18° each flank), together with the discrete quality of the damage (destruction is observed only in certain locations in Area C), supports destruction by the on-fault effect of an earthquake, as classified by Rodríguez-Pascua et al. (2011: 22). Area C is located directly on a fault line (Zilberman, Chapter 2) and the deformation caused by the fault scarp is expressed by the tilting (folding); the ductile reaction of the structures (rather than brittle, e.g., Altunel 1998: Fig. 5), is most probably the result of the quality of building materials and construction techniques, including the use of wooden beams. Finally, the possibility that an earthquake occurred after and independently from the fire (option [2] above) is entirely excluded by the magnetic results (Fig. 54.2b).
4 The most common carrier of magnetic remanence in baked clay is magnetite; thus, most probably both walls were subjected
to at least 585°C, the temperature at which magnetite loses its permanent magnetization (Curie temperature).
5 At an earlier stage of the research, A. Mazar suggested attributing the destruction of Stratum V to the military campaign of
Pharaoh Shoshenq I to Canaan around 925 BCE (Mazar 2003: 317). This destruction date and its cause were challenged by
Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2003), who argued for a later date and rejected the destructive quality of Shoshenq I's campaign
to the region. Later excavation seasons since 2003 made it clear that the violent destruction of Stratum V occurred only
in a certain part of Area C, and this result led to the reevaluation of the previous conclusions (see Chapters 4 and 12).
If, indeed, an earthquake was the cause of the partial destruction of Stratum V in Area C, it excludes the possibility
that the destruction was caused by the campaign of Shoshenq I.
Building | Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square R/4 | 1555 | 1562, 4458, and 1563 |
Figure 12.9
Plan of Stratum C-2, west; area in Squares Y/1–2 cut by apiary (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
apparently southward |
Photo 12.24
Square R/4, looking southeast at Wall 1563 (left) and its corner with Wall 1572 (right) (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
All walls tilted - esp. 4458 |
Description(s)
|
Square R/4 | 1555 |
Figure 12.9
Plan of Stratum C-2, west; area in Squares Y/1–2 cut by apiary (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.25
Square R/4, looking south at smashed vessels in Locus 1555b (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CA | 4420 | 4439 |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
northward |
Photo 12.28
Southeastern part of C-2 Building CA, looking south; C-1b Wall 1448 above repair line covering Wall 4439 (2000) JW: Walls 4439 is bulging Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.27
View of C-2 Building CA, looking south; C-2 Building CB on the south (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Bulged Wall |
Description(s)
|
Just east of CA | 1506 |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward |
Figure 12.68
Section 14 (Square T/3, looking north) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Support Wall ? |
Description(s)
|
|
CA | All rooms |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
|||
CB | 1520 | 1442 and 1483 |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
probably southward |
Photo 12.35
C-2 Building CB, northern wall; note possible earthquake damage (1998) JW: The earthquake damage alluded to is the split between walls 1442 and 1483 Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Split Wall |
Description(s)
|
CB | 1520 |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
|||
CB | 1520 |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Excavators suggested it fell eastward or northward. Due to it's size and weight, I suggest it did not fall far and likely fell to the south from the split walls which probably split in a southerly direction due to a force from the north. |
Photo 12.37
C-2 Building CB; large stone south of entrance in Wall 1483, looking north (1998) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.35
C-2 Building CB, northern wall; note possible earthquake damage (1998) JW: The earthquake damage alluded to is the split between walls 1442 and 1483 Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Fallen stone |
Description(s)
|
|
CE | 6464 |
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.42
C-2 Building CE, looking east; fallen bricks and debris in Room 6464 (2003) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CE | Spaces north of Room 6464 in Squares Y/5-6 |
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Figure 12.62
Section 8 (Square Y/5, looking north) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.63
Section 9 (Square Y/5, looking west) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.64
Section 10 (Square T/4, looking east) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CY | 6506, 7512, and 8488 (?) | 7511 |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward - tilt most pronounced on W end of the wall |
Photo 12.59
C-2 Building CY, looking south at Wall 7511, covered by wood in foundation of C-1 Wall 6444 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.60
Detail of Wall 7511 (see Photo 12.59), looking southwest (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Tilted Wall |
Description(s)
|
CY | Central courtyard 7512 |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Figure 12.55
Section 1 (Squares A/6–C/6, looking north) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CY | 8470 and 6506 |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Figure 12.55
Section 1 (Squares A/6–C/6, looking north) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.56
Section 2 (Squares B/5–6, section below C-1 Walls 6420 and 6476, and below C-2 Wall 7506, looking west) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CY | 8488 |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Figure 12.55
Section 1 (Squares A/6–C/6, looking north) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.58
C-2 Building CY, looking west; meter stick on Floor 7512 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.62
C-2 Building CY, looking east; note blocked entrance to Room 8479; meter stick on Floor 7512 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.63
. Eastern part of C-2 Building CY, looking south; note blockage of Room 8479 in center; meter stick on Floor 8488 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Debris |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Damaged and tilted walls + Debris including smashed vessels |
Figure 12.9
Plan of Stratum C-2, west; area in Squares Y/1–2 cut by apiary (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Bulged Wall + Debris |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Support Wall ? |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Split Wall |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fallen stone |
Figure 12.10
Plan of Buildings CA and CB, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fallen bricks in debris |
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Tilted Wall |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fallen bricks in debris |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fallen bricks in debris |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fallen bricks in debris |
Figure 12.14
Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.12
Plan of Stratum C-2, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building [Square(s)] |
Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD (Q/3) | 5047 | 5063 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Eastward |
|
Tilted Wall |
Description(s)
|
GB and GA | 5061 and 5044 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
5061 tilts E 5044 tilts W |
|
Separated and titled Walls |
Description(s)
|
|
GA | 8052 | W of G2-b Wall 5044 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Eastward |
|
Debris - Collapsed mudbricks |
Description(s)
|
GB (G2-b) | 8062 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
probably westward |
|
Debris - Collapsed mudbricks |
Description(s)
|
|
GB (G-2b or G-2a) | Floor 8041 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
tilts east to west |
|
Tilted Floor |
Description(s)
|
|
Open Area Squares P-Q/6 |
5050 (G2-b) |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
a 0.15 m- deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036)which in turn was covered by a brick debris layer (5043) |
Description(s)
|
|||
GC | 4050 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Debris (not necessarily with a seismic origin) |
Description(s)
|
||
E of GD | 4081 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Southward |
|
Tilted Wall (Phases G2-b and G2-a tilted) |
Description(s)
|
|
E of GD | 8038 and 8061 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Debris - brick collapse in Rooms 8038 and 8061 (both attributed to G-2b) |
Description(s)
|
||
GD | 8046 and 8017 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Debris (brick collapse) attributed to G2-b |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
General Comments on possible earthquake at end of Stratum G-2 |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Area G - no violent destruction was observed at the end of Stratum G-2, yet hints at an earthquake which caused considerable damage were found in the form of tilted and split walls. |
Description(s)
|
Tilted Wall 5063 (eastward) |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Separated and titled Walls |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris - Collapsed mudbricks |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris - Collapsed mudbricks |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Tilted Floor 8041 - tilts east to west |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB
and bounded on the north by Building GC - Floor 5050 was covered by two layers attributed to Stratum G2-b;
a 0.15 m- deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036)which in turn was covered by a brick debris layer (5043). |
Description(s)
|
Debris (not necessarily with a seismic origin) |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Tilted Wall + Debris (brick collapse in Rooms 8038 and 8061) |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris (brick collapse) in Bldg. GD |
Figure 20.1
Plan of Stratum G-2b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.2a
Plan of Stratum G-2a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building | Room(s) | Wall | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR | 6491 | 6512 |
Figure 12.34
Plan of Stratum C-1b, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
east-west strike-slip |
Photo 12.88
Building CR, late phase of C-1b; bricks of 6512, looking east (2005) JW: Note fractured and displaced blocks Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
displaced blocks |
Notes
|
CE | 2489 | 2454 |
Figure 12.27
Plan of Stratum C-1b, north-center (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
northward |
Photo 12.40
Building CE, looking at eastern wall (2003) Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
tilted wall |
Notes
|
CG | 2441 | 2439 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward |
Photo 12.133
Building CG, Room 2411, looking south at collapse of Wall 2439 above wooden beams, below floor of Room 2441 (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.135
Square Y/2, looking northeast; right: Wall 4443 of C-1a Building CL; left: Fill 5430 above brick collapse from C-1b Building CG (2001) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
wall collapse | Square Y/2 - The wall collapsed into the Apiary |
CG | 2441 | 2439 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward |
Photo 12.129
Detail of additional layers of wood under Wall 2439 (see Photo 12.128), looking south; note C-1b brick collapse on left (south); entrance in C-2 Wall 2505 on right (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.128
Building CG, detail of corner of Walls 2439 (left) and 1416 (right), with wooden beams in foundations, looking south (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
tilted wall |
Notes
|
CG | 2460 and 2444 | 2411 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
southward |
Photo 12.39
Square Y/3,looking west at C-1 Building CG; C-2 walls below wood in foundation (2008) Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
tilted wall |
Notes
|
CG | 2441 | 2411 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward |
Photo 12.131
C-1b Building CG, Room 2441, looking north at destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Wall 2411 (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.132
Same view as Photo 12.131, looking north, after excavation of destruction debris in southern part; wooden beams appearing just under floor level (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
wall collapse and folding | |
CH | 2455 | 1437 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward |
Photo 12.144
Squares T–Y/1–2, northern part of C-1b Building CH, looking north; lower right: northwestern corner of C-1a Building CL, Stratum C-1a (2000) JW: Note the axis of deformation and slumping from foreground to background Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
wall collapse and folding | Squares T–Y/1–2 |
CH | 2455 | 2426 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
eastward |
Photo 12.146
Square Y/1, C-1b Building CH, looking east ; wooden construction and collapsed Wall 2426 (right) cut by Wall 2413 of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1998) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.147
Square Y/1, C-1b Building CH, looking south; detail of eastern end of collapsed Wall 2426, cut by foundation trench of Wall 2413 of C-1a Building CL (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.129
Detail of additional layers of wood under Wall 2439 (see Photo 12.128), looking south; note C-1b brick collapse on left (south); entrance in C-2 Wall 2505 on right (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.74
Section 20 (Squares T–Y/1, looking south at Wall 2426) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
wall collapse and folding |
Notes
|
The Apiary | 8469 |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
southward |
Photo 12.154
Squares Y/2– 3; collapsed western part of Wall 8469 abutting Wall 2411 of Building CG, looking west; note wood in foundation of both walls (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.155
Square Y/2, looking north at collapsed bricks in western end of Wall 8469, near corner with Wall 2411 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.157
Western row of hives abutting Wall 8469, looking west (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
wall collapse | Squares Y/2 | |
The Apiary |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
appears mostly southward |
Photo 12.235
Square Y/1, C-1a Building CL, western wing, looking north; walls in section above apiary destruction debris (2000) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
collapsed wall debris | Square Y/1 | ||
The Apiary |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Figure 12.83
Section 29 (Squares Z/1–2, looking east) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Notes
|
|||
CZ | 11457, 11449, 11426, 11408, and 11404 are described - debris was probably present in all rooms |
Figure 12.48
Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.166
C-1b Building CZ, looking west at C-1a Wall 10464 sealing the fallen bricks and debris on Floor 11426 (2012) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.167
C-1b Building CZ, central courtyard, looking south; pillar bases of C-1a Building CX set directly on top of fallen bricks (2012) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.94
Section 40 (Square A/3, looking east) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Notes
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls |
Plan of Bldgs. CL and others in C1-b
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) Plan of Bldg. CL in overlying C1-a showing location of Fill 5430
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) Wider view of Plan of Bldgs. around CL in overlying C1-a - shows location of Fill 5430
Figure 12.50
Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Wall |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Wall |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Wall |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Tilted Wall |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Tilted Walls |
Fig. 54.3
Sampling locations in Buildings CE and CG Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
Fig. 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.27
Plan of Stratum C-1b, north-center (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fractured and Displaced Blocks (mudbricks) - Steps (?) or a wall remnant |
Figure 12.34
Plan of Stratum C-1b, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 12.40
Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 12.18
Plan of Stratum C-1b (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.48
Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building [Square(s)] |
Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square Q/5 | 7837 | 7803 |
Figure 15.29
Plan of Stratum D-1c Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
northward |
|
Tilted Wall |
Description(s)
|
Square Q/5 | 7837 |
Figure 15.29
Plan of Stratum D-1c Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
? |
|
Wall Collapse Debris |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
|
Figure 15.29
Plan of Stratum D-1c Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building [Square(s)] |
Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EA | Room 1704 |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Brick Debris (not necessarily of seismic origin) |
Description(s)
|
||
EA | Rooms 1699 and 2651 |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.12
Plan of Stratum E-0 and topsoil loci Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Brick Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EA | Room 2663 |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Brick Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
Courtyard | throughout |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.4
Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.5
General plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.8
Detailed plan and elevations of Platform 2654 and standing stones Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.9
Stratum E-1a in Squares E/15–16 and Stratum E-1a–b (or just E-1b) in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Photos and Sections
|
Debris (not necessarily of a seismic origin) found throughout the courtyard |
Description(s)
Introduction
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
Probe in Squares E/17–18
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor. In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626). The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.
Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC. An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard. Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square. The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44). Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard. An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones. It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase. In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south. A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.
Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606. It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a. In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above. It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.
Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
Squares D/13–14, C/14
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
Summary of the Open Area
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624). |
||
Squares E/20, E/1 |
Figure 17.11
Plan of probe in Squares E/20, E/1 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1 |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Debris (not necessarily of seismic origin) |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Brick Debris |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.12
Plan of Stratum E-0 and topsoil loci Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Brick Debris |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
|
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.4
Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.5
General plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.8
Detailed plan and elevations of Platform 2654 and standing stones Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.9
Stratum E-1a in Squares E/15–16 and Stratum E-1a–b (or just E-1b) in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Photos and Sections
|
Description(s)
Introduction
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
Probe in Squares E/17–18
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor. In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626). The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.
Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC. An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard. Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square. The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44). Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard. An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones. It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase. In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south. A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.
Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606. It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a. In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above. It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.
Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
Squares D/13–14, C/14
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
Summary of the Open Area
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624). |
Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1 |
Figure 17.11
Plan of probe in Squares E/20, E/1 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building | Room | Wall | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF | 5498, 6435, and 5460 |
Figure 12.28
Plan of Stratum C-1a, north-center (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.96
C-1a Building CF, southern part of Room 5498, looking north; center: top of pottery model shrine, wooden beam (loom?) to its north (2001) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.106
Building CF, looking south; top of destruction debris 6401 in C-1a; right: Room 6435 with grinding stone Installation 6406 (2003) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.107
Building CF, grinding installation 6406 and destruction debris 6401 in Room 6435, looking south (2003) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.111
Building CF, looking south at western wing; front; smashed vessels on floor of Room 5460; note bricks 5458 in Room 5445 to south (2001) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CL | 5449, 5482, and to the west and north of Bldg. CL |
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.239
C-1a Building CL, eastern wing, looking south; Floor 5446 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.237
Square Z/20, C-1a Building CL, looking south; burnt material (9432) on Floor 9435 (2008) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.238
C-1a Building CL, burnt oily material (5435) on Floor 5482, looking west (2001) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.84
Section 30 (Square Z/20, looking east) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CL | 4435 | 4443 |
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.236
Squares Y–Z/1, C-1a Building CL, Wall 4443 with layer of black oily material; Wall 2504 on the left (north); looking east (2001) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.80
Section 26 (Square Z/1, western end, looking south) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.86
Section 32 (Square Y/1, looking east along Wall 4443) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris + collapsed walls (?) |
Description(s)
|
|
CW | 6411 and Courtyard Area |
Figure 12.38
Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.117
C-1a Building CW, looking south; destruction debris and vessels in Room 6411 (2003) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.115
C-1a Building CW, eastern part, looking west (2007) JW:Debris on 8430 Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
Square C/6 east of Wall 8424 of C-1a Building CW |
Figure 12.38
Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.119
Square C/6, skeleton (8472) east of Wall 8424 of C-1a Building CW, looking west (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
collapsed wall (fell on a human) |
Description(s)
|
|||
CQ1 | 6483 and 6436 |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.121
C-1a Building CQ1, looking west; destruction debris in western rooms (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.122
C-1a Building CQ1, looking west; floors of western rooms (see Photo 12.121) (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CQ2 | All rooms - 7500, 7490, and 8431 |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.126
C-1a Building CQ2, looking west; destruction debris (7442) in western half of Room 7500 (2005) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.124
C-1a Building CQ2, looking west; destruction debris in Room 7490 (2005) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CQ2 | 7500 | 7413 |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
southward |
Photo 12.125
C-1a Building CQ2, wood in foundation of Walls 7413 and 7459 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.123
C-1a Building CQ2, looking west; meter stick on Floor 7500 (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.120
C-1a Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 and street (Squares Z, A–C/4) to their south, looking southwest (2007) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
tilted wall |
Description(s)
|
CQ3 | 10452 and 10460 |
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.178
C-1a Building CQ3, Room 10452, looking south; smashed pottery and destruction debris against southern wall, on plastered installation (see Photo 12.179) (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.88
Section 34 (A–C/2, looking north) 2504, looking south) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CQ3 | 10460 | 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south |
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
wall stumps - collapsed wall ? |
Description(s)
|
||
CQ3 | 10494 |
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.170
General view of southeastern part of Area C, looking west (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
damaged wall + debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CX | All rooms |
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.185
C-1a Building CX, vessels in destruction debris in center of Room 10507, against Bench 10502, looking north (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.186
C-1a Building CX, Locus 10431, vessels in burnt destruction debris, looking west (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.88
Section 34 (A–C/2, looking north) 2504, looking south) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CP | 11451, 9449, 9450, 10458, 10476, 10506, 10510, and 11441 |
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.205
C-1a Building CP, Room 11451, looking east; right: destruction debris with fallen grinding stone and loom weights; left foreground: plastered Bench 11452 attached to Wall 11417 (2012) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.228
C-1a Building CP, Room 9450, pottery altar (Chapter 35, No. 2) in destruction debris (9420), looking east (2008) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.226
C-1a Building CP, Bin 9434 in Room 9450, looking south (2008) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.211
C-1a Building CP, southwestern corner of Room 10458, looking south at krater-pithos and Oven 10430, with concentration of vessels to their north (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.212
As Photo 12.211, detail of vessels, grinding stone and stand with petals, before exposure of the mortar seen in Photo 12.213 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.213
C-1a Building CP, southwestern corner of Room 10458, looking south at krater-pithos with cooking pot inside, mortar embedded in floor, Oven 10430 and large stone to its east; woman sitting on Bench 10454 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.217
C-1a Building CP, looking north at Room 10458 (top) and Room 10476 (bottom); note vessels on Bench 10466 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.218
Building CP, Stratum C-1a, Room 10476, looking west at Bench 10467 and entrance into Room 9450 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.221
C-1a Building CP, looking south at destruction debris in Room 10476, with loom weights, stones and smashed top of kraterpithos (Fig. 13.146:4), east of Bin 10488 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.222
As Photo 12.228, detail of Bin 10488 and krater-pithos (Fig. 12.146:4) to its east (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.224
C-1a Building CP, detail of grain in bottom of Bin 10488 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.232
Bin 10501 restored Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.220
Large mortar from Building CP, Room 10476 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.198
C-1a Building CP, Room 10510 (northeastern room), looking north (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.199
C-1a Building CP, Room 10510; incense burner (Fig. 13.158:5) and other finds (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.201
C-1a Building CP, destruction debris (11418) in Room 11441, looking west (2012) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
debris |
Description(s)
|
||
CP | 10476 |
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.219
C-1a Building CP, Room 10476, sub-floor construction 11468, looking north (2012) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.189
C-1a Building CP, with sub-floor construction in Room 10476 (top center) (2012) (photo: David Silverman) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.194
Building CP, looking south at C-1b Wall 11477 and C-1a Wall 10457; center: C-1a sub-floor construction 11468 (2012) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.221
C-1a Building CP, looking south at destruction debris in Room 10476, with loom weights, stones and smashed top of krater-pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), east of Bin 10488 (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52c
Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:100) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
fractured floor |
Description(s)
|
||
CP | 10458 |
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
collapsed wall ? |
Description(s)
|
|||
CP | 9449 | 9406 |
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Photo 12.192
Wall 9406, dividing Building CL (mostly removed, left) and Building CP (right), looking north; lower left: eastern row of beehives, C-1b apiary (2008) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Photo 12.234
Walls 9406, 5418 and 5453 of C-1a Building CL above C-1b Wall 9453 and apiary destruction debris (2010) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
damaged wall |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.28
Plan of Stratum C-1a, north-center (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
Inside3 [Room 9450] was an intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig. 13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10, 13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812 BCE (2σ).- Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179) |
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.38
Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Bldg. CW - Courtyard Area |
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Bldg. CQ2 - Room 8431 - Phase C-1a |
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Bldg. CP - Deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484) in Room 10506, including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels |
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.28
Plan of Stratum C-1a, north-center (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.28
Plan of Stratum C-1a, north-center (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.38
Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Fractured stones of sub-floor construction |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Tilted Walls |
Figure 12.35
Plan of Stratum C-1a, northeast (1:125) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapsed Walls ? |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Bldg. CP - Room 10458 |
Description(s)
|
Wall Stumps - Collapsed Walls ? |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
Bldg. CQ3 - Wall 10482 in Room 10460 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south in Bldg. CP |
Description(s)
|
Damaged Wall |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52a
Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.52b
Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris and burnt and damaged walls |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 12.38
Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.51
Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris |
Figure 12.19
Plan of Stratum C-1a (1:200) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Figure 12.53
Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Human Remains |
Figure 12.38
Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a (1:75) Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building [Square(s)] |
Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square Q/4 | 1804 |
Figure 15.31
Plan of Stratum D-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
possibly east (downslope) |
|
Collapsed and Burnt Bricks |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed and Burnt Bricks |
Figure 15.31
Plan of Stratum D-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building [Square(s)] |
Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EA (Square F/14) | Room 1677 and Locus 1670 |
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Smashed pottery in destruction debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EA | Loci 1626, 1605, and 1635 of Rooms 1701, 1605, and 1635 respectively |
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Collapse Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EB | Space 2641 |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Collapse Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EB | Room 4654 |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Collapse Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EB | Room 2629 |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Collapse Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EB | Room 4616 |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Collapse Debris |
Description(s)
|
||
EB | Platform 2654 and environs |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Damaged Corner of a Platform (not necessarily due to seismic activity) and surrounding brick collapse |
Description(s)
|
||
Courtyard | throughout but particularly in the southern end, in Squares E/15, F/15, and the N part of E-F/14 |
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.4
Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.5
General plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.8
Detailed plan and elevations of Platform 2654 and standing stones Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.9
Stratum E-1a in Squares E/15–16 and Stratum E-1a–b (or just E-1b) in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Photos and Sections
|
|
Description(s)
Introduction
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
Probe in Squares E/17–18
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor. In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626). The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.
Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC. An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard. Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square. The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44). Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard. An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones. It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase. In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south. A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.
Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606. It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a. In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above. It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.
Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
Squares D/13–14, C/14
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
Summary of the Open Area
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624). |
||
EC | Space 5637 and Room 5613 |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Debris (Fallen Bricks) |
Description(s)
|
||
Squares E/20, E/1 |
Figure 17.11
Plan of probe in Squares E/20, E/1 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1 |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
General comments on destruction of Stratum E-1a |
Figure 17.5
General plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Smashed pottery in destruction debris |
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapse Debris |
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapse Debris |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapse Debris |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapse Debris |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Collapse Debris |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Damaged Corner of a Platform (not necessarily due to seismic activity) |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.13
Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
|
Figure 17.3
Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.4
Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.5
General plan of Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.6
Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.8
Detailed plan and elevations of Platform 2654 and standing stones Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 17.9
Stratum E-1a in Squares E/15–16 and Stratum E-1a–b (or just E-1b) in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Photos and Sections
|
Description(s)
Introduction
A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.
Probe in Squares E/17–18
A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor. In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626). The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.
Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)
The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC. An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)
The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard. Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).
Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)
Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.
Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).
Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)
A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)
Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square. The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44). Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard. An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones. It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase. In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,
Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)
Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south. A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.
Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)
In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606. It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a. In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above. It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.
Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)
The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.
Squares D/13–14, C/14
In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).
Summary of the Open Area
The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624). |
Debris (Fallen Bricks) in Space 5637 and Room 5613 of Building EC |
Figure 17.7
Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1 |
Figure 17.11
Plan of probe in Squares E/20, E/1 Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Building [Square(s)] |
Room(s) | Wall(s) | Plan(s) | Collapse Direction |
Image (s) | Destruction Type |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square P/5 | E of and abutting Wall 4014 |
Figure 20.3
Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Burnt Brick debris below wood foundations |
Description(s)
|
||
Square Q/4 | 5018 |
Figure 20.3
Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Brick Debris below wood beam foundation at bottom of Wall 5018 |
Description(s)
|
||
Square Q/3 |
Figure 20.3
Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Disordered wood beam foundation |
Description(s)
|
|||
GF Square Q/5 |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Burning and destruction of Building GF |
Description(s)
|
|||
GG | 4047 and 5008 |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
Wall 4047 is folded and bowed in Phases G1-b and G1-a Wall 5008 is tilted E |
|
Wall 4047 is folded and bowed in Phases G1-b and G1-a Wall 5008 is tilted E |
Description(s)
|
|
GG | 4089 |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Destruction layer in Room 4089 |
Description(s)
|
||
GG | 5037 + Loci 4065 and 4069 (all G1-b) |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Destruction layers including smashed pottery and fallen objects |
Description(s)
|
Effect | Plan(s) | Location(s) + Image(s) | Description(s) |
---|---|---|---|
General comments on destruction of Stratum G-1a |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
The dramatic destruction of Stratum G-1a yielded a rich pottery assemblage and other finds. This can be correlated to the general destruction of the city of Stratum IV in the 9th century BCE, as evidenced in other areas at Tel Rehov. |
Description(s)
|
Burnt Brick debris below wood foundations and abutting Wall 4014 in Square P/5 |
Figure 20.3
Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Brick Debris below wood beam foundation at bottom of Wall 5018 in Square Q/4 |
Figure 20.3
Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Disordered wood beam foundation in Square Q/3 |
Figure 20.3
Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Burning and destruction of Building GF |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Folded and bowed walls in Building GG |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Destruction layer in Room 4089 of Building GG |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Destruction layer in Room 5037 of Building GG |
Figure 20.4
Plan of Stratum G-1b Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)
Figure 20.5
Plan of Stratum G-1a Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3) |
|
Description(s)
|
Effect | Location | Comments | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls |
|
VIII+ | |
Broken Pottery found in fallen position |
|
VII+ | |
Tilted Walls |
|
VI+ | |
Folded Walls |
|
Bulged Wall in Area C | VII+ |
Displaced Walls |
|
Split Wall in Area C, Separated Walls in Area G | VII+ |
Seismic Uplift/Subsidence |
|
VI+ |
Effect | Building(s) | Comments | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls |
|
VIII+ | |
Tilted Walls |
|
VI+ | |
Displaced Blocks |
|
Intensity Estimate downgraded from VIII+ to VI+ since the displacement in Bldg. CR of Area C was in mudbricks rather than stones (masonry) as specified in the EAE Chart | VI+ |
Effect | Building(s) | Comments | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls |
|
VIII+ | |
Tilted Walls |
|
VI+ | |
Folded Walls |
|
VII+ | |
Broken Pottery (some apparently in fallen position) |
|
VII+ |
Effect | Image(s) | Location | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed and folded wall | Collapsed and folded wall
Collapsed and folded wall on the west side of Area G
Photo by Jefferson Williams - 11 June 2023 Collapsed and folded wall - Digital Theodolite
Digital Theodolite view of Collapsed and folded wall on the west side of Area G
Photo by Jefferson Williams - 11 June 2023 Link to Lidar 3D scan of Collapsed and Folded Western Wall in Area G |
Western Wall of Area G | |
Anticline limb (mostly north limb) |
Area C | ||
Parted Walls | Area C | Wall to the right tilts | |
Warped E-W Wall | Area C | ||
Anticlinal folding | Area C | ||
Tilted Wall | Area C | ||
Downdropped block | Area C | possibly a blocked entrance |
Description | Scan Date | Scanner | Processing | Link opens a new tab |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed and folded western wall in Area G | 11 June 2023 | iPhone 14 - Jefferson Williams | Detail Mode | Collapsed and Folded Western Wall in Area G |
Description | Flight Date | Pilot | Processing | Downloadable Link |
---|---|---|---|---|
Entire Site | 11 June 2023 | Jefferson Williams | ODM - no GCPs | Right Click to download. Then unzip |
Area C | 11 June 2023 | Jefferson Williams | ODM - no GCPs | Right Click to download. Then unzip |
Description | Scan Date | Scanner | Processing | Downloadable Link (las format) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed and folded western wall in Area G | 11 June 2023 | Jefferson Williams | Detail Mode | Right Click to download |
Bruins, H.J., van der Plicht, J., Mazar, A., Bronk Ramsey,
Ch. and Manning, S.W. 2005. The Groningen Radiocarbon Series
from Tel Reov: OxCal Bayesian Computations for the Iron IB–IIA Boundary and Iron IIA
Destruction Events. Pp. 271–293 in Levy, T. and
Higham, T. (eds.). The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating:
Archaeology, Text and Science. London. -
can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
Bruins, H., Mazar, A. and van der Plicht, J. 2007. The End
of the 2nd Millennium BCE and the Transition from
Iron I to Iron IIA: Radiocarbon Dates from Tel Rehov,
Israel. Pp. 79–100 in Bietak, M. and Czerny, E. (eds.).
The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern
Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C. III:
Proceedings of the SCIEM 2000 — 2nd Euro Conference. Vienna.
Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar (2003a) 14C Dates from Tel Rehov: Iron-Age Chronology, Pharaohs, and Hebrew Kings,
Science Vol. 300 11 April 2003 315-318
Bruins, H., van der Plicht, J. and Mazar, A. 2003b.
Response to Comment on “14C Dates from Tel Rehov:
Iron-Age Chronology, Pharaohs and Hebrew Kings”.
Science 302 (24 October 2003): 568c.
Finkelstein I. and Piasetzky, E. 2010. Radiocarbon Dating the Iron
Age in the Levant: A Bayesian Model for Six Ceramic Phases and
Six Transitions, Antiquity 84: 374–385. - full copy on academia.edu
Finkelstein, I. 2013. The Forgotten Kingdom. Atlanta. - full copy on academia.edu
Finkelstein, I. 2013. The Forgotten Kingdom. Atlanta. - can be borrowed with a free account on archive.org
Finkelstein, I. 2017. What the Biblical Authors Knew
About Canaan Before and in the Early Days of the
Hebrew Kingdom. Ugarit Forschungen 48: 173–198. - full copy on academia.edu
Gorner, Aaron BY, (2023) Mazar's Modified Modified Chronology:
The Preservation of Solomonic Possibilities, BYU Scholars Archive
Levy, Thomas., Higham, Thomas. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating:
Archaeology, Text and Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. -
can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
Mazar, A. (1992). Archaeology of the Land of the Bible:
10,000-586 B.C.E, Yale University Press. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
Mazar, A. and E. Stern (2001). Archaeology of the Land of the Bible, Doubleday. - there may be two volumes to this
Mazar, Amihai, Bruins, H. J., Panitz-Cohen, N., and van der Plicht, J. ,
(2014:193-255) 13 Ladder of Time at Tel Rehov -
Stratigraphy, archaeological context, pottery and radiocarbon dates in
Levy, Thomas., Higham, Thomas. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating:
Archaeology, Text and Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. -
full text at academia.edu -
Roberts (2012:169-170) highlighted
page 218
Mazar, Amihai, Bruins, H. J., Panitz-Cohen, N., and van der Plicht, J. ,
(2014:193-255) 13 Ladder of Time at Tel Rehov -
Stratigraphy, archaeological context, pottery and radiocarbon dates in
Levy, Thomas., Higham, Thomas. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating:
Archaeology, Text and Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. -
can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org -
Roberts (2012:169-170) highlighted
page 218
Raphael, Kate and Agnon, Amotz (2018). EARTHQUAKES EAST AND WEST OF THE DEAD SEA TRANSFORM IN THE BRONZE AND IRON AGES.
Tell it in Gath Studies in the History and Archaeology of Israel Essays in Honor of Aren M. Maeir on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday.
Vaknin, Y., et al. (2023). Tel Beth-Shean in the Tenth–Ninth Centuries BCE: A Chronological Query and Its Possible Archaeomagnetic Resolution.
in “And in Length of Days Understanding” (Job 12:12): Essays on Archaeology in the Eastern Mediterranean and Beyond in Honor of Thomas E. Levy.
E. Ben-Yosef and I. W. N. Jones. Cham, Springer International Publishing: 787-810.
Mazar, A. (1999) The 1997–1998 Excavations at Tel Reḥov: Preliminary Report
Amihai Mazar Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1/2 (1999), pp. 1-42 (42 pages)
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY
IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME I: INTRODUCTIONS, SYNTHESIS AND EXCAVATIONS
ON THE UPPER MOUND." Qedem 59: III-416.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen, N. (2020), Chapters 3-4
Introductions, Synthesis and Excavations on the Upper Mound in
"TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY
IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME I: INTRODUCTIONS, SYNTHESIS AND EXCAVATIONS
ON THE UPPER MOUND." Qedem 59: III-416.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY
IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME II: THE LOWER MOUND: AREA C AND THE APIARY." Qedem 60: III-658.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). Chapter 12 Area C : Stratigraphy and Architecture
in "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME II: THE LOWER MOUND:
AREA C AND THE APIARY." Qedem 60: III-658.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME III:
THE LOWER MOUND: AREAS D, E, F AND G." Qedem 61: III-466.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME IV:
POTTERY STUDIES, INSCRIPTIONS AND FIGURATIVE ART." Qedem 62: III-640.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020).
"TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME V:
VARIOUS OBJECTS AND NATURAL-SCIENCE STUDIES." Qedem 63: III-683.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY
IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME I: INTRODUCTIONS, SYNTHESIS AND EXCAVATIONS
ON THE UPPER MOUND." Qedem 59: III-416.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY
IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME II: THE LOWER MOUND: AREA C AND THE APIARY." Qedem 60: III-658.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME III:
THE LOWER MOUND: AREAS D, E, F AND G." Qedem 61: III-466.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME IV:
POTTERY STUDIES, INSCRIPTIONS AND FIGURATIVE ART." Qedem 62: III-640.
Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020).
"TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME V:
VARIOUS OBJECTS AND NATURAL-SCIENCE STUDIES." Qedem 63: III-683.
S. Kunath, BN 64 (1992), 14–16
P. Beck & U. Zevulun, BASOR 304 (1996), 67
D. C. Browning, Jr. & A. Mazar, ASOR Newsletter 47/2 (1997), 24–25
A. Mazar, AJA 102 (1998), 775–777; id., ESI 109 (1999),
42*–43*; 114 (2002), 38*–40*; id., IEJ 49 (1999), 1–42; 53 (2003), 29–48; 54 (2004), 24–36; id. (& J.
Camp), BAR 26/2 (2000), 38–51, 75; 29/2 (2003), 60–61; id., International Radiocarbon Conference, 17,
Judean Hills, Israel, 18–23.7.2000, Abstracts, Tel Aviv 2000, 81; id., ASOR Annual Meeting Abstract Book,
Boulder, CO 2001, 3, 9; id. (& I. Carmi), Radiocarbon 43 (2001), 1333–1342; id., MdB 146 (2002), 30–32;
id., EI 27 (2003), 287*–288*; id., Saxa Loquentur, Münster 2003, 171–184; M. Pritchard, BAIAS 16 (1998),
131–132; S. A. Kingsley, Minerva 14/4 (1999), 3–4; R. A. Mullins (& J. A. Montgomery), ASOR Newsletter
49/1 (1999), 7–9; id., Papers Presented at the Albright Appointee’s Colloquium at ACOR in Amman, Jordan, Amman 1999
Y. Garfinkel, Studies in the Archaeology of Israel and Neighboring Lands, Chicago, IL
2001, 143–159
N. Panitz-Cohen, ASOR Annual Meeting Abstract Book, Boulder, CO 2001, 9; A. Sumaka ’i Fink,
ibid., 8–9
Y. Goren et al., TA 29 (2002), 221–227; id., Inscribed in Clay, Tel Aviv 2004, 248–255
E. A. Knauf, BN 112 (2002), 21–27
E. Zilberman et al., Geological Survey of Israel, Current Research 13
(2002), 9–18; BAR 29/1 (2003), 58
H. J. Bruins et al., Science 300/11.4.2003, 315–318
N. Coldstream
(& A. Mazar), IEJ 53 (2003), 29–48; id., TA 30 (2003), 247–258
I. Finkelstein (& E. Piasetzky), Antiquity
77/298 (2003), 771–779; id., Symbiosis, Symbolism and the Power of the Past, Winona Lake, IN 2003,
75–83; id. (& E. Piasetzky), TA 30 (2003), 283–295; id., Levant 36 (2004), 181–188
H. M. Niemann, UF 35
(2003), 439–442 (421–485)
T. Fries, ASOR Newsletter 54/3 (2004), 16–17
E. Boaretto et al., Radiocarbon
47 (2005), 39–55.
0. Yogev, 'Atiqot 17 (1985), 90-113.
The synagogue (and halakhic inscription)
D. Bahat, IEJ 23 (1973), 181-183
F. Vitto, Archeologia 110
(1977), 72; id., JEJ 30 (1980), 214-217; id., ASR, 90-94; id., Temples and High Places in Biblical Times,
Jerusalem 1981, 164-167; id., RB 88 (1981), 584-586; id., BAlAS I (1982), 11-14; id., Jahrbuch der
Osterreichischen Byzantinistik 32 (1982), 361-370
z. Safrai, lmmanue/8 (1978), 48-57
A. Demsky, IEJ29
(1979), 182-193
R. Frankel, ibid., 194-196
Y. Liebermann, Moria 8/8-9 (1979), 59-68
J. Sussman,
ASR, 146-153
D. Chen, LA 36 (1986), 239-240
G. Foerster, Actes du Xle Congres International
d'Archeologie Chrhienne (21-28 Sept. 1986), Rome 1989, 1809-1820.
kmz | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|
Right Click to download | Master Tel Rehov Archaeoseismic and Paleoseismic file | various |