Open this page in a new tab

Tel Rehov

Aerial view of Tel Rehov from the northwest Aerial view of Tel Rehov from the southeast (left) Aerial View of Tel Rehov from the northwest

Areas C (left) and D (right, down the slope) are seen in the foreground and Areas B (left) and G (right) in the background

Used with permission from BibleWalks.com



(right) Aerial view of Tel Rehov from the southeast showing erosion that has taken place on this side of the Tel

Click on Image for high resolution magnifiable image

Drone photos taken by Jefferson Williams on 11 June 2023





Names
Transliterated Name Source Name
Tel Rehov Hebrew תל רחוב
Tell es-Sarem Arabic تل الصارم
Ro-ob Greek Pσωβ
Rihib
Introduction
History and Identification

Tel Rehov (Tell es-Sarem), the largest mound in the alluvial Beth-Shean Valley, is located about 6 km west of the Jordan River, 3 km east of the Gilboa Ridge, and 5 km south of Tel Beth-Shean. Rehov dominated the north–south road through the Jordan Valley. The site comprises an upper mound and a lower mound to its north, each covering about 12 a. The upper mound rises to 20 m above the surrounding plain, while the lower mound stands about 8 m above the plain; the summit of the upper mound is at an absolute elevation of 116 m below sea level. A ravine separates the two mounds; a gate may have been located in this ravine on the eastern side of the mound. The closest water source is a spring near the northeastern corner of the mound. Additional springs are found at short distances from the site.

In the early 1920s, P. Abel identified the site with Rehob mentioned in Egyptian texts. The identification is also based on the occurrence of the name in several other historical sources, on the name of the Byzantine Jewish town Rohob (Rehob) located at Ḥorvat Parva (Khirbet Farwana) northwest of the mound (see Vol. 4, pp. 1272–1274), and on the name of the Islamic tomb of Sheikh er-Rihab south of the mound. Surveys conducted by W. F. Albright, A. Bergman (Biran), and N. Zori indicated occupation at the site throughout the Bronze and Iron Ages.

Reḥov (Hebrew for “piazza” or “street”) was the name of several cities mentioned in the Hebrew Bible and other ancient Near Eastern sources. Two cities by that name in the western Galilee are referred to in the city lists of Asher (Josh. 19:28–30). An Aramean city and state of that name are mentioned in Syria, mainly in relation to David’s conquests (2 Sam. 10:6, 8). However, Rehov in the Beth-Shean Valley is never mentioned in the Hebrew Bible.

Several Egyptian sources, however, do make mention of Rehov in the Beth-Shean Valley. The earliest is probably Rahabu in letter no. 2 from Taanach (fifteenth century BCE). In the stele of Seti I found at Beth-Shean (c. 1300 BCE), Pehel, Ḥamat, and Yeno‘am are mentioned as rebelling against the Egyptian administration, while Rehov remained loyal to the Pharaoh. In Papyrus Anastasi I (22:8; thirteenth century BCE), the Egyptian scribe refers to Rehov in relation to Beth-Shean and the crossing of the Jordan. Pharaoh Shishak’s list of conquered cities (c. 925 BCE) mentions Rehov (no. 17) after “the valley” and before Beth-Shean. Several other Egyptian sources refer to a city of this name in the Beth-Shean Valley or to Rehov in western Galilee. These include the execration texts, Tuthmosis III’s topographic list (no. 87; the latter two probably refer to the western Galilee); bronze vessels from a place called Rehov mentioned in a papyrus kept in Turin, Italy, which includes accounts dated to the Twentieth Dynasty; and a notation concerning the production of chariot parts at Rehov in Papyrus Anastasi IV (17:3).

Hebrew University Excavations

The excavations at Tel Rehov were directed by A. Mazar on behalf of the Institute of Archaeology of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and sponsored by J. Camp. The first six seasons took place between 1997 and 2003. Three excavation areas (A, B, H) were opened on the upper mound, and five (C, D, E, F, G) on the lower mound. Geophysical and geological surveys were also conducted. The number of strata varies in certain areas or sub-areas, and the correlation between them is tentative in certain cases. Yet an attempt was made to correlate local strata dating from the late Iron Age I and onwards in each of the excavation areas with seven general strata (VII–I), which also remain tentative in certain cases.

Maps, Aerial Views, and Plans
Maps, Aerial Views, and Plans

Maps

  • Fig. 1.1 Location Map for Tel Rehov from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.5)
  • Location Map for Tel Rehov from biblewalks.com

Aerial Views

  • Annotated Satellite View of Tel Rehov and environs from biblewalks.com
  • Annotated Satellite View of Tel Rehov showing excavation areas from biblewalks.com
  • Photo 3.1 Aerial Photo from 1945 showing Tel Rehov and vicinity from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Aerial View of Tel Rehov from biblewalks.com
  • Wide Aerial View of Tel Rehov from the northwest from Jefferson Williams
  • Photo 3.7 Aerial Photo of Tel Rehov showing eroded ravine on the eastern slope from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Photo 3.8 Another Aerial Photo of Tel Rehov showing eroded ravine on the eastern slope from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Tel Rehov in Google Earth
  • Tel Rehov on govmap.gov.il

Plans

Site Plans

Normal Size

  • Fig. 3.7 Map of the site showing grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Magnified

  • Fig. 3.7 Map of the site showing grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Area Plans

Area C

Normal Size

  • Fig. 12.7           Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.18           Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.19           Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.23           Isometric view of Area C, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Magnified

  • Fig. 12.7           Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.18           Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.19           Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.23           Isometric view of Area C, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Area D

Normal Size

Magnified

Area E

Normal Size

  • Fig. 17.1           Schematic plan of Areas E and F; Iron IIA Stratum F-1 in black from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.2a           Plan of Stratum E-3 (Square E/15) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.2b           Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.3           Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.4           Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.5           General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Magnified

  • Fig. 17.1           Schematic plan of Areas E and F; Iron IIA Stratum F-1 in black from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.2a           Plan of Stratum E-3 (Square E/15) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.2b           Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.3           Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.4           Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Fig. 17.5           General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Area G

Normal Size

Magnified

Background Information
Geology and Geophysics

  • from Chapter 2 - The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and Tel Rehov ( Zilberman in Mazar et. al., 2020 v. 1)
  • If you don't want to spend time reading, go through the Figures - they tell much of the story
Figures
Figures

  • Figure 2.1 - Digital Terrain Map showing locations and faults from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 2.5 - Drawing of geological and morphological structure of the Beth-Shean Valley from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

  • Figure 2.6 - Map of the main surface and subsurface structural elements in the Beth-Shean area from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

  • Figure 2.7a - Air Photo showing surface scarps (in black) and subsurface trace (in yellow) of the marginal fault along with (in red) traces of the west to east seismic lines GP-5037 (to the north) and GP-5036 (to the south)

  • Figure 2.7b - West to east seismic line GP-5037 (the northern line)

  • Figure 2.7c - West to east seismic line GP-5036 (the southern line)

    Explanation : The deep faults labeled as "Fault Zone" in the seismic sections (2.7 b and c) were used to help draw the location of the marginal fault (in yellow) on the Air photo (2.7a).

    Tel Rehov Paleoseismic Trench - The location of the Tel Rehov Paleoseismic Trench is pointed to by a yellow arrow in the Air photo (2.7a). Its extent is shown as a white double arrow (labeled Trench TR-1) on GP-5036 (2.7c). This Earthquake Encyclopedia has a webpage for the Tel Rehov Trench. Clicking on the link to the left will open it's page in a new tab.

    Figures 2.7 a-c all come from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

  • Figure 2.11 - Subsurface structure of Tel Rehov interpreted from a N-S seismic line - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 2.12 - Seismic interpretation of the top of the lower tufa layer along with subsurface faults - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 2.13 - Buried Fault Scarp (exposed in a trench) which bounds the western part of the mound - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 2.10 - Topography of Tel, Excavation Areas, and location of seismic lines - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion
Abbreviations used

  • BSV - Beth-Shean Valley
  • CJV - Central Jordan Valley
  • DSR - Dead Sea Rift
  • DST - Dead Sea Transform
  • WMF - Western Marginal Fault

The Structural Framework of the Beth-Shean Area

The Beth-Shean Valley [BSV] is bounded by four fault systems (Fig. 2.6). Its eastern boundary is a morphotectonic escarpment 20-40 m high that marks the trace of the Western Marginal Fault (WMF) of the DSR [Dead Sea Rift] (Gardosh and Bruner 1998; Bruner et al. 2002: Zilberman et al. 2004; Meiler et al. 2008). The north-south-oriented escarpment of the marginal fault runs between Sede Trumot in the south and the Nahal Harod stream in the north.

The valley is bounded in the west and north-west by the Gilboa fault belt that runs along the foot of Mt. Gilboa (Hatzor 1991; Shaliv et al. 1991; Gardosh and Bruner 1998; Meiler et al. 2008), which is the northeastern elevated part of the Shekhem Syncline. The southwestern tilted block of the Gilboa is bounded in the northeast by a belt of normal faults that forms a series of northeastward-descending blocks (Hatzor 1991; Gardosh and Bruner 1998).

The northern boundary of the BSV is the WNW (295°)—ESE(115°)-oriented Harod Graben fault system that separates between the southwestward-tilted blocks of the Sheluhat Zev'aim block in the north and Mt. Gilboa in the south (Meiler at al. 2008). The Sheluhat Zeva'im Ridge is a southwest-tilted block, capped by the Pliocene Cover Basalt. It is the southernmost of a series of post-Cover Basalt tilted blocks that dictate the present relief of the eastern Lower Galilee.

The north—west-oriented buried Mehola fault and the younger, subparallel Bardala fault, form the southern border of the BSV. They down-fault the northeastern part of the Faria anticline, which is buried under the Neogene sequence of the valley (Shaliv et al. 1991; Gardosh and Bruner 1998; Meiler et al. 2008) (Fig. 2.6). The Faria anticline is part of the Syrian Arc Fold belt. It is crossed by a north-west oriented normal fault system with a vertical displacement of several hundred meters. This system is part of a north-west-oriented fault system detected in the subsurface of the BSV by Meiler et al. (2008). The most prominent feature of this system is the "Arched Fault" that splits from the WMF near Tel Rehov and crosses the BSV to the northwest, where it appears to merge with the fault that runs along the northeast-facing mountain front of Mt. Gilboa.

From the above data, it appears that the Beth-Shean Valley is a structural block bounded between the elevated (about 1200 m) Gilboa block in the west and the subsided (about 2800 m; Meiler et al. 2008) DSR in the east.

The Western Marginal Fault (WMF) of the Dead Sea Rift (DSR)

The WMF of the DSR forms a prominent morphological escarpment 20-40 m high that separates the BSV [Beth-Shean Valley] from the CJV [Central Jordan Valley]. This escarpment is underlain by a system of deep-seated fault belts several hundred meters wide, encountered in several seismic reflection lines (Gardosh and Bruner 1998; Bruner et al. 2002; Meiler et al. 2008) (Figs. 2.5-2.7). The faults are inclined eastward towards the deep Kinnarot-CJV basin (Meiler et al. 2008) that is bounded in the east by the DST [Dead Sea Transform].

The escarpment formed by the vertical displacement along the fault is built of a tufa sequence that also underlies the surface of the BSV, as well as the western part of the CJV, thus reflecting a post-tufa deposition (post 20 ka) vertical offset of 20-40 m.

The southern escarpment (termed here the "Rehov Fault") extends from Sde Trumot in the south to Tel Rehov in the north (Figs. 2.5, 2.7a). It is a 15-20 m-high arched escarpment, which separates a high tufa plateau in the west from a flat surface covered by soil in the east. The northern escarpment (termed here the "Beth-Shean Fault") starts north of Tel Rehov and extends northward to the CJV (Fig. 2.5). The morphological expression of this fault can be traced northward to Kibbutz 'En Hanatziv, where it forms a clear step. Several springs are located along the trace of the fault: 'En Neshev, which is located some 600 m north of Tel Rehov, and 'En Naftali and 'En Yehuda, which are located in Kibbutz 'En Hanatziv. North of 'En Hanatziv, the steps of the fault merge with the 40 m-high escarpment that runs northward towards Beth-Shean (Figs. 2.1, 2.5, 2.7a).

North of Beth-Shean, the escarpment splits into two branches: one continues northward towards the Sea of Galilee and the second runs to the northwest towards Tel Beth-Shean and seems to merge with the north-south-oriented fault system that separates between the tilted blocks of Sheluhat Zev'aim and the CJV [Central Jordan Valley].

A deep seismic line, 1800 m long, and a short (500 m), shallow high-resolution seismic reflection line, which were shot across the escarpment of the marginal fault some 300 m north of Tel Rehov (Bruner et al. 2002) detected a fault belt some 400 m wide (Fig. 2.7c). The main stem of the marginal fault exhibits a dip of 70° eastward, while a low-angle (30-40°) array of listric faults splits from the main fault to the west, forming a fault belt. All these faults seem to displace the surface and some of them are expressed as N—NW-oriented low steps or undulations in the cultivated area.

Paleoseismology of the Western Marginal Fault

A paleoseismic trench was excavated across a branch of the marginal fault of the DSR, some 300 m north of Tel Rehov (Fig 2.7a, c). In this area, a gentle slope, 40-50 m high, separates the flat tufa plateau in the west from a lower surface capped by soil in the east. The total vertical offset along this segment of the fault, following the deposition of the Late Pleistocene tufa sequence, is estimated to be 50-60 m.

The trenched fault is the western branch of a low-angle normal fault belt, which is part of the WMF belt of the DSR. It was detected in the seismic line that was shot across the escarpment. It is visible up to a depth of 0.5 sec (two-way travel time), near the top of the Miocene Hordos Formation (Fig. 2.7b, c).

The trench exposed a fault escarpment about 3.0 m high (Figs. 2.8-2.9), built of tufa. The age of the tufa in the lower block is 64±5 ka, and in the upper block 32 ±2.5 ka (determined by the U/Th method). The time period between the deposition of the upper part of the tufa and the colluvial sediments exposed in the trench (i.e., almost 30 ky) is not represented in the sequence. This sedimentary hiatus is related to the erosion of the uplifted block which is located on the upper part of the tectonic step.

The lower block is overlain by two colluvial units built of silty gray-brown sediments, consisting mainly of reworked soils and tufa fragments, with scattered pieces of pottery. The deposition of each of these units was triggered by an earthquake associated with a vertical displacement of about 1.5 m that occurred sometime in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE. These two co-seismic displacements correspond to earthquakes with a magnitude of M=6.5-6.7, which are usually accompanied by surface rupture 20-30 km long (Wells and Coppersmith 1994). However, only one strong earthquake from this period is mentioned in historic catalogues (Ben Menahem 1991).

This earthquake, which is also mentioned in the book of Amos, occurred in 759 BCE and caused great damage in the Galilee, Samaria and Judea. The magnitude of this earthquake has been estimated from historical records as ML=7.3 and it is assumed that its epicenter was located some 140 km north of Jerusalem, probably near Hazor (Ben Menahem 1991).
  • [JW: The Amos Quakes appear to have been at least two large earthquakes rather than one. This was discovered by Kagan et. al. (2011:Appendix C) who observed two seismites at three locations in the Dead Sea separated by up to a few decades of deposition.
  • Two closely timed earthquakes were also observed in Deir 'Alla
  • Destruction observed at Hazor was not extensive and may have occurred to abandoned or weakened structures. There is no good reason to place the epicenter(s) that far north
  • Ben-Menahem (1991) was unaware that there were two earthquakes when he composed his catalog and surmised that only a very large magnitude earthquake could explain all the archeoseismic evidence in the north and south of Israel.
  • The archeoseismic evidence in the north and south of Israel is explained by two (or more) earthquakes
  • Historical records do not allow us to assign a Magnitude as the description of the earthquake in the older sources is too brief. No locations for seismic destruction is mentioned in Amos. Pseudo-Zechariah mentioned that the earthquake was felt in Jerusalem and the passage suggests that the shaking was intense.
  • Ben-Menahem (1991) also assumed that the chronological synchronisms of Josephus, writing about one of the Amos Quakes ~850 years later and not citing a source, were accurate. This was not a good assumption as Josephus has a tendency to embellish his narratives. As a result, while 759 BCE is a possible date for one of the Amos earthquakes, the best the historical sources can do is to constrain the dates to between 766/765 and 751 BCE.
  • See more in the entry for the Amos Quakes
  • If you need to consult an earthquake catalog, consult this one, Ambraseys (2009), Guidoboni et. al. (1994), Guidoboni and Comastri (2005), or Zohar (2019). Other catalogs contain a number of errors.]
An additional seismic event is represented in the trench by fractures that cross the entire young sequence that covers the fault escarpment. This event is not associated with vertical displacement and it might reflect a more distant earthquake. The age of this event is not clear, but it could be related to the 743 CE earthquake that destroyed the nearby town of Beth-Shean.

[JW: That earthquake struck in January 749 CE - See the Sabbatical Year Quakes entry.]

Young Tectonic Activity in the BSV and the Modification of the Drainage Systems

The paleoseismic analyses of the tectonic activity along the WMF illustrates only part of the tectonic activity in this region, which is induced by the left lateral movement along the DST that runs in this area along the eastern margin of the DSR. The most prominent feature related to this activity is the escarpment that separates the BSV from the CJV. This fault escarpment is underlain by a deep-seated, east-dipping fault belt dominated by vertical displacement, which accommodates the subsidence of the Kinnarot-CJV basin (Meiler et al. 2008).

The deformation of the landscape by the young tectonic activity is manifested by the configuration of the stream network in the BSV and the CJV. In the BSV, the escarpment forms a barrier to the east-flowing streams that drain Mt. Gilboa and then shift northward towards Nahal Harod (Fig. 2.5). This situation is attributed to a westward tilting of the Beth-Shean block (the Beth-Shean Valley) by the tectonic phase that established the present escarpment. This change in the flow direction post-dates the tufa sequence that was deposited in eastward-flowing streams.

The situation on the eastern, down-faulted block (the Central Jordan Valley) is much more complicated; the present eastward gradient of this area is well manifested by the flow direction of the main springs and Nahal Harod. However, the geometry of the abandoned stream network indicates that a previous westward-flowing channel system drained this area. Therefore, it seems that the post-tufa tectonic activity along the marginal fault also caused a westward tilting of the eastern, down-faulted block.

The establishment of this drainage system is probably young, not older than the mid-Holocene. This conclusion is based on observations made by Neev (1976) and Koucky and Smith (1986) that in the early Holocene, the CJV was still covered by swamps and ponds. The development of the present drainage systems was induced by the establishment of the Jordan River and desiccation of the ponds and swamps that covered the CJV.

It is not clear when the westward-descending terrain of the western part of the CJV was inverted to the present eastward gradient. However, if we accept the observations of Neev (1976), we must assume that post-Chalcolithic period tectonic activity was responsible for this gradient inversion, which was also associated with the first incision of the Jordan River in the CJV. The preservation of this channel system in spite of a thousand years of intensive cultivation, suggests that the inversion of the drainage direction occurred in historic times.

Tel Rehov

Tel Rehov is located 4 km south of Beth-Shean on the tectonic and morphological boundary between the Beth-Shean and the Central Jordan Valleys (Figs. 2.1, 2.5, 2.7a). The tell is separated from the tufa plateau of Moshav Rehov in the south by a narrow valley occupied today by an artificial drainage canal and from the northern tufa plateau by a valley, probably a route of an ancient spring, occupied today by dense vegetation indicating a high ground-water level. To the east, the tell rises above a flat east-descending surface underlain by tufa near the marginal fault and by lacustrine sediments of the Lisan Formation further eastward (Rozenbaum 2009).

The mound of Tel Rehov is located in a tectonic depression that developed between two segments of the Western Marginal Fault of the DSR (Figs. 2.5-2.6): the Rehov Fault in the south and the Beth-Shean Fault in the north. The WMF that runs east of the mound is expressed in this area as a fault array several hundred meters wide, which forms a series of low morphologic steps descending to the east, associated with east-flowing springs that create narrow gorges in the uplifted blocks.

The mound of Tel Rehov is composed of two levels separated by a steep step (Fig. 2.10). The height of the southern mound is 20-25 m above its surroundings, whereas the northern low mound is only 8-10 m high. The base of the step that separates the two parts of the tell is drained eastward by a channel, which, together with the base of the escarpment, forms a morphologic lineament. A tufa bank, which is exposed at the western foot of the mound, indicates that the first settlement was built on a small hill built of tufa sequence.

The Subsurface Relief

The subsurface relief of Tel Rehov is hidden at present under the anthropogenic sediments of the mound. In order to evaluate the relief of the underlying terrain and to examine the relations between its morphology and the fault system in this area, several high resolution seismic lines were shot by the GII across the mound (Fig. 2.10), applying a combination of reflection and refraction wave methods (for details, see Zilberman et al. 2002). Mapping of seismic reflectors and velocity estimation along them based on refraction waves is carried out in three stages (Fig. 2.11):
  1. refraction stack
  2. inversion
  3. tomography
Results

A three-dimensonal map of the contact plane between the two seismic units identified in the area of Tel Rehov (Fig. 2.12) indicates that human settlement on the tell began on an apparently uplifted tectonic block approximately 10 meters above its surroundings. The western border of the block is steep and relatively straight, whereas its eastern part slopes moderately eastward. In the northeast, there is a subsurface step along which the seismic contact plane drops about 6.0 m to the north. This step coincides roughly with the northern slope of the low mound. The morphological step that separates the two parts of the tell is also manifested, albeit indistinctly, in the buried relief below the anthropogenic section. The map indicates that beneath the morphologic step there is a low tectonic step, 3.0-4.0 m high, which is underlain by a fault.

A steep slope also characterizes the southern margin of the uplifted block, were the seismic contact surface between the anthropogenic section and the tufa is some 15-20 m lower than the tufa sequence exposed in the slope of the Rehov tufa plateau, just south of the tell. This suggests that a NW—SE trending fault separates the tufa plateau in the south from the tectonic depression of Tel Rehov in the north. This is evidently the tip of a fault that runs southward and separates the elevated Rehov tufa plateau from the lower eastern block on which Kibbutz Sde Eliyyahu is located.

Faults were also identified along the northern (seismic lines 133, 137), southern (seismic lines 135, 136) and western (seismic line 134) margins of the tell. The west-facing escarpment of the western fault was exposed in an E—W-oriented deep trench excavated across its subsurface trace (Fig. 2.13). On the other hand, no fault was identified along the moderate eastern margins of the uplifted block (seismic lines 135, 137).

Therefore, the overall view of Tel Rehov is of a tectonic block which is tilted to the east and bounded on three sides (west, north and south) by faults or sets of faults. The seismic sections also indicate the presence of several faults that cross the uplifted block of the tell.

Mound Morphology and Site-formation processes

Figures and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Photo 3.7 - Aerial Photo of Tel Rehov showing eroded ravine on the eastern slope from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Photo 3.8 - Another Aerial Photo of Tel Rehov showing eroded ravine on the eastern slope from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 3.4 - Plan View and Section Views through the Tel from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.5)

Discussion

... THE MOUND: LOCATION, MORPHOLOGY AND SITE-FORMATION PROCESSES

... The morphology of the mound as seen today is probably the result of site-formation processes which occurred during its history due to both tectonic and human activities. A geophysical survey of the mound enabled reconstruction of the natural topography and the depth of the anthropogenic deposits (Chapter 2; Zilberman et al. 2002). The results indicate the existence of an elongated ridge stretching along the western side of the mound from its top until the northwestern corner of the lower mound, with its top level at ca. 140–143 m below sea level (corresponding to ca. 74–77 m in terms of the expedition heights; see explanation below). Thus, the uppermost point of the upper mound in the south should be ca. 24 m above bed-rock, and the topsoil in Area C (in the northwestern part of the lower mound in the north) would be ca. 12 m above the tufa bedrock in that part of the mound (Chapter 2, Figs. 2.10–2.11). A small hill, evidently of tectonic origin, was defined below the top of the upper mound; perhaps this would become the core of the fortified Early Bronze Age settlement defined in Area H (Chapter 5). A series of geological faults were mapped along the survey lines, as follows:
  • along the northern edge of the lower mound
  • in the south of the upper mound
  • three faults in the area of the mound itself, the largest one at the eastern side of the lower mound, including the ravine between the upper and lower mounds south of Area E (Chapter 2, Figs. 2.10,2.12); see Fig. 3.4 for schematic sections of the present topography of the tell.
A prominent feature of the mound is that while its northern, western and southern slopes are steep and homogeneous along their entire length, the eastern side is gutted and uneven, due to two elements. The first is an east–west ravine that drains towards the east and separates most of the lower mound from the upper mound; the two parts are joined only at their western edge. This ravine was probably created as a result of a subsidiary geological fault, perpendicular to a north–south fault which runs just east of the mound and is itself a subsidiary of the Dead Sea Rift (Chapter 2). It is assumed that the ravine was filled with eroded material from both the upper and lower parts of the mound, although we did not examine this issue during the excavations. Such severe erosion may explain the fact that mudbrick walls of Stratum IV(9th century BCE) in Areas C, E and F in the lower mound were found just below topsoil, with almost no accumulation of brick debris above their extant remains. The second feature is a deep, wide depression in the eastern slope of the upper mound which caused wide-scale damage to this part of the mound (Figs. 3.3; 3.7; Photos 3.2–3.3, 3.7–3.8, 3.12). This feature appears to have been man-made, most probably the result of quarrying earth from the tell for fertilizing fields during the last hundreds of years(see the report on Area A3, Chapter 6). Such an operation, known in Arabic as sabbakhin, is a well-known phenomenon at ancient sites in the Levant, yet here it is on a particularly large scale. An alternative explanation of this damage is that it was created by a combination of tectonic changes, erosion and human activity.

The lower mound, ca. 315 m along the east–west axis and 135 m along the north–south axis, rises to 8–9 m above the plain on the west and north, while the upper mound (275 m on the east–west axis and 237 m on the north–south axis) rises to ca. 20 m above the plain on the west and ca. 25 m above the ravine that traverses the tell from west to east at the juncture between the upper and lower mounds. The surface of both the upper and lower mounds slopes down to the east; thus, the triangulation point on the western end of the upper mound (-116.26 m, our 100 m datum line) is 15 m higher than the topsoil at the eastern edge of Area A2, 125m to the east, where Iron IIB remains were found just below topsoil. The western end of the lower city at the top of the mound’s slopes in Area C is ca. 16 m higher than the eastern end of that part of the city, near Area E, ca. 300 m away (Fig. 3.4).

The downslope of the topsoil surface to the east and the ravine between the lower and upper mounds may have been created by tectonic activity during historical times. This suggestion is supported by the fact that the mound is located between two segments of the Rehov–Beth-Shean geological fault, and that a minor fault was detected between the upper and lower mounds, as noted above. These subsidiary faults of the Dead Sea Rift are still active and could have affected the shape of the mound during historical times (Chapter 2). Evidence of the slope down from west to east was also detected inside the excavation areas and comprises a prominent site-formation feature. For example, in AreaD, Late Bronze and Iron I layers and floor surfaces were found tilted from west to east, although they are on the western slope of the mound, which would infer an opposite tilt direction. In Area C, elevations of floors in the eastern side of the area are ca. 0.6–1 m lower than floors of the same stratum in the western side of the area, ca. 20 m away; such differences may indicate that by the- 10th and 9th centuries BCE, the slope down from west to east already existed.

Evidence for recent tectonic movements was also found at the bottom of the step-trench in Area D on the western slope of the lower mound, in the form of a 1.3 m-high step in the tufa bedrock in Square K/5, which was interpreted by Zilberman as the outcome of young tectonic activity (see Chapter 2, Figs. 2.8-2.9). This down-faulted block (level 74.70 m) was not reached in the deep backhoe trench that was dug in the field west of the mound (base level of 73.85 m), implying that this is possibly only one step in a graduated fault zone, which resulted in a considerable subsidence of the area west of the mound prior to the accumulation of thick colluvial sediments to its west (see further below). This fault was initially detected in the geo-seismic study of the mound (Zilberman et al. 2002). The dating of the faulting activity is unclear; however, it could, at least in part, be later than the earliest occupation of the lower mound in the 15th century BCE.

The lowest part of the western slope of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium accumulated over the last 3000 years. This became evident in Area D, where Stratum D-11, the lowest Late Bronze Age occupation layer, was exposed 2.15 m lower than the current level of the plain to the west of the mound (Chapter 15; Fig. 15.2). This indicates a substantial rise of the field level in historical times, as well as significant changes in the topography and visible prominence of the mound, at least on the western side. A backhoe trench dug into the field ca. 8 m to the west of the edge of the mound opposite Area D, revealed an accumulation of brown colluvial soils at least 4.3 m deep (as much as the backhoe could reach); this layer contained only Roman/Byzantine sherds, probably eroded from Khirbet Farwana, ca. 0.7 km northwest of the mound, the location of the Roman-Byzantine town Rohob. The accumulation of such thick deposits during the last 3000 years (or less) is probably the result of massive erosion from the Gilboa ridge, located ca. 3 km west of the mound, possibly through ancient channels not clearly visible in the present topography of the valley, but that can be detected through geophysical inquiries (Zilberman et al. 2002; Zilberman, Amit and Bruner 2004; Chapter 2, this volume). Similar phenomena were observed near other mounds in the Southern Levant, e.g., Lachish and Megiddo (Rosen 2006, with previous literature).

Erosion along the slopes of the mound is another site-formation feature. In Area D, all eleven strata revealed in the step-trench were found cut along their western margins, so that the western portions of all the structures were missing. The extent of the erosion is unknown, but it may be assumed that it caused the elimination of ca. 1-2 m of each stratum. No fortifications were found along the slope in Area D, but it seems that an entire fortification system could not just disappear due to erosion and we thus concluded that such fortifications did not exist during the entire LB IB-Iron Age IIA occupation sequence represented in Area D (Chapter 15).

On the north and south, the mound is bounded by east-west brooks. An unnamed spring is located at the bottom of the northern slope of the lower mound; today, a substantial part of this area is covered by dense reeds and vegetation typical of an area adjoining a water source (see Photo 3.3, top). Three additional springs ('En Neshev, 'En Merljav and 'En Rehov) are found 350-450 m to the north and east of the mound; these must have been the main water sources of the ancient city. Five additional springs are located at a distance of up to 2 km to the north and east; two of them are in the area of Kibbutz 'En Hanatziv, 1.5-2 km north of the mound (known today as 'En Zvi and 'En Yehudah, which are probably the springs marked as Ain Nusrah and Ain Nuseirah on the SWP map; see Fig. 3.1 and Chapter 1, Fig. 1.3).

The SWP map marks a "Roman Road" 500 m due west of the mound, just below or parallel to the modern Route 90, the main road through the Jordan Valley to Beth-Shean (Fig. 3.1; Photo 3.1, upper left). It may be assumed that a similar road was in use during the Bronze and Iron Ages, and that an east-west road led to Transjordan, as alluded to in Papyrus Anastasi I.

Gates to the lower city may have been located at the eastern end of the outlet of the ravine between the upper and lower mounds and, perhaps, also near the western join between the lower and upper mounds, where there is a topographic depression with a modern dirt road that ascends the mound from the west. A ramp visible on the northern slope of the lower mound could be evidence for an ancient road that climbed the slope to a possible entrance located between Areas C and E, although this may have been a modern feature (Photo 3.11).

Detailed Table of Contents from Final Report (2020)

Volume 1 - Chapters 1-11
Volume 2 - Chapters 12-14
Volume 3 - Chapters 15-21
Volume 4 - Chapters 22-35


Volume 5 - Chapters 36-55

Chronology
Stratigraphy and Time Periods

Site Wide Stratigraphy from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Stratigraphic Table

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.5)

Area C Stratigraphy from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Table 15.1

Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)


Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Table 17.2

Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)


Correlation of Strata - Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Table 20.1

Correlation of strata – Areas G and C

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)


Dates of ceramic phases in the Levant from Finkelstein (2013)

Table 1

Dates of ceramic phases in the Levant and the transition between them according to recent radiocarbon results (based on a Bayesian model, 63 percent agreement between the model and the data)

Finkelstein (2013:7)

Site Wide Stratigraphy from Stern et al (2008)

Stratigraphy of Tel Rehov

Amihai Mazar in Stern et. al. (2008)

Time periods from Stern et al (1993)

Age Dates Comments
Early Bronze IA-B 3300-3000 BCE
Early Bronze II 3000-2700 BCE
Early Bronze III 2700-2200 BCE
Middle Bronze I 2200-2000 BCE ‎EB IV - Intermediate Bronze
Middle Bronze IIA 2000-1750 BCE
Middle Bronze IIB 1750-1550 BCE
Late Bronze I 1550-1400 BCE
Late Bronze IIA 1400-1300 BCE
Late Bronze IIB 1300-1200 BCE
Iron IA 1200-1150 BCE
Iron IB 1150-1100 BCE
Iron IIA 1000-900 BCE
Iron IIB 900-700 BCE
Iron IIC 700-586 BCE
Babylonian & Persian 586-332 BCE
Early Hellenistic 332-167 BCE
Late Hellenistic 167-37 BCE
Early Roman 37 BCE - 132 CE
Herodian 37 BCE - 70 CE
Late Roman 132-324 CE
Byzantine 324-638 CE
Early Arab 638-1099 CE Umayyad & Abbasid‎
Crusader & Ayyubid 1099-1291 CE
Late Arab 1291-1516 CE Fatimid & Mameluke‎
Ottoman 1516-1917 CE

Time periods from Meyers et al (1997)

Phase Dates Variants
Early Bronze IA-B 3400-3100 BCE
Early Bronze II 3100-2650 BCE
Early Bronze III 2650-2300 BCE
Early Bronze IVA-C 2300-2000 BCE Intermediate Early-Middle Bronze, Middle Bronze I‎
Middle Bronze I 2000-1800 BCE ‎Middle Bronze IIA
Middle Bronze II 1800-1650 BCE ‎Middle Bronze IIB‎
Middle Bronze III 1650-1500 BCE ‎‎Middle Bronze IIC
Late Bronze IA 1500-1450 BCE
Late Bronze IIB 1450-1400 BCE
Late Bronze IIA 1400-1300 BCE
Late Bronze IIB 1300-1200 BCE
Iron IA 1200-1125 BCE
Iron IB 1125-1000 BCE
Iron IC 1000-925 BCE Iron IIA‎
Iron IIA 925-722 BCE Iron IIB‎
Iron IIB 722-586 BCE ‎Iron IIC
Iron III 586-520 BCE Neo-Babylonian‎
Early Persian 520-450 BCE
Late Persian 450-332 BCE
Early Hellenistic 332-200 BCE
Late Hellenistic 200-63 BCE
Early Roman 63 BCE - 135 CE
Middle Roman 135-250 CE
Late Roman 250-363 CE
Early Byzantine 363-460 CE
Late Byzantine 460-638 CE
Early Arab 638-1099 CE
Crusader & Ayyubid 1099-1291 CE
Late Arab 1291-1516 CE
Ottoman 1516-1917 CE

The Iron Age in the Southern Levant

Potential archaeoseismic evidence in Area D

Although Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:1) noted that continuous occupation was detected in Area D from Late Bronze I to Iron IIA, a time span of some 600 years and that no major destruction events were identified between the strata, there are a number of descriptions of potentially seismically induced structural damage in their report on Area D. It may be the case that in some parts of Mazar et. al. (2020)'s Final Report, destruction is defined solely as destruction due to military conquest. Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:57) report that Iron IIA strata in Area D (D-2 and younger) were very damaged, apparently due to erosion.

Stratum D-10

Plans

Plans

Discussion

Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:16-19) report brick debris related to collapse of Building DA in Stratum D-10 while noting that it remains unclear whether a human or natural agent initiated the collapse of the building. Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:20) later noted that
There is no clear evidence for a sudden or violent destruction of this building, although very little of its interior was excavated. It is possible that the building went out of use due to deterioration, damage by earthquakes or other natural causes. It is also possible that the building was abandoned as part of socio-political changes in the city during the transition between the 14th and 13th centuries BCE.
Stratum D-10 was dated to LB IIA in the 14th century BCE

Stratum D-9

Plans and Photos

Plans and Photos

  • Figure 15.7            Plan of Stratum D-9b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.8            Plan of Stratum D-9a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28            Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29            Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31            Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Discussion

Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:22-26) report that two units, either rooms or courtyards in D-9b Building DB were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31) while noting that Wall 9923 sloped considerably to the east, with a difference of up to 0.4 m in elevation of the lower level over its length. They noted the presence of other tilted features in this area which possibly resulted from young [er?] tectonic activity. They also noted that the wall ended abruptly on the east, without a clear edge, and with a slight protrusion to the south, the nature of which remained unclear.

Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:22-26) noted that the foundations of oven 9924 near to Wall 9923 were slightly tilted to the east, in accordance with Floor 9925 and Wall 9923.

Strata D-9a and D-9b were dated to LB IIA/IIB in the late 14th-13th centuries BCE.

Stratum D-8'

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1            Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2            Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1            Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2            Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.10            Plan of Stratum D-8' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

The Stratum D-8 floor to the west of Wall 8932 was covered with a 0.3–0.4 m-thick layer of brick debris, containing compacted whitish brick fragments, which most probably originated from Wall 8932. In Square M/5, this debris layer was superimposed by a 0.01–0.02 m-thick pinkish clay layer (7938; Figs. 15.10, 15.17), which was covered by a thick (0.05–0.1 m) layer of dark gray ash. This layer sloped from west (80.40 m) to east (80.26 m); it extended into the northern section of the square, but faded away in its southern part, as well as in Square N/5 (9908; Fig. 15.10). On 7938 was a 0.15–0.2 m-thick accumulation, rich in sherds and animal bones, which may be explained as some kind of a localized ephemeral activity, post-dating Stratum D-8 and pre-dating Stratum D-7b; this phase was denoted D-8'. No evidence for this activity was found in Squares M–N/4.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 (Figs. 16.16–16.22), and is dated to LB IIB [13th century BCE].

Layer between Strata D-8 and D-7b (Post D-8)

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1            Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2            Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1            Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2            Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.10            Plan of Stratum D-8' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

Covering the brick debris and walls related to Stratum D-8, a 0.35–0.6 m-thick layered accumulation was found all over the excavated area (2826 in Square M/4, 7915 and 7937 in M/5, 8927 and 8929 in N/4, 9904 in N/5) (Fig. 15.11). It was characterized by a soft brown layered matrix containing a few brick fragments, very rich in charred material (charcoal and grain), as well as sherds, bones, and fine plaster fragments of unknown origin. The layering of this accumulation was more pronounced in the eastern part, where the layers sloped down into the eastern section of Squares N/4–5. Several thin layers consisted of grayish material, possibly the remains of ash or decayed organics.

No architectural elements were noted in association with this thick accumulation. It clearly sealed the remains of Stratum D-8 and was superimposed by Stratum D-7b elements, most of which were pits dug into the aforementioned accumulation (see below). Therefore, it seems to belong to a post-D-8 and pre-D-7 phase. Nevertheless, it is difficult to suggest any clear explanation for such a thick accumulation, unless a gap in occupation enabled natural forces of sedimentation to operate undisrupted for an unknown time span. Another option is that this layer was a constructional fill related to the building of Stratum D-7b. Although no substantial architecture was found in the latter, the small size of the excavated area does not allow us to reach secure conclusions, and this option remains viable.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 in Figs. 16.16–16.23.

Stratum D-7a

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1            Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2            Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1            Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2            Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.12            Plan of Stratum D-7b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.13            Plan of Stratum D-7a (encircled numbers denote foundation deposits as listed in the text) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.14            Plan of Stratum D-7a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a            Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b            Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19            Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20            Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21            Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40            Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42            Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45            Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46            Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47            Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49            Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50            Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51            Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a            Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b            Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55            Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Discussion

Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:40-41) reported three lamp-and-bowl foundation deposits associated with Wall 7906, each comprised of one lamp and one bowl, the latter usually placed above the former. A deposit labeled as the second deposit (No. 6, Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14) was found immediately to the south of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 in the eastern portion of Square M/5. It is possible that this foundation deposit had shifted slightly from its original position, as the lamp and bowl were found at an angle and not horizontally laid.

Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:40-41) also noted

  • the foundation of Wall 8917 (Photo 15.50), parallel to Wall 7906, was tilted to the east (80.84–81.05 m along the 2.3 m exposed part of the wall).
  • Floor 9906, made of basalt and limestone fieldstones, cobbles and pebbles, with occasional basalt grinding stone fragments, sloped to the east (80.92–81.07 m), in accordance with the foundations of Walls 7906 (eastern part) and 8917, possibly due to post-depositional processes, such as young tectonic activities.
  • difficult to interpret stratigraphy in the southwestern unit of Stratum D-7a which included brick debris layers and a floor tilted to the west


Strata D-7a and D-7b were dated to Iron IA [12th century BCE until ca. 1130 BCE(?)].

Stratum D-7a'

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1            Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2            Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1            Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2            Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.12            Plan of Stratum D-7b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.13            Plan of Stratum D-7a (encircled numbers denote foundation deposits as listed in the text) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.14            Plan of Stratum D-7a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a            Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b            Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19            Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20            Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21            Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40            Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42            Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45            Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46            Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47            Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49            Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50            Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51            Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a            Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b            Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55            Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Discussion

Davidovich, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15:45-46) report the following:
Building DC of Stratum D-7a collapsed and the occupation layers were covered by brick debris, although no evidence for a violent destruction and fire was found. The collapse layer, ranging in depth from 0.3 m to 1.2 m, was excavated as different loci in the various parts of the building: 2843 in the southwestern unit, 7945 in the southeastern unit, 7935/8903 in the southern and western parts of Square N/5, and 4847/4817/4812 in the northwestern part. The collapse contained brick fragments of both the typical yellowish bricks of the initial phase of Stratum D-7a and other types of bricks (white, gray, brown, reddish) used in this stratum and its later phase. These collapse layers were found immediately below topsoil in Squares M–N/4 and below floor levels related to Stratum D-6b in Squares M–N/5. In the main part of Square N/5, installations of Stratum D-6b penetrated considerably into the earlier deposits (Figs. 15.20– 15.21), removing much of the brick debris of Stratum D-7.4

The pottery assemblage of Stratum D-7a–b is similar to that of Strata S-4 and S-3 at Beth-Shean (TBS III: Chapter 5) and should be dated to the 12th century BCE (Iron IA).
Footnotes

4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.

Strata D-7a and D-7b were dated to Iron IA [12th century BCE until ca. 1130 BCE(?)].

Stratum D-5

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1            Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2            Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1            Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2            Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19            Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20            Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21            Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.22            Plan of Stratum D-5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32            Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33            Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34            Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35            Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45            Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57            Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61            Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63            Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64            Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65            Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66            Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67            Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68            Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69            Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70            Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71            Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72            Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73            Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74            Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75            Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76            Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77            Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88            Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plan: Fig. 15.22
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19–15.21; 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.45, 15.56–15.57, 15.61, 15.63–15.77, 15.88
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.38–16.40; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47)
Discussions
Wall 2882 and Features to Its West

Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.

Wall 2882, running slightly northeast to southwest, was exposed over 9.5 m, crossing the entire excavation area and continuing into the northern and southern balks (Figs. 15.21–15.22, 15.33– 15.34; Photos 15.56–15.57, 15.64). It was preserved to a height of five brick courses with no stone foundation and was superimposed by Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. A difference of 0.6 m along a distance of 8.0 m was found in the foundation level of the wall from north to south, perhaps due to tectonic activity. One possible explanation of Wall 2882 is that it was a sub-structure and functioned as a terrace wall against which a presently non-preserved western unit was built in Stratum D-5, while the fill to its east supported the earliest phase of the street that would continue to exist in Stratum D-4.

Close to the erosion line west of Wall 2882, thick layers of compact brick debris were detected at levels 82.90–83.80 m, abutting the western face of the wall (1855, 2836 in Square N/4 and 7904, 7907, 7908, 7912–7914 in Square N/5). This layer was sealed by Building DF of Stratum D-4. This brick debris layer can be explained as either the collapse of Wall 2882 or as a deliberate fill below the floors of D-4 Building DF.

The Eastern Unit: Buildings DD and DE

Building DE (Squares P–Q/5)

Room 8865

East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.

Room 8874

West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.

Building DD (Squares P–Q/4–5)

Room 8867

This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.

Room 8867 was paved with a well-preserved brick floor (8867, level 83.42 m), composed of three clear lines of bricks and possibly a fourth one in the eastern part of the room. The floor abutted Walls 8852, 8848 and 8854, but did not continue into the northern section of the room, where another brick floor was exposed on a lower level (see below). In the northern part of the room, a square installation (9805), bounded by three brick walls, was laid directly on top of Floor 8867. The walls (0.14 m wide), composed of bricks placed on their narrow side and preserved to two courses, were 1.0 m long, creating an inner space of 0.85 sq m. As in some of the walls of this building, the installation was built of different types of bricks: the southern and western walls of black friable bricks and the northern wall of whitish bricks; traces of plaster were found on both faces. This appears to have been a storage bin. A ca. 0.55 m wide passage west of Installation 9805 led to the northern part of the room, where brick Floor 8867 terminated on line with the northern wall of the installation. In the northern part of the room (1.05×1.6 m), a less-well-constructed brick floor (9804) was laid, lower by more than 0.4 m than Floor 8867 and Installation 9805. This floor abutted Walls 8848 and 8853, but did not reach Wall 8854 on the west. It was difficult to determine whether this difference in levels between the two parts of the room was due to function or whether the lower northern floor belonged to an earlier phase of D-5 (see below). A thick layer of debris (8839) rested on Floor 9804; two complete bricks fallen on top of each other were found in this debris at 83.71 m and on top of them were several complete vessels, including seven small bowls, perhaps votive (Fig. 16.38:6, 11–12, 14–15, 18–19), a chalice (Fig. 16.38:24), a juglet (Fig. 16.39:19) and a lamp (Fig. 16.39:21). It seems like the bricks and the vessels had fallen from a higher spot, perhaps a shelf.

In the southeastern corner of the room was a large bell-shaped pit (8883; Photos 15.69–15.70); its eastern part adjoined the western face of Wall 8848, whose foundation level could be seen in the pit. It was apparently dug sometime during the course of use of this room, as it was sealed by the D-4b occupation above. The pit contained ash and brick debris, sherds and one complete juglet (Fig. 16.39:20). South of Wall 8852, a small segment of a floor (8882) was found at level 83.86 m, perhaps belonging to an adjacent room of the same building.

Summary of Stratum D-5

... No evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum D-5 was detected. It seems that the buildings went out of use due to either deterioration or earthquake damage and were rebuilt in the following Stratum D-4. The pottery and artifacts from Stratum D-5 point to their date in Iron IB, perhaps the early part of the 11th century BCE.

Stratum D-4

from Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15) report collapse debris at various locations in Area D within Stratum D-4. Consult the Final Report (2020) for details. Relevant sections of this report is reproduced in the References section for the Stratum VI and V earthquakes and the Stratum IV Destruction Layer.

Stratum VI Earthquake - Early Iron IIA - 10th century BCE

Figures

Figures

  • Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)
  • Fig. 3.7 Map of the site showing grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Deformation Map of Stratum C-2 by Jefferson Williams
  • Deformation Map of Stratum G2 by Jefferson Williams
  • Fig. 2.11 Subsurface structure of Tel Rehov interpreted from seismic - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Fig. 2.12 Seismic interpretation of the top of the lower tufa layer along with subsurface faults - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Fig. 12.7 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.54 - Superimposed plan of Strata C-3–C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Chronology
Chronology of Iron Age Strata VII-IV (C-4 to C-1a)

  • from Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, (2020 v. 1:119)
  • Area C stratigraphy correlated to the rest of the site
  • Dating of Iron IIA strata was based on a combination of the following:
    • Relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts
    • Absolute dating based on radiometric data
    • Historical considerations
Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


Discussion

Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:186) report that there were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings by an earthquake, including layers of complete fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of the buildings which would have buried vessels, and perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of debris. Rather, they state, it could have been an earthquake that was strong enough to cause severe damage to the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of Stratum C-1b. Complete fallen bricks were found in most of the rooms ( Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al., 2020 v.2:23).

Deformation Maps made from photos and descriptions of damage indicate that parts of Area C and G experienced vertical shaking during this event which, in turn, suggests that one or more of the active faults1 underneath the Tel slipped during this earthquake and/or that the Tel was within the hypocentral region of the earthquake. In either case, this suggests that that some part of the northern part of the Jordan Valley Fault broke and, despite Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:186)'s observation that this earthquake did not leave a legacy of total destruction and abandonment, local intensity was probably quite high - i.e. VIII (8) or higher.

Dating was based on ceramic evidence and radiocarbon. Area C contains a complete Iron Age II stratigraphy which improves confidence in the date, although Iron Age II chronology is still actively debated and as of yet not fully resolved. The damaged structures were made entirely of mudbricks with wood beam foundations so there is likely a construction related site affect for all the Iron Age II structures.
Footnotes

1 Active Faults under Tel Rehov were identified and mapped based on seismic surveys (and presumably some aerial photos). This is discussed in The Geology and Geophysics section of this web page which, in turn, comes from the Chapter 2 of the Final Excavation Report (The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and Tel Rehov by Zilberman in Mazar et. al., 2020 v. 1). The possibility that these active faults slipped during one of the Iron Age earthquakes is discussed sporadically in the Final Report and Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:187) observed a tilt from west to east/southeast in all strata at Tel Rehov which may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures.

References
Final Report (2020)

Chapter 2 - The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and Tel Rehov

  • see the Geology and Geophysics collapsible panel in the Background Information section

Chapter 3 - Introduction to the Site and the Excavations

  • see the Mound Morphology and Site-formation processes collapsible panel in the Background Information section for that section of Chapter 3

Chapter 4 - The Tel Rehov Excavations: Overview and Synthesis

Figures, Tables, and Photos

Figures and Tables

  • Figure 4.1          Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 4.2          Map of Tel ReHov showing the excavation areas and architecture of Stratum IV from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Table 4.1          Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)

Photos

  • Photo 4.2          Fragments of roofing material from Stratum IV from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussions
Iron Age IIA

Terminology and Stratigraphy

The term Iron IIA has been employed in different ways in the archaeology of Israel. G.E. Wright (1961: 97-99) used it to describe the period between 900-730/700 BCE, while he termed the 10th century BCE "Iron IC". Initially, Israeli archaeologists used the term to denote the 10th century BCE, equaling the time of the United Monarchy (e.g., Aharoni 1979 [first published in Hebrew in 1963] and in subsequent editions; NEAEHL: 1529; Mazar 1990: 30) and this terminology was widely accepted (e.g., King and Stager 2001: XXIII). According to this system, the 9th century BCE was included in the Iron IIB, together with the 8th century. Finkelstein (1996) and Sharon et al. (2007) suggested to lower the transition from Iron I/Iron IIA to the late 10th century BCE (see above) and dated the Iron IIA to the 9th century BCE. I suggested a Modified Conventional Chronology, which broadly accepted the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century, based on the finds from Jezreel and Tel Rehov, yet I claimed that the period began well in the 10th century (Coldstream and Mazar 2003: 40-45; Mazar 2005). Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006; 2011) accepted this chronological framework, but went one step further by suggesting a division of the Iron IIA into two sub-periods: Early Iron IIA and Late Iron IIA, the former dated to the 10th century and the latter to the 9th. This suggestion is now accepted by many archaeologists in Israel, although the details of absolute dating of each phase remain unresolved. In this publication, we refer to Iron Age IIA as a period starting sometime during the first half of the 10th century BCE (ca. 980 BCE?) and ending during the second half of the 9th century, probably following severe destructions caused by Aramean conquests led by Hazael (see below for a detailed chronological and historical discussion).

Local stratum numbers were assigned in each of the excavation areas. It so happened that in the four main areas in the lower city (Areas C, D, E and G), the uppermost stratum was attributed to Late Iron IIA and was numbered 1 (C-1, D-1, etc.), while an earlier stratum denoted Stratum 2 was attributed to Early Iron IIA (C-2, D-2, etc.). Yet, as the excavation progressed, we found it necessary to divide Stratum 1 in Areas C, D, E and G into two sub-phases denoted la and lb, while in Area F, three sub-phases equaling these two phases were deter¬mined (Table 4.1). When the decision was made to assign final strata numbers (in Roman numerals), and considering the later Iron IIB Strata II-III and Islamic period Strata IA and IB on the upper mound, it was decided to allocate a separate general Roman numeral — IV and V — to each of the sub-phases la and lb, while local Stratum 2 in all these areas was called general Stratum VI. This terminology has its deficiencies, since it became clear during later excavation seasons and subsequent research that, in fact, Strata IV and V are two phases of the same city. In certain places, major rebuilding took place during the transition between the two (as in the southeastern part of Area C, where the apiary of Stratum V went out of use in Stratum IV), while in Areas B, E, G and parts of C, there was great a deal of continuity between these two strata and, in fact, they could be merged into one general stratum with local sub-phases. This is also substantiated by the pottery assemblage, which is almost identical in Strata V and IV, while that of Stratum VI is somewhat different. In retrospect, it might have been preferable to retain the single general stratum number with sub-phases (as was done in the local strata numbers) instead of using the terms Strata V and IV. In this publication, we use both the local and the general stratum numbers. In summary, we may define two major cities: that of Stratum VI, attributed to Early Iron IIA, and that of Strata V and IV, attributed to Late Iron IIA.

Building Materials and Techniques

The Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov are characterized by several architectural features which are unknown elsewhere in Israel (see discussion at the end of Chapter 12). The first is the virtually exclusive use of mudbricks as building material. Stones were used only in exceptional places for constructing cobblestone floors and installations (as in Area F: Fig. 19.4, Photo 19.6), pillar bases (rarely; e.g., Area C, Building CX) and working surfaces.

The avoidance of stone foundations for brick walls in Strata VI-IV is astonishing, since their use was common at Tel Rehov in LB II (although they were missing in the earlier LB Strata D-11 and D-10) and Iron I strata, as they are in the architecture of the Southern Levant since the Protohistoric periods. Such stone sockles are essential to protect mudbrick walls from water damage and humidity and their absence must indicate a cultural choice which is difficult to explain. In the Jordan Valley, mudbrick walls with no stone foundations can be found in the Iron IIA/B Stratum VIII buildings at Tell Deir 'Alla (van der Kooij 1993: 341) and at Tell es-Sa'idiyeh Stratum XII (Tubb and Dorrell 1993: 58), which should be dated to Late Iron IIA (see below). Brick walls without stone foundations are known in Egypt, and appear in selected New Kingdom Egyptian-inspired structures in Canaan, such as at Deir el-Balah and, in a few cases, at Beth-Shean (Stratum Q-2; TBS I: 83-89), although other Egyptian structures at Beth-Shean, such as Building 1500, did have stone sockles. However, there is no justification to assume Egyptian architectural influence in Iron IIA at Tel Rehov, and there is no evidence for any foreign architectural tradition of this kind that could be a source of inspiration. Therefore, the introduction of this building technique and its persistence throughout all three Iron IIA strata remains unexplained.

Another exceptional and surprising feature was the use of wood foundations for walls and floors, a feature introduced in Stratum V and found in almost every building in Areas B, C and G. Narrow, round beams or branches were laid perpendicular to the brick walls at their foundation level (e.g., Area C: Figs. 12.29; 12.72; 12.74; 12.77; Photos 12.59-12.60; 12.77-12.78; 12.125; 12.128-12.129; 12.172). Sometimes, thicker beams were found incorporated in the wall foundation; in several cases, there was a gap of more than 20 cm between the lowest brick and the preserved beam, filled with charred material that appears to have been wood or some other organic material. In other places, the lowest brick course was laid directly above the wood. Often, these beams or branches were also placed below the beaten-earth floors (e.g., Area C: Figs. 12.30; 12.32; 12.37; 12.41-12.43; 12.45-12.46; Photos 12.33; 12.130; 12.141; 12.144; 12.146; Area G: Fig. 20.3; Photos 20.23; 20.26). Many of the wood samples were identified by N. Liphschitz (Chapter 52, Table 52.1); ca. 50% were identified as olive trees, while other species included Ficus sycomorus, Ulmus, Tamarix, Pistacia atlantica and a few others. Only few oaks were represented and pines and cypress were lacking. Most of the walls with wood foundations continued to be used in Stratum IV, but no wood was found in walls that were first built in that stratum, so that this unusual building technique was limited to Stratum V. No parallels are known in the Southern Levant and it seems to be a local invention, perhaps intended to provide flexibility to the walls during seismic events, creating a kind of shock absorber. This was perhaps a reaction to an earthquake which appears to be the reason for the severe damage causing the abandonment of the previous Stratum VI buildings.8

Bricks were made of local clays taken from the fields around the mound. In most cases, they were light brown-yellowish or, less frequently, they were composed of dark brown colluvial soil. Their sizes range from 45-60 cm in length (most common, 50 cm), 30-40 cm in width (most common, 35 cm) and 10-17 cm in height (Tables 12.28-12.30; Photo 4.1). An exceptional feature limited to certain structures of Stratum V (in particular, Buildings CF and CE in Area C) are bricks with two vertical flattened protrusions close to their ends on their broad external face, created by special depressions in the brick molds (Figs. 12.29, 12.63). They were perhaps intended to better adhere the plaster coating.

Most of the walls were one brick wide (ca. 50 cm); yet, double walls often appear, in particular when two buildings were adjoined, each with its own exterior wall (see plans of Strata V-IV in Areas B, C, E and G; Chapters 8, 12, 17 and 20 respectively). In several cases, a ca. 2 cm-thick plaster made of brown clay was preserved (e.g., in Building CF in Area C). It may be assumed that such plaster covered all the brick walls. In the exceptional Building CP in Area C, a whitish plaster was found on some of the walls, in particular near the entrance to the southern wing. In several places, roofing material comprising large lumps of clay with reed and wooden beam impressions was found, mainly in the destruction debris of Stratum IV (Photo 4.2).
Footnotes

8 During a visit to the site by Prof. D. Yankelevsky and other experts from the National Building Research Institute of the Technion, Haifa, this explanation was accepted as the most reasonable. They mentioned the current use of steel rolls in foundations of highly sensitive structures, such as nuclear reactors, as a device providing flexibility in the event of an earthquake.

Chronology

Introduction

The dates of the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov, as well as the other sites, depend upon a combination of relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts, and absolute dating based on radiometric data combined with historical considerations. In this section, the first two issues are discussed, while historical considerations will be surveyed in the following section.

Relative Chronology

Introduction

As explained above, there are two Iron IIA ceramic horizons at Tel Rehov:
  • Early Iron IIA (Stratum VI)
  • Late Iron IIA (Strata V-IV)
This formal division of the period was suggested by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006) and is followed here, although it raises some serious difficulties, as discussed above and below. As shown in Chapter 24, there is a great deal of continuity in many pottery forms between the three horizons:
  • Iron IB
  • Early Iron IIA
  • Late Iron IIA
Nevertheless, there are sufficient criteria to distinguish between these three assemblages, which are substantiated by a clear stratigraphic division (Table 4.2).

Early Iron IIA

Figures
Figures

  • Figure 4.1 - Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion

Stratum VI is attributed to Early Iron IIA, since it is preceded by Stratum VII of Iron IB and succeeded by Strata V-IV of Late Iron IIA. It yielded a relatively substantial pottery assemblage which, on the one hand, demonstrates many similarities with the preceding and subsequent assemblages but, on the other hand, has its own characteristics. The latter include the first appearance, mostly on serving vessels, of a relatively large amount of red slip, often hand burnished. Painted decoration is mainly limited to horizontal straight and wavy red bands in the style known at Tel Rehov in the Iron IB; most of the Canaanite-like motifs appear on small sherds, so it is difficult to say to what extent these are residual. Hippo jars appear for the first time, but are still rare. Imported Phoenician pottery includes several Bichrome sherds, and a small amount of imported Cypriot pottery includes White Painted and Bichrome sherds, but no Black-on-Red, aside from one small and ambivalent sherd in Stratum C-2.

The northern ceramic assemblages assigned by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006) to their Early Iron IIA horizon are (references updated):
  • Beth-Shean Stratum S-lb (TBS I: Pls. 6—8)
  • Megiddo Stratum VB (Arie 2013)
  • Jezreel pre-enclosure fills (Zimhoni 1997: 29-56)
  • Taanach Period IIA (Rast 1978: Figs.18-29)
  • Yoqne'am Strata XVI-XV (Ben Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg and Cohen-Anidjar 2005: 108-112, Figs. I.36-I.38)
  • Horbat Rosh Zayit Stratum III (Gal and Alexandre 2000: 30-33)
  • Tell el-Farah North Stratum VIIa (Chambon 1984: Pls. 45-60)
  • Dor Phase Ir1|2A (Phases 7a-b, 6b-c in Area G) (Gilboa and Sharon 2003: 21-22, Figs. 10-11; Gilboa 2018: Pls. 20:49, 20.56-20.64)
To these contexts, I would add
  • Hazor X-IX (?)
  • Tell el-Hammah, lower phase (attributed to Iron Age I, yet the few published pottery items [Cahill 2006: 436, Fig. 4] can fit Tel Rehov VI)
Tell Abu al-Kharaz Phase X in Trench XI, Area 3 may fit this period (Fischer 2013: 104-108, Figs. 99-101), yet the pottery attributed to Phase X in Area 9 East appears to be late Iron Age I (Fischer 2013: 354-362, Figs. 361-368). The small amount of published pottery from the Tell el-Mazar "sanctuary" may belong to this period as well (Yassine 1984).

Several caveats to this list must be noted. The first is that all the contexts mentioned above (except Dor and, to some extent, Tell Abu al-Kharaz) yielded very small quantities of pottery, mainly sherds, and most of them are not sufficiently distinctive to be compared to our Stratum VI assemblage. In addition, the great degree of continuity between these assemblages and the following Late Iron IIA renders it difficult to distinguish between these two sub-periods. For example, at Jezreel, the pottery from the pre-enclosure fills cannot be distinguished from that found in the enclosure's destruction layer (Zimhoni 1997). At Megiddo, the pottery from Stratum VB is very similar to that of VA-IVB (Zimhoni 1997; Arie 2013) and the same may be said concerning Taanach IIA and IIB. Regional differences should also be taken into account. For example, the correlation between the pottery from Hazor Strata X-IX (Ben-Tor and Ben-Ami 1998; 2012) and our Stratum VI cannot be established with confidence, perhaps due to such regional differences and the strong Canaanite traditions which are present at Tel Rehov, but missing at Hazor. To conclude, Tel Rehov VI provides the largest pottery assemblage that can be attributed to the Early Iron IIA in northern Israel, along with Dor for the northern coastal plain. Yet, even at Tel Rehov, the continuity of many forms from Iron IB to Early Iron IIA, and from the latter to Late Iron IIA, make precise divisions difficult in many cases.

Late Iron IIA

Figures
Figures

  • Figure 4.1 - Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion

The large amount of pottery from Strata V-IV (with very little distinction between the two), discussed in Chapter 24, can be attributed to Late Iron IIA, as defined by Herzog and Avitz-Singer (2006; see also surveys in TBS I: 320-323; APIN-IH: 135-188). The following contexts can be assigned to this phase:
  • Tel Beth-Shean Strata S-la and P-10-P-9 (TBS I: 313-384; Plates 6-16)
  • Tell el-Hammah two upper phases (Cahill 2006: Figs. 6-11)
  • Tel 'Amal Strata III-IV (Levi and Edelstein 1972)
  • the Jezreel 7enclosure (Zimhoni 1997: 13-28, 39-53, Figs. 1.2-1.10; 2.5-2.12)
  • Megiddo VA-IVB (Finkelstein, Zimhoni and Kafri 2000; Arie 2013)
  • Yoqne'am XIV (Ben Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg and Cohen-Anidjar 2005: Figs. I.50-I.52)
  • Taanach Period IIB (Rast 1978: Figs. 30-69)
  • Tell el-Far'ah North Stratum VIIb (Chambon 1984: 53-72, Pls. 45-62)
  • Hazor X—IX(?), VIII (although see comments above and below)
  • Horbat Rosh Zayit Strata IIa-Ilb (Gal and Alexandre 2000: 34-122)
  • Dor Phase Ir2a (Phase 6a in Area G; Gilboa and Sharon 2003: 23-24, Figs. 12-13; Gilboa 2018: Pls. 20.6-20.67)
  • Tell Abu Hawam Stratum III (Hamilton 1935)
  • Tell Keisan Strata 8?-6 (Briend and Humbert 1980: Pls. 48-56)
  • Tell Abu al-Kharaz Phases XI-XII (Fischer 2013)20
Most of these contexts yielded rich pottery assemblages which can be compared to the Tel Rehov Strata V-IV assemblage, yet it should be stressed that the more distant the site, the more disparate the assemblages tend to be. Thus, coastal sites like Dor, Tell Abu Hawam and Tell Keisan show strong Phoenician influence; Hazor X—VIII and Samaria are less similar to Tel Rehov than sites in the Beth-Shean and Jezreel Valleys (including Taanach IIB). The close similarity of our assemblages to Horbat Rosh Zayit, mentioned earlier, is exceptional and must be explained in light of special relations between these two sites
Footnotes

20 Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE) suggested by him for the end of this period. It seems that the motivation behind this suggestion is to justify the idea that Hazor Stratum VIII was an Aramean city built by Hazael, yet I see no reason to refute the excavators' attribution of Stratum VIII to the days of Ahab.

Absolute Chronology and the Radiometric Evidence

The absolute chronology of the Iron IIA strata is a subject of ongoing debate, based on radiometric dates and historical considerations, although it seems that by now, agreement has been reached on some major issues. The original Low Chronology date of the beginning of Iron IIA strata to ca. 900 BCE proved to be wrong, based on radiocarbon dating. On the other hand, the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century is certainly correct, as it is anchored in the evidence from Jezreel, where the royal enclosure cannot predate Ahab [r. c. 871 - c. 852 BCE]. According to the modified chronology which I have suggested since 2003, Iron IIA started during the first half of the 10th century BCE and continued until sometime in the second half of the 9th century (Table 4.3). This approach was basically backed up by numerous radiocarbon dates, although there are different views concerning the precise time span and absolute dates of each of the two Iron IIA phases (for summaries and earlier literature, see Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011b).

Table 4.3

Three chronological systems for Iron IB-IIB

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)


The radiocarbon data from the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov is based on 27 short-lived samples, most of them measured several times, so that a total of 110 dates are available (Chapter 48, Table 48.4; partly published earlier in Mazar et al. 2005). This is the largest number of dates from a single site in this period. Several difficulties should be noted (see discussion in Chapter 48):
  1. The stratigraphic affiliation of several samples to specific phase of the Iron IIA is questionable: in particular, Samples R21—R23 from Area D and Samples R31—R34 from Area C, which could be either Stratum V or IV
  2. There are a few outliers (all Sample 27 and one determination in R36)
  3. Occasionally, samples from the same context or stratum yielded considerably different dates, which would provide too wide a range for our required resolution of less than half a century.
A Bayesian model was first presented in 2005, based on the data available at that time (Bruins et al. 2005) and new models (one for Areas C and D and another for Area B) are presented in Chapter 48. The main results of these models are presented here in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4

Results of a Bayesian model for secure dates from Areas C+D and B in lσ and 2σ CalBC showing dates for Strata VI-IV (not including unmodeled dates from Area E) - for details see Chapter 48

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)


The model for Areas C and D (in which most of the samples are included) resulted in the condensation of Strata VI, V and IV into a time frame of maximum 73 years between 936 (uppermost possible date) and 863 (lowest possible date) and minimum seven years (911-904 CalBC) in 1σ, while the 2σ, dates provide a longer maximal range of 145 years for this time span (and minimal -4 years!). The results in the 1σ range are much too short a time slot for three strata with several sub-phases and clear changes in the pottery assemblage between Stratum VI and Strata V-IV. The Bayesian model from Area B (from the end of Stratum VI to the end of Stratum IV) provided a wider range. It should also be recalled that the models provide considerable time spans for each of the transitions between strata, much wider than we would expect for the close dating of less than half a century that we seek for this period. Furthermore, one sample measured several times from Area E provided unmodeled calibrated dates in the late 9th century BCE which are much lower compared to both the unmodeled and modeled dates from the other areas. It appears that the more samples are measured, the problems involved in their interpretation become more complex.

Since the subject is discussed in detail in Chapter 48, I emphasize here only a few notable points. At the outset it should be noted that in the discussion of Iron Age chronology, where we expect restricted resolutions of less than half a century, it became common to cite only or mainly the 1σ CalBC dates (68% probability), and so I did as well in most cases. Yet, it should be recalled that the 2σ dates (95% probability) provide wider ranges and should be taken into consideration as well. Indeed, quite a few discussions of radiocarbon dates in archaeology refer only to the 2σ dates. In such narrow time slots as those involved in the Iron Age chronological debate, the possibilities provided by the 2σ range are sometimes crucial.

Another problem is the relationship between unmodeled and modeled dates. Unmodeled dates from Stratum VI cover most of the 10th century BCE, while the Bayesian model for Areas C+D provide, in my opinion, too short a time span for this stratum, which has in several locations two stratigraphic phases and yielded a pottery assemblage that differs somewhat from the previous and later strata. This result may have been caused by the constraint resulting from the over 100-years span provided by the Bayesian model for Stratum D-3 (see above in the discussion of Iron IB dates). I therefore suggest a much shorter time span for Stratum D-3 and a longer one for Stratum VI, supported by the unmodeled calibrated dates, and conclude that the beginning of Stratum VI could occur during the first half of the 10th century. Taking into consideration the dates of the following Stratum V, the end of Stratum VI should be dated to somewhere in the last quarter of the 10th century.

The date of Stratum V is based on five samples from secure contexts in Area C and one from Area B (a total of 24 repetitions).21 It appears that the last two decades of the 10th century and the beginning of the 9th century BCE are the most reasonable dates for this stratum.

The destruction of Stratum IV is dated by three samples from Area C and two from Area B (a total of 17 repetitions) (Samples R35-R41). The dates are partly in the 10th century and mostly in the 9th century; some reach the second half of the 9th century BCE. The Bayesian model for Areas C+D would end this stratum no later than 863 (1σ) and 817 (2σ) CalBC, while the model for Area B provides lower dates: 833 (161σ) and 822 (1σ) CalBC. In Area E, one of two samples from loci attributed to the early phase of the courtyard (E-lb, probably corresponding with Stratum V), measured several times, provided the exceptionally low date of 832-810 (unmodeled).

My suggested date of 840/830 BCE for the destruction of Stratum IV is based on attribution of this destruction to Hazael (see below). As can be seen in Table 4.4, this date is lower by 23-33 years than the lowest date in the 1σ model for the end of Stratum IV in Area C (863 CalBC), but can fit the lowest as date from Area C (812 BCE), the lowest 2σ and as dates from Area B (838, 822 BCE) and many of the unmodeled lowest dates from Areas B, C and E in the 1σ and 2σ ranges.

Radiocarbon dates from Iron IIA strata at other sites in northern Israel were widely discussed in recent years (e.g., Sharon et al. 2007; Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2008; Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2009; 2010; 2011; Lee, Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2013). However, in many cases, the number of measurements from a single site is insufficient, and often they provide a wide range of dates in the 10th to 9th centuries. An example is Megiddo, where only eight samples with eleven repetitions were measured from Iron IIA strata: one from Stratum H-7 (a middle phase of Stratum VB) with a CalBC 1σ date of 1000-920, three from Stratum H-5 which corresponds to general Stratum VA-IVB, two of them (RTT3948 and RTK 6429) provided dates that cover the entire 9th century BCE and the third (RTT 3949) provided a date in the 10th century (1005-930 CaIBC) (Toffolo et al. 2014: 235).22 Four additional dates were published from Stratum Q-5, a Late Iron IIA context which is phased by the excavators between Stratum VB and VA-IVB; the calibrated dates are 1050-940, 980-895, 1000-920 and 895-830 BCE (1σ) and a (yet unpublished) Bayesian model is cited as providing a date of ca. 900 BCE (Kleiman et al. 2019: 547 and Table 7). This is just one example of the potential inconsistencies in the results of 14C dating, in particular when only a few dates are available. Bayesian models are used in order to limit these wide ranges; yet, the unmodeled dates should be taken into account when weighing the results of Bayesian models, specially in cases when the models include data from many sites. The radiometric evidence is certainly important, but has its limitations when it comes down to subtle dating at a resolution of less than 50 years.

I end this section with the words of Walter Kutchera, the former director of the radiometric laboratory in the University of Vienna:
I am convinced that 14C is the most wonderful tool for archaeology, when its inherent uncertainty is properly respected. Unfortunately, pushing its use beyond these limitations puts "oil into the fire" of those who mistrust the 14C method altogether .....23
These words are very true when we deal with Iron Age chronology, particularly in the 10th-9th centuries BCE.
Footnotes

21 As mentioned above, Samples R31-R34 from Locus 2425 in Building CG are excluded from this discussion, although it seems more viable that this context should be attributed to Stratum V. See discussion in Chapter 48.

22 Note that Tofollo et al. 2014 omit sample 3949 in their tables. It does appear, however in Gilboa, Sharon and Boaretto 2013.

23 Sent to me via an e-mail correspondence in 2008.

Historical Considerations

Introduction

In the following, I will survey some of the historical questions related to the 10th-9th centuries BCE that are relevant for the results of the Tel Rehov excavations (see also Mazar 2016a). It should be recalled that the city is mentioned in only one written source from these centuries: the Sheshonq I list (see Chapter 3). In this section, I will use the assumed ancient name Rehob.

Ethnic Identity and Geo-Political Status

Who were the people who inhabited the large and opulent city of Rehob and what was its geo-political status in Iron Age IIA?

A longue durée perspective shows that the Canaanite city Rehob continued to survive without a major gap or devastating event throughout the Late Bronze and Iron Age I, for about 500 years. During the ca. 150 year-long duration of the Iron IIA, the same city continued to develop with changes in the material culture, but with no actual crisis between Iron I and Iron IIA, and with a significant continuity of the material culture throughout the three Iron IIA strata. Canaanite cultural continuity during Iron IIA is demonstrated in a number of features: continuity in selected architectural plans (in the case of Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, see above), the lack of "four room houses" or pillared buildings which are a hallmark of Israelite sites, continuity of certain ceramic traditions (forms and occasional painted decoration), cult objects, figurines and seals that are rooted in Canaanite/Phoenician traditions, the limited consumption of pig bones (mainly hunted boars) which indicates a departure from strict Israelite religious practices (if indeed they were practiced elsewhere in Israel in this period). The few private names known from the Tel Rehov inscriptions include the Canaanite theophoric component El, but not a Yahwistic component. The name Nimshi could be from a local Canaanite root. However, Jehu is certainly a Yahwistic name, and if indeed he came from this city as I suggest, it would mean that he was born with or adopted an Israelite theophoric name. It should also be emphasized that paleographic studies of the inscriptions show that those of Stratum IV can be defined as written in Hebrew script.

It thus may be assumed that many of the Iron IIA inhabitants were descendants of indigenous local Canaanite families who lived in this city for generations (Mazar 2016a; 2016b; Arie 2017). Their self-identity must have revolved around the city and its local families and traditions. There is no doubt that during this period (either Stratum VI or V), the city became part of the geo-political entity of Israel (see below). However, we must differentiate between geo-political status and ethnic identity; even when the city became part of the northern Kingdom of Israel, it may be conjectured that the main bulk of the population continued to be the descendants of indigenous Canaanite families (cf., Judg 1:27). It may be assumed that once the city became part of the Israelite kingdom, certain Israelite families from the hill country settled in the city alongside the locals and that Israelite religious beliefs and ideology were slowly accepted by the local population, probably encouraged by the central political institutions of the kingdom. This dichotomy between the indigenous Canaanite population in the northern valleys and the Israelite hill-country population was addressed in the past by a number of studies and is fundamental for the understanding the social makeup of the northern Kingdom of Israel. Faust (2000; 2012: Chapter 8) addressed this issue manly in relation to the rural sector, but his conclusions are also appropriate for an urban society like that of Rehob.

Rehob in the 10th Century BCE: An Independent City or Part of the Assumed United Monarchy?

What was the geo-political status of Rehob and its vicinity (including Beth-Shean) in the 10th century BCE? The question of the historicity of the biblical concept of a United Monarchy during the 10th century BCE is one of the most debated issues regarding biblical history during the last generation, and this is not the place for a detailed discussion of this issue. Some scholars maintain the biblical concept as valid (e.g., Millard and Dever in Handy 1997; Ben-Tor 2000; Stager 2003; Dietrich 2007; Blum 2010; Faust 2010; Lemaire 2010), while many others either negate the historicity of such a kingdom altogether or diminish its territory to Jerusalem and its close vicinity (e.g., Finkelstein 1996,2010 and many other publications; Na'aman, Knauf, Niemann, Lemche in Handy 1997; Grabbe 2007: 111-115; Frevel 2016: 108-148; Garfinkel, Kreimerman and Zilberg 2016: 225-232; Sergi 2017; for a recent survey and earlier literature, see Na'aman 2019). Still others attempt to find middle ground (e.g., Miller in Handy 1997).

In several past articles (Mazar 2007a: 164-166; 2010: 51-52; 2014), I claimed that the biblical concept of a "United Monarchy", although ensconced in a deep literary, theological and ideological wrapping, may very well reflect a historical-political construct that emerged from the political vacuum created in large parts of the Land of Israel with the destruction at ca. 1000 BCE of the few Iron Age I Canaanite cities which survived the collapse at the end of the Late Bronze Age (such as Megiddo, Yoqnecam, Tell Keisan). During the 10th century BCE, the coastal plain and the lower Shephelah were under the domination of Philistine and Phoenician city states, while other parts of the country may have undergone severe political changes. At such a time of instability and social change, a charismatic local leader like David, even if emerging from a peripheral hilly region like Bethlehem, may have possessed political abilities that could have led to tribal alliances and economic treaties and may have succeeded in uniting the inner parts of the country under his control. The monumental architecture in Jerusalem may support such a concept. His kingdom should perhaps be understood as a short-lived tribal alliance, lacking a centralized administration and hierarchical society, yet having an impact on extensive territories. The historical Solomon is even more vague due to the literary/legendary nature of the biblical narrative, and only a few verses may have retained some historical information, perhaps those referring to his building operations (I Kgs 9:17-18). Ultimately, there are extremely contradictory views on this subject and it remains debated.

If such a concept of a "United Monarchy" is accepted as having some historical validity, it would mean that the large and densely built 10th century BCE city of Rehob was subordinate in some way to Jerusalem. If, however, there was no United Monarchy that ruled the northern part of the country, it would mean that Rehob Stratum VI continued to be an independent Canaanite city state, unrelated to any other known political unit of the time. If the latter possibility is correct, Rehob would be the only inland independent city with a highly developed urban culture in the 10th century BCE (not including the Philistine and Phoenician cities along the coast and in the lower Shephelah). The recently excavated intense Iron I and Iron IIA occupation sequence at Tel Abel Beth Maacah in the upper Galilee might be another example of an inland site with such urban continuity, although in a more northern region (Yahalom-Mack, Panitz-Cohen and Mullins 2018).

The Impact of Sheshonq's (Shishak) Invasion

Rehob, in Sheshonq I's list mentioned aside Beth-Shean, can safely be identified with Tel Rehov (Chapter 3). The precise date of the raid is unknown and depends on two debated factors: the accession year of Sheshonq I and the time of the raid within his 21-year reign. The accession year is calculated by most scholars to ca. 945/940 BCE (e.g., Kitchen 2000: 50; Shortland 2005); a lower date ca. 934/929 was suggested by Ben-Dor Evian (2011), who also suggested that the raid occurred early in his reign, while most other scholars attribute it to the last years of his reign. All in all, the raid probably occurred between ca. 930 and 915 BCE.24 Assessments of the impact of Sheshonq's raid vary (Helck 1971: 240; Na'aman 1998; 2007: 404-405; Rainey and Notley 2006: 186; Finkelstein 2013: 41-48). Traditionally, scholars tended to attribute destruction layers to this raid, assuming that the Egyptian army destroyed the places mentioned in the Karnak list. However, as first suggested by Na'aman, this assumption should not be taken for granted and it must be taken into account that toponyms are mentioned in the list just because they surrendered to the Egyptian army during the raid or since the Egyptian army passed through them or ruled them for a while without causing destruction. The inclusion of a toponym in this list means only that the place existed during Sheshonq's raid and was known to the Egyptians.

In earlier papers (Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar 2003a; 2003b), we attributed the destruction of Stratum V to Sheshonq I. But later excavation seasons have shown that the heavy destruction referred to in these papers was a local feature limited to the central part of Area C (the apiary, Buildings CH, CG, CF and CE), while buildings to the east and west, as well as Stratum V structures in other excavation areas, did not suffer a destruction and continued to be in use in Stratum IV. A paleomagnetic study pointed to the possibility that the local destruction and burning in Area C was result of an earthquake. As we have seen, there is no evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum VI. Thus, we are left with no destruction level that can be attributed to Sheshonq. I thus conclude that the mentioning of the city in his topographic list means only that he passed through it or overtook it for a while on his way from the Central Jordan Valley towards the Jezreel Valley. Based on the 14C dates from Stratum VI and some of those from Stratum V it appears that the raid may be correlated with the late years of Stratum VI or the beginning of Stratum V.
Footnotes

24 The date ca. 915 BCE would fit the accession date as suggested by Ben-Dor Evian and the attribution of the raid to the late years of Sheshonq as suggested by most scholars; however, the precise date of the raid remains unknown.

When Did Rehob Become Part of the Northern Kingdom of Israel?

The question when did Rehob become part of the northern Kingdom of Israel is somewhat controversial (Mazar 2016a: 98-100). Arie (2017: 14-15) emphasized the unique components at Tel Rehov and its dissimilarity to what he termed "regular" Israelite traits, and suggested that Rehob was a local Canaanite city-state until the end of Stratum V and was annexed to Israel only in Stratum IV, during the Omride era [~876-~842 BCE] and after the foundation of Jezreel.25 Finkelstein went even further and suggested that both Strata V and IV were non-Israelite, Rehob being a local "late-Canaanean city state at the southwestern edge of the Aramean culture sphere of influence" (2017: 181; for an earlier version, see 2013: 120-122). Based on a Bayesian model of 14C dates published before 2005, he dated the destruction of Stratum IV between 875-849 CalBC and suggested that both Strata V and IV were destroyed by Omride assaults. In my view, both these suggestions are unacceptable. Arie's distinction between Strata V and IV as pre-Israelite versus Israelite contradicts the identical material culture in both these strata. As said, the destruction at the end of Stratum V is limited to part of Area C, while in all the other excavated areas, no such destruction was observed and the city of Stratum V appears to have been continuously developed with some architectural changes in the following Stratum IV. In fact, these two strata comprise two phases in the life of the same city. Finkelstein's statement that "the material culture of Tel Rehov differs from that of the Israelite centers in the Jezreel Valley - for instance Megiddo - in almost every respect" (2017: 180) cannot be accepted. Although there are exceptional traits in the local material culture of Tel Rehov compared to other Israelite sites (such as the building techniques and house plans) there are also many similarities, for example, in the pottery assemblage (cf., Tell el-Far'ah North, Jezreel, Megiddo and Horbat Rosh Zayit), clay figurines, seals, pottery altars ("cult stands"), and other material-culture components. In addition, similarity to Megiddo can be found in the fact that both cities lacked a city wall in Iron IIA and in the resemblance between Building CF at Tel Rehov and Building 2081 at Megiddo, as explained above. In contrast to Finkelstein, I cannot discern any Aramean components at Tel Rehov. The claim that such components exist in the inscriptions is unfounded, except perhaps in the case of the component sqy in inscription No. 5 (Chapter 29A). In my view, both Strata V and IV represent a city that was under the hegemony of the northern Kingdom of Israel right from its inception.

Although being part of the Israelite kingdom, it seems that Rehob retained its independent nature and indigenous population throughout this period, until the destruction of Stratum IV. The city is probably not mentioned in the bible, in spite of suggestions to the contrary, referring to 2 Sam. 10:6-8 (Finkelstein) and 2 Sam 21:12 (Kadary) (see Chapter 3). Since Rehob was certainly one of the largest and most prosperous cities of the kingdom, this is an example of the lacunae and selectivity in the biblical narrative as it has come down to us (cf., the fact that Ahab's participation in the battle of Qarqar [853 BCE] is not mentioned in the biblical narrative).

The radiometric dates indicate that Stratum V was founded in the early years of the northern Kingdom of Israel. If we accept as historical the biblical reference to Tirzah (Tell el-Far'ah North) as the capital of the kingdom before the foundation of Samaria, the most reasonable archaeological level that would fit this status is Stratum VIIb (see above in the section on northern Samaria). Indeed, the pottery assemblage and other finds from that stratum resemble the material culture of Tel Rehov Strata V-IV. The outstanding apiary in Stratum V must have been operating in these early days of the kingdom, probably before the rise of the Omride dynasty [~876-~842 BCE].

Nimshi and Elisha

The appearance of the name nms (Nimshi) in two inscriptions from Tel Rehov, in both Strata V and IV, as well as on a jar from Tel 'Amal, led me to suggest that the prosperous Iron Age IIA city Rehob was the hometown of the Nimshi family (Mazar 2016a: 110). This was perhaps a strong and powerful family or clan who might have owned a large portion of the city's resources, including the apiary of Stratum V, in which one of the jars with this family name was found. Perhaps this was one of the indigenous families, rooted in the local Canaanite population, as described above. Nimshi is mentioned in the Bible as the father or grandfather of Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], whose rise to power brought about the fall of the Omride dynasty in 842 BCE (1 Kgs 19:16; 2 Kgs 9:2, 14, 20). Thus Jehu must have belonged to the Nimshi family, and perhaps he was born and raised at Rehob. His coup and the establishment of a new dynasty which ruled northern Israel for almost 100 years may be understood as a shift of power in the kingdom from the Omride dynasty which originated in the Samaria hills to the local descendants of Canaanite families in the northern valleys.

The reading of [']lys' as the biblical name Elisha, written in large letters with red ink on a well worked pottery sherd found in the northwestern chamber of Building CP in Stratum IV, although a reconstruction, is intriguing (see details in Chapter 29A, No 9). However, although this reading is not conclusive, we cannot suggest an alternative.26 Although the name Elisha is known from several 8th-7th centuries BCE inscriptions and seals, this is the only example in a 9th century context, and one has to ask whether there might be a relationship between this ostracon and the "man of God" who stands in the center of the Elisha cycle (2 Kgs 2-13) (Mazar 2016a: 112-114; Ahituv and Mazar 2016: 223-225)? A straightforward identification of the name on the ostracon with the biblical figure may sound unlikely and naïve, but we have to consider the exceptional context and date. Building CP in which the ostracon was found is outstanding by all means, as explained above in this chapter. The ostracon was found in a small chamber with benches and two entrances, with an elaborate pottery altar set at the exterior of each entrance. Several additional cult objects were found in nearby rooms, including a ceremonial stand, a fragment of a third pottery altar, a complete incense burner with a lid, and a mold for producing figurines of naked females, identical to those found on the facades of a pottery altar in a nearby building (CF). Bone astragali and the unusual predominance of the right limbs of animals also point to religious activity in this building. The unique plan of the building, with two major wings connected through the small northwestern chamber, enabled mobility from one wing to the other through this chamber. An unusually large number of pottery vessels found in the building, including many bowls and cooking pots, as well as benches along the walls and two unique pottery silos, are evidence for public meals, perhaps banquets intended to feed a considerable number of people. This exceptional planning and activity in Building CP would be in keeping with exceptional activity such as that related to Elisha: a "man of God" — a seer and healer, whom people would wish to approach and consult, while conducting rituals and participating in public feasts.

Although the Elisha stories are thought by biblical scholars to be literary creations (legenda) of the late Monarchic to post-Exilic eras (Rofe 1974; Ghantous 2013: 128-156; Oeming 2016, with previous literature), they nevertheless could preserve kernels of historical reality, rooted in the activity of an actual seer and healer with that name who was active during the second half of the 9th century BCE in this region (Na'aman 2000: 100-104; Lemaire 2014).27 The stories include many geographical and historical details which may be considered as rooted in genuine historical memory. The biblical narrative locates the birth town of Elisha at Abel Mehola, identified ca. 15 km southeast of Tel Rehov (Zertal 2005: 100-102; 175-179; Rainey and Notley 2006: 176) and thus, at the outset, he is related to the Beth-Shean Valley. According to this narrative, he was active during the reign of Ahab [r. c. 871 c. 852 BCE], Joram [r. c. 850 c. 840 BCE], Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], Jehoahaz [r. c. 814 - c. 798 BCE] and Joash [r. c. 798 - c. 782 BCE]. However, this appears to be much too long a time range and therefore, scholars have suggested to limit this activity to a shorter span.28 The early years of his career would be contemporary with his relationship to Jehu and involvement in his anointment, perhaps shortly before the city was put to the torch by Hazael sometime between 840-830 BCE (see below).

Seers, healers, and "men of God" are known in many ancient and modern traditional societies. Historical Elisha may have been such a figure, whose outstanding personality and activity left an indelible impression, generating memories that later served as the basis for the "Elisha cycle" in the Book of Kings. Although a straightforward identification of a biblical figure in the archaeological record is always dubious, the data provided above allow us, at the very least, to raise the possibility, with all due reservation, of a possible connection between the name on the ostracon and the biblical figure of Elisha. If this hypothesis is correct, Building CP would have been the seat of Elisha for a period of time during his early career, when he was involved in the ascent to kingship of Jehu. This suggestion remains, of course, in the realm of speculation.
Footnotes

26 In addition to the views expressed in Chapter 29A, I should note the Ph.D. dissertation by H.D.D. Parker (2018) which reached me after the completion of Chapter 29A. She rejects our reading and reads the second letter as cayin rather than lamed (p. 191). However, this letter is open on its upper part, unlike the cayin at the end of the name, and probably had an extension beyond the fragment line, as explained in Chapter 29A. The reading cayin would make no sense.

27 See for example Ghantous (2013) who views the redaction of the Elisha-Elijah stories as having taken place in the 4th century BCE, but, unlike the Elijah stories that he considers late (i.e., 5th century BCE), "the Elisha tradition... originated in the eighth century and continued to evolve independently until the fifth century BCE" (p. 128).

28 Miller and Hayes (1986: 290) suggested that the stories relating to the early years of Elisha (2 Kg 2, 4:1-8:15) should be attributed to Jehu's reign rather than to that of Ahab and Jehoram, as the Bible puts it.

When and How Did the Destruction of Stratum IV Occur?

The destruction of Stratum IV marks a dramatic point in the history of the city. Evidence for fierce fire and severe devastation was found in all the excavation areas. People left their belongings in the houses and probably fled, or were deported, or slaughtered. In one case, a human skeleton may be attributed to this destruction layer in Area C (Chapter 46B). Following the destruction, the lower city was abandoned and only the upper mound was resettled in the following Iron IIB. It appears that this destruction resulted from a military conquest rather than an earthquake, though no direct evidence such as multiple arrowheads or sling stones were detected. The date of the destruction and the identity of the conqueror can be suggested on the basis of three parameters: pottery typology, historical considerations and radiocarbon dates.

The pottery assemblage from the destruction layer is typical Late Iron IIA, which may be dated to a time range from the late 10th century until somewhere in the last third of the 9th century BCE (see Chapter 24 and the chronological discussion above).

A number of historical events should be taken into consideration as possible causes for this event. Finkelstein's suggestion that Rehov Stratum IV was destroyed by Ahab was rejected in the discussion above. Aramean attacks during the first half of the 9th century BCE can hardly be accounted for; the Ben Hadad I raid on the northern part of the kingdom, if it really occurred, is too early for the end of Stratum IV and, in any event, did not have an impact on the Beth-Shean Valley (Younger 2016: 571-580, with a review of earlier views). Wars between Ahab and Ben-Hadad (II?) (1 Kgs 20, 22) should be taken into account, since the Arameans are said to have arrived from the Jordan Valley (Succoth) probably through Wadi el-Far'ah, and laid siege to Samaria (1 Kgs 20). However, the historical reality behind these narratives is highly debated. M. Miller was the first to claim that since Ahab was a member of the anti-Assyrian coalition alongside Hadadezer (Assyrian Adad-Idri) of Damascus in the battle of Qarqar against Shalmaneser III (853 BCE), followed by three additional Assyrian raids to Syria, it makes no sense that the king of Damascus would fight Israel during the same time when they were allies (Miller and Hayes 1986: 262-264; 290, 300-302). He therefore suggested to date these biblical descriptions of clashes between Aram and Israel to the time of Jehu's successors. This view became popular in recent research, although a few historians believe that an Aramean attack on Israel could have occurred a few years prior to the battle of Qarqar (Aharoni 1979: 334-335; Rainey and Notely 2006: 199). Yamada and Na'aman claimed that there was one Aramean raid during the time of Ahab, although each of them accepted a different tradition in 1 Kgs (survey and references in Younger 2016: 580-591 and, in particular, 582, notes 124-126). I tend to accept the view that no Aramean attacks on Israel occurred during the reign of Ahab.

Another possibility is the Shalmaneser III raid on southern Syria in 841 BCE, described in several Assyrian sources, including the Marble Slab and the Black Obelisk (Younger 2016: 6 13-618, with references to earlier literature). This attack occurred close to Jehu's coup, which is dated by most scholars to 842 BCE and Jehu "of Bit Humri" is mentioned in both these Assyrian sources as surrendering to Shalmaneser. Since the inscriptions mention both the Hauran and the coast, scholars conjectured that the Assyrian army reached northern Israel, and some identified the geographical name Ba'li-Rasi mentioned in the text as Mt. Carmel (Aharoni 1979: 341; Miller and Hayes 1986: 287; Rainey and Notley 2006: 208; others suggested Ras en-Naqura or the vicinity of Nahr el-Kalb in Lebanon: Younger 2016: 616). In any event, the possibility that this hypothetical Assyrian invasion caused the destruction of Rehov Stratum IV remains very doubtful.

The most reasonable explanation for the destruction is, in my view, an Aramean attack during the time of Hazael. "Resilience, perseverance, drive, military prowess, ruthlessness — these are some of the traits no doubt possessed by Hazael that led to Damascene hegemony" (Younger 2016: 630). His bloody attacks on Israel are echoed in the bible (1 Kgs 19:17; 2 Kgs 8:12; Amos 1: 3-4). The Tel Dan inscription is commonly interpreted as relating that Hazael killed Joram son of Ahab and Ahaziah son of Jehoram king of Judah, in contrast to the biblical story of the assassination of these two kings by Jehu. In both cases, the events must be dated to ca. 842/841 BCE, following the battle of Ramot Gilead, after which Jehu of the Nimshi family came to power (Na'aman 2000: 100-104; Younger 2016: 606-620, with vast earlier literature). Between 841-837 BCE, Hazael was occupied with Assyrian attacks by Shalmaneser III. Yet, following 837 BCE, the Assyrians withdrew from Syria for a good number of years, and Hazael was able to build up his power and establish a regional empire (Younger 2016: 620-632). He ruled large parts of northern Transjordan and central and southern Syria, attacked Israel, conquered Gath, threatened Jerusalem and forced Jehoash of Judah to pay him tribute (2 Kgs 12:18-19). His domination continued until the time of Jehoahaz son of Jehu (2 Kgs 13:3-7). As mentioned above, several scholars have suggested that the Aramean wars attributed in I Kgs 20,22 to Ben Hadad during the time of Ahab were led, in fact, by Hazael during Jehu's reign or during the time of his successor Jehoahaz. The biblical stories regarding the conflicts with the Arameans are intertwined in the Elisha cycle, including the siege of Samaria (2 Kgs 5-7), the story of Elisha at the deathbed of Ben-Hadad, the rise of Hazael, and the prophecy of Elisha to Hazael concerning the devastation of Israel (2 Kgs 8: 7-15).

The suggested role of Tel Rehov as the home-town of the Nimshi family and of Jehu may explain the choice of this city as a target of a severe Aramean attack. Other reasons could be the status of the city as one of the largest and richest in the northern Kingdom of Israel, as well as its proximity to the Gilead, which was now dominated by the Arameans. Thus, the destruction may be explained as personal revenge and a threat against Jehu by Hazael. The total destruction by fire resembles the fierce destruction of Gath (Tell es-Safi) by Hazael, which probably occurred somewhat later (Maeir 2009; 2016).

When may Hazael have destroyed Rehob? One possibility is that the conquest occurred in the very beginning of his and Jehu's kingships, ca. 841-840 BCE, just after the battle of Ramoth Gilead. Another possibility is that it occurred during the years following 837 BCE, perhaps between 837¬830 BCE. These dates would fit the lowest range of the 14C dates presented earlier in this chapter (see the section on absolute chronology) and in Chapter 48.

The extent of the 9th century BCE destruction at Tel Rehov is unparalleled elsewhere in northern Israel; nowhere was such a violent and total destruction found, although less severe destructions which may be attributed to Hazael were found at Jezreel, parts of Megiddo Stratum VA-IVB, and perhaps Beth-Shean Stratum Upper V (=S-la, see above) (Kleiman 2016). Finkelstein (2016; followed by Kleiman 2016) suggested that Hazael caused the destruction of Hazor IX and Dan IVA; yet, in none of these places was evidence for a heavy destruction found. It should be noted that the excavators of both sites suggested higher dates in the 9th century BCE for the same strata and this issue remains unresolved, as does the question of Aramean presence at these sites (as well as at Abel Beth Maacah) during the reign of Hazael (Younger 2016: 624). As to Hazael's conquests in southern and perhaps central Israel, see recent surveys and suggestions by Maeir (2016), Kleiman (2016) and Younger (2016: 624-627); the latter dates the conquest of Gath and the tribute payed to Hazael by Jehoash king of Judah to ca. 810 BCE.

Chapter 12 - Area C: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Introduction

Plans and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Figure 12.1 - Site Plan with grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.1 - Aerial Photo showing Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)

Discussion

Area C was located at the northwestern end of the lower city of Tel Rehov, which is the highest point of this part of the mound (Fig. 12.1; Photo 12.1). It was excavated with the purpose of clarifying the stratigraphic sequence and defining the nature of settlement in this part of the tell. ...

Stratigraphy

Four main strata were detected in Area C, termed from earliest to latest (Table 12.1):
  • C-3
  • C-2
  • C-1b
  • C-1a
Stratum C-4 was reached only in a very limited probe in Square Y/1 (Fig. 12.3). Stratum C-3 had two phases in one building and in a few cases, Strata C-2 and C-1b had more than one phase, detected mainly in open areas with multiple occupation layers. See Table 12.1 for the correlation between the local phases of Area C and the general tell strata, and suggested periodization; see further discussion in Chapter 4. See also the stratigraphic table at the beginning of this volume for the correlation with local strata in all other areas.

Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


The amount of continuity between the major strata (C-3–C-1) differed. Some walls of Stratum C-2 were built directly on those of C-3, while others were constructed according to a different plan altogether. Some buildings of Stratum C-2 were rebuilt in C-1b, while others went out of use. The greatest continuity took place between Strata C-1b and C-1a, which should be viewed, in fact, as two phases of the same occupation, although there were also several marked changes, mostly in the southeastern part of the area. Strata C-3 and C-2 each had a distinct brick type, while the bricks of Strata C-1b and C-1a were similar, although of varied materials (Tables 12.27–12.30).

The correlation between the destruction/construction events in a city that was constructed entirely of bricks turned out to be complicated task. Our stratigraphic division was based on the attempt to integrate local sequences in the various parts of the area into one comprehensive scheme. Although in each context we were able to establish clear stratigraphy, there remained open questions concerning the correlation between them, in particular due to a violent event at the end of Stratum C-1b, mostly in the southeastern part of the field (Squares Y–Z, A– B/20, 1–3). However, other parts of Area C with remains attributed to Stratum C-1b did not suffer such massive destruction. Following the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a, Area C, like the entire lower city, was entirely abandoned, and the architecture of this stratum was revealed just under modern topsoil.

Stratum C-2

Introduction

Plans
Plans

  • Fig. 12.7 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion

Stratum C-2 was dated to Early Iron Age IIA, the 10th century BCE (for more specific dating, see below and Chapters 4, 48). It marked the initial appearance of red-slipped and hand-burnished wares; Cypriot Black-on-Red ware that appeared in subsequent strata was lacking (Chapter 27). The Hippo storage jar made its first appearance in this stratum, although in small amounts and partially ambiguous from a typological point of view, made of the same type of clay common in subsequent strata (Chapter 24). Most of the pottery was fragmentary, aside from several complete vessels, including an assemblage from Locus 1555b in Square R/4 (Figs. 13.10–13.11; Photo 13.1) whose typological attributes and decoration recall Iron IB pottery, as discussed below.

One of the most distinct characteristics of this occupation phase was that almost all the walls were constructed with hard-packed yellow bricks, very different from the crumbly gray bricks of Stratum C-3 (Table 12.28). Most of the rooms were found full of complete fallen bricks of this type. This, and traces of damage in the walls, such as cracks and slippage, allude to seismic activity at some point, possibly the reason for the end of this stratum. Despite this damage, the walls of Stratum C-2 were, in most cases, well preserved, for example in Building CB, where they stood up to 18 courses, with two intact entrances.

Square R/4 — Room 1555

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.23 - Room 1555 at the beginning of excavation from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.24 - Damaged eastern face of Wall 1563 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.25 - Smashed vessels in Room 1555 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.9
  • Section: Fig. 12.97
  • Photos 12.23–12.25
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.10–13.11
Room 1555 in Square R/4 was ca. 2.6 m wide and at least 2.9 m long, bordered by Walls 1562 on the east, 4458 on the south and 1563 on the west; the northern wall was beyond the excavation limits (Photo 12.23). The southern wall (4458) was the western continuation of Wall 4438, the northern wall of Building CA (see below). The western wall (1563) was preserved to ten courses (Photo 12.24), although its eastern face was very damaged. All the walls, and particularly Wall 4458 on the south, were found tilted, apparently the result of seismic activity. The bottom of the western wall (1563) was reached on its western side at level 85.61 m, which is somewhat lower than the upper level of some of the Stratum D-3 pits in the adjacent Square Q/4 (see Chapter 15, Table 15.3). The bottom level of the southern wall (4458) was reached at 85.66 m; this wall continued to the west, where it was designated 1572. It was not clear whether the eastern wall (1562) continued down, as its lowest courses were very poorly preserved. Inside the room there were two layers. The upper one (1555a), sealed by Floor 4488 of Stratum C-1b, was a debris layer between levels 86.62– 85.92 m. The lower one (1555b) included a concentration of restorable pottery at levels 85.92–85.60 m (Fig. 12.97; Photo 12.25), although one large storage jar fragment was found 0.20 m lower than the rest of the pottery in the assemblage. No clear floor matrix could be defined here. The lowest level of this layer, with the single storage jar sherd, was resting just above a 0.10 m debris layer (11428) which covered Floor 11436 (level 85.30 m) and Pits 11439 and 11438, all assigned to Stratum C-3 (see above).

The 18 restored vessels from Locus 1555b (Figs. 13.10–13.11; photo on p. 270) were attributed to Room 1555 of Stratum C-2, based on the relation of the debris layer (1555a) and the top of the pottery layer (1555b) to the surrounding walls. As such, this would be the only case where an assemblage of restorable vessels could be attributed to Stratum C-2 and the only evidence for a sudden destruction at the end of this occupation level, although no traces of fire were found; the cause might have been an earthquake. Yet, there is a certain dilemma concerning this pottery group. Unlike much of the other pottery from Stratum C-2, the vessels lacked red slip and burnish, and several were painted in a style typical of the Iron IB pottery at Tel Rehov. Typologically as well, the vessels suit an Iron IB date, although most forms also continued into Early Iron IIA. These factors, as well as the fact that the main bulk of the pottery was found at level 85.60 m, which is somewhat lower than the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (general Stratum VII) in the adjacent Square Q/4, raised initial doubts as to the attribution of this locus. If this pottery was on a layer relating to the debris of Locus 1555a and abutting the bottom of the room’s walls, it must belong to Stratum C-2. However, the possibility remains that this pottery concentration should be attributed to Stratum C-3a, the last Iron IB phase, in which case the thin debris layer 11428 might have been the surface on which the assemblage rested. In that case, Floor 11436 and Pits 11438 and 11439 would be attributed to an earlier phase, denoted Stratum C-3b, corresponding to the lower pits of Stratum D-3; if so, then the pottery concentration preceded the walls of the room as defined above. This is not entirely impossible when considering the location of this pottery concentration in relation to the bottom of these walls (see section, Fig. 12.97). However, in that case, Room 1555 would remain without a floor, despite the good preservation of its walls. Another problem with this explanation is that floors attributed to Stratum C-2 east of Room 1555 (in Square S/4) are almost at the same level or even lower than the pottery in Locus 1555b. Ultimately, this unique assemblage was assigned to Stratum C-2, while acknowledging that the pottery types could be either Iron IB or Early Iron IIA, demonstrating the continuity between these two periods, as discussed in Chapter 24.

West of Square R/4, where the steep western slope of the mound started, was the border between Areas C and D. In Squares R–Q/4–5 of Area D, architectural elements attributed to Stratum D-2 continued until the erosion line down the slope, with no evidence for a defense line of any sort. These remains were contemporary with Stratum C-2 and thus, we concluded that the city had not been fortified at that time.

Building CA

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 (west) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.10 - Plan of Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.27 - Looking south at Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.28 - Looking south at Building CA in Stratum C-2 with a bulge in Wall 4439 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.29 - Room 4426 in Building CA in Stratum C-2 with burnt grain on the floor from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.30 - Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.9–12.10
  • Sections: Figs. 12.65–12.68
  • Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.27–12.30
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.13–13.14
Building CA

This was a rectangular building in Squares S–T/3–4 (external measurements 5.2×6.2 m). All of its walls were composed of hard yellow bricks and were very well preserved to a height of more than 1.0 m. No entrance to this building was located, suggesting that it had been entered from above. Its plan consisted of two small rooms on the west and two somewhat larger rooms on the east, and it might have served a storage function. It was constructed above a thin layer of fill (8408) that served to level the remains of Stratum C-3a Building CS below it.

The northern wall (4438) was preserved nine courses high on the west, but much less on the east, so much so that it was not clear whether there had been an entranceway here or whether the bricks were missing due to damage. Stratum C-1b Walls 1464 and 1524 superimposed it, but there was no C-3 wall below it; Wall 8503 adjoined it on the north. The western wall (4440), constructed right on top of Wall 8418 of Stratum C-3a (Photos 12.12– 12.13), was preserved 11–12 courses high; its width was unknown, since C-1b Wall 1523 covered its western face. The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo 12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses high and was poorly preserved, especially on the northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that the main damage to the building, whatever the cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6 m, although a thickening identified in its lower courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m. There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).

The two eastern rooms were similar to each other in size, as were the two western rooms. Their internal measurements were: Room 4429 in the northeast (2.0×2.4 m; 4.8 sq m), Room 4420 in the southeast (1.9×2.0 m; 3.8 sq m), Room 4426 in the southwest (1.3×2.0 m; 2.6 sq m) (Photo 12.29), and Room 4409 in the northwest (1.1×2.0 m; 2.2 sq m); the total floor space of this building was only 13.4 sq m. Two intersecting inner partition walls separated these rooms: east–west Wall 2509 and north– south Wall 2493, with its northern continuation, 4407. An entranceway in the eastern end of Wall 2509 joined the two eastern rooms, while an opening in Wall 2509, just to the west of its corner with Wall 2493, joined the two western rooms. However, it seems that at some point, this latter opening was blocked, as a brick course spanned its top. No entrance was found in Walls 2493 or 4407, leaving the eastern and western chambers inaccessible from each other; it is possible that the rooms were entered from above. Their small size, and the fact that some grain was found in the southwestern room, indicate the possibility that they were used for grain storage.

The rooms were found full of complete fallen yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash, and brown soil. There were relatively few finds, mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs. 13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426 (Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18), yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ) CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were made of beaten earth and for the most part, their level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible makeup.

The nature and function of this building remained unclear. There was no evidence for domestic activity or storage, such as cooking facilities, installations or storage jars. Perhaps it was related to grain storage, possibly with some administrative function. To some extent, this building recalls the eastern part of Building 200 in Hazor Strata X–IX (Hazor III–IV: Plans VIII–X), which was also comprised of a series of small chambers.

Wall 1506

A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3 m and was composed of the same hard yellow bricks as the other walls in this building, although here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses of its eastern face protruding; this might have been the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).

The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was not certain; it abutted the southern half of the poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA (4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where it was abutted by an open area in which cooking and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a retainer built to buttress the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b Building CD, terminated just at the point where the northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:

  1. Wall 1506 was built as a retaining wall to support the damaged southern end of the eastern wall of Building CA during some later phase of Stratum C-2, and was subsequently reused in Stratum C-1b, when the building was rebuilt
  2. Wall 1506 was constructed in Stratum C-1b as part of the renovation of Building CA as Building CD
It seems that the first option is preferable for the following reasons
  1. layers attributed to C-2 in the open area to the north and east of the wall abutted its lowest exposed courses
  2. there was an alternative entrance into Building CB, so the blockage of the northern entrance did not cancel this building
  3. it was built of yellow bricks typical only of Stratum C-2.
The end of Building CA was perhaps the result of an earthquake, as evidenced by the damaged and cracked state of the walls and the large amount of complete fallen bricks above the floors. Preservation was especially poor on the eastern side of the building. It is possible that earlier seismic damage ravaged the building during the course of its use and there was some evidence of attempts to repair and continue to use it, such as Wall 1506. However, the final event put the building out of use, to be leveled, deliberately filled-in, and rebuilt in Stratum C-1b (Building CD). The fact that the floors of the building were relatively empty of finds may suggest that it was abandoned before its final devastation.

Building CB

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 (west) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.10 - Plan of Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.30 - Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.31 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.32 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.33 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.34 - Central Hall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.35 - Split between northern walls 1442 and 1483 of Building CB - possibly due to an earthquake - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.36 - Lamp in niche of Wall 1483 - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.37 - Large Tumbled Stone in Building CB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.38 - Wall 2481 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.39 - Tilted Stratum C-1 Wall 2411 overlying Stratum C-2 Wall 5476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.9–12.10
  • Sections: Figs.12.65, 12.69, 12.77, 12.79
  • Photos 12.3–12.5, 12.8, 12.15–12.16, 12.30–12.39
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.15–13.18
Building CB in Squares S–Y/2–3 adjoined Building CA on the south, with the northern wall of the former built flush against the southern wall of the latter, creating a double wall. No connection was found between the two back-to-back units and they represented separate, contemporary buildings.
Room 1520 — The Central Hall

The major component of Building CB was a large, roughly rectangular space which underwent minor changes during the course of its existence (Figs. 12.9–12.10; Photo 12.30). This large room (1520) was perhaps a major living room or reception hall in a larger architectural complex, which continued to the east and perhaps, south.

The external measurements of this hall were 5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the northern wall) were constructed directly on top of the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3 Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG (Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were: 1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses; Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east (preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall, preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo 12.35); the western half was designated 1442 and the eastern half, 1483. An entrance in Wall 1483 was located 1.0 m to the west of its corner with Wall 2505. An intact oil lamp with soot on its nozzle was found in a niche in the eastern door jamb, one course below the top (Photo 12.36). This entrance led to the north, where an open area with cooking facilities was found in Squares T/3-4, although note that this opening was partially blocked on the north by Wall 1506, probably during a later phase of Stratum C-2, as described above. Wall 1483 continued to the east past its corner with Wall 2505 into Squares T–Y/3, where it was designated Wall 2481 (Photo 12.38). All four walls of Room 1520 were composed of hard yellow bricks, although note the gray bricks of the earlier C-3 wall incorporated into the lower courses of Wall 1470, as described above; several dark brown bricks joined these gray bricks in what might be a repair in the center of this wall (Photo 12.34).

The two entrances that accessed this hall from the east and the north were used concurrently. Both were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact (Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was subjected to some damage, particularly on its western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).

The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from 84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474, 2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these striations represented the accumulation of floors in this hall, although it was difficult to separate these thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels might have been a fill. Some layers contained large patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes, such as one long, rope-like configuration found lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers, most of which were sherds or fragments of small vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots, kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs. 13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking facilities were found here.

A large, roughly squared mizi limestone (0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south of the entranceway in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35, 12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we assume that the smooth bottom side had originally been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position of this large stone in front of the entranceway in Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this was not its original position and that it had tumbled over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location during the assumed earthquake that terminated this occupation phase.

Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5 m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks (1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake, either during the time it was still in use or some time after the building was abandoned.

Although it was considered that this room could have been a basement, this possibility was ruled out since there was no constructed element above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran beneath the later Building CG

East of the Central Hall

Excavation to the east of Wall 2505 exposed its eastern face with the entranceway. The top of the wall had been damaged and leveled when the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built (Photos 12.32–12.33), protruding 0.45 m to the east of the face of Wall 2505. The top of a yellow brick wall (4503) that cornered with Wall 2505 was revealed 1.0 m to the north of the entranceway; its eastern continuation was cut by the foundations of Building CG and only its southern face could be seen, as Wall 2429 of Stratum C-1b was built above it. This wall was preserved much lower than Wall 2505 due to the damage caused when the deep and massive wooden and brick foundations of Building CG were laid (see below). Thus, the only possible Stratum C-2 debris that could be isolated here was Locus 4500 to the south of Wall 4503.

Some 1.4 m to the north of Wall 4503 was Wall 2481, the eastern continuation of Wall 1442/1483, which was revealed in a small probe under the floor of Building CG (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38). The eastern part of a north–south wall (5476) was exposed 2.5 m to the east of Wall 2505, directly under the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 2411 (Photo 12.39), which had cut the top of Wall 5476 in a step-like manner, descending from north to south, so that it was preserved five courses high on the north and only two on the south. This appears to have been the eastern closing wall of a room bordered by Walls 2481 on the north, 2505 on the west, and 4503 on the south. A small area was excavated in this room (2469), although a floor was not reached (Figs. 12.77, 12.79). Still another north–south wall (5491) abutted Wall 5476 on the east, on the level of its lowest course (85.25 m); only one brick course of this wall was preserved, with an offset that protruded 0.35 m to the east, located just about on the same line as Wall 2481 to its west (Photo 12.39). Wall 5491 might have been a bench attached to Wall 5476 or a poorly preserved part of the unit uncovered in Squares Y/3–4 (see below).

Abutting the eastern face of Wall 5491 was a beaten-earth floor (5494; Fig. 12.79) that was bordered on the south by an east–west row of four flattopped stones, which may have been pillar bases (Photo 12.21). The floor and the stones were laid directly above Stratum C-3 Room 9441. All other remains of Stratum C-2 to the south of these stones were obliterated when Building CH and the apiary were constructed in Stratum C-1b. The northern border of this activity remained unknown, since it was covered by later Stratum C-2 architecture, described below.

Building CE

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.12 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.40 - Tilted C1-b Wall 2454 on top of C-2 Wall 6441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.41 - Building CE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.42 - fallen bricks and debris in Room 6464 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.43 - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.12
  • Section: Figs. 12.62–12.64
  • Photos 12.40–12.43
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.22
Building CE

Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 was founded in Stratum C-2 and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Strata C-1b and C-1a. This is one of the few instances where more or less the same building continued in all three main strata. The unit was composed of a broad room on the south and rooms or open spaces, to its north (Fig. 12.12); the relationship between the two components was not clear, due to the partial exposure.

Room 6464

Three walls of this room, preserved to a height of 0.7–1.25 m and built of the typical hard yellow bricks of Stratum C-2, were revealed in Squares T– Y/4, directly below the later walls: 6441 on the east, 6460 on the south, and 6504 on the north (Photos 12.40–12.41). The western part of the room remained unexcavated and it seems that the entrance to the room had been on this side. An interesting feature of the eastern wall (6441) was the damage wrought by the builders of C-1b when they set the wooden foundations for their wall (2454) above it; they cut back the western face and the top of the earlier wall, whose original face protruded some 0.2 m to the west, three courses below the cut (Photo 12.40). In the corner of the southern and eastern walls was an offset that protruded 0.3 m into the room (Photo 12.42).

A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443) that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504) was floating above this floor, although a protruding course of bricks found just about on level with Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded a layer of sandy material with some brick debris (6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460.

Spaces to the North of Room 6464

Three spaces were attributed to this building in Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between them was found, due to overlying elements that remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43). Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.

The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5 was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1 Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east– west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).

The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433) and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south) and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall 6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship between these walls. At some later stage, east–west Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added, dividing the space into two; in the north were the upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).

Building CY

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.12 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.14 - Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.58 - Building CY in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.59 - Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.60 - Closeup on Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.61 - brick collapse 10412 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.62 - Building CY from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.63 - Building CY from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.12, 12.14
  • Section: Figs. 12.55–12.56
  • Photos 12.58–12.63
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.34–13.37
Building CY

Part of a finely constructed building was excavated in the northeastern corner of Area C, in Squares A– C/5–6. It continued to the north, beyond the limit of the excavation area. Building CY covered a Stratum C-3 stone floor and installation (Fig. 12.6) and was sealed by Strata C-1a–b Building CW.

The external measurements of the building were 10.2 m from east to west and at least 6.3 m from north to south. It contained a central space, most probably a courtyard (7512), flanked on the west and east by rooms; the two southern rooms were exactly symmetric, but the northernmost room on the east differed from its equivalent on the west. The main entrance to the building was probably in the unexcavated area to the north and perhaps led directly into the central space.

The western wall (8457), preserved 1.0 m high, was superimposed by Wall 6408 of Strata C-1a–b. Its entire eastern face was exposed, and also the northern part of its western face, which served as the border of the assumed entrance corridor leading to Building CU; its southern part ran parallel to Wall 6520, the eastern wall of that building. The southern wall (7511), preserved 0.7 m high, was known only on its northern face, since it was covered by Wall 6444 of Building CW in Strata C-1a–b (Figs. 12.34, 12.56) which was not dismantled. The wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6444 were laid directly on top of Wall 7511 (Photos 12.22, 12.59–12.61). Wall 7511 was preserved at a tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of this wall was built of segments, with two vertical seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a mode of construction which might have been aimed at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake. Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which closed the building on the east.

Courtyard 7512

The central courtyard was 3.1 m wide and at least 5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig. 12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505) resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level 85.15–85.25 m. In the debris was a relatively large amount of red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well as red-painted pottery (Figs. 13.34–13.37) and sherds of a Late Philistine Decorated Ware (Ashdod Ware) vessel (Fig. 13.37:8). Two clay figurine fragments, one a human head and the other a horse head (Chapter 34, Nos. 22, 35), were found together in the eastern part of the space, to the north of Oven 8461. Near the figurines were two sherds with letters, one with an ayin and a yod in ink, and the other with an incised lamed (Fig. 13.37:2–3; Ahituv and Mazar 2014: 40–42; Chapter 29A, Nos. 1, 3). Elements on Floor 7512 included:

  1. Oven 8461, just north of the entrance into Room 8488, coated with sherds on the exterior

  2. a brick bin just north of the oven (unnumbered)

  3. a semi-circular clay bin (7514) attached to Wall 7506

  4. a large (1.0 m diameter, 0.86 m deep) round pit or silo (8452) dug from the floor, close to the center of the northern balk of Square B/6. It was lined with hard mud plaster and found full of small stones and eroded brick debris, but empty, other than a few small sherds.
An additional feature of Floor 7512 was a series of flat-topped stones (basalt and limestone) of different sizes placed along the walls surrounding the central space. Six nicely worked stones were found along the northern face of Wall 7511, four in its center, along with a complete brick just before the westernmost stone (Photo 12.61), and two in Room 8488 on the east. Three stones were found along the western wall (7506) of the central space, two of them flanking the entrance to Room 8470. Three stones were placed along the eastern side of the central space, two flanking the entrance to Space 8479 (Photo 12.62), and a third, smaller stone near the blocked entrance into Room 8487. Thus, the stones on the west and east flanked the entrances into the side rooms and were more or less antithetic. A similar line of three stones was found in Room 8470 in the western wing of this building. The position of these flattopped stones flush against the walls is curious and precludes their functionality as structural pillar bases. They could have been supports for jars or other objects, or perhaps served a ceremonial or decorative purpose. In the courtyard, they might have supported a wooden construction of some sort, perhaps a kind of temporary awning.

Under the courtyard floor was a shallow subfloor fill (10404) that abutted the floating level of the abovementioned stones. Below this was a layer of complete bricks (10412) of the same hard consistency and yellow color as those of the building itself, but that was clearly below the building’s floor (Photo 12.61).

The Western Wing — Rooms 6506 and 8470

Room 6506, the southern room, was bordered by Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506 on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square (2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellowearth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1 Building CW.

Room 8470, the northern room, was bordered on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner, leading from the central courtyard. A smooth yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three nicely worked limestones were set in a row along Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of dark organic material, similar to that in the southern room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW (Fig. 12.55).

The Eastern Wing — Rooms 8488, 8479 and 8487

Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room 6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458 on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m, was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14; Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not proceed down below the floor, it seems that this was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer above the floor (8466) included complete fallen yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34– 13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones, including horns.

North of Room 8488 was a narrow space (8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls 8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479 impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space was what looked like an intentional blockage on its western end that was composed of three parts (Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide), spanning the entrance from the central space, and preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m to their east was yet another apparent blockage (8485), although it was more typical of a regularly built wall in width, preserved five to six courses high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide. None of these rows of bricks bonded with either Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the south. No clear floor level was identified in this narrow space, although it was excavated down to the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material (phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this narrow space was a staircase leading to a second story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.

To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west. The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow row of bricks, identical to the westernmost blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor (8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper story.

Summary of Building CY

We have no way of knowing to what extent Building CY continued to the north. One possibility is that the northern outer wall was close to the excavation limit; in that case, the building had a central courtyard flanked by two rooms on the west and two rooms on the east. Another possibility is that the building was much larger and included additional rooms on each side of the courtyard. In any event, the entrance would have been from the north directly into the central courtyard. The flat stones along the walls of the courtyard and the narrow corridor or staircase (8479) are exceptional features in the Iron IIA architecture at Tel Rehov.

Building CY is one of the few examples in Iron Age IIA Tel Rehov of a courtyard house. The plan is somewhat similar to that of Building CZ in Squares A–C/2–3, 10 m to the south, assigned to Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.48). It recalls, to some extent, Iron Age II houses known from Hazor Area B (next to the citadel), Samaria and Megiddo. Such structures were explained by Yeivin, followed by Herzog, as representing officials’ houses, and were dubbed “scribes’ chambers” (Herzog 1992: 229– 230, with references)

Summary of Stratum C-2

Plans
Plans

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion

The plan of Stratum C-2 included densely built units of varying architectural plans, most of which were adjoined and all built of the same type of hard yellow bricks. Notable were the absence of stone foundations for the brick walls and the architectural plans which, although fragmentary in most cases, appear to differ from most known Iron Age II buildings in northern Israel. Moreover, they differ from each other, so that each structure was unique.

The finds included red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well as red-painted pottery, mostly sherds, aside from sporadic complete vessels. The single locus that yielded restorable pottery (Locus 1555b with 18 vessels) is stratigraphically attributed to Stratum C-2, while the pottery types recall late Iron IB forms that continued into Iron IIA (see Chapter 24). Additional finds included several clay figurines, seals, three inscriptions (one on an almost-complete storage jar), and iron and bronze objects.

Stratum C-2 appears to have lasted a long time, as evidenced by the thick accumulation of striations in the open areas and inside several of the buildings. Only in three places was there clear evidence of two phases (Buildings CT, CE, and perhaps, the partial unit in Squares Y/3–4) and it is possible that most of the well-built units simply continued to be used, with very minor renovations, during the entire occupation phase.

The lack of Stratum C-2 remains in the area of the apiary of Stratum C-1b (Squares Y–Z/1–2) must be explained as resulting from their intentional removal by the builders of the apiary when they established it on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. This was evidenced by the existence of Stratum C-2 building remains west, north and northeast of the apiary area. It should be noted that the Stratum C-2 floor west of the apiary in Square T/1 was ca. 1.0 m higher than the apiary floor, while in Square B/3 (northeast of the apiary), it was almost at the same level as that of the apiary floor. This comprises additional evidence for the tilt towards the east or southeast, observed in other cases at Tel Rehov as well.

The termination of Stratum C-2 appears to have been brought about by an earthquake, based on the fact that many of the walls showed signs of damage, such as cracks, tilts and sinkage, as well as the large amount of fallen bricks consistently found on the floors in each unit. A possibility is that some of this damage was gradual and not cataclysmic, generating local renovations and internal changes during the course of this stratum. Aside from the layer in Room 1555 (Square R/4) with its 18 complete smashed vessels, the relative lack of whole vessels and other finds in situ on the floors suggests that the final termination of this occupation did not take the inhabitants by surprise and that they had enough time to evacuate. We may think of a series of earthquakes that caused the abandonment and demolition of the houses, some taking place after the abandonment of the town.

Strata C-1b and C-1a

Introduction

Plans
Plans

  • Fig. 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.23 - Isometric view of Area C, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.16–12.53
The transition from Stratum C-2 to C-1b marked a large-scale renovation of the area, although the general orientation of the architecture remained the same, and brick was still the only building material used. New buildings were erected, with a number of walls constructed directly on top of the Stratum C-2 walls, while in other instances, the new walls followed entirely different lines (Fig. 12.16). The type of brick changed from the hard yellow clay typical of C-2 to a mixture of light and dark gray, brown, and beige bricks, although the average size of the bricks remained the same (Table 12.29). The densely built nature of the town continued in both strata (Figs. 12.18–12.21). A feature that was introduced in Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in both wall foundations and floors. This was one of the hallmarks of Stratum C-1b. This technique was employed only in isolated new cases in Stratum C-1a, in which many of the C-1b walls continued to be in use. In a few units, two sub-phases were discerned in Stratum C-1b, with the earlier one denoted Early C-1b. Stratum C-1a contained only one phase that was violently destroyed, following which the area was abandoned, aside from a possible pit in its northwestern part.

In the western and northern parts of Area C, the continuity between Strata C-1b and C-1a was marked and, in fact, both should be considered phases of one city, with most of the changes being floor raisings and minor adjustments of walls (Fig. 12.17). However, in the southeastern quarter of the area, the apiary, Building CM and buildings to their east went of use and were replaced by entirely new buildings in Stratum C-1a. Due to this situation, the following description is organized by units, detailing the phases within them that are attributed to C-1b and C-1a. The units of Strata C-1b and C-1a in the southeast of the area are described at the end in separate sections.

Altogether, 23 architectural units were defined; they are presented below according to four main parts.
The Western Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.24–12.25
  • Remains in Square R/4 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CD and the area to its north in SquaresS–T/3–4 (C-1b)
  • The cooking area in Square T/4 (Early C-1b, C-1b, C-1a)
  • The courtyard south of Building CD in Squares S–T/2–3 (C-1b)
  • Piazza CK in Squares S–T/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CJ in Squares S–T/1 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Remains to the west of Building CJ (C-1a)
The western part of Area C was occupied by a series of buildings and courtyards covering a total excavated area of some 225 sq m (Figs. 12.24– 12.25). The eastern border of these units adjoined the buildings attributed to the northeastern and central blocks and they were interconnected by shared walls and sometimes, by double adjoining walls. One long north–south backbone wall ran along the western border of the entire area, uniting all the units in this part of the area. The area between this wall and the edge of the mound was excavated in Squares R/4, S/1–2 and Q/4–5 (the latter in Area D), showing that there were houses up until the erosion line on the west, leaving no space for a fortification wall.

The North-Central and Northeastern Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36, 12.38
  • Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CR in Squares Y–Z/6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CF in Squares Y–Z, A/4–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CW in Squares A–C/5–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Buildings CQ1and CQ2 in Squares A–C/4–5 (C-1b, C-1a
  • Street in Squares Z, A–C/4 (C-1a)
The north-central and northeastern part of Area C was occupied by a well-planned and densely built insula, composed of buildings interconnected by both shared walls and adjoining double walls (Figs. 12.18–12.21, 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36): Building CE on the west, Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the south, and Buildings CR and CW on the north. The plan of each building, aside from CQ1 and CQ2, was different. Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, and (apparently) CF, were completely excavated, while Buildings CE, CR and CW continued beyond the limits of the excavation. All these buildings were founded in Stratum C-1b and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Stratum C-1a. A street, 2.3–2.8 m wide and ca. 15 m long, separated this block of buildings from the south-central and southeastern parts of the area in both strata.

The South-Central Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Building CG in Squares T–Y/2–4 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CM in Squares Y–Z/3 (C-1b)
  • Building CH and the apiary in Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20 (C-1b)
  • Piazza 2417 in Squares Y–Z/3–4 (C-1a)
In Squares T–Z/1–4, the south-central part of Area C, substantial changes occurred in the transition from Stratum C-1b to C-1a, following a severe destruction at the end of Stratum C-1b. The following units were found in this part of the area:
  • Stratum C-1b: Building CG, Building CM, Building CH, the apiary (Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44).
  • Stratum C-1a: Building CG (partly continued to be in use), Piazza 2417 (replacing Building CM) (Fig. 12.50)

The Southeastern Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.39, 12.48–12.53
  • Building CZ in Squares Z, A–B/2–3 (C-1b)
  • Building CP — early phase in Squares A–C/1–2 (C-1b)
  • Building CQ3 in Squares A/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CX in Squares B–C/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CP in Squares A–C/1–2 (C-1a)
  • Building CL in Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20 (C-1a)
In the southeastern part of Area C, the distinction between Strata C-1b and C-1a was clearer than in most of the rest of the area, with C-1b Building CZ and the early phase of Building CP having different plans than Buildings CQ3, CX and CP above them, and Building CL replacing the apiary. The following units were defined:
  • Stratum C-1b: Building CZ and an early phase of Building CP (Fig. 12.39)
  • Stratum C-1a: Buildings CQ3, CX, CP and CL (Fig. 12.50).

While the buildings of Stratum C-1b in this area were only partially excavated, the four buildings of Stratum C-1a were exposed in their entirety. They comprised a densely built and well-planned urban block, bordered by the street in Squares Z, A–C/4 on the north and Piazza 2417 on the northwest. Unlike the situation in the Stratum C-1a buildings in the northern part of Area C, most of the walls between the various units in this part of the area were shared, and in only one instance was there a double wall. This indicated a high degree of interdependence between all these units on the level of construction, and possibly function as well. Moreover, it seems that during some stage of the use of this complex, some walls were razed to create access between the units.

Building CZ of Stratum C-1b apparently suffered a destruction, judging by the large amount of fallen bricks and some burning (Figs. 12.88, 12.90), although it did not leave complete vessels or other objects on the floors, aside from one place. The early phase of Building CP seems to have met the same fate, with fallen bricks and burnt debris, although its floors were not reached in the excavation. All four buildings of Stratum C-1a were destroyed by a heavy conflagration and their remains were exposed just below topsoil, with numerous finds on the floors.

Square R/4 — Strata C-1b and C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.64 - Square R/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.65 - Square R/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.24–12.25
  • Section: Fig. 12.97
  • Photos 12.8, 12.64–12.65
  • Pottery: C-1b — Fig. 13.40:8–12; C-1a — Figs. 13.68–13.70
Introduction

In Square R/4, above C-2 Room 1555, two main phases were attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a; the latter was the clearest and best preserved, found just below topsoil and containing destruction debris and restorable vessels on a floor. Traces of additional narrow brick walls and restorable pottery revealed in the topsoil to the north and south of Square R/4, and in Square Q/4 of Area D, indicated that domestic occupation in the Iron Age IIA reached the western perimeter of the tell, with no evidence for any fortification wall.

Room 4483 in Stratum C-1b

Several phases of construction were found in this room (Fig. 12.24).

The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b was 1557, which continued the northern line of Wall 1413 that ran the entire length of Area C on the west (see details below); it seems that Wall 1557 was not used in Stratum C-1a. Parallel to it and 3.1 m to its west was Wall 1563, which apparently continued to be in use from Stratum C-2. In the initial phase of Stratum C-1b, a pink plaster floor (4483) passed below Walls 2416 and 4457, and possibly related to Wall 1557 on the east. At this stage, Wall 1568, which abutted the southern continuation of Wall 1557, was most probably the southern wall of the room, while its northern wall was beyond the excavation area. In a later phase of C-1b, Wall 2416 was built against the western face of Wall 1557; on the south, it abutted Wall 1568. In the center of the room, a narrow north–south wall (4457; Photo 12.64), preserved only one course high, made a corner on the south with Wall 4458, which was first built in Stratum C-2 (see above, Room 1555). In Stratum C-1b, its eastern part was covered by Floor 4483; a small round posthole was found on the northeastern end of this floor. The addition of Wall 4457 formed a narrow space (0.9 m wide) on the western side of the room. While Floor 4483 ran below the secondary walls (2416, 4457), the occupation debris above the floor abutted these walls. To the west of Wall 4457, Floor 4488, made of plaster with a layer of striations above it, penetrated below Wall 4457. In the second phase, a higher floor (4464) was laid, 0.1 m above the latter, abutting Walls 4457 and 4458. To this same phase, and perhaps to the same building, we attributed several walls surrounding a courtyard with ovens found in Square Q/4, which was part of Area D (Chapter 15; see also Fig. 12.24). The density of construction and layers points to the intensive activity in this area on the cusp of the mound during the course of Stratum C-1b.

Room 2442 in Stratum C-1a

A new room was built above the C-1b remains in this square, reusing Wall 2416 and adding new walls on the south (2423), west (1554) and north (1552) (Fig. 12.25). Wall 1558 was a short segment that seemed to corner with Wall 1552; perhaps it was the original western wall of the room that was removed at one point and replaced by Wall 1554, slightly to the west. A concentration of stones (2450), some of which were grinding stone fragments, was found in the southwestern corner of the square. These might have been part of a pavement which had continued to the west, but was eroded down the slope. A north–south row of three stones, running along the western face of Wall 1554, may have belonged to a room in Square Q/4 (Area D), bounded by Walls 1816 and 1808 (Figs. 12.19, 12.25). This space, poorly preserved due to the severe erosion on the slope of the mound, may have belonged to the same building as Room 2442.

Inside the room was a 0.4 m-deep layer of burnt destruction debris (2405) on a beaten-earth floor (2442, 87.56 m); part of this floor was a rectangular patch of hard plaster (2438) which abutted the northern face of Wall 2423 (Photo 12.65). It sloped slightly down to the north (0.18 m over 1.2 m) and might have served for some liquid-related activity; this plaster had been repaired with a whitish lime substance at one time during its use. In the burnt debris was an assemblage of restorable vessels (Figs. 13.68–13.70). One sherd of an imported Greek bowl was found as well (Fig. 13.70:22; see Chapter 28A). The smaller vessels in this room were found just below topsoil, in a layer above two parallel rows of storage jars that rested directly on the floor, one running along Wall 2416 and the other near Wall 1554 on the west. Most of the jars were fallen with their rims to the north; under several of the jars was a burnt patch with phytolith, suggesting that they had been set on some organic material, such as reed mats or wood.

Building CD and the Area to the North — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.66 - Tilted Wall 2495 in C-1b Building CD excavation from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.24
  • Section: Figs. 12.65–12.68
  • Photos 12.66
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.41
North of Building CD

Above the elements attributed to Stratum C-2 to the north of Building CA in Squares R–S/4 was the southern end of a room or a courtyard located in front of Building CD (Fig. 12.24). Although not well preserved, a gap in its southern wall (1524) was probably an entrance, on line with the entrance to Building CD, thus linking the two units. Wall 1524 was built on top of a thin fill laid on Stratum C-2 Wall 8503; it ran flush against Wall 1464 of Building CD, creating a wide double wall (Fig. 12.66). The western end of Wall 1524 continued westward to abut (but not to join) the eastern face of Wall 2416, and was abutted on the north by Wall 1557. Several bricks with two marginal bosses on each end were incorporated in Wall 1524. Such protrusions must have been part of the brick mold and their function might have been to improve the grip of the mud plaster that covered the walls. Alternatively, it could have been intended as a decorative element, as no traces of plaster were found. Bricks with similar protrusions were also found in walls of Stratum C-1b in Buildings CE and CF (see below). On the east, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 2501, although this corner was disturbed. On the west, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 1557, the northern end of long backbone Wall 1413. All three walls were abutted by occupation debris (1512) and a floor (2494, 86.75 m), which contained an oven (2496) and a stone basin in the northern balk (unnumbered). The floor (4491) in the western part of this space was set on a bedding of small stones that raised it slightly higher than the floor level to the east.

No architecture that could be attributed to Stratum C-1a was found here and the same loose debris, possibly a disturbance, that covered Building CD, also covered these remains (Fig. 12.25).

Building CD

This building in Squares S/3–4 (Fig. 12.24; Photo 12.2) was, in fact, a renovation of Stratum C-2 Building CA. The outer walls were rebuilt along the same lines, but the inner division was canceled, thus creating a large, roughly rectangular space; the external measurements were 5.0×6.2 m and the floor space, ca. 20 sq m.

All the outer walls of C-2 Building CA were rebuilt with a new type of brick made of light gray, dark gray and light brown clay. The demarcation between the previous walls and the rebuild was very clear and a distinct line of a fill or repair was visible, especially in the northern, eastern and southern walls (Figs. 12.65–12.67; Photos 12.28, 12.66). This was a layer of light brownish-gray clay (similar to the brick material) that was packed down on top of the damaged C-2 walls, leveling them in preparation for the rebuild.

On the north, Wall 1464 replaced C-2 Wall 4438; the entrance into the new building was now located nearer to the center of the northern wall, through an opening in the double wall (1524/1464). Wall 1464 was deliberately cut on its western end, as can be seen in the western balk of Square S/4 (Fig. 12.66). On the west, Wall 1523 replaced C-2 Wall 4440 (Fig. 12.67); it was poorly preserved and tilted severely towards the east, especially in its northern part. This wall ran along the eastern face of Wall 1413, with the latter continuing further to the south and north to enclose additional units. On the south, Wall 1448 replaced C-2 Wall 4439; the repair line between the two walls was clearest here (Photo 12.28). On the east, Wall 2495 replaced C-2 Wall 4434 (Fig. 12.66; Photo 12.66); however, the former was traced only in Square S/4 and did not continue to the south. This may be due to its state of preservation or, as suggested above, Wall 1506, possibly built at the end of Stratum C-2 as a buttress for the damaged eastern wall of Building CA, continued in Stratum C-1b as the southeastern wall of Building CD (Fig. 12.68). As noted above, it is possible that Wall 1506 had been first built in Stratum C-1b, although this seems less likely. This rather makeshift arrangement would have lent a slipshod look to this part of the building, which contrasts with the otherwise well-built walls. The eastern side of Building CD was less well preserved, just like in its predecessor, Building CA.

The inner division of the previous Building CA was cancelled. The inner walls were deliberately removed, so that five to six cut courses were detected close to their juncture with the external walls of the building: Wall 2509 of the previous building was cut 0.35 m to the east of its corner with Wall 4440 and Wall 2493 was cut 0.15 m to the north of its corner with Wall 4439 (Photo 12.28). The reason for the deliberate razing of these inner partition walls was not clear; perhaps they were in such a poor state of preservation following the destruction of Building CA that they required removal before the leveling and rebuilding could take place.3 Indeed, below the lowest floor of Building CD were layers of brick debris interspersed with layers of red clay and ashy gray striations, which might be understood as a fill (2491 in Square S/4, 2485 in Square S/3) laid on top of the previous building, serving to level off the razed walls. These layers yielded sherds and partial vessels, including red-slipped and hand-burnished bowls and jugs (Fig. 13.41).

On top of this debris/fill were successive occupation layers, with a total thickness of 0.6–0.8 m, rich in sherds and bones: 2486, 1485 and 1466 in Square S/4, and 1474 in Square S/3. While these layers were stratified, it was difficult to clearly identify a floor. Two flat-topped stones were found near the northeastern and northwestern corners of the building, relating to Locus 2486. Their function was not clear, as they were too close to the wall to have served as pillar bases, recalling the stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 (see discussion above).

The only internal construction in the new building was a row of crumbly gray bricks (0.5–0.6 m wide) added along the northern face of Wall 1448, covering the cut southern end of Stratum C-2 Wall 2493. This element (2484) was preserved 0.4– 0.6 m high and 3.4 m long; it might have been a bench along Wall 1448.

The end of Building CD was not violent and no traces of sudden destruction were found. The building was not renovated in Stratum C-1a, when its southern part was covered by the northern end of Piazza CK and its northern part was covered by a layer of loose debris (1412, 1417) that appeared to have been a disturbance of some sort.

Piazza CK — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.70 - C-1a Piazza CK from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.71 - C-1a Piazza CK from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.25
  • Section: Figs. 12.65, 12.69
  • Photos 12.70–12.71
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.71–13.72
Introduction

In Stratum C-1a, Building CD went out of use and a large open area, denoted Piazza CK, replaced it (Squares S–T/2–3). This courtyard included the open area to the south of Building CD, as well as the cooking area described above. It was bordered on the south by Wall 1437 (the northern wall of Building CJ) and an additional stub of a wall (1415), on the east by Wall 1416 (the western wall of Building CG), and on the west by Wall 1413 (the long backbone wall running along the entire area). On the northeastern end of this space was a short wall (1457) that seemed to be a continuation of the northern wall of Building CG; it was preserved only one course high and ended abruptly after 2.0 m, on line with Wall 1415 on the south. It is possible that these were stubs of walls that had been dismantled or otherwise damaged. Thus, the width of Piazza CK ranged from 7.0 m on the south to 8.0 m on the north, and its length was at least 13 m, as the northern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. The total area was at least 97 sq m, making this one of the largest open areas in all strata in Area C, which was, for the most part, densely built up. Access into the piazza must have been from the north.

In the enclosure formed by these walls, the northwestern quadrant (Square S/4) contained a layer of soft earth and eroded brick debris (1417, 1412, 1439) that might have been a late disturbance, while in the rest of the area, very burnt and vitrified brick debris resting on a hard-packed white floor (1418, 1422, 1428) was revealed under topsoil (Figs. 12.65, 12.69). Running through the center of this courtyard on a north–south axis and abutted on the east, south and west by the destruction debris and white floor, was a concentration of stones, several of which were grinding stone fragments, and brick fragments (1427) (Photo 12.70). This element was roughly L-shaped, with a plastered, right-angled niche in its western face, which contained part of a smashed storage jar (unrestored); another storage jar (Fig. 13.72:9) abutted the installation on its south, and yet another one (Fig. 13.72:10) was found to its north. Another concentration of basalt stones was found 0.5 m to the south of 1427, designated 1496; they most likely comprised parts of the same element, perhaps with a stone missing in the middle. Two cooking pots (Fig. 13.71:7, 9) were found against the western face of these stones (Photo 12.71). An additional element was a brick block (1458), 1.0 m long, 0.5 m wide and preserved to one or two courses, located just to the west of the southern end of 1427 (Fig. 12.69). This might have been a work surface or, perhaps, a space divider.

Wall 1413 in Strata C-1a–b

Wall 1413, that bordered Piazza CK on the west, ran for 19.7 m on a slightly southeast–northwest line along the western end of the entire area and continued beyond the limits of the excavation to both the north and the south (Photos 12.2–12.5). In Square R/4, Wall 1413 abutted the western end of Wall 1524. The continuation of its line to the north was denoted 1557 (Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.8). The southern part of Wall 1413 was made of hard yellow bricks, typical of Stratum C-2, as opposed to the light gray bricks of the rest of the wall, typical of Strata C-1b and C-1a. This was the only place in this wall where two phases were discerned: in the earlier phase (Stratum C-1b), the wall was termed 2432 and the later phase, 1431 (Stratum C-1a). Wall 1413 was constructed slightly above and west of Stratum C-2 Buildings CA and CB (Figs. 12.16, 12.69). In Stratum C-1b, its lower part adjoined the western wall of Building CD and it served as the western border of the space south of Building CD, of the unit north of Building CD, and of Building CJ. In Stratum C-1a, it was the western border of Building CJ and Piazza CK. In Square R/4, the structures of both Strata C-1b and C-1a (described above) were attached to its western face. Wall 1413 was unique in its length and multiple-use in several units during the course of two strata, making it a prime example of the integrated urban planning that characterized this area.

Building CE

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.75 - Buildings CE, CF and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.76 - Building CE, C-1b Room 2489 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.77 - Building CE, looking east at Wall 2454 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.78 - Building CE; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.79 - Building CE, C-1a Room 1471 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.80 - Northern rooms of Building CE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.81 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b, Room 6449 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.82 - Destruction debris inBuilding CE, C-1b Room 6449 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.83 - Detail of marginal bosses on bricks in C-1b Wall 6452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.84 - Building CE, C-1a Room 6433 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.87 - C-1 Building CR from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27–12.28
  • Section: Figs. 12.62–12.64
  • Photos 12.75–12.84, 12.87
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.44–13.45; C-1a — Figs. 13.75–13.76
Introduction

Building CE was located in Squares T–Y/4–6, to the east of the cooking area in Square T/4. The building was composed of a broad room in the south and an area to its north, of which a strip, 2.0 m wide and 10 m long, was excavated (Photo 12.75). The broad room was a rebuild of an earlier structure, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.9–12.10); it had two phases, while the area to the north had three. In Stratum C-1b, the building suffered a destruction, after which it was renovated in Stratum C-1a and continued to be used with various changes, mainly in its northern part, until its final destruction.

The Broad Room

Room 2489 — Stratum C-1b

Room 2489 was a rectangular room (internal measurements 2.0×4.8 m; 9.6 sq m) with an entrance just east of the center of the northern wall (1491); the threshold was paved with a wooden plank (Fig. 12.27; Photo 12.76). Inside the entrance were a bowl and a cup-and-saucer (Figs. 13.44:4, 13.45:12). The southern wall of this room (1473) ran parallel to the northern wall of Building CG (see below), separated by a 0.10 m gap, which contained a large amount of sherds, possibly a fill. The eastern end of Wall 1473 dog-legged 0.3 m to the north, exactly following the line of the C-2 wall here. The eastern wall (2454) was part of a long wall that enclosed the entire building on the east. Note that Wall 2454 was oriented due north–south, while the rest of the room was angled towards the west, so that this wall was not parallel to the western wall of the building (1487), lending a somewhat crooked look to room. Wall 2454 was built flush against the western wall of Building CF; together, they were 1.1 m wide. At its southern end, Wall 2454 made a corner with Wall 4479, the northern wall of Building CM to the south in Stratum C-1b, which created a double wall with the southern wall of Building CF. This construction method well demonstrates the closely interrelated character of the architecture of the buildings in this northeastern insula.

All the walls were composed of hard graybrown bricks, with light-colored mortar lines; they were burnt to black in some instances, particularly in the east. The western face of Wall 2454 and the southern face of Wall 1491 included bricks with marginal bosses composed of two vertical protrusions on each end of the brick (Fig. 12.29; Photos 12.77–12.78), identical to those found in other buildings in the north-central part of Area C in Stratum C-1b, including the unit north of Building CD, described above, and Building CF; they were also found in the walls of the rooms to the north of the broad room in Building CE (Photo 12.83). Walls 2454 and 1491 contained a thick and intricate construction of perpendicular and parallel wooden beams in their foundations (Fig. 12.29; Photos 12.77–12.78). The beams, like the bricks, were very burnt.

The smooth reddish-brown beaten-earth floor (2489, 86.30 m) was coated by a thick layer of black ash (2458; Fig. 12.64), covering mostly the eastern half of the room (Photo 12.76). A small square plastered brick (2477; 0.45 x.0.45 m, 0.45 m high) was attached to Wall 1491, just east of the entrance and opposite the offset in Wall 1473. It had a slight depression on top which contained some light gray ash, although it is possible that it had served as a jar support. Underneath it was an intact juglet in a small pit (Fig. 13.45:10), apparently placed there as a foundation deposit before the brick was laid.

Room 1471 — Stratum C-1a

Following the destruction of C-1b, the broad room continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a with the same walls (Fig. 12.28), although there was a visible repair in the upper courses of the western wall (1487), composed of light gray bricks (Photos 12.76, 12.79). Above the burnt debris on the floor of C-1b was a layer of hard brick debris (2443) that supported an earthen floor (1471) at level 86.65 m, which was covered by a layer of decayed brick debris with some ash (Fig. 12.64; Photo 12.79).

The Northern Rooms and Courtyard

Introduction

Remains of rooms and possibly a courtyard were found in Squares Y/5–6 to the north of the broad room (Photos 12.80–12.84). It seems that these were part of Building CE, particularly due to the shared walls and similar construction techniques, although no entrance was found to join them in the limited excavated area. Each of these components had two phases, attributed to C-1b and C-1a, while the northern courtyard contained yet an additional phase.

Rooms 6448 and 6449 — Stratum C-1b

Two narrow rooms (6448, 6449) were excavated to the north of the eastern side of the broad room; no entrance joined them. The eastern wall of both rooms was the continuation of Wall 2454, indicating that the northern rooms and the broad room to the south were part of the same building.

Like in its southern end, the foundations of the entire length of Wall 2454 contained a thick and intricate composition of wooden beams, both perpendicular and parallel to the lower course of bricks (Figs. 12.30, 12.62). Wooden beams, all charred, were found below the floors of the two rooms as well (Photos 12.80–12.81). All of the wood was set into a distinct layer of soft reddish earth (6426, 6486; Fig. 12.32); such a construction of wooden beams in a reddish fill was a feature found in the foundations of other Stratum C-1b buildings as well.

The western wall of the two northern rooms was Wall 6452; only its eastern face was uncovered. This wall cornered with Wall 1491 on the south, just east of the entranceway in that wall. Wall 6452 also had many wooden beams in and adjoining its foundation (Figs. 12.30, 12.62– 12.63). Walls 2454 and 6452 ran for 7.0 m and two east–west cross walls (6447 and 7445) divided this space into two identical rooms (6448 on the north and 6449 on the south), each 3.1 m long and between 1.6–1.8 m wide. The difference in width was due to the angle of Wall 6452, which ran slightly southeast to northwest, as opposed to the straight north–south line of Wall 2454. Wall 6447, which separated the two rooms, had wood in its foundation, but Wall 7445, the northern wall of Room 6448), did not. As they had no entrances, it is possible that these rooms served as storage spaces, accessed from above. All the walls of these rooms, aside from 7445, which was poorly preserved, included bricks with marginal bosses composed of thin vertical protrusions on both ends, which were hallmarks of Stratum C-1b in this part of the area, as noted above (Figs. 12.29, 12.63; Photo 12.83). The southern room had a patchy beaten-earth floor at level 86.12 m (6449), on which were vessels and sherds, among them three complete chalices (Fig. 13.44:10–11, 13), as well as loomweights and a concentration of burnt grain against Wall 1491. Four 14C measurements of this grain (Chapter 48, Sample R24) provided a calibrated average date between 902–843 BCE (1σ) and 920–830 BCE (2σ).

Two large bricks set near the corner of Walls 6452 and 1491 might have served as a kind of podium or shelf, possibly for the chalices found nearby (Photo 12.82). Room 6448 contained a similar floor in its southern part, while its northern part contained a concentration of stones that might have been a disturbed stone floor (7451), including two broken upper grinding stones. The stones were covered by a thin layer of debris (7446) with some sherds and bones.

Rooms 6448 and 6449 were covered by a fill (6432), which leveled them in preparation for the renovation that took place in Stratum C-1a.

Courtyard 7427 — Stratum C-1b

To the north of Wall 7445 in Square Y/6 was an open space, continuing the activity that was here in Stratum C-2. This space is described here as part of Building CE, although, in fact, no entrance to the two southern rooms was found, and it might represent the southern part of an open space to the north of this building. The two phases identified in this space were both attributed to Stratum C-1b, as they covered the Stratum C-2 activity and were sealed by the Stratum C-1a courtyard floor.

The courtyard surface was composed of red and gray striations (7427) that were a direct continuation of those found here in Stratum C-2 and their attribution to two sub-phases of C-1b was based on their relation to related installations. The lowest layer was related to three poorly preserved installations, whose function remained unknown (Fig. 12.31): a ring of brown clay (7463), almost directly underneath C-1b Oven 7443, and two semi-circles of soft red clay (7464, 7465), filled with light gray ash. These installations seem to each have been used only for a short time and cut each other in a haphazard manner.

In the later phase of Stratum C-1b, the uppermost layer of the red and gray striations contained one poorly preserved oven (7443) and several shallow red-clay circles (7433, 7437, 7438), similar to those of the previous sub-phase. In both phases, only a few sherds and bones were found. The center and southeastern part of these remains were cut by Pit 6498 (Photo 12.87).

Space 6433 — Stratum C-1a

A reddish clay floor (6433, 5415) in Square Y/5 was laid at level 86.75 m, above a fill covering C-1b Rooms 6448 and 6449. Thus, the entire area north of Wall 1491 and west of Wall 2454 became an open area, at least 10 m long and continuing to the north beyond the excavation area. The reddish clay floor was covered by a soft burnt layer just under topsoil. The floor and burnt debris abutted the rather poorly preserved upper courses of Walls 2454 and 1491, which were rebuilt after the C-1b destruction. Below Floor 5415 was a layer of wooden beams that both penetrated underneath the foundation of the C-1a rebuild of Wall 2454 here and extended into part of the room. This wood was laid in two layers: an east–west upper layer and a north–south lower layer (Fig. 12.32). This was one of the few instances where wood was used in construction in Stratum C-1a.

A number of installations were set on this floor. In the southeastern corner was a mud-plastered clay ring (5436) containing a large lower grinding stone inside; an upper grinding stone was found below this and another such grinding stone rested on top of the clay ring. This is similar to grinding installations found in other Stratum C-1a buildings, such as Buildings CF, CQ1, CQ2 and CP. The southern part of a similar ring (5438) was found in the northwestern corner of Square Y/5, although it did not contain any grinding stones. Three bricks were found to the west of 5436 and one to its north. The southern part of the space was covered with a layer of burnt destruction debris containing pottery and loomweights (Photo 12.84), while the northern part was less burnt.

On the northern end of this open area (Square Y/6) was a layer of brick debris and collapse, with some ash and charcoal (7404), abutting Wall 4422 and the northern end of Wall 2454. Although no clear floor level was discerned, this layer clearly covered the Stratum C-1b activity below. Three intact vessels (Fig. 13.76:6, 10–11), one jug and two juglets, were found in this debris layer.

Building CR

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.85 - Square Z/6, looking north at C-1a, C-1b and C-2 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.86 - Square Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.87 - Squares Y–Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.88 - Fractured and displaced blocks of Building CR, late phase of C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.89 - Broken Jugs and charred beams in Building CR, C-1a Room 6468 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.90 - Building CR, C-1a Room 6468 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.91 - Buildings CR, CF, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.27–12.29, 12.33–12.36
  • Photos 12.85–12.91
  • Pottery: C-1b — Fig.13.48:1–14; C-1a — Figs. 13.77–13.79
Introduction

Building CR was the southern part of a building in Squares Y–Z/6 that continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.43, 12.86) and was, in fact, a rebuild of Stratum C-2 Building CT; this was one of the few instances of continuity between all the Iron Age IIA strata in Area C. Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. The southern wall of Building CR was also the northern wall of Building CF and its eastern wall was the western boundary of the entrance into that building (Photo 12.86). The southwestern corner of this building was cut by Pit 6498 (Photos 12.43, 12.48, 12.87).

Building CR in an Early Phase of Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.33
New walls built above those of C-2 Building CT followed roughly the same line and orientation and, like that building, enclosed two rooms, one on the east (6491) and one on the west (6459), separated by Wall 6490. As noted above, Wall 6490 was built on top of the Stratum C-2 debris. The outer walls of the building in this phase were 6467 on the south, 7458 on the east, 4422 on the west and 6489 on the north of the eastern room; the latter had an entrance 0.6 m wide on its western end, which was paved with a single brick course, showing that this building continued to the north. No clear floor was found in this phase, although it seemed that the lower part of Floor 6491 in the eastern room abutted the upper course of Wall 7458 on the east, and thus, it is shown on the plan of this sub-phase.

Building CR in the Main Phase of Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
The western wall (4422), the dividing wall (6490) between the rooms, and the northern wall of the eastern room (6489) with its entrance, remained unchanged in the subsequent phase. A new southern wall (6493) was built directly above Wall 6467 of the earlier phase; its upper-two preserved courses were slightly narrower than the latter and were made of a different brick type (reddish gray and crumbly), as opposed to the hard light gray bricks of the earlier phase. The eastern end of this room underwent a more pronounced change, where the wall was replaced by several rows of narrow bricks on a north–south line (6512). Although it seems that this was an intentional arrangement, these bricks might represent a fallen wall or a feature whose function remained unknown (Photo 12.88). These brick rows ended 1.0 m west of Building CW (see below), creating a rather narrow corridor that led into Building CF to the south. A very large concentration of bones, including many mandibles, was found on the eastern end of the bricks of 6512 (7410). It may be noted that the locus in the entrance corridor (6463) to the east of the installation also contained a relatively large amount of bones. The floor of the room (6491) was composed of smooth light brown clay.

A layer of soft debris (6479) above the floor included several high quality red-slipped and burnished bowl fragments (Fig. 13.48:1–4); its upper layer might have been a fill laid in preparation for the construction of the subsequent phase.

The western room (5459) did not undergo any change in this phase of Stratum C-1b. It contained a layer of brick debris and charcoal patches, with some bones and sherds. No clear floor level was discerned.

Building CR in Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.28, 12.35–12.36
In Stratum C-1a, the western wall of Building CR (4422) continued unchanged, while the other walls were rebuilt. The new southern wall (6410), built directly over the previous wall, still served as the northern border of Building CF (Photos 12.85– 12.86), but now only on the east, as an additional wall (6409) was built alongside it on the west (Photo 12.91). The new eastern wall of the unit (6419) was built over the rows of 6512. A new dividing wall (6461) between the two rooms (6468, 6416) was built to the west of the line of the previous wall, so that the western room was now smaller than the eastern one. Due to the poor state of preservation of Wall 6461, the space was excavated as one (6416) until it became clear that these were two rooms separated by this wall.

Floors of this stratum were found 0.7–0.8 m above those of the previous phase. The floor of the eastern room (6468) covered the top of Wall 6489, so that this room, like the western one, continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. In Room 6468, the floor was covered by a layer of burnt destruction debris, covered in turn by fallen bricks just below topsoil. This room contained 13 loomweights, including several that were arranged in a circle against the eastern face of Wall 6461, and others that surrounded two burnt wooden beams on a north–south axis that appeared to have belonged to a loom (Photos 12.89–12.90). Among the pottery vessels (Figs. 13.77–13.79) were seven jugs, two of which were finely red slipped and burnished (Fig. 13.79:6–7).

Building CF

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.58 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.59 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.60 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.61 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.91 - Buildings CR, CF, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.92 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.93 - Eastern balk of Square Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.94 - Eastern part of Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.95 - Section in the middle of Square Z/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.96 - C-1a Building CF, broken pottery in southern part of Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.97 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.98 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.99 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5499 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.100 - C-1a Building CF, below Room 5499 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.101 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.102 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.103 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.104 - Building CF, C-1a Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.105 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.106 - Building CF, top of destruction debris 6401 in C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.107 - Building CF, grinding installation 6406 and destruction debris 6401 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.108 - Building CF, fragments of altar from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.109 - Building CF, grinding installation 6406 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.110 - Building CF, Stratum C-1a, grinding Installation 6406 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.111 - Smashed vessels on floor of Room 5460 in Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.112 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.113 - Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36
  • Section: Figs. 12.58–12.61
  • Photos 12.5–12.6, 12.91–12.113
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.46–13.47, C-1a — Figs. 13.80–13.96
Introduction

Building CF in Squares Y–A/4–6 was one of the largest and most interesting structures in Area C. Its unique plan, fine construction, and exceptional finds point to its importance. The building was initially constructed in Stratum C-1b and, following a destruction, was renovated and reused until its final destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. Its external measurements were 8.7×11.3 m (excluding Wall 2454 on the west and the entrance corridor) and its floor space was 50.46 sq m in Stratum C-1b and 52.89 sq m in C-1a. This latter phase was the best known, as it was exposed just below topsoil and destroyed in a fierce conflagration, after which the building was abandoned. Although the remains of Stratum C-1b were not as well preserved, they were sufficient to define a separate building phase, with finds attributed to its floors. Both phases will be described together, emphasizing the stratigraphic considerations that led to the division between the two. Building CF was built over Stratum C-2 Building CU (Photos 12.85, 12.100– 12.104); although both buildings were of the same orientation, they were two entirely different structures.

Building CF contained an entrance corridor in the northeast and three main components: a rectangular space on the north, with a western and an eastern wing to its south. Each of these wings was enclosed by separate walls that adjoined each other to form double walls, so that each was both independent and united. Double walls also surrounded the building on the west, south and east; these walls had a total width of 1.0–1.1 m. This, along with the well-built straight walls, lent the structure a sturdy look and also raises the possibility that the building had an upper floor. Thus, Building CF, although a unique and independent structure, was an integral part of a well-planned quarter that was densely built in both Strata C-1b and C-1a (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.91–12.92; 12.169).

The Entrance Corridor

Introduction

The entrance into the building in both strata was in its northeastern corner, through a passageway which continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. The entrance was bordered on the east by Wall 6408 in both strata and on the west by the eastern end of Building CR (Wall 7458 in the early phase of Stratum C-1b, brick rows 6512 in the later phase of C-1b, and Wall 6419 in Stratum C-1a). This formed a 2.0 m-wide corridor which was narrower only in the latter part of Stratum C-1b, when 6512 occupied part of its western side. Three phases were discerned in the entrance, one attributed to the construction of the building and the other two to Strata C-1b and C-1a.

The Entrance Corridor in Pre-Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.33
Just above the floor and pits that occupied this area in Stratum C-2 was a layer of patchy red and gray striations (6478, 7457, 7472) that contained a series of small, shallow pits and plastered bins, some of which cut each other, indicating intense activity here. The pits contained soft brown earth with few sherds and bones. The striated layer and pits abutted early Stratum C-1b Wall 7458 on the west and Walls 6497/6408 on the east. In fact, these shallow bins and pits made passage here virtually impossible, similar to the situation in Stratum C-2 described above, with Pit 7504/7507. It is possible that these elements represent a phase that can be defined as interim between Stratum C-2 and C-1b, perhaps related to the construction of the building. In any case, they did not enable easy access to the building while they existed.

The Entrance Corridor in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
In the main phase of Stratum C-1b, the entrance corridor contained soft debris (6463) with many bones; no floor was detected. On the west, it was bordered by the bricks of 6512. The western face of Wall 6408, the eastern border, was very damaged on this level and apparently underwent some kind of repair that included a row of small stones inserted into its lowest course. The northern end of the corridor was bordered on the east by poorly preserved Wall 6497 of Building CW. The corridor was narrowed by the bricks of 6512 in this phase.

The Entrance Corridor in Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
In Stratum C-1a, the corridor contained a beatenearth floor at level 86.60 m, covered with burnt destruction debris (6412, 6417), including some fallen bricks and restorable pottery (Figs. 13.86, 13.89, 13.94; Photo 12.93; see also Fig. 12.58). Like in Stratum C-1b, Wall 6408 continued as the eastern border of the corridor, aside from its northern end, where Wall 6497 of Building CW constituted the border. The corridor was 1.5 m wide in this phase.

The Northern Space in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
In Stratum C-1b, the entrance corridor led into a broad space (internal measurements 2.0×5.3 m; 10.2 sq m) from which the western and eastern wings were accessed.

The northern border of this space was Wall 6493, shared with Building CR (Photos 12.85, 12.91–12.92). On the east, it was bounded by Wall 6408, and on the south, by Wall 6482 (Photos 12.94, 12.116). No entrance in Wall 6482 that would have connected the northern space with the rooms to the south was found, but possibly one had existed above the two preserved courses of this wall.

The space enclosed by these walls contained a patchy floor of red, gray and white striations (6466) at level 86.10 m, with only a few sherds and bones (Photo 12.93). The floor was covered by a layer of soft brown earth (6450) which might have been a leveling fill in preparation for the construction of the Stratum C-1a floor above. Two smooth pink mizi limestone slabs were found on the floor level, one in Square Z/6 and another near the southeastern corner of the space. They were similar to the large stone found in Room 6465 to the south.

A curious feature revealed at the bottom level of the striations in this space was the presence of several very large, amorphic blocks of brick, with a particularly large one in the center (Fig. 12.58). It is possible that these were placed as a kind of leveler above the remains of C-2 Building CU, or were simply discarded during the construction of Building CF and covered by the earliest floor of that building.

The Eastern Wing

Introduction

This wing was composed of a large room on the north and a smaller room to its south; the latter was accessed only through the former. In Stratum C-1b, the larger northern room of this wing was separated from the northern rectangular space described above by a wall, making it a separate room. In Stratum C-1a, when this wall was removed, these two spaces were united and were accessed directly from the entrance in the northeast of the building. On the other hand, the southern room remained the same in both strata. The description below follows these developments: the two phases in the northern room are described separately (C-1b and C-1a), and the two phases in the southern room are described together.

Room 6465 — Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
This room was bordered by Walls 6482 on the north, 5437 on the south, 6455 on the west, and 6456 on the east (internal measurements 3.4×3.5 m; 11.9 sq m) (Photo 12.94). The two latter walls were the direct continuation of the western and eastern walls of the southern room (5454, 6424); all these walls had a thick layer of wooden beams in their foundations. A 0.1 m-thick layer of reddishbrown and gray striations (6465), whose bottom was a thin layer of light gray mud plaster at 85.90 m, abutted the lowest level of the surrounding walls. A large, smooth pink mizi limestone with a flattened top was found 0.4 m to the east of the center of Wall 6455, abutted by the striations (Photo 12.95). This would have been too large and not well located to have been a pillar base, although its function was not clear. A relatively large amount of sherds (Figs. 13.46–13.47) and several grinding stones were found in this room. The striations and stone were sealed by Floor 5498 of Stratum C-1a.

Room 5498 — Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
The removal of Wall 6482 in Stratum C-1a created a large space in the northeast of the building that included both Room 6465 and the broad northern space of C-1b (6466) of the former building. Another major change that took place in this room in Stratum C-1a entailed the deliberate removal of the eastern and western walls down to their lowest one or two courses (Photo 12.94), which were covered by the C-1a floor makeup. This widened the room internally by 1.0 m, so that the internal measurements of this space were now 4.4×6.0 m (26.4 sq m). This cut was especially evident close to the northern end of the southern room (5499), where the higher southern ends of these walls remained intact (Photo 12.95). With the removal of the eastern and western walls, there was no longer a double wall between the northern part of the two wings of the building or between the building and Building CQ1 to its east.

The slightly higher stump of the erstwhile northern wall (6482) created a situation wherein the floor (6427, 86.50 m) in the area of the former northern space was now 0.35 m higher than the floor (5498, 86.15 m) to the south of this wall; this discrepancy was probably bridged by wooden or brick steps. Floor 6427 in the north was composed of white lime, covered with burnt debris (6417). An oven (6421) was built in the center of the northern space, against the southern face of Wall 6410, about 1.0 m to the west of the location of Oven 7428 of Stratum C-2, yet 2.0 m higher (Photo 12.109). A storage jar (Fig. 13.90:10) and a krater (Fig. 13.84:2) were found right near it, resting on the floor. On the far eastern end of this space, opposite the entrance corridor, was a large, roughly squared, 0.3 m-tall, flat-topped stone. Numerous bones found on and nearby this stone suggest that it was possibly used as a butcher block (Photo 12.94).

Floor 5498 in the south (covering the area of C-1b Room 6465) was composed of thin mud plaster below a layer of soft reddish earth, which covered the top of the cut walls of Stratum C-1b. On the floor was a 0.7 m-thick layer of very burnt destruction debris (5416, 5429, 5439), containing fallen bricks, burnt brick debris, ash and charcoal, ceiling collapse, and 49 complete (restorable and intact) vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95; Photo 12.96). Other finds included grinding stones and stone vessels, as well as 59 stone loomweights, mostly concentrated around a wooden beam that apparently represented a loom in the middle of this space (Photos 12.96–12.97; Fig. 12.35). To the north of this beam was a poorly preserved installation (5481) composed of a low, curving parapet of clay; to its north were short pieces of wood and numerous fragments of an oven or a low-fired clay vat; none of these elements could be reconstructed due to the fierce destruction. Built against the southern wall of this space (5437) was a grinding stone installation (5456), like that found in Room 6435 (6406) (Photos 12.96, 12.98), although this one was a semi-circle attached to the wall, while the latter was a complete oval (described below). This installation was composed of a low round-topped clay parapet, 0.9 m at its widest diameter, in which a large lower grinding stone was set on an east– west axis; it was not found tilted, as it was in Installation 6406. Two complete upper grinding stones were found nearby. A unique find in this room, located 1.5 m north of the entranceway in Wall 5437, was a pottery model shrine (Chapter 35, No. 36), resting directly on the floor, its opening facing north. Its upper part was broken off, found overturned just to the southeast of the lower part, with a Hippo jar (Fig. 13.92:3) lying smashed on top of it; another storage jar (Fig. 13.89:9) was found to its east (Photo 12.96). The top of the model shrine was adorned with a unique scene of figures in relief, showing what appears to be a lion(?) grasping two human heads in its claws. Inside the box was light gray ashy material that contained an animal jaw bone and a tooth. A jug containing grain (Fig. 13.93:5) was found in this room as well. Some grain was also found spilled on the floor near the abovementioned storage jars. Grain from the jug was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R35); the average calibrated dates were 922–850 BCE (1σ) and 970–838 BCE (2σ).

Room 5499 — Strata C-1a and C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.27, 12.29, 12.35–12.36
A 0.8 m-wide entranceway in the western end of Wall 5437 led into the southern room (internal measurements 2.2×3.3 m; 7.26 sq m). This room did not undergo any architectural change between Strata C-1b and C-1a and it had been in continuous use, with frequent floor clearings. The walls, preserved to a height of 1.3 m above the floor, were covered with fine hard mud plaster that continued down to constitute the original floor makeup (5499), which was covered by a layer of smooth red earth, just as in the northern room. The floor plaster was laid just above a layer of charred wooden beams which were, in fact, a continuation of those in the foundations of the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.37; Photos 12.99–12.100). Under the level of the plaster floor, the courses of the walls contained bricks with two vertical protrusions near the ends, exactly like the bricks that were found in the western wing of this building in its Stratum C-1b phase (see below), as well as in the unit north of Building CD and in Building CE, both attributed to Stratum C-1b. The wooden beams and this type of brick support the conclusion that the original construction of this room was in Stratum C-1b.

The room was filled with almost 1.0 m of very burnt destruction debris; the top layer (5426) was virtually sterile and contained extremely hard brick material and fallen bricks, as well as ceiling material, while the remainder of the debris (5461) was extremely burnt and rich in finds, including 46 intact and smashed vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95), 19 of them storage jars, which were mostly stacked against the eastern wall. One of these jars was found full of a powdery white substance, most likely an organic material that had burnt, while another contained grain. Additional finds included grinding stones and other worked stones, a large clay ‘footbath’ (Fig. 13.96a:11), and 15 loomweights, concentrated in the entranceway (5500) (Table 12.15). In the southeastern corner of the room was a concentration of extremely burnt pinkish brick that had pulverized. This appears to have been some installation that was too damaged by the fire to define.

The Western Wing

Introduction

In both Strata C-1b and C-1a, the western wing of the building (Squares Y–Z/4–6) was composed of a long rectangular space. In Stratum C-1b, there was a small niche or cell on the north and the rest was one long hall, while in Stratum C-1a, the hall was divided into four consecutive rooms, including the small niche/cell on the north, and three small rooms to its south (Photos 12.92, 12.101).

This wing was bordered on three sides by double walls that remained the same in both strata: on the west by Walls 4422 and 2454, on the south by Walls 4413 and 4479, and on the east by Walls 5414 and 5454. In Stratum C-1b, the northern border of this wing was a single wall (6533), while in Stratum C-1a, it was composed of a double wall: Wall 6409 was built alongside Wall 6410, the southern wall of Building CR.

The Western Wing in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.27
Stratigraphic evidence for the use of the western and southern external walls (2454, 4479) in Stratum C-1b came from adjoining units (Buildings CE and CM), where floors and walls belonging to this phase abutted them. All the internal walls in this wing were constructed in Stratum C-1b and continued to be used in Stratum C-1a, based on the following evidence:
  1. Walls 4413 and 4422 (Squares Y–Z/4) had wooden beams incorporated in their foundations; this was a consistent characteristic typical of all Stratum C-1b construction in Area C, but was almost never found in walls that were first built in Stratum C-1a.

  2. The bricks in the lower courses of the northern face of Wall 4413 and eastern face of Wall 4422 (southern end) had two vertical protrusions, or marginal bosses, on each end, which was a characteristic found in other walls clearly dated to Stratum C-1b in the adjacent Building CE and in the unit north of Building CD (see above).

  3. The wooden beams incorporated in the foundation of Wall 4479, seen in its southern face in Square Z/4 and clearly related to Stratum C-1b, were probably, based on their levels, the continuation of the beams in the foundation of Wall 4413, which ran adjacent to it on the north and served as the inner southern wall of the western wing.

  4. The floors abutted the lowest course of these walls.

In Stratum C-1b, the long rectangular hall of the western wing was accessed directly from the western end of the broad space (6466). At the northern end of the hall was a small chamber, bordered on the north, west and south by Walls 6533, 6534 and 6535. On the east was a short wall (7422) whose top was flush with the floating level of the former walls, so that it seems to have served as a threshold. Inside this small room was a layer of brick chunks, charcoal and rubble (7409), similar to that found in the hall to the south, but on a level 0.6 m higher. This would have required a step down to the hall, although this was not identified in the excavation, since the C-1a wall here was not dismantled. Underneath the floating level of the walls was a layer of soft debris (7417) that abutted Wall 7422, but was only excavated to a depth of 0.1 m and could not be defined; perhaps it was a fill laid to level the C-2 remains below.

The length of the hall was 8.6–8.8 m (due to the angle of the southern wall, 4413) and its width, 2.7 m. Its interior was revealed only in probes under the floors and benches of Stratum C-1a (Figs. 12.59– 12.61; Photos 12.102–12.105). The lowest layer was 0.4 m-thick, composed of soft, smooth, burnt black material (5488, 5487, 5475, from north to south), which abutted the lowest course of the walls, on the level of the wooden beams in their foundations, as revealed in those spots where we removed the benches of the later phase. This black layer apparently represents the floor; directly below it were the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CU. Finds from this black layer included red-slipped and hand-burnished pottery, mostly sherds, but several complete or almost-complete vessels as well (Figs. 13.46–13.47), along with loomweights, beads, stoppers, grinding stones, bone objects and some grain (Table 12.14). This layer was covered by a 0.4 m-thick layer of burnt rubble (5478, 5479, 5463, from north to south), composed of hard burnt chunks of reddish brick, gray ash, bits of charcoal and large segments of collapsed ceiling material, some of which lay flat (Photos 12.102–12.105). This rubble abutted the surrounding walls in each room and was covered by a thin layer of whitish material (phytolith?), on which the Stratum C-1a floors, walls and benches were laid.

The Western Wing in Stratum C-1a

Introduction

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
Following the destruction of the C-1b building, traces of which were noticeable mainly in the western wing, the long narrow hall was divided into four consecutive rooms by the addition of three cross walls that were built on top of wider foundations, which also served as narrow benches along the walls and continued eastwards to serve as brick thresholds in each entrance (Photos 12.92, 12.101). Two of the walls (5464, 5497) had a shallow niche cut into their southern face. Access to each of the rooms was only from the adjoining room, so that in order to enter the southernmost room, one had to pass through the three rooms to its north. From north to south, the dividing walls of these three rooms were: 5464, 5431 and 5497. They were 1.6 m long and 0.5 m wide each, and terminated 1.0 m west of Wall 5414, so that the entrances were aligned on a north–south axis, located in the northeastern corner of each room.

Along the north–south walls were lines of bricks, most of them 0.35 m wide, while others were narrower (0.3 m) or wider (0.45 m). All were preserved 0.25–0.35 m high (two courses); their height above the abutting floors ranged from 0.1– 0.25 m, while in the northern room they were flush with the floor. These were understood as benches, and they joined with those found under the three east–west cross walls. The bottom level of the benches was ca. 0.65 m above that of the outer walls of the building to which they were attached, and they were clearly built on top of the rubble and collapse layer ascribed to Stratum C-1b, described above (Figs. 12.59–12.61). This rubble also abutted the very bottom of the benches, suggesting that they were slightly sunk into that debris when constructed. The north–south benches lining the eastern and western walls of this wing run on one continuous line. This was particularly noticeable on the east, where the bench ran contiguously along the western face of Wall 5414. The benches were all composed of identical bricks that had been burnt to an almost stone-like consistency and to a pinkish color.

The Stratum C-1a floors in each room were composed of white lime and abutted the upper course of the benches. On these floors was a thick layer of burnt destruction debris with many finds. Following is a description of the rooms from north to south (6435, 5460, 5445, 5444)

Room 6435

This was a small room (internal measurements 1.5×3.1 m; 4.65 sq m) built above the small chamber/nich, 7409, of Stratum C-1b. On the north, west and south, the tops of the C-1b walls (6533, 6534, 6535) were visible in the floor makeup of the new room. Although they lined the walls, they were different from the other benches in this wing, as they did not rise above the floor level, and they continued down to be abutted by the C-1b rubble rather than built above it.

The room was entered from the broad space to the east. The beaten-earth floor (6435, level 86.85 m) was 0.35 m higher than Floor 6427 to the east, which would have necessitated some kind of small step to join them. A large grinding stone installation (6406) occupied its southeastern part. On the floor was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401) that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an exceptionally large amount considering the small space (Figs. 13.80–13.96; Photos 12.106–12.107). Just below topsoil were fragments of an elaborate horned pottery altar with mold-made female figures (Photo 12.108; Chapter 35, No. 5). The impression was that the numerous finds here were in storage and not found as used, since they were densely packed in this small area, around the grinding stone installation (6406) that took up part of the room as well (Photos 12.106–12.107, 12.109–12.110).

Installation 6406 was comprised of a finely made oval, round-topped clay parapet, 0.4 m high, enclosing a large lower grinding stone, on top of which was a complete upper grinding stone lying on its eastern end. The large lower grinding stone was somewhat raised above the floor of the installation and tilted down from west to east, so as to facilitate the gathering of the grain into a small depression between the western end of the lower grinding stone and the parapet. Curiously, the installation, built against the eastern end of Wall 5464, was situated so that its eastern end partially blocked the entrance to the room to the south. It is either possible that this was a later addition to the room or that, despite its position, it was not considered as an obstacle. This installation was similar to the one found in Room 5498 of the eastern wing of Building CF, as well as in Building CQ1 and possibly, Buildings CQ2, CP and CE; one was found in Area G as well (Chapter 20). The clay parapets of these grinding stone installations enabled flour to be easily collected and to prevent grain from being scattered. It seems that the grinder would have worked from the higher (western) side of the installation, so as to use gravity when pushing the upper grinding stone (as in Photo 12.110), although this was quite a cramped space to crouch in.

Room 5460

The second room from the north, built above C-1b burnt debris 5478 (Figs. 12.59–12.60), was the largest (internal measurements 2.4×2.7 m; 6.48 sq m). Destruction debris (5425 on the east and 5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and the benches (Photo 12.111). The northern wall (5464) was built on top of a wider wall (5474) that protruded on its southern face, creating a kind of narrow bench; a shallow niche created in Wall 5464 widened this bench to 0.3 m. Abutting the western wall (4422) was a line of bricks that cornered with 5474 and created a bench (5472). A similar situation existed on the east, where Bench 5473 abutted Wall 5414; this bench continued south into the other rooms as well and cornered on the north with 5474. No bench lined the southern wall.

Among the many finds was a Hippo storage jar with an inscription reading לשקינמש, Isqymns (Fig. 13.91:2; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 303–304; Ahituv and Mazar 2014: 44–45; Chapter 29A, No. 6). It was found in Locus 5425, along with another 40 vessels, several of them intact (Figs. 13.80–13.87, 13.89, 13.91–13.93, 13.95–13.96); most were concentrated in the southeastern part of the room, near the entrance leading south to Room 5445 (Photo 12.111). Among them was a unique shovel (Fig. 13.96:1; Chapter 35, No. 49).

Room 5445

The middle room, built above C-1b burnt debris 5479, was the smallest (internal measurements 1.2×2.7 m; 3.24 sq. m). Its northern wall (5431) was built on top of a slightly wider wall/ bench (5484), so that only 0.2 m of the latter protruded into the room on the south, but not at all on the north. On the west, Bench 5485 cornered with 5484. On the east, the situation was somewhat ambivalent: it seems that 5473, the eastern bench of Room 5460 to the north, continued to the south into Room 5445 as well. However, an additional row of bricks, identical to Bench 5473, adjoined it on the west. Above this western row of bricks was a line composed of large chunks of burnt bricks. This feature (5458), 0.3 m wide and 1.5 m long, stood two courses high and blocked the entrance into this room, as well as the entrance into the southernmost room (Photo 12.111). However, although it appears to have been built as a blockage, it is possible to understand it as the collapse of bricks from one of the walls that happened to land on this line inside the room.

Room 5445 was filled with burnt destruction debris (5421, 5467) that covered and abutted the benches and rested on Floor 5445; however, as opposed to the other rooms in this building, it was virtually empty, with only a small amount of sherds, mostly concentrated on the eastern bench (Figs. 13.81–13.82). Among the sherds was a fragment of a Greek bowl (Fig. 13.96:9; Chapter 28A).

Room 5444

This room, built above C-1b burnt debris 5463 (Fig. 12.60) was the southernmost and innermost room in the western wing (internal measurements 1.8×2.7 m; 4.86 sq m) (Photos 12.112–12.113). Its northern wall (5497) was built on top of a wider wall that served as a narrow bench on the south (5471); a niche cut out of the southern face of the wall exposed 0.5 m of this bench, although on the eastern and western ends, where there was no niche, only 0.1 m of it protruded. This arrangement was almost identical to that in the northern end of the northernmost room. This small room was found full of extremely burnt destruction debris (4414) on the white lime floor with some ash (5444), including many fallen bricks that had been fired almost to the consistency of pottery. Thirteen vessels from this room were restored (Figs. 13.80– 13.81, 13.83–13.84, 13.86, 13.90–13.96). Several of these were found on (or partly on) the benches, including a Hippo storage jar on the eastern bench (Fig. 13.91:4), another storage jar (Fig. 13.90:9) on the eastern end of the northern bench, just where the entrance was, and a very large krater (Fig. 13.92:7) on the southern bench. A unique find was a large, heavy clay box with a matching lid (Fig. 13.96a:10) in the northwestern corner of the room (Photo 12.112). This box, very distorted by fire, ca. 0.55 m wide, 0.65 m long and 0.45 m high, was set on a protrusion in the corner of Benches 5469 and 5471, composed of bricks identical to those of the benches, apparently deliberately built to accommodate the box (Photo 12.113). The lid of the box was found overturned just to its east, above a bowl (Fig. 13.80:6) and an intact juglet (Fig. 13.95:11) was found just below the box’s southwestern corner; the only finds inside the box was a small fragment of a very worn female figurine (Chapter 34, No. 13).

The location of this room in the deep interior of the western wing of Building CF, which was surrounded on three sides by double walls and accessed only through the other rooms of the western wing, as well as the unique pottery box and ceramic assemblage, indicated that it had some special function, perhaps some sort of a treasury.

Summary of Building CF

The architecture and contents of Building CF are unique in many ways. Although the grinding installations, oven and many loomweights found in this building in Stratum C-1a are typical of household activity, the plan of this building, the double walls, and the unique finds make it exceptional.

The net floor space is not exceptional and should be regarded as modest compared to other Iron Age II houses (Table 12.13; Schloen 2001: 165–183; Mazar 2008; see summary below), although it was larger than most other buildings excavated at Tel Rehov. Based on the width of the walls, we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris. Although one may surmise that the large northeastern space (5498) in Stratum C-1a was an open courtyard, this does not seem feasible, in spite of the fact that an oven was located at the northern end of this space. Air and light could be obtained through the main entrance on the north and windows in the southern wall of the building, since all other walls bordered neighboring buildings.

The most outstanding feature in this building was the row of small rooms in the western wing in Stratum C-1a, with benches along the walls. The consecutive arrangement of four rooms entered successively by way of the previous room, lined with benches along most of the walls, is virtually unparalleled in the Iron Age architecture in Israel (see further below). The small size of these rooms and the fact that the two inner ones could not get direct light or air except from the room to the north, emphasize their unique function. The inscribed jar with the inscription — לשקינמש, lšqynmš — found in the largest of these rooms, and the massive pottery box with the lid found in the southern room, allude to a special function of this wing. We can suggest that these were the offices of an important personality, perhaps a merchant or a clan leader, and that the box served as a ‘treasury’ of some kind. The unique model shrine, decorated altar facade, and so-called ‘footbath’ (the function of which remains enigmatic), as well as the presence of two elaborate grinding stone installations, a loom, and other rich finds from this building, are evidence of this special function.

The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. The integration of Building CF with the buildings surrounding it during both strata is typical of the architectural and occupational nature of the Iron Age IIA at Tel Rehov. One possible reason for such dense and crowded construction may be related to efforts to stabilize the structures in light of the seismic sensitivity in this region. This may also be related to local architectural traditions that continued during all of Iron IIA, perhaps with earlier origins, and were special markers of the inhabitants’ cultural identity.

An interesting parallel to the plan of this building can be seen at Megiddo in Stratum VA– IVB Building 2081 (Loud 1948: 44–46, plan: Fig. 388, reconstructed plan: Fig. 100). This building comprised a large courtyard (2081). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a cult corner containing two stone horned altars, two pottery stands and additional objects (Zevit 2001: 220– 225). From the courtyard, an entrance led into a unit that resembled Building CF, with a rectangular hall containing an inner chamber. From the front part of the hall, an entrance led into a narrow side chamber, which, in turn, led into two additional rooms arranged in a similar manner as those in Building CF, with entrances located at the end of the walls. It may be suggested that a room at the southwestern corner of this building was also part of this chain of rooms, since the walls were preserved lower than the floor and the location of entrances could not be determined with any certainty in this place. The size of this building fits that of Building CF. It differed in having an additional western wing, the long hall 2163. However, no entrance connecting the eastern to the western wing was found and thus, it is difficult to say whether it belonged to the same building. Another exceptional feature was the two pillar bases at the front part of the main hall. These have no parallels in Building CF, unless we consider the large stone found near Wall 6455 in Stratum C-1b and a second large stone found nearby in Stratum C-1a as pillar bases found out of their original position. It should be noted that the rooms of the eastern wing of Building 2081 at Megiddo were not numbered and no finds were published from them. However, the cult corner in Courtyard 2081 included pottery similar to that from Tel Rehov Strata IV–V (C-1a–b). It may be suggested that these two buildings might have had similar functions, perhaps serving as dwellings of elite families who incorporated commercial activities in their household and had their own cult corners and paraphernalia (see Chapter 4; Fig. 4.12).

Building CW

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.114 - C-1a Buildings CW, CQ1, CQ2 (west half excavated) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.115 - Debris on Floor 8430 in C-1a Building CW Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.116 - C-1a Building CW, looking west, Rooms 6411 and 6438 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.117 - C-1a Building CW, looking south; destruction debris and vessels in Room 6411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.118 - C-1a Building CW, Room 6411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.119 - C-1a Skeleton in Square C/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
  • Sections: Figs. 12.55–12.56
  • Photos 12.114–12.119
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.48:15–20; C-1a — Figs. 13.97–13.102
Introduction

Building CW (Squares A–C/6) was constructed above Stratum C-2 Building CY (Photo 12.114) and to a large extent, is a rebuild of the latter, retaining much of its layout. Like Building CY, it was only partly excavated and continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation area. Two phases were defined in this building, attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a, yet in the second phase (C-1a), changes occurred mainly in the courtyard and the eastern part of the building, while the two rooms in the west remained unchanged; thus, they appear in the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a. Since the differentiation between the two phases was not emphatic, both are described together.

The building adjoined the entrance corridor and northern space of Building CF on the west and the northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 on the south (Photos 12.92, 12.114). Its outer width from east to west was 10.4 m and its known length was 5.8 m, although it extended to the north beyond the limits of the excavation area. Unlike most other Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this appears to have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least on one side. See also Building CY in Stratum C-2 and Building CZ in Stratum C-1b for a similar concept. The southern border of the building was Wall 6444, which ran parallel and adjacent to the northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (6407), forming a double wall, 1.1 m wide. Wall 6444 contained wooden beams typical of Stratum C-1b in its foundation; these were round, ca. 0.05–0.07 m in diameter, closely spaced, and placed perpendicular to the wall’s foundation (Photos 12.59–12.61). The western wall 6408 continued to the south where it was the western wall of Building CQ1. It is thus clear that Building CW was built together with Building CQ1, and probably with CQ2 as well. The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b (8491) was replaced in C-1a by Wall 8424.

Courtyard 7501 (C-1b) and 7471 (C-1a)

In Stratum C-1b, the spacious courtyard was 6.0 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Its western border was Wall 6420 and its northern continuation, Wall 6476. The border on the east was Wall 8491; a segment of an additional wall (8476) was attached to its western face for 2.5 m; north of this, in its stead, was a north–south row of rather large (ca. 0.3×0.4 m each) roughly rectangular stones (8499), three of which were placed together and a fourth slightly to the north, running into the northern balk (Photo 12.63). These stones adjoined Wall 8491 and thus could not have served as pillar bases; they recall the stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and elsewhere and perhaps served as solid bases for jars or other objects. In Stratum C-1a, Wall 8476 and the stones were removed, and substantial changes were made in the eastern part of the courtyard (see below).

Only a single floor was found in the courtyard (7471, level 86.29 m) (Photo 12.114), laid on a 0.4 m-thick fill of soft brown earth (7501, 8462) that covered the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CY (Fig. 12.55). This fill layer is shown in the plan of Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.35), as we assume that it was laid at that time, in preparation for the laying of the floor; it is possible that an earlier floor of C-1b was removed when Floor 7471 was laid, leaving only the fill. The floor (shown on the plan of Stratum C-1a; Figs. 12.36, 12.38) was composed of soft reddish-brown earth, its central and southeastern parts burnt black, with some light gray ashy patches and flecks of charcoal throughout. The floor dipped down in the northwest, visible in the northern section of Square B/6 (Fig. 12.55); in this shallow depression was a complete Hippo jar (Fig. 13.99:7). It was not clear whether this depression was intentional (a pit?) or whether it represented a postdepositional phenomenon. A concentration of black ash found to the west of this dip, against Wall 6476, contained two cooking pots (Fig. 13.98:1, 3) and a loomweight. Along the western end of the courtyard was a strip of small stones (7479) set closely together, although rather haphazardly, with a lower layer of stones in its central part. The stones ran parallel to Wall 6420 (Photo 12.114) and may have been a remnant of a poorly preserved stone pavement. The stones ended in the north close to the abovementioned dip in the floor; they recall those found in the northwestern part of Building CX, described below.

The main change in the courtyard, attributed to the transition from C-1b to C-1a, took place in its eastern part and included the replacement of Wall 8491 with Wall 8424 and the addition of an installation that covered Wall 8476 and Stones 8499. Wall 8424 was poorly preserved and it is not clear if it was cut on its northern end or whether there had been an entrance there.

The installation included Wall 8426, an east– west wall, preserved along 2.2 m and 0.15 m high, that extended from the center of Wall 8424 and served as a divider between two spaces that were open to the west (Photo 12.115). The floors of these spaces (8423, 8430 in the north, 8420 in the south) were covered with plaster that lipped up to the faces of the wall in a manner that created shallow channels, which were burnt on their western ends. The northern end of the northern space contained a concentration of stones, east of which were three jugs and one juglet (Fig. 13.101:2–3, 6, 12). On its western end, Wall 8426 joined a shallow north– south channel that terminated on the north near a large lower grinding stone embedded in the floor, and on the south at the center of the southern space. Two stone mortars, one particularly large and the other smaller, flanked the northern end of the channel on the west and east, respectively. The function of these elements remained unclear; it is possible that some substance was drained from the plastered floors into the shallow channel on their west, and that the grinding stone and mortars were used in conjunction with this activity.

A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401), revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire courtyard area, comprising hard burnt brick debris with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash. Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97– 13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig. 13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table 12.16).

Room 6411

This room was bordered by Walls 6408 on the west, 6429 on the north and 6420 on the east (internal measurements 2.1×3.0 m; 6.3 sq. m). An entranceway in the southern end of Wall 6420 led to the room from the courtyard. The only floor found in this room (6411) was made of pink plaster laid above a layer of earth and brick debris (6451) that appears to have been a fill above Building CY, similar to the situation in the courtyard to the east.

Brick benches (6457, 6458 and 6496) were constructed along the western, eastern and southern walls of the room respectively. The benches were 0.35 m wide and 0.35 m high, recalling those in Building CF, although in this case, they were built against the walls and not under them. Placed on top of each end of the western and eastern benches (6457, 6458) were flat-topped stones, perhaps serving as solid supports for jars or other objects (Photo 12.116). In the southwestern corner of the room was an L-shaped brick that formed a niche in which an intact juglet (Fig. 13.101:11) was placed. The room was full of heavily burnt destruction debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris, including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs, juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig. 13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in the debris above the benches that lined the walls (Photo 12.117). A concentration of ten clay loomweights was found on the western end of this bench (Photo 12.118). Other finds in this room included three scale weights and a bronze scale pan, as well as a seal and iron tools (Table 12.16).

Room 6438

This room, located in the northwestern part of the building, was bordered by Walls 6429 on the south, 6497 on the west and 6476 on the east. The internal width was 2.5 m and it was at least 1.4 m long, as its northern border was beyond the limit of the excavation area, with an entrance probably in its northeastern corner. Although the eastern and western walls continued the lines of those of Room 6411 to the south, they were not one and the same, as they abutted the northern face of Wall 6429, but did not bond with it. It is possible that this room had been accessed from the courtyard on the east at a spot further to the north, beyond the limits of the excavation. Just as in Room 6411, a layer of debris that might have been a fill (6462) was found above the C-2 remains and was covered by the floor and benches in this room, so it is assumed that it, like the room to its south, had only one phase of use.

Benches (6480, 6481) lined the western and eastern walls (but not the southern wall), continuing the line of the benches in Room 6411 to the south. Here too, stones were found on top of their southern and northern ends (Photo 12.116). The room was full of burnt destruction debris; eight vessels rested on Floor 6438 at level 86.50 m.

Area East of Building CW

A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city

Buildings CQ1 and CQ2

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.57 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.120 - Wall 7413 of C-1a Building CQ2 tilted southward towards the street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.121 - C-1a Building CQ1; destruction debris in western rooms from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.122 - C-1a Building CQ1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.123 - Wall 7413 of C-1a Building CQ2 tilted southward from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.124 - C-1a Building CQ1; destruction debris in Room 7490 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.125 - Tilted Wall in C-1a Building CQ2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.126 - Destruction debris in Room 7500 of C-1a Building CQ1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
  • Section: Fig. 12.57
  • Photos 12.120–12.126
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.103–13.119
Introduction

To the south of Building CW and the east of Building CF were two virtually twin buildings, termed CQ1 and CQ2, adjoined by a double wall (Squares A–C/4–5). Both buildings were enclosed on the north by Wall 6407, which was attached to Wall 6444 of Building CW, together creating a double wall, 1.1 m wide (Photo 12.120). On the west, Building CQ1 adjoined Building CF with a double wall, although in Stratum C-1a, with the removal of the inner wall of the northeastern part of Building CF, a double wall was left only in the south and the two buildings shared a wall in the north. Thus, it can be seen how Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 were not only related to each other, but were also a part of the northeastern insula, all the units of which must have been built together according to an integrated plan. On the south, the buildings were closed by a single wall and fronted by a street. The eastern border of Building CQ2 was also a single wall; although unexcavated, it is possible that a north–south street ran here and continued to the north alongside Building CW.

Both buildings were small and comprised three rooms each: a rectangular room on the south and two small rooms on the north, one larger than the other. Yet another building with the same plan was found to the south of Building CQ1, termed Building CQ3. The entrance to Building CQ1 was in its southeastern corner (opposite the entrance of Building CQ3), but curiously, no entrance into CQ2 could be identified. While Building CQ1 was built on a north–south axis, its eastern side ran on a slightly northwest–southeast line, which dictated the orientation of the adjoining Building CQ2; in fact, the eastern wall of the latter building was even more skewed, lending it a trapezoidal shape.

Similar to Building CW to the immediate north Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 had one main phase, with burnt destruction debris under topsoil down to the floors and only ephemeral indications of an earlier occupation in Stratum C-1b. Both buildings were built above remains attributed to Stratum C-2 in Squares A–B/4–5. The most likely explanation is that the buildings were constructed in Stratum C-1b and continued to be in use until the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. The wood in the foundations of the walls points to this option, as this was a typical C-1b feature. Thus, the buildings appear on the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.

A narrow area to the south of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as Building CF to their west (Photos 12.120, 12.122), appears to have been an east–west street, some 1.4 m wide, that ran between the block of Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the north and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south, merging into Piazza 2417 on the west in Stratum C-1a.

The buildings are described below as found in Stratum C-1a, noting the very minor remains of the sporadically detected earlier (C-1b) phase.

Building CQ1

Plans, Sections, and Photos

Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
Introduction

The external measurements of Building CQ1 were 5.2–5.5×6.4 m (floor space, ca. 19 sq m). It included one large room (6483) that spanned the width of the building and two smaller rooms (6436, 7447) to its north. The southern wall was Wall 6445, which continued the line of Wall 5455, the southern inner wall of Building CF. On the west, the building was closed by Wall 6408, which continued to the north, where it was the western wall of Building CW and abutted the eastern wall of Building CF on the south (Photos 12.121–12.122). The eastern wall (7416) created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast.

Room 6483

The southern and largest space of the building was apparently a roofed room, measuring internally 2.8×4.3 m (floor space, 12.04 sq m). The entrance into this room, and, in fact, into the building itself, was in its southeastern corner. The entrance was 1.2 m wide and had a brick threshold at 86.12 m; it opened to the street that ran along the southern façade of the building, although the excavated level of the street surface was higher by ca. 0.7 m than the threshold. This would have required few steps or a ladder to access the building from the street, whether into Room 6483 or to a second story.

The floor was composed of two parts: on the west was a stone floor (6472) that ran up to the line of the entranceway in Wall 6446, containing closely laid basalt stones and limestones, as well as some broken upper grinding stones and mortars. Underneath the stone pavement were two large stones that apparently served to buttress it. Such a stone floor was rare at Tel Rehov in Iron IIA and was found only in Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and perhaps CJ in Stratum C-1a.

The stone floor was abutted on the east by a smooth reddish clay floor (7450 in the east, 6483 in the west); patches of this matrix were also found between the stones, so that it apparently had covered them as well. In the central-eastern part of Floor 6483 was a round, flat-topped stone that appears to have been a pillar base; it was encircled by several small stones that included two loomweights, one of stone and one of clay. Between this pillar base and Wall 7454 on the north was a patch of hard plaster.

The floor was covered with a layer of extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris (6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo 12.121). In the northwestern part of the room, near the southern face of Wall 6446, was a grinding stone installation (6453), like those found in Buildings CF and CE; it was not very well preserved (Photo 12.122). The lower grinding stone of the installation was installed on a brick base, which raised it to ca. 0.4 m above the floor; underneath the stone was an antler. This room contained 26 vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects (Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights.

The reddish clay matrix of Floor 6483 rested on a 0.15 m-deep layer of red, gray and white striations (also numbered 6483) that abutted the lowest courses of the surrounding walls, which contained wooden beams in their foundations. These striations penetrated below the stone floor in the western half of the room and they may have belonged to the initial use of this room in Stratum C-1b.

Room 6436

The small northwestern room (6436; measuring internally 1.9×2.35 m, 4.46 sq m) was bordered on the east by Wall 6422 and on the south by Wall 6446; in the eastern end of the latter wall was a narrow entrance, 0.5 m wide. The floor was made of smooth reddish clay (level 86.00 m), identical to that of the large room to the south. The wood in the foundations of the surrounding walls protruded somewhat into the room below the floor, embedded in a matrix of reddish clay (6477) that was similar to the floor makeup itself. This sub-floor material with wood was laid on top of Wall 6501 and Locus 6502, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.12). A wooden beam was found in the entranceway itself, possibly a threshold. On the floor was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17).

Room 7447

The northeastern room (7447; measuring internally 1.3×2.0 m, 2.6 sq m) was separated from the room to its west by Wall 6422. This small narrow room was entered from the larger southern room by way of an opening, 0.8–0.9 m wide, in its southern wall (7454); this opening had a brick threshold that was, in fact, the continuation of Wall 7454, on the level of the floor. A row of bricks (7448) ran along the northern wall of this room just on the floor level and might have been a bench. Like in the room to the west, the wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6422 protruded into the sub-floor makeup of reddish clay. The reddish clay floor was identical to that of the other rooms and was covered by very burnt complete fallen bricks and ceiling material (7426); on it were six pottery vessels and other objects (Table 12.17)

Building CQ2

Plans, Sections, and Photos

Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
Introduction

Adjoining Building CQ1 on the east was an almost identical, slightly larger unit, termed Building CQ2 (Photos 12.120, 12.123) (external measurements 5.6–6.0×6.3 m; floor space, ca. 21 sq m). As noted above, the southern part of the western wall was slightly skewed, and the entire eastern wall (8405) was even more so, and thus, the building was somewhat trapezoidal (Photo 12.123).

The problem of the entrance to this building remains unresolved. If we duplicate the plan of Building CQ1, the entrance should have been close to the eastern end of Wall 8434 and thus, exactly opposite the entrance into C-1a Building CX to the south. However, the wall here stood up to 1.0 m above the floor level inside the building and did not show any signs of a gap or a blockage. Note the suggestion that the street level to the south of Building CQ2, which was ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor inside the building, might have served to directly access an upper floor.

Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an extremely large amount for such a small building, even when taking into account the existence of a second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in Chapter 45.

Room 7500

The southern and largest room of this building (7500) spanned its entire width. Due to the angle of the eastern wall (8405), it was trapezoidal (internal measurements 2.6×4.5–4.9 m; 12.2 sq m). The floor of this room was identical to that of Room 6483 in Building CQ1: a stone pavement (7503) on the west and soft reddish clay on the east (7500), on line with the entrance into Room 7490. The pavement was nicely laid, with small stones filling the gaps between the flat-topped stones, which incorporated several broken and complete upper grinding stones. A large lower grinding stone was found in the southwestern part of the room, some 0.3 m above the stone floor. It is possible that this had belonged to a grinding stone installation similar to those found in Building CQ1, CF and CE, as chunks of hard clay found scattered nearby might have been part of its surrounding parapet. Attached to the center of the southern wall was a bin (7508), 0.8 m wide and 1.5 m long, with narrow clay walls that also ran partially along the southern wall. A stone mortar was found on the northeastern end of this bin with an upper grinding stone inside it.

Underneath the reddish clay floor in the southeastern corner of this room was a rather large smooth pink mizi limestone resting on a layer of red and gray striations (8445), similar to those in Building CQ1; a juglet (Fig. 13.118:11) was found in this layer. This stone was very similar to that found in the Stratum C-1b phase of Building CF, described above. Like in Room 6483 in Building CQ1, this layer ran to the west under the stone floor and it is possible that it represented the Stratum C-1b occupation. The foundations of both the southern and eastern walls of Building CQ2 were not reached and it is possible that an earlier phase is yet to be exposed.

Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos 12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of fine small closed vessels. Several other objects were found as well (Table 12.18). An interesting find was a concentration of some 20 small polished black and gray wadi pebbles found on the floor, as well as inside an intact juglet (Fig. 13.118:17). These were weighed in order to ascertain if they had significance as weights, but it seems that this was not their main function, as they did not yield any known value (pers. comm., Raz Kletter).

Room 7490

The northwestern room (internal measurements 2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m), was slightly wider than its counterpart in Building CQ1. On the east, it was closed by Wall 7406 and on the south by Wall 7459, in which a 0.75 m-wide entrance was located on its eastern end. Wooden beams were incorporated in the foundations of the walls in this room (Photo 12.125) and the entrance had a fine brick threshold with a plank of wood found in situ. An exceptional recess was located in the outer eastern side of the entrance in Wall 8411, a detail somewhat similar to the rounded recesses in two of the entrances in Building CP (11440, 11446), described below. Two brick courses were missing from this wall in its center (Photo 12.126); this appears to have been a kind of window or niche between this room and the one to its south.

The reddish clay floor (7490) in this room was exactly the same as the floors in Building CQ1. The top of Stratum C-2 Wall 7492 (Photo 12.125) protruded into the floor, running along the northern wall of the room, 0.2 m above the floor, and might have been used as a bench.

This room was filled with burnt destruction debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds (Table 12.18). A complete baking tray (Fig. 13.112:1), made of non-cooking pot fabric, a rare item in the Iron Age IIA pottery assemblage of Tel Rehov, was one of the finds in this room.

Room 8431

The northeastern room was the smallest; its trapezoid shape was due to the angle of the eastern wall (8405) (internal measurements 1.2–1.4×2.1; ca. 3.0 sq m). A row of bricks (8412) ran along the southern face of Wall 6407 in the northern part of this room, continuing the line of 7492 from the adjacent room, but standing much higher, almost on the level of the tops of the surrounding walls. Since excavation did not proceed below the floor, it is not known whether this was the upper part of an earlier wall, like Wall 7492. The entrance to the room on the southeast, 0.7–0.8 m wide, contained a curious feature composed of four narrow bricks that formed a square, enclosing a small area of softer debris (8446). To the south of the southern brick was an upper grinding stone, parallel to the threshold; it is difficult to say whether it was deliberately placed there or was fallen. The presence of this bin-like element just where one would step into the room through the threshold is enigmatic. It is possible that it was a Stratum C-1b element that slightly protruded into the floor here, or that it was somehow related to the function of the room.

Room 8431 was full of burnt destruction debris and fallen bricks, yielding seven vessels and several other objects (Table 12.18).

Summary of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2

Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to the south, see below) are exceptional among the Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small overall size and the even smaller size of the inner rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms. It may be assumed that these houses had a second story, thus their functional space could have been double, although no evidence for steps was found and access must have been from the outside of the building. This possibility may explain the lack of an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the lower storey of this building was entered by a wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact, there was such an entrance in Building CQ1, despite the higher street level to its south. Notably, the buildings contained very large amounts of pottery, as well as a range of other finds, that might point to them having been dwellings. On the other hand, they lacked cooking facilities, such as ovens, although cooking pots and one baking tray were found.

These buildings can be compared to small houses found in Area C at Hazor, dating to the 13th–11th centuries BCE (Yadin et al. 1960: 98, Pl. 208), in Tell Abu Hawam Stratum IV (Hamilton 1935: Plate IV), Aphek Stratum X11 (Gadot and Yadin 2009: 90––93, Figs. 6.2, 6.4), and perhaps also Building 442 in Stratum VIA at Tel Batash, although it was not fully uncovered and appears to have been larger (Mazar 1997: 76–79; list cited from Gadot and Yadin 2009: 93, with Egyptian parallels as well). However, all these examples are much earlier (13th–11th centuries BCE), while no similar houses are known in Iron Age II Israel.

Building CG

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.76 - Section 22 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.92 - Buildings CF, CW, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.127 - C-1 Building CG and C-2 Buildings CA and CB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.128 - Tilted and Deformed Walls in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.129 - Tilted and Collapsed Walls in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.130 - Wood Beam Foundations in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.131 - Destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Room 2441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.132 - Destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Room 2441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.133 - Collapse of Wall 2439 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.134 - Foundation trench of C-1 Wall 1416 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.135 - Brick collapse from C-1b Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18–12.19, 12.39–12.40
  • Sections: Figs. 12.68–12.69, 12.73, 12.76–12.77
  • Photos: 12.92, 12.127–12.135;
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.52–13.55
Introduction

Building CG (Squares T–Y/2–4) was a narrow rectangular structure, measuring externally 3.4×8.9 m, with massive walls wider than those of other buildings (recalling the double walls of back-to-back units) (Photos 12.5, 12.8, 12.127). Both the external and the internal walls were 0.9 m wide, composed of two rows of bricks, one laid widthwise and one lengthwise, a building technique found so far almost exclusively in this building. The walls were composed of hard-packed light and dark gray bricks and were exposed just under topsoil.

The building contained three small square rooms that had no entrances and were apparently accessed from above. The floor space of each room was 2.5–2.7 sq m. It is possible that this building had a second story. Although the amount of debris and fallen bricks found here did not seem to justify this, we must take into account that much of this material was eroded and disappeared from this high point of the lower mound.

The only discernible change in this building between Strata C-1b and C-1a took place in its southernmost room, while only one phase was detected in the other two rooms. The buildings adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the southeast, and the open area south of Building CD on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to the east and west of Building CG became open spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to the west).

The two outer walls on the west and east (1416, 2411) ran parallel to each other on an almost straight north–south line, while the northern (2453) and southern (2439) walls of the building were slightly skewed, running on a southwest–northeast line; on the north, this was the same angle as that of Building CE, which adjoined it. The sharp angles of the short walls (especially in the northern part of the structure) give the plan a slightly irregular shape.

The building was constructed on top of the ruins of Building CB of Stratum C-2: the western wall (1416) was built over Wall 2505, 0.3 m to its east (Figs. 12.16, 12.68–12.69, Photos 12.31– 12.34) and the southern wall (2439) was built over the southern part of the entrance in Wall 2505 (Photo 12.32). Room 2444 covered Wall 2481 of C2 (Photo 12.38). All the walls were preserved ca. ten courses high and had wooden beams in their foundations (Photos 12.128–12.133). The massive construction of the interior and exterior walls was apparently related to the surmised function as a granary or storage building.

Building CG — Stratum C-1b

Room 2460

The northernmost room (internal measurements 1.5–1.6×1.6 m; ca. 2.56 sq m) contained fallen ceiling material and hard vitrified brick debris (2449), some of it burnt to a powdery lime, to a total depth of 1.2 m above the assumed floor at level 86.40 m. Although excavation proceeded past the foundation level of the walls, no clear floor matrix was detected and the assumed floor (2460) was determined only on the basis of the location of the finds and the floating level of the walls (Fig. 12.76). Unlike the other rooms in this building, no charred wood was found here below the floor level.

This small room contained 22 vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), many of them very burnt. Twenty-eight stone loomweights were found, concentrated mainly in the southwestern corner of the room. No grain was found in this room, although a large amount was found in the other two rooms. The small size of this chamber and the lack of an entrance indicated that this large collection of varied pottery vessels and objects was apparently stored here, perhaps close to the time of destruction. As we assume that all three chambers in this building served as a granary, the use of this chamber for storage appears to be secondary, at a time when no grain was stored here.

Room 2444

The middle room of the building (2444) measured almost exactly the same as Room 2460 to its north (internal measurements 1.5×1.6 m; 2.4 sq m). Its southern wall (2429) had a 0.7 m wide gap in its five upper courses (not shown on the plan; Photo 12.127), although its southern face and bottom courses clearly showed that this was a solid wall. This gap appears to have been intentional, perhaps used as a storage niche or it was an elevated opening, similar to those in the square granary rooms at Tel Hadar (Kochavi 1999: 181, Fig. 2).

A light-colored clay layer which appears to have been the floor (2444, 86.60 m) was defined as such mainly based on its position at the foundation of the walls, the wooden beams underneath it, and the destruction debris (2425) resting on it, including a large amount of grain. Just below the floor level, a round wooden beam was incorporated in the foundation of Wall 1416, running 1.3 m from the northwestern corner of the room to the south, where it branched out to protrude into the room for 0.25 m. Round wooden beams (average diameter 0.10–0.15 m) were also placed in the foundation of Wall 2411 on the east (Fig. 12.77). However, as opposed to the beam in Wall 1416, these were laid perpendicular to the wall and protruded into the room up to 1.5 m, just below the floor level; they included tree trunks and branches, as well as some worked beams (Fig. 12.41; Photo 12.130). As noted above, these same wooden beams were visible in the eastern face of Wall 2411. It thus can be seen that the wood was laid in preparation for the construction of the walls and floors and constituted a well-planned system. Under the charred wood that extended from the foundation of Wall 2411 into the room was a single course of bricks (2478) running north–south, serving as a kind of support, above which a shallow fill was laid. These bricks appeared to have been intentionally removed from C-2 Wall 2481, which ran under the northern end of this room, and served as a sub-floor constructional element (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38).

The room was full of fallen ceiling material and extremely burnt debris, including ashes and complete fallen bricks, burnt to white and yellow vitrification and to a powdery consistency (2425), which were found especially in the southwestern part of the room, at a total depth of 1.0 m. At 86.80–86.90 m, a large concentration of charred grain (about 2.0 kg) was found in the southwestern corner and against the northern face of Wall 2429. The only other finds in this room were fragments of a bowl (Fig. 13.52:10) and sherds of a large Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.55:18), indicating that its main function might have been grain storage, used as a kind of a ‘chamber-bin’. The grains were identified as wheat (Chapter 53) and were subjected to a series of 14C dating. One measurement from Locus 2444 (Sample R30) provided the dates 928–858 BCE (1σ) and 970–846 BCE (2σ); a second date appears to be too high. Samples R31–R34 from Locus 2425 were measured with 21 repetitions in four laboratories; the average calibrated date was 898–844 BCE (1σ) and 906–837 BCE (2σ) (see data and discussion in Chapter 48).

Room 2441

The southern room is reconstructed as having been identical to the two complete northern rooms. With the reconstructed southeastern corner, Room 2441 measured internally ca. 1.6×1.7 m (2.7 sq m), very similar to the room to its north. However, most of the eastern and southern walls of this room had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72; Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall 2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a door jamb of an opening leading to the room from Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain.

Both the floor and the walls of this room were constructed above a 1.3 m-deep layer of fill and wood which apparently was laid as a leveler and stabilizer on top of the C-2 remains below (Photos 12.128–12.129). This deep wooden construction was composed of four to five layers of alternating lengthwise and widthwise wooden beams (2470, 2471, 4421; Fig. 12.42a–c; Photos 12.131–12.133). The upper layer of wood, with nicely worked rounded beams, some reaching over 1.0 m long, was mostly laid on a north–south axis (2470; Photo 12.143). The two lowest layers of this wood (2471, 4421) were mostly laid on an east–west axis (Photo 12.133). Notably, most of the lower level of this sub-floor wooden construction was horizontal, as opposed to the higher levels of the wood, which sloped down towards the east, having collapsed with the southeastern corner of the room. Although the lower layers of wood under the floor penetrated down deeper than the wood in the foundations of Walls 1416 and 2439, and were found on the level of the entranceway in C-2 Wall 2505 (Photos 12.32–12.33, 12.128–12.129), they should be attributed to the construction of Building CG in Stratum C-1b. The reasons for this are:

  1. The entrance in C-2 Wall 2505 was intentionally filled in and leveled off with a wooden beam when C-1b Wall 1416 was built; this beam was on the same level as the uppermost wood in Locus 2470.

  2. The wooden beams would have obstructed passageway through this entrance and thus, they could not have been used in C-2.

  3. The wooden construction was concentrated between the line just to the east of Wall 1416 and the eastern face of Wall 2411, indicating that all these elements were built at the same time.

  4. The lowest wooden construction was on the same level as the foundation of Wall 2429, seen on its southern face (85.80 m), and Wall 2411, seen on its southern end (85.90 m).

  5. The construction of Wall 1416 cut the eastern end of Stratum C-2 Wall 1483, with a clearly visible foundation trench (Photo 12.134). Thus, the wood in the foundation of Wall 1416 postdated the Stratum C-2 walls, including 2505.
In the severely burnt destruction debris of fallen bricks and wood in Room 2441 were 57 restorable vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), as well as other finds (Table 12.19), and a concentration of burnt grain. All the finds were concentrated within the area enclosed by the surmised lines of the collapsed walls and did not continue to the east or south. This further supports the idea that this originally had been a closed room like the two others in this building. The destruction debris rested on a layer of powdery white lime that apparently had been the floor; this floor was found to be horizontal on the west (86.30 m), but fallen towards the east, underneath the brick collapse described above (Photo 12.131). The lowest level to which this white floor was traced was 85.05 m (2471), just in the area where the assumed southeastern corner of the room is reconstructed. Most of the restorable pottery vessels were found in the collapse down to the east, so that their levels were below that of the horizontal section of the white floor in the west, but they were clearly related to this floor.

The collapse of the southeastern corner of Room 2441 created a huge pile of fallen bricks, 3.0 m high (Photos 12.131–12.133), that collapsed on the floor of the northwestern corner of the apiary, which was ca. 1.3 m lower than the foundation of the walls. The discrepancy between the foundation levels of the walls of Room 2441 and the bottom of the collapse might indicate the existence of a basement or some other hollow space below this room, perhaps enclosed on the west by Wall 2505, reused from Stratum C-2. The layers of charred wood found here may have been related to the construction of such a basement, as in Building CH (see below), and it might have been open towards the apiary on the east and south.

It was difficult to securely determine whether this collapse occurred as a result of human activity (war, unintentional burning, etc.) or was caused by a severe earthquake. The latter possibility seems more likely, based on paleomagnetic testing (Chapter 54). This destruction by fire and collapse is attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b. Five 14C dates measured on the grain found in the collapse layer (Chapter 48, Sample R26) provided the following calibrated average dates: 926–898 BCE (1σ) and 970–850 BCE (2σ). These early dates fit the destruction of Stratum C-1b, as confirmed also by dates from the apiary to the east

Building CG — Stratum C-1a

Since the two northern rooms of Building CG did not suffer the same severe collapse as Room 2441, the possibility exists that they continued to be in use during Stratum C-1a (Fig. 12.50). An indication for this is the fact that Piazza 2417 on the east and Piazza CK on the west, both of Stratum C-1a, abutted this building. The floors of the courtyards were at levels 87.55–87.75 m, 1.2–1.4 m higher than the original floors inside these two chambers. There are two possibilities to explain this stratigraphic situation. The first is that the floors of Stratum C-1b continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a and the rooms were approached from above, as in the previous occupation level. In that case, the destruction debris in Rooms 2460 and 2444, with its pottery and the charred grain that was measured for 14C dates, would be explained as belonging to the last use of the rooms in Stratum C-1a. The other possibility is that a new floor was constructed in Stratum C-1a above this destruction debris, which would then be attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b in these two rooms. Such a floor, which was not preserved, would have been at a level higher than 87.70 m (the preserved top of the walls) and might have disappeared due to erosion. We thus leave this question open, although it is of crucial importance for dating, due to the large number of 14C dates from the central room (Loci 2425, 2444) mentioned above. It should be noted that the loci numbers of floors and destruction layers appear only in the plan of Stratum C-1b, thus accepting the second possibility; the first possibility would require presenting these numbers in the plan of Stratum C-1a as well. However, since a final verdict is impossible, the loci in these two rooms are tentatively defined as belonging to Stratum C-1b, although we are aware of the alternative.

Evidence for partial rebuild of the southern room (2441) in Stratum C-1a can possibly be seen in the two upper courses of Wall 2441 close to its southern end; while the entire wall suffered from severe slippage of the bricks, these two upper course were not burnt and were laid horizontally above the burnt and tilted courses below (Photos 12.127, 12.131–12.132, 12.159, 12.160). This raises the possibility that these two courses represent a rebuild of the wall in Stratum C-1a. It should, however, be emphasized that there are no other stratigraphic indications for such a phase in this room, such as a higher floor, although such a floor could have existed close to topsoil and had been eroded away, as possible in the two northern rooms.

In the area east of Building CG, and above the collapse from this building that sealed the apiary, a leveling fill (5430, 4408; Squares Y/1–2) was laid in preparation for the construction of Building CL in Stratum C-1a; Wall 4443 of that building had a foundation trench that cut this fill (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.135, 12.144). This stratigraphic evidence to the east of Building CG, but clearly related to it, supports our conclusion that the building was founded in Stratum C-1b, destroyed at the end of this stratum, along with Building CH and the apiary, and reused (partially?) in Stratum C-1a.

Building CM — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.75 - Section 21 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.78 - Section 24 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.136 - Stratigraphic section through walls in C-2 and C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.137 - Row of chalices along eastern face of Wall 2411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.138 - Row of chalices along eastern face of Wall 2411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.139 - C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.140 - Cracked Cooking Jar on the floor in C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.141 - C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39–12.40;
  • Sections: Figs. 12.75, 12.78–12.79
  • Photos 12.136–12.142
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.49–13.51
Introduction

Building CM (Squares Y–Z/3) was a unit to the south of Building CF and to the east of Building CG (Photo 12.127), built above the C-2 remains here. It adjoined the apiary on the north and, since the partition wall between them was quite flimsy, it is possible that Building CM was related to the apiary in some functional way, despite the difference in floor levels: 86.20 m in the northern and central part of Building CM and 84.55–84.60 m in the northern part of the apiary. It seems that Wall 9453 of Building CZ (exposed only along its eastern face in Squares A/2–3) was the eastern border of Building CM. The floor inside the western part of Building CZ (84.90 m) was lower by 0.35 m than that in the eastern part of Building CM (85.20 m) and 1.35 m lower than that identified in the western part of Building CM (86.20 m), and it is possible that there was a terraced effect here, following a natural downslope from west to east.

The external measurements of Building CM were ca. 7.8 m×9.0 m, depending on the western and eastern boundaries, which were not entirely clear. It included a small room (4446) in its northwestern corner, a larger space to its south (4445) and possibly an open space (5441, 5442) in its east. Access to the building was most likely from the western end of the street that we assume ran in Squares Z, A–C/4 to the northeast of the building.

Building CM ended in a fierce fire. It went out of use in Stratum C-1a and was covered by a courtyard (2417), whose floor was 1.35 m higher than the floors in this building. It is noteworthy that this was one of the few places where a clear distinction could be made between Strata C-2, C-1b and C-1a.

Room 4446

The northwestern room (4446) was poorly preserved (internal measurements 2.0×2.9 m, 5.8 sq m) (Photos 12.136–12.138). Its walls were composed of crumbly brownish-gray bricks with light gray mortar lines. The western wall of the room (4432) was built above Stratum C-2 Wall 4516 (Fig. 12.75), but continued further to the south, running a total of 4.0 m until it terminated rather abruptly just past its corner with Wall 4411. It ran parallel to the eastern face of Wall 2411 of Building CG, with a 0.2 m gap between them; the foundation heights of the two walls were identical, suggesting that they were constructed together. Yet, unlike Wall 2411, which was standing to a height of 1.5 m, due to its being in continuous use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, Wall 4432 was preserved only 0.25–0.35 m high, aside from a lone stump that was 0.65 m higher than the rest of the wall (Photo 12.136); this stump was located precisely in the balk between Squares Y/3 and Y/4. It is not clear why it was left standing so high, when the rest of the wall was razed.

Along the eastern face of Wall 2411 was a row of nine chalices (4424) (Fig. 13.49:9–17; Photo 12.138). Two (one intact) were found near the northern end of Wall 4432 (just north of the abovementioned stump), while six more were found running 2.0 m to the south. The chalices were revealed just at the level of the preserved top of Wall 4432, leading to the conclusion that they were placed there following the razing of this wall. Their position exactly in the gap between Walls 4432 and 2411, as well as the higher preservation of the stump, suggests that they might have been a deliberate deposit, perhaps related to some ritual following the destruction of Stratum C-1b.

The northern wall of the building (4479) created a double wall with Wall 4413 of Building CF. Wall 4479 was 8.7 m long, preserved to a height of 1.3 m, and was very burnt. The northwestern corner of Building CM was part of a massive construction, where the corners of four buildings (CE, CF, CG and CM) met. This dense corner in Square Y/4 was a meeting point between Walls 1473, 4479, 4432 and 2454; each of these walls had its own end or face and they abutted one another, indicating that although each belonged to separate buildings, all were built in consideration of each other. As in most other Stratum C-1b walls, wooden beams were incorporated in the foundations of Walls 4432 and 4479. While only a few pieces were noted in the northern end of Wall 4432, the wood in the foundation of Wall 4479 was dense and composed of small rounded beams laid perpendicular to the line of the wall at closely spaced intervals (Photos 12.136–12.137); see Wall 6444 in Building CW and Wall 1437 in Building CH for a similar configuration (Fig. 12.46; Photo 12.145). A unique feature of the wood in Wall 4479 was that it was laid above the lowest two brick courses, rather than at the very bottom of the wall. This somewhat recalls the situation with Wall 2411 in Building CG, where the wooden beams in its foundation were laid on bricks (2478), as described above.

The eastern wall of the room in Stratum C-1b was Wall 4433, which abutted Wall 4479. This wall was 0.8 m wide and was composed of a row of bricks laid lengthwise and one row widthwise, recalling the walls in Building CG. The wall was poorly preserved on both its southern end and its eastern face; it seems that it terminated just about at the line of the balk between Squares Y/3–4, and it is possible that its southern end originally had an entrance that led into the room. The southern closing wall of this room (4411) was very poorly preserved. The room contained several layers of debris (4417, 4430, 4446). While no clear floor was detected, its lowest layer (4446) was on the same level (86.19 m) as Floor 4445 to the south of Wall 4411. These loci, which lacked traces of destruction, might have been a fill that leveled off the area in preparation for the construction of Piazza 2417 in Stratum C-1a.

Space 5441/5442

In the area to the east of Room 4446 was a floor (5441, 5442) at level 86.25–86.30 m. In the north, Floor 5442 contained a concentration of crushed travertine in its center. In the south, Floor 5441 was made of soft pink plaster; a smooth flat-topped pink mizi limestone and a complete storage jar (Fig. 13.51:3) turned upside down were found on this floor. While the northern end of this floor was horizontal, it sloped down towards the south (Fig. 12.78); this slope may possibly be related to the lower southern end of the building, described below. As noted above, it is not known whether this space continued to the east up to Building CZ, as the area between them remained mostly unexcavated (Square Z/3). It might have been an open courtyard, although enclosing walls may be hidden in the unexcavated area in Squares Z/3–4.

Room 4445

To the south of Wall 4411 was a space (4445; Photos 12.127, 12.139–12.142) that ran 3.2 m to the south until Wall 8469, the flimsy narrow wall that bordered the apiary (Fig. 12.78). An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the result of the same seismic activity that caused the collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG, described above. The wooden beams laid in the foundation of Wall 2411 that were visible in the matrix of 4445, penetrated under the wall into Building CG to the west, as described above.

The northern and central part of Room 4445 contained very burnt brick debris (4441) on top of a beaten-earth floor (4445, level 86.20 m) (Photo 12.139). An oval-shaped installation built of hard dark gray clay (4448) was built on this floor, just against the southern face of Wall 4411; the gray clay of the installation continued along the southern face of Wall 4411, indicating their contemporaneity. The installation was ca. 0.7 m long, 0.4 m wide, preserved 0.28 m high; it contained a complete cooking jug (Fig. 13.50:4; Photos 12.139–12.140). Another installation related to Floor 4445 was a small bin made of reddish clay and lined with wood (4449) in the southwestern part of this area, built against the eastern face of Wall 2411 (Photo 12.139).

From the line of Installation 4449 until the southern end of the building, the floor was not clear and, in its stead, was a dense concentration of charred wood, 1.0 m wide (4456, 8443, 8447), abutting Wall 8469. Just north of this pile, and east of Installation 4449, was a large stone (Photos 12.139, 12.141–12.142). This strip of charred wood, composed mostly of tree trunks and branches, was set into a reddish layer (8471) (Fig. 12.78). The bottom of this reddish layer (85.30 m) was 0.9 m lower than the floor in the northern part of this room, suggesting that this area might have been dug out to accommodate the wood pile. This strip of charred wood might have been either part of a sub-floor construction or was related to the construction of Wall 8469, which enclosed the apiary to the south (see below). The goal of this wood was perhaps to support the gap created by the 1.6 m height difference between the floor of this space and that of the apiary to the south. Thus, the strip of wood, together with Wall 8469, may be explained as a kind of revetment for the lower terrace on which the apiary was constructed to the south. The eastern part of the wood concentration (8443, 8447) contained many fallen bricks, burnt debris and a thick layer of phytolith (Photo 12.142), inside of which was the lower part of a very large krater (Fig. 13.50:1) and several loomweights.

At the eastern end of Room 4445 was a short north–south line of bricks (8441) standing only two courses high; its northern end terminated in a complete brick, while its southern end appears to have been cut (Photo 12.142). Although these bricks were on line with the middle row of hives in the apiary to the south, no connection between them was found. This segment of bricks could have been a low partition or part of a wall that had been dismantled.

Probe in Square Z/3

To the east of Wall 8441, a probe in the eastern part of Square Z/3 revealed a layer of destruction debris, fallen bricks, wood and phytolith (11429) that rested on a reddish layer (11450) at 85.20 m and abutted Wall 8469 (very poorly preserved here; Photo 12.160), a sequence similar to that in the south of Room 4445. It seems that this was the continuation of the wood and reddish debris layer in the south of that room and might have been related to the eastern row of hives in the apiary, revealed to its south. Most probably, this matrix abutted the western face of Wall 9453 and its corner with Wall 8469, although the point of contact remained unexcavated.

Building CH — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.70 - Section 16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.72 - Section 18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.143 - C-1b Building CH from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.144 - Collapsed and Tilted Walls along a lineament from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.145 - Wood foundations from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.146 - Collapsed Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.147 - Collapsed Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.148 - Wooden Construction from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.149 - Wooden Construction from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • (Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Sections: Figs. 12.70, 12.72–12.74
  • Photos 12.3, 12.143–12.149;
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.56–13.59
Introduction

Building CH was comprised of two excavated rooms (2455, 2451) that adjoined Building CG on the south (Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20) (Photo 12.143); its southern part was beyond the limit of the excavation and to its east was the apiary. This structure apparently functioned as a service wing for the apiary, perhaps used for the processing of the products and/or for administrative work (Fig. 12.47). Its floors were ca. 1.75 m higher than those of the apiary itself, although both were contemporary and related. All the walls of this building were composed of light and dark gray bricks, incorporating sporadic yellow bricks. Along the eastern edge of the two rooms was a sub-floor construction of wooden beams laid in two to three layers that joined the rooms to the apiary floor below, described below.

The western wall (1438) of Building CH, which was also the eastern wall of Building CJ, was exposed along 7.5 m and continued to the south beyond the limit of the excavation. It was built on top of C-2 Wall 2468 (Photos 12.45, 12.143) and had wooden beams incorporated in its foundation, mostly in its northern part (Figs. 12.72–12.74). The northern wall (1437) was the continuation of the northern wall of Building CJ. It terminated on the east just on line with the southern wall (2439) of Building CG, which it abutted. To the east of this was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the southeastern corner of Building CG, as described above. Wall 1437 had many small round wooden beams in its foundation, set perpendicular to the wall in two layers, above the preserved top of C-3 Wall 4495 (Fig. 12.72; Photos 12.144–12.145).

The eastern part of Building CH collapsed down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the southeastern end of Building CG to the north. This collapsed eastern part of Building CH was superimposed by the western wing of Building CL of Stratum C-1a (Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146– 12.147, 12.149). Although none was found, it is possible that there had been an eastern closing wall to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood, that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden partition might have closed off this end of the room that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a higher level than the apiary floor below.

The two excavated rooms of Building CH were separated by Wall 2426, which extended 3.0 m to the east of Wall 1438, until it was cut by the foundation trench of Wall 2413, the western wall of Building CL (Photos 12.146–12.147, 12.149). No entrance between the two rooms was found; perhaps such a connection had been located further to the east, or each was accessed separately from the apiary by way of wooden ladders or brick steps. Wall 2426 was built on top of the northern face of C-2 Wall 2465 (Photo 12.148). It was horizontal on its western end, but 1.0 m from its corner with Wall 1438, it collapsed towards the east at an acute angle; the difference between the level and fallen parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a, as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b.

While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. However, Wall 1438, the western wall of the building, continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a as the eastern wall of Building CJ (described above).

The Wooden Construction

Below the destruction debris in the eastern part of the rooms was a unique construction of wood, two to three layers deep, 1.4 m wide, and running north to south along 10 m, the entire exposed length of the building, from the southern balk of Square Y/1 (where it continued to the south beyond the limit of the excavation) up to Wall 1437 and the subsidiary balk to its east in Square Y/2, where it intersected with the perpendicular beams in the foundation of Wall 1437 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.3, 12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148–12.149). The wood continued to the north under Wall 1437 and apparently ran under Wall 2439 (collapsed at this point) to join with the sub-floor wood in Room 2441 in Building CG, showing that the two buildings had been constructed at the same time.

The wood that ran along the eastern edge of Rooms 2451 and 2455 was obviously constructed before the floors were laid and before Wall 2426 was built. Just north of Wall 2426, the strip of wood cut C-2 Wall 2465. The eastern part of the wooden construction sloped down towards the east, particularly in the southern part (Square Y/1); the height of the top of the wood in the west was 86.25 m, while the height of its top in the east was 85.50 m, a 0.75 m difference over 1.4 m. The wood was comprised mostly of tree trunks and branches, all found charred and carbonized.

In the northern room (2455), the wood was laid in two layers, with a 0.2 m-deep reddish fill between them; the uppermost layer ran north–south and was composed of relatively large beams, while the layer below, less well defined, ran both north– south and east–west, creating a kind of a weave. There was a 1.0 m gap between this strip of wood and the wood in the foundation of Wall 1438 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.144, 12.148). No wood was found to the east of this strip and it was laid on top of layer of whitish material, possibly very burnt wood or bricks, located directly above the preserved tops of Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496. It is suggested that these walls served as a support for the wood (see further below).

In the southern room (2451), the wood construction consisted of three tiers whose eastern part was markedly stepped (Photo 12.149). Like in Room 2455, the wood was laid alternately north– south and east–west (Fig. 12.45) and did not join with the wood in Wall 1438, except for one beam that protruded from the wall in the northwestern corner of the room. Like in the northern room, underneath the wood was a white layer which was laid on top of a Stratum C-3 gray-brick wall (4480).

Two alternatives are suggested to explain this construction. The first is that this descent could have been wooden steps, wood that supported brick steps, or a sloping ramp, leading down to the apiary floor on the east. This suggestion is supported by the relatively orderly manner in which the tiers of wood were laid (Fig. 12.45; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148). The alternative explanation is that the wood, as found, was fallen, and that originally it had served as a roof and support beams of a hollow space below it, forming a basement in Building CH. Such a basement may have been bordered on the west by re-used C-3 Wall 4495 and perhaps by a wood construction built on that wall, while in the east, it could have been left open towards the apiary, with only a few wooden posts supporting the roof (see suggested reconstruction in Fig. 12.47c). The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have been partly built above this basement, which would explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74). The destruction of this structure and the bricks of Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created the slope of this layer as found. The height of this basement can be calculated by comparing the floor to the west (2451, 1515, levels 86.20–86.40 m) to the top level of the gray walls of Stratum C-3 (4480, 4495, 4496) that were found below the charred beams (85.14–84.85 m), since we surmise that these walls served as a support for this basement. This difference in levels (maximum 1.55 m) should also include the floor of the basement and the thickness of the wood construction that supported the floor above it, that later collapsed. Thus, the subfloor space itself could not have been more than ca. 1.0 m high. According to this reconstruction, this basement could have had two components: 1) underneath the northern room (2455), a narrow space located in the area above Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496 (Fig. 12.47a) and 2) underneath the southern room (2451), a narrow space that would have been open towards the apiary (Fig. 12.47b). Alternatively, it is possible that this entire area was one long space, possibly continuing to the north into Building CG, as suggested above (Fig. 12.47d). The roof of this alcove would have been the collapsed tiers of wood on the eastern end of the wooden construction in the south. The low ceiling of this basement would suggest that these spaces could have served for storage of commodities in containers. The postulated space below Room 2441 of Building CG (described above) might have been a continuation of the same phenomenon.

Room 2451

The southern room (2451) was at least 3.3 m from north to south, as its southern border was beyond the limits of the excavation (Photos 12.143, 12.149). Like the room to the north, the eastern end collapsed to the east and was covered by Stratum C-1a Building CL.

The floor of this room was identical to that of Room 2455, both in its composition of burnt powdery white lime and the reddish sub-floor material, as well as the strip of wooden beams on its eastern end. Here too, it is surmised that below the floor in this room there was a basement, as described above.

On the floor was a thick layer of destruction debris with fallen bricks, ceiling material, charcoal and ash, concentrated mainly in the west and south of the room. Fifteen vessels were found in this room (of which only a part was excavated), as well as other finds (Table 12.21).

The Apiary — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.44 - Plan of Building CH and apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.81 - Section 27 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.82 - Section 28 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.150 - General view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.151 - Another view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.152 - Another view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.153 - Tilted Wall 5453 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.154 - Collapsed western part of Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.155 - Collapsed bricks in western end of Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.156 - North-central and northwestern part of apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.157 - Tilted Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.158 - View of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.159 - Central and western part of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.160 - Northern end of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Sections: Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.87
  • Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.160; additional illustrations in Chapter 14A
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.60–13.67
Introduction

The area to the east of Building CH in Squares Y– Z, A/1–2, 20 was occupied by an apiary of industrial scope, which included three north–south rows of unfired clay hives, separated by elongated aisles. The stratigraphy and general spatial organization of the apiary will be described below, while the structure and makeup of the hives, as well as additional details and illustrations, are presented in Chapter 14A. Three scientific studies of the apiary are presented in Chapters 14B–14D, and discussions of the apiary’s operation, historical context, and ethnographic comparisons are presented in Chapter 14E.

The Borders of the Apiary

Due to the broad expanse of this space, as well as the very nature of the industry, which contained over a million bees, we assume that this had been an open area, although it is probable that each row of hives was roofed with thatch or other material, such as cloth or clay, to shield them from the intense heat in the summer or from the rains in the winter.

The apiary was bordered by Wall 9453 on the east, Building CH on the west, and Wall 8469 of Building CM on the north. It extended to the south beyond the limit of the excavation in Square Z/20 and thus, it measured 9.0–9.5 m from east to west and at least 13.0 m from north to south, an area of 117–123.5 sq m

The Eastern Side

The eastern wall of the apiary was Wall 9453, which was on line with Wall 6408 of the northeastern complex (Squares A/4–5; Fig. 12.18), demonstrating the integral city plan of Stratum C-1b. It was a well-built wall, preserved to five courses and very burnt, that ran for 16.4 m, serving as both the eastern wall of the apiary and the western wall of Building CP (early phase), while on its northern end (preserved to ten courses, not burnt), it was both the western wall of Building CZ and, most likely, the eastern wall of Building CM. Above it was C-1a Wall 9406, that served as the western wall of both Buildings CP and CQ3 (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 9453 was abutted on the west by the destruction debris and floor of the apiary (9451); a perpendicular wooden beam in its foundation extended into the floor. The southern end (in Square A/1; Fig. 12.39) contained a section with some irregular bricks, possibly an entrance leading to the lower phase of Building CP on the east (Photos 12.153, 12.234). Just at this point, it was abutted by a 2.0 m-long strip of narrow bricks fronted by a patch of small stones on the floor level that might have served as a step up to this entrance. The western face of the wall was covered with a hard brownish-yellow mud plaster, while its bricks were mostly brown and gray and of a very hard consistency, possibly due to the fire that engulfed this area

The Northern Side

Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition, perhaps constructed in conjunction with the deep strip of wood to its north (at the southern end of Building CM) described above, which both abutted the northern side of this wall and penetrated down to a level below its foundation (Fig. 12.78; Photos 12.142, 12.151, 12.154, 12.160). The wall was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). The highest level of its central segment was just about on line with the highest preserved top of the hives (Photos 12.151, 12.156–12.157). Between the floating level of this wall and the apiary floor was a 0.15 m thick layer of brown-earth fill that also filled a narrow channel that ran along the southern face of the wall (Photos 12.151, 12.156, 12.159). The eastern end of Wall 8469, north of the eastern row of hives, was so poorly preserved that only a narrow strip of pulverized pinkish material could be identified, although a few complete fallen bricks to the west and east of these hives might have belonged to it (Photo 12.157). As mentioned above, Wall 8469 was most likely not a free-standing element, but rather a kind of buttress attached to the wood construction to its north, both creating a single, quite massive construction that separated Building CM on the north from the apiary to the south. This might have been due to the difference in level of 1.3–1.5 m between these two units, with Wall 8469 and the wood construction serving as kind of terrace or retaining wall between them.

The Northwestern Corner

The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary.

The Western Side

Building CH bordered the apiary on the west, to the south of the aforementioned corner of Building CG. As described in detail above, its walls and floors were on a higher level than the apiary floor by some 1.7 m, built above a wooden construction that was founded on Stratum C-3 gray-brick walls (4480, 4495, 4496), creating a roofed area below Building CH, perhaps open towards the apiary on the east (Fig. 12.47c). The apiary floor ran up to the eastern faces of Walls 4480 and 4496 (Figs. 12.72–12.73; Photos 12.17, 12.158), and possibly to Wall 5483 on the south. A thin layer of eroded gray debris (4499) from these walls was found right on top of the floor (4469, 5440, 7481) in this southwestern section of the apiary (Figs. 12.86–12.87). It is surmised that when the builders of Building CH and the apiary dug down to this level, they encountered these earlier walls and reused them as a support for the wooden construction that bordered the building on the east and as the western edge of the apiary. In spite of the differences in the floor level of ca. 1.7 m, the apiary was most likely related to Building CH, which might have served as its service wing, as proposed above.

Thus, the apiary was surrounded (at least) on three sides by built units, and was established on a lower level than those structures on its west and north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining units were built more or less on the same level, judging by the floor levels.

Stratigraphy

As noted above, no remains of Stratum C-2 were identified in the probe made below the apiary floor (Figs. 12.80, 12.82), and, in fact, C-3 walls were found directly relating to this floor (Figs. 12.72– 12.73). The reason for the lack of C-2 remains was most likely related to the low level of the apiary; it appears that the builders dug down to this level to create this broad cavity for their industry, obliterating all traces of the previous phase, until they encountered remains of an even earlier occupation, C-3, which they utilized to some degree, as described in detail above and below. It should be noted that Stratum C-2 remains were revealed east of the apiary under Building CZ (in Squares A– C/2–3 (Figs. 12.7, 12.15). Wall 11471 of Stratum C-2 was cut in this place by Wall 9453, which served as the eastern boundary of the apiary. Thus, Stratum C-2 remains were found to the north, west and east of the apiary, but not within its confines.

The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to east, while the same level of destruction debris found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.150–12.151). Stratum C-1a Building CL was built directly above this ca. 1.0 m-deep layer of collapsed bricks and burnt destruction debris that covered the apiary (Photo 12.146) and thus, the attribution of the apiary to Stratum C-1b is secure.

The Apiary Floor

The level of the apiary floor ranged from 84.50– 84.70 m. It was composed of three different matrices (Photos 12.150–12.152, 12.158), all of which were covered by the same destruction debris and collapse (Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.81, 12.83– 12.87).

The first type of floor was made of dark red smooth clay, found in the space between Wall 9453 and the eastern row of hives (8482, 9451; 84.55– 84.60 m) (Photos 12.152–12.158). It had many black burnt patches, especially on its northern end. In the center of this part of the floor was a hive (8500) that appeared to have fallen from the eastern row.

The second type of floor was made of very hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick, found in the aisle between the eastern and middle rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle between the middle and western rows of hives (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). This floor was covered in part by a thin layer of soft reddish material, identical to the fill in other Stratum C-1b buildings in which the wood was set. It is notable that the hives were set ca. 0.15–0.3 m above this hard white floor and red layer, on top of a loose brown-earth fill that included many bones, some sherds and pieces of wood (Fig. 12.81; Photos 12.152, 12.156). This was the same material seen under the foundation of the northern wall (8469) and in a narrow channel running along its southern face (Photos 12.151, 12.159). The destruction debris in the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed bricks, rested directly on this floor. The very hard and thick matrix of this floor seems to have served a purpose related to the work in the hives, since it was concentrated mainly in that area. The reason for the fill between the floor and bottom of the hives must have been technical, related to drainage and ventilation; perhaps the large amount of bones in this fill served this purpose. In several places, particularly in the middle row of hives, we found evidence for charred beams that separated the hives from the floor, suggesting that in some places, the hives were located on a level raised by wood. Another interesting feature in the hard white floor between the middle and eastern rows (8436) was a sunken area adjoining the floating level of the three northernmost hives in the middle row and abutting the floating level of Wall 8469 to its north (Photos 12.156, 12.159). This sunken area measured 0.6×1.2 m and was 0.1 m deep; it was lined with the same hard white material as the floor showing that they were constructed together, and was filled with the same loose brown fill as the channel that ran alongside Wall 8469 and that was placed under the hives.

An enigmatic feature identified under the southern end of the middle row of hives (seen in the northern balk of Square Z/1) was a round area of eroded gray brick material, 0.5 m in diameter, which was cut into the hard white floor and penetrated into the upper pink layer of the Stratum C-3 accumulation under the apiary (Photo 12.20). It is possible that this was a pit, related in some way to the construction of the hives. This further supports the relationship between the hard white floor and the hives themselves.

The third floor type was a soft powdery matrix of vivid red color, found in the southwestern part of the apiary (Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.152, 12.158). It merged with the hard white floor just south of the western row of hives and west of the southern part of the middle row of hives (4469); it continued to the southwest (7481) to abut Walls 4495 and 4480, as well as to the southern part of the apiary in Squares Y–Z/20 (5440, 9455, 9458). In the probes excavated below the apiary floor in the area south of the three rows of hives (Squares Y–Z/1; Figs. 12.4, 12.82; Photos 12.19–12.20), it was seen that this red powdery layer continued to the east and south underneath the hard white tufa floor described above. It thus seems (as suggested above) that the tufa floor was laid above the soft red floor of Stratum C-3, possibly to provide a substantial, non-permeable surface for the hives and the related activity, while in the west, where there were no hives, there was no need for such a surface. The question remains whether the builders of the apiary reused the Stratum C-3 floor that they encountered (along with the gray-brick walls) when digging down to the level on which they intended to establish the apiary, or whether this was a new floor laid in Stratum C-1b when the apiary was built. Since there was no other floor below that abutted the C-3 gray walls, it seems that the former possibility is more viable. What is clear is that both types of floors — the hard white and the soft red — were used together for the duration of the operation of the apiary and were found covered with the same layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and pottery.

Pits in the Red Floor

To the west of the middle row of hives in Squares Y–Z/1–2 were a number of pits that were dug from this red floor, as most of them were lined with this same material (Photos 12.150– 12.152, 12.158–12.159). Very little pottery was recovered from these pits (Fig. 12.62:4–13), aside from 8496, which contained a large amount of redpainted pottery and a few red-slipped and handburnished sherds. It is difficult to phase these pits and, ultimately, it depends whether the red floor was a Stratum C-1b addition or was originally laid in Stratum C-3 and reused.

These pits included (from north to south):

  • 8497 in Square Z/2, 0.45 m long, 0.15 m deep, elliptic; it contained gray debris, no finds; adjoined the white floor on the north and the red floor on the south.
  • 8493 in Square Y/2, 0.45 m deep, composed of a slightly higher round pit on the west (0.9 m in diameter) and a smaller round pit on the east (0.5 m in diameter), separated by a thin wall of the same red matrix as the floor. The western pit was lined with this red clay, but the smaller eastern pit was lined with soft brownish clay and had a burnt black line in its walls and bottom; it contained a layer of soft gray earth and ash with a few worn sherds.
  • 8495 in Square Y/1, 0.35 m deep, 0.65 m in diameter, round. The western part was lined with same red material as the floor, while the slightly lower eastern part contained eroded gray debris with a few sherds and bones.
  • 9427 in Squares Y/1–2, 0.3 m deep, 2.5 m long, roughly oval, abutted the reddish floor and was lined with the same material; it contained a very large amount of bones and a few sherds.
  • 8496 in Square Y/1, 0.2 m deep, 2.7 m long, amorphic, abutted the reddish floor, but was not lined with this material; it contained soft gray earth, brick debris and chunks and a very large amount of bones and sherds, many of which were red-painted (Fig. 13.62). On the southern end of this pit was a small rounded sunken area of darker gray color. This pit ran just along the top of the eastern face of C-3b Wall 9429 (Fig.12.5).
No clear floor was found in the northwestern part of the apiary; instead, there was a layer of soft gray earth (8444, 8498) between the western row of hives the collapsed southeastern corner of Building CG. Fallen bricks and burnt debris from this corner rested directly on this layer which must have been contemporary with the red floor (4469, 7481) to its south, based on the levels. On line with the southern end of the western row of hives, the powdery red floor (4469) was traced.

For the description of the apiary itself, and its operation, see Chapter 14A.

Building CZ — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.48 - Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.161 - Southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.162 - C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.163 - C-1b Building CZ, southwestern room (11449) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.164 - C-1b Building CZ, looking south at Wall 11427 below C-1a Wall 10482 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.165 - C-1b Building CZ, southeastern part from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.166 - C-1a Wall 10464 sealing the fallen bricks and debris on Floor 1142 of C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.167 - Pillar bases of C-1a Building CX set directly on top of fallen bricks from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.168 - Layered Walls in C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39, 12.48
  • Sections: Figs. 12.89–12.92, 12.94–12.95
  • Photos 12.9, 12.161–12.168
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.51:17
Introduction

This building, only party excavated in Squares A– C/2–3, was composed of a central space flanked by two rooms on the western side and at least one room on the eastern side; it might be considered a variation of a courtyard house. Its borders on the north and east were beyond the limit of the excavation, yet it appears that it was bordered on the north by an unexcavated earlier phase of the Stratum C-1a street. In that case, it may be assumed that the building could not be much larger than the parts excavated. On the west, it was probably attached to Building CM, and its southwestern corner abutted the northeastern corner of the apiary. On the south, the neighboring building was the early phase of Building CP, with a double wall between the two (Photo 12.161). Its external measurements were at least ca. 7.5×12 m. In the southeastern corner of Building CZ was an opening leading south into Building CP (early phase) (Photos 12.165, 12.168).

The walls of Building CZ, built of gray and brown bricks, were well preserved in the western part, up to a height of up ten courses above the floors (Photo 12.163).

The Central Space

The central space of this building was bounded on the south by Wall 11421, on the southeast by Wall 10500, on the west by Wall 11407, and on the north probably by the continuation of Wall 11455, which is known only in the western part of the building. Since Wall 10500 cornered with Wall 10518 and did not continue to the north (Photos 12.161– 12.162, 12.164), a large L-shaped space was created, most likely an unroofed courtyard, which was 6.2 m from north to south, 3.6 m wide at its southern part, and at least 7.5 m from east to west in its northern part; it thus measured at least 41 sq. m.

Wall 11421 was first built in Stratum C-2 (see above) and was reused in Stratum C-1b, since the debris and floor (11422, 11442) related to this stratum abutted it above the debris attributed to Stratum C-2, some 0.5 m lower. The northern wall (11458) of the adjacent Building CP was built flush against Wall 11421; it was preserved three courses higher than Wall 11421 (Photos 12.165, 12.168) and, in fact, the layer of fallen bricks and debris that filled the courtyard abutted these top courses, as well as the top courses of Wall 11421. It seems that, at one point, the upper part of Wall 11421 had been removed in its center and eastern end, revealing the northern face of Wall 11458 and making it the southern border of this space.

The floor identified in the central part of the courtyard (11422, 11426, 11442) was composed of somewhat patchy red and gray striations that sloped down from east to west in the southern part near Wall 11421, but were horizontal in the northern part (north of the line of Wall 10518). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard, just east of the entrance into Room 11449 was a pit (11456) lined with very hard gray mud plaster; it contained only a few sherds. In the area to the north of Wall 10518 (the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a 0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris (11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds, many of them red slipped and hand burnished. There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and, in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of the courtyard (Photo 12.167).

Room 11404

In the southeastern part of this building was Room 11404 (internal measurements 2.1×3.25 m; 6.8 sq m) (Photos 12.162, 12.165). The room was bounded on the south by Wall 11421 and on the north and west by Walls 10500 (1.3 m long) and 10518 (2.4 m long), the latter revealed directly below the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX (Photos 12.176, 12.180–12.181). The eastern wall was not revealed, but it was most likely located close to the edge of the excavation, just below C-1a Wall 10490, continuing the line of the short segment of a wall (11479) revealed to the south in Square C/2, belonging to the early phase of Building CP (Fig. 12.39; Photos 12.165, 12.168).

This small room had three entrances. The western entrance, 0.8 m wide, led to the room from the southern part of the courtyard. The other two, also 0.8 m wide, were opposite each other on the eastern ends of Walls 10518 and 11421. The former led to the northeastern part of the L-shaped courtyard, while the latter led to Building CP (early phase) by way of an identical entrance in Wall 11458, the northern wall of that building (Photos 12.165, 12.168). The room with three openings is unparalleled in other buildings and may indicate some special function, possibly for transit between Buildings CZ and CP.

This room contained a large amount of fallen bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls

The Western Wing–Rooms 11449 and 11457

The western wing of this unit contained two square rooms of identical size: Room 11449 on the south and Room 11457 on the north, each with internal measurements of 2.4×2.4 m; 5.8 sq. m (Photos 12.161, 12.163). The western boundary of both rooms was the northern continuation of Wall 9453, which was the wall between the apiary and the early phase of Building CP. A distinct fill (0.08 m thick) separated this wall from the Stratum C-1a wall above it (9406) (Fig. 12.95; Photo 12.163). Wall 11412 separated the two rooms and Wall 11407 bordered both on the east; openings in both ends of this wall led to the courtyard on the east. Wall 11455 bordered the northern room on the north and Wall 11427 on the south; both were superimposed by Stratum C-1a Walls 10472 and 10482 of Building CQ3, respectively (Photo 12.164).

The floors in the two western rooms were made of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in the eastern part of the building. They were covered by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. After removal of the floor of Room 11449, the top of an earlier wall (11471) built of hard yellow bricks was uncovered at level 84.85 m and attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.14; Photo 12.163).

The floors of C-1a Building CQ3, located 1.45 m above those of Stratum C-1b, sealed the debris and the tops of the walls in these rooms (Photos 12.171, 12.173, 12.176). Notably, the floor level in these two rooms (84.85–84.90 m) was only 0.15– 0.2 m higher than the floor of the apiary that abutted the eastern face of Wall 9453, showing that this building was built on the same low level as the apiary, as opposed to the higher elevation of Buildings CM, CG and CH to its north and west.

It was deliberated whether Building CZ might be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. In favor of this assessment were the following arguments: 1.) the building’s walls were preserved to 11–12 courses, just like other Stratum C-2 structures to the north and west (e.g., Building CB); 2.) its levels and stratigraphic situation were similar to those of nearby Room 6515 and other remains in Squares A–B/4–5, which we attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.7, 12.12), although they were found right below C-1a Building CQ1, just as Building CZ was found just below C-1a Building CX; 3.) Building CZ was filled with fallen bricks and relatively empty of finds, like most C-2 structures. In contrast, the following arguments were in favor of the attribution of Building CZ to Stratum C-1b: 1.) it shared a wall (9453) with the apiary of Stratum C-1b; 2.) we assume that Building CX above it was founded in Stratum C-1a, since no traces of an earlier phase were identified in that building; 3.) while the walls of Stratum C-2 were composed of distinct hard yellow bricks, the walls of Building CZ were built of the typical gray and brown bricks found in Stratum C-1b; 4.) Wall 11471, found below the floor of the southeastern room of Building CZ (Fig. 12.15; Photo 12.163), was constructed of the C-2 brick type and apparently penetrated below Wall 9453 to its west.

This dilemna remains unsolved and both possibilities pose questions. If we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-2, we would need to understand Wall 9453, the eastern boundary of the apiary, as a reused C-2 wall, and this has no other support, particularly in light of the lack of C-2 elements in the area of the apiary. We would also have to assume that either Building CZ continued to be in use in Stratum C-1b with insignificant changes, or that Building CX (the building above Building CZ) was first erected in Stratum C-1b, which too, lacks evidence (although we suggested the same concerning Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 which, in our view, were in use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, based on elements such as wood in the foundations and subfloor striations that abutted the walls). The relatively small amount of pottery recovered from Building CZ is of types that exist in both Strata C-2 and C-1b, and thus does not help to decide the issue. Thus, we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence.

Building CQ3 — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.169 - General view of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.170 - General view of southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.171 - C-1a Building CQ3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.172 - C-1a Building CQ3; wooden beams below bricks in threshold of Wall 9406 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.173 - C-1a Building CQ3, southern part of Room 10460 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.174 - Smashed object on the floor of Room 10495 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.175 - Room 10495 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.176 - Looking south from Room 10495 to Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.177 - Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.178 - Smashed pottery and destruction debris against southern wall of Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.179 - Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50–12.51
  • Sections: Figs. 12.88, 12.94–12.95
  • Photos 12.169–12.179
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.130–13.135
Introduction

Building CQ3 (Squares A/2–3) was built above the western wing of Building CZ. It was bounded on the north by the street in Squares A–B/4, on the west by Piazza 2417, on the east by Building CX (with which it shared a wall) and on the south by Building CP (partly by a shared wall and partly by a double wall). It was designated Building CQ3 due to the similarity of its plan and dimensions to Buildings CQ1 and CQ2. The external measurements of this building were 5.6×7.2–7.4 m (including all walls) and its net floor space was ca. 23.5 sq m.

Like Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, CQ3 was composed of a single large room (10494) and two small back rooms (10452, 10460). As opposed to Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, there were two entranceways in this building; one in its northeastern corner and one in the middle of its western wall, both 1.2 m wide. The northern entrance (Photo 12.171) led to the street and was located directly opposite the entrance into Building CQ1. The western entranceway led to Piazza 2417; it was partially paved with bricks, in the foundation of which was a plank of wood with small round wooden beams set perpendicularly above it (Photo 12.172). This arrangement was unknown in any other entranceway and represents a rare use of wooden beams in Stratum C-1a.

The western wall of this building was Wall 9406 (Fig. 12.95; Photos 12.162–12.163), whose southern part served as the western wall of Building CP, indicating that the two buildings were constructed at the same time. The southern wall was composed of two abutting segments: 9415 on the west, which was shared with the northwestern room of Building CP, and 10482 on the east, which formed a double wall with the northern wall (10409) of Building CP at this point; this is the only double wall in the entire southeastern complex in Stratum C-1a. Wall 10482 had small round wooden beams in its foundation, similar to those in the western threshold of the building, and was built above C-1b Wall 11427 (Photo 12.164). Walls 10482 and 10409 abutted, but did not bond with, Wall 9448 on their west; this was a constructional feature and not the result of sub-phasing.

Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room 10460 and were flush with the floor level in Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could have been done at some point during the lifetime of the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such an opening was part of the original plan of both buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall 10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3 was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately left at a low level in order to allow for passage between the buildings; see also Wall 10464 (described below). According to A. Mazar, the low levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part) resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely damaged during the final destruction of this building or suffered from a late intrusion which could not be observed in the excavation. According to this explanation, there had been no passage between Buildings CP and CQ3.

Room 10494

The northern room’s inner measurements were 3.1×4.4 m; 13.6 sq m (Photo 12.170). As noted above, it had entrances on the north and on the west, as well as two entrances leading to the rooms on its south. The walls, preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). Almost all of the western part of this room was occupied by a unique installation (10505).

Installation 10505

The southern end of this installation was composed of a narrow parapet made of hard-packed brick material, 2.0 m long, 0.2 m wide and ca. 0.5 m high (Photos 12.170, 12.174–12.175). Its western end was built on top of a large stone and was attached to the door jamb of Wall 9406, so that it bordered the western entrance into the room on its north.

Attached to the southeastern end of the parapet was a large gray brick. The area left to the south of the parapet must have been used as a narrow passageway into the building from the western entrance, as well as into Room 10452 to the south. In the floor foundation to the southwest of the brick parapet was a patch composed of small stones and chunks of hard brick material (11424; 0.6×0.8 m), as well as fragments of a lower grinding stone and a basalt mortar in secondary use. The brick parapet was built on top of the northern end of these stones (Photos 12.175–12.176).

To the north of the brick parapet, and occupying the northwestern corner of the room, was a squarish (1.5×1.7 m) patch of gravelly earth and reddish brick material, found very burnt. This square was surrounded by brick material similar to that of the parapet on its south, while its center contained a paving of sherds and small travertine stones. On this paving was a storage jar, with its top half apparently deliberately removed (Fig. 13.133:5; Photo 12.174), containing a large amount of gray ash; a few scattered loomweights were found here as well.

The function of this installation remains enigmatic, but the fact that it occupied the western part of the room points to it having been a major feature of Building CQ3.

Room 10452

The southwestern room (10452; internal measurements 2.0×2.6 m; 5.2 sq m) (Photo 12.170) was accessed from the southwestern part of Room 10494 through a 1.2 m-wide entrance in Wall 10417, the northern wall of the room (Photos 12.176–12.177). The room was bordered on the west by Wall 9406, which was also the western wall of Building CP to the south, and on the south by Wall 9415, which was the northern wall of the western part of Building CP; this demonstrates the close relationship between the buildings in this sector. On the east was Wall 10407. All the walls were covered with a high-quality mud plaster (Photos 12.177–12.179), similar in makeup to that found on the walls of Building CP.

The floor (10452) was composed of red clay interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of) Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen bricks was found against the southern and eastern walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo 12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular plastered depression located along the center of the southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo 12.179).

Room 10460

The southeastern room (10460) was the smallest (internal measurements 1.8×2.6 m; 4.68 sq m). It was accessed from Room 10494 through a 1.0 m wide entrance (Photo 12.170). The room was bordered on the north by Wall 10483, on the west by Wall 10407, on the south by Wall 10482, and on the east by Wall 10464, which was also the western wall of Building CX. A curious feature of the eastern wall (10464) was its ‘stepped’ preservation. On the southern end, at its corner with Wall 10482, it was preserved only 0.15 m above the floor of Room 10460 along 1.5 m, while halfway through the room, the wall was preserved some 0.2 m higher, up to its corner with Wall 10483 (Photos 12.170, 12.173, 12.180); north of this, in Room 10494, the wall was preserved much higher. This low preservation of the southern end of the wall in Room 10460 was similar to that of the southern wall of this room (10482) and western end of Wall 10409 of the adjacent Building CP to the south, described above. As in that situation, here, too, it may be asked whether these walls were deliberately razed in order to allow passage from Room 10460 into the southern part of Building CX on the east, thus effectively joining these two buildings at one point during their lifetime. Alternatively, this low level might be the result of poor preservation, caused by the destruction of the buildings, which might have been particularly heavy in the southeastern corner of Building CQ3.

The floor was less well preserved than in the other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights that were concentrated mainly along the western wall and near the entrance.

Building CX — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.180 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.181 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.182 - Entrance into Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.183 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.184 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.185 - C-1a Building CX, vessels in destruction debris in center of Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.186 - C-1a Building CX, Locus 10431, vessels in burnt destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.187 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.188 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50–12.51
  • Sections: Figs. 12.88–12.92
  • Photos 12.170, 12.180–12.188
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.136–13.142
Building CX (Squares B–C/3) was bounded by the street on the north and by Buildings CQ3 on the west and CP on the south (external measurements 6.8×7.8 m; internal measurements 5.7×6.8 m; 35.5 sq m). Its western and southern walls were shared by the neighboring buildings, CQ3 and CP, respectively. The building comprised one large space (38 sq m), partially separated by a T-shaped bench or screen wall (10502) into a northern and a southern space on its west (Photos 12.170, 12.180–12.181). The northern and eastern walls (10515, 10490) were built of unique reddish-gray bricks with many light-colored inclusions and barely-visible brick lines. A 1.6 m-wide entrance in the northeastern corner led into this building from the street on the north. This entrance was bordered on the east by a finely plastered pilaster that separated it from the western face of Wall 10490 with a narrow gap filled with burnt material (Fig. 12.92; Photo 12.182). A curious feature in this entranceway was a dip in the floor level just in front of it (11413), so that the threshold, containing traces of burnt wood, was ca. 0.2 m lower than the rest of the floor in this building. The wood in the threshold recalls that in the western entranceway in Building CQ3.

Two means of roof support were identified in the large inner space of this building. One was a north–south row of five pillar bases, each made of an unworked flat stone, located in the northern half, 2.0 m east of the western wall and 3.4 m west of the eastern wall (Photos 12.180–12.181). The two northernmost bases bore traces of the burnt wood pillars on them. The other means of roof support was a unique square pilaster of gray bricks (10517), located to the southeast of the row of pillar bases and standing 1.3 m high (Photo 12.184). A large smooth stone was found southeast of this pilaster.

A T-shaped brick bench or screen wall (10502) was located along the northern two-thirds of the western wall (10464); it protruded 1.3 m into the center of the structure (Photo 12.181). Two vessels were placed in the southern niche formed by this ‘T’, a large barrel krater (Fig. 13.137:2) and a storage jar (Fig. 13.140:14) (Photo 12.185). Another bench (10491) ran along the eastern end of the southern wall (10409), built above the eastern end of C-1b Wall 11421 of Building CZ, separated by a 0.4 m-thick fill.

The floor of Building CX (10481, 10497 and 10507) was composed of reddish-brown clay interspersed with black burnt material and gray ash. In the area between the pillar bases and Bench 10502 was a strip of small travertine chunks that were incorporated into the floor (10477; Photos 12.180– 12.181). They were not suitable to serve as a pavement, since they were very loosely laid, and perhaps they played a role in some activity that took place here. They recall a similar strip of stones (7479) set in the floor of Courtyard 7471 in Building CW. Immediately below the floor level in the southeastern part of the building were the tops of C-1b Walls 10500 and 10518 of Building CZ (Figs. 12.89, 12.91; Photo 12.181).

Like the other units, Building CX was found full of very burnt destruction debris, with fallen bricks, charcoal pieces, ash, and large a amount of pottery, with 122 complete or almost-complete vessels, many of them in situ (Figs. 12.88, 13.136– 13.142; Photos 12.185–12.186). Just inside and west of the entrance, a cooking jug (Fig. 13.138:8) and part of a storage jar were found (Fig. 13.140:17; Photo 12.183). Concentrations of loomweights here, to the south of Installation 10509, and just west of the northern end of the row of pillar bases, found along with fragments of burnt wood beams (Photos 12.181, 12.187–12.188), indicate these had belonged to one, or possibly two looms. Altogether, 164 loomweights were found in this building, mostly in the northern part (Chapter 39).

Two grinding installations were located close to the entrance. One (10509), just to its west, was attached to the northern wall, comprising a large lower grinding stone slab fronted on the east by a small shallow plastered basin which was slightly lower and served as a receptacle for the grain as it was ground; it was surrounded by a flat-topped brick ‘rim’ (Photo 12.188). An additional lower grinding stone slab fragment was found below the upper one, apparently as a support, and a nicely worked rectangular smoothed pink mizi limestone, apparently in secondary use, was set under the eastern end of the large lower grinding, between it and the receptacle on the south. On the northern ‘rim’ of the plastered basin was a fine flint blade and a small upper grinding stone; two large upper grinding stones were found just to the west. To the east of Installation 10509, in front of the entranceway, was still another large lower grinding stone slab fragment, found overturned (Photo 12.188). The second installation (10519), less well preserved, was found just south of the entrance, close to the eastern wall. It comprised a similar round plastered receptacle with a brick bordering it on its west; a rounded lower grinding stone was set inside it and another such stone was found to the west of the brick.

A large concentration of grain was found inside a storage jar in the southern part of the building (10431). The grain was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R36). One of the two measurements provided the calibrated dates 978–848 BCE (1σ) and 996–838 BCE (2σ); the other was way too high and was defined as an outlier.

Notably, no ovens or other cooking installations were found in any of the buildings, CQ1, CQ2, CQ3 and CX, although such installations were found in the larger buildings, CF and CP.

Building CP — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52a - Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52b - Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52c - Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.169 - General view of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.170 - General view of southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.189 - C-1a Building CP, with sub-floor construction in Room 10476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.190 - C-1a Building CP on the floor level from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.191 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.192 - Wall 9406, dividing Building CL (mostly removed) and Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.193 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.194 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.195 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.196 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.197 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.198 - C-1a Building CP Room 10510 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.199 - Smashed objects in C-1a Building CP, Room 10510 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.200 - Rooms 11441 and 10510 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.201 - Destruction debris in Room 11441 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.202 - Rooms 11441 and 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.203 - Rooms 10476 and 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.204 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.205 - destruction debris with fallen grinding stone and loom weights in Room 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.206 - Room 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.207 - C-1a Building CP, looking north (before excavation of eastern wing) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.208 - Room 10458 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.209 - Room 10458 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.210 - Pottery altar in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.211 - Broken vessels in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.212 - Broken vessels in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.213 - Pottery in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.214 - Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.215 - Rooms 10476 and 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.216 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.217 - Broken Vessels on 1 side of wall and on a Bench on other side - in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.218 - Room 10476 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.219 - Fractured stones in sub floor construction of Room 10476 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.220 - Large mortar from Building CP, Room 10476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.221 - Destruction debris in Room 10476 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.222 - Bin 10488 and krater-pithos from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.223 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.224 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.225 - Room 9449 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.226 - Bin 9434 in Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.227 - Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.228 - Copious destruction debris in Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.229 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.230 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.231 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.232 - Bin 10501 restored Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.233 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.234 - Walls of Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50, 12.52a–c
  • Section: Fig. 12.93
  • Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.234
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.143–13.160
Introduction

Building CP in Stratum C-1a was a large structure with a unique plan, located in the southeastern corner of Area C in Squares A–C/20, 1–2 (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190). The remains attributed to Stratum C-1b, which were only partly excavated, were, in fact, an early phase of the building, with only minor differences in the walls discerned in the part of the earlier building that was exposed, as described above (Photo 12.189). Some of the walls (e.g., 11477/10457 in the south and 11479/10490 in the east) were, in fact, the same, with the upper courses of the previous building reused in Stratum C-1a, now covered with a thick fine mud plaster, and with new floors laid against them (Photos 12.193–12.194, 12.196). The eastern wall of the central rooms (10462, 10485) was new, built above a gap with fill laid above the earlier wall (11473) that served as a threshold in the entranceways in the new wall (Photos 12.191, 12.195). The western wall of the central rooms (9448, 10480) was also new, built above the earlier wall (with no gap or fill); here too, the earlier wall (11470) served as a threshold in the entrances in the C-1a wall (Photos 12.191, 12.196, 12.219). An additional difference was the nature and size of the bricks in the early building, which were larger and of an extremely hard consistency and gray-white color; these early walls were not plastered, while those in the C-1a phase were coated with a fine thick mud plaster.

In Stratum C-1a, Building CP adjoined Building CL on the east and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south, sharing walls with these buildings (Photos 12.169–12.170), indicating that all were built, and possibly functioned, together.

This building was excavated in its entirety (Squares A–C/20, 1–2). Its external measurements were 9.2–9.7×12.3 m (ca. 112 sq. m, including walls) and its internal floor space (including the benches along the walls) totaled 71.84 sq m. The walls stood to a height of 1.2 m (on the west) to 0.75 m (on the east) above the floors, and were exposed just below topsoil.

Building CP was unique in its plan and flow of internal circulation. Its plan consisted of eight rooms: two large rectangular central ones (10458, 10476) flanked by three small rooms on the east (10510, 11441, 11451) and three small rooms on the west (9449, 9450, 10506). The three eastern rooms had entrances in their northwestern corners that accessed the central rooms. Two of these (11441, 11451) also had entrances in their northeastern corners (on line with the western entrances), leading in from an assumed street or courtyard on the east; all these entrances were 1.3 m wide, except for the western one in the middle room, which was 1.1 m wide. Thus, each of the central rooms could be approached separately from outside the building, as well as from the inside. The three small rooms in the western wing were accessible from the two large central rooms: two of them (10506, 9450) were entered from the southern central room (10476), while the northern one (9449) was entered from the northern central room (10458). Rooms 9449 and 9450 were joined by an entrance, thus enabling circulation between the southern and the northern wings of the building via these two small rooms. On the other hand, the southwestern small room (10506) could be accessed only through the southern central room (10476), and the northeastern small room (10510) could be accessed only through the northern central room (10458), creating a symmetry to the building that was marred only by the difference of accessibility in the eastern rooms and minor differences in room sizes. It is notable that six of the seven entrances found in this building were located in the corners of the rooms; the only entrance located in the center of a wall was the one connecting Rooms 9450 and 9449 in the western wing.

All the walls were covered with plaster and the floors were made of fine red clay mixed with smooth black burnt material. In Rooms 10458, 10506, and the southeastern part of 11451, the floors were set on a mud-plaster bedding (Photos 12.207–12.209) and in Rooms 10506, 10476 and 10510, they were set on a sub-floor brick construction (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.194, 12.200, 12.219).

A wide range of many complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.143–13.160) and numerous objects (Table 12.24), as well as a large amount of grain, were found in the 0.8 m-deep destruction debris on the floors, as detailed below and in Chapter 45.

The Small Eastern Rooms — 10510, 11441, 11451

Room 10510

The northern room of the eastern wing (Photos 12.197–12.198, 12.200) measured internally 2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m. Its eastern wall (10490) was built above C-1b Wall 11479, while its northern wall (10409) was built above C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). This room was accessed only through an entrance in Wall 10462 that led from the northern central room (10458).

The floor in this room was identical to the others throughout Building CP, composed of red clay mixed with black burnt material. It sloped down from west to east, from 86.20 to 85.98 m; the western elevation was higher than the other floors in the building, perhaps because just underneath the burnt floor makeup on the west were two concentrations of bricks, one in the southwestern corner of the room and the other in the northwestern corner, just inside the entrance (Fig. 12.52c). The latter (11478) was a rectangle measuring 0.6×1.2 m, ca. 0.1 m high. The bricks in the southwestern corner were more sporadic (Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.197). These are understood as a sub-floor construction, similar to those found in the southwestern part of the building, described below.

The room was full of burnt destruction debris (10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact four-legged incense burner with a matching lid (Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458, apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items were found above the sub-floor brick construction in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the room.

Room 11441

The middle room of the eastern wing measured internally 2.2×2.8 m (6.16 sq m) (Photos 12.197, 12.200, 12.202). Like the southern room, it had entrances in its northeastern and northwestern corners. The floor (11441) was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl.

Room 11451

The southern room of the eastern wing (internal measurements 2.6×2.8 m; 7.28 sq m) had an entrance in its northeastern corner and another one opposite it that led into Room 10476 on the west (Photos 12.197, 12.202–12.203). A notable feature of the eastern entrance was the molding of the door jambs; the inner (western) northern end of Wall 11440 was nicely molded to a curved shape (Photo 12.204) and the southern end of Wall 11417 that faced the entrance was also curved, although less well preserved. The walls in this part of the room were covered with fine gray-whitish plaster, somewhat different from the light brown mud plaster that coated the other walls of this building. The floor of this room was composed of red clay interspersed with smooth black burnt material. The southeastern part of the floor contained a layer of plaster, identical to that on the walls, below the red and black floor makeup. Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206).

The Large Central Rooms — 10458 and 10476

The central part of the building included two large rectangular rooms of similar size: Room 10458 on the north and Room 10476 on the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190, 12.207).

Room 10458

The northern central room measured internally 4.0×4.7 m; 19 sq m (Photo 12.208). The main entrance to this room was from Room 11411 on the east, while two other entrances led into Rooms 10510 and 9449, the latter creating a connection to the southern wing of the building. The floor was higher by 0.25–0.35 m than that in Room 9449 to the west and Room 11441 to the east, but was almost the same as that of Room 10510 on the northeast.

The preservation of the northern and eastern walls was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north (which was also the southern wall of Building CX) was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length, but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower western end adjoined the southern face of Wall 10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved to the same low height. As mentioned above in the discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to explain this feature: either there was a deliberate lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458 into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation was due to damage caused by the destruction or by some unrecognized later intrusion. A 0.4 m wide bench (10463), composed of terre pisé and partially plastered, was built along the southern face of Wall 10409, running 2.4 m from exactly where Wall 10409 was cut on the west, almost up to the entrance into Room 10510 on the east (Photo 12.208). Two bricks laid on the western end of Bench 10463 were on the same low level as the western end of Wall 10409; their function is not known. Following a 0.7 m gap was yet another brick, set into the corner of Walls 9448 and 10409, found floating 0.1 m above the level of the plastered floor in the western part of this room (10498) (Photo 12.209). The low western end of Wall 10409 abutted, but did not bond with, the western wall (9448) of the room.

The eastern wall (10462) of Room 10458 was different than the others in its composition, being built of similar terre pisé as Bench 10463. It was preserved to only 0.20 above the floor in the south and 0.40 m in the north. The corner of Wall 10462 with Wall 10405 (the southern wall of the room) was not well bonded; the latter was preserved to a height of 0.65 m, similar to that of the northern wall of this room.

Running along the eastern face of Wall 9448 and ending on the north at the entrance into Room 9449, was yet another bench (10454), built of crumbly yellow bricks, 0.5 m wide, 1.6 m long and ca. 0.2 m high (Photos 12.208–12.209).

The floor of the room (10458) was composed of reddish-brown earth mixed with black ash; in the western part of the room, it was laid 0.05–0.08 m above a layer of hard mud plaster (10498) (Photos 12.208–12.209). This plaster was identical to that found under the floor of Rooms 10506 and 11451, as well as on most of the walls in this building; it was concentrated in the area between the lower western end of Wall 10409 on the north and along the line of Oven 10430, just north of Wall 10405, on the south (the contours of this plaster are marked on the plan; Fig. 12.52a). Depressions in the plaster accommodated the rounded contour of the stone mortar, as well as two of the pottery vessels just north of Oven 10430. The plaster-bedding layer was laid on top of a layer of soft light brown earth with very few sherds (11461), which seems to have been a leveling fill laid above the C-1b remains.

The room was full of a layer of burnt destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained 23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found just to the southwest of the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the northwestern corner of the room, above the lower western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo 12.214); a few additional loomweights were found dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454 along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this bench was a dense concentration of finds that included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos (Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it (Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars (Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35, No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north (Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498) in the western part of the room included a few small upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well as several loomweights and sherds.

Room 10476

The southern central room measured internally 3.6×4.6 m (16.6 sq m) (Photo 12.215). The main entrance to this room was from Room 11451 on the east, while two other entrances led into Rooms 10506 and 9450, the latter creating a connection to the northern wing of the building (Photos 12.189– 190, 12.203, 12.215). Since Room 9450 was joined to Room 9449, one could pass between the southern and northern parts of the building by way of these two small rooms.

Room 10476 was bordered on the east by the southern end of Wall 10462 and its continuation to the south, which was designated a separate number (10485) because it was built of discernible bricks, as opposed to the terre pisé of 10462; it was preserved higher than the latter and its northern end was covered with molded plaster (Photo 12.216). The southern wall of the room (10457) ran along 12.2 m; it was located 0.5 m north of the southern wall of adjoining Building CL on the west, indicating that although they ran more or less along the same line, these were two separate walls. The northern wall (10405) separated the two large central rooms. All these walls were found standing to a height of 0.6–1.0 m and were covered with mud plaster.

The floor was made of soft reddish-brown earth, interspersed with black ash. Just below the floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219). Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part, most of the bricks were missing, although it is not clear whether this area had never been constructed or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and, in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo 12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468 was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms 10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to have been a building technique intended to provide reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to protect against rodents in certain places (compare a similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room 8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor above it (Photo 12.221).

Benches were constructed along the northern and western walls. Bench 10466, 3.6 m long, 0.6 wide and ca. 0.25 m high, ran along the northern wall (10405); the plaster on this wall joined the plaster that covered the bench. This bench was built directly above C-1b Wall 11472, utilizing the top of this wall as its foundation. On this bench were three cooking pots (Figs. 13.147:1, 3; 13.149:6), one jug (Fig. 13.155:4), four juglets (Fig. 13.156:19, 24– 25) and two loomweights (Photo 12.217). Bench 10467, 1.7 m long, 0.5 m wide and ca. 0.15 m high, was rather poorly preserved along the western wall (10480); a jug (Fig. 13.155:7), a seal (Chapter 30, No. 32), a bead, a loomweight and a scoria scraper were found on it (Photo 12.218). In the northeastern corner of the room, Installation 10468 was composed of bricks set on their narrow side around a circular mud-plastered receptacle (Photo 12.217). Inside the plastered depression were two cooking pots stacked together, a very small one (Fig. 13.148:9) on the bottom and a medium-sized one (Fig. 13.148:4) on top of it.

Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster, ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix (Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the destruction debris were found in situ (some intact) on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds (Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the southern half of the room (10493) contained much less pottery than in the north and center, mostly concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall 10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room 10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the same wall in the southwestern corner of Room 10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos 12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with 0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup.6 It was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base, and contained a large amount of charred grain (Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221– 12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the east of the pithos was a concentration of 85 loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains of charred wood here might represent a loom. A few vessels were found in the entrance leading from the east, mostly against the plastered southern doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large and heavy stone was found upside down, just under topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451 (Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small depression carved out of part of its top, in which some substance was probably ground, judging by the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room 11451 to the east, described above.

The Western Rooms – 9449, 9450, 10506

Room 9449

This was the northern room in the western wing (internal measurements 2.3×2.8 m; 6.4 sq m) (Photos 12.207, 12.225). The northern wall (9415) was also the southern wall of Building CQ3; it cornered with Wall 9406 on the west and with Wall 9448 on the east. Notably, this wall was not on line with the northern wall (10409) of the large room to the east, but ran 0.25 m to its north. A 0.5 m-wide and 0.35 m-high brick bench (9443) was attached to the southern face of Wall 9415, which was, in fact, the direct continuation of the line of Wall 10409. Its top level was ca. 0.1 m lower than the western end of this wall and it is possible that it constituted the (as of yet unexposed) western end of Stratum C-1b Wall 11458 (Fig. 12.48), whose extant top was used as a bench in this room. At its juncture with Wall 9406, the bench had an extension, protruding to the south, 0.4×0.6 m, 0.35 m high, with slightly sloping sides. The walls of the room, as well as the bench and its extension, were all covered with the same fine mud plaster. The eastern face of Wall 9406 in this room was very damaged and burnt, as opposed to its excellent preservation further to the north (in Building CQ3) and south, as well as on its western face in Building CL, as described below. The room had two entrances. A 1.0-m-wide entrance in the southern end of the eastern wall (9448) connected this room with the large room (10458) on the east (Photos 12.189–191, 12.196). Since the floor of the room to the east was 0.35–0.4 m higher than that of Room 9449, there was a small step here (Photos 12.196, 12.207). Some charred wooden pieces found in the entranceway might be remnants of a step, doorjamb or door. The bench (10454) with the pottery altar and bowl in Room 10458 to the east adjoined the southern doorjamb of this entrance. A second entrance, 0.9 m-wide, was located in the middle of the southern wall, connecting this room with Room 9450. The floor of the room (9449) was composed of red clay mixed with soft black burnt material.

The room was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418, 9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were found in this small room, among them 11 storage jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east, but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell from a second floor. A special find in this room was an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See Table 12.24 for other finds.

Room 9450

The middle room in the western wing (internal measurements 2.4×2.4; 5.76 sq m) was accessed both from Room 9449 to its north and from the large room to the east (10476) through a 1.0 m-wide entrance in its southeastern corner (Photo 12.207). The walls were covered with fine mud plaster. The floor (9450) was composed of red clay mixed with soft black burnt material. In the southwestern corner of the room was a square brick bin (9434) (internal measurements 1.0 sq m; 0.6 m high) (Photos 12.226–12.227). It was coated with a fine plaster that continued from the surrounding walls down to line the floor as well. Inside was an intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig. 13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10, 13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812 BCE (2σ).

The entire room was filled with very burnt destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43 restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig. 13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of the pottery in this room, in particular the storage jars (like in the previous room), were found smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ on the floor. This situation may hint that much of this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher shelves. A special item in this room was a horned pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo 12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar was a complete brick, but it appears that this was fallen and not meant as a support. For additional finds from this room, see Table 12.24.

Room 10506

The southern room of the western wing (internal measurements 2.15×2.5 m; 5.4 sq m) (Photos 12.215, 12.229–12.230) could be entered only from the large room to its east (10476) (Photos 12.203, 12.229). An intact juglet (Fig. 13.156:18) found leaning against the threshold just inside the room appeared to have been intentionally placed there before the floor was laid (Photo 12.233). The western wall of the room (10513) was the poorly preserved continuation of Wall 9406 to its north. The other walls, 9421 on the north, 10457 on the south and 10480 on the east, were well preserved; all the walls were covered with fine mud plaster (Photo 12.229–12.231).

The floor was composed of soft dark earth, except for the northwestern part, which was composed of the same mud plaster as the surrounding walls, recalling the plaster in the western part of Room 10458. This plastered area was 0.15 m higher than the rest of the room (Photos 12.229– 12.230). Below the earthen floor in the southeastern part of the room, against Wall 10457 and just underneath the floor where the pottery bin and pottery ‘bucket’ were found (see below), was a brick construction (11464), similar to the sub-floor bricks found in Rooms 10510 and 10476 (Fig. 12.52c). Like in those rooms, this seems to have been an element related to the construction phase of the building. A low (0.1 m high) bench (10504) composed of crumbly brown bricks was built along part of the western wall (Photo 12.230).

A pottery bin (10501) was set in the southwestern corner of the room (Photos 12.215, 12.223, 12.229–12.232); it was very similar to Bin 10488 in Room 10476, 3.0 m to its east and set against the same wall (10457). It stood 0.75 m high, which was shorter than the other bin; 0.15 m of its base was sunk into the floor makeup. Like the latter bin, it was made with thick slabs and restoration showed it to be trapezoid, with the wider part on top (Photo 12.232; Fig. 13.160:12); it had no base or lid, although 0.1 m above its bottom was a layer of low-fired clay that was laid down as a kind of floor. Inside the bin (capacity-93 liters) was a small amount of burnt grain.

Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484), including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed against the center of the southern wall (Photos 12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round container with a matching lid to its east (Fig. 13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken. Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those found attached to the altar fragment from Building CF.

Summary of Building CP

Building CP, with its eight rooms, was the largest and most complex building excavated at Tel Rehov. Many unique features characterized its plan, including the two eastern entrances, the symmetric division into a western and eastern wing flanking central rooms, the plan of circulation, the benches along the walls, the sub-floor brick constructions and the molded plaster on the doorjambs. It contained a large amount of unique pottery items, such as two altars, the Elisha ostracon, containers with lids, a ‘bucket’, a strainer, two free-standing bins, a figurine mold, a stand with petals, and an incense burner with a lid, as well as more than 230 pottery vessels of a wide variety of types (see Chapters 24, 45), all indicating that this building had some special function. The integral relation of Building CP to the smaller buildings to its north (CQ3, CX) and the spacious Building CL to its west, shows that it was part of a greater complex. For further discussion and interpretation, see Mazar (2015) and Chapter 4.

Building CL — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.53 - Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.234 - Walls of Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.235 - Walls in section of C-1a Building CL above C-1b apiary destruction debris (collapsed walls) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.236 - Wall 4443 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.237 - Burnt material (9432) on Floor 9435 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.238 - Burnt oily material (5435) on Floor 5482 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.239 - Eastern wing and Floor 5446 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50, 12.53
  • Sections: Figs. 12.73–12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87
  • Photos 12.234–12.239
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.125–13.129
Introduction

Building CL was constructed above the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos 12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235) and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73– 12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner of this building was built above a leveling fill (4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for two superimposed destructions in Area C.

Building CL was composed of two wings, each comprising two rooms: the external measurements of the western wing were 3.3×6.5 m (not including Wall 4443) and those of the eastern wing were 6.5×11.5 m (including walls). The total floor space was 63 sq m. Although the walls were found standing to a height of 1.2–1.5 m, no entrances were located. A passage from the western wing to the eastern wing may have existed in Wall 4443, close to its corner with Wall 4481, since here the former wall was preserved very low. In such a case, the threshold would have been 0.3 m above the floor. However, this cannot be determined with certainty and the location of entrances in this building remained enigmatic. This building was excavated in parts during several seasons; the excavated parts were removed in order to reach Stratum C-1b below and thus, no general photograph could be taken.

The southern wall of Building CL ran 0.5 m to the south of the line of that of Building CP. However, since the two buildings shared a wall (9406), it is likely that they were built together. All the walls of Building CL were founded 0.4–1.0 m lower than the foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1438 in Squares Y/1–2 to the west. This might be explained by the fact that they were built above the apiary, which was on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. Perhaps the deeper foundations were also the result of the need to stabilize these walls, which were built directly above the collapsed bricks and burnt debris that covered the destroyed apiary.

The area to the west and north of Building CL remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west (Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep, covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417.

The Western Wing — Rooms 4435 and 5432

The western wing of the building was about half the size of the eastern wing, and adjoined only its southern part. It was composed of a long room on the north (4435; internal measurements 2.7×3.5 m; 9.45 sq m) and a broad room on the south (5432; internal measurements 1.5×2.9 m; 4.35 sq m). As noted above, there was no entrance between the two.

The western wall (2413) ran for 6.5 m and was preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235) and also cut the eastern end of Wall 2426 of Building CH (Figs. 12.73–12.74; Photos 12.146– 12.147). The northern wall (2504) was 3.2 m long; its eastern end was preserved almost 1.0 m higher than Wall 4443 with which it cornered on the east (Photos 12.235–12.236); the reason for this was not clear. The southern wall (5423 on the west, 9424 on the east; Photo 12.237) was also the southern wall of the eastern wing; it was exposed over 7.6 m and apparently continued to the east to corner with Wall 10513, although this end remained unexcavated.

Wall 4443, joining the eastern and western wings, ran along 11 m and was preserved to a height of 1.5 m on its northern half, although up to only 0.5 m on the south (Squares Y/1, 20) (Photos 12.236, 12.238). The foundation level of this wall (85.40 m) was 0.3–0.4 m lower than that of Walls 2413 and 2504 (Figs. 12.73, 12.86–12.87). Wall 4481, which separated the two rooms in this wing, was built directly on top of the concentration of cult objects (the pottery altar and petal chalice) in the apiary below.

Both rooms had a distinct floor (4435 in the northern room, 5432 in the southern room) made of a 0.3-m-thick layer of soft light-red clay at levels 86.20–85.90 m (Fig. 12.86). A clay female figurine that most probably had belonged to an altar was found on the floor in the northeastern corner of Room 5432. An almost identical figurine was found in Locus 5446 in the northwestern part of the eastern wing (Chapter 35, Nos. 6a–b); it is possible that these two figurines had originally belonged to the same altar. Room 4435 was filled with burnt debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig. 13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed with some whitish material, that was concentrated mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall 4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing (Photo 12.236). This was further evidence that the southern end of this wall had been deliberately razed during the course of the use of Building CL, thus joining the two southern spaces. Alternatively, the southern end of Wall 4443 had been originally built as a low screen wall.

The Eastern Wing — Rooms 5449 and 5482

The eastern wing was composed of two large rooms or open spaces: 5449 on the north (measuring internally 5.0×5.35 m; ca. 27 sq. m) and 5482 on the south (measuring internally 4.2×5.3 m; 22.2 sq m). Wall 5418, the northern wall, was well preserved to 11 courses, built of gray, brown and yellow bricks (Photo 12.142), yet it was found severely tilted to the south, perhaps due to seismic activity (Photos 12.150, 12.152). As noted above, the southern wall of the eastern wing (9424) continued that of the western wing. The eastern wall (9406) was also the western wall of adjoining Buildings CP and CQ3 (Photo 12.192). This latter wall, preserved 14 courses high on its western face, was built directly above the eastern closing wall (9453) of the Stratum C-1b apiary (Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 5453, a well-built wall preserved nine courses high (Photos 12.150–12.153), separated the northern from the southern room, with no entrance joining them.

The floor of both rooms was made of the same soft red clay as the western rooms; it was 0.4 m thick in the north and center (85.70–86.10 m), but only 0.1 m thick near Wall 5453 (85.65 m) (Figs. 12.83–12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.150–12.151, 12.239). The floor in the southern room (5482), at levels 85.60–85.70 m, sealed the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Fig. 12.83; Photo 12.150). As noted above, the same black burnt oily substance mixed with white material that was found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237– 12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the northern part of Room 5449 not burnt.

Both rooms were full of a thick layer of destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs. 13.127–13.128), as were several other objects (Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239).

A curious feature found in the eastern wing of Building CL was a 0.7–1.1 m-thick layer of light gray debris (5419 in Square Z/2 and 5427 in Square Z/1) that sloped down from south to north (Fig. 12.83; Photos 12.150, 12.152). This layer, revealed just under topsoil, was virtually sterile. It appears to be either an intentional fill placed in the room following its destruction or possibly, erosion following the destruction and abandonment of the lower city; the latter explanation seems to be more plausible. In the topsoil (5402) just above this layer in Square Z/2 was a fragment of a very large pottery altar horn (Chapter 35, No. 28).

One has to question whether the two eastern spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m, appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar bases or any other roof support were found, it may be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed.

Summary of Building CL

The unique plan of Building CL and lack of domestic installations rule out it having been a dwelling, and it most likely served for some administrative, industrial or storage function. The large amount of bones, as well as their special nature, might allude to some relationship to the cultic practices in the adjacent Building CP. It is difficult to explain the lack of entrances in this building, especially in light of the fact that in the adjacent buildings to the east, entrances were found in all the rooms. A similar lack of entrances was also observed in Building CG (possibly a granary) and in the outer walls of Building CQ2. One possibility is that the excavated rooms were part of a basement floor, entered from a higher level. But such a hypothesis is contradicted by the level of the floors in the adjacent buildings on the east (CQ3, CX, CP), which were only slightly higher than the floors in Building CL. Alternatively, the rooms were entered from the roof by way of ladders or from the roofs of the adjacent buildings. In such a case, the entire ground floor of this building would have been sealed from the outside. All these features indicate the exceptional function of this building.

Summary of the Stratigraphy, Architecture and Main Features

Plan
Plan

Fig. 12.54

Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata C-3–C-1a (1:250)

Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
Continuity and Change in the Occupational Sequence

The architectural sequence of Strata C-4 to C-1a, ranging from the 11th to the 9th centuries BCE, demonstrated both continuity and change. This sequence, however, was not necessarily related to destruction episodes, as some buildings continued almost unchanged following their destruction, while others were demolished and new ones built in their stead. On the one hand, the use of brick as the only building material, the general orientation of the units, the rebuilding of some walls on the same line, and the density of construction, are continuing features. On the other hand, innovations included changes in the type of bricks (but rarely the size) and the introduction of wooden beams for the construction of wall and floor foundations in Stratum C-1b.

The substantial and well-preserved building remains of the two phases of Stratum C-3 in Squares S/2–4, attributed to Iron IB, are evidence for a well-constructed and planned city, as also found in Strata D-5 and D-4 in Area D (Chapter 15). No evidence for a violent destruction of this level was found. A number of Stratum C-3 walls, characterized by gray bricks and light-colored mortar, were rebuilt in Stratum C-2 of the early Iron IIA on the same lines, but with hard yellow bricks, as in the cases of Walls 2507, 2506 and 8418 in Squares S/2–4. This indicates urban continuity from the late Iron I to the early Iron IIA.

The two pits found in Square R/4 recall a similar feature in Area D (Stratum D-3) in Squares N, P/4–5 and Q/4, where ca. 45 pits were found above and cutting through Stratum D-4 architecture; they were explained as a local feature in this area. Such pits were not found in any other part of Area C, except for a few in the apiary (Squares Y/1–2) in relation to a floor which appears to have originally belonged to Stratum C-3. Thus, the two pits in Square R/4 are understood to have belonged to the same phenomenon as those in Area D at the end of Iron IB. Above the pits and the floor was a thin layer of debris, followed by Locus 1555b, a pottery concentration in the lowest level of a room attributed to a Stratum C-2 (see above).

The division of the Iron IIA into three strata (C-2, C-1b, C-1a) was first and foremost based on a clear differentiation between Strata C-2 and C-1 in terms of overall plan and building techniques. The well-preserved walls of Stratum C-2 (general Stratum VI), sometimes standing to a height of 18 courses, were made of typical hard-packed yellow bricks, differing in their texture from the bricks of Strata C-1b and C-1a (Tables 12.28–12.30). The lack of stone foundations and the almost total absence of wood in the construction were also typical of this stratum. In certain places, we observed architectural continuity between Strata C-2 and C-1b, such as in the transition from Building CA to Building CD, in some of the walls of Building CE, and, to some extent, between the upper phases of Building CT, as well as one wall in Building CZ. In other places, the builders of Stratum C-1b ignored the earlier walls of Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.16).

In the area of Building CH and the apiary in Squares T–Z/1–2, Stratum C-1b units were founded right on top of Stratum C-3 structures of Iron IB, and even reused walls and floors from this period. This seems to have occurred due to the intentional removal of building remains of Stratum C-2 by the builders of the apiary, who sought to establish it on a lower level than the rest of the buildings in the area to its west (CG and CH) and north (CM).

The differentiation between Strata C-1b and C-1a (general Strata V and IV) was clear in some cases and unclear in others. These two stratum numbers refer to the same city that underwent local destruction and rebuilding in certain places. A major feature of Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in the foundations of walls and floors. Often these beams were laid directly on top of Stratum C-2 structures. Buildings CJ, CF, CW, CQ1, CQ2 and CG, as well as the room in Square R/4, were founded, in our view, in Stratum C-1b, and continued to be in use with only few or no changes in Stratum C-1a. In contrast, Building CH and the apiary were used only in Stratum C-1b and, following a severe destruction, were replaced by Building CL. Building CD of Stratum C-1b went out of use and was replaced by an open area in Stratum C-1a. Likewise, Building CM was destroyed at the end of C-1b and was replaced by Piazza 2417 in C-1a. In the southeastern block, Building CZ of Stratum C-1b went out of use and was replaced in Stratum C-1a by two new buildings (CQ3, CX). As discussed in detail above, the possibility that Building CZ could be attributed to Stratum C-2 was considered, particularly due to the similarity of its levels to those of the remains under Building CQ1 to its south that we ascribed to Stratum C-2. If this was the case, then Building CQ3 and CX too would have been established in Stratum C-1b and continued unchanged into Stratum C-1a, although there is no tangible evidence for this, such as wooden foundations (except in their thresholds) or floor raisings. Ultimately, we rejected this possibility and prefer to attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b. To its south, Building CP of Stratum C-1a was a rebuild of an earlier building of Stratum C-1b, although this early stage is insufficiently known due to lack of excavation.

In a few instances, an extra phase was discerned, demonstrating the complexity of the stratigraphy in the three main Iron IIA levels. For example, an earlier phase of Building CR (Squares Y–Z/6) in Stratum C-1b was detected above the well-preserved remains of C-2 Building CT. A later phase was identified in the remains east of Stratum C-2 Building CB (Squares Y–Z/4). Additional phases in the courtyard devoted to cooking activity in Square T/4 were a typical feature of such an open area. This diversity indicates that each building had its own history; some continued with no change from Stratum C-1b to C-1a and others underwent modifications of varying degrees. The clearest change between these two strata was in the vicinity of the apiary and its surroundings in the southeastern part of Area C.

Destruction Episodes

No evidence for violent destruction was found at the end of Strata C-3 and C-2, and therefore most of the floors of these levels were found virtually lacking complete vessels (except in the case of Locus 1555b in Square R/4). There were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings by an earthquake, including layers of complete fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of the buildings which would have buried vessels, and perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of debris. Rather, it could have been an earthquake that was strong enough to cause severe damage to the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of Stratum C-1b.

Evidence of severe destruction by fire in Stratum C-1b was found in the apiary and in Buildings CH, CG (the southern room), CM, CF and CE. In Building CG, it remained unclear whether the destruction of the northern rooms should be attributed to Stratum C-1b or C-1a. All of these buildings, except for CF and CE, contained large amounts of in situ pottery and other objects. Notably, these structures were located along a north-south axis running through the center of Area C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’, as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning. Perhaps the heavy destruction noted in these buildings was caused by a local event, such as deliberate or unintentional burning by human agency, or by an earthquake. The latter possibility is suggested in Chapter 54, based on paleomagnetic testing.

As opposed to this, Stratum C-1a came to an end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. The temperature must have been more than 500 degrees, since it caused partial firing of the brick courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In several cases, pottery vessels cracked and became distorted, with much calcification; for example, the large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore. The incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other objects found in the houses indicates the sudden destruction, although a human skeleton was found in only one place. There was no activity in this area following the destruction, except one deep pit (6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.

An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m above the floors and their tops were discovered flat and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil. While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem that there would have been a larger quantity if they had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were probably washed to the southeast towards the gulley that separates the upper from the lower mound. A less feasible explanation would be that bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).

Urban Planning

Area C was densely built in all three Iron Age IIA strata, C-2, C-1b and C-1, with houses attached to one another in what can be defined as pre-planned insulae, separated by only a few open spaces.

Open Spaces

An open space in Squares S–T/3–4 in Stratum C-2 was at least partly occupied by Building CM in Stratum C-1b (although the eastern part of this area remained unexcavated). In Stratum C-1b, an open area was located south of Building CD, above Building CB of Stratum C-2. In Stratum C-1a, this latter area was expanded and to its east, beyond Building CG, another piazza was created, with a 3.0-m-wide street leading into it from the east, and a somewhat irregular alley from the south. These open spaces seem not to have been related to an individual unit, but rather served as small piazzas surrounded by several buildings. Few installations were located in these open courtyards, for example, ovens found in the cooking area in Square T/4, which was in use throughout all three strata, and a stone formation in the center of Piazza CK in Stratum C-1a.

Central Planning and Orientation

Evidence for central urban planning can be seen mainly in the plan of Strata C-1b and C-1a. Two major walls traverse the entire area from south to north in a straight line: on the west was Wall 1413, which ran along 19.8 m and continued both to the south and the north of the excavated area. In the eastern part of the area (along the line of Squares A/20, 1–6), Walls 9453/9406+6408+6497 created a continuous straight line, intersected by the street in Squares Z, A–C/4. These two long backbone walls were not parallel to one another: the western one ran on a northwest–southeast alignment, while the eastern wall was due north–south. The distance between them (outer faces) was 19 m on the south and 21.5 m along the northern line of Squares R–Z, A/4, ca. 20 m to the north.

The blocks of houses in all three strata were oriented along virtually the same lines: almost exactly east–west and north–south, with minor deviations in the western part of the area, causing trapezoidshaped spaces in the seam between the eastern and western parts, such as the alley between Walls 2413 and 1438 in Squares T–Y/1–2 in Stratum C-1a or the passage from the open area in Squares S–T/2–3 to the north, towards the cooking area in Squares S– T/4 in Stratum C-1b. Evidence of central planning is also seen in the sharing of walls and the back-toback construction of many units, as discussed in the next section.

Fortifications

No evidence for the existence of fortifications was found along the western perimeter of the mound in Areas C and D, nor along the northern perimeter, where a probe was excavated in Square Y/9. The westernmost structures of all Iron IIA strata continued into Squares Q/4–5 of Area D (defined there as Strata D-1a, D-1b and D-2), located on the upper slope of the mound, where they disappeared with the erosion line. Although the slope of the mound suffered from severe erosion, as shown by the fact that the eastern sides of the buildings in Area D were missing, it is improbable that an entire city wall was eroded away, and we thus concluded that the city remained unfortified during this entire period.

Building Plans, Size and Function

Throughout all three main Iron IIA strata, a notable characteristic is the uniqueness of the architecture. Not only are the buildings quite unlike most of the typical Iron Age structures known from proximate, as well as more distant regions, but they also do not resemble each other. While certain technical features are repeated, such as size and type of bricks and the use of double walls, each unit was unique in its plan, except for three very similar buildings (CQ1, CQ2, CQ3).

In the discussion of individual buildings, we presented several parallels: Building CF was compared to part of Building 2081 at Megiddo Stratum VA–IVB, and Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 were compared to several buildings from 13th–11th centuries BCE contexts at Hazor Stratum XIII, Tell Abu-Hawam Stratum IV, Tel Batash Stratum VI and Aphek Stratum X11. Building CA was compared to part of Building 200 at Hazor Strata X–IX, and Building CY (and to some extent, also Building CZ) to a type of building with a central space flanked by rooms on two sides, known from Hazor, Samaria and Megiddo in the Iron Age II.

Although individual parallels such as these may be cited, the general concept of the architecture, in both building techniques and plans, as well as in architectural details, deviates from the common architecture in Iron Age II Israelite cities. Notably, none of these buildings recall the so-called ‘Four-Room’ or ‘Three-Room’ houses or pillared buildings that were so typical. No stone pillars were found and wooden posts were used only in the case of Building CX and seen in scant remains of Stratum C-2 under Building CZ.

An unresolved question is whether the buildings had a second story. The double walls, up to 1.1 in width, could easily have supported a second story, but even the narrow walls of 0.6 m width could have been used for such a purpose. Evidence for staircases was not found, except perhaps in the case of the eastern part of Building CY of Stratum C-2. In other buildings, wooden ladders could have led to upper stories or to the roofs, where daily activities could have taken place, such as in the case of Building CP, where large grinding stones were found fallen from a second story or a roof.

Table 12.26 compares the external dimensions and floor space of the buildings excavated in Area C, showing the diversity, which might have had social and cultural implications. The larger buildings, CF and CP, had an average floor space of ca. 62 sq m, while Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 had an average floor space of ca. 20 sq m. Building CX contained 34 sq m. In case of the existence of a second story, these numbers should be potentially doubled.

The number of persons that such houses could accommodate can only be guessed, based on various analyses. Narroll’s (1962) often-cited coefficient of 10 sq m per person would suggest two to five inhabitants in such houses if they had one story and four to ten persons if they had two. Yet, there are different variables that should be considered, and it is doubtful whether Narroll’s coefficient can be taken for granted. Thus, Schloen (e.g., 2001: 180) suggested a coefficient of 8.0 sq m per person in Israelite houses; following a detailed discussion, he estimated that the average Israelite “jointfamily” included seven to ten persons (Schloen 2001: 135–183). It seems that the larger houses, such as Building CY in Stratum C-2, as well as Buildings CW, CF and CP in Stratum C-1a, were inhabited by families of eight to twelve persons, while the smaller houses, such as Building CA in Stratum C-2 and CQ1, C2 and CQ3 in Stratum C-1a, served much smaller units, perhaps nuclear families or other social groups. It should be noted, however, that the function of these buildings as regular dwellings is not obvious; several of the buildings, such as CA in Stratum C-2 and CF and CP in Strata C-1a–b, may have had special functions, based on their plans and assemblages of finds. Building CF could have been an elite residence that incorporated administrative, domestic and cultic activities. Building CP in Stratum C-1a may have served specific functions related to religious rituals, such as shared meals/feasts and perhaps, the activity of a “man of god”, such as the biblical Elisha. The possible special functions of Buildings CF and CP are further discussed in Chapter 4 and Mazar 2015: 103–117. The small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, and perhaps also CX, may have belonged to groups or families of special status, perhaps related to or under the control of the elites in Buildings CF and CP. It should be noted that all these buildings yielded large numbers of finds, including an incredible amount of pottery vessels, considering the size of the buildings. In each building there was at least one loom and one or more grinding installations. Yet, cooking facilities were found only in Buildings CF and CP, as well as in the open piazza to the west. This, again, may emphasize the different status of the residents of the small houses, such as CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3.

Several buildings in Area C certainly served functions other than dwelling. Thus, Stratum C-2 Building CB, with its large hall, could have had some public function. Building CG in Stratum C-1 is interpreted as a granary, and Building CL as a storage facility or an or industrial structure, possibly servicing other buildings in the eastern quarter.

The clustering of the buildings in Stratum C-1a is a notable feature. An interesting configuration is the group of small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, and Building CW, flanking an east–west street, as well as the location of larger buildings, CF and CP, adjoining and beyond this cluster. This arrangement may reflect social ranking of some sort.

Levels

Differences in the founding levels of various buildings in the different strata were noted. In Stratum C-2, Wall 8467 in Building CY in the northeastern corner of the area was founded at 85.00 m, while the southwesternmost wall (1470) was founded at 85.57 m. The westernmost wall (1563 in Square R/4) was founded at 85.61 m and the easternmost wall (8467 in Square C/6), at 85.00 m. In Stratum C-1b, the foundations of all the buildings, except the apiary and Building CZ, ranged between 85.90 m in the northeastern corner of the area to 86.50 m in the southwestern corner, over a distance of 39 m. In Stratum C-1a, there was a 1.0 m difference between the foundation level of the northeastern wall (8424; 86.10 m) as opposed to the southwestern wall (1431; 87.10 m), and a 1.6 m difference between the westernmost wall (1413; 87.60 m) and the easternmost wall (10490; 86.00 m) along Squares S–Z, A–C/2. The difference in level of almost 1.7 m between Buildings CG, CH, CM and the apiary was a deliberate choice, as discussed in detail above.

A tilt from west to east/southeast was defined in all strata at Tel Rehov, and may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures.

Construction and Building Features

Double Walls

In many cases, adjacent buildings had their own outer walls, even when they were attached to one another, so that back-to-back double walls were created, with total thickness reaching 1.0–1.1 m. This feature can be seen in many of the units in all three strata, although the buildings in the southeastern block, CQ3, CX, CP and CL, had shared walls of regular width (0.5 m), perhaps reflecting their construction as one integral unit for social or functional reasons. The existence of an individual outer wall for each house, even in cases of attached buildings, may have had practical, as well as symbolic social meaning. Practically, it may represent building phases, indicating that each building was constructed independently, perhaps at a somewhat different time, and then, an adjacent unit was added. Double walls added to the strength of the buildings and their resistivity to earthquakes, as well as facilitating the construction of a second story. Faust (2012: 39–117) noted the rarity of double walls in Israelite domestic architecture and the social significance of this feature: individual walls for each house that create double walls together appear mainly in houses of elite families. This may be the case at Tel Rehov as well, where double walls were much more common than in any other known Iron Age II city

Building Techniques

All the Iron Age IIA buildings were constructed exclusively of bricks, with no stone foundations. This is an unusual feature in the Land of Israel, where most brick walls were laid on stone socles. At Tel Rehov itself, stone socles for brick walls were common in Late Bronze IIB and Iron Age I, and the lack of such foundations in Iron IIA is an unusual feature that remains unexplained.

Most of the bricks were made of brown, gray or yellow clay. In Stratum C-3, all of the walls were constructed with distinct gray bricks of friable consistency, laid with a light-colored mortar between them and covered with a plaster of the same composition as the mortar. In the walls of Strata C-1b and C-1a, a wider variety of bricks was used; in most cases, they were made of light gray-brown clay, and more rarely, of a dark brown soil taken from the nearby colluvium. See Tables 12.27–12.30 for details of brick sizes and materials in most of the walls. The size deviations are small, indicating a great deal of standardization in the size and manufacturing technique, if not the composition, of the bricks.

In some cases, mud plaster was preserved on walls, some 0.02–0.03 m thick and sometimes nicely smoothed. Whitish plaster of higher quality than the mud plaster was used only in the entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP, where the plaster was molded to a rounded profile.

Wood Foundations

The use of wood for wall and floor foundations at Tel Rehov is a unique feature. This is a novelty of Stratum C-1b, but there is one such case in Stratum C-2 (Building CU) and isolated cases in Stratum C-1a (e.g., Building CQ3). A similar construction technique was found in two buildings of Stratum B-5 in Area B, as well as in a building in Area G, attributed to Stratum G-1b. Hence, this technique appears to have been utilized contemporaneously in various buildings throughout the city. The purpose of this wood construction is as yet to be clarified. One possible explanation is that it was intended to stabilize the buildings in the event of earthquakes. This might have been the outcome of what we surmise was the cause of the destruction of Stratum C-2, namely, seismic activity. This function of the wood is illustrated mainly by the way circular beams (their charred remains usually no more than .05–0.1 m in diameter) were often laid at intervals of 0.1–0.2 m, perpendicular to the brick wall, below its lowest brick course. In several cases (i.e., Wall 1438), two or more layers of such beams were found. In this way, the wood could serve as a ‘shock absorber’. Prof. David Yankelevsky, head of the National Building Research Institute in the Technion, Haifa, who visited the site, compared this building technique to modern engineering, when steel cylinders are laid below the foundations of massive structures where the danger of damage by earthquakes is at high risk, such as in nuclear plants. This explanation, if accepted, would point to a technological innovation intended to protect structures against the hazards of earthquakes in a location so close to the Syro-African fault, where the threat of such activity was more acute than anywhere else in the country.

Floors

In most cases, floors were composed of beaten earth or clay. In Stratum C-1b, wooden branches and beams were incorporated into the foundation of some floors; these were usually arranged rather haphazardly below the earth floor. The wood itself was embedded into a matrix of soft red clay that was often similar to, or served as, the floor makeup itself. Stone floors were found only in Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, and perhaps Building CJ, all in Stratum C-1a. In a few places, floors incorporated pebbly gravel, such as in the western part of C-1a Building CX, or in the open space in Stratum C-1a Building CW. In Building CP, as well as in two rooms in Building CY of Stratum C-2, a brick construction was found under the red clay floors in a few rooms, while in other rooms, a mud-plaster foundation was laid under these floors.

The distinct composition of the floor of the Stratum C-1b apiary should be mentioned. It was composed of three different matrices, each apparently serving a different purpose, particularly the very hard thick white tufa floor surrounding the hives, most likely meant to be a permeable surface to protect against spillage or to possibly fend off rodents and insects.

Wooden Posts

The use of wooden posts on unworked stone bases was a rare feature that was found only in Building CX of Stratum C-1a, where there was a line of five post-holes above stone bases, and in the Stratum C-2 level under Building CZ.

Various Installations

Benches

Benches built of bricks or terre pisé were found in several instances in Stratum C-1 buildings. In Building CF of Stratum C-1a, they were found along almost all the walls of the three western chambers. In Building CW of Strata C-1a–b, they were located along the walls of the western rooms. Benches ran along some of the walls of the inner rooms of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as in Buildings CX and CP, where benches were located along the walls of four of the rooms. The benches could be used for sitting, but their main purpose was probably placement of items. A number of vessels were found on Benches 10466 and 10467 in Building CP, including a very large cooking pot. A pottery altar and bowl were found on Bench 10454 in this building.

Silos, Bins and Other Installations

Several storage installations made of packed-clay walls or bricks were found. In Building CP of Stratum C-1a, a corner of Room 9450 was enclosed by two narrow walls, creating a bin (9434) which contained an intact Hippo jar full of grain, as well as other finds. Other storage installations were Silo 7514 in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and plastered Pit 11456 in Building CZ of Stratum C-1b. An exceptional feature was the two rectangular pottery bins, made without a base and standing on their narrow side against the southern wall of Building CP. These bins, found with grain, have no parallels elsewhere.

The installation occupying the western part of the northern room of Building CQ3 in Stratum C-1a (10505) is unusual in its size and shape, although its function could not be determined; it seems that it had some industrial role. Yet another installation with a hard plaster surface was found against the southern wall of the southwestern room in this building, but it was too damaged to determine its function. Other installations include a mud-plastered semi-circle (11452) attached to the wall inside the western entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP in Stratum C-1a, and a brick with a depression on top inside the entrance to Room 2489 in Building CE in Stratum C-1b (2477); both were possibly used as stands for vessels, perhaps for drinking, positioned just inside the entrance to the rooms.

Ovens

Twenty-two ovens were excavated in Area C. Such ovens (tannur, often denoted ‘tabun’) were found in many houses, as well as in open areas. The ovens were always circular, 0.4–0.6 m in diameter; in most cases, only the lower part was preserved. Ovens were constructed with a clay wall ca. 4–5 cm thick, that was, in many cases, coated with pottery sherds on the outside. The most outstanding example is Oven 7428 in Building CU of Stratum C-2, which was completely preserved from base to rim, with an opening at the bottom and an incised mark on its exterior (Fig. 12.13). It was 0.56 m in diameter at its base, 0.56 m tall, with a 0.3 m-wide opening at its top and a small opening at its bottom, used for inserting fuel. It was coated on the outside by large sherds of restorable pottery vessels, a feature found in other ovens, but not as well preserved as this one (Mazar 2011). Ovens were also found in Stratum C-2 Building CY and in the rooms north of Building CA (Stratum C-2) and Building CD (Stratum C-1b), as well as in Buildings CF, CJ, and CP of Stratum C-1a. In several of these cases, the spaces where the ovens were found could have been unroofed areas (e.g., Buildings CY and CU), although this could not be determined with certainty. In certain cases, the location of the oven was quite certainly inside a roofed space (e.g., Building CF). An open space containing a succession of ovens throughout all the Iron IIA strata was found in Square T/4. The lack of ovens in certain buildings should be noted, in particular, Stratum C-1a Buildings CX, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3. It is assumed that residents of these houses shared ovens located in open spaces, or that they belonged to a specific social organization in which people cooked and ate together, for example, in Building CP, where the evidence points to communal meals.

Stones

In several cases, flat stones were located on the floor or on benches along and close to walls. The latter was the case in Building CY of Stratum C-2, where 13 such stones were found along the walls, and in its successor, Building CW of Stratum C-1a, where eight such stones were found in the western rooms, placed on top of the benches lining the walls. It is difficult to explain them as a constructional feature; perhaps they were used as solid bases for objects such as water or oil jars, leather containers, etc.

Another feature was isolated cases of hard mizi stones of considerable size inside buildings. Examples include the very large stone found in Building CB of Stratum C-2, two large stones found in Building CF (one in the large hall in the eastern wing in Stratum C-1b and the second in the entrance corridor in Stratum C-1a, possibly used as a butcher block), a stone in the southern part of Building CM in Stratum C-1b and stones in Buildings CQ2 and CX of Stratum C-1a. Notable also is a large smoothed-top limestone placed at an angle to the east of the oven in the large northern room of Building CP in Stratum C-1a. Such stones could have served as working surfaces in places where a hard surface was needed. They are outstanding in light of the relatively rare use of stones in Iron Age IIA contexts at the site.

Grinding Tools and Installations

Slab-shaped lower grinding stones, loaf-shaped upper grinding stones, hammerstones, pestles, and mortars were numerous in Area C (see Chapter 43). A notable feature in Stratum C-1a were grinding installations of two basic types. The first comprised a large lower grinding stone enclosed by a low hard-clay rounded parapet; the slab is tilted towards a low area on the edge into which the ground flour could be collected; loaf-shaped upper grinding stones were found in association with it. Two very well-preserved installations of this type were found in Building CF and less well-preserved examples in Buildings CE, CQ1, and CQ2. The second type of grinding installation comprised a similar large lower grinding stone set at a slight angle and directed to a hard clay round receptacle, which was most likely meant to contain the ground flour. In Building CX, where two such installations were found, the better-preserved example had a narrow brick bordering the grinding stone on one side and built against the wall on the other. Upper grinding stones were found in association with the lower stone. In Building CP, very large lower and upper grinding stones were found in the destruction debris, 0.8 m above the floor of Room 11451, most probably fallen from the roof or an upper story of the building. Likewise, a very large stone with a small depression in its top that was smoothed from use, and might have been used as a mortar, was found just under topsoil and above the thick destruction debris in this room, suggesting that it, too, originally had been positioned on the roof or upper story.

Looms

Numerous loom weights, mostly made of stone and less so, of clay, were found in concentrations in most of the Stratum C-1a buildings; many of these contained dozens of loom weights each. Remains of charred wood in proximity to such caches, such as in Buildings CP, CR, CX, CF and CE, indicate the presence of one or two looms in the houses. See details and discussion in Chapter 39.

Notes

  1. The word ‘beam’ refers to a worked piece of wood, often squared, used as a support in construction. In the present chapter, we use it to denote the wood that was commonly found in the wall and floor foundations, mainly in Stratum C-1b, although in many cases, these were tree trunks and branches that did not seem to have been worked.

  2. Locus 2466 was related to Stratum C-2, although its absolute levels corresponded with Locus 2487 in Square S/2, which was related to Stratum C-3. This is because the C-2 walls in Square T/2 continued down, while in Square S/2, the C-3 walls began at this level.

  3. The phenomenon of cut walls was also seen in Stratum C-1b Wall 1464 in Square S/4 and Stratum C-2 Wall 2481 in Square T/3.

  4. An additional two Hippo jars were found in Locus 11425, but were not restored or drawn.

  5. The photos showing the early phase of Building CP appear together with those of its later phase in Stratum C-1a, when the entire building was exposed.

  6. At the time of writing, this bin was not restored.

Partial Collection of Plans and Sections

Plans

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.44 - Plan of Building CH and apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.48 - Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52a - Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52b - Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52c - Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Sections

  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.57 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.58 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.59 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.60 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.61 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.70 - Section 16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.72 - Section 18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.75 - Section 21 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.76 - Section 22 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.78 - Section 24 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.81 - Section 27 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.82 - Section 28 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Chapter 15 - Area D: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1           Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2           Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1           Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2           Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Discussions
Chapter 15A - Introduction

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 15.1 - Area D at the end of 1997 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.2 - Area D at the end of 1998 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.3 - Area D at the end of 2000 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4 - Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5 - Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Discussion

Area D was a step trench dug in the northern part of the western slope of the lower mound, from the bottom of the tell to the uppermost level (Fig. 15.2). The area was excavated during seven seasons (1997–1998, 2000, 2005, 2007–2008, 2010). In 1997 and 1998, the area was excavated as a 4.0 m wide trench extending westwards from the northwestern square of Area C (R/4) and running five squares (25 m) down the slope (Squares Q/4–L/4) (Photos 15.1–15.2). In 2000 and 2005, the trench was extended by one square to the north (L–Q/5), while only minor probes were conducted in the original trench (Photos 15.3–15.4). Starting from 2005, Area D was divided into two sub-areas: the upper (eastern) portion of the slope (Squares P– Q/4–5) was excavated as Area D1 and the lower (western) portion (Squares L–N/4–5) as Area D2. These terms are not retained in this chapter and are replaced by Area D East (the upper part of the trench) and Area D West (the lower part of the trench) respectively. Both areas were excavated in 2005, 2007 and 2008 (Photo 15.5), while in the 2010 season, and for a few days in April 2011 (Squares N/4–5), work was carried out only in Area D West (Photo 15.6). The actual width of the excavated step trench was 9.0 m (Fig. 15.1). In addition to the manual excavation, two backhoe trenches were excavated from the base of the mound westwards, towards the present agricultural field, intended to reveal geological features and geomorphological processes at the base of the mound. In the first three seasons (1997, 1998, 2000) Area D was supervised by Amir Sumaka'i Fink, together with Yoav Schur in 1997–1998. In 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2011), Area D East was supervised by Yael Rotem and Area D West by Uri Davidovich.

The present chapter is divided between the two parts of the area: the western (lower) part and eastern (higher) part.

The goal of the excavation of Area D was to study the occupation history, stratigraphic sequence, formation processes and potential fortification lines in the lower mound. Based on results of previous surveys (see Chapter 3) and the shape of the steep, homogeneous western and northern slopes of the lower mound, it was assumed that this formation was created by an earthen rampart, possibly constructed during the Middle Bronze Age. However, excavation has unequivocally shown that the lower mound was first settled in Late Bronze I, a phenomenon which is almost unparalleled at other sites in the Southern Levant.

Continuous occupation was detected in Area D from Late Bronze I to Iron IIA, a time span of some 600 years. The excavation concentrated on defining the various strata and occupation phases and their architectural remains, as well as the nature of the transition between them. Eleven main strata and several sub-phases were defined along the slope, with an accumulation reaching 11.45 m (between levels 76.45 m and 87.90 m) (Fig. 15.2). No fortifications were found along the entire step trench and no major destruction events were identified between the strata. The correlation between Strata D-2 and D-1 to the stratigraphy in nearby Area C was a key to anchoring the local stratigraphy of Area D in relation to the rest of the tell, although the issue of the precise correlation between the Iron IB strata in Area D and those in Area C remains unresolved and is further discussed below in this chapter. Table 15.1 presents the stratigraphic sequence and suggested correlation to strata in Area C, as well as periodization and approximate dates of the various strata.1
Footnotes

1 The terminology in this chapter follows Mazar 1990: 30 and NEAEHL: 1529. The period Iron IA (first half of the 12th century BCE) is called Late Bronze III by several scholars in recent years. See discussion in Chapter 4 and by Mazar in TBS III: 23–24.

Site Formation Processes

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

The initial understanding of the formation processes of the site assumed that Tel Rehov in general, and the lower mound in particular, developed on a natural spur which protruded slightly above the level of the surrounding fields. This assumption was presumably corroborated later by the results of the geoseismic survey, which showed that both parts of the mound were built on an elevated, eastward-tilted tufa block (Zilberman et al. 2002; Chapter 2, this volume). It was also assumed that the level of the field to the west of the mound remained fairly unchanged during the time span that elapsed from the first settlement in the lower mound to the present day. The low natural hill inferred from the geoseismic survey (Zilberman et al. 2002) was not found during the excavation. In fact, the excavation in Area D has shown that the lower mound was built of successive, almost horizontal strata which show almost no terracing, beginning at a level even lower than that of the current field.

Evidence gathered both by excavation at the base of Area D (see below) and during the geoseismic survey indicates that a geological fault, probably of a stepped structure, borders the mound on the west (Chapter 2 and Zilberman et al. 2004). Young tectonic activity along this fault, which postdates at least the earlier strata of the lower mound, is indicated by the missing western portion of the monumental building of Stratum D-10 (see below), as gravitational erosion cannot account for this observation. This tectonic activity has created, together with the continuous occupation of the site east of the fault line, a clear demarcation between the mound and the down-faulted block to its west, a process which possibly enhanced post-depositional erosion on the western slope of the mound. It is hypothesized, based on the plans of most strata (e.g., the buildings of Strata D-5 and D-4), that the scale of erosion (i.e., the missing portions of most strata) is no greater than a few meters. Thus, it seems untenable to assume that fortification systems could have been entirely eroded. Combined with the evidence gathered in Areas C and E, it is concluded that the lower mound was probably never fortified.

The young tectonic activities, both in the aforementioned fault and in other faults surrounding the mound (Zilberman et al. 2004; Chapter 2, this volume), could also have caused the tilting of layers and structures towards the southeast (towards the center of the mound) that was noted in both Areas D and C. This post-depositional tilting could have occurred during the occupational sequence, either close in time to the creation of the tilted features, or much later (see Chapter 3 and below, discussion of Strata D-11 and D-10).

Based on a backhoe trench excavated in the present-day field west of the mound, it is clear that the down-faulted block is covered with at least 4.3 m of dark brown colluvium which accumulated in the last 1000–1500 years, as indicated by the appearance of worn Roman-Byzantine or later sherds which must have originated in the Late Antiquity settlement of Rehob, located ca. 700 m to the northwest of Area D (Vitto 1993). The top level of the present field is ca. 2.0 m higher than the bedrock of the uplifted tufa block, as was exposed at the base of the excavation in Area D (Fig. 15.17b, and further below).

Chapter 15B - Area D West, Strata D-11 TO D-6:Late Bronze to Iron IA

Geo-Archaeological Investigations at the Base of Area D

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Sections: Fig. 15.17a–b
Discussion

Apart from studying the earliest part of the stratigraphic sequence of the lower mound, the excavations at the base of Area D had two additional goals: to clarify the outline of the natural topography, whether bedrock or virgin soil, which predated the first human activity in this area, and to explore the relationship between the formation processes of the lower mound in its initial phases and of the nearby plain located to the west of the mound. These investigations were carried out in three deep manually excavated probes and in two narrow backhoe trenches, all located at the lowermost part of the step trench.

Three probes were dug in order to explore the constructional fill of Stratum D-10 and occupation layers of Stratum D-11 (Fig. 15.3):

  • Probe I, located at the northwestern corner of Square L/4 (excavated in 1998, 1.0×2.0 m)
  • Probe II, located at the southwestern corner of Square M/4 (excavated in 2008 and 2010, ca. 1.0×2.5 m)
  • Probe III, located at the southern part of Square M/5 and northern part of Square M/4 (excavated in 2010, ca. 9.0 sq m).


A 17 m-long backhoe trench, 0.7 m wide and up to 4.0 m deep, was first dug in 1998 in Squares K–L/5 (4.0 m long) and was extended and deepened during the 2005 and 2008 seasons, along the line of Squares J–M/5 (Fig. 15.3, lower part of Fig. 15.17a). The purpose of this trench was to examine the depth and extent of the 2.0 m-deep artificial fill of Stratum D-10 (which, at the time, was thought to be a natural phenomenon), as well as to uncover geological features related to the edge of the mound and its relation to the colluvial field to the west. During the 2008 season, another short trench (1.0 m wide, 2.5 m long, 4.3 m deep) was dug in this field (Squares H–G/5) (Fig. 15.17a). Although done with a backhoe, the work was closely supervised, with pottery collected and assigned to the various layers. Yet, most of this trench contained either topsoil wash (Squares J–K/5) or a deep fill devoid of finds (Squares L–M/5).

Bedrock, reached at the bottom of Probes I and III, as well as in the backhoe trench (Squares L– M/4–5) (Figs. 15.3, 15.17a, 15.18a), is composed of chunky yellowish tufa, belonging most probably to the Beth-Shean formation of the Late Pleistocene, at the margins of the tilted, uplifted block detected in the geoseismic survey (Chapter 2 and Zilberman et al. 2002). The tufa bedrock forms a roughly horizontal surface, detected at level 76.15 m in Squares K–M/5 in the backhoe trench, at 76.30 m at the bottom of Probe I, and at 75.95 m at the bottom of Probe III. In the western portion of the backhoe trench, at the eastern side of Square J/5, a natural fault was observed in the tufa bedrock. The fault, 1.3 m high, separates an eastern uplifted block from a down-faulted area to its west, where bedrock forms a horizontal surface at level 74.85 m (Figs. 15.17a–b). This fault may constitute only one branch of a wider, stepped fault, since the continuation of the long backhoe trench, dug in the field ca. 8.0 m to the west of the aforementioned fault, was excavated to level 73.85 m without reaching bedrock (Fig. 15.17a). This level is lower by ca. 1.0 m compared to the bedrock level of the down-faulted block detected in the long trench, thus implying a step-like fault zone west of the mound, which is probably part of the fault bordering Tel Rehov on the west, detected during the geoseismic survey (Chapter 2). Regarding the possibility of young tectonic activity along this fault line and its implications for the formation of the lower mound, see discussion above and further below.

The field which lies to the west of the lower mound, intensively cultivated in the last decades, gradually slopes from the west (near today’s Road 90) to the east, towards its lowest part just at the foot of the mound, where a north–south dirt road currently runs. The present level of the field at the base of Area D is 78.50 m, ca. 2.3 m above the uplifted tufa bedrock surface described above. As already mentioned, the short backhoe trench that was dug in the field ca. 8.0 m west of the aforementioned fault (Fig. 15.17a; Photo 15.7), descended from the surface of the field to level 73.85 m (4.3 m deep) without reaching bedrock.

The first anthropogenic activity in Squares K– L/4–5 seems to have taken place immediately above bedrock. Considering that the uplifted tufa bedrock had been exposed above ground when the first occupants arrived, the field would have been at least 2.0 m below its present level. However, due to the possibility of young tectonic activities, discussed above, the actual level of the field could have been much lower with regard to the initial occupation.

Stratum D-11

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.3 - Plan of Stratum D-11b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.4 - Plan of Stratum D-11a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13 - Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.3–15.4
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17–15.20
  • Photos 15.6, 15.8–15.13
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.1–16.3
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-11 is known only from the three probes (I–III) in Squares L–M/4–5, where a 1.0 m-thick deposit of occupation debris and architectural elements (walls, installations, fireplaces and floor patches) was found above bedrock and below the tufa fill that was ascribed to Stratum D-10. Two phases were determined here, termed D-11b and D-11a.

Stratum D-11b

Stratum D-11b was the earliest occupation phase detected in Area D (Fig. 15.3). In Probe I (Square L/4, 1.0×2.0 m), the lowest levels excavated (76.47–76.95 m, Locus 2839) may belong to this phase. In Probe II (Square M/4, 1.0×ca. 1.3 m; Photo 15.12), Locus 9931, in the western half of the probe, consisted of a 0.6 m-deep accumulation of dark brown earth containing meager finds, at levels 76.41–77.00 m. A few consolidated tufa chunks in the center of the probe (unnumbered) might have formed part of a wall or installation.

A narrow east–west brick wall (1927) was found at the bottom of Probe III (Squares M/4–5) (Figs. 15.3, 15.18a; Photo 15.9). It was 3.3 m long, 0.4 m wide and preserved to 0.4 m; its gritty compacted yellowish-brown bricks were barely distinguishable from the surrounding accumulation. No mortar lines were discernible between the bricks and thus, the building technique might have been packed clay. Its foundation was probably detected at level 76.28 m, ca. 0.35 m above bedrock at this point.

The area north of Wall 1927 was not excavated, while the area south of the wall, excavated only ca. 0.2 m down, seems to have constituted an open area. The floor here was apparently represented by discontinuous patches of a thin whitish layer (1921) at levels 76.55–76.60 m. Two small fire installations or hearths were related to this layer at a distance of ca. 1.3 m apart (Photo 15.9). The western one (1925) was circular, ca. 0.55 m in diameter, while the eastern one (1926) was elliptical, 0.35×0.6 m. Both were built of limestone pebbles around the circumference with fragments of broken basalt grinding stones in the center and were somewhat concave. Some stones were clearly burnt, while others showed signs of soot and thus, they are explained as fireplaces. Above Floor 1921 and the fireplaces/hearths was an accumulation of very decayed brown brick debris that contained only a few bones and sherds.

Stratum D-11a

Immediately above the remains of Stratum D-11b and sealed below the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10, an upper building phase was detected in Probes II and III, designated Stratum D-11a (Figs. 15.4, 15.18a–b). It consisted of brick walls (1923, 1929, 1930), creating at least two units (1913, 9917), which were partly excavated.

In Probe III, part of an open space was excavated (1913; Photo 15.10), bordered on the north by Wall 1923 and extending throughout the probe; on the south, it may have been limited by Wall 1929 (exposed in Probe II). Wall 1923 was oriented slightly northeast–southwest and was made mainly of pinkish clayey bricks, resembling some of those used in Walls 1929 and 1930 in Probe II. It was preserved unevenly to a maximum height of four courses (76.65–77.04 m; Photo 15.11). This open space, at least 3.5×4.0 m, had a whitish beaten-earth floor (1913) which covered the aforementioned components of Stratum D-11b.

Three features were related to Floor 1913. The first was a section of a stone wall (1915) located in the southeastern corner of the probe, above a Stratum D-11b fireplace/hearth (1926) (Photo 15.10). It was oriented slightly northwest–southeast and ended abruptly on the north, ca. 1.2 m north of the southern edge of the probe. The wall was built of one course of small- and medium-sized limestone and tufa cobbles, in addition to a few basalt grinding stones in secondary use. It seems to have functioned as some kind of low partition in an open area. The second feature was a circular hearth (1924) made of densely arranged, small burnt limestone pebbles; only its eastern half was inside the probe boundaries, above Wall 1927 of Stratum D-11b. This hearth was 0.9 m in diameter, larger and flatter than the hearths of Stratum D-11b (above), but seems to have served a similar function as an open fireplace, possibly for baking or cooking. The third element was an amorphic heap of ash and charcoal (1919), ca. 1.0 m in diameter, found slightly to the north of Wall 1915 (Photo 15.10). This ash may have been related to a fireplace like 1924, perhaps located beyond the borders of the probe to the east. The hearths of Strata D-11b and D-11a recall three circular hearths with pebble floors found in an open area of Stratum R-4 (late MB II) at Tel Beth-Shean, although the latter were larger (TBS II: 54–59, Fig. 3.6; Photos 3.6, 3.8).

The accumulation above Floor 1913 comprised a 0.2–0.3 m-thick deposit of compacted gritty brown earth, mixed with some decayed bricks and gray ashy patches. Above it, Locus 1907 constituted another layer of debris which was entirely sealed by the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10 and penetrated by the foundations of the massive walls of the D-10 building above it. Locus 1907 (Photo 15.11) was characterized by dark brown, moderately compacted layered sediments with patches of burning (indicated by burnt bones) concentrated in the northern and western portions of the probe, and gritty brown soil with some large bones in the eastern and southern portions. A similar layer was observed in Probe I (2839).

In Probe II (Square M/4; Fig. 15.18b), the southern and eastern faces of two brick walls (1929 and 1930 respectively) were uncovered just below Walls 2886 and 2890 of Stratum D-10. Both walls were comprised of two types of bricks, namely clayey whitish-pink and brown silty bricks, which were clearly distinguishable from the gray bricks of the Stratum D-10 walls. Both walls seem to have been slightly embedded into the Stratum D-11b accumulation of Locus 9931, although no foundation trenches were noted. The walls were preserved to a height of five to six courses (up to 0.6 m, 76.71–77.30 m). The courses of Wall 1929 sloped slightly to the east. The width of these walls was unknown, since the northern face of Wall 1929 was not found below the northern face of Wall 2886 of Stratum D-10, as it was probably narrower than the latter.

Wall 1929 was abutted by a patch of a floor, built of large and medium-sized flat stones of limestone and basalt, found in the eastern half of Probe II, at the bottom of the ca. 0.15 m-thick accumulation of brown earth (9917) (Photo 15.12). The stones were covered with a 0.03 m-thick layer of soft pinkish matrix, suspected as being the actual floor level. While the stones ended abruptly along a clear line in the middle of the probe, the pinkish layer continued westwards to abut the eastern face of Wall 1930. Both elements extended eastwards and southwards beyond the borders of the probe and covered D-11b Locus 9931. A broken cooking pot (Fig. 16.2:8) was found in the northeastern corner of the probe, immediately above the floor, which was otherwise almost devoid of finds.

The material remains deriving from the few contexts associated with Stratum D-11 were limited and fragmentary. The pottery presented in Figs. 16.1–16.3 resembles that from Strata R-2 and R-1b at Tel Beth-Shean and should be dated to LB I and the LB I–II transition

Trench in Squares K–M/5

The 0.7 m-wide trench dug in the northern edge of Squares K–M/5 was intended to answer the question whether the thick tufa fill below the floor of Stratum D-10 was a natural or anthropogenic feature (see below). Earlier work in Probe I raised the hypothesis that the tufa layer was created in a water body (pond or small lake), above deposition of dark earth within a paludal environment (a marsh) (Mazar 1999: 11; see also Rozenbaum 2009 for the high frequency of such environments in the BethShean Valley during the Holocene). The backhoe trench described above, which preceded the manual excavation of Probes II–III, revealed anthropogenic layers below the thick tufa fill of D10 (2814). This was an accumulation of layered, finely sorted silts and clays of alternating gray and brown, totaling ca. 1.0 m in thickness (7923, 9910, 9911, 9913; Fig. 15.17b). No architectural elements were noted in these layers and no sub-phases were observed. This area may have been part of a large open space. The finds included sherds, bones, flints, oven fragments, a broken bronze earring and an almost complete ceramic plaque figurine (Chapter 33; Fig. 33.1).

Stratum D-10

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.5 - Plan of Stratum D-10 constructional fills from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.6 - Plan of Stratum D-10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4 - Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5 - Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13 - Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.14 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.15 - Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.16 - Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.18 - Squares L–M/4 at end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.19 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.20 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.21 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.22 - Square M/5, Buttress 8938 and Wall 8942 abutted by D-10 Courtyard 8934 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27 - Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.5–15.6
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17–15.20
  • Photos 15.4–15.6, 15.8–15.16, 15.18–15.27, 15.37–15.38
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.4–16.8
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-10 constituted the earliest architectural phase detected on a relatively large scale in Area D, consisting of a large brick building (DA), apparently of public nature, erected simultaneously with the placement of massive constructional fills which elevated the ground level by some 2.0 m compared with the top level of the accumulation associated with Stratum D-11. The building and its related fills were exposed over an area of ca. 125 sq m in Squares L–M/4–5 and in the western half of Squares N/4–5. The building extended beyond the excavation area to the north, east and south, while the western part is probably missing due to young tectonic activity along the fault line, discussed above. Based on the associated ceramic assemblage and other finds, Stratum D-10 was dated to the LB IIA (14th century BCE).

Building DA

Introduction

The exposed portion of Building DA was composed of three integrated walls (8942, 2886, 2890), each 1.1 m wide and constructed of rectangular bricks which varied in dimensions, hardness, color, and manner of placement. These massive well-built walls were preserved 2.2–2.5 m high (16–18 courses). Their foundations were slightly embedded in the upper part of the Stratum D-11 accumulation or laid directly on top of earlier walls (as was the case of Walls 2886 and 2890, which were built on top of Walls 1929 and 1930 respectively). Three buttresses were constructed along Walls 2886 and 8942, facing the open space to their west (Photos 15.8, 15.10, 15.14–15.15, 15.18, 15.21– 15.24). Two of them, 1902 and 2889, protruded northwards from Wall 2886; in fact, 1902 continued the line of Wall 2890, which continued southwards beyond the excavated area. A third buttress (8938) projected westwards from Wall 8942 opposite Buttress 9929 (see further discussion of 9929 below). All the buttresses shared the exact same dimensions, protruding 0.85 m from the wall face and measuring 1.1 m in width, equal to the width of the walls. They were rather evenly spaced: Buttress 8938 was located 2.25 m to the north of the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942, while Buttress 2889 was located 2.4 m to the west of the aforementioned corner. Buttress 1902 was located 2.7 m farther to the west from 2889. It should be emphasized that the buttresses were bonded with the walls and thus, both elements were erected simultaneously. An additional possible buttress was 1903 (Square L/4), although it can also be regarded as the western end of Wall 2886. It was identical in dimensions to the other three buttresses and appears to have had a similar function. Nevertheless, it can be argued that 1903 may have functioned as a pier flanking an entrance, the parallel pier of which is to be found further to the west. As such a parallel pier was not found in Square L/4, this hypothesis can be maintained only if assuming an entrance of at least 3.0 m wide. The first option — viewing 1903 as a fourth buttress — is thus preferable (but see below). Two architectural elements were located east of Wall 8942. The first was Buttress 9929, which adjoined the eastern face of Wall 8942 immediately opposite Buttress 8938, and had exactly the same dimensions as the other buttresses. The second, 2.2 m to its south, was the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 (unnumbered), which protruded ca. 1.05 from the eastern line of Wall 8942. It seems likely that this feature was not a buttress, but rather, a pier flanking a doorway within the building, the opposite pier of which lies beyond the excavated area. A narrow wall (1937) extending to the south of this pier is the only inner partition wall uncovered within the building.

Courtyard 8934 and Its Constructional Fill

The area bounded by Walls 2886 and 8942 on the south and east respectively was an open courtyard, covering at least 6.0×8.0 m and extending to the north and west beyond the limits of the excavation. Immediately after the erection of the wall system, the area of the courtyard was covered with a ca. 2.0 m-deep constructional fill (2814) made of two distinct layers of tufa (2814a and 2814b), each ca. 1.0 m thick (Figs. 15.5, 15.17–15.19a; Photos 15.8, 15.10–15.11, 15.13–15.14). This fill was excavated manually in Probes I (1.0×2.0 m) and III (ca. 9.0 sq m), as well as in a shallower probe west of Buttresses 1902 and 1903 in Square L/4 (ca. 4.0 sq m).2 In addition, this fill was uncovered in the long backhoe trench, where it extended ca. 12 m to the west of Wall 8942, before being eroded and replaced with deposits associated with the nearby field (Fig. 15.17a–b). The erosion line was found 3.0 m east of the geological fault described above, and it is probable that the western part of the courtyard disappeared due to young tectonic activity along this fault.

The lower layer of the massive tufa fill (2814b, levels 77.30/77.15–78.25/78.10 m) comprised compacted, homogeneous clayey yellowish tufa. At the bottom of this layer, a ca. 0.2 m-thick deposit of less-compacted chunky tufa was found; the latter also filled an elongated depression within the upper part of Stratum D-11, observed in Probe III (above). The upper tufa layer (2814a, levels 78.10–79.20 m) had a very loose and crumbly matrix and consisted of unsorted tufa chunks that included angular, subangular and sub-rounded cobbles and pebbles, granules, sands and silts. The light tan color of this matrix was lighter than the lower tufa layer. In the lower portion of 2814a, moist brown brick material appeared in isolated chunks (levels 78.10–78.40 m) and included sherds, bones, oven fragments, and one complete bowl (Fig. 16.4:11), found in Probe I. Such remains were virtually non-existent in the other portions of the thick fill, which contained only a few isolated sherds. The contact between the two layers was abrupt and virtually horizontal (Photo 15.11).

When first encountered, before the relation to the surrounding walls was established, it was suggested that this thick tufa deposition, or at least the compacted lower layer, was the result of natural sedimentation within a water body (Mazar 1999: 11; 2008: 2014). It was suspected that Building DA, then assigned to Stratum D-9, was built on top of the tufa deposit. However, in the 2008 season, it became clear that the tufa layers abutted the wall system from the west for the entire 2.0 m height of the fill. No separation whatsoever existed between the tufa layers and the brick walls and buttresses and the latter do not show any signs of erosion related to water. Thus, it is now clear that the tufa layers constituted an artificial fill, intended probably to support the foundations of the building, as well as to raise the ground level.3

In order to study the extent of the tufa fill, a short backhoe trench was opened, ca. 25 m to the north of Area D, at the foot of the mound in Square M/10 (Photo 15.17). This trench (0.7×3.0 m) was excavated in 1998 and examined again in 2010. It revealed a massive deposition of tufa, at least 3.6 m deep, yet its bottom was not reached. This layer was devoid of finds. It remains unclear whether this deposition was a continuation of the same artificial tufa fill found in Stratum D-10 in Area D and if so, whether it also indicates continuation of the complex of Building DA to that line. If indeed it was related to the same building, then the tufa fill, and perhaps the courtyard which it supported, was at least 29 m long from north to south, creating an immense constructional feature. The total area of the fill could thus have reached a minimum of ca. 700 sq m and, assuming a thickness of 2.0 m on the average, the minimal total volume would be 1400 m3. Such a major construction project seems to have necessarily involved some kind of a central administration, adding to the notion of the building’s public nature based on its architectural traits.

The tufa fill most probably served as a raised platform for a wide open courtyard in the interior part of the building. This option would have necessitated the construction of additional walls to the west and north of the exposed segment of the building, beyond the excavated area, which would provide the boundaries for the tufa fill. A thin beaten-earth floor was laid on top of the fill (79.10– 79.20 m; Fig. 15.6; Photos 15.22–15.25). This floor was uncovered in an area of ca. 40 sq m, north of Wall 2886 and west of Wall 8942. It was excavated as Locus 8934 in Square M/5, where it was characterized by soft gray-brown soil mixed with ash patches (0.05–0.1 m), covered by a debris layer, ca. 0.3 m thick (the locus number refers to both the occupation-debris layer and the floor). The remains of this floor were evident mainly near the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942 (Photo 15.27) and north of Buttress 2889. In the eastern part of Square L/5, the floor (7917) was located at level 79.15 m, yet, here, the layers above the floor were somewhat disturbed by erosion and porcupine burrows.

The occupation layer (8934) was covered by two higher layers (8940 and 8930), creating a total accumulation of 0.55–0.7 m between the floor of Stratum D-10 and that of D-9b. The layers above 8934 were characterized by compact brick debris and discontinuous layers of tufa (0.1–0.2 m thick). The central-western part of the area was severely damaged by porcupine burrowing. The brick fragments, which constituted the main volume of the accumulation, were mostly of friable gray and brown material and resembled the bricks used in the surrounding walls and buttresses. A fairly large amount of pottery, including some restorable kraters, was found in these loci, especially in the lower levels (Figs. 16.5–16.6). Most of this pottery was not found in primary deposition, but were fragments distributed throughout the different loci (i.e., at different levels) that turned out to be parts of the same vessels. One almost complete spouted krater (Fig. 16.5:2) was found in situ immediately on top of the tufa layer in Locus 7917. This accumulation was eroded at the base of the mound, west of the line of Buttresses 1902 and 1903. The brick debris should be regarded as collapse related to Building DA. In this respect, it remains unclear whether a human or natural agent initiated the collapse of the building.

In the upper part of the aforementioned accumulation (8930), an exceptional scarab was found. It was defined by Arlette David as a funerary scarab bearing the name of a high Egyptian official — “Scribe of (the) house of (the) overseer of (the) Treasury, Amenemhat repeating life” (Chapter 30B). The 18th Dynasty date of this scarab accords with its stratigraphic context. This scarab may allude to the importance of Building DA, from which it most probably originated.
Footnotes

2 Note that the locus number 2814 refers to the same fill in all three probes.

3 One more argument may be raised against the ‘pond hypothesis’. The possible time span for the deposition of the tufa can be no longer than 100 years, when comparing the pottery assemblages from below and above it, and not 200–300 years as previously assumed (see Mazar 1999: 11; Zilberman et al. 2004: 19). This time span is too short for the deposition of 2.0 m-thick tufa sediments or even of the lower layer alone (compare the 1m/1000 years sedimentation rate for the Beth-Shean tufa given in Zilberman et al. 2004: 27).

The Southern and Eastern Wings of Building DA

The area south of Wall 2886, designated 8939, was bordered by Wall 2890 on the west and by a narrow partition wall (1937) on the east. The latter differed considerably from all other D-10 walls: it was 0.55 m thick, built of a western row of dark gray bricks laid on their narrow side and an eastern row of mixed bricks laid as stretchers. The wall was traced ca. 1.7 m southwards of Wall 2886, below Wall 1904 and Oven 9918 of Stratum D-9b. Only the uppermost courses of the wall were excavated. Space 8939, which was 7.2 long and at least 3.0 m wide, was excavated over most of the area down to the floor level at 79.10 m, except in Probe II (Square M/4), where the deep foundations of Walls 2886 and 2890 were exposed (Fig. 15.18b). The foundation levels of both walls were abutted by a thick sequence of gray sediments (9905, 9914), which were composed of various matrices of brick material, containing very few sherds and other finds (Photos 15.19–15.20). The total thickness of these sediments, which sealed the Stratum D-11 accumulation of 9917, reached 1.74 m near Wall 2886. The top level of Locus 9905 sloped down from north to south (79.04 m to 78.66 m near the southern section), perhaps due to young tectonic activity (Photos 15.12, 15.19). The layers in Loci 9914 and 9905 may be explained as a constructional fill, intended to elevate the level of Building DA, resembling in function the tufa fill (2814) north of Wall 2886, although composed of different material.

Locus 9905 was topped by a 0.65 m-thick series of sloping layers, excavated as Loci 8941 and 8939. Both loci comprised soft light-colored striations, each 0.01–0.1 m thick, separated by thin dark-colored layers, the most prominent of which was a dark ashy layer which denoted the bottom of Locus 8939 (Photo 15.20). All layers sloped to the south, in accordance with the sloping top level of Locus 9905 (Photo 15.19). The thick beige layer at the bottom of Locus 8941, immediately above the thick fill of Loci 9905 and 9914, was possibly a floor level related to Building DA. Both loci contained a relatively small amount of sherds. This sequence of striations was topped by a Stratum D-9b floor (8919).

Most of the area east of Wall 8942 (Squares N/4–5) remained unexcavated to the depths of Stratum D-10, apart from the top of a few architectural elements, as noted above. In the area east of Walls 8942 and 1937, layers of brown soil mixed with a few brick fragments, semi-complete bricks and concentrations of charred material were excavated; in Square N/5, this layer (1936) was excavated down to level 78.40 m, about 0.9 m below Floor 9925 of Stratum D-9b and the top of D-10 Wall 8942, and no floor surface was detected. In Square N/4, only the top of this layer was exposed (1933).

Summary of Building DA

Building DA, with its massive sub-floor fills, wide walls, deep foundations and elaborate arrangement of buttresses, must have been a public structure of some sort, whether a palace or an administrative building. It appears that the excavated remains constituted just a small part of a much larger LB IIA building, which extended in all directions, whose nature and size remain mostly unknown.

The buttresses probably served both as decorative elements and as constructional supports for the building, which might have had several storys. Parallels for similar buttresses, albeit in stone and with different dimensions, can be seen in several other cases in the second millennium BCE Levant. At Megiddo, a line of buttresses appear on the southern (inner) side of the city wall of Stratum XI of the Middle Bronze Age II (Loud 1948: Fig. 379) and on the northern (outer) side of Strata VIIB– VIIA Palace 2041 of the 13th–12th centuries BCE, where there are eight such buttresses (Loud 1948: Fig. 383). In the northeastern corridor (2160) in Square J8 that leads to the palace of Stratum VIIB, the alignment of buttresses recalls our Buttresses 1902 and 1903. At Ugarit, similar buttresses appeared at several locations: four along the outer side of the northern wall of the main palace, facing a street, four along the eastern and southern walls of Courtyard V, and one along the eastern wall of the same courtyard, facing the outside of the palace (Yon 2006: 37, Fig. 20). At Alalakh, three buttresses (ca. 2.0 m wide each) appeared along the southern wall of the “Fort” of Levels IV to IIB of the Late Bronze II (late 15th–13th centuries BCE; Woolley 1955: 166 Fig. 59; Sumakaºi-Fink 2010: 8–10, 77). These parallels support the interpretation of the building remains of Stratum D-10 as belonging to a much larger public building of some sort.

There is no clear evidence for a sudden or violent destruction of this building, although very little of its interior was excavated. It is possible that the building went out of use due to deterioration, damage by earthquakes or other natural causes. It is also possible that the building was abandoned as part of socio-political changes in the city during the transition between the 14th and 13th centuries BCE.

Stratum D-9

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.7 - Plan of Stratum D-9b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.8 - Plan of Stratum D-9a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27 - Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29 - Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31 - Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.32 - Squares N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.33 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.34 - Detail of bronze-melting canal (8921) with fragments of bellow, charcoal, and metal object in situ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.35 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.36 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.39 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42 - Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.43 - Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.44 - Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.7–15.8
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17, 15.18b, 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.23–15.44
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.9–16.15
Discussions
Stratigraphy of Strata D-9 and D-8: Methodological Issues

Following the apparent abandonment of the monumental Building DA of Stratum D-10, the area underwent a major change, albeit with some continuation in architectural orientation. Strata D-9b and D-9a, together with Stratum D-8, form a complex and dense stratigraphic sequence, in which different lines of development can be traced in each excavated unit. The remains were excavated mainly in four squares (M–N/4–5), as well as in the southeastern part of Square L/4 (Stratum D-9b only). The sequence was dated to the Late Bronze IIB (13th century BCE) based on the associated finds.

Several obstacles hinder a clear reconstruction of the stratigraphy of Strata D-9 and D-8. The major problem is related to the identification of floor levels. All the floors, except one (2855, made of stones), were beaten-earth layers which were especially difficult to trace. These layered accumulations consisted of relatively thin striations, making it difficult to differentiate floors from other types of layered accumulation, e.g., phytolith layers or striations deposited in times of abandonment due to winter rains. Another problem was that the suspected floors did not clearly relate to architectural elements (walls and installations) due to the fact that, in most cases, only one or two courses of the stone foundations were preserved and their brick superstructure was almost entirely eroded away. In fact, the superstructure was preserved only in the southernmost end of Wall 8943 (Square N/4, Stratum D-9b) and in Wall 8932 (Squares N/4–5, Strata D-9a–D-8). It is assumed that the original floor levels abutted the brick superstructure, yet the possibility that certain floors abutted the stone foundations is also plausible. Another complication was the ancient robbing of parts of stone-built elements (e.g., the eastern part of Stratum D-9a Floor 2855), which prevented the possibility of linking some of the elements to each other. Finally, as in the previous stratum, some of the floor levels and wall foundations were severely tilted to the south and east, possibly due to young tectonic activity.

In each of the four relevant squares (M–N/4–5), a slightly different stratigraphic sequence was observed within the general sequence of Strata D-9–8. For example, in Square M/4, four floor levels were clearly detected in relation to these strata: 8919 — beaten-earth floor, D-9b; 2855 — stone floor, D-9a; 2825 — plaster floor slightly above 2855, D-9a; 2824 — D-8. Square M/5 contained only two such floors: 7951 (D-9a–b) and 7944 (D-8), and, possibly, a higher floor, 7938 (D-8').

With these caveats in mind, we present the data related to Strata D-9 and D-8 within the framework of the simplest stratigraphic scheme possible. Nevertheless, other interpretations are possible in places; some will be mentioned below.

Stratum D-9b: Building DB

Introduction

In Stratum D-9b, a new building complex (Building DB) was erected on the ruins of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Fig. 15.7). The building was composed of two adjacent units, separated by a long north–south wall (8943). The eastern unit was partially divided into two sub-units (9927, 9925), while the western unit was probably a spacious courtyard which was divided into an open area in the north (7951) and a roofed area in the south (8919).

The Eastern Units — 9925 and 9927

Two units, either rooms or courtyards, were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31). The eastern and northern walls were not found, probably located beyond the borders of the excavated area. Wall 8943 crossed the excavated area on a slightly northwest to southeast line and was mostly preserved only at the stone-foundation level. The northern part of Wall 8943 was built above Wall 8942 of Stratum D-10 and its stones were embedded into the latter, as if using the earlier massive brick wall as a stabilizer. On the southernmost end, the lowermost course of the brick superstructure of Wall 8943 was preserved, made of one row of bricks laid as headers. The stone foundation, preserved one to two courses high, was made of two rows of medium-sized limestone and basalt stones, with some small stones to fill the gaps. Some parts of the foundation, mainly in the southern portion, were missing, probably due to ancient robbing.

Two walls, 1904 and 9923, cornered with Wall 8943 on the east; both were preserved only as high as their stone foundation. Wall 1904 had only one clear row of stones, while its southern row was mostly beyond the excavated area and its eastern part was damaged by Pit 8916 of Stratum D-7b. Wall 1904 probably served as the southern boundary of the unit. Wall 9923 was a 3.2 m-long wall segment which partially divided the eastern unit into two sub-units. It sloped considerably to the east, with a difference of up to 0.4 m in elevation of the lower level over its length. Like other tilted features in this area, this possibly resulted from young tectonic activity. The wall ended abruptly on the east, without a clear edge, and with a slight protrusion to the south, the nature of which remained unclear. Perhaps there was an opening here connecting the two spaces, 9925 and 9927, to the north and south of the wall. Space 9925 was at least 3.0 m long, continuing to the north beyond the excavation area, while Space 9927 in the south was 4.5 m long. Both sub-units were at least 3.5 m wide, as their eastern boundary was beyond the excavated area.

The beaten-earth floor (9925) in the northern space was characterized by a 0.1–0.2 m-thick accumulation of slanted, deformed striations of alternating gray and brown layers, which sloped to the north and east (levels ca. 79.20–79.30 m), and was clearly recognized only in the southwestern portion of this space. The bricks in the top level of Stratum D-10 Buttress 9929 were shaved down and integrated into the floor. On top of the latter, and close to Wall 9923, was a circular oven (9924), measuring 0.7 m in diameter and built of a 0.02–0.03 m thick coating of red clay which was not as solidly baked as in similar installations. It was partially bordered on the north and west by small and medium-sized stones. The oven was filled with whitish ashy powder and soft reddish burnt earth; gray ashy material was spread over part of the floor around it. Its foundations were slightly tilted to the east, in accordance with Floor 9925 and Wall 9923. This northern space may have been an open courtyard.

The floor of the southern space (9927) consisted of a sequence of thin earthen layers, sloping from west (levels 79.41–79.56 m) to east (levels 79.20–79.45 m), containing a large amount of ash and associated with several features. As in the northern unit, Floor 9927 made use of the top of earlier brick walls (the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 and Wall 1937) as part of the floor; no clear floor could be discerned in the northern part of this space (9920). An oven (9918) in the southwestern corner of this space was similar to Oven 9924 in the northern space. The oven was 0.85 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.3 m; its foundations were supported by small pebbles and its wall was made of baked reddish clay covered on the outside by layers of large sherds (Photo 15.32). At its base, remains of up to four different discontinuous layers of baked clay mantles were visible, a possible indication of earlier phases of the oven that were built at the same spot. A small circular plastered basin (1905), 0.24 m in diameter and made of 0.02 m thick whitish lime plaster, was embedded in Floor 9927, 0.55 m to the northeast of the oven. Two similar installations (2883, 8936) were found in the western part of Building DB, in relation to a metallurgical workshop described below. A third feature, a small pit (1934) lined with small burnt limestone pebbles, was found in the southeastern corner, just north of Wall 1904. This peculiar installation, found full of charcoal, in addition to sherds of a cooking pot, clearly related to cooking activities. A fourth feature associated with Floor 9927 was a small pit (1935), ca. 0.7–0.8 m in diameter, which only slightly protruded from the eastern balk southeast of the edge of Wall 9923. This southern space could have been an unroofed courtyard, although it is possible that it had been roofed, providing that there was a closing wall to the east of the excavated area. It seems clear that both these spaces served as working areas, associated, among other things, with food preparation.

The Western Courtyard 7951 and Metallurgical Activity

In the western part of Building DB was a large courtyard, 0.7 m above that of Stratum D-10 Building DA. As no openings connecting the eastern unit with this courtyard were identified, the linkage between them is only tentative; the opening might have been north of the limit of the excavated area. The courtyard (7951, 8919) was excavated in an area of 8.0×9.0 m, between Wall 8943 and the erosion line to the west. Its northern boundary was beyond the excavated area, while its southern limit was Wall 2816 and a line of pillar bases to its east. South of this wall and pillar bases there was an additional space (8919), ca. 2.5 m wide and at least 9.0 m long, bounded on the south by Wall 1906 that protruded along the southern section of Squares M– N/4.

Floor 7951, the northern and main part of the courtyard, contained several installations, notably, one used for the recycling of copper/bronze objects. This was a generally horizontal floor (average 79.85 m), sometimes hard to define (especially in the south), composed of layered brown soil alternating with patches of compacted brick debris. The floor was laid on top of the brick debris related to Building DA of Stratum D-10. In the northeastern corner of the courtyard, near Wall 8943, it seems that the floor was somewhat sunken or had been laid at a lower level (8930; 79.64 m). The western portion of the floor was severely damaged by porcupine burrows (7933).

The main feature associated with Floor 7951 was an elongated installation (8921) used for the melting of copper-based objects (Photos 15.33– 15.34). The installation comprised a long (2.5 m), narrow (0.15–0.25 m) and shallow (0.1–0.15 m) canal, oriented north–south, that was built of the same matrix as the beaten-earth floor, showing that both elements were created simultaneously. The shallow canal was filled with charred wood pieces and contained a large number of copper/bronze prills and a few bronze objects ready to be remelted. In addition, a complete tuyère and fragments of other tuyères and crucibles were found in the canal and next to it. More prills were found scattered on the floor around the installation (Chapter 40C).

Several other installations were related to Floor 7951, although their function and possible connection to the metal industry remained unclear. To the west of the northern tip of Canal 8921, a rounded flat stone, 0.45 m in diameter, was embedded in Floor 7951, surrounded by a circle of small pebbles (Photo 15.35). This installation (8925), which did not contain any finds, could have served as a working platform of some sort, possibly for crushing. To the south of the southern tip of 8921, a concentration of heavily burnt bones was found, with a small pit, 0.25 m in diameter, cutting into the burnt-bone pile. A limestone slab, found broken into two pieces to the south of Installation 8921 possibly functioned as another working platform. Three small plastered basins (2883, 8936 and an unnumbered one south of Installation 8921) were found in the courtyard; these are similar to 1905 in Floor 9927, described above. One of them (8936) was embedded in the lower-level part of the floor in the north and surrounded at the base by small stones (Photo 15.36). In the northwestern corner of the excavated area, a row of two bricks oriented slightly northwest–southeast protruding from the northern section were denoted Wall 7916; they possibly served as a local partition within the large open area.

Area 8919

This area, to the south of Courtyard 7951, was separated from it by two different features, both located on top of the earlier Stratum D-10 architecture. In the western part (Squares L–M/4), Walls 2816 and 2892 appeared to be an attempt to rebuild Wall 2886 and Buttresses 1902 and 1903 (Photos 15.23, 15.25–15.26, 15.37). Wall 2816, preserved along 4.3 m and one course high, was constructed of small- and medium-sized tufa stones. It was built directly on top of Wall 2886 and Buttress 1903 in its eastern part and on top of the tufa fill 2814 in its western part, where it continued westwards beyond the limits of the erosion line. It seems that when the D-9b walls were built, the architectural elements of Stratum D-10 were shaved to a relatively low level (79.05–79.10 m), essentially to that of the thick tufa fill (2814). Wall 2816 was abutted by 2892, made of larger tufa stones, which was built over Buttress 1902 of Stratum D-10. Although these two features constituted an attempt to rebuild part of Building DA of Stratum D-10, their peculiar construction, and the fact that Wall 2816 extended further to the west, indicated changes compared with the original plan of the building in D-10. Wall 2816 must have supported a brick superstructure. The reason for it being lower by 0.8–0.9 m than the line of pillar bases to its east (8935, see below) was perhaps due to the way this part of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Wall 2886, Buttresses 1902, 1903) was destroyed; these elements were possibly damaged more than the eastern part, so that the builders of Stratum D-9b found a depression or step in the ruined wall which they used as foundations for their new construction.

The continuation of the line of Wall 2816 to the east was comprised of six limestone and basalt stones (8935) with relatively flat tops, placed on top of the ruined Wall 2886 of Stratum D-10, which was preserved here at a much higher level compared to the western part (79.80–79.94 m; Photo 15.40). One of these six stones was found somewhat to the south of the main line, but it perhaps was moved in antiquity from its original location. Apparently, these six stones functioned as a line of pillar bases. They were clearly related to the stone floor (2855) of Stratum D-9a, as they ran along the line of its edge. However, they might have originated already in Stratum D-9b, since the stones were placed directly on top of Stratum D-10 Wall 2886. Thus, both Wall 2816 and pillar bases 8935 could be part of a partition, separating Courtyard 7951 from Area 8919 to its south.

Area 8919 was bounded on the north by Wall 2816 and pillar bases 8935, on the east by Wall 8943, and on the south by Wall 1906, while its western limit remained unknown. The southern wall (1906), a continuation to the west of Wall 1904, is known only from a small section of its northern face (Photo 15.38). It was composed of two courses of stone foundation and one to two courses of brick superstructure. Thus, Area 8919 was about 2.3 m wide and at least 9.0 m long. The floor (8919) sloped down considerably towards the southern section, in accordance with the layers of Stratum D-10 and the other tilted layers in Area D, as explained above (Fig. 15.18b). This part of the floor was characterized by a thick build-up of thin soft whitish-pink striations (Photo 15.26). Below the southeastern corner of the floor, near the corner of Walls 8943 and 1906, was a foundation deposit composed of a lamp (Fig. 16.14:30) covered with a broken basalt bowl (Photo 15.39). This deposit was the earliest of its kind found in Area D (several similar deposits were uncovered in later strata, see below). The occupation debris above Floor 8919 contained partly restorable pottery and large animal bones, as well as a large fragment of a crucible filled with traces of melted copper, indicating its contemporaneity with the melting activity in Courtyard 7951.

Stratum D-9a

In Stratum D-9a, Building DB was replaced by new architectural features which partially preserved the outline of previous elements, although the overall plan and nature of this stratum was fairly different (Fig. 15.8). It seems that the builders of Stratum D9a were very familiar with the previous stratum and utilized earlier constructions. They may even have been partly responsible for the dismantling and removal of the brick superstructure of the Stratum D-9b walls, as no brick debris was found in the deserted units of the latter. Stratum D-9a was a kind of transitional phase in the process of deterioration in this area, from the elaborate architecture of Stratum D-10, through the less substantial Stratum D-9b building, to the large open area of the following Stratum D-8.

The main new feature was Wall 8932 and the pillar bases (1912) that continued its line to the north, crossing the eastern part of the excavated area from north to south (Photos 15.29–15.30). Wall 8932 was built of two rows of a stone foundation laid in two courses, on top of which was a brick superstructure made of compacted off-white bricks, preserved to a maximum height of seven courses (ca. 1.0 m) (Photo 15.41). The wall, preserved to 4.5 m, abruptly ended on both edges. While its southern end might have been cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916, its northern end was planned and the continuation of the wall line to the north was in the form of a line of three wooden pillars laid on medium-sized basalt stones with flat tops (1912). The holes formed by the pillars were clearly preserved in a layer of brick debris (1914); they were filled with loose brown sediment, which most probably penetrated into the holes created when the wood decayed, thus preserving their negative within the layer of brick debris (Photos 15.29– 15.30). The southern pillar base was, in fact, an in situ stone of Stratum D-9b Wall 9923 which was no longer in use and after its brick superstructure had been dismantled. In the northern section of Square N/5, a single brick located on line with the pillar bases could have been the beginning of a wall that continued Wall 8932. Wall 8932 and pillar bases 1912 partly damaged and partly superimposed Stratum D-9b Floors 9927 and 9925 respectively.

In Squares N/4–5, east of Walls 8932 and 1912, only a narrow space could be excavated, containing a thick sequence of brown debris layers. Thin whitish patches might represent a floor level at approximately 79.60–79.70 m (1910, 1917); these were associated with three large flat stones found immediately east of Wall 8932 (Photos 15.29– 15.30).

West of Wall 8932/1912, an elongated, probably roofed space, was created. It was bordered on the west by a row of three large stones which most probably served as pillar bases, erected immediately on top of the stone foundation of Wall 8943, after its brick superstructure was deliberately dismantled. The supposedly wooden pillars were freestanding and evenly spaced at intervals of 2.8 m. The floor of this space (9912 in Square N/5 and 9901 in Square N/4; level 79.85 m) was a thin, patchy, soft brown earth layer. On the northern portion of the floor (9912), an intact storage jar (Fig. 16.13:4) was found leaning against the brick material (1914) related to pillar bases 1912. The floor of this space covered the thin layer of debris (9915, 9916, 9921) which rested on Floors 9925 and 9927 of Stratum D-9b.

Flimsy architectural elements were found on both ends of Floor 9912/9901. A small section of a wall or other stone construction (9922) ran along the central part of the southern section of Square N/4, above D-9b Wall 1904. This feature was built of two rows of medium-sized stones arranged in two courses; its relation to other elements could not be established. Its eastern end was cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916.

In the northwestern edge of Square N/5, another flimsy stone construction was defined as Wall 1916. It comprised two rows of medium-sized stones preserved to one course. While on the east it ended abruptly, on the west it might have been connected to a possible north–south wall (1918), of which only a few stones projected from the northern section. However, these elements might have been remains of a stone floor, similar to Floor 2855, described below. To the north of the stones of 1916 was a beaten-earth floor (1911) with the meager remains of an oven (1920) protruding from the northern section, surrounded by ash deposits. The gap between 1916 and Wall 1912 might have served as a passage to 1911 from 9912, yet all these remains at the northern edge of Square N/5 were very scanty and not well understood.

In Square M/4, a major change was noted, where Stratum D-9b Floor 8919 was replaced with a fine floor (2855) made of flat stones, with a polished sheen from use (Photos 15.26, 15.42–15.43). The floor was very well preserved from the erosion line on the west to a distance of 4.1 m, and isolated patches of it continued further to the east, totaling 5.6 m. The floor continued beyond the excavation area to the south; on the north, it was bounded by the row of six large stones (8935), probably a row of pillar bases, described above as possibly having been first built in Stratum D-9b. Floor 2855 was laid above a layer of debris which leveled this south-sloping area, so that it sloped only slightly to the southeast (Photo 15.44). On top of the stones of the floor was a layer of beaten earth (2825), which might represent a somewhat later phase of activity still within Stratum D-9a. The possibility that Wall 2816 (west of 8935 in Square L/4) of Stratum D-9b continued to be in use in this stratum cannot be ruled out.

In Square M/5, where the metal workshop existed in Stratum D-9b (Floor 7951), no clear floor level related to Stratum D-9a was found. On top of Floor 7951 was a 0.2–0.3 m-thick layer containing a large amount of small to medium fieldstones. Although the stones do not seem to create any clear pattern, they might be the remains of yet another stone floor, similar to Floor 2855, or a disturbed western continuation of Walls 1916 and 1918, located in the northwest corner of Square N/5. Alternatively, this can be defined as debris that accumulated on top of Floor 7951 after its abandonment. It was sealed by Floor 7944, which was assigned to Stratum D-8. Thus, it seems that two options regarding Square M/5 during Stratum D-9a may be considered: either Floor 7951 and its related installations continued to be in use, or it was abandoned and gave way to an open area of unclear nature.

The pottery and finds from Strata D-9a–b (Figs. 16.9–16.15) point to a date in LB IIB (13th century BCE).

Stratum D-8

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.9–15.11
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17b, 15.19–15.21
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.16–16.23
Discussion

In Stratum D-8, a large open area covered with a thick white beaten-earth floor replaced the halfopen spaces of Stratum D-9a, while the main wall line of the latter (8932 and row of pillar bases 1912) continued to be in use. The function of this spacious courtyard was hard to define, as only its eastern border was found within the excavated area and it was totally devoid of installations.

The white floor (2824 in Square M/4, 7944 in M/5, 8933 in N/4 and 9909 in N/5) extended over an area of ca. 70 sq. m and was cut by the erosion line in the west. The floor sloped in various directions at levels between 80.06 m–80.27 m, the former only 0.2–0.4 m above the floors that were attributed to Stratum D-9a, described above. It also covered the two rows of pillar bases of the previous stratum, as well as Wall 9922 in the southern part of Square N/4. The floor abutted Wall 8932 and perhaps also the wooden pillars that had stood on the stone bases 1912 (although the bases were now ca. 0.7 m lower than the new floor). The southeastern corner of the floor was cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916. A large complete krater (Fig. 16.18:4) was found leaning against Wall 8932 and a complete Mycenaean IIB stirrup jar (Fig. 16.22:5) was found on Floor 7944 (Square M/5). It should be noted that while the floor was clearly observed in most parts, the northern and northeastern portion of it, near the pillar bases (1912) and the northern section of Squares M–N/5, was harder to discern, possibly as the floor there was thinner or less well preserved.

In the narrow strip excavated east of Wall 8932 and pillar bases 1912, was a ca. 0.5 m-thick layer (1908, 1909) comprised mostly of brown layered sediments that might have been floors, with bones and sherds (Figs. 16.16–16.17, 16.19–16.22). An almost-complete small jug (Fig. 16.21:1) was found on top of a rather continuous thin whitish layer which might represent a floor level (79.73– 79.84 m).

The ceramic assemblage of Stratum D-8 that included several Mycenaean and Cypriot imports is typical of LB IIB and should be dated to the 13th century BCE.

Stratum D-8'

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

The Stratum D-8 floor to the west of Wall 8932 was covered with a 0.3–0.4 m-thick layer of brick debris, containing compacted whitish brick fragments, which most probably originated from Wall 8932. In Square M/5, this debris layer was superimposed by a 0.01–0.02 m-thick pinkish clay layer (7938; Figs. 15.10, 15.17), which was covered by a thick (0.05–0.1 m) layer of dark gray ash. This layer sloped from west (80.40 m) to east (80.26 m); it extended into the northern section of the square, but faded away in its southern part, as well as in Square N/5 (9908; Fig. 15.10). On 7938 was a 0.15–0.2 m-thick accumulation, rich in sherds and animal bones, which may be explained as some kind of a localized ephemeral activity, post-dating Stratum D-8 and pre-dating Stratum D-7b; this phase was denoted D-8'. No evidence for this activity was found in Squares M–N/4.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 (Figs. 16.16–16.22), and is dated to LB IIB.

Layer between Strata D-8 and D-7b (Post D-8)

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

Covering the brick debris and walls related to Stratum D-8, a 0.35–0.6 m-thick layered accumulation was found all over the excavated area (2826 in Square M/4, 7915 and 7937 in M/5, 8927 and 8929 in N/4, 9904 in N/5) (Fig. 15.11). It was characterized by a soft brown layered matrix containing a few brick fragments, very rich in charred material (charcoal and grain), as well as sherds, bones, and fine plaster fragments of unknown origin. The layering of this accumulation was more pronounced in the eastern part, where the layers sloped down into the eastern section of Squares N/4–5. Several thin layers consisted of grayish material, possibly the remains of ash or decayed organics.

No architectural elements were noted in association with this thick accumulation. It clearly sealed the remains of Stratum D-8 and was superimposed by Stratum D-7b elements, most of which were pits dug into the aforementioned accumulation (see below). Therefore, it seems to belong to a post-D-8 and pre-D-7 phase. Nevertheless, it is difficult to suggest any clear explanation for such a thick accumulation, unless a gap in occupation enabled natural forces of sedimentation to operate undisrupted for an unknown time span. Another option is that this layer was a constructional fill related to the building of Stratum D-7b. Although no substantial architecture was found in the latter, the small size of the excavated area does not allow us to reach secure conclusions, and this option remains viable.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 in Figs. 16.16–16.23.

Stratum D-7

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.12 - Plan of Stratum D-7b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.13 - Plan of Stratum D-7a (encircled numbers denote foundation deposits as listed in the text) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.14 - Plan of Stratum D-7a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42 - Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45 - Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46- Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47- Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49- Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a- Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b- Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.12–15.14
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17b, 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.40–15.42,15.45–15.57
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.24–16.33
Discussions

Stratum D-7 comprised two main and one local stratigraphic phases, denoted D-7b, D-7a and D-7a'.
Stratum D-7b

Stratum D-7b signifies the first occupation phase related to the Iron Age IA in Area D (Fig. 15.12). It comprised a few installations and pits related to floor patches spread over the four excavated squares (M–N/4–5), without any walls or other architectural elements. The relatively thin accumulation associated with this stratum was quickly replaced by a new building phase (Stratum D-7a), to which much more substantial remains were assigned. Thus, it seems that Stratum D-7b constituted a rather ephemeral occupation that will not necessarily be found in other parts of the site. See Photo 15.45 for a general view of the area and accumulation in the section up to Stratum D-7a.

Floor segments and installations related to Stratum D-7b were found mainly in Squares M/5 and N/4. In the former, above the accumulation of the post-D-8 layer (7915, 7937), was a compacted thin yellowish layer, probably a beaten-earth floor made of local clays or tufa, 0.02–0.03 m thick, and covered by a thin layer of ash (7903). Both layers were clearly visible in the northern two-thirds of the square, but faded to the east and south. Like the earlier layers in Strata D-9 and D-8, this floor sloped slightly from west to east (levels 81.05 m and 80.95 m respectively). The thin ash layer was superimposed by a layer containing a large concentration of small pebbles, which served as the basis for the Stratum D-7a Floor 7902 above. The thin accumulation below the pebbles (7903, 9903) contained partly restorable pottery and a large amount of bones. The ash layer of 7903 was clearly sealed by Wall 7906 of Stratum D-7a.

Two installations were associated with Floor 7903. One was an oven (7924) found in the northeastern part of the locus. Only its base and a few supporting stones around it were preserved, probably due to its deliberate dismantling by the founders of Stratum D-7a, who placed the red-clay fragments of the oven walls in its center and covered them with pebbles, as part of the foundation of Floor 7902. A lamp-and-bowl deposit associated with the construction of the latter floor and Wall 7906 in Stratum D-7a was placed immediately beside the dismantled oven (Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14); see further below.

A second installation (7919) was composed of a small segment of a stone pavement (1.0×1.2 m), slightly sloping from west to east (81.02–81.19 m) towards a large sunken intact bowl (Fig. 16.26:2; Photo 15.47). The pavement was made of limestones and basalt stones, including a grinding stone fragment in secondary use, as well as broken pottery. Another grinding stone fragment and a few sherds lined the eastern part of the bowl’s rim. This installation must have had something to do with liquid processing, but no specific function could be defined.

Floor 7903 continued into Square N/5 as Floor 9903, which was patchy and disappeared in the eastern part of the square, where relatively deep foundations of the Stratum D-7a architecture damaged it.

In Square N/4, a thick beaten-earth floor (8914) and three pits (8916, 8926, 9932) were attributed to this phase. Floor 8914 was composed of 0.05–0.15 m-thick striations of alternating colors (81.07– 81.15 m), including one whitish layer observed in the southeast portion of the square (Photo 15.48). The floor and the 0.1–0.2 m-thick accumulation on it were almost devoid of finds.

Three pits were dug from Floor 8914 into earlier deposits. Pit 8926, dug into the debris of Locus 8929 (Fig. 15.11), was elliptical (0.7×0.9 m), ca. 0.7 m deep (80.44–81.07 m). It was unlined and filled with loose brown debris and a few stones. A small collection of objects was found in this pit, including a group of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapter 39). A second pit (8916) was found in the southeastern corner of the square and extended into the southern and eastern sections. This large deep rounded pit (0.9 m in diameter) cut through Strata D-8 and D-9 to a total depth of ca. 1.6 m (79.39–81.02 m). It was filled with a layered accumulation of various colors and matrices, including ashes, and contained a large quantity of tiny charred fragments. Few sherds (Fig. 16.33:14– 16) and objects were retrieved from this pit. Attached to the upper part of the pit on the north was another small pit (9932) in the eastern section of the square, ca. 0.6 m in diameter and 0.3 m deep (80.65–80.94 m), and full of ash. No clear remains related to Stratum D-7b were found in Square M/4, perhaps due to erosion.

The features attributed to Stratum D-7b point to a relatively meager occupation of short duration, with no significant architecture. It might be suggested that the post Stratum D-8 fills described above should be merged with Stratum D-7b features, the fills being a levelling operation for the construction of Stratum D-7b floors and installations. This issue is related to the definition of Stratum D-7b as either the last phase of LB IIB or the earliest phase of Iron IA, a question further discussed in Chapters 4 and 23.

Stratum D-7a

Introduction

In an excavated area of ca. 80 sq m, three units built of brick walls with stone foundations were found, denoted Building DC, although their attribution to a single building remains uncertain (Fig. 15.13). All brick superstructures except one (2842) were built of one row of gritty yellowish bricks laid as headers, with thin (0.02 m) gray mortar between them. This type of brick, which had similar dimensions in most walls (0.58×0.36×0.12 m), was unique to Stratum D-7a. The brick superstructure rested on top of a one-course stone foundation which was made of two rows of stones with a gap between them, filled with gray-brown debris. The stone foundations were slightly wider than the brick superstructure, measuring 0.75 m as opposed to the 0.6 m-wide brick wall, and thus, they protruded on both faces. The stones were mediumsized basalt and limestone and included occasional basalt grinding stone fragments in secondary use. Floors were found to abut the top level of the stone foundation or the lower courses of the brick superstructure.

The three units of Building DC were not completely excavated: the northern (7902, 9906) and southwestern (2871) units were cut by the erosion line in the west, while the southeastern unit (8907) extended beyond the excavated area to the east and south. As a whole, Building DC might also have extended to the north, as indicated by the opening in Wall 7906. Although not completely exposed, it seems that the nature of the three units excavated can be defined. The spacious northern rectangular unit probably served as an open courtyard, its eastern portion (9906) separated from its main western part (7902) by a row of pillar bases (9907) to enable its roofing. The southeastern unit (8907) contained several installations in close proximity to one another and appears to have been some kind of a working area, probably roofed. The southwestern room (2871) was roofed, although its exact function could not be determined. It is assumed that all units belonged to the same building, although no clear entrance was found connecting Room 2871 with the other components; such an opening might have been located to the west, beyond the line of erosion.

Building DC was built partly into and on top of the remains of Stratum D-7b. At some places, mainly below the southwestern and northeastern units, no elements or floor levels related to the previous stratum were found, possibly due to their removal by the Stratum D-7a builders. In Square M/5, the floor of Stratum D-7a (7902) was just 0.1 m above that of Stratum D-7b (7903), while in Square N/4, a 0.3 m-thick accumulation separated the two strata. Thus, the floors of the different units of Stratum D-7a were on somewhat different levels. Although a relatively large domestic area, Stratum D-7a did not yield rich assemblages of occupation remains, probably due to the fact that the structures were not destroyed abruptly, but were gradually abandoned. Some minor changes, concentrated in the northeastern part of the excavated area, have led us to designate a local phase (D-7a') that followed the initial construction (see Fig. 15.14 and below). The artifactual assemblages are broadly dated to the first half of the 12th century BCE.

A prominent feature of Stratum D-7a was the multiplicity of foundation deposits that were placed in foundations of walls and floors. The six deposits (marked as Nos. 1–6 in the text below and in Fig. 15.13) are of the lamp-and-bowl type; in two cases, the lamp was inside a bowl and covered by another bowl and in four cases, one lamp was located inside a bowl. Discussion of this phenomenon appears in the summary of this chapter. Following is a list of the deposits.
  1. Fig. 16.24:1–3: Reg. No. 18548, Locus 1856, south of Wall 4856; two bowls, one lamp.
  2. Fig. 16.24:4–6: Reg. No. 18698, Locus 1856, found near the western end of Wall 1818, below a large stone; two bowls, one lamp.
  3. Fig. 16.24:7–8: Reg. No. 79389, Wall 1818, attached to the northern side of the eastern part of the wall (Square N/4); one bowl, one lamp.
  4. Fig. 16.24:9–10: Reg. No. 79307, embedded into Stratum D-7b Locus 7903, near the western end of Wall 7906 (Square M/5); one bowl, one lamp.
  5. Fig. 16.24:11–12: Reg. No. 19048, attached to Wall 7906, east of entrance in Square N/5; one bowl, one lamp.
  6. Fig. 16.24:13–14: Reg. No. 79198, embedded into Stratum D-7b Locus 7903, related to the construction of Wall 7906, south of its central side; one bowl, one lamp.

The Northern Unit

This unit was bounded by Wall 7906 to the north and Walls 4856 and 8917 to the south (Fig. 15.13). The western boundary was eroded, while the eastern one was beyond the excavation area.

Wall 7906 was oriented slightly southwest– northeast, preserved along 8.0 m. A 0.75 m-wide opening in this wall led northwards, beyond the excavated area. The wall ended on the west with the erosion line (Photo 15.49). It was preserved to a height of four–five brick courses (81.62 m at the western end, 81.37–81.45 m at the eastern end) above a foundation made of medium-sized stones laid at the western part above Stratum D-7b Locus 7903 at levels 80.95–81.01 m. The foundation of the eastern part was less carefully built of somewhat smaller stones. The opening had a beaten-earth threshold (ca. 81.10 m), covered by a 0.1–0.15 m-thick accumulation of gray material of unclear nature.

Three lamp-and-bowl foundation deposits were associated with Wall 7906, each comprised of one lamp and one bowl, the latter usually placed above the former. The westernmost deposit (No. 4, Fig. 16.24:9–10) was found below the northern row of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 where the brick superstructure was missing due to erosion (Fig. 15.13). The second deposit (No. 6, Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14) was found immediately to the south of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 in the eastern portion of Square M/5. This deposit was placed when Oven 7924 of Stratum D-7b was already dismantled, as it was found leaning against its red-clay wall (see above). It is possible that this foundation deposit had shifted slightly from its original position, as the lamp and bowl were found at an angle and not horizontally laid. The third deposit (No. 5, Fig. 16.24:11–12) was found below the southern row of the stone foundation of Wall 7906, ca. 0.5 m east of the opening in the wall.

Walls 4856 and 8917 separated the northern and southern units. Wall 8917 (Photo 15.50) was parallel to Wall 7906 and its foundation also tilted to the east (80.84–81.05 m along the 2.3 m exposed part of the wall). It had a foundation of small stones and four brick courses were preserved (81.05– 81.57 m). A 0.75 m-wide opening was located between the western edge of this wall and Wall 4856, which enabled passage between the northern and the southeastern units. This opening was on line with the opening in Wall 7906, thus creating access to the various parts of the building.

Wall 4856 was built on an east–west axis, at a slightly different angle compared to the aforementioned walls. It extended along 4.1 m and ended with the erosion line on the west, where it was also partly damaged by animal burrowing. The wall was preserved to a maximum height of eight courses (81.13–82.48 m), including the stone foundation, which was much higher than in the other walls in this stratum. The southern row of the stone foundation was higher by 0.1–0.15 m compared to the northern row, possibly an intentional technique related to drainage arrangements. The northern face of the wall was plastered with a 0.01–0.02 m-thick mud plaster, but it was not clear whether the same technique was applied to the southern face as well.

The western part of the northern unit was a 3.5– 3.8 m-wide open area, stretching from a row of pillar bases (9907) ca. 5.8 m westwards, where it was eroded on the slope of the mound. This area, 7902 and 9902 in Squares M/5 and N/5 respectively, was characterized by a 0.1–0.2 m-thick build-up of floor material (81.12–81.31 m in the western part, 81.10–81.20 m in the eastern part). This accumulation abutted the top of the stone foundations of the surrounding walls and their brick superstructure’s lowermost course. Locus 7902 contained a large amount of small (LT 0.1 m) limestone pebbles scattered in the north-central part of the locus and embedded in the floor foundations; these pebbles were laid above Stratum D-7b Locus 7903 and Oven 7924. A medium-sized flat stone was found in the middle of the floor (top level 81.31 m), possibly serving as a working platform. The floor striations contained a relatively small amount of sherds and bones, but were rich in charred wooden pieces; a broken jug (Fig. 16.31:19) was the only find associated with the top level of the floor. At the western edge of the floor, the lower portion of an oven (4874) was found, surrounded by small stones (including broken basalt grinding stones in secondary use), some large sherds, and ashy deposits. The eastern portion of this space, excavated as Locus 9902, served as the main area of movement between the units along the axis linking the two openings discussed above.

The open area of Floor 7902/9902 was bordered on the east by a row of pillar bases, designated 9907 (80.93–81.18 m), located somewhat to the east of the aforesaid openings in Walls 7906 and 8917. Each of the four pillar bases was composed of one medium-sized field stone with a relatively flat top which was supported by a few smaller stones (Photos 15.50–15.51). These pillar bases were not evenly spaced, with a larger gap between the northernmost one and the rest. The row of pillar bases was abutted on the east by a stone floor (9906) which also abutted the stone foundation of Wall 8917 and the brick superstructure of Wall 7906. The floor was made of basalt and limestone fieldstones, cobbles and pebbles, with occasional basalt grinding stone fragments. The floor sloped down to the east (80.92–81.07 m), in accordance with the foundations of Walls 7906 (eastern part) and 8917, possibly due to post-depositional processes, such as young tectonic activities.

The Southeastern Unit

The opening between Walls 8917 and 4856 led to the southeastern unit, characterized by a rather thick floor build-up (8907, levels 81.45–81.60 m) that was related to a dense concentration of installations (Fig. 15.13). The floor was ca. 0.3–0.4 m higher than Floor 7902/9902 of the northern unit and this gap was bridged by a step built of two bricks (levels 81.35–81.60 m) which were found immediately to the southwest of Wall 8917 (shown on the plan of Stratum D-7a', Fig. 15.14), although it is unclear whether these two bricks were placed during the initial construction phase of Stratum D-7a or during the later phase, D-7a'. Floor 8907 extended 4.2 m to the south of Wall 8917 up to the southern section of Square N/4, and 3.5–4.0 m on an east–west axis from Wall 2842 to the eastern section. This appears to have been an open courtyard, although two medium-sized stones with flat tops embedded in the upper part of the floor striations, 2.4–2.5 m to the south of Wall 8917, may have served as pillar bases for a lightweight roof.

Seven features were found in association with Floor 8907.
  1. Oven 7946 (Photo 15.53). This oven, 0.6 m in diameter, was located in the southeastern part of Square N/4. It was comprised of three mantles — very low-fired red clay walls, sherds lining the outer wall, and compacted yellowish clayey material which encircled the latter. The oven was preserved to a height of 0.2 m (top level 81.90 m), but its lower portion remained unexcavated and thus its foundation level was unknown.

  2. Circular Installation 8902 (Photo 15.53). This installation was located to the south of Oven 7946, but was preserved at a much lower level (81.69 m); its bottom was not excavated. It was built of two concentric mantles, the inner one made of 0.02 m thick off-white clay material (plaster?) mixed with dark-colored inclusions. This inner coat created an ellipse, 0.35×0.45 m. The outer mantle consisted of a 0.05–0.07 m-thick layer of red-brown very low-fired clay. It seems that this installation was used for cooking.

  3. Pit 8945. This pit, 0.7×0.8 m and 0.4 m deep, was located ca. 0.4 m southwest of Installation 8902 and penetrated into the southern section of the square. The pit was filled with soft gray and brown striations containing numerous charred pieces; the bottom was made of harder brown soil. It may have served as refuse pit for the nearby cooking installations, although only part of the accumulation seems to be comprised of decayed ash. The pit was covered by the upper portion of the Floor 8907 buildup and probably was filled at an early phase of the use of this floor.

  4. Pit 8915. Located 1.0 m west of Pit 8945, this was a rather irregularly shaped pit, 0.4×0.7 m and 0.6 m deep, that was filled with three different layers. The bottom, 0.2 m thick, was a relatively hard brown soil. The middle layer was pure decayed ash, some 0.25 m thick. The upper layer was light brown fill. All three layers were almost devoid of material remains. As in the case of Pit 8945, Pit 8915 was covered by the upper part of the Floor 8907 buildup.

  5. Installation 8908. This semi-circular installation, located immediately to the north of Pit 8915, was built against the eastern face of Wall 2842. It was shaped as a shallow basin with an elevated outer tip composed of soft brown clay (81.50–81.63 m). Its complete form was not known, since its northern part was damaged when Installation 7947 was built (see below). The remaining portion was somewhat peculiar, since its tip was slightly lower than the basin’s bottom; however, this sinkage may be the result of post-depositional processes. The function of this installation was not clear.

  6. Installation 7947. This square installation (inner dimensions ca. 0.6×06 m) was attached to the eastern face of Wall 2842 and cut the northern part of Installation 8908. The installation was built of three bricks placed on their narrow side; the northern and eastern bricks remained intact, while a large fragment of the southern brick was found to the south of the installation. The installation was full of soft ashy material and it may have served as a small bin or as some kind of cooking facility.

  7. Installation 8906. Located in the middle of the northern part of Floor 8907, this was the largest feature associated with it (Photo 15.52). This rectangular brick construction (external measurement 1.4×1.85; inner measurement 0.85×1.3 m) was sunken from the floor into earlier deposits (80.89– 81.54 m). The construction was flimsy, using bricks of varying sizes, possibly in secondary use, and sometimes placed with gaps between them or not on the exact same line. The average thickness of the walls was 0.25–0.3 m, except for the western wall, which was only 0.1 m thick. Most of the bricks were brown-orange and of a homogenous compact matrix, while those used in the western wall were friable gray bricks. Traces of a thin (0.01–0.02 m) white clay plaster were found on the inside of the western wall, but might have originally coated the entire interior. A few curving plaster patches found at ca. 80.92 m indicated the floor level of this basin, but the rest of the floor was not detected. The upper 0.15 m of the accumulation inside the installation was characterized by many small, fist-size stones and brick fragments dispersed among ashy gray material. Below this layer, the accumulation contained mostly layered gray debris. A bronze rod and a loomweight were among the few objects found in the installation, although it seems that they were not related to its original function which might have been for storage.

The multiplicity of installations indicates that the southeastern space was used primarily to perform various tasks, such as cooking, refuse collection and possibly storage. Nevertheless, it was clear that not all features were in use simultaneously; Installation 8908 was damaged by Installation 7947 and Pits 8915 and 8945 were covered by the latest floor build-up. This indicates a rather prolonged period of use of this floor, an assumption corroborated by the thick accumulation of floor striations. These observations are in accordance with the possibility that Floor 8907 continued to be in use when Wall 8917 was leveled and Wall 8904 was erected slightly to its south, as part of the minor changes that occurred in the later stage of Stratum D-7a (see below, D-7a').

The Southwestern Unit

Room 2871 was bounded by Walls 2842, 4856 and 1818 (Photo 15.57, upper right); its western boundary was eroded away (Fig. 15.13). The room measured 3.1 m in width (north–south) and at least 3.8 m in length (east–west). A marked peculiarity in Room 2871 was the significant difference in wall foundation levels and, as a result, the irregular relationship between the walls, an issue which clearly pertains to the history of the room’s construction. Wall 1818 was the deepest of the three. Its stone foundation, 0.7–0.9 m wide, was carefully built of two rows of medium- and large-sized flat stones, the largest of which were in the western portion of the foundation. The foundation extended 3.6 m from the erosion line to the east, where it abruptly ended ca. 0.4 m west of Wall 2842, while its brick superstructure abutted the latter wall. Two foundation deposits were found below the northern row of stones: the western one (No. 2; Fig. 16.24:4–6; see Fig. 15.20, Photo 15.54a), placed below a large flat limestone, was composed of two bowls placed rim to-rim, enclosing a lamp. The second deposit (No. 3; Fig. 16.24:9–10, Photo 15.54b) was ca. 1.5 m to the east of the former and consisted of one lamp and one bowl. The brick superstructure built on top of the stone foundation was preserved five to six courses high (0.8–0.9 m), composed of the typical yellowish gritty bricks of Stratum D-7a, on top of which three to five courses of gray-brown friable bricks were placed (top preserved level: 82.50 m). The upper part resembled Wall 2842 and was probably erected with the latter. It should be noted that the lower part of the brick superstructure of Wall 1818 was built of different-sized bricks compared to other Stratum D-7a walls, placed as either headers or stretchers; the overall width of the wall ranged from 0.55 m in the east to 0.7 m in the west.

A peculiar feature was found in the corner of Walls 4856 and 2842, where the yellowish bricks of Wall 4856 turned southwards and comprised the first ‘column’ of bricks in the northern end of Wall 2842. Only 0.3 m to the south of the line of Wall 4856 did the real construction of Wall 2842 begin, using carelessly placed gray, brown and white bricks. These bricks were preserved up to eight or nine courses above a flimsy stone foundation built of rather large irregularly shaped fieldstones, with smaller stones filling the gaps between them (Photo 15.52). This stone foundation was ca. 0.15–0.3 m higher than that of Walls 4856 and 1818, in accordance with the slope of the mound. Wall 2842 extended into the southern section of Square N/4 and was preserved to a height of over 1.1 m above the floor in Room 2871; it clearly continued to be in use during Stratum D-6b (see below). In the central part of the brick superstructure, just west of Installation 7947 (above), the wall was damaged by animal burrowing.

The observations detailed above are not easy to interpret stratigraphically. It seems probable that Walls 1818 and 4856 were built simultaneously. The peculiar eastern corner of the latter with Wall 2842 may imply that originally there had been a yellow-brick north–south wall that was later entirely dismantled for some reason. In its place, a new wall (2842) was erected at a slightly higher level compared to the existing walls and its join with these walls was modified in a rather flimsy way. At that time, Wall 1818 was rebuilt with bricks similar to those used in Wall 2842. It is possible that a similar case happened with Wall 4856, where only traces of gray and white bricks appeared in the top part of the wall.

The main problem with the suggested scenario is that only one clear floor sequence was found in the space enclosed by the aforementioned walls — a thick accumulation of floor build-up (2871 in Square N/4 and 1856 in Square M/4; Fig. 15.19). The floor sloped down towards the west, its higher area near the stone foundation of Wall 2842 (81.56 m and 81.65 m in the east, down to 81.39 m in the west). The floor striations were characterized by compacted brown layers which contained large amounts of charred material and whitish patches (phytoliths?). The tilt of the floor to the west hindered full understanding of its relation to the surrounding walls.

A few features were found related to Floor 2871. A small, deep (80.36–81.41 m) bell-shaped pit (1846) with a slightly collapsed perimeter was found in the north-central part of the room. The pit was presumably lined with bricks, but only a few remained attached to the pit contour; inside was a layered accumulation covered by ashy material. The pit was sealed by the upper part of the floor striations which sloped inwards in the vicinity of the pit (compare Pit 8945 of the southeastern unit), meaning that the pit went out of use before the end of Stratum D-7a. Just northeast of the pit and south of Wall 4856 (in the confines of Locus 1856), another foundation deposit of two bowls and a lamp (No. 1; Fig. 16.24:1–3), similar to the one found below the western part of Wall 1818, was found embedded in the floor make-up (81.39 m). A third feature, found north of Wall 1818, ca. 2.0 m southeast of the pit, was a construction of one course of four bricks, 0.8 sq m (2893, 81.23–81.39 m; not on the plan) whose purpose remained unclear. Floor 2871 was covered by a 0.2 m-thick layer of occupation debris (2854) and the latter by a thick layer of brick debris (2843).

Stratum D-7a'

Minor changes in the northeastern part of the excavated area were attributed to this phase (Fig. 15.4); these changes might correspond to the upper layers of the floor build-up that accumulated in the other spaces in Stratum D-7a, discussed above.

The most obvious change was the replacement of flagstone Floor 9906 in Square N/5 with a beaten-earth floor (8912; 81.16–81.30 m). In addition, the row of pillar bases (9907) was replaced with a new row (8944), built on the exact same line, on a slightly higher level (81.20–81.46 m) (Photo 15.55). This row was built of four stones; the southern two were regular large limestone fieldstones, while the northern two consisted of a complete basalt bowl placed upside down and a large lower basalt grinding stone. It is possible that a concentration of smaller stones close to Wall 7906 constituted a fifth pillar base. West of this row, the continuation of the beaten-earth floor was found (8920, 81.20–81.30 m), which gradually integrated with Floor 7902 to the west. The floor abutted the brick superstructure of Walls 7906 and 4856. Floor 8912 was covered with 0.2–0.3 m of layered debris, containing discontinuous patches of phytoliths, ash mixed with many olive pits and tilted striations of varied colors (excavated partly as Locus 8909).

In the southern part of this area, Wall 8917 of D-7a was now replaced with a new wall (8904), built slightly to the south and partly covering its southern face, although the northern face perhaps continued to be used as bench in this phase. Wall 8904 was preserved to six courses (81.50–82.23 m) of white and gray bricks placed as stretchers in one row, thus making it rather narrow (0.35 m wide). The wall extended from the eastern section to ca. 1.0 m east of the corner of Walls 4856 and 2842, thus maintaining the passage that was here in Stratum D-7a. Two bricks found in the passage somewhat to the north of the wall line were preserved and used as a threshold; in fact, they may also be attributed to the original opening in Stratum D-7a. The northern wall of Installation 2874 of Stratum D-6b was built right on top of Wall 8904 (Fig. 15.21).

It seems that no architectural changes occurred in this phase in Squares M–N/4, where D-7a walls and installations continued to be in use. Occupation debris found above the thick floor striations in this area should be regarded as contemporary with Phase D-7a' in Square N/5. Above Floor 2871/1856, was a 0.2–0.3 m layer of such debris (2854, 1831; Fig. 15.19) containing partly restorable pottery (Figs. 16.25–16.32), bones and grinding stones. Similar debris (7948) was found above Floor 8907, containing pottery (Figs. 16.25– 16.26, 16.30–16.33), as well as a few small finds.

Building DC of Stratum D-7a collapsed and the occupation layers were covered by brick debris, although no evidence for a violent destruction and fire was found. The collapse layer, ranging in depth from 0.3 m to 1.2 m, was excavated as different loci in the various parts of the building: 2843 in the southwestern unit, 7945 in the southeastern unit, 7935/8903 in the southern and western parts of Square N/5, and 4847/4817/4812 in the northwestern part. The collapse contained brick fragments of both the typical yellowish bricks of the initial phase of Stratum D-7a and other types of bricks (white, gray, brown, reddish) used in this stratum and its later phase. These collapse layers were found immediately below topsoil in Squares M–N/4 and below floor levels related to Stratum D-6b in Squares M–N/5. In the main part of Square N/5, installations of Stratum D-6b penetrated considerably into the earlier deposits (Figs. 15.20– 15.21), removing much of the brick debris of Stratum D-7.4

The pottery assemblage of Stratum D-7a–b is similar to that of Strata S-4 and S-3 at Beth-Shean (TBS III: Chapter 5) and should be dated to the 12th century BCE (Iron IA).
Footnotes

4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.

Stratum D-6

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Plans: 15.15–15.16
  • Sections: : Figs. 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.56–15.62
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.34–16.37
Discussions
Introduction

Possibly the most complicated stratigraphic sequence in the western part of Area D was found above Stratum D-7a and below the Iron IB Strata D-5–D-4. Inside this 1.5 m-deep accumulation, excavated over an area of approximately 60 sq m (in Squares M/5, N/4–5, and the southwestern portion of P/4), numerous installations and built elements were uncovered, each with a different foundation and preservation level. In-between these installations, as well as partly above and below several of them, was a thick accumulation of striations, found in all areas except for the western and northern portions of Squares M–N/5. These striations, which totaled ca. 0.9 m (82.10–83.00 m), represented both floor build-up and natural accumulation of layered sediments. However, the distinction between different depositional processes during the excavation was impossible due to the overall homogenous nature of the striations and the absence of concentrations of material remains within the sequence. The striations must have accumulated during a relatively long time-span, in which man-made features were built and went out of use intermittently. The correlation of different features found at various elevations along the sequence was often complicated. We tentatively divided this stratum into two main phases, although in certain places, this division was arbitrary: a lower phase (D-6b; Fig. 15.15) and an upper phase (D-6a; Fig. 15.16).

Stratum D-6b

The lowest level in which the striated accumulation appeared in Square N/4 was 82.10–82.20 m, designated Locus 1876 (above brick debris 7936 of Stratum D-7a; Figs. 15.19–15.21). In Loci 7935 and 7950, excavated at the same levels in Square N/5, no clear continuation of these striations was observed and, instead, the top of the brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' was found (Fig. 15.21). Only in the southeastern corner of Square N/5, within Locus 7935 (82.10–82.23 m), a local layered accumulation was noted, which included large cattle bones and an associated gray-ash accumulation.

The only architectural element which was clearly abutted by these lower striations was Wall 2842 of Stratum D-7a, which appeared to be in use in Stratum D-6b as well (Figs. 15.19–15.20; Photo 15.57). This is evident by the fact that the sequence of striations either abutted Wall 2842 or ended at the line of the wall, above the uppermost level of its preservation. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the wall stood much higher when the striations were deposited and only at a later stage its upper courses collapsed. It is less clear whether the entire southwestern unit of Stratum D-7a, including Walls 4856 and 1818, continued to be in use in Stratum D-6b.

Three rectangular brick installations were associated with the floor striations in this area. The two northern ones (7931, 7939), in the northern part of Square N/5 (Photos 15.4, 15.56–15.58), were almost identical in dimensions (1.07×1.87 m and 1.1×1.75 m, respectively) and were built along different axes (east–west and north–south, respectively). Although they were contemporary, it seems that Installation 7939 had been attached to 7931 at a slightly later stage. The walls were built of homogeneous compact gray bricks of fairly standard dimensions (0.5–0.55 m long, 0.3–0.35 m wide, 0.12–0.14 m thick), laid as stretchers in one row and preserved to a height of seven courses. The walls were plastered on their interior and exterior faces with yellow clay, 0.03–0.05 m thick. The western wall of Installation 7939 also functioned as the eastern wall of Installation 7931; its eastern face was thus covered with two layers of plaster. The floor levels of both installations were damaged, partly due to animal burrowing, mainly in 7939. However, the yellow clay floor of Installation 7939 was clearly observed in the eastern section of Square N/5 (Fig. 15.21), sloping slightly from north (81.70 m) to south (81.61 m). The floor of Installation 7931 might have been slightly higher (ca. 81.90 m), as indicated by patches of reddish clay preserved in two of its corners. The accumulation inside the installations consisted of loose graybrown soil, with occasional brick chunks and isolated sherds (Figs. 16.34–16.36). The function of these installations and another described below (2874) remained unclear.

Installations 7931 and 7939 cut into Stratum D-7a brick debris (7941, 7949 below their floors and Loci 8903, 8905, 7950 around the installations). A floor related to the installations was found mainly to the south (7935, 82.10 m); no clear floor was found to the west. To the north of Installation 7931, a possible floor was found in the form of a thin gray layer, sloping slightly eastwards (8911, 82.37–82.47 m). This layer covered brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' (8924), which was cut near the installation wall by a foundation trench of the installation and filled with brick fragments (8923). It seems probable that the upper part of both installations protruded above the surrounding floor levels. This was also indicated by the fact that Installation 7939 was preserved to its original top level (82.60 m), as evidenced by the yellow clay plaster which covered the uppermost bricks; it is assumed that Installation 7931 was of the same height. North of Installation 7939 and at approximately the same level, a brick wall (8922) was found protruding along the northern section. It perhaps was the southern wall of yet another installation or a room located beyond the excavated area to the north (Fig. 15.21).

A third rectangular brick installation was 2874 in Square N/4 (Photo 15.59), located ca. 2.0 m to the south of Installation 7939. Its northern wall was built exactly on top of Wall 8904 of Phase D-7a' and was preserved to a higher level (82.92 m) than the other walls and elements. The inner dimensions were 0.85×1.25 m and its inner corners were slightly rounded. The foundation level of its walls was 82.15–82.20 m and its patchy plaster floor was found at 82.25 m. The aforementioned levels were 0.4–0.5 m higher than the parallel values of Installations 7931 and 7939, which may suggest that Installation 2874 was erected at a later stage (D-6a). The installation was built of compact greenish bricks and was plastered inside and outside with a similar matrix; it was abutted on all sides by the thick accumulation of striations. Attached to the northern wall on its outer face at 82.45–82.55 m was a small semi-circular patch of baked red clay (7932), resembling oven ware, 0.43 m in diameter and 0.03–0.05 m thick. A small quantity of charcoal and olive pits were found on top of this feature, as well as in its vicinity; its function was evidently connected with fire. The same type of red clay was found in small patches inside Installation 7931 and in another patch (7925) above Wall 7926 of Stratum D-6a (see below).

To the west of Installation 2874 was a thick layer of ash, mixed with many olive pits, found at the bottom level of the striations in Locus 7935. This layer, and earlier deposits below it, were cut by a small round pit (7930), 0.53 m in diameter, its top level at ca. 82.45 m and its depth ca. 0.35 m. It was unlined and filled with loose brown debris. The pit was covered by striations 7921 and 1876 of Stratum D-6a.

To the south of Installation 2874, two ovens (2877, 2878) were embedded in the striations of 1876. Oven 2877 (82.40–82.97 m) comprised a circular outline (0.6 m in diameter) of burnt red material alongside several oven wall fragments. Oven 2878 (82.42–82.77 m), located 0.8 m to the east, was slightly larger (0.8 m in diameter). Both ovens were poorly preserved due to the fact that they were later replaced by new ones in Stratum D-6a (2851 and 2841 respectively). Built-up floors were found in the southern part of Square N/4 (1876, 2852; Photo 15.60).

Wall 4833 in Square M/5 was made of white and brown bricks, preserved to a maximum height of seven courses near the eastern section of Square M/5 (81.64–82.48 m) and extending 4.2 m until the erosion line. The wall was built on top of and slightly to the south of Stratum D-7a Wall 7906, on a slightly different orientation, and thus should be seen as an attempt to rebuilt Wall 7906. No floor was found to abut this wall.

Stratum D-6a

The later phase of Stratum D-6 was characterized by the continued accumulation of striations in Square N/4 (the top of 1876, Photo 15.60), as well as in the southern (7921) and eastern (7922) parts of Square N/5, at levels 82.80–83.00 m (Fig. 15.6).

In Square N/5, Installations 7931 and 7939 went out of use and were covered with striations (7922) mixed with some brick debris. Above Installation 7939, three whitish bricks oriented north– south were embedded in the striations of 7922, most probably a constructed feature rather than fallen bricks. To the west of these bricks, parallel to the northern section, a new wall was erected (7926) on top of the gray layer 8911, presumably a Stratum D-6b floor which related to Installation 7931. It was ca. 1.8 m in length and 0.4 m in width. Above its eastern portion was a patch of baked red clay resembling oven material (7925, 82.93 m) that recalled those found in Stratum D-6b Loci 7931 and 7932. In the western part of Square N/5, a narrow wall (7929) was built perpendicular to Wall 7926 and slightly to its west (82.62–82.96 m). It was preserved to a height of three courses and 1.5 m long, and did not clearly relate to any other feature. It should be noted that the striations did not abut either of these walls, thus preventing their clear stratigraphic association.

In Square N/4, Installation 2874 possibly continued to be in use in Stratum D-6a, although it was finally covered by the striations, as was clearly observed in the southeastern portion of 7921. To the south of this installation, the two adjacent ovens (2877, 2878, Stratum D-6b) were replaced with two new ones (2851 founded at 82.97 m and 2841 founded at 82.81 m, respectively; Photos 15.61, 15.64), that were embedded in the upper part of the striations (1876). Both ovens were attached to the outer face of a brick wall (4853).

Room 4848 was bounded by Wall 4853 on the north, Wall 4868 on the west, Wall 7953 on the east, and extended into the southern section. All three walls were founded at 82.60–82.56 m and were preserved to maximal height of ca. 1.0 m; they were poorly preserved due to animal burrowing. A thick lime plaster still adhered to the inner corner of Walls 4853 and 7953, probably indicating that the entire room had been plastered.

Stratum D-6a, and the entire sequence of the Stratum D-6 striations in Squares N/4–5, were covered by a 0.7–0.9 m-thick debris layer which continued eastwards below the floors and walls of Stratum D-5. This layer might constitute a constructional fill, placed to support the massive new architecture in the subsequent stratum, D-5.

Chapter 15C - Area D East Strata D-5 to D-1: Iron IB–IIA

Introduction

Discussion

The eastern (higher) part of the step trench in Area D revealed a sequence of five strata and several sub-phases dated to Late Iron I and Early Iron IIA (11th–10th centuries BCE) (Photos 15.1–15.5, 15.63). While the 11th century strata were well preserved, those of the Iron IIA, exposed on the uppermost part of the slope, were very damaged. Erosion caused the disappearance of Stratum D-5 and later strata west of the middle of Squares N/4–5, those of Stratum D-2 west of the middle of Squares P/4–5, and those of Strata D-1a–c west of Squares Q/4–5. See Table 15.1 for the stratigraphic sequence.

Stratum D-5

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.22 - Plan of Stratum D-5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45 - Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63- Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64- Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65- Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66- Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67- Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68- Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69- Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70- Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71- Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73- Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74- Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75- Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77- Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plan: Fig. 15.22
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19–15.21; 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.45, 15.56–15.57, 15.61, 15.63–15.77, 15.88
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.38–16.40; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47)
Discussions
Introduction

Architectural remains attributed to Stratum D-5 included Buildings DD and DE in the east, bordered on the west by a north–south street, and partially preserved elements to the west of the street that could have been either part of a unit presently eroded away or a subterranean support for the architecture above it. Based on the founding levels of the walls flanking the street, it seems that the buildings of this stratum were terraced to some extent, with an upper terrace to the east of the street and a lower one to its west, following the gradient of the slope.

Wall 2882 and Features to Its West

Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.

Wall 2882, running slightly northeast to southwest, was exposed over 9.5 m, crossing the entire excavation area and continuing into the northern and southern balks (Figs. 15.21–15.22, 15.33– 15.34; Photos 15.56–15.57, 15.64). It was preserved to a height of five brick courses with no stone foundation and was superimposed by Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. A difference of 0.6 m along a distance of 8.0 m was found in the foundation level of the wall from north to south, perhaps due to tectonic activity. One possible explanation of Wall 2882 is that it was a sub-structure and functioned as a terrace wall against which a presently non-preserved western unit was built in Stratum D-5, while the fill to its east supported the earliest phase of the street that would continue to exist in Stratum D-4.

Close to the erosion line west of Wall 2882, thick layers of compact brick debris were detected at levels 82.90–83.80 m, abutting the western face of the wall (1855, 2836 in Square N/4 and 7904, 7907, 7908, 7912–7914 in Square N/5). This layer was sealed by Building DF of Stratum D-4. This brick debris layer can be explained as either the collapse of Wall 2882 or as a deliberate fill below the floors of D-4 Building DF.

Street East of Wall 2882

Between Wall 2882 on the west and Building DD on the east ran a north–south street for 9.25 m; it continued into the northern and southern balks. Its width in the south was 1.0–1.2 m, while in the north it was ca. 2.35 m (between Walls 2882 and 8878 in Square P/5).

The eastern face of Wall 2882 was very blurred and irregular; the bricks were not even in shape or size and fieldstones appeared occasionally between the bricks. The layers east of the wall were excavated only in a few probes; the lower layer was composed of fieldstones (9810, levels 82.92–83.09 m; Photo 15.65), covered by layers of gravel, brick debris, sherds (mostly worn, including some Early Bronze sherds) and bones (9808, 9802; levels 83.09–83.84 m). These layers appeared to be a deliberate fill supporting the street surface (2870), although, in fact, no clear surface of Stratum D-5 could be identified.

The situation here raised an unresolved stratigraphic quandry. In the process of excavation and analysis, it was considered that Building DF west of the street was founded in Stratum D-5 and reused in Strata D-4b and D-4a. One of the reasons for this was the situation seen in Figs. 15.33–15.34, where the street surface (2870) abutted Wall 1883 of D-4 Building DF on the west and Wall 2881 (attributed to Stratum D-5) on the east. The problem with this interpretation is that Wall 1883, the eastern wall of Building DF, was constructed above Wall 2882. Assignment of Building DF to Stratum D-5 would leave this wall an ‘orphan’ in terms of stratigraphic attribution, unless it would be explained as a terrace wall supporting Wall 1883. However, the fact that Wall 1883 had a stone foundation, while Wall 2882 below it was a brick wall without one, seems to contradict such an explanation. The solution presented here leaves unresolved questions; while it seems to be the preferred scenario, the alternative interpretation should not be entirely ruled out.

The Eastern Unit: Buildings DD and DE

Introduction

The eastern unit in Stratum D-5 was not fully exposed, since some of the walls of Stratum D-4 which were built directly on top of Stratum D-5 structures were not dismantled. The exposed remains were sufficient to show that these were massive buildings that housed special activity. The area was divided into two units: Building DE in the north and DD to its south (Photos 15.69–15.77). The northern unit included two rooms with an unclear connection between them; both continued to the north and east beyond the border of the excavation. The southern unit comprised two large rooms paved with well-preserved brick floors. The exact relationship between the two units remained obscure, since the juncture between them was covered by later walls that were not dismantled.

Building DE (Squares P–Q/5)

Introduction

Building DE was comprised of two rooms, separated by north–south Wall 8861, preserved to five brick courses. The upper two courses were built of dark gray friable bricks, the two courses below them of white bricks, and the lowermost course was again dark gray. The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same wall was typical of this stratum, such as in Walls 8884 and 8854 of Building DD, described below. Later walls covered the northern and southern ends of Wall 8861, but it is most likely that it had cornered with Wall 8884 on the south.

Room 8865

East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.

Room 8874

West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.

Building DD (Squares P–Q/4–5)

Introduction

This was part of a massive building whose eastern and western walls were 1.25 m wide each, composed of two rows of bricks. While the eastern wall (8848) was comprised of two rows, the western wall seems to have been made of two adjoining walls (8855, 2881) which were constructed separately: the eastern side (8855) had a stone foundation which was lacking in the western side (2881). Wall 2881 apparently continued to be in use in the subsequent stratum, D-4b, when it abutted the newly built Wall 1860 on the west (see below). Wall 2881 was poorly preserved, perhaps since it was in use longer than Wall 8855. The northern wall (8884) was apparently just as wide as the western and eastern walls, based on a small part of its northern face exposed in Square P/5; the rest of the northern part of the wall was covered by D-4b walls. The eastern wall (8848) appeared to have been the outer wall of the entire building, although this could not be ascertained due to the limited excavation area. If this is correct, then the external width of the building was ca. 6.7 m (for the possibility that this complex continued to the east into Area C, see below). It seems that the southern wall (8852) of the eastern room was an internal wall, since the parallel room to the west continued south beyond the border of the excavation. Thus, the length of the building was at least 6.0 m and it probably continued beyond the southern limit of the area.

Room 8867

This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.

Room 8867 was paved with a well-preserved brick floor (8867, level 83.42 m), composed of three clear lines of bricks and possibly a fourth one in the eastern part of the room. The floor abutted Walls 8852, 8848 and 8854, but did not continue into the northern section of the room, where another brick floor was exposed on a lower level (see below). In the northern part of the room, a square installation (9805), bounded by three brick walls, was laid directly on top of Floor 8867. The walls (0.14 m wide), composed of bricks placed on their narrow side and preserved to two courses, were 1.0 m long, creating an inner space of 0.85 sq m. As in some of the walls of this building, the installation was built of different types of bricks: the southern and western walls of black friable bricks and the northern wall of whitish bricks; traces of plaster were found on both faces. This appears to have been a storage bin. A ca. 0.55 m wide passage west of Installation 9805 led to the northern part of the room, where brick Floor 8867 terminated on line with the northern wall of the installation. In the northern part of the room (1.05×1.6 m), a less-well-constructed brick floor (9804) was laid, lower by more than 0.4 m than Floor 8867 and Installation 9805. This floor abutted Walls 8848 and 8853, but did not reach Wall 8854 on the west. It was difficult to determine whether this difference in levels between the two parts of the room was due to function or whether the lower northern floor belonged to an earlier phase of D-5 (see below). A thick layer of debris (8839) rested on Floor 9804; two complete bricks fallen on top of each other were found in this debris at 83.71 m and on top of them were several complete vessels, including seven small bowls, perhaps votive (Fig. 16.38:6, 11–12, 14–15, 18–19), a chalice (Fig. 16.38:24), a juglet (Fig. 16.39:19) and a lamp (Fig. 16.39:21). It seems like the bricks and the vessels had fallen from a higher spot, perhaps a shelf.

In the southeastern corner of the room was a large bell-shaped pit (8883; Photos 15.69–15.70); its eastern part adjoined the western face of Wall 8848, whose foundation level could be seen in the pit. It was apparently dug sometime during the course of use of this room, as it was sealed by the D-4b occupation above. The pit contained ash and brick debris, sherds and one complete juglet (Fig. 16.39:20). South of Wall 8852, a small segment of a floor (8882) was found at level 83.86 m, perhaps belonging to an adjacent room of the same building.

Room 8871

Room 8871 was the western room of Building DD (Photos 15.69, 15.76–15.77). Its inner size was ca. 2.0×at least 5.2 m, as its southern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. In the north, the excavation almost reached the presumed southern face of Wall 8884. The floor (levels 83.55–83.74 m) was made of four to five rows of bricks, like the floor of Room 8867 to its east. It abutted Walls 8855 and 8854. The bricks of the floor were covered by 0.25 m-deep striated layers of soft earth and plaster, which were sealed by Floor 8816 of Stratum D-4b. Although the level of the floor in this room was 0.5–0.6 m higher than that in the eastern room, it was clear that the two rooms belonged to the same building. A similar situation was observed in Stratum D-4b Building DG (see below).

Three pits were detected in Room 8871, sealed by D-4b architectural elements and thus perhaps dug either when the building was still in use or a short time afterwards, before the construction of D-4b, similar to Pit 8883 in Room 8867.

Pit 8876 was a round shallow pit, ca. 0.3 m deep and 0.44 m in diameter located south of the center of the room and discerned at level 83.73 m (Photo 15.69). It contained ashy material and a small amount of sherds. Pit 8873 was a semicircular shallow pit, 0.2 m deep and 0.45 cm in diameter, located in the eastern part of the room and attached to Wall 8854 at level 83.79 m. It contained loose ashy material with charcoal pieces and a few sherds. Pit 8880 was round, 0.45 m in diameter and of unknown depth, located in the southeastern part of the room, discerned at level 83.74 m. It could not be fully excavated due to D-4 Wall 1884, which was built on top of its southern part. Its continuation below Wall 1884 of D-4 was further proof that this room extended further to the south, beyond the excavated area.

Summary of Stratum D-5

The building remains of Stratum D-5, although limited, indicated dense urban planning and the existence of well-planned structures. Wall 2882, which crossed the entire area from north to south, represented a degree of central planning, although it remained unclear as to what unit it had been belonged. Initially, it had been considered that this wall was a foundation intended to support the slope during the construction of Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. According to this suggestion, Building DF would have been founded in Stratum D-5 and continued to be in use, with slight changes, in Strata D-4b and D-4a. However, it was finally decided in favor of the stratigraphic separation as suggested here, namely, that Wall 2882 represented an independent phase, attributed to Stratum D-5, and that it was an isolated element, with no structural remains belonging to this stratum to its west.

Building DD was an unusual structure which must have had a special function; the two elongated spaces with brick floors may be explained as storerooms that perhaps were part of a much larger administrative building. This may be compared to similar elongated storage rooms in Building L at Tell Qasile, probably founded in Stratum X (Mazar 1951: 20). The wide walls of Building DD suggest that this had been a tall building, perhaps of two or more storeys. The building continued south beyond the limits of the excavated area and perhaps also to the east, possibly related to Building CS of Stratum C-3b in Area C (Chapter 12). The western wall of the latter (8520) was well preserved, but its width was unknown. The eastern face of this wall was parallel to the walls of Building DD at a distance of 5.7 m and the floor of the spaces to its east were almost at the same level as those of Building DD. It may be suggested, although with great caution, that these walls belonged to one large architectural complex (Fig. 15.25a). Alternatively, these were two separate structures, possibly with a street between them.

Building DE to the north of Building DD was hardly known; its massive western wall recalled those of Building DD and the two could belong to one structure, although in that case, the connection between the two parts must have been to the east of the excavated area.

No evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum D-5 was detected. It seems that the buildings went out of use due to either deterioration or earthquake damage and were rebuilt in the following Stratum D-4. The pottery and artifacts from Stratum D-5 point to their date in Iron IB, perhaps the early part of the 11th century BCE.

Stratum D-4

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.23 - Plan of Stratum D-4b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.24 - Plan of Stratum D-4a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.25a - Iron IB remains in Areas D and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.25b - Iron IB remains in Areas D and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63- Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64- Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65- Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66- Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71- Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77- Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.78- General view of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.79- Squares N–P/4,from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.80- Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.81- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.82- Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.83- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.84- Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.85- Squares P–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.86- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.87- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.89- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.90- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.95 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.96 - Square P/5, looking west; D-4a Building DJ, debris and vessels in Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.97 - Smashed Pottery in Square P/5 D-4a Building DJ, Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.98 - Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.99 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.101 - Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.102 - Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.111 - Square P/5, looking south at reed impressions (ceiling collapse?) on plaster layer from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.112 - Closeup of layer in Photo 15.111 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.113 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.114 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.116 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.23–15.25
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19a–15.21, 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.61, 15.63–15.66, 15.71–15.72, 15.77–15.90, 15.95–15.99, 15.101–15.102, 15.111–15.114, 15.116;
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.48–16.54; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-4 was the most extensively exposed stratum in Area D, revealed in six excavation squares (N–P–Q/4–5). Although new structures replaced the massive Buildings DD and DE of Stratum D-5, and Building DF was built west of the street, the general outline of Stratum D-5 was maintained, with the north–south street continuing to separate the eastern and the western units.

In the area west of the street, Building DF was built above Wall 2882 and the layers attributed to D-5 to its west. The area east of the street was rebuilt on a different plan: in the early phase of Stratum D-4, denoted D-4b, Buildings DE and DD were replaced with Buildings DH and DG, thus retaining the general spatial division of Stratum D-5; several of the walls of the new buildings were constructed on top of the earlier walls. In a later phase, denoted D-4a, the two units together created a larger building (Building DJ). Apart from this significant change, several other minor changes occurred inside the rooms during each of these phases and the street level was raised.

The Western Unit: Building DF (Strata D-4b and D-4a)

Introduction

To the best of our understanding, Building DF was built in Stratum D-4, although as explained above, there was a slight possibility that it was founded already in Stratum D-5 (see above). The building included two rows of rooms running parallel to the slope of the mound west of the street and comprised two terraces, separated by Wall 4866 and its possible southern extension (Photos 15.78–15.82). The eastern line of rooms included 4839, 1845 and 2840 and the western line included 4871 and 4879; the latter were destroyed by erosion and only their eastern ends were preserved. It is not certain that all these rooms belonged to the same building, but it is clear that this was a well-planned structure adjoining the north–south street on its west.

Room 2840

Walls 1811, 2822 and 2846 created the northern end of a 2.5 m-wide room that continued to the south (Squares N–P/4). They were a rebuild of the walls found in the same place in Stratum D-6a, described above (Room 4848). East–west Wall 1811 in Squares N–P/4 was comprised of two rows of bricks, 1.0 m wide and well preserved for the most part. The wall had a stone foundation comprised of small- and medium-sized stones, with one row seen along the northern face, although these stones were not visible under the southern face; the foundation was dug into the brick collapse (1855) below. Inside this room was a hard-packed earth floor (2840; level 84.08 m) set on a bedding of pebbles. A shallow pit (2828) was partially excavated in the northwestern part of the room. The floor of this room was raised and a higher floor (2823) was constructed at level 84.20 m in Stratum D-4a.

Courtyard/Room 1845

The space between the rooms on the north and the south was probably a courtyard, paved with stones (1845), with a series of plaster floors accumulated above it (1836) (Squares N–P/4–5; Photos 15.80– 15.82). This space was 4.0 m long and at least 3.0 m wide. It was bordered on the east by Wall 1883, on the west by the supposed continuation of Wall 4866 along the erosion line of the slope, on the south by Wall 1811, and on the north by Wall 4813. Wall 1883 was built above Wall 2882 of Stratum D-5. It had a three-course stone foundation that protruded beyond the face of the wall towards the east and seven courses of its brick superstructure were preserved; the uppermost three tilted strongly to the west (Fig. 15.33). From its corner with Wall 1811, the wall continued ca. 7.5 m to the north, running into the balk. The southern end of the wall (termed 2846) was slightly curved and served as the eastern wall of Room 2840.

On the western edge of this space was a layer of fallen and decayed brick debris (1826) which might represent the damaged southern continuation of Wall 4866. This was also indicated by how stone Floor 1845 ended on a straight line in the northwest, perhaps on line with the inner face of the missing western wall. A series of floors was found in this space. The lowest was a stone floor (1845) which had a partial bedding of smaller stones; the northern part of the floor consisted of a row of closely laid stones arranged in a row along Wall 4813. The stone floor was partly covered by a layer of pebbles (1842) which could be either an independent floor or a constructional fill meant to support the build-up of plaster floors (1836) above, which was 0.40 m thick. The uppermost floor (1825) was composed of earth and a few small stones and was covered by brick debris and collapse (1806), with several large undressed stones. These upper surfaces were attributed to Stratum D-4a. In the south of the building, west of Wall 2822, was an area paved with small stones and earth (1822), that might have been the continuation of Space 1845 or a paved alleyway.

Rooms 4839, 4879 and 4871

In Square N/5 were remains of one complete room (4839) and segments of two additional rooms (4879, 4871), arranged on two levels, with a floorlevel difference of 0.65 m: Room 4839 on an upper terrace, which was on the same level as 1845 and 2840 to its south, and Rooms 4879 and 4871 on a lower terrace to the west. Wall 4866, 1.0 m wide, which was common to all these rooms, served as a retaining wall for the terrace above it. The latter wall was not preserved entirely, but most likely had cornered with Wall 4861.

The inner dimensions of Room 4839 were 2.3×2.7 m; its outer walls (4813, 4866, 4861, 1883) were well preserved, although two of them were damaged by Stratum D-3 pits: 4810 was dug into Wall 1883 and 4811 into Wall 4813. It seems that Wall 4861 was also damaged by pits, but it was not possible to ascertain this, since the wall was only partially excavated. A section in this wall was examined in the eastern balk of Square N/5, where it could be seen that the wall had no stone foundation and its bottom bricks reached the top of Wall 4833 of Stratum D-6b.

Floor 4839 was a pinkish clay floor covered by an accumulation (4855) containing sherds (Fig. 16.48) and one almost complete juglet (Fig. 16.48:20). A flat stone found adjacent to Wall 4866 on the east may have served as work surface. A thick layer (up to 1.2 m) of decayed brick debris (4807) covered the accumulation on this floor.

The lower terrace (Rooms 4879, 4871) was severely eroded on the west. Wall 4870, separating the two lower rooms, was preserved to a length of 1.05 m. The northern room (4879) had a stone floor preserved only in its southeastern corner, where a lower grinding stone was sunk into the floor and an upper grinding stone was found in another part of the floor. The preserved segment of the stone floor (83.10 m) could be interpreted as a domestic working area. A row of small stones and two larger stones aligned to their east along Wall 7918 may have been steps. The northern wall of the room was Wall 4861, which continued from Room 4839 to the east. North of this wall, in the northwestern corner of Square N/5, a small segment of a stone floor (7928), similar to Floor 4879, was located at level 83.15 m just below topsoil. A lamp-and-bowl foundation deposit (Fig. 16.48:1–2) was found just below this floor.

Room 4871 to the south, filled with brick collapse, was mostly ruined by erosion.

The Street in Stratum D-4

The north–south street of Stratum D-5 in Squares P/4–5 continued to be in use through Stratum D-4, when it was ca. 1.85–2.0 m wide (Photos 15.83– 15.84). The street surface was gradually raised, with striations accumulating between Wall 1883 (which stood to a height of 1.5 m) in the west and the western walls of Buildings DH and DG (in Stratum D-4b) and DJ (in Stratum D-4a).

It seems that in Stratum D-4b, the lowest street surface (2870; Square P/4), which was already in use in Stratum D-5, abutted the stone foundation of Wall 1883 on the west and Wall 2881 on the east, which is explained as a re-use of a Stratum D-5 wall, now serving as a bench along the western wall of Building DG. The accumulation above 2870 contained several floors, rich in pottery, bones, organic material and gravel, to a total depth of ca. 1.83 m (2870, 2864, 2835, 1882, 2807, 1873, 1871; levels 83.74–85.39 m) and in two separate sequences in Square P/5 (8803, 7805, 7804 and 7829, 7828, 7822, 7807; levels 83.89–85.14 m). The lower floors were attributed to D-4b and the higher ones to D-4a, related to Building DJ. The uppermost floors were much higher than those in the adjacent buildings.

The stratified accumulation was quite homogeneous, although several sporadic or loosely arranged complete bricks were revealed occasionally on both the western and eastern margins of the street. These could have been either steps that led to the rooms in the eastern and western units (such as the case with the step leading to Room 8816 in Stratum D-4b), fallen bricks, or remains of benches. In Square P/5, a layer of bricks was found tilted against the Wall 1883 (7847 against the stone foundation and 7846 against the brick superstructure). The bricks, alternatively dark brown and white, were irregularly placed, with gaps between them. Their function could not be determined; perhaps this was a ruined bench or a brick collapse.

Among the upper stratified street striations, a pavement (7805) comprising a concentration of small field stones and cobbles with a large amount of sherds, was revealed at level 85.15 m in Square P/5 and attributed to Stratum D-4a. The pavement

The Eastern Unit in Stratum D-4b: Buildings DG and DH

Introduction

To the east of the street were two units, Buildings DG and DH, attributed to Stratum D-4b, built above D-5 Building DG.

Building DG

Introduction

This building comprised three rooms, two of which were completely excavated, and part of a fourth unexcavated room which continued into the eastern balk (Photo 15.85). The excavated part measured 5.8×6.9 m, but the building apparently continued to the east and perhaps also to the south, beyond the limit of the excavation area.

Room 8816

The western room in the building (inner dimensions 2.0×4.7 m, 9.4 sq m) was a rebuild of the previous Room 8871 of Stratum D-5. Each of its four well-preserved walls was built of dark gray bricks with distinctive whitish mortar between them (recalling the Stratum C-3 bricks in Area C; see Chapter 12). The western wall of the room (1860) was founded directly on top of Wall 8855 of Stratum D-5, but about 0.5 m north of the entrance, there was an earth layer separating these two walls. The entrance into Room 8816 was through an opening in the southern part of Wall 1860. West of the entrance was a plastered stone step, 0.75 m long (2866) at level 84.46 m, constructed above the stump of D-5 Wall 2881, leading from the street into the room.

The room had a thick white plaster floor that had been laid above a foundation of bricks (8816), discerned at levels 84.45–84.64 m (ca. 0.7 m above the floor of Stratum D-5 in the room below). Such white plaster had not been exposed in any of the other rooms in the building and it may indicate some special function of this room. In the center of the room were two adjoining pits, coated with the same white plaster as the floor. Pit 8823 was 0.2 m deep and 0.5 m in diameter and contained ash and a relatively large amount of olive pits. Pit 8822, slightly to the south, was 0.7 m in diameter and 0.6 m deep and contained ash and many sherds (Figs. 16.49–16.50, 16.53) and bones, as well as a relatively large amount of charred olive pits. In the accumulation (8813) above Floor 8816 remains of bronze production were found, including a tuyère, a crucible and two prills (see Chapter 40C).

In the middle of the eastern part of the room and attached to Wall 4878 was Installation 8824, composed of a square brick, in which the lower part of a storage jar was sunk (Fig. 16.51:22; Photo 15.86). The installation was attached to a line of complete white bricks which seem to have been laid against Wall 4878, coating its western face. A similar installation (2891), related to Phase D-4a, was attached to the southern wall (1884) of the room (see below).

No opening leading from this room to the eastern rooms of the building was discerned, in spite of the good preservation of the eastern wall (4878).

Space 8841

The southeastern space in Building DG was perhaps an open courtyard, 3.5 m wide and at least 3.5 m long (at least 12.25 sq m); it continued eastward beyond the limit of the excavated area and thus, its full length could not be determined. Its northern wall (4859) was composed of white bricks and had an opening leading to Room 8830 to its north. The southern wall (4862), also built of white bricks, was exposed only along 1.5 m, since its western part was disturbed; there could have been an opening here leading to another room in the south.

The beaten-earth floor in this space (8841), revealed at levels 84.07–84.33 m, was preserved mainly in the southern part, abutting Walls 4862 and 4878. A small patch of a white plaster floor (8832) was preserved in the center of the room, at level 84.26 m. It seems that both were part of a series of successive floors used during the lifetime of Building DG in Stratum D-4b (8814; levels 84.26–84.40 m). Pit 8840, located in the southern part of the room, 1.0 m in diameter and ca. 0.6 m deep, was full of gray ash and was sealed by a thick layer of debris found in the room. The pit damaged Wall 8848 of Stratum D-5.

Space 8841 continued to be in use in the following Stratum D-4a with minor changes.

Space 8830

This small room (inner dimensions 1.45×1.9 m) was entered from Space 8841 to its south. Its northern, eastern and southern walls were built of white bricks, while on the west it was bounded by Wall 4878, built of dark gray bricks. The 0.6 m-wide corner entrance had a brick threshold at level 84.44 m. It is notable that such a corner entrance was also found in Room 8816 and perhaps also in 8841.

A series of successive beaten-earth floors was revealed in Room 8830 at levels 84.18–84.38 m. In the northeastern corner of the room was an installation (8837), comprising three complete bricks, measuring 0.7×1.2 m (Photo 15.87). Two of the bricks were laid parallel to each other, with their narrow sides attached to Wall 8828, the northern wall of this room. The third brick was perpendicular to them, its narrow side attached to Wall 8805, the eastern wall of the room. The installation had a rounded depression in its center, similar to the one in Installation 8824 in the room to the west and to Installations 2891 and 8859 of Stratum D-4a (see below). These can be explained as stands for jars containing water or other liquids.

Wall 8805, the eastern wall of the room, was well preserved on its western face, but much less so on the east. To the east of Wall 8805 was yet another room, which was not excavated due to a mass of bricks covering it.

Summary of Building DG

It remained unclear whether the three rooms described above (and the fourth unexcavated one) belonged to the same unit. Since no entrance leading from Room 8816 to the eastern rooms was found, it may be that this room was independent and accessed directly from the street, perhaps serving as a storage space or workshop, while Rooms 8841 and 8830 belonged to a separate building entered from the east or the south. Space 8841 could be part of an open courtyard, while Room 8830 and the unexcavated room to its east could be small living spaces.

The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same building should be noted: dark gray bricks in Wall 1860 and white bricks in all the other walls. This phenomenon was noted in other buildings as well.

Building DH

Introduction

The northern building in the eastern unit comprised two rooms and perhaps a third unexcavated room on the east. Its southern wall (8821) adjoined Building DG on the south.

Room 8844 (Photos 15.88–15.91)

The inner dimensions of this room were 1.80×2.55 m (4.6 sq m, including the area of Bench 8860). A corner entrance with a brick threshold at level 84.29 m at the northern end of Wall 8849 connected Rooms 8844 and 8842. Another opening (8886) was detected in the eastern wall of the room (7851), just on line with the latter entrance. The opening in Wall 7851 was preserved to its full height, standing 1.25 m high and 0.8 m wide. The beaten-earth floor of this room (8844) covered a strip of bricks (8870) that ran along the western face of Wall 7851; these bricks were wider than the wall and were possibly placed in order to support the floor near the entrance. Wall 7851 was preserved to a height of 16 courses and continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a. Wall 8860 was a line of bricks adjoining the northern face of Wall 8821; yet, while Wall 8821 was preserved to a height of four courses, 8860 was preserved to only one course and was abutted by Floor 8844. Thus, 8860 was interpreted as a bench.

In the western part of the room was a standing brick lying on its narrow side (not on the plan) that created an enclosed area in the corner of the room. Between the brick and Bench 8860, on a level just below Floor 8844, was an incomplete jar (Fig. 16.51:13) with a broken goblet (Fig. 16.49:28) inside it.

This room continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a with some architectural alterations, although with the same floor.

Room 8842 and Installation 8810

Room 8842 was the western room of Building DH (Photos 15.63, 15.73, 15.92). This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.6×1.8 m, 2.88 sq m) had a beaten-earth floor (8842) abutting the walls at levels 84.28–84.34 m. A row of five stones (8856) lined the western side of the room; to its west was Installation 8810 (Photos 15.63, 15.66, 15.73, 15.92). This enigmatic feature included three large flat pinkish limestone blocks and a large basalt basin, located east of the street, on the same line as the supposed western wall of Room 8842 and above D-5 Wall 8878. The southernmost limestone was a large rectangular block (0.3×0.6×0.97 m). The middle limestone was whitish/pinkish and almost square (0.3×0.6×0.6 m). The northernmost stone was 0.5 m wide and at least 0.5 m long. A basalt basin (8807) was located south of and on the same line as these three stones. This was a large oval-shaped basalt stone, 0.8–0.9 m in diameter, with a rounded shallow flat depression in its center, 0.5 m in diameter and 0.12 m deep. Grinding marks could be seen inside the depression. A flat limestone was found to the south of this basin. The tops of these stones were at levels 84.56–84.66 m, ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor of Stratum D-5 Room 8874 and 0.3–0.4 m above the floor of Room 8842 of Stratum D-4b, both to the east of the stones. The street west of this installation was wider than it was further to the south, thus providing convenient access to the installation.

The installation was covered by several stones laid in disorder, by a line of stones that created the western side of Room 4858 in Stratum D-4a, and by the foundations of Wall 4819 of Stratum D-2.

The function of this installation remained obscure. It could have been an olive-oil press. Olives could have been crushed in the basalt basin and then placed in baskets on top of the central stone. The two side stones could serve as a foundation for a wooden frame that would hold some kind of stone weights (although no such weights were actually found). The setup recalls to some degree the installation at Tel Dan Area T, explained by Biran (1994: 176, Fig. 137) as a water-libation installation and by Stager and Wolff (1981) as an olive-oil press. A less probable explanation is that the stones of 8810 were in secondary use and served as part of a solid foundation for the western wall of Building DH or the later Building DJ. A possible support for this suggestion are a few bricks found to the west and north of the installation which appeared to have been placed when the stones were laid.

The Eastern Unit in Stratum D-4a: Building DJ

Introduction

The term Building DJ refers to the area of Buildings DG and DH, which underwent several major internal changes. Although no opening was found to connect the southern and northern wings, some of the renovations indicate that the entire area was considered as part of one architectural system. Many of the previous walls continued to be in use (4859, southern part of 4878, 4862, 1884, 1860, 4876, 8828, 8834), while others were cancelled or replaced. Thus, the double wall separating Building DG from DH in Stratum D-4b (8821, 8828) was replaced by a single wall (8828/8834) and the eastern wall (7851) of D-4b Room 8844 was extended to the south (denoted here 7848), cancelling the earlier wall (8805) to its west and becoming the eastern wall of the new room (7855), thus widening D-4b Room 8830 by 0.9 m. In the center of the building, Wall 7852 was built directly over Wall 8849 of D-4b, abutting the northern wall of D-4b Building DG (8828, 8834), which continued to be in use. At this time, the western part of Wall 8821 was cancelled, so that the previous space of Room 8842 was enlarged, but was now divided by a narrow wall (4877) into two separate chambers (4858, 4872). On the west, Wall 8850 was constructed above Installation 8810 and served as the western wall of the building, facing the street.

Seven rooms belonged to Building DJ. North– south Walls 7852, 7861 and 4878 functioned as the backbone wall through the center of the building, with three rooms to their east and four rooms to their west.

Room 8844

This room of Building DH in Stratum D-4b continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a, with the same floor and walls on the north and east. However, architectural changes occurred in the other two walls; on the west, a new wall (7852) was constructed on top of Wall 8849, preserved to seven courses. On the south, Wall 8821 of Stratum D-4b was cancelled and the room was now bordered by Wall 8828, which continued to be in use from Stratum D-4b. The inner dimensions of the new room were 2.4×2.6 (6.24 sq m). All the walls’ interiors were coated with a thick layer of white plaster. Floor 8844, attributed to D-4b and probably continuing in D-4a, was covered by destruction debris (8833) and fallen roof material (8829), the latter covered by a layer of brick debris (7853) reaching an uppermost level of 85.64 m, 1.25 m above the original floor.

Rooms 4858 and 4872

D-4b Room 8842 was now extended to the south and divided into two chambers by a narrow partition wall (4877) (Photos 15.94–15.97). To the north, Room 4858 was a narrow space with inner dimensions of 1.0×2.3 m. Traces of thick white plaster were preserved on Walls 4876, 7852 and 4877. No floor was traced, but since Wall 4877 floated at level 85.07 m, almost 0.8 m above the floor of the Stratum D-4b, such a floor must have existed.

Room 4872, located south of Room 4858, had inner dimensions of 1.2×2.4 m (2.9 sq m). Plaster was preserved on its northern (4877) and eastern (7852) walls. In a small area south of Wall 4877, a floor (4872) was found at level 84.72 m, 0.56 m above the floor of Stratum R-4b in the same place.

The western wall of these two rooms (8850) was not very clear. Installation 8810 of the previous phase was covered by scattered stones, on which this wall was constructed. No entrance was detected, yet since both faces of Wall 8850 were not well preserved, it is possible that there had been an opening from the street. The solid patch of a pebble-stone pavement (7805) revealed in the street at level 85.04 m, opposite the supposed entrance to Room 4872, might indicate that it led into the room. No evidence for any connection between Room 4872 and the other rooms of the building was detected.

A concentration of complete vessels, including bowls, a pyxis, cooking pots and other small vessels (Fig. 16.54), was found in this room in a destruction layer containing fallen bricks and burnt wooden beams.

Room 7855

Replacing D-4b Room 8830 of Building DG was a new room that was enlarged to the east (inner dimensions 1.4×2.8 m, 3.92 sq m), entered from the south through the same entrance used in D-4b. No floor was detected in this room. The brick debris layer in this room (7855, 8806) was cut by Stratum D-3 Pits (7858, 7860, 7863).

Room 8820

This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.25×1.45 m, 1.8 sq m) was created by constructing a narrow partition wall (1868) in the northern part of D-4b Room 8816. The eastern wall (7861), composed of dark gray bricks and coated on the exterior with a layer of unique white bricks, was preserved to a height of six courses. This outer coating of bricks decreased the room’s length by ca. 0.3 m. This chamber had a stone floor at level 84.80 m (0.1 m above Floor 8816 of D-4b), covered by a beatenearth floor (8820) at level 84.83 m, about 0.3 m higher than D-4b floor in the same location. Along the western side of the chamber was a brick bench or installation (8859), composed of three white bricks. The northern one was 0.4×0.5 m and the narrow middle brick (0.3×0.45 m) was laid with its long side against the northern brick. The southernmost brick had the same dimensions as the northern one, with a round depression in its southern part (diameter 0.4 m) which could have served as a base for a jar. The installation/bench was surrounded by ashy material and a large amount of charred olive pits.

Finds in the debris (8826) on Floor 8820 included a scaraboid (Chapter 30, No. 3) and two small lentoid pieces of unfired clay with a textile impression that might have been lids.

Space 4863

The previous Space 8841, possibly an open courtyard, continued with almost no change in Stratum D-4a. No floor was detected in this later phase, although it probably existed, since a large oven (4851) was found in the northwestern corner of the room with a foundation level at 84.75 m, ca. 0.5 m above the floor of Stratum D-4b. Three stones running on a diagonal line at levels 84.70–84.81 m were found in the northeastern part of the room (8838).

Room 2869

This room (inner dimensions 2.1×3.0 m, 6.3 sq m) was the southern part of D-4b Room 8816, after its division by a narrow partition wall (1868) (Photos 15.98–15.99). Its walls were covered with white plaster. The western wall (1860) was preserved to six to seven courses, the southern wall (1884) to at least nine courses, and the northern wall (1868) up to seven courses in the west, yet its eastern part was severely damaged by Stratum D-3 pits (see below).

The 1.1 m-wide entrance to Room 2869 from the street was in its southwestern corner. The door jambs were covered with white plaster. Beatenearth floor accumulations (2869) were revealed in this room at levels 84.71–84.81 m. The upper floor, composed of white plaster, seemed to slope up to Wall 1860 and abut it, but Wall 1868 floated above it, as if this wall was a later addition.

In the southeastern corner of the room, a row of bricks, 1.2 m long, was attached to Wall 1884 (4840); its function remained elusive. An installation made of light gray bricks (2891, not on the plan) was built against this construction, opposite the entrance to the room. Inside the installation was an almost complete storage jar, lacking its rim (Fig. 16.54:10). This installation perhaps belongs to a late phase in Stratum D-4a, as it almost blocked the entrance, suggesting that it was constructed after the entrance went out of use.

The function and nature of Building DJ cannot be determined with any certainty. The small size of most of the chambers could hardly have been functional in a dwelling and the plan does not resemble any known building of the period (Iron IB). It also remained unclear whether the two parts of the building on both sides of Walls 8834/8828 comprised one unit (as we are inclined to think) or belonged to two separate buildings (a northern one with three rooms and a southern one with four rooms, as in Stratum D-4b). Both these units were probably accessed from the east.

Summary of Stratum D-4

In Stratum D-4b, the general layout of the excavated area continued from Stratum D-5, but substantial changes occurred in each individual building. West of the street, Building DF was founded at this stage, although the possibility that it was founded in Stratum D-5 should not be ruled out. East of the street, the massive Buildings DD and DE of the previous stratum were replaced by new buildings (DG and DH). Building DG appeared to have contained a square courtyard surrounded by rooms at least on the north and west (although no entrance from the courtyard to the western rooms was found); its full plan on the east and south remained unknown. The northern building, DH, included only two rooms entered from the east, although they may have been part of a larger building extending to the east and perhaps to the north.

The installation on top of the western wall of Building DH raises questions as to its function and stratigraphy. If it had been contemporary with the building, the wall on which it was founded could not have functioned as an actual wall, but rather as a podium for the installation, which might have been related to olive-oil production. Alternatively, it could be explained as being in secondary use as a foundation for the western wall of Building DH.

In Stratum D-4a, the former plan of the area west of the street remained unchanged, while east of the street, the basic plan was retained, with inner changes. It seems most likely that this area became one large building (DJ), although it is possible that it was divided between two adjacent building, as in the previous phase.

Stratum D-3

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.26–15.27
  • Sections: Figs. 15.21, 15.33–15.35
  • Photos 15.100–15.107
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.55–16.58
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-3 was characterized by a series of 45 pits found in an open area in Squares N–P–Q/4–5 between levels 84.95–86.60 m. They post-dated Stratum D-4 elements and pre-dated the construction of Walls 1809, 1820 and 2820 of Stratum D-2. However, they could have been either contemporary with or earlier than Walls 4808 and 4809, attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/5, since the latter had deep foundations on the same level and even lower than the pits and rest on top of Stratum D-4 walls and debris (see further on this subject below). Two additional pits were located in Square R/4 in Area C (Stratum C-3; Chapter 12), thus establishing a good correlation between the stratigraphic sequences in these two areas.

The pits were cut into debris (1806, 1850) and brick walls of Stratum D-4a. In several places, two and sometimes three phases of pits cut one another. In light of the sheer density of the pits, graphic considerations required their presentation in two plans (Figs. 15.26–15.27).

Table 15.3 provides a list of the pits and their levels, while the plans show their location without levels.

The pits ranged in diameter from 0.3 to 1.0 m (except 2834, discussed below); some were very shallow (at least their preserved height), while others were over a meter deep. They can be divided into two groups: pits lined with thick pink plaster, probably used as silos, some of which yielded large amounts of olive stones, and unplastered pits, which could have been used for refuse. None of the pits which cut into the D-4a brick collapse had a pink plaster floor. This does not necessarily mean they were not used as silos, but rather that the compacted brick material perhaps supplied a sufficiently hard and sealed bedding for storage. Indeed, a couple of these pits contained olive stones and grain.

In the following description, the pits are listed from south to north, starting with the plastered ones, followed by the unplastered ones. The text below includes only some of the pits, while others are recorded only in the table and plans.

Plastered Pits

In Square Q/4, just north of the southern balk, Pit 2833 was a deep pit that was not completely excavated. It cut Pit 2868 to its east. East of these pits, 2804 cut into Pits 4815 and 4834. Further east was Pit 2829, continuing into the eastern section, with Pit 4841 below it. Pit 2834 differed from the other pits, being larger (diameter 1.9 m) and amorphic in shape. This pit was cut by a plastered pit (2844).

In the central and northern parts of Square Q/4, the number of pits and the density of their phasing increased. An exception was Pit 2808, 0.6 m in diameter and only 0.17 m deep, surrounded by bricks. Additional pits in this dense concentration were 2850, 2857, 2858, 2862, 2872 and 2885.

Unplastered Pits

Eight pits in Square Q/4 were unplastered (4805, 4806, 4814, 4815, 4821, 4834, 4835, 4865). Most of these belonged to the lower layer of pits (Table 15.3; Fig. 15.26). Some of them contained organic material, such as (in order of frequency) olive stones, wood charcoal, charred grain and chickpeas. In some of the pits were large sherds, including bases of jars (e.g., 4814).

Three additional unplastered pits were located on the southern edge of Square Q/5 (7858, 7860, 7863). They were dug into a compact accumulation of Stratum D-4a (7855) and were the northernmost pits in this concentration. All three contained loose dark soil with a large quantity of olive pits, charcoal and grains. Pit 7863 was a small shallow pit (diameter ca. 0.6 m). Pit 7860 was ca. 1.0 m in diameter and contained several layers of ash; in addition to the organic remains, it contained some sherds and bones, mixed with plaster chunks and brick fragments. Both these pits were cut by Pit 7858, a round shallow pit, ca. 1.0 m in diameter.

On the western edge of Square Q/4 and the eastern side of P/4 were several additional unplastered pits that cut into one another. Pit 2885 was 1.1 m long and about 0.7 m wide; it cut the shallow Pit 2832 to its north. North of this, Pit 2815 cut into a large and deep plastered pit (1858), which cut D-4 Wall 1868.

Nine pits were dug into the collapsed-brick layers of Stratum D-4 in the western part of Square P/4 and in Squares N/4–5 (1838, 1848, 1849, 1859, 1867, 4810, 4811, 4846, 8804). Pit 1848 in Squares P/4–5 was sealed by Wall 1809 of Stratum D-2 and cut the corner of Walls 1860 and 1868 of Stratum D-4a. In the center of Square P/4, Pit 1838, which was cut by another very poorly preserved pit, cut collapse and debris layer 1850 down to the level of the street surface (1873) of Stratum D-4a. The burnt organic material which covered the center of the square in D-4a was visible in the sides of this pit. Three additional pits, excavated in the western part of Square P/4, cut into a D-4a collapse layer (1806): Pit 1849 (only its rounded bottom was preserved) and Pits 1865 and 1859 to its north; olive stones found in many of these pits raised the possibility that local olive-oil production took place nearby.

Pits in Area C. Two additional pits were excavated in Square R/4 of Area C, adjacent to Area D. These were Pits 11438 and 11439, found at levels which corresponded to the lower pits in Area D (Fig. 15.27; see also Fig. 12.5). They were sealed by Stratum C-2 (=VI) walls and floors (Chapter 12). The finds in these pits were scanty and included a few olive pits and sherds.

Summary of D-3 Pits

The numerous pits in Stratum D-3 were bounded on the north by the line of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 in the middle of Squares P–Q/5. North of this line, no pits nor any other elements of Stratum D-3 were found and the structures of Stratum D-2 were built right on top of D-4 elements. It should be noted that the foundations of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 (=VI) were sunk to levels 85.20–85.50 m, which corresponded to the level of the pits. This wall was constructed on top of Stratum D-4a Building DJ. Similarly, the foundation of Stratum C-2 (=VI) Wall 1563 in the balk between Squares Q–R/4 was at level 85.70 m, which fits the upper level of most of the pits. However, elsewhere in Area C, no such pits were found in contexts dated to the transition from Iron I to Iron IIA, and architectural continuity predominated.

The D-3 pits thus represent a local phenomenon entailing special activity of short duration, post-dating the destruction of Stratum D-4 and established before the construction of Stratum VI (local Strata D-2 and C-2). A discussion of their possible function, either for food storage or as refuse pits, as well as a comparative analysis, is presented in the summary and conclusions at the end of this chapter. For an alternative interpretation suggesting that the pits, in fact, belonged to Stratum D-2, see below in the discussion of Stratum D-2. Even if this alternative is not accepted, it should be noted that seven pits were found in Stratum D-2, in Squares Q–P/4, just above the pits attributed to Stratum D-3. It was unclear whether an additional pit, 2829, belonged to D-3 or D-2.

The area around the pits and slightly above them was denoted Locus 2817 in Square Q/4 and in the eastern part of Square P/4. This was a layer of soft brown earth between levels 86.16–85.60 m that might have been either the D-3 occupation layer from which the pits were dug or the top layer of decayed debris of D-4 into which the pits were cut. Locus 1823 in Square P/4 (85.67–86.10 m) was higher by ca. 0.4–0.9 m than the D-3 pits in this square; since this square was on the slope of the mound just below walls of Stratum D-2, this layer might be explained as levelling in preparation for the construction of the D-2 walls (see below). Pottery from these two loci (2817, 1823) is presented in Figs 16.57–16.58.

Stratum D-2

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plan: Fig. 15.28
  • Sections: Figs. 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.108–15.115
  • Pottery: Fig. 16.59
Discussions
Introduction

Several architectural features were assigned to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/4–5 that were interpreted as being later than the D-3 pits of Iron IB and preceding the Stratum D-1a–c architecture found in Square Q/5 (an alternative interpretation is suggested below). These remains are thought to be contemporary with those of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and thus are shown on the same plan (Chapter 12; Figs. 12.7–12.8).

Remains in Squares P–Q/4

Three narrow brick walls (1820, 1809, 4827) created a small chamber in Square P/4 (4826; 1.7 m wide, length unknown), close to the erosion line which cut it on the west. This room (Photo 15.108) was built above a layer of D-4a burnt brick debris and collapse (1850) which seems to have been levelled in preparation for the construction of the new building and above the D-3 pits. A fragmentary floor (4826) was found at level 86.08 m, continuing below Wall 4827 to the north (4825) and thus, the wall was probably a secondary partition constructed on top of the floor. Floor 4825 was cut in a straight line by Trench 4860, which was either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal trench burrowed from the nearby slope on the west; the latter possibility is more plausible. The southern and eastern walls, preserved up to four courses high and lacking stone foundations, were covered with mud plaster — Wall 1809 on both faces and Wall 1820 on the northern face only. To the east of the chamber, a floor (1886) abutted Wall 1809 at 86.34 m, higher than the floor inside the chamber. The mud plaster on Wall 1809 continued down to coat one of the bricks below this floor level as well.

Below Floor 1886, and on the level of the lowest brick of Wall 1809, was an earth layer (1823) at levels 86.10–85.67 m, which was higher than the pits attributed to Stratum D-3 in this square and thus, may be explained as either the upper layer of Stratum D-3 or a fill intended to level the area on the slope of the mound for the construction of Walls 1820, 1809 and 4827 of Stratum D-2. This stratigraphic attribution is significant due to the fact that four radiocarbon dates of olive stones from this layer were measured (Chapter 48; Samples R21– R22) that point to the last quarter of the 10th century BCE in the 68.2% probability range and somewhat earlier in the 95% probability range.

South of Wall 1820, Locus 1802 probably marked an open area where thick striated layers of occupation debris between levels 86.11–87.19 m covered a layer of burnt brick collapse of Stratum D-4a (1850) and two pits of Stratum D-3. Among the finds from this area was a small stone seal depicting a scorpion (Chapter 30A, No. 1). Six radiocarbon dates of olive pits from this locus (Chapter 48; Sample R23) provide dates that cover most of the 10th century BCE.

A poorly preserved brick wall (2820) was exposed along 2.0 m, cut by Pit 2818 on the north and Pit 2805 on the south. Floor 1886 was found west of Wall 2820 at level 86.34 m, although it did not abut this wall. In the northern part of the square was a plaster floor at level 86.51 m (7837) and to the east of Wall 2820 was a thick layer (1837) containing a large amount of pottery (Figs. 16.60– 16.62), several fallen bricks, bones and some charcoal; a number of beads were found here as well. Among the finds was one Philistine Bichrome sherd (Fig. 16.60:15). This apparently had been a refuse dump in an open area, similar to Locus 1802 to the southwest of the wall, although it might have been a fill laid in preparation for construction of the subsequent D-1 structures.

Building 4828 in Squares P–Q/5

In Squares P–Q/5, two walls (4808, 4819), preserved to 1.15–1.6 m, formed part of a unit that continued to the east. Trench 4860 to the south of these walls cut the remains of Phase D-4. As mentioned above, this could be either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal burrow. A layer of reed impressions in clay found below the foundation of Wall 4808 (Photo 15.111) may be explained as either related to the construction of this wall or as the roof collapse of Building DJ of Stratum D-4 (the top of the latter’s walls were ca. 0.5 m lower). A third wall (4869), observed in the topsoil of Square P/6 north of the limits of the excavation area, seems to have belonged to the same building as Walls 4808 and 4819, creating a space 3.25 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Inside this space was a brick debris layer (4828) that rested on a possible floor at level 86.08 m. This was exactly the same level as the floor in Room 4826 to the south. If this indeed was the floor, then the foundations of the walls consisted of six to seven brick courses below the floor level, with no stone foundation. These deep foundations imply that this had been a sturdy, well-built structure. The light yellow and compacted matrix of the bricks of these walls was typical of Stratum VI construction elsewhere in the site. The pottery recovered from Locus 4828 included some red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, typical of this stratum. Thus, this room might be correlated on the basis of architectural, stratigraphic and pottery indicators to Stratum C-2 (=VI); see, however an alternative interpretation below.

Squares Q–R/4

Dismantling the balk between Squares Q/4 and R/4 revealed Wall 1563, a north–south wall preserved to a height of 1.6 m; its foundation was at levels 85.61–85.70 m, higher than that of Wall 4808 in Square P/5 (Fig. 15.28). Wall 1563 was built of the same yellowish bricks typical of Stratum VI and was found tilted to the east (in the opposite direction of the nearby slope of the mound), perhaps due to seismic damage. It was the western wall of a room of Stratum VI exposed in Area C, Square R/4, whose floor was at level 85.60 m (Chapter 12, Fig. 12.9). It made a corner on the south with Wall 1572, which was preserved only four courses high and to a length of ca. 1.0 m. Abutting Wall 1563 on the west was a layer of debris on an earthen layer (1556) at level 85.70 m, which may have been a floor, although this identification remained unsure. The eastern half of a pit (1567) was uncovered, dug into Floor 1556. The relationship between this floor and the deep debris of Locus 1837 to its west (see above) remained unclear, since the levels of 1837 and the foundations of Wall 2820 further to the west were higher than the supposed floor (1556). These discrepancies may be explained as a result of the layers tilting towards the east, as observed in several strata at Tel Rehov. As noted, Debris 1837 may have been a constructional fill for Stratum D-1 floors, which may explain its rather high level compared to Floor 1556. A third possible explanation is that Floor 1556 (if indeed correctly identified as a floor) belonged to a late phase of Stratum D-3 and was not related to Wall 1563 (although this was not the impression during the excavation).

No evidence for the nature of the end of Stratum D-2 was found. Floors, as much as they were revealed, were found empty of finds in situ and the remains were damaged by erosion, especially on the west. This level is correlated with Stratum C-2 based on the stratigraphic continuity with Square R/4 and thus, should be dated to the early to middle 10th century BCE.

An Alternative Interpretation

Yael Rotem, field supervisor of Area D East, suggested that the northern structure in Stratum D-2 (Walls 4808, 4819, 4869) was contemporary with the Stratum D-3 pits, based on the fact that none of the D-3 pits were found below or north of Wall 4808 and that the latter wall was founded just above Stratum D-4a walls and occupation debris. In its center, Wall 4808 stands to a height of up to 1.6 m between levels 85.27 and 87.06 m, while the pits were between levels 85.23 and 86.50 m, corresponding to the lower part of this wall. Thus, the possibility that the pits and the wall were contemporary should not be ruled out. In that case, the walls belonging to this unit should be attributed to Stratum D-3 at the end of the Iron Age I. This is not contradicted by the few sherds that were related to these walls.

In the western part of Square R/4, Wall 1563, attributed to Stratum D-2, was founded at level 85.61 m, which may indicate that this wall, too, was contemporary with at least some of the D-3 pits (Fig. 15.28). The concentration of restorable pottery found in Locus 1555b east of this wall (Figs. 13.10–13.11) is typical of late Iron I or Early Iron IIA at Tel Rehov. However, stratigraphically, this locus is attributed to Stratum C-2 because of its relation to D-2 Wall 1563 and C-2 walls to its east. It is above a thin debris layer that covered a floor with two pits that are similar to those in Stratum D-3 (see details in Chapter 12).

A. Mazar pointed out the following difficulties in accepting Y. Rotem’s suggestion:
  1. the short and fragmentary walls (1809, 1820, 4827, 2820) and related floors that were attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares R–Q/4 were on a higher level and were later than the D-3 pits. A floor related to these structures (4825) was cut on its north by a trench that ran along the southern side of Wall 4808. If this was the foundation trench of this wall, then it would have been later than the D-3 pits. However, as noted above, it seems more likely that this trench represented animal burrowing and thus, these stratigraphic conclusions would be inaccurate.
  2. Pits 11438 and 11439 in Square R/4 (excavated as part of Area C; see Fig. 15.27 and Chapter 12, discussion of Strata C-3 and C-2 in Square R/4, Figs. 12.5, 12.9) were earlier than the pottery concentration in Locus 1555b, which abutted the lowest level of Walls 1563, 4458 and 1567 of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI). The floor with the two pits could be contemporary with the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (see Table 15.3). In any event, the Stratum D-3 pits would be earlier than the architecture of Stratum C-2, which appears to correspond with Room 4828 of Stratum D-2.
  3. Locus 1837, a 1.0 m thick debris layer with Iron IIA pottery in Square Q/4, may allude to an Iron IIA date of Wall 4808 to the north (although this debris layer may also be explained as a fill laid prior to the construction of D-1 structures).
  4. As mentioned above, the technical features of the walls in Room 4828 fit those of Stratum VI in other excavation areas.
We thus present Y. Rotem’s suggestion as a remote possibility. If correct, it would require attributing Room 4828 to Stratum D-3 and leaving Stratum D-2 with almost no architectural remains.

Stratum D-1

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.29–15.31
  • Sections: Figs. 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.115–15.122
  • Pottery: Fig. 16.60
Discussions
Introduction

Several fragmentary architectural elements at the top of the slope in Squares P–Q/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-1 (Strata V and IV). Although they were close to topsoil and the erosion line and were poorly preserved, they indicated dense building activity which can be divided into three phases, denoted D-1c, D-1b and D-1a; these can be correlated with similar phases uncovered in the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C (Chapter 12). Like in Area D, the lower two levels in the latter square were identical in terms of architecture and the difference between them was only in floor raising, while the upper phase, C-1a, showed a substantial change in terms of plan and architecture. This similarity between the two adjacent squares enabled a secure correlation between the two areas.

Stratum D-1c

This phase comprised several architectural features in Squares Q/4–5, which superimposed Stratum D-2 architecture (Fig. 15.29; Photos 15.115– 15.116). The walls appeared to belong to one building, the western part of which was destroyed by erosion.

The most substantial element of Phases D-1c and D-1b was Wall 7803, preserved to a height of more than 1.5 m. This east–west wall in Square Q/5 had a stone foundation only at its eroded western end (Square P/5), where the brick superstructure had disappeared due to erosion. This rather massive stone foundation was intended to support the wall close to the steep slope of the mound. Such a stone foundation is notable, as it was not found in other buildings of Strata VI–IV in all other excavation areas. Wall 7803 was bonded with north–south Wall 7824, which was narrower and probably served as an inner partition wall. Some 2.0 m north of its corner with Wall 7803, Wall 7824 made a corner with Wall 4809, which extended to the west and disappeared at the erosion line after 1.1 m. To the north of this corner, Wall 7811 continued the line of Wall 7824. It was built of dark friable bricks, preserved two courses high. It may have been a later addition to the building, since its foundation level was somewhat higher than the rest of the walls in this structure. These walls created three separate rooms or spaces.

The space east of Wall 7824 (7837) was at least 3.0×3.7 m, continuing east and north beyond the limits of the excavation area. A plaster floor (7837) was exposed in this space at level 86.49 m; on top of it was an accumulation of striations, sealed underneath a massive brick collapse.

The space to the west of Wall 7824 and limited by Wall 4809 on the north was badly eroded on the slope. In the corner of Walls 7824 and 4809 was a semi-circular brick bin (7820), comprising two courses of narrow bricks. It covered the top of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2.

Square Q/4 remained a large open space. On the western edge of this area very fragmentary remains were detected close to the erosion line, including part of a circular line of bricks with a floor (1834), perhaps a silo, located above the D-2 remains. The installation was bordered on the north by a fragment of a stone foundation (1852) bearing a single brick, which was all that remained of its superstructure. To the north of the wall, the stones continued into Square Q/5, where they functioned as a foundation for Wall 7803.

It seems that the end of this phase was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse.

Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C, which consisted of a few narrow walls and a floor (4483, level 86.70 m; Chapter 12).

Stratum D-1b

Stratum D-1b refers to a later phase of the previous occupation, when the buildings continued to be in use, but slight changes were made in floors and installations (Fig. 15.30; Photos 15.117–15.120). In Square Q/5, two phases of partially preserved ovens (7825, 7817) were found east of Wall 7811, related to a floor (7812). Their foundations were at levels 86.87 m and 86.78 m respectively, ca. 0.3 m above the floor of Stratum D-1c. Two intact oil lamps (Fig. 16.61:8–9) were found in the debris (7809) west of the ovens. In the corner of Walls 4809 and 7811, a thin clay floor (7827) was found at level 86.71 m.

Square Q/4 continued to be an open space (1807) as in the previous phase. Three ovens were found in the southwestern corner of this square, just below topsoil: 1813 (87.26–87.47 m), 1827 (87.11– 87.38 m) and 1817 (87.13–87.28 m). Two of them (1813, 1827) continued into the southern balk. The level of these ovens was slightly lower than the foundation of Wall 1808 of Stratum D-1a to the east (Fig. 15.31) and thus, they were attributed to D-1b.

In spite of the above description, the division between D-1c and D-1b must be viewed with reservation: the three ovens attributed to D-1b in Squares Q–P/4 could also be attributed to D-1c and thus, the separation between these two phases would be limited to the construction of the two ovens in Square Q/5, ca. 0.3 m above Floor 7837.

Stratum D-1a

In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.

In the southeastern corner of Square Q/5, a fragmentary east–west wall (7806), 1.2 m long and preserved to 0.6 m, can be attributed to this phase. A single brick (7823) found to its west may be its continuation, although it might just be a fallen brick.

Islamic Period Burial 4829

In Square P/5, a burial of an adult (4829) was dug into D-1c–b Wall 4809. The grave was covered with a line of bricks taken from the wall. The body was lying on its back, the skull in the northeast and the feet in the southwest. The skull was slightly tilted, with the eye sockets facing the feet, approximately towards the south. No finds were found in relation to this burial. This was most probably an Islamic burial, similar to the ones found in Area B (Chapter 8).

Chapter 15D - Summary and Conclusions

Settlement History and Architecture

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

Discussions
The Available Data

It should be recalled that only a limited area of ca. 150 sq m, and in many cases much less, was excavated in Area D in each phase. This is a very tiny sample compared to the entire area of the site, which is ca. 100,000 sq m; thus, the available sample comprised only ca. 0.15%. Since the Late Bronze/Iron I sequence was hardly excavated in other parts of the tell, caution must be exercised when making generalizations based on the available data. Phases with poor architectural remains should not be taken as representing the entire site. For example, although the building remains of Strata D-2 and D-1 were fragmentary and unimpressive, we know that they belonged to a densely built and well-planned Iron IIA city, as uncovered in the adjacent Area C and other excavation areas.

Settlement Continuity

The most prominent result of the excavation in Area D was the observation of continued occupation throughout the 600 years spanning Late Bronze I to Iron IIA. Eleven main strata from this time span were defined and several of them have two sub-phases (D-11, D-9, D-7, D-6, D-4) or even three sub-phases (D-1). No major widespread destruction layers were detected in the entire sequence in Area D; an occupation gap may have separated Stratum D-8 from D-7b, as evidenced by the 0.5 m thick accumulation between these two strata, yet this could not be confirmed. Thick accumulations of floor striations in open areas and streets in most strata were evidence for continued activity over a long time. In terms of architecture, the large public building of Stratum D-10 (14th century BCE) and the urban planning and architecture of Strata D-5 and D-4 of Iron IB, should be noted.

Summary of the Stratigraphy and Architecture by Period

The Late Bronze Age

The foundation of the city in Late Bronze I (Stratum D-11b) is an exceptional phenomenon in the Southern Levant, as there are almost no new cities founded in this period, which is considered as a period of decline following the Egyptian conquest of Canaan. The low elevation of the earliest stratum compared to the present-day field west of the mound shows that the level of the colluvial field must have risen considerably during the historical periods. It is hypothesized that the earliest settlement was founded at approximately the same level as the adjacent field, or somewhat higher than the field west of the mound, while young tectonic activities were responsible for later geomorphological processes in this area. This, again, is an exceptional feature in Canaanite cities, which were most often located on raised topography. This earliest occupation had a later phase, denoted D-11a, although both these phases are little known, due to limited exposure.

The builders of Building DA of Stratum D-10 (most probably in the 14th century BCE) found it necessary to raise the level of the floors by erecting deep buttressed foundation walls and a 2.0 m-deep constructional fill. We assume that only a small part of this substantial building was excavated; not enough was excavated to define its function with any certainty. It may have served as a palace or elite residence, or as an administrative building. Its brick buttresses were a rare phenomenon in this period, known only from public architecture at a few other sites like Ugarit, Alalakh and Megiddo, mostly in stone.

Strata D-9 and D-8 were later occupation phases of Late Bronze IIB (late 14th and 13th centuries BCE). In Stratum D-9b, a new building (DB) was built above Building DA of Stratum D-10, with some continuity between the two, as demonstrated by several walls retaining the outline of the former building. However, the building techniques changed and the new building appeared to have been much less elaborate than its predecessor. An important feature was the bronze-melting installation in the form of a canal, which recalls Egyptian metallurgical technology of the 13th century BCE (Chapter 40C). Stratum D-9a demonstrated a radical architectural change; some of the older walls went out of use and a new wall, stone floor and pillar bases were added. In the last LB IIB phase, Stratum D-8, architectural continuity is seen in the eastern side of the excavated area, while the rest of the area remained an open space.

Iron Age IA

A thick accumulation separated the open area of Stratum D-8 from that of the subsequent Stratum D-7b which can be securely dated to the early 12th century BCE. One small pit contained a cache of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapters 4, 39). In the following phase (D-7a), the area was redesigned as a dwelling with a stone floor and several installations, some of which were densely concentrated in one of its units; a prominent feature in this phase was the six foundation deposits of the lampand-bowl type (see discussion below). In part of the area, a still higher phase was detected (D-7a'), when a new line of pillar bases was built above the previous stone pavement.

In Stratum D-6b, two of the older walls continued to be in use, but new floors, installations and ovens were constructed. The location of the ovens above earlier ones indicated continuity in the function of this area in the transition from D-7a to D-6b. Two of the installations were plastered basins that perhaps were used for some industrial purpose, such as linen dyeing or processing. Stratum D-6a marks further changes; much of the previous architecture went out of use, although one installation continued and two new ovens replaced the previous ones. Two samples submitted to 14C dating (Samples R2, R3, measured four times) provided a date in the 12th–11th centuries BCE and additional considerations narrow it down to the second half of the 12th century (see Chapters 4, 48).

Iron Age IB

Iron IB Strata D-5 and D-4 were preserved only in Squares N–Q/5 in the eastern part of the area. In both, a street crossed the area from north to south. The street surfaces were raised during the course of Strata D-5 and D-4 by almost 1.0 m, evidence for continuous intensive use and dumping of refuse into the street. Substantial buildings flanked the street on the east and west. Building DD of Stratum D-5 was a massive structure with elongated rooms and brick floors. It appeared to have had some public or administrative function, perhaps storage. A room to the north of this building may have been used for domestic cult.

In Stratum D-4, some substantial changes occurred in the planning of the area east of the street, now divided between two buildings: DG and DH. Building DG, based on the outlines of the previous building, DD, may have been a dwelling with a small square courtyard, surrounded by rooms on at least two sides. Building DH is little known, as only two rooms were exposed. An unusual feature attributed to this phase was an installation composed of three large stones, one with a shallow depression, located on top of the eastern wall. Its function and the reason for its strange location remain unknown. Building DF, west of the street, was another dwelling or parts of two attached dwellings, of which only the eastern part was preserved, including a stone-paved area (courtyard?) and parts of three rooms. In the later Stratum D-4a, it appears that Buildings DG and DH were combined into one, since the double wall between the two was replaced by a single brick wall. The new building, denoted DJ, retained the basic features of the previous two buildings, yet new partition walls and floors were constructed in several of the rooms. Building DF west of the street continued to be in use and the floors above the stone-paved area in the southern part of this complex were raised several times. A suggested reconstruction of the area, combined with building remains in Area C (Fig. 15.25), indicates a well-planned and densely built area, perhaps representative of other parts of the city as well. Radiocarbon dates from Stratum D-4 point to an 11th century BCE date (Chapter 48).

Stratum D-3 indicates a substantial change in the occupational history of this area; the buildings of Stratum D-4 went out of use and were replaced by 45 pits cut into the brick debris of the Stratum D-4 buildings. Probably used as refuse or storage pits, they continued into the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C to the east. However, a similar phenomenon was not found in other parts of Area C and thus, the pits were probably a local phenomenon, while elsewhere in Area C, Iron IB buildings continued unchanged. A large number of radiocarbon dates from the pits provided a wide range, from the 11th to the 10th/9th centuries BCE (Chapters 4, 48).

Iron Age IIA

Strata D-2 and D-1 of the Iron IIA were preserved only on the upper part of the slope (Squares Q/4–5 and the eastern side of P/4–5). Stratum D-2 is correlated with Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and marks the westernmost structures of this well-planned Early Iron IIA city, well known in Area C (Table 15.1 and Chapter 12). In the north of the area were remains of a substantial building and in the south were fragmentary structures and an open area with pits (for an alternative proposal which would combine the building in Squares P–Q/5 and the pits of Stratum D-3 into a single stratum; see above).

Strata D-1c and D-1b should be correlated with Stratum C-1b (Stratum V; Table 15.1). The building of D-2 in the northern part of the area was replaced with a new building comprising two stratigraphic phases; the later one included two ovens. In the southern part, the open area continued to be in use with higher floors and three new ovens. Stratum D-1a marks yet another architectural change; a new structure with narrow brick walls was built in the southern part of the area, perhaps part of a dwelling continuing into Square R/4 of Area C to the east.

Discussion of Various Features

Erosion, Tectonic Changes and Lack of Fortifications

The excavation in Area D provided important information concerning the impact of environmental factors, such as erosion and tectonic movements, on site formation. The lower (western) edge of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium created during the last three thousand years. Each of the strata was damaged by erosion, although its extent is unknown; it may have demolished only narrow parts of the western slope or, combined with tectonic movements, a somewhat larger part. Nevertheless, it seems likely that erosion could not have been so extensive, and that there were no fortifications during the periods excavated in Area D. This was confirmed also along the northern edge of the mound in Areas C and E concerning the Iron IIA strata.

Tectonic movements caused walls, floors and occupation layers to tilt from west to east or to the southeast, as opposed to the direction of the outer slope of the mound. Such tilting was clearly related to tectonic movements which occurred both during the occupation of the lower mound and subsequently (Chapter 2). The location of the tell on top of the Western Marginal Fault of the Dead Sea Transform was thus significant in regard to site formation processes.

Destruction, Continuity and Change

No evidence for violent destruction was found in any of the strata in Area D, except in part of Building DJ, Stratum D-4a, where limited ash debris and restorable pottery in situ were detected. It appeared that the transition between strata was peaceful and was the result of damage caused by prolonged use, earthquakes, etc. In spite of marked changes between strata, there was continuity in the outlines of buildings, continuous use of certain walls and installations, and the construction of new ovens more or less in the same location of earlier ones.

Building Techniques

The walls of the Late Bronze Strata D-11 and D-10 were constructed of bricks without stone foundations; Stratum D-11b Wall 1927 might have been made of packed-earth construction (pisé). In Strata D-9–D-4, most walls had stone foundations of one or two courses that bore a brick superstructure. In the Iron IIA strata (D-2 and D-1), brick walls were constructed without stone foundations, as in contemporary strata in the other excavation areas across the mound.

The 2.0 m-thick constructional fill and buttresses of Building DA in Stratum D-10 were an exceptional feature found only in this specific building, which was clearly of a public nature. The thick fills were possibly necessary due to the low location of the building close to the surrounding fields.

Most floors were made of beaten earth or plaster. In several cases, such as in the courtyard of Building DA of Stratum D-10, the floor was white, probably the result of using crushed tufa and/or lisan-formation huwar. In a few cases, floors were made of a light pink clay. In Strata D-11a, D-9a, D-7a and D-4b, cobblestone floors were found in specific rooms or courtyards.

Lines of pillar bases were detected in Strata D-9b, D-9a, D-8, D-7a and D-7a'. The bases were made of flattened basalt and limestone, and sometimes large pebbles were used, as well as broken grinding stones. These bases must have supported wooden pillars. In one case in Stratum D-9a, postholes were preserved above the stone bases.

No evidence for terraced construction on the slope was found, except for Stratum D-4, where a difference of 0.5–0.7 m was observed between the floors of rooms east and west of the street. A difference of 0.7 m in floor levels between Rooms 4879 and 4839, both west of the street, was also observed.

Nature of the Archaeological Deposits

Two main types of archaeological deposits were found in all the strata: debris related to the collapse of brick walls and occupation debris composed of thin accumulated layers, sometimes laminated in appearance (denoted ‘striations’) that contained many pottery sherds and animal bones. Such striations were especially common in the street layers of Strata D-5 and D-4 and open spaces in Strata D-8 to D-6. These layers are explained as resulting from intentional raising of floor levels and dumping refuse into open spaces.5
Footnotes

5 Natural causes for the creation of such layers were also considered, such as water flow and the deposition of chemical sediments (e.g., evaporites) or silts and clays which originated from nearby exposures of earlier strata, in a mechanism resembling ‘winter-wash’ deposits accumulating inside the squares between the excavation seasons. Based on field observations only, it seems that continuous human activity was the main cause for these laminations.

Foundation Deposits

Eight foundation deposits of the lamp-and-bowl type were found in Area D. The subject was discussed by Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993), who cited all examples known at the time of writing (for two additional ones from a 12th century BCE context at Tel Beth-Shean, see TBS III: 19); the earliest known examples are dated to the 13th century BCE. Our example from Stratum D-9b is tentatively dated to the late 14th or early 13th century BCE and thus, is one of the oldest known deposits of this type. It included a basalt bowl (unlike all the later foundation deposits that have a ceramic bowl) and a single lamp. Six deposits were discovered in Stratum D-7a Building DC of the 12th century, the heyday of this phenomenon, representing one of the densest concentrations of such deposits to be found in a single structure. A single deposit found in Stratum D-4 is one of the latest, dating to the late 11th century BCE. Our deposits contain either one bowl and one lamp or two bowls placed rim to rim, with a lamp between them. No other finds or material such as ash were detected in these deposits. Most of these were located either below a wall or close to its foundation (Fig. 15.13) and must have been related to the construction of the building. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993: 123) emphasized the southern distribution of such deposits (Shephelah, western Negev, southern coastal plain and Egyptian fortresses in northern Sinai and Gaza). The only northern site they could cite was Pella. The examples from Tel Beth-Shean and Tel Rehov enlarge this distribution map to include the Beth-Shean Valley. However, the lack of such deposits in major northern sites such as Dan, Hazor and Megiddo remains a fact. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni defined the phenomenon as “an Egyptian inspired local Canaanite custom”, which appeared mainly during the height of Egyptian control in Canaan, as well as in the Philistine city, Ekron (Tel Miqne). These foundation deposits must have been an expression of beliefs related to the construction of buildings, perhaps to ward off evil spirits.

Hearths and Ovens

Two hearths, a cooking installation and 16 ovens (tabuns) were found in Area D.

Two hearths (1925, 1926) were found in LB I Stratum D-11. They were circular (diameter 0.55 m) or oval (0.4×0.6 m), with a floor made of limestone pebbles and broken basalt grinding stones covered by black soot, and must have been used for cooking or roasting. They recall three hearths found in MB II levels at Tel Beth-Shean, although those were much larger, 1.3–1.5 m diameter (TBS II: 55–57, Fig. 3.6). A different type of cooking installation was found in Stratum D-7a (8902), which was a poorly preserved small fireplace, surrounded by clay.

Most of the 16 baking ovens were located in open spaces, with the possible exception of Space 9927 in Stratum D-9b. Most of the ovens were preserved less than 0.1 m high and were made of a number of clay layers; in several cases, an outer coating of pottery sherds was found. Stratum D-2 Oven 8818 was large (diameter 0.85 m) and well constructed. Another large oven (diameter 1.0 m, somewhat irregular in shape) was in the inner courtyard of Stratum D-4 Building DJ. Its construction may have been related to the unification of the previous buildings, DH and DG, into one large (family?) unit. All other ovens were smaller, 0.5– 0.6 m in diameter. Ovens did not appear in Strata D-10 and D-5, when cooking and baking must have been conducted in an area beyond the borders of the excavation.

Continuity in the location of ovens between several strata indicates continuity in the location of cooking areas. This was observed in two cases: Strata D-7 to D-6 and Strata D-2 to D-1b. In Stratum D-7a, Oven 7946, 0.6 m in diameter, was located in an open space near the installations in the southeastern corner of the area. It was replaced by a similar oven in Stratum D-6b, when a second oven was added slightly to its west. In Stratum D-6a, a new oven was built above the eastern one and thus, three superimposed ovens were found here. In Iron IIA Stratum D-2, an oven was found in the open space at the southern side of the area. In Stratum D-1b, five ovens were found, three more or less in the same area where the previous oven stood and two in the northern part of the area.

Installations

Various additional installations were found in Area D.

In Stratum D-9b, a bronze-melting installation in the form of a canal was found. Near it, a large circular flat stone surrounded by small stones and three plastered circular depressions in the floor were probably part of this workshop. A similar plastered depression was found in the eastern unit of the building.

Several plastered rectangular brick installations were found, one in Stratum D-7a, three in Stratum D-6b and one of which continued to be in use in Stratum D-6a. It may be suggested that these installations were used in some industrial function, such as textile production.

A square brick installation with traces of plaster inside that was probably used for storage was found in Building DD of Stratum D-5. Such bins were common in the 12th century BCE Strata S-4 and S-3 at Tel Beth-Shean (TBS III: 104, Fig. 4.3a, Building SA; 132–135, Buildings SH, SM).

Installation 8810 in Stratum D-4b was composed of four large basalt stones, one of them with a rounded depression; it might have been used for oil production.

Pits

Pits are a common feature in any excavation and their function for refuse, drainage or storage often remains obscure. In Area D, single pits were found in Strata D-7b and D-7a in open areas. In Strata D-5 and D-4, several pits of various sizes were found inside massive buildings. In Building DD, one large and three small pits were dug from the brick floors and in Building 8816 of Stratum D-4b, a large pit was located in the inner courtyard and two smaller pits in Room DG. These pits must have functioned in the house when it was in use, perhaps for refuse or to drain sewage.

A most outstanding phenomenon was the large group of 45 pits in Stratum D-3, (and two in Square R/4 in Area C, Stratum C-3), most likely used for refuse or storage. Most were unlined, containing few pottery sherds, olive pits and some ash. In several cases, such pits cut one another. These may be compared to a similar phenomena of multiple pits in a good number of Iron Age I sites, in particular those that were related to the ‘Israelite settlement’ (for a summary until 1988, see Finkelstein 1986: 124–128; 1988: 264–269, with references to Iron I contexts at Dan, Tel Zeror, Shiloh, Izbet ¥artah, Tell en-Na§beh, Tell Beit Mirsim, Beer Sheba, and Iron IIA Aphek). Finkelstein explained these pits as grain silos. Yet, a distinction should be made between stone-lined pits and unlined pits. Stonelined pits could indeed be used as silos for grain storage. Many of the pits at Dan V–VI were so used, while others were not stone lined and were perhaps used as refuse pits (Biran 1994: 126–135). Many pits were found at Izbet Sartah (seven in Stratum III, 43 in Stratum III, 10 in Stratum I; Finkelstein 1986: 5–28, 124–128), Shiloh (Finkelstein, Bunimovitz and Lederman 1993: 47– 48), Tell en-Nasbeh and Tell Beit Mirsim (ca. 20 pits in Stratum B; Albright 1943: Pl. 2). In Stratum XII/XI at Hazor, ca. 70 pits, ca. 1.0 m in diameter, comprised the bulk of the Iron I remains at this site. Most of them contained only pottery sherds and broken stone vessels; some were sealed with stones. They were explained as refuse pits (BenAmi and Ben Tor 2012: 18–21, 24–25). At Tell Deir ªAlla in the eastern Jordan Valley, 14 pits were found in Phase A, 20 in Phase B and 10 in Phase C, all dated to the 12th century BCE (Franken 1969: 3–45). At Tel Zeror, over 20 unlined pits dating to Iron I, possibly used for refuse, were found (Ohata 1996: 24–25, Pl. III). Our pits seem to belong to this latter group, although several were coated with a thin white plaster, which may have rendered them suitable for food storage. This matter remains open.

While at most of these sites, the pits appeared throughout the Iron Age I, in our case, they were a cluster only in the latest phase of that period, probably representing some short-term activity. On the dating of these pits, see Chapters 4 and 48.

Four pits were attributed to Early Iron IIA Stratum D-2; they were not different from those of Stratum D-3 and their stratigraphic attribution is based only on levels.

Plans and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 15.1          Area D at the end of 1997 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.2          Area D at the end of 1998 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.3          Area D at the end of 2000 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4          Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5          Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6          General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.7          General view, with backhoe digging a trench in the alluvial plain west of the mound, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13          Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.14          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.15          Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.16          Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.17          Backhoe trench in Square M/10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.18          Squares L–M/4 at end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.19          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.20          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.21          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.22          Square M/5, Buttress 8938 and Wall 8942 abutted by D-10 Courtyard 8934 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27          Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28          Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29          Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31          Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.32          Squares N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.33          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.34          Detail of bronze-melting canal (8921) with fragments of bellow, charcoal, and metal object in situ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.35          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.36          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.39          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40          Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42          Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.43          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.44          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45          Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46          Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.58          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.59          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.60          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.62          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63          Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64          Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65          Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66          Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67          Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68          Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69          Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70          Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71          Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74          Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.78          General view of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.79          Squares N–P/4,from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.80          Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.81          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.82          Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.83          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.84          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.85          Squares P–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.86          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.87          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.89          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.90          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.91          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.92          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.93          Squares Q–P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.94          Square Q/5, looking east; D-4a Building DJ, brick collapse in Room 7853 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.95          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.96          Square P/5, looking west; D-4a Building DJ, debris and vessels in Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.97          Smashed Pottery in Square P/5 D-4a Building DJ, Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.98          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.99          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.100          Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.101          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.102          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.103          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.104          Square Q/4, D-3 Pit 2808 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.105          Squares P–Q/4, looking west at upper D-3 pits from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.106          Square Q/4, looking south at D-3 Pit 2872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.107          Square Q/4, looking west at D-3 Pit 2850 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.108          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.109          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.110          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.111          Square P/5, looking south at reed impressions (ceiling collapse?) on plaster layer from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.112          Closeup of layer in Photo 15.111 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.113          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.114          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.115          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.116          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.117          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.118          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.119          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.120          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.121          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.122          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.123          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Chapter 17 - Area E: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 17.1          Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2          Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.1          Schematic plan of Areas E and F; Iron IIA Stratum F-1 in black from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2a          Plan of Stratum E-3 (Square E/15) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2b          Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3          Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.4          Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5          General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.13          Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Discussions
Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

Area E was located in the northeastern part of Tel Rehov in main grid square 16 (Chapter 3) at the highest point of the eastern part of the lower mound, although it was 13.5 m lower than the highest point in Area C in the northwestern part. The area was close to the northern and eastern edges of the mound, reaching the top of the steep northern slope in only one narrow probe (Squares E/20, E/1). The area included fourteen fully excavated squares and four half squares, a total of 400 sq m, and an additional narrow trench of 25 sq m north of the main area. The topsoil slightly descended southwards, creating an elevation difference of 0.82 m over a distance of 20 m between the northern and southern ends of the area.

The goal of the excavation was to determine the occupational history of the uppermost strata in this part of the mound. It turned out that most of this area can be interpreted as a sacred precinct or sanctuary during the Iron Age IIA, comprising a large open courtyard, a raised platform, several installations and two structural units which can be related to this sanctuary (Buildings EA and EB). On the western edge of the area, part of a dwelling was excavated (Building EC)

The excavation in Area E began in 1997 in six squares: E–F/13–15. During the 1998 season, the area was extended to the north (Squares D–E/15– 16, F/16). In 2000, the area was extended to Square D/14, the northern half of D/13, and 2.0 m-wide probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16, intended to locate the edge of the open courtyard in the northern part of the area. In 2001, three new squares were opened (C/14–16) and a 2.5 m-wide probe was excavated in Squares E/20 and E/1 (in main grid square 20), intended to answer the question whether there were fortifications along the northern edge of the mound (Photos 17.1–17.3).

The excavations in Area E were supervised by Se Jin Koh (1997–1998, 2000) and James Paul Cowie, Diana Edelman and Naama Yahalom-Mack (2001).

Area F, located 5.0 m south of Area E, was directly related to the latter (Fig. 17.1; see Chapter 19).

Stratum E-3 (perhaps to be correlated with general Stratum VII) is known from only one debris layer in a narrow probe in Square E/15. Stratum E-2 (correlated with general Stratum VI) was examined in only a few probes in Squares D–F/15, E/13–14 and the nature of the area in that stratum remains virtually unknown. The few floors from this phase were 0.7–1.0 m below those of Stratum E-1b, at levels 71.07–71.30 m.

The main feature in this area was an architectural complex which we define as an open-air sanctuary, attributed to Strata E-1b and E-1a, correlated with general Strata V and IV. In Stratum E-1a, the heart of this complex was Building EB, containing a platform with masseboth at its northeastern corner. This building was preceded by Building ED of Stratum E-1b, although only one room and a few fragmentary walls of the latter were excavated. A spacious courtyard east and north of Buildings ED and EB was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a. Outer walls of this courtyard, located in Squares E/17–18 and G/16, appear to have been in use in both strata. In the courtyard, floors with an accumulation of debris that contained pottery, animal bones, various artifacts and installations, as well as ovens, circular clay bins and benches, were found in a total accumulation of almost 1.0 m. It was sometimes difficult to define which of these layers and installations belonged to Stratum E-1b and which to E-1a, as the courtyard continued to be in use throughout both these strata, with occasional alterations. Floors of Stratum E-1a seem to have been eroded in certain parts of the courtyard (in Squares E/17–18, F–G/16) but were well defined close to Building EB in Squares D–E/15–16. In certain cases, it was difficult to determine whether a certain installation was founded in E-1b or E-1a. Building EA in the southeastern part of the area was an auxiliary structure which, in fact, may have included parts of two or three different buildings. It was founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, with a few changes and floor raisings.

Building EC in the western part of the area was a partly excavated dwelling located west of the sanctuary; it is known from Stratum E-1a, but was perhaps founded in E-1b.

Strata E-1b and E-1a

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Schematic plans: Figs. 17.1, 17.4
  • Detailed plans: Figs. 17.3, 17.5–17.9
  • Sections: Figs. 17.14–17.22;
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.3–18.21
The designation Strata E-1b and E-1a (general Strata V and IV respectively) refers to the same architectural complex which underwent modifications and changes. The structures belonging to these strata were oriented northeast–southwest and they are all parallel or perpendicular to one another, indicating central planning.

Five architectural units were defined:
  1. Building EA in Squares E–F/13–1 4, Strata E-1b and E-1a.
  2. Building ED in Squares D–E/15. This building preceded Building EB; only one room and parts of additional walls were excavated.
  3. Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 and E/15, Stratum E-1a.
  4. Open area/courtyard in Squares E–F/14–16, D/16, E/17–18, Strata E-1b and E-1a.
  5. Building EC in Squares C/13–16, Stratum E-1a.
In our view, the courtyard, Building EB, and perhaps also Buildings EA and ED, belonged to a sanctuary complex that might have been first established in Stratum E-1b, but whose main phase of use was in Stratum E-1a.

In the following discussion, the stratigraphic development and architectural features of both Strata E-1a and E-1b in each architectural unit are described according to the order of the main units defined above.

Building EA (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3 - Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.4 - Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.6 - Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.1 - General view of Area E, end of 1997 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.10 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.11 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.12 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.13 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking west; E-1a Floor 1677 with pottery in destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.14 - Building EA, detail of Room 1701 and compartments 1666 and 1700 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.15 - Building EA, detail of compartments 1666 and 1700 and double wall 1618/1612 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.16 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking east, E-1b Room 2651 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.17 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking east; right: E-1a–b Wall 1629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.18 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.19 - Squares E/13–14, Building EA, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20 - Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.3–17.6
  • Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.9–17.20
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.3–18.5
Discussions
Introduction

Building EA included all the structural remains in Squares E–F/13–14, although the possibility exists that these remains may have belonged to two or three independent buildings, as described below This complex existed in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, with some architectural changes made between them. The topsoil in this area descended to the south, towards the ravine that separated the lower from the upper mound. There was a distinct difference between the preservation in Squares F/13–14, as opposed to E/13–14. While the building remains in F/13–14 were found just below topsoil and were well preserved to a height of ca. 0.8 m, those in Squares E/13–14 were poorly preserved on a much lower level and were covered by a thick layer of eroded wash. Thus, the difference in the height of the top of Wall 1689 in E/13 (71.32 m) and Wall 1629 in F/13 (72.27 m) was 1.07 m, although they were only 3.0 m apart. This lower preservation of the walls in Squares E–F/13 seems to have been caused by severe erosion towards the ravine south of the excavation area, as well as due to a violent destruction in this area, as evidenced by the fallen bricks in Squares E–F/13. It seems that the walls uncovered in the southern part of Square E/13 belonged to Stratum E-1b only and that almost no remains of E-1a were preserved in this square, due to erosion.

Most of the walls were constructed of one row of bricks laid as headers. In two places, two walls were attached to one another (1661+1619 in Squares F/13–14 and 1618+1612 in Square F/13), creating a double wall, 1.2–1.4 m wide. In the case of Walls 1661 and 1619, the narrow space between them was filled with brick material. These double walls may have been the result of constructing adjoining buildings in the same insula, a common practice in Area C (Chapter 12). If this assumption is correct, then the structural remains in this unit belonged to three separate buildings, each excavated only partly:
  1. The northern part: Rooms 1704 and 2639 in Stratum E-1b and Room 1677 in Stratum E-1a.

  2. The southern part: Rooms 1701, 1699, 2651, 2663 in Stratum E-1b; 1701 and 1605 in Stratum E-1a.

  3. An eastern building: Room 1662, Stratum E-1b and Room 1646, Stratum E-1a.

Examples of brick sizes used in the construction of this building are 0.52×0.34×0.13 m (Wall 1689), 0.52×0.32×0.15 m (Wall 1618), 0.54×0.32×0.14 m (Wall 1619) and 0.56×0.37×0.14 m (Wall 1661). In general, the color of the bricks was light grayish brown and light yellow/off-white. In most cases, the foundation level of the walls was not reached, but those that were, lacked stone foundations.

The Northern Part of Building EA: Rooms 1704 and 2639 (Stratum E-1b) and 1677 (Stratum E-1a)

In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north.

E-1b Room 1704 was reused in Stratum E-1a with some architectural changes (Fig. 17.6). Wall 1687 went out of use and the floor of the new room (1677), that now extended to the north, covered it. The northern wall of the new room was 1688, preserved to one course only, its top level flush with the floor. Although the levels of this wall were almost identical to those of Wall 1687 to its south, Floor 1677 of Stratum E-1a covered Wall 1687 and appeared to be related to the top of Wall 1688, and thus the two walls were attributed to separate phases. The top of the western wall of the previous phase (1669) was also almost flush with the floor of the new room, so much so that it was not clear whether the floor covered the wall or whether the wall continued in use in this phase as well. The latter possibility was accepted as more reasonable and so the wall is included in the plan of Stratum E-1a. Thus, Room 1677 had inner dimensions of 2.8×3.7 m; its entrance could have been from the northeastern side, which was beyond the limits of the excavated area. The floor (1677) was made of hard-packed beaten-earth of a creamy color (77.17–72.08 m).

Room 1677 was destroyed by a severe fire at the end of Stratum E-1a and some of the brick debris was burnt and hardened to the consistency of fired ceramic. Above the beaten-earth floor was a thin ash layer (1652), which was covered by a 0.4 m-deep layer of destruction debris (1610) with restorable pottery (Photo 17.13), including a Phoenician Bichrome jug (Fig. 18.5:5), four cooking pots (Fig. 18.4–7), four chalices (Fig.18.3:16–19), and a large four-handled krater (Fig. 18.4:1). A large Hippo jar was standing in a spot between this room (1677) and Locus 1670 to the west (Fig. 18.5:1); three more such jars were found farther west in Locus 1670 (Fig. 18.5:2–4) (see description of the courtyard, below).

The Southern Part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b: Rooms 1701, 1699, 2651, 2663

Room 1701

Room 1701 (Square F/13) had inner dimensions of ca. 2.4 sq m (Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.14–17.15). Its four walls (1628, 1619, 1618, 1629) were identical in their construction technique, including the samesize light yellow bricks. The walls appeared ca. 0.2 m below the topsoil and were preserved to a height of five courses (0.7–0.8 m). A 0.8 m-wide entrance led to the room from Room 1664 on the west. Another entrance in the western end of the southern wall (1629) was found blocked by bricks laid lengthwise (Photo 17.15), yet the door jambs of this blocked entrance could be easily detected. The blocking of the entrance may have taken place between Strata E-1b and E-1a. In the eastern part of this room were two storage compartments (1666 and 1700), created by narrow walls (up to 0.1 m wide) made of whitish clay (Photos 17.14–17.15). The northern compartment (1666) was almost square (inner dimensions 0.9×1.0 m), while the southern one (1700) was rectangular (inner dimensions 1.0×1.4 m). A small hole (ca. 0.11 m in diameter) in the partition between the northern compartment and the western part of Room 1701 was located somewhat above the floor level. The compartments may have served as grain bins; the lack of plaster and the very thin walls precluded their use to store liquids.

The floor of both the room and the compartments was hard packed and smooth. Above this floor was mostly brown earth containing brick fragments and occasional finds, mainly flint and sherds. Only one phase was identified in this room and it was attributed to both Strata E-1a and E-1b. It may be suggested that the compartments were added in Stratum E-1a to the existing room, yet this could not be securely ascertained.

Rooms 1699 and 2651

The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.

Wall 1657, the northern wall of Room 1699, was 2.7 m-long, made of dark gray bricks, unlike the other bricks in this area. On its eastern end, the wall was preserved to a height of five courses; its western end bordered the street to its west. This wall was a continuation of Wall 1619 and in fact, they may be defined as one wall. Wall 1656, the western wall of this room, was poorly preserved. Its two rows of bricks were 1.0 m wide and preserved to a height of two courses at the southern edge of Square E/14, although six courses were seen in the northern section of E/13. On the south, this space was enclosed by Walls 1690 and 1689 (Square E/13); the latter was attached to another wall (2667), only the top of which was uncovered in the excavation. This double wall, 1.2 m wide, was perhaps the southern limit of Building EA; Wall 2667 might represent the northern wall of a separate unit to the south.

In the northern part of this room in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.

In the northern part of Square E/13, Locus 1699 was the continuation of Locus 2661. It contained occupation debris above a 0.01 m-thick, hard whitish plaster floor which sloped down from east to west (average level, 71.39 m). The accumulation on the plaster floor included small pieces of wall plaster and brick debris.

This area was bounded on the south by a narrow partition wall (1672), extending on a diagonal line from Wall 1690 on the east to the northwestern corner of the square, where it seemed to have made a corner with Wall 1656 or was embedded in the latter wall, which was not detected along the rest of Square E/13 south of Wall 1672 (Photos 17.17–17.19). This was an exceptional wall, since its orientation, width and brick sizes (0.36×0.22 m and 0.42×0.40 m) differed from all other walls in this area. A break in this wall served as a passage between Rooms 1699 and 2651. It seems that this was a secondary partition wall, dividing the larger rectangular space; based on its levels, this division must have been constructed during the earliest use of the building in Stratum E-1b. This wall was constructed slightly above the brick platform (2657) and installation (2666), which were attributed to Stratum E-2. The space south of Wall 1672 had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).

Room 2663

The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665.

The Southern Part of Building EA in Stratum E-1a: Rooms 1701, 1605 and 1635

We assume that the southern part of the building continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, yet erosion destroyed much of the evidence.

Room 1701 continued to be used in E-1a with no change, as noted above, where it was suggested that perhaps the double bin (1700/1666) was added at this stage.

In the southern part of Square E/14, Locus 1605 was a destruction layer on what might be a beaten-earth floor which was difficult to detect, as it was found just below topsoil (level 72.25 m; 0.75 m above the assumed E-1b floor, 2661). The tops of Walls 1657 and 1656 were not revealed until a level lower than this destruction layer, yet, since the destruction was limited to the area bounded by the contours of these walls, it may be assumed that they were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The same assumption was made in relation to Room 1701 and its compartments, as described above. In Square E/13, this destruction debris was not very clear. The outline of a 0.65 m-wide brick wall (1694) was seen in the western section of the square, standing 0.5 m high from level 71.80 m, ca. 0.6 m higher than the E-1b floor in this area (Fig. 17.14). In the northern section of the square, Wall 1695, 0.8 m-wide, was preserved in the section to a height of 0.4 m; its foundation was at 72.15 m, which could fit Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.20). These two wall stubs may have been part of one wall that replaced the older wall (1656) in this square and represent a rebuild or alteration in Building EA at this time; however, their poor preservation makes it difficult to reconstruct the plan. Locus 1626 in the center of the square represents an occupation layer at level 72.00 m, which should be seen as a continuation of 1605 further to the north. It was covered by brick debris (1617) just below topsoil and sealed layers of ash (1641), perhaps marking the floor here. The poor preservation and erosion in this area prevented a more detailed analysis of the Stratum E-1a remains.

In the southern part of Squares E–F/13, above E-1b Rooms 2663, 2665 and 1662, was a layer of fallen bricks (1635) below topsoil (1609); yet the attribution of this layer to either E-1a or E-1b could not be clarified.

Summary of Building EA

The southeastern part of Area E was densely built up and the architectural remains belonged perhaps to two or three independent buildings, attached to one another and forming one complex. This area was first built in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use, with modifications, in Stratum E-1a. This unit continued beyond the limits of the excavation area to the east and south, where its possible continuation can be determined in Area F (Fig. 17.1).

Building ED (Strata E-2/E-1b)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2b - Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3 - Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20 - Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22 - General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.2b – 17.3
  • Photos 17.2, 17.20, 17.22, 17.59
Discussions
Introduction

Building ED, attributed to E-1b (and possibly to E-2), pertains to a partly uncovered structure located in Squares D–E/15, below Building EB of Stratum E-1a.

The excavated part of this building included only one room (4653) in Square D/15, (inner dimensions 2.2×2.8 m) that was discovered below Room 2629 of Stratum E-1a Building EB (Fig. 17.17). All the walls were made of brittle gray bricks with white inclusions; the eastern wall (4632) was preserved to a height of ca. 1.0 m (nine brick courses from level 70.90–71.95 m), yet its foundation course was not reached. In the other walls (4635, 5658, 4650), the uppermost levels were similar or slightly higher (72.00–72.20 m), while the lowest visible brick courses were at 71.41 or 71.67 m. Wall 4658 was disturbed by a narrow trench of a later period (Photo 17.20). The only floor in the room (4653) was at levels 71.11–71.25 m, somewhat lower than the bottom of these walls (Photo 17.20). This may be explained either due to the nature of the bricks, which were difficult to detect, or perhaps due to a tilt in the walls which made it hard to reach the face of the walls in their lower parts. Floor 4653 was composed of 0.14 m thick striations, ca. 1.5 m below E-1a Floor 2629 (Fig. 17.14a), ca. 0.9 m lower than the floor (1648) attributed to Stratum E-1b in Square E/15 to the east, and even slightly lower than Floor 4661, attributed to Stratum E-2 in Square E/15 to the east. Therefore, we tentatively suggest that this room was founded in Stratum E-2 and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1b, although only one floor was found (see further below). Yet, as mentioned above, the relationship between the floor and the three other walls of the room (4635, 4658, 4650) remained questionable, since the lower part of these brick walls was unclear and no bricks could be determined at the floor level (Fig. 17.17; Photo 17.20). Thus, these three walls may be defined as possibly belonging to a later phase in the use of this space. If so, then only Wall 4632 and Floor 4653 may be attributed to Stratum E-2, while the other walls were added in Stratum E-1b. The difficulty with this explanation is that no independent floor later than Floor 4653 was detected. In light of these uncertainties, we show the room on the plan of Stratum E-1b, while on the plan of Stratum E-2 only the floor and Wall 4632 are shown. Two scarabs were found on Floor 4653 (Chapter 30A, Nos. 30, 43).

Floor 4653 was covered by a 0.8 m-thick debris layer (4634). Finds from this layer included a number of vessels (Figs. 18.1–18.2), as well as several grinding stones. No sign of burning or violent destruction was found in this room. Above this layer, a layer of brick detritus, 0.35 m thick, (4618) was covered by the make-up of the floor (2645) in E-1a Room 2629. It should be noted that while the western wall (4658) was rebuilt in Stratum E-1a with no break between the two phases, all other walls of the room were covered by a thick layer of debris (4618) before the construction of the new walls of Room 2629 in Stratum E-1a, on the same lines as those of the earlier walls of Room 4653.

In the area south of this room was a layer of brick debris (4633); excavation stopped at level 71.75 m.

Below E-1a Platform 1624 (Square E/15)

Excavation along the northern and eastern faces of Platform 1624 in Square E/15 (the focal point of the sanctuary of Stratum E-1a, see below) revealed earlier wall lines (4623, 4624) attributed to Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.34, 17.37). They appeared at levels 71.75–71.81 m and stood one or two courses high. These two walls were slightly to the north and east of the outer lines of the Stratum E-1a platform. Hardly any brick lines could be detected in the northern wall (4624) and it is possible that it was constructed of compacted mud. These walls were most probably contemporary with Room 4653 further to the west and with the early phase of the open space to the north and east, including the circular installations found in the eastern part of Square E/15, Oven 1649, and the layers in the lower part of Locus 1647, all attributed to Stratum E-1b (see below). A shallow debris layer separated the top of these walls from the bottom of the E-1a platform. A major question is whether these two walls belonged to an earlier platform. In order to clarify this point, we dismantled most of the platform (except for the area of the standing stones). The excavation reached level 71.64 m (5623), 0.85 m below the top of the brick platform of E-1a, revealing only brick debris and a large number of random bricks, mostly haphazardly placed (Photo 17.21). No evidence for an earlier platform was found and thus, the function of Walls 4623 and 4624 remained enigmatic.

Below E-1a Room 4654 (Square D/14)

A 1.5×2.5 m probe conducted below Floor 4654 of E-1a Building EB contained fallen and decayed bricks (5629) attributed to E-1b. The excavation stopped at level 71.69 m, almost 1.0 m below the top of 4654. Among the finds from this lower layer was a sherd of a Greek Late Protogeometric/SubProtogeometric krater (Fig. 18.2:12).

Building EB (Stratum E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.7 - Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.3 - General view of Area E, end of 2001 season, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22 - General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23a - Destruction debris in Locus 5621 in the western part of Space 2641 in Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23b - Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.24 - Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.25 - Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.26 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.27 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.28 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629, destruction debris and fallen roof material from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.29 - E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.30 - Destruction debris in eastern part of E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.31 - Grinding stone leaning on wall 5609 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.32 - Destruction debris in southeastern corner of E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.33 - Seal impressions on plaster of Room 4616 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.34 - E-1a Building EB, Platform 2654, looking south; below platform: E-1b Walls 4634 and 4623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.35 - Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.36 - Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.37 - Section below Platform 2654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.5, 17.7,
  • Photos 17.2–17.3, 17.22–17.37
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.6–18.14
Discussions
Introduction

Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 was founded in Stratum E-1a. The northern room (2629) was built above Room 4653 of E-2/E-1b Building ED and the platform in the northeastern corner of the building was higher than the E-1b floors to its north and east. The outer measurements of the building were 7.7×9.8 m and it comprised a central space with an enclosed room or alcove at its eastern end, a rectangular room at the southern side and a smaller room in the northwestern corner. A unique feature in this building was the design of its northeastern corner, which included a rectangular brick platform (2654) topped by a smaller stone platform with standing stones (1624), facing a courtyard to its north and east. This platform was the focal point of what we identify as an open-air sanctuary, which included Building EB and a spacious courtyard with installations to its north and east.

Four openings connected the central space (2641) with the three rooms surrounding it. On the western side, two of these openings were located opposite one another, leading into Rooms 2629 on the north and 4616 on the south. In the southeast of the space was an entrance that also led into Room 4616 and on the east into Room 4654. There was most likely also an entrance connecting this space with the platform (2654) in the northeast.

The location of the main entrance to this building remained enigmatic. The building was attached on its western side to Building EC and thus, the entrance could not have been there. The northern, eastern and southern walls were preserved high enough to exclude the possibility of an entrance through these three sides. One possibility is that the entrance was along the western side of the platform, directly into the central space, although this would have been a very narrow approach.

Space 2641

This is the central space in the building (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.

Excavation below Floor 2641 in the northwestern corner of the room (southern part of Square D/15) revealed a layer of brick debris (2652 and 4618 below it) which was the top of Stratum E-1b in this area. In the rest of the room, excavation stopped at the floor level of Stratum E-1a.

Room 4654

This room (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).

It was difficult to determine whether there was a direct connection between Room 4654 and the platform to its north; on the west, they were adjoining, while on the east, there was a wall separating them (unnumbered in the plan), preserved to the same level as the top of the platform (72.40 m). A probe below the floor revealed the top of Stratum E-1b debris, as described above.

Room 2629

This small rectangular room (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.

As mentioned above, there was a gap of ca. 0.6–0.7 m between the top of the earlier walls of E-1b Building ED on the north, south and east (4635, 4650, 4632) and the foundation level of the new walls of Room 2645 (2632, 2633, 2634), while on the west, there was no such gap (Fig. 17.17).

Room 4616

This was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.

Two entrances led into this room from Room 2641 to its north. The eastern one was 1.0 m wide and on the west, it was strengthened by a plastered pilaster (4631). A narrower entranceway, 0.67 m wide, was at the northwestern corner of the room. This western entrance was enigmatically blocked by a bench (unnumbered) built along Wall 2646 and thus its function as an entrance may be questioned. The identification of the floor in this room was difficult, particularly in the western part of the room, where there was no evidence for fire. The identified beaten-earth floor in the east (4616) was at level 72.00 m, covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris with occasional burnt and fallen bricks (4609 in the eastern part of the room, and 5614 and 5605 in the western part). The destruction debris in the eastern part contained a large amount of pottery vessels (Photo 17.32). Among them was a Hippo storage jar with an incised inscription on its shoulder that reads טע ... עם (Fig. 18.11:1; Chapter 29A, No. 8). A unique feature in this room was fragments of plaster impressed with seal impressions, found close to the pilaster at the eastern entrance (Photo 17.33; Chapter 30D). These impressions served as architectural decorations that are unparalleled elsewhere; they perhaps were made with wooden seals, showing a lotus bloom flanked by high buds below a volute motif, which recalls Proto-Aeolic capitals. Such consecutive impressions stamped on the mud plaster would have created a decorative frieze on the wall interiors. A fragment of roofing material made of clay with reed impressions was also found in this room. In the southeastern corner of the room was a clay bulla with a seal impression made by an Egyptian Middle Bronze Age scarab (Chapter 30A, No. 40). These finds allude to the important function of this room.

The Platform and Standing Stones

The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).

The platform was constructed of well-defined square bricks, best seen at its western part. On top of the eastern side of the brick platform was a smaller square platform (1624; 1.0×1.2 m) made of one to two courses of basalt fieldstones and large river pebbles, rising to a height of 0.33 m (uppermost level, 72.60 m). This stone platform was well preserved on its southern and western sides, while its northeastern corner was damaged. On its southern side were three standing stones, the two eastern ones elongated and standing on their narrow side. The eastern stone was 0.37 m high and 0.3 m wide, the central stone was 0.41 m high and 0.3 m wide, and the western stone was only 0.2 m high and 0.4 m wide. The eastern stone was of hard smoothed limestone, while the central and western stones were rough unworked travertine. Due to its small dimensions, a fourth limestone at the western end apparently was not another standing stone, but rather part of the construction of the platform. These three stones are interpreted as sacred standing stones (masseboth), facing a spacious courtyard to the north (see below). On the western side of the platform, almost at the center of the second line of bricks from the west, was a posthole, ca. 0.14 m in diameter and 0.1 m deep, which may have held a wooden pole. A basalt mortar adjoined the western face of the platform close to its top level, just opposite this posthole, and was covered by burnt brick debris. Just opposite the platform to its north was a large flat limestone which was understood to have been an offering table (Photos 17.49–17.50); see below.

It appears that this platform was part of an open area that continued into the spacious courtyard to the north and east. Yet, in that case, one might ask how a single-course brick platform would have survived the elements. It must have been protected by either thick plaster which was not preserved or covered during harsh climate conditions by some kind of seasonal roofing, although no traces of this were found, as it would have been constructed from perishable materials. As noted above, the platform was preceded by an earlier structure of undetermined shape (Photo 17.37).

Summary of Building EB

The plan of Building EB is exceptional. Although in its size and building techniques, it does not differ from dwellings at Tel Rehov, its unique plan was apparently suited to a specific function related to the open-air sanctuary of which it was a part, with the platform and standing stones occupying the northeastern corner of this structure. The decorated plaster found at the entrance to the southern elongated room emphasizes the importance of this room, which was perhaps the seat of a priest, scribe or other functionaries related to the cultic activity in this area.

The Courtyard (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 17.3–17.9
  • Photos 17.2, 17.38–17.53
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.17–18.19
Discussions
Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

Building EC (Stratum E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.7 - Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.55 - Squares C–D/15–16, Building EC (right) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.56 - E-1a Building EC, circular installations in Room 5637 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.57 - E-1a Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Bin 5630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.58 - Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Oven 5632 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.5, 17.7
  • Photos 17.55–17.59
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.15–18.16
Discussions
Introduction

The eastern part of a dwelling of Stratum E-1a, denoted Building EC, was excavated west of and attached to Building EB, in Squares C/14–16. The excavated part included a courtyard (5637), a room to its southeast (5613), and two corners of additional rooms on the west. Like the others in Area E, this building was also oriented northwest–southeast. It was built as an independent building and thus, most of its eastern wall (2647) was attached to Wall 2546 of Building EB (with a slight gap between them), thus creating a double wall, like in many other buildings of this period at Tel Rehov.

This building was probably founded in Stratum E-1b, as evidenced in a small probe, 0.5 m wide, in Square D/16, along the eastern side of Wall 2647 (not shown on the plan). The probe revealed that the wall stood to a height of 1.06 m (eight courses, floating level at 71.93 m). Its foundation was 0.65 m below the level of the Stratum E-1a floor inside the building, which was only slightly higher than that of Wall 4658 of Building ED of Stratum E-2/E1b to its east and lower than the foundation level of nearby Wall 2646 of Building EB of Stratum E-1a (72.70 m). This may indicate that Wall 2647 (and perhaps the entire building) was founded in Stratum E-1b, and continued to be in use (perhaps with a higher floor) in Stratum E-1a. This remains unknown, as the excavation of this building stopped at the level of E-1a.

Space 5637

This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens.

Room 5613

Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room.

Room 5639

Locus 5639 represented the northeastern corner of a room in Building EC, west of Room 5613 (Square C/15). It was bounded by Walls 5640 on the north and 5606 on the east. This small area was excavated to 72.82 m, revealing a layer of brown earth (Photo 17.59).

Destruction of Stratum E-1a

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

The end of Stratum E-1a was accompanied by a heavy fire that resulted in thick burnt destruction debris. In Buildings EA (Room 1677 and Locus 1670 to its west), EB and EC, large groups of restorable vessels and other objects were found below a tumble of bricks and burnt debris with fallen roof material, all evidence for this violent end. In the courtyard, the evidence for fire and violent destruction was less clear, yet the upper layer in Squares E–F/15–16, just below topsoil, was composed of soft gray ash, 0.15–0.20 m thick, and in the southern section of Square F/15, a thick black ash line and burnt wood could be seen above the floor (Fig. 17.18a). In Square F/15, fire had burnt the fallen bricks to a hard consistency and reddish color. Some roof material of laminated clay with reed impressions were mixed in the brick debris, also hardened and reddened by fire. Another sign of the violent and apparently man-made destruction was the pottery altar in Square E/15 that had been deliberately smashed to many small pieces.

Post-Stratum E-1a Activity in Space 5637

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Evidence for a brief re-occupation of Space 5637 after the destruction of Stratum E-1a was provided by Ovens 5611 and 5631 and Bench/Wall 5638 (Fig. 17.10), which were built within the brick collapse resulting from the Stratum E-1a destruction, ca. 0.15 m above the E-1a floor level. Bench/Wall 5638 was built 0.4 m north of Wall 5640 and consisted of a single row of bricks preserved along 1.6 m (top level: 73.27 m, bottom level: 73.09 m) that were set directly on top of the destruction debris in the courtyard. This was the only evidence for any activity that post-dated the destruction of Stratum E-1a. It may be explained as a short phase of squatters, perhaps the inhabitants of the ruined city returning briefly, following the destruction of this house.

A Probe in Squares E/20, E/1

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Schematic plans: Fig. 17.11
  • Photos 17.60–17.61
A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).

Summary

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

The open space, Building EB, and perhaps Building EA, can be interpreted as belonging to a sanctuary or high place (the biblical bamah) that served the neighborhood. The platform and standing stones, that can be interpreted as masseboth, were the focal point of this sanctuary in Stratum E-1a. In the spacious courtyard to the north and east of this platform, ovens and the circular bins were perhaps used in relation to feasting. Although they were attributed to late Stratum E-1b, they possibly continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The flat stone in front of the platform can be explained as an offering table and the pottery altar could have been used for burning offerings, including incense or small animals, such as pigeons. The rectangular area with benches in Squares F–E/14–15 could have been used for public feasting.

It could not be securely determined whether the area served as a sanctuary in Stratum E-1b, as it did in Stratum E-1a. Yet, the architectural continuity in the courtyard and surrounding buildings alludes to a similar function in both phases. Alterations in Stratum E-1a were needed due to the rise of floor levels in the courtyard. This may explain the need to rebuild Building ED of Stratum E-1b (of which only one room was exposed) as Building EB in Stratum E-1a. The continuity between these two buildings was demonstrated in the similar plan and location of Rooms 4653 (E-1b) and 2629 (E-1a). The platform and standing stones, which were the focal point of cult in Stratum E-1a, were preceded by an earlier structure defined by Walls 4624 and 4623, yet its nature could not be clarified. Building EA in the southeastern part of the area appears to have been founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a, with only minor modifications.

This is a rare example of an Iron Age II openair sanctuary. The concept of a small cult place which served a local neighborhood is known from approximately the same time at Lachish (Stratum V Cult Room 49), Megiddo (Stratum VA–IVB Building 2081) and perhaps at Ta'anach (Dever 1983; Holladay 1987: 249–299; Zevit 2001: 213– 266). Yet, all three differ from our sanctuary in many aspects; they are either an independent cult room (Lachish),1 a cult room in a large building (Megiddo), or a cult corner in a dwelling (Ta'anach). None of these sites have standing stones (masseboth) and a platform (bamah). Platforms and standing stones are known from several Iron Age public cult places, such as at Bethsaida (Zevit 2001: 149–152) and the 9th century BCE temple at Khirbet 'Atarus ('Atarot) in Moab (Ji 2012).2 Standing stones of a similar rough shape and small size as ours are known from the city gate area at Dan (Biran 1994: 244, Photos 203–204; Zevit 2001: 191–196). Our sanctuary, if correctly identified, is the most complete example in Israel of an open-air sanctuary with a platform, standing stones, a spacious courtyard with cooking and food-preparation facilities, and auxiliary rooms. The cultic paraphernalia included a pottery altar, an offering table, and artifacts such as clay figurines. Other special objects included the impressed plaster and the painted Phoenician-style storage jar. The evidence of metal and flint-scraper production in the center of the open courtyard (although attributed to Stratum E-1b) is striking, since the combination of industry with a cult place is known in other cases as well, such as the copper industry at Timna' (Rothenberg 1988: 276–278) and at Kition in Cyprus (Karageorghis 1985: 253), the olive oil industry at Tel Miqne-Ekron (Gitin 2003), and the apiary in Area C at Tel Rehov (Chapters 12, 14A). The large quantity of animal bones found in the open area in front and east of the platform may be taken as evidence for sacrifices and sacred meals (marzeah) that took place in this sanctuary (see Chapter 49; cf., Greer 2013).
Footnotes

1 For negation of the Lachish Stratum V cult room as such, see Ussishkin 2003.

2 The ethnic affiliation of the temple at Khirbet 'Atarus ('Atarot) should be addressed. If this is the town mentioned in the Mesha inscription (lines 10–11) as being part of the land of Gad and built by the king of Israel, then it could be that the temple belonged to an Israelite or Israelite-related population

Tables, Plans, and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 17.1          General view of Area E, end of 1997 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2          General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.3          General view of Area E, end of 2001 season, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.4          Squares D–E/15, excavated to level of Strata E-2–E-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.5          South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.6          Probe in Square F/15, looking north; E-2 Floor 2662 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.7          Southeastern corner of Square E/14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.8          Building EA, general view, end of 1997 season, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.9          Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.10          Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.11          Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.12          Building EA, Square F/14, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.13          Building EA, Square F/14, looking west; E-1a Floor 1677 with pottery in destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.14          Building EA, detail of Room 1701 and compartments 1666 and 1700 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.15          Building EA, detail of compartments 1666 and 1700 and double wall 1618/1612 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.16          Building EA, Square E/13, looking east, E-1b Room 2651 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.17          Building EA, Square E/13, looking east; right: E-1a–b Wall 1629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.18          Building EA, Square E/13, looking southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.19          Squares E/13–14, Building EA, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20          Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.21          Squares D–E/15, section through E-1a Platform 2654 with brick collapse below platform from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22          General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23a          Destruction debris in Locus 5621 in the western part of Space 2641 in Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23b          Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.24          Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.25          Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.26          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.27          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.28          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629, destruction debris and fallen roof material from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.29          E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.30          Destruction debris in eastern part of E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.31          Grinding stone leaning on wall 5609 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.32          Destruction debris in southeastern corner of E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.33          Seal impressions on plaster of Room 4616 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.34          E-1a Building EB, Platform 2654, looking south; below platform: E-1b Walls 4634 and 4623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.35          Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.36          Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.37          Section below Platform 2654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.38          Probe in Squares E/17–18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.39          Probe in Square E/18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.40          Probe in Square E/18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.41          Oven 4608, Square E/17 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.42          Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.43          E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.44          Buildings EB and EA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.45          Square E/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.46          Square E/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.47          Square E/15 detail from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.48          Square E/15 detail from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.49          Square E/15 with debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.50          Detail of stone 1623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.51          Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.52          Squares E–F/15–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.53          Square F/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.54          Square E/14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.55          Squares C–D/15–16, Building EC (right) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.56          E-1a Building EC, circular installations in Room 5637 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.57          E-1a Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Bin 5630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.58          Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Oven 5632 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59          Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.60          Probe in Squares E/20, E/1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.61          Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Chapter 20 - Area G: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion
Introduction

Table and Photos
Table and Photos

Discussion

Area G was located at the western edge of the lower mound, near the foot of the upper mound. The area occupies a small hillock, bordered on the north and the south by small ravines which presently serve as approach roads to the tell. The goals of excavating this area were:
  1. to examine the prominent small hill in that area in order to determine architectural or other features that caused this element, such as a city gate
  2. to examine the stratigraphic sequence and nature of settlement in this part of the tell.
Excavation of Area G commenced in 2000 and lasted six weeks (Photo 20.1). Six squares were opened (P–Q/5–6 and P/3–4), located in main grid square 13 (Chapter 3). In 2001, the excavation continued for four weeks and two additional squares were opened (Q/3–4; Photo 20.1). In 2007, the excavation continued for three weeks in Squares P– Q/3–5. The total area excavated is 200 m.

The supervisors were Adi-Ziv Esudri (2000) and Naama Yahalom-Mack (2001, 2007).

The excavation in Area G uncovered an Iron Age IIA domestic area with two major strata, each divided into two sub-phases. Table 20.1 shows the stratigraphic correlation to Area C and to the general strata numbers in Tel Rehov. Table 20.2 specifies the locus and basket numbers given in the three seasons.

The large architectural units revealed in Stratum G-2 were part of larger buildings of unknown plans. An open courtyard in the eastern and northern parts of the area included many installations and storage pits; the walls were preserved to a height of up to 1.0 m and in Square Q/3, up to 2.0 m. The buildings of Stratum G-2 were abandoned in a similar way as those of Stratum VI in Areas B and C and the floors were found almost empty of finds. One possibility is that the buildings suffered from an earthquake; possible evidence for this can be seen in the severe tilt eastwards of Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Fig. 20.17). In Stratum G-1b, new buildings were constructed, which continued to be in use in Stratum G-1a with slight changes. Here too, only parts of buildings were excavated and no complete plan of a single building is known. In all strata, brick walls without stone foundations were the common building practice; only one wall attributed to Stratum G-1b (5040) had a stone foundation. Extensive use of wooden beams was made in the foundations of Stratum G-1b walls and floors, similar to the situation in Areas B and C. Stratum G-1a (Stratum IV) ended in violent destruction, evidenced in particular in Building GG in Squares P–Q/3.

Stratum G-2

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 20.1–20.2
This stratum comprises the earliest architecture encountered in this area, including part of a large structure oriented southwest–northeast (Building GB), the beginning of a building to its west (Building GA), parts of additional buildings to the east (Building GD) and rooms in the north (Building GC) and south which probably belonged to additional buildings. In most places, two stratigraphic phases were encountered, denoted G-2b and G-2a, with a clear distinction between them; in G-2a, additional walls were constructed in Building GB and higher floors were laid in many parts of the area. In one square (Q/5), a later phase was identified, designated G-2a'. The following discussion includes both phases in each of the buildings

Building GA

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P–Q/4–5, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.4 - Collapsed mudbricks on left corner in G-2b Building GA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Only the eastern edge of this building was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). These two walls were parallel to Wall 5061 of Building GB (Photos 20.3–20.4) and together, they created a double-wall system, an architectural feature common at Tel Rehov that, in most cases, designated the outer walls of attached individual buildings. In our case, the top preserved level of the two walls was separated by a V-shaped gap, 0.1 m wide on the south and up to 0.7 m on the north (Photo 20.3). These walls had apparently separated as a result of seismic movement, perhaps an earthquake, at the end of Stratum G-2, with Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west. The gap between the walls was filled with brick debris (5058). After the gap was excavated to a depth of 1.0 m, the walls appeared closer together until, at the lower courses, the two walls were only a few centimeters apart. Wall 5044 was preserved to a height of at least 0.85 m, although its bottom level could not be determined due to its strong tilt to the west. Wall 5048 joined Wall 5044, enclosing the corner of a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.

Building GB

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

The designation Building GB was given to the large space bounded by Wall 5061 on the west and Wall 8030 (in Square Q/4) on the east, and perhaps also Room 8038, as well as the area to its west in Squares P–Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). Its northern border remained unclear. Significant changes occurred here between the two phases of Stratum G-2 and the definition of this area as a single building is insecure. In fact, one can define the spaces between Walls 5064 and 5061 as a single unit, while the open space with installations between Walls 5064 and 8030 may have been part of an L-shaped area that continued in Squares P– Q/6. This alternative understanding should be kept in mind when reading the following analysis.

Phase G-2b

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space, 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.

Phase G-2a

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.5 - Tilted Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.7 - Building GA, G-2 Building GB, and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.8 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.9 - Wall 5064 and G-2a courtyard from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.10 - G-2b and G-2a circular bins from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This phase is much better known than the previous one due to wider exposure. The large courtyard of the previous phase was divided by Wall 5064, a poorly preserved north–south wall which divided the open area into two roughly equal parts, eastern and western (Fig. 20.2; Photos 20.7–20.9). The wall was preserved up to 0.38 m and its bottom was at 85.52–85.58 m, higher by 0.9 m than Oven 8063 of Phase G-2b to its west. In the northern end of Square Q/5, the wall cornered with Wall 8064, of which only a small segment of its southern face was excavated, preserved to 86.15 m. It may be conjectured that Wall 8056 in Square P/4 was a continuation of Wall 5064.

Room 8035, bounded by Walls 5061, 8064, 5064 and 8055, had inner dimensions of 2.35×6.55 m (Photo 20.7). The floor (8035) was at level 85.60 m, at least 0.75 m (and perhaps more) above the assumed floor of G-2b in the same place.

In Square P/4, a corner of two short walls (8055 and 8056; Photos 20.5–20.6) created a small room with an entrance leading from Room 8035 to its north. A floor in this room (8023), located at level 85.64 m, was sealed by the brick platform (5069) of Stratum G-1b. Wooden beams (4071) found close to the top of the walls of this room at levels 85.82– 85.92 m (Fig. 20.3) were related to the construction of Stratum G-1b.

The area east of Wall 5064, bounded on the south by Wall 8039 in Squares P–Q/3 and on the east by Wall 8030 in Square Q/4, served as a spacious courtyard, ca. 4.0–4.5 m wide and up to 13 m long (if continuing until Wall 4029 in Square Q/6 on the north). In fact, in Square Q/6, this open area continued to the west, thus creating an L-shaped open space.

In Squares Q/4–5, several plastered surfaces were identified, alongside other floor types, with some 13 related installations that were not all used contemporaneously; note an additional one (8047) that was attributed to Phase G-2b (see above). The installations comprise mainly two types: plastered circular or oval bins and clay ovens (Table 20.3; Photos 20.2, 20.7–20.10, 20.16).

In Square Q/4, three superimposed plaster floors (8053 at level 85.76 m, 8024 at level 86.07 m and 8008 at level 86.27 m) were exposed above the earlier floor (8044) attributed to Phase G-2b. The floors were exposed mainly in the northern half of the square, with three related plastered bins (8060, 8051, 8059) and a single poorly preserved oven (8025). The plastered bins were exposed between 85.99 and 85.88 m, while the oven was exposed at level 86.19 m (Photos 20.8, 20.10). In the southern half of the square, only one floor was detected (8041), sloping from east to west; it was attributed to Stratum G-2b, yet probably continued to be in use in G-2a.

In Square Q-5, two superimposed plaster floors were exposed between levels 86.28 and 85.98 m. Related to these floors were four circular bins and two superimposed ovens (Table 20.3; Photos 20.7– 20.9). None of the floors clearly abutted the poorly preserved Wall 5064.

Small circular bins of the type found here (as well as in Squares P–Q/6; see below) were also found in Areas B (Chapter 8) and E (Chapter 17). Their capacity was ca. 10 liters or slightly more; thus, the seven bins found in these two squares may have been used for storing ca. 70–100 liters, perhaps of grain used for baking in the three ovens found nearby. However, it was difficult to attribute these installations to each of the several floor surfaces found here and thus, it remains unknown whether all of them served at the same time. At least in one instance, it seems that there was subphasing here, where Oven 4074 cut Oven 4084. In any case, this appears to have been an area used for intensive baking.

Open Area with Circular Bins in Squares P–Q/6

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.13 - Stratum G-2a Square P/6 and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.14 - Stratum G-2a Floors 4016 and 5004 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB and bounded on the north by Building GC. The width of this area was ca. 2.5 m and its length was at least 9.0 m.

The lowest floor found here in Square P/6 was a clay floor (5050) at level 85.46 m. It was covered by a 0.15 m-deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036); the latter was covered by a brick debris layer (5043). These layers were all attributed to Stratum G-2b, since they were lower than Floors 5026 and 5004 and the installations of Phase G-2a.

In the eastern part of the square, a floor comprised of striations (5004 and 5026 to its north) was found above G-2b layer 5021, between levels 85.92–86.28 m; the top of this layer (4016) appeared to be a continuation of Floor 4022 in Square Q/6 (level 86.28 m). No floor could be identified in the western part of the square (4011, 4012).

In Square Q/6, excavation stopped at the level of the uppermost floor (4022) (level 86.30 m); the floor was exposed over most of the square, comprising patches of grayish-white plaster and beaten earth with pottery sherds mixed with small stones.

Eleven bins of various sizes were found in this area, four in Square Q/6 and seven in Square P/6 (Table 20.4, Photos 20.12–20.14). Most of these were exposed along one line in the central part of Square P/6, while the others were scattered along the southern part of Squares P–Q/6 and one was located in Building GC. The definition of these installations as bins is the most reasonable one, although they could have been used for other purposes as well, such as for some industrial activity that was conducted in the courtyard.

These plaster-lined installations were cut into the floor. They were oval to round, with a diameter of 0.45–0.70 m (except 4018, which was 1.2 in diameter) and a depth of 0.30–0.38 m, although the state of preservation does not allow an exact measurement. Thus, the average capacity of the smaller bins was ca. 33 liters (based on an average diameter of 0.55 m and depth of 0.35 m). All were lined with a very friable greyish-white plaster. The thickness of the walls was 0.02–0.04 m, aside from reinforcements which were added where two neighboring bins were close together. These installations contained grayish earth mixed with light-colored brick debris, as well as a few sherds, flint fragments and bones; no grain or organic materials were recovered.

Like in Squares Q/4–5, the bins marked several successive construction phases and thus, not all of them were in use at the same time. Three (4008, 4009, 5009) appear to be contemporary and earlier than the others (Photos 20.12–20.14). They were all exposed at approximately level 86.20 m; Bins 4008 and 4009 share a wall. Bin 4008 appears to cut into a very poorly preserved wall or built installation (5014, not on the plan), chipped along its southern face, of which only one course was preserved.

Bin 4010 abutted 4019 on the west and appears to be contemporary with it, while 4019 cut into 4009 and thus replaced it. Bin 4018 was the largest (diameter 1.2 m) and latest of all, as it cut into 4010; it was 0.96 m deep. Its walls were plastered and it contained crumbly grayish-brown earth mixed with pieces of brick, as well as many sherds, flint, bones, shells and some charcoal. In the eastern side of Square P/6, Bin 4032 (Fig. 20.8) was 0.9 m wide; it may have been contemporary with the large bin (4018).

At least two successive floors were located in Square P/6 (5004, 4016) above Floor 5050 of Phase G-2b. They were difficult to trace, but were identifiable by their related plastered installations. Contemporary Bins 5009, 4008 and 4009 apparently were related to the earliest floor. Installations 4019, 4010 and 4032 were possibly contemporary and related to a later floor. Bin 4018, which was larger than the others, apparently coexisted with the similar installation (4032) near the eastern balk of the square and was related to the latest floor.

The attribution of these installations and floors to Stratum G-2a was based on their levels compared to similar remains in Square Q/5. However, it should be noted that the building remains and installations in Squares P–Q/6 were exposed below topsoil, with no stratigraphic elements above them. Their attribution to Stratum G-2a means that Stratum G-1 was completely eroded away in Squares P–Q/6. Indeed, Wall 4014 of G-1a–b in Square P/5 was founded at its northern end at level 86.48 m, which was higher than the bins and Building GC. The continuation of Wall 4014 and other elements of G-1a in Squares P–Q/6 were eroded away and thus, Squares P–Q/6 are not shown on the plans of Stratum G-1a–b.

Building GC

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The remains defined as Building GC in Squares P– Q/6 (Photos 20.1, 20.13, 20.15) included the southern part of a building that continued to the north beyond the borders of the excavated area. The excavated part of the building included three walls (4029, 5056, 4028), all composed of similar greybrown bricks and preserved 0.25–0.4 m high. Inside, a compact clay floor (5035) was exposed near the corner of Walls 4029 and 5056 at level 85.44 m, covered by brick debris (5027). A beatenearth floor (4050) was exposed in Square Q/6 at level 85.48 m, abutting Wall 4029, covered by a brick debris layer (4027) and a layer of collapsed bricks (4024), found against Wall 4028. Both small segments of floors were empty of finds and no evidence for violent destruction was found. It seems that the building was constructed in Stratum G-2b, together with the earliest floor of the open space to its south (5050, level 85.46 m). It probably continued in use in Phase G-2a with the same floors, at the time when the floor of the open area to the south was raised and the bins were constructed; at that time, Bin 4037 was constructed inside the building.

Like the open space and installations to the west and south in Squares P–Q/6, Building GC was exposed immediately below topsoil, with no later stratigraphic features, and its attribution to Stratum G-2 was based on its relation to the open space to its south.

Room 8038/4090 and Space 8061/4087

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Squares P–Q/3, to the south of Building GB (and to the west of Building GD, see below) was a room (8038/4090) and what seems to have been an open space (8061/4087) that might have belonged to Building GB or might have been part of a separate unit (Figs. 20.1–20.2). Since the wide double wall (5012/4047) of Stratum G-1 was not dismantled, it is unknown whether there was an earlier wall of Stratum G-2 below that would have belonged to another building to the south of Building GB.

Room 8038/4090

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The room to the west of the southern room of Building GD was bounded by Walls 4081, 8027 and 8039, while its southern wall was beyond the limit of the excavation area. It was 2.2 m wide and at least 3.0 m long. Wall 8027 created a double wall with Wall 5063 of Building GD to the east. The northern wall (8039) was narrower than the other walls of the room and perhaps served as a narrow partition with an opening towards the north, which might have led to the courtyard of Building GB. The western wall (4081) was preserved 1.4 m high and perhaps had two construction phases; the earlier one (G-2b) comprising the lower 1.0 m (as seen from the west) and the upper one (G-2a) consisting of the uppermost two or three brick courses. The seam between these two phases can be clearly seen (Photos 20.20–20.21).

Inside this room was a layer of brick collapse (8038) that was exposed down to level 85.28 m. This locus was attributed to Stratum G-2b, although a floor was not reached. A higher patchy floor in this room (4090) at level 85.66 m is attributed to Stratum G-2a.

Space 8061/4087

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Wall 4081 in Square P/3 was preserved to at least 1.4 m (Photos 20.20–20.21). Abutting this wall on the west were several floors attributed to Stratum G-2b. The lowest was Floor 8061, covered by phytoliths, at levels 84.39–84.45 m. Above it was a thin layer of brick debris with some scattered phytoliths (8057) and a build-up of brown patchy clay floors (8049, levels 84.52–84.84 m). The uppermost floor was sealed by a layer of brick collapse (8012). A clay plaque figurine showing a female drummer (Chapter 34, No. 5) was found at level 85.54 m, which is just at the top of the brick debris (5034) attributed to phase G-2b, under the G-2a floor (4087). The figurine was found very close to the erosion line and thus, its attribution to the G-2b layer is insecure.

A new floor (4087), beaten-earth and ash, was laid at 85.61 m; it did not clearly abut Wall 4081. This floor is attributed to Stratum G-2a, but might be related to Stratum G-1 Building GG, since destruction layer 4065 of that building is directly above it.

Building GD

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.7 - Superposition of walls in Area G with location of section drawings from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.18 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This building (Squares Q/3–4) was bounded on the west by Wall 8030 (found below Wall 5018 of Stratum G-1a, see below) and Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). The latter created a double wall together with Wall 8027 of Room 8030/4090 to the west. The walls were preserved to a considerable height; in a probe in the northeastern corner of Square Q/3 (Photos 20.16–20.18), Walls 5063 and 5062 stood to a height of almost 2.0 m. Wall 5063 tilted considerably eastwards (Fig. 20.17), possibly as a result of the same seismic event that caused Walls 5044 and 5061 to separate, as described above. Parts of two rooms were excavated south and north of the dividing Wall 5062.

In the northern room, a clear distinction between Strata G-2b and G-2a could be made (Figs. 20.17–20.18; Photo 20.18). The lowest layer reached was a beaten-earth floor (8046) exposed in a small area at level 84.16 m, which appeared to abut the foundation of Walls 5062 and 5063. This floor was covered by a layer of small chunks of brick debris (8040) and a higher layer of large collapsed bricks (8018). Note that the floor in Room 8046 was much lower than the surrounding floors of the same phase, 8041/8044 in Square Q/4 west of Wall 8030, as well as Floor 8017 to the south. Thus, it may be suggested that Room 8046 was, to some extent, subterranean.

In Phase G-2a, new floor composed of soft red and gray striations (5053) accumulated between levels 85.00–85.68 m, sloping to the north and sealing the earlier brick collapse (Figs. 20.17– 20.18; Photo 20.18). Many pottery sherds (some restorable) were found here (Figs. 21.6–21.7), as well as three clay loomweights.

In the southern room, a series of at least three successive floors (8017) attributed to Stratum G-2b was found at levels 84.95–85.35 m; a soft brown floor, a reddish floor and a grey floor with bits of plaster and ash, all containing many sherds, bones and olive pits. The highest floor was covered by a layer of brick debris (8004). A patchy clay floor (5047) at level 85.69 m covering the brick debris layer was attributed to Stratum G-2a. Its relation to Walls 5063 and 5062 was insecure, although very likely.

Phase G-2a'

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Square Q/5, a localized transitional phase between the end of G-2a and the construction of the G-1b structures may be suggested (Fig. 20.2b), based on a white plaster floor (5067) at level 86.39 m that was related to a circular installation (4062; Photos 20.22–20.23); the latter was 0.19 m deep and had a thick clay-plastered wall. It resembled Installation 4064 of Stratum G-1 (see below) and two grinding installations in Area C, Building CF, Stratum C-1a. Floor 5067 at levels 86.30–86.50 m in the southern part of the square may belong to the same phase. These floors and the installation sealed the bins and ovens attributed to G-2a, and was sealed by layer 5024 and the wooden beams of Stratum G-1b (see below). We thus attribute these elements to a late phase of G-2, denoted G-2a', an intermediate phase between G-2a and G-1b.

Stratum G-1

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. Figs. 20.3–20.5
Following Stratum G-2a, the area was rebuilt on a new plan. None of the previous walls continued to be in use, although the new walls retained the same northeast–southwest orientation and a few of them (4014, 5018, 5008) were constructed on top of earlier walls from Stratum G-2. A new feature introduced in Stratum G-1b was the use of wooden beams as foundations of walls and floors, also known in Stratum C-1b in Area C (Chapter 12) and Stratum B-5 in Area B (Chapter 8).

Two major architectural units were detected: Building GF in the central and northern part of the area and Building GG in the southern part, separated by a double wall (4047/5012). The eastern wall of the northern building (5017) was attached to another wall (5018), which probably belonged to an adjacent building to the east, beyond the limits of the excavation area. In the southwestern part of Area G, erosion destroyed much of Building GG.

In Building GG, very few changes were made between Strata G-1a and G-1b. The building was destroyed in G-1a by heavy fire, probably corresponding to the destruction of Stratum C-1a in Area C and E-1a in Area E. In Building GF, distinctions between the two strata could be observed in several cases, but since no violent destruction layer was detected, it might be conjectured that most of the Stratum G-1a floors in this building were eroded away, although this remains an open question. As noted above, building remains of Stratum G-1 were eroded away in Squares P–Q/6, the floors were almost completely eroded away in Squares P–Q/5, and erosion also destroyed the G-1 structures in the southwestern corner of the area in Square P/3.

The Wooden-Beam Foundations

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.24 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.27 - Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.28 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.29 - Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Charred wooden beams served as foundations for floors and walls of Stratum G-1 structures and sealed Stratum G-2 architecture in most of Area G (Fig. 20.3; Photos 20.22–20.30). The following is a description of this wooden construction in each of the excavation squares.

Square P/5

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Wooden beams were exposed in at least two consecutive layers in the east of the square (4020, 4031). They were arranged in a crisscross pattern, in an area 2.7 m wide and 0.4–0.6 m deep, below and to the east of Wall 4014, on both sides of Wall 4017 that extended from it. Both of these walls were related to Stratum G-1 (Photos 20.22–20.24, 20.30). The beams were used as foundations for both these walls, as well as for the related floors. The section created below Wall 4014 (Fig. 20.10) showed two layers of beams. East of this wall, there were three layers of beams; in the lower and upper layers, the beams were laid perpendicular to Wall 4014, while in the middle layer (4031), the beams were laid parallel to this wall. The beams of the lowest level ranged from 0.15–0.3 m in diameter. Of the beams in the middle layer, the longest was 2.4 m and the diameter ranged from 0.1–0.16 m. The dimensions of the beams in the upper layer (4020) were more modest, the largest being 1.4 m long and 0.1 m in diameter. Their top level was at 86.54 m.

It should be noted that when the poorly preserved bricks of Wall 4014 were dismantled, a 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris was revealed, separating the wall from the wooden beams described above (Fig. 20.10). This raised questions as to the relationship of the wooden beams to the construction of the wall; however, since the connection of the beams to other G-1 walls was established with great certainty, we maintain that Wall 4014 was supported by the wooden beams and that this crumbly brick layer was created during the heavy conflagration which strongly affected the lowest brick courses of the wall, because of its proximity to the wood.

Square Q/5

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The wooden beams exposed in the eastern part of the square were embedded into a light reddish-pink layer (5024), which sealed the latest plaster floor (5067) of the Stratum G-2 courtyard (Fig. 20.11). The beams were arranged in two layers, the lower beams running north–south (4079) and the upper beams running northwest–southeast (5020). The top of the upper beams was at level 86.63 m and their bottom was at level 86.56 m. Two additional north–south beams were exposed in the southeastern corner of the square (continuing into Square Q/4) at 86.53 m. The beams in this area appear to be a foundation for a beaten-earth floor that disappeared, which was possibly a continuation of 5024 in the middle of the square.

Squares P/4

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Wall 5012 of Stratum G-1in Squares P–Q/3–4 had a wooden foundation, seen in the section created below its northern face (Photos 20.27–20.28). The beams (8003) were perpendicular to the wall and continued northwards to serve as a foundation for a brick floor or platform (5069) and possibly for a floor that was not preserved east of this platform, between Walls 5012 and 4083 (Fig. 20.4). This layer of beams, oriented northeast–southwest, was between levels 85.79–85.91 m, extending from the top of Wall 5061 of Stratum G-2 on the west until the eastern end of the square. In fact, the top of Wall 5061 appears to have been reused, defining the brick platform on the west. East of the platform was a higher layer of beams (4066) that was laid perpendicularly to the lower layer, at levels at 86.08–86.44 m. (Photo 20.26)

In the northeastern corner of the square was a layer of beams laid at a northeastern–southeastern orientation (4071, between 86.53–86.29 m) that was the continuation of the southern group of beams (4020) in Square P/5, described above (Photo 20.25). Two elongated beams were located just on top of G-2 Wall 5061 at levels 86.03–86.28 m, serving as a foundation for the new wall (4070) built on the same line. West of this wall was a group of five beams which were perpendicular to the wall at level 86.00 m, probably serving as foundation for a floor that was not preserved in the small area that was excavated.

Wooden beams were also found in the foundation of Wall 4047, which created a double wall with Wall 5012, mentioned above (Fig. 20.16; Photo 20.31).

Square Q/4

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

After removing Wall 5017 of Stratum G-1 (see below), wooden beams were found below its lowest brick courses, among brick debris (5016); a section through Wall 5018 (attached to Wall 5017 on the east) revealed a foundation of beams perpendicular to the wall below its lowest course (Fig. 20.13; Photos 20.29, 20.40). A few beams found in the northeastern corner of the square continued those found in Square Q/5 to the north.

Square Q/3

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

A 0.46 m-thick layer of charred beams (5029) at levels 85.68–86.14 m sealed both Wall 5063 and the abutting floor build-up (5053) of Stratum G-2 in the northeastern corner of this square (Photos 20.17–20.18, 20.34–20.35). The beams appeared in several courses laid crosswise, at an east–west and north–south orientation; some appeared to be in disorder as if moved from their original location (perhaps due to seismic activity). This layer continued below the double brick wall (5017, 5018), which was founded some 0.3 m above the beams (Fig. 20.17) and extended ca. 1.3 m to the south of Wall 5017/5018 (Photo 20.40). It appears that the beams served as a foundation for a floor that was not preserved.

It should be noted that in several places there was a considerable gap of up to 0.5 m between the uppermost beams and the lowest brick course of the wall above (i.e., the case of Wall 4014, noted above) while in other places (such as the foundations of Walls 5012 and 4047), it was clear that the beams served as a foundation for the wall, as was the case in Area C. It appears that even where there was a gap, the wood served as such a foundation and the gap was created by seismic activity or the burning of the lowest bricks until melting point during the destruction.

Building GF

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.15 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.11 - Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.32 - Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.33 - Square Q/5 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The excavated remains attributed to this building in Squares P–Q/4–5 were 8.5×9.0 m, bordered by Walls 4014/4070 on the west, 5012 on the south and 5017 on the east (Photo 20.1). No closing wall on the north was uncovered and it seems that it was beyond the present limit of the excavation. In Square P/5, the western wall (4014) was built above G-2 Wall 5061, with wooden beams separating them, as described above (Photos 20.12, 20.22–20.23, 20.30, 20.32). It was exposed along 5.0 m in Square P/5 and its edge in Square P/4 was very poorly preserved to less than one course high. A strip of reddish-brown crumbly earth (4033), 0.4–0.5 m wide, exposed to the west of the wall, might be an indication of a foundation trench, although this is far from certain. The conflagration that destroyed the building burnt the bricks to a pinkish-orange hue. Wall 4017 extended from Wall 4014 towards the east (Photos 20.12, 20.22); only a brick and a half were preserved to one course high. This wall probably divided the area of Square P/5 east of Wall 4014 into two spaces, although no additional details of this assumed division further to the east were preserved.

In Square Q/5, no floors of Stratum G-1b were preserved above the constructional beams. In the eastern part of the square, a stone floor (4049), 3.5 m long and ca. 0.5–1.3 m wide, was exposed just below topsoil at levels 86.90–86.97 m, unrelated to any other feature (Photos 20.22, 20.33); this floor was attributed to Stratum G-1a. It is possible that this part of the building was an open courtyard. In the rest of the square, brick debris mixed with collapsed burnt bricks and grayish-brown and black ash (4007, 4013) found below topsoil, appeared to be related to the destruction of the building.

In Squares P–Q/4, Walls 4083 and 5019 were two segments of partition walls that comprised the southern border of the space described above, although they appeared to belong to two subsequent phases: Wall 4083 was founded in Stratum G1b, built on top of a wooden-beam foundation that separated it from the earlier wall (8055) of Stratum G-2 (Photo 20.11). Wall 5019 in the eastern part of Q/4 was narrower and higher; its foundation was 0.33 m higher than that of Wall 4083 and fit the level of the plaster floor (5023) to its north and was thus attributed to Stratum G-1a. It seems that in Squares Q–P/4–5 in Stratum G-1b, we may reconstruct a large space (inner dimensions 3.2×7.0 m) enclosed by Walls 4014, 4017, 4083 and an extension of Wall 5018 to the north (Photo 20.34). An element found in this space that remained enigmatic was Wall 5040, a 3.5 m-long and ca. 0.7 m wide stone foundation in the northern part of Square Q/4 (Photos 20.1, 20.32, 20.34), which was architecturally detached from the other walls of the building. It was attributed to Stratum G-1b, since it was covered by G-1a plaster floor 5023, which covered much of the northern part of Square Q/4. The nature of Wall 5040 was even more enigmatic in light of the lack of stone foundations in the Iron IIA levels at Tel Rehov. This element remains architecturally unexplained, although perhaps it served as a bench.

Plaster Floor 5023 in the northern part of Square Q/4 (levels 86.65–86.72 m) was composed of two thin superimposed layers of plaster; it did not clearly abut any wall, although it most likely did reach Wall 5019. Although it was somewhat lower than the stone floor (4049) in Square Q/5, it appears that both these floors were contemporary and belonged to Stratum G-1a.

In Square P/4, a single-course brick platform or floor (5069, 1.3×1.8 m), covered with a thick layer of plaster, was built above the wooden beams in the space between the short segment of Wall 4083 on the north and Wall 5012 on the south (Fig. 20.15; Photos 20.1, 20.11, 20.32, 20.34). Approach to this platform/floor could be through a possible opening in Wall 4083 to the north, where the bricks of this wall were found at the same level as the top of the platform (86.10 m). Note that the lowest brick course of Wall 5012 south of the platform was at level 86.26 m, 0.18 m above the top of the brick platform, but the wooden foundations of this wall started at level 85.72 m, which fit the wooden beams under the platform. It thus appears that the platform/floor and Wall 5012 were constructed at the same time. Brick debris with some small pebbles (4055, 4088) had accumulated on top of the platform. It appears that the platform/floor went out of use in Stratum G-1a, although no clear stratigraphic element was found above it, except for a small segment of an unnumbered wall, which made a corner with Wall 5012 and may be attributed to Stratum G-1a. The function of this brick platform/floor remained obscure.

Summary of Building GF

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Two phases were identified in Building GF, Strata G-1b and G-1a. In Stratum G-1b, the preserved parts of the building included a northern and a southern space. The northern space was probably an open courtyard with floor striations, resembling the open space that was here in the previous Stratum G-2, but lacking installations, such as ovens, bins and pits. It remained unclear whether Wall 4017 in Square P/5 continued to the east and divided this large space into two smaller spaces (in both strata). In the southern end of the building was a narrow elongated space with a brick platform or floor at its western end, yet its function, as well as that of the stone foundation 5040, remained obscure. In any event, the building does not appear to have been a regular dwelling and perhaps was utilized as a public space of some sort. In Stratum G-1a, it appears that inner changes were made; the wall segment that made a corner with 5012 perhaps continued northwards to create a corner with an assumed continuation to the west of the new Wall 5019, thus creating a room (inner dimensions 2.0×4.3 m) in the southeastern part of this building. However such a reconstruction is, to a large extent, hypothetical.

Building GG

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Building GG refers to the northern part of a structure whose southern and western parts disappeared due to erosion. The remains were exposed under topsoil on the southern slope of the hillock. The northern wall of the building was Wall 4047, a brick wall attached to Wall 5012, the southern wall of Building GF, together comprising a wide double wall. The plastered wall, 0.5 m wide and exposed along 7.0 m, was founded on round wooden beams laid perpendicularly (Fig. 20.16). Two construction phases in this wall could be discerned: the lower one (comprised of three brick courses) was attributed to G-1b, while the upper one (two brick courses protruding about 0.1 m to the south of the earlier courses), were attributed to G-1a (Photo 20.31). An alternative explanation would be that the two upper courses shifted from their original location due to seismic activity, although this is less plausible. On its western end, the wall made a corner with Wall 4068, of which only a single brick was preserved to one course high. The eastern wall (5008) was built on top of G-2 Walls 8027 and 5063 (Photo 20.18). It was exposed along 3.8 m, built of a single row of hard white bricks and was preserved to the height of three courses (Photos 20.34–20.35).

Room 4089

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.36 - Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.37 - Squares P–Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The eastern room (4089) was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, Wall 5008 on the east and Wall 4060 on the west; the southern end of this space was eroded away. Its width was 3.2 m and its length at least 3.0 m until the erosion line. Two installations were found in this room: 5031 and 4064, both related to food production.

A reddish-brown beaten-earth floor (4089) was exposed west of Installation 5031 at level 85.92 m. A 1.0 m-long charred wooden beam was found on the floor, perhaps part of a loom that stood nearby (see below). Floor 5038 was a pinkish clay surface with small ash patches that abutted Installation 5031 on its west and Wall 5008 on its east at level 85.87 m. The remains of an orange-clay oven were exposed near Wall 4047 to the north (not shown on the plan). No floor was found south of Installation 5031, where only extremely decayed debris was found due to the intense erosion.

Installation 5031 in the middle of this space was an oval of standing bricks coated inside and outside with white plaster (Fig. 20.6; Photos 20.34, 20.36, 20.40). Four open channels were carved in the upper part of the northern and southern walls of the installation, with plaster preserved inside three of these channels. The floor of the installation was composed of stones of various types and sizes, including a grinding stone fragment. A deep krater (Fig. 21.8:8) was embedded in the southwestern corner of the installation, its rim more or less flush with the stone floor and possibly used to collect liquid (olive oil?) that was processed or gathered inside the installation. Inside the installation, a layer of soft dark ashy earth contained two cooking jugs, a bowl and a krater (Figs. 21.8:7–8; 21.9:1–2).

An elongated plastered open channel north of the installation was covered by four large hard limestones (5071; Photos 20.34, 20.37, 20.40); the stones were chipped and cracked as a result of extensive heat. The largest one measured 0.38× 0.51×0.73 m. The bottom of these large stones were ca. 0.15 m above the top of the open channel and chips from these stones were found in the accumulation above Floor 4089 to the west. The stones appeared to be related to the installation and perhaps were used as weights, possibly hung on the wooden beam found lying in the destruction debris to the west of the installation. A roughly worked stone mortar was found close the large stones (Photo 20.37).

The elongated plastered channel to the north of the installation, the four open channels carved into the top of the installation’s walls and the sunken vessel, all indicate that this installation was used in the processing of liquid, perhaps olive oil. The four sunken depressions on top of the installation’s wall were perhaps intended to hold two wooden beams, which somehow were used in the operation. However the exact identification of the function and operation of this installation remains elusive.

The second installation (4064), just 0.4 m to the west of 5031, was an elongated, almost elliptical semi-circle (Photos 20.34; 20.37–20.40, 20.42), built against Wall 4060 and on top of Floor 4089, just on top of Wall 4081 of the previous stratum. It was constructed of small bricks that were covered inside and outside with a thick gray plaster; the center of the installation apparently also had been plastered, although none of this plaster was preserved. Two stones were set at the southern edge of the installation, which may be explained as a grinding installation with a mud-plastered parapet of the type found in Area C (Chapters 12, 43). This suggestion is supported by the find of an upper and a lower grinding stone in the destruction layer (4059) east and north of this installation (Photo 20.39).1

The room was destroyed in a heavy conflagration, creating a layer of burnt bricks and black ash. The thick destruction layer on top of Floor 4089 in the western part of the room (4059) included vessels (Figs. 21.8–21.13) and upper and lower grindstones. A few loomweights found near Installation 5031 were perhaps related to the cache of loomweights found to the west of the entranceway in Wall 4060 (see below). The wooden beam found on the floor could be related to Installation 5031 or to a loom that stood near the entrance to Room 5037. No separate floor that could be attributed to a later phase was found in this room and thus, it appears in identical form in the plans of both Strata G-1b and G-1a (Figs. 20.4–20.5).
Footnotes

1 A narrow cylindrical gap in the middle of Wall 4060 had remains of plaster. This was interpreted during the excavation as a channel conducting liquids from the room to the west into the installation. However, the parallels to the grinding installations in Area C are more convincing and we tend to reconstruct 4064 as such.

Room 5037

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.41 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.42 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.43 - Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.44 - Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This small square room (inner dimensions 2.2×2.3 m) was in the northwestern corner of the extant part of Building GG. It was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, poorly preserved Wall 4068 on the west, and Walls 4067 and 4060 on the south and east (Photos 20.40–20.45). A 0.9 m-wide entranceway led to this room from the eastern space (4089) at the northern end of Wall 4060. At least two floors were exposed. The early floor attributed to Stratum G-1b was preserved in three areas. Two small segments were exposed near Wall 4047 (8011, 8022) at level 85.75 m, abutting the lowest course of Wall 4047. On top of the western patch (8022), a scaraboid was found (Chapter 30A, No. 17). In the central part of the room was a compact clay floor (5037) at level 85.82 m, abutting Wall 4060.

A higher floor (4088) made of hard gray plaster was identified in the central and northern parts of the room, between levels 85.91–86.00 m, ca. 0.1– 0.2 m higher than the earlier floor. This higher floor is related to Stratum G-1a and appears to have abutted all four walls of the room, although this was not clearly seen.

Destruction debris (4052) that covered the floor consisted of burnt bricks, light gray ash, charcoal pieces and burnt earth that contained 47 restorable vessels (Photos 20.41–2.44; Figs. 21.8–21.14). A large number of these vessels were sunk into the floor against Wall 4067. Over 80 gypsum loomweights were found in the northeastern corner of the room, near the entranceway. They were piled up, covering an area 1.5 m long and 0.65 m wide. Their configuration and dimensions apparently indicate the size and shape of the loom that stood here. Note the abovementioned possibility that the wooden beam in the room to the east might have belonged to this loom. The location of a loom at the entrance of a room recalls a similar situation at Tell Qasile Stratum X, where concentrations of about 80 loomweights each were found at the entrances of several rooms (Mazar 2008).

In the southern part of Square P/3, Loci 4065 and 4069 contain the same destruction layer, although it is slightly lower due to the topography and damaged by the erosion line.

Summary and Conclusions

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

There are two major strata in Area G: G-2 and G-1, each with two phases in several locations. The architectural data from both strata is fragmentary and the complete plans of the buildings remain unknown. In Stratum G-2, Buildings GC, GD and GA could be parts of regular dwellings, although Building GB appears to have had a public function. In Stratum G-2b, it might have been a wide open space, about 7.0×13.3 m, while in Stratum G-1b, it was divided into an elongated roofed(?) space on the west and an L-shaped open space on the east and north, with numerous clay bins and pits, as well as several ovens. This open space perhaps was used for food storage or processing and baking, serving several adjacent dwellings; it thus may have belonged to a clan composed of several nuclear families living in the houses around this open area.

As elsewhere in Tel Rehov, no violent destruction was observed at the end of Stratum G-2, yet hints at an earthquake which caused considerable damage were found in the form of tilted and split walls. Such damages may have been the reason for abandoning the Stratum G-2 structures and for the foundation of the new buildings of Stratum G-1. The construction of Stratum G-1 was accompanied by laying wooden foundations for both walls and floors, as was detected also in Areas C and B. About half of this wood was composed of olive tree branches (Chapter 52).

Architectural continuity between Strata G-2 and G-1 was found in several places (i.e., Wall 4014 on top of Wall 5061, Wall 8030 on top of Wall 5018, Wall 5008 on top of Wall 5063), while the general plan of the structures differed from that of Stratum G-1. The new double wall 5012/4047 was a major feature, separating Building GG on the south from Building GF on the north. Both of these buildings are only partly known. Building GF continued the tradition of Building GB of the previous period in its being composed of large open spaces, although no food processing or storage installations were found in it and thus, its function may have changed. Architectural changes between Strata G-1b and G-1a were also observed. A unique feature was the brick platform/floor (5069), which perhaps served as a base for storage facilities. The preserved part of Building GG contained two installations of particular interest: a possible grinding installation with a plaster parapet and perhaps an oil-extracting installation with stone weights, which was rather rare in this period. A loom with some 80 gypsum weights apparently stood at the entrance to the small chamber (5037) and a wooden beam found outside this room might have belonged to the loom.

The dramatic destruction of Stratum G-1a yielded a rich pottery assemblage and other finds. This can be correlated to the general destruction of the city of Stratum IV in the 9th century BCE, as evidenced in other areas at Tel Rehov.

Plans and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 20.1        Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2        Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.3        Squares P–Q/4–5, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.4        Collapsed mudbricks on left corner in G-2b Building GA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.5        Tilted Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6        G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.7        Building GA, G-2 Building GB, and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.8        G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.9        Wall 5064 and G-2a courtyard from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.10        G-2b and G-2a circular bins from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.11        Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12        G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.13        Stratum G-2a Square P/6 and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.14        Stratum G-2a Floors 4016 and 5004 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.15        Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16        Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17        Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18        Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.19        Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.20        Tilted G-2 Wall 4081 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.21        Closeup on Tilted G-2 Wall 4081 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22        Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23        Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.24        Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.27        Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.28        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.29        Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30        Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31        Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.32        Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.33        Square Q/5 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34        Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35        Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.36        Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.37        Squares P–Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.38        Square P/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.39        Square P/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40        General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.41        Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.42        Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.43        Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.44        Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.45        Room 4088 floor below G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Chapter 54 - Reconstructing a Seismic Destruction at Tel Rehov: Insights from a Paleomagnetic Fold Test on Tilted Walls in Area C, Stratum V

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Fig. 54.1                     Visualization of the Earth's Magnetic Field from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.2                     Paleomagnetic fold test as applied to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.3                     Sampling locations in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.1                     Samples in Burnt Wall 2454 of Building CE from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.2                     Samples in Tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Table 54.1                     Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.4                     Zijderveld diagrams of the AF demagnetization of samples from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.5                     Equal area projection of measured directions from Buildings CE and CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.6                     Equal area projection of measured directions from Buildings CE and CG after tilt correction from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Discussion
Introduction

The architectural remains uncovered at Tel Rehov throughout the occupation history of the site (15th—8th centuries BCE) are dominated by mudbricks; during the Iron Age IIA (Strata VI-IV, 10th-9th centuries BCE), the brick walls typically lack stone foundations. In Stratum V of Iron IIA, wooden beams were used on a large-scale as foundations for the walls or were incorporated in the floor makeup. A destruction that involved intense fire was identified at the end of Stratum V (local Stratum C-1b) in the eastern and northern parts of Area C: Buildings CG, CH, CM, and CE (see Chapter 12), but not in other parts of the area. A later violent destruction of Stratum IV (local Stratum C-1a) was found across the entire site (Mazar 2003; 2008; Chapter 4 and various stratigraphic chapters).

The current study focuses on the local destruction of parts of Stratum C-lb, which is dated by radiocarbon and ceramic typology to the late 10th until the early 9th century BCE (Chapters 4, 24, 48).

The mudbricks are sun dried, and their firing during the destruction process is the basis for the archaeomagnetic investigation that was undertaken in Area C. The question at hand is whether the partial destruction of the Stratum C-lb buildings was caused by a military campaign, local fire, or, given the geological setting of the site (Chapter 2), by an earthquake. The latter is supported by extensive segments of strongly tilted walls; however, it is possible that in this earthquake-frequented region, the earthquake that tilted the walls of Stratum C-lb occurred independently of the fire, sometime after the site was destroyed by the intense conflagration indicated by the color and texture of the mudbricks.

The active faulting at the site is reflected in many other tilted floors and occupation layers, dated to the Late Bronze Age I onwards, particularly in Area D (where the direction of the tilt is towards the southeast; see Chapters 4, 15). Deducing a causal relationship of tilting and fire events based only on field observations is a difficult task; the current case study demonstrates how archaeomagnetic investigation can provide decisive observations regarding this relationship, and how it can be used in the reconstruction of destruction processes.

In 2003, we investigated the relationship between the tilting of the walls and the fire by an archaeomagnetic study of the burnt mudbricks of two Stratum C- lb walls that were found tilted. The samples were collected in collaboration with A. Mazar and measured at the Paleomagnetic Laboratory of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.1
Footnotes

1 The measurements were done with the help of R. Granot.

Research Methods

Archaeomagnetism

The case study presented in this paper belongs to the wider field of archaeomagnetism — the application of paleomagnetic methods in archaeology, which consists of various techniques. Some are aimed solely to reconstruct the geomagnetic field itself during archaeological times (e.g., Korte et al. 2011) and others, to answer archaeological questions, mostly by using archaeomagnetic data as a dating tool (e.g., Eighmy and Sternberg 1990; Lanos 2003; Pavon-Carrasco et al. 2011). The most typical recorders of the geomagnetic field in archaeological contexts are heat-impacted clayey materials (e.g., pottery, kilns and ovens, mudbricks and metallurgical installations). The full vector information of the geomagnetic field (declination, inclination and intensity; Fig. 54.1) might be retrieved by sampling materials found in their original cooling position. In addition to reconstructing the properties of the geomagnetic field, the experiments are designed to evaluate the reliability of the material as a geomagnetic recorder (Tauxe 2010); they also provide information regarding the thermal history of the samples.

The geomagnetic field vector consists of three components (Fig. 54.1):
  1. declination (D) — its direction in respect to the geographic north
  2. inclination (I) — its direction in respect to the horizon
  3. intensity (its strength)
For each point on the earth's surface, the geomagnetic field can be represented as a vector, and, as all components change constantly with time, regional reference curves can be used as a dating tool. The case study presented here makes use only of the directional components of the geomagnetic field, which are relatively easy to reconstruct in the paleomagnetic laboratory when the magnetic properties of the sample are stable.

Methods and Sampling

Figures and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Fig. 54.1           Visualization of the Earth's Magnetic Field from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.2           Paleomagnetic fold test as applied to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.3           Sampling locations in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.1           Samples in Burnt Wall 2454 of Building CE from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.2           Samples in Tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Discussion

The archaeomagnetic study was designed to provide conclusive evidence for one of the two following possible scenarios:2
  1. An earthquake is the main cause for the partial destruction of Stratum C-lb and the tilting of the buildings' walls, and is also responsible for the fire.
  2. A fire is the main cause for the destruction of the Stratum C-lb buildings; after this, during a period in which the site was abandoned, an earthquake tilted the walls.
As the two main segments of the tilted walls are facing opposite directions, creating an anticlinal fold structure, we applied the paleomagnetic "fold test" (Tauxe 2010: 177) to test the relationship between the folding (tilting) and the magnetization of the mudbricks (the result of the fire) (Fig. 54.2). In this test, the geomagnetic directions (D and I [Fig. 54.1]) are reconstructed from the two opposite flanks of the fold (the two opposing burnt mudbricks walls) and their statistical averages are compared. If they are similar, the fire had to occur during or after the tilting, implying option (1) above (Fig. 54.2a). If they are statistically different, then the fire had to occur before the tilting, implying option (2) above (Fig. 54.2b). To enhance statistical evaluation of similarity, the directions are corrected for their respective tilt; sparser directional cluster after correction indicates option (1) and tighter directional cluster, option (2).

We collected ten samples of burnt mudbricks from the two opposing tilted walls (Fig. 54.3): six samples from the western (inner) face of Wall 2454, which served as the eastern wall of Building CE (Photo 54.1; Chapter 12; Fig. 12.27), and four from the eastern (outer) face of Wall 2411, the eastern wall of Building CG (Photo 54.2; Figs. 12.39-12.40). The sampling was done by cutting out oriented chunks of clay bricks into small (~8 cm3) plastic boxes using a Brunton compass.3 The tilting direction of the walls (their dip) was measured on flat surfaces in various locations and an average was calculated. The paleomagnetic experiments were done using alternating field (AF) demagnetization (Tauxe 2010: 127) in steps of 5µT to 40µT or 10µT to 90µT. As the signal was consistent and stable, the samples were not fully demagnetized.
Footnotes

2 The options that the fire occurred later than and independent of the earthquake (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable from option 1), or that the fire caused the tilting (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable from option 2) are much less likely and are not discussed here.

3 The mudbricks were too fragile for drilling, thus an alternative sampling method was improvised.

Results

Both walls are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall of Building CE towards the north and the wall of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold.

The demagnetization data are presented in Fig. 54.4. Two samples (C3 and C6) from Wall 2454 were rejected, as they demonstrated an unstable magnetization (Fig. 54.4). The mean vectorial direction was calculated for the two clusters of samples using Fisher statistics. The results are presented in Table 54.1 and Fig. 54.5; Fig. 54.6 presents the results after tilt correction.

Table 54.1

Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C

Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Conclusions

AF demagnetization of eight of the ten samples from the two tilted mudbrick walls in Buildings CE and CG (Stratum V, C-1b) demonstrated stable, single-component magnetization, indicating a simple thermal history of only one major heating event. This result is an objective and conclusive confirmation of the field observation that both walls were subjected to the same intense fire.4 The directions retrieved from the samples indicate that the fire took place after or simultaneously with the tilting. We therefore argue that the simplest explanation for the destruction process of Stratum V is an earthquake that triggered an intense fire (option [1] above). The symmetric anticlinal structure observed in the deformed structures of both walls (~18° each flank), together with the discrete quality of the damage (destruction is observed only in certain locations in Area C), supports destruction by the on-fault effect of an earthquake, as classified by Rodríguez-Pascua et al. (2011: 22). Area C is located directly on a fault line (Zilberman, Chapter 2) and the deformation caused by the fault scarp is expressed by the tilting (folding); the ductile reaction of the structures (rather than brittle, e.g., Altunel 1998: Fig. 5), is most probably the result of the quality of building materials and construction techniques, including the use of wooden beams. Finally, the possibility that an earthquake occurred after and independently from the fire (option [2] above) is entirely excluded by the magnetic results (Fig. 54.2b).

As the region is prone to earthquakes and the tell itself is located directly on a major segment of the Dead Sea Transform (Zilberman, Chapter 2), the site most probably suffered from frequent earthquake-triggered destructions of different magnitudes. This might be sustained by the use of wooden beams as part of the construction techniques, and, in the case of Stratum V, also by the fast recovery and organic reconstruction of the city, in many cases of the same buildings, in Stratum IV. This process of close continuity between the two strata may also explain the absence of trapped bodies and other features typical of massive destruction by earthquakes.5

In addition to specific insights regarding the destruction process of Stratum C-lb at Tel Rehov, the study presented here demonstrates the feasibility and potential of archaeomagnetic studies on burnt mudbricks. The stable and strong magnetization provides opportunity for studies regarding all aspects of archaeomagnetism, including establishing dating references and other related applications.
Footnotes

4 The most common carrier of magnetic remanence in baked clay is magnetite; thus, most probably both walls were subjected to at least 585°C, the temperature at which magnetite loses its permanent magnetization (Curie temperature).

5 At an earlier stage of the research, A. Mazar suggested attributing the destruction of Stratum V to the military campaign of Pharaoh Shoshenq I to Canaan around 925 BCE (Mazar 2003: 317). This destruction date and its cause were challenged by Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2003), who argued for a later date and rejected the destructive quality of Shoshenq I's campaign to the region. Later excavation seasons since 2003 made it clear that the violent destruction of Stratum V occurred only in a certain part of Area C, and this result led to the reevaluation of the previous conclusions (see Chapters 4 and 12). If, indeed, an earthquake was the cause of the partial destruction of Stratum V in Area C, it excludes the possibility that the destruction was caused by the campaign of Shoshenq I.

Roberts (2012)

  • from Roberts (2012:169-170)
  • Roberts (2012:169-170), whose dissertation was about the Amos Quake(s), appears to be discussing the wrong Stratum. He should be discussing Stratum IV but he is discussing Stratum VI instead.
11. Tel Rehov

Tel Rehov’s location along the Dead Sea Transform, a few miles south of Beth-Shean already presents itself as a strong candidate for earthquake damage. While the initial excavations in the late 1970s carried out by Fanny Vitto were most well known for the excavated synagogue, the renewed excavations led by Amihai Mazar began in 1997 and thereafter, Mazar tentatively identified eighth century earthquake damage. In Area C, located in the uppermost part of the lower tell and near the northwestern corner, several structures of Stratum VI were exposed and according to the excavators
A thick mudbrick collapse, with many whole bricks, was found above the floor, although there was no evidence of fire. This severe collapse may be evidence of an earthquake. Another hint of seismic activity is a split or seam in the northern wall of the hall, suggesting that the wall was torn into two.78
They also stated
Stratum VI; the western wall was constructed above a wall of Stratum VII. The poor preservation of the walls, showing signs of brick slippage and cracks, indicate that the building might have been damaged by an earthquake.79
The site is also known for its Iron Age buildings, without stone foundations, and instead often employ wood foundations and walls which are a common feature, especially in stratum V.80 Mazar is well known for his careful and well respected excavations and further study and excavation should clarify the damage that appears to be caused by an earthquake. A better understanding of the patterning of the brick fall and the types of cracks in the walls should help clarify the damage.81
Footnotes

78 Amihai Mazar, “The 1997-1998 Excavations at Tel Rehov: Preliminary Report,” IEJ 49 (1999): 1-42. In stratum C-1, Mazar, 21-22, suggested that charred timber could be the remains of seismic retrofitting,

A common feature of these rooms is the use of wooden logs or beams as a foundation for the walls and floors. The wood was sometimes found to have been laid in several superimposed and interspersed layers. Such wood was also found in the southern compartment room described above. All the beams were carbonised, and in the southern part of the area they were found tilted at a sharp angle down to the east (Fig. 10). The trees used for this construction were identified by Dr. U. Baruch (Israel Antiquities Authority) as belonging to various species, such as elm, olive, acacia, Judas tree, Syrian ash and mulberry. This type of wooden construction serving as a foundation for both mudbrick walls and clay and plaster floors is unusual, and unparalleled elsewhere in the Levant. It may have been intended to protect the building against earthquakes, which present a hazard in the Jordan Valley, or it could be the roof of a basement, still unexcavated.
See also, the summary of the earthquake damage listed on the Tel Rehov project website
No evidence for violent destruction of this city was found, yet thick mud-brick debris, intact fallen bricks and cracks in the walls allude to destruction or severe damage caused by an earthquake.

- Amihai Mazar, “Tel Rehov Summary,” n.p. [Cited 18 March 2012]. Online link [JW: The link is broken. This website was taken down but parts of it have been archived on the wayback machine]
Herzog and Singer-Avitz, “Sub-dividing the Iron Age IIA,” 177.

79 Amihai Mazar, H. J. Bruins, N. Panitz-Cohen, and J. van der Plicht, “Ladder of Time at Tel Rehov: Stratigraphy, Archaeological Context, Pottery and Radiocarbon Dates,” in The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science (eds. T. E. Levy and T. Higham; London: Equinox, 2005), 193-255, esp. 218; Amihai Mazar, “Rehov, Tel” NEAHL 5:2013-2018.

80 Mazar, “Rehov, Tel” NEAHL 5:2014.

81 Nimrod Marom, Noa Raban-Gerstel, Amihai Mazar, and Guy Bar-Oz, “Backbone of Society: Evidence for Social and Economic Status of the Iron Age Population of Tel Rehov, Beth Shean Valley, Israel,” BASOR 354 (2009): 1- 21, suggests there is more than just Iron IIA earthquake damage at Rehov: “Several episodes of rebuilding can be attributed to destruction caused by earthquakes and human activity.”

Raphael and Agnon (2018)

Period Age Site Damage Description
Iron IIA 1000-900 BCE Rehov thick mudbrick debris, intact fallen brick walls (Area C, Stratum VI) suggest an earthquake (Mazar 2008: 2015). Based on a preliminary paleomagnetic fold test, Ben-Yosef and Ron (2016: 4-7) suggested that the tilted wall (Area C, Stratum V) was the result of an earthquake.

Stratum V Earthquake - Late Iron IIA - late 10th until the early 9th century BCE

Figures

Figures

  • Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)
  • Fig. 3.7 Map of the site showing grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Deformation Map of Strata C1-b and D1-c by Jefferson Williams
  • Deformation Map of Stratum E1-b by Jefferson Williams
  • Fig. 2.11 Subsurface structure of Tel Rehov interpreted from seismic - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Fig. 2.12 Seismic interpretation of the top of the lower tufa layer along with subsurface faults - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Fig. 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.54 - Superimposed plan of Strata C-3–C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Chronology
Chronology of Iron Age Strata VII-IV (C-4 to C-1a)

Chronology of Iron Age Strata VII-IV (C-4 to C-1a)

  • from Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, (2020 v. 1:119)
  • Area C stratigraphy correlated to the rest of the site
  • Dating of Iron IIA strata was based on a combination of the following:
    • Relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts
    • Absolute dating based on radiometric data
    • Historical considerations
Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


Finkelstein's subdivision of Late Iron IIA

Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, 2020 v. 1:119 n. 20 noted the following

Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE)
Finkelstein (2013:7)'s Table 1 is shown below:

Table 1

Dates of ceramic phases in the Levant and the transition between them according to recent radiocarbon results (based on a Bayesian model, 63 percent agreement between the model and the data)

Finkelstein (2013:7)


Discussion

Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:123-124) report evidence of heavy destruction and fire in the central part of Area C. Archaeoseismic evidence on the site is fairly extensive and includes collapsed and tilted walls, fallen ceilings, broken pottery (some apparently found in fallen position), and debris. Although earlier papers ( Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar, 2003a; 2003b) suggested that the destruction layer was a result of Sheshonq I's invasion (around 925 BCE), a paleomagnetic study of two tilted mudbrick walls by Ben-Yosef and Ron in Chapter 54 of Volume V of the Final Report indicates that the walls tilted before a fire struck the site and not after. This is thought to eliminate the possibility that an earthquake tilted the walls well after an invasion force torched Area C. Thus, the fire was likely caused by an earthquake which is dated to the the late 10th until the early 9th century BCE.

As with the Stratum VI earthquake there are indications that the site experienced vertical shaking during this Stratum V event. A symmetrical anticlinal structure with an east-west fold axis (aka a Hinge line) is present in Area C in the walls of Buildings CM and CE. The same anticlinal folding appears to also be present in the vicinity of building CF (Site Visit by Jefferson Williams on 11 June 2023) and in Wall 7803 of Room 7837 in Area D ( Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al., 2020 v. 3 Ch.15:92-93). Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5:670) measured the dip of the mudbrick walls they submitted for paleomagnetic testing and found them to be dipping at 18 degrees. Brick debris, perhaps also due to seismic collapse, was also found in Area E.

The anticlinal folding indicates that upward vertical forces were experienced during this event which, in turn, suggests that one or more of the active faults1 underneath the Tel slipped during this earthquake and/or that the Tel was within the hypocentral region of the earthquake. In either case, this suggests that that some part of the northern part of the Jordan Valley Fault broke and local intensity was probably quite high - i.e. VIII (8) or higher.

Dating was based on ceramic evidence and radiocarbon. Area C contains a complete Iron Age II stratigraphy which improves confidence in the date, although Iron Age II chronology is still actively debated and as of yet not fully resolved.

The damaged structures were made entirely of mudbricks with wood beam foundations so there is likely a construction related site affect for all the Iron Age II structures.
Footnotes

1 Active Faults under Tel Rehov were identified and mapped based on seismic surveys (and presumably some aerial photos). This is discussed in The Geology and Geophysics section of this web page which, in turn, comes from the Chapter 2 of the Final Excavation Report (The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and Tel Rehov by Zilberman in Mazar et. al., 2020 v. 1). The possibility that these active faults slipped during one of the Iron Age earthquakes is discussed sporadically in the Final Report and Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:187) observed a tilt from west to east/southeast in all strata at Tel Rehov which may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures.

Additional Note - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:186) observed that the most severely damaged structures were located along a north-south axis running through the center of Area C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’, as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning. However, in my site visit and examination of the Final Report for Areas C, D, E, and G, it appears that there is archaeoseismic evidence for this event in Areas D and E and it appears that the axis of deformation in Area C ran east-west - i.e. there was vertical uplift along an east west axis which could coincide with some of the on-site active faults mapped by Zilberman in Mazar et al. (2020 v. 1).

References
Final Report (2020)

Chapter 2 - The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and Tel Rehov

  • see the Geology and Geophysics collapsible panel in the Background Information section

Chapter 3 - Introduction to the Site and the Excavations

  • see the Mound Morphology and Site-formation processes collapsible panel in the Background Information section for that section of Chapter 3

Chapter 4 - The Tel Rehov Excavations: Overview and Synthesis

Figures, Tables, and Photos

Figures and Tables

  • Figure 4.1          Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 4.2          Map of Tel ReHov showing the excavation areas and architecture of Stratum IV from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Table 4.1          Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)

Photos

  • Photo 4.2          Fragments of roofing material from Stratum IV from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussions
Iron Age IIA

Terminology and Stratigraphy

The term Iron IIA has been employed in different ways in the archaeology of Israel. G.E. Wright (1961: 97-99) used it to describe the period between 900-730/700 BCE, while he termed the 10th century BCE "Iron IC". Initially, Israeli archaeologists used the term to denote the 10th century BCE, equaling the time of the United Monarchy (e.g., Aharoni 1979 [first published in Hebrew in 1963] and in subsequent editions; NEAEHL: 1529; Mazar 1990: 30) and this terminology was widely accepted (e.g., King and Stager 2001: XXIII). According to this system, the 9th century BCE was included in the Iron IIB, together with the 8th century. Finkelstein (1996) and Sharon et al. (2007) suggested to lower the transition from Iron I/Iron IIA to the late 10th century BCE (see above) and dated the Iron IIA to the 9th century BCE. I suggested a Modified Conventional Chronology, which broadly accepted the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century, based on the finds from Jezreel and Tel Rehov, yet I claimed that the period began well in the 10th century (Coldstream and Mazar 2003: 40-45; Mazar 2005). Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006; 2011) accepted this chronological framework, but went one step further by suggesting a division of the Iron IIA into two sub-periods: Early Iron IIA and Late Iron IIA, the former dated to the 10th century and the latter to the 9th. This suggestion is now accepted by many archaeologists in Israel, although the details of absolute dating of each phase remain unresolved. In this publication, we refer to Iron Age IIA as a period starting sometime during the first half of the 10th century BCE (ca. 980 BCE?) and ending during the second half of the 9th century, probably following severe destructions caused by Aramean conquests led by Hazael (see below for a detailed chronological and historical discussion).

Local stratum numbers were assigned in each of the excavation areas. It so happened that in the four main areas in the lower city (Areas C, D, E and G), the uppermost stratum was attributed to Late Iron IIA and was numbered 1 (C-1, D-1, etc.), while an earlier stratum denoted Stratum 2 was attributed to Early Iron IIA (C-2, D-2, etc.). Yet, as the excavation progressed, we found it necessary to divide Stratum 1 in Areas C, D, E and G into two sub-phases denoted la and lb, while in Area F, three sub-phases equaling these two phases were deter¬mined (Table 4.1). When the decision was made to assign final strata numbers (in Roman numerals), and considering the later Iron IIB Strata II-III and Islamic period Strata IA and IB on the upper mound, it was decided to allocate a separate general Roman numeral — IV and V — to each of the sub-phases la and lb, while local Stratum 2 in all these areas was called general Stratum VI. This terminology has its deficiencies, since it became clear during later excavation seasons and subsequent research that, in fact, Strata IV and V are two phases of the same city. In certain places, major rebuilding took place during the transition between the two (as in the southeastern part of Area C, where the apiary of Stratum V went out of use in Stratum IV), while in Areas B, E, G and parts of C, there was great a deal of continuity between these two strata and, in fact, they could be merged into one general stratum with local sub-phases. This is also substantiated by the pottery assemblage, which is almost identical in Strata V and IV, while that of Stratum VI is somewhat different. In retrospect, it might have been preferable to retain the single general stratum number with sub-phases (as was done in the local strata numbers) instead of using the terms Strata V and IV. In this publication, we use both the local and the general stratum numbers. In summary, we may define two major cities: that of Stratum VI, attributed to Early Iron IIA, and that of Strata V and IV, attributed to Late Iron IIA.

Building Materials and Techniques

The Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov are characterized by several architectural features which are unknown elsewhere in Israel (see discussion at the end of Chapter 12). The first is the virtually exclusive use of mudbricks as building material. Stones were used only in exceptional places for constructing cobblestone floors and installations (as in Area F: Fig. 19.4, Photo 19.6), pillar bases (rarely; e.g., Area C, Building CX) and working surfaces.

The avoidance of stone foundations for brick walls in Strata VI-IV is astonishing, since their use was common at Tel Rehov in LB II (although they were missing in the earlier LB Strata D-11 and D-10) and Iron I strata, as they are in the architecture of the Southern Levant since the Protohistoric periods. Such stone sockles are essential to protect mudbrick walls from water damage and humidity and their absence must indicate a cultural choice which is difficult to explain. In the Jordan Valley, mudbrick walls with no stone foundations can be found in the Iron IIA/B Stratum VIII buildings at Tell Deir 'Alla (van der Kooij 1993: 341) and at Tell es-Sa'idiyeh Stratum XII (Tubb and Dorrell 1993: 58), which should be dated to Late Iron IIA (see below). Brick walls without stone foundations are known in Egypt, and appear in selected New Kingdom Egyptian-inspired structures in Canaan, such as at Deir el-Balah and, in a few cases, at Beth-Shean (Stratum Q-2; TBS I: 83-89), although other Egyptian structures at Beth-Shean, such as Building 1500, did have stone sockles. However, there is no justification to assume Egyptian architectural influence in Iron IIA at Tel Rehov, and there is no evidence for any foreign architectural tradition of this kind that could be a source of inspiration. Therefore, the introduction of this building technique and its persistence throughout all three Iron IIA strata remains unexplained.

Another exceptional and surprising feature was the use of wood foundations for walls and floors, a feature introduced in Stratum V and found in almost every building in Areas B, C and G. Narrow, round beams or branches were laid perpendicular to the brick walls at their foundation level (e.g., Area C: Figs. 12.29; 12.72; 12.74; 12.77; Photos 12.59-12.60; 12.77-12.78; 12.125; 12.128-12.129; 12.172). Sometimes, thicker beams were found incorporated in the wall foundation; in several cases, there was a gap of more than 20 cm between the lowest brick and the preserved beam, filled with charred material that appears to have been wood or some other organic material. In other places, the lowest brick course was laid directly above the wood. Often, these beams or branches were also placed below the beaten-earth floors (e.g., Area C: Figs. 12.30; 12.32; 12.37; 12.41-12.43; 12.45-12.46; Photos 12.33; 12.130; 12.141; 12.144; 12.146; Area G: Fig. 20.3; Photos 20.23; 20.26). Many of the wood samples were identified by N. Liphschitz (Chapter 52, Table 52.1); ca. 50% were identified as olive trees, while other species included Ficus sycomorus, Ulmus, Tamarix, Pistacia atlantica and a few others. Only few oaks were represented and pines and cypress were lacking. Most of the walls with wood foundations continued to be used in Stratum IV, but no wood was found in walls that were first built in that stratum, so that this unusual building technique was limited to Stratum V. No parallels are known in the Southern Levant and it seems to be a local invention, perhaps intended to provide flexibility to the walls during seismic events, creating a kind of shock absorber. This was perhaps a reaction to an earthquake which appears to be the reason for the severe damage causing the abandonment of the previous Stratum VI buildings.8

Bricks were made of local clays taken from the fields around the mound. In most cases, they were light brown-yellowish or, less frequently, they were composed of dark brown colluvial soil. Their sizes range from 45-60 cm in length (most common, 50 cm), 30-40 cm in width (most common, 35 cm) and 10-17 cm in height (Tables 12.28-12.30; Photo 4.1). An exceptional feature limited to certain structures of Stratum V (in particular, Buildings CF and CE in Area C) are bricks with two vertical flattened protrusions close to their ends on their broad external face, created by special depressions in the brick molds (Figs. 12.29, 12.63). They were perhaps intended to better adhere the plaster coating.

Most of the walls were one brick wide (ca. 50 cm); yet, double walls often appear, in particular when two buildings were adjoined, each with its own exterior wall (see plans of Strata V-IV in Areas B, C, E and G; Chapters 8, 12, 17 and 20 respectively). In several cases, a ca. 2 cm-thick plaster made of brown clay was preserved (e.g., in Building CF in Area C). It may be assumed that such plaster covered all the brick walls. In the exceptional Building CP in Area C, a whitish plaster was found on some of the walls, in particular near the entrance to the southern wing. In several places, roofing material comprising large lumps of clay with reed and wooden beam impressions was found, mainly in the destruction debris of Stratum IV (Photo 4.2).
Footnotes

8 During a visit to the site by Prof. D. Yankelevsky and other experts from the National Building Research Institute of the Technion, Haifa, this explanation was accepted as the most reasonable. They mentioned the current use of steel rolls in foundations of highly sensitive structures, such as nuclear reactors, as a device providing flexibility in the event of an earthquake.

Chronology

Introduction

The dates of the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov, as well as the other sites, depend upon a combination of relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts, and absolute dating based on radiometric data combined with historical considerations. In this section, the first two issues are discussed, while historical considerations will be surveyed in the following section.

Relative Chronology

Introduction

As explained above, there are two Iron IIA ceramic horizons at Tel Rehov:
  • Early Iron IIA (Stratum VI)
  • Late Iron IIA (Strata V-IV)
This formal division of the period was suggested by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006) and is followed here, although it raises some serious difficulties, as discussed above and below. As shown in Chapter 24, there is a great deal of continuity in many pottery forms between the three horizons:
  • Iron IB
  • Early Iron IIA
  • Late Iron IIA
Nevertheless, there are sufficient criteria to distinguish between these three assemblages, which are substantiated by a clear stratigraphic division (Table 4.2).

Early Iron IIA

Figures
Figures

  • Figure 4.1 - Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion

Stratum VI is attributed to Early Iron IIA, since it is preceded by Stratum VII of Iron IB and succeeded by Strata V-IV of Late Iron IIA. It yielded a relatively substantial pottery assemblage which, on the one hand, demonstrates many similarities with the preceding and subsequent assemblages but, on the other hand, has its own characteristics. The latter include the first appearance, mostly on serving vessels, of a relatively large amount of red slip, often hand burnished. Painted decoration is mainly limited to horizontal straight and wavy red bands in the style known at Tel Rehov in the Iron IB; most of the Canaanite-like motifs appear on small sherds, so it is difficult to say to what extent these are residual. Hippo jars appear for the first time, but are still rare. Imported Phoenician pottery includes several Bichrome sherds, and a small amount of imported Cypriot pottery includes White Painted and Bichrome sherds, but no Black-on-Red, aside from one small and ambivalent sherd in Stratum C-2.

The northern ceramic assemblages assigned by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006) to their Early Iron IIA horizon are (references updated):
  • Beth-Shean Stratum S-lb (TBS I: Pls. 6—8)
  • Megiddo Stratum VB (Arie 2013)
  • Jezreel pre-enclosure fills (Zimhoni 1997: 29-56)
  • Taanach Period IIA (Rast 1978: Figs.18-29)
  • Yoqne'am Strata XVI-XV (Ben Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg and Cohen-Anidjar 2005: 108-112, Figs. I.36-I.38)
  • Horbat Rosh Zayit Stratum III (Gal and Alexandre 2000: 30-33)
  • Tell el-Farah North Stratum VIIa (Chambon 1984: Pls. 45-60)
  • Dor Phase Ir1|2A (Phases 7a-b, 6b-c in Area G) (Gilboa and Sharon 2003: 21-22, Figs. 10-11; Gilboa 2018: Pls. 20:49, 20.56-20.64)
To these contexts, I would add
  • Hazor X-IX (?)
  • Tell el-Hammah, lower phase (attributed to Iron Age I, yet the few published pottery items [Cahill 2006: 436, Fig. 4] can fit Tel Rehov VI)
Tell Abu al-Kharaz Phase X in Trench XI, Area 3 may fit this period (Fischer 2013: 104-108, Figs. 99-101), yet the pottery attributed to Phase X in Area 9 East appears to be late Iron Age I (Fischer 2013: 354-362, Figs. 361-368). The small amount of published pottery from the Tell el-Mazar "sanctuary" may belong to this period as well (Yassine 1984).

Several caveats to this list must be noted. The first is that all the contexts mentioned above (except Dor and, to some extent, Tell Abu al-Kharaz) yielded very small quantities of pottery, mainly sherds, and most of them are not sufficiently distinctive to be compared to our Stratum VI assemblage. In addition, the great degree of continuity between these assemblages and the following Late Iron IIA renders it difficult to distinguish between these two sub-periods. For example, at Jezreel, the pottery from the pre-enclosure fills cannot be distinguished from that found in the enclosure's destruction layer (Zimhoni 1997). At Megiddo, the pottery from Stratum VB is very similar to that of VA-IVB (Zimhoni 1997; Arie 2013) and the same may be said concerning Taanach IIA and IIB. Regional differences should also be taken into account. For example, the correlation between the pottery from Hazor Strata X-IX (Ben-Tor and Ben-Ami 1998; 2012) and our Stratum VI cannot be established with confidence, perhaps due to such regional differences and the strong Canaanite traditions which are present at Tel Rehov, but missing at Hazor. To conclude, Tel Rehov VI provides the largest pottery assemblage that can be attributed to the Early Iron IIA in northern Israel, along with Dor for the northern coastal plain. Yet, even at Tel Rehov, the continuity of many forms from Iron IB to Early Iron IIA, and from the latter to Late Iron IIA, make precise divisions difficult in many cases.

Late Iron IIA

Figures
Figures

  • Figure 4.1 - Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion

The large amount of pottery from Strata V-IV (with very little distinction between the two), discussed in Chapter 24, can be attributed to Late Iron IIA, as defined by Herzog and Avitz-Singer (2006; see also surveys in TBS I: 320-323; APIN-IH: 135-188). The following contexts can be assigned to this phase:
  • Tel Beth-Shean Strata S-la and P-10-P-9 (TBS I: 313-384; Plates 6-16)
  • Tell el-Hammah two upper phases (Cahill 2006: Figs. 6-11)
  • Tel 'Amal Strata III-IV (Levi and Edelstein 1972)
  • the Jezreel 7enclosure (Zimhoni 1997: 13-28, 39-53, Figs. 1.2-1.10; 2.5-2.12)
  • Megiddo VA-IVB (Finkelstein, Zimhoni and Kafri 2000; Arie 2013)
  • Yoqne'am XIV (Ben Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg and Cohen-Anidjar 2005: Figs. I.50-I.52)
  • Taanach Period IIB (Rast 1978: Figs. 30-69)
  • Tell el-Far'ah North Stratum VIIb (Chambon 1984: 53-72, Pls. 45-62)
  • Hazor X—IX(?), VIII (although see comments above and below)
  • Horbat Rosh Zayit Strata IIa-Ilb (Gal and Alexandre 2000: 34-122)
  • Dor Phase Ir2a (Phase 6a in Area G; Gilboa and Sharon 2003: 23-24, Figs. 12-13; Gilboa 2018: Pls. 20.6-20.67)
  • Tell Abu Hawam Stratum III (Hamilton 1935)
  • Tell Keisan Strata 8?-6 (Briend and Humbert 1980: Pls. 48-56)
  • Tell Abu al-Kharaz Phases XI-XII (Fischer 2013)20
Most of these contexts yielded rich pottery assemblages which can be compared to the Tel Rehov Strata V-IV assemblage, yet it should be stressed that the more distant the site, the more disparate the assemblages tend to be. Thus, coastal sites like Dor, Tell Abu Hawam and Tell Keisan show strong Phoenician influence; Hazor X—VIII and Samaria are less similar to Tel Rehov than sites in the Beth-Shean and Jezreel Valleys (including Taanach IIB). The close similarity of our assemblages to Horbat Rosh Zayit, mentioned earlier, is exceptional and must be explained in light of special relations between these two sites
Footnotes

20 Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE) suggested by him for the end of this period. It seems that the motivation behind this suggestion is to justify the idea that Hazor Stratum VIII was an Aramean city built by Hazael, yet I see no reason to refute the excavators' attribution of Stratum VIII to the days of Ahab.

Absolute Chronology and the Radiometric Evidence

The absolute chronology of the Iron IIA strata is a subject of ongoing debate, based on radiometric dates and historical considerations, although it seems that by now, agreement has been reached on some major issues. The original Low Chronology date of the beginning of Iron IIA strata to ca. 900 BCE proved to be wrong, based on radiocarbon dating. On the other hand, the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century is certainly correct, as it is anchored in the evidence from Jezreel, where the royal enclosure cannot predate Ahab [r. c. 871 - c. 852 BCE]. According to the modified chronology which I have suggested since 2003, Iron IIA started during the first half of the 10th century BCE and continued until sometime in the second half of the 9th century (Table 4.3). This approach was basically backed up by numerous radiocarbon dates, although there are different views concerning the precise time span and absolute dates of each of the two Iron IIA phases (for summaries and earlier literature, see Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011b).

Table 4.3

Three chronological systems for Iron IB-IIB

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)


The radiocarbon data from the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov is based on 27 short-lived samples, most of them measured several times, so that a total of 110 dates are available (Chapter 48, Table 48.4; partly published earlier in Mazar et al. 2005). This is the largest number of dates from a single site in this period. Several difficulties should be noted (see discussion in Chapter 48):
  1. The stratigraphic affiliation of several samples to specific phase of the Iron IIA is questionable: in particular, Samples R21—R23 from Area D and Samples R31—R34 from Area C, which could be either Stratum V or IV
  2. There are a few outliers (all Sample 27 and one determination in R36)
  3. Occasionally, samples from the same context or stratum yielded considerably different dates, which would provide too wide a range for our required resolution of less than half a century.
A Bayesian model was first presented in 2005, based on the data available at that time (Bruins et al. 2005) and new models (one for Areas C and D and another for Area B) are presented in Chapter 48. The main results of these models are presented here in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4

Results of a Bayesian model for secure dates from Areas C+D and B in lσ and 2σ CalBC showing dates for Strata VI-IV (not including unmodeled dates from Area E) - for details see Chapter 48

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)


The model for Areas C and D (in which most of the samples are included) resulted in the condensation of Strata VI, V and IV into a time frame of maximum 73 years between 936 (uppermost possible date) and 863 (lowest possible date) and minimum seven years (911-904 CalBC) in 1σ, while the 2σ, dates provide a longer maximal range of 145 years for this time span (and minimal -4 years!). The results in the 1σ range are much too short a time slot for three strata with several sub-phases and clear changes in the pottery assemblage between Stratum VI and Strata V-IV. The Bayesian model from Area B (from the end of Stratum VI to the end of Stratum IV) provided a wider range. It should also be recalled that the models provide considerable time spans for each of the transitions between strata, much wider than we would expect for the close dating of less than half a century that we seek for this period. Furthermore, one sample measured several times from Area E provided unmodeled calibrated dates in the late 9th century BCE which are much lower compared to both the unmodeled and modeled dates from the other areas. It appears that the more samples are measured, the problems involved in their interpretation become more complex.

Since the subject is discussed in detail in Chapter 48, I emphasize here only a few notable points. At the outset it should be noted that in the discussion of Iron Age chronology, where we expect restricted resolutions of less than half a century, it became common to cite only or mainly the 1σ CalBC dates (68% probability), and so I did as well in most cases. Yet, it should be recalled that the 2σ dates (95% probability) provide wider ranges and should be taken into consideration as well. Indeed, quite a few discussions of radiocarbon dates in archaeology refer only to the 2σ dates. In such narrow time slots as those involved in the Iron Age chronological debate, the possibilities provided by the 2σ range are sometimes crucial.

Another problem is the relationship between unmodeled and modeled dates. Unmodeled dates from Stratum VI cover most of the 10th century BCE, while the Bayesian model for Areas C+D provide, in my opinion, too short a time span for this stratum, which has in several locations two stratigraphic phases and yielded a pottery assemblage that differs somewhat from the previous and later strata. This result may have been caused by the constraint resulting from the over 100-years span provided by the Bayesian model for Stratum D-3 (see above in the discussion of Iron IB dates). I therefore suggest a much shorter time span for Stratum D-3 and a longer one for Stratum VI, supported by the unmodeled calibrated dates, and conclude that the beginning of Stratum VI could occur during the first half of the 10th century. Taking into consideration the dates of the following Stratum V, the end of Stratum VI should be dated to somewhere in the last quarter of the 10th century.

The date of Stratum V is based on five samples from secure contexts in Area C and one from Area B (a total of 24 repetitions).21 It appears that the last two decades of the 10th century and the beginning of the 9th century BCE are the most reasonable dates for this stratum.

The destruction of Stratum IV is dated by three samples from Area C and two from Area B (a total of 17 repetitions) (Samples R35-R41). The dates are partly in the 10th century and mostly in the 9th century; some reach the second half of the 9th century BCE. The Bayesian model for Areas C+D would end this stratum no later than 863 (1σ) and 817 (2σ) CalBC, while the model for Area B provides lower dates: 833 (161σ) and 822 (1σ) CalBC. In Area E, one of two samples from loci attributed to the early phase of the courtyard (E-lb, probably corresponding with Stratum V), measured several times, provided the exceptionally low date of 832-810 (unmodeled).

My suggested date of 840/830 BCE for the destruction of Stratum IV is based on attribution of this destruction to Hazael (see below). As can be seen in Table 4.4, this date is lower by 23-33 years than the lowest date in the 1σ model for the end of Stratum IV in Area C (863 CalBC), but can fit the lowest as date from Area C (812 BCE), the lowest 2σ and as dates from Area B (838, 822 BCE) and many of the unmodeled lowest dates from Areas B, C and E in the 1σ and 2σ ranges.

Radiocarbon dates from Iron IIA strata at other sites in northern Israel were widely discussed in recent years (e.g., Sharon et al. 2007; Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2008; Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2009; 2010; 2011; Lee, Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2013). However, in many cases, the number of measurements from a single site is insufficient, and often they provide a wide range of dates in the 10th to 9th centuries. An example is Megiddo, where only eight samples with eleven repetitions were measured from Iron IIA strata: one from Stratum H-7 (a middle phase of Stratum VB) with a CalBC 1σ date of 1000-920, three from Stratum H-5 which corresponds to general Stratum VA-IVB, two of them (RTT3948 and RTK 6429) provided dates that cover the entire 9th century BCE and the third (RTT 3949) provided a date in the 10th century (1005-930 CaIBC) (Toffolo et al. 2014: 235).22 Four additional dates were published from Stratum Q-5, a Late Iron IIA context which is phased by the excavators between Stratum VB and VA-IVB; the calibrated dates are 1050-940, 980-895, 1000-920 and 895-830 BCE (1σ) and a (yet unpublished) Bayesian model is cited as providing a date of ca. 900 BCE (Kleiman et al. 2019: 547 and Table 7). This is just one example of the potential inconsistencies in the results of 14C dating, in particular when only a few dates are available. Bayesian models are used in order to limit these wide ranges; yet, the unmodeled dates should be taken into account when weighing the results of Bayesian models, specially in cases when the models include data from many sites. The radiometric evidence is certainly important, but has its limitations when it comes down to subtle dating at a resolution of less than 50 years.

I end this section with the words of Walter Kutchera, the former director of the radiometric laboratory in the University of Vienna:
I am convinced that 14C is the most wonderful tool for archaeology, when its inherent uncertainty is properly respected. Unfortunately, pushing its use beyond these limitations puts "oil into the fire" of those who mistrust the 14C method altogether .....23
These words are very true when we deal with Iron Age chronology, particularly in the 10th-9th centuries BCE.
Footnotes

21 As mentioned above, Samples R31-R34 from Locus 2425 in Building CG are excluded from this discussion, although it seems more viable that this context should be attributed to Stratum V. See discussion in Chapter 48.

22 Note that Tofollo et al. 2014 omit sample 3949 in their tables. It does appear, however in Gilboa, Sharon and Boaretto 2013.

23 Sent to me via an e-mail correspondence in 2008.

Historical Considerations

Introduction

In the following, I will survey some of the historical questions related to the 10th-9th centuries BCE that are relevant for the results of the Tel Rehov excavations (see also Mazar 2016a). It should be recalled that the city is mentioned in only one written source from these centuries: the Sheshonq I list (see Chapter 3). In this section, I will use the assumed ancient name Rehob.

Ethnic Identity and Geo-Political Status

Who were the people who inhabited the large and opulent city of Rehob and what was its geo-political status in Iron Age IIA?

A longue durée perspective shows that the Canaanite city Rehob continued to survive without a major gap or devastating event throughout the Late Bronze and Iron Age I, for about 500 years. During the ca. 150 year-long duration of the Iron IIA, the same city continued to develop with changes in the material culture, but with no actual crisis between Iron I and Iron IIA, and with a significant continuity of the material culture throughout the three Iron IIA strata. Canaanite cultural continuity during Iron IIA is demonstrated in a number of features: continuity in selected architectural plans (in the case of Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, see above), the lack of "four room houses" or pillared buildings which are a hallmark of Israelite sites, continuity of certain ceramic traditions (forms and occasional painted decoration), cult objects, figurines and seals that are rooted in Canaanite/Phoenician traditions, the limited consumption of pig bones (mainly hunted boars) which indicates a departure from strict Israelite religious practices (if indeed they were practiced elsewhere in Israel in this period). The few private names known from the Tel Rehov inscriptions include the Canaanite theophoric component El, but not a Yahwistic component. The name Nimshi could be from a local Canaanite root. However, Jehu is certainly a Yahwistic name, and if indeed he came from this city as I suggest, it would mean that he was born with or adopted an Israelite theophoric name. It should also be emphasized that paleographic studies of the inscriptions show that those of Stratum IV can be defined as written in Hebrew script.

It thus may be assumed that many of the Iron IIA inhabitants were descendants of indigenous local Canaanite families who lived in this city for generations (Mazar 2016a; 2016b; Arie 2017). Their self-identity must have revolved around the city and its local families and traditions. There is no doubt that during this period (either Stratum VI or V), the city became part of the geo-political entity of Israel (see below). However, we must differentiate between geo-political status and ethnic identity; even when the city became part of the northern Kingdom of Israel, it may be conjectured that the main bulk of the population continued to be the descendants of indigenous Canaanite families (cf., Judg 1:27). It may be assumed that once the city became part of the Israelite kingdom, certain Israelite families from the hill country settled in the city alongside the locals and that Israelite religious beliefs and ideology were slowly accepted by the local population, probably encouraged by the central political institutions of the kingdom. This dichotomy between the indigenous Canaanite population in the northern valleys and the Israelite hill-country population was addressed in the past by a number of studies and is fundamental for the understanding the social makeup of the northern Kingdom of Israel. Faust (2000; 2012: Chapter 8) addressed this issue manly in relation to the rural sector, but his conclusions are also appropriate for an urban society like that of Rehob.

Rehob in the 10th Century BCE: An Independent City or Part of the Assumed United Monarchy?

What was the geo-political status of Rehob and its vicinity (including Beth-Shean) in the 10th century BCE? The question of the historicity of the biblical concept of a United Monarchy during the 10th century BCE is one of the most debated issues regarding biblical history during the last generation, and this is not the place for a detailed discussion of this issue. Some scholars maintain the biblical concept as valid (e.g., Millard and Dever in Handy 1997; Ben-Tor 2000; Stager 2003; Dietrich 2007; Blum 2010; Faust 2010; Lemaire 2010), while many others either negate the historicity of such a kingdom altogether or diminish its territory to Jerusalem and its close vicinity (e.g., Finkelstein 1996,2010 and many other publications; Na'aman, Knauf, Niemann, Lemche in Handy 1997; Grabbe 2007: 111-115; Frevel 2016: 108-148; Garfinkel, Kreimerman and Zilberg 2016: 225-232; Sergi 2017; for a recent survey and earlier literature, see Na'aman 2019). Still others attempt to find middle ground (e.g., Miller in Handy 1997).

In several past articles (Mazar 2007a: 164-166; 2010: 51-52; 2014), I claimed that the biblical concept of a "United Monarchy", although ensconced in a deep literary, theological and ideological wrapping, may very well reflect a historical-political construct that emerged from the political vacuum created in large parts of the Land of Israel with the destruction at ca. 1000 BCE of the few Iron Age I Canaanite cities which survived the collapse at the end of the Late Bronze Age (such as Megiddo, Yoqnecam, Tell Keisan). During the 10th century BCE, the coastal plain and the lower Shephelah were under the domination of Philistine and Phoenician city states, while other parts of the country may have undergone severe political changes. At such a time of instability and social change, a charismatic local leader like David, even if emerging from a peripheral hilly region like Bethlehem, may have possessed political abilities that could have led to tribal alliances and economic treaties and may have succeeded in uniting the inner parts of the country under his control. The monumental architecture in Jerusalem may support such a concept. His kingdom should perhaps be understood as a short-lived tribal alliance, lacking a centralized administration and hierarchical society, yet having an impact on extensive territories. The historical Solomon is even more vague due to the literary/legendary nature of the biblical narrative, and only a few verses may have retained some historical information, perhaps those referring to his building operations (I Kgs 9:17-18). Ultimately, there are extremely contradictory views on this subject and it remains debated.

If such a concept of a "United Monarchy" is accepted as having some historical validity, it would mean that the large and densely built 10th century BCE city of Rehob was subordinate in some way to Jerusalem. If, however, there was no United Monarchy that ruled the northern part of the country, it would mean that Rehob Stratum VI continued to be an independent Canaanite city state, unrelated to any other known political unit of the time. If the latter possibility is correct, Rehob would be the only inland independent city with a highly developed urban culture in the 10th century BCE (not including the Philistine and Phoenician cities along the coast and in the lower Shephelah). The recently excavated intense Iron I and Iron IIA occupation sequence at Tel Abel Beth Maacah in the upper Galilee might be another example of an inland site with such urban continuity, although in a more northern region (Yahalom-Mack, Panitz-Cohen and Mullins 2018).

The Impact of Sheshonq's (Shishak) Invasion

Rehob, in Sheshonq I's list mentioned aside Beth-Shean, can safely be identified with Tel Rehov (Chapter 3). The precise date of the raid is unknown and depends on two debated factors: the accession year of Sheshonq I and the time of the raid within his 21-year reign. The accession year is calculated by most scholars to ca. 945/940 BCE (e.g., Kitchen 2000: 50; Shortland 2005); a lower date ca. 934/929 was suggested by Ben-Dor Evian (2011), who also suggested that the raid occurred early in his reign, while most other scholars attribute it to the last years of his reign. All in all, the raid probably occurred between ca. 930 and 915 BCE.24 Assessments of the impact of Sheshonq's raid vary (Helck 1971: 240; Na'aman 1998; 2007: 404-405; Rainey and Notley 2006: 186; Finkelstein 2013: 41-48). Traditionally, scholars tended to attribute destruction layers to this raid, assuming that the Egyptian army destroyed the places mentioned in the Karnak list. However, as first suggested by Na'aman, this assumption should not be taken for granted and it must be taken into account that toponyms are mentioned in the list just because they surrendered to the Egyptian army during the raid or since the Egyptian army passed through them or ruled them for a while without causing destruction. The inclusion of a toponym in this list means only that the place existed during Sheshonq's raid and was known to the Egyptians.

In earlier papers (Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar 2003a; 2003b), we attributed the destruction of Stratum V to Sheshonq I. But later excavation seasons have shown that the heavy destruction referred to in these papers was a local feature limited to the central part of Area C (the apiary, Buildings CH, CG, CF and CE), while buildings to the east and west, as well as Stratum V structures in other excavation areas, did not suffer a destruction and continued to be in use in Stratum IV. A paleomagnetic study pointed to the possibility that the local destruction and burning in Area C was result of an earthquake. As we have seen, there is no evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum VI. Thus, we are left with no destruction level that can be attributed to Sheshonq. I thus conclude that the mentioning of the city in his topographic list means only that he passed through it or overtook it for a while on his way from the Central Jordan Valley towards the Jezreel Valley. Based on the 14C dates from Stratum VI and some of those from Stratum V it appears that the raid may be correlated with the late years of Stratum VI or the beginning of Stratum V.
Footnotes

24 The date ca. 915 BCE would fit the accession date as suggested by Ben-Dor Evian and the attribution of the raid to the late years of Sheshonq as suggested by most scholars; however, the precise date of the raid remains unknown.

When Did Rehob Become Part of the Northern Kingdom of Israel?

The question when did Rehob become part of the northern Kingdom of Israel is somewhat controversial (Mazar 2016a: 98-100). Arie (2017: 14-15) emphasized the unique components at Tel Rehov and its dissimilarity to what he termed "regular" Israelite traits, and suggested that Rehob was a local Canaanite city-state until the end of Stratum V and was annexed to Israel only in Stratum IV, during the Omride era [~876-~842 BCE] and after the foundation of Jezreel.25 Finkelstein went even further and suggested that both Strata V and IV were non-Israelite, Rehob being a local "late-Canaanean city state at the southwestern edge of the Aramean culture sphere of influence" (2017: 181; for an earlier version, see 2013: 120-122). Based on a Bayesian model of 14C dates published before 2005, he dated the destruction of Stratum IV between 875-849 CalBC and suggested that both Strata V and IV were destroyed by Omride assaults. In my view, both these suggestions are unacceptable. Arie's distinction between Strata V and IV as pre-Israelite versus Israelite contradicts the identical material culture in both these strata. As said, the destruction at the end of Stratum V is limited to part of Area C, while in all the other excavated areas, no such destruction was observed and the city of Stratum V appears to have been continuously developed with some architectural changes in the following Stratum IV. In fact, these two strata comprise two phases in the life of the same city. Finkelstein's statement that "the material culture of Tel Rehov differs from that of the Israelite centers in the Jezreel Valley - for instance Megiddo - in almost every respect" (2017: 180) cannot be accepted. Although there are exceptional traits in the local material culture of Tel Rehov compared to other Israelite sites (such as the building techniques and house plans) there are also many similarities, for example, in the pottery assemblage (cf., Tell el-Far'ah North, Jezreel, Megiddo and Horbat Rosh Zayit), clay figurines, seals, pottery altars ("cult stands"), and other material-culture components. In addition, similarity to Megiddo can be found in the fact that both cities lacked a city wall in Iron IIA and in the resemblance between Building CF at Tel Rehov and Building 2081 at Megiddo, as explained above. In contrast to Finkelstein, I cannot discern any Aramean components at Tel Rehov. The claim that such components exist in the inscriptions is unfounded, except perhaps in the case of the component sqy in inscription No. 5 (Chapter 29A). In my view, both Strata V and IV represent a city that was under the hegemony of the northern Kingdom of Israel right from its inception.

Although being part of the Israelite kingdom, it seems that Rehob retained its independent nature and indigenous population throughout this period, until the destruction of Stratum IV. The city is probably not mentioned in the bible, in spite of suggestions to the contrary, referring to 2 Sam. 10:6-8 (Finkelstein) and 2 Sam 21:12 (Kadary) (see Chapter 3). Since Rehob was certainly one of the largest and most prosperous cities of the kingdom, this is an example of the lacunae and selectivity in the biblical narrative as it has come down to us (cf., the fact that Ahab's participation in the battle of Qarqar [853 BCE] is not mentioned in the biblical narrative).

The radiometric dates indicate that Stratum V was founded in the early years of the northern Kingdom of Israel. If we accept as historical the biblical reference to Tirzah (Tell el-Far'ah North) as the capital of the kingdom before the foundation of Samaria, the most reasonable archaeological level that would fit this status is Stratum VIIb (see above in the section on northern Samaria). Indeed, the pottery assemblage and other finds from that stratum resemble the material culture of Tel Rehov Strata V-IV. The outstanding apiary in Stratum V must have been operating in these early days of the kingdom, probably before the rise of the Omride dynasty [~876-~842 BCE].

Nimshi and Elisha

The appearance of the name nms (Nimshi) in two inscriptions from Tel Rehov, in both Strata V and IV, as well as on a jar from Tel 'Amal, led me to suggest that the prosperous Iron Age IIA city Rehob was the hometown of the Nimshi family (Mazar 2016a: 110). This was perhaps a strong and powerful family or clan who might have owned a large portion of the city's resources, including the apiary of Stratum V, in which one of the jars with this family name was found. Perhaps this was one of the indigenous families, rooted in the local Canaanite population, as described above. Nimshi is mentioned in the Bible as the father or grandfather of Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], whose rise to power brought about the fall of the Omride dynasty in 842 BCE (1 Kgs 19:16; 2 Kgs 9:2, 14, 20). Thus Jehu must have belonged to the Nimshi family, and perhaps he was born and raised at Rehob. His coup and the establishment of a new dynasty which ruled northern Israel for almost 100 years may be understood as a shift of power in the kingdom from the Omride dynasty which originated in the Samaria hills to the local descendants of Canaanite families in the northern valleys.

The reading of [']lys' as the biblical name Elisha, written in large letters with red ink on a well worked pottery sherd found in the northwestern chamber of Building CP in Stratum IV, although a reconstruction, is intriguing (see details in Chapter 29A, No 9). However, although this reading is not conclusive, we cannot suggest an alternative.26 Although the name Elisha is known from several 8th-7th centuries BCE inscriptions and seals, this is the only example in a 9th century context, and one has to ask whether there might be a relationship between this ostracon and the "man of God" who stands in the center of the Elisha cycle (2 Kgs 2-13) (Mazar 2016a: 112-114; Ahituv and Mazar 2016: 223-225)? A straightforward identification of the name on the ostracon with the biblical figure may sound unlikely and naïve, but we have to consider the exceptional context and date. Building CP in which the ostracon was found is outstanding by all means, as explained above in this chapter. The ostracon was found in a small chamber with benches and two entrances, with an elaborate pottery altar set at the exterior of each entrance. Several additional cult objects were found in nearby rooms, including a ceremonial stand, a fragment of a third pottery altar, a complete incense burner with a lid, and a mold for producing figurines of naked females, identical to those found on the facades of a pottery altar in a nearby building (CF). Bone astragali and the unusual predominance of the right limbs of animals also point to religious activity in this building. The unique plan of the building, with two major wings connected through the small northwestern chamber, enabled mobility from one wing to the other through this chamber. An unusually large number of pottery vessels found in the building, including many bowls and cooking pots, as well as benches along the walls and two unique pottery silos, are evidence for public meals, perhaps banquets intended to feed a considerable number of people. This exceptional planning and activity in Building CP would be in keeping with exceptional activity such as that related to Elisha: a "man of God" — a seer and healer, whom people would wish to approach and consult, while conducting rituals and participating in public feasts.

Although the Elisha stories are thought by biblical scholars to be literary creations (legenda) of the late Monarchic to post-Exilic eras (Rofe 1974; Ghantous 2013: 128-156; Oeming 2016, with previous literature), they nevertheless could preserve kernels of historical reality, rooted in the activity of an actual seer and healer with that name who was active during the second half of the 9th century BCE in this region (Na'aman 2000: 100-104; Lemaire 2014).27 The stories include many geographical and historical details which may be considered as rooted in genuine historical memory. The biblical narrative locates the birth town of Elisha at Abel Mehola, identified ca. 15 km southeast of Tel Rehov (Zertal 2005: 100-102; 175-179; Rainey and Notley 2006: 176) and thus, at the outset, he is related to the Beth-Shean Valley. According to this narrative, he was active during the reign of Ahab [r. c. 871 c. 852 BCE], Joram [r. c. 850 c. 840 BCE], Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], Jehoahaz [r. c. 814 - c. 798 BCE] and Joash [r. c. 798 - c. 782 BCE]. However, this appears to be much too long a time range and therefore, scholars have suggested to limit this activity to a shorter span.28 The early years of his career would be contemporary with his relationship to Jehu and involvement in his anointment, perhaps shortly before the city was put to the torch by Hazael sometime between 840-830 BCE (see below).

Seers, healers, and "men of God" are known in many ancient and modern traditional societies. Historical Elisha may have been such a figure, whose outstanding personality and activity left an indelible impression, generating memories that later served as the basis for the "Elisha cycle" in the Book of Kings. Although a straightforward identification of a biblical figure in the archaeological record is always dubious, the data provided above allow us, at the very least, to raise the possibility, with all due reservation, of a possible connection between the name on the ostracon and the biblical figure of Elisha. If this hypothesis is correct, Building CP would have been the seat of Elisha for a period of time during his early career, when he was involved in the ascent to kingship of Jehu. This suggestion remains, of course, in the realm of speculation.
Footnotes

26 In addition to the views expressed in Chapter 29A, I should note the Ph.D. dissertation by H.D.D. Parker (2018) which reached me after the completion of Chapter 29A. She rejects our reading and reads the second letter as cayin rather than lamed (p. 191). However, this letter is open on its upper part, unlike the cayin at the end of the name, and probably had an extension beyond the fragment line, as explained in Chapter 29A. The reading cayin would make no sense.

27 See for example Ghantous (2013) who views the redaction of the Elisha-Elijah stories as having taken place in the 4th century BCE, but, unlike the Elijah stories that he considers late (i.e., 5th century BCE), "the Elisha tradition... originated in the eighth century and continued to evolve independently until the fifth century BCE" (p. 128).

28 Miller and Hayes (1986: 290) suggested that the stories relating to the early years of Elisha (2 Kg 2, 4:1-8:15) should be attributed to Jehu's reign rather than to that of Ahab and Jehoram, as the Bible puts it.

When and How Did the Destruction of Stratum IV Occur?

The destruction of Stratum IV marks a dramatic point in the history of the city. Evidence for fierce fire and severe devastation was found in all the excavation areas. People left their belongings in the houses and probably fled, or were deported, or slaughtered. In one case, a human skeleton may be attributed to this destruction layer in Area C (Chapter 46B). Following the destruction, the lower city was abandoned and only the upper mound was resettled in the following Iron IIB. It appears that this destruction resulted from a military conquest rather than an earthquake, though no direct evidence such as multiple arrowheads or sling stones were detected. The date of the destruction and the identity of the conqueror can be suggested on the basis of three parameters: pottery typology, historical considerations and radiocarbon dates.

The pottery assemblage from the destruction layer is typical Late Iron IIA, which may be dated to a time range from the late 10th century until somewhere in the last third of the 9th century BCE (see Chapter 24 and the chronological discussion above).

A number of historical events should be taken into consideration as possible causes for this event. Finkelstein's suggestion that Rehov Stratum IV was destroyed by Ahab was rejected in the discussion above. Aramean attacks during the first half of the 9th century BCE can hardly be accounted for; the Ben Hadad I raid on the northern part of the kingdom, if it really occurred, is too early for the end of Stratum IV and, in any event, did not have an impact on the Beth-Shean Valley (Younger 2016: 571-580, with a review of earlier views). Wars between Ahab and Ben-Hadad (II?) (1 Kgs 20, 22) should be taken into account, since the Arameans are said to have arrived from the Jordan Valley (Succoth) probably through Wadi el-Far'ah, and laid siege to Samaria (1 Kgs 20). However, the historical reality behind these narratives is highly debated. M. Miller was the first to claim that since Ahab was a member of the anti-Assyrian coalition alongside Hadadezer (Assyrian Adad-Idri) of Damascus in the battle of Qarqar against Shalmaneser III (853 BCE), followed by three additional Assyrian raids to Syria, it makes no sense that the king of Damascus would fight Israel during the same time when they were allies (Miller and Hayes 1986: 262-264; 290, 300-302). He therefore suggested to date these biblical descriptions of clashes between Aram and Israel to the time of Jehu's successors. This view became popular in recent research, although a few historians believe that an Aramean attack on Israel could have occurred a few years prior to the battle of Qarqar (Aharoni 1979: 334-335; Rainey and Notely 2006: 199). Yamada and Na'aman claimed that there was one Aramean raid during the time of Ahab, although each of them accepted a different tradition in 1 Kgs (survey and references in Younger 2016: 580-591 and, in particular, 582, notes 124-126). I tend to accept the view that no Aramean attacks on Israel occurred during the reign of Ahab.

Another possibility is the Shalmaneser III raid on southern Syria in 841 BCE, described in several Assyrian sources, including the Marble Slab and the Black Obelisk (Younger 2016: 6 13-618, with references to earlier literature). This attack occurred close to Jehu's coup, which is dated by most scholars to 842 BCE and Jehu "of Bit Humri" is mentioned in both these Assyrian sources as surrendering to Shalmaneser. Since the inscriptions mention both the Hauran and the coast, scholars conjectured that the Assyrian army reached northern Israel, and some identified the geographical name Ba'li-Rasi mentioned in the text as Mt. Carmel (Aharoni 1979: 341; Miller and Hayes 1986: 287; Rainey and Notley 2006: 208; others suggested Ras en-Naqura or the vicinity of Nahr el-Kalb in Lebanon: Younger 2016: 616). In any event, the possibility that this hypothetical Assyrian invasion caused the destruction of Rehov Stratum IV remains very doubtful.

The most reasonable explanation for the destruction is, in my view, an Aramean attack during the time of Hazael. "Resilience, perseverance, drive, military prowess, ruthlessness — these are some of the traits no doubt possessed by Hazael that led to Damascene hegemony" (Younger 2016: 630). His bloody attacks on Israel are echoed in the bible (1 Kgs 19:17; 2 Kgs 8:12; Amos 1: 3-4). The Tel Dan inscription is commonly interpreted as relating that Hazael killed Joram son of Ahab and Ahaziah son of Jehoram king of Judah, in contrast to the biblical story of the assassination of these two kings by Jehu. In both cases, the events must be dated to ca. 842/841 BCE, following the battle of Ramot Gilead, after which Jehu of the Nimshi family came to power (Na'aman 2000: 100-104; Younger 2016: 606-620, with vast earlier literature). Between 841-837 BCE, Hazael was occupied with Assyrian attacks by Shalmaneser III. Yet, following 837 BCE, the Assyrians withdrew from Syria for a good number of years, and Hazael was able to build up his power and establish a regional empire (Younger 2016: 620-632). He ruled large parts of northern Transjordan and central and southern Syria, attacked Israel, conquered Gath, threatened Jerusalem and forced Jehoash of Judah to pay him tribute (2 Kgs 12:18-19). His domination continued until the time of Jehoahaz son of Jehu (2 Kgs 13:3-7). As mentioned above, several scholars have suggested that the Aramean wars attributed in I Kgs 20,22 to Ben Hadad during the time of Ahab were led, in fact, by Hazael during Jehu's reign or during the time of his successor Jehoahaz. The biblical stories regarding the conflicts with the Arameans are intertwined in the Elisha cycle, including the siege of Samaria (2 Kgs 5-7), the story of Elisha at the deathbed of Ben-Hadad, the rise of Hazael, and the prophecy of Elisha to Hazael concerning the devastation of Israel (2 Kgs 8: 7-15).

The suggested role of Tel Rehov as the home-town of the Nimshi family and of Jehu may explain the choice of this city as a target of a severe Aramean attack. Other reasons could be the status of the city as one of the largest and richest in the northern Kingdom of Israel, as well as its proximity to the Gilead, which was now dominated by the Arameans. Thus, the destruction may be explained as personal revenge and a threat against Jehu by Hazael. The total destruction by fire resembles the fierce destruction of Gath (Tell es-Safi) by Hazael, which probably occurred somewhat later (Maeir 2009; 2016).

When may Hazael have destroyed Rehob? One possibility is that the conquest occurred in the very beginning of his and Jehu's kingships, ca. 841-840 BCE, just after the battle of Ramoth Gilead. Another possibility is that it occurred during the years following 837 BCE, perhaps between 837¬830 BCE. These dates would fit the lowest range of the 14C dates presented earlier in this chapter (see the section on absolute chronology) and in Chapter 48.

The extent of the 9th century BCE destruction at Tel Rehov is unparalleled elsewhere in northern Israel; nowhere was such a violent and total destruction found, although less severe destructions which may be attributed to Hazael were found at Jezreel, parts of Megiddo Stratum VA-IVB, and perhaps Beth-Shean Stratum Upper V (=S-la, see above) (Kleiman 2016). Finkelstein (2016; followed by Kleiman 2016) suggested that Hazael caused the destruction of Hazor IX and Dan IVA; yet, in none of these places was evidence for a heavy destruction found. It should be noted that the excavators of both sites suggested higher dates in the 9th century BCE for the same strata and this issue remains unresolved, as does the question of Aramean presence at these sites (as well as at Abel Beth Maacah) during the reign of Hazael (Younger 2016: 624). As to Hazael's conquests in southern and perhaps central Israel, see recent surveys and suggestions by Maeir (2016), Kleiman (2016) and Younger (2016: 624-627); the latter dates the conquest of Gath and the tribute payed to Hazael by Jehoash king of Judah to ca. 810 BCE.

Chapter 12 - Area C: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Introduction

Plans and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Figure 12.1 - Site Plan with grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.1 - Aerial Photo showing Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)

Discussion

Area C was located at the northwestern end of the lower city of Tel Rehov, which is the highest point of this part of the mound (Fig. 12.1; Photo 12.1). It was excavated with the purpose of clarifying the stratigraphic sequence and defining the nature of settlement in this part of the tell. ...

Stratigraphy

Four main strata were detected in Area C, termed from earliest to latest (Table 12.1):
  • C-3
  • C-2
  • C-1b
  • C-1a
Stratum C-4 was reached only in a very limited probe in Square Y/1 (Fig. 12.3). Stratum C-3 had two phases in one building and in a few cases, Strata C-2 and C-1b had more than one phase, detected mainly in open areas with multiple occupation layers. See Table 12.1 for the correlation between the local phases of Area C and the general tell strata, and suggested periodization; see further discussion in Chapter 4. See also the stratigraphic table at the beginning of this volume for the correlation with local strata in all other areas.

Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


The amount of continuity between the major strata (C-3–C-1) differed. Some walls of Stratum C-2 were built directly on those of C-3, while others were constructed according to a different plan altogether. Some buildings of Stratum C-2 were rebuilt in C-1b, while others went out of use. The greatest continuity took place between Strata C-1b and C-1a, which should be viewed, in fact, as two phases of the same occupation, although there were also several marked changes, mostly in the southeastern part of the area. Strata C-3 and C-2 each had a distinct brick type, while the bricks of Strata C-1b and C-1a were similar, although of varied materials (Tables 12.27–12.30).

The correlation between the destruction/construction events in a city that was constructed entirely of bricks turned out to be complicated task. Our stratigraphic division was based on the attempt to integrate local sequences in the various parts of the area into one comprehensive scheme. Although in each context we were able to establish clear stratigraphy, there remained open questions concerning the correlation between them, in particular due to a violent event at the end of Stratum C-1b, mostly in the southeastern part of the field (Squares Y–Z, A– B/20, 1–3). However, other parts of Area C with remains attributed to Stratum C-1b did not suffer such massive destruction. Following the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a, Area C, like the entire lower city, was entirely abandoned, and the architecture of this stratum was revealed just under modern topsoil.

Stratum C-2

Introduction

Plans
Plans

  • Fig. 12.7 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion

Stratum C-2 was dated to Early Iron Age IIA, the 10th century BCE (for more specific dating, see below and Chapters 4, 48). It marked the initial appearance of red-slipped and hand-burnished wares; Cypriot Black-on-Red ware that appeared in subsequent strata was lacking (Chapter 27). The Hippo storage jar made its first appearance in this stratum, although in small amounts and partially ambiguous from a typological point of view, made of the same type of clay common in subsequent strata (Chapter 24). Most of the pottery was fragmentary, aside from several complete vessels, including an assemblage from Locus 1555b in Square R/4 (Figs. 13.10–13.11; Photo 13.1) whose typological attributes and decoration recall Iron IB pottery, as discussed below.

One of the most distinct characteristics of this occupation phase was that almost all the walls were constructed with hard-packed yellow bricks, very different from the crumbly gray bricks of Stratum C-3 (Table 12.28). Most of the rooms were found full of complete fallen bricks of this type. This, and traces of damage in the walls, such as cracks and slippage, allude to seismic activity at some point, possibly the reason for the end of this stratum. Despite this damage, the walls of Stratum C-2 were, in most cases, well preserved, for example in Building CB, where they stood up to 18 courses, with two intact entrances.

Square R/4 — Room 1555

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.23 - Room 1555 at the beginning of excavation from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.24 - Damaged eastern face of Wall 1563 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.25 - Smashed vessels in Room 1555 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.9
  • Section: Fig. 12.97
  • Photos 12.23–12.25
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.10–13.11
Room 1555 in Square R/4 was ca. 2.6 m wide and at least 2.9 m long, bordered by Walls 1562 on the east, 4458 on the south and 1563 on the west; the northern wall was beyond the excavation limits (Photo 12.23). The southern wall (4458) was the western continuation of Wall 4438, the northern wall of Building CA (see below). The western wall (1563) was preserved to ten courses (Photo 12.24), although its eastern face was very damaged. All the walls, and particularly Wall 4458 on the south, were found tilted, apparently the result of seismic activity. The bottom of the western wall (1563) was reached on its western side at level 85.61 m, which is somewhat lower than the upper level of some of the Stratum D-3 pits in the adjacent Square Q/4 (see Chapter 15, Table 15.3). The bottom level of the southern wall (4458) was reached at 85.66 m; this wall continued to the west, where it was designated 1572. It was not clear whether the eastern wall (1562) continued down, as its lowest courses were very poorly preserved. Inside the room there were two layers. The upper one (1555a), sealed by Floor 4488 of Stratum C-1b, was a debris layer between levels 86.62– 85.92 m. The lower one (1555b) included a concentration of restorable pottery at levels 85.92–85.60 m (Fig. 12.97; Photo 12.25), although one large storage jar fragment was found 0.20 m lower than the rest of the pottery in the assemblage. No clear floor matrix could be defined here. The lowest level of this layer, with the single storage jar sherd, was resting just above a 0.10 m debris layer (11428) which covered Floor 11436 (level 85.30 m) and Pits 11439 and 11438, all assigned to Stratum C-3 (see above).

The 18 restored vessels from Locus 1555b (Figs. 13.10–13.11; photo on p. 270) were attributed to Room 1555 of Stratum C-2, based on the relation of the debris layer (1555a) and the top of the pottery layer (1555b) to the surrounding walls. As such, this would be the only case where an assemblage of restorable vessels could be attributed to Stratum C-2 and the only evidence for a sudden destruction at the end of this occupation level, although no traces of fire were found; the cause might have been an earthquake. Yet, there is a certain dilemma concerning this pottery group. Unlike much of the other pottery from Stratum C-2, the vessels lacked red slip and burnish, and several were painted in a style typical of the Iron IB pottery at Tel Rehov. Typologically as well, the vessels suit an Iron IB date, although most forms also continued into Early Iron IIA. These factors, as well as the fact that the main bulk of the pottery was found at level 85.60 m, which is somewhat lower than the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (general Stratum VII) in the adjacent Square Q/4, raised initial doubts as to the attribution of this locus. If this pottery was on a layer relating to the debris of Locus 1555a and abutting the bottom of the room’s walls, it must belong to Stratum C-2. However, the possibility remains that this pottery concentration should be attributed to Stratum C-3a, the last Iron IB phase, in which case the thin debris layer 11428 might have been the surface on which the assemblage rested. In that case, Floor 11436 and Pits 11438 and 11439 would be attributed to an earlier phase, denoted Stratum C-3b, corresponding to the lower pits of Stratum D-3; if so, then the pottery concentration preceded the walls of the room as defined above. This is not entirely impossible when considering the location of this pottery concentration in relation to the bottom of these walls (see section, Fig. 12.97). However, in that case, Room 1555 would remain without a floor, despite the good preservation of its walls. Another problem with this explanation is that floors attributed to Stratum C-2 east of Room 1555 (in Square S/4) are almost at the same level or even lower than the pottery in Locus 1555b. Ultimately, this unique assemblage was assigned to Stratum C-2, while acknowledging that the pottery types could be either Iron IB or Early Iron IIA, demonstrating the continuity between these two periods, as discussed in Chapter 24.

West of Square R/4, where the steep western slope of the mound started, was the border between Areas C and D. In Squares R–Q/4–5 of Area D, architectural elements attributed to Stratum D-2 continued until the erosion line down the slope, with no evidence for a defense line of any sort. These remains were contemporary with Stratum C-2 and thus, we concluded that the city had not been fortified at that time.

Building CA

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 (west) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.10 - Plan of Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.27 - Looking south at Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.28 - Looking south at Building CA in Stratum C-2 with a bulge in Wall 4439 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.29 - Room 4426 in Building CA in Stratum C-2 with burnt grain on the floor from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.30 - Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.9–12.10
  • Sections: Figs. 12.65–12.68
  • Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.27–12.30
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.13–13.14
Building CA

This was a rectangular building in Squares S–T/3–4 (external measurements 5.2×6.2 m). All of its walls were composed of hard yellow bricks and were very well preserved to a height of more than 1.0 m. No entrance to this building was located, suggesting that it had been entered from above. Its plan consisted of two small rooms on the west and two somewhat larger rooms on the east, and it might have served a storage function. It was constructed above a thin layer of fill (8408) that served to level the remains of Stratum C-3a Building CS below it.

The northern wall (4438) was preserved nine courses high on the west, but much less on the east, so much so that it was not clear whether there had been an entranceway here or whether the bricks were missing due to damage. Stratum C-1b Walls 1464 and 1524 superimposed it, but there was no C-3 wall below it; Wall 8503 adjoined it on the north. The western wall (4440), constructed right on top of Wall 8418 of Stratum C-3a (Photos 12.12– 12.13), was preserved 11–12 courses high; its width was unknown, since C-1b Wall 1523 covered its western face. The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo 12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses high and was poorly preserved, especially on the northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that the main damage to the building, whatever the cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6 m, although a thickening identified in its lower courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m. There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).

The two eastern rooms were similar to each other in size, as were the two western rooms. Their internal measurements were: Room 4429 in the northeast (2.0×2.4 m; 4.8 sq m), Room 4420 in the southeast (1.9×2.0 m; 3.8 sq m), Room 4426 in the southwest (1.3×2.0 m; 2.6 sq m) (Photo 12.29), and Room 4409 in the northwest (1.1×2.0 m; 2.2 sq m); the total floor space of this building was only 13.4 sq m. Two intersecting inner partition walls separated these rooms: east–west Wall 2509 and north– south Wall 2493, with its northern continuation, 4407. An entranceway in the eastern end of Wall 2509 joined the two eastern rooms, while an opening in Wall 2509, just to the west of its corner with Wall 2493, joined the two western rooms. However, it seems that at some point, this latter opening was blocked, as a brick course spanned its top. No entrance was found in Walls 2493 or 4407, leaving the eastern and western chambers inaccessible from each other; it is possible that the rooms were entered from above. Their small size, and the fact that some grain was found in the southwestern room, indicate the possibility that they were used for grain storage.

The rooms were found full of complete fallen yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash, and brown soil. There were relatively few finds, mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs. 13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426 (Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18), yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ) CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were made of beaten earth and for the most part, their level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible makeup.

The nature and function of this building remained unclear. There was no evidence for domestic activity or storage, such as cooking facilities, installations or storage jars. Perhaps it was related to grain storage, possibly with some administrative function. To some extent, this building recalls the eastern part of Building 200 in Hazor Strata X–IX (Hazor III–IV: Plans VIII–X), which was also comprised of a series of small chambers.

Wall 1506

A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3 m and was composed of the same hard yellow bricks as the other walls in this building, although here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses of its eastern face protruding; this might have been the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).

The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was not certain; it abutted the southern half of the poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA (4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where it was abutted by an open area in which cooking and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a retainer built to buttress the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b Building CD, terminated just at the point where the northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:

  1. Wall 1506 was built as a retaining wall to support the damaged southern end of the eastern wall of Building CA during some later phase of Stratum C-2, and was subsequently reused in Stratum C-1b, when the building was rebuilt
  2. Wall 1506 was constructed in Stratum C-1b as part of the renovation of Building CA as Building CD
It seems that the first option is preferable for the following reasons
  1. layers attributed to C-2 in the open area to the north and east of the wall abutted its lowest exposed courses
  2. there was an alternative entrance into Building CB, so the blockage of the northern entrance did not cancel this building
  3. it was built of yellow bricks typical only of Stratum C-2.
The end of Building CA was perhaps the result of an earthquake, as evidenced by the damaged and cracked state of the walls and the large amount of complete fallen bricks above the floors. Preservation was especially poor on the eastern side of the building. It is possible that earlier seismic damage ravaged the building during the course of its use and there was some evidence of attempts to repair and continue to use it, such as Wall 1506. However, the final event put the building out of use, to be leveled, deliberately filled-in, and rebuilt in Stratum C-1b (Building CD). The fact that the floors of the building were relatively empty of finds may suggest that it was abandoned before its final devastation.

Building CB

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 (west) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.10 - Plan of Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.30 - Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.31 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.32 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.33 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.34 - Central Hall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.35 - Split between northern walls 1442 and 1483 of Building CB - possibly due to an earthquake - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.36 - Lamp in niche of Wall 1483 - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.37 - Large Tumbled Stone in Building CB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.38 - Wall 2481 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.39 - Tilted Stratum C-1 Wall 2411 overlying Stratum C-2 Wall 5476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.9–12.10
  • Sections: Figs.12.65, 12.69, 12.77, 12.79
  • Photos 12.3–12.5, 12.8, 12.15–12.16, 12.30–12.39
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.15–13.18
Building CB in Squares S–Y/2–3 adjoined Building CA on the south, with the northern wall of the former built flush against the southern wall of the latter, creating a double wall. No connection was found between the two back-to-back units and they represented separate, contemporary buildings.
Room 1520 — The Central Hall

The major component of Building CB was a large, roughly rectangular space which underwent minor changes during the course of its existence (Figs. 12.9–12.10; Photo 12.30). This large room (1520) was perhaps a major living room or reception hall in a larger architectural complex, which continued to the east and perhaps, south.

The external measurements of this hall were 5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the northern wall) were constructed directly on top of the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3 Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG (Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were: 1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses; Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east (preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall, preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo 12.35); the western half was designated 1442 and the eastern half, 1483. An entrance in Wall 1483 was located 1.0 m to the west of its corner with Wall 2505. An intact oil lamp with soot on its nozzle was found in a niche in the eastern door jamb, one course below the top (Photo 12.36). This entrance led to the north, where an open area with cooking facilities was found in Squares T/3-4, although note that this opening was partially blocked on the north by Wall 1506, probably during a later phase of Stratum C-2, as described above. Wall 1483 continued to the east past its corner with Wall 2505 into Squares T–Y/3, where it was designated Wall 2481 (Photo 12.38). All four walls of Room 1520 were composed of hard yellow bricks, although note the gray bricks of the earlier C-3 wall incorporated into the lower courses of Wall 1470, as described above; several dark brown bricks joined these gray bricks in what might be a repair in the center of this wall (Photo 12.34).

The two entrances that accessed this hall from the east and the north were used concurrently. Both were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact (Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was subjected to some damage, particularly on its western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).

The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from 84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474, 2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these striations represented the accumulation of floors in this hall, although it was difficult to separate these thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels might have been a fill. Some layers contained large patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes, such as one long, rope-like configuration found lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers, most of which were sherds or fragments of small vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots, kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs. 13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking facilities were found here.

A large, roughly squared mizi limestone (0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south of the entranceway in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35, 12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we assume that the smooth bottom side had originally been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position of this large stone in front of the entranceway in Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this was not its original position and that it had tumbled over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location during the assumed earthquake that terminated this occupation phase.

Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5 m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks (1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake, either during the time it was still in use or some time after the building was abandoned.

Although it was considered that this room could have been a basement, this possibility was ruled out since there was no constructed element above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran beneath the later Building CG

East of the Central Hall

Excavation to the east of Wall 2505 exposed its eastern face with the entranceway. The top of the wall had been damaged and leveled when the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built (Photos 12.32–12.33), protruding 0.45 m to the east of the face of Wall 2505. The top of a yellow brick wall (4503) that cornered with Wall 2505 was revealed 1.0 m to the north of the entranceway; its eastern continuation was cut by the foundations of Building CG and only its southern face could be seen, as Wall 2429 of Stratum C-1b was built above it. This wall was preserved much lower than Wall 2505 due to the damage caused when the deep and massive wooden and brick foundations of Building CG were laid (see below). Thus, the only possible Stratum C-2 debris that could be isolated here was Locus 4500 to the south of Wall 4503.

Some 1.4 m to the north of Wall 4503 was Wall 2481, the eastern continuation of Wall 1442/1483, which was revealed in a small probe under the floor of Building CG (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38). The eastern part of a north–south wall (5476) was exposed 2.5 m to the east of Wall 2505, directly under the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 2411 (Photo 12.39), which had cut the top of Wall 5476 in a step-like manner, descending from north to south, so that it was preserved five courses high on the north and only two on the south. This appears to have been the eastern closing wall of a room bordered by Walls 2481 on the north, 2505 on the west, and 4503 on the south. A small area was excavated in this room (2469), although a floor was not reached (Figs. 12.77, 12.79). Still another north–south wall (5491) abutted Wall 5476 on the east, on the level of its lowest course (85.25 m); only one brick course of this wall was preserved, with an offset that protruded 0.35 m to the east, located just about on the same line as Wall 2481 to its west (Photo 12.39). Wall 5491 might have been a bench attached to Wall 5476 or a poorly preserved part of the unit uncovered in Squares Y/3–4 (see below).

Abutting the eastern face of Wall 5491 was a beaten-earth floor (5494; Fig. 12.79) that was bordered on the south by an east–west row of four flattopped stones, which may have been pillar bases (Photo 12.21). The floor and the stones were laid directly above Stratum C-3 Room 9441. All other remains of Stratum C-2 to the south of these stones were obliterated when Building CH and the apiary were constructed in Stratum C-1b. The northern border of this activity remained unknown, since it was covered by later Stratum C-2 architecture, described below.

Building CE

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.12 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.40 - Tilted C1-b Wall 2454 on top of C-2 Wall 6441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.41 - Building CE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.42 - fallen bricks and debris in Room 6464 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.43 - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.12
  • Section: Figs. 12.62–12.64
  • Photos 12.40–12.43
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.22
Building CE

Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 was founded in Stratum C-2 and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Strata C-1b and C-1a. This is one of the few instances where more or less the same building continued in all three main strata. The unit was composed of a broad room on the south and rooms or open spaces, to its north (Fig. 12.12); the relationship between the two components was not clear, due to the partial exposure.

Room 6464

Three walls of this room, preserved to a height of 0.7–1.25 m and built of the typical hard yellow bricks of Stratum C-2, were revealed in Squares T– Y/4, directly below the later walls: 6441 on the east, 6460 on the south, and 6504 on the north (Photos 12.40–12.41). The western part of the room remained unexcavated and it seems that the entrance to the room had been on this side. An interesting feature of the eastern wall (6441) was the damage wrought by the builders of C-1b when they set the wooden foundations for their wall (2454) above it; they cut back the western face and the top of the earlier wall, whose original face protruded some 0.2 m to the west, three courses below the cut (Photo 12.40). In the corner of the southern and eastern walls was an offset that protruded 0.3 m into the room (Photo 12.42).

A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443) that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504) was floating above this floor, although a protruding course of bricks found just about on level with Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded a layer of sandy material with some brick debris (6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460.

Spaces to the North of Room 6464

Three spaces were attributed to this building in Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between them was found, due to overlying elements that remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43). Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.

The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5 was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1 Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east– west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).

The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433) and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south) and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall 6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship between these walls. At some later stage, east–west Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added, dividing the space into two; in the north were the upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).

Building CY

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.12 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.14 - Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.58 - Building CY in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.59 - Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.60 - Closeup on Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.61 - brick collapse 10412 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.62 - Building CY from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.63 - Building CY from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.12, 12.14
  • Section: Figs. 12.55–12.56
  • Photos 12.58–12.63
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.34–13.37
Building CY

Part of a finely constructed building was excavated in the northeastern corner of Area C, in Squares A– C/5–6. It continued to the north, beyond the limit of the excavation area. Building CY covered a Stratum C-3 stone floor and installation (Fig. 12.6) and was sealed by Strata C-1a–b Building CW.

The external measurements of the building were 10.2 m from east to west and at least 6.3 m from north to south. It contained a central space, most probably a courtyard (7512), flanked on the west and east by rooms; the two southern rooms were exactly symmetric, but the northernmost room on the east differed from its equivalent on the west. The main entrance to the building was probably in the unexcavated area to the north and perhaps led directly into the central space.

The western wall (8457), preserved 1.0 m high, was superimposed by Wall 6408 of Strata C-1a–b. Its entire eastern face was exposed, and also the northern part of its western face, which served as the border of the assumed entrance corridor leading to Building CU; its southern part ran parallel to Wall 6520, the eastern wall of that building. The southern wall (7511), preserved 0.7 m high, was known only on its northern face, since it was covered by Wall 6444 of Building CW in Strata C-1a–b (Figs. 12.34, 12.56) which was not dismantled. The wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6444 were laid directly on top of Wall 7511 (Photos 12.22, 12.59–12.61). Wall 7511 was preserved at a tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of this wall was built of segments, with two vertical seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a mode of construction which might have been aimed at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake. Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which closed the building on the east.

Courtyard 7512

The central courtyard was 3.1 m wide and at least 5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig. 12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505) resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level 85.15–85.25 m. In the debris was a relatively large amount of red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well as red-painted pottery (Figs. 13.34–13.37) and sherds of a Late Philistine Decorated Ware (Ashdod Ware) vessel (Fig. 13.37:8). Two clay figurine fragments, one a human head and the other a horse head (Chapter 34, Nos. 22, 35), were found together in the eastern part of the space, to the north of Oven 8461. Near the figurines were two sherds with letters, one with an ayin and a yod in ink, and the other with an incised lamed (Fig. 13.37:2–3; Ahituv and Mazar 2014: 40–42; Chapter 29A, Nos. 1, 3). Elements on Floor 7512 included:

  1. Oven 8461, just north of the entrance into Room 8488, coated with sherds on the exterior

  2. a brick bin just north of the oven (unnumbered)

  3. a semi-circular clay bin (7514) attached to Wall 7506

  4. a large (1.0 m diameter, 0.86 m deep) round pit or silo (8452) dug from the floor, close to the center of the northern balk of Square B/6. It was lined with hard mud plaster and found full of small stones and eroded brick debris, but empty, other than a few small sherds.
An additional feature of Floor 7512 was a series of flat-topped stones (basalt and limestone) of different sizes placed along the walls surrounding the central space. Six nicely worked stones were found along the northern face of Wall 7511, four in its center, along with a complete brick just before the westernmost stone (Photo 12.61), and two in Room 8488 on the east. Three stones were found along the western wall (7506) of the central space, two of them flanking the entrance to Room 8470. Three stones were placed along the eastern side of the central space, two flanking the entrance to Space 8479 (Photo 12.62), and a third, smaller stone near the blocked entrance into Room 8487. Thus, the stones on the west and east flanked the entrances into the side rooms and were more or less antithetic. A similar line of three stones was found in Room 8470 in the western wing of this building. The position of these flattopped stones flush against the walls is curious and precludes their functionality as structural pillar bases. They could have been supports for jars or other objects, or perhaps served a ceremonial or decorative purpose. In the courtyard, they might have supported a wooden construction of some sort, perhaps a kind of temporary awning.

Under the courtyard floor was a shallow subfloor fill (10404) that abutted the floating level of the abovementioned stones. Below this was a layer of complete bricks (10412) of the same hard consistency and yellow color as those of the building itself, but that was clearly below the building’s floor (Photo 12.61).

The Western Wing — Rooms 6506 and 8470

Room 6506, the southern room, was bordered by Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506 on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square (2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellowearth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1 Building CW.

Room 8470, the northern room, was bordered on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner, leading from the central courtyard. A smooth yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three nicely worked limestones were set in a row along Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of dark organic material, similar to that in the southern room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW (Fig. 12.55).

The Eastern Wing — Rooms 8488, 8479 and 8487

Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room 6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458 on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m, was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14; Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not proceed down below the floor, it seems that this was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer above the floor (8466) included complete fallen yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34– 13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones, including horns.

North of Room 8488 was a narrow space (8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls 8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479 impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space was what looked like an intentional blockage on its western end that was composed of three parts (Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide), spanning the entrance from the central space, and preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m to their east was yet another apparent blockage (8485), although it was more typical of a regularly built wall in width, preserved five to six courses high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide. None of these rows of bricks bonded with either Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the south. No clear floor level was identified in this narrow space, although it was excavated down to the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material (phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this narrow space was a staircase leading to a second story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.

To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west. The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow row of bricks, identical to the westernmost blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor (8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper story.

Summary of Building CY

We have no way of knowing to what extent Building CY continued to the north. One possibility is that the northern outer wall was close to the excavation limit; in that case, the building had a central courtyard flanked by two rooms on the west and two rooms on the east. Another possibility is that the building was much larger and included additional rooms on each side of the courtyard. In any event, the entrance would have been from the north directly into the central courtyard. The flat stones along the walls of the courtyard and the narrow corridor or staircase (8479) are exceptional features in the Iron IIA architecture at Tel Rehov.

Building CY is one of the few examples in Iron Age IIA Tel Rehov of a courtyard house. The plan is somewhat similar to that of Building CZ in Squares A–C/2–3, 10 m to the south, assigned to Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.48). It recalls, to some extent, Iron Age II houses known from Hazor Area B (next to the citadel), Samaria and Megiddo. Such structures were explained by Yeivin, followed by Herzog, as representing officials’ houses, and were dubbed “scribes’ chambers” (Herzog 1992: 229– 230, with references)

Summary of Stratum C-2

Plans
Plans

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion

The plan of Stratum C-2 included densely built units of varying architectural plans, most of which were adjoined and all built of the same type of hard yellow bricks. Notable were the absence of stone foundations for the brick walls and the architectural plans which, although fragmentary in most cases, appear to differ from most known Iron Age II buildings in northern Israel. Moreover, they differ from each other, so that each structure was unique.

The finds included red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well as red-painted pottery, mostly sherds, aside from sporadic complete vessels. The single locus that yielded restorable pottery (Locus 1555b with 18 vessels) is stratigraphically attributed to Stratum C-2, while the pottery types recall late Iron IB forms that continued into Iron IIA (see Chapter 24). Additional finds included several clay figurines, seals, three inscriptions (one on an almost-complete storage jar), and iron and bronze objects.

Stratum C-2 appears to have lasted a long time, as evidenced by the thick accumulation of striations in the open areas and inside several of the buildings. Only in three places was there clear evidence of two phases (Buildings CT, CE, and perhaps, the partial unit in Squares Y/3–4) and it is possible that most of the well-built units simply continued to be used, with very minor renovations, during the entire occupation phase.

The lack of Stratum C-2 remains in the area of the apiary of Stratum C-1b (Squares Y–Z/1–2) must be explained as resulting from their intentional removal by the builders of the apiary when they established it on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. This was evidenced by the existence of Stratum C-2 building remains west, north and northeast of the apiary area. It should be noted that the Stratum C-2 floor west of the apiary in Square T/1 was ca. 1.0 m higher than the apiary floor, while in Square B/3 (northeast of the apiary), it was almost at the same level as that of the apiary floor. This comprises additional evidence for the tilt towards the east or southeast, observed in other cases at Tel Rehov as well.

The termination of Stratum C-2 appears to have been brought about by an earthquake, based on the fact that many of the walls showed signs of damage, such as cracks, tilts and sinkage, as well as the large amount of fallen bricks consistently found on the floors in each unit. A possibility is that some of this damage was gradual and not cataclysmic, generating local renovations and internal changes during the course of this stratum. Aside from the layer in Room 1555 (Square R/4) with its 18 complete smashed vessels, the relative lack of whole vessels and other finds in situ on the floors suggests that the final termination of this occupation did not take the inhabitants by surprise and that they had enough time to evacuate. We may think of a series of earthquakes that caused the abandonment and demolition of the houses, some taking place after the abandonment of the town.

Strata C-1b and C-1a

Introduction

Plans
Plans

  • Fig. 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.23 - Isometric view of Area C, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.16–12.53
The transition from Stratum C-2 to C-1b marked a large-scale renovation of the area, although the general orientation of the architecture remained the same, and brick was still the only building material used. New buildings were erected, with a number of walls constructed directly on top of the Stratum C-2 walls, while in other instances, the new walls followed entirely different lines (Fig. 12.16). The type of brick changed from the hard yellow clay typical of C-2 to a mixture of light and dark gray, brown, and beige bricks, although the average size of the bricks remained the same (Table 12.29). The densely built nature of the town continued in both strata (Figs. 12.18–12.21). A feature that was introduced in Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in both wall foundations and floors. This was one of the hallmarks of Stratum C-1b. This technique was employed only in isolated new cases in Stratum C-1a, in which many of the C-1b walls continued to be in use. In a few units, two sub-phases were discerned in Stratum C-1b, with the earlier one denoted Early C-1b. Stratum C-1a contained only one phase that was violently destroyed, following which the area was abandoned, aside from a possible pit in its northwestern part.

In the western and northern parts of Area C, the continuity between Strata C-1b and C-1a was marked and, in fact, both should be considered phases of one city, with most of the changes being floor raisings and minor adjustments of walls (Fig. 12.17). However, in the southeastern quarter of the area, the apiary, Building CM and buildings to their east went of use and were replaced by entirely new buildings in Stratum C-1a. Due to this situation, the following description is organized by units, detailing the phases within them that are attributed to C-1b and C-1a. The units of Strata C-1b and C-1a in the southeast of the area are described at the end in separate sections.

Altogether, 23 architectural units were defined; they are presented below according to four main parts.
The Western Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.24–12.25
  • Remains in Square R/4 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CD and the area to its north in SquaresS–T/3–4 (C-1b)
  • The cooking area in Square T/4 (Early C-1b, C-1b, C-1a)
  • The courtyard south of Building CD in Squares S–T/2–3 (C-1b)
  • Piazza CK in Squares S–T/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CJ in Squares S–T/1 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Remains to the west of Building CJ (C-1a)
The western part of Area C was occupied by a series of buildings and courtyards covering a total excavated area of some 225 sq m (Figs. 12.24– 12.25). The eastern border of these units adjoined the buildings attributed to the northeastern and central blocks and they were interconnected by shared walls and sometimes, by double adjoining walls. One long north–south backbone wall ran along the western border of the entire area, uniting all the units in this part of the area. The area between this wall and the edge of the mound was excavated in Squares R/4, S/1–2 and Q/4–5 (the latter in Area D), showing that there were houses up until the erosion line on the west, leaving no space for a fortification wall.

The North-Central and Northeastern Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36, 12.38
  • Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CR in Squares Y–Z/6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CF in Squares Y–Z, A/4–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CW in Squares A–C/5–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Buildings CQ1and CQ2 in Squares A–C/4–5 (C-1b, C-1a
  • Street in Squares Z, A–C/4 (C-1a)
The north-central and northeastern part of Area C was occupied by a well-planned and densely built insula, composed of buildings interconnected by both shared walls and adjoining double walls (Figs. 12.18–12.21, 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36): Building CE on the west, Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the south, and Buildings CR and CW on the north. The plan of each building, aside from CQ1 and CQ2, was different. Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, and (apparently) CF, were completely excavated, while Buildings CE, CR and CW continued beyond the limits of the excavation. All these buildings were founded in Stratum C-1b and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Stratum C-1a. A street, 2.3–2.8 m wide and ca. 15 m long, separated this block of buildings from the south-central and southeastern parts of the area in both strata.

The South-Central Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Building CG in Squares T–Y/2–4 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CM in Squares Y–Z/3 (C-1b)
  • Building CH and the apiary in Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20 (C-1b)
  • Piazza 2417 in Squares Y–Z/3–4 (C-1a)
In Squares T–Z/1–4, the south-central part of Area C, substantial changes occurred in the transition from Stratum C-1b to C-1a, following a severe destruction at the end of Stratum C-1b. The following units were found in this part of the area:
  • Stratum C-1b: Building CG, Building CM, Building CH, the apiary (Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44).
  • Stratum C-1a: Building CG (partly continued to be in use), Piazza 2417 (replacing Building CM) (Fig. 12.50)

The Southeastern Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.39, 12.48–12.53
  • Building CZ in Squares Z, A–B/2–3 (C-1b)
  • Building CP — early phase in Squares A–C/1–2 (C-1b)
  • Building CQ3 in Squares A/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CX in Squares B–C/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CP in Squares A–C/1–2 (C-1a)
  • Building CL in Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20 (C-1a)
In the southeastern part of Area C, the distinction between Strata C-1b and C-1a was clearer than in most of the rest of the area, with C-1b Building CZ and the early phase of Building CP having different plans than Buildings CQ3, CX and CP above them, and Building CL replacing the apiary. The following units were defined:
  • Stratum C-1b: Building CZ and an early phase of Building CP (Fig. 12.39)
  • Stratum C-1a: Buildings CQ3, CX, CP and CL (Fig. 12.50).

While the buildings of Stratum C-1b in this area were only partially excavated, the four buildings of Stratum C-1a were exposed in their entirety. They comprised a densely built and well-planned urban block, bordered by the street in Squares Z, A–C/4 on the north and Piazza 2417 on the northwest. Unlike the situation in the Stratum C-1a buildings in the northern part of Area C, most of the walls between the various units in this part of the area were shared, and in only one instance was there a double wall. This indicated a high degree of interdependence between all these units on the level of construction, and possibly function as well. Moreover, it seems that during some stage of the use of this complex, some walls were razed to create access between the units.

Building CZ of Stratum C-1b apparently suffered a destruction, judging by the large amount of fallen bricks and some burning (Figs. 12.88, 12.90), although it did not leave complete vessels or other objects on the floors, aside from one place. The early phase of Building CP seems to have met the same fate, with fallen bricks and burnt debris, although its floors were not reached in the excavation. All four buildings of Stratum C-1a were destroyed by a heavy conflagration and their remains were exposed just below topsoil, with numerous finds on the floors.

Square R/4 — Strata C-1b and C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.64 - Square R/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.65 - Square R/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.24–12.25
  • Section: Fig. 12.97
  • Photos 12.8, 12.64–12.65
  • Pottery: C-1b — Fig. 13.40:8–12; C-1a — Figs. 13.68–13.70
Introduction

In Square R/4, above C-2 Room 1555, two main phases were attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a; the latter was the clearest and best preserved, found just below topsoil and containing destruction debris and restorable vessels on a floor. Traces of additional narrow brick walls and restorable pottery revealed in the topsoil to the north and south of Square R/4, and in Square Q/4 of Area D, indicated that domestic occupation in the Iron Age IIA reached the western perimeter of the tell, with no evidence for any fortification wall.

Room 4483 in Stratum C-1b

Several phases of construction were found in this room (Fig. 12.24).

The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b was 1557, which continued the northern line of Wall 1413 that ran the entire length of Area C on the west (see details below); it seems that Wall 1557 was not used in Stratum C-1a. Parallel to it and 3.1 m to its west was Wall 1563, which apparently continued to be in use from Stratum C-2. In the initial phase of Stratum C-1b, a pink plaster floor (4483) passed below Walls 2416 and 4457, and possibly related to Wall 1557 on the east. At this stage, Wall 1568, which abutted the southern continuation of Wall 1557, was most probably the southern wall of the room, while its northern wall was beyond the excavation area. In a later phase of C-1b, Wall 2416 was built against the western face of Wall 1557; on the south, it abutted Wall 1568. In the center of the room, a narrow north–south wall (4457; Photo 12.64), preserved only one course high, made a corner on the south with Wall 4458, which was first built in Stratum C-2 (see above, Room 1555). In Stratum C-1b, its eastern part was covered by Floor 4483; a small round posthole was found on the northeastern end of this floor. The addition of Wall 4457 formed a narrow space (0.9 m wide) on the western side of the room. While Floor 4483 ran below the secondary walls (2416, 4457), the occupation debris above the floor abutted these walls. To the west of Wall 4457, Floor 4488, made of plaster with a layer of striations above it, penetrated below Wall 4457. In the second phase, a higher floor (4464) was laid, 0.1 m above the latter, abutting Walls 4457 and 4458. To this same phase, and perhaps to the same building, we attributed several walls surrounding a courtyard with ovens found in Square Q/4, which was part of Area D (Chapter 15; see also Fig. 12.24). The density of construction and layers points to the intensive activity in this area on the cusp of the mound during the course of Stratum C-1b.

Room 2442 in Stratum C-1a

A new room was built above the C-1b remains in this square, reusing Wall 2416 and adding new walls on the south (2423), west (1554) and north (1552) (Fig. 12.25). Wall 1558 was a short segment that seemed to corner with Wall 1552; perhaps it was the original western wall of the room that was removed at one point and replaced by Wall 1554, slightly to the west. A concentration of stones (2450), some of which were grinding stone fragments, was found in the southwestern corner of the square. These might have been part of a pavement which had continued to the west, but was eroded down the slope. A north–south row of three stones, running along the western face of Wall 1554, may have belonged to a room in Square Q/4 (Area D), bounded by Walls 1816 and 1808 (Figs. 12.19, 12.25). This space, poorly preserved due to the severe erosion on the slope of the mound, may have belonged to the same building as Room 2442.

Inside the room was a 0.4 m-deep layer of burnt destruction debris (2405) on a beaten-earth floor (2442, 87.56 m); part of this floor was a rectangular patch of hard plaster (2438) which abutted the northern face of Wall 2423 (Photo 12.65). It sloped slightly down to the north (0.18 m over 1.2 m) and might have served for some liquid-related activity; this plaster had been repaired with a whitish lime substance at one time during its use. In the burnt debris was an assemblage of restorable vessels (Figs. 13.68–13.70). One sherd of an imported Greek bowl was found as well (Fig. 13.70:22; see Chapter 28A). The smaller vessels in this room were found just below topsoil, in a layer above two parallel rows of storage jars that rested directly on the floor, one running along Wall 2416 and the other near Wall 1554 on the west. Most of the jars were fallen with their rims to the north; under several of the jars was a burnt patch with phytolith, suggesting that they had been set on some organic material, such as reed mats or wood.

Building CD and the Area to the North — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.66 - Tilted Wall 2495 in C-1b Building CD excavation from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.24
  • Section: Figs. 12.65–12.68
  • Photos 12.66
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.41
North of Building CD

Above the elements attributed to Stratum C-2 to the north of Building CA in Squares R–S/4 was the southern end of a room or a courtyard located in front of Building CD (Fig. 12.24). Although not well preserved, a gap in its southern wall (1524) was probably an entrance, on line with the entrance to Building CD, thus linking the two units. Wall 1524 was built on top of a thin fill laid on Stratum C-2 Wall 8503; it ran flush against Wall 1464 of Building CD, creating a wide double wall (Fig. 12.66). The western end of Wall 1524 continued westward to abut (but not to join) the eastern face of Wall 2416, and was abutted on the north by Wall 1557. Several bricks with two marginal bosses on each end were incorporated in Wall 1524. Such protrusions must have been part of the brick mold and their function might have been to improve the grip of the mud plaster that covered the walls. Alternatively, it could have been intended as a decorative element, as no traces of plaster were found. Bricks with similar protrusions were also found in walls of Stratum C-1b in Buildings CE and CF (see below). On the east, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 2501, although this corner was disturbed. On the west, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 1557, the northern end of long backbone Wall 1413. All three walls were abutted by occupation debris (1512) and a floor (2494, 86.75 m), which contained an oven (2496) and a stone basin in the northern balk (unnumbered). The floor (4491) in the western part of this space was set on a bedding of small stones that raised it slightly higher than the floor level to the east.

No architecture that could be attributed to Stratum C-1a was found here and the same loose debris, possibly a disturbance, that covered Building CD, also covered these remains (Fig. 12.25).

Building CD

This building in Squares S/3–4 (Fig. 12.24; Photo 12.2) was, in fact, a renovation of Stratum C-2 Building CA. The outer walls were rebuilt along the same lines, but the inner division was canceled, thus creating a large, roughly rectangular space; the external measurements were 5.0×6.2 m and the floor space, ca. 20 sq m.

All the outer walls of C-2 Building CA were rebuilt with a new type of brick made of light gray, dark gray and light brown clay. The demarcation between the previous walls and the rebuild was very clear and a distinct line of a fill or repair was visible, especially in the northern, eastern and southern walls (Figs. 12.65–12.67; Photos 12.28, 12.66). This was a layer of light brownish-gray clay (similar to the brick material) that was packed down on top of the damaged C-2 walls, leveling them in preparation for the rebuild.

On the north, Wall 1464 replaced C-2 Wall 4438; the entrance into the new building was now located nearer to the center of the northern wall, through an opening in the double wall (1524/1464). Wall 1464 was deliberately cut on its western end, as can be seen in the western balk of Square S/4 (Fig. 12.66). On the west, Wall 1523 replaced C-2 Wall 4440 (Fig. 12.67); it was poorly preserved and tilted severely towards the east, especially in its northern part. This wall ran along the eastern face of Wall 1413, with the latter continuing further to the south and north to enclose additional units. On the south, Wall 1448 replaced C-2 Wall 4439; the repair line between the two walls was clearest here (Photo 12.28). On the east, Wall 2495 replaced C-2 Wall 4434 (Fig. 12.66; Photo 12.66); however, the former was traced only in Square S/4 and did not continue to the south. This may be due to its state of preservation or, as suggested above, Wall 1506, possibly built at the end of Stratum C-2 as a buttress for the damaged eastern wall of Building CA, continued in Stratum C-1b as the southeastern wall of Building CD (Fig. 12.68). As noted above, it is possible that Wall 1506 had been first built in Stratum C-1b, although this seems less likely. This rather makeshift arrangement would have lent a slipshod look to this part of the building, which contrasts with the otherwise well-built walls. The eastern side of Building CD was less well preserved, just like in its predecessor, Building CA.

The inner division of the previous Building CA was cancelled. The inner walls were deliberately removed, so that five to six cut courses were detected close to their juncture with the external walls of the building: Wall 2509 of the previous building was cut 0.35 m to the east of its corner with Wall 4440 and Wall 2493 was cut 0.15 m to the north of its corner with Wall 4439 (Photo 12.28). The reason for the deliberate razing of these inner partition walls was not clear; perhaps they were in such a poor state of preservation following the destruction of Building CA that they required removal before the leveling and rebuilding could take place.3 Indeed, below the lowest floor of Building CD were layers of brick debris interspersed with layers of red clay and ashy gray striations, which might be understood as a fill (2491 in Square S/4, 2485 in Square S/3) laid on top of the previous building, serving to level off the razed walls. These layers yielded sherds and partial vessels, including red-slipped and hand-burnished bowls and jugs (Fig. 13.41).

On top of this debris/fill were successive occupation layers, with a total thickness of 0.6–0.8 m, rich in sherds and bones: 2486, 1485 and 1466 in Square S/4, and 1474 in Square S/3. While these layers were stratified, it was difficult to clearly identify a floor. Two flat-topped stones were found near the northeastern and northwestern corners of the building, relating to Locus 2486. Their function was not clear, as they were too close to the wall to have served as pillar bases, recalling the stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 (see discussion above).

The only internal construction in the new building was a row of crumbly gray bricks (0.5–0.6 m wide) added along the northern face of Wall 1448, covering the cut southern end of Stratum C-2 Wall 2493. This element (2484) was preserved 0.4– 0.6 m high and 3.4 m long; it might have been a bench along Wall 1448.

The end of Building CD was not violent and no traces of sudden destruction were found. The building was not renovated in Stratum C-1a, when its southern part was covered by the northern end of Piazza CK and its northern part was covered by a layer of loose debris (1412, 1417) that appeared to have been a disturbance of some sort.

Piazza CK — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.70 - C-1a Piazza CK from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.71 - C-1a Piazza CK from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.25
  • Section: Figs. 12.65, 12.69
  • Photos 12.70–12.71
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.71–13.72
Introduction

In Stratum C-1a, Building CD went out of use and a large open area, denoted Piazza CK, replaced it (Squares S–T/2–3). This courtyard included the open area to the south of Building CD, as well as the cooking area described above. It was bordered on the south by Wall 1437 (the northern wall of Building CJ) and an additional stub of a wall (1415), on the east by Wall 1416 (the western wall of Building CG), and on the west by Wall 1413 (the long backbone wall running along the entire area). On the northeastern end of this space was a short wall (1457) that seemed to be a continuation of the northern wall of Building CG; it was preserved only one course high and ended abruptly after 2.0 m, on line with Wall 1415 on the south. It is possible that these were stubs of walls that had been dismantled or otherwise damaged. Thus, the width of Piazza CK ranged from 7.0 m on the south to 8.0 m on the north, and its length was at least 13 m, as the northern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. The total area was at least 97 sq m, making this one of the largest open areas in all strata in Area C, which was, for the most part, densely built up. Access into the piazza must have been from the north.

In the enclosure formed by these walls, the northwestern quadrant (Square S/4) contained a layer of soft earth and eroded brick debris (1417, 1412, 1439) that might have been a late disturbance, while in the rest of the area, very burnt and vitrified brick debris resting on a hard-packed white floor (1418, 1422, 1428) was revealed under topsoil (Figs. 12.65, 12.69). Running through the center of this courtyard on a north–south axis and abutted on the east, south and west by the destruction debris and white floor, was a concentration of stones, several of which were grinding stone fragments, and brick fragments (1427) (Photo 12.70). This element was roughly L-shaped, with a plastered, right-angled niche in its western face, which contained part of a smashed storage jar (unrestored); another storage jar (Fig. 13.72:9) abutted the installation on its south, and yet another one (Fig. 13.72:10) was found to its north. Another concentration of basalt stones was found 0.5 m to the south of 1427, designated 1496; they most likely comprised parts of the same element, perhaps with a stone missing in the middle. Two cooking pots (Fig. 13.71:7, 9) were found against the western face of these stones (Photo 12.71). An additional element was a brick block (1458), 1.0 m long, 0.5 m wide and preserved to one or two courses, located just to the west of the southern end of 1427 (Fig. 12.69). This might have been a work surface or, perhaps, a space divider.

Wall 1413 in Strata C-1a–b

Wall 1413, that bordered Piazza CK on the west, ran for 19.7 m on a slightly southeast–northwest line along the western end of the entire area and continued beyond the limits of the excavation to both the north and the south (Photos 12.2–12.5). In Square R/4, Wall 1413 abutted the western end of Wall 1524. The continuation of its line to the north was denoted 1557 (Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.8). The southern part of Wall 1413 was made of hard yellow bricks, typical of Stratum C-2, as opposed to the light gray bricks of the rest of the wall, typical of Strata C-1b and C-1a. This was the only place in this wall where two phases were discerned: in the earlier phase (Stratum C-1b), the wall was termed 2432 and the later phase, 1431 (Stratum C-1a). Wall 1413 was constructed slightly above and west of Stratum C-2 Buildings CA and CB (Figs. 12.16, 12.69). In Stratum C-1b, its lower part adjoined the western wall of Building CD and it served as the western border of the space south of Building CD, of the unit north of Building CD, and of Building CJ. In Stratum C-1a, it was the western border of Building CJ and Piazza CK. In Square R/4, the structures of both Strata C-1b and C-1a (described above) were attached to its western face. Wall 1413 was unique in its length and multiple-use in several units during the course of two strata, making it a prime example of the integrated urban planning that characterized this area.

Building CE

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.75 - Buildings CE, CF and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.76 - Building CE, C-1b Room 2489 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.77 - Building CE, looking east at Wall 2454 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.78 - Building CE; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.79 - Building CE, C-1a Room 1471 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.80 - Northern rooms of Building CE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.81 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b, Room 6449 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.82 - Destruction debris inBuilding CE, C-1b Room 6449 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.83 - Detail of marginal bosses on bricks in C-1b Wall 6452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.84 - Building CE, C-1a Room 6433 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.87 - C-1 Building CR from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27–12.28
  • Section: Figs. 12.62–12.64
  • Photos 12.75–12.84, 12.87
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.44–13.45; C-1a — Figs. 13.75–13.76
Introduction

Building CE was located in Squares T–Y/4–6, to the east of the cooking area in Square T/4. The building was composed of a broad room in the south and an area to its north, of which a strip, 2.0 m wide and 10 m long, was excavated (Photo 12.75). The broad room was a rebuild of an earlier structure, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.9–12.10); it had two phases, while the area to the north had three. In Stratum C-1b, the building suffered a destruction, after which it was renovated in Stratum C-1a and continued to be used with various changes, mainly in its northern part, until its final destruction.

The Broad Room

Room 2489 — Stratum C-1b

Room 2489 was a rectangular room (internal measurements 2.0×4.8 m; 9.6 sq m) with an entrance just east of the center of the northern wall (1491); the threshold was paved with a wooden plank (Fig. 12.27; Photo 12.76). Inside the entrance were a bowl and a cup-and-saucer (Figs. 13.44:4, 13.45:12). The southern wall of this room (1473) ran parallel to the northern wall of Building CG (see below), separated by a 0.10 m gap, which contained a large amount of sherds, possibly a fill. The eastern end of Wall 1473 dog-legged 0.3 m to the north, exactly following the line of the C-2 wall here. The eastern wall (2454) was part of a long wall that enclosed the entire building on the east. Note that Wall 2454 was oriented due north–south, while the rest of the room was angled towards the west, so that this wall was not parallel to the western wall of the building (1487), lending a somewhat crooked look to room. Wall 2454 was built flush against the western wall of Building CF; together, they were 1.1 m wide. At its southern end, Wall 2454 made a corner with Wall 4479, the northern wall of Building CM to the south in Stratum C-1b, which created a double wall with the southern wall of Building CF. This construction method well demonstrates the closely interrelated character of the architecture of the buildings in this northeastern insula.

All the walls were composed of hard graybrown bricks, with light-colored mortar lines; they were burnt to black in some instances, particularly in the east. The western face of Wall 2454 and the southern face of Wall 1491 included bricks with marginal bosses composed of two vertical protrusions on each end of the brick (Fig. 12.29; Photos 12.77–12.78), identical to those found in other buildings in the north-central part of Area C in Stratum C-1b, including the unit north of Building CD, described above, and Building CF; they were also found in the walls of the rooms to the north of the broad room in Building CE (Photo 12.83). Walls 2454 and 1491 contained a thick and intricate construction of perpendicular and parallel wooden beams in their foundations (Fig. 12.29; Photos 12.77–12.78). The beams, like the bricks, were very burnt.

The smooth reddish-brown beaten-earth floor (2489, 86.30 m) was coated by a thick layer of black ash (2458; Fig. 12.64), covering mostly the eastern half of the room (Photo 12.76). A small square plastered brick (2477; 0.45 x.0.45 m, 0.45 m high) was attached to Wall 1491, just east of the entrance and opposite the offset in Wall 1473. It had a slight depression on top which contained some light gray ash, although it is possible that it had served as a jar support. Underneath it was an intact juglet in a small pit (Fig. 13.45:10), apparently placed there as a foundation deposit before the brick was laid.

Room 1471 — Stratum C-1a

Following the destruction of C-1b, the broad room continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a with the same walls (Fig. 12.28), although there was a visible repair in the upper courses of the western wall (1487), composed of light gray bricks (Photos 12.76, 12.79). Above the burnt debris on the floor of C-1b was a layer of hard brick debris (2443) that supported an earthen floor (1471) at level 86.65 m, which was covered by a layer of decayed brick debris with some ash (Fig. 12.64; Photo 12.79).

The Northern Rooms and Courtyard

Introduction

Remains of rooms and possibly a courtyard were found in Squares Y/5–6 to the north of the broad room (Photos 12.80–12.84). It seems that these were part of Building CE, particularly due to the shared walls and similar construction techniques, although no entrance was found to join them in the limited excavated area. Each of these components had two phases, attributed to C-1b and C-1a, while the northern courtyard contained yet an additional phase.

Rooms 6448 and 6449 — Stratum C-1b

Two narrow rooms (6448, 6449) were excavated to the north of the eastern side of the broad room; no entrance joined them. The eastern wall of both rooms was the continuation of Wall 2454, indicating that the northern rooms and the broad room to the south were part of the same building.

Like in its southern end, the foundations of the entire length of Wall 2454 contained a thick and intricate composition of wooden beams, both perpendicular and parallel to the lower course of bricks (Figs. 12.30, 12.62). Wooden beams, all charred, were found below the floors of the two rooms as well (Photos 12.80–12.81). All of the wood was set into a distinct layer of soft reddish earth (6426, 6486; Fig. 12.32); such a construction of wooden beams in a reddish fill was a feature found in the foundations of other Stratum C-1b buildings as well.

The western wall of the two northern rooms was Wall 6452; only its eastern face was uncovered. This wall cornered with Wall 1491 on the south, just east of the entranceway in that wall. Wall 6452 also had many wooden beams in and adjoining its foundation (Figs. 12.30, 12.62– 12.63). Walls 2454 and 6452 ran for 7.0 m and two east–west cross walls (6447 and 7445) divided this space into two identical rooms (6448 on the north and 6449 on the south), each 3.1 m long and between 1.6–1.8 m wide. The difference in width was due to the angle of Wall 6452, which ran slightly southeast to northwest, as opposed to the straight north–south line of Wall 2454. Wall 6447, which separated the two rooms, had wood in its foundation, but Wall 7445, the northern wall of Room 6448), did not. As they had no entrances, it is possible that these rooms served as storage spaces, accessed from above. All the walls of these rooms, aside from 7445, which was poorly preserved, included bricks with marginal bosses composed of thin vertical protrusions on both ends, which were hallmarks of Stratum C-1b in this part of the area, as noted above (Figs. 12.29, 12.63; Photo 12.83). The southern room had a patchy beaten-earth floor at level 86.12 m (6449), on which were vessels and sherds, among them three complete chalices (Fig. 13.44:10–11, 13), as well as loomweights and a concentration of burnt grain against Wall 1491. Four 14C measurements of this grain (Chapter 48, Sample R24) provided a calibrated average date between 902–843 BCE (1σ) and 920–830 BCE (2σ).

Two large bricks set near the corner of Walls 6452 and 1491 might have served as a kind of podium or shelf, possibly for the chalices found nearby (Photo 12.82). Room 6448 contained a similar floor in its southern part, while its northern part contained a concentration of stones that might have been a disturbed stone floor (7451), including two broken upper grinding stones. The stones were covered by a thin layer of debris (7446) with some sherds and bones.

Rooms 6448 and 6449 were covered by a fill (6432), which leveled them in preparation for the renovation that took place in Stratum C-1a.

Courtyard 7427 — Stratum C-1b

To the north of Wall 7445 in Square Y/6 was an open space, continuing the activity that was here in Stratum C-2. This space is described here as part of Building CE, although, in fact, no entrance to the two southern rooms was found, and it might represent the southern part of an open space to the north of this building. The two phases identified in this space were both attributed to Stratum C-1b, as they covered the Stratum C-2 activity and were sealed by the Stratum C-1a courtyard floor.

The courtyard surface was composed of red and gray striations (7427) that were a direct continuation of those found here in Stratum C-2 and their attribution to two sub-phases of C-1b was based on their relation to related installations. The lowest layer was related to three poorly preserved installations, whose function remained unknown (Fig. 12.31): a ring of brown clay (7463), almost directly underneath C-1b Oven 7443, and two semi-circles of soft red clay (7464, 7465), filled with light gray ash. These installations seem to each have been used only for a short time and cut each other in a haphazard manner.

In the later phase of Stratum C-1b, the uppermost layer of the red and gray striations contained one poorly preserved oven (7443) and several shallow red-clay circles (7433, 7437, 7438), similar to those of the previous sub-phase. In both phases, only a few sherds and bones were found. The center and southeastern part of these remains were cut by Pit 6498 (Photo 12.87).

Space 6433 — Stratum C-1a

A reddish clay floor (6433, 5415) in Square Y/5 was laid at level 86.75 m, above a fill covering C-1b Rooms 6448 and 6449. Thus, the entire area north of Wall 1491 and west of Wall 2454 became an open area, at least 10 m long and continuing to the north beyond the excavation area. The reddish clay floor was covered by a soft burnt layer just under topsoil. The floor and burnt debris abutted the rather poorly preserved upper courses of Walls 2454 and 1491, which were rebuilt after the C-1b destruction. Below Floor 5415 was a layer of wooden beams that both penetrated underneath the foundation of the C-1a rebuild of Wall 2454 here and extended into part of the room. This wood was laid in two layers: an east–west upper layer and a north–south lower layer (Fig. 12.32). This was one of the few instances where wood was used in construction in Stratum C-1a.

A number of installations were set on this floor. In the southeastern corner was a mud-plastered clay ring (5436) containing a large lower grinding stone inside; an upper grinding stone was found below this and another such grinding stone rested on top of the clay ring. This is similar to grinding installations found in other Stratum C-1a buildings, such as Buildings CF, CQ1, CQ2 and CP. The southern part of a similar ring (5438) was found in the northwestern corner of Square Y/5, although it did not contain any grinding stones. Three bricks were found to the west of 5436 and one to its north. The southern part of the space was covered with a layer of burnt destruction debris containing pottery and loomweights (Photo 12.84), while the northern part was less burnt.

On the northern end of this open area (Square Y/6) was a layer of brick debris and collapse, with some ash and charcoal (7404), abutting Wall 4422 and the northern end of Wall 2454. Although no clear floor level was discerned, this layer clearly covered the Stratum C-1b activity below. Three intact vessels (Fig. 13.76:6, 10–11), one jug and two juglets, were found in this debris layer.

Building CR

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.85 - Square Z/6, looking north at C-1a, C-1b and C-2 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.86 - Square Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.87 - Squares Y–Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.88 - Fractured and displaced blocks of Building CR, late phase of C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.89 - Broken Jugs and charred beams in Building CR, C-1a Room 6468 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.90 - Building CR, C-1a Room 6468 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.91 - Buildings CR, CF, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.27–12.29, 12.33–12.36
  • Photos 12.85–12.91
  • Pottery: C-1b — Fig.13.48:1–14; C-1a — Figs. 13.77–13.79
Introduction

Building CR was the southern part of a building in Squares Y–Z/6 that continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.43, 12.86) and was, in fact, a rebuild of Stratum C-2 Building CT; this was one of the few instances of continuity between all the Iron Age IIA strata in Area C. Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. The southern wall of Building CR was also the northern wall of Building CF and its eastern wall was the western boundary of the entrance into that building (Photo 12.86). The southwestern corner of this building was cut by Pit 6498 (Photos 12.43, 12.48, 12.87).

Building CR in an Early Phase of Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.33
New walls built above those of C-2 Building CT followed roughly the same line and orientation and, like that building, enclosed two rooms, one on the east (6491) and one on the west (6459), separated by Wall 6490. As noted above, Wall 6490 was built on top of the Stratum C-2 debris. The outer walls of the building in this phase were 6467 on the south, 7458 on the east, 4422 on the west and 6489 on the north of the eastern room; the latter had an entrance 0.6 m wide on its western end, which was paved with a single brick course, showing that this building continued to the north. No clear floor was found in this phase, although it seemed that the lower part of Floor 6491 in the eastern room abutted the upper course of Wall 7458 on the east, and thus, it is shown on the plan of this sub-phase.

Building CR in the Main Phase of Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
The western wall (4422), the dividing wall (6490) between the rooms, and the northern wall of the eastern room (6489) with its entrance, remained unchanged in the subsequent phase. A new southern wall (6493) was built directly above Wall 6467 of the earlier phase; its upper-two preserved courses were slightly narrower than the latter and were made of a different brick type (reddish gray and crumbly), as opposed to the hard light gray bricks of the earlier phase. The eastern end of this room underwent a more pronounced change, where the wall was replaced by several rows of narrow bricks on a north–south line (6512). Although it seems that this was an intentional arrangement, these bricks might represent a fallen wall or a feature whose function remained unknown (Photo 12.88). These brick rows ended 1.0 m west of Building CW (see below), creating a rather narrow corridor that led into Building CF to the south. A very large concentration of bones, including many mandibles, was found on the eastern end of the bricks of 6512 (7410). It may be noted that the locus in the entrance corridor (6463) to the east of the installation also contained a relatively large amount of bones. The floor of the room (6491) was composed of smooth light brown clay.

A layer of soft debris (6479) above the floor included several high quality red-slipped and burnished bowl fragments (Fig. 13.48:1–4); its upper layer might have been a fill laid in preparation for the construction of the subsequent phase.

The western room (5459) did not undergo any change in this phase of Stratum C-1b. It contained a layer of brick debris and charcoal patches, with some bones and sherds. No clear floor level was discerned.

Building CR in Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.28, 12.35–12.36
In Stratum C-1a, the western wall of Building CR (4422) continued unchanged, while the other walls were rebuilt. The new southern wall (6410), built directly over the previous wall, still served as the northern border of Building CF (Photos 12.85– 12.86), but now only on the east, as an additional wall (6409) was built alongside it on the west (Photo 12.91). The new eastern wall of the unit (6419) was built over the rows of 6512. A new dividing wall (6461) between the two rooms (6468, 6416) was built to the west of the line of the previous wall, so that the western room was now smaller than the eastern one. Due to the poor state of preservation of Wall 6461, the space was excavated as one (6416) until it became clear that these were two rooms separated by this wall.

Floors of this stratum were found 0.7–0.8 m above those of the previous phase. The floor of the eastern room (6468) covered the top of Wall 6489, so that this room, like the western one, continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. In Room 6468, the floor was covered by a layer of burnt destruction debris, covered in turn by fallen bricks just below topsoil. This room contained 13 loomweights, including several that were arranged in a circle against the eastern face of Wall 6461, and others that surrounded two burnt wooden beams on a north–south axis that appeared to have belonged to a loom (Photos 12.89–12.90). Among the pottery vessels (Figs. 13.77–13.79) were seven jugs, two of which were finely red slipped and burnished (Fig. 13.79:6–7).

Building CF

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.58 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.59 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.60 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.61 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.91 - Buildings CR, CF, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.92 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.93 - Eastern balk of Square Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.94 - Eastern part of Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.95 - Section in the middle of Square Z/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.96 - C-1a Building CF, broken pottery in southern part of Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.97 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.98 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.99 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5499 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.100 - C-1a Building CF, below Room 5499 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.101 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.102 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.103 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.104 - Building CF, C-1a Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.105 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.106 - Building CF, top of destruction debris 6401 in C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.107 - Building CF, grinding installation 6406 and destruction debris 6401 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.108 - Building CF, fragments of altar from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.109 - Building CF, grinding installation 6406 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.110 - Building CF, Stratum C-1a, grinding Installation 6406 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.111 - Smashed vessels on floor of Room 5460 in Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.112 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.113 - Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36
  • Section: Figs. 12.58–12.61
  • Photos 12.5–12.6, 12.91–12.113
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.46–13.47, C-1a — Figs. 13.80–13.96
Introduction

Building CF in Squares Y–A/4–6 was one of the largest and most interesting structures in Area C. Its unique plan, fine construction, and exceptional finds point to its importance. The building was initially constructed in Stratum C-1b and, following a destruction, was renovated and reused until its final destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. Its external measurements were 8.7×11.3 m (excluding Wall 2454 on the west and the entrance corridor) and its floor space was 50.46 sq m in Stratum C-1b and 52.89 sq m in C-1a. This latter phase was the best known, as it was exposed just below topsoil and destroyed in a fierce conflagration, after which the building was abandoned. Although the remains of Stratum C-1b were not as well preserved, they were sufficient to define a separate building phase, with finds attributed to its floors. Both phases will be described together, emphasizing the stratigraphic considerations that led to the division between the two. Building CF was built over Stratum C-2 Building CU (Photos 12.85, 12.100– 12.104); although both buildings were of the same orientation, they were two entirely different structures.

Building CF contained an entrance corridor in the northeast and three main components: a rectangular space on the north, with a western and an eastern wing to its south. Each of these wings was enclosed by separate walls that adjoined each other to form double walls, so that each was both independent and united. Double walls also surrounded the building on the west, south and east; these walls had a total width of 1.0–1.1 m. This, along with the well-built straight walls, lent the structure a sturdy look and also raises the possibility that the building had an upper floor. Thus, Building CF, although a unique and independent structure, was an integral part of a well-planned quarter that was densely built in both Strata C-1b and C-1a (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.91–12.92; 12.169).

The Entrance Corridor

Introduction

The entrance into the building in both strata was in its northeastern corner, through a passageway which continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. The entrance was bordered on the east by Wall 6408 in both strata and on the west by the eastern end of Building CR (Wall 7458 in the early phase of Stratum C-1b, brick rows 6512 in the later phase of C-1b, and Wall 6419 in Stratum C-1a). This formed a 2.0 m-wide corridor which was narrower only in the latter part of Stratum C-1b, when 6512 occupied part of its western side. Three phases were discerned in the entrance, one attributed to the construction of the building and the other two to Strata C-1b and C-1a.

The Entrance Corridor in Pre-Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.33
Just above the floor and pits that occupied this area in Stratum C-2 was a layer of patchy red and gray striations (6478, 7457, 7472) that contained a series of small, shallow pits and plastered bins, some of which cut each other, indicating intense activity here. The pits contained soft brown earth with few sherds and bones. The striated layer and pits abutted early Stratum C-1b Wall 7458 on the west and Walls 6497/6408 on the east. In fact, these shallow bins and pits made passage here virtually impossible, similar to the situation in Stratum C-2 described above, with Pit 7504/7507. It is possible that these elements represent a phase that can be defined as interim between Stratum C-2 and C-1b, perhaps related to the construction of the building. In any case, they did not enable easy access to the building while they existed.

The Entrance Corridor in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
In the main phase of Stratum C-1b, the entrance corridor contained soft debris (6463) with many bones; no floor was detected. On the west, it was bordered by the bricks of 6512. The western face of Wall 6408, the eastern border, was very damaged on this level and apparently underwent some kind of repair that included a row of small stones inserted into its lowest course. The northern end of the corridor was bordered on the east by poorly preserved Wall 6497 of Building CW. The corridor was narrowed by the bricks of 6512 in this phase.

The Entrance Corridor in Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
In Stratum C-1a, the corridor contained a beatenearth floor at level 86.60 m, covered with burnt destruction debris (6412, 6417), including some fallen bricks and restorable pottery (Figs. 13.86, 13.89, 13.94; Photo 12.93; see also Fig. 12.58). Like in Stratum C-1b, Wall 6408 continued as the eastern border of the corridor, aside from its northern end, where Wall 6497 of Building CW constituted the border. The corridor was 1.5 m wide in this phase.

The Northern Space in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
In Stratum C-1b, the entrance corridor led into a broad space (internal measurements 2.0×5.3 m; 10.2 sq m) from which the western and eastern wings were accessed.

The northern border of this space was Wall 6493, shared with Building CR (Photos 12.85, 12.91–12.92). On the east, it was bounded by Wall 6408, and on the south, by Wall 6482 (Photos 12.94, 12.116). No entrance in Wall 6482 that would have connected the northern space with the rooms to the south was found, but possibly one had existed above the two preserved courses of this wall.

The space enclosed by these walls contained a patchy floor of red, gray and white striations (6466) at level 86.10 m, with only a few sherds and bones (Photo 12.93). The floor was covered by a layer of soft brown earth (6450) which might have been a leveling fill in preparation for the construction of the Stratum C-1a floor above. Two smooth pink mizi limestone slabs were found on the floor level, one in Square Z/6 and another near the southeastern corner of the space. They were similar to the large stone found in Room 6465 to the south.

A curious feature revealed at the bottom level of the striations in this space was the presence of several very large, amorphic blocks of brick, with a particularly large one in the center (Fig. 12.58). It is possible that these were placed as a kind of leveler above the remains of C-2 Building CU, or were simply discarded during the construction of Building CF and covered by the earliest floor of that building.

The Eastern Wing

Introduction

This wing was composed of a large room on the north and a smaller room to its south; the latter was accessed only through the former. In Stratum C-1b, the larger northern room of this wing was separated from the northern rectangular space described above by a wall, making it a separate room. In Stratum C-1a, when this wall was removed, these two spaces were united and were accessed directly from the entrance in the northeast of the building. On the other hand, the southern room remained the same in both strata. The description below follows these developments: the two phases in the northern room are described separately (C-1b and C-1a), and the two phases in the southern room are described together.

Room 6465 — Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
This room was bordered by Walls 6482 on the north, 5437 on the south, 6455 on the west, and 6456 on the east (internal measurements 3.4×3.5 m; 11.9 sq m) (Photo 12.94). The two latter walls were the direct continuation of the western and eastern walls of the southern room (5454, 6424); all these walls had a thick layer of wooden beams in their foundations. A 0.1 m-thick layer of reddishbrown and gray striations (6465), whose bottom was a thin layer of light gray mud plaster at 85.90 m, abutted the lowest level of the surrounding walls. A large, smooth pink mizi limestone with a flattened top was found 0.4 m to the east of the center of Wall 6455, abutted by the striations (Photo 12.95). This would have been too large and not well located to have been a pillar base, although its function was not clear. A relatively large amount of sherds (Figs. 13.46–13.47) and several grinding stones were found in this room. The striations and stone were sealed by Floor 5498 of Stratum C-1a.

Room 5498 — Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
The removal of Wall 6482 in Stratum C-1a created a large space in the northeast of the building that included both Room 6465 and the broad northern space of C-1b (6466) of the former building. Another major change that took place in this room in Stratum C-1a entailed the deliberate removal of the eastern and western walls down to their lowest one or two courses (Photo 12.94), which were covered by the C-1a floor makeup. This widened the room internally by 1.0 m, so that the internal measurements of this space were now 4.4×6.0 m (26.4 sq m). This cut was especially evident close to the northern end of the southern room (5499), where the higher southern ends of these walls remained intact (Photo 12.95). With the removal of the eastern and western walls, there was no longer a double wall between the northern part of the two wings of the building or between the building and Building CQ1 to its east.

The slightly higher stump of the erstwhile northern wall (6482) created a situation wherein the floor (6427, 86.50 m) in the area of the former northern space was now 0.35 m higher than the floor (5498, 86.15 m) to the south of this wall; this discrepancy was probably bridged by wooden or brick steps. Floor 6427 in the north was composed of white lime, covered with burnt debris (6417). An oven (6421) was built in the center of the northern space, against the southern face of Wall 6410, about 1.0 m to the west of the location of Oven 7428 of Stratum C-2, yet 2.0 m higher (Photo 12.109). A storage jar (Fig. 13.90:10) and a krater (Fig. 13.84:2) were found right near it, resting on the floor. On the far eastern end of this space, opposite the entrance corridor, was a large, roughly squared, 0.3 m-tall, flat-topped stone. Numerous bones found on and nearby this stone suggest that it was possibly used as a butcher block (Photo 12.94).

Floor 5498 in the south (covering the area of C-1b Room 6465) was composed of thin mud plaster below a layer of soft reddish earth, which covered the top of the cut walls of Stratum C-1b. On the floor was a 0.7 m-thick layer of very burnt destruction debris (5416, 5429, 5439), containing fallen bricks, burnt brick debris, ash and charcoal, ceiling collapse, and 49 complete (restorable and intact) vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95; Photo 12.96). Other finds included grinding stones and stone vessels, as well as 59 stone loomweights, mostly concentrated around a wooden beam that apparently represented a loom in the middle of this space (Photos 12.96–12.97; Fig. 12.35). To the north of this beam was a poorly preserved installation (5481) composed of a low, curving parapet of clay; to its north were short pieces of wood and numerous fragments of an oven or a low-fired clay vat; none of these elements could be reconstructed due to the fierce destruction. Built against the southern wall of this space (5437) was a grinding stone installation (5456), like that found in Room 6435 (6406) (Photos 12.96, 12.98), although this one was a semi-circle attached to the wall, while the latter was a complete oval (described below). This installation was composed of a low round-topped clay parapet, 0.9 m at its widest diameter, in which a large lower grinding stone was set on an east– west axis; it was not found tilted, as it was in Installation 6406. Two complete upper grinding stones were found nearby. A unique find in this room, located 1.5 m north of the entranceway in Wall 5437, was a pottery model shrine (Chapter 35, No. 36), resting directly on the floor, its opening facing north. Its upper part was broken off, found overturned just to the southeast of the lower part, with a Hippo jar (Fig. 13.92:3) lying smashed on top of it; another storage jar (Fig. 13.89:9) was found to its east (Photo 12.96). The top of the model shrine was adorned with a unique scene of figures in relief, showing what appears to be a lion(?) grasping two human heads in its claws. Inside the box was light gray ashy material that contained an animal jaw bone and a tooth. A jug containing grain (Fig. 13.93:5) was found in this room as well. Some grain was also found spilled on the floor near the abovementioned storage jars. Grain from the jug was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R35); the average calibrated dates were 922–850 BCE (1σ) and 970–838 BCE (2σ).

Room 5499 — Strata C-1a and C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.27, 12.29, 12.35–12.36
A 0.8 m-wide entranceway in the western end of Wall 5437 led into the southern room (internal measurements 2.2×3.3 m; 7.26 sq m). This room did not undergo any architectural change between Strata C-1b and C-1a and it had been in continuous use, with frequent floor clearings. The walls, preserved to a height of 1.3 m above the floor, were covered with fine hard mud plaster that continued down to constitute the original floor makeup (5499), which was covered by a layer of smooth red earth, just as in the northern room. The floor plaster was laid just above a layer of charred wooden beams which were, in fact, a continuation of those in the foundations of the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.37; Photos 12.99–12.100). Under the level of the plaster floor, the courses of the walls contained bricks with two vertical protrusions near the ends, exactly like the bricks that were found in the western wing of this building in its Stratum C-1b phase (see below), as well as in the unit north of Building CD and in Building CE, both attributed to Stratum C-1b. The wooden beams and this type of brick support the conclusion that the original construction of this room was in Stratum C-1b.

The room was filled with almost 1.0 m of very burnt destruction debris; the top layer (5426) was virtually sterile and contained extremely hard brick material and fallen bricks, as well as ceiling material, while the remainder of the debris (5461) was extremely burnt and rich in finds, including 46 intact and smashed vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95), 19 of them storage jars, which were mostly stacked against the eastern wall. One of these jars was found full of a powdery white substance, most likely an organic material that had burnt, while another contained grain. Additional finds included grinding stones and other worked stones, a large clay ‘footbath’ (Fig. 13.96a:11), and 15 loomweights, concentrated in the entranceway (5500) (Table 12.15). In the southeastern corner of the room was a concentration of extremely burnt pinkish brick that had pulverized. This appears to have been some installation that was too damaged by the fire to define.

The Western Wing

Introduction

In both Strata C-1b and C-1a, the western wing of the building (Squares Y–Z/4–6) was composed of a long rectangular space. In Stratum C-1b, there was a small niche or cell on the north and the rest was one long hall, while in Stratum C-1a, the hall was divided into four consecutive rooms, including the small niche/cell on the north, and three small rooms to its south (Photos 12.92, 12.101).

This wing was bordered on three sides by double walls that remained the same in both strata: on the west by Walls 4422 and 2454, on the south by Walls 4413 and 4479, and on the east by Walls 5414 and 5454. In Stratum C-1b, the northern border of this wing was a single wall (6533), while in Stratum C-1a, it was composed of a double wall: Wall 6409 was built alongside Wall 6410, the southern wall of Building CR.

The Western Wing in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.27
Stratigraphic evidence for the use of the western and southern external walls (2454, 4479) in Stratum C-1b came from adjoining units (Buildings CE and CM), where floors and walls belonging to this phase abutted them. All the internal walls in this wing were constructed in Stratum C-1b and continued to be used in Stratum C-1a, based on the following evidence:
  1. Walls 4413 and 4422 (Squares Y–Z/4) had wooden beams incorporated in their foundations; this was a consistent characteristic typical of all Stratum C-1b construction in Area C, but was almost never found in walls that were first built in Stratum C-1a.

  2. The bricks in the lower courses of the northern face of Wall 4413 and eastern face of Wall 4422 (southern end) had two vertical protrusions, or marginal bosses, on each end, which was a characteristic found in other walls clearly dated to Stratum C-1b in the adjacent Building CE and in the unit north of Building CD (see above).

  3. The wooden beams incorporated in the foundation of Wall 4479, seen in its southern face in Square Z/4 and clearly related to Stratum C-1b, were probably, based on their levels, the continuation of the beams in the foundation of Wall 4413, which ran adjacent to it on the north and served as the inner southern wall of the western wing.

  4. The floors abutted the lowest course of these walls.

In Stratum C-1b, the long rectangular hall of the western wing was accessed directly from the western end of the broad space (6466). At the northern end of the hall was a small chamber, bordered on the north, west and south by Walls 6533, 6534 and 6535. On the east was a short wall (7422) whose top was flush with the floating level of the former walls, so that it seems to have served as a threshold. Inside this small room was a layer of brick chunks, charcoal and rubble (7409), similar to that found in the hall to the south, but on a level 0.6 m higher. This would have required a step down to the hall, although this was not identified in the excavation, since the C-1a wall here was not dismantled. Underneath the floating level of the walls was a layer of soft debris (7417) that abutted Wall 7422, but was only excavated to a depth of 0.1 m and could not be defined; perhaps it was a fill laid to level the C-2 remains below.

The length of the hall was 8.6–8.8 m (due to the angle of the southern wall, 4413) and its width, 2.7 m. Its interior was revealed only in probes under the floors and benches of Stratum C-1a (Figs. 12.59– 12.61; Photos 12.102–12.105). The lowest layer was 0.4 m-thick, composed of soft, smooth, burnt black material (5488, 5487, 5475, from north to south), which abutted the lowest course of the walls, on the level of the wooden beams in their foundations, as revealed in those spots where we removed the benches of the later phase. This black layer apparently represents the floor; directly below it were the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CU. Finds from this black layer included red-slipped and hand-burnished pottery, mostly sherds, but several complete or almost-complete vessels as well (Figs. 13.46–13.47), along with loomweights, beads, stoppers, grinding stones, bone objects and some grain (Table 12.14). This layer was covered by a 0.4 m-thick layer of burnt rubble (5478, 5479, 5463, from north to south), composed of hard burnt chunks of reddish brick, gray ash, bits of charcoal and large segments of collapsed ceiling material, some of which lay flat (Photos 12.102–12.105). This rubble abutted the surrounding walls in each room and was covered by a thin layer of whitish material (phytolith?), on which the Stratum C-1a floors, walls and benches were laid.

The Western Wing in Stratum C-1a

Introduction

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
Following the destruction of the C-1b building, traces of which were noticeable mainly in the western wing, the long narrow hall was divided into four consecutive rooms by the addition of three cross walls that were built on top of wider foundations, which also served as narrow benches along the walls and continued eastwards to serve as brick thresholds in each entrance (Photos 12.92, 12.101). Two of the walls (5464, 5497) had a shallow niche cut into their southern face. Access to each of the rooms was only from the adjoining room, so that in order to enter the southernmost room, one had to pass through the three rooms to its north. From north to south, the dividing walls of these three rooms were: 5464, 5431 and 5497. They were 1.6 m long and 0.5 m wide each, and terminated 1.0 m west of Wall 5414, so that the entrances were aligned on a north–south axis, located in the northeastern corner of each room.

Along the north–south walls were lines of bricks, most of them 0.35 m wide, while others were narrower (0.3 m) or wider (0.45 m). All were preserved 0.25–0.35 m high (two courses); their height above the abutting floors ranged from 0.1– 0.25 m, while in the northern room they were flush with the floor. These were understood as benches, and they joined with those found under the three east–west cross walls. The bottom level of the benches was ca. 0.65 m above that of the outer walls of the building to which they were attached, and they were clearly built on top of the rubble and collapse layer ascribed to Stratum C-1b, described above (Figs. 12.59–12.61). This rubble also abutted the very bottom of the benches, suggesting that they were slightly sunk into that debris when constructed. The north–south benches lining the eastern and western walls of this wing run on one continuous line. This was particularly noticeable on the east, where the bench ran contiguously along the western face of Wall 5414. The benches were all composed of identical bricks that had been burnt to an almost stone-like consistency and to a pinkish color.

The Stratum C-1a floors in each room were composed of white lime and abutted the upper course of the benches. On these floors was a thick layer of burnt destruction debris with many finds. Following is a description of the rooms from north to south (6435, 5460, 5445, 5444)

Room 6435

This was a small room (internal measurements 1.5×3.1 m; 4.65 sq m) built above the small chamber/nich, 7409, of Stratum C-1b. On the north, west and south, the tops of the C-1b walls (6533, 6534, 6535) were visible in the floor makeup of the new room. Although they lined the walls, they were different from the other benches in this wing, as they did not rise above the floor level, and they continued down to be abutted by the C-1b rubble rather than built above it.

The room was entered from the broad space to the east. The beaten-earth floor (6435, level 86.85 m) was 0.35 m higher than Floor 6427 to the east, which would have necessitated some kind of small step to join them. A large grinding stone installation (6406) occupied its southeastern part. On the floor was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401) that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an exceptionally large amount considering the small space (Figs. 13.80–13.96; Photos 12.106–12.107). Just below topsoil were fragments of an elaborate horned pottery altar with mold-made female figures (Photo 12.108; Chapter 35, No. 5). The impression was that the numerous finds here were in storage and not found as used, since they were densely packed in this small area, around the grinding stone installation (6406) that took up part of the room as well (Photos 12.106–12.107, 12.109–12.110).

Installation 6406 was comprised of a finely made oval, round-topped clay parapet, 0.4 m high, enclosing a large lower grinding stone, on top of which was a complete upper grinding stone lying on its eastern end. The large lower grinding stone was somewhat raised above the floor of the installation and tilted down from west to east, so as to facilitate the gathering of the grain into a small depression between the western end of the lower grinding stone and the parapet. Curiously, the installation, built against the eastern end of Wall 5464, was situated so that its eastern end partially blocked the entrance to the room to the south. It is either possible that this was a later addition to the room or that, despite its position, it was not considered as an obstacle. This installation was similar to the one found in Room 5498 of the eastern wing of Building CF, as well as in Building CQ1 and possibly, Buildings CQ2, CP and CE; one was found in Area G as well (Chapter 20). The clay parapets of these grinding stone installations enabled flour to be easily collected and to prevent grain from being scattered. It seems that the grinder would have worked from the higher (western) side of the installation, so as to use gravity when pushing the upper grinding stone (as in Photo 12.110), although this was quite a cramped space to crouch in.

Room 5460

The second room from the north, built above C-1b burnt debris 5478 (Figs. 12.59–12.60), was the largest (internal measurements 2.4×2.7 m; 6.48 sq m). Destruction debris (5425 on the east and 5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and the benches (Photo 12.111). The northern wall (5464) was built on top of a wider wall (5474) that protruded on its southern face, creating a kind of narrow bench; a shallow niche created in Wall 5464 widened this bench to 0.3 m. Abutting the western wall (4422) was a line of bricks that cornered with 5474 and created a bench (5472). A similar situation existed on the east, where Bench 5473 abutted Wall 5414; this bench continued south into the other rooms as well and cornered on the north with 5474. No bench lined the southern wall.

Among the many finds was a Hippo storage jar with an inscription reading לשקינמש, Isqymns (Fig. 13.91:2; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 303–304; Ahituv and Mazar 2014: 44–45; Chapter 29A, No. 6). It was found in Locus 5425, along with another 40 vessels, several of them intact (Figs. 13.80–13.87, 13.89, 13.91–13.93, 13.95–13.96); most were concentrated in the southeastern part of the room, near the entrance leading south to Room 5445 (Photo 12.111). Among them was a unique shovel (Fig. 13.96:1; Chapter 35, No. 49).

Room 5445

The middle room, built above C-1b burnt debris 5479, was the smallest (internal measurements 1.2×2.7 m; 3.24 sq. m). Its northern wall (5431) was built on top of a slightly wider wall/ bench (5484), so that only 0.2 m of the latter protruded into the room on the south, but not at all on the north. On the west, Bench 5485 cornered with 5484. On the east, the situation was somewhat ambivalent: it seems that 5473, the eastern bench of Room 5460 to the north, continued to the south into Room 5445 as well. However, an additional row of bricks, identical to Bench 5473, adjoined it on the west. Above this western row of bricks was a line composed of large chunks of burnt bricks. This feature (5458), 0.3 m wide and 1.5 m long, stood two courses high and blocked the entrance into this room, as well as the entrance into the southernmost room (Photo 12.111). However, although it appears to have been built as a blockage, it is possible to understand it as the collapse of bricks from one of the walls that happened to land on this line inside the room.

Room 5445 was filled with burnt destruction debris (5421, 5467) that covered and abutted the benches and rested on Floor 5445; however, as opposed to the other rooms in this building, it was virtually empty, with only a small amount of sherds, mostly concentrated on the eastern bench (Figs. 13.81–13.82). Among the sherds was a fragment of a Greek bowl (Fig. 13.96:9; Chapter 28A).

Room 5444

This room, built above C-1b burnt debris 5463 (Fig. 12.60) was the southernmost and innermost room in the western wing (internal measurements 1.8×2.7 m; 4.86 sq m) (Photos 12.112–12.113). Its northern wall (5497) was built on top of a wider wall that served as a narrow bench on the south (5471); a niche cut out of the southern face of the wall exposed 0.5 m of this bench, although on the eastern and western ends, where there was no niche, only 0.1 m of it protruded. This arrangement was almost identical to that in the northern end of the northernmost room. This small room was found full of extremely burnt destruction debris (4414) on the white lime floor with some ash (5444), including many fallen bricks that had been fired almost to the consistency of pottery. Thirteen vessels from this room were restored (Figs. 13.80– 13.81, 13.83–13.84, 13.86, 13.90–13.96). Several of these were found on (or partly on) the benches, including a Hippo storage jar on the eastern bench (Fig. 13.91:4), another storage jar (Fig. 13.90:9) on the eastern end of the northern bench, just where the entrance was, and a very large krater (Fig. 13.92:7) on the southern bench. A unique find was a large, heavy clay box with a matching lid (Fig. 13.96a:10) in the northwestern corner of the room (Photo 12.112). This box, very distorted by fire, ca. 0.55 m wide, 0.65 m long and 0.45 m high, was set on a protrusion in the corner of Benches 5469 and 5471, composed of bricks identical to those of the benches, apparently deliberately built to accommodate the box (Photo 12.113). The lid of the box was found overturned just to its east, above a bowl (Fig. 13.80:6) and an intact juglet (Fig. 13.95:11) was found just below the box’s southwestern corner; the only finds inside the box was a small fragment of a very worn female figurine (Chapter 34, No. 13).

The location of this room in the deep interior of the western wing of Building CF, which was surrounded on three sides by double walls and accessed only through the other rooms of the western wing, as well as the unique pottery box and ceramic assemblage, indicated that it had some special function, perhaps some sort of a treasury.

Summary of Building CF

The architecture and contents of Building CF are unique in many ways. Although the grinding installations, oven and many loomweights found in this building in Stratum C-1a are typical of household activity, the plan of this building, the double walls, and the unique finds make it exceptional.

The net floor space is not exceptional and should be regarded as modest compared to other Iron Age II houses (Table 12.13; Schloen 2001: 165–183; Mazar 2008; see summary below), although it was larger than most other buildings excavated at Tel Rehov. Based on the width of the walls, we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris. Although one may surmise that the large northeastern space (5498) in Stratum C-1a was an open courtyard, this does not seem feasible, in spite of the fact that an oven was located at the northern end of this space. Air and light could be obtained through the main entrance on the north and windows in the southern wall of the building, since all other walls bordered neighboring buildings.

The most outstanding feature in this building was the row of small rooms in the western wing in Stratum C-1a, with benches along the walls. The consecutive arrangement of four rooms entered successively by way of the previous room, lined with benches along most of the walls, is virtually unparalleled in the Iron Age architecture in Israel (see further below). The small size of these rooms and the fact that the two inner ones could not get direct light or air except from the room to the north, emphasize their unique function. The inscribed jar with the inscription — לשקינמש, lšqynmš — found in the largest of these rooms, and the massive pottery box with the lid found in the southern room, allude to a special function of this wing. We can suggest that these were the offices of an important personality, perhaps a merchant or a clan leader, and that the box served as a ‘treasury’ of some kind. The unique model shrine, decorated altar facade, and so-called ‘footbath’ (the function of which remains enigmatic), as well as the presence of two elaborate grinding stone installations, a loom, and other rich finds from this building, are evidence of this special function.

The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. The integration of Building CF with the buildings surrounding it during both strata is typical of the architectural and occupational nature of the Iron Age IIA at Tel Rehov. One possible reason for such dense and crowded construction may be related to efforts to stabilize the structures in light of the seismic sensitivity in this region. This may also be related to local architectural traditions that continued during all of Iron IIA, perhaps with earlier origins, and were special markers of the inhabitants’ cultural identity.

An interesting parallel to the plan of this building can be seen at Megiddo in Stratum VA– IVB Building 2081 (Loud 1948: 44–46, plan: Fig. 388, reconstructed plan: Fig. 100). This building comprised a large courtyard (2081). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a cult corner containing two stone horned altars, two pottery stands and additional objects (Zevit 2001: 220– 225). From the courtyard, an entrance led into a unit that resembled Building CF, with a rectangular hall containing an inner chamber. From the front part of the hall, an entrance led into a narrow side chamber, which, in turn, led into two additional rooms arranged in a similar manner as those in Building CF, with entrances located at the end of the walls. It may be suggested that a room at the southwestern corner of this building was also part of this chain of rooms, since the walls were preserved lower than the floor and the location of entrances could not be determined with any certainty in this place. The size of this building fits that of Building CF. It differed in having an additional western wing, the long hall 2163. However, no entrance connecting the eastern to the western wing was found and thus, it is difficult to say whether it belonged to the same building. Another exceptional feature was the two pillar bases at the front part of the main hall. These have no parallels in Building CF, unless we consider the large stone found near Wall 6455 in Stratum C-1b and a second large stone found nearby in Stratum C-1a as pillar bases found out of their original position. It should be noted that the rooms of the eastern wing of Building 2081 at Megiddo were not numbered and no finds were published from them. However, the cult corner in Courtyard 2081 included pottery similar to that from Tel Rehov Strata IV–V (C-1a–b). It may be suggested that these two buildings might have had similar functions, perhaps serving as dwellings of elite families who incorporated commercial activities in their household and had their own cult corners and paraphernalia (see Chapter 4; Fig. 4.12).

Building CW

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.114 - C-1a Buildings CW, CQ1, CQ2 (west half excavated) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.115 - Debris on Floor 8430 in C-1a Building CW Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.116 - C-1a Building CW, looking west, Rooms 6411 and 6438 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.117 - C-1a Building CW, looking south; destruction debris and vessels in Room 6411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.118 - C-1a Building CW, Room 6411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.119 - C-1a Skeleton in Square C/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
  • Sections: Figs. 12.55–12.56
  • Photos 12.114–12.119
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.48:15–20; C-1a — Figs. 13.97–13.102
Introduction

Building CW (Squares A–C/6) was constructed above Stratum C-2 Building CY (Photo 12.114) and to a large extent, is a rebuild of the latter, retaining much of its layout. Like Building CY, it was only partly excavated and continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation area. Two phases were defined in this building, attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a, yet in the second phase (C-1a), changes occurred mainly in the courtyard and the eastern part of the building, while the two rooms in the west remained unchanged; thus, they appear in the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a. Since the differentiation between the two phases was not emphatic, both are described together.

The building adjoined the entrance corridor and northern space of Building CF on the west and the northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 on the south (Photos 12.92, 12.114). Its outer width from east to west was 10.4 m and its known length was 5.8 m, although it extended to the north beyond the limits of the excavation area. Unlike most other Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this appears to have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least on one side. See also Building CY in Stratum C-2 and Building CZ in Stratum C-1b for a similar concept. The southern border of the building was Wall 6444, which ran parallel and adjacent to the northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (6407), forming a double wall, 1.1 m wide. Wall 6444 contained wooden beams typical of Stratum C-1b in its foundation; these were round, ca. 0.05–0.07 m in diameter, closely spaced, and placed perpendicular to the wall’s foundation (Photos 12.59–12.61). The western wall 6408 continued to the south where it was the western wall of Building CQ1. It is thus clear that Building CW was built together with Building CQ1, and probably with CQ2 as well. The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b (8491) was replaced in C-1a by Wall 8424.

Courtyard 7501 (C-1b) and 7471 (C-1a)

In Stratum C-1b, the spacious courtyard was 6.0 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Its western border was Wall 6420 and its northern continuation, Wall 6476. The border on the east was Wall 8491; a segment of an additional wall (8476) was attached to its western face for 2.5 m; north of this, in its stead, was a north–south row of rather large (ca. 0.3×0.4 m each) roughly rectangular stones (8499), three of which were placed together and a fourth slightly to the north, running into the northern balk (Photo 12.63). These stones adjoined Wall 8491 and thus could not have served as pillar bases; they recall the stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and elsewhere and perhaps served as solid bases for jars or other objects. In Stratum C-1a, Wall 8476 and the stones were removed, and substantial changes were made in the eastern part of the courtyard (see below).

Only a single floor was found in the courtyard (7471, level 86.29 m) (Photo 12.114), laid on a 0.4 m-thick fill of soft brown earth (7501, 8462) that covered the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CY (Fig. 12.55). This fill layer is shown in the plan of Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.35), as we assume that it was laid at that time, in preparation for the laying of the floor; it is possible that an earlier floor of C-1b was removed when Floor 7471 was laid, leaving only the fill. The floor (shown on the plan of Stratum C-1a; Figs. 12.36, 12.38) was composed of soft reddish-brown earth, its central and southeastern parts burnt black, with some light gray ashy patches and flecks of charcoal throughout. The floor dipped down in the northwest, visible in the northern section of Square B/6 (Fig. 12.55); in this shallow depression was a complete Hippo jar (Fig. 13.99:7). It was not clear whether this depression was intentional (a pit?) or whether it represented a postdepositional phenomenon. A concentration of black ash found to the west of this dip, against Wall 6476, contained two cooking pots (Fig. 13.98:1, 3) and a loomweight. Along the western end of the courtyard was a strip of small stones (7479) set closely together, although rather haphazardly, with a lower layer of stones in its central part. The stones ran parallel to Wall 6420 (Photo 12.114) and may have been a remnant of a poorly preserved stone pavement. The stones ended in the north close to the abovementioned dip in the floor; they recall those found in the northwestern part of Building CX, described below.

The main change in the courtyard, attributed to the transition from C-1b to C-1a, took place in its eastern part and included the replacement of Wall 8491 with Wall 8424 and the addition of an installation that covered Wall 8476 and Stones 8499. Wall 8424 was poorly preserved and it is not clear if it was cut on its northern end or whether there had been an entrance there.

The installation included Wall 8426, an east– west wall, preserved along 2.2 m and 0.15 m high, that extended from the center of Wall 8424 and served as a divider between two spaces that were open to the west (Photo 12.115). The floors of these spaces (8423, 8430 in the north, 8420 in the south) were covered with plaster that lipped up to the faces of the wall in a manner that created shallow channels, which were burnt on their western ends. The northern end of the northern space contained a concentration of stones, east of which were three jugs and one juglet (Fig. 13.101:2–3, 6, 12). On its western end, Wall 8426 joined a shallow north– south channel that terminated on the north near a large lower grinding stone embedded in the floor, and on the south at the center of the southern space. Two stone mortars, one particularly large and the other smaller, flanked the northern end of the channel on the west and east, respectively. The function of these elements remained unclear; it is possible that some substance was drained from the plastered floors into the shallow channel on their west, and that the grinding stone and mortars were used in conjunction with this activity.

A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401), revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire courtyard area, comprising hard burnt brick debris with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash. Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97– 13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig. 13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table 12.16).

Room 6411

This room was bordered by Walls 6408 on the west, 6429 on the north and 6420 on the east (internal measurements 2.1×3.0 m; 6.3 sq. m). An entranceway in the southern end of Wall 6420 led to the room from the courtyard. The only floor found in this room (6411) was made of pink plaster laid above a layer of earth and brick debris (6451) that appears to have been a fill above Building CY, similar to the situation in the courtyard to the east.

Brick benches (6457, 6458 and 6496) were constructed along the western, eastern and southern walls of the room respectively. The benches were 0.35 m wide and 0.35 m high, recalling those in Building CF, although in this case, they were built against the walls and not under them. Placed on top of each end of the western and eastern benches (6457, 6458) were flat-topped stones, perhaps serving as solid supports for jars or other objects (Photo 12.116). In the southwestern corner of the room was an L-shaped brick that formed a niche in which an intact juglet (Fig. 13.101:11) was placed. The room was full of heavily burnt destruction debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris, including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs, juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig. 13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in the debris above the benches that lined the walls (Photo 12.117). A concentration of ten clay loomweights was found on the western end of this bench (Photo 12.118). Other finds in this room included three scale weights and a bronze scale pan, as well as a seal and iron tools (Table 12.16).

Room 6438

This room, located in the northwestern part of the building, was bordered by Walls 6429 on the south, 6497 on the west and 6476 on the east. The internal width was 2.5 m and it was at least 1.4 m long, as its northern border was beyond the limit of the excavation area, with an entrance probably in its northeastern corner. Although the eastern and western walls continued the lines of those of Room 6411 to the south, they were not one and the same, as they abutted the northern face of Wall 6429, but did not bond with it. It is possible that this room had been accessed from the courtyard on the east at a spot further to the north, beyond the limits of the excavation. Just as in Room 6411, a layer of debris that might have been a fill (6462) was found above the C-2 remains and was covered by the floor and benches in this room, so it is assumed that it, like the room to its south, had only one phase of use.

Benches (6480, 6481) lined the western and eastern walls (but not the southern wall), continuing the line of the benches in Room 6411 to the south. Here too, stones were found on top of their southern and northern ends (Photo 12.116). The room was full of burnt destruction debris; eight vessels rested on Floor 6438 at level 86.50 m.

Area East of Building CW

A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city

Buildings CQ1 and CQ2

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.57 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.120 - Wall 7413 of C-1a Building CQ2 tilted southward towards the street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.121 - C-1a Building CQ1; destruction debris in western rooms from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.122 - C-1a Building CQ1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.123 - Wall 7413 of C-1a Building CQ2 tilted southward from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.124 - C-1a Building CQ1; destruction debris in Room 7490 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.125 - Tilted Wall in C-1a Building CQ2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.126 - Destruction debris in Room 7500 of C-1a Building CQ1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
  • Section: Fig. 12.57
  • Photos 12.120–12.126
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.103–13.119
Introduction

To the south of Building CW and the east of Building CF were two virtually twin buildings, termed CQ1 and CQ2, adjoined by a double wall (Squares A–C/4–5). Both buildings were enclosed on the north by Wall 6407, which was attached to Wall 6444 of Building CW, together creating a double wall, 1.1 m wide (Photo 12.120). On the west, Building CQ1 adjoined Building CF with a double wall, although in Stratum C-1a, with the removal of the inner wall of the northeastern part of Building CF, a double wall was left only in the south and the two buildings shared a wall in the north. Thus, it can be seen how Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 were not only related to each other, but were also a part of the northeastern insula, all the units of which must have been built together according to an integrated plan. On the south, the buildings were closed by a single wall and fronted by a street. The eastern border of Building CQ2 was also a single wall; although unexcavated, it is possible that a north–south street ran here and continued to the north alongside Building CW.

Both buildings were small and comprised three rooms each: a rectangular room on the south and two small rooms on the north, one larger than the other. Yet another building with the same plan was found to the south of Building CQ1, termed Building CQ3. The entrance to Building CQ1 was in its southeastern corner (opposite the entrance of Building CQ3), but curiously, no entrance into CQ2 could be identified. While Building CQ1 was built on a north–south axis, its eastern side ran on a slightly northwest–southeast line, which dictated the orientation of the adjoining Building CQ2; in fact, the eastern wall of the latter building was even more skewed, lending it a trapezoidal shape.

Similar to Building CW to the immediate north Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 had one main phase, with burnt destruction debris under topsoil down to the floors and only ephemeral indications of an earlier occupation in Stratum C-1b. Both buildings were built above remains attributed to Stratum C-2 in Squares A–B/4–5. The most likely explanation is that the buildings were constructed in Stratum C-1b and continued to be in use until the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. The wood in the foundations of the walls points to this option, as this was a typical C-1b feature. Thus, the buildings appear on the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.

A narrow area to the south of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as Building CF to their west (Photos 12.120, 12.122), appears to have been an east–west street, some 1.4 m wide, that ran between the block of Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the north and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south, merging into Piazza 2417 on the west in Stratum C-1a.

The buildings are described below as found in Stratum C-1a, noting the very minor remains of the sporadically detected earlier (C-1b) phase.

Building CQ1

Plans, Sections, and Photos

Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
Introduction

The external measurements of Building CQ1 were 5.2–5.5×6.4 m (floor space, ca. 19 sq m). It included one large room (6483) that spanned the width of the building and two smaller rooms (6436, 7447) to its north. The southern wall was Wall 6445, which continued the line of Wall 5455, the southern inner wall of Building CF. On the west, the building was closed by Wall 6408, which continued to the north, where it was the western wall of Building CW and abutted the eastern wall of Building CF on the south (Photos 12.121–12.122). The eastern wall (7416) created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast.

Room 6483

The southern and largest space of the building was apparently a roofed room, measuring internally 2.8×4.3 m (floor space, 12.04 sq m). The entrance into this room, and, in fact, into the building itself, was in its southeastern corner. The entrance was 1.2 m wide and had a brick threshold at 86.12 m; it opened to the street that ran along the southern façade of the building, although the excavated level of the street surface was higher by ca. 0.7 m than the threshold. This would have required few steps or a ladder to access the building from the street, whether into Room 6483 or to a second story.

The floor was composed of two parts: on the west was a stone floor (6472) that ran up to the line of the entranceway in Wall 6446, containing closely laid basalt stones and limestones, as well as some broken upper grinding stones and mortars. Underneath the stone pavement were two large stones that apparently served to buttress it. Such a stone floor was rare at Tel Rehov in Iron IIA and was found only in Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and perhaps CJ in Stratum C-1a.

The stone floor was abutted on the east by a smooth reddish clay floor (7450 in the east, 6483 in the west); patches of this matrix were also found between the stones, so that it apparently had covered them as well. In the central-eastern part of Floor 6483 was a round, flat-topped stone that appears to have been a pillar base; it was encircled by several small stones that included two loomweights, one of stone and one of clay. Between this pillar base and Wall 7454 on the north was a patch of hard plaster.

The floor was covered with a layer of extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris (6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo 12.121). In the northwestern part of the room, near the southern face of Wall 6446, was a grinding stone installation (6453), like those found in Buildings CF and CE; it was not very well preserved (Photo 12.122). The lower grinding stone of the installation was installed on a brick base, which raised it to ca. 0.4 m above the floor; underneath the stone was an antler. This room contained 26 vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects (Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights.

The reddish clay matrix of Floor 6483 rested on a 0.15 m-deep layer of red, gray and white striations (also numbered 6483) that abutted the lowest courses of the surrounding walls, which contained wooden beams in their foundations. These striations penetrated below the stone floor in the western half of the room and they may have belonged to the initial use of this room in Stratum C-1b.

Room 6436

The small northwestern room (6436; measuring internally 1.9×2.35 m, 4.46 sq m) was bordered on the east by Wall 6422 and on the south by Wall 6446; in the eastern end of the latter wall was a narrow entrance, 0.5 m wide. The floor was made of smooth reddish clay (level 86.00 m), identical to that of the large room to the south. The wood in the foundations of the surrounding walls protruded somewhat into the room below the floor, embedded in a matrix of reddish clay (6477) that was similar to the floor makeup itself. This sub-floor material with wood was laid on top of Wall 6501 and Locus 6502, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.12). A wooden beam was found in the entranceway itself, possibly a threshold. On the floor was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17).

Room 7447

The northeastern room (7447; measuring internally 1.3×2.0 m, 2.6 sq m) was separated from the room to its west by Wall 6422. This small narrow room was entered from the larger southern room by way of an opening, 0.8–0.9 m wide, in its southern wall (7454); this opening had a brick threshold that was, in fact, the continuation of Wall 7454, on the level of the floor. A row of bricks (7448) ran along the northern wall of this room just on the floor level and might have been a bench. Like in the room to the west, the wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6422 protruded into the sub-floor makeup of reddish clay. The reddish clay floor was identical to that of the other rooms and was covered by very burnt complete fallen bricks and ceiling material (7426); on it were six pottery vessels and other objects (Table 12.17)

Building CQ2

Plans, Sections, and Photos

Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
Introduction

Adjoining Building CQ1 on the east was an almost identical, slightly larger unit, termed Building CQ2 (Photos 12.120, 12.123) (external measurements 5.6–6.0×6.3 m; floor space, ca. 21 sq m). As noted above, the southern part of the western wall was slightly skewed, and the entire eastern wall (8405) was even more so, and thus, the building was somewhat trapezoidal (Photo 12.123).

The problem of the entrance to this building remains unresolved. If we duplicate the plan of Building CQ1, the entrance should have been close to the eastern end of Wall 8434 and thus, exactly opposite the entrance into C-1a Building CX to the south. However, the wall here stood up to 1.0 m above the floor level inside the building and did not show any signs of a gap or a blockage. Note the suggestion that the street level to the south of Building CQ2, which was ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor inside the building, might have served to directly access an upper floor.

Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an extremely large amount for such a small building, even when taking into account the existence of a second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in Chapter 45.

Room 7500

The southern and largest room of this building (7500) spanned its entire width. Due to the angle of the eastern wall (8405), it was trapezoidal (internal measurements 2.6×4.5–4.9 m; 12.2 sq m). The floor of this room was identical to that of Room 6483 in Building CQ1: a stone pavement (7503) on the west and soft reddish clay on the east (7500), on line with the entrance into Room 7490. The pavement was nicely laid, with small stones filling the gaps between the flat-topped stones, which incorporated several broken and complete upper grinding stones. A large lower grinding stone was found in the southwestern part of the room, some 0.3 m above the stone floor. It is possible that this had belonged to a grinding stone installation similar to those found in Building CQ1, CF and CE, as chunks of hard clay found scattered nearby might have been part of its surrounding parapet. Attached to the center of the southern wall was a bin (7508), 0.8 m wide and 1.5 m long, with narrow clay walls that also ran partially along the southern wall. A stone mortar was found on the northeastern end of this bin with an upper grinding stone inside it.

Underneath the reddish clay floor in the southeastern corner of this room was a rather large smooth pink mizi limestone resting on a layer of red and gray striations (8445), similar to those in Building CQ1; a juglet (Fig. 13.118:11) was found in this layer. This stone was very similar to that found in the Stratum C-1b phase of Building CF, described above. Like in Room 6483 in Building CQ1, this layer ran to the west under the stone floor and it is possible that it represented the Stratum C-1b occupation. The foundations of both the southern and eastern walls of Building CQ2 were not reached and it is possible that an earlier phase is yet to be exposed.

Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos 12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of fine small closed vessels. Several other objects were found as well (Table 12.18). An interesting find was a concentration of some 20 small polished black and gray wadi pebbles found on the floor, as well as inside an intact juglet (Fig. 13.118:17). These were weighed in order to ascertain if they had significance as weights, but it seems that this was not their main function, as they did not yield any known value (pers. comm., Raz Kletter).

Room 7490

The northwestern room (internal measurements 2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m), was slightly wider than its counterpart in Building CQ1. On the east, it was closed by Wall 7406 and on the south by Wall 7459, in which a 0.75 m-wide entrance was located on its eastern end. Wooden beams were incorporated in the foundations of the walls in this room (Photo 12.125) and the entrance had a fine brick threshold with a plank of wood found in situ. An exceptional recess was located in the outer eastern side of the entrance in Wall 8411, a detail somewhat similar to the rounded recesses in two of the entrances in Building CP (11440, 11446), described below. Two brick courses were missing from this wall in its center (Photo 12.126); this appears to have been a kind of window or niche between this room and the one to its south.

The reddish clay floor (7490) in this room was exactly the same as the floors in Building CQ1. The top of Stratum C-2 Wall 7492 (Photo 12.125) protruded into the floor, running along the northern wall of the room, 0.2 m above the floor, and might have been used as a bench.

This room was filled with burnt destruction debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds (Table 12.18). A complete baking tray (Fig. 13.112:1), made of non-cooking pot fabric, a rare item in the Iron Age IIA pottery assemblage of Tel Rehov, was one of the finds in this room.

Room 8431

The northeastern room was the smallest; its trapezoid shape was due to the angle of the eastern wall (8405) (internal measurements 1.2–1.4×2.1; ca. 3.0 sq m). A row of bricks (8412) ran along the southern face of Wall 6407 in the northern part of this room, continuing the line of 7492 from the adjacent room, but standing much higher, almost on the level of the tops of the surrounding walls. Since excavation did not proceed below the floor, it is not known whether this was the upper part of an earlier wall, like Wall 7492. The entrance to the room on the southeast, 0.7–0.8 m wide, contained a curious feature composed of four narrow bricks that formed a square, enclosing a small area of softer debris (8446). To the south of the southern brick was an upper grinding stone, parallel to the threshold; it is difficult to say whether it was deliberately placed there or was fallen. The presence of this bin-like element just where one would step into the room through the threshold is enigmatic. It is possible that it was a Stratum C-1b element that slightly protruded into the floor here, or that it was somehow related to the function of the room.

Room 8431 was full of burnt destruction debris and fallen bricks, yielding seven vessels and several other objects (Table 12.18).

Summary of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2

Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to the south, see below) are exceptional among the Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small overall size and the even smaller size of the inner rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms. It may be assumed that these houses had a second story, thus their functional space could have been double, although no evidence for steps was found and access must have been from the outside of the building. This possibility may explain the lack of an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the lower storey of this building was entered by a wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact, there was such an entrance in Building CQ1, despite the higher street level to its south. Notably, the buildings contained very large amounts of pottery, as well as a range of other finds, that might point to them having been dwellings. On the other hand, they lacked cooking facilities, such as ovens, although cooking pots and one baking tray were found.

These buildings can be compared to small houses found in Area C at Hazor, dating to the 13th–11th centuries BCE (Yadin et al. 1960: 98, Pl. 208), in Tell Abu Hawam Stratum IV (Hamilton 1935: Plate IV), Aphek Stratum X11 (Gadot and Yadin 2009: 90––93, Figs. 6.2, 6.4), and perhaps also Building 442 in Stratum VIA at Tel Batash, although it was not fully uncovered and appears to have been larger (Mazar 1997: 76–79; list cited from Gadot and Yadin 2009: 93, with Egyptian parallels as well). However, all these examples are much earlier (13th–11th centuries BCE), while no similar houses are known in Iron Age II Israel.

Building CG

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.76 - Section 22 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.92 - Buildings CF, CW, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.127 - C-1 Building CG and C-2 Buildings CA and CB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.128 - Tilted and Deformed Walls in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.129 - Tilted and Collapsed Walls in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.130 - Wood Beam Foundations in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.131 - Destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Room 2441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.132 - Destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Room 2441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.133 - Collapse of Wall 2439 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.134 - Foundation trench of C-1 Wall 1416 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.135 - Brick collapse from C-1b Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18–12.19, 12.39–12.40
  • Sections: Figs. 12.68–12.69, 12.73, 12.76–12.77
  • Photos: 12.92, 12.127–12.135;
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.52–13.55
Introduction

Building CG (Squares T–Y/2–4) was a narrow rectangular structure, measuring externally 3.4×8.9 m, with massive walls wider than those of other buildings (recalling the double walls of back-to-back units) (Photos 12.5, 12.8, 12.127). Both the external and the internal walls were 0.9 m wide, composed of two rows of bricks, one laid widthwise and one lengthwise, a building technique found so far almost exclusively in this building. The walls were composed of hard-packed light and dark gray bricks and were exposed just under topsoil.

The building contained three small square rooms that had no entrances and were apparently accessed from above. The floor space of each room was 2.5–2.7 sq m. It is possible that this building had a second story. Although the amount of debris and fallen bricks found here did not seem to justify this, we must take into account that much of this material was eroded and disappeared from this high point of the lower mound.

The only discernible change in this building between Strata C-1b and C-1a took place in its southernmost room, while only one phase was detected in the other two rooms. The buildings adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the southeast, and the open area south of Building CD on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to the east and west of Building CG became open spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to the west).

The two outer walls on the west and east (1416, 2411) ran parallel to each other on an almost straight north–south line, while the northern (2453) and southern (2439) walls of the building were slightly skewed, running on a southwest–northeast line; on the north, this was the same angle as that of Building CE, which adjoined it. The sharp angles of the short walls (especially in the northern part of the structure) give the plan a slightly irregular shape.

The building was constructed on top of the ruins of Building CB of Stratum C-2: the western wall (1416) was built over Wall 2505, 0.3 m to its east (Figs. 12.16, 12.68–12.69, Photos 12.31– 12.34) and the southern wall (2439) was built over the southern part of the entrance in Wall 2505 (Photo 12.32). Room 2444 covered Wall 2481 of C2 (Photo 12.38). All the walls were preserved ca. ten courses high and had wooden beams in their foundations (Photos 12.128–12.133). The massive construction of the interior and exterior walls was apparently related to the surmised function as a granary or storage building.

Building CG — Stratum C-1b

Room 2460

The northernmost room (internal measurements 1.5–1.6×1.6 m; ca. 2.56 sq m) contained fallen ceiling material and hard vitrified brick debris (2449), some of it burnt to a powdery lime, to a total depth of 1.2 m above the assumed floor at level 86.40 m. Although excavation proceeded past the foundation level of the walls, no clear floor matrix was detected and the assumed floor (2460) was determined only on the basis of the location of the finds and the floating level of the walls (Fig. 12.76). Unlike the other rooms in this building, no charred wood was found here below the floor level.

This small room contained 22 vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), many of them very burnt. Twenty-eight stone loomweights were found, concentrated mainly in the southwestern corner of the room. No grain was found in this room, although a large amount was found in the other two rooms. The small size of this chamber and the lack of an entrance indicated that this large collection of varied pottery vessels and objects was apparently stored here, perhaps close to the time of destruction. As we assume that all three chambers in this building served as a granary, the use of this chamber for storage appears to be secondary, at a time when no grain was stored here.

Room 2444

The middle room of the building (2444) measured almost exactly the same as Room 2460 to its north (internal measurements 1.5×1.6 m; 2.4 sq m). Its southern wall (2429) had a 0.7 m wide gap in its five upper courses (not shown on the plan; Photo 12.127), although its southern face and bottom courses clearly showed that this was a solid wall. This gap appears to have been intentional, perhaps used as a storage niche or it was an elevated opening, similar to those in the square granary rooms at Tel Hadar (Kochavi 1999: 181, Fig. 2).

A light-colored clay layer which appears to have been the floor (2444, 86.60 m) was defined as such mainly based on its position at the foundation of the walls, the wooden beams underneath it, and the destruction debris (2425) resting on it, including a large amount of grain. Just below the floor level, a round wooden beam was incorporated in the foundation of Wall 1416, running 1.3 m from the northwestern corner of the room to the south, where it branched out to protrude into the room for 0.25 m. Round wooden beams (average diameter 0.10–0.15 m) were also placed in the foundation of Wall 2411 on the east (Fig. 12.77). However, as opposed to the beam in Wall 1416, these were laid perpendicular to the wall and protruded into the room up to 1.5 m, just below the floor level; they included tree trunks and branches, as well as some worked beams (Fig. 12.41; Photo 12.130). As noted above, these same wooden beams were visible in the eastern face of Wall 2411. It thus can be seen that the wood was laid in preparation for the construction of the walls and floors and constituted a well-planned system. Under the charred wood that extended from the foundation of Wall 2411 into the room was a single course of bricks (2478) running north–south, serving as a kind of support, above which a shallow fill was laid. These bricks appeared to have been intentionally removed from C-2 Wall 2481, which ran under the northern end of this room, and served as a sub-floor constructional element (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38).

The room was full of fallen ceiling material and extremely burnt debris, including ashes and complete fallen bricks, burnt to white and yellow vitrification and to a powdery consistency (2425), which were found especially in the southwestern part of the room, at a total depth of 1.0 m. At 86.80–86.90 m, a large concentration of charred grain (about 2.0 kg) was found in the southwestern corner and against the northern face of Wall 2429. The only other finds in this room were fragments of a bowl (Fig. 13.52:10) and sherds of a large Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.55:18), indicating that its main function might have been grain storage, used as a kind of a ‘chamber-bin’. The grains were identified as wheat (Chapter 53) and were subjected to a series of 14C dating. One measurement from Locus 2444 (Sample R30) provided the dates 928–858 BCE (1σ) and 970–846 BCE (2σ); a second date appears to be too high. Samples R31–R34 from Locus 2425 were measured with 21 repetitions in four laboratories; the average calibrated date was 898–844 BCE (1σ) and 906–837 BCE (2σ) (see data and discussion in Chapter 48).

Room 2441

The southern room is reconstructed as having been identical to the two complete northern rooms. With the reconstructed southeastern corner, Room 2441 measured internally ca. 1.6×1.7 m (2.7 sq m), very similar to the room to its north. However, most of the eastern and southern walls of this room had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72; Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall 2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a door jamb of an opening leading to the room from Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain.

Both the floor and the walls of this room were constructed above a 1.3 m-deep layer of fill and wood which apparently was laid as a leveler and stabilizer on top of the C-2 remains below (Photos 12.128–12.129). This deep wooden construction was composed of four to five layers of alternating lengthwise and widthwise wooden beams (2470, 2471, 4421; Fig. 12.42a–c; Photos 12.131–12.133). The upper layer of wood, with nicely worked rounded beams, some reaching over 1.0 m long, was mostly laid on a north–south axis (2470; Photo 12.143). The two lowest layers of this wood (2471, 4421) were mostly laid on an east–west axis (Photo 12.133). Notably, most of the lower level of this sub-floor wooden construction was horizontal, as opposed to the higher levels of the wood, which sloped down towards the east, having collapsed with the southeastern corner of the room. Although the lower layers of wood under the floor penetrated down deeper than the wood in the foundations of Walls 1416 and 2439, and were found on the level of the entranceway in C-2 Wall 2505 (Photos 12.32–12.33, 12.128–12.129), they should be attributed to the construction of Building CG in Stratum C-1b. The reasons for this are:

  1. The entrance in C-2 Wall 2505 was intentionally filled in and leveled off with a wooden beam when C-1b Wall 1416 was built; this beam was on the same level as the uppermost wood in Locus 2470.

  2. The wooden beams would have obstructed passageway through this entrance and thus, they could not have been used in C-2.

  3. The wooden construction was concentrated between the line just to the east of Wall 1416 and the eastern face of Wall 2411, indicating that all these elements were built at the same time.

  4. The lowest wooden construction was on the same level as the foundation of Wall 2429, seen on its southern face (85.80 m), and Wall 2411, seen on its southern end (85.90 m).

  5. The construction of Wall 1416 cut the eastern end of Stratum C-2 Wall 1483, with a clearly visible foundation trench (Photo 12.134). Thus, the wood in the foundation of Wall 1416 postdated the Stratum C-2 walls, including 2505.
In the severely burnt destruction debris of fallen bricks and wood in Room 2441 were 57 restorable vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), as well as other finds (Table 12.19), and a concentration of burnt grain. All the finds were concentrated within the area enclosed by the surmised lines of the collapsed walls and did not continue to the east or south. This further supports the idea that this originally had been a closed room like the two others in this building. The destruction debris rested on a layer of powdery white lime that apparently had been the floor; this floor was found to be horizontal on the west (86.30 m), but fallen towards the east, underneath the brick collapse described above (Photo 12.131). The lowest level to which this white floor was traced was 85.05 m (2471), just in the area where the assumed southeastern corner of the room is reconstructed. Most of the restorable pottery vessels were found in the collapse down to the east, so that their levels were below that of the horizontal section of the white floor in the west, but they were clearly related to this floor.

The collapse of the southeastern corner of Room 2441 created a huge pile of fallen bricks, 3.0 m high (Photos 12.131–12.133), that collapsed on the floor of the northwestern corner of the apiary, which was ca. 1.3 m lower than the foundation of the walls. The discrepancy between the foundation levels of the walls of Room 2441 and the bottom of the collapse might indicate the existence of a basement or some other hollow space below this room, perhaps enclosed on the west by Wall 2505, reused from Stratum C-2. The layers of charred wood found here may have been related to the construction of such a basement, as in Building CH (see below), and it might have been open towards the apiary on the east and south.

It was difficult to securely determine whether this collapse occurred as a result of human activity (war, unintentional burning, etc.) or was caused by a severe earthquake. The latter possibility seems more likely, based on paleomagnetic testing (Chapter 54). This destruction by fire and collapse is attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b. Five 14C dates measured on the grain found in the collapse layer (Chapter 48, Sample R26) provided the following calibrated average dates: 926–898 BCE (1σ) and 970–850 BCE (2σ). These early dates fit the destruction of Stratum C-1b, as confirmed also by dates from the apiary to the east

Building CG — Stratum C-1a

Since the two northern rooms of Building CG did not suffer the same severe collapse as Room 2441, the possibility exists that they continued to be in use during Stratum C-1a (Fig. 12.50). An indication for this is the fact that Piazza 2417 on the east and Piazza CK on the west, both of Stratum C-1a, abutted this building. The floors of the courtyards were at levels 87.55–87.75 m, 1.2–1.4 m higher than the original floors inside these two chambers. There are two possibilities to explain this stratigraphic situation. The first is that the floors of Stratum C-1b continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a and the rooms were approached from above, as in the previous occupation level. In that case, the destruction debris in Rooms 2460 and 2444, with its pottery and the charred grain that was measured for 14C dates, would be explained as belonging to the last use of the rooms in Stratum C-1a. The other possibility is that a new floor was constructed in Stratum C-1a above this destruction debris, which would then be attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b in these two rooms. Such a floor, which was not preserved, would have been at a level higher than 87.70 m (the preserved top of the walls) and might have disappeared due to erosion. We thus leave this question open, although it is of crucial importance for dating, due to the large number of 14C dates from the central room (Loci 2425, 2444) mentioned above. It should be noted that the loci numbers of floors and destruction layers appear only in the plan of Stratum C-1b, thus accepting the second possibility; the first possibility would require presenting these numbers in the plan of Stratum C-1a as well. However, since a final verdict is impossible, the loci in these two rooms are tentatively defined as belonging to Stratum C-1b, although we are aware of the alternative.

Evidence for partial rebuild of the southern room (2441) in Stratum C-1a can possibly be seen in the two upper courses of Wall 2441 close to its southern end; while the entire wall suffered from severe slippage of the bricks, these two upper course were not burnt and were laid horizontally above the burnt and tilted courses below (Photos 12.127, 12.131–12.132, 12.159, 12.160). This raises the possibility that these two courses represent a rebuild of the wall in Stratum C-1a. It should, however, be emphasized that there are no other stratigraphic indications for such a phase in this room, such as a higher floor, although such a floor could have existed close to topsoil and had been eroded away, as possible in the two northern rooms.

In the area east of Building CG, and above the collapse from this building that sealed the apiary, a leveling fill (5430, 4408; Squares Y/1–2) was laid in preparation for the construction of Building CL in Stratum C-1a; Wall 4443 of that building had a foundation trench that cut this fill (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.135, 12.144). This stratigraphic evidence to the east of Building CG, but clearly related to it, supports our conclusion that the building was founded in Stratum C-1b, destroyed at the end of this stratum, along with Building CH and the apiary, and reused (partially?) in Stratum C-1a.

Building CM — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.75 - Section 21 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.78 - Section 24 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.136 - Stratigraphic section through walls in C-2 and C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.137 - Row of chalices along eastern face of Wall 2411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.138 - Row of chalices along eastern face of Wall 2411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.139 - C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.140 - Cracked Cooking Jar on the floor in C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.141 - C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39–12.40;
  • Sections: Figs. 12.75, 12.78–12.79
  • Photos 12.136–12.142
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.49–13.51
Introduction

Building CM (Squares Y–Z/3) was a unit to the south of Building CF and to the east of Building CG (Photo 12.127), built above the C-2 remains here. It adjoined the apiary on the north and, since the partition wall between them was quite flimsy, it is possible that Building CM was related to the apiary in some functional way, despite the difference in floor levels: 86.20 m in the northern and central part of Building CM and 84.55–84.60 m in the northern part of the apiary. It seems that Wall 9453 of Building CZ (exposed only along its eastern face in Squares A/2–3) was the eastern border of Building CM. The floor inside the western part of Building CZ (84.90 m) was lower by 0.35 m than that in the eastern part of Building CM (85.20 m) and 1.35 m lower than that identified in the western part of Building CM (86.20 m), and it is possible that there was a terraced effect here, following a natural downslope from west to east.

The external measurements of Building CM were ca. 7.8 m×9.0 m, depending on the western and eastern boundaries, which were not entirely clear. It included a small room (4446) in its northwestern corner, a larger space to its south (4445) and possibly an open space (5441, 5442) in its east. Access to the building was most likely from the western end of the street that we assume ran in Squares Z, A–C/4 to the northeast of the building.

Building CM ended in a fierce fire. It went out of use in Stratum C-1a and was covered by a courtyard (2417), whose floor was 1.35 m higher than the floors in this building. It is noteworthy that this was one of the few places where a clear distinction could be made between Strata C-2, C-1b and C-1a.

Room 4446

The northwestern room (4446) was poorly preserved (internal measurements 2.0×2.9 m, 5.8 sq m) (Photos 12.136–12.138). Its walls were composed of crumbly brownish-gray bricks with light gray mortar lines. The western wall of the room (4432) was built above Stratum C-2 Wall 4516 (Fig. 12.75), but continued further to the south, running a total of 4.0 m until it terminated rather abruptly just past its corner with Wall 4411. It ran parallel to the eastern face of Wall 2411 of Building CG, with a 0.2 m gap between them; the foundation heights of the two walls were identical, suggesting that they were constructed together. Yet, unlike Wall 2411, which was standing to a height of 1.5 m, due to its being in continuous use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, Wall 4432 was preserved only 0.25–0.35 m high, aside from a lone stump that was 0.65 m higher than the rest of the wall (Photo 12.136); this stump was located precisely in the balk between Squares Y/3 and Y/4. It is not clear why it was left standing so high, when the rest of the wall was razed.

Along the eastern face of Wall 2411 was a row of nine chalices (4424) (Fig. 13.49:9–17; Photo 12.138). Two (one intact) were found near the northern end of Wall 4432 (just north of the abovementioned stump), while six more were found running 2.0 m to the south. The chalices were revealed just at the level of the preserved top of Wall 4432, leading to the conclusion that they were placed there following the razing of this wall. Their position exactly in the gap between Walls 4432 and 2411, as well as the higher preservation of the stump, suggests that they might have been a deliberate deposit, perhaps related to some ritual following the destruction of Stratum C-1b.

The northern wall of the building (4479) created a double wall with Wall 4413 of Building CF. Wall 4479 was 8.7 m long, preserved to a height of 1.3 m, and was very burnt. The northwestern corner of Building CM was part of a massive construction, where the corners of four buildings (CE, CF, CG and CM) met. This dense corner in Square Y/4 was a meeting point between Walls 1473, 4479, 4432 and 2454; each of these walls had its own end or face and they abutted one another, indicating that although each belonged to separate buildings, all were built in consideration of each other. As in most other Stratum C-1b walls, wooden beams were incorporated in the foundations of Walls 4432 and 4479. While only a few pieces were noted in the northern end of Wall 4432, the wood in the foundation of Wall 4479 was dense and composed of small rounded beams laid perpendicular to the line of the wall at closely spaced intervals (Photos 12.136–12.137); see Wall 6444 in Building CW and Wall 1437 in Building CH for a similar configuration (Fig. 12.46; Photo 12.145). A unique feature of the wood in Wall 4479 was that it was laid above the lowest two brick courses, rather than at the very bottom of the wall. This somewhat recalls the situation with Wall 2411 in Building CG, where the wooden beams in its foundation were laid on bricks (2478), as described above.

The eastern wall of the room in Stratum C-1b was Wall 4433, which abutted Wall 4479. This wall was 0.8 m wide and was composed of a row of bricks laid lengthwise and one row widthwise, recalling the walls in Building CG. The wall was poorly preserved on both its southern end and its eastern face; it seems that it terminated just about at the line of the balk between Squares Y/3–4, and it is possible that its southern end originally had an entrance that led into the room. The southern closing wall of this room (4411) was very poorly preserved. The room contained several layers of debris (4417, 4430, 4446). While no clear floor was detected, its lowest layer (4446) was on the same level (86.19 m) as Floor 4445 to the south of Wall 4411. These loci, which lacked traces of destruction, might have been a fill that leveled off the area in preparation for the construction of Piazza 2417 in Stratum C-1a.

Space 5441/5442

In the area to the east of Room 4446 was a floor (5441, 5442) at level 86.25–86.30 m. In the north, Floor 5442 contained a concentration of crushed travertine in its center. In the south, Floor 5441 was made of soft pink plaster; a smooth flat-topped pink mizi limestone and a complete storage jar (Fig. 13.51:3) turned upside down were found on this floor. While the northern end of this floor was horizontal, it sloped down towards the south (Fig. 12.78); this slope may possibly be related to the lower southern end of the building, described below. As noted above, it is not known whether this space continued to the east up to Building CZ, as the area between them remained mostly unexcavated (Square Z/3). It might have been an open courtyard, although enclosing walls may be hidden in the unexcavated area in Squares Z/3–4.

Room 4445

To the south of Wall 4411 was a space (4445; Photos 12.127, 12.139–12.142) that ran 3.2 m to the south until Wall 8469, the flimsy narrow wall that bordered the apiary (Fig. 12.78). An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the result of the same seismic activity that caused the collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG, described above. The wooden beams laid in the foundation of Wall 2411 that were visible in the matrix of 4445, penetrated under the wall into Building CG to the west, as described above.

The northern and central part of Room 4445 contained very burnt brick debris (4441) on top of a beaten-earth floor (4445, level 86.20 m) (Photo 12.139). An oval-shaped installation built of hard dark gray clay (4448) was built on this floor, just against the southern face of Wall 4411; the gray clay of the installation continued along the southern face of Wall 4411, indicating their contemporaneity. The installation was ca. 0.7 m long, 0.4 m wide, preserved 0.28 m high; it contained a complete cooking jug (Fig. 13.50:4; Photos 12.139–12.140). Another installation related to Floor 4445 was a small bin made of reddish clay and lined with wood (4449) in the southwestern part of this area, built against the eastern face of Wall 2411 (Photo 12.139).

From the line of Installation 4449 until the southern end of the building, the floor was not clear and, in its stead, was a dense concentration of charred wood, 1.0 m wide (4456, 8443, 8447), abutting Wall 8469. Just north of this pile, and east of Installation 4449, was a large stone (Photos 12.139, 12.141–12.142). This strip of charred wood, composed mostly of tree trunks and branches, was set into a reddish layer (8471) (Fig. 12.78). The bottom of this reddish layer (85.30 m) was 0.9 m lower than the floor in the northern part of this room, suggesting that this area might have been dug out to accommodate the wood pile. This strip of charred wood might have been either part of a sub-floor construction or was related to the construction of Wall 8469, which enclosed the apiary to the south (see below). The goal of this wood was perhaps to support the gap created by the 1.6 m height difference between the floor of this space and that of the apiary to the south. Thus, the strip of wood, together with Wall 8469, may be explained as a kind of revetment for the lower terrace on which the apiary was constructed to the south. The eastern part of the wood concentration (8443, 8447) contained many fallen bricks, burnt debris and a thick layer of phytolith (Photo 12.142), inside of which was the lower part of a very large krater (Fig. 13.50:1) and several loomweights.

At the eastern end of Room 4445 was a short north–south line of bricks (8441) standing only two courses high; its northern end terminated in a complete brick, while its southern end appears to have been cut (Photo 12.142). Although these bricks were on line with the middle row of hives in the apiary to the south, no connection between them was found. This segment of bricks could have been a low partition or part of a wall that had been dismantled.

Probe in Square Z/3

To the east of Wall 8441, a probe in the eastern part of Square Z/3 revealed a layer of destruction debris, fallen bricks, wood and phytolith (11429) that rested on a reddish layer (11450) at 85.20 m and abutted Wall 8469 (very poorly preserved here; Photo 12.160), a sequence similar to that in the south of Room 4445. It seems that this was the continuation of the wood and reddish debris layer in the south of that room and might have been related to the eastern row of hives in the apiary, revealed to its south. Most probably, this matrix abutted the western face of Wall 9453 and its corner with Wall 8469, although the point of contact remained unexcavated.

Building CH — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.70 - Section 16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.72 - Section 18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.143 - C-1b Building CH from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.144 - Collapsed and Tilted Walls along a lineament from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.145 - Wood foundations from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.146 - Collapsed Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.147 - Collapsed Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.148 - Wooden Construction from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.149 - Wooden Construction from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • (Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Sections: Figs. 12.70, 12.72–12.74
  • Photos 12.3, 12.143–12.149;
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.56–13.59
Introduction

Building CH was comprised of two excavated rooms (2455, 2451) that adjoined Building CG on the south (Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20) (Photo 12.143); its southern part was beyond the limit of the excavation and to its east was the apiary. This structure apparently functioned as a service wing for the apiary, perhaps used for the processing of the products and/or for administrative work (Fig. 12.47). Its floors were ca. 1.75 m higher than those of the apiary itself, although both were contemporary and related. All the walls of this building were composed of light and dark gray bricks, incorporating sporadic yellow bricks. Along the eastern edge of the two rooms was a sub-floor construction of wooden beams laid in two to three layers that joined the rooms to the apiary floor below, described below.

The western wall (1438) of Building CH, which was also the eastern wall of Building CJ, was exposed along 7.5 m and continued to the south beyond the limit of the excavation. It was built on top of C-2 Wall 2468 (Photos 12.45, 12.143) and had wooden beams incorporated in its foundation, mostly in its northern part (Figs. 12.72–12.74). The northern wall (1437) was the continuation of the northern wall of Building CJ. It terminated on the east just on line with the southern wall (2439) of Building CG, which it abutted. To the east of this was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the southeastern corner of Building CG, as described above. Wall 1437 had many small round wooden beams in its foundation, set perpendicular to the wall in two layers, above the preserved top of C-3 Wall 4495 (Fig. 12.72; Photos 12.144–12.145).

The eastern part of Building CH collapsed down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the southeastern end of Building CG to the north. This collapsed eastern part of Building CH was superimposed by the western wing of Building CL of Stratum C-1a (Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146– 12.147, 12.149). Although none was found, it is possible that there had been an eastern closing wall to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood, that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden partition might have closed off this end of the room that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a higher level than the apiary floor below.

The two excavated rooms of Building CH were separated by Wall 2426, which extended 3.0 m to the east of Wall 1438, until it was cut by the foundation trench of Wall 2413, the western wall of Building CL (Photos 12.146–12.147, 12.149). No entrance between the two rooms was found; perhaps such a connection had been located further to the east, or each was accessed separately from the apiary by way of wooden ladders or brick steps. Wall 2426 was built on top of the northern face of C-2 Wall 2465 (Photo 12.148). It was horizontal on its western end, but 1.0 m from its corner with Wall 1438, it collapsed towards the east at an acute angle; the difference between the level and fallen parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a, as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b.

While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. However, Wall 1438, the western wall of the building, continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a as the eastern wall of Building CJ (described above).

The Wooden Construction

Below the destruction debris in the eastern part of the rooms was a unique construction of wood, two to three layers deep, 1.4 m wide, and running north to south along 10 m, the entire exposed length of the building, from the southern balk of Square Y/1 (where it continued to the south beyond the limit of the excavation) up to Wall 1437 and the subsidiary balk to its east in Square Y/2, where it intersected with the perpendicular beams in the foundation of Wall 1437 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.3, 12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148–12.149). The wood continued to the north under Wall 1437 and apparently ran under Wall 2439 (collapsed at this point) to join with the sub-floor wood in Room 2441 in Building CG, showing that the two buildings had been constructed at the same time.

The wood that ran along the eastern edge of Rooms 2451 and 2455 was obviously constructed before the floors were laid and before Wall 2426 was built. Just north of Wall 2426, the strip of wood cut C-2 Wall 2465. The eastern part of the wooden construction sloped down towards the east, particularly in the southern part (Square Y/1); the height of the top of the wood in the west was 86.25 m, while the height of its top in the east was 85.50 m, a 0.75 m difference over 1.4 m. The wood was comprised mostly of tree trunks and branches, all found charred and carbonized.

In the northern room (2455), the wood was laid in two layers, with a 0.2 m-deep reddish fill between them; the uppermost layer ran north–south and was composed of relatively large beams, while the layer below, less well defined, ran both north– south and east–west, creating a kind of a weave. There was a 1.0 m gap between this strip of wood and the wood in the foundation of Wall 1438 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.144, 12.148). No wood was found to the east of this strip and it was laid on top of layer of whitish material, possibly very burnt wood or bricks, located directly above the preserved tops of Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496. It is suggested that these walls served as a support for the wood (see further below).

In the southern room (2451), the wood construction consisted of three tiers whose eastern part was markedly stepped (Photo 12.149). Like in Room 2455, the wood was laid alternately north– south and east–west (Fig. 12.45) and did not join with the wood in Wall 1438, except for one beam that protruded from the wall in the northwestern corner of the room. Like in the northern room, underneath the wood was a white layer which was laid on top of a Stratum C-3 gray-brick wall (4480).

Two alternatives are suggested to explain this construction. The first is that this descent could have been wooden steps, wood that supported brick steps, or a sloping ramp, leading down to the apiary floor on the east. This suggestion is supported by the relatively orderly manner in which the tiers of wood were laid (Fig. 12.45; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148). The alternative explanation is that the wood, as found, was fallen, and that originally it had served as a roof and support beams of a hollow space below it, forming a basement in Building CH. Such a basement may have been bordered on the west by re-used C-3 Wall 4495 and perhaps by a wood construction built on that wall, while in the east, it could have been left open towards the apiary, with only a few wooden posts supporting the roof (see suggested reconstruction in Fig. 12.47c). The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have been partly built above this basement, which would explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74). The destruction of this structure and the bricks of Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created the slope of this layer as found. The height of this basement can be calculated by comparing the floor to the west (2451, 1515, levels 86.20–86.40 m) to the top level of the gray walls of Stratum C-3 (4480, 4495, 4496) that were found below the charred beams (85.14–84.85 m), since we surmise that these walls served as a support for this basement. This difference in levels (maximum 1.55 m) should also include the floor of the basement and the thickness of the wood construction that supported the floor above it, that later collapsed. Thus, the subfloor space itself could not have been more than ca. 1.0 m high. According to this reconstruction, this basement could have had two components: 1) underneath the northern room (2455), a narrow space located in the area above Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496 (Fig. 12.47a) and 2) underneath the southern room (2451), a narrow space that would have been open towards the apiary (Fig. 12.47b). Alternatively, it is possible that this entire area was one long space, possibly continuing to the north into Building CG, as suggested above (Fig. 12.47d). The roof of this alcove would have been the collapsed tiers of wood on the eastern end of the wooden construction in the south. The low ceiling of this basement would suggest that these spaces could have served for storage of commodities in containers. The postulated space below Room 2441 of Building CG (described above) might have been a continuation of the same phenomenon.

Room 2451

The southern room (2451) was at least 3.3 m from north to south, as its southern border was beyond the limits of the excavation (Photos 12.143, 12.149). Like the room to the north, the eastern end collapsed to the east and was covered by Stratum C-1a Building CL.

The floor of this room was identical to that of Room 2455, both in its composition of burnt powdery white lime and the reddish sub-floor material, as well as the strip of wooden beams on its eastern end. Here too, it is surmised that below the floor in this room there was a basement, as described above.

On the floor was a thick layer of destruction debris with fallen bricks, ceiling material, charcoal and ash, concentrated mainly in the west and south of the room. Fifteen vessels were found in this room (of which only a part was excavated), as well as other finds (Table 12.21).

The Apiary — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.44 - Plan of Building CH and apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.81 - Section 27 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.82 - Section 28 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.150 - General view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.151 - Another view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.152 - Another view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.153 - Tilted Wall 5453 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.154 - Collapsed western part of Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.155 - Collapsed bricks in western end of Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.156 - North-central and northwestern part of apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.157 - Tilted Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.158 - View of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.159 - Central and western part of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.160 - Northern end of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Sections: Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.87
  • Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.160; additional illustrations in Chapter 14A
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.60–13.67
Introduction

The area to the east of Building CH in Squares Y– Z, A/1–2, 20 was occupied by an apiary of industrial scope, which included three north–south rows of unfired clay hives, separated by elongated aisles. The stratigraphy and general spatial organization of the apiary will be described below, while the structure and makeup of the hives, as well as additional details and illustrations, are presented in Chapter 14A. Three scientific studies of the apiary are presented in Chapters 14B–14D, and discussions of the apiary’s operation, historical context, and ethnographic comparisons are presented in Chapter 14E.

The Borders of the Apiary

Due to the broad expanse of this space, as well as the very nature of the industry, which contained over a million bees, we assume that this had been an open area, although it is probable that each row of hives was roofed with thatch or other material, such as cloth or clay, to shield them from the intense heat in the summer or from the rains in the winter.

The apiary was bordered by Wall 9453 on the east, Building CH on the west, and Wall 8469 of Building CM on the north. It extended to the south beyond the limit of the excavation in Square Z/20 and thus, it measured 9.0–9.5 m from east to west and at least 13.0 m from north to south, an area of 117–123.5 sq m

The Eastern Side

The eastern wall of the apiary was Wall 9453, which was on line with Wall 6408 of the northeastern complex (Squares A/4–5; Fig. 12.18), demonstrating the integral city plan of Stratum C-1b. It was a well-built wall, preserved to five courses and very burnt, that ran for 16.4 m, serving as both the eastern wall of the apiary and the western wall of Building CP (early phase), while on its northern end (preserved to ten courses, not burnt), it was both the western wall of Building CZ and, most likely, the eastern wall of Building CM. Above it was C-1a Wall 9406, that served as the western wall of both Buildings CP and CQ3 (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 9453 was abutted on the west by the destruction debris and floor of the apiary (9451); a perpendicular wooden beam in its foundation extended into the floor. The southern end (in Square A/1; Fig. 12.39) contained a section with some irregular bricks, possibly an entrance leading to the lower phase of Building CP on the east (Photos 12.153, 12.234). Just at this point, it was abutted by a 2.0 m-long strip of narrow bricks fronted by a patch of small stones on the floor level that might have served as a step up to this entrance. The western face of the wall was covered with a hard brownish-yellow mud plaster, while its bricks were mostly brown and gray and of a very hard consistency, possibly due to the fire that engulfed this area

The Northern Side

Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition, perhaps constructed in conjunction with the deep strip of wood to its north (at the southern end of Building CM) described above, which both abutted the northern side of this wall and penetrated down to a level below its foundation (Fig. 12.78; Photos 12.142, 12.151, 12.154, 12.160). The wall was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). The highest level of its central segment was just about on line with the highest preserved top of the hives (Photos 12.151, 12.156–12.157). Between the floating level of this wall and the apiary floor was a 0.15 m thick layer of brown-earth fill that also filled a narrow channel that ran along the southern face of the wall (Photos 12.151, 12.156, 12.159). The eastern end of Wall 8469, north of the eastern row of hives, was so poorly preserved that only a narrow strip of pulverized pinkish material could be identified, although a few complete fallen bricks to the west and east of these hives might have belonged to it (Photo 12.157). As mentioned above, Wall 8469 was most likely not a free-standing element, but rather a kind of buttress attached to the wood construction to its north, both creating a single, quite massive construction that separated Building CM on the north from the apiary to the south. This might have been due to the difference in level of 1.3–1.5 m between these two units, with Wall 8469 and the wood construction serving as kind of terrace or retaining wall between them.

The Northwestern Corner

The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary.

The Western Side

Building CH bordered the apiary on the west, to the south of the aforementioned corner of Building CG. As described in detail above, its walls and floors were on a higher level than the apiary floor by some 1.7 m, built above a wooden construction that was founded on Stratum C-3 gray-brick walls (4480, 4495, 4496), creating a roofed area below Building CH, perhaps open towards the apiary on the east (Fig. 12.47c). The apiary floor ran up to the eastern faces of Walls 4480 and 4496 (Figs. 12.72–12.73; Photos 12.17, 12.158), and possibly to Wall 5483 on the south. A thin layer of eroded gray debris (4499) from these walls was found right on top of the floor (4469, 5440, 7481) in this southwestern section of the apiary (Figs. 12.86–12.87). It is surmised that when the builders of Building CH and the apiary dug down to this level, they encountered these earlier walls and reused them as a support for the wooden construction that bordered the building on the east and as the western edge of the apiary. In spite of the differences in the floor level of ca. 1.7 m, the apiary was most likely related to Building CH, which might have served as its service wing, as proposed above.

Thus, the apiary was surrounded (at least) on three sides by built units, and was established on a lower level than those structures on its west and north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining units were built more or less on the same level, judging by the floor levels.

Stratigraphy

As noted above, no remains of Stratum C-2 were identified in the probe made below the apiary floor (Figs. 12.80, 12.82), and, in fact, C-3 walls were found directly relating to this floor (Figs. 12.72– 12.73). The reason for the lack of C-2 remains was most likely related to the low level of the apiary; it appears that the builders dug down to this level to create this broad cavity for their industry, obliterating all traces of the previous phase, until they encountered remains of an even earlier occupation, C-3, which they utilized to some degree, as described in detail above and below. It should be noted that Stratum C-2 remains were revealed east of the apiary under Building CZ (in Squares A– C/2–3 (Figs. 12.7, 12.15). Wall 11471 of Stratum C-2 was cut in this place by Wall 9453, which served as the eastern boundary of the apiary. Thus, Stratum C-2 remains were found to the north, west and east of the apiary, but not within its confines.

The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to east, while the same level of destruction debris found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.150–12.151). Stratum C-1a Building CL was built directly above this ca. 1.0 m-deep layer of collapsed bricks and burnt destruction debris that covered the apiary (Photo 12.146) and thus, the attribution of the apiary to Stratum C-1b is secure.

The Apiary Floor

The level of the apiary floor ranged from 84.50– 84.70 m. It was composed of three different matrices (Photos 12.150–12.152, 12.158), all of which were covered by the same destruction debris and collapse (Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.81, 12.83– 12.87).

The first type of floor was made of dark red smooth clay, found in the space between Wall 9453 and the eastern row of hives (8482, 9451; 84.55– 84.60 m) (Photos 12.152–12.158). It had many black burnt patches, especially on its northern end. In the center of this part of the floor was a hive (8500) that appeared to have fallen from the eastern row.

The second type of floor was made of very hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick, found in the aisle between the eastern and middle rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle between the middle and western rows of hives (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). This floor was covered in part by a thin layer of soft reddish material, identical to the fill in other Stratum C-1b buildings in which the wood was set. It is notable that the hives were set ca. 0.15–0.3 m above this hard white floor and red layer, on top of a loose brown-earth fill that included many bones, some sherds and pieces of wood (Fig. 12.81; Photos 12.152, 12.156). This was the same material seen under the foundation of the northern wall (8469) and in a narrow channel running along its southern face (Photos 12.151, 12.159). The destruction debris in the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed bricks, rested directly on this floor. The very hard and thick matrix of this floor seems to have served a purpose related to the work in the hives, since it was concentrated mainly in that area. The reason for the fill between the floor and bottom of the hives must have been technical, related to drainage and ventilation; perhaps the large amount of bones in this fill served this purpose. In several places, particularly in the middle row of hives, we found evidence for charred beams that separated the hives from the floor, suggesting that in some places, the hives were located on a level raised by wood. Another interesting feature in the hard white floor between the middle and eastern rows (8436) was a sunken area adjoining the floating level of the three northernmost hives in the middle row and abutting the floating level of Wall 8469 to its north (Photos 12.156, 12.159). This sunken area measured 0.6×1.2 m and was 0.1 m deep; it was lined with the same hard white material as the floor showing that they were constructed together, and was filled with the same loose brown fill as the channel that ran alongside Wall 8469 and that was placed under the hives.

An enigmatic feature identified under the southern end of the middle row of hives (seen in the northern balk of Square Z/1) was a round area of eroded gray brick material, 0.5 m in diameter, which was cut into the hard white floor and penetrated into the upper pink layer of the Stratum C-3 accumulation under the apiary (Photo 12.20). It is possible that this was a pit, related in some way to the construction of the hives. This further supports the relationship between the hard white floor and the hives themselves.

The third floor type was a soft powdery matrix of vivid red color, found in the southwestern part of the apiary (Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.152, 12.158). It merged with the hard white floor just south of the western row of hives and west of the southern part of the middle row of hives (4469); it continued to the southwest (7481) to abut Walls 4495 and 4480, as well as to the southern part of the apiary in Squares Y–Z/20 (5440, 9455, 9458). In the probes excavated below the apiary floor in the area south of the three rows of hives (Squares Y–Z/1; Figs. 12.4, 12.82; Photos 12.19–12.20), it was seen that this red powdery layer continued to the east and south underneath the hard white tufa floor described above. It thus seems (as suggested above) that the tufa floor was laid above the soft red floor of Stratum C-3, possibly to provide a substantial, non-permeable surface for the hives and the related activity, while in the west, where there were no hives, there was no need for such a surface. The question remains whether the builders of the apiary reused the Stratum C-3 floor that they encountered (along with the gray-brick walls) when digging down to the level on which they intended to establish the apiary, or whether this was a new floor laid in Stratum C-1b when the apiary was built. Since there was no other floor below that abutted the C-3 gray walls, it seems that the former possibility is more viable. What is clear is that both types of floors — the hard white and the soft red — were used together for the duration of the operation of the apiary and were found covered with the same layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and pottery.

Pits in the Red Floor

To the west of the middle row of hives in Squares Y–Z/1–2 were a number of pits that were dug from this red floor, as most of them were lined with this same material (Photos 12.150– 12.152, 12.158–12.159). Very little pottery was recovered from these pits (Fig. 12.62:4–13), aside from 8496, which contained a large amount of redpainted pottery and a few red-slipped and handburnished sherds. It is difficult to phase these pits and, ultimately, it depends whether the red floor was a Stratum C-1b addition or was originally laid in Stratum C-3 and reused.

These pits included (from north to south):

  • 8497 in Square Z/2, 0.45 m long, 0.15 m deep, elliptic; it contained gray debris, no finds; adjoined the white floor on the north and the red floor on the south.
  • 8493 in Square Y/2, 0.45 m deep, composed of a slightly higher round pit on the west (0.9 m in diameter) and a smaller round pit on the east (0.5 m in diameter), separated by a thin wall of the same red matrix as the floor. The western pit was lined with this red clay, but the smaller eastern pit was lined with soft brownish clay and had a burnt black line in its walls and bottom; it contained a layer of soft gray earth and ash with a few worn sherds.
  • 8495 in Square Y/1, 0.35 m deep, 0.65 m in diameter, round. The western part was lined with same red material as the floor, while the slightly lower eastern part contained eroded gray debris with a few sherds and bones.
  • 9427 in Squares Y/1–2, 0.3 m deep, 2.5 m long, roughly oval, abutted the reddish floor and was lined with the same material; it contained a very large amount of bones and a few sherds.
  • 8496 in Square Y/1, 0.2 m deep, 2.7 m long, amorphic, abutted the reddish floor, but was not lined with this material; it contained soft gray earth, brick debris and chunks and a very large amount of bones and sherds, many of which were red-painted (Fig. 13.62). On the southern end of this pit was a small rounded sunken area of darker gray color. This pit ran just along the top of the eastern face of C-3b Wall 9429 (Fig.12.5).
No clear floor was found in the northwestern part of the apiary; instead, there was a layer of soft gray earth (8444, 8498) between the western row of hives the collapsed southeastern corner of Building CG. Fallen bricks and burnt debris from this corner rested directly on this layer which must have been contemporary with the red floor (4469, 7481) to its south, based on the levels. On line with the southern end of the western row of hives, the powdery red floor (4469) was traced.

For the description of the apiary itself, and its operation, see Chapter 14A.

Building CZ — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.48 - Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.161 - Southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.162 - C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.163 - C-1b Building CZ, southwestern room (11449) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.164 - C-1b Building CZ, looking south at Wall 11427 below C-1a Wall 10482 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.165 - C-1b Building CZ, southeastern part from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.166 - C-1a Wall 10464 sealing the fallen bricks and debris on Floor 1142 of C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.167 - Pillar bases of C-1a Building CX set directly on top of fallen bricks from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.168 - Layered Walls in C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39, 12.48
  • Sections: Figs. 12.89–12.92, 12.94–12.95
  • Photos 12.9, 12.161–12.168
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.51:17
Introduction

This building, only party excavated in Squares A– C/2–3, was composed of a central space flanked by two rooms on the western side and at least one room on the eastern side; it might be considered a variation of a courtyard house. Its borders on the north and east were beyond the limit of the excavation, yet it appears that it was bordered on the north by an unexcavated earlier phase of the Stratum C-1a street. In that case, it may be assumed that the building could not be much larger than the parts excavated. On the west, it was probably attached to Building CM, and its southwestern corner abutted the northeastern corner of the apiary. On the south, the neighboring building was the early phase of Building CP, with a double wall between the two (Photo 12.161). Its external measurements were at least ca. 7.5×12 m. In the southeastern corner of Building CZ was an opening leading south into Building CP (early phase) (Photos 12.165, 12.168).

The walls of Building CZ, built of gray and brown bricks, were well preserved in the western part, up to a height of up ten courses above the floors (Photo 12.163).

The Central Space

The central space of this building was bounded on the south by Wall 11421, on the southeast by Wall 10500, on the west by Wall 11407, and on the north probably by the continuation of Wall 11455, which is known only in the western part of the building. Since Wall 10500 cornered with Wall 10518 and did not continue to the north (Photos 12.161– 12.162, 12.164), a large L-shaped space was created, most likely an unroofed courtyard, which was 6.2 m from north to south, 3.6 m wide at its southern part, and at least 7.5 m from east to west in its northern part; it thus measured at least 41 sq. m.

Wall 11421 was first built in Stratum C-2 (see above) and was reused in Stratum C-1b, since the debris and floor (11422, 11442) related to this stratum abutted it above the debris attributed to Stratum C-2, some 0.5 m lower. The northern wall (11458) of the adjacent Building CP was built flush against Wall 11421; it was preserved three courses higher than Wall 11421 (Photos 12.165, 12.168) and, in fact, the layer of fallen bricks and debris that filled the courtyard abutted these top courses, as well as the top courses of Wall 11421. It seems that, at one point, the upper part of Wall 11421 had been removed in its center and eastern end, revealing the northern face of Wall 11458 and making it the southern border of this space.

The floor identified in the central part of the courtyard (11422, 11426, 11442) was composed of somewhat patchy red and gray striations that sloped down from east to west in the southern part near Wall 11421, but were horizontal in the northern part (north of the line of Wall 10518). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard, just east of the entrance into Room 11449 was a pit (11456) lined with very hard gray mud plaster; it contained only a few sherds. In the area to the north of Wall 10518 (the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a 0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris (11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds, many of them red slipped and hand burnished. There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and, in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of the courtyard (Photo 12.167).

Room 11404

In the southeastern part of this building was Room 11404 (internal measurements 2.1×3.25 m; 6.8 sq m) (Photos 12.162, 12.165). The room was bounded on the south by Wall 11421 and on the north and west by Walls 10500 (1.3 m long) and 10518 (2.4 m long), the latter revealed directly below the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX (Photos 12.176, 12.180–12.181). The eastern wall was not revealed, but it was most likely located close to the edge of the excavation, just below C-1a Wall 10490, continuing the line of the short segment of a wall (11479) revealed to the south in Square C/2, belonging to the early phase of Building CP (Fig. 12.39; Photos 12.165, 12.168).

This small room had three entrances. The western entrance, 0.8 m wide, led to the room from the southern part of the courtyard. The other two, also 0.8 m wide, were opposite each other on the eastern ends of Walls 10518 and 11421. The former led to the northeastern part of the L-shaped courtyard, while the latter led to Building CP (early phase) by way of an identical entrance in Wall 11458, the northern wall of that building (Photos 12.165, 12.168). The room with three openings is unparalleled in other buildings and may indicate some special function, possibly for transit between Buildings CZ and CP.

This room contained a large amount of fallen bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls

The Western Wing–Rooms 11449 and 11457

The western wing of this unit contained two square rooms of identical size: Room 11449 on the south and Room 11457 on the north, each with internal measurements of 2.4×2.4 m; 5.8 sq. m (Photos 12.161, 12.163). The western boundary of both rooms was the northern continuation of Wall 9453, which was the wall between the apiary and the early phase of Building CP. A distinct fill (0.08 m thick) separated this wall from the Stratum C-1a wall above it (9406) (Fig. 12.95; Photo 12.163). Wall 11412 separated the two rooms and Wall 11407 bordered both on the east; openings in both ends of this wall led to the courtyard on the east. Wall 11455 bordered the northern room on the north and Wall 11427 on the south; both were superimposed by Stratum C-1a Walls 10472 and 10482 of Building CQ3, respectively (Photo 12.164).

The floors in the two western rooms were made of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in the eastern part of the building. They were covered by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. After removal of the floor of Room 11449, the top of an earlier wall (11471) built of hard yellow bricks was uncovered at level 84.85 m and attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.14; Photo 12.163).

The floors of C-1a Building CQ3, located 1.45 m above those of Stratum C-1b, sealed the debris and the tops of the walls in these rooms (Photos 12.171, 12.173, 12.176). Notably, the floor level in these two rooms (84.85–84.90 m) was only 0.15– 0.2 m higher than the floor of the apiary that abutted the eastern face of Wall 9453, showing that this building was built on the same low level as the apiary, as opposed to the higher elevation of Buildings CM, CG and CH to its north and west.

It was deliberated whether Building CZ might be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. In favor of this assessment were the following arguments: 1.) the building’s walls were preserved to 11–12 courses, just like other Stratum C-2 structures to the north and west (e.g., Building CB); 2.) its levels and stratigraphic situation were similar to those of nearby Room 6515 and other remains in Squares A–B/4–5, which we attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.7, 12.12), although they were found right below C-1a Building CQ1, just as Building CZ was found just below C-1a Building CX; 3.) Building CZ was filled with fallen bricks and relatively empty of finds, like most C-2 structures. In contrast, the following arguments were in favor of the attribution of Building CZ to Stratum C-1b: 1.) it shared a wall (9453) with the apiary of Stratum C-1b; 2.) we assume that Building CX above it was founded in Stratum C-1a, since no traces of an earlier phase were identified in that building; 3.) while the walls of Stratum C-2 were composed of distinct hard yellow bricks, the walls of Building CZ were built of the typical gray and brown bricks found in Stratum C-1b; 4.) Wall 11471, found below the floor of the southeastern room of Building CZ (Fig. 12.15; Photo 12.163), was constructed of the C-2 brick type and apparently penetrated below Wall 9453 to its west.

This dilemna remains unsolved and both possibilities pose questions. If we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-2, we would need to understand Wall 9453, the eastern boundary of the apiary, as a reused C-2 wall, and this has no other support, particularly in light of the lack of C-2 elements in the area of the apiary. We would also have to assume that either Building CZ continued to be in use in Stratum C-1b with insignificant changes, or that Building CX (the building above Building CZ) was first erected in Stratum C-1b, which too, lacks evidence (although we suggested the same concerning Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 which, in our view, were in use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, based on elements such as wood in the foundations and subfloor striations that abutted the walls). The relatively small amount of pottery recovered from Building CZ is of types that exist in both Strata C-2 and C-1b, and thus does not help to decide the issue. Thus, we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence.

Building CQ3 — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.169 - General view of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.170 - General view of southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.171 - C-1a Building CQ3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.172 - C-1a Building CQ3; wooden beams below bricks in threshold of Wall 9406 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.173 - C-1a Building CQ3, southern part of Room 10460 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.174 - Smashed object on the floor of Room 10495 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.175 - Room 10495 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.176 - Looking south from Room 10495 to Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.177 - Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.178 - Smashed pottery and destruction debris against southern wall of Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.179 - Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50–12.51
  • Sections: Figs. 12.88, 12.94–12.95
  • Photos 12.169–12.179
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.130–13.135
Introduction

Building CQ3 (Squares A/2–3) was built above the western wing of Building CZ. It was bounded on the north by the street in Squares A–B/4, on the west by Piazza 2417, on the east by Building CX (with which it shared a wall) and on the south by Building CP (partly by a shared wall and partly by a double wall). It was designated Building CQ3 due to the similarity of its plan and dimensions to Buildings CQ1 and CQ2. The external measurements of this building were 5.6×7.2–7.4 m (including all walls) and its net floor space was ca. 23.5 sq m.

Like Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, CQ3 was composed of a single large room (10494) and two small back rooms (10452, 10460). As opposed to Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, there were two entranceways in this building; one in its northeastern corner and one in the middle of its western wall, both 1.2 m wide. The northern entrance (Photo 12.171) led to the street and was located directly opposite the entrance into Building CQ1. The western entranceway led to Piazza 2417; it was partially paved with bricks, in the foundation of which was a plank of wood with small round wooden beams set perpendicularly above it (Photo 12.172). This arrangement was unknown in any other entranceway and represents a rare use of wooden beams in Stratum C-1a.

The western wall of this building was Wall 9406 (Fig. 12.95; Photos 12.162–12.163), whose southern part served as the western wall of Building CP, indicating that the two buildings were constructed at the same time. The southern wall was composed of two abutting segments: 9415 on the west, which was shared with the northwestern room of Building CP, and 10482 on the east, which formed a double wall with the northern wall (10409) of Building CP at this point; this is the only double wall in the entire southeastern complex in Stratum C-1a. Wall 10482 had small round wooden beams in its foundation, similar to those in the western threshold of the building, and was built above C-1b Wall 11427 (Photo 12.164). Walls 10482 and 10409 abutted, but did not bond with, Wall 9448 on their west; this was a constructional feature and not the result of sub-phasing.

Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room 10460 and were flush with the floor level in Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could have been done at some point during the lifetime of the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such an opening was part of the original plan of both buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall 10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3 was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately left at a low level in order to allow for passage between the buildings; see also Wall 10464 (described below). According to A. Mazar, the low levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part) resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely damaged during the final destruction of this building or suffered from a late intrusion which could not be observed in the excavation. According to this explanation, there had been no passage between Buildings CP and CQ3.

Room 10494

The northern room’s inner measurements were 3.1×4.4 m; 13.6 sq m (Photo 12.170). As noted above, it had entrances on the north and on the west, as well as two entrances leading to the rooms on its south. The walls, preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). Almost all of the western part of this room was occupied by a unique installation (10505).

Installation 10505

The southern end of this installation was composed of a narrow parapet made of hard-packed brick material, 2.0 m long, 0.2 m wide and ca. 0.5 m high (Photos 12.170, 12.174–12.175). Its western end was built on top of a large stone and was attached to the door jamb of Wall 9406, so that it bordered the western entrance into the room on its north.

Attached to the southeastern end of the parapet was a large gray brick. The area left to the south of the parapet must have been used as a narrow passageway into the building from the western entrance, as well as into Room 10452 to the south. In the floor foundation to the southwest of the brick parapet was a patch composed of small stones and chunks of hard brick material (11424; 0.6×0.8 m), as well as fragments of a lower grinding stone and a basalt mortar in secondary use. The brick parapet was built on top of the northern end of these stones (Photos 12.175–12.176).

To the north of the brick parapet, and occupying the northwestern corner of the room, was a squarish (1.5×1.7 m) patch of gravelly earth and reddish brick material, found very burnt. This square was surrounded by brick material similar to that of the parapet on its south, while its center contained a paving of sherds and small travertine stones. On this paving was a storage jar, with its top half apparently deliberately removed (Fig. 13.133:5; Photo 12.174), containing a large amount of gray ash; a few scattered loomweights were found here as well.

The function of this installation remains enigmatic, but the fact that it occupied the western part of the room points to it having been a major feature of Building CQ3.

Room 10452

The southwestern room (10452; internal measurements 2.0×2.6 m; 5.2 sq m) (Photo 12.170) was accessed from the southwestern part of Room 10494 through a 1.2 m-wide entrance in Wall 10417, the northern wall of the room (Photos 12.176–12.177). The room was bordered on the west by Wall 9406, which was also the western wall of Building CP to the south, and on the south by Wall 9415, which was the northern wall of the western part of Building CP; this demonstrates the close relationship between the buildings in this sector. On the east was Wall 10407. All the walls were covered with a high-quality mud plaster (Photos 12.177–12.179), similar in makeup to that found on the walls of Building CP.

The floor (10452) was composed of red clay interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of) Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen bricks was found against the southern and eastern walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo 12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular plastered depression located along the center of the southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo 12.179).

Room 10460

The southeastern room (10460) was the smallest (internal measurements 1.8×2.6 m; 4.68 sq m). It was accessed from Room 10494 through a 1.0 m wide entrance (Photo 12.170). The room was bordered on the north by Wall 10483, on the west by Wall 10407, on the south by Wall 10482, and on the east by Wall 10464, which was also the western wall of Building CX. A curious feature of the eastern wall (10464) was its ‘stepped’ preservation. On the southern end, at its corner with Wall 10482, it was preserved only 0.15 m above the floor of Room 10460 along 1.5 m, while halfway through the room, the wall was preserved some 0.2 m higher, up to its corner with Wall 10483 (Photos 12.170, 12.173, 12.180); north of this, in Room 10494, the wall was preserved much higher. This low preservation of the southern end of the wall in Room 10460 was similar to that of the southern wall of this room (10482) and western end of Wall 10409 of the adjacent Building CP to the south, described above. As in that situation, here, too, it may be asked whether these walls were deliberately razed in order to allow passage from Room 10460 into the southern part of Building CX on the east, thus effectively joining these two buildings at one point during their lifetime. Alternatively, this low level might be the result of poor preservation, caused by the destruction of the buildings, which might have been particularly heavy in the southeastern corner of Building CQ3.

The floor was less well preserved than in the other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights that were concentrated mainly along the western wall and near the entrance.

Building CX — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.180 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.181 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.182 - Entrance into Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.183 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.184 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.185 - C-1a Building CX, vessels in destruction debris in center of Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.186 - C-1a Building CX, Locus 10431, vessels in burnt destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.187 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.188 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50–12.51
  • Sections: Figs. 12.88–12.92
  • Photos 12.170, 12.180–12.188
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.136–13.142
Building CX (Squares B–C/3) was bounded by the street on the north and by Buildings CQ3 on the west and CP on the south (external measurements 6.8×7.8 m; internal measurements 5.7×6.8 m; 35.5 sq m). Its western and southern walls were shared by the neighboring buildings, CQ3 and CP, respectively. The building comprised one large space (38 sq m), partially separated by a T-shaped bench or screen wall (10502) into a northern and a southern space on its west (Photos 12.170, 12.180–12.181). The northern and eastern walls (10515, 10490) were built of unique reddish-gray bricks with many light-colored inclusions and barely-visible brick lines. A 1.6 m-wide entrance in the northeastern corner led into this building from the street on the north. This entrance was bordered on the east by a finely plastered pilaster that separated it from the western face of Wall 10490 with a narrow gap filled with burnt material (Fig. 12.92; Photo 12.182). A curious feature in this entranceway was a dip in the floor level just in front of it (11413), so that the threshold, containing traces of burnt wood, was ca. 0.2 m lower than the rest of the floor in this building. The wood in the threshold recalls that in the western entranceway in Building CQ3.

Two means of roof support were identified in the large inner space of this building. One was a north–south row of five pillar bases, each made of an unworked flat stone, located in the northern half, 2.0 m east of the western wall and 3.4 m west of the eastern wall (Photos 12.180–12.181). The two northernmost bases bore traces of the burnt wood pillars on them. The other means of roof support was a unique square pilaster of gray bricks (10517), located to the southeast of the row of pillar bases and standing 1.3 m high (Photo 12.184). A large smooth stone was found southeast of this pilaster.

A T-shaped brick bench or screen wall (10502) was located along the northern two-thirds of the western wall (10464); it protruded 1.3 m into the center of the structure (Photo 12.181). Two vessels were placed in the southern niche formed by this ‘T’, a large barrel krater (Fig. 13.137:2) and a storage jar (Fig. 13.140:14) (Photo 12.185). Another bench (10491) ran along the eastern end of the southern wall (10409), built above the eastern end of C-1b Wall 11421 of Building CZ, separated by a 0.4 m-thick fill.

The floor of Building CX (10481, 10497 and 10507) was composed of reddish-brown clay interspersed with black burnt material and gray ash. In the area between the pillar bases and Bench 10502 was a strip of small travertine chunks that were incorporated into the floor (10477; Photos 12.180– 12.181). They were not suitable to serve as a pavement, since they were very loosely laid, and perhaps they played a role in some activity that took place here. They recall a similar strip of stones (7479) set in the floor of Courtyard 7471 in Building CW. Immediately below the floor level in the southeastern part of the building were the tops of C-1b Walls 10500 and 10518 of Building CZ (Figs. 12.89, 12.91; Photo 12.181).

Like the other units, Building CX was found full of very burnt destruction debris, with fallen bricks, charcoal pieces, ash, and large a amount of pottery, with 122 complete or almost-complete vessels, many of them in situ (Figs. 12.88, 13.136– 13.142; Photos 12.185–12.186). Just inside and west of the entrance, a cooking jug (Fig. 13.138:8) and part of a storage jar were found (Fig. 13.140:17; Photo 12.183). Concentrations of loomweights here, to the south of Installation 10509, and just west of the northern end of the row of pillar bases, found along with fragments of burnt wood beams (Photos 12.181, 12.187–12.188), indicate these had belonged to one, or possibly two looms. Altogether, 164 loomweights were found in this building, mostly in the northern part (Chapter 39).

Two grinding installations were located close to the entrance. One (10509), just to its west, was attached to the northern wall, comprising a large lower grinding stone slab fronted on the east by a small shallow plastered basin which was slightly lower and served as a receptacle for the grain as it was ground; it was surrounded by a flat-topped brick ‘rim’ (Photo 12.188). An additional lower grinding stone slab fragment was found below the upper one, apparently as a support, and a nicely worked rectangular smoothed pink mizi limestone, apparently in secondary use, was set under the eastern end of the large lower grinding, between it and the receptacle on the south. On the northern ‘rim’ of the plastered basin was a fine flint blade and a small upper grinding stone; two large upper grinding stones were found just to the west. To the east of Installation 10509, in front of the entranceway, was still another large lower grinding stone slab fragment, found overturned (Photo 12.188). The second installation (10519), less well preserved, was found just south of the entrance, close to the eastern wall. It comprised a similar round plastered receptacle with a brick bordering it on its west; a rounded lower grinding stone was set inside it and another such stone was found to the west of the brick.

A large concentration of grain was found inside a storage jar in the southern part of the building (10431). The grain was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R36). One of the two measurements provided the calibrated dates 978–848 BCE (1σ) and 996–838 BCE (2σ); the other was way too high and was defined as an outlier.

Notably, no ovens or other cooking installations were found in any of the buildings, CQ1, CQ2, CQ3 and CX, although such installations were found in the larger buildings, CF and CP.

Building CP — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52a - Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52b - Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52c - Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.169 - General view of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.170 - General view of southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.189 - C-1a Building CP, with sub-floor construction in Room 10476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.190 - C-1a Building CP on the floor level from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.191 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.192 - Wall 9406, dividing Building CL (mostly removed) and Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.193 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.194 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.195 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.196 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.197 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.198 - C-1a Building CP Room 10510 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.199 - Smashed objects in C-1a Building CP, Room 10510 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.200 - Rooms 11441 and 10510 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.201 - Destruction debris in Room 11441 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.202 - Rooms 11441 and 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.203 - Rooms 10476 and 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.204 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.205 - destruction debris with fallen grinding stone and loom weights in Room 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.206 - Room 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.207 - C-1a Building CP, looking north (before excavation of eastern wing) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.208 - Room 10458 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.209 - Room 10458 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.210 - Pottery altar in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.211 - Broken vessels in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.212 - Broken vessels in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.213 - Pottery in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.214 - Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.215 - Rooms 10476 and 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.216 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.217 - Broken Vessels on 1 side of wall and on a Bench on other side - in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.218 - Room 10476 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.219 - Fractured stones in sub floor construction of Room 10476 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.220 - Large mortar from Building CP, Room 10476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.221 - Destruction debris in Room 10476 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.222 - Bin 10488 and krater-pithos from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.223 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.224 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.225 - Room 9449 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.226 - Bin 9434 in Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.227 - Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.228 - Copious destruction debris in Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.229 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.230 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.231 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.232 - Bin 10501 restored Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.233 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.234 - Walls of Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50, 12.52a–c
  • Section: Fig. 12.93
  • Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.234
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.143–13.160
Introduction

Building CP in Stratum C-1a was a large structure with a unique plan, located in the southeastern corner of Area C in Squares A–C/20, 1–2 (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190). The remains attributed to Stratum C-1b, which were only partly excavated, were, in fact, an early phase of the building, with only minor differences in the walls discerned in the part of the earlier building that was exposed, as described above (Photo 12.189). Some of the walls (e.g., 11477/10457 in the south and 11479/10490 in the east) were, in fact, the same, with the upper courses of the previous building reused in Stratum C-1a, now covered with a thick fine mud plaster, and with new floors laid against them (Photos 12.193–12.194, 12.196). The eastern wall of the central rooms (10462, 10485) was new, built above a gap with fill laid above the earlier wall (11473) that served as a threshold in the entranceways in the new wall (Photos 12.191, 12.195). The western wall of the central rooms (9448, 10480) was also new, built above the earlier wall (with no gap or fill); here too, the earlier wall (11470) served as a threshold in the entrances in the C-1a wall (Photos 12.191, 12.196, 12.219). An additional difference was the nature and size of the bricks in the early building, which were larger and of an extremely hard consistency and gray-white color; these early walls were not plastered, while those in the C-1a phase were coated with a fine thick mud plaster.

In Stratum C-1a, Building CP adjoined Building CL on the east and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south, sharing walls with these buildings (Photos 12.169–12.170), indicating that all were built, and possibly functioned, together.

This building was excavated in its entirety (Squares A–C/20, 1–2). Its external measurements were 9.2–9.7×12.3 m (ca. 112 sq. m, including walls) and its internal floor space (including the benches along the walls) totaled 71.84 sq m. The walls stood to a height of 1.2 m (on the west) to 0.75 m (on the east) above the floors, and were exposed just below topsoil.

Building CP was unique in its plan and flow of internal circulation. Its plan consisted of eight rooms: two large rectangular central ones (10458, 10476) flanked by three small rooms on the east (10510, 11441, 11451) and three small rooms on the west (9449, 9450, 10506). The three eastern rooms had entrances in their northwestern corners that accessed the central rooms. Two of these (11441, 11451) also had entrances in their northeastern corners (on line with the western entrances), leading in from an assumed street or courtyard on the east; all these entrances were 1.3 m wide, except for the western one in the middle room, which was 1.1 m wide. Thus, each of the central rooms could be approached separately from outside the building, as well as from the inside. The three small rooms in the western wing were accessible from the two large central rooms: two of them (10506, 9450) were entered from the southern central room (10476), while the northern one (9449) was entered from the northern central room (10458). Rooms 9449 and 9450 were joined by an entrance, thus enabling circulation between the southern and the northern wings of the building via these two small rooms. On the other hand, the southwestern small room (10506) could be accessed only through the southern central room (10476), and the northeastern small room (10510) could be accessed only through the northern central room (10458), creating a symmetry to the building that was marred only by the difference of accessibility in the eastern rooms and minor differences in room sizes. It is notable that six of the seven entrances found in this building were located in the corners of the rooms; the only entrance located in the center of a wall was the one connecting Rooms 9450 and 9449 in the western wing.

All the walls were covered with plaster and the floors were made of fine red clay mixed with smooth black burnt material. In Rooms 10458, 10506, and the southeastern part of 11451, the floors were set on a mud-plaster bedding (Photos 12.207–12.209) and in Rooms 10506, 10476 and 10510, they were set on a sub-floor brick construction (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.194, 12.200, 12.219).

A wide range of many complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.143–13.160) and numerous objects (Table 12.24), as well as a large amount of grain, were found in the 0.8 m-deep destruction debris on the floors, as detailed below and in Chapter 45.

The Small Eastern Rooms — 10510, 11441, 11451

Room 10510

The northern room of the eastern wing (Photos 12.197–12.198, 12.200) measured internally 2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m. Its eastern wall (10490) was built above C-1b Wall 11479, while its northern wall (10409) was built above C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). This room was accessed only through an entrance in Wall 10462 that led from the northern central room (10458).

The floor in this room was identical to the others throughout Building CP, composed of red clay mixed with black burnt material. It sloped down from west to east, from 86.20 to 85.98 m; the western elevation was higher than the other floors in the building, perhaps because just underneath the burnt floor makeup on the west were two concentrations of bricks, one in the southwestern corner of the room and the other in the northwestern corner, just inside the entrance (Fig. 12.52c). The latter (11478) was a rectangle measuring 0.6×1.2 m, ca. 0.1 m high. The bricks in the southwestern corner were more sporadic (Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.197). These are understood as a sub-floor construction, similar to those found in the southwestern part of the building, described below.

The room was full of burnt destruction debris (10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact four-legged incense burner with a matching lid (Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458, apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items were found above the sub-floor brick construction in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the room.

Room 11441

The middle room of the eastern wing measured internally 2.2×2.8 m (6.16 sq m) (Photos 12.197, 12.200, 12.202). Like the southern room, it had entrances in its northeastern and northwestern corners. The floor (11441) was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl.

Room 11451

The southern room of the eastern wing (internal measurements 2.6×2.8 m; 7.28 sq m) had an entrance in its northeastern corner and another one opposite it that led into Room 10476 on the west (Photos 12.197, 12.202–12.203). A notable feature of the eastern entrance was the molding of the door jambs; the inner (western) northern end of Wall 11440 was nicely molded to a curved shape (Photo 12.204) and the southern end of Wall 11417 that faced the entrance was also curved, although less well preserved. The walls in this part of the room were covered with fine gray-whitish plaster, somewhat different from the light brown mud plaster that coated the other walls of this building. The floor of this room was composed of red clay interspersed with smooth black burnt material. The southeastern part of the floor contained a layer of plaster, identical to that on the walls, below the red and black floor makeup. Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206).

The Large Central Rooms — 10458 and 10476

The central part of the building included two large rectangular rooms of similar size: Room 10458 on the north and Room 10476 on the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190, 12.207).

Room 10458

The northern central room measured internally 4.0×4.7 m; 19 sq m (Photo 12.208). The main entrance to this room was from Room 11411 on the east, while two other entrances led into Rooms 10510 and 9449, the latter creating a connection to the southern wing of the building. The floor was higher by 0.25–0.35 m than that in Room 9449 to the west and Room 11441 to the east, but was almost the same as that of Room 10510 on the northeast.

The preservation of the northern and eastern walls was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north (which was also the southern wall of Building CX) was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length, but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower western end adjoined the southern face of Wall 10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved to the same low height. As mentioned above in the discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to explain this feature: either there was a deliberate lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458 into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation was due to damage caused by the destruction or by some unrecognized later intrusion. A 0.4 m wide bench (10463), composed of terre pisé and partially plastered, was built along the southern face of Wall 10409, running 2.4 m from exactly where Wall 10409 was cut on the west, almost up to the entrance into Room 10510 on the east (Photo 12.208). Two bricks laid on the western end of Bench 10463 were on the same low level as the western end of Wall 10409; their function is not known. Following a 0.7 m gap was yet another brick, set into the corner of Walls 9448 and 10409, found floating 0.1 m above the level of the plastered floor in the western part of this room (10498) (Photo 12.209). The low western end of Wall 10409 abutted, but did not bond with, the western wall (9448) of the room.

The eastern wall (10462) of Room 10458 was different than the others in its composition, being built of similar terre pisé as Bench 10463. It was preserved to only 0.20 above the floor in the south and 0.40 m in the north. The corner of Wall 10462 with Wall 10405 (the southern wall of the room) was not well bonded; the latter was preserved to a height of 0.65 m, similar to that of the northern wall of this room.

Running along the eastern face of Wall 9448 and ending on the north at the entrance into Room 9449, was yet another bench (10454), built of crumbly yellow bricks, 0.5 m wide, 1.6 m long and ca. 0.2 m high (Photos 12.208–12.209).

The floor of the room (10458) was composed of reddish-brown earth mixed with black ash; in the western part of the room, it was laid 0.05–0.08 m above a layer of hard mud plaster (10498) (Photos 12.208–12.209). This plaster was identical to that found under the floor of Rooms 10506 and 11451, as well as on most of the walls in this building; it was concentrated in the area between the lower western end of Wall 10409 on the north and along the line of Oven 10430, just north of Wall 10405, on the south (the contours of this plaster are marked on the plan; Fig. 12.52a). Depressions in the plaster accommodated the rounded contour of the stone mortar, as well as two of the pottery vessels just north of Oven 10430. The plaster-bedding layer was laid on top of a layer of soft light brown earth with very few sherds (11461), which seems to have been a leveling fill laid above the C-1b remains.

The room was full of a layer of burnt destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained 23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found just to the southwest of the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the northwestern corner of the room, above the lower western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo 12.214); a few additional loomweights were found dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454 along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this bench was a dense concentration of finds that included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos (Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it (Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars (Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35, No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north (Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498) in the western part of the room included a few small upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well as several loomweights and sherds.

Room 10476

The southern central room measured internally 3.6×4.6 m (16.6 sq m) (Photo 12.215). The main entrance to this room was from Room 11451 on the east, while two other entrances led into Rooms 10506 and 9450, the latter creating a connection to the northern wing of the building (Photos 12.189– 190, 12.203, 12.215). Since Room 9450 was joined to Room 9449, one could pass between the southern and northern parts of the building by way of these two small rooms.

Room 10476 was bordered on the east by the southern end of Wall 10462 and its continuation to the south, which was designated a separate number (10485) because it was built of discernible bricks, as opposed to the terre pisé of 10462; it was preserved higher than the latter and its northern end was covered with molded plaster (Photo 12.216). The southern wall of the room (10457) ran along 12.2 m; it was located 0.5 m north of the southern wall of adjoining Building CL on the west, indicating that although they ran more or less along the same line, these were two separate walls. The northern wall (10405) separated the two large central rooms. All these walls were found standing to a height of 0.6–1.0 m and were covered with mud plaster.

The floor was made of soft reddish-brown earth, interspersed with black ash. Just below the floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219). Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part, most of the bricks were missing, although it is not clear whether this area had never been constructed or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and, in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo 12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468 was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms 10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to have been a building technique intended to provide reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to protect against rodents in certain places (compare a similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room 8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor above it (Photo 12.221).

Benches were constructed along the northern and western walls. Bench 10466, 3.6 m long, 0.6 wide and ca. 0.25 m high, ran along the northern wall (10405); the plaster on this wall joined the plaster that covered the bench. This bench was built directly above C-1b Wall 11472, utilizing the top of this wall as its foundation. On this bench were three cooking pots (Figs. 13.147:1, 3; 13.149:6), one jug (Fig. 13.155:4), four juglets (Fig. 13.156:19, 24– 25) and two loomweights (Photo 12.217). Bench 10467, 1.7 m long, 0.5 m wide and ca. 0.15 m high, was rather poorly preserved along the western wall (10480); a jug (Fig. 13.155:7), a seal (Chapter 30, No. 32), a bead, a loomweight and a scoria scraper were found on it (Photo 12.218). In the northeastern corner of the room, Installation 10468 was composed of bricks set on their narrow side around a circular mud-plastered receptacle (Photo 12.217). Inside the plastered depression were two cooking pots stacked together, a very small one (Fig. 13.148:9) on the bottom and a medium-sized one (Fig. 13.148:4) on top of it.

Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster, ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix (Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the destruction debris were found in situ (some intact) on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds (Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the southern half of the room (10493) contained much less pottery than in the north and center, mostly concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall 10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room 10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the same wall in the southwestern corner of Room 10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos 12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with 0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup.6 It was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base, and contained a large amount of charred grain (Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221– 12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the east of the pithos was a concentration of 85 loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains of charred wood here might represent a loom. A few vessels were found in the entrance leading from the east, mostly against the plastered southern doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large and heavy stone was found upside down, just under topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451 (Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small depression carved out of part of its top, in which some substance was probably ground, judging by the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room 11451 to the east, described above.

The Western Rooms – 9449, 9450, 10506

Room 9449

This was the northern room in the western wing (internal measurements 2.3×2.8 m; 6.4 sq m) (Photos 12.207, 12.225). The northern wall (9415) was also the southern wall of Building CQ3; it cornered with Wall 9406 on the west and with Wall 9448 on the east. Notably, this wall was not on line with the northern wall (10409) of the large room to the east, but ran 0.25 m to its north. A 0.5 m-wide and 0.35 m-high brick bench (9443) was attached to the southern face of Wall 9415, which was, in fact, the direct continuation of the line of Wall 10409. Its top level was ca. 0.1 m lower than the western end of this wall and it is possible that it constituted the (as of yet unexposed) western end of Stratum C-1b Wall 11458 (Fig. 12.48), whose extant top was used as a bench in this room. At its juncture with Wall 9406, the bench had an extension, protruding to the south, 0.4×0.6 m, 0.35 m high, with slightly sloping sides. The walls of the room, as well as the bench and its extension, were all covered with the same fine mud plaster. The eastern face of Wall 9406 in this room was very damaged and burnt, as opposed to its excellent preservation further to the north (in Building CQ3) and south, as well as on its western face in Building CL, as described below. The room had two entrances. A 1.0-m-wide entrance in the southern end of the eastern wall (9448) connected this room with the large room (10458) on the east (Photos 12.189–191, 12.196). Since the floor of the room to the east was 0.35–0.4 m higher than that of Room 9449, there was a small step here (Photos 12.196, 12.207). Some charred wooden pieces found in the entranceway might be remnants of a step, doorjamb or door. The bench (10454) with the pottery altar and bowl in Room 10458 to the east adjoined the southern doorjamb of this entrance. A second entrance, 0.9 m-wide, was located in the middle of the southern wall, connecting this room with Room 9450. The floor of the room (9449) was composed of red clay mixed with soft black burnt material.

The room was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418, 9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were found in this small room, among them 11 storage jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east, but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell from a second floor. A special find in this room was an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See Table 12.24 for other finds.

Room 9450

The middle room in the western wing (internal measurements 2.4×2.4; 5.76 sq m) was accessed both from Room 9449 to its north and from the large room to the east (10476) through a 1.0 m-wide entrance in its southeastern corner (Photo 12.207). The walls were covered with fine mud plaster. The floor (9450) was composed of red clay mixed with soft black burnt material. In the southwestern corner of the room was a square brick bin (9434) (internal measurements 1.0 sq m; 0.6 m high) (Photos 12.226–12.227). It was coated with a fine plaster that continued from the surrounding walls down to line the floor as well. Inside was an intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig. 13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10, 13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812 BCE (2σ).

The entire room was filled with very burnt destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43 restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig. 13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of the pottery in this room, in particular the storage jars (like in the previous room), were found smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ on the floor. This situation may hint that much of this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher shelves. A special item in this room was a horned pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo 12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar was a complete brick, but it appears that this was fallen and not meant as a support. For additional finds from this room, see Table 12.24.

Room 10506

The southern room of the western wing (internal measurements 2.15×2.5 m; 5.4 sq m) (Photos 12.215, 12.229–12.230) could be entered only from the large room to its east (10476) (Photos 12.203, 12.229). An intact juglet (Fig. 13.156:18) found leaning against the threshold just inside the room appeared to have been intentionally placed there before the floor was laid (Photo 12.233). The western wall of the room (10513) was the poorly preserved continuation of Wall 9406 to its north. The other walls, 9421 on the north, 10457 on the south and 10480 on the east, were well preserved; all the walls were covered with fine mud plaster (Photo 12.229–12.231).

The floor was composed of soft dark earth, except for the northwestern part, which was composed of the same mud plaster as the surrounding walls, recalling the plaster in the western part of Room 10458. This plastered area was 0.15 m higher than the rest of the room (Photos 12.229– 12.230). Below the earthen floor in the southeastern part of the room, against Wall 10457 and just underneath the floor where the pottery bin and pottery ‘bucket’ were found (see below), was a brick construction (11464), similar to the sub-floor bricks found in Rooms 10510 and 10476 (Fig. 12.52c). Like in those rooms, this seems to have been an element related to the construction phase of the building. A low (0.1 m high) bench (10504) composed of crumbly brown bricks was built along part of the western wall (Photo 12.230).

A pottery bin (10501) was set in the southwestern corner of the room (Photos 12.215, 12.223, 12.229–12.232); it was very similar to Bin 10488 in Room 10476, 3.0 m to its east and set against the same wall (10457). It stood 0.75 m high, which was shorter than the other bin; 0.15 m of its base was sunk into the floor makeup. Like the latter bin, it was made with thick slabs and restoration showed it to be trapezoid, with the wider part on top (Photo 12.232; Fig. 13.160:12); it had no base or lid, although 0.1 m above its bottom was a layer of low-fired clay that was laid down as a kind of floor. Inside the bin (capacity-93 liters) was a small amount of burnt grain.

Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484), including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed against the center of the southern wall (Photos 12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round container with a matching lid to its east (Fig. 13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken. Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those found attached to the altar fragment from Building CF.

Summary of Building CP

Building CP, with its eight rooms, was the largest and most complex building excavated at Tel Rehov. Many unique features characterized its plan, including the two eastern entrances, the symmetric division into a western and eastern wing flanking central rooms, the plan of circulation, the benches along the walls, the sub-floor brick constructions and the molded plaster on the doorjambs. It contained a large amount of unique pottery items, such as two altars, the Elisha ostracon, containers with lids, a ‘bucket’, a strainer, two free-standing bins, a figurine mold, a stand with petals, and an incense burner with a lid, as well as more than 230 pottery vessels of a wide variety of types (see Chapters 24, 45), all indicating that this building had some special function. The integral relation of Building CP to the smaller buildings to its north (CQ3, CX) and the spacious Building CL to its west, shows that it was part of a greater complex. For further discussion and interpretation, see Mazar (2015) and Chapter 4.

Building CL — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.53 - Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.234 - Walls of Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.235 - Walls in section of C-1a Building CL above C-1b apiary destruction debris (collapsed walls) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.236 - Wall 4443 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.237 - Burnt material (9432) on Floor 9435 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.238 - Burnt oily material (5435) on Floor 5482 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.239 - Eastern wing and Floor 5446 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50, 12.53
  • Sections: Figs. 12.73–12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87
  • Photos 12.234–12.239
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.125–13.129
Introduction

Building CL was constructed above the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos 12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235) and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73– 12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner of this building was built above a leveling fill (4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for two superimposed destructions in Area C.

Building CL was composed of two wings, each comprising two rooms: the external measurements of the western wing were 3.3×6.5 m (not including Wall 4443) and those of the eastern wing were 6.5×11.5 m (including walls). The total floor space was 63 sq m. Although the walls were found standing to a height of 1.2–1.5 m, no entrances were located. A passage from the western wing to the eastern wing may have existed in Wall 4443, close to its corner with Wall 4481, since here the former wall was preserved very low. In such a case, the threshold would have been 0.3 m above the floor. However, this cannot be determined with certainty and the location of entrances in this building remained enigmatic. This building was excavated in parts during several seasons; the excavated parts were removed in order to reach Stratum C-1b below and thus, no general photograph could be taken.

The southern wall of Building CL ran 0.5 m to the south of the line of that of Building CP. However, since the two buildings shared a wall (9406), it is likely that they were built together. All the walls of Building CL were founded 0.4–1.0 m lower than the foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1438 in Squares Y/1–2 to the west. This might be explained by the fact that they were built above the apiary, which was on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. Perhaps the deeper foundations were also the result of the need to stabilize these walls, which were built directly above the collapsed bricks and burnt debris that covered the destroyed apiary.

The area to the west and north of Building CL remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west (Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep, covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417.

The Western Wing — Rooms 4435 and 5432

The western wing of the building was about half the size of the eastern wing, and adjoined only its southern part. It was composed of a long room on the north (4435; internal measurements 2.7×3.5 m; 9.45 sq m) and a broad room on the south (5432; internal measurements 1.5×2.9 m; 4.35 sq m). As noted above, there was no entrance between the two.

The western wall (2413) ran for 6.5 m and was preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235) and also cut the eastern end of Wall 2426 of Building CH (Figs. 12.73–12.74; Photos 12.146– 12.147). The northern wall (2504) was 3.2 m long; its eastern end was preserved almost 1.0 m higher than Wall 4443 with which it cornered on the east (Photos 12.235–12.236); the reason for this was not clear. The southern wall (5423 on the west, 9424 on the east; Photo 12.237) was also the southern wall of the eastern wing; it was exposed over 7.6 m and apparently continued to the east to corner with Wall 10513, although this end remained unexcavated.

Wall 4443, joining the eastern and western wings, ran along 11 m and was preserved to a height of 1.5 m on its northern half, although up to only 0.5 m on the south (Squares Y/1, 20) (Photos 12.236, 12.238). The foundation level of this wall (85.40 m) was 0.3–0.4 m lower than that of Walls 2413 and 2504 (Figs. 12.73, 12.86–12.87). Wall 4481, which separated the two rooms in this wing, was built directly on top of the concentration of cult objects (the pottery altar and petal chalice) in the apiary below.

Both rooms had a distinct floor (4435 in the northern room, 5432 in the southern room) made of a 0.3-m-thick layer of soft light-red clay at levels 86.20–85.90 m (Fig. 12.86). A clay female figurine that most probably had belonged to an altar was found on the floor in the northeastern corner of Room 5432. An almost identical figurine was found in Locus 5446 in the northwestern part of the eastern wing (Chapter 35, Nos. 6a–b); it is possible that these two figurines had originally belonged to the same altar. Room 4435 was filled with burnt debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig. 13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed with some whitish material, that was concentrated mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall 4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing (Photo 12.236). This was further evidence that the southern end of this wall had been deliberately razed during the course of the use of Building CL, thus joining the two southern spaces. Alternatively, the southern end of Wall 4443 had been originally built as a low screen wall.

The Eastern Wing — Rooms 5449 and 5482

The eastern wing was composed of two large rooms or open spaces: 5449 on the north (measuring internally 5.0×5.35 m; ca. 27 sq. m) and 5482 on the south (measuring internally 4.2×5.3 m; 22.2 sq m). Wall 5418, the northern wall, was well preserved to 11 courses, built of gray, brown and yellow bricks (Photo 12.142), yet it was found severely tilted to the south, perhaps due to seismic activity (Photos 12.150, 12.152). As noted above, the southern wall of the eastern wing (9424) continued that of the western wing. The eastern wall (9406) was also the western wall of adjoining Buildings CP and CQ3 (Photo 12.192). This latter wall, preserved 14 courses high on its western face, was built directly above the eastern closing wall (9453) of the Stratum C-1b apiary (Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 5453, a well-built wall preserved nine courses high (Photos 12.150–12.153), separated the northern from the southern room, with no entrance joining them.

The floor of both rooms was made of the same soft red clay as the western rooms; it was 0.4 m thick in the north and center (85.70–86.10 m), but only 0.1 m thick near Wall 5453 (85.65 m) (Figs. 12.83–12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.150–12.151, 12.239). The floor in the southern room (5482), at levels 85.60–85.70 m, sealed the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Fig. 12.83; Photo 12.150). As noted above, the same black burnt oily substance mixed with white material that was found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237– 12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the northern part of Room 5449 not burnt.

Both rooms were full of a thick layer of destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs. 13.127–13.128), as were several other objects (Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239).

A curious feature found in the eastern wing of Building CL was a 0.7–1.1 m-thick layer of light gray debris (5419 in Square Z/2 and 5427 in Square Z/1) that sloped down from south to north (Fig. 12.83; Photos 12.150, 12.152). This layer, revealed just under topsoil, was virtually sterile. It appears to be either an intentional fill placed in the room following its destruction or possibly, erosion following the destruction and abandonment of the lower city; the latter explanation seems to be more plausible. In the topsoil (5402) just above this layer in Square Z/2 was a fragment of a very large pottery altar horn (Chapter 35, No. 28).

One has to question whether the two eastern spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m, appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar bases or any other roof support were found, it may be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed.

Summary of Building CL

The unique plan of Building CL and lack of domestic installations rule out it having been a dwelling, and it most likely served for some administrative, industrial or storage function. The large amount of bones, as well as their special nature, might allude to some relationship to the cultic practices in the adjacent Building CP. It is difficult to explain the lack of entrances in this building, especially in light of the fact that in the adjacent buildings to the east, entrances were found in all the rooms. A similar lack of entrances was also observed in Building CG (possibly a granary) and in the outer walls of Building CQ2. One possibility is that the excavated rooms were part of a basement floor, entered from a higher level. But such a hypothesis is contradicted by the level of the floors in the adjacent buildings on the east (CQ3, CX, CP), which were only slightly higher than the floors in Building CL. Alternatively, the rooms were entered from the roof by way of ladders or from the roofs of the adjacent buildings. In such a case, the entire ground floor of this building would have been sealed from the outside. All these features indicate the exceptional function of this building.

Summary of the Stratigraphy, Architecture and Main Features

Plan
Plan

Fig. 12.54

Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata C-3–C-1a (1:250)

Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
Continuity and Change in the Occupational Sequence

The architectural sequence of Strata C-4 to C-1a, ranging from the 11th to the 9th centuries BCE, demonstrated both continuity and change. This sequence, however, was not necessarily related to destruction episodes, as some buildings continued almost unchanged following their destruction, while others were demolished and new ones built in their stead. On the one hand, the use of brick as the only building material, the general orientation of the units, the rebuilding of some walls on the same line, and the density of construction, are continuing features. On the other hand, innovations included changes in the type of bricks (but rarely the size) and the introduction of wooden beams for the construction of wall and floor foundations in Stratum C-1b.

The substantial and well-preserved building remains of the two phases of Stratum C-3 in Squares S/2–4, attributed to Iron IB, are evidence for a well-constructed and planned city, as also found in Strata D-5 and D-4 in Area D (Chapter 15). No evidence for a violent destruction of this level was found. A number of Stratum C-3 walls, characterized by gray bricks and light-colored mortar, were rebuilt in Stratum C-2 of the early Iron IIA on the same lines, but with hard yellow bricks, as in the cases of Walls 2507, 2506 and 8418 in Squares S/2–4. This indicates urban continuity from the late Iron I to the early Iron IIA.

The two pits found in Square R/4 recall a similar feature in Area D (Stratum D-3) in Squares N, P/4–5 and Q/4, where ca. 45 pits were found above and cutting through Stratum D-4 architecture; they were explained as a local feature in this area. Such pits were not found in any other part of Area C, except for a few in the apiary (Squares Y/1–2) in relation to a floor which appears to have originally belonged to Stratum C-3. Thus, the two pits in Square R/4 are understood to have belonged to the same phenomenon as those in Area D at the end of Iron IB. Above the pits and the floor was a thin layer of debris, followed by Locus 1555b, a pottery concentration in the lowest level of a room attributed to a Stratum C-2 (see above).

The division of the Iron IIA into three strata (C-2, C-1b, C-1a) was first and foremost based on a clear differentiation between Strata C-2 and C-1 in terms of overall plan and building techniques. The well-preserved walls of Stratum C-2 (general Stratum VI), sometimes standing to a height of 18 courses, were made of typical hard-packed yellow bricks, differing in their texture from the bricks of Strata C-1b and C-1a (Tables 12.28–12.30). The lack of stone foundations and the almost total absence of wood in the construction were also typical of this stratum. In certain places, we observed architectural continuity between Strata C-2 and C-1b, such as in the transition from Building CA to Building CD, in some of the walls of Building CE, and, to some extent, between the upper phases of Building CT, as well as one wall in Building CZ. In other places, the builders of Stratum C-1b ignored the earlier walls of Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.16).

In the area of Building CH and the apiary in Squares T–Z/1–2, Stratum C-1b units were founded right on top of Stratum C-3 structures of Iron IB, and even reused walls and floors from this period. This seems to have occurred due to the intentional removal of building remains of Stratum C-2 by the builders of the apiary, who sought to establish it on a lower level than the rest of the buildings in the area to its west (CG and CH) and north (CM).

The differentiation between Strata C-1b and C-1a (general Strata V and IV) was clear in some cases and unclear in others. These two stratum numbers refer to the same city that underwent local destruction and rebuilding in certain places. A major feature of Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in the foundations of walls and floors. Often these beams were laid directly on top of Stratum C-2 structures. Buildings CJ, CF, CW, CQ1, CQ2 and CG, as well as the room in Square R/4, were founded, in our view, in Stratum C-1b, and continued to be in use with only few or no changes in Stratum C-1a. In contrast, Building CH and the apiary were used only in Stratum C-1b and, following a severe destruction, were replaced by Building CL. Building CD of Stratum C-1b went out of use and was replaced by an open area in Stratum C-1a. Likewise, Building CM was destroyed at the end of C-1b and was replaced by Piazza 2417 in C-1a. In the southeastern block, Building CZ of Stratum C-1b went out of use and was replaced in Stratum C-1a by two new buildings (CQ3, CX). As discussed in detail above, the possibility that Building CZ could be attributed to Stratum C-2 was considered, particularly due to the similarity of its levels to those of the remains under Building CQ1 to its south that we ascribed to Stratum C-2. If this was the case, then Building CQ3 and CX too would have been established in Stratum C-1b and continued unchanged into Stratum C-1a, although there is no tangible evidence for this, such as wooden foundations (except in their thresholds) or floor raisings. Ultimately, we rejected this possibility and prefer to attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b. To its south, Building CP of Stratum C-1a was a rebuild of an earlier building of Stratum C-1b, although this early stage is insufficiently known due to lack of excavation.

In a few instances, an extra phase was discerned, demonstrating the complexity of the stratigraphy in the three main Iron IIA levels. For example, an earlier phase of Building CR (Squares Y–Z/6) in Stratum C-1b was detected above the well-preserved remains of C-2 Building CT. A later phase was identified in the remains east of Stratum C-2 Building CB (Squares Y–Z/4). Additional phases in the courtyard devoted to cooking activity in Square T/4 were a typical feature of such an open area. This diversity indicates that each building had its own history; some continued with no change from Stratum C-1b to C-1a and others underwent modifications of varying degrees. The clearest change between these two strata was in the vicinity of the apiary and its surroundings in the southeastern part of Area C.

Destruction Episodes

No evidence for violent destruction was found at the end of Strata C-3 and C-2, and therefore most of the floors of these levels were found virtually lacking complete vessels (except in the case of Locus 1555b in Square R/4). There were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings by an earthquake, including layers of complete fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of the buildings which would have buried vessels, and perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of debris. Rather, it could have been an earthquake that was strong enough to cause severe damage to the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of Stratum C-1b.

Evidence of severe destruction by fire in Stratum C-1b was found in the apiary and in Buildings CH, CG (the southern room), CM, CF and CE. In Building CG, it remained unclear whether the destruction of the northern rooms should be attributed to Stratum C-1b or C-1a. All of these buildings, except for CF and CE, contained large amounts of in situ pottery and other objects. Notably, these structures were located along a north-south axis running through the center of Area C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’, as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning. Perhaps the heavy destruction noted in these buildings was caused by a local event, such as deliberate or unintentional burning by human agency, or by an earthquake. The latter possibility is suggested in Chapter 54, based on paleomagnetic testing.

As opposed to this, Stratum C-1a came to an end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. The temperature must have been more than 500 degrees, since it caused partial firing of the brick courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In several cases, pottery vessels cracked and became distorted, with much calcification; for example, the large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore. The incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other objects found in the houses indicates the sudden destruction, although a human skeleton was found in only one place. There was no activity in this area following the destruction, except one deep pit (6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.

An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m above the floors and their tops were discovered flat and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil. While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem that there would have been a larger quantity if they had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were probably washed to the southeast towards the gulley that separates the upper from the lower mound. A less feasible explanation would be that bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).

Urban Planning

Area C was densely built in all three Iron Age IIA strata, C-2, C-1b and C-1, with houses attached to one another in what can be defined as pre-planned insulae, separated by only a few open spaces.

Open Spaces

An open space in Squares S–T/3–4 in Stratum C-2 was at least partly occupied by Building CM in Stratum C-1b (although the eastern part of this area remained unexcavated). In Stratum C-1b, an open area was located south of Building CD, above Building CB of Stratum C-2. In Stratum C-1a, this latter area was expanded and to its east, beyond Building CG, another piazza was created, with a 3.0-m-wide street leading into it from the east, and a somewhat irregular alley from the south. These open spaces seem not to have been related to an individual unit, but rather served as small piazzas surrounded by several buildings. Few installations were located in these open courtyards, for example, ovens found in the cooking area in Square T/4, which was in use throughout all three strata, and a stone formation in the center of Piazza CK in Stratum C-1a.

Central Planning and Orientation

Evidence for central urban planning can be seen mainly in the plan of Strata C-1b and C-1a. Two major walls traverse the entire area from south to north in a straight line: on the west was Wall 1413, which ran along 19.8 m and continued both to the south and the north of the excavated area. In the eastern part of the area (along the line of Squares A/20, 1–6), Walls 9453/9406+6408+6497 created a continuous straight line, intersected by the street in Squares Z, A–C/4. These two long backbone walls were not parallel to one another: the western one ran on a northwest–southeast alignment, while the eastern wall was due north–south. The distance between them (outer faces) was 19 m on the south and 21.5 m along the northern line of Squares R–Z, A/4, ca. 20 m to the north.

The blocks of houses in all three strata were oriented along virtually the same lines: almost exactly east–west and north–south, with minor deviations in the western part of the area, causing trapezoidshaped spaces in the seam between the eastern and western parts, such as the alley between Walls 2413 and 1438 in Squares T–Y/1–2 in Stratum C-1a or the passage from the open area in Squares S–T/2–3 to the north, towards the cooking area in Squares S– T/4 in Stratum C-1b. Evidence of central planning is also seen in the sharing of walls and the back-toback construction of many units, as discussed in the next section.

Fortifications

No evidence for the existence of fortifications was found along the western perimeter of the mound in Areas C and D, nor along the northern perimeter, where a probe was excavated in Square Y/9. The westernmost structures of all Iron IIA strata continued into Squares Q/4–5 of Area D (defined there as Strata D-1a, D-1b and D-2), located on the upper slope of the mound, where they disappeared with the erosion line. Although the slope of the mound suffered from severe erosion, as shown by the fact that the eastern sides of the buildings in Area D were missing, it is improbable that an entire city wall was eroded away, and we thus concluded that the city remained unfortified during this entire period.

Building Plans, Size and Function

Throughout all three main Iron IIA strata, a notable characteristic is the uniqueness of the architecture. Not only are the buildings quite unlike most of the typical Iron Age structures known from proximate, as well as more distant regions, but they also do not resemble each other. While certain technical features are repeated, such as size and type of bricks and the use of double walls, each unit was unique in its plan, except for three very similar buildings (CQ1, CQ2, CQ3).

In the discussion of individual buildings, we presented several parallels: Building CF was compared to part of Building 2081 at Megiddo Stratum VA–IVB, and Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 were compared to several buildings from 13th–11th centuries BCE contexts at Hazor Stratum XIII, Tell Abu-Hawam Stratum IV, Tel Batash Stratum VI and Aphek Stratum X11. Building CA was compared to part of Building 200 at Hazor Strata X–IX, and Building CY (and to some extent, also Building CZ) to a type of building with a central space flanked by rooms on two sides, known from Hazor, Samaria and Megiddo in the Iron Age II.

Although individual parallels such as these may be cited, the general concept of the architecture, in both building techniques and plans, as well as in architectural details, deviates from the common architecture in Iron Age II Israelite cities. Notably, none of these buildings recall the so-called ‘Four-Room’ or ‘Three-Room’ houses or pillared buildings that were so typical. No stone pillars were found and wooden posts were used only in the case of Building CX and seen in scant remains of Stratum C-2 under Building CZ.

An unresolved question is whether the buildings had a second story. The double walls, up to 1.1 in width, could easily have supported a second story, but even the narrow walls of 0.6 m width could have been used for such a purpose. Evidence for staircases was not found, except perhaps in the case of the eastern part of Building CY of Stratum C-2. In other buildings, wooden ladders could have led to upper stories or to the roofs, where daily activities could have taken place, such as in the case of Building CP, where large grinding stones were found fallen from a second story or a roof.

Table 12.26 compares the external dimensions and floor space of the buildings excavated in Area C, showing the diversity, which might have had social and cultural implications. The larger buildings, CF and CP, had an average floor space of ca. 62 sq m, while Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 had an average floor space of ca. 20 sq m. Building CX contained 34 sq m. In case of the existence of a second story, these numbers should be potentially doubled.

The number of persons that such houses could accommodate can only be guessed, based on various analyses. Narroll’s (1962) often-cited coefficient of 10 sq m per person would suggest two to five inhabitants in such houses if they had one story and four to ten persons if they had two. Yet, there are different variables that should be considered, and it is doubtful whether Narroll’s coefficient can be taken for granted. Thus, Schloen (e.g., 2001: 180) suggested a coefficient of 8.0 sq m per person in Israelite houses; following a detailed discussion, he estimated that the average Israelite “jointfamily” included seven to ten persons (Schloen 2001: 135–183). It seems that the larger houses, such as Building CY in Stratum C-2, as well as Buildings CW, CF and CP in Stratum C-1a, were inhabited by families of eight to twelve persons, while the smaller houses, such as Building CA in Stratum C-2 and CQ1, C2 and CQ3 in Stratum C-1a, served much smaller units, perhaps nuclear families or other social groups. It should be noted, however, that the function of these buildings as regular dwellings is not obvious; several of the buildings, such as CA in Stratum C-2 and CF and CP in Strata C-1a–b, may have had special functions, based on their plans and assemblages of finds. Building CF could have been an elite residence that incorporated administrative, domestic and cultic activities. Building CP in Stratum C-1a may have served specific functions related to religious rituals, such as shared meals/feasts and perhaps, the activity of a “man of god”, such as the biblical Elisha. The possible special functions of Buildings CF and CP are further discussed in Chapter 4 and Mazar 2015: 103–117. The small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, and perhaps also CX, may have belonged to groups or families of special status, perhaps related to or under the control of the elites in Buildings CF and CP. It should be noted that all these buildings yielded large numbers of finds, including an incredible amount of pottery vessels, considering the size of the buildings. In each building there was at least one loom and one or more grinding installations. Yet, cooking facilities were found only in Buildings CF and CP, as well as in the open piazza to the west. This, again, may emphasize the different status of the residents of the small houses, such as CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3.

Several buildings in Area C certainly served functions other than dwelling. Thus, Stratum C-2 Building CB, with its large hall, could have had some public function. Building CG in Stratum C-1 is interpreted as a granary, and Building CL as a storage facility or an or industrial structure, possibly servicing other buildings in the eastern quarter.

The clustering of the buildings in Stratum C-1a is a notable feature. An interesting configuration is the group of small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, and Building CW, flanking an east–west street, as well as the location of larger buildings, CF and CP, adjoining and beyond this cluster. This arrangement may reflect social ranking of some sort.

Levels

Differences in the founding levels of various buildings in the different strata were noted. In Stratum C-2, Wall 8467 in Building CY in the northeastern corner of the area was founded at 85.00 m, while the southwesternmost wall (1470) was founded at 85.57 m. The westernmost wall (1563 in Square R/4) was founded at 85.61 m and the easternmost wall (8467 in Square C/6), at 85.00 m. In Stratum C-1b, the foundations of all the buildings, except the apiary and Building CZ, ranged between 85.90 m in the northeastern corner of the area to 86.50 m in the southwestern corner, over a distance of 39 m. In Stratum C-1a, there was a 1.0 m difference between the foundation level of the northeastern wall (8424; 86.10 m) as opposed to the southwestern wall (1431; 87.10 m), and a 1.6 m difference between the westernmost wall (1413; 87.60 m) and the easternmost wall (10490; 86.00 m) along Squares S–Z, A–C/2. The difference in level of almost 1.7 m between Buildings CG, CH, CM and the apiary was a deliberate choice, as discussed in detail above.

A tilt from west to east/southeast was defined in all strata at Tel Rehov, and may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures.

Construction and Building Features

Double Walls

In many cases, adjacent buildings had their own outer walls, even when they were attached to one another, so that back-to-back double walls were created, with total thickness reaching 1.0–1.1 m. This feature can be seen in many of the units in all three strata, although the buildings in the southeastern block, CQ3, CX, CP and CL, had shared walls of regular width (0.5 m), perhaps reflecting their construction as one integral unit for social or functional reasons. The existence of an individual outer wall for each house, even in cases of attached buildings, may have had practical, as well as symbolic social meaning. Practically, it may represent building phases, indicating that each building was constructed independently, perhaps at a somewhat different time, and then, an adjacent unit was added. Double walls added to the strength of the buildings and their resistivity to earthquakes, as well as facilitating the construction of a second story. Faust (2012: 39–117) noted the rarity of double walls in Israelite domestic architecture and the social significance of this feature: individual walls for each house that create double walls together appear mainly in houses of elite families. This may be the case at Tel Rehov as well, where double walls were much more common than in any other known Iron Age II city

Building Techniques

All the Iron Age IIA buildings were constructed exclusively of bricks, with no stone foundations. This is an unusual feature in the Land of Israel, where most brick walls were laid on stone socles. At Tel Rehov itself, stone socles for brick walls were common in Late Bronze IIB and Iron Age I, and the lack of such foundations in Iron IIA is an unusual feature that remains unexplained.

Most of the bricks were made of brown, gray or yellow clay. In Stratum C-3, all of the walls were constructed with distinct gray bricks of friable consistency, laid with a light-colored mortar between them and covered with a plaster of the same composition as the mortar. In the walls of Strata C-1b and C-1a, a wider variety of bricks was used; in most cases, they were made of light gray-brown clay, and more rarely, of a dark brown soil taken from the nearby colluvium. See Tables 12.27–12.30 for details of brick sizes and materials in most of the walls. The size deviations are small, indicating a great deal of standardization in the size and manufacturing technique, if not the composition, of the bricks.

In some cases, mud plaster was preserved on walls, some 0.02–0.03 m thick and sometimes nicely smoothed. Whitish plaster of higher quality than the mud plaster was used only in the entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP, where the plaster was molded to a rounded profile.

Wood Foundations

The use of wood for wall and floor foundations at Tel Rehov is a unique feature. This is a novelty of Stratum C-1b, but there is one such case in Stratum C-2 (Building CU) and isolated cases in Stratum C-1a (e.g., Building CQ3). A similar construction technique was found in two buildings of Stratum B-5 in Area B, as well as in a building in Area G, attributed to Stratum G-1b. Hence, this technique appears to have been utilized contemporaneously in various buildings throughout the city. The purpose of this wood construction is as yet to be clarified. One possible explanation is that it was intended to stabilize the buildings in the event of earthquakes. This might have been the outcome of what we surmise was the cause of the destruction of Stratum C-2, namely, seismic activity. This function of the wood is illustrated mainly by the way circular beams (their charred remains usually no more than .05–0.1 m in diameter) were often laid at intervals of 0.1–0.2 m, perpendicular to the brick wall, below its lowest brick course. In several cases (i.e., Wall 1438), two or more layers of such beams were found. In this way, the wood could serve as a ‘shock absorber’. Prof. David Yankelevsky, head of the National Building Research Institute in the Technion, Haifa, who visited the site, compared this building technique to modern engineering, when steel cylinders are laid below the foundations of massive structures where the danger of damage by earthquakes is at high risk, such as in nuclear plants. This explanation, if accepted, would point to a technological innovation intended to protect structures against the hazards of earthquakes in a location so close to the Syro-African fault, where the threat of such activity was more acute than anywhere else in the country.

Floors

In most cases, floors were composed of beaten earth or clay. In Stratum C-1b, wooden branches and beams were incorporated into the foundation of some floors; these were usually arranged rather haphazardly below the earth floor. The wood itself was embedded into a matrix of soft red clay that was often similar to, or served as, the floor makeup itself. Stone floors were found only in Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, and perhaps Building CJ, all in Stratum C-1a. In a few places, floors incorporated pebbly gravel, such as in the western part of C-1a Building CX, or in the open space in Stratum C-1a Building CW. In Building CP, as well as in two rooms in Building CY of Stratum C-2, a brick construction was found under the red clay floors in a few rooms, while in other rooms, a mud-plaster foundation was laid under these floors.

The distinct composition of the floor of the Stratum C-1b apiary should be mentioned. It was composed of three different matrices, each apparently serving a different purpose, particularly the very hard thick white tufa floor surrounding the hives, most likely meant to be a permeable surface to protect against spillage or to possibly fend off rodents and insects.

Wooden Posts

The use of wooden posts on unworked stone bases was a rare feature that was found only in Building CX of Stratum C-1a, where there was a line of five post-holes above stone bases, and in the Stratum C-2 level under Building CZ.

Various Installations

Benches

Benches built of bricks or terre pisé were found in several instances in Stratum C-1 buildings. In Building CF of Stratum C-1a, they were found along almost all the walls of the three western chambers. In Building CW of Strata C-1a–b, they were located along the walls of the western rooms. Benches ran along some of the walls of the inner rooms of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as in Buildings CX and CP, where benches were located along the walls of four of the rooms. The benches could be used for sitting, but their main purpose was probably placement of items. A number of vessels were found on Benches 10466 and 10467 in Building CP, including a very large cooking pot. A pottery altar and bowl were found on Bench 10454 in this building.

Silos, Bins and Other Installations

Several storage installations made of packed-clay walls or bricks were found. In Building CP of Stratum C-1a, a corner of Room 9450 was enclosed by two narrow walls, creating a bin (9434) which contained an intact Hippo jar full of grain, as well as other finds. Other storage installations were Silo 7514 in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and plastered Pit 11456 in Building CZ of Stratum C-1b. An exceptional feature was the two rectangular pottery bins, made without a base and standing on their narrow side against the southern wall of Building CP. These bins, found with grain, have no parallels elsewhere.

The installation occupying the western part of the northern room of Building CQ3 in Stratum C-1a (10505) is unusual in its size and shape, although its function could not be determined; it seems that it had some industrial role. Yet another installation with a hard plaster surface was found against the southern wall of the southwestern room in this building, but it was too damaged to determine its function. Other installations include a mud-plastered semi-circle (11452) attached to the wall inside the western entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP in Stratum C-1a, and a brick with a depression on top inside the entrance to Room 2489 in Building CE in Stratum C-1b (2477); both were possibly used as stands for vessels, perhaps for drinking, positioned just inside the entrance to the rooms.

Ovens

Twenty-two ovens were excavated in Area C. Such ovens (tannur, often denoted ‘tabun’) were found in many houses, as well as in open areas. The ovens were always circular, 0.4–0.6 m in diameter; in most cases, only the lower part was preserved. Ovens were constructed with a clay wall ca. 4–5 cm thick, that was, in many cases, coated with pottery sherds on the outside. The most outstanding example is Oven 7428 in Building CU of Stratum C-2, which was completely preserved from base to rim, with an opening at the bottom and an incised mark on its exterior (Fig. 12.13). It was 0.56 m in diameter at its base, 0.56 m tall, with a 0.3 m-wide opening at its top and a small opening at its bottom, used for inserting fuel. It was coated on the outside by large sherds of restorable pottery vessels, a feature found in other ovens, but not as well preserved as this one (Mazar 2011). Ovens were also found in Stratum C-2 Building CY and in the rooms north of Building CA (Stratum C-2) and Building CD (Stratum C-1b), as well as in Buildings CF, CJ, and CP of Stratum C-1a. In several of these cases, the spaces where the ovens were found could have been unroofed areas (e.g., Buildings CY and CU), although this could not be determined with certainty. In certain cases, the location of the oven was quite certainly inside a roofed space (e.g., Building CF). An open space containing a succession of ovens throughout all the Iron IIA strata was found in Square T/4. The lack of ovens in certain buildings should be noted, in particular, Stratum C-1a Buildings CX, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3. It is assumed that residents of these houses shared ovens located in open spaces, or that they belonged to a specific social organization in which people cooked and ate together, for example, in Building CP, where the evidence points to communal meals.

Stones

In several cases, flat stones were located on the floor or on benches along and close to walls. The latter was the case in Building CY of Stratum C-2, where 13 such stones were found along the walls, and in its successor, Building CW of Stratum C-1a, where eight such stones were found in the western rooms, placed on top of the benches lining the walls. It is difficult to explain them as a constructional feature; perhaps they were used as solid bases for objects such as water or oil jars, leather containers, etc.

Another feature was isolated cases of hard mizi stones of considerable size inside buildings. Examples include the very large stone found in Building CB of Stratum C-2, two large stones found in Building CF (one in the large hall in the eastern wing in Stratum C-1b and the second in the entrance corridor in Stratum C-1a, possibly used as a butcher block), a stone in the southern part of Building CM in Stratum C-1b and stones in Buildings CQ2 and CX of Stratum C-1a. Notable also is a large smoothed-top limestone placed at an angle to the east of the oven in the large northern room of Building CP in Stratum C-1a. Such stones could have served as working surfaces in places where a hard surface was needed. They are outstanding in light of the relatively rare use of stones in Iron Age IIA contexts at the site.

Grinding Tools and Installations

Slab-shaped lower grinding stones, loaf-shaped upper grinding stones, hammerstones, pestles, and mortars were numerous in Area C (see Chapter 43). A notable feature in Stratum C-1a were grinding installations of two basic types. The first comprised a large lower grinding stone enclosed by a low hard-clay rounded parapet; the slab is tilted towards a low area on the edge into which the ground flour could be collected; loaf-shaped upper grinding stones were found in association with it. Two very well-preserved installations of this type were found in Building CF and less well-preserved examples in Buildings CE, CQ1, and CQ2. The second type of grinding installation comprised a similar large lower grinding stone set at a slight angle and directed to a hard clay round receptacle, which was most likely meant to contain the ground flour. In Building CX, where two such installations were found, the better-preserved example had a narrow brick bordering the grinding stone on one side and built against the wall on the other. Upper grinding stones were found in association with the lower stone. In Building CP, very large lower and upper grinding stones were found in the destruction debris, 0.8 m above the floor of Room 11451, most probably fallen from the roof or an upper story of the building. Likewise, a very large stone with a small depression in its top that was smoothed from use, and might have been used as a mortar, was found just under topsoil and above the thick destruction debris in this room, suggesting that it, too, originally had been positioned on the roof or upper story.

Looms

Numerous loom weights, mostly made of stone and less so, of clay, were found in concentrations in most of the Stratum C-1a buildings; many of these contained dozens of loom weights each. Remains of charred wood in proximity to such caches, such as in Buildings CP, CR, CX, CF and CE, indicate the presence of one or two looms in the houses. See details and discussion in Chapter 39.

Notes

  1. The word ‘beam’ refers to a worked piece of wood, often squared, used as a support in construction. In the present chapter, we use it to denote the wood that was commonly found in the wall and floor foundations, mainly in Stratum C-1b, although in many cases, these were tree trunks and branches that did not seem to have been worked.

  2. Locus 2466 was related to Stratum C-2, although its absolute levels corresponded with Locus 2487 in Square S/2, which was related to Stratum C-3. This is because the C-2 walls in Square T/2 continued down, while in Square S/2, the C-3 walls began at this level.

  3. The phenomenon of cut walls was also seen in Stratum C-1b Wall 1464 in Square S/4 and Stratum C-2 Wall 2481 in Square T/3.

  4. An additional two Hippo jars were found in Locus 11425, but were not restored or drawn.

  5. The photos showing the early phase of Building CP appear together with those of its later phase in Stratum C-1a, when the entire building was exposed.

  6. At the time of writing, this bin was not restored.

Partial Collection of Plans and Sections

Plans

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.44 - Plan of Building CH and apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.48 - Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52a - Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52b - Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52c - Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Sections

  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.57 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.58 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.59 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.60 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.61 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.70 - Section 16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.72 - Section 18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.75 - Section 21 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.76 - Section 22 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.78 - Section 24 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.81 - Section 27 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.82 - Section 28 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Chapter 15 - Area D: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1           Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2           Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1           Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2           Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Discussions
Chapter 15A - Introduction

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 15.1 - Area D at the end of 1997 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.2 - Area D at the end of 1998 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.3 - Area D at the end of 2000 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4 - Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5 - Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Discussion

Area D was a step trench dug in the northern part of the western slope of the lower mound, from the bottom of the tell to the uppermost level (Fig. 15.2). The area was excavated during seven seasons (1997–1998, 2000, 2005, 2007–2008, 2010). In 1997 and 1998, the area was excavated as a 4.0 m wide trench extending westwards from the northwestern square of Area C (R/4) and running five squares (25 m) down the slope (Squares Q/4–L/4) (Photos 15.1–15.2). In 2000 and 2005, the trench was extended by one square to the north (L–Q/5), while only minor probes were conducted in the original trench (Photos 15.3–15.4). Starting from 2005, Area D was divided into two sub-areas: the upper (eastern) portion of the slope (Squares P– Q/4–5) was excavated as Area D1 and the lower (western) portion (Squares L–N/4–5) as Area D2. These terms are not retained in this chapter and are replaced by Area D East (the upper part of the trench) and Area D West (the lower part of the trench) respectively. Both areas were excavated in 2005, 2007 and 2008 (Photo 15.5), while in the 2010 season, and for a few days in April 2011 (Squares N/4–5), work was carried out only in Area D West (Photo 15.6). The actual width of the excavated step trench was 9.0 m (Fig. 15.1). In addition to the manual excavation, two backhoe trenches were excavated from the base of the mound westwards, towards the present agricultural field, intended to reveal geological features and geomorphological processes at the base of the mound. In the first three seasons (1997, 1998, 2000) Area D was supervised by Amir Sumaka'i Fink, together with Yoav Schur in 1997–1998. In 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2011), Area D East was supervised by Yael Rotem and Area D West by Uri Davidovich.

The present chapter is divided between the two parts of the area: the western (lower) part and eastern (higher) part.

The goal of the excavation of Area D was to study the occupation history, stratigraphic sequence, formation processes and potential fortification lines in the lower mound. Based on results of previous surveys (see Chapter 3) and the shape of the steep, homogeneous western and northern slopes of the lower mound, it was assumed that this formation was created by an earthen rampart, possibly constructed during the Middle Bronze Age. However, excavation has unequivocally shown that the lower mound was first settled in Late Bronze I, a phenomenon which is almost unparalleled at other sites in the Southern Levant.

Continuous occupation was detected in Area D from Late Bronze I to Iron IIA, a time span of some 600 years. The excavation concentrated on defining the various strata and occupation phases and their architectural remains, as well as the nature of the transition between them. Eleven main strata and several sub-phases were defined along the slope, with an accumulation reaching 11.45 m (between levels 76.45 m and 87.90 m) (Fig. 15.2). No fortifications were found along the entire step trench and no major destruction events were identified between the strata. The correlation between Strata D-2 and D-1 to the stratigraphy in nearby Area C was a key to anchoring the local stratigraphy of Area D in relation to the rest of the tell, although the issue of the precise correlation between the Iron IB strata in Area D and those in Area C remains unresolved and is further discussed below in this chapter. Table 15.1 presents the stratigraphic sequence and suggested correlation to strata in Area C, as well as periodization and approximate dates of the various strata.1
Footnotes

1 The terminology in this chapter follows Mazar 1990: 30 and NEAEHL: 1529. The period Iron IA (first half of the 12th century BCE) is called Late Bronze III by several scholars in recent years. See discussion in Chapter 4 and by Mazar in TBS III: 23–24.

Site Formation Processes

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

The initial understanding of the formation processes of the site assumed that Tel Rehov in general, and the lower mound in particular, developed on a natural spur which protruded slightly above the level of the surrounding fields. This assumption was presumably corroborated later by the results of the geoseismic survey, which showed that both parts of the mound were built on an elevated, eastward-tilted tufa block (Zilberman et al. 2002; Chapter 2, this volume). It was also assumed that the level of the field to the west of the mound remained fairly unchanged during the time span that elapsed from the first settlement in the lower mound to the present day. The low natural hill inferred from the geoseismic survey (Zilberman et al. 2002) was not found during the excavation. In fact, the excavation in Area D has shown that the lower mound was built of successive, almost horizontal strata which show almost no terracing, beginning at a level even lower than that of the current field.

Evidence gathered both by excavation at the base of Area D (see below) and during the geoseismic survey indicates that a geological fault, probably of a stepped structure, borders the mound on the west (Chapter 2 and Zilberman et al. 2004). Young tectonic activity along this fault, which postdates at least the earlier strata of the lower mound, is indicated by the missing western portion of the monumental building of Stratum D-10 (see below), as gravitational erosion cannot account for this observation. This tectonic activity has created, together with the continuous occupation of the site east of the fault line, a clear demarcation between the mound and the down-faulted block to its west, a process which possibly enhanced post-depositional erosion on the western slope of the mound. It is hypothesized, based on the plans of most strata (e.g., the buildings of Strata D-5 and D-4), that the scale of erosion (i.e., the missing portions of most strata) is no greater than a few meters. Thus, it seems untenable to assume that fortification systems could have been entirely eroded. Combined with the evidence gathered in Areas C and E, it is concluded that the lower mound was probably never fortified.

The young tectonic activities, both in the aforementioned fault and in other faults surrounding the mound (Zilberman et al. 2004; Chapter 2, this volume), could also have caused the tilting of layers and structures towards the southeast (towards the center of the mound) that was noted in both Areas D and C. This post-depositional tilting could have occurred during the occupational sequence, either close in time to the creation of the tilted features, or much later (see Chapter 3 and below, discussion of Strata D-11 and D-10).

Based on a backhoe trench excavated in the present-day field west of the mound, it is clear that the down-faulted block is covered with at least 4.3 m of dark brown colluvium which accumulated in the last 1000–1500 years, as indicated by the appearance of worn Roman-Byzantine or later sherds which must have originated in the Late Antiquity settlement of Rehob, located ca. 700 m to the northwest of Area D (Vitto 1993). The top level of the present field is ca. 2.0 m higher than the bedrock of the uplifted tufa block, as was exposed at the base of the excavation in Area D (Fig. 15.17b, and further below).

Chapter 15B - Area D West, Strata D-11 TO D-6:Late Bronze to Iron IA

Geo-Archaeological Investigations at the Base of Area D

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Sections: Fig. 15.17a–b
Discussion

Apart from studying the earliest part of the stratigraphic sequence of the lower mound, the excavations at the base of Area D had two additional goals: to clarify the outline of the natural topography, whether bedrock or virgin soil, which predated the first human activity in this area, and to explore the relationship between the formation processes of the lower mound in its initial phases and of the nearby plain located to the west of the mound. These investigations were carried out in three deep manually excavated probes and in two narrow backhoe trenches, all located at the lowermost part of the step trench.

Three probes were dug in order to explore the constructional fill of Stratum D-10 and occupation layers of Stratum D-11 (Fig. 15.3):

  • Probe I, located at the northwestern corner of Square L/4 (excavated in 1998, 1.0×2.0 m)
  • Probe II, located at the southwestern corner of Square M/4 (excavated in 2008 and 2010, ca. 1.0×2.5 m)
  • Probe III, located at the southern part of Square M/5 and northern part of Square M/4 (excavated in 2010, ca. 9.0 sq m).


A 17 m-long backhoe trench, 0.7 m wide and up to 4.0 m deep, was first dug in 1998 in Squares K–L/5 (4.0 m long) and was extended and deepened during the 2005 and 2008 seasons, along the line of Squares J–M/5 (Fig. 15.3, lower part of Fig. 15.17a). The purpose of this trench was to examine the depth and extent of the 2.0 m-deep artificial fill of Stratum D-10 (which, at the time, was thought to be a natural phenomenon), as well as to uncover geological features related to the edge of the mound and its relation to the colluvial field to the west. During the 2008 season, another short trench (1.0 m wide, 2.5 m long, 4.3 m deep) was dug in this field (Squares H–G/5) (Fig. 15.17a). Although done with a backhoe, the work was closely supervised, with pottery collected and assigned to the various layers. Yet, most of this trench contained either topsoil wash (Squares J–K/5) or a deep fill devoid of finds (Squares L–M/5).

Bedrock, reached at the bottom of Probes I and III, as well as in the backhoe trench (Squares L– M/4–5) (Figs. 15.3, 15.17a, 15.18a), is composed of chunky yellowish tufa, belonging most probably to the Beth-Shean formation of the Late Pleistocene, at the margins of the tilted, uplifted block detected in the geoseismic survey (Chapter 2 and Zilberman et al. 2002). The tufa bedrock forms a roughly horizontal surface, detected at level 76.15 m in Squares K–M/5 in the backhoe trench, at 76.30 m at the bottom of Probe I, and at 75.95 m at the bottom of Probe III. In the western portion of the backhoe trench, at the eastern side of Square J/5, a natural fault was observed in the tufa bedrock. The fault, 1.3 m high, separates an eastern uplifted block from a down-faulted area to its west, where bedrock forms a horizontal surface at level 74.85 m (Figs. 15.17a–b). This fault may constitute only one branch of a wider, stepped fault, since the continuation of the long backhoe trench, dug in the field ca. 8.0 m to the west of the aforementioned fault, was excavated to level 73.85 m without reaching bedrock (Fig. 15.17a). This level is lower by ca. 1.0 m compared to the bedrock level of the down-faulted block detected in the long trench, thus implying a step-like fault zone west of the mound, which is probably part of the fault bordering Tel Rehov on the west, detected during the geoseismic survey (Chapter 2). Regarding the possibility of young tectonic activity along this fault line and its implications for the formation of the lower mound, see discussion above and further below.

The field which lies to the west of the lower mound, intensively cultivated in the last decades, gradually slopes from the west (near today’s Road 90) to the east, towards its lowest part just at the foot of the mound, where a north–south dirt road currently runs. The present level of the field at the base of Area D is 78.50 m, ca. 2.3 m above the uplifted tufa bedrock surface described above. As already mentioned, the short backhoe trench that was dug in the field ca. 8.0 m west of the aforementioned fault (Fig. 15.17a; Photo 15.7), descended from the surface of the field to level 73.85 m (4.3 m deep) without reaching bedrock.

The first anthropogenic activity in Squares K– L/4–5 seems to have taken place immediately above bedrock. Considering that the uplifted tufa bedrock had been exposed above ground when the first occupants arrived, the field would have been at least 2.0 m below its present level. However, due to the possibility of young tectonic activities, discussed above, the actual level of the field could have been much lower with regard to the initial occupation.

Stratum D-11

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.3 - Plan of Stratum D-11b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.4 - Plan of Stratum D-11a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13 - Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.3–15.4
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17–15.20
  • Photos 15.6, 15.8–15.13
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.1–16.3
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-11 is known only from the three probes (I–III) in Squares L–M/4–5, where a 1.0 m-thick deposit of occupation debris and architectural elements (walls, installations, fireplaces and floor patches) was found above bedrock and below the tufa fill that was ascribed to Stratum D-10. Two phases were determined here, termed D-11b and D-11a.

Stratum D-11b

Stratum D-11b was the earliest occupation phase detected in Area D (Fig. 15.3). In Probe I (Square L/4, 1.0×2.0 m), the lowest levels excavated (76.47–76.95 m, Locus 2839) may belong to this phase. In Probe II (Square M/4, 1.0×ca. 1.3 m; Photo 15.12), Locus 9931, in the western half of the probe, consisted of a 0.6 m-deep accumulation of dark brown earth containing meager finds, at levels 76.41–77.00 m. A few consolidated tufa chunks in the center of the probe (unnumbered) might have formed part of a wall or installation.

A narrow east–west brick wall (1927) was found at the bottom of Probe III (Squares M/4–5) (Figs. 15.3, 15.18a; Photo 15.9). It was 3.3 m long, 0.4 m wide and preserved to 0.4 m; its gritty compacted yellowish-brown bricks were barely distinguishable from the surrounding accumulation. No mortar lines were discernible between the bricks and thus, the building technique might have been packed clay. Its foundation was probably detected at level 76.28 m, ca. 0.35 m above bedrock at this point.

The area north of Wall 1927 was not excavated, while the area south of the wall, excavated only ca. 0.2 m down, seems to have constituted an open area. The floor here was apparently represented by discontinuous patches of a thin whitish layer (1921) at levels 76.55–76.60 m. Two small fire installations or hearths were related to this layer at a distance of ca. 1.3 m apart (Photo 15.9). The western one (1925) was circular, ca. 0.55 m in diameter, while the eastern one (1926) was elliptical, 0.35×0.6 m. Both were built of limestone pebbles around the circumference with fragments of broken basalt grinding stones in the center and were somewhat concave. Some stones were clearly burnt, while others showed signs of soot and thus, they are explained as fireplaces. Above Floor 1921 and the fireplaces/hearths was an accumulation of very decayed brown brick debris that contained only a few bones and sherds.

Stratum D-11a

Immediately above the remains of Stratum D-11b and sealed below the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10, an upper building phase was detected in Probes II and III, designated Stratum D-11a (Figs. 15.4, 15.18a–b). It consisted of brick walls (1923, 1929, 1930), creating at least two units (1913, 9917), which were partly excavated.

In Probe III, part of an open space was excavated (1913; Photo 15.10), bordered on the north by Wall 1923 and extending throughout the probe; on the south, it may have been limited by Wall 1929 (exposed in Probe II). Wall 1923 was oriented slightly northeast–southwest and was made mainly of pinkish clayey bricks, resembling some of those used in Walls 1929 and 1930 in Probe II. It was preserved unevenly to a maximum height of four courses (76.65–77.04 m; Photo 15.11). This open space, at least 3.5×4.0 m, had a whitish beaten-earth floor (1913) which covered the aforementioned components of Stratum D-11b.

Three features were related to Floor 1913. The first was a section of a stone wall (1915) located in the southeastern corner of the probe, above a Stratum D-11b fireplace/hearth (1926) (Photo 15.10). It was oriented slightly northwest–southeast and ended abruptly on the north, ca. 1.2 m north of the southern edge of the probe. The wall was built of one course of small- and medium-sized limestone and tufa cobbles, in addition to a few basalt grinding stones in secondary use. It seems to have functioned as some kind of low partition in an open area. The second feature was a circular hearth (1924) made of densely arranged, small burnt limestone pebbles; only its eastern half was inside the probe boundaries, above Wall 1927 of Stratum D-11b. This hearth was 0.9 m in diameter, larger and flatter than the hearths of Stratum D-11b (above), but seems to have served a similar function as an open fireplace, possibly for baking or cooking. The third element was an amorphic heap of ash and charcoal (1919), ca. 1.0 m in diameter, found slightly to the north of Wall 1915 (Photo 15.10). This ash may have been related to a fireplace like 1924, perhaps located beyond the borders of the probe to the east. The hearths of Strata D-11b and D-11a recall three circular hearths with pebble floors found in an open area of Stratum R-4 (late MB II) at Tel Beth-Shean, although the latter were larger (TBS II: 54–59, Fig. 3.6; Photos 3.6, 3.8).

The accumulation above Floor 1913 comprised a 0.2–0.3 m-thick deposit of compacted gritty brown earth, mixed with some decayed bricks and gray ashy patches. Above it, Locus 1907 constituted another layer of debris which was entirely sealed by the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10 and penetrated by the foundations of the massive walls of the D-10 building above it. Locus 1907 (Photo 15.11) was characterized by dark brown, moderately compacted layered sediments with patches of burning (indicated by burnt bones) concentrated in the northern and western portions of the probe, and gritty brown soil with some large bones in the eastern and southern portions. A similar layer was observed in Probe I (2839).

In Probe II (Square M/4; Fig. 15.18b), the southern and eastern faces of two brick walls (1929 and 1930 respectively) were uncovered just below Walls 2886 and 2890 of Stratum D-10. Both walls were comprised of two types of bricks, namely clayey whitish-pink and brown silty bricks, which were clearly distinguishable from the gray bricks of the Stratum D-10 walls. Both walls seem to have been slightly embedded into the Stratum D-11b accumulation of Locus 9931, although no foundation trenches were noted. The walls were preserved to a height of five to six courses (up to 0.6 m, 76.71–77.30 m). The courses of Wall 1929 sloped slightly to the east. The width of these walls was unknown, since the northern face of Wall 1929 was not found below the northern face of Wall 2886 of Stratum D-10, as it was probably narrower than the latter.

Wall 1929 was abutted by a patch of a floor, built of large and medium-sized flat stones of limestone and basalt, found in the eastern half of Probe II, at the bottom of the ca. 0.15 m-thick accumulation of brown earth (9917) (Photo 15.12). The stones were covered with a 0.03 m-thick layer of soft pinkish matrix, suspected as being the actual floor level. While the stones ended abruptly along a clear line in the middle of the probe, the pinkish layer continued westwards to abut the eastern face of Wall 1930. Both elements extended eastwards and southwards beyond the borders of the probe and covered D-11b Locus 9931. A broken cooking pot (Fig. 16.2:8) was found in the northeastern corner of the probe, immediately above the floor, which was otherwise almost devoid of finds.

The material remains deriving from the few contexts associated with Stratum D-11 were limited and fragmentary. The pottery presented in Figs. 16.1–16.3 resembles that from Strata R-2 and R-1b at Tel Beth-Shean and should be dated to LB I and the LB I–II transition

Trench in Squares K–M/5

The 0.7 m-wide trench dug in the northern edge of Squares K–M/5 was intended to answer the question whether the thick tufa fill below the floor of Stratum D-10 was a natural or anthropogenic feature (see below). Earlier work in Probe I raised the hypothesis that the tufa layer was created in a water body (pond or small lake), above deposition of dark earth within a paludal environment (a marsh) (Mazar 1999: 11; see also Rozenbaum 2009 for the high frequency of such environments in the BethShean Valley during the Holocene). The backhoe trench described above, which preceded the manual excavation of Probes II–III, revealed anthropogenic layers below the thick tufa fill of D10 (2814). This was an accumulation of layered, finely sorted silts and clays of alternating gray and brown, totaling ca. 1.0 m in thickness (7923, 9910, 9911, 9913; Fig. 15.17b). No architectural elements were noted in these layers and no sub-phases were observed. This area may have been part of a large open space. The finds included sherds, bones, flints, oven fragments, a broken bronze earring and an almost complete ceramic plaque figurine (Chapter 33; Fig. 33.1).

Stratum D-10

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.5 - Plan of Stratum D-10 constructional fills from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.6 - Plan of Stratum D-10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4 - Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5 - Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13 - Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.14 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.15 - Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.16 - Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.18 - Squares L–M/4 at end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.19 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.20 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.21 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.22 - Square M/5, Buttress 8938 and Wall 8942 abutted by D-10 Courtyard 8934 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27 - Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.5–15.6
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17–15.20
  • Photos 15.4–15.6, 15.8–15.16, 15.18–15.27, 15.37–15.38
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.4–16.8
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-10 constituted the earliest architectural phase detected on a relatively large scale in Area D, consisting of a large brick building (DA), apparently of public nature, erected simultaneously with the placement of massive constructional fills which elevated the ground level by some 2.0 m compared with the top level of the accumulation associated with Stratum D-11. The building and its related fills were exposed over an area of ca. 125 sq m in Squares L–M/4–5 and in the western half of Squares N/4–5. The building extended beyond the excavation area to the north, east and south, while the western part is probably missing due to young tectonic activity along the fault line, discussed above. Based on the associated ceramic assemblage and other finds, Stratum D-10 was dated to the LB IIA (14th century BCE).

Building DA

Introduction

The exposed portion of Building DA was composed of three integrated walls (8942, 2886, 2890), each 1.1 m wide and constructed of rectangular bricks which varied in dimensions, hardness, color, and manner of placement. These massive well-built walls were preserved 2.2–2.5 m high (16–18 courses). Their foundations were slightly embedded in the upper part of the Stratum D-11 accumulation or laid directly on top of earlier walls (as was the case of Walls 2886 and 2890, which were built on top of Walls 1929 and 1930 respectively). Three buttresses were constructed along Walls 2886 and 8942, facing the open space to their west (Photos 15.8, 15.10, 15.14–15.15, 15.18, 15.21– 15.24). Two of them, 1902 and 2889, protruded northwards from Wall 2886; in fact, 1902 continued the line of Wall 2890, which continued southwards beyond the excavated area. A third buttress (8938) projected westwards from Wall 8942 opposite Buttress 9929 (see further discussion of 9929 below). All the buttresses shared the exact same dimensions, protruding 0.85 m from the wall face and measuring 1.1 m in width, equal to the width of the walls. They were rather evenly spaced: Buttress 8938 was located 2.25 m to the north of the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942, while Buttress 2889 was located 2.4 m to the west of the aforementioned corner. Buttress 1902 was located 2.7 m farther to the west from 2889. It should be emphasized that the buttresses were bonded with the walls and thus, both elements were erected simultaneously. An additional possible buttress was 1903 (Square L/4), although it can also be regarded as the western end of Wall 2886. It was identical in dimensions to the other three buttresses and appears to have had a similar function. Nevertheless, it can be argued that 1903 may have functioned as a pier flanking an entrance, the parallel pier of which is to be found further to the west. As such a parallel pier was not found in Square L/4, this hypothesis can be maintained only if assuming an entrance of at least 3.0 m wide. The first option — viewing 1903 as a fourth buttress — is thus preferable (but see below). Two architectural elements were located east of Wall 8942. The first was Buttress 9929, which adjoined the eastern face of Wall 8942 immediately opposite Buttress 8938, and had exactly the same dimensions as the other buttresses. The second, 2.2 m to its south, was the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 (unnumbered), which protruded ca. 1.05 from the eastern line of Wall 8942. It seems likely that this feature was not a buttress, but rather, a pier flanking a doorway within the building, the opposite pier of which lies beyond the excavated area. A narrow wall (1937) extending to the south of this pier is the only inner partition wall uncovered within the building.

Courtyard 8934 and Its Constructional Fill

The area bounded by Walls 2886 and 8942 on the south and east respectively was an open courtyard, covering at least 6.0×8.0 m and extending to the north and west beyond the limits of the excavation. Immediately after the erection of the wall system, the area of the courtyard was covered with a ca. 2.0 m-deep constructional fill (2814) made of two distinct layers of tufa (2814a and 2814b), each ca. 1.0 m thick (Figs. 15.5, 15.17–15.19a; Photos 15.8, 15.10–15.11, 15.13–15.14). This fill was excavated manually in Probes I (1.0×2.0 m) and III (ca. 9.0 sq m), as well as in a shallower probe west of Buttresses 1902 and 1903 in Square L/4 (ca. 4.0 sq m).2 In addition, this fill was uncovered in the long backhoe trench, where it extended ca. 12 m to the west of Wall 8942, before being eroded and replaced with deposits associated with the nearby field (Fig. 15.17a–b). The erosion line was found 3.0 m east of the geological fault described above, and it is probable that the western part of the courtyard disappeared due to young tectonic activity along this fault.

The lower layer of the massive tufa fill (2814b, levels 77.30/77.15–78.25/78.10 m) comprised compacted, homogeneous clayey yellowish tufa. At the bottom of this layer, a ca. 0.2 m-thick deposit of less-compacted chunky tufa was found; the latter also filled an elongated depression within the upper part of Stratum D-11, observed in Probe III (above). The upper tufa layer (2814a, levels 78.10–79.20 m) had a very loose and crumbly matrix and consisted of unsorted tufa chunks that included angular, subangular and sub-rounded cobbles and pebbles, granules, sands and silts. The light tan color of this matrix was lighter than the lower tufa layer. In the lower portion of 2814a, moist brown brick material appeared in isolated chunks (levels 78.10–78.40 m) and included sherds, bones, oven fragments, and one complete bowl (Fig. 16.4:11), found in Probe I. Such remains were virtually non-existent in the other portions of the thick fill, which contained only a few isolated sherds. The contact between the two layers was abrupt and virtually horizontal (Photo 15.11).

When first encountered, before the relation to the surrounding walls was established, it was suggested that this thick tufa deposition, or at least the compacted lower layer, was the result of natural sedimentation within a water body (Mazar 1999: 11; 2008: 2014). It was suspected that Building DA, then assigned to Stratum D-9, was built on top of the tufa deposit. However, in the 2008 season, it became clear that the tufa layers abutted the wall system from the west for the entire 2.0 m height of the fill. No separation whatsoever existed between the tufa layers and the brick walls and buttresses and the latter do not show any signs of erosion related to water. Thus, it is now clear that the tufa layers constituted an artificial fill, intended probably to support the foundations of the building, as well as to raise the ground level.3

In order to study the extent of the tufa fill, a short backhoe trench was opened, ca. 25 m to the north of Area D, at the foot of the mound in Square M/10 (Photo 15.17). This trench (0.7×3.0 m) was excavated in 1998 and examined again in 2010. It revealed a massive deposition of tufa, at least 3.6 m deep, yet its bottom was not reached. This layer was devoid of finds. It remains unclear whether this deposition was a continuation of the same artificial tufa fill found in Stratum D-10 in Area D and if so, whether it also indicates continuation of the complex of Building DA to that line. If indeed it was related to the same building, then the tufa fill, and perhaps the courtyard which it supported, was at least 29 m long from north to south, creating an immense constructional feature. The total area of the fill could thus have reached a minimum of ca. 700 sq m and, assuming a thickness of 2.0 m on the average, the minimal total volume would be 1400 m3. Such a major construction project seems to have necessarily involved some kind of a central administration, adding to the notion of the building’s public nature based on its architectural traits.

The tufa fill most probably served as a raised platform for a wide open courtyard in the interior part of the building. This option would have necessitated the construction of additional walls to the west and north of the exposed segment of the building, beyond the excavated area, which would provide the boundaries for the tufa fill. A thin beaten-earth floor was laid on top of the fill (79.10– 79.20 m; Fig. 15.6; Photos 15.22–15.25). This floor was uncovered in an area of ca. 40 sq m, north of Wall 2886 and west of Wall 8942. It was excavated as Locus 8934 in Square M/5, where it was characterized by soft gray-brown soil mixed with ash patches (0.05–0.1 m), covered by a debris layer, ca. 0.3 m thick (the locus number refers to both the occupation-debris layer and the floor). The remains of this floor were evident mainly near the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942 (Photo 15.27) and north of Buttress 2889. In the eastern part of Square L/5, the floor (7917) was located at level 79.15 m, yet, here, the layers above the floor were somewhat disturbed by erosion and porcupine burrows.

The occupation layer (8934) was covered by two higher layers (8940 and 8930), creating a total accumulation of 0.55–0.7 m between the floor of Stratum D-10 and that of D-9b. The layers above 8934 were characterized by compact brick debris and discontinuous layers of tufa (0.1–0.2 m thick). The central-western part of the area was severely damaged by porcupine burrowing. The brick fragments, which constituted the main volume of the accumulation, were mostly of friable gray and brown material and resembled the bricks used in the surrounding walls and buttresses. A fairly large amount of pottery, including some restorable kraters, was found in these loci, especially in the lower levels (Figs. 16.5–16.6). Most of this pottery was not found in primary deposition, but were fragments distributed throughout the different loci (i.e., at different levels) that turned out to be parts of the same vessels. One almost complete spouted krater (Fig. 16.5:2) was found in situ immediately on top of the tufa layer in Locus 7917. This accumulation was eroded at the base of the mound, west of the line of Buttresses 1902 and 1903. The brick debris should be regarded as collapse related to Building DA. In this respect, it remains unclear whether a human or natural agent initiated the collapse of the building.

In the upper part of the aforementioned accumulation (8930), an exceptional scarab was found. It was defined by Arlette David as a funerary scarab bearing the name of a high Egyptian official — “Scribe of (the) house of (the) overseer of (the) Treasury, Amenemhat repeating life” (Chapter 30B). The 18th Dynasty date of this scarab accords with its stratigraphic context. This scarab may allude to the importance of Building DA, from which it most probably originated.
Footnotes

2 Note that the locus number 2814 refers to the same fill in all three probes.

3 One more argument may be raised against the ‘pond hypothesis’. The possible time span for the deposition of the tufa can be no longer than 100 years, when comparing the pottery assemblages from below and above it, and not 200–300 years as previously assumed (see Mazar 1999: 11; Zilberman et al. 2004: 19). This time span is too short for the deposition of 2.0 m-thick tufa sediments or even of the lower layer alone (compare the 1m/1000 years sedimentation rate for the Beth-Shean tufa given in Zilberman et al. 2004: 27).

The Southern and Eastern Wings of Building DA

The area south of Wall 2886, designated 8939, was bordered by Wall 2890 on the west and by a narrow partition wall (1937) on the east. The latter differed considerably from all other D-10 walls: it was 0.55 m thick, built of a western row of dark gray bricks laid on their narrow side and an eastern row of mixed bricks laid as stretchers. The wall was traced ca. 1.7 m southwards of Wall 2886, below Wall 1904 and Oven 9918 of Stratum D-9b. Only the uppermost courses of the wall were excavated. Space 8939, which was 7.2 long and at least 3.0 m wide, was excavated over most of the area down to the floor level at 79.10 m, except in Probe II (Square M/4), where the deep foundations of Walls 2886 and 2890 were exposed (Fig. 15.18b). The foundation levels of both walls were abutted by a thick sequence of gray sediments (9905, 9914), which were composed of various matrices of brick material, containing very few sherds and other finds (Photos 15.19–15.20). The total thickness of these sediments, which sealed the Stratum D-11 accumulation of 9917, reached 1.74 m near Wall 2886. The top level of Locus 9905 sloped down from north to south (79.04 m to 78.66 m near the southern section), perhaps due to young tectonic activity (Photos 15.12, 15.19). The layers in Loci 9914 and 9905 may be explained as a constructional fill, intended to elevate the level of Building DA, resembling in function the tufa fill (2814) north of Wall 2886, although composed of different material.

Locus 9905 was topped by a 0.65 m-thick series of sloping layers, excavated as Loci 8941 and 8939. Both loci comprised soft light-colored striations, each 0.01–0.1 m thick, separated by thin dark-colored layers, the most prominent of which was a dark ashy layer which denoted the bottom of Locus 8939 (Photo 15.20). All layers sloped to the south, in accordance with the sloping top level of Locus 9905 (Photo 15.19). The thick beige layer at the bottom of Locus 8941, immediately above the thick fill of Loci 9905 and 9914, was possibly a floor level related to Building DA. Both loci contained a relatively small amount of sherds. This sequence of striations was topped by a Stratum D-9b floor (8919).

Most of the area east of Wall 8942 (Squares N/4–5) remained unexcavated to the depths of Stratum D-10, apart from the top of a few architectural elements, as noted above. In the area east of Walls 8942 and 1937, layers of brown soil mixed with a few brick fragments, semi-complete bricks and concentrations of charred material were excavated; in Square N/5, this layer (1936) was excavated down to level 78.40 m, about 0.9 m below Floor 9925 of Stratum D-9b and the top of D-10 Wall 8942, and no floor surface was detected. In Square N/4, only the top of this layer was exposed (1933).

Summary of Building DA

Building DA, with its massive sub-floor fills, wide walls, deep foundations and elaborate arrangement of buttresses, must have been a public structure of some sort, whether a palace or an administrative building. It appears that the excavated remains constituted just a small part of a much larger LB IIA building, which extended in all directions, whose nature and size remain mostly unknown.

The buttresses probably served both as decorative elements and as constructional supports for the building, which might have had several storys. Parallels for similar buttresses, albeit in stone and with different dimensions, can be seen in several other cases in the second millennium BCE Levant. At Megiddo, a line of buttresses appear on the southern (inner) side of the city wall of Stratum XI of the Middle Bronze Age II (Loud 1948: Fig. 379) and on the northern (outer) side of Strata VIIB– VIIA Palace 2041 of the 13th–12th centuries BCE, where there are eight such buttresses (Loud 1948: Fig. 383). In the northeastern corridor (2160) in Square J8 that leads to the palace of Stratum VIIB, the alignment of buttresses recalls our Buttresses 1902 and 1903. At Ugarit, similar buttresses appeared at several locations: four along the outer side of the northern wall of the main palace, facing a street, four along the eastern and southern walls of Courtyard V, and one along the eastern wall of the same courtyard, facing the outside of the palace (Yon 2006: 37, Fig. 20). At Alalakh, three buttresses (ca. 2.0 m wide each) appeared along the southern wall of the “Fort” of Levels IV to IIB of the Late Bronze II (late 15th–13th centuries BCE; Woolley 1955: 166 Fig. 59; Sumakaºi-Fink 2010: 8–10, 77). These parallels support the interpretation of the building remains of Stratum D-10 as belonging to a much larger public building of some sort.

There is no clear evidence for a sudden or violent destruction of this building, although very little of its interior was excavated. It is possible that the building went out of use due to deterioration, damage by earthquakes or other natural causes. It is also possible that the building was abandoned as part of socio-political changes in the city during the transition between the 14th and 13th centuries BCE.

Stratum D-9

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.7 - Plan of Stratum D-9b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.8 - Plan of Stratum D-9a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27 - Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29 - Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31 - Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.32 - Squares N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.33 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.34 - Detail of bronze-melting canal (8921) with fragments of bellow, charcoal, and metal object in situ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.35 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.36 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.39 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42 - Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.43 - Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.44 - Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.7–15.8
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17, 15.18b, 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.23–15.44
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.9–16.15
Discussions
Stratigraphy of Strata D-9 and D-8: Methodological Issues

Following the apparent abandonment of the monumental Building DA of Stratum D-10, the area underwent a major change, albeit with some continuation in architectural orientation. Strata D-9b and D-9a, together with Stratum D-8, form a complex and dense stratigraphic sequence, in which different lines of development can be traced in each excavated unit. The remains were excavated mainly in four squares (M–N/4–5), as well as in the southeastern part of Square L/4 (Stratum D-9b only). The sequence was dated to the Late Bronze IIB (13th century BCE) based on the associated finds.

Several obstacles hinder a clear reconstruction of the stratigraphy of Strata D-9 and D-8. The major problem is related to the identification of floor levels. All the floors, except one (2855, made of stones), were beaten-earth layers which were especially difficult to trace. These layered accumulations consisted of relatively thin striations, making it difficult to differentiate floors from other types of layered accumulation, e.g., phytolith layers or striations deposited in times of abandonment due to winter rains. Another problem was that the suspected floors did not clearly relate to architectural elements (walls and installations) due to the fact that, in most cases, only one or two courses of the stone foundations were preserved and their brick superstructure was almost entirely eroded away. In fact, the superstructure was preserved only in the southernmost end of Wall 8943 (Square N/4, Stratum D-9b) and in Wall 8932 (Squares N/4–5, Strata D-9a–D-8). It is assumed that the original floor levels abutted the brick superstructure, yet the possibility that certain floors abutted the stone foundations is also plausible. Another complication was the ancient robbing of parts of stone-built elements (e.g., the eastern part of Stratum D-9a Floor 2855), which prevented the possibility of linking some of the elements to each other. Finally, as in the previous stratum, some of the floor levels and wall foundations were severely tilted to the south and east, possibly due to young tectonic activity.

In each of the four relevant squares (M–N/4–5), a slightly different stratigraphic sequence was observed within the general sequence of Strata D-9–8. For example, in Square M/4, four floor levels were clearly detected in relation to these strata: 8919 — beaten-earth floor, D-9b; 2855 — stone floor, D-9a; 2825 — plaster floor slightly above 2855, D-9a; 2824 — D-8. Square M/5 contained only two such floors: 7951 (D-9a–b) and 7944 (D-8), and, possibly, a higher floor, 7938 (D-8').

With these caveats in mind, we present the data related to Strata D-9 and D-8 within the framework of the simplest stratigraphic scheme possible. Nevertheless, other interpretations are possible in places; some will be mentioned below.

Stratum D-9b: Building DB

Introduction

In Stratum D-9b, a new building complex (Building DB) was erected on the ruins of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Fig. 15.7). The building was composed of two adjacent units, separated by a long north–south wall (8943). The eastern unit was partially divided into two sub-units (9927, 9925), while the western unit was probably a spacious courtyard which was divided into an open area in the north (7951) and a roofed area in the south (8919).

The Eastern Units — 9925 and 9927

Two units, either rooms or courtyards, were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31). The eastern and northern walls were not found, probably located beyond the borders of the excavated area. Wall 8943 crossed the excavated area on a slightly northwest to southeast line and was mostly preserved only at the stone-foundation level. The northern part of Wall 8943 was built above Wall 8942 of Stratum D-10 and its stones were embedded into the latter, as if using the earlier massive brick wall as a stabilizer. On the southernmost end, the lowermost course of the brick superstructure of Wall 8943 was preserved, made of one row of bricks laid as headers. The stone foundation, preserved one to two courses high, was made of two rows of medium-sized limestone and basalt stones, with some small stones to fill the gaps. Some parts of the foundation, mainly in the southern portion, were missing, probably due to ancient robbing.

Two walls, 1904 and 9923, cornered with Wall 8943 on the east; both were preserved only as high as their stone foundation. Wall 1904 had only one clear row of stones, while its southern row was mostly beyond the excavated area and its eastern part was damaged by Pit 8916 of Stratum D-7b. Wall 1904 probably served as the southern boundary of the unit. Wall 9923 was a 3.2 m-long wall segment which partially divided the eastern unit into two sub-units. It sloped considerably to the east, with a difference of up to 0.4 m in elevation of the lower level over its length. Like other tilted features in this area, this possibly resulted from young tectonic activity. The wall ended abruptly on the east, without a clear edge, and with a slight protrusion to the south, the nature of which remained unclear. Perhaps there was an opening here connecting the two spaces, 9925 and 9927, to the north and south of the wall. Space 9925 was at least 3.0 m long, continuing to the north beyond the excavation area, while Space 9927 in the south was 4.5 m long. Both sub-units were at least 3.5 m wide, as their eastern boundary was beyond the excavated area.

The beaten-earth floor (9925) in the northern space was characterized by a 0.1–0.2 m-thick accumulation of slanted, deformed striations of alternating gray and brown layers, which sloped to the north and east (levels ca. 79.20–79.30 m), and was clearly recognized only in the southwestern portion of this space. The bricks in the top level of Stratum D-10 Buttress 9929 were shaved down and integrated into the floor. On top of the latter, and close to Wall 9923, was a circular oven (9924), measuring 0.7 m in diameter and built of a 0.02–0.03 m thick coating of red clay which was not as solidly baked as in similar installations. It was partially bordered on the north and west by small and medium-sized stones. The oven was filled with whitish ashy powder and soft reddish burnt earth; gray ashy material was spread over part of the floor around it. Its foundations were slightly tilted to the east, in accordance with Floor 9925 and Wall 9923. This northern space may have been an open courtyard.

The floor of the southern space (9927) consisted of a sequence of thin earthen layers, sloping from west (levels 79.41–79.56 m) to east (levels 79.20–79.45 m), containing a large amount of ash and associated with several features. As in the northern unit, Floor 9927 made use of the top of earlier brick walls (the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 and Wall 1937) as part of the floor; no clear floor could be discerned in the northern part of this space (9920). An oven (9918) in the southwestern corner of this space was similar to Oven 9924 in the northern space. The oven was 0.85 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.3 m; its foundations were supported by small pebbles and its wall was made of baked reddish clay covered on the outside by layers of large sherds (Photo 15.32). At its base, remains of up to four different discontinuous layers of baked clay mantles were visible, a possible indication of earlier phases of the oven that were built at the same spot. A small circular plastered basin (1905), 0.24 m in diameter and made of 0.02 m thick whitish lime plaster, was embedded in Floor 9927, 0.55 m to the northeast of the oven. Two similar installations (2883, 8936) were found in the western part of Building DB, in relation to a metallurgical workshop described below. A third feature, a small pit (1934) lined with small burnt limestone pebbles, was found in the southeastern corner, just north of Wall 1904. This peculiar installation, found full of charcoal, in addition to sherds of a cooking pot, clearly related to cooking activities. A fourth feature associated with Floor 9927 was a small pit (1935), ca. 0.7–0.8 m in diameter, which only slightly protruded from the eastern balk southeast of the edge of Wall 9923. This southern space could have been an unroofed courtyard, although it is possible that it had been roofed, providing that there was a closing wall to the east of the excavated area. It seems clear that both these spaces served as working areas, associated, among other things, with food preparation.

The Western Courtyard 7951 and Metallurgical Activity

In the western part of Building DB was a large courtyard, 0.7 m above that of Stratum D-10 Building DA. As no openings connecting the eastern unit with this courtyard were identified, the linkage between them is only tentative; the opening might have been north of the limit of the excavated area. The courtyard (7951, 8919) was excavated in an area of 8.0×9.0 m, between Wall 8943 and the erosion line to the west. Its northern boundary was beyond the excavated area, while its southern limit was Wall 2816 and a line of pillar bases to its east. South of this wall and pillar bases there was an additional space (8919), ca. 2.5 m wide and at least 9.0 m long, bounded on the south by Wall 1906 that protruded along the southern section of Squares M– N/4.

Floor 7951, the northern and main part of the courtyard, contained several installations, notably, one used for the recycling of copper/bronze objects. This was a generally horizontal floor (average 79.85 m), sometimes hard to define (especially in the south), composed of layered brown soil alternating with patches of compacted brick debris. The floor was laid on top of the brick debris related to Building DA of Stratum D-10. In the northeastern corner of the courtyard, near Wall 8943, it seems that the floor was somewhat sunken or had been laid at a lower level (8930; 79.64 m). The western portion of the floor was severely damaged by porcupine burrows (7933).

The main feature associated with Floor 7951 was an elongated installation (8921) used for the melting of copper-based objects (Photos 15.33– 15.34). The installation comprised a long (2.5 m), narrow (0.15–0.25 m) and shallow (0.1–0.15 m) canal, oriented north–south, that was built of the same matrix as the beaten-earth floor, showing that both elements were created simultaneously. The shallow canal was filled with charred wood pieces and contained a large number of copper/bronze prills and a few bronze objects ready to be remelted. In addition, a complete tuyère and fragments of other tuyères and crucibles were found in the canal and next to it. More prills were found scattered on the floor around the installation (Chapter 40C).

Several other installations were related to Floor 7951, although their function and possible connection to the metal industry remained unclear. To the west of the northern tip of Canal 8921, a rounded flat stone, 0.45 m in diameter, was embedded in Floor 7951, surrounded by a circle of small pebbles (Photo 15.35). This installation (8925), which did not contain any finds, could have served as a working platform of some sort, possibly for crushing. To the south of the southern tip of 8921, a concentration of heavily burnt bones was found, with a small pit, 0.25 m in diameter, cutting into the burnt-bone pile. A limestone slab, found broken into two pieces to the south of Installation 8921 possibly functioned as another working platform. Three small plastered basins (2883, 8936 and an unnumbered one south of Installation 8921) were found in the courtyard; these are similar to 1905 in Floor 9927, described above. One of them (8936) was embedded in the lower-level part of the floor in the north and surrounded at the base by small stones (Photo 15.36). In the northwestern corner of the excavated area, a row of two bricks oriented slightly northwest–southeast protruding from the northern section were denoted Wall 7916; they possibly served as a local partition within the large open area.

Area 8919

This area, to the south of Courtyard 7951, was separated from it by two different features, both located on top of the earlier Stratum D-10 architecture. In the western part (Squares L–M/4), Walls 2816 and 2892 appeared to be an attempt to rebuild Wall 2886 and Buttresses 1902 and 1903 (Photos 15.23, 15.25–15.26, 15.37). Wall 2816, preserved along 4.3 m and one course high, was constructed of small- and medium-sized tufa stones. It was built directly on top of Wall 2886 and Buttress 1903 in its eastern part and on top of the tufa fill 2814 in its western part, where it continued westwards beyond the limits of the erosion line. It seems that when the D-9b walls were built, the architectural elements of Stratum D-10 were shaved to a relatively low level (79.05–79.10 m), essentially to that of the thick tufa fill (2814). Wall 2816 was abutted by 2892, made of larger tufa stones, which was built over Buttress 1902 of Stratum D-10. Although these two features constituted an attempt to rebuild part of Building DA of Stratum D-10, their peculiar construction, and the fact that Wall 2816 extended further to the west, indicated changes compared with the original plan of the building in D-10. Wall 2816 must have supported a brick superstructure. The reason for it being lower by 0.8–0.9 m than the line of pillar bases to its east (8935, see below) was perhaps due to the way this part of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Wall 2886, Buttresses 1902, 1903) was destroyed; these elements were possibly damaged more than the eastern part, so that the builders of Stratum D-9b found a depression or step in the ruined wall which they used as foundations for their new construction.

The continuation of the line of Wall 2816 to the east was comprised of six limestone and basalt stones (8935) with relatively flat tops, placed on top of the ruined Wall 2886 of Stratum D-10, which was preserved here at a much higher level compared to the western part (79.80–79.94 m; Photo 15.40). One of these six stones was found somewhat to the south of the main line, but it perhaps was moved in antiquity from its original location. Apparently, these six stones functioned as a line of pillar bases. They were clearly related to the stone floor (2855) of Stratum D-9a, as they ran along the line of its edge. However, they might have originated already in Stratum D-9b, since the stones were placed directly on top of Stratum D-10 Wall 2886. Thus, both Wall 2816 and pillar bases 8935 could be part of a partition, separating Courtyard 7951 from Area 8919 to its south.

Area 8919 was bounded on the north by Wall 2816 and pillar bases 8935, on the east by Wall 8943, and on the south by Wall 1906, while its western limit remained unknown. The southern wall (1906), a continuation to the west of Wall 1904, is known only from a small section of its northern face (Photo 15.38). It was composed of two courses of stone foundation and one to two courses of brick superstructure. Thus, Area 8919 was about 2.3 m wide and at least 9.0 m long. The floor (8919) sloped down considerably towards the southern section, in accordance with the layers of Stratum D-10 and the other tilted layers in Area D, as explained above (Fig. 15.18b). This part of the floor was characterized by a thick build-up of thin soft whitish-pink striations (Photo 15.26). Below the southeastern corner of the floor, near the corner of Walls 8943 and 1906, was a foundation deposit composed of a lamp (Fig. 16.14:30) covered with a broken basalt bowl (Photo 15.39). This deposit was the earliest of its kind found in Area D (several similar deposits were uncovered in later strata, see below). The occupation debris above Floor 8919 contained partly restorable pottery and large animal bones, as well as a large fragment of a crucible filled with traces of melted copper, indicating its contemporaneity with the melting activity in Courtyard 7951.

Stratum D-9a

In Stratum D-9a, Building DB was replaced by new architectural features which partially preserved the outline of previous elements, although the overall plan and nature of this stratum was fairly different (Fig. 15.8). It seems that the builders of Stratum D9a were very familiar with the previous stratum and utilized earlier constructions. They may even have been partly responsible for the dismantling and removal of the brick superstructure of the Stratum D-9b walls, as no brick debris was found in the deserted units of the latter. Stratum D-9a was a kind of transitional phase in the process of deterioration in this area, from the elaborate architecture of Stratum D-10, through the less substantial Stratum D-9b building, to the large open area of the following Stratum D-8.

The main new feature was Wall 8932 and the pillar bases (1912) that continued its line to the north, crossing the eastern part of the excavated area from north to south (Photos 15.29–15.30). Wall 8932 was built of two rows of a stone foundation laid in two courses, on top of which was a brick superstructure made of compacted off-white bricks, preserved to a maximum height of seven courses (ca. 1.0 m) (Photo 15.41). The wall, preserved to 4.5 m, abruptly ended on both edges. While its southern end might have been cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916, its northern end was planned and the continuation of the wall line to the north was in the form of a line of three wooden pillars laid on medium-sized basalt stones with flat tops (1912). The holes formed by the pillars were clearly preserved in a layer of brick debris (1914); they were filled with loose brown sediment, which most probably penetrated into the holes created when the wood decayed, thus preserving their negative within the layer of brick debris (Photos 15.29– 15.30). The southern pillar base was, in fact, an in situ stone of Stratum D-9b Wall 9923 which was no longer in use and after its brick superstructure had been dismantled. In the northern section of Square N/5, a single brick located on line with the pillar bases could have been the beginning of a wall that continued Wall 8932. Wall 8932 and pillar bases 1912 partly damaged and partly superimposed Stratum D-9b Floors 9927 and 9925 respectively.

In Squares N/4–5, east of Walls 8932 and 1912, only a narrow space could be excavated, containing a thick sequence of brown debris layers. Thin whitish patches might represent a floor level at approximately 79.60–79.70 m (1910, 1917); these were associated with three large flat stones found immediately east of Wall 8932 (Photos 15.29– 15.30).

West of Wall 8932/1912, an elongated, probably roofed space, was created. It was bordered on the west by a row of three large stones which most probably served as pillar bases, erected immediately on top of the stone foundation of Wall 8943, after its brick superstructure was deliberately dismantled. The supposedly wooden pillars were freestanding and evenly spaced at intervals of 2.8 m. The floor of this space (9912 in Square N/5 and 9901 in Square N/4; level 79.85 m) was a thin, patchy, soft brown earth layer. On the northern portion of the floor (9912), an intact storage jar (Fig. 16.13:4) was found leaning against the brick material (1914) related to pillar bases 1912. The floor of this space covered the thin layer of debris (9915, 9916, 9921) which rested on Floors 9925 and 9927 of Stratum D-9b.

Flimsy architectural elements were found on both ends of Floor 9912/9901. A small section of a wall or other stone construction (9922) ran along the central part of the southern section of Square N/4, above D-9b Wall 1904. This feature was built of two rows of medium-sized stones arranged in two courses; its relation to other elements could not be established. Its eastern end was cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916.

In the northwestern edge of Square N/5, another flimsy stone construction was defined as Wall 1916. It comprised two rows of medium-sized stones preserved to one course. While on the east it ended abruptly, on the west it might have been connected to a possible north–south wall (1918), of which only a few stones projected from the northern section. However, these elements might have been remains of a stone floor, similar to Floor 2855, described below. To the north of the stones of 1916 was a beaten-earth floor (1911) with the meager remains of an oven (1920) protruding from the northern section, surrounded by ash deposits. The gap between 1916 and Wall 1912 might have served as a passage to 1911 from 9912, yet all these remains at the northern edge of Square N/5 were very scanty and not well understood.

In Square M/4, a major change was noted, where Stratum D-9b Floor 8919 was replaced with a fine floor (2855) made of flat stones, with a polished sheen from use (Photos 15.26, 15.42–15.43). The floor was very well preserved from the erosion line on the west to a distance of 4.1 m, and isolated patches of it continued further to the east, totaling 5.6 m. The floor continued beyond the excavation area to the south; on the north, it was bounded by the row of six large stones (8935), probably a row of pillar bases, described above as possibly having been first built in Stratum D-9b. Floor 2855 was laid above a layer of debris which leveled this south-sloping area, so that it sloped only slightly to the southeast (Photo 15.44). On top of the stones of the floor was a layer of beaten earth (2825), which might represent a somewhat later phase of activity still within Stratum D-9a. The possibility that Wall 2816 (west of 8935 in Square L/4) of Stratum D-9b continued to be in use in this stratum cannot be ruled out.

In Square M/5, where the metal workshop existed in Stratum D-9b (Floor 7951), no clear floor level related to Stratum D-9a was found. On top of Floor 7951 was a 0.2–0.3 m-thick layer containing a large amount of small to medium fieldstones. Although the stones do not seem to create any clear pattern, they might be the remains of yet another stone floor, similar to Floor 2855, or a disturbed western continuation of Walls 1916 and 1918, located in the northwest corner of Square N/5. Alternatively, this can be defined as debris that accumulated on top of Floor 7951 after its abandonment. It was sealed by Floor 7944, which was assigned to Stratum D-8. Thus, it seems that two options regarding Square M/5 during Stratum D-9a may be considered: either Floor 7951 and its related installations continued to be in use, or it was abandoned and gave way to an open area of unclear nature.

The pottery and finds from Strata D-9a–b (Figs. 16.9–16.15) point to a date in LB IIB (13th century BCE).

Stratum D-8

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.9–15.11
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17b, 15.19–15.21
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.16–16.23
Discussion

In Stratum D-8, a large open area covered with a thick white beaten-earth floor replaced the halfopen spaces of Stratum D-9a, while the main wall line of the latter (8932 and row of pillar bases 1912) continued to be in use. The function of this spacious courtyard was hard to define, as only its eastern border was found within the excavated area and it was totally devoid of installations.

The white floor (2824 in Square M/4, 7944 in M/5, 8933 in N/4 and 9909 in N/5) extended over an area of ca. 70 sq. m and was cut by the erosion line in the west. The floor sloped in various directions at levels between 80.06 m–80.27 m, the former only 0.2–0.4 m above the floors that were attributed to Stratum D-9a, described above. It also covered the two rows of pillar bases of the previous stratum, as well as Wall 9922 in the southern part of Square N/4. The floor abutted Wall 8932 and perhaps also the wooden pillars that had stood on the stone bases 1912 (although the bases were now ca. 0.7 m lower than the new floor). The southeastern corner of the floor was cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916. A large complete krater (Fig. 16.18:4) was found leaning against Wall 8932 and a complete Mycenaean IIB stirrup jar (Fig. 16.22:5) was found on Floor 7944 (Square M/5). It should be noted that while the floor was clearly observed in most parts, the northern and northeastern portion of it, near the pillar bases (1912) and the northern section of Squares M–N/5, was harder to discern, possibly as the floor there was thinner or less well preserved.

In the narrow strip excavated east of Wall 8932 and pillar bases 1912, was a ca. 0.5 m-thick layer (1908, 1909) comprised mostly of brown layered sediments that might have been floors, with bones and sherds (Figs. 16.16–16.17, 16.19–16.22). An almost-complete small jug (Fig. 16.21:1) was found on top of a rather continuous thin whitish layer which might represent a floor level (79.73– 79.84 m).

The ceramic assemblage of Stratum D-8 that included several Mycenaean and Cypriot imports is typical of LB IIB and should be dated to the 13th century BCE.

Stratum D-8'

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

The Stratum D-8 floor to the west of Wall 8932 was covered with a 0.3–0.4 m-thick layer of brick debris, containing compacted whitish brick fragments, which most probably originated from Wall 8932. In Square M/5, this debris layer was superimposed by a 0.01–0.02 m-thick pinkish clay layer (7938; Figs. 15.10, 15.17), which was covered by a thick (0.05–0.1 m) layer of dark gray ash. This layer sloped from west (80.40 m) to east (80.26 m); it extended into the northern section of the square, but faded away in its southern part, as well as in Square N/5 (9908; Fig. 15.10). On 7938 was a 0.15–0.2 m-thick accumulation, rich in sherds and animal bones, which may be explained as some kind of a localized ephemeral activity, post-dating Stratum D-8 and pre-dating Stratum D-7b; this phase was denoted D-8'. No evidence for this activity was found in Squares M–N/4.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 (Figs. 16.16–16.22), and is dated to LB IIB.

Layer between Strata D-8 and D-7b (Post D-8)

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

Covering the brick debris and walls related to Stratum D-8, a 0.35–0.6 m-thick layered accumulation was found all over the excavated area (2826 in Square M/4, 7915 and 7937 in M/5, 8927 and 8929 in N/4, 9904 in N/5) (Fig. 15.11). It was characterized by a soft brown layered matrix containing a few brick fragments, very rich in charred material (charcoal and grain), as well as sherds, bones, and fine plaster fragments of unknown origin. The layering of this accumulation was more pronounced in the eastern part, where the layers sloped down into the eastern section of Squares N/4–5. Several thin layers consisted of grayish material, possibly the remains of ash or decayed organics.

No architectural elements were noted in association with this thick accumulation. It clearly sealed the remains of Stratum D-8 and was superimposed by Stratum D-7b elements, most of which were pits dug into the aforementioned accumulation (see below). Therefore, it seems to belong to a post-D-8 and pre-D-7 phase. Nevertheless, it is difficult to suggest any clear explanation for such a thick accumulation, unless a gap in occupation enabled natural forces of sedimentation to operate undisrupted for an unknown time span. Another option is that this layer was a constructional fill related to the building of Stratum D-7b. Although no substantial architecture was found in the latter, the small size of the excavated area does not allow us to reach secure conclusions, and this option remains viable.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 in Figs. 16.16–16.23.

Stratum D-7

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.12 - Plan of Stratum D-7b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.13 - Plan of Stratum D-7a (encircled numbers denote foundation deposits as listed in the text) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.14 - Plan of Stratum D-7a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42 - Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45 - Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46- Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47- Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49- Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a- Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b- Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.12–15.14
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17b, 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.40–15.42,15.45–15.57
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.24–16.33
Discussions

Stratum D-7 comprised two main and one local stratigraphic phases, denoted D-7b, D-7a and D-7a'.
Stratum D-7b

Stratum D-7b signifies the first occupation phase related to the Iron Age IA in Area D (Fig. 15.12). It comprised a few installations and pits related to floor patches spread over the four excavated squares (M–N/4–5), without any walls or other architectural elements. The relatively thin accumulation associated with this stratum was quickly replaced by a new building phase (Stratum D-7a), to which much more substantial remains were assigned. Thus, it seems that Stratum D-7b constituted a rather ephemeral occupation that will not necessarily be found in other parts of the site. See Photo 15.45 for a general view of the area and accumulation in the section up to Stratum D-7a.

Floor segments and installations related to Stratum D-7b were found mainly in Squares M/5 and N/4. In the former, above the accumulation of the post-D-8 layer (7915, 7937), was a compacted thin yellowish layer, probably a beaten-earth floor made of local clays or tufa, 0.02–0.03 m thick, and covered by a thin layer of ash (7903). Both layers were clearly visible in the northern two-thirds of the square, but faded to the east and south. Like the earlier layers in Strata D-9 and D-8, this floor sloped slightly from west to east (levels 81.05 m and 80.95 m respectively). The thin ash layer was superimposed by a layer containing a large concentration of small pebbles, which served as the basis for the Stratum D-7a Floor 7902 above. The thin accumulation below the pebbles (7903, 9903) contained partly restorable pottery and a large amount of bones. The ash layer of 7903 was clearly sealed by Wall 7906 of Stratum D-7a.

Two installations were associated with Floor 7903. One was an oven (7924) found in the northeastern part of the locus. Only its base and a few supporting stones around it were preserved, probably due to its deliberate dismantling by the founders of Stratum D-7a, who placed the red-clay fragments of the oven walls in its center and covered them with pebbles, as part of the foundation of Floor 7902. A lamp-and-bowl deposit associated with the construction of the latter floor and Wall 7906 in Stratum D-7a was placed immediately beside the dismantled oven (Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14); see further below.

A second installation (7919) was composed of a small segment of a stone pavement (1.0×1.2 m), slightly sloping from west to east (81.02–81.19 m) towards a large sunken intact bowl (Fig. 16.26:2; Photo 15.47). The pavement was made of limestones and basalt stones, including a grinding stone fragment in secondary use, as well as broken pottery. Another grinding stone fragment and a few sherds lined the eastern part of the bowl’s rim. This installation must have had something to do with liquid processing, but no specific function could be defined.

Floor 7903 continued into Square N/5 as Floor 9903, which was patchy and disappeared in the eastern part of the square, where relatively deep foundations of the Stratum D-7a architecture damaged it.

In Square N/4, a thick beaten-earth floor (8914) and three pits (8916, 8926, 9932) were attributed to this phase. Floor 8914 was composed of 0.05–0.15 m-thick striations of alternating colors (81.07– 81.15 m), including one whitish layer observed in the southeast portion of the square (Photo 15.48). The floor and the 0.1–0.2 m-thick accumulation on it were almost devoid of finds.

Three pits were dug from Floor 8914 into earlier deposits. Pit 8926, dug into the debris of Locus 8929 (Fig. 15.11), was elliptical (0.7×0.9 m), ca. 0.7 m deep (80.44–81.07 m). It was unlined and filled with loose brown debris and a few stones. A small collection of objects was found in this pit, including a group of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapter 39). A second pit (8916) was found in the southeastern corner of the square and extended into the southern and eastern sections. This large deep rounded pit (0.9 m in diameter) cut through Strata D-8 and D-9 to a total depth of ca. 1.6 m (79.39–81.02 m). It was filled with a layered accumulation of various colors and matrices, including ashes, and contained a large quantity of tiny charred fragments. Few sherds (Fig. 16.33:14– 16) and objects were retrieved from this pit. Attached to the upper part of the pit on the north was another small pit (9932) in the eastern section of the square, ca. 0.6 m in diameter and 0.3 m deep (80.65–80.94 m), and full of ash. No clear remains related to Stratum D-7b were found in Square M/4, perhaps due to erosion.

The features attributed to Stratum D-7b point to a relatively meager occupation of short duration, with no significant architecture. It might be suggested that the post Stratum D-8 fills described above should be merged with Stratum D-7b features, the fills being a levelling operation for the construction of Stratum D-7b floors and installations. This issue is related to the definition of Stratum D-7b as either the last phase of LB IIB or the earliest phase of Iron IA, a question further discussed in Chapters 4 and 23.

Stratum D-7a

Introduction

In an excavated area of ca. 80 sq m, three units built of brick walls with stone foundations were found, denoted Building DC, although their attribution to a single building remains uncertain (Fig. 15.13). All brick superstructures except one (2842) were built of one row of gritty yellowish bricks laid as headers, with thin (0.02 m) gray mortar between them. This type of brick, which had similar dimensions in most walls (0.58×0.36×0.12 m), was unique to Stratum D-7a. The brick superstructure rested on top of a one-course stone foundation which was made of two rows of stones with a gap between them, filled with gray-brown debris. The stone foundations were slightly wider than the brick superstructure, measuring 0.75 m as opposed to the 0.6 m-wide brick wall, and thus, they protruded on both faces. The stones were mediumsized basalt and limestone and included occasional basalt grinding stone fragments in secondary use. Floors were found to abut the top level of the stone foundation or the lower courses of the brick superstructure.

The three units of Building DC were not completely excavated: the northern (7902, 9906) and southwestern (2871) units were cut by the erosion line in the west, while the southeastern unit (8907) extended beyond the excavated area to the east and south. As a whole, Building DC might also have extended to the north, as indicated by the opening in Wall 7906. Although not completely exposed, it seems that the nature of the three units excavated can be defined. The spacious northern rectangular unit probably served as an open courtyard, its eastern portion (9906) separated from its main western part (7902) by a row of pillar bases (9907) to enable its roofing. The southeastern unit (8907) contained several installations in close proximity to one another and appears to have been some kind of a working area, probably roofed. The southwestern room (2871) was roofed, although its exact function could not be determined. It is assumed that all units belonged to the same building, although no clear entrance was found connecting Room 2871 with the other components; such an opening might have been located to the west, beyond the line of erosion.

Building DC was built partly into and on top of the remains of Stratum D-7b. At some places, mainly below the southwestern and northeastern units, no elements or floor levels related to the previous stratum were found, possibly due to their removal by the Stratum D-7a builders. In Square M/5, the floor of Stratum D-7a (7902) was just 0.1 m above that of Stratum D-7b (7903), while in Square N/4, a 0.3 m-thick accumulation separated the two strata. Thus, the floors of the different units of Stratum D-7a were on somewhat different levels. Although a relatively large domestic area, Stratum D-7a did not yield rich assemblages of occupation remains, probably due to the fact that the structures were not destroyed abruptly, but were gradually abandoned. Some minor changes, concentrated in the northeastern part of the excavated area, have led us to designate a local phase (D-7a') that followed the initial construction (see Fig. 15.14 and below). The artifactual assemblages are broadly dated to the first half of the 12th century BCE.

A prominent feature of Stratum D-7a was the multiplicity of foundation deposits that were placed in foundations of walls and floors. The six deposits (marked as Nos. 1–6 in the text below and in Fig. 15.13) are of the lamp-and-bowl type; in two cases, the lamp was inside a bowl and covered by another bowl and in four cases, one lamp was located inside a bowl. Discussion of this phenomenon appears in the summary of this chapter. Following is a list of the deposits.
  1. Fig. 16.24:1–3: Reg. No. 18548, Locus 1856, south of Wall 4856; two bowls, one lamp.
  2. Fig. 16.24:4–6: Reg. No. 18698, Locus 1856, found near the western end of Wall 1818, below a large stone; two bowls, one lamp.
  3. Fig. 16.24:7–8: Reg. No. 79389, Wall 1818, attached to the northern side of the eastern part of the wall (Square N/4); one bowl, one lamp.
  4. Fig. 16.24:9–10: Reg. No. 79307, embedded into Stratum D-7b Locus 7903, near the western end of Wall 7906 (Square M/5); one bowl, one lamp.
  5. Fig. 16.24:11–12: Reg. No. 19048, attached to Wall 7906, east of entrance in Square N/5; one bowl, one lamp.
  6. Fig. 16.24:13–14: Reg. No. 79198, embedded into Stratum D-7b Locus 7903, related to the construction of Wall 7906, south of its central side; one bowl, one lamp.

The Northern Unit

This unit was bounded by Wall 7906 to the north and Walls 4856 and 8917 to the south (Fig. 15.13). The western boundary was eroded, while the eastern one was beyond the excavation area.

Wall 7906 was oriented slightly southwest– northeast, preserved along 8.0 m. A 0.75 m-wide opening in this wall led northwards, beyond the excavated area. The wall ended on the west with the erosion line (Photo 15.49). It was preserved to a height of four–five brick courses (81.62 m at the western end, 81.37–81.45 m at the eastern end) above a foundation made of medium-sized stones laid at the western part above Stratum D-7b Locus 7903 at levels 80.95–81.01 m. The foundation of the eastern part was less carefully built of somewhat smaller stones. The opening had a beaten-earth threshold (ca. 81.10 m), covered by a 0.1–0.15 m-thick accumulation of gray material of unclear nature.

Three lamp-and-bowl foundation deposits were associated with Wall 7906, each comprised of one lamp and one bowl, the latter usually placed above the former. The westernmost deposit (No. 4, Fig. 16.24:9–10) was found below the northern row of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 where the brick superstructure was missing due to erosion (Fig. 15.13). The second deposit (No. 6, Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14) was found immediately to the south of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 in the eastern portion of Square M/5. This deposit was placed when Oven 7924 of Stratum D-7b was already dismantled, as it was found leaning against its red-clay wall (see above). It is possible that this foundation deposit had shifted slightly from its original position, as the lamp and bowl were found at an angle and not horizontally laid. The third deposit (No. 5, Fig. 16.24:11–12) was found below the southern row of the stone foundation of Wall 7906, ca. 0.5 m east of the opening in the wall.

Walls 4856 and 8917 separated the northern and southern units. Wall 8917 (Photo 15.50) was parallel to Wall 7906 and its foundation also tilted to the east (80.84–81.05 m along the 2.3 m exposed part of the wall). It had a foundation of small stones and four brick courses were preserved (81.05– 81.57 m). A 0.75 m-wide opening was located between the western edge of this wall and Wall 4856, which enabled passage between the northern and the southeastern units. This opening was on line with the opening in Wall 7906, thus creating access to the various parts of the building.

Wall 4856 was built on an east–west axis, at a slightly different angle compared to the aforementioned walls. It extended along 4.1 m and ended with the erosion line on the west, where it was also partly damaged by animal burrowing. The wall was preserved to a maximum height of eight courses (81.13–82.48 m), including the stone foundation, which was much higher than in the other walls in this stratum. The southern row of the stone foundation was higher by 0.1–0.15 m compared to the northern row, possibly an intentional technique related to drainage arrangements. The northern face of the wall was plastered with a 0.01–0.02 m-thick mud plaster, but it was not clear whether the same technique was applied to the southern face as well.

The western part of the northern unit was a 3.5– 3.8 m-wide open area, stretching from a row of pillar bases (9907) ca. 5.8 m westwards, where it was eroded on the slope of the mound. This area, 7902 and 9902 in Squares M/5 and N/5 respectively, was characterized by a 0.1–0.2 m-thick build-up of floor material (81.12–81.31 m in the western part, 81.10–81.20 m in the eastern part). This accumulation abutted the top of the stone foundations of the surrounding walls and their brick superstructure’s lowermost course. Locus 7902 contained a large amount of small (LT 0.1 m) limestone pebbles scattered in the north-central part of the locus and embedded in the floor foundations; these pebbles were laid above Stratum D-7b Locus 7903 and Oven 7924. A medium-sized flat stone was found in the middle of the floor (top level 81.31 m), possibly serving as a working platform. The floor striations contained a relatively small amount of sherds and bones, but were rich in charred wooden pieces; a broken jug (Fig. 16.31:19) was the only find associated with the top level of the floor. At the western edge of the floor, the lower portion of an oven (4874) was found, surrounded by small stones (including broken basalt grinding stones in secondary use), some large sherds, and ashy deposits. The eastern portion of this space, excavated as Locus 9902, served as the main area of movement between the units along the axis linking the two openings discussed above.

The open area of Floor 7902/9902 was bordered on the east by a row of pillar bases, designated 9907 (80.93–81.18 m), located somewhat to the east of the aforesaid openings in Walls 7906 and 8917. Each of the four pillar bases was composed of one medium-sized field stone with a relatively flat top which was supported by a few smaller stones (Photos 15.50–15.51). These pillar bases were not evenly spaced, with a larger gap between the northernmost one and the rest. The row of pillar bases was abutted on the east by a stone floor (9906) which also abutted the stone foundation of Wall 8917 and the brick superstructure of Wall 7906. The floor was made of basalt and limestone fieldstones, cobbles and pebbles, with occasional basalt grinding stone fragments. The floor sloped down to the east (80.92–81.07 m), in accordance with the foundations of Walls 7906 (eastern part) and 8917, possibly due to post-depositional processes, such as young tectonic activities.

The Southeastern Unit

The opening between Walls 8917 and 4856 led to the southeastern unit, characterized by a rather thick floor build-up (8907, levels 81.45–81.60 m) that was related to a dense concentration of installations (Fig. 15.13). The floor was ca. 0.3–0.4 m higher than Floor 7902/9902 of the northern unit and this gap was bridged by a step built of two bricks (levels 81.35–81.60 m) which were found immediately to the southwest of Wall 8917 (shown on the plan of Stratum D-7a', Fig. 15.14), although it is unclear whether these two bricks were placed during the initial construction phase of Stratum D-7a or during the later phase, D-7a'. Floor 8907 extended 4.2 m to the south of Wall 8917 up to the southern section of Square N/4, and 3.5–4.0 m on an east–west axis from Wall 2842 to the eastern section. This appears to have been an open courtyard, although two medium-sized stones with flat tops embedded in the upper part of the floor striations, 2.4–2.5 m to the south of Wall 8917, may have served as pillar bases for a lightweight roof.

Seven features were found in association with Floor 8907.
  1. Oven 7946 (Photo 15.53). This oven, 0.6 m in diameter, was located in the southeastern part of Square N/4. It was comprised of three mantles — very low-fired red clay walls, sherds lining the outer wall, and compacted yellowish clayey material which encircled the latter. The oven was preserved to a height of 0.2 m (top level 81.90 m), but its lower portion remained unexcavated and thus its foundation level was unknown.

  2. Circular Installation 8902 (Photo 15.53). This installation was located to the south of Oven 7946, but was preserved at a much lower level (81.69 m); its bottom was not excavated. It was built of two concentric mantles, the inner one made of 0.02 m thick off-white clay material (plaster?) mixed with dark-colored inclusions. This inner coat created an ellipse, 0.35×0.45 m. The outer mantle consisted of a 0.05–0.07 m-thick layer of red-brown very low-fired clay. It seems that this installation was used for cooking.

  3. Pit 8945. This pit, 0.7×0.8 m and 0.4 m deep, was located ca. 0.4 m southwest of Installation 8902 and penetrated into the southern section of the square. The pit was filled with soft gray and brown striations containing numerous charred pieces; the bottom was made of harder brown soil. It may have served as refuse pit for the nearby cooking installations, although only part of the accumulation seems to be comprised of decayed ash. The pit was covered by the upper portion of the Floor 8907 buildup and probably was filled at an early phase of the use of this floor.

  4. Pit 8915. Located 1.0 m west of Pit 8945, this was a rather irregularly shaped pit, 0.4×0.7 m and 0.6 m deep, that was filled with three different layers. The bottom, 0.2 m thick, was a relatively hard brown soil. The middle layer was pure decayed ash, some 0.25 m thick. The upper layer was light brown fill. All three layers were almost devoid of material remains. As in the case of Pit 8945, Pit 8915 was covered by the upper part of the Floor 8907 buildup.

  5. Installation 8908. This semi-circular installation, located immediately to the north of Pit 8915, was built against the eastern face of Wall 2842. It was shaped as a shallow basin with an elevated outer tip composed of soft brown clay (81.50–81.63 m). Its complete form was not known, since its northern part was damaged when Installation 7947 was built (see below). The remaining portion was somewhat peculiar, since its tip was slightly lower than the basin’s bottom; however, this sinkage may be the result of post-depositional processes. The function of this installation was not clear.

  6. Installation 7947. This square installation (inner dimensions ca. 0.6×06 m) was attached to the eastern face of Wall 2842 and cut the northern part of Installation 8908. The installation was built of three bricks placed on their narrow side; the northern and eastern bricks remained intact, while a large fragment of the southern brick was found to the south of the installation. The installation was full of soft ashy material and it may have served as a small bin or as some kind of cooking facility.

  7. Installation 8906. Located in the middle of the northern part of Floor 8907, this was the largest feature associated with it (Photo 15.52). This rectangular brick construction (external measurement 1.4×1.85; inner measurement 0.85×1.3 m) was sunken from the floor into earlier deposits (80.89– 81.54 m). The construction was flimsy, using bricks of varying sizes, possibly in secondary use, and sometimes placed with gaps between them or not on the exact same line. The average thickness of the walls was 0.25–0.3 m, except for the western wall, which was only 0.1 m thick. Most of the bricks were brown-orange and of a homogenous compact matrix, while those used in the western wall were friable gray bricks. Traces of a thin (0.01–0.02 m) white clay plaster were found on the inside of the western wall, but might have originally coated the entire interior. A few curving plaster patches found at ca. 80.92 m indicated the floor level of this basin, but the rest of the floor was not detected. The upper 0.15 m of the accumulation inside the installation was characterized by many small, fist-size stones and brick fragments dispersed among ashy gray material. Below this layer, the accumulation contained mostly layered gray debris. A bronze rod and a loomweight were among the few objects found in the installation, although it seems that they were not related to its original function which might have been for storage.

The multiplicity of installations indicates that the southeastern space was used primarily to perform various tasks, such as cooking, refuse collection and possibly storage. Nevertheless, it was clear that not all features were in use simultaneously; Installation 8908 was damaged by Installation 7947 and Pits 8915 and 8945 were covered by the latest floor build-up. This indicates a rather prolonged period of use of this floor, an assumption corroborated by the thick accumulation of floor striations. These observations are in accordance with the possibility that Floor 8907 continued to be in use when Wall 8917 was leveled and Wall 8904 was erected slightly to its south, as part of the minor changes that occurred in the later stage of Stratum D-7a (see below, D-7a').

The Southwestern Unit

Room 2871 was bounded by Walls 2842, 4856 and 1818 (Photo 15.57, upper right); its western boundary was eroded away (Fig. 15.13). The room measured 3.1 m in width (north–south) and at least 3.8 m in length (east–west). A marked peculiarity in Room 2871 was the significant difference in wall foundation levels and, as a result, the irregular relationship between the walls, an issue which clearly pertains to the history of the room’s construction. Wall 1818 was the deepest of the three. Its stone foundation, 0.7–0.9 m wide, was carefully built of two rows of medium- and large-sized flat stones, the largest of which were in the western portion of the foundation. The foundation extended 3.6 m from the erosion line to the east, where it abruptly ended ca. 0.4 m west of Wall 2842, while its brick superstructure abutted the latter wall. Two foundation deposits were found below the northern row of stones: the western one (No. 2; Fig. 16.24:4–6; see Fig. 15.20, Photo 15.54a), placed below a large flat limestone, was composed of two bowls placed rim to-rim, enclosing a lamp. The second deposit (No. 3; Fig. 16.24:9–10, Photo 15.54b) was ca. 1.5 m to the east of the former and consisted of one lamp and one bowl. The brick superstructure built on top of the stone foundation was preserved five to six courses high (0.8–0.9 m), composed of the typical yellowish gritty bricks of Stratum D-7a, on top of which three to five courses of gray-brown friable bricks were placed (top preserved level: 82.50 m). The upper part resembled Wall 2842 and was probably erected with the latter. It should be noted that the lower part of the brick superstructure of Wall 1818 was built of different-sized bricks compared to other Stratum D-7a walls, placed as either headers or stretchers; the overall width of the wall ranged from 0.55 m in the east to 0.7 m in the west.

A peculiar feature was found in the corner of Walls 4856 and 2842, where the yellowish bricks of Wall 4856 turned southwards and comprised the first ‘column’ of bricks in the northern end of Wall 2842. Only 0.3 m to the south of the line of Wall 4856 did the real construction of Wall 2842 begin, using carelessly placed gray, brown and white bricks. These bricks were preserved up to eight or nine courses above a flimsy stone foundation built of rather large irregularly shaped fieldstones, with smaller stones filling the gaps between them (Photo 15.52). This stone foundation was ca. 0.15–0.3 m higher than that of Walls 4856 and 1818, in accordance with the slope of the mound. Wall 2842 extended into the southern section of Square N/4 and was preserved to a height of over 1.1 m above the floor in Room 2871; it clearly continued to be in use during Stratum D-6b (see below). In the central part of the brick superstructure, just west of Installation 7947 (above), the wall was damaged by animal burrowing.

The observations detailed above are not easy to interpret stratigraphically. It seems probable that Walls 1818 and 4856 were built simultaneously. The peculiar eastern corner of the latter with Wall 2842 may imply that originally there had been a yellow-brick north–south wall that was later entirely dismantled for some reason. In its place, a new wall (2842) was erected at a slightly higher level compared to the existing walls and its join with these walls was modified in a rather flimsy way. At that time, Wall 1818 was rebuilt with bricks similar to those used in Wall 2842. It is possible that a similar case happened with Wall 4856, where only traces of gray and white bricks appeared in the top part of the wall.

The main problem with the suggested scenario is that only one clear floor sequence was found in the space enclosed by the aforementioned walls — a thick accumulation of floor build-up (2871 in Square N/4 and 1856 in Square M/4; Fig. 15.19). The floor sloped down towards the west, its higher area near the stone foundation of Wall 2842 (81.56 m and 81.65 m in the east, down to 81.39 m in the west). The floor striations were characterized by compacted brown layers which contained large amounts of charred material and whitish patches (phytoliths?). The tilt of the floor to the west hindered full understanding of its relation to the surrounding walls.

A few features were found related to Floor 2871. A small, deep (80.36–81.41 m) bell-shaped pit (1846) with a slightly collapsed perimeter was found in the north-central part of the room. The pit was presumably lined with bricks, but only a few remained attached to the pit contour; inside was a layered accumulation covered by ashy material. The pit was sealed by the upper part of the floor striations which sloped inwards in the vicinity of the pit (compare Pit 8945 of the southeastern unit), meaning that the pit went out of use before the end of Stratum D-7a. Just northeast of the pit and south of Wall 4856 (in the confines of Locus 1856), another foundation deposit of two bowls and a lamp (No. 1; Fig. 16.24:1–3), similar to the one found below the western part of Wall 1818, was found embedded in the floor make-up (81.39 m). A third feature, found north of Wall 1818, ca. 2.0 m southeast of the pit, was a construction of one course of four bricks, 0.8 sq m (2893, 81.23–81.39 m; not on the plan) whose purpose remained unclear. Floor 2871 was covered by a 0.2 m-thick layer of occupation debris (2854) and the latter by a thick layer of brick debris (2843).

Stratum D-7a'

Minor changes in the northeastern part of the excavated area were attributed to this phase (Fig. 15.4); these changes might correspond to the upper layers of the floor build-up that accumulated in the other spaces in Stratum D-7a, discussed above.

The most obvious change was the replacement of flagstone Floor 9906 in Square N/5 with a beaten-earth floor (8912; 81.16–81.30 m). In addition, the row of pillar bases (9907) was replaced with a new row (8944), built on the exact same line, on a slightly higher level (81.20–81.46 m) (Photo 15.55). This row was built of four stones; the southern two were regular large limestone fieldstones, while the northern two consisted of a complete basalt bowl placed upside down and a large lower basalt grinding stone. It is possible that a concentration of smaller stones close to Wall 7906 constituted a fifth pillar base. West of this row, the continuation of the beaten-earth floor was found (8920, 81.20–81.30 m), which gradually integrated with Floor 7902 to the west. The floor abutted the brick superstructure of Walls 7906 and 4856. Floor 8912 was covered with 0.2–0.3 m of layered debris, containing discontinuous patches of phytoliths, ash mixed with many olive pits and tilted striations of varied colors (excavated partly as Locus 8909).

In the southern part of this area, Wall 8917 of D-7a was now replaced with a new wall (8904), built slightly to the south and partly covering its southern face, although the northern face perhaps continued to be used as bench in this phase. Wall 8904 was preserved to six courses (81.50–82.23 m) of white and gray bricks placed as stretchers in one row, thus making it rather narrow (0.35 m wide). The wall extended from the eastern section to ca. 1.0 m east of the corner of Walls 4856 and 2842, thus maintaining the passage that was here in Stratum D-7a. Two bricks found in the passage somewhat to the north of the wall line were preserved and used as a threshold; in fact, they may also be attributed to the original opening in Stratum D-7a. The northern wall of Installation 2874 of Stratum D-6b was built right on top of Wall 8904 (Fig. 15.21).

It seems that no architectural changes occurred in this phase in Squares M–N/4, where D-7a walls and installations continued to be in use. Occupation debris found above the thick floor striations in this area should be regarded as contemporary with Phase D-7a' in Square N/5. Above Floor 2871/1856, was a 0.2–0.3 m layer of such debris (2854, 1831; Fig. 15.19) containing partly restorable pottery (Figs. 16.25–16.32), bones and grinding stones. Similar debris (7948) was found above Floor 8907, containing pottery (Figs. 16.25– 16.26, 16.30–16.33), as well as a few small finds.

Building DC of Stratum D-7a collapsed and the occupation layers were covered by brick debris, although no evidence for a violent destruction and fire was found. The collapse layer, ranging in depth from 0.3 m to 1.2 m, was excavated as different loci in the various parts of the building: 2843 in the southwestern unit, 7945 in the southeastern unit, 7935/8903 in the southern and western parts of Square N/5, and 4847/4817/4812 in the northwestern part. The collapse contained brick fragments of both the typical yellowish bricks of the initial phase of Stratum D-7a and other types of bricks (white, gray, brown, reddish) used in this stratum and its later phase. These collapse layers were found immediately below topsoil in Squares M–N/4 and below floor levels related to Stratum D-6b in Squares M–N/5. In the main part of Square N/5, installations of Stratum D-6b penetrated considerably into the earlier deposits (Figs. 15.20– 15.21), removing much of the brick debris of Stratum D-7.4

The pottery assemblage of Stratum D-7a–b is similar to that of Strata S-4 and S-3 at Beth-Shean (TBS III: Chapter 5) and should be dated to the 12th century BCE (Iron IA).
Footnotes

4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.

Stratum D-6

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Plans: 15.15–15.16
  • Sections: : Figs. 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.56–15.62
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.34–16.37
Discussions
Introduction

Possibly the most complicated stratigraphic sequence in the western part of Area D was found above Stratum D-7a and below the Iron IB Strata D-5–D-4. Inside this 1.5 m-deep accumulation, excavated over an area of approximately 60 sq m (in Squares M/5, N/4–5, and the southwestern portion of P/4), numerous installations and built elements were uncovered, each with a different foundation and preservation level. In-between these installations, as well as partly above and below several of them, was a thick accumulation of striations, found in all areas except for the western and northern portions of Squares M–N/5. These striations, which totaled ca. 0.9 m (82.10–83.00 m), represented both floor build-up and natural accumulation of layered sediments. However, the distinction between different depositional processes during the excavation was impossible due to the overall homogenous nature of the striations and the absence of concentrations of material remains within the sequence. The striations must have accumulated during a relatively long time-span, in which man-made features were built and went out of use intermittently. The correlation of different features found at various elevations along the sequence was often complicated. We tentatively divided this stratum into two main phases, although in certain places, this division was arbitrary: a lower phase (D-6b; Fig. 15.15) and an upper phase (D-6a; Fig. 15.16).

Stratum D-6b

The lowest level in which the striated accumulation appeared in Square N/4 was 82.10–82.20 m, designated Locus 1876 (above brick debris 7936 of Stratum D-7a; Figs. 15.19–15.21). In Loci 7935 and 7950, excavated at the same levels in Square N/5, no clear continuation of these striations was observed and, instead, the top of the brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' was found (Fig. 15.21). Only in the southeastern corner of Square N/5, within Locus 7935 (82.10–82.23 m), a local layered accumulation was noted, which included large cattle bones and an associated gray-ash accumulation.

The only architectural element which was clearly abutted by these lower striations was Wall 2842 of Stratum D-7a, which appeared to be in use in Stratum D-6b as well (Figs. 15.19–15.20; Photo 15.57). This is evident by the fact that the sequence of striations either abutted Wall 2842 or ended at the line of the wall, above the uppermost level of its preservation. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the wall stood much higher when the striations were deposited and only at a later stage its upper courses collapsed. It is less clear whether the entire southwestern unit of Stratum D-7a, including Walls 4856 and 1818, continued to be in use in Stratum D-6b.

Three rectangular brick installations were associated with the floor striations in this area. The two northern ones (7931, 7939), in the northern part of Square N/5 (Photos 15.4, 15.56–15.58), were almost identical in dimensions (1.07×1.87 m and 1.1×1.75 m, respectively) and were built along different axes (east–west and north–south, respectively). Although they were contemporary, it seems that Installation 7939 had been attached to 7931 at a slightly later stage. The walls were built of homogeneous compact gray bricks of fairly standard dimensions (0.5–0.55 m long, 0.3–0.35 m wide, 0.12–0.14 m thick), laid as stretchers in one row and preserved to a height of seven courses. The walls were plastered on their interior and exterior faces with yellow clay, 0.03–0.05 m thick. The western wall of Installation 7939 also functioned as the eastern wall of Installation 7931; its eastern face was thus covered with two layers of plaster. The floor levels of both installations were damaged, partly due to animal burrowing, mainly in 7939. However, the yellow clay floor of Installation 7939 was clearly observed in the eastern section of Square N/5 (Fig. 15.21), sloping slightly from north (81.70 m) to south (81.61 m). The floor of Installation 7931 might have been slightly higher (ca. 81.90 m), as indicated by patches of reddish clay preserved in two of its corners. The accumulation inside the installations consisted of loose graybrown soil, with occasional brick chunks and isolated sherds (Figs. 16.34–16.36). The function of these installations and another described below (2874) remained unclear.

Installations 7931 and 7939 cut into Stratum D-7a brick debris (7941, 7949 below their floors and Loci 8903, 8905, 7950 around the installations). A floor related to the installations was found mainly to the south (7935, 82.10 m); no clear floor was found to the west. To the north of Installation 7931, a possible floor was found in the form of a thin gray layer, sloping slightly eastwards (8911, 82.37–82.47 m). This layer covered brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' (8924), which was cut near the installation wall by a foundation trench of the installation and filled with brick fragments (8923). It seems probable that the upper part of both installations protruded above the surrounding floor levels. This was also indicated by the fact that Installation 7939 was preserved to its original top level (82.60 m), as evidenced by the yellow clay plaster which covered the uppermost bricks; it is assumed that Installation 7931 was of the same height. North of Installation 7939 and at approximately the same level, a brick wall (8922) was found protruding along the northern section. It perhaps was the southern wall of yet another installation or a room located beyond the excavated area to the north (Fig. 15.21).

A third rectangular brick installation was 2874 in Square N/4 (Photo 15.59), located ca. 2.0 m to the south of Installation 7939. Its northern wall was built exactly on top of Wall 8904 of Phase D-7a' and was preserved to a higher level (82.92 m) than the other walls and elements. The inner dimensions were 0.85×1.25 m and its inner corners were slightly rounded. The foundation level of its walls was 82.15–82.20 m and its patchy plaster floor was found at 82.25 m. The aforementioned levels were 0.4–0.5 m higher than the parallel values of Installations 7931 and 7939, which may suggest that Installation 2874 was erected at a later stage (D-6a). The installation was built of compact greenish bricks and was plastered inside and outside with a similar matrix; it was abutted on all sides by the thick accumulation of striations. Attached to the northern wall on its outer face at 82.45–82.55 m was a small semi-circular patch of baked red clay (7932), resembling oven ware, 0.43 m in diameter and 0.03–0.05 m thick. A small quantity of charcoal and olive pits were found on top of this feature, as well as in its vicinity; its function was evidently connected with fire. The same type of red clay was found in small patches inside Installation 7931 and in another patch (7925) above Wall 7926 of Stratum D-6a (see below).

To the west of Installation 2874 was a thick layer of ash, mixed with many olive pits, found at the bottom level of the striations in Locus 7935. This layer, and earlier deposits below it, were cut by a small round pit (7930), 0.53 m in diameter, its top level at ca. 82.45 m and its depth ca. 0.35 m. It was unlined and filled with loose brown debris. The pit was covered by striations 7921 and 1876 of Stratum D-6a.

To the south of Installation 2874, two ovens (2877, 2878) were embedded in the striations of 1876. Oven 2877 (82.40–82.97 m) comprised a circular outline (0.6 m in diameter) of burnt red material alongside several oven wall fragments. Oven 2878 (82.42–82.77 m), located 0.8 m to the east, was slightly larger (0.8 m in diameter). Both ovens were poorly preserved due to the fact that they were later replaced by new ones in Stratum D-6a (2851 and 2841 respectively). Built-up floors were found in the southern part of Square N/4 (1876, 2852; Photo 15.60).

Wall 4833 in Square M/5 was made of white and brown bricks, preserved to a maximum height of seven courses near the eastern section of Square M/5 (81.64–82.48 m) and extending 4.2 m until the erosion line. The wall was built on top of and slightly to the south of Stratum D-7a Wall 7906, on a slightly different orientation, and thus should be seen as an attempt to rebuilt Wall 7906. No floor was found to abut this wall.

Stratum D-6a

The later phase of Stratum D-6 was characterized by the continued accumulation of striations in Square N/4 (the top of 1876, Photo 15.60), as well as in the southern (7921) and eastern (7922) parts of Square N/5, at levels 82.80–83.00 m (Fig. 15.6).

In Square N/5, Installations 7931 and 7939 went out of use and were covered with striations (7922) mixed with some brick debris. Above Installation 7939, three whitish bricks oriented north– south were embedded in the striations of 7922, most probably a constructed feature rather than fallen bricks. To the west of these bricks, parallel to the northern section, a new wall was erected (7926) on top of the gray layer 8911, presumably a Stratum D-6b floor which related to Installation 7931. It was ca. 1.8 m in length and 0.4 m in width. Above its eastern portion was a patch of baked red clay resembling oven material (7925, 82.93 m) that recalled those found in Stratum D-6b Loci 7931 and 7932. In the western part of Square N/5, a narrow wall (7929) was built perpendicular to Wall 7926 and slightly to its west (82.62–82.96 m). It was preserved to a height of three courses and 1.5 m long, and did not clearly relate to any other feature. It should be noted that the striations did not abut either of these walls, thus preventing their clear stratigraphic association.

In Square N/4, Installation 2874 possibly continued to be in use in Stratum D-6a, although it was finally covered by the striations, as was clearly observed in the southeastern portion of 7921. To the south of this installation, the two adjacent ovens (2877, 2878, Stratum D-6b) were replaced with two new ones (2851 founded at 82.97 m and 2841 founded at 82.81 m, respectively; Photos 15.61, 15.64), that were embedded in the upper part of the striations (1876). Both ovens were attached to the outer face of a brick wall (4853).

Room 4848 was bounded by Wall 4853 on the north, Wall 4868 on the west, Wall 7953 on the east, and extended into the southern section. All three walls were founded at 82.60–82.56 m and were preserved to maximal height of ca. 1.0 m; they were poorly preserved due to animal burrowing. A thick lime plaster still adhered to the inner corner of Walls 4853 and 7953, probably indicating that the entire room had been plastered.

Stratum D-6a, and the entire sequence of the Stratum D-6 striations in Squares N/4–5, were covered by a 0.7–0.9 m-thick debris layer which continued eastwards below the floors and walls of Stratum D-5. This layer might constitute a constructional fill, placed to support the massive new architecture in the subsequent stratum, D-5.

Chapter 15C - Area D East Strata D-5 to D-1: Iron IB–IIA

Introduction

Discussion

The eastern (higher) part of the step trench in Area D revealed a sequence of five strata and several sub-phases dated to Late Iron I and Early Iron IIA (11th–10th centuries BCE) (Photos 15.1–15.5, 15.63). While the 11th century strata were well preserved, those of the Iron IIA, exposed on the uppermost part of the slope, were very damaged. Erosion caused the disappearance of Stratum D-5 and later strata west of the middle of Squares N/4–5, those of Stratum D-2 west of the middle of Squares P/4–5, and those of Strata D-1a–c west of Squares Q/4–5. See Table 15.1 for the stratigraphic sequence.

Stratum D-5

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.22 - Plan of Stratum D-5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45 - Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63- Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64- Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65- Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66- Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67- Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68- Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69- Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70- Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71- Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73- Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74- Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75- Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77- Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plan: Fig. 15.22
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19–15.21; 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.45, 15.56–15.57, 15.61, 15.63–15.77, 15.88
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.38–16.40; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47)
Discussions
Introduction

Architectural remains attributed to Stratum D-5 included Buildings DD and DE in the east, bordered on the west by a north–south street, and partially preserved elements to the west of the street that could have been either part of a unit presently eroded away or a subterranean support for the architecture above it. Based on the founding levels of the walls flanking the street, it seems that the buildings of this stratum were terraced to some extent, with an upper terrace to the east of the street and a lower one to its west, following the gradient of the slope.

Wall 2882 and Features to Its West

Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.

Wall 2882, running slightly northeast to southwest, was exposed over 9.5 m, crossing the entire excavation area and continuing into the northern and southern balks (Figs. 15.21–15.22, 15.33– 15.34; Photos 15.56–15.57, 15.64). It was preserved to a height of five brick courses with no stone foundation and was superimposed by Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. A difference of 0.6 m along a distance of 8.0 m was found in the foundation level of the wall from north to south, perhaps due to tectonic activity. One possible explanation of Wall 2882 is that it was a sub-structure and functioned as a terrace wall against which a presently non-preserved western unit was built in Stratum D-5, while the fill to its east supported the earliest phase of the street that would continue to exist in Stratum D-4.

Close to the erosion line west of Wall 2882, thick layers of compact brick debris were detected at levels 82.90–83.80 m, abutting the western face of the wall (1855, 2836 in Square N/4 and 7904, 7907, 7908, 7912–7914 in Square N/5). This layer was sealed by Building DF of Stratum D-4. This brick debris layer can be explained as either the collapse of Wall 2882 or as a deliberate fill below the floors of D-4 Building DF.

Street East of Wall 2882

Between Wall 2882 on the west and Building DD on the east ran a north–south street for 9.25 m; it continued into the northern and southern balks. Its width in the south was 1.0–1.2 m, while in the north it was ca. 2.35 m (between Walls 2882 and 8878 in Square P/5).

The eastern face of Wall 2882 was very blurred and irregular; the bricks were not even in shape or size and fieldstones appeared occasionally between the bricks. The layers east of the wall were excavated only in a few probes; the lower layer was composed of fieldstones (9810, levels 82.92–83.09 m; Photo 15.65), covered by layers of gravel, brick debris, sherds (mostly worn, including some Early Bronze sherds) and bones (9808, 9802; levels 83.09–83.84 m). These layers appeared to be a deliberate fill supporting the street surface (2870), although, in fact, no clear surface of Stratum D-5 could be identified.

The situation here raised an unresolved stratigraphic quandry. In the process of excavation and analysis, it was considered that Building DF west of the street was founded in Stratum D-5 and reused in Strata D-4b and D-4a. One of the reasons for this was the situation seen in Figs. 15.33–15.34, where the street surface (2870) abutted Wall 1883 of D-4 Building DF on the west and Wall 2881 (attributed to Stratum D-5) on the east. The problem with this interpretation is that Wall 1883, the eastern wall of Building DF, was constructed above Wall 2882. Assignment of Building DF to Stratum D-5 would leave this wall an ‘orphan’ in terms of stratigraphic attribution, unless it would be explained as a terrace wall supporting Wall 1883. However, the fact that Wall 1883 had a stone foundation, while Wall 2882 below it was a brick wall without one, seems to contradict such an explanation. The solution presented here leaves unresolved questions; while it seems to be the preferred scenario, the alternative interpretation should not be entirely ruled out.

The Eastern Unit: Buildings DD and DE

Introduction

The eastern unit in Stratum D-5 was not fully exposed, since some of the walls of Stratum D-4 which were built directly on top of Stratum D-5 structures were not dismantled. The exposed remains were sufficient to show that these were massive buildings that housed special activity. The area was divided into two units: Building DE in the north and DD to its south (Photos 15.69–15.77). The northern unit included two rooms with an unclear connection between them; both continued to the north and east beyond the border of the excavation. The southern unit comprised two large rooms paved with well-preserved brick floors. The exact relationship between the two units remained obscure, since the juncture between them was covered by later walls that were not dismantled.

Building DE (Squares P–Q/5)

Introduction

Building DE was comprised of two rooms, separated by north–south Wall 8861, preserved to five brick courses. The upper two courses were built of dark gray friable bricks, the two courses below them of white bricks, and the lowermost course was again dark gray. The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same wall was typical of this stratum, such as in Walls 8884 and 8854 of Building DD, described below. Later walls covered the northern and southern ends of Wall 8861, but it is most likely that it had cornered with Wall 8884 on the south.

Room 8865

East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.

Room 8874

West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.

Building DD (Squares P–Q/4–5)

Introduction

This was part of a massive building whose eastern and western walls were 1.25 m wide each, composed of two rows of bricks. While the eastern wall (8848) was comprised of two rows, the western wall seems to have been made of two adjoining walls (8855, 2881) which were constructed separately: the eastern side (8855) had a stone foundation which was lacking in the western side (2881). Wall 2881 apparently continued to be in use in the subsequent stratum, D-4b, when it abutted the newly built Wall 1860 on the west (see below). Wall 2881 was poorly preserved, perhaps since it was in use longer than Wall 8855. The northern wall (8884) was apparently just as wide as the western and eastern walls, based on a small part of its northern face exposed in Square P/5; the rest of the northern part of the wall was covered by D-4b walls. The eastern wall (8848) appeared to have been the outer wall of the entire building, although this could not be ascertained due to the limited excavation area. If this is correct, then the external width of the building was ca. 6.7 m (for the possibility that this complex continued to the east into Area C, see below). It seems that the southern wall (8852) of the eastern room was an internal wall, since the parallel room to the west continued south beyond the border of the excavation. Thus, the length of the building was at least 6.0 m and it probably continued beyond the southern limit of the area.

Room 8867

This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.

Room 8867 was paved with a well-preserved brick floor (8867, level 83.42 m), composed of three clear lines of bricks and possibly a fourth one in the eastern part of the room. The floor abutted Walls 8852, 8848 and 8854, but did not continue into the northern section of the room, where another brick floor was exposed on a lower level (see below). In the northern part of the room, a square installation (9805), bounded by three brick walls, was laid directly on top of Floor 8867. The walls (0.14 m wide), composed of bricks placed on their narrow side and preserved to two courses, were 1.0 m long, creating an inner space of 0.85 sq m. As in some of the walls of this building, the installation was built of different types of bricks: the southern and western walls of black friable bricks and the northern wall of whitish bricks; traces of plaster were found on both faces. This appears to have been a storage bin. A ca. 0.55 m wide passage west of Installation 9805 led to the northern part of the room, where brick Floor 8867 terminated on line with the northern wall of the installation. In the northern part of the room (1.05×1.6 m), a less-well-constructed brick floor (9804) was laid, lower by more than 0.4 m than Floor 8867 and Installation 9805. This floor abutted Walls 8848 and 8853, but did not reach Wall 8854 on the west. It was difficult to determine whether this difference in levels between the two parts of the room was due to function or whether the lower northern floor belonged to an earlier phase of D-5 (see below). A thick layer of debris (8839) rested on Floor 9804; two complete bricks fallen on top of each other were found in this debris at 83.71 m and on top of them were several complete vessels, including seven small bowls, perhaps votive (Fig. 16.38:6, 11–12, 14–15, 18–19), a chalice (Fig. 16.38:24), a juglet (Fig. 16.39:19) and a lamp (Fig. 16.39:21). It seems like the bricks and the vessels had fallen from a higher spot, perhaps a shelf.

In the southeastern corner of the room was a large bell-shaped pit (8883; Photos 15.69–15.70); its eastern part adjoined the western face of Wall 8848, whose foundation level could be seen in the pit. It was apparently dug sometime during the course of use of this room, as it was sealed by the D-4b occupation above. The pit contained ash and brick debris, sherds and one complete juglet (Fig. 16.39:20). South of Wall 8852, a small segment of a floor (8882) was found at level 83.86 m, perhaps belonging to an adjacent room of the same building.

Room 8871

Room 8871 was the western room of Building DD (Photos 15.69, 15.76–15.77). Its inner size was ca. 2.0×at least 5.2 m, as its southern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. In the north, the excavation almost reached the presumed southern face of Wall 8884. The floor (levels 83.55–83.74 m) was made of four to five rows of bricks, like the floor of Room 8867 to its east. It abutted Walls 8855 and 8854. The bricks of the floor were covered by 0.25 m-deep striated layers of soft earth and plaster, which were sealed by Floor 8816 of Stratum D-4b. Although the level of the floor in this room was 0.5–0.6 m higher than that in the eastern room, it was clear that the two rooms belonged to the same building. A similar situation was observed in Stratum D-4b Building DG (see below).

Three pits were detected in Room 8871, sealed by D-4b architectural elements and thus perhaps dug either when the building was still in use or a short time afterwards, before the construction of D-4b, similar to Pit 8883 in Room 8867.

Pit 8876 was a round shallow pit, ca. 0.3 m deep and 0.44 m in diameter located south of the center of the room and discerned at level 83.73 m (Photo 15.69). It contained ashy material and a small amount of sherds. Pit 8873 was a semicircular shallow pit, 0.2 m deep and 0.45 cm in diameter, located in the eastern part of the room and attached to Wall 8854 at level 83.79 m. It contained loose ashy material with charcoal pieces and a few sherds. Pit 8880 was round, 0.45 m in diameter and of unknown depth, located in the southeastern part of the room, discerned at level 83.74 m. It could not be fully excavated due to D-4 Wall 1884, which was built on top of its southern part. Its continuation below Wall 1884 of D-4 was further proof that this room extended further to the south, beyond the excavated area.

Summary of Stratum D-5

The building remains of Stratum D-5, although limited, indicated dense urban planning and the existence of well-planned structures. Wall 2882, which crossed the entire area from north to south, represented a degree of central planning, although it remained unclear as to what unit it had been belonged. Initially, it had been considered that this wall was a foundation intended to support the slope during the construction of Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. According to this suggestion, Building DF would have been founded in Stratum D-5 and continued to be in use, with slight changes, in Strata D-4b and D-4a. However, it was finally decided in favor of the stratigraphic separation as suggested here, namely, that Wall 2882 represented an independent phase, attributed to Stratum D-5, and that it was an isolated element, with no structural remains belonging to this stratum to its west.

Building DD was an unusual structure which must have had a special function; the two elongated spaces with brick floors may be explained as storerooms that perhaps were part of a much larger administrative building. This may be compared to similar elongated storage rooms in Building L at Tell Qasile, probably founded in Stratum X (Mazar 1951: 20). The wide walls of Building DD suggest that this had been a tall building, perhaps of two or more storeys. The building continued south beyond the limits of the excavated area and perhaps also to the east, possibly related to Building CS of Stratum C-3b in Area C (Chapter 12). The western wall of the latter (8520) was well preserved, but its width was unknown. The eastern face of this wall was parallel to the walls of Building DD at a distance of 5.7 m and the floor of the spaces to its east were almost at the same level as those of Building DD. It may be suggested, although with great caution, that these walls belonged to one large architectural complex (Fig. 15.25a). Alternatively, these were two separate structures, possibly with a street between them.

Building DE to the north of Building DD was hardly known; its massive western wall recalled those of Building DD and the two could belong to one structure, although in that case, the connection between the two parts must have been to the east of the excavated area.

No evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum D-5 was detected. It seems that the buildings went out of use due to either deterioration or earthquake damage and were rebuilt in the following Stratum D-4. The pottery and artifacts from Stratum D-5 point to their date in Iron IB, perhaps the early part of the 11th century BCE.

Stratum D-4

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.23 - Plan of Stratum D-4b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.24 - Plan of Stratum D-4a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.25a - Iron IB remains in Areas D and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.25b - Iron IB remains in Areas D and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63- Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64- Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65- Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66- Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71- Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77- Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.78- General view of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.79- Squares N–P/4,from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.80- Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.81- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.82- Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.83- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.84- Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.85- Squares P–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.86- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.87- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.89- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.90- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.95 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.96 - Square P/5, looking west; D-4a Building DJ, debris and vessels in Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.97 - Smashed Pottery in Square P/5 D-4a Building DJ, Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.98 - Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.99 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.101 - Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.102 - Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.111 - Square P/5, looking south at reed impressions (ceiling collapse?) on plaster layer from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.112 - Closeup of layer in Photo 15.111 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.113 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.114 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.116 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.23–15.25
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19a–15.21, 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.61, 15.63–15.66, 15.71–15.72, 15.77–15.90, 15.95–15.99, 15.101–15.102, 15.111–15.114, 15.116;
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.48–16.54; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-4 was the most extensively exposed stratum in Area D, revealed in six excavation squares (N–P–Q/4–5). Although new structures replaced the massive Buildings DD and DE of Stratum D-5, and Building DF was built west of the street, the general outline of Stratum D-5 was maintained, with the north–south street continuing to separate the eastern and the western units.

In the area west of the street, Building DF was built above Wall 2882 and the layers attributed to D-5 to its west. The area east of the street was rebuilt on a different plan: in the early phase of Stratum D-4, denoted D-4b, Buildings DE and DD were replaced with Buildings DH and DG, thus retaining the general spatial division of Stratum D-5; several of the walls of the new buildings were constructed on top of the earlier walls. In a later phase, denoted D-4a, the two units together created a larger building (Building DJ). Apart from this significant change, several other minor changes occurred inside the rooms during each of these phases and the street level was raised.

The Western Unit: Building DF (Strata D-4b and D-4a)

Introduction

To the best of our understanding, Building DF was built in Stratum D-4, although as explained above, there was a slight possibility that it was founded already in Stratum D-5 (see above). The building included two rows of rooms running parallel to the slope of the mound west of the street and comprised two terraces, separated by Wall 4866 and its possible southern extension (Photos 15.78–15.82). The eastern line of rooms included 4839, 1845 and 2840 and the western line included 4871 and 4879; the latter were destroyed by erosion and only their eastern ends were preserved. It is not certain that all these rooms belonged to the same building, but it is clear that this was a well-planned structure adjoining the north–south street on its west.

Room 2840

Walls 1811, 2822 and 2846 created the northern end of a 2.5 m-wide room that continued to the south (Squares N–P/4). They were a rebuild of the walls found in the same place in Stratum D-6a, described above (Room 4848). East–west Wall 1811 in Squares N–P/4 was comprised of two rows of bricks, 1.0 m wide and well preserved for the most part. The wall had a stone foundation comprised of small- and medium-sized stones, with one row seen along the northern face, although these stones were not visible under the southern face; the foundation was dug into the brick collapse (1855) below. Inside this room was a hard-packed earth floor (2840; level 84.08 m) set on a bedding of pebbles. A shallow pit (2828) was partially excavated in the northwestern part of the room. The floor of this room was raised and a higher floor (2823) was constructed at level 84.20 m in Stratum D-4a.

Courtyard/Room 1845

The space between the rooms on the north and the south was probably a courtyard, paved with stones (1845), with a series of plaster floors accumulated above it (1836) (Squares N–P/4–5; Photos 15.80– 15.82). This space was 4.0 m long and at least 3.0 m wide. It was bordered on the east by Wall 1883, on the west by the supposed continuation of Wall 4866 along the erosion line of the slope, on the south by Wall 1811, and on the north by Wall 4813. Wall 1883 was built above Wall 2882 of Stratum D-5. It had a three-course stone foundation that protruded beyond the face of the wall towards the east and seven courses of its brick superstructure were preserved; the uppermost three tilted strongly to the west (Fig. 15.33). From its corner with Wall 1811, the wall continued ca. 7.5 m to the north, running into the balk. The southern end of the wall (termed 2846) was slightly curved and served as the eastern wall of Room 2840.

On the western edge of this space was a layer of fallen and decayed brick debris (1826) which might represent the damaged southern continuation of Wall 4866. This was also indicated by how stone Floor 1845 ended on a straight line in the northwest, perhaps on line with the inner face of the missing western wall. A series of floors was found in this space. The lowest was a stone floor (1845) which had a partial bedding of smaller stones; the northern part of the floor consisted of a row of closely laid stones arranged in a row along Wall 4813. The stone floor was partly covered by a layer of pebbles (1842) which could be either an independent floor or a constructional fill meant to support the build-up of plaster floors (1836) above, which was 0.40 m thick. The uppermost floor (1825) was composed of earth and a few small stones and was covered by brick debris and collapse (1806), with several large undressed stones. These upper surfaces were attributed to Stratum D-4a. In the south of the building, west of Wall 2822, was an area paved with small stones and earth (1822), that might have been the continuation of Space 1845 or a paved alleyway.

Rooms 4839, 4879 and 4871

In Square N/5 were remains of one complete room (4839) and segments of two additional rooms (4879, 4871), arranged on two levels, with a floorlevel difference of 0.65 m: Room 4839 on an upper terrace, which was on the same level as 1845 and 2840 to its south, and Rooms 4879 and 4871 on a lower terrace to the west. Wall 4866, 1.0 m wide, which was common to all these rooms, served as a retaining wall for the terrace above it. The latter wall was not preserved entirely, but most likely had cornered with Wall 4861.

The inner dimensions of Room 4839 were 2.3×2.7 m; its outer walls (4813, 4866, 4861, 1883) were well preserved, although two of them were damaged by Stratum D-3 pits: 4810 was dug into Wall 1883 and 4811 into Wall 4813. It seems that Wall 4861 was also damaged by pits, but it was not possible to ascertain this, since the wall was only partially excavated. A section in this wall was examined in the eastern balk of Square N/5, where it could be seen that the wall had no stone foundation and its bottom bricks reached the top of Wall 4833 of Stratum D-6b.

Floor 4839 was a pinkish clay floor covered by an accumulation (4855) containing sherds (Fig. 16.48) and one almost complete juglet (Fig. 16.48:20). A flat stone found adjacent to Wall 4866 on the east may have served as work surface. A thick layer (up to 1.2 m) of decayed brick debris (4807) covered the accumulation on this floor.

The lower terrace (Rooms 4879, 4871) was severely eroded on the west. Wall 4870, separating the two lower rooms, was preserved to a length of 1.05 m. The northern room (4879) had a stone floor preserved only in its southeastern corner, where a lower grinding stone was sunk into the floor and an upper grinding stone was found in another part of the floor. The preserved segment of the stone floor (83.10 m) could be interpreted as a domestic working area. A row of small stones and two larger stones aligned to their east along Wall 7918 may have been steps. The northern wall of the room was Wall 4861, which continued from Room 4839 to the east. North of this wall, in the northwestern corner of Square N/5, a small segment of a stone floor (7928), similar to Floor 4879, was located at level 83.15 m just below topsoil. A lamp-and-bowl foundation deposit (Fig. 16.48:1–2) was found just below this floor.

Room 4871 to the south, filled with brick collapse, was mostly ruined by erosion.

The Street in Stratum D-4

The north–south street of Stratum D-5 in Squares P/4–5 continued to be in use through Stratum D-4, when it was ca. 1.85–2.0 m wide (Photos 15.83– 15.84). The street surface was gradually raised, with striations accumulating between Wall 1883 (which stood to a height of 1.5 m) in the west and the western walls of Buildings DH and DG (in Stratum D-4b) and DJ (in Stratum D-4a).

It seems that in Stratum D-4b, the lowest street surface (2870; Square P/4), which was already in use in Stratum D-5, abutted the stone foundation of Wall 1883 on the west and Wall 2881 on the east, which is explained as a re-use of a Stratum D-5 wall, now serving as a bench along the western wall of Building DG. The accumulation above 2870 contained several floors, rich in pottery, bones, organic material and gravel, to a total depth of ca. 1.83 m (2870, 2864, 2835, 1882, 2807, 1873, 1871; levels 83.74–85.39 m) and in two separate sequences in Square P/5 (8803, 7805, 7804 and 7829, 7828, 7822, 7807; levels 83.89–85.14 m). The lower floors were attributed to D-4b and the higher ones to D-4a, related to Building DJ. The uppermost floors were much higher than those in the adjacent buildings.

The stratified accumulation was quite homogeneous, although several sporadic or loosely arranged complete bricks were revealed occasionally on both the western and eastern margins of the street. These could have been either steps that led to the rooms in the eastern and western units (such as the case with the step leading to Room 8816 in Stratum D-4b), fallen bricks, or remains of benches. In Square P/5, a layer of bricks was found tilted against the Wall 1883 (7847 against the stone foundation and 7846 against the brick superstructure). The bricks, alternatively dark brown and white, were irregularly placed, with gaps between them. Their function could not be determined; perhaps this was a ruined bench or a brick collapse.

Among the upper stratified street striations, a pavement (7805) comprising a concentration of small field stones and cobbles with a large amount of sherds, was revealed at level 85.15 m in Square P/5 and attributed to Stratum D-4a. The pavement

The Eastern Unit in Stratum D-4b: Buildings DG and DH

Introduction

To the east of the street were two units, Buildings DG and DH, attributed to Stratum D-4b, built above D-5 Building DG.

Building DG

Introduction

This building comprised three rooms, two of which were completely excavated, and part of a fourth unexcavated room which continued into the eastern balk (Photo 15.85). The excavated part measured 5.8×6.9 m, but the building apparently continued to the east and perhaps also to the south, beyond the limit of the excavation area.

Room 8816

The western room in the building (inner dimensions 2.0×4.7 m, 9.4 sq m) was a rebuild of the previous Room 8871 of Stratum D-5. Each of its four well-preserved walls was built of dark gray bricks with distinctive whitish mortar between them (recalling the Stratum C-3 bricks in Area C; see Chapter 12). The western wall of the room (1860) was founded directly on top of Wall 8855 of Stratum D-5, but about 0.5 m north of the entrance, there was an earth layer separating these two walls. The entrance into Room 8816 was through an opening in the southern part of Wall 1860. West of the entrance was a plastered stone step, 0.75 m long (2866) at level 84.46 m, constructed above the stump of D-5 Wall 2881, leading from the street into the room.

The room had a thick white plaster floor that had been laid above a foundation of bricks (8816), discerned at levels 84.45–84.64 m (ca. 0.7 m above the floor of Stratum D-5 in the room below). Such white plaster had not been exposed in any of the other rooms in the building and it may indicate some special function of this room. In the center of the room were two adjoining pits, coated with the same white plaster as the floor. Pit 8823 was 0.2 m deep and 0.5 m in diameter and contained ash and a relatively large amount of olive pits. Pit 8822, slightly to the south, was 0.7 m in diameter and 0.6 m deep and contained ash and many sherds (Figs. 16.49–16.50, 16.53) and bones, as well as a relatively large amount of charred olive pits. In the accumulation (8813) above Floor 8816 remains of bronze production were found, including a tuyère, a crucible and two prills (see Chapter 40C).

In the middle of the eastern part of the room and attached to Wall 4878 was Installation 8824, composed of a square brick, in which the lower part of a storage jar was sunk (Fig. 16.51:22; Photo 15.86). The installation was attached to a line of complete white bricks which seem to have been laid against Wall 4878, coating its western face. A similar installation (2891), related to Phase D-4a, was attached to the southern wall (1884) of the room (see below).

No opening leading from this room to the eastern rooms of the building was discerned, in spite of the good preservation of the eastern wall (4878).

Space 8841

The southeastern space in Building DG was perhaps an open courtyard, 3.5 m wide and at least 3.5 m long (at least 12.25 sq m); it continued eastward beyond the limit of the excavated area and thus, its full length could not be determined. Its northern wall (4859) was composed of white bricks and had an opening leading to Room 8830 to its north. The southern wall (4862), also built of white bricks, was exposed only along 1.5 m, since its western part was disturbed; there could have been an opening here leading to another room in the south.

The beaten-earth floor in this space (8841), revealed at levels 84.07–84.33 m, was preserved mainly in the southern part, abutting Walls 4862 and 4878. A small patch of a white plaster floor (8832) was preserved in the center of the room, at level 84.26 m. It seems that both were part of a series of successive floors used during the lifetime of Building DG in Stratum D-4b (8814; levels 84.26–84.40 m). Pit 8840, located in the southern part of the room, 1.0 m in diameter and ca. 0.6 m deep, was full of gray ash and was sealed by a thick layer of debris found in the room. The pit damaged Wall 8848 of Stratum D-5.

Space 8841 continued to be in use in the following Stratum D-4a with minor changes.

Space 8830

This small room (inner dimensions 1.45×1.9 m) was entered from Space 8841 to its south. Its northern, eastern and southern walls were built of white bricks, while on the west it was bounded by Wall 4878, built of dark gray bricks. The 0.6 m-wide corner entrance had a brick threshold at level 84.44 m. It is notable that such a corner entrance was also found in Room 8816 and perhaps also in 8841.

A series of successive beaten-earth floors was revealed in Room 8830 at levels 84.18–84.38 m. In the northeastern corner of the room was an installation (8837), comprising three complete bricks, measuring 0.7×1.2 m (Photo 15.87). Two of the bricks were laid parallel to each other, with their narrow sides attached to Wall 8828, the northern wall of this room. The third brick was perpendicular to them, its narrow side attached to Wall 8805, the eastern wall of the room. The installation had a rounded depression in its center, similar to the one in Installation 8824 in the room to the west and to Installations 2891 and 8859 of Stratum D-4a (see below). These can be explained as stands for jars containing water or other liquids.

Wall 8805, the eastern wall of the room, was well preserved on its western face, but much less so on the east. To the east of Wall 8805 was yet another room, which was not excavated due to a mass of bricks covering it.

Summary of Building DG

It remained unclear whether the three rooms described above (and the fourth unexcavated one) belonged to the same unit. Since no entrance leading from Room 8816 to the eastern rooms was found, it may be that this room was independent and accessed directly from the street, perhaps serving as a storage space or workshop, while Rooms 8841 and 8830 belonged to a separate building entered from the east or the south. Space 8841 could be part of an open courtyard, while Room 8830 and the unexcavated room to its east could be small living spaces.

The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same building should be noted: dark gray bricks in Wall 1860 and white bricks in all the other walls. This phenomenon was noted in other buildings as well.

Building DH

Introduction

The northern building in the eastern unit comprised two rooms and perhaps a third unexcavated room on the east. Its southern wall (8821) adjoined Building DG on the south.

Room 8844 (Photos 15.88–15.91)

The inner dimensions of this room were 1.80×2.55 m (4.6 sq m, including the area of Bench 8860). A corner entrance with a brick threshold at level 84.29 m at the northern end of Wall 8849 connected Rooms 8844 and 8842. Another opening (8886) was detected in the eastern wall of the room (7851), just on line with the latter entrance. The opening in Wall 7851 was preserved to its full height, standing 1.25 m high and 0.8 m wide. The beaten-earth floor of this room (8844) covered a strip of bricks (8870) that ran along the western face of Wall 7851; these bricks were wider than the wall and were possibly placed in order to support the floor near the entrance. Wall 7851 was preserved to a height of 16 courses and continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a. Wall 8860 was a line of bricks adjoining the northern face of Wall 8821; yet, while Wall 8821 was preserved to a height of four courses, 8860 was preserved to only one course and was abutted by Floor 8844. Thus, 8860 was interpreted as a bench.

In the western part of the room was a standing brick lying on its narrow side (not on the plan) that created an enclosed area in the corner of the room. Between the brick and Bench 8860, on a level just below Floor 8844, was an incomplete jar (Fig. 16.51:13) with a broken goblet (Fig. 16.49:28) inside it.

This room continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a with some architectural alterations, although with the same floor.

Room 8842 and Installation 8810

Room 8842 was the western room of Building DH (Photos 15.63, 15.73, 15.92). This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.6×1.8 m, 2.88 sq m) had a beaten-earth floor (8842) abutting the walls at levels 84.28–84.34 m. A row of five stones (8856) lined the western side of the room; to its west was Installation 8810 (Photos 15.63, 15.66, 15.73, 15.92). This enigmatic feature included three large flat pinkish limestone blocks and a large basalt basin, located east of the street, on the same line as the supposed western wall of Room 8842 and above D-5 Wall 8878. The southernmost limestone was a large rectangular block (0.3×0.6×0.97 m). The middle limestone was whitish/pinkish and almost square (0.3×0.6×0.6 m). The northernmost stone was 0.5 m wide and at least 0.5 m long. A basalt basin (8807) was located south of and on the same line as these three stones. This was a large oval-shaped basalt stone, 0.8–0.9 m in diameter, with a rounded shallow flat depression in its center, 0.5 m in diameter and 0.12 m deep. Grinding marks could be seen inside the depression. A flat limestone was found to the south of this basin. The tops of these stones were at levels 84.56–84.66 m, ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor of Stratum D-5 Room 8874 and 0.3–0.4 m above the floor of Room 8842 of Stratum D-4b, both to the east of the stones. The street west of this installation was wider than it was further to the south, thus providing convenient access to the installation.

The installation was covered by several stones laid in disorder, by a line of stones that created the western side of Room 4858 in Stratum D-4a, and by the foundations of Wall 4819 of Stratum D-2.

The function of this installation remained obscure. It could have been an olive-oil press. Olives could have been crushed in the basalt basin and then placed in baskets on top of the central stone. The two side stones could serve as a foundation for a wooden frame that would hold some kind of stone weights (although no such weights were actually found). The setup recalls to some degree the installation at Tel Dan Area T, explained by Biran (1994: 176, Fig. 137) as a water-libation installation and by Stager and Wolff (1981) as an olive-oil press. A less probable explanation is that the stones of 8810 were in secondary use and served as part of a solid foundation for the western wall of Building DH or the later Building DJ. A possible support for this suggestion are a few bricks found to the west and north of the installation which appeared to have been placed when the stones were laid.

The Eastern Unit in Stratum D-4a: Building DJ

Introduction

The term Building DJ refers to the area of Buildings DG and DH, which underwent several major internal changes. Although no opening was found to connect the southern and northern wings, some of the renovations indicate that the entire area was considered as part of one architectural system. Many of the previous walls continued to be in use (4859, southern part of 4878, 4862, 1884, 1860, 4876, 8828, 8834), while others were cancelled or replaced. Thus, the double wall separating Building DG from DH in Stratum D-4b (8821, 8828) was replaced by a single wall (8828/8834) and the eastern wall (7851) of D-4b Room 8844 was extended to the south (denoted here 7848), cancelling the earlier wall (8805) to its west and becoming the eastern wall of the new room (7855), thus widening D-4b Room 8830 by 0.9 m. In the center of the building, Wall 7852 was built directly over Wall 8849 of D-4b, abutting the northern wall of D-4b Building DG (8828, 8834), which continued to be in use. At this time, the western part of Wall 8821 was cancelled, so that the previous space of Room 8842 was enlarged, but was now divided by a narrow wall (4877) into two separate chambers (4858, 4872). On the west, Wall 8850 was constructed above Installation 8810 and served as the western wall of the building, facing the street.

Seven rooms belonged to Building DJ. North– south Walls 7852, 7861 and 4878 functioned as the backbone wall through the center of the building, with three rooms to their east and four rooms to their west.

Room 8844

This room of Building DH in Stratum D-4b continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a, with the same floor and walls on the north and east. However, architectural changes occurred in the other two walls; on the west, a new wall (7852) was constructed on top of Wall 8849, preserved to seven courses. On the south, Wall 8821 of Stratum D-4b was cancelled and the room was now bordered by Wall 8828, which continued to be in use from Stratum D-4b. The inner dimensions of the new room were 2.4×2.6 (6.24 sq m). All the walls’ interiors were coated with a thick layer of white plaster. Floor 8844, attributed to D-4b and probably continuing in D-4a, was covered by destruction debris (8833) and fallen roof material (8829), the latter covered by a layer of brick debris (7853) reaching an uppermost level of 85.64 m, 1.25 m above the original floor.

Rooms 4858 and 4872

D-4b Room 8842 was now extended to the south and divided into two chambers by a narrow partition wall (4877) (Photos 15.94–15.97). To the north, Room 4858 was a narrow space with inner dimensions of 1.0×2.3 m. Traces of thick white plaster were preserved on Walls 4876, 7852 and 4877. No floor was traced, but since Wall 4877 floated at level 85.07 m, almost 0.8 m above the floor of the Stratum D-4b, such a floor must have existed.

Room 4872, located south of Room 4858, had inner dimensions of 1.2×2.4 m (2.9 sq m). Plaster was preserved on its northern (4877) and eastern (7852) walls. In a small area south of Wall 4877, a floor (4872) was found at level 84.72 m, 0.56 m above the floor of Stratum R-4b in the same place.

The western wall of these two rooms (8850) was not very clear. Installation 8810 of the previous phase was covered by scattered stones, on which this wall was constructed. No entrance was detected, yet since both faces of Wall 8850 were not well preserved, it is possible that there had been an opening from the street. The solid patch of a pebble-stone pavement (7805) revealed in the street at level 85.04 m, opposite the supposed entrance to Room 4872, might indicate that it led into the room. No evidence for any connection between Room 4872 and the other rooms of the building was detected.

A concentration of complete vessels, including bowls, a pyxis, cooking pots and other small vessels (Fig. 16.54), was found in this room in a destruction layer containing fallen bricks and burnt wooden beams.

Room 7855

Replacing D-4b Room 8830 of Building DG was a new room that was enlarged to the east (inner dimensions 1.4×2.8 m, 3.92 sq m), entered from the south through the same entrance used in D-4b. No floor was detected in this room. The brick debris layer in this room (7855, 8806) was cut by Stratum D-3 Pits (7858, 7860, 7863).

Room 8820

This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.25×1.45 m, 1.8 sq m) was created by constructing a narrow partition wall (1868) in the northern part of D-4b Room 8816. The eastern wall (7861), composed of dark gray bricks and coated on the exterior with a layer of unique white bricks, was preserved to a height of six courses. This outer coating of bricks decreased the room’s length by ca. 0.3 m. This chamber had a stone floor at level 84.80 m (0.1 m above Floor 8816 of D-4b), covered by a beatenearth floor (8820) at level 84.83 m, about 0.3 m higher than D-4b floor in the same location. Along the western side of the chamber was a brick bench or installation (8859), composed of three white bricks. The northern one was 0.4×0.5 m and the narrow middle brick (0.3×0.45 m) was laid with its long side against the northern brick. The southernmost brick had the same dimensions as the northern one, with a round depression in its southern part (diameter 0.4 m) which could have served as a base for a jar. The installation/bench was surrounded by ashy material and a large amount of charred olive pits.

Finds in the debris (8826) on Floor 8820 included a scaraboid (Chapter 30, No. 3) and two small lentoid pieces of unfired clay with a textile impression that might have been lids.

Space 4863

The previous Space 8841, possibly an open courtyard, continued with almost no change in Stratum D-4a. No floor was detected in this later phase, although it probably existed, since a large oven (4851) was found in the northwestern corner of the room with a foundation level at 84.75 m, ca. 0.5 m above the floor of Stratum D-4b. Three stones running on a diagonal line at levels 84.70–84.81 m were found in the northeastern part of the room (8838).

Room 2869

This room (inner dimensions 2.1×3.0 m, 6.3 sq m) was the southern part of D-4b Room 8816, after its division by a narrow partition wall (1868) (Photos 15.98–15.99). Its walls were covered with white plaster. The western wall (1860) was preserved to six to seven courses, the southern wall (1884) to at least nine courses, and the northern wall (1868) up to seven courses in the west, yet its eastern part was severely damaged by Stratum D-3 pits (see below).

The 1.1 m-wide entrance to Room 2869 from the street was in its southwestern corner. The door jambs were covered with white plaster. Beatenearth floor accumulations (2869) were revealed in this room at levels 84.71–84.81 m. The upper floor, composed of white plaster, seemed to slope up to Wall 1860 and abut it, but Wall 1868 floated above it, as if this wall was a later addition.

In the southeastern corner of the room, a row of bricks, 1.2 m long, was attached to Wall 1884 (4840); its function remained elusive. An installation made of light gray bricks (2891, not on the plan) was built against this construction, opposite the entrance to the room. Inside the installation was an almost complete storage jar, lacking its rim (Fig. 16.54:10). This installation perhaps belongs to a late phase in Stratum D-4a, as it almost blocked the entrance, suggesting that it was constructed after the entrance went out of use.

The function and nature of Building DJ cannot be determined with any certainty. The small size of most of the chambers could hardly have been functional in a dwelling and the plan does not resemble any known building of the period (Iron IB). It also remained unclear whether the two parts of the building on both sides of Walls 8834/8828 comprised one unit (as we are inclined to think) or belonged to two separate buildings (a northern one with three rooms and a southern one with four rooms, as in Stratum D-4b). Both these units were probably accessed from the east.

Summary of Stratum D-4

In Stratum D-4b, the general layout of the excavated area continued from Stratum D-5, but substantial changes occurred in each individual building. West of the street, Building DF was founded at this stage, although the possibility that it was founded in Stratum D-5 should not be ruled out. East of the street, the massive Buildings DD and DE of the previous stratum were replaced by new buildings (DG and DH). Building DG appeared to have contained a square courtyard surrounded by rooms at least on the north and west (although no entrance from the courtyard to the western rooms was found); its full plan on the east and south remained unknown. The northern building, DH, included only two rooms entered from the east, although they may have been part of a larger building extending to the east and perhaps to the north.

The installation on top of the western wall of Building DH raises questions as to its function and stratigraphy. If it had been contemporary with the building, the wall on which it was founded could not have functioned as an actual wall, but rather as a podium for the installation, which might have been related to olive-oil production. Alternatively, it could be explained as being in secondary use as a foundation for the western wall of Building DH.

In Stratum D-4a, the former plan of the area west of the street remained unchanged, while east of the street, the basic plan was retained, with inner changes. It seems most likely that this area became one large building (DJ), although it is possible that it was divided between two adjacent building, as in the previous phase.

Stratum D-3

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.26–15.27
  • Sections: Figs. 15.21, 15.33–15.35
  • Photos 15.100–15.107
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.55–16.58
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-3 was characterized by a series of 45 pits found in an open area in Squares N–P–Q/4–5 between levels 84.95–86.60 m. They post-dated Stratum D-4 elements and pre-dated the construction of Walls 1809, 1820 and 2820 of Stratum D-2. However, they could have been either contemporary with or earlier than Walls 4808 and 4809, attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/5, since the latter had deep foundations on the same level and even lower than the pits and rest on top of Stratum D-4 walls and debris (see further on this subject below). Two additional pits were located in Square R/4 in Area C (Stratum C-3; Chapter 12), thus establishing a good correlation between the stratigraphic sequences in these two areas.

The pits were cut into debris (1806, 1850) and brick walls of Stratum D-4a. In several places, two and sometimes three phases of pits cut one another. In light of the sheer density of the pits, graphic considerations required their presentation in two plans (Figs. 15.26–15.27).

Table 15.3 provides a list of the pits and their levels, while the plans show their location without levels.

The pits ranged in diameter from 0.3 to 1.0 m (except 2834, discussed below); some were very shallow (at least their preserved height), while others were over a meter deep. They can be divided into two groups: pits lined with thick pink plaster, probably used as silos, some of which yielded large amounts of olive stones, and unplastered pits, which could have been used for refuse. None of the pits which cut into the D-4a brick collapse had a pink plaster floor. This does not necessarily mean they were not used as silos, but rather that the compacted brick material perhaps supplied a sufficiently hard and sealed bedding for storage. Indeed, a couple of these pits contained olive stones and grain.

In the following description, the pits are listed from south to north, starting with the plastered ones, followed by the unplastered ones. The text below includes only some of the pits, while others are recorded only in the table and plans.

Plastered Pits

In Square Q/4, just north of the southern balk, Pit 2833 was a deep pit that was not completely excavated. It cut Pit 2868 to its east. East of these pits, 2804 cut into Pits 4815 and 4834. Further east was Pit 2829, continuing into the eastern section, with Pit 4841 below it. Pit 2834 differed from the other pits, being larger (diameter 1.9 m) and amorphic in shape. This pit was cut by a plastered pit (2844).

In the central and northern parts of Square Q/4, the number of pits and the density of their phasing increased. An exception was Pit 2808, 0.6 m in diameter and only 0.17 m deep, surrounded by bricks. Additional pits in this dense concentration were 2850, 2857, 2858, 2862, 2872 and 2885.

Unplastered Pits

Eight pits in Square Q/4 were unplastered (4805, 4806, 4814, 4815, 4821, 4834, 4835, 4865). Most of these belonged to the lower layer of pits (Table 15.3; Fig. 15.26). Some of them contained organic material, such as (in order of frequency) olive stones, wood charcoal, charred grain and chickpeas. In some of the pits were large sherds, including bases of jars (e.g., 4814).

Three additional unplastered pits were located on the southern edge of Square Q/5 (7858, 7860, 7863). They were dug into a compact accumulation of Stratum D-4a (7855) and were the northernmost pits in this concentration. All three contained loose dark soil with a large quantity of olive pits, charcoal and grains. Pit 7863 was a small shallow pit (diameter ca. 0.6 m). Pit 7860 was ca. 1.0 m in diameter and contained several layers of ash; in addition to the organic remains, it contained some sherds and bones, mixed with plaster chunks and brick fragments. Both these pits were cut by Pit 7858, a round shallow pit, ca. 1.0 m in diameter.

On the western edge of Square Q/4 and the eastern side of P/4 were several additional unplastered pits that cut into one another. Pit 2885 was 1.1 m long and about 0.7 m wide; it cut the shallow Pit 2832 to its north. North of this, Pit 2815 cut into a large and deep plastered pit (1858), which cut D-4 Wall 1868.

Nine pits were dug into the collapsed-brick layers of Stratum D-4 in the western part of Square P/4 and in Squares N/4–5 (1838, 1848, 1849, 1859, 1867, 4810, 4811, 4846, 8804). Pit 1848 in Squares P/4–5 was sealed by Wall 1809 of Stratum D-2 and cut the corner of Walls 1860 and 1868 of Stratum D-4a. In the center of Square P/4, Pit 1838, which was cut by another very poorly preserved pit, cut collapse and debris layer 1850 down to the level of the street surface (1873) of Stratum D-4a. The burnt organic material which covered the center of the square in D-4a was visible in the sides of this pit. Three additional pits, excavated in the western part of Square P/4, cut into a D-4a collapse layer (1806): Pit 1849 (only its rounded bottom was preserved) and Pits 1865 and 1859 to its north; olive stones found in many of these pits raised the possibility that local olive-oil production took place nearby.

Pits in Area C. Two additional pits were excavated in Square R/4 of Area C, adjacent to Area D. These were Pits 11438 and 11439, found at levels which corresponded to the lower pits in Area D (Fig. 15.27; see also Fig. 12.5). They were sealed by Stratum C-2 (=VI) walls and floors (Chapter 12). The finds in these pits were scanty and included a few olive pits and sherds.

Summary of D-3 Pits

The numerous pits in Stratum D-3 were bounded on the north by the line of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 in the middle of Squares P–Q/5. North of this line, no pits nor any other elements of Stratum D-3 were found and the structures of Stratum D-2 were built right on top of D-4 elements. It should be noted that the foundations of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 (=VI) were sunk to levels 85.20–85.50 m, which corresponded to the level of the pits. This wall was constructed on top of Stratum D-4a Building DJ. Similarly, the foundation of Stratum C-2 (=VI) Wall 1563 in the balk between Squares Q–R/4 was at level 85.70 m, which fits the upper level of most of the pits. However, elsewhere in Area C, no such pits were found in contexts dated to the transition from Iron I to Iron IIA, and architectural continuity predominated.

The D-3 pits thus represent a local phenomenon entailing special activity of short duration, post-dating the destruction of Stratum D-4 and established before the construction of Stratum VI (local Strata D-2 and C-2). A discussion of their possible function, either for food storage or as refuse pits, as well as a comparative analysis, is presented in the summary and conclusions at the end of this chapter. For an alternative interpretation suggesting that the pits, in fact, belonged to Stratum D-2, see below in the discussion of Stratum D-2. Even if this alternative is not accepted, it should be noted that seven pits were found in Stratum D-2, in Squares Q–P/4, just above the pits attributed to Stratum D-3. It was unclear whether an additional pit, 2829, belonged to D-3 or D-2.

The area around the pits and slightly above them was denoted Locus 2817 in Square Q/4 and in the eastern part of Square P/4. This was a layer of soft brown earth between levels 86.16–85.60 m that might have been either the D-3 occupation layer from which the pits were dug or the top layer of decayed debris of D-4 into which the pits were cut. Locus 1823 in Square P/4 (85.67–86.10 m) was higher by ca. 0.4–0.9 m than the D-3 pits in this square; since this square was on the slope of the mound just below walls of Stratum D-2, this layer might be explained as levelling in preparation for the construction of the D-2 walls (see below). Pottery from these two loci (2817, 1823) is presented in Figs 16.57–16.58.

Stratum D-2

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plan: Fig. 15.28
  • Sections: Figs. 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.108–15.115
  • Pottery: Fig. 16.59
Discussions
Introduction

Several architectural features were assigned to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/4–5 that were interpreted as being later than the D-3 pits of Iron IB and preceding the Stratum D-1a–c architecture found in Square Q/5 (an alternative interpretation is suggested below). These remains are thought to be contemporary with those of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and thus are shown on the same plan (Chapter 12; Figs. 12.7–12.8).

Remains in Squares P–Q/4

Three narrow brick walls (1820, 1809, 4827) created a small chamber in Square P/4 (4826; 1.7 m wide, length unknown), close to the erosion line which cut it on the west. This room (Photo 15.108) was built above a layer of D-4a burnt brick debris and collapse (1850) which seems to have been levelled in preparation for the construction of the new building and above the D-3 pits. A fragmentary floor (4826) was found at level 86.08 m, continuing below Wall 4827 to the north (4825) and thus, the wall was probably a secondary partition constructed on top of the floor. Floor 4825 was cut in a straight line by Trench 4860, which was either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal trench burrowed from the nearby slope on the west; the latter possibility is more plausible. The southern and eastern walls, preserved up to four courses high and lacking stone foundations, were covered with mud plaster — Wall 1809 on both faces and Wall 1820 on the northern face only. To the east of the chamber, a floor (1886) abutted Wall 1809 at 86.34 m, higher than the floor inside the chamber. The mud plaster on Wall 1809 continued down to coat one of the bricks below this floor level as well.

Below Floor 1886, and on the level of the lowest brick of Wall 1809, was an earth layer (1823) at levels 86.10–85.67 m, which was higher than the pits attributed to Stratum D-3 in this square and thus, may be explained as either the upper layer of Stratum D-3 or a fill intended to level the area on the slope of the mound for the construction of Walls 1820, 1809 and 4827 of Stratum D-2. This stratigraphic attribution is significant due to the fact that four radiocarbon dates of olive stones from this layer were measured (Chapter 48; Samples R21– R22) that point to the last quarter of the 10th century BCE in the 68.2% probability range and somewhat earlier in the 95% probability range.

South of Wall 1820, Locus 1802 probably marked an open area where thick striated layers of occupation debris between levels 86.11–87.19 m covered a layer of burnt brick collapse of Stratum D-4a (1850) and two pits of Stratum D-3. Among the finds from this area was a small stone seal depicting a scorpion (Chapter 30A, No. 1). Six radiocarbon dates of olive pits from this locus (Chapter 48; Sample R23) provide dates that cover most of the 10th century BCE.

A poorly preserved brick wall (2820) was exposed along 2.0 m, cut by Pit 2818 on the north and Pit 2805 on the south. Floor 1886 was found west of Wall 2820 at level 86.34 m, although it did not abut this wall. In the northern part of the square was a plaster floor at level 86.51 m (7837) and to the east of Wall 2820 was a thick layer (1837) containing a large amount of pottery (Figs. 16.60– 16.62), several fallen bricks, bones and some charcoal; a number of beads were found here as well. Among the finds was one Philistine Bichrome sherd (Fig. 16.60:15). This apparently had been a refuse dump in an open area, similar to Locus 1802 to the southwest of the wall, although it might have been a fill laid in preparation for construction of the subsequent D-1 structures.

Building 4828 in Squares P–Q/5

In Squares P–Q/5, two walls (4808, 4819), preserved to 1.15–1.6 m, formed part of a unit that continued to the east. Trench 4860 to the south of these walls cut the remains of Phase D-4. As mentioned above, this could be either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal burrow. A layer of reed impressions in clay found below the foundation of Wall 4808 (Photo 15.111) may be explained as either related to the construction of this wall or as the roof collapse of Building DJ of Stratum D-4 (the top of the latter’s walls were ca. 0.5 m lower). A third wall (4869), observed in the topsoil of Square P/6 north of the limits of the excavation area, seems to have belonged to the same building as Walls 4808 and 4819, creating a space 3.25 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Inside this space was a brick debris layer (4828) that rested on a possible floor at level 86.08 m. This was exactly the same level as the floor in Room 4826 to the south. If this indeed was the floor, then the foundations of the walls consisted of six to seven brick courses below the floor level, with no stone foundation. These deep foundations imply that this had been a sturdy, well-built structure. The light yellow and compacted matrix of the bricks of these walls was typical of Stratum VI construction elsewhere in the site. The pottery recovered from Locus 4828 included some red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, typical of this stratum. Thus, this room might be correlated on the basis of architectural, stratigraphic and pottery indicators to Stratum C-2 (=VI); see, however an alternative interpretation below.

Squares Q–R/4

Dismantling the balk between Squares Q/4 and R/4 revealed Wall 1563, a north–south wall preserved to a height of 1.6 m; its foundation was at levels 85.61–85.70 m, higher than that of Wall 4808 in Square P/5 (Fig. 15.28). Wall 1563 was built of the same yellowish bricks typical of Stratum VI and was found tilted to the east (in the opposite direction of the nearby slope of the mound), perhaps due to seismic damage. It was the western wall of a room of Stratum VI exposed in Area C, Square R/4, whose floor was at level 85.60 m (Chapter 12, Fig. 12.9). It made a corner on the south with Wall 1572, which was preserved only four courses high and to a length of ca. 1.0 m. Abutting Wall 1563 on the west was a layer of debris on an earthen layer (1556) at level 85.70 m, which may have been a floor, although this identification remained unsure. The eastern half of a pit (1567) was uncovered, dug into Floor 1556. The relationship between this floor and the deep debris of Locus 1837 to its west (see above) remained unclear, since the levels of 1837 and the foundations of Wall 2820 further to the west were higher than the supposed floor (1556). These discrepancies may be explained as a result of the layers tilting towards the east, as observed in several strata at Tel Rehov. As noted, Debris 1837 may have been a constructional fill for Stratum D-1 floors, which may explain its rather high level compared to Floor 1556. A third possible explanation is that Floor 1556 (if indeed correctly identified as a floor) belonged to a late phase of Stratum D-3 and was not related to Wall 1563 (although this was not the impression during the excavation).

No evidence for the nature of the end of Stratum D-2 was found. Floors, as much as they were revealed, were found empty of finds in situ and the remains were damaged by erosion, especially on the west. This level is correlated with Stratum C-2 based on the stratigraphic continuity with Square R/4 and thus, should be dated to the early to middle 10th century BCE.

An Alternative Interpretation

Yael Rotem, field supervisor of Area D East, suggested that the northern structure in Stratum D-2 (Walls 4808, 4819, 4869) was contemporary with the Stratum D-3 pits, based on the fact that none of the D-3 pits were found below or north of Wall 4808 and that the latter wall was founded just above Stratum D-4a walls and occupation debris. In its center, Wall 4808 stands to a height of up to 1.6 m between levels 85.27 and 87.06 m, while the pits were between levels 85.23 and 86.50 m, corresponding to the lower part of this wall. Thus, the possibility that the pits and the wall were contemporary should not be ruled out. In that case, the walls belonging to this unit should be attributed to Stratum D-3 at the end of the Iron Age I. This is not contradicted by the few sherds that were related to these walls.

In the western part of Square R/4, Wall 1563, attributed to Stratum D-2, was founded at level 85.61 m, which may indicate that this wall, too, was contemporary with at least some of the D-3 pits (Fig. 15.28). The concentration of restorable pottery found in Locus 1555b east of this wall (Figs. 13.10–13.11) is typical of late Iron I or Early Iron IIA at Tel Rehov. However, stratigraphically, this locus is attributed to Stratum C-2 because of its relation to D-2 Wall 1563 and C-2 walls to its east. It is above a thin debris layer that covered a floor with two pits that are similar to those in Stratum D-3 (see details in Chapter 12).

A. Mazar pointed out the following difficulties in accepting Y. Rotem’s suggestion:
  1. the short and fragmentary walls (1809, 1820, 4827, 2820) and related floors that were attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares R–Q/4 were on a higher level and were later than the D-3 pits. A floor related to these structures (4825) was cut on its north by a trench that ran along the southern side of Wall 4808. If this was the foundation trench of this wall, then it would have been later than the D-3 pits. However, as noted above, it seems more likely that this trench represented animal burrowing and thus, these stratigraphic conclusions would be inaccurate.
  2. Pits 11438 and 11439 in Square R/4 (excavated as part of Area C; see Fig. 15.27 and Chapter 12, discussion of Strata C-3 and C-2 in Square R/4, Figs. 12.5, 12.9) were earlier than the pottery concentration in Locus 1555b, which abutted the lowest level of Walls 1563, 4458 and 1567 of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI). The floor with the two pits could be contemporary with the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (see Table 15.3). In any event, the Stratum D-3 pits would be earlier than the architecture of Stratum C-2, which appears to correspond with Room 4828 of Stratum D-2.
  3. Locus 1837, a 1.0 m thick debris layer with Iron IIA pottery in Square Q/4, may allude to an Iron IIA date of Wall 4808 to the north (although this debris layer may also be explained as a fill laid prior to the construction of D-1 structures).
  4. As mentioned above, the technical features of the walls in Room 4828 fit those of Stratum VI in other excavation areas.
We thus present Y. Rotem’s suggestion as a remote possibility. If correct, it would require attributing Room 4828 to Stratum D-3 and leaving Stratum D-2 with almost no architectural remains.

Stratum D-1

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.29–15.31
  • Sections: Figs. 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.115–15.122
  • Pottery: Fig. 16.60
Discussions
Introduction

Several fragmentary architectural elements at the top of the slope in Squares P–Q/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-1 (Strata V and IV). Although they were close to topsoil and the erosion line and were poorly preserved, they indicated dense building activity which can be divided into three phases, denoted D-1c, D-1b and D-1a; these can be correlated with similar phases uncovered in the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C (Chapter 12). Like in Area D, the lower two levels in the latter square were identical in terms of architecture and the difference between them was only in floor raising, while the upper phase, C-1a, showed a substantial change in terms of plan and architecture. This similarity between the two adjacent squares enabled a secure correlation between the two areas.

Stratum D-1c

This phase comprised several architectural features in Squares Q/4–5, which superimposed Stratum D-2 architecture (Fig. 15.29; Photos 15.115– 15.116). The walls appeared to belong to one building, the western part of which was destroyed by erosion.

The most substantial element of Phases D-1c and D-1b was Wall 7803, preserved to a height of more than 1.5 m. This east–west wall in Square Q/5 had a stone foundation only at its eroded western end (Square P/5), where the brick superstructure had disappeared due to erosion. This rather massive stone foundation was intended to support the wall close to the steep slope of the mound. Such a stone foundation is notable, as it was not found in other buildings of Strata VI–IV in all other excavation areas. Wall 7803 was bonded with north–south Wall 7824, which was narrower and probably served as an inner partition wall. Some 2.0 m north of its corner with Wall 7803, Wall 7824 made a corner with Wall 4809, which extended to the west and disappeared at the erosion line after 1.1 m. To the north of this corner, Wall 7811 continued the line of Wall 7824. It was built of dark friable bricks, preserved two courses high. It may have been a later addition to the building, since its foundation level was somewhat higher than the rest of the walls in this structure. These walls created three separate rooms or spaces.

The space east of Wall 7824 (7837) was at least 3.0×3.7 m, continuing east and north beyond the limits of the excavation area. A plaster floor (7837) was exposed in this space at level 86.49 m; on top of it was an accumulation of striations, sealed underneath a massive brick collapse.

The space to the west of Wall 7824 and limited by Wall 4809 on the north was badly eroded on the slope. In the corner of Walls 7824 and 4809 was a semi-circular brick bin (7820), comprising two courses of narrow bricks. It covered the top of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2.

Square Q/4 remained a large open space. On the western edge of this area very fragmentary remains were detected close to the erosion line, including part of a circular line of bricks with a floor (1834), perhaps a silo, located above the D-2 remains. The installation was bordered on the north by a fragment of a stone foundation (1852) bearing a single brick, which was all that remained of its superstructure. To the north of the wall, the stones continued into Square Q/5, where they functioned as a foundation for Wall 7803.

It seems that the end of this phase was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse.

Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C, which consisted of a few narrow walls and a floor (4483, level 86.70 m; Chapter 12).

Stratum D-1b

Stratum D-1b refers to a later phase of the previous occupation, when the buildings continued to be in use, but slight changes were made in floors and installations (Fig. 15.30; Photos 15.117–15.120). In Square Q/5, two phases of partially preserved ovens (7825, 7817) were found east of Wall 7811, related to a floor (7812). Their foundations were at levels 86.87 m and 86.78 m respectively, ca. 0.3 m above the floor of Stratum D-1c. Two intact oil lamps (Fig. 16.61:8–9) were found in the debris (7809) west of the ovens. In the corner of Walls 4809 and 7811, a thin clay floor (7827) was found at level 86.71 m.

Square Q/4 continued to be an open space (1807) as in the previous phase. Three ovens were found in the southwestern corner of this square, just below topsoil: 1813 (87.26–87.47 m), 1827 (87.11– 87.38 m) and 1817 (87.13–87.28 m). Two of them (1813, 1827) continued into the southern balk. The level of these ovens was slightly lower than the foundation of Wall 1808 of Stratum D-1a to the east (Fig. 15.31) and thus, they were attributed to D-1b.

In spite of the above description, the division between D-1c and D-1b must be viewed with reservation: the three ovens attributed to D-1b in Squares Q–P/4 could also be attributed to D-1c and thus, the separation between these two phases would be limited to the construction of the two ovens in Square Q/5, ca. 0.3 m above Floor 7837.

Stratum D-1a

In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.

In the southeastern corner of Square Q/5, a fragmentary east–west wall (7806), 1.2 m long and preserved to 0.6 m, can be attributed to this phase. A single brick (7823) found to its west may be its continuation, although it might just be a fallen brick.

Islamic Period Burial 4829

In Square P/5, a burial of an adult (4829) was dug into D-1c–b Wall 4809. The grave was covered with a line of bricks taken from the wall. The body was lying on its back, the skull in the northeast and the feet in the southwest. The skull was slightly tilted, with the eye sockets facing the feet, approximately towards the south. No finds were found in relation to this burial. This was most probably an Islamic burial, similar to the ones found in Area B (Chapter 8).

Chapter 15D - Summary and Conclusions

Settlement History and Architecture

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

Discussions
The Available Data

It should be recalled that only a limited area of ca. 150 sq m, and in many cases much less, was excavated in Area D in each phase. This is a very tiny sample compared to the entire area of the site, which is ca. 100,000 sq m; thus, the available sample comprised only ca. 0.15%. Since the Late Bronze/Iron I sequence was hardly excavated in other parts of the tell, caution must be exercised when making generalizations based on the available data. Phases with poor architectural remains should not be taken as representing the entire site. For example, although the building remains of Strata D-2 and D-1 were fragmentary and unimpressive, we know that they belonged to a densely built and well-planned Iron IIA city, as uncovered in the adjacent Area C and other excavation areas.

Settlement Continuity

The most prominent result of the excavation in Area D was the observation of continued occupation throughout the 600 years spanning Late Bronze I to Iron IIA. Eleven main strata from this time span were defined and several of them have two sub-phases (D-11, D-9, D-7, D-6, D-4) or even three sub-phases (D-1). No major widespread destruction layers were detected in the entire sequence in Area D; an occupation gap may have separated Stratum D-8 from D-7b, as evidenced by the 0.5 m thick accumulation between these two strata, yet this could not be confirmed. Thick accumulations of floor striations in open areas and streets in most strata were evidence for continued activity over a long time. In terms of architecture, the large public building of Stratum D-10 (14th century BCE) and the urban planning and architecture of Strata D-5 and D-4 of Iron IB, should be noted.

Summary of the Stratigraphy and Architecture by Period

The Late Bronze Age

The foundation of the city in Late Bronze I (Stratum D-11b) is an exceptional phenomenon in the Southern Levant, as there are almost no new cities founded in this period, which is considered as a period of decline following the Egyptian conquest of Canaan. The low elevation of the earliest stratum compared to the present-day field west of the mound shows that the level of the colluvial field must have risen considerably during the historical periods. It is hypothesized that the earliest settlement was founded at approximately the same level as the adjacent field, or somewhat higher than the field west of the mound, while young tectonic activities were responsible for later geomorphological processes in this area. This, again, is an exceptional feature in Canaanite cities, which were most often located on raised topography. This earliest occupation had a later phase, denoted D-11a, although both these phases are little known, due to limited exposure.

The builders of Building DA of Stratum D-10 (most probably in the 14th century BCE) found it necessary to raise the level of the floors by erecting deep buttressed foundation walls and a 2.0 m-deep constructional fill. We assume that only a small part of this substantial building was excavated; not enough was excavated to define its function with any certainty. It may have served as a palace or elite residence, or as an administrative building. Its brick buttresses were a rare phenomenon in this period, known only from public architecture at a few other sites like Ugarit, Alalakh and Megiddo, mostly in stone.

Strata D-9 and D-8 were later occupation phases of Late Bronze IIB (late 14th and 13th centuries BCE). In Stratum D-9b, a new building (DB) was built above Building DA of Stratum D-10, with some continuity between the two, as demonstrated by several walls retaining the outline of the former building. However, the building techniques changed and the new building appeared to have been much less elaborate than its predecessor. An important feature was the bronze-melting installation in the form of a canal, which recalls Egyptian metallurgical technology of the 13th century BCE (Chapter 40C). Stratum D-9a demonstrated a radical architectural change; some of the older walls went out of use and a new wall, stone floor and pillar bases were added. In the last LB IIB phase, Stratum D-8, architectural continuity is seen in the eastern side of the excavated area, while the rest of the area remained an open space.

Iron Age IA

A thick accumulation separated the open area of Stratum D-8 from that of the subsequent Stratum D-7b which can be securely dated to the early 12th century BCE. One small pit contained a cache of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapters 4, 39). In the following phase (D-7a), the area was redesigned as a dwelling with a stone floor and several installations, some of which were densely concentrated in one of its units; a prominent feature in this phase was the six foundation deposits of the lampand-bowl type (see discussion below). In part of the area, a still higher phase was detected (D-7a'), when a new line of pillar bases was built above the previous stone pavement.

In Stratum D-6b, two of the older walls continued to be in use, but new floors, installations and ovens were constructed. The location of the ovens above earlier ones indicated continuity in the function of this area in the transition from D-7a to D-6b. Two of the installations were plastered basins that perhaps were used for some industrial purpose, such as linen dyeing or processing. Stratum D-6a marks further changes; much of the previous architecture went out of use, although one installation continued and two new ovens replaced the previous ones. Two samples submitted to 14C dating (Samples R2, R3, measured four times) provided a date in the 12th–11th centuries BCE and additional considerations narrow it down to the second half of the 12th century (see Chapters 4, 48).

Iron Age IB

Iron IB Strata D-5 and D-4 were preserved only in Squares N–Q/5 in the eastern part of the area. In both, a street crossed the area from north to south. The street surfaces were raised during the course of Strata D-5 and D-4 by almost 1.0 m, evidence for continuous intensive use and dumping of refuse into the street. Substantial buildings flanked the street on the east and west. Building DD of Stratum D-5 was a massive structure with elongated rooms and brick floors. It appeared to have had some public or administrative function, perhaps storage. A room to the north of this building may have been used for domestic cult.

In Stratum D-4, some substantial changes occurred in the planning of the area east of the street, now divided between two buildings: DG and DH. Building DG, based on the outlines of the previous building, DD, may have been a dwelling with a small square courtyard, surrounded by rooms on at least two sides. Building DH is little known, as only two rooms were exposed. An unusual feature attributed to this phase was an installation composed of three large stones, one with a shallow depression, located on top of the eastern wall. Its function and the reason for its strange location remain unknown. Building DF, west of the street, was another dwelling or parts of two attached dwellings, of which only the eastern part was preserved, including a stone-paved area (courtyard?) and parts of three rooms. In the later Stratum D-4a, it appears that Buildings DG and DH were combined into one, since the double wall between the two was replaced by a single brick wall. The new building, denoted DJ, retained the basic features of the previous two buildings, yet new partition walls and floors were constructed in several of the rooms. Building DF west of the street continued to be in use and the floors above the stone-paved area in the southern part of this complex were raised several times. A suggested reconstruction of the area, combined with building remains in Area C (Fig. 15.25), indicates a well-planned and densely built area, perhaps representative of other parts of the city as well. Radiocarbon dates from Stratum D-4 point to an 11th century BCE date (Chapter 48).

Stratum D-3 indicates a substantial change in the occupational history of this area; the buildings of Stratum D-4 went out of use and were replaced by 45 pits cut into the brick debris of the Stratum D-4 buildings. Probably used as refuse or storage pits, they continued into the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C to the east. However, a similar phenomenon was not found in other parts of Area C and thus, the pits were probably a local phenomenon, while elsewhere in Area C, Iron IB buildings continued unchanged. A large number of radiocarbon dates from the pits provided a wide range, from the 11th to the 10th/9th centuries BCE (Chapters 4, 48).

Iron Age IIA

Strata D-2 and D-1 of the Iron IIA were preserved only on the upper part of the slope (Squares Q/4–5 and the eastern side of P/4–5). Stratum D-2 is correlated with Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and marks the westernmost structures of this well-planned Early Iron IIA city, well known in Area C (Table 15.1 and Chapter 12). In the north of the area were remains of a substantial building and in the south were fragmentary structures and an open area with pits (for an alternative proposal which would combine the building in Squares P–Q/5 and the pits of Stratum D-3 into a single stratum; see above).

Strata D-1c and D-1b should be correlated with Stratum C-1b (Stratum V; Table 15.1). The building of D-2 in the northern part of the area was replaced with a new building comprising two stratigraphic phases; the later one included two ovens. In the southern part, the open area continued to be in use with higher floors and three new ovens. Stratum D-1a marks yet another architectural change; a new structure with narrow brick walls was built in the southern part of the area, perhaps part of a dwelling continuing into Square R/4 of Area C to the east.

Discussion of Various Features

Erosion, Tectonic Changes and Lack of Fortifications

The excavation in Area D provided important information concerning the impact of environmental factors, such as erosion and tectonic movements, on site formation. The lower (western) edge of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium created during the last three thousand years. Each of the strata was damaged by erosion, although its extent is unknown; it may have demolished only narrow parts of the western slope or, combined with tectonic movements, a somewhat larger part. Nevertheless, it seems likely that erosion could not have been so extensive, and that there were no fortifications during the periods excavated in Area D. This was confirmed also along the northern edge of the mound in Areas C and E concerning the Iron IIA strata.

Tectonic movements caused walls, floors and occupation layers to tilt from west to east or to the southeast, as opposed to the direction of the outer slope of the mound. Such tilting was clearly related to tectonic movements which occurred both during the occupation of the lower mound and subsequently (Chapter 2). The location of the tell on top of the Western Marginal Fault of the Dead Sea Transform was thus significant in regard to site formation processes.

Destruction, Continuity and Change

No evidence for violent destruction was found in any of the strata in Area D, except in part of Building DJ, Stratum D-4a, where limited ash debris and restorable pottery in situ were detected. It appeared that the transition between strata was peaceful and was the result of damage caused by prolonged use, earthquakes, etc. In spite of marked changes between strata, there was continuity in the outlines of buildings, continuous use of certain walls and installations, and the construction of new ovens more or less in the same location of earlier ones.

Building Techniques

The walls of the Late Bronze Strata D-11 and D-10 were constructed of bricks without stone foundations; Stratum D-11b Wall 1927 might have been made of packed-earth construction (pisé). In Strata D-9–D-4, most walls had stone foundations of one or two courses that bore a brick superstructure. In the Iron IIA strata (D-2 and D-1), brick walls were constructed without stone foundations, as in contemporary strata in the other excavation areas across the mound.

The 2.0 m-thick constructional fill and buttresses of Building DA in Stratum D-10 were an exceptional feature found only in this specific building, which was clearly of a public nature. The thick fills were possibly necessary due to the low location of the building close to the surrounding fields.

Most floors were made of beaten earth or plaster. In several cases, such as in the courtyard of Building DA of Stratum D-10, the floor was white, probably the result of using crushed tufa and/or lisan-formation huwar. In a few cases, floors were made of a light pink clay. In Strata D-11a, D-9a, D-7a and D-4b, cobblestone floors were found in specific rooms or courtyards.

Lines of pillar bases were detected in Strata D-9b, D-9a, D-8, D-7a and D-7a'. The bases were made of flattened basalt and limestone, and sometimes large pebbles were used, as well as broken grinding stones. These bases must have supported wooden pillars. In one case in Stratum D-9a, postholes were preserved above the stone bases.

No evidence for terraced construction on the slope was found, except for Stratum D-4, where a difference of 0.5–0.7 m was observed between the floors of rooms east and west of the street. A difference of 0.7 m in floor levels between Rooms 4879 and 4839, both west of the street, was also observed.

Nature of the Archaeological Deposits

Two main types of archaeological deposits were found in all the strata: debris related to the collapse of brick walls and occupation debris composed of thin accumulated layers, sometimes laminated in appearance (denoted ‘striations’) that contained many pottery sherds and animal bones. Such striations were especially common in the street layers of Strata D-5 and D-4 and open spaces in Strata D-8 to D-6. These layers are explained as resulting from intentional raising of floor levels and dumping refuse into open spaces.5
Footnotes

5 Natural causes for the creation of such layers were also considered, such as water flow and the deposition of chemical sediments (e.g., evaporites) or silts and clays which originated from nearby exposures of earlier strata, in a mechanism resembling ‘winter-wash’ deposits accumulating inside the squares between the excavation seasons. Based on field observations only, it seems that continuous human activity was the main cause for these laminations.

Foundation Deposits

Eight foundation deposits of the lamp-and-bowl type were found in Area D. The subject was discussed by Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993), who cited all examples known at the time of writing (for two additional ones from a 12th century BCE context at Tel Beth-Shean, see TBS III: 19); the earliest known examples are dated to the 13th century BCE. Our example from Stratum D-9b is tentatively dated to the late 14th or early 13th century BCE and thus, is one of the oldest known deposits of this type. It included a basalt bowl (unlike all the later foundation deposits that have a ceramic bowl) and a single lamp. Six deposits were discovered in Stratum D-7a Building DC of the 12th century, the heyday of this phenomenon, representing one of the densest concentrations of such deposits to be found in a single structure. A single deposit found in Stratum D-4 is one of the latest, dating to the late 11th century BCE. Our deposits contain either one bowl and one lamp or two bowls placed rim to rim, with a lamp between them. No other finds or material such as ash were detected in these deposits. Most of these were located either below a wall or close to its foundation (Fig. 15.13) and must have been related to the construction of the building. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993: 123) emphasized the southern distribution of such deposits (Shephelah, western Negev, southern coastal plain and Egyptian fortresses in northern Sinai and Gaza). The only northern site they could cite was Pella. The examples from Tel Beth-Shean and Tel Rehov enlarge this distribution map to include the Beth-Shean Valley. However, the lack of such deposits in major northern sites such as Dan, Hazor and Megiddo remains a fact. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni defined the phenomenon as “an Egyptian inspired local Canaanite custom”, which appeared mainly during the height of Egyptian control in Canaan, as well as in the Philistine city, Ekron (Tel Miqne). These foundation deposits must have been an expression of beliefs related to the construction of buildings, perhaps to ward off evil spirits.

Hearths and Ovens

Two hearths, a cooking installation and 16 ovens (tabuns) were found in Area D.

Two hearths (1925, 1926) were found in LB I Stratum D-11. They were circular (diameter 0.55 m) or oval (0.4×0.6 m), with a floor made of limestone pebbles and broken basalt grinding stones covered by black soot, and must have been used for cooking or roasting. They recall three hearths found in MB II levels at Tel Beth-Shean, although those were much larger, 1.3–1.5 m diameter (TBS II: 55–57, Fig. 3.6). A different type of cooking installation was found in Stratum D-7a (8902), which was a poorly preserved small fireplace, surrounded by clay.

Most of the 16 baking ovens were located in open spaces, with the possible exception of Space 9927 in Stratum D-9b. Most of the ovens were preserved less than 0.1 m high and were made of a number of clay layers; in several cases, an outer coating of pottery sherds was found. Stratum D-2 Oven 8818 was large (diameter 0.85 m) and well constructed. Another large oven (diameter 1.0 m, somewhat irregular in shape) was in the inner courtyard of Stratum D-4 Building DJ. Its construction may have been related to the unification of the previous buildings, DH and DG, into one large (family?) unit. All other ovens were smaller, 0.5– 0.6 m in diameter. Ovens did not appear in Strata D-10 and D-5, when cooking and baking must have been conducted in an area beyond the borders of the excavation.

Continuity in the location of ovens between several strata indicates continuity in the location of cooking areas. This was observed in two cases: Strata D-7 to D-6 and Strata D-2 to D-1b. In Stratum D-7a, Oven 7946, 0.6 m in diameter, was located in an open space near the installations in the southeastern corner of the area. It was replaced by a similar oven in Stratum D-6b, when a second oven was added slightly to its west. In Stratum D-6a, a new oven was built above the eastern one and thus, three superimposed ovens were found here. In Iron IIA Stratum D-2, an oven was found in the open space at the southern side of the area. In Stratum D-1b, five ovens were found, three more or less in the same area where the previous oven stood and two in the northern part of the area.

Installations

Various additional installations were found in Area D.

In Stratum D-9b, a bronze-melting installation in the form of a canal was found. Near it, a large circular flat stone surrounded by small stones and three plastered circular depressions in the floor were probably part of this workshop. A similar plastered depression was found in the eastern unit of the building.

Several plastered rectangular brick installations were found, one in Stratum D-7a, three in Stratum D-6b and one of which continued to be in use in Stratum D-6a. It may be suggested that these installations were used in some industrial function, such as textile production.

A square brick installation with traces of plaster inside that was probably used for storage was found in Building DD of Stratum D-5. Such bins were common in the 12th century BCE Strata S-4 and S-3 at Tel Beth-Shean (TBS III: 104, Fig. 4.3a, Building SA; 132–135, Buildings SH, SM).

Installation 8810 in Stratum D-4b was composed of four large basalt stones, one of them with a rounded depression; it might have been used for oil production.

Pits

Pits are a common feature in any excavation and their function for refuse, drainage or storage often remains obscure. In Area D, single pits were found in Strata D-7b and D-7a in open areas. In Strata D-5 and D-4, several pits of various sizes were found inside massive buildings. In Building DD, one large and three small pits were dug from the brick floors and in Building 8816 of Stratum D-4b, a large pit was located in the inner courtyard and two smaller pits in Room DG. These pits must have functioned in the house when it was in use, perhaps for refuse or to drain sewage.

A most outstanding phenomenon was the large group of 45 pits in Stratum D-3, (and two in Square R/4 in Area C, Stratum C-3), most likely used for refuse or storage. Most were unlined, containing few pottery sherds, olive pits and some ash. In several cases, such pits cut one another. These may be compared to a similar phenomena of multiple pits in a good number of Iron Age I sites, in particular those that were related to the ‘Israelite settlement’ (for a summary until 1988, see Finkelstein 1986: 124–128; 1988: 264–269, with references to Iron I contexts at Dan, Tel Zeror, Shiloh, Izbet ¥artah, Tell en-Na§beh, Tell Beit Mirsim, Beer Sheba, and Iron IIA Aphek). Finkelstein explained these pits as grain silos. Yet, a distinction should be made between stone-lined pits and unlined pits. Stonelined pits could indeed be used as silos for grain storage. Many of the pits at Dan V–VI were so used, while others were not stone lined and were perhaps used as refuse pits (Biran 1994: 126–135). Many pits were found at Izbet Sartah (seven in Stratum III, 43 in Stratum III, 10 in Stratum I; Finkelstein 1986: 5–28, 124–128), Shiloh (Finkelstein, Bunimovitz and Lederman 1993: 47– 48), Tell en-Nasbeh and Tell Beit Mirsim (ca. 20 pits in Stratum B; Albright 1943: Pl. 2). In Stratum XII/XI at Hazor, ca. 70 pits, ca. 1.0 m in diameter, comprised the bulk of the Iron I remains at this site. Most of them contained only pottery sherds and broken stone vessels; some were sealed with stones. They were explained as refuse pits (BenAmi and Ben Tor 2012: 18–21, 24–25). At Tell Deir ªAlla in the eastern Jordan Valley, 14 pits were found in Phase A, 20 in Phase B and 10 in Phase C, all dated to the 12th century BCE (Franken 1969: 3–45). At Tel Zeror, over 20 unlined pits dating to Iron I, possibly used for refuse, were found (Ohata 1996: 24–25, Pl. III). Our pits seem to belong to this latter group, although several were coated with a thin white plaster, which may have rendered them suitable for food storage. This matter remains open.

While at most of these sites, the pits appeared throughout the Iron Age I, in our case, they were a cluster only in the latest phase of that period, probably representing some short-term activity. On the dating of these pits, see Chapters 4 and 48.

Four pits were attributed to Early Iron IIA Stratum D-2; they were not different from those of Stratum D-3 and their stratigraphic attribution is based only on levels.

Plans and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 15.1          Area D at the end of 1997 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.2          Area D at the end of 1998 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.3          Area D at the end of 2000 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4          Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5          Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6          General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.7          General view, with backhoe digging a trench in the alluvial plain west of the mound, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13          Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.14          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.15          Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.16          Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.17          Backhoe trench in Square M/10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.18          Squares L–M/4 at end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.19          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.20          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.21          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.22          Square M/5, Buttress 8938 and Wall 8942 abutted by D-10 Courtyard 8934 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27          Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28          Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29          Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31          Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.32          Squares N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.33          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.34          Detail of bronze-melting canal (8921) with fragments of bellow, charcoal, and metal object in situ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.35          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.36          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.39          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40          Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42          Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.43          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.44          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45          Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46          Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.58          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.59          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.60          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.62          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63          Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64          Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65          Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66          Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67          Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68          Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69          Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70          Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71          Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74          Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.78          General view of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.79          Squares N–P/4,from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.80          Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.81          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.82          Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.83          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.84          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.85          Squares P–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.86          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.87          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.89          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.90          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.91          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.92          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.93          Squares Q–P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.94          Square Q/5, looking east; D-4a Building DJ, brick collapse in Room 7853 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.95          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.96          Square P/5, looking west; D-4a Building DJ, debris and vessels in Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.97          Smashed Pottery in Square P/5 D-4a Building DJ, Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.98          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.99          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.100          Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.101          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.102          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.103          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.104          Square Q/4, D-3 Pit 2808 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.105          Squares P–Q/4, looking west at upper D-3 pits from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.106          Square Q/4, looking south at D-3 Pit 2872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.107          Square Q/4, looking west at D-3 Pit 2850 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.108          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.109          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.110          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.111          Square P/5, looking south at reed impressions (ceiling collapse?) on plaster layer from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.112          Closeup of layer in Photo 15.111 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.113          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.114          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.115          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.116          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.117          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.118          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.119          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.120          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.121          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.122          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.123          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Chapter 17 - Area E: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 17.1          Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2          Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.1          Schematic plan of Areas E and F; Iron IIA Stratum F-1 in black from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2a          Plan of Stratum E-3 (Square E/15) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2b          Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3          Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.4          Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5          General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.13          Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Discussions
Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

Area E was located in the northeastern part of Tel Rehov in main grid square 16 (Chapter 3) at the highest point of the eastern part of the lower mound, although it was 13.5 m lower than the highest point in Area C in the northwestern part. The area was close to the northern and eastern edges of the mound, reaching the top of the steep northern slope in only one narrow probe (Squares E/20, E/1). The area included fourteen fully excavated squares and four half squares, a total of 400 sq m, and an additional narrow trench of 25 sq m north of the main area. The topsoil slightly descended southwards, creating an elevation difference of 0.82 m over a distance of 20 m between the northern and southern ends of the area.

The goal of the excavation was to determine the occupational history of the uppermost strata in this part of the mound. It turned out that most of this area can be interpreted as a sacred precinct or sanctuary during the Iron Age IIA, comprising a large open courtyard, a raised platform, several installations and two structural units which can be related to this sanctuary (Buildings EA and EB). On the western edge of the area, part of a dwelling was excavated (Building EC)

The excavation in Area E began in 1997 in six squares: E–F/13–15. During the 1998 season, the area was extended to the north (Squares D–E/15– 16, F/16). In 2000, the area was extended to Square D/14, the northern half of D/13, and 2.0 m-wide probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16, intended to locate the edge of the open courtyard in the northern part of the area. In 2001, three new squares were opened (C/14–16) and a 2.5 m-wide probe was excavated in Squares E/20 and E/1 (in main grid square 20), intended to answer the question whether there were fortifications along the northern edge of the mound (Photos 17.1–17.3).

The excavations in Area E were supervised by Se Jin Koh (1997–1998, 2000) and James Paul Cowie, Diana Edelman and Naama Yahalom-Mack (2001).

Area F, located 5.0 m south of Area E, was directly related to the latter (Fig. 17.1; see Chapter 19).

Stratum E-3 (perhaps to be correlated with general Stratum VII) is known from only one debris layer in a narrow probe in Square E/15. Stratum E-2 (correlated with general Stratum VI) was examined in only a few probes in Squares D–F/15, E/13–14 and the nature of the area in that stratum remains virtually unknown. The few floors from this phase were 0.7–1.0 m below those of Stratum E-1b, at levels 71.07–71.30 m.

The main feature in this area was an architectural complex which we define as an open-air sanctuary, attributed to Strata E-1b and E-1a, correlated with general Strata V and IV. In Stratum E-1a, the heart of this complex was Building EB, containing a platform with masseboth at its northeastern corner. This building was preceded by Building ED of Stratum E-1b, although only one room and a few fragmentary walls of the latter were excavated. A spacious courtyard east and north of Buildings ED and EB was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a. Outer walls of this courtyard, located in Squares E/17–18 and G/16, appear to have been in use in both strata. In the courtyard, floors with an accumulation of debris that contained pottery, animal bones, various artifacts and installations, as well as ovens, circular clay bins and benches, were found in a total accumulation of almost 1.0 m. It was sometimes difficult to define which of these layers and installations belonged to Stratum E-1b and which to E-1a, as the courtyard continued to be in use throughout both these strata, with occasional alterations. Floors of Stratum E-1a seem to have been eroded in certain parts of the courtyard (in Squares E/17–18, F–G/16) but were well defined close to Building EB in Squares D–E/15–16. In certain cases, it was difficult to determine whether a certain installation was founded in E-1b or E-1a. Building EA in the southeastern part of the area was an auxiliary structure which, in fact, may have included parts of two or three different buildings. It was founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, with a few changes and floor raisings.

Building EC in the western part of the area was a partly excavated dwelling located west of the sanctuary; it is known from Stratum E-1a, but was perhaps founded in E-1b.

Strata E-1b and E-1a

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Schematic plans: Figs. 17.1, 17.4
  • Detailed plans: Figs. 17.3, 17.5–17.9
  • Sections: Figs. 17.14–17.22;
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.3–18.21
The designation Strata E-1b and E-1a (general Strata V and IV respectively) refers to the same architectural complex which underwent modifications and changes. The structures belonging to these strata were oriented northeast–southwest and they are all parallel or perpendicular to one another, indicating central planning.

Five architectural units were defined:
  1. Building EA in Squares E–F/13–1 4, Strata E-1b and E-1a.
  2. Building ED in Squares D–E/15. This building preceded Building EB; only one room and parts of additional walls were excavated.
  3. Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 and E/15, Stratum E-1a.
  4. Open area/courtyard in Squares E–F/14–16, D/16, E/17–18, Strata E-1b and E-1a.
  5. Building EC in Squares C/13–16, Stratum E-1a.
In our view, the courtyard, Building EB, and perhaps also Buildings EA and ED, belonged to a sanctuary complex that might have been first established in Stratum E-1b, but whose main phase of use was in Stratum E-1a.

In the following discussion, the stratigraphic development and architectural features of both Strata E-1a and E-1b in each architectural unit are described according to the order of the main units defined above.

Building EA (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3 - Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.4 - Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.6 - Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.1 - General view of Area E, end of 1997 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.10 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.11 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.12 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.13 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking west; E-1a Floor 1677 with pottery in destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.14 - Building EA, detail of Room 1701 and compartments 1666 and 1700 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.15 - Building EA, detail of compartments 1666 and 1700 and double wall 1618/1612 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.16 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking east, E-1b Room 2651 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.17 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking east; right: E-1a–b Wall 1629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.18 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.19 - Squares E/13–14, Building EA, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20 - Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.3–17.6
  • Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.9–17.20
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.3–18.5
Discussions
Introduction

Building EA included all the structural remains in Squares E–F/13–14, although the possibility exists that these remains may have belonged to two or three independent buildings, as described below This complex existed in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, with some architectural changes made between them. The topsoil in this area descended to the south, towards the ravine that separated the lower from the upper mound. There was a distinct difference between the preservation in Squares F/13–14, as opposed to E/13–14. While the building remains in F/13–14 were found just below topsoil and were well preserved to a height of ca. 0.8 m, those in Squares E/13–14 were poorly preserved on a much lower level and were covered by a thick layer of eroded wash. Thus, the difference in the height of the top of Wall 1689 in E/13 (71.32 m) and Wall 1629 in F/13 (72.27 m) was 1.07 m, although they were only 3.0 m apart. This lower preservation of the walls in Squares E–F/13 seems to have been caused by severe erosion towards the ravine south of the excavation area, as well as due to a violent destruction in this area, as evidenced by the fallen bricks in Squares E–F/13. It seems that the walls uncovered in the southern part of Square E/13 belonged to Stratum E-1b only and that almost no remains of E-1a were preserved in this square, due to erosion.

Most of the walls were constructed of one row of bricks laid as headers. In two places, two walls were attached to one another (1661+1619 in Squares F/13–14 and 1618+1612 in Square F/13), creating a double wall, 1.2–1.4 m wide. In the case of Walls 1661 and 1619, the narrow space between them was filled with brick material. These double walls may have been the result of constructing adjoining buildings in the same insula, a common practice in Area C (Chapter 12). If this assumption is correct, then the structural remains in this unit belonged to three separate buildings, each excavated only partly:
  1. The northern part: Rooms 1704 and 2639 in Stratum E-1b and Room 1677 in Stratum E-1a.

  2. The southern part: Rooms 1701, 1699, 2651, 2663 in Stratum E-1b; 1701 and 1605 in Stratum E-1a.

  3. An eastern building: Room 1662, Stratum E-1b and Room 1646, Stratum E-1a.

Examples of brick sizes used in the construction of this building are 0.52×0.34×0.13 m (Wall 1689), 0.52×0.32×0.15 m (Wall 1618), 0.54×0.32×0.14 m (Wall 1619) and 0.56×0.37×0.14 m (Wall 1661). In general, the color of the bricks was light grayish brown and light yellow/off-white. In most cases, the foundation level of the walls was not reached, but those that were, lacked stone foundations.

The Northern Part of Building EA: Rooms 1704 and 2639 (Stratum E-1b) and 1677 (Stratum E-1a)

In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north.

E-1b Room 1704 was reused in Stratum E-1a with some architectural changes (Fig. 17.6). Wall 1687 went out of use and the floor of the new room (1677), that now extended to the north, covered it. The northern wall of the new room was 1688, preserved to one course only, its top level flush with the floor. Although the levels of this wall were almost identical to those of Wall 1687 to its south, Floor 1677 of Stratum E-1a covered Wall 1687 and appeared to be related to the top of Wall 1688, and thus the two walls were attributed to separate phases. The top of the western wall of the previous phase (1669) was also almost flush with the floor of the new room, so much so that it was not clear whether the floor covered the wall or whether the wall continued in use in this phase as well. The latter possibility was accepted as more reasonable and so the wall is included in the plan of Stratum E-1a. Thus, Room 1677 had inner dimensions of 2.8×3.7 m; its entrance could have been from the northeastern side, which was beyond the limits of the excavated area. The floor (1677) was made of hard-packed beaten-earth of a creamy color (77.17–72.08 m).

Room 1677 was destroyed by a severe fire at the end of Stratum E-1a and some of the brick debris was burnt and hardened to the consistency of fired ceramic. Above the beaten-earth floor was a thin ash layer (1652), which was covered by a 0.4 m-deep layer of destruction debris (1610) with restorable pottery (Photo 17.13), including a Phoenician Bichrome jug (Fig. 18.5:5), four cooking pots (Fig. 18.4–7), four chalices (Fig.18.3:16–19), and a large four-handled krater (Fig. 18.4:1). A large Hippo jar was standing in a spot between this room (1677) and Locus 1670 to the west (Fig. 18.5:1); three more such jars were found farther west in Locus 1670 (Fig. 18.5:2–4) (see description of the courtyard, below).

The Southern Part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b: Rooms 1701, 1699, 2651, 2663

Room 1701

Room 1701 (Square F/13) had inner dimensions of ca. 2.4 sq m (Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.14–17.15). Its four walls (1628, 1619, 1618, 1629) were identical in their construction technique, including the samesize light yellow bricks. The walls appeared ca. 0.2 m below the topsoil and were preserved to a height of five courses (0.7–0.8 m). A 0.8 m-wide entrance led to the room from Room 1664 on the west. Another entrance in the western end of the southern wall (1629) was found blocked by bricks laid lengthwise (Photo 17.15), yet the door jambs of this blocked entrance could be easily detected. The blocking of the entrance may have taken place between Strata E-1b and E-1a. In the eastern part of this room were two storage compartments (1666 and 1700), created by narrow walls (up to 0.1 m wide) made of whitish clay (Photos 17.14–17.15). The northern compartment (1666) was almost square (inner dimensions 0.9×1.0 m), while the southern one (1700) was rectangular (inner dimensions 1.0×1.4 m). A small hole (ca. 0.11 m in diameter) in the partition between the northern compartment and the western part of Room 1701 was located somewhat above the floor level. The compartments may have served as grain bins; the lack of plaster and the very thin walls precluded their use to store liquids.

The floor of both the room and the compartments was hard packed and smooth. Above this floor was mostly brown earth containing brick fragments and occasional finds, mainly flint and sherds. Only one phase was identified in this room and it was attributed to both Strata E-1a and E-1b. It may be suggested that the compartments were added in Stratum E-1a to the existing room, yet this could not be securely ascertained.

Rooms 1699 and 2651

The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.

Wall 1657, the northern wall of Room 1699, was 2.7 m-long, made of dark gray bricks, unlike the other bricks in this area. On its eastern end, the wall was preserved to a height of five courses; its western end bordered the street to its west. This wall was a continuation of Wall 1619 and in fact, they may be defined as one wall. Wall 1656, the western wall of this room, was poorly preserved. Its two rows of bricks were 1.0 m wide and preserved to a height of two courses at the southern edge of Square E/14, although six courses were seen in the northern section of E/13. On the south, this space was enclosed by Walls 1690 and 1689 (Square E/13); the latter was attached to another wall (2667), only the top of which was uncovered in the excavation. This double wall, 1.2 m wide, was perhaps the southern limit of Building EA; Wall 2667 might represent the northern wall of a separate unit to the south.

In the northern part of this room in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.

In the northern part of Square E/13, Locus 1699 was the continuation of Locus 2661. It contained occupation debris above a 0.01 m-thick, hard whitish plaster floor which sloped down from east to west (average level, 71.39 m). The accumulation on the plaster floor included small pieces of wall plaster and brick debris.

This area was bounded on the south by a narrow partition wall (1672), extending on a diagonal line from Wall 1690 on the east to the northwestern corner of the square, where it seemed to have made a corner with Wall 1656 or was embedded in the latter wall, which was not detected along the rest of Square E/13 south of Wall 1672 (Photos 17.17–17.19). This was an exceptional wall, since its orientation, width and brick sizes (0.36×0.22 m and 0.42×0.40 m) differed from all other walls in this area. A break in this wall served as a passage between Rooms 1699 and 2651. It seems that this was a secondary partition wall, dividing the larger rectangular space; based on its levels, this division must have been constructed during the earliest use of the building in Stratum E-1b. This wall was constructed slightly above the brick platform (2657) and installation (2666), which were attributed to Stratum E-2. The space south of Wall 1672 had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).

Room 2663

The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665.

The Southern Part of Building EA in Stratum E-1a: Rooms 1701, 1605 and 1635

We assume that the southern part of the building continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, yet erosion destroyed much of the evidence.

Room 1701 continued to be used in E-1a with no change, as noted above, where it was suggested that perhaps the double bin (1700/1666) was added at this stage.

In the southern part of Square E/14, Locus 1605 was a destruction layer on what might be a beaten-earth floor which was difficult to detect, as it was found just below topsoil (level 72.25 m; 0.75 m above the assumed E-1b floor, 2661). The tops of Walls 1657 and 1656 were not revealed until a level lower than this destruction layer, yet, since the destruction was limited to the area bounded by the contours of these walls, it may be assumed that they were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The same assumption was made in relation to Room 1701 and its compartments, as described above. In Square E/13, this destruction debris was not very clear. The outline of a 0.65 m-wide brick wall (1694) was seen in the western section of the square, standing 0.5 m high from level 71.80 m, ca. 0.6 m higher than the E-1b floor in this area (Fig. 17.14). In the northern section of the square, Wall 1695, 0.8 m-wide, was preserved in the section to a height of 0.4 m; its foundation was at 72.15 m, which could fit Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.20). These two wall stubs may have been part of one wall that replaced the older wall (1656) in this square and represent a rebuild or alteration in Building EA at this time; however, their poor preservation makes it difficult to reconstruct the plan. Locus 1626 in the center of the square represents an occupation layer at level 72.00 m, which should be seen as a continuation of 1605 further to the north. It was covered by brick debris (1617) just below topsoil and sealed layers of ash (1641), perhaps marking the floor here. The poor preservation and erosion in this area prevented a more detailed analysis of the Stratum E-1a remains.

In the southern part of Squares E–F/13, above E-1b Rooms 2663, 2665 and 1662, was a layer of fallen bricks (1635) below topsoil (1609); yet the attribution of this layer to either E-1a or E-1b could not be clarified.

Summary of Building EA

The southeastern part of Area E was densely built up and the architectural remains belonged perhaps to two or three independent buildings, attached to one another and forming one complex. This area was first built in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use, with modifications, in Stratum E-1a. This unit continued beyond the limits of the excavation area to the east and south, where its possible continuation can be determined in Area F (Fig. 17.1).

Building ED (Strata E-2/E-1b)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2b - Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3 - Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20 - Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22 - General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.2b – 17.3
  • Photos 17.2, 17.20, 17.22, 17.59
Discussions
Introduction

Building ED, attributed to E-1b (and possibly to E-2), pertains to a partly uncovered structure located in Squares D–E/15, below Building EB of Stratum E-1a.

The excavated part of this building included only one room (4653) in Square D/15, (inner dimensions 2.2×2.8 m) that was discovered below Room 2629 of Stratum E-1a Building EB (Fig. 17.17). All the walls were made of brittle gray bricks with white inclusions; the eastern wall (4632) was preserved to a height of ca. 1.0 m (nine brick courses from level 70.90–71.95 m), yet its foundation course was not reached. In the other walls (4635, 5658, 4650), the uppermost levels were similar or slightly higher (72.00–72.20 m), while the lowest visible brick courses were at 71.41 or 71.67 m. Wall 4658 was disturbed by a narrow trench of a later period (Photo 17.20). The only floor in the room (4653) was at levels 71.11–71.25 m, somewhat lower than the bottom of these walls (Photo 17.20). This may be explained either due to the nature of the bricks, which were difficult to detect, or perhaps due to a tilt in the walls which made it hard to reach the face of the walls in their lower parts. Floor 4653 was composed of 0.14 m thick striations, ca. 1.5 m below E-1a Floor 2629 (Fig. 17.14a), ca. 0.9 m lower than the floor (1648) attributed to Stratum E-1b in Square E/15 to the east, and even slightly lower than Floor 4661, attributed to Stratum E-2 in Square E/15 to the east. Therefore, we tentatively suggest that this room was founded in Stratum E-2 and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1b, although only one floor was found (see further below). Yet, as mentioned above, the relationship between the floor and the three other walls of the room (4635, 4658, 4650) remained questionable, since the lower part of these brick walls was unclear and no bricks could be determined at the floor level (Fig. 17.17; Photo 17.20). Thus, these three walls may be defined as possibly belonging to a later phase in the use of this space. If so, then only Wall 4632 and Floor 4653 may be attributed to Stratum E-2, while the other walls were added in Stratum E-1b. The difficulty with this explanation is that no independent floor later than Floor 4653 was detected. In light of these uncertainties, we show the room on the plan of Stratum E-1b, while on the plan of Stratum E-2 only the floor and Wall 4632 are shown. Two scarabs were found on Floor 4653 (Chapter 30A, Nos. 30, 43).

Floor 4653 was covered by a 0.8 m-thick debris layer (4634). Finds from this layer included a number of vessels (Figs. 18.1–18.2), as well as several grinding stones. No sign of burning or violent destruction was found in this room. Above this layer, a layer of brick detritus, 0.35 m thick, (4618) was covered by the make-up of the floor (2645) in E-1a Room 2629. It should be noted that while the western wall (4658) was rebuilt in Stratum E-1a with no break between the two phases, all other walls of the room were covered by a thick layer of debris (4618) before the construction of the new walls of Room 2629 in Stratum E-1a, on the same lines as those of the earlier walls of Room 4653.

In the area south of this room was a layer of brick debris (4633); excavation stopped at level 71.75 m.

Below E-1a Platform 1624 (Square E/15)

Excavation along the northern and eastern faces of Platform 1624 in Square E/15 (the focal point of the sanctuary of Stratum E-1a, see below) revealed earlier wall lines (4623, 4624) attributed to Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.34, 17.37). They appeared at levels 71.75–71.81 m and stood one or two courses high. These two walls were slightly to the north and east of the outer lines of the Stratum E-1a platform. Hardly any brick lines could be detected in the northern wall (4624) and it is possible that it was constructed of compacted mud. These walls were most probably contemporary with Room 4653 further to the west and with the early phase of the open space to the north and east, including the circular installations found in the eastern part of Square E/15, Oven 1649, and the layers in the lower part of Locus 1647, all attributed to Stratum E-1b (see below). A shallow debris layer separated the top of these walls from the bottom of the E-1a platform. A major question is whether these two walls belonged to an earlier platform. In order to clarify this point, we dismantled most of the platform (except for the area of the standing stones). The excavation reached level 71.64 m (5623), 0.85 m below the top of the brick platform of E-1a, revealing only brick debris and a large number of random bricks, mostly haphazardly placed (Photo 17.21). No evidence for an earlier platform was found and thus, the function of Walls 4623 and 4624 remained enigmatic.

Below E-1a Room 4654 (Square D/14)

A 1.5×2.5 m probe conducted below Floor 4654 of E-1a Building EB contained fallen and decayed bricks (5629) attributed to E-1b. The excavation stopped at level 71.69 m, almost 1.0 m below the top of 4654. Among the finds from this lower layer was a sherd of a Greek Late Protogeometric/SubProtogeometric krater (Fig. 18.2:12).

Building EB (Stratum E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.7 - Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.3 - General view of Area E, end of 2001 season, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22 - General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23a - Destruction debris in Locus 5621 in the western part of Space 2641 in Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23b - Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.24 - Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.25 - Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.26 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.27 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.28 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629, destruction debris and fallen roof material from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.29 - E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.30 - Destruction debris in eastern part of E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.31 - Grinding stone leaning on wall 5609 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.32 - Destruction debris in southeastern corner of E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.33 - Seal impressions on plaster of Room 4616 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.34 - E-1a Building EB, Platform 2654, looking south; below platform: E-1b Walls 4634 and 4623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.35 - Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.36 - Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.37 - Section below Platform 2654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.5, 17.7,
  • Photos 17.2–17.3, 17.22–17.37
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.6–18.14
Discussions
Introduction

Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 was founded in Stratum E-1a. The northern room (2629) was built above Room 4653 of E-2/E-1b Building ED and the platform in the northeastern corner of the building was higher than the E-1b floors to its north and east. The outer measurements of the building were 7.7×9.8 m and it comprised a central space with an enclosed room or alcove at its eastern end, a rectangular room at the southern side and a smaller room in the northwestern corner. A unique feature in this building was the design of its northeastern corner, which included a rectangular brick platform (2654) topped by a smaller stone platform with standing stones (1624), facing a courtyard to its north and east. This platform was the focal point of what we identify as an open-air sanctuary, which included Building EB and a spacious courtyard with installations to its north and east.

Four openings connected the central space (2641) with the three rooms surrounding it. On the western side, two of these openings were located opposite one another, leading into Rooms 2629 on the north and 4616 on the south. In the southeast of the space was an entrance that also led into Room 4616 and on the east into Room 4654. There was most likely also an entrance connecting this space with the platform (2654) in the northeast.

The location of the main entrance to this building remained enigmatic. The building was attached on its western side to Building EC and thus, the entrance could not have been there. The northern, eastern and southern walls were preserved high enough to exclude the possibility of an entrance through these three sides. One possibility is that the entrance was along the western side of the platform, directly into the central space, although this would have been a very narrow approach.

Space 2641

This is the central space in the building (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.

Excavation below Floor 2641 in the northwestern corner of the room (southern part of Square D/15) revealed a layer of brick debris (2652 and 4618 below it) which was the top of Stratum E-1b in this area. In the rest of the room, excavation stopped at the floor level of Stratum E-1a.

Room 4654

This room (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).

It was difficult to determine whether there was a direct connection between Room 4654 and the platform to its north; on the west, they were adjoining, while on the east, there was a wall separating them (unnumbered in the plan), preserved to the same level as the top of the platform (72.40 m). A probe below the floor revealed the top of Stratum E-1b debris, as described above.

Room 2629

This small rectangular room (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.

As mentioned above, there was a gap of ca. 0.6–0.7 m between the top of the earlier walls of E-1b Building ED on the north, south and east (4635, 4650, 4632) and the foundation level of the new walls of Room 2645 (2632, 2633, 2634), while on the west, there was no such gap (Fig. 17.17).

Room 4616

This was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.

Two entrances led into this room from Room 2641 to its north. The eastern one was 1.0 m wide and on the west, it was strengthened by a plastered pilaster (4631). A narrower entranceway, 0.67 m wide, was at the northwestern corner of the room. This western entrance was enigmatically blocked by a bench (unnumbered) built along Wall 2646 and thus its function as an entrance may be questioned. The identification of the floor in this room was difficult, particularly in the western part of the room, where there was no evidence for fire. The identified beaten-earth floor in the east (4616) was at level 72.00 m, covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris with occasional burnt and fallen bricks (4609 in the eastern part of the room, and 5614 and 5605 in the western part). The destruction debris in the eastern part contained a large amount of pottery vessels (Photo 17.32). Among them was a Hippo storage jar with an incised inscription on its shoulder that reads טע ... עם (Fig. 18.11:1; Chapter 29A, No. 8). A unique feature in this room was fragments of plaster impressed with seal impressions, found close to the pilaster at the eastern entrance (Photo 17.33; Chapter 30D). These impressions served as architectural decorations that are unparalleled elsewhere; they perhaps were made with wooden seals, showing a lotus bloom flanked by high buds below a volute motif, which recalls Proto-Aeolic capitals. Such consecutive impressions stamped on the mud plaster would have created a decorative frieze on the wall interiors. A fragment of roofing material made of clay with reed impressions was also found in this room. In the southeastern corner of the room was a clay bulla with a seal impression made by an Egyptian Middle Bronze Age scarab (Chapter 30A, No. 40). These finds allude to the important function of this room.

The Platform and Standing Stones

The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).

The platform was constructed of well-defined square bricks, best seen at its western part. On top of the eastern side of the brick platform was a smaller square platform (1624; 1.0×1.2 m) made of one to two courses of basalt fieldstones and large river pebbles, rising to a height of 0.33 m (uppermost level, 72.60 m). This stone platform was well preserved on its southern and western sides, while its northeastern corner was damaged. On its southern side were three standing stones, the two eastern ones elongated and standing on their narrow side. The eastern stone was 0.37 m high and 0.3 m wide, the central stone was 0.41 m high and 0.3 m wide, and the western stone was only 0.2 m high and 0.4 m wide. The eastern stone was of hard smoothed limestone, while the central and western stones were rough unworked travertine. Due to its small dimensions, a fourth limestone at the western end apparently was not another standing stone, but rather part of the construction of the platform. These three stones are interpreted as sacred standing stones (masseboth), facing a spacious courtyard to the north (see below). On the western side of the platform, almost at the center of the second line of bricks from the west, was a posthole, ca. 0.14 m in diameter and 0.1 m deep, which may have held a wooden pole. A basalt mortar adjoined the western face of the platform close to its top level, just opposite this posthole, and was covered by burnt brick debris. Just opposite the platform to its north was a large flat limestone which was understood to have been an offering table (Photos 17.49–17.50); see below.

It appears that this platform was part of an open area that continued into the spacious courtyard to the north and east. Yet, in that case, one might ask how a single-course brick platform would have survived the elements. It must have been protected by either thick plaster which was not preserved or covered during harsh climate conditions by some kind of seasonal roofing, although no traces of this were found, as it would have been constructed from perishable materials. As noted above, the platform was preceded by an earlier structure of undetermined shape (Photo 17.37).

Summary of Building EB

The plan of Building EB is exceptional. Although in its size and building techniques, it does not differ from dwellings at Tel Rehov, its unique plan was apparently suited to a specific function related to the open-air sanctuary of which it was a part, with the platform and standing stones occupying the northeastern corner of this structure. The decorated plaster found at the entrance to the southern elongated room emphasizes the importance of this room, which was perhaps the seat of a priest, scribe or other functionaries related to the cultic activity in this area.

The Courtyard (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 17.3–17.9
  • Photos 17.2, 17.38–17.53
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.17–18.19
Discussions
Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

Building EC (Stratum E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.7 - Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.55 - Squares C–D/15–16, Building EC (right) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.56 - E-1a Building EC, circular installations in Room 5637 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.57 - E-1a Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Bin 5630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.58 - Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Oven 5632 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.5, 17.7
  • Photos 17.55–17.59
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.15–18.16
Discussions
Introduction

The eastern part of a dwelling of Stratum E-1a, denoted Building EC, was excavated west of and attached to Building EB, in Squares C/14–16. The excavated part included a courtyard (5637), a room to its southeast (5613), and two corners of additional rooms on the west. Like the others in Area E, this building was also oriented northwest–southeast. It was built as an independent building and thus, most of its eastern wall (2647) was attached to Wall 2546 of Building EB (with a slight gap between them), thus creating a double wall, like in many other buildings of this period at Tel Rehov.

This building was probably founded in Stratum E-1b, as evidenced in a small probe, 0.5 m wide, in Square D/16, along the eastern side of Wall 2647 (not shown on the plan). The probe revealed that the wall stood to a height of 1.06 m (eight courses, floating level at 71.93 m). Its foundation was 0.65 m below the level of the Stratum E-1a floor inside the building, which was only slightly higher than that of Wall 4658 of Building ED of Stratum E-2/E1b to its east and lower than the foundation level of nearby Wall 2646 of Building EB of Stratum E-1a (72.70 m). This may indicate that Wall 2647 (and perhaps the entire building) was founded in Stratum E-1b, and continued to be in use (perhaps with a higher floor) in Stratum E-1a. This remains unknown, as the excavation of this building stopped at the level of E-1a.

Space 5637

This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens.

Room 5613

Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room.

Room 5639

Locus 5639 represented the northeastern corner of a room in Building EC, west of Room 5613 (Square C/15). It was bounded by Walls 5640 on the north and 5606 on the east. This small area was excavated to 72.82 m, revealing a layer of brown earth (Photo 17.59).

Destruction of Stratum E-1a

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

The end of Stratum E-1a was accompanied by a heavy fire that resulted in thick burnt destruction debris. In Buildings EA (Room 1677 and Locus 1670 to its west), EB and EC, large groups of restorable vessels and other objects were found below a tumble of bricks and burnt debris with fallen roof material, all evidence for this violent end. In the courtyard, the evidence for fire and violent destruction was less clear, yet the upper layer in Squares E–F/15–16, just below topsoil, was composed of soft gray ash, 0.15–0.20 m thick, and in the southern section of Square F/15, a thick black ash line and burnt wood could be seen above the floor (Fig. 17.18a). In Square F/15, fire had burnt the fallen bricks to a hard consistency and reddish color. Some roof material of laminated clay with reed impressions were mixed in the brick debris, also hardened and reddened by fire. Another sign of the violent and apparently man-made destruction was the pottery altar in Square E/15 that had been deliberately smashed to many small pieces.

Post-Stratum E-1a Activity in Space 5637

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Evidence for a brief re-occupation of Space 5637 after the destruction of Stratum E-1a was provided by Ovens 5611 and 5631 and Bench/Wall 5638 (Fig. 17.10), which were built within the brick collapse resulting from the Stratum E-1a destruction, ca. 0.15 m above the E-1a floor level. Bench/Wall 5638 was built 0.4 m north of Wall 5640 and consisted of a single row of bricks preserved along 1.6 m (top level: 73.27 m, bottom level: 73.09 m) that were set directly on top of the destruction debris in the courtyard. This was the only evidence for any activity that post-dated the destruction of Stratum E-1a. It may be explained as a short phase of squatters, perhaps the inhabitants of the ruined city returning briefly, following the destruction of this house.

A Probe in Squares E/20, E/1

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Schematic plans: Fig. 17.11
  • Photos 17.60–17.61
A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).

Summary

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

The open space, Building EB, and perhaps Building EA, can be interpreted as belonging to a sanctuary or high place (the biblical bamah) that served the neighborhood. The platform and standing stones, that can be interpreted as masseboth, were the focal point of this sanctuary in Stratum E-1a. In the spacious courtyard to the north and east of this platform, ovens and the circular bins were perhaps used in relation to feasting. Although they were attributed to late Stratum E-1b, they possibly continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The flat stone in front of the platform can be explained as an offering table and the pottery altar could have been used for burning offerings, including incense or small animals, such as pigeons. The rectangular area with benches in Squares F–E/14–15 could have been used for public feasting.

It could not be securely determined whether the area served as a sanctuary in Stratum E-1b, as it did in Stratum E-1a. Yet, the architectural continuity in the courtyard and surrounding buildings alludes to a similar function in both phases. Alterations in Stratum E-1a were needed due to the rise of floor levels in the courtyard. This may explain the need to rebuild Building ED of Stratum E-1b (of which only one room was exposed) as Building EB in Stratum E-1a. The continuity between these two buildings was demonstrated in the similar plan and location of Rooms 4653 (E-1b) and 2629 (E-1a). The platform and standing stones, which were the focal point of cult in Stratum E-1a, were preceded by an earlier structure defined by Walls 4624 and 4623, yet its nature could not be clarified. Building EA in the southeastern part of the area appears to have been founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a, with only minor modifications.

This is a rare example of an Iron Age II openair sanctuary. The concept of a small cult place which served a local neighborhood is known from approximately the same time at Lachish (Stratum V Cult Room 49), Megiddo (Stratum VA–IVB Building 2081) and perhaps at Ta'anach (Dever 1983; Holladay 1987: 249–299; Zevit 2001: 213– 266). Yet, all three differ from our sanctuary in many aspects; they are either an independent cult room (Lachish),1 a cult room in a large building (Megiddo), or a cult corner in a dwelling (Ta'anach). None of these sites have standing stones (masseboth) and a platform (bamah). Platforms and standing stones are known from several Iron Age public cult places, such as at Bethsaida (Zevit 2001: 149–152) and the 9th century BCE temple at Khirbet 'Atarus ('Atarot) in Moab (Ji 2012).2 Standing stones of a similar rough shape and small size as ours are known from the city gate area at Dan (Biran 1994: 244, Photos 203–204; Zevit 2001: 191–196). Our sanctuary, if correctly identified, is the most complete example in Israel of an open-air sanctuary with a platform, standing stones, a spacious courtyard with cooking and food-preparation facilities, and auxiliary rooms. The cultic paraphernalia included a pottery altar, an offering table, and artifacts such as clay figurines. Other special objects included the impressed plaster and the painted Phoenician-style storage jar. The evidence of metal and flint-scraper production in the center of the open courtyard (although attributed to Stratum E-1b) is striking, since the combination of industry with a cult place is known in other cases as well, such as the copper industry at Timna' (Rothenberg 1988: 276–278) and at Kition in Cyprus (Karageorghis 1985: 253), the olive oil industry at Tel Miqne-Ekron (Gitin 2003), and the apiary in Area C at Tel Rehov (Chapters 12, 14A). The large quantity of animal bones found in the open area in front and east of the platform may be taken as evidence for sacrifices and sacred meals (marzeah) that took place in this sanctuary (see Chapter 49; cf., Greer 2013).
Footnotes

1 For negation of the Lachish Stratum V cult room as such, see Ussishkin 2003.

2 The ethnic affiliation of the temple at Khirbet 'Atarus ('Atarot) should be addressed. If this is the town mentioned in the Mesha inscription (lines 10–11) as being part of the land of Gad and built by the king of Israel, then it could be that the temple belonged to an Israelite or Israelite-related population

Tables, Plans, and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 17.1          General view of Area E, end of 1997 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2          General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.3          General view of Area E, end of 2001 season, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.4          Squares D–E/15, excavated to level of Strata E-2–E-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.5          South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.6          Probe in Square F/15, looking north; E-2 Floor 2662 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.7          Southeastern corner of Square E/14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.8          Building EA, general view, end of 1997 season, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.9          Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.10          Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.11          Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.12          Building EA, Square F/14, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.13          Building EA, Square F/14, looking west; E-1a Floor 1677 with pottery in destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.14          Building EA, detail of Room 1701 and compartments 1666 and 1700 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.15          Building EA, detail of compartments 1666 and 1700 and double wall 1618/1612 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.16          Building EA, Square E/13, looking east, E-1b Room 2651 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.17          Building EA, Square E/13, looking east; right: E-1a–b Wall 1629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.18          Building EA, Square E/13, looking southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.19          Squares E/13–14, Building EA, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20          Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.21          Squares D–E/15, section through E-1a Platform 2654 with brick collapse below platform from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22          General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23a          Destruction debris in Locus 5621 in the western part of Space 2641 in Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23b          Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.24          Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.25          Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.26          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.27          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.28          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629, destruction debris and fallen roof material from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.29          E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.30          Destruction debris in eastern part of E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.31          Grinding stone leaning on wall 5609 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.32          Destruction debris in southeastern corner of E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.33          Seal impressions on plaster of Room 4616 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.34          E-1a Building EB, Platform 2654, looking south; below platform: E-1b Walls 4634 and 4623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.35          Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.36          Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.37          Section below Platform 2654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.38          Probe in Squares E/17–18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.39          Probe in Square E/18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.40          Probe in Square E/18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.41          Oven 4608, Square E/17 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.42          Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.43          E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.44          Buildings EB and EA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.45          Square E/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.46          Square E/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.47          Square E/15 detail from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.48          Square E/15 detail from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.49          Square E/15 with debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.50          Detail of stone 1623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.51          Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.52          Squares E–F/15–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.53          Square F/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.54          Square E/14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.55          Squares C–D/15–16, Building EC (right) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.56          E-1a Building EC, circular installations in Room 5637 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.57          E-1a Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Bin 5630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.58          Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Oven 5632 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59          Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.60          Probe in Squares E/20, E/1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.61          Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Chapter 20 - Area G: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion
Introduction

Table and Photos
Table and Photos

Discussion

Area G was located at the western edge of the lower mound, near the foot of the upper mound. The area occupies a small hillock, bordered on the north and the south by small ravines which presently serve as approach roads to the tell. The goals of excavating this area were:
  1. to examine the prominent small hill in that area in order to determine architectural or other features that caused this element, such as a city gate
  2. to examine the stratigraphic sequence and nature of settlement in this part of the tell.
Excavation of Area G commenced in 2000 and lasted six weeks (Photo 20.1). Six squares were opened (P–Q/5–6 and P/3–4), located in main grid square 13 (Chapter 3). In 2001, the excavation continued for four weeks and two additional squares were opened (Q/3–4; Photo 20.1). In 2007, the excavation continued for three weeks in Squares P– Q/3–5. The total area excavated is 200 m.

The supervisors were Adi-Ziv Esudri (2000) and Naama Yahalom-Mack (2001, 2007).

The excavation in Area G uncovered an Iron Age IIA domestic area with two major strata, each divided into two sub-phases. Table 20.1 shows the stratigraphic correlation to Area C and to the general strata numbers in Tel Rehov. Table 20.2 specifies the locus and basket numbers given in the three seasons.

The large architectural units revealed in Stratum G-2 were part of larger buildings of unknown plans. An open courtyard in the eastern and northern parts of the area included many installations and storage pits; the walls were preserved to a height of up to 1.0 m and in Square Q/3, up to 2.0 m. The buildings of Stratum G-2 were abandoned in a similar way as those of Stratum VI in Areas B and C and the floors were found almost empty of finds. One possibility is that the buildings suffered from an earthquake; possible evidence for this can be seen in the severe tilt eastwards of Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Fig. 20.17). In Stratum G-1b, new buildings were constructed, which continued to be in use in Stratum G-1a with slight changes. Here too, only parts of buildings were excavated and no complete plan of a single building is known. In all strata, brick walls without stone foundations were the common building practice; only one wall attributed to Stratum G-1b (5040) had a stone foundation. Extensive use of wooden beams was made in the foundations of Stratum G-1b walls and floors, similar to the situation in Areas B and C. Stratum G-1a (Stratum IV) ended in violent destruction, evidenced in particular in Building GG in Squares P–Q/3.

Stratum G-2

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 20.1–20.2
This stratum comprises the earliest architecture encountered in this area, including part of a large structure oriented southwest–northeast (Building GB), the beginning of a building to its west (Building GA), parts of additional buildings to the east (Building GD) and rooms in the north (Building GC) and south which probably belonged to additional buildings. In most places, two stratigraphic phases were encountered, denoted G-2b and G-2a, with a clear distinction between them; in G-2a, additional walls were constructed in Building GB and higher floors were laid in many parts of the area. In one square (Q/5), a later phase was identified, designated G-2a'. The following discussion includes both phases in each of the buildings

Building GA

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P–Q/4–5, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.4 - Collapsed mudbricks on left corner in G-2b Building GA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Only the eastern edge of this building was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). These two walls were parallel to Wall 5061 of Building GB (Photos 20.3–20.4) and together, they created a double-wall system, an architectural feature common at Tel Rehov that, in most cases, designated the outer walls of attached individual buildings. In our case, the top preserved level of the two walls was separated by a V-shaped gap, 0.1 m wide on the south and up to 0.7 m on the north (Photo 20.3). These walls had apparently separated as a result of seismic movement, perhaps an earthquake, at the end of Stratum G-2, with Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west. The gap between the walls was filled with brick debris (5058). After the gap was excavated to a depth of 1.0 m, the walls appeared closer together until, at the lower courses, the two walls were only a few centimeters apart. Wall 5044 was preserved to a height of at least 0.85 m, although its bottom level could not be determined due to its strong tilt to the west. Wall 5048 joined Wall 5044, enclosing the corner of a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.

Building GB

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

The designation Building GB was given to the large space bounded by Wall 5061 on the west and Wall 8030 (in Square Q/4) on the east, and perhaps also Room 8038, as well as the area to its west in Squares P–Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). Its northern border remained unclear. Significant changes occurred here between the two phases of Stratum G-2 and the definition of this area as a single building is insecure. In fact, one can define the spaces between Walls 5064 and 5061 as a single unit, while the open space with installations between Walls 5064 and 8030 may have been part of an L-shaped area that continued in Squares P– Q/6. This alternative understanding should be kept in mind when reading the following analysis.

Phase G-2b

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space, 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.

Phase G-2a

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.5 - Tilted Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.7 - Building GA, G-2 Building GB, and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.8 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.9 - Wall 5064 and G-2a courtyard from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.10 - G-2b and G-2a circular bins from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This phase is much better known than the previous one due to wider exposure. The large courtyard of the previous phase was divided by Wall 5064, a poorly preserved north–south wall which divided the open area into two roughly equal parts, eastern and western (Fig. 20.2; Photos 20.7–20.9). The wall was preserved up to 0.38 m and its bottom was at 85.52–85.58 m, higher by 0.9 m than Oven 8063 of Phase G-2b to its west. In the northern end of Square Q/5, the wall cornered with Wall 8064, of which only a small segment of its southern face was excavated, preserved to 86.15 m. It may be conjectured that Wall 8056 in Square P/4 was a continuation of Wall 5064.

Room 8035, bounded by Walls 5061, 8064, 5064 and 8055, had inner dimensions of 2.35×6.55 m (Photo 20.7). The floor (8035) was at level 85.60 m, at least 0.75 m (and perhaps more) above the assumed floor of G-2b in the same place.

In Square P/4, a corner of two short walls (8055 and 8056; Photos 20.5–20.6) created a small room with an entrance leading from Room 8035 to its north. A floor in this room (8023), located at level 85.64 m, was sealed by the brick platform (5069) of Stratum G-1b. Wooden beams (4071) found close to the top of the walls of this room at levels 85.82– 85.92 m (Fig. 20.3) were related to the construction of Stratum G-1b.

The area east of Wall 5064, bounded on the south by Wall 8039 in Squares P–Q/3 and on the east by Wall 8030 in Square Q/4, served as a spacious courtyard, ca. 4.0–4.5 m wide and up to 13 m long (if continuing until Wall 4029 in Square Q/6 on the north). In fact, in Square Q/6, this open area continued to the west, thus creating an L-shaped open space.

In Squares Q/4–5, several plastered surfaces were identified, alongside other floor types, with some 13 related installations that were not all used contemporaneously; note an additional one (8047) that was attributed to Phase G-2b (see above). The installations comprise mainly two types: plastered circular or oval bins and clay ovens (Table 20.3; Photos 20.2, 20.7–20.10, 20.16).

In Square Q/4, three superimposed plaster floors (8053 at level 85.76 m, 8024 at level 86.07 m and 8008 at level 86.27 m) were exposed above the earlier floor (8044) attributed to Phase G-2b. The floors were exposed mainly in the northern half of the square, with three related plastered bins (8060, 8051, 8059) and a single poorly preserved oven (8025). The plastered bins were exposed between 85.99 and 85.88 m, while the oven was exposed at level 86.19 m (Photos 20.8, 20.10). In the southern half of the square, only one floor was detected (8041), sloping from east to west; it was attributed to Stratum G-2b, yet probably continued to be in use in G-2a.

In Square Q-5, two superimposed plaster floors were exposed between levels 86.28 and 85.98 m. Related to these floors were four circular bins and two superimposed ovens (Table 20.3; Photos 20.7– 20.9). None of the floors clearly abutted the poorly preserved Wall 5064.

Small circular bins of the type found here (as well as in Squares P–Q/6; see below) were also found in Areas B (Chapter 8) and E (Chapter 17). Their capacity was ca. 10 liters or slightly more; thus, the seven bins found in these two squares may have been used for storing ca. 70–100 liters, perhaps of grain used for baking in the three ovens found nearby. However, it was difficult to attribute these installations to each of the several floor surfaces found here and thus, it remains unknown whether all of them served at the same time. At least in one instance, it seems that there was subphasing here, where Oven 4074 cut Oven 4084. In any case, this appears to have been an area used for intensive baking.

Open Area with Circular Bins in Squares P–Q/6

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.13 - Stratum G-2a Square P/6 and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.14 - Stratum G-2a Floors 4016 and 5004 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB and bounded on the north by Building GC. The width of this area was ca. 2.5 m and its length was at least 9.0 m.

The lowest floor found here in Square P/6 was a clay floor (5050) at level 85.46 m. It was covered by a 0.15 m-deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036); the latter was covered by a brick debris layer (5043). These layers were all attributed to Stratum G-2b, since they were lower than Floors 5026 and 5004 and the installations of Phase G-2a.

In the eastern part of the square, a floor comprised of striations (5004 and 5026 to its north) was found above G-2b layer 5021, between levels 85.92–86.28 m; the top of this layer (4016) appeared to be a continuation of Floor 4022 in Square Q/6 (level 86.28 m). No floor could be identified in the western part of the square (4011, 4012).

In Square Q/6, excavation stopped at the level of the uppermost floor (4022) (level 86.30 m); the floor was exposed over most of the square, comprising patches of grayish-white plaster and beaten earth with pottery sherds mixed with small stones.

Eleven bins of various sizes were found in this area, four in Square Q/6 and seven in Square P/6 (Table 20.4, Photos 20.12–20.14). Most of these were exposed along one line in the central part of Square P/6, while the others were scattered along the southern part of Squares P–Q/6 and one was located in Building GC. The definition of these installations as bins is the most reasonable one, although they could have been used for other purposes as well, such as for some industrial activity that was conducted in the courtyard.

These plaster-lined installations were cut into the floor. They were oval to round, with a diameter of 0.45–0.70 m (except 4018, which was 1.2 in diameter) and a depth of 0.30–0.38 m, although the state of preservation does not allow an exact measurement. Thus, the average capacity of the smaller bins was ca. 33 liters (based on an average diameter of 0.55 m and depth of 0.35 m). All were lined with a very friable greyish-white plaster. The thickness of the walls was 0.02–0.04 m, aside from reinforcements which were added where two neighboring bins were close together. These installations contained grayish earth mixed with light-colored brick debris, as well as a few sherds, flint fragments and bones; no grain or organic materials were recovered.

Like in Squares Q/4–5, the bins marked several successive construction phases and thus, not all of them were in use at the same time. Three (4008, 4009, 5009) appear to be contemporary and earlier than the others (Photos 20.12–20.14). They were all exposed at approximately level 86.20 m; Bins 4008 and 4009 share a wall. Bin 4008 appears to cut into a very poorly preserved wall or built installation (5014, not on the plan), chipped along its southern face, of which only one course was preserved.

Bin 4010 abutted 4019 on the west and appears to be contemporary with it, while 4019 cut into 4009 and thus replaced it. Bin 4018 was the largest (diameter 1.2 m) and latest of all, as it cut into 4010; it was 0.96 m deep. Its walls were plastered and it contained crumbly grayish-brown earth mixed with pieces of brick, as well as many sherds, flint, bones, shells and some charcoal. In the eastern side of Square P/6, Bin 4032 (Fig. 20.8) was 0.9 m wide; it may have been contemporary with the large bin (4018).

At least two successive floors were located in Square P/6 (5004, 4016) above Floor 5050 of Phase G-2b. They were difficult to trace, but were identifiable by their related plastered installations. Contemporary Bins 5009, 4008 and 4009 apparently were related to the earliest floor. Installations 4019, 4010 and 4032 were possibly contemporary and related to a later floor. Bin 4018, which was larger than the others, apparently coexisted with the similar installation (4032) near the eastern balk of the square and was related to the latest floor.

The attribution of these installations and floors to Stratum G-2a was based on their levels compared to similar remains in Square Q/5. However, it should be noted that the building remains and installations in Squares P–Q/6 were exposed below topsoil, with no stratigraphic elements above them. Their attribution to Stratum G-2a means that Stratum G-1 was completely eroded away in Squares P–Q/6. Indeed, Wall 4014 of G-1a–b in Square P/5 was founded at its northern end at level 86.48 m, which was higher than the bins and Building GC. The continuation of Wall 4014 and other elements of G-1a in Squares P–Q/6 were eroded away and thus, Squares P–Q/6 are not shown on the plans of Stratum G-1a–b.

Building GC

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The remains defined as Building GC in Squares P– Q/6 (Photos 20.1, 20.13, 20.15) included the southern part of a building that continued to the north beyond the borders of the excavated area. The excavated part of the building included three walls (4029, 5056, 4028), all composed of similar greybrown bricks and preserved 0.25–0.4 m high. Inside, a compact clay floor (5035) was exposed near the corner of Walls 4029 and 5056 at level 85.44 m, covered by brick debris (5027). A beatenearth floor (4050) was exposed in Square Q/6 at level 85.48 m, abutting Wall 4029, covered by a brick debris layer (4027) and a layer of collapsed bricks (4024), found against Wall 4028. Both small segments of floors were empty of finds and no evidence for violent destruction was found. It seems that the building was constructed in Stratum G-2b, together with the earliest floor of the open space to its south (5050, level 85.46 m). It probably continued in use in Phase G-2a with the same floors, at the time when the floor of the open area to the south was raised and the bins were constructed; at that time, Bin 4037 was constructed inside the building.

Like the open space and installations to the west and south in Squares P–Q/6, Building GC was exposed immediately below topsoil, with no later stratigraphic features, and its attribution to Stratum G-2 was based on its relation to the open space to its south.

Room 8038/4090 and Space 8061/4087

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Squares P–Q/3, to the south of Building GB (and to the west of Building GD, see below) was a room (8038/4090) and what seems to have been an open space (8061/4087) that might have belonged to Building GB or might have been part of a separate unit (Figs. 20.1–20.2). Since the wide double wall (5012/4047) of Stratum G-1 was not dismantled, it is unknown whether there was an earlier wall of Stratum G-2 below that would have belonged to another building to the south of Building GB.

Room 8038/4090

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The room to the west of the southern room of Building GD was bounded by Walls 4081, 8027 and 8039, while its southern wall was beyond the limit of the excavation area. It was 2.2 m wide and at least 3.0 m long. Wall 8027 created a double wall with Wall 5063 of Building GD to the east. The northern wall (8039) was narrower than the other walls of the room and perhaps served as a narrow partition with an opening towards the north, which might have led to the courtyard of Building GB. The western wall (4081) was preserved 1.4 m high and perhaps had two construction phases; the earlier one (G-2b) comprising the lower 1.0 m (as seen from the west) and the upper one (G-2a) consisting of the uppermost two or three brick courses. The seam between these two phases can be clearly seen (Photos 20.20–20.21).

Inside this room was a layer of brick collapse (8038) that was exposed down to level 85.28 m. This locus was attributed to Stratum G-2b, although a floor was not reached. A higher patchy floor in this room (4090) at level 85.66 m is attributed to Stratum G-2a.

Space 8061/4087

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Wall 4081 in Square P/3 was preserved to at least 1.4 m (Photos 20.20–20.21). Abutting this wall on the west were several floors attributed to Stratum G-2b. The lowest was Floor 8061, covered by phytoliths, at levels 84.39–84.45 m. Above it was a thin layer of brick debris with some scattered phytoliths (8057) and a build-up of brown patchy clay floors (8049, levels 84.52–84.84 m). The uppermost floor was sealed by a layer of brick collapse (8012). A clay plaque figurine showing a female drummer (Chapter 34, No. 5) was found at level 85.54 m, which is just at the top of the brick debris (5034) attributed to phase G-2b, under the G-2a floor (4087). The figurine was found very close to the erosion line and thus, its attribution to the G-2b layer is insecure.

A new floor (4087), beaten-earth and ash, was laid at 85.61 m; it did not clearly abut Wall 4081. This floor is attributed to Stratum G-2a, but might be related to Stratum G-1 Building GG, since destruction layer 4065 of that building is directly above it.

Building GD

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.7 - Superposition of walls in Area G with location of section drawings from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.18 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This building (Squares Q/3–4) was bounded on the west by Wall 8030 (found below Wall 5018 of Stratum G-1a, see below) and Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). The latter created a double wall together with Wall 8027 of Room 8030/4090 to the west. The walls were preserved to a considerable height; in a probe in the northeastern corner of Square Q/3 (Photos 20.16–20.18), Walls 5063 and 5062 stood to a height of almost 2.0 m. Wall 5063 tilted considerably eastwards (Fig. 20.17), possibly as a result of the same seismic event that caused Walls 5044 and 5061 to separate, as described above. Parts of two rooms were excavated south and north of the dividing Wall 5062.

In the northern room, a clear distinction between Strata G-2b and G-2a could be made (Figs. 20.17–20.18; Photo 20.18). The lowest layer reached was a beaten-earth floor (8046) exposed in a small area at level 84.16 m, which appeared to abut the foundation of Walls 5062 and 5063. This floor was covered by a layer of small chunks of brick debris (8040) and a higher layer of large collapsed bricks (8018). Note that the floor in Room 8046 was much lower than the surrounding floors of the same phase, 8041/8044 in Square Q/4 west of Wall 8030, as well as Floor 8017 to the south. Thus, it may be suggested that Room 8046 was, to some extent, subterranean.

In Phase G-2a, new floor composed of soft red and gray striations (5053) accumulated between levels 85.00–85.68 m, sloping to the north and sealing the earlier brick collapse (Figs. 20.17– 20.18; Photo 20.18). Many pottery sherds (some restorable) were found here (Figs. 21.6–21.7), as well as three clay loomweights.

In the southern room, a series of at least three successive floors (8017) attributed to Stratum G-2b was found at levels 84.95–85.35 m; a soft brown floor, a reddish floor and a grey floor with bits of plaster and ash, all containing many sherds, bones and olive pits. The highest floor was covered by a layer of brick debris (8004). A patchy clay floor (5047) at level 85.69 m covering the brick debris layer was attributed to Stratum G-2a. Its relation to Walls 5063 and 5062 was insecure, although very likely.

Phase G-2a'

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Square Q/5, a localized transitional phase between the end of G-2a and the construction of the G-1b structures may be suggested (Fig. 20.2b), based on a white plaster floor (5067) at level 86.39 m that was related to a circular installation (4062; Photos 20.22–20.23); the latter was 0.19 m deep and had a thick clay-plastered wall. It resembled Installation 4064 of Stratum G-1 (see below) and two grinding installations in Area C, Building CF, Stratum C-1a. Floor 5067 at levels 86.30–86.50 m in the southern part of the square may belong to the same phase. These floors and the installation sealed the bins and ovens attributed to G-2a, and was sealed by layer 5024 and the wooden beams of Stratum G-1b (see below). We thus attribute these elements to a late phase of G-2, denoted G-2a', an intermediate phase between G-2a and G-1b.

Stratum G-1

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. Figs. 20.3–20.5
Following Stratum G-2a, the area was rebuilt on a new plan. None of the previous walls continued to be in use, although the new walls retained the same northeast–southwest orientation and a few of them (4014, 5018, 5008) were constructed on top of earlier walls from Stratum G-2. A new feature introduced in Stratum G-1b was the use of wooden beams as foundations of walls and floors, also known in Stratum C-1b in Area C (Chapter 12) and Stratum B-5 in Area B (Chapter 8).

Two major architectural units were detected: Building GF in the central and northern part of the area and Building GG in the southern part, separated by a double wall (4047/5012). The eastern wall of the northern building (5017) was attached to another wall (5018), which probably belonged to an adjacent building to the east, beyond the limits of the excavation area. In the southwestern part of Area G, erosion destroyed much of Building GG.

In Building GG, very few changes were made between Strata G-1a and G-1b. The building was destroyed in G-1a by heavy fire, probably corresponding to the destruction of Stratum C-1a in Area C and E-1a in Area E. In Building GF, distinctions between the two strata could be observed in several cases, but since no violent destruction layer was detected, it might be conjectured that most of the Stratum G-1a floors in this building were eroded away, although this remains an open question. As noted above, building remains of Stratum G-1 were eroded away in Squares P–Q/6, the floors were almost completely eroded away in Squares P–Q/5, and erosion also destroyed the G-1 structures in the southwestern corner of the area in Square P/3.

The Wooden-Beam Foundations

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.24 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.27 - Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.28 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.29 - Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Charred wooden beams served as foundations for floors and walls of Stratum G-1 structures and sealed Stratum G-2 architecture in most of Area G (Fig. 20.3; Photos 20.22–20.30). The following is a description of this wooden construction in each of the excavation squares.

Square P/5

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Wooden beams were exposed in at least two consecutive layers in the east of the square (4020, 4031). They were arranged in a crisscross pattern, in an area 2.7 m wide and 0.4–0.6 m deep, below and to the east of Wall 4014, on both sides of Wall 4017 that extended from it. Both of these walls were related to Stratum G-1 (Photos 20.22–20.24, 20.30). The beams were used as foundations for both these walls, as well as for the related floors. The section created below Wall 4014 (Fig. 20.10) showed two layers of beams. East of this wall, there were three layers of beams; in the lower and upper layers, the beams were laid perpendicular to Wall 4014, while in the middle layer (4031), the beams were laid parallel to this wall. The beams of the lowest level ranged from 0.15–0.3 m in diameter. Of the beams in the middle layer, the longest was 2.4 m and the diameter ranged from 0.1–0.16 m. The dimensions of the beams in the upper layer (4020) were more modest, the largest being 1.4 m long and 0.1 m in diameter. Their top level was at 86.54 m.

It should be noted that when the poorly preserved bricks of Wall 4014 were dismantled, a 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris was revealed, separating the wall from the wooden beams described above (Fig. 20.10). This raised questions as to the relationship of the wooden beams to the construction of the wall; however, since the connection of the beams to other G-1 walls was established with great certainty, we maintain that Wall 4014 was supported by the wooden beams and that this crumbly brick layer was created during the heavy conflagration which strongly affected the lowest brick courses of the wall, because of its proximity to the wood.

Square Q/5

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The wooden beams exposed in the eastern part of the square were embedded into a light reddish-pink layer (5024), which sealed the latest plaster floor (5067) of the Stratum G-2 courtyard (Fig. 20.11). The beams were arranged in two layers, the lower beams running north–south (4079) and the upper beams running northwest–southeast (5020). The top of the upper beams was at level 86.63 m and their bottom was at level 86.56 m. Two additional north–south beams were exposed in the southeastern corner of the square (continuing into Square Q/4) at 86.53 m. The beams in this area appear to be a foundation for a beaten-earth floor that disappeared, which was possibly a continuation of 5024 in the middle of the square.

Squares P/4

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Wall 5012 of Stratum G-1in Squares P–Q/3–4 had a wooden foundation, seen in the section created below its northern face (Photos 20.27–20.28). The beams (8003) were perpendicular to the wall and continued northwards to serve as a foundation for a brick floor or platform (5069) and possibly for a floor that was not preserved east of this platform, between Walls 5012 and 4083 (Fig. 20.4). This layer of beams, oriented northeast–southwest, was between levels 85.79–85.91 m, extending from the top of Wall 5061 of Stratum G-2 on the west until the eastern end of the square. In fact, the top of Wall 5061 appears to have been reused, defining the brick platform on the west. East of the platform was a higher layer of beams (4066) that was laid perpendicularly to the lower layer, at levels at 86.08–86.44 m. (Photo 20.26)

In the northeastern corner of the square was a layer of beams laid at a northeastern–southeastern orientation (4071, between 86.53–86.29 m) that was the continuation of the southern group of beams (4020) in Square P/5, described above (Photo 20.25). Two elongated beams were located just on top of G-2 Wall 5061 at levels 86.03–86.28 m, serving as a foundation for the new wall (4070) built on the same line. West of this wall was a group of five beams which were perpendicular to the wall at level 86.00 m, probably serving as foundation for a floor that was not preserved in the small area that was excavated.

Wooden beams were also found in the foundation of Wall 4047, which created a double wall with Wall 5012, mentioned above (Fig. 20.16; Photo 20.31).

Square Q/4

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

After removing Wall 5017 of Stratum G-1 (see below), wooden beams were found below its lowest brick courses, among brick debris (5016); a section through Wall 5018 (attached to Wall 5017 on the east) revealed a foundation of beams perpendicular to the wall below its lowest course (Fig. 20.13; Photos 20.29, 20.40). A few beams found in the northeastern corner of the square continued those found in Square Q/5 to the north.

Square Q/3

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

A 0.46 m-thick layer of charred beams (5029) at levels 85.68–86.14 m sealed both Wall 5063 and the abutting floor build-up (5053) of Stratum G-2 in the northeastern corner of this square (Photos 20.17–20.18, 20.34–20.35). The beams appeared in several courses laid crosswise, at an east–west and north–south orientation; some appeared to be in disorder as if moved from their original location (perhaps due to seismic activity). This layer continued below the double brick wall (5017, 5018), which was founded some 0.3 m above the beams (Fig. 20.17) and extended ca. 1.3 m to the south of Wall 5017/5018 (Photo 20.40). It appears that the beams served as a foundation for a floor that was not preserved.

It should be noted that in several places there was a considerable gap of up to 0.5 m between the uppermost beams and the lowest brick course of the wall above (i.e., the case of Wall 4014, noted above) while in other places (such as the foundations of Walls 5012 and 4047), it was clear that the beams served as a foundation for the wall, as was the case in Area C. It appears that even where there was a gap, the wood served as such a foundation and the gap was created by seismic activity or the burning of the lowest bricks until melting point during the destruction.

Building GF

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.15 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.11 - Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.32 - Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.33 - Square Q/5 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The excavated remains attributed to this building in Squares P–Q/4–5 were 8.5×9.0 m, bordered by Walls 4014/4070 on the west, 5012 on the south and 5017 on the east (Photo 20.1). No closing wall on the north was uncovered and it seems that it was beyond the present limit of the excavation. In Square P/5, the western wall (4014) was built above G-2 Wall 5061, with wooden beams separating them, as described above (Photos 20.12, 20.22–20.23, 20.30, 20.32). It was exposed along 5.0 m in Square P/5 and its edge in Square P/4 was very poorly preserved to less than one course high. A strip of reddish-brown crumbly earth (4033), 0.4–0.5 m wide, exposed to the west of the wall, might be an indication of a foundation trench, although this is far from certain. The conflagration that destroyed the building burnt the bricks to a pinkish-orange hue. Wall 4017 extended from Wall 4014 towards the east (Photos 20.12, 20.22); only a brick and a half were preserved to one course high. This wall probably divided the area of Square P/5 east of Wall 4014 into two spaces, although no additional details of this assumed division further to the east were preserved.

In Square Q/5, no floors of Stratum G-1b were preserved above the constructional beams. In the eastern part of the square, a stone floor (4049), 3.5 m long and ca. 0.5–1.3 m wide, was exposed just below topsoil at levels 86.90–86.97 m, unrelated to any other feature (Photos 20.22, 20.33); this floor was attributed to Stratum G-1a. It is possible that this part of the building was an open courtyard. In the rest of the square, brick debris mixed with collapsed burnt bricks and grayish-brown and black ash (4007, 4013) found below topsoil, appeared to be related to the destruction of the building.

In Squares P–Q/4, Walls 4083 and 5019 were two segments of partition walls that comprised the southern border of the space described above, although they appeared to belong to two subsequent phases: Wall 4083 was founded in Stratum G1b, built on top of a wooden-beam foundation that separated it from the earlier wall (8055) of Stratum G-2 (Photo 20.11). Wall 5019 in the eastern part of Q/4 was narrower and higher; its foundation was 0.33 m higher than that of Wall 4083 and fit the level of the plaster floor (5023) to its north and was thus attributed to Stratum G-1a. It seems that in Squares Q–P/4–5 in Stratum G-1b, we may reconstruct a large space (inner dimensions 3.2×7.0 m) enclosed by Walls 4014, 4017, 4083 and an extension of Wall 5018 to the north (Photo 20.34). An element found in this space that remained enigmatic was Wall 5040, a 3.5 m-long and ca. 0.7 m wide stone foundation in the northern part of Square Q/4 (Photos 20.1, 20.32, 20.34), which was architecturally detached from the other walls of the building. It was attributed to Stratum G-1b, since it was covered by G-1a plaster floor 5023, which covered much of the northern part of Square Q/4. The nature of Wall 5040 was even more enigmatic in light of the lack of stone foundations in the Iron IIA levels at Tel Rehov. This element remains architecturally unexplained, although perhaps it served as a bench.

Plaster Floor 5023 in the northern part of Square Q/4 (levels 86.65–86.72 m) was composed of two thin superimposed layers of plaster; it did not clearly abut any wall, although it most likely did reach Wall 5019. Although it was somewhat lower than the stone floor (4049) in Square Q/5, it appears that both these floors were contemporary and belonged to Stratum G-1a.

In Square P/4, a single-course brick platform or floor (5069, 1.3×1.8 m), covered with a thick layer of plaster, was built above the wooden beams in the space between the short segment of Wall 4083 on the north and Wall 5012 on the south (Fig. 20.15; Photos 20.1, 20.11, 20.32, 20.34). Approach to this platform/floor could be through a possible opening in Wall 4083 to the north, where the bricks of this wall were found at the same level as the top of the platform (86.10 m). Note that the lowest brick course of Wall 5012 south of the platform was at level 86.26 m, 0.18 m above the top of the brick platform, but the wooden foundations of this wall started at level 85.72 m, which fit the wooden beams under the platform. It thus appears that the platform/floor and Wall 5012 were constructed at the same time. Brick debris with some small pebbles (4055, 4088) had accumulated on top of the platform. It appears that the platform/floor went out of use in Stratum G-1a, although no clear stratigraphic element was found above it, except for a small segment of an unnumbered wall, which made a corner with Wall 5012 and may be attributed to Stratum G-1a. The function of this brick platform/floor remained obscure.

Summary of Building GF

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Two phases were identified in Building GF, Strata G-1b and G-1a. In Stratum G-1b, the preserved parts of the building included a northern and a southern space. The northern space was probably an open courtyard with floor striations, resembling the open space that was here in the previous Stratum G-2, but lacking installations, such as ovens, bins and pits. It remained unclear whether Wall 4017 in Square P/5 continued to the east and divided this large space into two smaller spaces (in both strata). In the southern end of the building was a narrow elongated space with a brick platform or floor at its western end, yet its function, as well as that of the stone foundation 5040, remained obscure. In any event, the building does not appear to have been a regular dwelling and perhaps was utilized as a public space of some sort. In Stratum G-1a, it appears that inner changes were made; the wall segment that made a corner with 5012 perhaps continued northwards to create a corner with an assumed continuation to the west of the new Wall 5019, thus creating a room (inner dimensions 2.0×4.3 m) in the southeastern part of this building. However such a reconstruction is, to a large extent, hypothetical.

Building GG

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Building GG refers to the northern part of a structure whose southern and western parts disappeared due to erosion. The remains were exposed under topsoil on the southern slope of the hillock. The northern wall of the building was Wall 4047, a brick wall attached to Wall 5012, the southern wall of Building GF, together comprising a wide double wall. The plastered wall, 0.5 m wide and exposed along 7.0 m, was founded on round wooden beams laid perpendicularly (Fig. 20.16). Two construction phases in this wall could be discerned: the lower one (comprised of three brick courses) was attributed to G-1b, while the upper one (two brick courses protruding about 0.1 m to the south of the earlier courses), were attributed to G-1a (Photo 20.31). An alternative explanation would be that the two upper courses shifted from their original location due to seismic activity, although this is less plausible. On its western end, the wall made a corner with Wall 4068, of which only a single brick was preserved to one course high. The eastern wall (5008) was built on top of G-2 Walls 8027 and 5063 (Photo 20.18). It was exposed along 3.8 m, built of a single row of hard white bricks and was preserved to the height of three courses (Photos 20.34–20.35).

Room 4089

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.36 - Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.37 - Squares P–Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The eastern room (4089) was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, Wall 5008 on the east and Wall 4060 on the west; the southern end of this space was eroded away. Its width was 3.2 m and its length at least 3.0 m until the erosion line. Two installations were found in this room: 5031 and 4064, both related to food production.

A reddish-brown beaten-earth floor (4089) was exposed west of Installation 5031 at level 85.92 m. A 1.0 m-long charred wooden beam was found on the floor, perhaps part of a loom that stood nearby (see below). Floor 5038 was a pinkish clay surface with small ash patches that abutted Installation 5031 on its west and Wall 5008 on its east at level 85.87 m. The remains of an orange-clay oven were exposed near Wall 4047 to the north (not shown on the plan). No floor was found south of Installation 5031, where only extremely decayed debris was found due to the intense erosion.

Installation 5031 in the middle of this space was an oval of standing bricks coated inside and outside with white plaster (Fig. 20.6; Photos 20.34, 20.36, 20.40). Four open channels were carved in the upper part of the northern and southern walls of the installation, with plaster preserved inside three of these channels. The floor of the installation was composed of stones of various types and sizes, including a grinding stone fragment. A deep krater (Fig. 21.8:8) was embedded in the southwestern corner of the installation, its rim more or less flush with the stone floor and possibly used to collect liquid (olive oil?) that was processed or gathered inside the installation. Inside the installation, a layer of soft dark ashy earth contained two cooking jugs, a bowl and a krater (Figs. 21.8:7–8; 21.9:1–2).

An elongated plastered open channel north of the installation was covered by four large hard limestones (5071; Photos 20.34, 20.37, 20.40); the stones were chipped and cracked as a result of extensive heat. The largest one measured 0.38× 0.51×0.73 m. The bottom of these large stones were ca. 0.15 m above the top of the open channel and chips from these stones were found in the accumulation above Floor 4089 to the west. The stones appeared to be related to the installation and perhaps were used as weights, possibly hung on the wooden beam found lying in the destruction debris to the west of the installation. A roughly worked stone mortar was found close the large stones (Photo 20.37).

The elongated plastered channel to the north of the installation, the four open channels carved into the top of the installation’s walls and the sunken vessel, all indicate that this installation was used in the processing of liquid, perhaps olive oil. The four sunken depressions on top of the installation’s wall were perhaps intended to hold two wooden beams, which somehow were used in the operation. However the exact identification of the function and operation of this installation remains elusive.

The second installation (4064), just 0.4 m to the west of 5031, was an elongated, almost elliptical semi-circle (Photos 20.34; 20.37–20.40, 20.42), built against Wall 4060 and on top of Floor 4089, just on top of Wall 4081 of the previous stratum. It was constructed of small bricks that were covered inside and outside with a thick gray plaster; the center of the installation apparently also had been plastered, although none of this plaster was preserved. Two stones were set at the southern edge of the installation, which may be explained as a grinding installation with a mud-plastered parapet of the type found in Area C (Chapters 12, 43). This suggestion is supported by the find of an upper and a lower grinding stone in the destruction layer (4059) east and north of this installation (Photo 20.39).1

The room was destroyed in a heavy conflagration, creating a layer of burnt bricks and black ash. The thick destruction layer on top of Floor 4089 in the western part of the room (4059) included vessels (Figs. 21.8–21.13) and upper and lower grindstones. A few loomweights found near Installation 5031 were perhaps related to the cache of loomweights found to the west of the entranceway in Wall 4060 (see below). The wooden beam found on the floor could be related to Installation 5031 or to a loom that stood near the entrance to Room 5037. No separate floor that could be attributed to a later phase was found in this room and thus, it appears in identical form in the plans of both Strata G-1b and G-1a (Figs. 20.4–20.5).
Footnotes

1 A narrow cylindrical gap in the middle of Wall 4060 had remains of plaster. This was interpreted during the excavation as a channel conducting liquids from the room to the west into the installation. However, the parallels to the grinding installations in Area C are more convincing and we tend to reconstruct 4064 as such.

Room 5037

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.41 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.42 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.43 - Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.44 - Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This small square room (inner dimensions 2.2×2.3 m) was in the northwestern corner of the extant part of Building GG. It was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, poorly preserved Wall 4068 on the west, and Walls 4067 and 4060 on the south and east (Photos 20.40–20.45). A 0.9 m-wide entranceway led to this room from the eastern space (4089) at the northern end of Wall 4060. At least two floors were exposed. The early floor attributed to Stratum G-1b was preserved in three areas. Two small segments were exposed near Wall 4047 (8011, 8022) at level 85.75 m, abutting the lowest course of Wall 4047. On top of the western patch (8022), a scaraboid was found (Chapter 30A, No. 17). In the central part of the room was a compact clay floor (5037) at level 85.82 m, abutting Wall 4060.

A higher floor (4088) made of hard gray plaster was identified in the central and northern parts of the room, between levels 85.91–86.00 m, ca. 0.1– 0.2 m higher than the earlier floor. This higher floor is related to Stratum G-1a and appears to have abutted all four walls of the room, although this was not clearly seen.

Destruction debris (4052) that covered the floor consisted of burnt bricks, light gray ash, charcoal pieces and burnt earth that contained 47 restorable vessels (Photos 20.41–2.44; Figs. 21.8–21.14). A large number of these vessels were sunk into the floor against Wall 4067. Over 80 gypsum loomweights were found in the northeastern corner of the room, near the entranceway. They were piled up, covering an area 1.5 m long and 0.65 m wide. Their configuration and dimensions apparently indicate the size and shape of the loom that stood here. Note the abovementioned possibility that the wooden beam in the room to the east might have belonged to this loom. The location of a loom at the entrance of a room recalls a similar situation at Tell Qasile Stratum X, where concentrations of about 80 loomweights each were found at the entrances of several rooms (Mazar 2008).

In the southern part of Square P/3, Loci 4065 and 4069 contain the same destruction layer, although it is slightly lower due to the topography and damaged by the erosion line.

Summary and Conclusions

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

There are two major strata in Area G: G-2 and G-1, each with two phases in several locations. The architectural data from both strata is fragmentary and the complete plans of the buildings remain unknown. In Stratum G-2, Buildings GC, GD and GA could be parts of regular dwellings, although Building GB appears to have had a public function. In Stratum G-2b, it might have been a wide open space, about 7.0×13.3 m, while in Stratum G-1b, it was divided into an elongated roofed(?) space on the west and an L-shaped open space on the east and north, with numerous clay bins and pits, as well as several ovens. This open space perhaps was used for food storage or processing and baking, serving several adjacent dwellings; it thus may have belonged to a clan composed of several nuclear families living in the houses around this open area.

As elsewhere in Tel Rehov, no violent destruction was observed at the end of Stratum G-2, yet hints at an earthquake which caused considerable damage were found in the form of tilted and split walls. Such damages may have been the reason for abandoning the Stratum G-2 structures and for the foundation of the new buildings of Stratum G-1. The construction of Stratum G-1 was accompanied by laying wooden foundations for both walls and floors, as was detected also in Areas C and B. About half of this wood was composed of olive tree branches (Chapter 52).

Architectural continuity between Strata G-2 and G-1 was found in several places (i.e., Wall 4014 on top of Wall 5061, Wall 8030 on top of Wall 5018, Wall 5008 on top of Wall 5063), while the general plan of the structures differed from that of Stratum G-1. The new double wall 5012/4047 was a major feature, separating Building GG on the south from Building GF on the north. Both of these buildings are only partly known. Building GF continued the tradition of Building GB of the previous period in its being composed of large open spaces, although no food processing or storage installations were found in it and thus, its function may have changed. Architectural changes between Strata G-1b and G-1a were also observed. A unique feature was the brick platform/floor (5069), which perhaps served as a base for storage facilities. The preserved part of Building GG contained two installations of particular interest: a possible grinding installation with a plaster parapet and perhaps an oil-extracting installation with stone weights, which was rather rare in this period. A loom with some 80 gypsum weights apparently stood at the entrance to the small chamber (5037) and a wooden beam found outside this room might have belonged to the loom.

The dramatic destruction of Stratum G-1a yielded a rich pottery assemblage and other finds. This can be correlated to the general destruction of the city of Stratum IV in the 9th century BCE, as evidenced in other areas at Tel Rehov.

Plans and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 20.1        Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2        Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.3        Squares P–Q/4–5, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.4        Collapsed mudbricks on left corner in G-2b Building GA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.5        Tilted Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6        G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.7        Building GA, G-2 Building GB, and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.8        G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.9        Wall 5064 and G-2a courtyard from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.10        G-2b and G-2a circular bins from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.11        Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12        G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.13        Stratum G-2a Square P/6 and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.14        Stratum G-2a Floors 4016 and 5004 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.15        Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16        Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17        Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18        Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.19        Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.20        Tilted G-2 Wall 4081 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.21        Closeup on Tilted G-2 Wall 4081 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22        Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23        Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.24        Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.27        Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.28        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.29        Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30        Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31        Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.32        Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.33        Square Q/5 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34        Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35        Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.36        Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.37        Squares P–Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.38        Square P/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.39        Square P/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40        General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.41        Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.42        Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.43        Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.44        Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.45        Room 4088 floor below G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Chapter 54 - Reconstructing a Seismic Destruction at Tel Rehov: Insights from a Paleomagnetic Fold Test on Tilted Walls in Area C, Stratum V

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Fig. 54.1                     Visualization of the Earth's Magnetic Field from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.2                     Paleomagnetic fold test as applied to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.3                     Sampling locations in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.1                     Samples in Burnt Wall 2454 of Building CE from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.2                     Samples in Tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Table 54.1                     Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.4                     Zijderveld diagrams of the AF demagnetization of samples from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.5                     Equal area projection of measured directions from Buildings CE and CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.6                     Equal area projection of measured directions from Buildings CE and CG after tilt correction from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Discussion
Introduction

The architectural remains uncovered at Tel Rehov throughout the occupation history of the site (15th—8th centuries BCE) are dominated by mudbricks; during the Iron Age IIA (Strata VI-IV, 10th-9th centuries BCE), the brick walls typically lack stone foundations. In Stratum V of Iron IIA, wooden beams were used on a large-scale as foundations for the walls or were incorporated in the floor makeup. A destruction that involved intense fire was identified at the end of Stratum V (local Stratum C-1b) in the eastern and northern parts of Area C: Buildings CG, CH, CM, and CE (see Chapter 12), but not in other parts of the area. A later violent destruction of Stratum IV (local Stratum C-1a) was found across the entire site (Mazar 2003; 2008; Chapter 4 and various stratigraphic chapters).

The current study focuses on the local destruction of parts of Stratum C-lb, which is dated by radiocarbon and ceramic typology to the late 10th until the early 9th century BCE (Chapters 4, 24, 48).

The mudbricks are sun dried, and their firing during the destruction process is the basis for the archaeomagnetic investigation that was undertaken in Area C. The question at hand is whether the partial destruction of the Stratum C-lb buildings was caused by a military campaign, local fire, or, given the geological setting of the site (Chapter 2), by an earthquake. The latter is supported by extensive segments of strongly tilted walls; however, it is possible that in this earthquake-frequented region, the earthquake that tilted the walls of Stratum C-lb occurred independently of the fire, sometime after the site was destroyed by the intense conflagration indicated by the color and texture of the mudbricks.

The active faulting at the site is reflected in many other tilted floors and occupation layers, dated to the Late Bronze Age I onwards, particularly in Area D (where the direction of the tilt is towards the southeast; see Chapters 4, 15). Deducing a causal relationship of tilting and fire events based only on field observations is a difficult task; the current case study demonstrates how archaeomagnetic investigation can provide decisive observations regarding this relationship, and how it can be used in the reconstruction of destruction processes.

In 2003, we investigated the relationship between the tilting of the walls and the fire by an archaeomagnetic study of the burnt mudbricks of two Stratum C- lb walls that were found tilted. The samples were collected in collaboration with A. Mazar and measured at the Paleomagnetic Laboratory of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.1
Footnotes

1 The measurements were done with the help of R. Granot.

Research Methods

Archaeomagnetism

The case study presented in this paper belongs to the wider field of archaeomagnetism — the application of paleomagnetic methods in archaeology, which consists of various techniques. Some are aimed solely to reconstruct the geomagnetic field itself during archaeological times (e.g., Korte et al. 2011) and others, to answer archaeological questions, mostly by using archaeomagnetic data as a dating tool (e.g., Eighmy and Sternberg 1990; Lanos 2003; Pavon-Carrasco et al. 2011). The most typical recorders of the geomagnetic field in archaeological contexts are heat-impacted clayey materials (e.g., pottery, kilns and ovens, mudbricks and metallurgical installations). The full vector information of the geomagnetic field (declination, inclination and intensity; Fig. 54.1) might be retrieved by sampling materials found in their original cooling position. In addition to reconstructing the properties of the geomagnetic field, the experiments are designed to evaluate the reliability of the material as a geomagnetic recorder (Tauxe 2010); they also provide information regarding the thermal history of the samples.

The geomagnetic field vector consists of three components (Fig. 54.1):
  1. declination (D) — its direction in respect to the geographic north
  2. inclination (I) — its direction in respect to the horizon
  3. intensity (its strength)
For each point on the earth's surface, the geomagnetic field can be represented as a vector, and, as all components change constantly with time, regional reference curves can be used as a dating tool. The case study presented here makes use only of the directional components of the geomagnetic field, which are relatively easy to reconstruct in the paleomagnetic laboratory when the magnetic properties of the sample are stable.

Methods and Sampling

Figures and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Fig. 54.1           Visualization of the Earth's Magnetic Field from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.2           Paleomagnetic fold test as applied to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.3           Sampling locations in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.1           Samples in Burnt Wall 2454 of Building CE from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.2           Samples in Tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Discussion

The archaeomagnetic study was designed to provide conclusive evidence for one of the two following possible scenarios:2
  1. An earthquake is the main cause for the partial destruction of Stratum C-lb and the tilting of the buildings' walls, and is also responsible for the fire.
  2. A fire is the main cause for the destruction of the Stratum C-lb buildings; after this, during a period in which the site was abandoned, an earthquake tilted the walls.
As the two main segments of the tilted walls are facing opposite directions, creating an anticlinal fold structure, we applied the paleomagnetic "fold test" (Tauxe 2010: 177) to test the relationship between the folding (tilting) and the magnetization of the mudbricks (the result of the fire) (Fig. 54.2). In this test, the geomagnetic directions (D and I [Fig. 54.1]) are reconstructed from the two opposite flanks of the fold (the two opposing burnt mudbricks walls) and their statistical averages are compared. If they are similar, the fire had to occur during or after the tilting, implying option (1) above (Fig. 54.2a). If they are statistically different, then the fire had to occur before the tilting, implying option (2) above (Fig. 54.2b). To enhance statistical evaluation of similarity, the directions are corrected for their respective tilt; sparser directional cluster after correction indicates option (1) and tighter directional cluster, option (2).

We collected ten samples of burnt mudbricks from the two opposing tilted walls (Fig. 54.3): six samples from the western (inner) face of Wall 2454, which served as the eastern wall of Building CE (Photo 54.1; Chapter 12; Fig. 12.27), and four from the eastern (outer) face of Wall 2411, the eastern wall of Building CG (Photo 54.2; Figs. 12.39-12.40). The sampling was done by cutting out oriented chunks of clay bricks into small (~8 cm3) plastic boxes using a Brunton compass.3 The tilting direction of the walls (their dip) was measured on flat surfaces in various locations and an average was calculated. The paleomagnetic experiments were done using alternating field (AF) demagnetization (Tauxe 2010: 127) in steps of 5µT to 40µT or 10µT to 90µT. As the signal was consistent and stable, the samples were not fully demagnetized.
Footnotes

2 The options that the fire occurred later than and independent of the earthquake (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable from option 1), or that the fire caused the tilting (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable from option 2) are much less likely and are not discussed here.

3 The mudbricks were too fragile for drilling, thus an alternative sampling method was improvised.

Results

Both walls are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall of Building CE towards the north and the wall of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold.

The demagnetization data are presented in Fig. 54.4. Two samples (C3 and C6) from Wall 2454 were rejected, as they demonstrated an unstable magnetization (Fig. 54.4). The mean vectorial direction was calculated for the two clusters of samples using Fisher statistics. The results are presented in Table 54.1 and Fig. 54.5; Fig. 54.6 presents the results after tilt correction.

Table 54.1

Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C

Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Conclusions

AF demagnetization of eight of the ten samples from the two tilted mudbrick walls in Buildings CE and CG (Stratum V, C-1b) demonstrated stable, single-component magnetization, indicating a simple thermal history of only one major heating event. This result is an objective and conclusive confirmation of the field observation that both walls were subjected to the same intense fire.4 The directions retrieved from the samples indicate that the fire took place after or simultaneously with the tilting. We therefore argue that the simplest explanation for the destruction process of Stratum V is an earthquake that triggered an intense fire (option [1] above). The symmetric anticlinal structure observed in the deformed structures of both walls (~18° each flank), together with the discrete quality of the damage (destruction is observed only in certain locations in Area C), supports destruction by the on-fault effect of an earthquake, as classified by Rodríguez-Pascua et al. (2011: 22). Area C is located directly on a fault line (Zilberman, Chapter 2) and the deformation caused by the fault scarp is expressed by the tilting (folding); the ductile reaction of the structures (rather than brittle, e.g., Altunel 1998: Fig. 5), is most probably the result of the quality of building materials and construction techniques, including the use of wooden beams. Finally, the possibility that an earthquake occurred after and independently from the fire (option [2] above) is entirely excluded by the magnetic results (Fig. 54.2b).

As the region is prone to earthquakes and the tell itself is located directly on a major segment of the Dead Sea Transform (Zilberman, Chapter 2), the site most probably suffered from frequent earthquake-triggered destructions of different magnitudes. This might be sustained by the use of wooden beams as part of the construction techniques, and, in the case of Stratum V, also by the fast recovery and organic reconstruction of the city, in many cases of the same buildings, in Stratum IV. This process of close continuity between the two strata may also explain the absence of trapped bodies and other features typical of massive destruction by earthquakes.5

In addition to specific insights regarding the destruction process of Stratum C-lb at Tel Rehov, the study presented here demonstrates the feasibility and potential of archaeomagnetic studies on burnt mudbricks. The stable and strong magnetization provides opportunity for studies regarding all aspects of archaeomagnetism, including establishing dating references and other related applications.
Footnotes

4 The most common carrier of magnetic remanence in baked clay is magnetite; thus, most probably both walls were subjected to at least 585°C, the temperature at which magnetite loses its permanent magnetization (Curie temperature).

5 At an earlier stage of the research, A. Mazar suggested attributing the destruction of Stratum V to the military campaign of Pharaoh Shoshenq I to Canaan around 925 BCE (Mazar 2003: 317). This destruction date and its cause were challenged by Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2003), who argued for a later date and rejected the destructive quality of Shoshenq I's campaign to the region. Later excavation seasons since 2003 made it clear that the violent destruction of Stratum V occurred only in a certain part of Area C, and this result led to the reevaluation of the previous conclusions (see Chapters 4 and 12). If, indeed, an earthquake was the cause of the partial destruction of Stratum V in Area C, it excludes the possibility that the destruction was caused by the campaign of Shoshenq I.

Raphael and Agnon (2018)

Period Age Site Damage Description
Iron IIA 1000-900 BCE Rehov thick mudbrick debris, intact fallen brick walls (Area C, Stratum VI) suggest an earthquake (Mazar 2008: 2015). Based on a preliminary paleomagnetic fold test, Ben-Yosef and Ron (2016: 4-7) suggested that the tilted wall (Area C, Stratum V) was the result of an earthquake.

Stratum IV Destruction - Late Iron IIA - ~9th-8th century BCE

Figures

Figures

  • Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)
  • Fig. 3.7 Map of the site showing grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Deformation Map of Strata C1-a and D1-a by Jefferson Williams
  • Deformation Map of Stratum E1-a by Jefferson Williams
  • Deformation Map of Stratum G-1 by Jefferson Williams
  • Fig. 2.11 Subsurface structure of Tel Rehov interpreted from seismic - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Fig. 2.12 Seismic interpretation of the top of the lower tufa layer along with subsurface faults - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Fig. 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.54 - Superimposed plan of Strata C-3–C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Chronology
Chronology of Iron Age Strata VII-IV (C-4 to C-1a)

Chronology of Iron Age Strata VII-IV (C-4 to C-1a)

  • from Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, (2020 v. 1:119)
  • Area C stratigraphy correlated to the rest of the site
  • Dating of Iron IIA strata was based on a combination of the following:
    • Relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts
    • Absolute dating based on radiometric data
    • Historical considerations
Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


Finkelstein's subdivision of Late Iron IIA

Mazar in Mazar and Panitz-Cohen ed.s, 2020 v. 1:119 n. 20 noted the following

Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE)
Finkelstein (2013:7)'s Table 1 is shown below:

Table 1

Dates of ceramic phases in the Levant and the transition between them according to recent radiocarbon results (based on a Bayesian model, 63 percent agreement between the model and the data)

Finkelstein (2013:7)


Discussion

According to Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:186), Stratum C-1a [equivalent to Stratum IV] came to an end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. Temperatures were thought to exceed 500°C, since it caused partial firing of the brick courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In several cases, they report that pottery vessels cracked and became distorted, with much calcification. As an example, they noted that the large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore.

According to Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:186), the destruction was sudden, based on the incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other objects found in the houses. Only one skeleton was found which might suggest an earthquake which struck during the daytime. No activity on the site was detected after the Stratum IV (C-1a) destruction except for one deep pit (6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL. The site appears to have been abandoned after the earthquake.

Archaeoseismic evidence in Area C, the best studied location, is fairly extensive and includes collapsed and tilted walls, fallen ceilings, broken pottery (some apparently found in fallen position), and debris. There also appears to be archaeoseismic evidence for this event in Areas D, E, and G. Unlike the Stratum V and VI earthquakes, there is no compelling or obvious evidence of vertical shaking during this event indicating that Tel Rehov probably was not in the hypocentral region and the active faults underlying the site probably did not slip.

Dating was based on ceramic evidence and radiocarbon. Although Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2) dated this Iron IIA event to the 9th century and no later than 840/830 BCE, Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2010:Table 2) and Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1, 83; 2017: 186) date the end of Late Iron IIA to ~760 BCE - which coincides with the approximate date of the Amos Quake. In the Tel Rehov Paleoseismic Trench, ~300 m north of Tel Rehov, Zilberman et. al. (2004) identified an Event (I) with 1.2+ meters of slip which they suggested was caused by the ~760 BCE Amos Quake (despite the fact that they dated Event I to the 7th century BCE in their report). Thus, it seems prudent to consider that the Stratum IV destruction could have been one and the same with the ~760 BCE Amos Quake. The dating range for this Stratum IV event has therefore been expanded out to include the 8th century BCE.

The damaged structures were made entirely of mudbricks with wood beam foundations so there is likely a construction related site affect for all the Iron Age II structures.

References
What happened to the C1-a rubble ?

An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m above the floors and their tops were discovered flat and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil. While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem that there would have been a larger quantity if they had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were probably washed to the southeast towards the gulley that separates the upper from the lower mound. A less feasible explanation would be that bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).

Final Report (2020)

Chapter 2 - The Geology and Morphology of the Beth-Shean Valley and Tel Rehov

  • see the Geology and Geophysics collapsible panel in the Background Information section

Chapter 3 - Introduction to the Site and the Excavations

  • see the Mound Morphology and Site-formation processes collapsible panel in the Background Information section for that section of Chapter 3

Chapter 4 - The Tel Rehov Excavations: Overview and Synthesis

Figures, Tables, and Photos

Figures and Tables

  • Figure 4.1          Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Figure 4.2          Map of Tel ReHov showing the excavation areas and architecture of Stratum IV from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)
  • Table 4.1          Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)

Photos

  • Photo 4.2          Fragments of roofing material from Stratum IV from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussions
Iron Age IIA

Terminology and Stratigraphy

The term Iron IIA has been employed in different ways in the archaeology of Israel. G.E. Wright (1961: 97-99) used it to describe the period between 900-730/700 BCE, while he termed the 10th century BCE "Iron IC". Initially, Israeli archaeologists used the term to denote the 10th century BCE, equaling the time of the United Monarchy (e.g., Aharoni 1979 [first published in Hebrew in 1963] and in subsequent editions; NEAEHL: 1529; Mazar 1990: 30) and this terminology was widely accepted (e.g., King and Stager 2001: XXIII). According to this system, the 9th century BCE was included in the Iron IIB, together with the 8th century. Finkelstein (1996) and Sharon et al. (2007) suggested to lower the transition from Iron I/Iron IIA to the late 10th century BCE (see above) and dated the Iron IIA to the 9th century BCE. I suggested a Modified Conventional Chronology, which broadly accepted the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century, based on the finds from Jezreel and Tel Rehov, yet I claimed that the period began well in the 10th century (Coldstream and Mazar 2003: 40-45; Mazar 2005). Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006; 2011) accepted this chronological framework, but went one step further by suggesting a division of the Iron IIA into two sub-periods: Early Iron IIA and Late Iron IIA, the former dated to the 10th century and the latter to the 9th. This suggestion is now accepted by many archaeologists in Israel, although the details of absolute dating of each phase remain unresolved. In this publication, we refer to Iron Age IIA as a period starting sometime during the first half of the 10th century BCE (ca. 980 BCE?) and ending during the second half of the 9th century, probably following severe destructions caused by Aramean conquests led by Hazael (see below for a detailed chronological and historical discussion).

Local stratum numbers were assigned in each of the excavation areas. It so happened that in the four main areas in the lower city (Areas C, D, E and G), the uppermost stratum was attributed to Late Iron IIA and was numbered 1 (C-1, D-1, etc.), while an earlier stratum denoted Stratum 2 was attributed to Early Iron IIA (C-2, D-2, etc.). Yet, as the excavation progressed, we found it necessary to divide Stratum 1 in Areas C, D, E and G into two sub-phases denoted la and lb, while in Area F, three sub-phases equaling these two phases were deter¬mined (Table 4.1). When the decision was made to assign final strata numbers (in Roman numerals), and considering the later Iron IIB Strata II-III and Islamic period Strata IA and IB on the upper mound, it was decided to allocate a separate general Roman numeral — IV and V — to each of the sub-phases la and lb, while local Stratum 2 in all these areas was called general Stratum VI. This terminology has its deficiencies, since it became clear during later excavation seasons and subsequent research that, in fact, Strata IV and V are two phases of the same city. In certain places, major rebuilding took place during the transition between the two (as in the southeastern part of Area C, where the apiary of Stratum V went out of use in Stratum IV), while in Areas B, E, G and parts of C, there was great a deal of continuity between these two strata and, in fact, they could be merged into one general stratum with local sub-phases. This is also substantiated by the pottery assemblage, which is almost identical in Strata V and IV, while that of Stratum VI is somewhat different. In retrospect, it might have been preferable to retain the single general stratum number with sub-phases (as was done in the local strata numbers) instead of using the terms Strata V and IV. In this publication, we use both the local and the general stratum numbers. In summary, we may define two major cities: that of Stratum VI, attributed to Early Iron IIA, and that of Strata V and IV, attributed to Late Iron IIA.

Building Materials and Techniques

The Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov are characterized by several architectural features which are unknown elsewhere in Israel (see discussion at the end of Chapter 12). The first is the virtually exclusive use of mudbricks as building material. Stones were used only in exceptional places for constructing cobblestone floors and installations (as in Area F: Fig. 19.4, Photo 19.6), pillar bases (rarely; e.g., Area C, Building CX) and working surfaces.

The avoidance of stone foundations for brick walls in Strata VI-IV is astonishing, since their use was common at Tel Rehov in LB II (although they were missing in the earlier LB Strata D-11 and D-10) and Iron I strata, as they are in the architecture of the Southern Levant since the Protohistoric periods. Such stone sockles are essential to protect mudbrick walls from water damage and humidity and their absence must indicate a cultural choice which is difficult to explain. In the Jordan Valley, mudbrick walls with no stone foundations can be found in the Iron IIA/B Stratum VIII buildings at Tell Deir 'Alla (van der Kooij 1993: 341) and at Tell es-Sa'idiyeh Stratum XII (Tubb and Dorrell 1993: 58), which should be dated to Late Iron IIA (see below). Brick walls without stone foundations are known in Egypt, and appear in selected New Kingdom Egyptian-inspired structures in Canaan, such as at Deir el-Balah and, in a few cases, at Beth-Shean (Stratum Q-2; TBS I: 83-89), although other Egyptian structures at Beth-Shean, such as Building 1500, did have stone sockles. However, there is no justification to assume Egyptian architectural influence in Iron IIA at Tel Rehov, and there is no evidence for any foreign architectural tradition of this kind that could be a source of inspiration. Therefore, the introduction of this building technique and its persistence throughout all three Iron IIA strata remains unexplained.

Another exceptional and surprising feature was the use of wood foundations for walls and floors, a feature introduced in Stratum V and found in almost every building in Areas B, C and G. Narrow, round beams or branches were laid perpendicular to the brick walls at their foundation level (e.g., Area C: Figs. 12.29; 12.72; 12.74; 12.77; Photos 12.59-12.60; 12.77-12.78; 12.125; 12.128-12.129; 12.172). Sometimes, thicker beams were found incorporated in the wall foundation; in several cases, there was a gap of more than 20 cm between the lowest brick and the preserved beam, filled with charred material that appears to have been wood or some other organic material. In other places, the lowest brick course was laid directly above the wood. Often, these beams or branches were also placed below the beaten-earth floors (e.g., Area C: Figs. 12.30; 12.32; 12.37; 12.41-12.43; 12.45-12.46; Photos 12.33; 12.130; 12.141; 12.144; 12.146; Area G: Fig. 20.3; Photos 20.23; 20.26). Many of the wood samples were identified by N. Liphschitz (Chapter 52, Table 52.1); ca. 50% were identified as olive trees, while other species included Ficus sycomorus, Ulmus, Tamarix, Pistacia atlantica and a few others. Only few oaks were represented and pines and cypress were lacking. Most of the walls with wood foundations continued to be used in Stratum IV, but no wood was found in walls that were first built in that stratum, so that this unusual building technique was limited to Stratum V. No parallels are known in the Southern Levant and it seems to be a local invention, perhaps intended to provide flexibility to the walls during seismic events, creating a kind of shock absorber. This was perhaps a reaction to an earthquake which appears to be the reason for the severe damage causing the abandonment of the previous Stratum VI buildings.8

Bricks were made of local clays taken from the fields around the mound. In most cases, they were light brown-yellowish or, less frequently, they were composed of dark brown colluvial soil. Their sizes range from 45-60 cm in length (most common, 50 cm), 30-40 cm in width (most common, 35 cm) and 10-17 cm in height (Tables 12.28-12.30; Photo 4.1). An exceptional feature limited to certain structures of Stratum V (in particular, Buildings CF and CE in Area C) are bricks with two vertical flattened protrusions close to their ends on their broad external face, created by special depressions in the brick molds (Figs. 12.29, 12.63). They were perhaps intended to better adhere the plaster coating.

Most of the walls were one brick wide (ca. 50 cm); yet, double walls often appear, in particular when two buildings were adjoined, each with its own exterior wall (see plans of Strata V-IV in Areas B, C, E and G; Chapters 8, 12, 17 and 20 respectively). In several cases, a ca. 2 cm-thick plaster made of brown clay was preserved (e.g., in Building CF in Area C). It may be assumed that such plaster covered all the brick walls. In the exceptional Building CP in Area C, a whitish plaster was found on some of the walls, in particular near the entrance to the southern wing. In several places, roofing material comprising large lumps of clay with reed and wooden beam impressions was found, mainly in the destruction debris of Stratum IV (Photo 4.2).
Footnotes

8 During a visit to the site by Prof. D. Yankelevsky and other experts from the National Building Research Institute of the Technion, Haifa, this explanation was accepted as the most reasonable. They mentioned the current use of steel rolls in foundations of highly sensitive structures, such as nuclear reactors, as a device providing flexibility in the event of an earthquake.

Chronology

Introduction

The dates of the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov, as well as the other sites, depend upon a combination of relative dating based on comparative study of pottery assemblages in well-stratified regional contexts, and absolute dating based on radiometric data combined with historical considerations. In this section, the first two issues are discussed, while historical considerations will be surveyed in the following section.

Relative Chronology

Introduction

As explained above, there are two Iron IIA ceramic horizons at Tel Rehov:
  • Early Iron IIA (Stratum VI)
  • Late Iron IIA (Strata V-IV)
This formal division of the period was suggested by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006) and is followed here, although it raises some serious difficulties, as discussed above and below. As shown in Chapter 24, there is a great deal of continuity in many pottery forms between the three horizons:
  • Iron IB
  • Early Iron IIA
  • Late Iron IIA
Nevertheless, there are sufficient criteria to distinguish between these three assemblages, which are substantiated by a clear stratigraphic division (Table 4.2).

Early Iron IIA

Figures
Figures

  • Figure 4.1 - Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion

Stratum VI is attributed to Early Iron IIA, since it is preceded by Stratum VII of Iron IB and succeeded by Strata V-IV of Late Iron IIA. It yielded a relatively substantial pottery assemblage which, on the one hand, demonstrates many similarities with the preceding and subsequent assemblages but, on the other hand, has its own characteristics. The latter include the first appearance, mostly on serving vessels, of a relatively large amount of red slip, often hand burnished. Painted decoration is mainly limited to horizontal straight and wavy red bands in the style known at Tel Rehov in the Iron IB; most of the Canaanite-like motifs appear on small sherds, so it is difficult to say to what extent these are residual. Hippo jars appear for the first time, but are still rare. Imported Phoenician pottery includes several Bichrome sherds, and a small amount of imported Cypriot pottery includes White Painted and Bichrome sherds, but no Black-on-Red, aside from one small and ambivalent sherd in Stratum C-2.

The northern ceramic assemblages assigned by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2004; 2006) to their Early Iron IIA horizon are (references updated):
  • Beth-Shean Stratum S-lb (TBS I: Pls. 6—8)
  • Megiddo Stratum VB (Arie 2013)
  • Jezreel pre-enclosure fills (Zimhoni 1997: 29-56)
  • Taanach Period IIA (Rast 1978: Figs.18-29)
  • Yoqne'am Strata XVI-XV (Ben Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg and Cohen-Anidjar 2005: 108-112, Figs. I.36-I.38)
  • Horbat Rosh Zayit Stratum III (Gal and Alexandre 2000: 30-33)
  • Tell el-Farah North Stratum VIIa (Chambon 1984: Pls. 45-60)
  • Dor Phase Ir1|2A (Phases 7a-b, 6b-c in Area G) (Gilboa and Sharon 2003: 21-22, Figs. 10-11; Gilboa 2018: Pls. 20:49, 20.56-20.64)
To these contexts, I would add
  • Hazor X-IX (?)
  • Tell el-Hammah, lower phase (attributed to Iron Age I, yet the few published pottery items [Cahill 2006: 436, Fig. 4] can fit Tel Rehov VI)
Tell Abu al-Kharaz Phase X in Trench XI, Area 3 may fit this period (Fischer 2013: 104-108, Figs. 99-101), yet the pottery attributed to Phase X in Area 9 East appears to be late Iron Age I (Fischer 2013: 354-362, Figs. 361-368). The small amount of published pottery from the Tell el-Mazar "sanctuary" may belong to this period as well (Yassine 1984).

Several caveats to this list must be noted. The first is that all the contexts mentioned above (except Dor and, to some extent, Tell Abu al-Kharaz) yielded very small quantities of pottery, mainly sherds, and most of them are not sufficiently distinctive to be compared to our Stratum VI assemblage. In addition, the great degree of continuity between these assemblages and the following Late Iron IIA renders it difficult to distinguish between these two sub-periods. For example, at Jezreel, the pottery from the pre-enclosure fills cannot be distinguished from that found in the enclosure's destruction layer (Zimhoni 1997). At Megiddo, the pottery from Stratum VB is very similar to that of VA-IVB (Zimhoni 1997; Arie 2013) and the same may be said concerning Taanach IIA and IIB. Regional differences should also be taken into account. For example, the correlation between the pottery from Hazor Strata X-IX (Ben-Tor and Ben-Ami 1998; 2012) and our Stratum VI cannot be established with confidence, perhaps due to such regional differences and the strong Canaanite traditions which are present at Tel Rehov, but missing at Hazor. To conclude, Tel Rehov VI provides the largest pottery assemblage that can be attributed to the Early Iron IIA in northern Israel, along with Dor for the northern coastal plain. Yet, even at Tel Rehov, the continuity of many forms from Iron IB to Early Iron IIA, and from the latter to Late Iron IIA, make precise divisions difficult in many cases.

Late Iron IIA

Figures
Figures

  • Figure 4.1 - Map of major archaeological and historical sites in central and northern Israel and Jordan from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)

Discussion

The large amount of pottery from Strata V-IV (with very little distinction between the two), discussed in Chapter 24, can be attributed to Late Iron IIA, as defined by Herzog and Avitz-Singer (2006; see also surveys in TBS I: 320-323; APIN-IH: 135-188). The following contexts can be assigned to this phase:
  • Tel Beth-Shean Strata S-la and P-10-P-9 (TBS I: 313-384; Plates 6-16)
  • Tell el-Hammah two upper phases (Cahill 2006: Figs. 6-11)
  • Tel 'Amal Strata III-IV (Levi and Edelstein 1972)
  • the Jezreel 7enclosure (Zimhoni 1997: 13-28, 39-53, Figs. 1.2-1.10; 2.5-2.12)
  • Megiddo VA-IVB (Finkelstein, Zimhoni and Kafri 2000; Arie 2013)
  • Yoqne'am XIV (Ben Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg and Cohen-Anidjar 2005: Figs. I.50-I.52)
  • Taanach Period IIB (Rast 1978: Figs. 30-69)
  • Tell el-Far'ah North Stratum VIIb (Chambon 1984: 53-72, Pls. 45-62)
  • Hazor X—IX(?), VIII (although see comments above and below)
  • Horbat Rosh Zayit Strata IIa-Ilb (Gal and Alexandre 2000: 34-122)
  • Dor Phase Ir2a (Phase 6a in Area G; Gilboa and Sharon 2003: 23-24, Figs. 12-13; Gilboa 2018: Pls. 20.6-20.67)
  • Tell Abu Hawam Stratum III (Hamilton 1935)
  • Tell Keisan Strata 8?-6 (Briend and Humbert 1980: Pls. 48-56)
  • Tell Abu al-Kharaz Phases XI-XII (Fischer 2013)20
Most of these contexts yielded rich pottery assemblages which can be compared to the Tel Rehov Strata V-IV assemblage, yet it should be stressed that the more distant the site, the more disparate the assemblages tend to be. Thus, coastal sites like Dor, Tell Abu Hawam and Tell Keisan show strong Phoenician influence; Hazor X—VIII and Samaria are less similar to Tel Rehov than sites in the Beth-Shean and Jezreel Valleys (including Taanach IIB). The close similarity of our assemblages to Horbat Rosh Zayit, mentioned earlier, is exceptional and must be explained in light of special relations between these two sites
Footnotes

20 Finkelstein (2013: 7-8, Table 1; 2017: 186) suggested to further divide the Late Iron IIA into two sub-phases - Late Iron IIA1 and Late Iron IIA2 (the latter called also "terminal Iron IIA"). I cannot see any stratigraphic or ceramic proof either for this subdivision or for the late date (ca. 760 BCE) suggested by him for the end of this period. It seems that the motivation behind this suggestion is to justify the idea that Hazor Stratum VIII was an Aramean city built by Hazael, yet I see no reason to refute the excavators' attribution of Stratum VIII to the days of Ahab.

Absolute Chronology and the Radiometric Evidence

The absolute chronology of the Iron IIA strata is a subject of ongoing debate, based on radiometric dates and historical considerations, although it seems that by now, agreement has been reached on some major issues. The original Low Chronology date of the beginning of Iron IIA strata to ca. 900 BCE proved to be wrong, based on radiocarbon dating. On the other hand, the extension of Iron IIA into the 9th century is certainly correct, as it is anchored in the evidence from Jezreel, where the royal enclosure cannot predate Ahab [r. c. 871 - c. 852 BCE]. According to the modified chronology which I have suggested since 2003, Iron IIA started during the first half of the 10th century BCE and continued until sometime in the second half of the 9th century (Table 4.3). This approach was basically backed up by numerous radiocarbon dates, although there are different views concerning the precise time span and absolute dates of each of the two Iron IIA phases (for summaries and earlier literature, see Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011b).

Table 4.3

Three chronological systems for Iron IB-IIB

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)


The radiocarbon data from the Iron IIA strata at Tel Rehov is based on 27 short-lived samples, most of them measured several times, so that a total of 110 dates are available (Chapter 48, Table 48.4; partly published earlier in Mazar et al. 2005). This is the largest number of dates from a single site in this period. Several difficulties should be noted (see discussion in Chapter 48):
  1. The stratigraphic affiliation of several samples to specific phase of the Iron IIA is questionable: in particular, Samples R21—R23 from Area D and Samples R31—R34 from Area C, which could be either Stratum V or IV
  2. There are a few outliers (all Sample 27 and one determination in R36)
  3. Occasionally, samples from the same context or stratum yielded considerably different dates, which would provide too wide a range for our required resolution of less than half a century.
A Bayesian model was first presented in 2005, based on the data available at that time (Bruins et al. 2005) and new models (one for Areas C and D and another for Area B) are presented in Chapter 48. The main results of these models are presented here in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4

Results of a Bayesian model for secure dates from Areas C+D and B in lσ and 2σ CalBC showing dates for Strata VI-IV (not including unmodeled dates from Area E) - for details see Chapter 48

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1)


The model for Areas C and D (in which most of the samples are included) resulted in the condensation of Strata VI, V and IV into a time frame of maximum 73 years between 936 (uppermost possible date) and 863 (lowest possible date) and minimum seven years (911-904 CalBC) in 1σ, while the 2σ, dates provide a longer maximal range of 145 years for this time span (and minimal -4 years!). The results in the 1σ range are much too short a time slot for three strata with several sub-phases and clear changes in the pottery assemblage between Stratum VI and Strata V-IV. The Bayesian model from Area B (from the end of Stratum VI to the end of Stratum IV) provided a wider range. It should also be recalled that the models provide considerable time spans for each of the transitions between strata, much wider than we would expect for the close dating of less than half a century that we seek for this period. Furthermore, one sample measured several times from Area E provided unmodeled calibrated dates in the late 9th century BCE which are much lower compared to both the unmodeled and modeled dates from the other areas. It appears that the more samples are measured, the problems involved in their interpretation become more complex.

Since the subject is discussed in detail in Chapter 48, I emphasize here only a few notable points. At the outset it should be noted that in the discussion of Iron Age chronology, where we expect restricted resolutions of less than half a century, it became common to cite only or mainly the 1σ CalBC dates (68% probability), and so I did as well in most cases. Yet, it should be recalled that the 2σ dates (95% probability) provide wider ranges and should be taken into consideration as well. Indeed, quite a few discussions of radiocarbon dates in archaeology refer only to the 2σ dates. In such narrow time slots as those involved in the Iron Age chronological debate, the possibilities provided by the 2σ range are sometimes crucial.

Another problem is the relationship between unmodeled and modeled dates. Unmodeled dates from Stratum VI cover most of the 10th century BCE, while the Bayesian model for Areas C+D provide, in my opinion, too short a time span for this stratum, which has in several locations two stratigraphic phases and yielded a pottery assemblage that differs somewhat from the previous and later strata. This result may have been caused by the constraint resulting from the over 100-years span provided by the Bayesian model for Stratum D-3 (see above in the discussion of Iron IB dates). I therefore suggest a much shorter time span for Stratum D-3 and a longer one for Stratum VI, supported by the unmodeled calibrated dates, and conclude that the beginning of Stratum VI could occur during the first half of the 10th century. Taking into consideration the dates of the following Stratum V, the end of Stratum VI should be dated to somewhere in the last quarter of the 10th century.

The date of Stratum V is based on five samples from secure contexts in Area C and one from Area B (a total of 24 repetitions).21 It appears that the last two decades of the 10th century and the beginning of the 9th century BCE are the most reasonable dates for this stratum.

The destruction of Stratum IV is dated by three samples from Area C and two from Area B (a total of 17 repetitions) (Samples R35-R41). The dates are partly in the 10th century and mostly in the 9th century; some reach the second half of the 9th century BCE. The Bayesian model for Areas C+D would end this stratum no later than 863 (1σ) and 817 (2σ) CalBC, while the model for Area B provides lower dates: 833 (161σ) and 822 (1σ) CalBC. In Area E, one of two samples from loci attributed to the early phase of the courtyard (E-lb, probably corresponding with Stratum V), measured several times, provided the exceptionally low date of 832-810 (unmodeled).

My suggested date of 840/830 BCE for the destruction of Stratum IV is based on attribution of this destruction to Hazael (see below). As can be seen in Table 4.4, this date is lower by 23-33 years than the lowest date in the 1σ model for the end of Stratum IV in Area C (863 CalBC), but can fit the lowest as date from Area C (812 BCE), the lowest 2σ and as dates from Area B (838, 822 BCE) and many of the unmodeled lowest dates from Areas B, C and E in the 1σ and 2σ ranges.

Radiocarbon dates from Iron IIA strata at other sites in northern Israel were widely discussed in recent years (e.g., Sharon et al. 2007; Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2008; Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2009; 2010; 2011; Lee, Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2013). However, in many cases, the number of measurements from a single site is insufficient, and often they provide a wide range of dates in the 10th to 9th centuries. An example is Megiddo, where only eight samples with eleven repetitions were measured from Iron IIA strata: one from Stratum H-7 (a middle phase of Stratum VB) with a CalBC 1σ date of 1000-920, three from Stratum H-5 which corresponds to general Stratum VA-IVB, two of them (RTT3948 and RTK 6429) provided dates that cover the entire 9th century BCE and the third (RTT 3949) provided a date in the 10th century (1005-930 CaIBC) (Toffolo et al. 2014: 235).22 Four additional dates were published from Stratum Q-5, a Late Iron IIA context which is phased by the excavators between Stratum VB and VA-IVB; the calibrated dates are 1050-940, 980-895, 1000-920 and 895-830 BCE (1σ) and a (yet unpublished) Bayesian model is cited as providing a date of ca. 900 BCE (Kleiman et al. 2019: 547 and Table 7). This is just one example of the potential inconsistencies in the results of 14C dating, in particular when only a few dates are available. Bayesian models are used in order to limit these wide ranges; yet, the unmodeled dates should be taken into account when weighing the results of Bayesian models, specially in cases when the models include data from many sites. The radiometric evidence is certainly important, but has its limitations when it comes down to subtle dating at a resolution of less than 50 years.

I end this section with the words of Walter Kutchera, the former director of the radiometric laboratory in the University of Vienna:
I am convinced that 14C is the most wonderful tool for archaeology, when its inherent uncertainty is properly respected. Unfortunately, pushing its use beyond these limitations puts "oil into the fire" of those who mistrust the 14C method altogether .....23
These words are very true when we deal with Iron Age chronology, particularly in the 10th-9th centuries BCE.
Footnotes

21 As mentioned above, Samples R31-R34 from Locus 2425 in Building CG are excluded from this discussion, although it seems more viable that this context should be attributed to Stratum V. See discussion in Chapter 48.

22 Note that Tofollo et al. 2014 omit sample 3949 in their tables. It does appear, however in Gilboa, Sharon and Boaretto 2013.

23 Sent to me via an e-mail correspondence in 2008.

Historical Considerations

Introduction

In the following, I will survey some of the historical questions related to the 10th-9th centuries BCE that are relevant for the results of the Tel Rehov excavations (see also Mazar 2016a). It should be recalled that the city is mentioned in only one written source from these centuries: the Sheshonq I list (see Chapter 3). In this section, I will use the assumed ancient name Rehob.

Ethnic Identity and Geo-Political Status

Who were the people who inhabited the large and opulent city of Rehob and what was its geo-political status in Iron Age IIA?

A longue durée perspective shows that the Canaanite city Rehob continued to survive without a major gap or devastating event throughout the Late Bronze and Iron Age I, for about 500 years. During the ca. 150 year-long duration of the Iron IIA, the same city continued to develop with changes in the material culture, but with no actual crisis between Iron I and Iron IIA, and with a significant continuity of the material culture throughout the three Iron IIA strata. Canaanite cultural continuity during Iron IIA is demonstrated in a number of features: continuity in selected architectural plans (in the case of Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, see above), the lack of "four room houses" or pillared buildings which are a hallmark of Israelite sites, continuity of certain ceramic traditions (forms and occasional painted decoration), cult objects, figurines and seals that are rooted in Canaanite/Phoenician traditions, the limited consumption of pig bones (mainly hunted boars) which indicates a departure from strict Israelite religious practices (if indeed they were practiced elsewhere in Israel in this period). The few private names known from the Tel Rehov inscriptions include the Canaanite theophoric component El, but not a Yahwistic component. The name Nimshi could be from a local Canaanite root. However, Jehu is certainly a Yahwistic name, and if indeed he came from this city as I suggest, it would mean that he was born with or adopted an Israelite theophoric name. It should also be emphasized that paleographic studies of the inscriptions show that those of Stratum IV can be defined as written in Hebrew script.

It thus may be assumed that many of the Iron IIA inhabitants were descendants of indigenous local Canaanite families who lived in this city for generations (Mazar 2016a; 2016b; Arie 2017). Their self-identity must have revolved around the city and its local families and traditions. There is no doubt that during this period (either Stratum VI or V), the city became part of the geo-political entity of Israel (see below). However, we must differentiate between geo-political status and ethnic identity; even when the city became part of the northern Kingdom of Israel, it may be conjectured that the main bulk of the population continued to be the descendants of indigenous Canaanite families (cf., Judg 1:27). It may be assumed that once the city became part of the Israelite kingdom, certain Israelite families from the hill country settled in the city alongside the locals and that Israelite religious beliefs and ideology were slowly accepted by the local population, probably encouraged by the central political institutions of the kingdom. This dichotomy between the indigenous Canaanite population in the northern valleys and the Israelite hill-country population was addressed in the past by a number of studies and is fundamental for the understanding the social makeup of the northern Kingdom of Israel. Faust (2000; 2012: Chapter 8) addressed this issue manly in relation to the rural sector, but his conclusions are also appropriate for an urban society like that of Rehob.

Rehob in the 10th Century BCE: An Independent City or Part of the Assumed United Monarchy?

What was the geo-political status of Rehob and its vicinity (including Beth-Shean) in the 10th century BCE? The question of the historicity of the biblical concept of a United Monarchy during the 10th century BCE is one of the most debated issues regarding biblical history during the last generation, and this is not the place for a detailed discussion of this issue. Some scholars maintain the biblical concept as valid (e.g., Millard and Dever in Handy 1997; Ben-Tor 2000; Stager 2003; Dietrich 2007; Blum 2010; Faust 2010; Lemaire 2010), while many others either negate the historicity of such a kingdom altogether or diminish its territory to Jerusalem and its close vicinity (e.g., Finkelstein 1996,2010 and many other publications; Na'aman, Knauf, Niemann, Lemche in Handy 1997; Grabbe 2007: 111-115; Frevel 2016: 108-148; Garfinkel, Kreimerman and Zilberg 2016: 225-232; Sergi 2017; for a recent survey and earlier literature, see Na'aman 2019). Still others attempt to find middle ground (e.g., Miller in Handy 1997).

In several past articles (Mazar 2007a: 164-166; 2010: 51-52; 2014), I claimed that the biblical concept of a "United Monarchy", although ensconced in a deep literary, theological and ideological wrapping, may very well reflect a historical-political construct that emerged from the political vacuum created in large parts of the Land of Israel with the destruction at ca. 1000 BCE of the few Iron Age I Canaanite cities which survived the collapse at the end of the Late Bronze Age (such as Megiddo, Yoqnecam, Tell Keisan). During the 10th century BCE, the coastal plain and the lower Shephelah were under the domination of Philistine and Phoenician city states, while other parts of the country may have undergone severe political changes. At such a time of instability and social change, a charismatic local leader like David, even if emerging from a peripheral hilly region like Bethlehem, may have possessed political abilities that could have led to tribal alliances and economic treaties and may have succeeded in uniting the inner parts of the country under his control. The monumental architecture in Jerusalem may support such a concept. His kingdom should perhaps be understood as a short-lived tribal alliance, lacking a centralized administration and hierarchical society, yet having an impact on extensive territories. The historical Solomon is even more vague due to the literary/legendary nature of the biblical narrative, and only a few verses may have retained some historical information, perhaps those referring to his building operations (I Kgs 9:17-18). Ultimately, there are extremely contradictory views on this subject and it remains debated.

If such a concept of a "United Monarchy" is accepted as having some historical validity, it would mean that the large and densely built 10th century BCE city of Rehob was subordinate in some way to Jerusalem. If, however, there was no United Monarchy that ruled the northern part of the country, it would mean that Rehob Stratum VI continued to be an independent Canaanite city state, unrelated to any other known political unit of the time. If the latter possibility is correct, Rehob would be the only inland independent city with a highly developed urban culture in the 10th century BCE (not including the Philistine and Phoenician cities along the coast and in the lower Shephelah). The recently excavated intense Iron I and Iron IIA occupation sequence at Tel Abel Beth Maacah in the upper Galilee might be another example of an inland site with such urban continuity, although in a more northern region (Yahalom-Mack, Panitz-Cohen and Mullins 2018).

The Impact of Sheshonq's (Shishak) Invasion

Rehob, in Sheshonq I's list mentioned aside Beth-Shean, can safely be identified with Tel Rehov (Chapter 3). The precise date of the raid is unknown and depends on two debated factors: the accession year of Sheshonq I and the time of the raid within his 21-year reign. The accession year is calculated by most scholars to ca. 945/940 BCE (e.g., Kitchen 2000: 50; Shortland 2005); a lower date ca. 934/929 was suggested by Ben-Dor Evian (2011), who also suggested that the raid occurred early in his reign, while most other scholars attribute it to the last years of his reign. All in all, the raid probably occurred between ca. 930 and 915 BCE.24 Assessments of the impact of Sheshonq's raid vary (Helck 1971: 240; Na'aman 1998; 2007: 404-405; Rainey and Notley 2006: 186; Finkelstein 2013: 41-48). Traditionally, scholars tended to attribute destruction layers to this raid, assuming that the Egyptian army destroyed the places mentioned in the Karnak list. However, as first suggested by Na'aman, this assumption should not be taken for granted and it must be taken into account that toponyms are mentioned in the list just because they surrendered to the Egyptian army during the raid or since the Egyptian army passed through them or ruled them for a while without causing destruction. The inclusion of a toponym in this list means only that the place existed during Sheshonq's raid and was known to the Egyptians.

In earlier papers (Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar 2003a; 2003b), we attributed the destruction of Stratum V to Sheshonq I. But later excavation seasons have shown that the heavy destruction referred to in these papers was a local feature limited to the central part of Area C (the apiary, Buildings CH, CG, CF and CE), while buildings to the east and west, as well as Stratum V structures in other excavation areas, did not suffer a destruction and continued to be in use in Stratum IV. A paleomagnetic study pointed to the possibility that the local destruction and burning in Area C was result of an earthquake. As we have seen, there is no evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum VI. Thus, we are left with no destruction level that can be attributed to Sheshonq. I thus conclude that the mentioning of the city in his topographic list means only that he passed through it or overtook it for a while on his way from the Central Jordan Valley towards the Jezreel Valley. Based on the 14C dates from Stratum VI and some of those from Stratum V it appears that the raid may be correlated with the late years of Stratum VI or the beginning of Stratum V.
Footnotes

24 The date ca. 915 BCE would fit the accession date as suggested by Ben-Dor Evian and the attribution of the raid to the late years of Sheshonq as suggested by most scholars; however, the precise date of the raid remains unknown.

When Did Rehob Become Part of the Northern Kingdom of Israel?

The question when did Rehob become part of the northern Kingdom of Israel is somewhat controversial (Mazar 2016a: 98-100). Arie (2017: 14-15) emphasized the unique components at Tel Rehov and its dissimilarity to what he termed "regular" Israelite traits, and suggested that Rehob was a local Canaanite city-state until the end of Stratum V and was annexed to Israel only in Stratum IV, during the Omride era [~876-~842 BCE] and after the foundation of Jezreel.25 Finkelstein went even further and suggested that both Strata V and IV were non-Israelite, Rehob being a local "late-Canaanean city state at the southwestern edge of the Aramean culture sphere of influence" (2017: 181; for an earlier version, see 2013: 120-122). Based on a Bayesian model of 14C dates published before 2005, he dated the destruction of Stratum IV between 875-849 CalBC and suggested that both Strata V and IV were destroyed by Omride assaults. In my view, both these suggestions are unacceptable. Arie's distinction between Strata V and IV as pre-Israelite versus Israelite contradicts the identical material culture in both these strata. As said, the destruction at the end of Stratum V is limited to part of Area C, while in all the other excavated areas, no such destruction was observed and the city of Stratum V appears to have been continuously developed with some architectural changes in the following Stratum IV. In fact, these two strata comprise two phases in the life of the same city. Finkelstein's statement that "the material culture of Tel Rehov differs from that of the Israelite centers in the Jezreel Valley - for instance Megiddo - in almost every respect" (2017: 180) cannot be accepted. Although there are exceptional traits in the local material culture of Tel Rehov compared to other Israelite sites (such as the building techniques and house plans) there are also many similarities, for example, in the pottery assemblage (cf., Tell el-Far'ah North, Jezreel, Megiddo and Horbat Rosh Zayit), clay figurines, seals, pottery altars ("cult stands"), and other material-culture components. In addition, similarity to Megiddo can be found in the fact that both cities lacked a city wall in Iron IIA and in the resemblance between Building CF at Tel Rehov and Building 2081 at Megiddo, as explained above. In contrast to Finkelstein, I cannot discern any Aramean components at Tel Rehov. The claim that such components exist in the inscriptions is unfounded, except perhaps in the case of the component sqy in inscription No. 5 (Chapter 29A). In my view, both Strata V and IV represent a city that was under the hegemony of the northern Kingdom of Israel right from its inception.

Although being part of the Israelite kingdom, it seems that Rehob retained its independent nature and indigenous population throughout this period, until the destruction of Stratum IV. The city is probably not mentioned in the bible, in spite of suggestions to the contrary, referring to 2 Sam. 10:6-8 (Finkelstein) and 2 Sam 21:12 (Kadary) (see Chapter 3). Since Rehob was certainly one of the largest and most prosperous cities of the kingdom, this is an example of the lacunae and selectivity in the biblical narrative as it has come down to us (cf., the fact that Ahab's participation in the battle of Qarqar [853 BCE] is not mentioned in the biblical narrative).

The radiometric dates indicate that Stratum V was founded in the early years of the northern Kingdom of Israel. If we accept as historical the biblical reference to Tirzah (Tell el-Far'ah North) as the capital of the kingdom before the foundation of Samaria, the most reasonable archaeological level that would fit this status is Stratum VIIb (see above in the section on northern Samaria). Indeed, the pottery assemblage and other finds from that stratum resemble the material culture of Tel Rehov Strata V-IV. The outstanding apiary in Stratum V must have been operating in these early days of the kingdom, probably before the rise of the Omride dynasty [~876-~842 BCE].

Nimshi and Elisha

The appearance of the name nms (Nimshi) in two inscriptions from Tel Rehov, in both Strata V and IV, as well as on a jar from Tel 'Amal, led me to suggest that the prosperous Iron Age IIA city Rehob was the hometown of the Nimshi family (Mazar 2016a: 110). This was perhaps a strong and powerful family or clan who might have owned a large portion of the city's resources, including the apiary of Stratum V, in which one of the jars with this family name was found. Perhaps this was one of the indigenous families, rooted in the local Canaanite population, as described above. Nimshi is mentioned in the Bible as the father or grandfather of Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], whose rise to power brought about the fall of the Omride dynasty in 842 BCE (1 Kgs 19:16; 2 Kgs 9:2, 14, 20). Thus Jehu must have belonged to the Nimshi family, and perhaps he was born and raised at Rehob. His coup and the establishment of a new dynasty which ruled northern Israel for almost 100 years may be understood as a shift of power in the kingdom from the Omride dynasty which originated in the Samaria hills to the local descendants of Canaanite families in the northern valleys.

The reading of [']lys' as the biblical name Elisha, written in large letters with red ink on a well worked pottery sherd found in the northwestern chamber of Building CP in Stratum IV, although a reconstruction, is intriguing (see details in Chapter 29A, No 9). However, although this reading is not conclusive, we cannot suggest an alternative.26 Although the name Elisha is known from several 8th-7th centuries BCE inscriptions and seals, this is the only example in a 9th century context, and one has to ask whether there might be a relationship between this ostracon and the "man of God" who stands in the center of the Elisha cycle (2 Kgs 2-13) (Mazar 2016a: 112-114; Ahituv and Mazar 2016: 223-225)? A straightforward identification of the name on the ostracon with the biblical figure may sound unlikely and naïve, but we have to consider the exceptional context and date. Building CP in which the ostracon was found is outstanding by all means, as explained above in this chapter. The ostracon was found in a small chamber with benches and two entrances, with an elaborate pottery altar set at the exterior of each entrance. Several additional cult objects were found in nearby rooms, including a ceremonial stand, a fragment of a third pottery altar, a complete incense burner with a lid, and a mold for producing figurines of naked females, identical to those found on the facades of a pottery altar in a nearby building (CF). Bone astragali and the unusual predominance of the right limbs of animals also point to religious activity in this building. The unique plan of the building, with two major wings connected through the small northwestern chamber, enabled mobility from one wing to the other through this chamber. An unusually large number of pottery vessels found in the building, including many bowls and cooking pots, as well as benches along the walls and two unique pottery silos, are evidence for public meals, perhaps banquets intended to feed a considerable number of people. This exceptional planning and activity in Building CP would be in keeping with exceptional activity such as that related to Elisha: a "man of God" — a seer and healer, whom people would wish to approach and consult, while conducting rituals and participating in public feasts.

Although the Elisha stories are thought by biblical scholars to be literary creations (legenda) of the late Monarchic to post-Exilic eras (Rofe 1974; Ghantous 2013: 128-156; Oeming 2016, with previous literature), they nevertheless could preserve kernels of historical reality, rooted in the activity of an actual seer and healer with that name who was active during the second half of the 9th century BCE in this region (Na'aman 2000: 100-104; Lemaire 2014).27 The stories include many geographical and historical details which may be considered as rooted in genuine historical memory. The biblical narrative locates the birth town of Elisha at Abel Mehola, identified ca. 15 km southeast of Tel Rehov (Zertal 2005: 100-102; 175-179; Rainey and Notley 2006: 176) and thus, at the outset, he is related to the Beth-Shean Valley. According to this narrative, he was active during the reign of Ahab [r. c. 871 c. 852 BCE], Joram [r. c. 850 c. 840 BCE], Jehu [r. c. 841-814 BCE], Jehoahaz [r. c. 814 - c. 798 BCE] and Joash [r. c. 798 - c. 782 BCE]. However, this appears to be much too long a time range and therefore, scholars have suggested to limit this activity to a shorter span.28 The early years of his career would be contemporary with his relationship to Jehu and involvement in his anointment, perhaps shortly before the city was put to the torch by Hazael sometime between 840-830 BCE (see below).

Seers, healers, and "men of God" are known in many ancient and modern traditional societies. Historical Elisha may have been such a figure, whose outstanding personality and activity left an indelible impression, generating memories that later served as the basis for the "Elisha cycle" in the Book of Kings. Although a straightforward identification of a biblical figure in the archaeological record is always dubious, the data provided above allow us, at the very least, to raise the possibility, with all due reservation, of a possible connection between the name on the ostracon and the biblical figure of Elisha. If this hypothesis is correct, Building CP would have been the seat of Elisha for a period of time during his early career, when he was involved in the ascent to kingship of Jehu. This suggestion remains, of course, in the realm of speculation.
Footnotes

26 In addition to the views expressed in Chapter 29A, I should note the Ph.D. dissertation by H.D.D. Parker (2018) which reached me after the completion of Chapter 29A. She rejects our reading and reads the second letter as cayin rather than lamed (p. 191). However, this letter is open on its upper part, unlike the cayin at the end of the name, and probably had an extension beyond the fragment line, as explained in Chapter 29A. The reading cayin would make no sense.

27 See for example Ghantous (2013) who views the redaction of the Elisha-Elijah stories as having taken place in the 4th century BCE, but, unlike the Elijah stories that he considers late (i.e., 5th century BCE), "the Elisha tradition... originated in the eighth century and continued to evolve independently until the fifth century BCE" (p. 128).

28 Miller and Hayes (1986: 290) suggested that the stories relating to the early years of Elisha (2 Kg 2, 4:1-8:15) should be attributed to Jehu's reign rather than to that of Ahab and Jehoram, as the Bible puts it.

When and How Did the Destruction of Stratum IV Occur?

The destruction of Stratum IV marks a dramatic point in the history of the city. Evidence for fierce fire and severe devastation was found in all the excavation areas. People left their belongings in the houses and probably fled, or were deported, or slaughtered. In one case, a human skeleton may be attributed to this destruction layer in Area C (Chapter 46B). Following the destruction, the lower city was abandoned and only the upper mound was resettled in the following Iron IIB. It appears that this destruction resulted from a military conquest rather than an earthquake, though no direct evidence such as multiple arrowheads or sling stones were detected. The date of the destruction and the identity of the conqueror can be suggested on the basis of three parameters: pottery typology, historical considerations and radiocarbon dates.

The pottery assemblage from the destruction layer is typical Late Iron IIA, which may be dated to a time range from the late 10th century until somewhere in the last third of the 9th century BCE (see Chapter 24 and the chronological discussion above).

A number of historical events should be taken into consideration as possible causes for this event. Finkelstein's suggestion that Rehov Stratum IV was destroyed by Ahab was rejected in the discussion above. Aramean attacks during the first half of the 9th century BCE can hardly be accounted for; the Ben Hadad I raid on the northern part of the kingdom, if it really occurred, is too early for the end of Stratum IV and, in any event, did not have an impact on the Beth-Shean Valley (Younger 2016: 571-580, with a review of earlier views). Wars between Ahab and Ben-Hadad (II?) (1 Kgs 20, 22) should be taken into account, since the Arameans are said to have arrived from the Jordan Valley (Succoth) probably through Wadi el-Far'ah, and laid siege to Samaria (1 Kgs 20). However, the historical reality behind these narratives is highly debated. M. Miller was the first to claim that since Ahab was a member of the anti-Assyrian coalition alongside Hadadezer (Assyrian Adad-Idri) of Damascus in the battle of Qarqar against Shalmaneser III (853 BCE), followed by three additional Assyrian raids to Syria, it makes no sense that the king of Damascus would fight Israel during the same time when they were allies (Miller and Hayes 1986: 262-264; 290, 300-302). He therefore suggested to date these biblical descriptions of clashes between Aram and Israel to the time of Jehu's successors. This view became popular in recent research, although a few historians believe that an Aramean attack on Israel could have occurred a few years prior to the battle of Qarqar (Aharoni 1979: 334-335; Rainey and Notely 2006: 199). Yamada and Na'aman claimed that there was one Aramean raid during the time of Ahab, although each of them accepted a different tradition in 1 Kgs (survey and references in Younger 2016: 580-591 and, in particular, 582, notes 124-126). I tend to accept the view that no Aramean attacks on Israel occurred during the reign of Ahab.

Another possibility is the Shalmaneser III raid on southern Syria in 841 BCE, described in several Assyrian sources, including the Marble Slab and the Black Obelisk (Younger 2016: 6 13-618, with references to earlier literature). This attack occurred close to Jehu's coup, which is dated by most scholars to 842 BCE and Jehu "of Bit Humri" is mentioned in both these Assyrian sources as surrendering to Shalmaneser. Since the inscriptions mention both the Hauran and the coast, scholars conjectured that the Assyrian army reached northern Israel, and some identified the geographical name Ba'li-Rasi mentioned in the text as Mt. Carmel (Aharoni 1979: 341; Miller and Hayes 1986: 287; Rainey and Notley 2006: 208; others suggested Ras en-Naqura or the vicinity of Nahr el-Kalb in Lebanon: Younger 2016: 616). In any event, the possibility that this hypothetical Assyrian invasion caused the destruction of Rehov Stratum IV remains very doubtful.

The most reasonable explanation for the destruction is, in my view, an Aramean attack during the time of Hazael. "Resilience, perseverance, drive, military prowess, ruthlessness — these are some of the traits no doubt possessed by Hazael that led to Damascene hegemony" (Younger 2016: 630). His bloody attacks on Israel are echoed in the bible (1 Kgs 19:17; 2 Kgs 8:12; Amos 1: 3-4). The Tel Dan inscription is commonly interpreted as relating that Hazael killed Joram son of Ahab and Ahaziah son of Jehoram king of Judah, in contrast to the biblical story of the assassination of these two kings by Jehu. In both cases, the events must be dated to ca. 842/841 BCE, following the battle of Ramot Gilead, after which Jehu of the Nimshi family came to power (Na'aman 2000: 100-104; Younger 2016: 606-620, with vast earlier literature). Between 841-837 BCE, Hazael was occupied with Assyrian attacks by Shalmaneser III. Yet, following 837 BCE, the Assyrians withdrew from Syria for a good number of years, and Hazael was able to build up his power and establish a regional empire (Younger 2016: 620-632). He ruled large parts of northern Transjordan and central and southern Syria, attacked Israel, conquered Gath, threatened Jerusalem and forced Jehoash of Judah to pay him tribute (2 Kgs 12:18-19). His domination continued until the time of Jehoahaz son of Jehu (2 Kgs 13:3-7). As mentioned above, several scholars have suggested that the Aramean wars attributed in I Kgs 20,22 to Ben Hadad during the time of Ahab were led, in fact, by Hazael during Jehu's reign or during the time of his successor Jehoahaz. The biblical stories regarding the conflicts with the Arameans are intertwined in the Elisha cycle, including the siege of Samaria (2 Kgs 5-7), the story of Elisha at the deathbed of Ben-Hadad, the rise of Hazael, and the prophecy of Elisha to Hazael concerning the devastation of Israel (2 Kgs 8: 7-15).

The suggested role of Tel Rehov as the home-town of the Nimshi family and of Jehu may explain the choice of this city as a target of a severe Aramean attack. Other reasons could be the status of the city as one of the largest and richest in the northern Kingdom of Israel, as well as its proximity to the Gilead, which was now dominated by the Arameans. Thus, the destruction may be explained as personal revenge and a threat against Jehu by Hazael. The total destruction by fire resembles the fierce destruction of Gath (Tell es-Safi) by Hazael, which probably occurred somewhat later (Maeir 2009; 2016).

When may Hazael have destroyed Rehob? One possibility is that the conquest occurred in the very beginning of his and Jehu's kingships, ca. 841-840 BCE, just after the battle of Ramoth Gilead. Another possibility is that it occurred during the years following 837 BCE, perhaps between 837¬830 BCE. These dates would fit the lowest range of the 14C dates presented earlier in this chapter (see the section on absolute chronology) and in Chapter 48.

The extent of the 9th century BCE destruction at Tel Rehov is unparalleled elsewhere in northern Israel; nowhere was such a violent and total destruction found, although less severe destructions which may be attributed to Hazael were found at Jezreel, parts of Megiddo Stratum VA-IVB, and perhaps Beth-Shean Stratum Upper V (=S-la, see above) (Kleiman 2016). Finkelstein (2016; followed by Kleiman 2016) suggested that Hazael caused the destruction of Hazor IX and Dan IVA; yet, in none of these places was evidence for a heavy destruction found. It should be noted that the excavators of both sites suggested higher dates in the 9th century BCE for the same strata and this issue remains unresolved, as does the question of Aramean presence at these sites (as well as at Abel Beth Maacah) during the reign of Hazael (Younger 2016: 624). As to Hazael's conquests in southern and perhaps central Israel, see recent surveys and suggestions by Maeir (2016), Kleiman (2016) and Younger (2016: 624-627); the latter dates the conquest of Gath and the tribute payed to Hazael by Jehoash king of Judah to ca. 810 BCE.

Chapter 12 - Area C: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Introduction

Plans and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Figure 12.1 - Site Plan with grid and excavation areas from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.1 - Aerial Photo showing Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Stratigraphic Table from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.1:XVII)

Discussion

Area C was located at the northwestern end of the lower city of Tel Rehov, which is the highest point of this part of the mound (Fig. 12.1; Photo 12.1). It was excavated with the purpose of clarifying the stratigraphic sequence and defining the nature of settlement in this part of the tell. ...

Stratigraphy

Four main strata were detected in Area C, termed from earliest to latest (Table 12.1):
  • C-3
  • C-2
  • C-1b
  • C-1a
Stratum C-4 was reached only in a very limited probe in Square Y/1 (Fig. 12.3). Stratum C-3 had two phases in one building and in a few cases, Strata C-2 and C-1b had more than one phase, detected mainly in open areas with multiple occupation layers. See Table 12.1 for the correlation between the local phases of Area C and the general tell strata, and suggested periodization; see further discussion in Chapter 4. See also the stratigraphic table at the beginning of this volume for the correlation with local strata in all other areas.

Table 12.1

Correlation of local Area C and general tell strata

Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)


The amount of continuity between the major strata (C-3–C-1) differed. Some walls of Stratum C-2 were built directly on those of C-3, while others were constructed according to a different plan altogether. Some buildings of Stratum C-2 were rebuilt in C-1b, while others went out of use. The greatest continuity took place between Strata C-1b and C-1a, which should be viewed, in fact, as two phases of the same occupation, although there were also several marked changes, mostly in the southeastern part of the area. Strata C-3 and C-2 each had a distinct brick type, while the bricks of Strata C-1b and C-1a were similar, although of varied materials (Tables 12.27–12.30).

The correlation between the destruction/construction events in a city that was constructed entirely of bricks turned out to be complicated task. Our stratigraphic division was based on the attempt to integrate local sequences in the various parts of the area into one comprehensive scheme. Although in each context we were able to establish clear stratigraphy, there remained open questions concerning the correlation between them, in particular due to a violent event at the end of Stratum C-1b, mostly in the southeastern part of the field (Squares Y–Z, A– B/20, 1–3). However, other parts of Area C with remains attributed to Stratum C-1b did not suffer such massive destruction. Following the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a, Area C, like the entire lower city, was entirely abandoned, and the architecture of this stratum was revealed just under modern topsoil.

Stratum C-2

Introduction

Plans
Plans

  • Fig. 12.7 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion

Stratum C-2 was dated to Early Iron Age IIA, the 10th century BCE (for more specific dating, see below and Chapters 4, 48). It marked the initial appearance of red-slipped and hand-burnished wares; Cypriot Black-on-Red ware that appeared in subsequent strata was lacking (Chapter 27). The Hippo storage jar made its first appearance in this stratum, although in small amounts and partially ambiguous from a typological point of view, made of the same type of clay common in subsequent strata (Chapter 24). Most of the pottery was fragmentary, aside from several complete vessels, including an assemblage from Locus 1555b in Square R/4 (Figs. 13.10–13.11; Photo 13.1) whose typological attributes and decoration recall Iron IB pottery, as discussed below.

One of the most distinct characteristics of this occupation phase was that almost all the walls were constructed with hard-packed yellow bricks, very different from the crumbly gray bricks of Stratum C-3 (Table 12.28). Most of the rooms were found full of complete fallen bricks of this type. This, and traces of damage in the walls, such as cracks and slippage, allude to seismic activity at some point, possibly the reason for the end of this stratum. Despite this damage, the walls of Stratum C-2 were, in most cases, well preserved, for example in Building CB, where they stood up to 18 courses, with two intact entrances.

Square R/4 — Room 1555

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.23 - Room 1555 at the beginning of excavation from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.24 - Damaged eastern face of Wall 1563 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.25 - Smashed vessels in Room 1555 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.9
  • Section: Fig. 12.97
  • Photos 12.23–12.25
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.10–13.11
Room 1555 in Square R/4 was ca. 2.6 m wide and at least 2.9 m long, bordered by Walls 1562 on the east, 4458 on the south and 1563 on the west; the northern wall was beyond the excavation limits (Photo 12.23). The southern wall (4458) was the western continuation of Wall 4438, the northern wall of Building CA (see below). The western wall (1563) was preserved to ten courses (Photo 12.24), although its eastern face was very damaged. All the walls, and particularly Wall 4458 on the south, were found tilted, apparently the result of seismic activity. The bottom of the western wall (1563) was reached on its western side at level 85.61 m, which is somewhat lower than the upper level of some of the Stratum D-3 pits in the adjacent Square Q/4 (see Chapter 15, Table 15.3). The bottom level of the southern wall (4458) was reached at 85.66 m; this wall continued to the west, where it was designated 1572. It was not clear whether the eastern wall (1562) continued down, as its lowest courses were very poorly preserved. Inside the room there were two layers. The upper one (1555a), sealed by Floor 4488 of Stratum C-1b, was a debris layer between levels 86.62– 85.92 m. The lower one (1555b) included a concentration of restorable pottery at levels 85.92–85.60 m (Fig. 12.97; Photo 12.25), although one large storage jar fragment was found 0.20 m lower than the rest of the pottery in the assemblage. No clear floor matrix could be defined here. The lowest level of this layer, with the single storage jar sherd, was resting just above a 0.10 m debris layer (11428) which covered Floor 11436 (level 85.30 m) and Pits 11439 and 11438, all assigned to Stratum C-3 (see above).

The 18 restored vessels from Locus 1555b (Figs. 13.10–13.11; photo on p. 270) were attributed to Room 1555 of Stratum C-2, based on the relation of the debris layer (1555a) and the top of the pottery layer (1555b) to the surrounding walls. As such, this would be the only case where an assemblage of restorable vessels could be attributed to Stratum C-2 and the only evidence for a sudden destruction at the end of this occupation level, although no traces of fire were found; the cause might have been an earthquake. Yet, there is a certain dilemma concerning this pottery group. Unlike much of the other pottery from Stratum C-2, the vessels lacked red slip and burnish, and several were painted in a style typical of the Iron IB pottery at Tel Rehov. Typologically as well, the vessels suit an Iron IB date, although most forms also continued into Early Iron IIA. These factors, as well as the fact that the main bulk of the pottery was found at level 85.60 m, which is somewhat lower than the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (general Stratum VII) in the adjacent Square Q/4, raised initial doubts as to the attribution of this locus. If this pottery was on a layer relating to the debris of Locus 1555a and abutting the bottom of the room’s walls, it must belong to Stratum C-2. However, the possibility remains that this pottery concentration should be attributed to Stratum C-3a, the last Iron IB phase, in which case the thin debris layer 11428 might have been the surface on which the assemblage rested. In that case, Floor 11436 and Pits 11438 and 11439 would be attributed to an earlier phase, denoted Stratum C-3b, corresponding to the lower pits of Stratum D-3; if so, then the pottery concentration preceded the walls of the room as defined above. This is not entirely impossible when considering the location of this pottery concentration in relation to the bottom of these walls (see section, Fig. 12.97). However, in that case, Room 1555 would remain without a floor, despite the good preservation of its walls. Another problem with this explanation is that floors attributed to Stratum C-2 east of Room 1555 (in Square S/4) are almost at the same level or even lower than the pottery in Locus 1555b. Ultimately, this unique assemblage was assigned to Stratum C-2, while acknowledging that the pottery types could be either Iron IB or Early Iron IIA, demonstrating the continuity between these two periods, as discussed in Chapter 24.

West of Square R/4, where the steep western slope of the mound started, was the border between Areas C and D. In Squares R–Q/4–5 of Area D, architectural elements attributed to Stratum D-2 continued until the erosion line down the slope, with no evidence for a defense line of any sort. These remains were contemporary with Stratum C-2 and thus, we concluded that the city had not been fortified at that time.

Building CA

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 (west) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.10 - Plan of Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.27 - Looking south at Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.28 - Looking south at Building CA in Stratum C-2 with a bulge in Wall 4439 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.29 - Room 4426 in Building CA in Stratum C-2 with burnt grain on the floor from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.30 - Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.9–12.10
  • Sections: Figs. 12.65–12.68
  • Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.27–12.30
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.13–13.14
Building CA

This was a rectangular building in Squares S–T/3–4 (external measurements 5.2×6.2 m). All of its walls were composed of hard yellow bricks and were very well preserved to a height of more than 1.0 m. No entrance to this building was located, suggesting that it had been entered from above. Its plan consisted of two small rooms on the west and two somewhat larger rooms on the east, and it might have served a storage function. It was constructed above a thin layer of fill (8408) that served to level the remains of Stratum C-3a Building CS below it.

The northern wall (4438) was preserved nine courses high on the west, but much less on the east, so much so that it was not clear whether there had been an entranceway here or whether the bricks were missing due to damage. Stratum C-1b Walls 1464 and 1524 superimposed it, but there was no C-3 wall below it; Wall 8503 adjoined it on the north. The western wall (4440), constructed right on top of Wall 8418 of Stratum C-3a (Photos 12.12– 12.13), was preserved 11–12 courses high; its width was unknown, since C-1b Wall 1523 covered its western face. The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo 12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses high and was poorly preserved, especially on the northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that the main damage to the building, whatever the cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6 m, although a thickening identified in its lower courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m. There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).

The two eastern rooms were similar to each other in size, as were the two western rooms. Their internal measurements were: Room 4429 in the northeast (2.0×2.4 m; 4.8 sq m), Room 4420 in the southeast (1.9×2.0 m; 3.8 sq m), Room 4426 in the southwest (1.3×2.0 m; 2.6 sq m) (Photo 12.29), and Room 4409 in the northwest (1.1×2.0 m; 2.2 sq m); the total floor space of this building was only 13.4 sq m. Two intersecting inner partition walls separated these rooms: east–west Wall 2509 and north– south Wall 2493, with its northern continuation, 4407. An entranceway in the eastern end of Wall 2509 joined the two eastern rooms, while an opening in Wall 2509, just to the west of its corner with Wall 2493, joined the two western rooms. However, it seems that at some point, this latter opening was blocked, as a brick course spanned its top. No entrance was found in Walls 2493 or 4407, leaving the eastern and western chambers inaccessible from each other; it is possible that the rooms were entered from above. Their small size, and the fact that some grain was found in the southwestern room, indicate the possibility that they were used for grain storage.

The rooms were found full of complete fallen yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash, and brown soil. There were relatively few finds, mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs. 13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426 (Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18), yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ) CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were made of beaten earth and for the most part, their level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible makeup.

The nature and function of this building remained unclear. There was no evidence for domestic activity or storage, such as cooking facilities, installations or storage jars. Perhaps it was related to grain storage, possibly with some administrative function. To some extent, this building recalls the eastern part of Building 200 in Hazor Strata X–IX (Hazor III–IV: Plans VIII–X), which was also comprised of a series of small chambers.

Wall 1506

A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3 m and was composed of the same hard yellow bricks as the other walls in this building, although here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses of its eastern face protruding; this might have been the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).

The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was not certain; it abutted the southern half of the poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA (4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where it was abutted by an open area in which cooking and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a retainer built to buttress the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b Building CD, terminated just at the point where the northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:

  1. Wall 1506 was built as a retaining wall to support the damaged southern end of the eastern wall of Building CA during some later phase of Stratum C-2, and was subsequently reused in Stratum C-1b, when the building was rebuilt
  2. Wall 1506 was constructed in Stratum C-1b as part of the renovation of Building CA as Building CD
It seems that the first option is preferable for the following reasons
  1. layers attributed to C-2 in the open area to the north and east of the wall abutted its lowest exposed courses
  2. there was an alternative entrance into Building CB, so the blockage of the northern entrance did not cancel this building
  3. it was built of yellow bricks typical only of Stratum C-2.
The end of Building CA was perhaps the result of an earthquake, as evidenced by the damaged and cracked state of the walls and the large amount of complete fallen bricks above the floors. Preservation was especially poor on the eastern side of the building. It is possible that earlier seismic damage ravaged the building during the course of its use and there was some evidence of attempts to repair and continue to use it, such as Wall 1506. However, the final event put the building out of use, to be leveled, deliberately filled-in, and rebuilt in Stratum C-1b (Building CD). The fact that the floors of the building were relatively empty of finds may suggest that it was abandoned before its final devastation.

Building CB

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 (west) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.10 - Plan of Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.30 - Buildings CA and CB in Stratum C-2 looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.31 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.32 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.33 - Wall 2505 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.34 - Central Hall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.35 - Split between northern walls 1442 and 1483 of Building CB - possibly due to an earthquake - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.36 - Lamp in niche of Wall 1483 - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.37 - Large Tumbled Stone in Building CB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.38 - Wall 2481 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.39 - Tilted Stratum C-1 Wall 2411 overlying Stratum C-2 Wall 5476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.9–12.10
  • Sections: Figs.12.65, 12.69, 12.77, 12.79
  • Photos 12.3–12.5, 12.8, 12.15–12.16, 12.30–12.39
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.15–13.18
Building CB in Squares S–Y/2–3 adjoined Building CA on the south, with the northern wall of the former built flush against the southern wall of the latter, creating a double wall. No connection was found between the two back-to-back units and they represented separate, contemporary buildings.
Room 1520 — The Central Hall

The major component of Building CB was a large, roughly rectangular space which underwent minor changes during the course of its existence (Figs. 12.9–12.10; Photo 12.30). This large room (1520) was perhaps a major living room or reception hall in a larger architectural complex, which continued to the east and perhaps, south.

The external measurements of this hall were 5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the northern wall) were constructed directly on top of the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3 Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG (Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were: 1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses; Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east (preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall, preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo 12.35); the western half was designated 1442 and the eastern half, 1483. An entrance in Wall 1483 was located 1.0 m to the west of its corner with Wall 2505. An intact oil lamp with soot on its nozzle was found in a niche in the eastern door jamb, one course below the top (Photo 12.36). This entrance led to the north, where an open area with cooking facilities was found in Squares T/3-4, although note that this opening was partially blocked on the north by Wall 1506, probably during a later phase of Stratum C-2, as described above. Wall 1483 continued to the east past its corner with Wall 2505 into Squares T–Y/3, where it was designated Wall 2481 (Photo 12.38). All four walls of Room 1520 were composed of hard yellow bricks, although note the gray bricks of the earlier C-3 wall incorporated into the lower courses of Wall 1470, as described above; several dark brown bricks joined these gray bricks in what might be a repair in the center of this wall (Photo 12.34).

The two entrances that accessed this hall from the east and the north were used concurrently. Both were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact (Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was subjected to some damage, particularly on its western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).

The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from 84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474, 2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these striations represented the accumulation of floors in this hall, although it was difficult to separate these thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels might have been a fill. Some layers contained large patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes, such as one long, rope-like configuration found lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers, most of which were sherds or fragments of small vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots, kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs. 13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking facilities were found here.

A large, roughly squared mizi limestone (0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south of the entranceway in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35, 12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we assume that the smooth bottom side had originally been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position of this large stone in front of the entranceway in Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this was not its original position and that it had tumbled over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location during the assumed earthquake that terminated this occupation phase.

Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5 m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks (1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake, either during the time it was still in use or some time after the building was abandoned.

Although it was considered that this room could have been a basement, this possibility was ruled out since there was no constructed element above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran beneath the later Building CG

East of the Central Hall

Excavation to the east of Wall 2505 exposed its eastern face with the entranceway. The top of the wall had been damaged and leveled when the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built (Photos 12.32–12.33), protruding 0.45 m to the east of the face of Wall 2505. The top of a yellow brick wall (4503) that cornered with Wall 2505 was revealed 1.0 m to the north of the entranceway; its eastern continuation was cut by the foundations of Building CG and only its southern face could be seen, as Wall 2429 of Stratum C-1b was built above it. This wall was preserved much lower than Wall 2505 due to the damage caused when the deep and massive wooden and brick foundations of Building CG were laid (see below). Thus, the only possible Stratum C-2 debris that could be isolated here was Locus 4500 to the south of Wall 4503.

Some 1.4 m to the north of Wall 4503 was Wall 2481, the eastern continuation of Wall 1442/1483, which was revealed in a small probe under the floor of Building CG (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38). The eastern part of a north–south wall (5476) was exposed 2.5 m to the east of Wall 2505, directly under the wooden foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 2411 (Photo 12.39), which had cut the top of Wall 5476 in a step-like manner, descending from north to south, so that it was preserved five courses high on the north and only two on the south. This appears to have been the eastern closing wall of a room bordered by Walls 2481 on the north, 2505 on the west, and 4503 on the south. A small area was excavated in this room (2469), although a floor was not reached (Figs. 12.77, 12.79). Still another north–south wall (5491) abutted Wall 5476 on the east, on the level of its lowest course (85.25 m); only one brick course of this wall was preserved, with an offset that protruded 0.35 m to the east, located just about on the same line as Wall 2481 to its west (Photo 12.39). Wall 5491 might have been a bench attached to Wall 5476 or a poorly preserved part of the unit uncovered in Squares Y/3–4 (see below).

Abutting the eastern face of Wall 5491 was a beaten-earth floor (5494; Fig. 12.79) that was bordered on the south by an east–west row of four flattopped stones, which may have been pillar bases (Photo 12.21). The floor and the stones were laid directly above Stratum C-3 Room 9441. All other remains of Stratum C-2 to the south of these stones were obliterated when Building CH and the apiary were constructed in Stratum C-1b. The northern border of this activity remained unknown, since it was covered by later Stratum C-2 architecture, described below.

Building CE

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.12 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.40 - Tilted C1-b Wall 2454 on top of C-2 Wall 6441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.41 - Building CE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.42 - fallen bricks and debris in Room 6464 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.43 - from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.12
  • Section: Figs. 12.62–12.64
  • Photos 12.40–12.43
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.22
Building CE

Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 was founded in Stratum C-2 and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Strata C-1b and C-1a. This is one of the few instances where more or less the same building continued in all three main strata. The unit was composed of a broad room on the south and rooms or open spaces, to its north (Fig. 12.12); the relationship between the two components was not clear, due to the partial exposure.

Room 6464

Three walls of this room, preserved to a height of 0.7–1.25 m and built of the typical hard yellow bricks of Stratum C-2, were revealed in Squares T– Y/4, directly below the later walls: 6441 on the east, 6460 on the south, and 6504 on the north (Photos 12.40–12.41). The western part of the room remained unexcavated and it seems that the entrance to the room had been on this side. An interesting feature of the eastern wall (6441) was the damage wrought by the builders of C-1b when they set the wooden foundations for their wall (2454) above it; they cut back the western face and the top of the earlier wall, whose original face protruded some 0.2 m to the west, three courses below the cut (Photo 12.40). In the corner of the southern and eastern walls was an offset that protruded 0.3 m into the room (Photo 12.42).

A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443) that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504) was floating above this floor, although a protruding course of bricks found just about on level with Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded a layer of sandy material with some brick debris (6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460.

Spaces to the North of Room 6464

Three spaces were attributed to this building in Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between them was found, due to overlying elements that remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43). Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.

The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5 was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1 Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east– west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).

The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433) and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south) and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall 6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship between these walls. At some later stage, east–west Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added, dividing the space into two; in the north were the upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).

Building CY

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.12 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.14 - Plan of Building CY, Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.58 - Building CY in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.59 - Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.60 - Closeup on Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.61 - brick collapse 10412 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.62 - Building CY from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.63 - Building CY from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.12, 12.14
  • Section: Figs. 12.55–12.56
  • Photos 12.58–12.63
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.34–13.37
Building CY

Part of a finely constructed building was excavated in the northeastern corner of Area C, in Squares A– C/5–6. It continued to the north, beyond the limit of the excavation area. Building CY covered a Stratum C-3 stone floor and installation (Fig. 12.6) and was sealed by Strata C-1a–b Building CW.

The external measurements of the building were 10.2 m from east to west and at least 6.3 m from north to south. It contained a central space, most probably a courtyard (7512), flanked on the west and east by rooms; the two southern rooms were exactly symmetric, but the northernmost room on the east differed from its equivalent on the west. The main entrance to the building was probably in the unexcavated area to the north and perhaps led directly into the central space.

The western wall (8457), preserved 1.0 m high, was superimposed by Wall 6408 of Strata C-1a–b. Its entire eastern face was exposed, and also the northern part of its western face, which served as the border of the assumed entrance corridor leading to Building CU; its southern part ran parallel to Wall 6520, the eastern wall of that building. The southern wall (7511), preserved 0.7 m high, was known only on its northern face, since it was covered by Wall 6444 of Building CW in Strata C-1a–b (Figs. 12.34, 12.56) which was not dismantled. The wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6444 were laid directly on top of Wall 7511 (Photos 12.22, 12.59–12.61). Wall 7511 was preserved at a tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of this wall was built of segments, with two vertical seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a mode of construction which might have been aimed at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake. Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which closed the building on the east.

Courtyard 7512

The central courtyard was 3.1 m wide and at least 5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig. 12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505) resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level 85.15–85.25 m. In the debris was a relatively large amount of red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well as red-painted pottery (Figs. 13.34–13.37) and sherds of a Late Philistine Decorated Ware (Ashdod Ware) vessel (Fig. 13.37:8). Two clay figurine fragments, one a human head and the other a horse head (Chapter 34, Nos. 22, 35), were found together in the eastern part of the space, to the north of Oven 8461. Near the figurines were two sherds with letters, one with an ayin and a yod in ink, and the other with an incised lamed (Fig. 13.37:2–3; Ahituv and Mazar 2014: 40–42; Chapter 29A, Nos. 1, 3). Elements on Floor 7512 included:

  1. Oven 8461, just north of the entrance into Room 8488, coated with sherds on the exterior

  2. a brick bin just north of the oven (unnumbered)

  3. a semi-circular clay bin (7514) attached to Wall 7506

  4. a large (1.0 m diameter, 0.86 m deep) round pit or silo (8452) dug from the floor, close to the center of the northern balk of Square B/6. It was lined with hard mud plaster and found full of small stones and eroded brick debris, but empty, other than a few small sherds.
An additional feature of Floor 7512 was a series of flat-topped stones (basalt and limestone) of different sizes placed along the walls surrounding the central space. Six nicely worked stones were found along the northern face of Wall 7511, four in its center, along with a complete brick just before the westernmost stone (Photo 12.61), and two in Room 8488 on the east. Three stones were found along the western wall (7506) of the central space, two of them flanking the entrance to Room 8470. Three stones were placed along the eastern side of the central space, two flanking the entrance to Space 8479 (Photo 12.62), and a third, smaller stone near the blocked entrance into Room 8487. Thus, the stones on the west and east flanked the entrances into the side rooms and were more or less antithetic. A similar line of three stones was found in Room 8470 in the western wing of this building. The position of these flattopped stones flush against the walls is curious and precludes their functionality as structural pillar bases. They could have been supports for jars or other objects, or perhaps served a ceremonial or decorative purpose. In the courtyard, they might have supported a wooden construction of some sort, perhaps a kind of temporary awning.

Under the courtyard floor was a shallow subfloor fill (10404) that abutted the floating level of the abovementioned stones. Below this was a layer of complete bricks (10412) of the same hard consistency and yellow color as those of the building itself, but that was clearly below the building’s floor (Photo 12.61).

The Western Wing — Rooms 6506 and 8470

Room 6506, the southern room, was bordered by Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506 on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square (2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellowearth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1 Building CW.

Room 8470, the northern room, was bordered on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner, leading from the central courtyard. A smooth yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three nicely worked limestones were set in a row along Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of dark organic material, similar to that in the southern room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW (Fig. 12.55).

The Eastern Wing — Rooms 8488, 8479 and 8487

Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room 6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458 on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m, was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14; Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not proceed down below the floor, it seems that this was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer above the floor (8466) included complete fallen yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34– 13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones, including horns.

North of Room 8488 was a narrow space (8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls 8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479 impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space was what looked like an intentional blockage on its western end that was composed of three parts (Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide), spanning the entrance from the central space, and preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m to their east was yet another apparent blockage (8485), although it was more typical of a regularly built wall in width, preserved five to six courses high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide. None of these rows of bricks bonded with either Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the south. No clear floor level was identified in this narrow space, although it was excavated down to the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material (phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this narrow space was a staircase leading to a second story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.

To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west. The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow row of bricks, identical to the westernmost blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor (8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper story.

Summary of Building CY

We have no way of knowing to what extent Building CY continued to the north. One possibility is that the northern outer wall was close to the excavation limit; in that case, the building had a central courtyard flanked by two rooms on the west and two rooms on the east. Another possibility is that the building was much larger and included additional rooms on each side of the courtyard. In any event, the entrance would have been from the north directly into the central courtyard. The flat stones along the walls of the courtyard and the narrow corridor or staircase (8479) are exceptional features in the Iron IIA architecture at Tel Rehov.

Building CY is one of the few examples in Iron Age IIA Tel Rehov of a courtyard house. The plan is somewhat similar to that of Building CZ in Squares A–C/2–3, 10 m to the south, assigned to Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.48). It recalls, to some extent, Iron Age II houses known from Hazor Area B (next to the citadel), Samaria and Megiddo. Such structures were explained by Yeivin, followed by Herzog, as representing officials’ houses, and were dubbed “scribes’ chambers” (Herzog 1992: 229– 230, with references)

Summary of Stratum C-2

Plans
Plans

  • Figure 12.9 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion

The plan of Stratum C-2 included densely built units of varying architectural plans, most of which were adjoined and all built of the same type of hard yellow bricks. Notable were the absence of stone foundations for the brick walls and the architectural plans which, although fragmentary in most cases, appear to differ from most known Iron Age II buildings in northern Israel. Moreover, they differ from each other, so that each structure was unique.

The finds included red-slipped and hand-burnished, as well as red-painted pottery, mostly sherds, aside from sporadic complete vessels. The single locus that yielded restorable pottery (Locus 1555b with 18 vessels) is stratigraphically attributed to Stratum C-2, while the pottery types recall late Iron IB forms that continued into Iron IIA (see Chapter 24). Additional finds included several clay figurines, seals, three inscriptions (one on an almost-complete storage jar), and iron and bronze objects.

Stratum C-2 appears to have lasted a long time, as evidenced by the thick accumulation of striations in the open areas and inside several of the buildings. Only in three places was there clear evidence of two phases (Buildings CT, CE, and perhaps, the partial unit in Squares Y/3–4) and it is possible that most of the well-built units simply continued to be used, with very minor renovations, during the entire occupation phase.

The lack of Stratum C-2 remains in the area of the apiary of Stratum C-1b (Squares Y–Z/1–2) must be explained as resulting from their intentional removal by the builders of the apiary when they established it on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. This was evidenced by the existence of Stratum C-2 building remains west, north and northeast of the apiary area. It should be noted that the Stratum C-2 floor west of the apiary in Square T/1 was ca. 1.0 m higher than the apiary floor, while in Square B/3 (northeast of the apiary), it was almost at the same level as that of the apiary floor. This comprises additional evidence for the tilt towards the east or southeast, observed in other cases at Tel Rehov as well.

The termination of Stratum C-2 appears to have been brought about by an earthquake, based on the fact that many of the walls showed signs of damage, such as cracks, tilts and sinkage, as well as the large amount of fallen bricks consistently found on the floors in each unit. A possibility is that some of this damage was gradual and not cataclysmic, generating local renovations and internal changes during the course of this stratum. Aside from the layer in Room 1555 (Square R/4) with its 18 complete smashed vessels, the relative lack of whole vessels and other finds in situ on the floors suggests that the final termination of this occupation did not take the inhabitants by surprise and that they had enough time to evacuate. We may think of a series of earthquakes that caused the abandonment and demolition of the houses, some taking place after the abandonment of the town.

Strata C-1b and C-1a

Introduction

Plans
Plans

  • Fig. 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.23 - Isometric view of Area C, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.16–12.53
The transition from Stratum C-2 to C-1b marked a large-scale renovation of the area, although the general orientation of the architecture remained the same, and brick was still the only building material used. New buildings were erected, with a number of walls constructed directly on top of the Stratum C-2 walls, while in other instances, the new walls followed entirely different lines (Fig. 12.16). The type of brick changed from the hard yellow clay typical of C-2 to a mixture of light and dark gray, brown, and beige bricks, although the average size of the bricks remained the same (Table 12.29). The densely built nature of the town continued in both strata (Figs. 12.18–12.21). A feature that was introduced in Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in both wall foundations and floors. This was one of the hallmarks of Stratum C-1b. This technique was employed only in isolated new cases in Stratum C-1a, in which many of the C-1b walls continued to be in use. In a few units, two sub-phases were discerned in Stratum C-1b, with the earlier one denoted Early C-1b. Stratum C-1a contained only one phase that was violently destroyed, following which the area was abandoned, aside from a possible pit in its northwestern part.

In the western and northern parts of Area C, the continuity between Strata C-1b and C-1a was marked and, in fact, both should be considered phases of one city, with most of the changes being floor raisings and minor adjustments of walls (Fig. 12.17). However, in the southeastern quarter of the area, the apiary, Building CM and buildings to their east went of use and were replaced by entirely new buildings in Stratum C-1a. Due to this situation, the following description is organized by units, detailing the phases within them that are attributed to C-1b and C-1a. The units of Strata C-1b and C-1a in the southeast of the area are described at the end in separate sections.

Altogether, 23 architectural units were defined; they are presented below according to four main parts.
The Western Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.24–12.25
  • Remains in Square R/4 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CD and the area to its north in SquaresS–T/3–4 (C-1b)
  • The cooking area in Square T/4 (Early C-1b, C-1b, C-1a)
  • The courtyard south of Building CD in Squares S–T/2–3 (C-1b)
  • Piazza CK in Squares S–T/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CJ in Squares S–T/1 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Remains to the west of Building CJ (C-1a)
The western part of Area C was occupied by a series of buildings and courtyards covering a total excavated area of some 225 sq m (Figs. 12.24– 12.25). The eastern border of these units adjoined the buildings attributed to the northeastern and central blocks and they were interconnected by shared walls and sometimes, by double adjoining walls. One long north–south backbone wall ran along the western border of the entire area, uniting all the units in this part of the area. The area between this wall and the edge of the mound was excavated in Squares R/4, S/1–2 and Q/4–5 (the latter in Area D), showing that there were houses up until the erosion line on the west, leaving no space for a fortification wall.

The North-Central and Northeastern Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36, 12.38
  • Building CE in Squares T–Y/4–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CR in Squares Y–Z/6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CF in Squares Y–Z, A/4–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CW in Squares A–C/5–6 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Buildings CQ1and CQ2 in Squares A–C/4–5 (C-1b, C-1a
  • Street in Squares Z, A–C/4 (C-1a)
The north-central and northeastern part of Area C was occupied by a well-planned and densely built insula, composed of buildings interconnected by both shared walls and adjoining double walls (Figs. 12.18–12.21, 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36): Building CE on the west, Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the south, and Buildings CR and CW on the north. The plan of each building, aside from CQ1 and CQ2, was different. Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, and (apparently) CF, were completely excavated, while Buildings CE, CR and CW continued beyond the limits of the excavation. All these buildings were founded in Stratum C-1b and continued to be in use, with some changes, in Stratum C-1a. A street, 2.3–2.8 m wide and ca. 15 m long, separated this block of buildings from the south-central and southeastern parts of the area in both strata.

The South-Central Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Building CG in Squares T–Y/2–4 (C-1b, C-1a)
  • Building CM in Squares Y–Z/3 (C-1b)
  • Building CH and the apiary in Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20 (C-1b)
  • Piazza 2417 in Squares Y–Z/3–4 (C-1a)
In Squares T–Z/1–4, the south-central part of Area C, substantial changes occurred in the transition from Stratum C-1b to C-1a, following a severe destruction at the end of Stratum C-1b. The following units were found in this part of the area:
  • Stratum C-1b: Building CG, Building CM, Building CH, the apiary (Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44).
  • Stratum C-1a: Building CG (partly continued to be in use), Piazza 2417 (replacing Building CM) (Fig. 12.50)

The Southeastern Part

  • Plans: Figs. 12.39, 12.48–12.53
  • Building CZ in Squares Z, A–B/2–3 (C-1b)
  • Building CP — early phase in Squares A–C/1–2 (C-1b)
  • Building CQ3 in Squares A/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CX in Squares B–C/2–3 (C-1a)
  • Building CP in Squares A–C/1–2 (C-1a)
  • Building CL in Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20 (C-1a)
In the southeastern part of Area C, the distinction between Strata C-1b and C-1a was clearer than in most of the rest of the area, with C-1b Building CZ and the early phase of Building CP having different plans than Buildings CQ3, CX and CP above them, and Building CL replacing the apiary. The following units were defined:
  • Stratum C-1b: Building CZ and an early phase of Building CP (Fig. 12.39)
  • Stratum C-1a: Buildings CQ3, CX, CP and CL (Fig. 12.50).

While the buildings of Stratum C-1b in this area were only partially excavated, the four buildings of Stratum C-1a were exposed in their entirety. They comprised a densely built and well-planned urban block, bordered by the street in Squares Z, A–C/4 on the north and Piazza 2417 on the northwest. Unlike the situation in the Stratum C-1a buildings in the northern part of Area C, most of the walls between the various units in this part of the area were shared, and in only one instance was there a double wall. This indicated a high degree of interdependence between all these units on the level of construction, and possibly function as well. Moreover, it seems that during some stage of the use of this complex, some walls were razed to create access between the units.

Building CZ of Stratum C-1b apparently suffered a destruction, judging by the large amount of fallen bricks and some burning (Figs. 12.88, 12.90), although it did not leave complete vessels or other objects on the floors, aside from one place. The early phase of Building CP seems to have met the same fate, with fallen bricks and burnt debris, although its floors were not reached in the excavation. All four buildings of Stratum C-1a were destroyed by a heavy conflagration and their remains were exposed just below topsoil, with numerous finds on the floors.

Square R/4 — Strata C-1b and C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.64 - Square R/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.65 - Square R/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.24–12.25
  • Section: Fig. 12.97
  • Photos 12.8, 12.64–12.65
  • Pottery: C-1b — Fig. 13.40:8–12; C-1a — Figs. 13.68–13.70
Introduction

In Square R/4, above C-2 Room 1555, two main phases were attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a; the latter was the clearest and best preserved, found just below topsoil and containing destruction debris and restorable vessels on a floor. Traces of additional narrow brick walls and restorable pottery revealed in the topsoil to the north and south of Square R/4, and in Square Q/4 of Area D, indicated that domestic occupation in the Iron Age IIA reached the western perimeter of the tell, with no evidence for any fortification wall.

Room 4483 in Stratum C-1b

Several phases of construction were found in this room (Fig. 12.24).

The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b was 1557, which continued the northern line of Wall 1413 that ran the entire length of Area C on the west (see details below); it seems that Wall 1557 was not used in Stratum C-1a. Parallel to it and 3.1 m to its west was Wall 1563, which apparently continued to be in use from Stratum C-2. In the initial phase of Stratum C-1b, a pink plaster floor (4483) passed below Walls 2416 and 4457, and possibly related to Wall 1557 on the east. At this stage, Wall 1568, which abutted the southern continuation of Wall 1557, was most probably the southern wall of the room, while its northern wall was beyond the excavation area. In a later phase of C-1b, Wall 2416 was built against the western face of Wall 1557; on the south, it abutted Wall 1568. In the center of the room, a narrow north–south wall (4457; Photo 12.64), preserved only one course high, made a corner on the south with Wall 4458, which was first built in Stratum C-2 (see above, Room 1555). In Stratum C-1b, its eastern part was covered by Floor 4483; a small round posthole was found on the northeastern end of this floor. The addition of Wall 4457 formed a narrow space (0.9 m wide) on the western side of the room. While Floor 4483 ran below the secondary walls (2416, 4457), the occupation debris above the floor abutted these walls. To the west of Wall 4457, Floor 4488, made of plaster with a layer of striations above it, penetrated below Wall 4457. In the second phase, a higher floor (4464) was laid, 0.1 m above the latter, abutting Walls 4457 and 4458. To this same phase, and perhaps to the same building, we attributed several walls surrounding a courtyard with ovens found in Square Q/4, which was part of Area D (Chapter 15; see also Fig. 12.24). The density of construction and layers points to the intensive activity in this area on the cusp of the mound during the course of Stratum C-1b.

Room 2442 in Stratum C-1a

A new room was built above the C-1b remains in this square, reusing Wall 2416 and adding new walls on the south (2423), west (1554) and north (1552) (Fig. 12.25). Wall 1558 was a short segment that seemed to corner with Wall 1552; perhaps it was the original western wall of the room that was removed at one point and replaced by Wall 1554, slightly to the west. A concentration of stones (2450), some of which were grinding stone fragments, was found in the southwestern corner of the square. These might have been part of a pavement which had continued to the west, but was eroded down the slope. A north–south row of three stones, running along the western face of Wall 1554, may have belonged to a room in Square Q/4 (Area D), bounded by Walls 1816 and 1808 (Figs. 12.19, 12.25). This space, poorly preserved due to the severe erosion on the slope of the mound, may have belonged to the same building as Room 2442.

Inside the room was a 0.4 m-deep layer of burnt destruction debris (2405) on a beaten-earth floor (2442, 87.56 m); part of this floor was a rectangular patch of hard plaster (2438) which abutted the northern face of Wall 2423 (Photo 12.65). It sloped slightly down to the north (0.18 m over 1.2 m) and might have served for some liquid-related activity; this plaster had been repaired with a whitish lime substance at one time during its use. In the burnt debris was an assemblage of restorable vessels (Figs. 13.68–13.70). One sherd of an imported Greek bowl was found as well (Fig. 13.70:22; see Chapter 28A). The smaller vessels in this room were found just below topsoil, in a layer above two parallel rows of storage jars that rested directly on the floor, one running along Wall 2416 and the other near Wall 1554 on the west. Most of the jars were fallen with their rims to the north; under several of the jars was a burnt patch with phytolith, suggesting that they had been set on some organic material, such as reed mats or wood.

Building CD and the Area to the North — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.66 - Tilted Wall 2495 in C-1b Building CD excavation from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.24
  • Section: Figs. 12.65–12.68
  • Photos 12.66
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.41
North of Building CD

Above the elements attributed to Stratum C-2 to the north of Building CA in Squares R–S/4 was the southern end of a room or a courtyard located in front of Building CD (Fig. 12.24). Although not well preserved, a gap in its southern wall (1524) was probably an entrance, on line with the entrance to Building CD, thus linking the two units. Wall 1524 was built on top of a thin fill laid on Stratum C-2 Wall 8503; it ran flush against Wall 1464 of Building CD, creating a wide double wall (Fig. 12.66). The western end of Wall 1524 continued westward to abut (but not to join) the eastern face of Wall 2416, and was abutted on the north by Wall 1557. Several bricks with two marginal bosses on each end were incorporated in Wall 1524. Such protrusions must have been part of the brick mold and their function might have been to improve the grip of the mud plaster that covered the walls. Alternatively, it could have been intended as a decorative element, as no traces of plaster were found. Bricks with similar protrusions were also found in walls of Stratum C-1b in Buildings CE and CF (see below). On the east, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 2501, although this corner was disturbed. On the west, Wall 1524 cornered with Wall 1557, the northern end of long backbone Wall 1413. All three walls were abutted by occupation debris (1512) and a floor (2494, 86.75 m), which contained an oven (2496) and a stone basin in the northern balk (unnumbered). The floor (4491) in the western part of this space was set on a bedding of small stones that raised it slightly higher than the floor level to the east.

No architecture that could be attributed to Stratum C-1a was found here and the same loose debris, possibly a disturbance, that covered Building CD, also covered these remains (Fig. 12.25).

Building CD

This building in Squares S/3–4 (Fig. 12.24; Photo 12.2) was, in fact, a renovation of Stratum C-2 Building CA. The outer walls were rebuilt along the same lines, but the inner division was canceled, thus creating a large, roughly rectangular space; the external measurements were 5.0×6.2 m and the floor space, ca. 20 sq m.

All the outer walls of C-2 Building CA were rebuilt with a new type of brick made of light gray, dark gray and light brown clay. The demarcation between the previous walls and the rebuild was very clear and a distinct line of a fill or repair was visible, especially in the northern, eastern and southern walls (Figs. 12.65–12.67; Photos 12.28, 12.66). This was a layer of light brownish-gray clay (similar to the brick material) that was packed down on top of the damaged C-2 walls, leveling them in preparation for the rebuild.

On the north, Wall 1464 replaced C-2 Wall 4438; the entrance into the new building was now located nearer to the center of the northern wall, through an opening in the double wall (1524/1464). Wall 1464 was deliberately cut on its western end, as can be seen in the western balk of Square S/4 (Fig. 12.66). On the west, Wall 1523 replaced C-2 Wall 4440 (Fig. 12.67); it was poorly preserved and tilted severely towards the east, especially in its northern part. This wall ran along the eastern face of Wall 1413, with the latter continuing further to the south and north to enclose additional units. On the south, Wall 1448 replaced C-2 Wall 4439; the repair line between the two walls was clearest here (Photo 12.28). On the east, Wall 2495 replaced C-2 Wall 4434 (Fig. 12.66; Photo 12.66); however, the former was traced only in Square S/4 and did not continue to the south. This may be due to its state of preservation or, as suggested above, Wall 1506, possibly built at the end of Stratum C-2 as a buttress for the damaged eastern wall of Building CA, continued in Stratum C-1b as the southeastern wall of Building CD (Fig. 12.68). As noted above, it is possible that Wall 1506 had been first built in Stratum C-1b, although this seems less likely. This rather makeshift arrangement would have lent a slipshod look to this part of the building, which contrasts with the otherwise well-built walls. The eastern side of Building CD was less well preserved, just like in its predecessor, Building CA.

The inner division of the previous Building CA was cancelled. The inner walls were deliberately removed, so that five to six cut courses were detected close to their juncture with the external walls of the building: Wall 2509 of the previous building was cut 0.35 m to the east of its corner with Wall 4440 and Wall 2493 was cut 0.15 m to the north of its corner with Wall 4439 (Photo 12.28). The reason for the deliberate razing of these inner partition walls was not clear; perhaps they were in such a poor state of preservation following the destruction of Building CA that they required removal before the leveling and rebuilding could take place.3 Indeed, below the lowest floor of Building CD were layers of brick debris interspersed with layers of red clay and ashy gray striations, which might be understood as a fill (2491 in Square S/4, 2485 in Square S/3) laid on top of the previous building, serving to level off the razed walls. These layers yielded sherds and partial vessels, including red-slipped and hand-burnished bowls and jugs (Fig. 13.41).

On top of this debris/fill were successive occupation layers, with a total thickness of 0.6–0.8 m, rich in sherds and bones: 2486, 1485 and 1466 in Square S/4, and 1474 in Square S/3. While these layers were stratified, it was difficult to clearly identify a floor. Two flat-topped stones were found near the northeastern and northwestern corners of the building, relating to Locus 2486. Their function was not clear, as they were too close to the wall to have served as pillar bases, recalling the stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 (see discussion above).

The only internal construction in the new building was a row of crumbly gray bricks (0.5–0.6 m wide) added along the northern face of Wall 1448, covering the cut southern end of Stratum C-2 Wall 2493. This element (2484) was preserved 0.4– 0.6 m high and 3.4 m long; it might have been a bench along Wall 1448.

The end of Building CD was not violent and no traces of sudden destruction were found. The building was not renovated in Stratum C-1a, when its southern part was covered by the northern end of Piazza CK and its northern part was covered by a layer of loose debris (1412, 1417) that appeared to have been a disturbance of some sort.

Piazza CK — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.70 - C-1a Piazza CK from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.71 - C-1a Piazza CK from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.25
  • Section: Figs. 12.65, 12.69
  • Photos 12.70–12.71
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.71–13.72
Introduction

In Stratum C-1a, Building CD went out of use and a large open area, denoted Piazza CK, replaced it (Squares S–T/2–3). This courtyard included the open area to the south of Building CD, as well as the cooking area described above. It was bordered on the south by Wall 1437 (the northern wall of Building CJ) and an additional stub of a wall (1415), on the east by Wall 1416 (the western wall of Building CG), and on the west by Wall 1413 (the long backbone wall running along the entire area). On the northeastern end of this space was a short wall (1457) that seemed to be a continuation of the northern wall of Building CG; it was preserved only one course high and ended abruptly after 2.0 m, on line with Wall 1415 on the south. It is possible that these were stubs of walls that had been dismantled or otherwise damaged. Thus, the width of Piazza CK ranged from 7.0 m on the south to 8.0 m on the north, and its length was at least 13 m, as the northern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. The total area was at least 97 sq m, making this one of the largest open areas in all strata in Area C, which was, for the most part, densely built up. Access into the piazza must have been from the north.

In the enclosure formed by these walls, the northwestern quadrant (Square S/4) contained a layer of soft earth and eroded brick debris (1417, 1412, 1439) that might have been a late disturbance, while in the rest of the area, very burnt and vitrified brick debris resting on a hard-packed white floor (1418, 1422, 1428) was revealed under topsoil (Figs. 12.65, 12.69). Running through the center of this courtyard on a north–south axis and abutted on the east, south and west by the destruction debris and white floor, was a concentration of stones, several of which were grinding stone fragments, and brick fragments (1427) (Photo 12.70). This element was roughly L-shaped, with a plastered, right-angled niche in its western face, which contained part of a smashed storage jar (unrestored); another storage jar (Fig. 13.72:9) abutted the installation on its south, and yet another one (Fig. 13.72:10) was found to its north. Another concentration of basalt stones was found 0.5 m to the south of 1427, designated 1496; they most likely comprised parts of the same element, perhaps with a stone missing in the middle. Two cooking pots (Fig. 13.71:7, 9) were found against the western face of these stones (Photo 12.71). An additional element was a brick block (1458), 1.0 m long, 0.5 m wide and preserved to one or two courses, located just to the west of the southern end of 1427 (Fig. 12.69). This might have been a work surface or, perhaps, a space divider.

Wall 1413 in Strata C-1a–b

Wall 1413, that bordered Piazza CK on the west, ran for 19.7 m on a slightly southeast–northwest line along the western end of the entire area and continued beyond the limits of the excavation to both the north and the south (Photos 12.2–12.5). In Square R/4, Wall 1413 abutted the western end of Wall 1524. The continuation of its line to the north was denoted 1557 (Photos 12.4–12.5, 12.8). The southern part of Wall 1413 was made of hard yellow bricks, typical of Stratum C-2, as opposed to the light gray bricks of the rest of the wall, typical of Strata C-1b and C-1a. This was the only place in this wall where two phases were discerned: in the earlier phase (Stratum C-1b), the wall was termed 2432 and the later phase, 1431 (Stratum C-1a). Wall 1413 was constructed slightly above and west of Stratum C-2 Buildings CA and CB (Figs. 12.16, 12.69). In Stratum C-1b, its lower part adjoined the western wall of Building CD and it served as the western border of the space south of Building CD, of the unit north of Building CD, and of Building CJ. In Stratum C-1a, it was the western border of Building CJ and Piazza CK. In Square R/4, the structures of both Strata C-1b and C-1a (described above) were attached to its western face. Wall 1413 was unique in its length and multiple-use in several units during the course of two strata, making it a prime example of the integrated urban planning that characterized this area.

Building CE

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.75 - Buildings CE, CF and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.76 - Building CE, C-1b Room 2489 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.77 - Building CE, looking east at Wall 2454 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.78 - Building CE; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.79 - Building CE, C-1a Room 1471 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.80 - Northern rooms of Building CE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.81 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b, Room 6449 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.82 - Destruction debris inBuilding CE, C-1b Room 6449 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.83 - Detail of marginal bosses on bricks in C-1b Wall 6452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.84 - Building CE, C-1a Room 6433 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.87 - C-1 Building CR from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27–12.28
  • Section: Figs. 12.62–12.64
  • Photos 12.75–12.84, 12.87
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.44–13.45; C-1a — Figs. 13.75–13.76
Introduction

Building CE was located in Squares T–Y/4–6, to the east of the cooking area in Square T/4. The building was composed of a broad room in the south and an area to its north, of which a strip, 2.0 m wide and 10 m long, was excavated (Photo 12.75). The broad room was a rebuild of an earlier structure, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.9–12.10); it had two phases, while the area to the north had three. In Stratum C-1b, the building suffered a destruction, after which it was renovated in Stratum C-1a and continued to be used with various changes, mainly in its northern part, until its final destruction.

The Broad Room

Room 2489 — Stratum C-1b

Room 2489 was a rectangular room (internal measurements 2.0×4.8 m; 9.6 sq m) with an entrance just east of the center of the northern wall (1491); the threshold was paved with a wooden plank (Fig. 12.27; Photo 12.76). Inside the entrance were a bowl and a cup-and-saucer (Figs. 13.44:4, 13.45:12). The southern wall of this room (1473) ran parallel to the northern wall of Building CG (see below), separated by a 0.10 m gap, which contained a large amount of sherds, possibly a fill. The eastern end of Wall 1473 dog-legged 0.3 m to the north, exactly following the line of the C-2 wall here. The eastern wall (2454) was part of a long wall that enclosed the entire building on the east. Note that Wall 2454 was oriented due north–south, while the rest of the room was angled towards the west, so that this wall was not parallel to the western wall of the building (1487), lending a somewhat crooked look to room. Wall 2454 was built flush against the western wall of Building CF; together, they were 1.1 m wide. At its southern end, Wall 2454 made a corner with Wall 4479, the northern wall of Building CM to the south in Stratum C-1b, which created a double wall with the southern wall of Building CF. This construction method well demonstrates the closely interrelated character of the architecture of the buildings in this northeastern insula.

All the walls were composed of hard graybrown bricks, with light-colored mortar lines; they were burnt to black in some instances, particularly in the east. The western face of Wall 2454 and the southern face of Wall 1491 included bricks with marginal bosses composed of two vertical protrusions on each end of the brick (Fig. 12.29; Photos 12.77–12.78), identical to those found in other buildings in the north-central part of Area C in Stratum C-1b, including the unit north of Building CD, described above, and Building CF; they were also found in the walls of the rooms to the north of the broad room in Building CE (Photo 12.83). Walls 2454 and 1491 contained a thick and intricate construction of perpendicular and parallel wooden beams in their foundations (Fig. 12.29; Photos 12.77–12.78). The beams, like the bricks, were very burnt.

The smooth reddish-brown beaten-earth floor (2489, 86.30 m) was coated by a thick layer of black ash (2458; Fig. 12.64), covering mostly the eastern half of the room (Photo 12.76). A small square plastered brick (2477; 0.45 x.0.45 m, 0.45 m high) was attached to Wall 1491, just east of the entrance and opposite the offset in Wall 1473. It had a slight depression on top which contained some light gray ash, although it is possible that it had served as a jar support. Underneath it was an intact juglet in a small pit (Fig. 13.45:10), apparently placed there as a foundation deposit before the brick was laid.

Room 1471 — Stratum C-1a

Following the destruction of C-1b, the broad room continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a with the same walls (Fig. 12.28), although there was a visible repair in the upper courses of the western wall (1487), composed of light gray bricks (Photos 12.76, 12.79). Above the burnt debris on the floor of C-1b was a layer of hard brick debris (2443) that supported an earthen floor (1471) at level 86.65 m, which was covered by a layer of decayed brick debris with some ash (Fig. 12.64; Photo 12.79).

The Northern Rooms and Courtyard

Introduction

Remains of rooms and possibly a courtyard were found in Squares Y/5–6 to the north of the broad room (Photos 12.80–12.84). It seems that these were part of Building CE, particularly due to the shared walls and similar construction techniques, although no entrance was found to join them in the limited excavated area. Each of these components had two phases, attributed to C-1b and C-1a, while the northern courtyard contained yet an additional phase.

Rooms 6448 and 6449 — Stratum C-1b

Two narrow rooms (6448, 6449) were excavated to the north of the eastern side of the broad room; no entrance joined them. The eastern wall of both rooms was the continuation of Wall 2454, indicating that the northern rooms and the broad room to the south were part of the same building.

Like in its southern end, the foundations of the entire length of Wall 2454 contained a thick and intricate composition of wooden beams, both perpendicular and parallel to the lower course of bricks (Figs. 12.30, 12.62). Wooden beams, all charred, were found below the floors of the two rooms as well (Photos 12.80–12.81). All of the wood was set into a distinct layer of soft reddish earth (6426, 6486; Fig. 12.32); such a construction of wooden beams in a reddish fill was a feature found in the foundations of other Stratum C-1b buildings as well.

The western wall of the two northern rooms was Wall 6452; only its eastern face was uncovered. This wall cornered with Wall 1491 on the south, just east of the entranceway in that wall. Wall 6452 also had many wooden beams in and adjoining its foundation (Figs. 12.30, 12.62– 12.63). Walls 2454 and 6452 ran for 7.0 m and two east–west cross walls (6447 and 7445) divided this space into two identical rooms (6448 on the north and 6449 on the south), each 3.1 m long and between 1.6–1.8 m wide. The difference in width was due to the angle of Wall 6452, which ran slightly southeast to northwest, as opposed to the straight north–south line of Wall 2454. Wall 6447, which separated the two rooms, had wood in its foundation, but Wall 7445, the northern wall of Room 6448), did not. As they had no entrances, it is possible that these rooms served as storage spaces, accessed from above. All the walls of these rooms, aside from 7445, which was poorly preserved, included bricks with marginal bosses composed of thin vertical protrusions on both ends, which were hallmarks of Stratum C-1b in this part of the area, as noted above (Figs. 12.29, 12.63; Photo 12.83). The southern room had a patchy beaten-earth floor at level 86.12 m (6449), on which were vessels and sherds, among them three complete chalices (Fig. 13.44:10–11, 13), as well as loomweights and a concentration of burnt grain against Wall 1491. Four 14C measurements of this grain (Chapter 48, Sample R24) provided a calibrated average date between 902–843 BCE (1σ) and 920–830 BCE (2σ).

Two large bricks set near the corner of Walls 6452 and 1491 might have served as a kind of podium or shelf, possibly for the chalices found nearby (Photo 12.82). Room 6448 contained a similar floor in its southern part, while its northern part contained a concentration of stones that might have been a disturbed stone floor (7451), including two broken upper grinding stones. The stones were covered by a thin layer of debris (7446) with some sherds and bones.

Rooms 6448 and 6449 were covered by a fill (6432), which leveled them in preparation for the renovation that took place in Stratum C-1a.

Courtyard 7427 — Stratum C-1b

To the north of Wall 7445 in Square Y/6 was an open space, continuing the activity that was here in Stratum C-2. This space is described here as part of Building CE, although, in fact, no entrance to the two southern rooms was found, and it might represent the southern part of an open space to the north of this building. The two phases identified in this space were both attributed to Stratum C-1b, as they covered the Stratum C-2 activity and were sealed by the Stratum C-1a courtyard floor.

The courtyard surface was composed of red and gray striations (7427) that were a direct continuation of those found here in Stratum C-2 and their attribution to two sub-phases of C-1b was based on their relation to related installations. The lowest layer was related to three poorly preserved installations, whose function remained unknown (Fig. 12.31): a ring of brown clay (7463), almost directly underneath C-1b Oven 7443, and two semi-circles of soft red clay (7464, 7465), filled with light gray ash. These installations seem to each have been used only for a short time and cut each other in a haphazard manner.

In the later phase of Stratum C-1b, the uppermost layer of the red and gray striations contained one poorly preserved oven (7443) and several shallow red-clay circles (7433, 7437, 7438), similar to those of the previous sub-phase. In both phases, only a few sherds and bones were found. The center and southeastern part of these remains were cut by Pit 6498 (Photo 12.87).

Space 6433 — Stratum C-1a

A reddish clay floor (6433, 5415) in Square Y/5 was laid at level 86.75 m, above a fill covering C-1b Rooms 6448 and 6449. Thus, the entire area north of Wall 1491 and west of Wall 2454 became an open area, at least 10 m long and continuing to the north beyond the excavation area. The reddish clay floor was covered by a soft burnt layer just under topsoil. The floor and burnt debris abutted the rather poorly preserved upper courses of Walls 2454 and 1491, which were rebuilt after the C-1b destruction. Below Floor 5415 was a layer of wooden beams that both penetrated underneath the foundation of the C-1a rebuild of Wall 2454 here and extended into part of the room. This wood was laid in two layers: an east–west upper layer and a north–south lower layer (Fig. 12.32). This was one of the few instances where wood was used in construction in Stratum C-1a.

A number of installations were set on this floor. In the southeastern corner was a mud-plastered clay ring (5436) containing a large lower grinding stone inside; an upper grinding stone was found below this and another such grinding stone rested on top of the clay ring. This is similar to grinding installations found in other Stratum C-1a buildings, such as Buildings CF, CQ1, CQ2 and CP. The southern part of a similar ring (5438) was found in the northwestern corner of Square Y/5, although it did not contain any grinding stones. Three bricks were found to the west of 5436 and one to its north. The southern part of the space was covered with a layer of burnt destruction debris containing pottery and loomweights (Photo 12.84), while the northern part was less burnt.

On the northern end of this open area (Square Y/6) was a layer of brick debris and collapse, with some ash and charcoal (7404), abutting Wall 4422 and the northern end of Wall 2454. Although no clear floor level was discerned, this layer clearly covered the Stratum C-1b activity below. Three intact vessels (Fig. 13.76:6, 10–11), one jug and two juglets, were found in this debris layer.

Building CR

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.85 - Square Z/6, looking north at C-1a, C-1b and C-2 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.86 - Square Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.87 - Squares Y–Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.88 - Fractured and displaced blocks of Building CR, late phase of C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.89 - Broken Jugs and charred beams in Building CR, C-1a Room 6468 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.90 - Building CR, C-1a Room 6468 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.91 - Buildings CR, CF, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.27–12.29, 12.33–12.36
  • Photos 12.85–12.91
  • Pottery: C-1b — Fig.13.48:1–14; C-1a — Figs. 13.77–13.79
Introduction

Building CR was the southern part of a building in Squares Y–Z/6 that continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.43, 12.86) and was, in fact, a rebuild of Stratum C-2 Building CT; this was one of the few instances of continuity between all the Iron Age IIA strata in Area C. Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. The southern wall of Building CR was also the northern wall of Building CF and its eastern wall was the western boundary of the entrance into that building (Photo 12.86). The southwestern corner of this building was cut by Pit 6498 (Photos 12.43, 12.48, 12.87).

Building CR in an Early Phase of Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.33
New walls built above those of C-2 Building CT followed roughly the same line and orientation and, like that building, enclosed two rooms, one on the east (6491) and one on the west (6459), separated by Wall 6490. As noted above, Wall 6490 was built on top of the Stratum C-2 debris. The outer walls of the building in this phase were 6467 on the south, 7458 on the east, 4422 on the west and 6489 on the north of the eastern room; the latter had an entrance 0.6 m wide on its western end, which was paved with a single brick course, showing that this building continued to the north. No clear floor was found in this phase, although it seemed that the lower part of Floor 6491 in the eastern room abutted the upper course of Wall 7458 on the east, and thus, it is shown on the plan of this sub-phase.

Building CR in the Main Phase of Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
The western wall (4422), the dividing wall (6490) between the rooms, and the northern wall of the eastern room (6489) with its entrance, remained unchanged in the subsequent phase. A new southern wall (6493) was built directly above Wall 6467 of the earlier phase; its upper-two preserved courses were slightly narrower than the latter and were made of a different brick type (reddish gray and crumbly), as opposed to the hard light gray bricks of the earlier phase. The eastern end of this room underwent a more pronounced change, where the wall was replaced by several rows of narrow bricks on a north–south line (6512). Although it seems that this was an intentional arrangement, these bricks might represent a fallen wall or a feature whose function remained unknown (Photo 12.88). These brick rows ended 1.0 m west of Building CW (see below), creating a rather narrow corridor that led into Building CF to the south. A very large concentration of bones, including many mandibles, was found on the eastern end of the bricks of 6512 (7410). It may be noted that the locus in the entrance corridor (6463) to the east of the installation also contained a relatively large amount of bones. The floor of the room (6491) was composed of smooth light brown clay.

A layer of soft debris (6479) above the floor included several high quality red-slipped and burnished bowl fragments (Fig. 13.48:1–4); its upper layer might have been a fill laid in preparation for the construction of the subsequent phase.

The western room (5459) did not undergo any change in this phase of Stratum C-1b. It contained a layer of brick debris and charcoal patches, with some bones and sherds. No clear floor level was discerned.

Building CR in Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.28, 12.35–12.36
In Stratum C-1a, the western wall of Building CR (4422) continued unchanged, while the other walls were rebuilt. The new southern wall (6410), built directly over the previous wall, still served as the northern border of Building CF (Photos 12.85– 12.86), but now only on the east, as an additional wall (6409) was built alongside it on the west (Photo 12.91). The new eastern wall of the unit (6419) was built over the rows of 6512. A new dividing wall (6461) between the two rooms (6468, 6416) was built to the west of the line of the previous wall, so that the western room was now smaller than the eastern one. Due to the poor state of preservation of Wall 6461, the space was excavated as one (6416) until it became clear that these were two rooms separated by this wall.

Floors of this stratum were found 0.7–0.8 m above those of the previous phase. The floor of the eastern room (6468) covered the top of Wall 6489, so that this room, like the western one, continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. In Room 6468, the floor was covered by a layer of burnt destruction debris, covered in turn by fallen bricks just below topsoil. This room contained 13 loomweights, including several that were arranged in a circle against the eastern face of Wall 6461, and others that surrounded two burnt wooden beams on a north–south axis that appeared to have belonged to a loom (Photos 12.89–12.90). Among the pottery vessels (Figs. 13.77–13.79) were seven jugs, two of which were finely red slipped and burnished (Fig. 13.79:6–7).

Building CF

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.58 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.59 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.60 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.61 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.91 - Buildings CR, CF, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.92 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.93 - Eastern balk of Square Z/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.94 - Eastern part of Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.95 - Section in the middle of Square Z/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.96 - C-1a Building CF, broken pottery in southern part of Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.97 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.98 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5498 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.99 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5499 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.100 - C-1a Building CF, below Room 5499 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.101 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.102 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.103 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.104 - Building CF, C-1a Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.105 - Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.106 - Building CF, top of destruction debris 6401 in C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.107 - Building CF, grinding installation 6406 and destruction debris 6401 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.108 - Building CF, fragments of altar from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.109 - Building CF, grinding installation 6406 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.110 - Building CF, Stratum C-1a, grinding Installation 6406 in Room 6435 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.111 - Smashed vessels on floor of Room 5460 in Building CF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.112 - C-1a Building CF, Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.113 - Room 5444 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27–12.28, 12.33–12.36
  • Section: Figs. 12.58–12.61
  • Photos 12.5–12.6, 12.91–12.113
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.46–13.47, C-1a — Figs. 13.80–13.96
Introduction

Building CF in Squares Y–A/4–6 was one of the largest and most interesting structures in Area C. Its unique plan, fine construction, and exceptional finds point to its importance. The building was initially constructed in Stratum C-1b and, following a destruction, was renovated and reused until its final destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. Its external measurements were 8.7×11.3 m (excluding Wall 2454 on the west and the entrance corridor) and its floor space was 50.46 sq m in Stratum C-1b and 52.89 sq m in C-1a. This latter phase was the best known, as it was exposed just below topsoil and destroyed in a fierce conflagration, after which the building was abandoned. Although the remains of Stratum C-1b were not as well preserved, they were sufficient to define a separate building phase, with finds attributed to its floors. Both phases will be described together, emphasizing the stratigraphic considerations that led to the division between the two. Building CF was built over Stratum C-2 Building CU (Photos 12.85, 12.100– 12.104); although both buildings were of the same orientation, they were two entirely different structures.

Building CF contained an entrance corridor in the northeast and three main components: a rectangular space on the north, with a western and an eastern wing to its south. Each of these wings was enclosed by separate walls that adjoined each other to form double walls, so that each was both independent and united. Double walls also surrounded the building on the west, south and east; these walls had a total width of 1.0–1.1 m. This, along with the well-built straight walls, lent the structure a sturdy look and also raises the possibility that the building had an upper floor. Thus, Building CF, although a unique and independent structure, was an integral part of a well-planned quarter that was densely built in both Strata C-1b and C-1a (Photos 12.6–12.7, 12.91–12.92; 12.169).

The Entrance Corridor

Introduction

The entrance into the building in both strata was in its northeastern corner, through a passageway which continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation. The entrance was bordered on the east by Wall 6408 in both strata and on the west by the eastern end of Building CR (Wall 7458 in the early phase of Stratum C-1b, brick rows 6512 in the later phase of C-1b, and Wall 6419 in Stratum C-1a). This formed a 2.0 m-wide corridor which was narrower only in the latter part of Stratum C-1b, when 6512 occupied part of its western side. Three phases were discerned in the entrance, one attributed to the construction of the building and the other two to Strata C-1b and C-1a.

The Entrance Corridor in Pre-Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.33
Just above the floor and pits that occupied this area in Stratum C-2 was a layer of patchy red and gray striations (6478, 7457, 7472) that contained a series of small, shallow pits and plastered bins, some of which cut each other, indicating intense activity here. The pits contained soft brown earth with few sherds and bones. The striated layer and pits abutted early Stratum C-1b Wall 7458 on the west and Walls 6497/6408 on the east. In fact, these shallow bins and pits made passage here virtually impossible, similar to the situation in Stratum C-2 described above, with Pit 7504/7507. It is possible that these elements represent a phase that can be defined as interim between Stratum C-2 and C-1b, perhaps related to the construction of the building. In any case, they did not enable easy access to the building while they existed.

The Entrance Corridor in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
In the main phase of Stratum C-1b, the entrance corridor contained soft debris (6463) with many bones; no floor was detected. On the west, it was bordered by the bricks of 6512. The western face of Wall 6408, the eastern border, was very damaged on this level and apparently underwent some kind of repair that included a row of small stones inserted into its lowest course. The northern end of the corridor was bordered on the east by poorly preserved Wall 6497 of Building CW. The corridor was narrowed by the bricks of 6512 in this phase.

The Entrance Corridor in Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
In Stratum C-1a, the corridor contained a beatenearth floor at level 86.60 m, covered with burnt destruction debris (6412, 6417), including some fallen bricks and restorable pottery (Figs. 13.86, 13.89, 13.94; Photo 12.93; see also Fig. 12.58). Like in Stratum C-1b, Wall 6408 continued as the eastern border of the corridor, aside from its northern end, where Wall 6497 of Building CW constituted the border. The corridor was 1.5 m wide in this phase.

The Northern Space in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
In Stratum C-1b, the entrance corridor led into a broad space (internal measurements 2.0×5.3 m; 10.2 sq m) from which the western and eastern wings were accessed.

The northern border of this space was Wall 6493, shared with Building CR (Photos 12.85, 12.91–12.92). On the east, it was bounded by Wall 6408, and on the south, by Wall 6482 (Photos 12.94, 12.116). No entrance in Wall 6482 that would have connected the northern space with the rooms to the south was found, but possibly one had existed above the two preserved courses of this wall.

The space enclosed by these walls contained a patchy floor of red, gray and white striations (6466) at level 86.10 m, with only a few sherds and bones (Photo 12.93). The floor was covered by a layer of soft brown earth (6450) which might have been a leveling fill in preparation for the construction of the Stratum C-1a floor above. Two smooth pink mizi limestone slabs were found on the floor level, one in Square Z/6 and another near the southeastern corner of the space. They were similar to the large stone found in Room 6465 to the south.

A curious feature revealed at the bottom level of the striations in this space was the presence of several very large, amorphic blocks of brick, with a particularly large one in the center (Fig. 12.58). It is possible that these were placed as a kind of leveler above the remains of C-2 Building CU, or were simply discarded during the construction of Building CF and covered by the earliest floor of that building.

The Eastern Wing

Introduction

This wing was composed of a large room on the north and a smaller room to its south; the latter was accessed only through the former. In Stratum C-1b, the larger northern room of this wing was separated from the northern rectangular space described above by a wall, making it a separate room. In Stratum C-1a, when this wall was removed, these two spaces were united and were accessed directly from the entrance in the northeast of the building. On the other hand, the southern room remained the same in both strata. The description below follows these developments: the two phases in the northern room are described separately (C-1b and C-1a), and the two phases in the southern room are described together.

Room 6465 — Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Figs. 12.27, 12.34
This room was bordered by Walls 6482 on the north, 5437 on the south, 6455 on the west, and 6456 on the east (internal measurements 3.4×3.5 m; 11.9 sq m) (Photo 12.94). The two latter walls were the direct continuation of the western and eastern walls of the southern room (5454, 6424); all these walls had a thick layer of wooden beams in their foundations. A 0.1 m-thick layer of reddishbrown and gray striations (6465), whose bottom was a thin layer of light gray mud plaster at 85.90 m, abutted the lowest level of the surrounding walls. A large, smooth pink mizi limestone with a flattened top was found 0.4 m to the east of the center of Wall 6455, abutted by the striations (Photo 12.95). This would have been too large and not well located to have been a pillar base, although its function was not clear. A relatively large amount of sherds (Figs. 13.46–13.47) and several grinding stones were found in this room. The striations and stone were sealed by Floor 5498 of Stratum C-1a.

Room 5498 — Stratum C-1a

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
The removal of Wall 6482 in Stratum C-1a created a large space in the northeast of the building that included both Room 6465 and the broad northern space of C-1b (6466) of the former building. Another major change that took place in this room in Stratum C-1a entailed the deliberate removal of the eastern and western walls down to their lowest one or two courses (Photo 12.94), which were covered by the C-1a floor makeup. This widened the room internally by 1.0 m, so that the internal measurements of this space were now 4.4×6.0 m (26.4 sq m). This cut was especially evident close to the northern end of the southern room (5499), where the higher southern ends of these walls remained intact (Photo 12.95). With the removal of the eastern and western walls, there was no longer a double wall between the northern part of the two wings of the building or between the building and Building CQ1 to its east.

The slightly higher stump of the erstwhile northern wall (6482) created a situation wherein the floor (6427, 86.50 m) in the area of the former northern space was now 0.35 m higher than the floor (5498, 86.15 m) to the south of this wall; this discrepancy was probably bridged by wooden or brick steps. Floor 6427 in the north was composed of white lime, covered with burnt debris (6417). An oven (6421) was built in the center of the northern space, against the southern face of Wall 6410, about 1.0 m to the west of the location of Oven 7428 of Stratum C-2, yet 2.0 m higher (Photo 12.109). A storage jar (Fig. 13.90:10) and a krater (Fig. 13.84:2) were found right near it, resting on the floor. On the far eastern end of this space, opposite the entrance corridor, was a large, roughly squared, 0.3 m-tall, flat-topped stone. Numerous bones found on and nearby this stone suggest that it was possibly used as a butcher block (Photo 12.94).

Floor 5498 in the south (covering the area of C-1b Room 6465) was composed of thin mud plaster below a layer of soft reddish earth, which covered the top of the cut walls of Stratum C-1b. On the floor was a 0.7 m-thick layer of very burnt destruction debris (5416, 5429, 5439), containing fallen bricks, burnt brick debris, ash and charcoal, ceiling collapse, and 49 complete (restorable and intact) vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95; Photo 12.96). Other finds included grinding stones and stone vessels, as well as 59 stone loomweights, mostly concentrated around a wooden beam that apparently represented a loom in the middle of this space (Photos 12.96–12.97; Fig. 12.35). To the north of this beam was a poorly preserved installation (5481) composed of a low, curving parapet of clay; to its north were short pieces of wood and numerous fragments of an oven or a low-fired clay vat; none of these elements could be reconstructed due to the fierce destruction. Built against the southern wall of this space (5437) was a grinding stone installation (5456), like that found in Room 6435 (6406) (Photos 12.96, 12.98), although this one was a semi-circle attached to the wall, while the latter was a complete oval (described below). This installation was composed of a low round-topped clay parapet, 0.9 m at its widest diameter, in which a large lower grinding stone was set on an east– west axis; it was not found tilted, as it was in Installation 6406. Two complete upper grinding stones were found nearby. A unique find in this room, located 1.5 m north of the entranceway in Wall 5437, was a pottery model shrine (Chapter 35, No. 36), resting directly on the floor, its opening facing north. Its upper part was broken off, found overturned just to the southeast of the lower part, with a Hippo jar (Fig. 13.92:3) lying smashed on top of it; another storage jar (Fig. 13.89:9) was found to its east (Photo 12.96). The top of the model shrine was adorned with a unique scene of figures in relief, showing what appears to be a lion(?) grasping two human heads in its claws. Inside the box was light gray ashy material that contained an animal jaw bone and a tooth. A jug containing grain (Fig. 13.93:5) was found in this room as well. Some grain was also found spilled on the floor near the abovementioned storage jars. Grain from the jug was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R35); the average calibrated dates were 922–850 BCE (1σ) and 970–838 BCE (2σ).

Room 5499 — Strata C-1a and C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.27, 12.29, 12.35–12.36
A 0.8 m-wide entranceway in the western end of Wall 5437 led into the southern room (internal measurements 2.2×3.3 m; 7.26 sq m). This room did not undergo any architectural change between Strata C-1b and C-1a and it had been in continuous use, with frequent floor clearings. The walls, preserved to a height of 1.3 m above the floor, were covered with fine hard mud plaster that continued down to constitute the original floor makeup (5499), which was covered by a layer of smooth red earth, just as in the northern room. The floor plaster was laid just above a layer of charred wooden beams which were, in fact, a continuation of those in the foundations of the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.37; Photos 12.99–12.100). Under the level of the plaster floor, the courses of the walls contained bricks with two vertical protrusions near the ends, exactly like the bricks that were found in the western wing of this building in its Stratum C-1b phase (see below), as well as in the unit north of Building CD and in Building CE, both attributed to Stratum C-1b. The wooden beams and this type of brick support the conclusion that the original construction of this room was in Stratum C-1b.

The room was filled with almost 1.0 m of very burnt destruction debris; the top layer (5426) was virtually sterile and contained extremely hard brick material and fallen bricks, as well as ceiling material, while the remainder of the debris (5461) was extremely burnt and rich in finds, including 46 intact and smashed vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95), 19 of them storage jars, which were mostly stacked against the eastern wall. One of these jars was found full of a powdery white substance, most likely an organic material that had burnt, while another contained grain. Additional finds included grinding stones and other worked stones, a large clay ‘footbath’ (Fig. 13.96a:11), and 15 loomweights, concentrated in the entranceway (5500) (Table 12.15). In the southeastern corner of the room was a concentration of extremely burnt pinkish brick that had pulverized. This appears to have been some installation that was too damaged by the fire to define.

The Western Wing

Introduction

In both Strata C-1b and C-1a, the western wing of the building (Squares Y–Z/4–6) was composed of a long rectangular space. In Stratum C-1b, there was a small niche or cell on the north and the rest was one long hall, while in Stratum C-1a, the hall was divided into four consecutive rooms, including the small niche/cell on the north, and three small rooms to its south (Photos 12.92, 12.101).

This wing was bordered on three sides by double walls that remained the same in both strata: on the west by Walls 4422 and 2454, on the south by Walls 4413 and 4479, and on the east by Walls 5414 and 5454. In Stratum C-1b, the northern border of this wing was a single wall (6533), while in Stratum C-1a, it was composed of a double wall: Wall 6409 was built alongside Wall 6410, the southern wall of Building CR.

The Western Wing in Stratum C-1b

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plan: Fig. 12.27
Stratigraphic evidence for the use of the western and southern external walls (2454, 4479) in Stratum C-1b came from adjoining units (Buildings CE and CM), where floors and walls belonging to this phase abutted them. All the internal walls in this wing were constructed in Stratum C-1b and continued to be used in Stratum C-1a, based on the following evidence:
  1. Walls 4413 and 4422 (Squares Y–Z/4) had wooden beams incorporated in their foundations; this was a consistent characteristic typical of all Stratum C-1b construction in Area C, but was almost never found in walls that were first built in Stratum C-1a.

  2. The bricks in the lower courses of the northern face of Wall 4413 and eastern face of Wall 4422 (southern end) had two vertical protrusions, or marginal bosses, on each end, which was a characteristic found in other walls clearly dated to Stratum C-1b in the adjacent Building CE and in the unit north of Building CD (see above).

  3. The wooden beams incorporated in the foundation of Wall 4479, seen in its southern face in Square Z/4 and clearly related to Stratum C-1b, were probably, based on their levels, the continuation of the beams in the foundation of Wall 4413, which ran adjacent to it on the north and served as the inner southern wall of the western wing.

  4. The floors abutted the lowest course of these walls.

In Stratum C-1b, the long rectangular hall of the western wing was accessed directly from the western end of the broad space (6466). At the northern end of the hall was a small chamber, bordered on the north, west and south by Walls 6533, 6534 and 6535. On the east was a short wall (7422) whose top was flush with the floating level of the former walls, so that it seems to have served as a threshold. Inside this small room was a layer of brick chunks, charcoal and rubble (7409), similar to that found in the hall to the south, but on a level 0.6 m higher. This would have required a step down to the hall, although this was not identified in the excavation, since the C-1a wall here was not dismantled. Underneath the floating level of the walls was a layer of soft debris (7417) that abutted Wall 7422, but was only excavated to a depth of 0.1 m and could not be defined; perhaps it was a fill laid to level the C-2 remains below.

The length of the hall was 8.6–8.8 m (due to the angle of the southern wall, 4413) and its width, 2.7 m. Its interior was revealed only in probes under the floors and benches of Stratum C-1a (Figs. 12.59– 12.61; Photos 12.102–12.105). The lowest layer was 0.4 m-thick, composed of soft, smooth, burnt black material (5488, 5487, 5475, from north to south), which abutted the lowest course of the walls, on the level of the wooden beams in their foundations, as revealed in those spots where we removed the benches of the later phase. This black layer apparently represents the floor; directly below it were the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CU. Finds from this black layer included red-slipped and hand-burnished pottery, mostly sherds, but several complete or almost-complete vessels as well (Figs. 13.46–13.47), along with loomweights, beads, stoppers, grinding stones, bone objects and some grain (Table 12.14). This layer was covered by a 0.4 m-thick layer of burnt rubble (5478, 5479, 5463, from north to south), composed of hard burnt chunks of reddish brick, gray ash, bits of charcoal and large segments of collapsed ceiling material, some of which lay flat (Photos 12.102–12.105). This rubble abutted the surrounding walls in each room and was covered by a thin layer of whitish material (phytolith?), on which the Stratum C-1a floors, walls and benches were laid.

The Western Wing in Stratum C-1a

Introduction

Plans

Plans

  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 (1:50) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.29, 12.35–12.36
Following the destruction of the C-1b building, traces of which were noticeable mainly in the western wing, the long narrow hall was divided into four consecutive rooms by the addition of three cross walls that were built on top of wider foundations, which also served as narrow benches along the walls and continued eastwards to serve as brick thresholds in each entrance (Photos 12.92, 12.101). Two of the walls (5464, 5497) had a shallow niche cut into their southern face. Access to each of the rooms was only from the adjoining room, so that in order to enter the southernmost room, one had to pass through the three rooms to its north. From north to south, the dividing walls of these three rooms were: 5464, 5431 and 5497. They were 1.6 m long and 0.5 m wide each, and terminated 1.0 m west of Wall 5414, so that the entrances were aligned on a north–south axis, located in the northeastern corner of each room.

Along the north–south walls were lines of bricks, most of them 0.35 m wide, while others were narrower (0.3 m) or wider (0.45 m). All were preserved 0.25–0.35 m high (two courses); their height above the abutting floors ranged from 0.1– 0.25 m, while in the northern room they were flush with the floor. These were understood as benches, and they joined with those found under the three east–west cross walls. The bottom level of the benches was ca. 0.65 m above that of the outer walls of the building to which they were attached, and they were clearly built on top of the rubble and collapse layer ascribed to Stratum C-1b, described above (Figs. 12.59–12.61). This rubble also abutted the very bottom of the benches, suggesting that they were slightly sunk into that debris when constructed. The north–south benches lining the eastern and western walls of this wing run on one continuous line. This was particularly noticeable on the east, where the bench ran contiguously along the western face of Wall 5414. The benches were all composed of identical bricks that had been burnt to an almost stone-like consistency and to a pinkish color.

The Stratum C-1a floors in each room were composed of white lime and abutted the upper course of the benches. On these floors was a thick layer of burnt destruction debris with many finds. Following is a description of the rooms from north to south (6435, 5460, 5445, 5444)

Room 6435

This was a small room (internal measurements 1.5×3.1 m; 4.65 sq m) built above the small chamber/nich, 7409, of Stratum C-1b. On the north, west and south, the tops of the C-1b walls (6533, 6534, 6535) were visible in the floor makeup of the new room. Although they lined the walls, they were different from the other benches in this wing, as they did not rise above the floor level, and they continued down to be abutted by the C-1b rubble rather than built above it.

The room was entered from the broad space to the east. The beaten-earth floor (6435, level 86.85 m) was 0.35 m higher than Floor 6427 to the east, which would have necessitated some kind of small step to join them. A large grinding stone installation (6406) occupied its southeastern part. On the floor was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401) that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an exceptionally large amount considering the small space (Figs. 13.80–13.96; Photos 12.106–12.107). Just below topsoil were fragments of an elaborate horned pottery altar with mold-made female figures (Photo 12.108; Chapter 35, No. 5). The impression was that the numerous finds here were in storage and not found as used, since they were densely packed in this small area, around the grinding stone installation (6406) that took up part of the room as well (Photos 12.106–12.107, 12.109–12.110).

Installation 6406 was comprised of a finely made oval, round-topped clay parapet, 0.4 m high, enclosing a large lower grinding stone, on top of which was a complete upper grinding stone lying on its eastern end. The large lower grinding stone was somewhat raised above the floor of the installation and tilted down from west to east, so as to facilitate the gathering of the grain into a small depression between the western end of the lower grinding stone and the parapet. Curiously, the installation, built against the eastern end of Wall 5464, was situated so that its eastern end partially blocked the entrance to the room to the south. It is either possible that this was a later addition to the room or that, despite its position, it was not considered as an obstacle. This installation was similar to the one found in Room 5498 of the eastern wing of Building CF, as well as in Building CQ1 and possibly, Buildings CQ2, CP and CE; one was found in Area G as well (Chapter 20). The clay parapets of these grinding stone installations enabled flour to be easily collected and to prevent grain from being scattered. It seems that the grinder would have worked from the higher (western) side of the installation, so as to use gravity when pushing the upper grinding stone (as in Photo 12.110), although this was quite a cramped space to crouch in.

Room 5460

The second room from the north, built above C-1b burnt debris 5478 (Figs. 12.59–12.60), was the largest (internal measurements 2.4×2.7 m; 6.48 sq m). Destruction debris (5425 on the east and 5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and the benches (Photo 12.111). The northern wall (5464) was built on top of a wider wall (5474) that protruded on its southern face, creating a kind of narrow bench; a shallow niche created in Wall 5464 widened this bench to 0.3 m. Abutting the western wall (4422) was a line of bricks that cornered with 5474 and created a bench (5472). A similar situation existed on the east, where Bench 5473 abutted Wall 5414; this bench continued south into the other rooms as well and cornered on the north with 5474. No bench lined the southern wall.

Among the many finds was a Hippo storage jar with an inscription reading לשקינמש, Isqymns (Fig. 13.91:2; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 303–304; Ahituv and Mazar 2014: 44–45; Chapter 29A, No. 6). It was found in Locus 5425, along with another 40 vessels, several of them intact (Figs. 13.80–13.87, 13.89, 13.91–13.93, 13.95–13.96); most were concentrated in the southeastern part of the room, near the entrance leading south to Room 5445 (Photo 12.111). Among them was a unique shovel (Fig. 13.96:1; Chapter 35, No. 49).

Room 5445

The middle room, built above C-1b burnt debris 5479, was the smallest (internal measurements 1.2×2.7 m; 3.24 sq. m). Its northern wall (5431) was built on top of a slightly wider wall/ bench (5484), so that only 0.2 m of the latter protruded into the room on the south, but not at all on the north. On the west, Bench 5485 cornered with 5484. On the east, the situation was somewhat ambivalent: it seems that 5473, the eastern bench of Room 5460 to the north, continued to the south into Room 5445 as well. However, an additional row of bricks, identical to Bench 5473, adjoined it on the west. Above this western row of bricks was a line composed of large chunks of burnt bricks. This feature (5458), 0.3 m wide and 1.5 m long, stood two courses high and blocked the entrance into this room, as well as the entrance into the southernmost room (Photo 12.111). However, although it appears to have been built as a blockage, it is possible to understand it as the collapse of bricks from one of the walls that happened to land on this line inside the room.

Room 5445 was filled with burnt destruction debris (5421, 5467) that covered and abutted the benches and rested on Floor 5445; however, as opposed to the other rooms in this building, it was virtually empty, with only a small amount of sherds, mostly concentrated on the eastern bench (Figs. 13.81–13.82). Among the sherds was a fragment of a Greek bowl (Fig. 13.96:9; Chapter 28A).

Room 5444

This room, built above C-1b burnt debris 5463 (Fig. 12.60) was the southernmost and innermost room in the western wing (internal measurements 1.8×2.7 m; 4.86 sq m) (Photos 12.112–12.113). Its northern wall (5497) was built on top of a wider wall that served as a narrow bench on the south (5471); a niche cut out of the southern face of the wall exposed 0.5 m of this bench, although on the eastern and western ends, where there was no niche, only 0.1 m of it protruded. This arrangement was almost identical to that in the northern end of the northernmost room. This small room was found full of extremely burnt destruction debris (4414) on the white lime floor with some ash (5444), including many fallen bricks that had been fired almost to the consistency of pottery. Thirteen vessels from this room were restored (Figs. 13.80– 13.81, 13.83–13.84, 13.86, 13.90–13.96). Several of these were found on (or partly on) the benches, including a Hippo storage jar on the eastern bench (Fig. 13.91:4), another storage jar (Fig. 13.90:9) on the eastern end of the northern bench, just where the entrance was, and a very large krater (Fig. 13.92:7) on the southern bench. A unique find was a large, heavy clay box with a matching lid (Fig. 13.96a:10) in the northwestern corner of the room (Photo 12.112). This box, very distorted by fire, ca. 0.55 m wide, 0.65 m long and 0.45 m high, was set on a protrusion in the corner of Benches 5469 and 5471, composed of bricks identical to those of the benches, apparently deliberately built to accommodate the box (Photo 12.113). The lid of the box was found overturned just to its east, above a bowl (Fig. 13.80:6) and an intact juglet (Fig. 13.95:11) was found just below the box’s southwestern corner; the only finds inside the box was a small fragment of a very worn female figurine (Chapter 34, No. 13).

The location of this room in the deep interior of the western wing of Building CF, which was surrounded on three sides by double walls and accessed only through the other rooms of the western wing, as well as the unique pottery box and ceramic assemblage, indicated that it had some special function, perhaps some sort of a treasury.

Summary of Building CF

The architecture and contents of Building CF are unique in many ways. Although the grinding installations, oven and many loomweights found in this building in Stratum C-1a are typical of household activity, the plan of this building, the double walls, and the unique finds make it exceptional.

The net floor space is not exceptional and should be regarded as modest compared to other Iron Age II houses (Table 12.13; Schloen 2001: 165–183; Mazar 2008; see summary below), although it was larger than most other buildings excavated at Tel Rehov. Based on the width of the walls, we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris. Although one may surmise that the large northeastern space (5498) in Stratum C-1a was an open courtyard, this does not seem feasible, in spite of the fact that an oven was located at the northern end of this space. Air and light could be obtained through the main entrance on the north and windows in the southern wall of the building, since all other walls bordered neighboring buildings.

The most outstanding feature in this building was the row of small rooms in the western wing in Stratum C-1a, with benches along the walls. The consecutive arrangement of four rooms entered successively by way of the previous room, lined with benches along most of the walls, is virtually unparalleled in the Iron Age architecture in Israel (see further below). The small size of these rooms and the fact that the two inner ones could not get direct light or air except from the room to the north, emphasize their unique function. The inscribed jar with the inscription — לשקינמש, lšqynmš — found in the largest of these rooms, and the massive pottery box with the lid found in the southern room, allude to a special function of this wing. We can suggest that these were the offices of an important personality, perhaps a merchant or a clan leader, and that the box served as a ‘treasury’ of some kind. The unique model shrine, decorated altar facade, and so-called ‘footbath’ (the function of which remains enigmatic), as well as the presence of two elaborate grinding stone installations, a loom, and other rich finds from this building, are evidence of this special function.

The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. The integration of Building CF with the buildings surrounding it during both strata is typical of the architectural and occupational nature of the Iron Age IIA at Tel Rehov. One possible reason for such dense and crowded construction may be related to efforts to stabilize the structures in light of the seismic sensitivity in this region. This may also be related to local architectural traditions that continued during all of Iron IIA, perhaps with earlier origins, and were special markers of the inhabitants’ cultural identity.

An interesting parallel to the plan of this building can be seen at Megiddo in Stratum VA– IVB Building 2081 (Loud 1948: 44–46, plan: Fig. 388, reconstructed plan: Fig. 100). This building comprised a large courtyard (2081). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a cult corner containing two stone horned altars, two pottery stands and additional objects (Zevit 2001: 220– 225). From the courtyard, an entrance led into a unit that resembled Building CF, with a rectangular hall containing an inner chamber. From the front part of the hall, an entrance led into a narrow side chamber, which, in turn, led into two additional rooms arranged in a similar manner as those in Building CF, with entrances located at the end of the walls. It may be suggested that a room at the southwestern corner of this building was also part of this chain of rooms, since the walls were preserved lower than the floor and the location of entrances could not be determined with any certainty in this place. The size of this building fits that of Building CF. It differed in having an additional western wing, the long hall 2163. However, no entrance connecting the eastern to the western wing was found and thus, it is difficult to say whether it belonged to the same building. Another exceptional feature was the two pillar bases at the front part of the main hall. These have no parallels in Building CF, unless we consider the large stone found near Wall 6455 in Stratum C-1b and a second large stone found nearby in Stratum C-1a as pillar bases found out of their original position. It should be noted that the rooms of the eastern wing of Building 2081 at Megiddo were not numbered and no finds were published from them. However, the cult corner in Courtyard 2081 included pottery similar to that from Tel Rehov Strata IV–V (C-1a–b). It may be suggested that these two buildings might have had similar functions, perhaps serving as dwellings of elite families who incorporated commercial activities in their household and had their own cult corners and paraphernalia (see Chapter 4; Fig. 4.12).

Building CW

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.114 - C-1a Buildings CW, CQ1, CQ2 (west half excavated) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.115 - Debris on Floor 8430 in C-1a Building CW Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.116 - C-1a Building CW, looking west, Rooms 6411 and 6438 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.117 - C-1a Building CW, looking south; destruction debris and vessels in Room 6411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.118 - C-1a Building CW, Room 6411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.119 - C-1a Skeleton in Square C/6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
  • Sections: Figs. 12.55–12.56
  • Photos 12.114–12.119
  • Pottery: C-1b — Figs. 13.48:15–20; C-1a — Figs. 13.97–13.102
Introduction

Building CW (Squares A–C/6) was constructed above Stratum C-2 Building CY (Photo 12.114) and to a large extent, is a rebuild of the latter, retaining much of its layout. Like Building CY, it was only partly excavated and continued to the north beyond the limit of the excavation area. Two phases were defined in this building, attributed to Strata C-1b and C-1a, yet in the second phase (C-1a), changes occurred mainly in the courtyard and the eastern part of the building, while the two rooms in the west remained unchanged; thus, they appear in the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a. Since the differentiation between the two phases was not emphatic, both are described together.

The building adjoined the entrance corridor and northern space of Building CF on the west and the northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 on the south (Photos 12.92, 12.114). Its outer width from east to west was 10.4 m and its known length was 5.8 m, although it extended to the north beyond the limits of the excavation area. Unlike most other Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this appears to have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least on one side. See also Building CY in Stratum C-2 and Building CZ in Stratum C-1b for a similar concept. The southern border of the building was Wall 6444, which ran parallel and adjacent to the northern wall of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (6407), forming a double wall, 1.1 m wide. Wall 6444 contained wooden beams typical of Stratum C-1b in its foundation; these were round, ca. 0.05–0.07 m in diameter, closely spaced, and placed perpendicular to the wall’s foundation (Photos 12.59–12.61). The western wall 6408 continued to the south where it was the western wall of Building CQ1. It is thus clear that Building CW was built together with Building CQ1, and probably with CQ2 as well. The eastern wall in Stratum C-1b (8491) was replaced in C-1a by Wall 8424.

Courtyard 7501 (C-1b) and 7471 (C-1a)

In Stratum C-1b, the spacious courtyard was 6.0 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Its western border was Wall 6420 and its northern continuation, Wall 6476. The border on the east was Wall 8491; a segment of an additional wall (8476) was attached to its western face for 2.5 m; north of this, in its stead, was a north–south row of rather large (ca. 0.3×0.4 m each) roughly rectangular stones (8499), three of which were placed together and a fourth slightly to the north, running into the northern balk (Photo 12.63). These stones adjoined Wall 8491 and thus could not have served as pillar bases; they recall the stones along the walls in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and elsewhere and perhaps served as solid bases for jars or other objects. In Stratum C-1a, Wall 8476 and the stones were removed, and substantial changes were made in the eastern part of the courtyard (see below).

Only a single floor was found in the courtyard (7471, level 86.29 m) (Photo 12.114), laid on a 0.4 m-thick fill of soft brown earth (7501, 8462) that covered the remains of Stratum C-2 Building CY (Fig. 12.55). This fill layer is shown in the plan of Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.35), as we assume that it was laid at that time, in preparation for the laying of the floor; it is possible that an earlier floor of C-1b was removed when Floor 7471 was laid, leaving only the fill. The floor (shown on the plan of Stratum C-1a; Figs. 12.36, 12.38) was composed of soft reddish-brown earth, its central and southeastern parts burnt black, with some light gray ashy patches and flecks of charcoal throughout. The floor dipped down in the northwest, visible in the northern section of Square B/6 (Fig. 12.55); in this shallow depression was a complete Hippo jar (Fig. 13.99:7). It was not clear whether this depression was intentional (a pit?) or whether it represented a postdepositional phenomenon. A concentration of black ash found to the west of this dip, against Wall 6476, contained two cooking pots (Fig. 13.98:1, 3) and a loomweight. Along the western end of the courtyard was a strip of small stones (7479) set closely together, although rather haphazardly, with a lower layer of stones in its central part. The stones ran parallel to Wall 6420 (Photo 12.114) and may have been a remnant of a poorly preserved stone pavement. The stones ended in the north close to the abovementioned dip in the floor; they recall those found in the northwestern part of Building CX, described below.

The main change in the courtyard, attributed to the transition from C-1b to C-1a, took place in its eastern part and included the replacement of Wall 8491 with Wall 8424 and the addition of an installation that covered Wall 8476 and Stones 8499. Wall 8424 was poorly preserved and it is not clear if it was cut on its northern end or whether there had been an entrance there.

The installation included Wall 8426, an east– west wall, preserved along 2.2 m and 0.15 m high, that extended from the center of Wall 8424 and served as a divider between two spaces that were open to the west (Photo 12.115). The floors of these spaces (8423, 8430 in the north, 8420 in the south) were covered with plaster that lipped up to the faces of the wall in a manner that created shallow channels, which were burnt on their western ends. The northern end of the northern space contained a concentration of stones, east of which were three jugs and one juglet (Fig. 13.101:2–3, 6, 12). On its western end, Wall 8426 joined a shallow north– south channel that terminated on the north near a large lower grinding stone embedded in the floor, and on the south at the center of the southern space. Two stone mortars, one particularly large and the other smaller, flanked the northern end of the channel on the west and east, respectively. The function of these elements remained unclear; it is possible that some substance was drained from the plastered floors into the shallow channel on their west, and that the grinding stone and mortars were used in conjunction with this activity.

A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401), revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire courtyard area, comprising hard burnt brick debris with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash. Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97– 13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig. 13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table 12.16).

Room 6411

This room was bordered by Walls 6408 on the west, 6429 on the north and 6420 on the east (internal measurements 2.1×3.0 m; 6.3 sq. m). An entranceway in the southern end of Wall 6420 led to the room from the courtyard. The only floor found in this room (6411) was made of pink plaster laid above a layer of earth and brick debris (6451) that appears to have been a fill above Building CY, similar to the situation in the courtyard to the east.

Brick benches (6457, 6458 and 6496) were constructed along the western, eastern and southern walls of the room respectively. The benches were 0.35 m wide and 0.35 m high, recalling those in Building CF, although in this case, they were built against the walls and not under them. Placed on top of each end of the western and eastern benches (6457, 6458) were flat-topped stones, perhaps serving as solid supports for jars or other objects (Photo 12.116). In the southwestern corner of the room was an L-shaped brick that formed a niche in which an intact juglet (Fig. 13.101:11) was placed. The room was full of heavily burnt destruction debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris, including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs, juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig. 13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in the debris above the benches that lined the walls (Photo 12.117). A concentration of ten clay loomweights was found on the western end of this bench (Photo 12.118). Other finds in this room included three scale weights and a bronze scale pan, as well as a seal and iron tools (Table 12.16).

Room 6438

This room, located in the northwestern part of the building, was bordered by Walls 6429 on the south, 6497 on the west and 6476 on the east. The internal width was 2.5 m and it was at least 1.4 m long, as its northern border was beyond the limit of the excavation area, with an entrance probably in its northeastern corner. Although the eastern and western walls continued the lines of those of Room 6411 to the south, they were not one and the same, as they abutted the northern face of Wall 6429, but did not bond with it. It is possible that this room had been accessed from the courtyard on the east at a spot further to the north, beyond the limits of the excavation. Just as in Room 6411, a layer of debris that might have been a fill (6462) was found above the C-2 remains and was covered by the floor and benches in this room, so it is assumed that it, like the room to its south, had only one phase of use.

Benches (6480, 6481) lined the western and eastern walls (but not the southern wall), continuing the line of the benches in Room 6411 to the south. Here too, stones were found on top of their southern and northern ends (Photo 12.116). The room was full of burnt destruction debris; eight vessels rested on Floor 6438 at level 86.50 m.

Area East of Building CW

A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city

Buildings CQ1 and CQ2

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.57 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.120 - Wall 7413 of C-1a Building CQ2 tilted southward towards the street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.121 - C-1a Building CQ1; destruction debris in western rooms from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.122 - C-1a Building CQ1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.123 - Wall 7413 of C-1a Building CQ2 tilted southward from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.124 - C-1a Building CQ1; destruction debris in Room 7490 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.125 - Tilted Wall in C-1a Building CQ2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.126 - Destruction debris in Room 7500 of C-1a Building CQ1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
  • Section: Fig. 12.57
  • Photos 12.120–12.126
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.103–13.119
Introduction

To the south of Building CW and the east of Building CF were two virtually twin buildings, termed CQ1 and CQ2, adjoined by a double wall (Squares A–C/4–5). Both buildings were enclosed on the north by Wall 6407, which was attached to Wall 6444 of Building CW, together creating a double wall, 1.1 m wide (Photo 12.120). On the west, Building CQ1 adjoined Building CF with a double wall, although in Stratum C-1a, with the removal of the inner wall of the northeastern part of Building CF, a double wall was left only in the south and the two buildings shared a wall in the north. Thus, it can be seen how Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 were not only related to each other, but were also a part of the northeastern insula, all the units of which must have been built together according to an integrated plan. On the south, the buildings were closed by a single wall and fronted by a street. The eastern border of Building CQ2 was also a single wall; although unexcavated, it is possible that a north–south street ran here and continued to the north alongside Building CW.

Both buildings were small and comprised three rooms each: a rectangular room on the south and two small rooms on the north, one larger than the other. Yet another building with the same plan was found to the south of Building CQ1, termed Building CQ3. The entrance to Building CQ1 was in its southeastern corner (opposite the entrance of Building CQ3), but curiously, no entrance into CQ2 could be identified. While Building CQ1 was built on a north–south axis, its eastern side ran on a slightly northwest–southeast line, which dictated the orientation of the adjoining Building CQ2; in fact, the eastern wall of the latter building was even more skewed, lending it a trapezoidal shape.

Similar to Building CW to the immediate north Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 had one main phase, with burnt destruction debris under topsoil down to the floors and only ephemeral indications of an earlier occupation in Stratum C-1b. Both buildings were built above remains attributed to Stratum C-2 in Squares A–B/4–5. The most likely explanation is that the buildings were constructed in Stratum C-1b and continued to be in use until the violent destruction at the end of Stratum C-1a. The wood in the foundations of the walls points to this option, as this was a typical C-1b feature. Thus, the buildings appear on the plans of both Strata C-1b and C-1a.

A narrow area to the south of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as Building CF to their west (Photos 12.120, 12.122), appears to have been an east–west street, some 1.4 m wide, that ran between the block of Buildings CF, CQ1 and CQ2 on the north and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south, merging into Piazza 2417 on the west in Stratum C-1a.

The buildings are described below as found in Stratum C-1a, noting the very minor remains of the sporadically detected earlier (C-1b) phase.

Building CQ1

Plans, Sections, and Photos

Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
Introduction

The external measurements of Building CQ1 were 5.2–5.5×6.4 m (floor space, ca. 19 sq m). It included one large room (6483) that spanned the width of the building and two smaller rooms (6436, 7447) to its north. The southern wall was Wall 6445, which continued the line of Wall 5455, the southern inner wall of Building CF. On the west, the building was closed by Wall 6408, which continued to the north, where it was the western wall of Building CW and abutted the eastern wall of Building CF on the south (Photos 12.121–12.122). The eastern wall (7416) created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast.

Room 6483

The southern and largest space of the building was apparently a roofed room, measuring internally 2.8×4.3 m (floor space, 12.04 sq m). The entrance into this room, and, in fact, into the building itself, was in its southeastern corner. The entrance was 1.2 m wide and had a brick threshold at 86.12 m; it opened to the street that ran along the southern façade of the building, although the excavated level of the street surface was higher by ca. 0.7 m than the threshold. This would have required few steps or a ladder to access the building from the street, whether into Room 6483 or to a second story.

The floor was composed of two parts: on the west was a stone floor (6472) that ran up to the line of the entranceway in Wall 6446, containing closely laid basalt stones and limestones, as well as some broken upper grinding stones and mortars. Underneath the stone pavement were two large stones that apparently served to buttress it. Such a stone floor was rare at Tel Rehov in Iron IIA and was found only in Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and perhaps CJ in Stratum C-1a.

The stone floor was abutted on the east by a smooth reddish clay floor (7450 in the east, 6483 in the west); patches of this matrix were also found between the stones, so that it apparently had covered them as well. In the central-eastern part of Floor 6483 was a round, flat-topped stone that appears to have been a pillar base; it was encircled by several small stones that included two loomweights, one of stone and one of clay. Between this pillar base and Wall 7454 on the north was a patch of hard plaster.

The floor was covered with a layer of extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris (6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo 12.121). In the northwestern part of the room, near the southern face of Wall 6446, was a grinding stone installation (6453), like those found in Buildings CF and CE; it was not very well preserved (Photo 12.122). The lower grinding stone of the installation was installed on a brick base, which raised it to ca. 0.4 m above the floor; underneath the stone was an antler. This room contained 26 vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects (Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights.

The reddish clay matrix of Floor 6483 rested on a 0.15 m-deep layer of red, gray and white striations (also numbered 6483) that abutted the lowest courses of the surrounding walls, which contained wooden beams in their foundations. These striations penetrated below the stone floor in the western half of the room and they may have belonged to the initial use of this room in Stratum C-1b.

Room 6436

The small northwestern room (6436; measuring internally 1.9×2.35 m, 4.46 sq m) was bordered on the east by Wall 6422 and on the south by Wall 6446; in the eastern end of the latter wall was a narrow entrance, 0.5 m wide. The floor was made of smooth reddish clay (level 86.00 m), identical to that of the large room to the south. The wood in the foundations of the surrounding walls protruded somewhat into the room below the floor, embedded in a matrix of reddish clay (6477) that was similar to the floor makeup itself. This sub-floor material with wood was laid on top of Wall 6501 and Locus 6502, attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.12). A wooden beam was found in the entranceway itself, possibly a threshold. On the floor was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17).

Room 7447

The northeastern room (7447; measuring internally 1.3×2.0 m, 2.6 sq m) was separated from the room to its west by Wall 6422. This small narrow room was entered from the larger southern room by way of an opening, 0.8–0.9 m wide, in its southern wall (7454); this opening had a brick threshold that was, in fact, the continuation of Wall 7454, on the level of the floor. A row of bricks (7448) ran along the northern wall of this room just on the floor level and might have been a bench. Like in the room to the west, the wooden beams in the foundation of Wall 6422 protruded into the sub-floor makeup of reddish clay. The reddish clay floor was identical to that of the other rooms and was covered by very burnt complete fallen bricks and ceiling material (7426); on it were six pottery vessels and other objects (Table 12.17)

Building CQ2

Plans, Sections, and Photos

Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.38 - Plan of Buildings CW, CQ1 and CQ3, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.34–12.35, 12.38
Introduction

Adjoining Building CQ1 on the east was an almost identical, slightly larger unit, termed Building CQ2 (Photos 12.120, 12.123) (external measurements 5.6–6.0×6.3 m; floor space, ca. 21 sq m). As noted above, the southern part of the western wall was slightly skewed, and the entire eastern wall (8405) was even more so, and thus, the building was somewhat trapezoidal (Photo 12.123).

The problem of the entrance to this building remains unresolved. If we duplicate the plan of Building CQ1, the entrance should have been close to the eastern end of Wall 8434 and thus, exactly opposite the entrance into C-1a Building CX to the south. However, the wall here stood up to 1.0 m above the floor level inside the building and did not show any signs of a gap or a blockage. Note the suggestion that the street level to the south of Building CQ2, which was ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor inside the building, might have served to directly access an upper floor.

Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an extremely large amount for such a small building, even when taking into account the existence of a second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in Chapter 45.

Room 7500

The southern and largest room of this building (7500) spanned its entire width. Due to the angle of the eastern wall (8405), it was trapezoidal (internal measurements 2.6×4.5–4.9 m; 12.2 sq m). The floor of this room was identical to that of Room 6483 in Building CQ1: a stone pavement (7503) on the west and soft reddish clay on the east (7500), on line with the entrance into Room 7490. The pavement was nicely laid, with small stones filling the gaps between the flat-topped stones, which incorporated several broken and complete upper grinding stones. A large lower grinding stone was found in the southwestern part of the room, some 0.3 m above the stone floor. It is possible that this had belonged to a grinding stone installation similar to those found in Building CQ1, CF and CE, as chunks of hard clay found scattered nearby might have been part of its surrounding parapet. Attached to the center of the southern wall was a bin (7508), 0.8 m wide and 1.5 m long, with narrow clay walls that also ran partially along the southern wall. A stone mortar was found on the northeastern end of this bin with an upper grinding stone inside it.

Underneath the reddish clay floor in the southeastern corner of this room was a rather large smooth pink mizi limestone resting on a layer of red and gray striations (8445), similar to those in Building CQ1; a juglet (Fig. 13.118:11) was found in this layer. This stone was very similar to that found in the Stratum C-1b phase of Building CF, described above. Like in Room 6483 in Building CQ1, this layer ran to the west under the stone floor and it is possible that it represented the Stratum C-1b occupation. The foundations of both the southern and eastern walls of Building CQ2 were not reached and it is possible that an earlier phase is yet to be exposed.

Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos 12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of fine small closed vessels. Several other objects were found as well (Table 12.18). An interesting find was a concentration of some 20 small polished black and gray wadi pebbles found on the floor, as well as inside an intact juglet (Fig. 13.118:17). These were weighed in order to ascertain if they had significance as weights, but it seems that this was not their main function, as they did not yield any known value (pers. comm., Raz Kletter).

Room 7490

The northwestern room (internal measurements 2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m), was slightly wider than its counterpart in Building CQ1. On the east, it was closed by Wall 7406 and on the south by Wall 7459, in which a 0.75 m-wide entrance was located on its eastern end. Wooden beams were incorporated in the foundations of the walls in this room (Photo 12.125) and the entrance had a fine brick threshold with a plank of wood found in situ. An exceptional recess was located in the outer eastern side of the entrance in Wall 8411, a detail somewhat similar to the rounded recesses in two of the entrances in Building CP (11440, 11446), described below. Two brick courses were missing from this wall in its center (Photo 12.126); this appears to have been a kind of window or niche between this room and the one to its south.

The reddish clay floor (7490) in this room was exactly the same as the floors in Building CQ1. The top of Stratum C-2 Wall 7492 (Photo 12.125) protruded into the floor, running along the northern wall of the room, 0.2 m above the floor, and might have been used as a bench.

This room was filled with burnt destruction debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds (Table 12.18). A complete baking tray (Fig. 13.112:1), made of non-cooking pot fabric, a rare item in the Iron Age IIA pottery assemblage of Tel Rehov, was one of the finds in this room.

Room 8431

The northeastern room was the smallest; its trapezoid shape was due to the angle of the eastern wall (8405) (internal measurements 1.2–1.4×2.1; ca. 3.0 sq m). A row of bricks (8412) ran along the southern face of Wall 6407 in the northern part of this room, continuing the line of 7492 from the adjacent room, but standing much higher, almost on the level of the tops of the surrounding walls. Since excavation did not proceed below the floor, it is not known whether this was the upper part of an earlier wall, like Wall 7492. The entrance to the room on the southeast, 0.7–0.8 m wide, contained a curious feature composed of four narrow bricks that formed a square, enclosing a small area of softer debris (8446). To the south of the southern brick was an upper grinding stone, parallel to the threshold; it is difficult to say whether it was deliberately placed there or was fallen. The presence of this bin-like element just where one would step into the room through the threshold is enigmatic. It is possible that it was a Stratum C-1b element that slightly protruded into the floor here, or that it was somehow related to the function of the room.

Room 8431 was full of burnt destruction debris and fallen bricks, yielding seven vessels and several other objects (Table 12.18).

Summary of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2

Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to the south, see below) are exceptional among the Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small overall size and the even smaller size of the inner rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms. It may be assumed that these houses had a second story, thus their functional space could have been double, although no evidence for steps was found and access must have been from the outside of the building. This possibility may explain the lack of an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the lower storey of this building was entered by a wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact, there was such an entrance in Building CQ1, despite the higher street level to its south. Notably, the buildings contained very large amounts of pottery, as well as a range of other finds, that might point to them having been dwellings. On the other hand, they lacked cooking facilities, such as ovens, although cooking pots and one baking tray were found.

These buildings can be compared to small houses found in Area C at Hazor, dating to the 13th–11th centuries BCE (Yadin et al. 1960: 98, Pl. 208), in Tell Abu Hawam Stratum IV (Hamilton 1935: Plate IV), Aphek Stratum X11 (Gadot and Yadin 2009: 90––93, Figs. 6.2, 6.4), and perhaps also Building 442 in Stratum VIA at Tel Batash, although it was not fully uncovered and appears to have been larger (Mazar 1997: 76–79; list cited from Gadot and Yadin 2009: 93, with Egyptian parallels as well). However, all these examples are much earlier (13th–11th centuries BCE), while no similar houses are known in Iron Age II Israel.

Building CG

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.76 - Section 22 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.92 - Buildings CF, CW, and CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.127 - C-1 Building CG and C-2 Buildings CA and CB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.128 - Tilted and Deformed Walls in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.129 - Tilted and Collapsed Walls in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.130 - Wood Beam Foundations in Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.131 - Destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Room 2441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.132 - Destruction and slippage of lower brick courses in Room 2441 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.133 - Collapse of Wall 2439 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.134 - Foundation trench of C-1 Wall 1416 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.135 - Brick collapse from C-1b Building CG from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18–12.19, 12.39–12.40
  • Sections: Figs. 12.68–12.69, 12.73, 12.76–12.77
  • Photos: 12.92, 12.127–12.135;
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.52–13.55
Introduction

Building CG (Squares T–Y/2–4) was a narrow rectangular structure, measuring externally 3.4×8.9 m, with massive walls wider than those of other buildings (recalling the double walls of back-to-back units) (Photos 12.5, 12.8, 12.127). Both the external and the internal walls were 0.9 m wide, composed of two rows of bricks, one laid widthwise and one lengthwise, a building technique found so far almost exclusively in this building. The walls were composed of hard-packed light and dark gray bricks and were exposed just under topsoil.

The building contained three small square rooms that had no entrances and were apparently accessed from above. The floor space of each room was 2.5–2.7 sq m. It is possible that this building had a second story. Although the amount of debris and fallen bricks found here did not seem to justify this, we must take into account that much of this material was eroded and disappeared from this high point of the lower mound.

The only discernible change in this building between Strata C-1b and C-1a took place in its southernmost room, while only one phase was detected in the other two rooms. The buildings adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the southeast, and the open area south of Building CD on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to the east and west of Building CG became open spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to the west).

The two outer walls on the west and east (1416, 2411) ran parallel to each other on an almost straight north–south line, while the northern (2453) and southern (2439) walls of the building were slightly skewed, running on a southwest–northeast line; on the north, this was the same angle as that of Building CE, which adjoined it. The sharp angles of the short walls (especially in the northern part of the structure) give the plan a slightly irregular shape.

The building was constructed on top of the ruins of Building CB of Stratum C-2: the western wall (1416) was built over Wall 2505, 0.3 m to its east (Figs. 12.16, 12.68–12.69, Photos 12.31– 12.34) and the southern wall (2439) was built over the southern part of the entrance in Wall 2505 (Photo 12.32). Room 2444 covered Wall 2481 of C2 (Photo 12.38). All the walls were preserved ca. ten courses high and had wooden beams in their foundations (Photos 12.128–12.133). The massive construction of the interior and exterior walls was apparently related to the surmised function as a granary or storage building.

Building CG — Stratum C-1b

Room 2460

The northernmost room (internal measurements 1.5–1.6×1.6 m; ca. 2.56 sq m) contained fallen ceiling material and hard vitrified brick debris (2449), some of it burnt to a powdery lime, to a total depth of 1.2 m above the assumed floor at level 86.40 m. Although excavation proceeded past the foundation level of the walls, no clear floor matrix was detected and the assumed floor (2460) was determined only on the basis of the location of the finds and the floating level of the walls (Fig. 12.76). Unlike the other rooms in this building, no charred wood was found here below the floor level.

This small room contained 22 vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), many of them very burnt. Twenty-eight stone loomweights were found, concentrated mainly in the southwestern corner of the room. No grain was found in this room, although a large amount was found in the other two rooms. The small size of this chamber and the lack of an entrance indicated that this large collection of varied pottery vessels and objects was apparently stored here, perhaps close to the time of destruction. As we assume that all three chambers in this building served as a granary, the use of this chamber for storage appears to be secondary, at a time when no grain was stored here.

Room 2444

The middle room of the building (2444) measured almost exactly the same as Room 2460 to its north (internal measurements 1.5×1.6 m; 2.4 sq m). Its southern wall (2429) had a 0.7 m wide gap in its five upper courses (not shown on the plan; Photo 12.127), although its southern face and bottom courses clearly showed that this was a solid wall. This gap appears to have been intentional, perhaps used as a storage niche or it was an elevated opening, similar to those in the square granary rooms at Tel Hadar (Kochavi 1999: 181, Fig. 2).

A light-colored clay layer which appears to have been the floor (2444, 86.60 m) was defined as such mainly based on its position at the foundation of the walls, the wooden beams underneath it, and the destruction debris (2425) resting on it, including a large amount of grain. Just below the floor level, a round wooden beam was incorporated in the foundation of Wall 1416, running 1.3 m from the northwestern corner of the room to the south, where it branched out to protrude into the room for 0.25 m. Round wooden beams (average diameter 0.10–0.15 m) were also placed in the foundation of Wall 2411 on the east (Fig. 12.77). However, as opposed to the beam in Wall 1416, these were laid perpendicular to the wall and protruded into the room up to 1.5 m, just below the floor level; they included tree trunks and branches, as well as some worked beams (Fig. 12.41; Photo 12.130). As noted above, these same wooden beams were visible in the eastern face of Wall 2411. It thus can be seen that the wood was laid in preparation for the construction of the walls and floors and constituted a well-planned system. Under the charred wood that extended from the foundation of Wall 2411 into the room was a single course of bricks (2478) running north–south, serving as a kind of support, above which a shallow fill was laid. These bricks appeared to have been intentionally removed from C-2 Wall 2481, which ran under the northern end of this room, and served as a sub-floor constructional element (Fig. 12.77; Photo 12.38).

The room was full of fallen ceiling material and extremely burnt debris, including ashes and complete fallen bricks, burnt to white and yellow vitrification and to a powdery consistency (2425), which were found especially in the southwestern part of the room, at a total depth of 1.0 m. At 86.80–86.90 m, a large concentration of charred grain (about 2.0 kg) was found in the southwestern corner and against the northern face of Wall 2429. The only other finds in this room were fragments of a bowl (Fig. 13.52:10) and sherds of a large Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.55:18), indicating that its main function might have been grain storage, used as a kind of a ‘chamber-bin’. The grains were identified as wheat (Chapter 53) and were subjected to a series of 14C dating. One measurement from Locus 2444 (Sample R30) provided the dates 928–858 BCE (1σ) and 970–846 BCE (2σ); a second date appears to be too high. Samples R31–R34 from Locus 2425 were measured with 21 repetitions in four laboratories; the average calibrated date was 898–844 BCE (1σ) and 906–837 BCE (2σ) (see data and discussion in Chapter 48).

Room 2441

The southern room is reconstructed as having been identical to the two complete northern rooms. With the reconstructed southeastern corner, Room 2441 measured internally ca. 1.6×1.7 m (2.7 sq m), very similar to the room to its north. However, most of the eastern and southern walls of this room had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72; Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall 2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a door jamb of an opening leading to the room from Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain.

Both the floor and the walls of this room were constructed above a 1.3 m-deep layer of fill and wood which apparently was laid as a leveler and stabilizer on top of the C-2 remains below (Photos 12.128–12.129). This deep wooden construction was composed of four to five layers of alternating lengthwise and widthwise wooden beams (2470, 2471, 4421; Fig. 12.42a–c; Photos 12.131–12.133). The upper layer of wood, with nicely worked rounded beams, some reaching over 1.0 m long, was mostly laid on a north–south axis (2470; Photo 12.143). The two lowest layers of this wood (2471, 4421) were mostly laid on an east–west axis (Photo 12.133). Notably, most of the lower level of this sub-floor wooden construction was horizontal, as opposed to the higher levels of the wood, which sloped down towards the east, having collapsed with the southeastern corner of the room. Although the lower layers of wood under the floor penetrated down deeper than the wood in the foundations of Walls 1416 and 2439, and were found on the level of the entranceway in C-2 Wall 2505 (Photos 12.32–12.33, 12.128–12.129), they should be attributed to the construction of Building CG in Stratum C-1b. The reasons for this are:

  1. The entrance in C-2 Wall 2505 was intentionally filled in and leveled off with a wooden beam when C-1b Wall 1416 was built; this beam was on the same level as the uppermost wood in Locus 2470.

  2. The wooden beams would have obstructed passageway through this entrance and thus, they could not have been used in C-2.

  3. The wooden construction was concentrated between the line just to the east of Wall 1416 and the eastern face of Wall 2411, indicating that all these elements were built at the same time.

  4. The lowest wooden construction was on the same level as the foundation of Wall 2429, seen on its southern face (85.80 m), and Wall 2411, seen on its southern end (85.90 m).

  5. The construction of Wall 1416 cut the eastern end of Stratum C-2 Wall 1483, with a clearly visible foundation trench (Photo 12.134). Thus, the wood in the foundation of Wall 1416 postdated the Stratum C-2 walls, including 2505.
In the severely burnt destruction debris of fallen bricks and wood in Room 2441 were 57 restorable vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), as well as other finds (Table 12.19), and a concentration of burnt grain. All the finds were concentrated within the area enclosed by the surmised lines of the collapsed walls and did not continue to the east or south. This further supports the idea that this originally had been a closed room like the two others in this building. The destruction debris rested on a layer of powdery white lime that apparently had been the floor; this floor was found to be horizontal on the west (86.30 m), but fallen towards the east, underneath the brick collapse described above (Photo 12.131). The lowest level to which this white floor was traced was 85.05 m (2471), just in the area where the assumed southeastern corner of the room is reconstructed. Most of the restorable pottery vessels were found in the collapse down to the east, so that their levels were below that of the horizontal section of the white floor in the west, but they were clearly related to this floor.

The collapse of the southeastern corner of Room 2441 created a huge pile of fallen bricks, 3.0 m high (Photos 12.131–12.133), that collapsed on the floor of the northwestern corner of the apiary, which was ca. 1.3 m lower than the foundation of the walls. The discrepancy between the foundation levels of the walls of Room 2441 and the bottom of the collapse might indicate the existence of a basement or some other hollow space below this room, perhaps enclosed on the west by Wall 2505, reused from Stratum C-2. The layers of charred wood found here may have been related to the construction of such a basement, as in Building CH (see below), and it might have been open towards the apiary on the east and south.

It was difficult to securely determine whether this collapse occurred as a result of human activity (war, unintentional burning, etc.) or was caused by a severe earthquake. The latter possibility seems more likely, based on paleomagnetic testing (Chapter 54). This destruction by fire and collapse is attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b. Five 14C dates measured on the grain found in the collapse layer (Chapter 48, Sample R26) provided the following calibrated average dates: 926–898 BCE (1σ) and 970–850 BCE (2σ). These early dates fit the destruction of Stratum C-1b, as confirmed also by dates from the apiary to the east

Building CG — Stratum C-1a

Since the two northern rooms of Building CG did not suffer the same severe collapse as Room 2441, the possibility exists that they continued to be in use during Stratum C-1a (Fig. 12.50). An indication for this is the fact that Piazza 2417 on the east and Piazza CK on the west, both of Stratum C-1a, abutted this building. The floors of the courtyards were at levels 87.55–87.75 m, 1.2–1.4 m higher than the original floors inside these two chambers. There are two possibilities to explain this stratigraphic situation. The first is that the floors of Stratum C-1b continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a and the rooms were approached from above, as in the previous occupation level. In that case, the destruction debris in Rooms 2460 and 2444, with its pottery and the charred grain that was measured for 14C dates, would be explained as belonging to the last use of the rooms in Stratum C-1a. The other possibility is that a new floor was constructed in Stratum C-1a above this destruction debris, which would then be attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b in these two rooms. Such a floor, which was not preserved, would have been at a level higher than 87.70 m (the preserved top of the walls) and might have disappeared due to erosion. We thus leave this question open, although it is of crucial importance for dating, due to the large number of 14C dates from the central room (Loci 2425, 2444) mentioned above. It should be noted that the loci numbers of floors and destruction layers appear only in the plan of Stratum C-1b, thus accepting the second possibility; the first possibility would require presenting these numbers in the plan of Stratum C-1a as well. However, since a final verdict is impossible, the loci in these two rooms are tentatively defined as belonging to Stratum C-1b, although we are aware of the alternative.

Evidence for partial rebuild of the southern room (2441) in Stratum C-1a can possibly be seen in the two upper courses of Wall 2441 close to its southern end; while the entire wall suffered from severe slippage of the bricks, these two upper course were not burnt and were laid horizontally above the burnt and tilted courses below (Photos 12.127, 12.131–12.132, 12.159, 12.160). This raises the possibility that these two courses represent a rebuild of the wall in Stratum C-1a. It should, however, be emphasized that there are no other stratigraphic indications for such a phase in this room, such as a higher floor, although such a floor could have existed close to topsoil and had been eroded away, as possible in the two northern rooms.

In the area east of Building CG, and above the collapse from this building that sealed the apiary, a leveling fill (5430, 4408; Squares Y/1–2) was laid in preparation for the construction of Building CL in Stratum C-1a; Wall 4443 of that building had a foundation trench that cut this fill (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.135, 12.144). This stratigraphic evidence to the east of Building CG, but clearly related to it, supports our conclusion that the building was founded in Stratum C-1b, destroyed at the end of this stratum, along with Building CH and the apiary, and reused (partially?) in Stratum C-1a.

Building CM — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.75 - Section 21 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.78 - Section 24 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.136 - Stratigraphic section through walls in C-2 and C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.137 - Row of chalices along eastern face of Wall 2411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.138 - Row of chalices along eastern face of Wall 2411 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.139 - C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.140 - Cracked Cooking Jar on the floor in C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.141 - C-1b Building CM from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39–12.40;
  • Sections: Figs. 12.75, 12.78–12.79
  • Photos 12.136–12.142
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.49–13.51
Introduction

Building CM (Squares Y–Z/3) was a unit to the south of Building CF and to the east of Building CG (Photo 12.127), built above the C-2 remains here. It adjoined the apiary on the north and, since the partition wall between them was quite flimsy, it is possible that Building CM was related to the apiary in some functional way, despite the difference in floor levels: 86.20 m in the northern and central part of Building CM and 84.55–84.60 m in the northern part of the apiary. It seems that Wall 9453 of Building CZ (exposed only along its eastern face in Squares A/2–3) was the eastern border of Building CM. The floor inside the western part of Building CZ (84.90 m) was lower by 0.35 m than that in the eastern part of Building CM (85.20 m) and 1.35 m lower than that identified in the western part of Building CM (86.20 m), and it is possible that there was a terraced effect here, following a natural downslope from west to east.

The external measurements of Building CM were ca. 7.8 m×9.0 m, depending on the western and eastern boundaries, which were not entirely clear. It included a small room (4446) in its northwestern corner, a larger space to its south (4445) and possibly an open space (5441, 5442) in its east. Access to the building was most likely from the western end of the street that we assume ran in Squares Z, A–C/4 to the northeast of the building.

Building CM ended in a fierce fire. It went out of use in Stratum C-1a and was covered by a courtyard (2417), whose floor was 1.35 m higher than the floors in this building. It is noteworthy that this was one of the few places where a clear distinction could be made between Strata C-2, C-1b and C-1a.

Room 4446

The northwestern room (4446) was poorly preserved (internal measurements 2.0×2.9 m, 5.8 sq m) (Photos 12.136–12.138). Its walls were composed of crumbly brownish-gray bricks with light gray mortar lines. The western wall of the room (4432) was built above Stratum C-2 Wall 4516 (Fig. 12.75), but continued further to the south, running a total of 4.0 m until it terminated rather abruptly just past its corner with Wall 4411. It ran parallel to the eastern face of Wall 2411 of Building CG, with a 0.2 m gap between them; the foundation heights of the two walls were identical, suggesting that they were constructed together. Yet, unlike Wall 2411, which was standing to a height of 1.5 m, due to its being in continuous use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, Wall 4432 was preserved only 0.25–0.35 m high, aside from a lone stump that was 0.65 m higher than the rest of the wall (Photo 12.136); this stump was located precisely in the balk between Squares Y/3 and Y/4. It is not clear why it was left standing so high, when the rest of the wall was razed.

Along the eastern face of Wall 2411 was a row of nine chalices (4424) (Fig. 13.49:9–17; Photo 12.138). Two (one intact) were found near the northern end of Wall 4432 (just north of the abovementioned stump), while six more were found running 2.0 m to the south. The chalices were revealed just at the level of the preserved top of Wall 4432, leading to the conclusion that they were placed there following the razing of this wall. Their position exactly in the gap between Walls 4432 and 2411, as well as the higher preservation of the stump, suggests that they might have been a deliberate deposit, perhaps related to some ritual following the destruction of Stratum C-1b.

The northern wall of the building (4479) created a double wall with Wall 4413 of Building CF. Wall 4479 was 8.7 m long, preserved to a height of 1.3 m, and was very burnt. The northwestern corner of Building CM was part of a massive construction, where the corners of four buildings (CE, CF, CG and CM) met. This dense corner in Square Y/4 was a meeting point between Walls 1473, 4479, 4432 and 2454; each of these walls had its own end or face and they abutted one another, indicating that although each belonged to separate buildings, all were built in consideration of each other. As in most other Stratum C-1b walls, wooden beams were incorporated in the foundations of Walls 4432 and 4479. While only a few pieces were noted in the northern end of Wall 4432, the wood in the foundation of Wall 4479 was dense and composed of small rounded beams laid perpendicular to the line of the wall at closely spaced intervals (Photos 12.136–12.137); see Wall 6444 in Building CW and Wall 1437 in Building CH for a similar configuration (Fig. 12.46; Photo 12.145). A unique feature of the wood in Wall 4479 was that it was laid above the lowest two brick courses, rather than at the very bottom of the wall. This somewhat recalls the situation with Wall 2411 in Building CG, where the wooden beams in its foundation were laid on bricks (2478), as described above.

The eastern wall of the room in Stratum C-1b was Wall 4433, which abutted Wall 4479. This wall was 0.8 m wide and was composed of a row of bricks laid lengthwise and one row widthwise, recalling the walls in Building CG. The wall was poorly preserved on both its southern end and its eastern face; it seems that it terminated just about at the line of the balk between Squares Y/3–4, and it is possible that its southern end originally had an entrance that led into the room. The southern closing wall of this room (4411) was very poorly preserved. The room contained several layers of debris (4417, 4430, 4446). While no clear floor was detected, its lowest layer (4446) was on the same level (86.19 m) as Floor 4445 to the south of Wall 4411. These loci, which lacked traces of destruction, might have been a fill that leveled off the area in preparation for the construction of Piazza 2417 in Stratum C-1a.

Space 5441/5442

In the area to the east of Room 4446 was a floor (5441, 5442) at level 86.25–86.30 m. In the north, Floor 5442 contained a concentration of crushed travertine in its center. In the south, Floor 5441 was made of soft pink plaster; a smooth flat-topped pink mizi limestone and a complete storage jar (Fig. 13.51:3) turned upside down were found on this floor. While the northern end of this floor was horizontal, it sloped down towards the south (Fig. 12.78); this slope may possibly be related to the lower southern end of the building, described below. As noted above, it is not known whether this space continued to the east up to Building CZ, as the area between them remained mostly unexcavated (Square Z/3). It might have been an open courtyard, although enclosing walls may be hidden in the unexcavated area in Squares Z/3–4.

Room 4445

To the south of Wall 4411 was a space (4445; Photos 12.127, 12.139–12.142) that ran 3.2 m to the south until Wall 8469, the flimsy narrow wall that bordered the apiary (Fig. 12.78). An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the result of the same seismic activity that caused the collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG, described above. The wooden beams laid in the foundation of Wall 2411 that were visible in the matrix of 4445, penetrated under the wall into Building CG to the west, as described above.

The northern and central part of Room 4445 contained very burnt brick debris (4441) on top of a beaten-earth floor (4445, level 86.20 m) (Photo 12.139). An oval-shaped installation built of hard dark gray clay (4448) was built on this floor, just against the southern face of Wall 4411; the gray clay of the installation continued along the southern face of Wall 4411, indicating their contemporaneity. The installation was ca. 0.7 m long, 0.4 m wide, preserved 0.28 m high; it contained a complete cooking jug (Fig. 13.50:4; Photos 12.139–12.140). Another installation related to Floor 4445 was a small bin made of reddish clay and lined with wood (4449) in the southwestern part of this area, built against the eastern face of Wall 2411 (Photo 12.139).

From the line of Installation 4449 until the southern end of the building, the floor was not clear and, in its stead, was a dense concentration of charred wood, 1.0 m wide (4456, 8443, 8447), abutting Wall 8469. Just north of this pile, and east of Installation 4449, was a large stone (Photos 12.139, 12.141–12.142). This strip of charred wood, composed mostly of tree trunks and branches, was set into a reddish layer (8471) (Fig. 12.78). The bottom of this reddish layer (85.30 m) was 0.9 m lower than the floor in the northern part of this room, suggesting that this area might have been dug out to accommodate the wood pile. This strip of charred wood might have been either part of a sub-floor construction or was related to the construction of Wall 8469, which enclosed the apiary to the south (see below). The goal of this wood was perhaps to support the gap created by the 1.6 m height difference between the floor of this space and that of the apiary to the south. Thus, the strip of wood, together with Wall 8469, may be explained as a kind of revetment for the lower terrace on which the apiary was constructed to the south. The eastern part of the wood concentration (8443, 8447) contained many fallen bricks, burnt debris and a thick layer of phytolith (Photo 12.142), inside of which was the lower part of a very large krater (Fig. 13.50:1) and several loomweights.

At the eastern end of Room 4445 was a short north–south line of bricks (8441) standing only two courses high; its northern end terminated in a complete brick, while its southern end appears to have been cut (Photo 12.142). Although these bricks were on line with the middle row of hives in the apiary to the south, no connection between them was found. This segment of bricks could have been a low partition or part of a wall that had been dismantled.

Probe in Square Z/3

To the east of Wall 8441, a probe in the eastern part of Square Z/3 revealed a layer of destruction debris, fallen bricks, wood and phytolith (11429) that rested on a reddish layer (11450) at 85.20 m and abutted Wall 8469 (very poorly preserved here; Photo 12.160), a sequence similar to that in the south of Room 4445. It seems that this was the continuation of the wood and reddish debris layer in the south of that room and might have been related to the eastern row of hives in the apiary, revealed to its south. Most probably, this matrix abutted the western face of Wall 9453 and its corner with Wall 8469, although the point of contact remained unexcavated.

Building CH — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.70 - Section 16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.72 - Section 18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.143 - C-1b Building CH from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.144 - Collapsed and Tilted Walls along a lineament from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.145 - Wood foundations from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.146 - Collapsed Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.147 - Collapsed Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.148 - Wooden Construction from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.149 - Wooden Construction from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • (Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Sections: Figs. 12.70, 12.72–12.74
  • Photos 12.3, 12.143–12.149;
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.56–13.59
Introduction

Building CH was comprised of two excavated rooms (2455, 2451) that adjoined Building CG on the south (Squares Y–Z, A/1–2, 20) (Photo 12.143); its southern part was beyond the limit of the excavation and to its east was the apiary. This structure apparently functioned as a service wing for the apiary, perhaps used for the processing of the products and/or for administrative work (Fig. 12.47). Its floors were ca. 1.75 m higher than those of the apiary itself, although both were contemporary and related. All the walls of this building were composed of light and dark gray bricks, incorporating sporadic yellow bricks. Along the eastern edge of the two rooms was a sub-floor construction of wooden beams laid in two to three layers that joined the rooms to the apiary floor below, described below.

The western wall (1438) of Building CH, which was also the eastern wall of Building CJ, was exposed along 7.5 m and continued to the south beyond the limit of the excavation. It was built on top of C-2 Wall 2468 (Photos 12.45, 12.143) and had wooden beams incorporated in its foundation, mostly in its northern part (Figs. 12.72–12.74). The northern wall (1437) was the continuation of the northern wall of Building CJ. It terminated on the east just on line with the southern wall (2439) of Building CG, which it abutted. To the east of this was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the southeastern corner of Building CG, as described above. Wall 1437 had many small round wooden beams in its foundation, set perpendicular to the wall in two layers, above the preserved top of C-3 Wall 4495 (Fig. 12.72; Photos 12.144–12.145).

The eastern part of Building CH collapsed down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the southeastern end of Building CG to the north. This collapsed eastern part of Building CH was superimposed by the western wing of Building CL of Stratum C-1a (Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146– 12.147, 12.149). Although none was found, it is possible that there had been an eastern closing wall to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood, that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden partition might have closed off this end of the room that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a higher level than the apiary floor below.

The two excavated rooms of Building CH were separated by Wall 2426, which extended 3.0 m to the east of Wall 1438, until it was cut by the foundation trench of Wall 2413, the western wall of Building CL (Photos 12.146–12.147, 12.149). No entrance between the two rooms was found; perhaps such a connection had been located further to the east, or each was accessed separately from the apiary by way of wooden ladders or brick steps. Wall 2426 was built on top of the northern face of C-2 Wall 2465 (Photo 12.148). It was horizontal on its western end, but 1.0 m from its corner with Wall 1438, it collapsed towards the east at an acute angle; the difference between the level and fallen parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a, as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b.

While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. However, Wall 1438, the western wall of the building, continued to be in use in Stratum C-1a as the eastern wall of Building CJ (described above).

The Wooden Construction

Below the destruction debris in the eastern part of the rooms was a unique construction of wood, two to three layers deep, 1.4 m wide, and running north to south along 10 m, the entire exposed length of the building, from the southern balk of Square Y/1 (where it continued to the south beyond the limit of the excavation) up to Wall 1437 and the subsidiary balk to its east in Square Y/2, where it intersected with the perpendicular beams in the foundation of Wall 1437 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.3, 12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148–12.149). The wood continued to the north under Wall 1437 and apparently ran under Wall 2439 (collapsed at this point) to join with the sub-floor wood in Room 2441 in Building CG, showing that the two buildings had been constructed at the same time.

The wood that ran along the eastern edge of Rooms 2451 and 2455 was obviously constructed before the floors were laid and before Wall 2426 was built. Just north of Wall 2426, the strip of wood cut C-2 Wall 2465. The eastern part of the wooden construction sloped down towards the east, particularly in the southern part (Square Y/1); the height of the top of the wood in the west was 86.25 m, while the height of its top in the east was 85.50 m, a 0.75 m difference over 1.4 m. The wood was comprised mostly of tree trunks and branches, all found charred and carbonized.

In the northern room (2455), the wood was laid in two layers, with a 0.2 m-deep reddish fill between them; the uppermost layer ran north–south and was composed of relatively large beams, while the layer below, less well defined, ran both north– south and east–west, creating a kind of a weave. There was a 1.0 m gap between this strip of wood and the wood in the foundation of Wall 1438 (Figs. 12.45–12.46; Photos 12.144, 12.148). No wood was found to the east of this strip and it was laid on top of layer of whitish material, possibly very burnt wood or bricks, located directly above the preserved tops of Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496. It is suggested that these walls served as a support for the wood (see further below).

In the southern room (2451), the wood construction consisted of three tiers whose eastern part was markedly stepped (Photo 12.149). Like in Room 2455, the wood was laid alternately north– south and east–west (Fig. 12.45) and did not join with the wood in Wall 1438, except for one beam that protruded from the wall in the northwestern corner of the room. Like in the northern room, underneath the wood was a white layer which was laid on top of a Stratum C-3 gray-brick wall (4480).

Two alternatives are suggested to explain this construction. The first is that this descent could have been wooden steps, wood that supported brick steps, or a sloping ramp, leading down to the apiary floor on the east. This suggestion is supported by the relatively orderly manner in which the tiers of wood were laid (Fig. 12.45; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146, 12.148). The alternative explanation is that the wood, as found, was fallen, and that originally it had served as a roof and support beams of a hollow space below it, forming a basement in Building CH. Such a basement may have been bordered on the west by re-used C-3 Wall 4495 and perhaps by a wood construction built on that wall, while in the east, it could have been left open towards the apiary, with only a few wooden posts supporting the roof (see suggested reconstruction in Fig. 12.47c). The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have been partly built above this basement, which would explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74). The destruction of this structure and the bricks of Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created the slope of this layer as found. The height of this basement can be calculated by comparing the floor to the west (2451, 1515, levels 86.20–86.40 m) to the top level of the gray walls of Stratum C-3 (4480, 4495, 4496) that were found below the charred beams (85.14–84.85 m), since we surmise that these walls served as a support for this basement. This difference in levels (maximum 1.55 m) should also include the floor of the basement and the thickness of the wood construction that supported the floor above it, that later collapsed. Thus, the subfloor space itself could not have been more than ca. 1.0 m high. According to this reconstruction, this basement could have had two components: 1) underneath the northern room (2455), a narrow space located in the area above Stratum C-3 Walls 4495 and 4496 (Fig. 12.47a) and 2) underneath the southern room (2451), a narrow space that would have been open towards the apiary (Fig. 12.47b). Alternatively, it is possible that this entire area was one long space, possibly continuing to the north into Building CG, as suggested above (Fig. 12.47d). The roof of this alcove would have been the collapsed tiers of wood on the eastern end of the wooden construction in the south. The low ceiling of this basement would suggest that these spaces could have served for storage of commodities in containers. The postulated space below Room 2441 of Building CG (described above) might have been a continuation of the same phenomenon.

Room 2451

The southern room (2451) was at least 3.3 m from north to south, as its southern border was beyond the limits of the excavation (Photos 12.143, 12.149). Like the room to the north, the eastern end collapsed to the east and was covered by Stratum C-1a Building CL.

The floor of this room was identical to that of Room 2455, both in its composition of burnt powdery white lime and the reddish sub-floor material, as well as the strip of wooden beams on its eastern end. Here too, it is surmised that below the floor in this room there was a basement, as described above.

On the floor was a thick layer of destruction debris with fallen bricks, ceiling material, charcoal and ash, concentrated mainly in the west and south of the room. Fifteen vessels were found in this room (of which only a part was excavated), as well as other finds (Table 12.21).

The Apiary — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.44 - Plan of Building CH and apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.81 - Section 27 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.82 - Section 28 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.150 - General view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.151 - Another view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.152 - Another view of C-1b apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.153 - Tilted Wall 5453 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.154 - Collapsed western part of Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.155 - Collapsed bricks in western end of Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.156 - North-central and northwestern part of apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.157 - Tilted Wall 8469 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.158 - View of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.159 - Central and western part of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.160 - Northern end of the apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.39–12.40, 12.44
  • Sections: Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.87
  • Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.160; additional illustrations in Chapter 14A
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.60–13.67
Introduction

The area to the east of Building CH in Squares Y– Z, A/1–2, 20 was occupied by an apiary of industrial scope, which included three north–south rows of unfired clay hives, separated by elongated aisles. The stratigraphy and general spatial organization of the apiary will be described below, while the structure and makeup of the hives, as well as additional details and illustrations, are presented in Chapter 14A. Three scientific studies of the apiary are presented in Chapters 14B–14D, and discussions of the apiary’s operation, historical context, and ethnographic comparisons are presented in Chapter 14E.

The Borders of the Apiary

Due to the broad expanse of this space, as well as the very nature of the industry, which contained over a million bees, we assume that this had been an open area, although it is probable that each row of hives was roofed with thatch or other material, such as cloth or clay, to shield them from the intense heat in the summer or from the rains in the winter.

The apiary was bordered by Wall 9453 on the east, Building CH on the west, and Wall 8469 of Building CM on the north. It extended to the south beyond the limit of the excavation in Square Z/20 and thus, it measured 9.0–9.5 m from east to west and at least 13.0 m from north to south, an area of 117–123.5 sq m

The Eastern Side

The eastern wall of the apiary was Wall 9453, which was on line with Wall 6408 of the northeastern complex (Squares A/4–5; Fig. 12.18), demonstrating the integral city plan of Stratum C-1b. It was a well-built wall, preserved to five courses and very burnt, that ran for 16.4 m, serving as both the eastern wall of the apiary and the western wall of Building CP (early phase), while on its northern end (preserved to ten courses, not burnt), it was both the western wall of Building CZ and, most likely, the eastern wall of Building CM. Above it was C-1a Wall 9406, that served as the western wall of both Buildings CP and CQ3 (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 9453 was abutted on the west by the destruction debris and floor of the apiary (9451); a perpendicular wooden beam in its foundation extended into the floor. The southern end (in Square A/1; Fig. 12.39) contained a section with some irregular bricks, possibly an entrance leading to the lower phase of Building CP on the east (Photos 12.153, 12.234). Just at this point, it was abutted by a 2.0 m-long strip of narrow bricks fronted by a patch of small stones on the floor level that might have served as a step up to this entrance. The western face of the wall was covered with a hard brownish-yellow mud plaster, while its bricks were mostly brown and gray and of a very hard consistency, possibly due to the fire that engulfed this area

The Northern Side

Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition, perhaps constructed in conjunction with the deep strip of wood to its north (at the southern end of Building CM) described above, which both abutted the northern side of this wall and penetrated down to a level below its foundation (Fig. 12.78; Photos 12.142, 12.151, 12.154, 12.160). The wall was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). The highest level of its central segment was just about on line with the highest preserved top of the hives (Photos 12.151, 12.156–12.157). Between the floating level of this wall and the apiary floor was a 0.15 m thick layer of brown-earth fill that also filled a narrow channel that ran along the southern face of the wall (Photos 12.151, 12.156, 12.159). The eastern end of Wall 8469, north of the eastern row of hives, was so poorly preserved that only a narrow strip of pulverized pinkish material could be identified, although a few complete fallen bricks to the west and east of these hives might have belonged to it (Photo 12.157). As mentioned above, Wall 8469 was most likely not a free-standing element, but rather a kind of buttress attached to the wood construction to its north, both creating a single, quite massive construction that separated Building CM on the north from the apiary to the south. This might have been due to the difference in level of 1.3–1.5 m between these two units, with Wall 8469 and the wood construction serving as kind of terrace or retaining wall between them.

The Northwestern Corner

The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary.

The Western Side

Building CH bordered the apiary on the west, to the south of the aforementioned corner of Building CG. As described in detail above, its walls and floors were on a higher level than the apiary floor by some 1.7 m, built above a wooden construction that was founded on Stratum C-3 gray-brick walls (4480, 4495, 4496), creating a roofed area below Building CH, perhaps open towards the apiary on the east (Fig. 12.47c). The apiary floor ran up to the eastern faces of Walls 4480 and 4496 (Figs. 12.72–12.73; Photos 12.17, 12.158), and possibly to Wall 5483 on the south. A thin layer of eroded gray debris (4499) from these walls was found right on top of the floor (4469, 5440, 7481) in this southwestern section of the apiary (Figs. 12.86–12.87). It is surmised that when the builders of Building CH and the apiary dug down to this level, they encountered these earlier walls and reused them as a support for the wooden construction that bordered the building on the east and as the western edge of the apiary. In spite of the differences in the floor level of ca. 1.7 m, the apiary was most likely related to Building CH, which might have served as its service wing, as proposed above.

Thus, the apiary was surrounded (at least) on three sides by built units, and was established on a lower level than those structures on its west and north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining units were built more or less on the same level, judging by the floor levels.

Stratigraphy

As noted above, no remains of Stratum C-2 were identified in the probe made below the apiary floor (Figs. 12.80, 12.82), and, in fact, C-3 walls were found directly relating to this floor (Figs. 12.72– 12.73). The reason for the lack of C-2 remains was most likely related to the low level of the apiary; it appears that the builders dug down to this level to create this broad cavity for their industry, obliterating all traces of the previous phase, until they encountered remains of an even earlier occupation, C-3, which they utilized to some degree, as described in detail above and below. It should be noted that Stratum C-2 remains were revealed east of the apiary under Building CZ (in Squares A– C/2–3 (Figs. 12.7, 12.15). Wall 11471 of Stratum C-2 was cut in this place by Wall 9453, which served as the eastern boundary of the apiary. Thus, Stratum C-2 remains were found to the north, west and east of the apiary, but not within its confines.

The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to east, while the same level of destruction debris found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.150–12.151). Stratum C-1a Building CL was built directly above this ca. 1.0 m-deep layer of collapsed bricks and burnt destruction debris that covered the apiary (Photo 12.146) and thus, the attribution of the apiary to Stratum C-1b is secure.

The Apiary Floor

The level of the apiary floor ranged from 84.50– 84.70 m. It was composed of three different matrices (Photos 12.150–12.152, 12.158), all of which were covered by the same destruction debris and collapse (Figs. 12.73, 12.80–12.81, 12.83– 12.87).

The first type of floor was made of dark red smooth clay, found in the space between Wall 9453 and the eastern row of hives (8482, 9451; 84.55– 84.60 m) (Photos 12.152–12.158). It had many black burnt patches, especially on its northern end. In the center of this part of the floor was a hive (8500) that appeared to have fallen from the eastern row.

The second type of floor was made of very hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick, found in the aisle between the eastern and middle rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle between the middle and western rows of hives (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). This floor was covered in part by a thin layer of soft reddish material, identical to the fill in other Stratum C-1b buildings in which the wood was set. It is notable that the hives were set ca. 0.15–0.3 m above this hard white floor and red layer, on top of a loose brown-earth fill that included many bones, some sherds and pieces of wood (Fig. 12.81; Photos 12.152, 12.156). This was the same material seen under the foundation of the northern wall (8469) and in a narrow channel running along its southern face (Photos 12.151, 12.159). The destruction debris in the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed bricks, rested directly on this floor. The very hard and thick matrix of this floor seems to have served a purpose related to the work in the hives, since it was concentrated mainly in that area. The reason for the fill between the floor and bottom of the hives must have been technical, related to drainage and ventilation; perhaps the large amount of bones in this fill served this purpose. In several places, particularly in the middle row of hives, we found evidence for charred beams that separated the hives from the floor, suggesting that in some places, the hives were located on a level raised by wood. Another interesting feature in the hard white floor between the middle and eastern rows (8436) was a sunken area adjoining the floating level of the three northernmost hives in the middle row and abutting the floating level of Wall 8469 to its north (Photos 12.156, 12.159). This sunken area measured 0.6×1.2 m and was 0.1 m deep; it was lined with the same hard white material as the floor showing that they were constructed together, and was filled with the same loose brown fill as the channel that ran alongside Wall 8469 and that was placed under the hives.

An enigmatic feature identified under the southern end of the middle row of hives (seen in the northern balk of Square Z/1) was a round area of eroded gray brick material, 0.5 m in diameter, which was cut into the hard white floor and penetrated into the upper pink layer of the Stratum C-3 accumulation under the apiary (Photo 12.20). It is possible that this was a pit, related in some way to the construction of the hives. This further supports the relationship between the hard white floor and the hives themselves.

The third floor type was a soft powdery matrix of vivid red color, found in the southwestern part of the apiary (Photos 12.8, 12.150–12.152, 12.158). It merged with the hard white floor just south of the western row of hives and west of the southern part of the middle row of hives (4469); it continued to the southwest (7481) to abut Walls 4495 and 4480, as well as to the southern part of the apiary in Squares Y–Z/20 (5440, 9455, 9458). In the probes excavated below the apiary floor in the area south of the three rows of hives (Squares Y–Z/1; Figs. 12.4, 12.82; Photos 12.19–12.20), it was seen that this red powdery layer continued to the east and south underneath the hard white tufa floor described above. It thus seems (as suggested above) that the tufa floor was laid above the soft red floor of Stratum C-3, possibly to provide a substantial, non-permeable surface for the hives and the related activity, while in the west, where there were no hives, there was no need for such a surface. The question remains whether the builders of the apiary reused the Stratum C-3 floor that they encountered (along with the gray-brick walls) when digging down to the level on which they intended to establish the apiary, or whether this was a new floor laid in Stratum C-1b when the apiary was built. Since there was no other floor below that abutted the C-3 gray walls, it seems that the former possibility is more viable. What is clear is that both types of floors — the hard white and the soft red — were used together for the duration of the operation of the apiary and were found covered with the same layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and pottery.

Pits in the Red Floor

To the west of the middle row of hives in Squares Y–Z/1–2 were a number of pits that were dug from this red floor, as most of them were lined with this same material (Photos 12.150– 12.152, 12.158–12.159). Very little pottery was recovered from these pits (Fig. 12.62:4–13), aside from 8496, which contained a large amount of redpainted pottery and a few red-slipped and handburnished sherds. It is difficult to phase these pits and, ultimately, it depends whether the red floor was a Stratum C-1b addition or was originally laid in Stratum C-3 and reused.

These pits included (from north to south):

  • 8497 in Square Z/2, 0.45 m long, 0.15 m deep, elliptic; it contained gray debris, no finds; adjoined the white floor on the north and the red floor on the south.
  • 8493 in Square Y/2, 0.45 m deep, composed of a slightly higher round pit on the west (0.9 m in diameter) and a smaller round pit on the east (0.5 m in diameter), separated by a thin wall of the same red matrix as the floor. The western pit was lined with this red clay, but the smaller eastern pit was lined with soft brownish clay and had a burnt black line in its walls and bottom; it contained a layer of soft gray earth and ash with a few worn sherds.
  • 8495 in Square Y/1, 0.35 m deep, 0.65 m in diameter, round. The western part was lined with same red material as the floor, while the slightly lower eastern part contained eroded gray debris with a few sherds and bones.
  • 9427 in Squares Y/1–2, 0.3 m deep, 2.5 m long, roughly oval, abutted the reddish floor and was lined with the same material; it contained a very large amount of bones and a few sherds.
  • 8496 in Square Y/1, 0.2 m deep, 2.7 m long, amorphic, abutted the reddish floor, but was not lined with this material; it contained soft gray earth, brick debris and chunks and a very large amount of bones and sherds, many of which were red-painted (Fig. 13.62). On the southern end of this pit was a small rounded sunken area of darker gray color. This pit ran just along the top of the eastern face of C-3b Wall 9429 (Fig.12.5).
No clear floor was found in the northwestern part of the apiary; instead, there was a layer of soft gray earth (8444, 8498) between the western row of hives the collapsed southeastern corner of Building CG. Fallen bricks and burnt debris from this corner rested directly on this layer which must have been contemporary with the red floor (4469, 7481) to its south, based on the levels. On line with the southern end of the western row of hives, the powdery red floor (4469) was traced.

For the description of the apiary itself, and its operation, see Chapter 14A.

Building CZ — Stratum C-1b

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.48 - Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.161 - Southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.162 - C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.163 - C-1b Building CZ, southwestern room (11449) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.164 - C-1b Building CZ, looking south at Wall 11427 below C-1a Wall 10482 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.165 - C-1b Building CZ, southeastern part from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.166 - C-1a Wall 10464 sealing the fallen bricks and debris on Floor 1142 of C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.167 - Pillar bases of C-1a Building CX set directly on top of fallen bricks from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.168 - Layered Walls in C-1b Building CZ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.18, 12.39, 12.48
  • Sections: Figs. 12.89–12.92, 12.94–12.95
  • Photos 12.9, 12.161–12.168
  • Pottery: Fig. 13.51:17
Introduction

This building, only party excavated in Squares A– C/2–3, was composed of a central space flanked by two rooms on the western side and at least one room on the eastern side; it might be considered a variation of a courtyard house. Its borders on the north and east were beyond the limit of the excavation, yet it appears that it was bordered on the north by an unexcavated earlier phase of the Stratum C-1a street. In that case, it may be assumed that the building could not be much larger than the parts excavated. On the west, it was probably attached to Building CM, and its southwestern corner abutted the northeastern corner of the apiary. On the south, the neighboring building was the early phase of Building CP, with a double wall between the two (Photo 12.161). Its external measurements were at least ca. 7.5×12 m. In the southeastern corner of Building CZ was an opening leading south into Building CP (early phase) (Photos 12.165, 12.168).

The walls of Building CZ, built of gray and brown bricks, were well preserved in the western part, up to a height of up ten courses above the floors (Photo 12.163).

The Central Space

The central space of this building was bounded on the south by Wall 11421, on the southeast by Wall 10500, on the west by Wall 11407, and on the north probably by the continuation of Wall 11455, which is known only in the western part of the building. Since Wall 10500 cornered with Wall 10518 and did not continue to the north (Photos 12.161– 12.162, 12.164), a large L-shaped space was created, most likely an unroofed courtyard, which was 6.2 m from north to south, 3.6 m wide at its southern part, and at least 7.5 m from east to west in its northern part; it thus measured at least 41 sq. m.

Wall 11421 was first built in Stratum C-2 (see above) and was reused in Stratum C-1b, since the debris and floor (11422, 11442) related to this stratum abutted it above the debris attributed to Stratum C-2, some 0.5 m lower. The northern wall (11458) of the adjacent Building CP was built flush against Wall 11421; it was preserved three courses higher than Wall 11421 (Photos 12.165, 12.168) and, in fact, the layer of fallen bricks and debris that filled the courtyard abutted these top courses, as well as the top courses of Wall 11421. It seems that, at one point, the upper part of Wall 11421 had been removed in its center and eastern end, revealing the northern face of Wall 11458 and making it the southern border of this space.

The floor identified in the central part of the courtyard (11422, 11426, 11442) was composed of somewhat patchy red and gray striations that sloped down from east to west in the southern part near Wall 11421, but were horizontal in the northern part (north of the line of Wall 10518). In the southwestern corner of the courtyard, just east of the entrance into Room 11449 was a pit (11456) lined with very hard gray mud plaster; it contained only a few sherds. In the area to the north of Wall 10518 (the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a 0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris (11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds, many of them red slipped and hand burnished. There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and, in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of the courtyard (Photo 12.167).

Room 11404

In the southeastern part of this building was Room 11404 (internal measurements 2.1×3.25 m; 6.8 sq m) (Photos 12.162, 12.165). The room was bounded on the south by Wall 11421 and on the north and west by Walls 10500 (1.3 m long) and 10518 (2.4 m long), the latter revealed directly below the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX (Photos 12.176, 12.180–12.181). The eastern wall was not revealed, but it was most likely located close to the edge of the excavation, just below C-1a Wall 10490, continuing the line of the short segment of a wall (11479) revealed to the south in Square C/2, belonging to the early phase of Building CP (Fig. 12.39; Photos 12.165, 12.168).

This small room had three entrances. The western entrance, 0.8 m wide, led to the room from the southern part of the courtyard. The other two, also 0.8 m wide, were opposite each other on the eastern ends of Walls 10518 and 11421. The former led to the northeastern part of the L-shaped courtyard, while the latter led to Building CP (early phase) by way of an identical entrance in Wall 11458, the northern wall of that building (Photos 12.165, 12.168). The room with three openings is unparalleled in other buildings and may indicate some special function, possibly for transit between Buildings CZ and CP.

This room contained a large amount of fallen bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls

The Western Wing–Rooms 11449 and 11457

The western wing of this unit contained two square rooms of identical size: Room 11449 on the south and Room 11457 on the north, each with internal measurements of 2.4×2.4 m; 5.8 sq. m (Photos 12.161, 12.163). The western boundary of both rooms was the northern continuation of Wall 9453, which was the wall between the apiary and the early phase of Building CP. A distinct fill (0.08 m thick) separated this wall from the Stratum C-1a wall above it (9406) (Fig. 12.95; Photo 12.163). Wall 11412 separated the two rooms and Wall 11407 bordered both on the east; openings in both ends of this wall led to the courtyard on the east. Wall 11455 bordered the northern room on the north and Wall 11427 on the south; both were superimposed by Stratum C-1a Walls 10472 and 10482 of Building CQ3, respectively (Photo 12.164).

The floors in the two western rooms were made of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in the eastern part of the building. They were covered by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. After removal of the floor of Room 11449, the top of an earlier wall (11471) built of hard yellow bricks was uncovered at level 84.85 m and attributed to Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.14; Photo 12.163).

The floors of C-1a Building CQ3, located 1.45 m above those of Stratum C-1b, sealed the debris and the tops of the walls in these rooms (Photos 12.171, 12.173, 12.176). Notably, the floor level in these two rooms (84.85–84.90 m) was only 0.15– 0.2 m higher than the floor of the apiary that abutted the eastern face of Wall 9453, showing that this building was built on the same low level as the apiary, as opposed to the higher elevation of Buildings CM, CG and CH to its north and west.

It was deliberated whether Building CZ might be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. In favor of this assessment were the following arguments: 1.) the building’s walls were preserved to 11–12 courses, just like other Stratum C-2 structures to the north and west (e.g., Building CB); 2.) its levels and stratigraphic situation were similar to those of nearby Room 6515 and other remains in Squares A–B/4–5, which we attributed to Stratum C-2 (Figs. 12.7, 12.12), although they were found right below C-1a Building CQ1, just as Building CZ was found just below C-1a Building CX; 3.) Building CZ was filled with fallen bricks and relatively empty of finds, like most C-2 structures. In contrast, the following arguments were in favor of the attribution of Building CZ to Stratum C-1b: 1.) it shared a wall (9453) with the apiary of Stratum C-1b; 2.) we assume that Building CX above it was founded in Stratum C-1a, since no traces of an earlier phase were identified in that building; 3.) while the walls of Stratum C-2 were composed of distinct hard yellow bricks, the walls of Building CZ were built of the typical gray and brown bricks found in Stratum C-1b; 4.) Wall 11471, found below the floor of the southeastern room of Building CZ (Fig. 12.15; Photo 12.163), was constructed of the C-2 brick type and apparently penetrated below Wall 9453 to its west.

This dilemna remains unsolved and both possibilities pose questions. If we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-2, we would need to understand Wall 9453, the eastern boundary of the apiary, as a reused C-2 wall, and this has no other support, particularly in light of the lack of C-2 elements in the area of the apiary. We would also have to assume that either Building CZ continued to be in use in Stratum C-1b with insignificant changes, or that Building CX (the building above Building CZ) was first erected in Stratum C-1b, which too, lacks evidence (although we suggested the same concerning Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 which, in our view, were in use in both Strata C-1b and C-1a, based on elements such as wood in the foundations and subfloor striations that abutted the walls). The relatively small amount of pottery recovered from Building CZ is of types that exist in both Strata C-2 and C-1b, and thus does not help to decide the issue. Thus, we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence.

Building CQ3 — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.169 - General view of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.170 - General view of southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.171 - C-1a Building CQ3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.172 - C-1a Building CQ3; wooden beams below bricks in threshold of Wall 9406 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.173 - C-1a Building CQ3, southern part of Room 10460 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.174 - Smashed object on the floor of Room 10495 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.175 - Room 10495 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.176 - Looking south from Room 10495 to Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.177 - Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.178 - Smashed pottery and destruction debris against southern wall of Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.179 - Room 10452 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50–12.51
  • Sections: Figs. 12.88, 12.94–12.95
  • Photos 12.169–12.179
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.130–13.135
Introduction

Building CQ3 (Squares A/2–3) was built above the western wing of Building CZ. It was bounded on the north by the street in Squares A–B/4, on the west by Piazza 2417, on the east by Building CX (with which it shared a wall) and on the south by Building CP (partly by a shared wall and partly by a double wall). It was designated Building CQ3 due to the similarity of its plan and dimensions to Buildings CQ1 and CQ2. The external measurements of this building were 5.6×7.2–7.4 m (including all walls) and its net floor space was ca. 23.5 sq m.

Like Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, CQ3 was composed of a single large room (10494) and two small back rooms (10452, 10460). As opposed to Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, there were two entranceways in this building; one in its northeastern corner and one in the middle of its western wall, both 1.2 m wide. The northern entrance (Photo 12.171) led to the street and was located directly opposite the entrance into Building CQ1. The western entranceway led to Piazza 2417; it was partially paved with bricks, in the foundation of which was a plank of wood with small round wooden beams set perpendicularly above it (Photo 12.172). This arrangement was unknown in any other entranceway and represents a rare use of wooden beams in Stratum C-1a.

The western wall of this building was Wall 9406 (Fig. 12.95; Photos 12.162–12.163), whose southern part served as the western wall of Building CP, indicating that the two buildings were constructed at the same time. The southern wall was composed of two abutting segments: 9415 on the west, which was shared with the northwestern room of Building CP, and 10482 on the east, which formed a double wall with the northern wall (10409) of Building CP at this point; this is the only double wall in the entire southeastern complex in Stratum C-1a. Wall 10482 had small round wooden beams in its foundation, similar to those in the western threshold of the building, and was built above C-1b Wall 11427 (Photo 12.164). Walls 10482 and 10409 abutted, but did not bond with, Wall 9448 on their west; this was a constructional feature and not the result of sub-phasing.

Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room 10460 and were flush with the floor level in Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could have been done at some point during the lifetime of the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such an opening was part of the original plan of both buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall 10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3 was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately left at a low level in order to allow for passage between the buildings; see also Wall 10464 (described below). According to A. Mazar, the low levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part) resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely damaged during the final destruction of this building or suffered from a late intrusion which could not be observed in the excavation. According to this explanation, there had been no passage between Buildings CP and CQ3.

Room 10494

The northern room’s inner measurements were 3.1×4.4 m; 13.6 sq m (Photo 12.170). As noted above, it had entrances on the north and on the west, as well as two entrances leading to the rooms on its south. The walls, preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). Almost all of the western part of this room was occupied by a unique installation (10505).

Installation 10505

The southern end of this installation was composed of a narrow parapet made of hard-packed brick material, 2.0 m long, 0.2 m wide and ca. 0.5 m high (Photos 12.170, 12.174–12.175). Its western end was built on top of a large stone and was attached to the door jamb of Wall 9406, so that it bordered the western entrance into the room on its north.

Attached to the southeastern end of the parapet was a large gray brick. The area left to the south of the parapet must have been used as a narrow passageway into the building from the western entrance, as well as into Room 10452 to the south. In the floor foundation to the southwest of the brick parapet was a patch composed of small stones and chunks of hard brick material (11424; 0.6×0.8 m), as well as fragments of a lower grinding stone and a basalt mortar in secondary use. The brick parapet was built on top of the northern end of these stones (Photos 12.175–12.176).

To the north of the brick parapet, and occupying the northwestern corner of the room, was a squarish (1.5×1.7 m) patch of gravelly earth and reddish brick material, found very burnt. This square was surrounded by brick material similar to that of the parapet on its south, while its center contained a paving of sherds and small travertine stones. On this paving was a storage jar, with its top half apparently deliberately removed (Fig. 13.133:5; Photo 12.174), containing a large amount of gray ash; a few scattered loomweights were found here as well.

The function of this installation remains enigmatic, but the fact that it occupied the western part of the room points to it having been a major feature of Building CQ3.

Room 10452

The southwestern room (10452; internal measurements 2.0×2.6 m; 5.2 sq m) (Photo 12.170) was accessed from the southwestern part of Room 10494 through a 1.2 m-wide entrance in Wall 10417, the northern wall of the room (Photos 12.176–12.177). The room was bordered on the west by Wall 9406, which was also the western wall of Building CP to the south, and on the south by Wall 9415, which was the northern wall of the western part of Building CP; this demonstrates the close relationship between the buildings in this sector. On the east was Wall 10407. All the walls were covered with a high-quality mud plaster (Photos 12.177–12.179), similar in makeup to that found on the walls of Building CP.

The floor (10452) was composed of red clay interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of) Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen bricks was found against the southern and eastern walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo 12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular plastered depression located along the center of the southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo 12.179).

Room 10460

The southeastern room (10460) was the smallest (internal measurements 1.8×2.6 m; 4.68 sq m). It was accessed from Room 10494 through a 1.0 m wide entrance (Photo 12.170). The room was bordered on the north by Wall 10483, on the west by Wall 10407, on the south by Wall 10482, and on the east by Wall 10464, which was also the western wall of Building CX. A curious feature of the eastern wall (10464) was its ‘stepped’ preservation. On the southern end, at its corner with Wall 10482, it was preserved only 0.15 m above the floor of Room 10460 along 1.5 m, while halfway through the room, the wall was preserved some 0.2 m higher, up to its corner with Wall 10483 (Photos 12.170, 12.173, 12.180); north of this, in Room 10494, the wall was preserved much higher. This low preservation of the southern end of the wall in Room 10460 was similar to that of the southern wall of this room (10482) and western end of Wall 10409 of the adjacent Building CP to the south, described above. As in that situation, here, too, it may be asked whether these walls were deliberately razed in order to allow passage from Room 10460 into the southern part of Building CX on the east, thus effectively joining these two buildings at one point during their lifetime. Alternatively, this low level might be the result of poor preservation, caused by the destruction of the buildings, which might have been particularly heavy in the southeastern corner of Building CQ3.

The floor was less well preserved than in the other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights that were concentrated mainly along the western wall and near the entrance.

Building CX — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.180 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.181 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.182 - Entrance into Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.183 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.184 - C-1a Building CX, Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.185 - C-1a Building CX, vessels in destruction debris in center of Room 10507 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.186 - C-1a Building CX, Locus 10431, vessels in burnt destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.187 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.188 - C-1a Building CX from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50–12.51
  • Sections: Figs. 12.88–12.92
  • Photos 12.170, 12.180–12.188
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.136–13.142
Building CX (Squares B–C/3) was bounded by the street on the north and by Buildings CQ3 on the west and CP on the south (external measurements 6.8×7.8 m; internal measurements 5.7×6.8 m; 35.5 sq m). Its western and southern walls were shared by the neighboring buildings, CQ3 and CP, respectively. The building comprised one large space (38 sq m), partially separated by a T-shaped bench or screen wall (10502) into a northern and a southern space on its west (Photos 12.170, 12.180–12.181). The northern and eastern walls (10515, 10490) were built of unique reddish-gray bricks with many light-colored inclusions and barely-visible brick lines. A 1.6 m-wide entrance in the northeastern corner led into this building from the street on the north. This entrance was bordered on the east by a finely plastered pilaster that separated it from the western face of Wall 10490 with a narrow gap filled with burnt material (Fig. 12.92; Photo 12.182). A curious feature in this entranceway was a dip in the floor level just in front of it (11413), so that the threshold, containing traces of burnt wood, was ca. 0.2 m lower than the rest of the floor in this building. The wood in the threshold recalls that in the western entranceway in Building CQ3.

Two means of roof support were identified in the large inner space of this building. One was a north–south row of five pillar bases, each made of an unworked flat stone, located in the northern half, 2.0 m east of the western wall and 3.4 m west of the eastern wall (Photos 12.180–12.181). The two northernmost bases bore traces of the burnt wood pillars on them. The other means of roof support was a unique square pilaster of gray bricks (10517), located to the southeast of the row of pillar bases and standing 1.3 m high (Photo 12.184). A large smooth stone was found southeast of this pilaster.

A T-shaped brick bench or screen wall (10502) was located along the northern two-thirds of the western wall (10464); it protruded 1.3 m into the center of the structure (Photo 12.181). Two vessels were placed in the southern niche formed by this ‘T’, a large barrel krater (Fig. 13.137:2) and a storage jar (Fig. 13.140:14) (Photo 12.185). Another bench (10491) ran along the eastern end of the southern wall (10409), built above the eastern end of C-1b Wall 11421 of Building CZ, separated by a 0.4 m-thick fill.

The floor of Building CX (10481, 10497 and 10507) was composed of reddish-brown clay interspersed with black burnt material and gray ash. In the area between the pillar bases and Bench 10502 was a strip of small travertine chunks that were incorporated into the floor (10477; Photos 12.180– 12.181). They were not suitable to serve as a pavement, since they were very loosely laid, and perhaps they played a role in some activity that took place here. They recall a similar strip of stones (7479) set in the floor of Courtyard 7471 in Building CW. Immediately below the floor level in the southeastern part of the building were the tops of C-1b Walls 10500 and 10518 of Building CZ (Figs. 12.89, 12.91; Photo 12.181).

Like the other units, Building CX was found full of very burnt destruction debris, with fallen bricks, charcoal pieces, ash, and large a amount of pottery, with 122 complete or almost-complete vessels, many of them in situ (Figs. 12.88, 13.136– 13.142; Photos 12.185–12.186). Just inside and west of the entrance, a cooking jug (Fig. 13.138:8) and part of a storage jar were found (Fig. 13.140:17; Photo 12.183). Concentrations of loomweights here, to the south of Installation 10509, and just west of the northern end of the row of pillar bases, found along with fragments of burnt wood beams (Photos 12.181, 12.187–12.188), indicate these had belonged to one, or possibly two looms. Altogether, 164 loomweights were found in this building, mostly in the northern part (Chapter 39).

Two grinding installations were located close to the entrance. One (10509), just to its west, was attached to the northern wall, comprising a large lower grinding stone slab fronted on the east by a small shallow plastered basin which was slightly lower and served as a receptacle for the grain as it was ground; it was surrounded by a flat-topped brick ‘rim’ (Photo 12.188). An additional lower grinding stone slab fragment was found below the upper one, apparently as a support, and a nicely worked rectangular smoothed pink mizi limestone, apparently in secondary use, was set under the eastern end of the large lower grinding, between it and the receptacle on the south. On the northern ‘rim’ of the plastered basin was a fine flint blade and a small upper grinding stone; two large upper grinding stones were found just to the west. To the east of Installation 10509, in front of the entranceway, was still another large lower grinding stone slab fragment, found overturned (Photo 12.188). The second installation (10519), less well preserved, was found just south of the entrance, close to the eastern wall. It comprised a similar round plastered receptacle with a brick bordering it on its west; a rounded lower grinding stone was set inside it and another such stone was found to the west of the brick.

A large concentration of grain was found inside a storage jar in the southern part of the building (10431). The grain was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R36). One of the two measurements provided the calibrated dates 978–848 BCE (1σ) and 996–838 BCE (2σ); the other was way too high and was defined as an outlier.

Notably, no ovens or other cooking installations were found in any of the buildings, CQ1, CQ2, CQ3 and CX, although such installations were found in the larger buildings, CF and CP.

Building CP — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52a - Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52b - Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52c - Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.169 - General view of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.170 - General view of southeastern part of Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.189 - C-1a Building CP, with sub-floor construction in Room 10476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.190 - C-1a Building CP on the floor level from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.191 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.192 - Wall 9406, dividing Building CL (mostly removed) and Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.193 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.194 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.195 - Building CP Walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.196 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.197 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.198 - C-1a Building CP Room 10510 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.199 - Smashed objects in C-1a Building CP, Room 10510 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.200 - Rooms 11441 and 10510 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.201 - Destruction debris in Room 11441 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.202 - Rooms 11441 and 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.203 - Rooms 10476 and 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.204 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.205 - destruction debris with fallen grinding stone and loom weights in Room 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.206 - Room 11451 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.207 - C-1a Building CP, looking north (before excavation of eastern wing) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.208 - Room 10458 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.209 - Room 10458 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.210 - Pottery altar in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.211 - Broken vessels in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.212 - Broken vessels in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.213 - Pottery in Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.214 - Room 10458 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.215 - Rooms 10476 and 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.216 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.217 - Broken Vessels on 1 side of wall and on a Bench on other side - in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.218 - Room 10476 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.219 - Fractured stones in sub floor construction of Room 10476 in C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.220 - Large mortar from Building CP, Room 10476 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.221 - Destruction debris in Room 10476 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.222 - Bin 10488 and krater-pithos from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.223 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.224 - C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.225 - Room 9449 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.226 - Bin 9434 in Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.227 - Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.228 - Copious destruction debris in Room 9450 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.229 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.230 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.231 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.232 - Bin 10501 restored Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.233 - Room 10506 of C-1a Building CP from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.234 - Walls of Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50, 12.52a–c
  • Section: Fig. 12.93
  • Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.234
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.143–13.160
Introduction

Building CP in Stratum C-1a was a large structure with a unique plan, located in the southeastern corner of Area C in Squares A–C/20, 1–2 (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190). The remains attributed to Stratum C-1b, which were only partly excavated, were, in fact, an early phase of the building, with only minor differences in the walls discerned in the part of the earlier building that was exposed, as described above (Photo 12.189). Some of the walls (e.g., 11477/10457 in the south and 11479/10490 in the east) were, in fact, the same, with the upper courses of the previous building reused in Stratum C-1a, now covered with a thick fine mud plaster, and with new floors laid against them (Photos 12.193–12.194, 12.196). The eastern wall of the central rooms (10462, 10485) was new, built above a gap with fill laid above the earlier wall (11473) that served as a threshold in the entranceways in the new wall (Photos 12.191, 12.195). The western wall of the central rooms (9448, 10480) was also new, built above the earlier wall (with no gap or fill); here too, the earlier wall (11470) served as a threshold in the entrances in the C-1a wall (Photos 12.191, 12.196, 12.219). An additional difference was the nature and size of the bricks in the early building, which were larger and of an extremely hard consistency and gray-white color; these early walls were not plastered, while those in the C-1a phase were coated with a fine thick mud plaster.

In Stratum C-1a, Building CP adjoined Building CL on the east and Buildings CQ3 and CX on the south, sharing walls with these buildings (Photos 12.169–12.170), indicating that all were built, and possibly functioned, together.

This building was excavated in its entirety (Squares A–C/20, 1–2). Its external measurements were 9.2–9.7×12.3 m (ca. 112 sq. m, including walls) and its internal floor space (including the benches along the walls) totaled 71.84 sq m. The walls stood to a height of 1.2 m (on the west) to 0.75 m (on the east) above the floors, and were exposed just below topsoil.

Building CP was unique in its plan and flow of internal circulation. Its plan consisted of eight rooms: two large rectangular central ones (10458, 10476) flanked by three small rooms on the east (10510, 11441, 11451) and three small rooms on the west (9449, 9450, 10506). The three eastern rooms had entrances in their northwestern corners that accessed the central rooms. Two of these (11441, 11451) also had entrances in their northeastern corners (on line with the western entrances), leading in from an assumed street or courtyard on the east; all these entrances were 1.3 m wide, except for the western one in the middle room, which was 1.1 m wide. Thus, each of the central rooms could be approached separately from outside the building, as well as from the inside. The three small rooms in the western wing were accessible from the two large central rooms: two of them (10506, 9450) were entered from the southern central room (10476), while the northern one (9449) was entered from the northern central room (10458). Rooms 9449 and 9450 were joined by an entrance, thus enabling circulation between the southern and the northern wings of the building via these two small rooms. On the other hand, the southwestern small room (10506) could be accessed only through the southern central room (10476), and the northeastern small room (10510) could be accessed only through the northern central room (10458), creating a symmetry to the building that was marred only by the difference of accessibility in the eastern rooms and minor differences in room sizes. It is notable that six of the seven entrances found in this building were located in the corners of the rooms; the only entrance located in the center of a wall was the one connecting Rooms 9450 and 9449 in the western wing.

All the walls were covered with plaster and the floors were made of fine red clay mixed with smooth black burnt material. In Rooms 10458, 10506, and the southeastern part of 11451, the floors were set on a mud-plaster bedding (Photos 12.207–12.209) and in Rooms 10506, 10476 and 10510, they were set on a sub-floor brick construction (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.194, 12.200, 12.219).

A wide range of many complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.143–13.160) and numerous objects (Table 12.24), as well as a large amount of grain, were found in the 0.8 m-deep destruction debris on the floors, as detailed below and in Chapter 45.

The Small Eastern Rooms — 10510, 11441, 11451

Room 10510

The northern room of the eastern wing (Photos 12.197–12.198, 12.200) measured internally 2.1×2.7 m; 5.8 sq m. Its eastern wall (10490) was built above C-1b Wall 11479, while its northern wall (10409) was built above C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). This room was accessed only through an entrance in Wall 10462 that led from the northern central room (10458).

The floor in this room was identical to the others throughout Building CP, composed of red clay mixed with black burnt material. It sloped down from west to east, from 86.20 to 85.98 m; the western elevation was higher than the other floors in the building, perhaps because just underneath the burnt floor makeup on the west were two concentrations of bricks, one in the southwestern corner of the room and the other in the northwestern corner, just inside the entrance (Fig. 12.52c). The latter (11478) was a rectangle measuring 0.6×1.2 m, ca. 0.1 m high. The bricks in the southwestern corner were more sporadic (Photos 12.189–12.190, 12.197). These are understood as a sub-floor construction, similar to those found in the southwestern part of the building, described below.

The room was full of burnt destruction debris (10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact four-legged incense burner with a matching lid (Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458, apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items were found above the sub-floor brick construction in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the room.

Room 11441

The middle room of the eastern wing measured internally 2.2×2.8 m (6.16 sq m) (Photos 12.197, 12.200, 12.202). Like the southern room, it had entrances in its northeastern and northwestern corners. The floor (11441) was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl.

Room 11451

The southern room of the eastern wing (internal measurements 2.6×2.8 m; 7.28 sq m) had an entrance in its northeastern corner and another one opposite it that led into Room 10476 on the west (Photos 12.197, 12.202–12.203). A notable feature of the eastern entrance was the molding of the door jambs; the inner (western) northern end of Wall 11440 was nicely molded to a curved shape (Photo 12.204) and the southern end of Wall 11417 that faced the entrance was also curved, although less well preserved. The walls in this part of the room were covered with fine gray-whitish plaster, somewhat different from the light brown mud plaster that coated the other walls of this building. The floor of this room was composed of red clay interspersed with smooth black burnt material. The southeastern part of the floor contained a layer of plaster, identical to that on the walls, below the red and black floor makeup. Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206).

The Large Central Rooms — 10458 and 10476

The central part of the building included two large rectangular rooms of similar size: Room 10458 on the north and Room 10476 on the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.189–12.190, 12.207).

Room 10458

The northern central room measured internally 4.0×4.7 m; 19 sq m (Photo 12.208). The main entrance to this room was from Room 11411 on the east, while two other entrances led into Rooms 10510 and 9449, the latter creating a connection to the southern wing of the building. The floor was higher by 0.25–0.35 m than that in Room 9449 to the west and Room 11441 to the east, but was almost the same as that of Room 10510 on the northeast.

The preservation of the northern and eastern walls was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north (which was also the southern wall of Building CX) was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length, but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower western end adjoined the southern face of Wall 10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved to the same low height. As mentioned above in the discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to explain this feature: either there was a deliberate lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458 into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation was due to damage caused by the destruction or by some unrecognized later intrusion. A 0.4 m wide bench (10463), composed of terre pisé and partially plastered, was built along the southern face of Wall 10409, running 2.4 m from exactly where Wall 10409 was cut on the west, almost up to the entrance into Room 10510 on the east (Photo 12.208). Two bricks laid on the western end of Bench 10463 were on the same low level as the western end of Wall 10409; their function is not known. Following a 0.7 m gap was yet another brick, set into the corner of Walls 9448 and 10409, found floating 0.1 m above the level of the plastered floor in the western part of this room (10498) (Photo 12.209). The low western end of Wall 10409 abutted, but did not bond with, the western wall (9448) of the room.

The eastern wall (10462) of Room 10458 was different than the others in its composition, being built of similar terre pisé as Bench 10463. It was preserved to only 0.20 above the floor in the south and 0.40 m in the north. The corner of Wall 10462 with Wall 10405 (the southern wall of the room) was not well bonded; the latter was preserved to a height of 0.65 m, similar to that of the northern wall of this room.

Running along the eastern face of Wall 9448 and ending on the north at the entrance into Room 9449, was yet another bench (10454), built of crumbly yellow bricks, 0.5 m wide, 1.6 m long and ca. 0.2 m high (Photos 12.208–12.209).

The floor of the room (10458) was composed of reddish-brown earth mixed with black ash; in the western part of the room, it was laid 0.05–0.08 m above a layer of hard mud plaster (10498) (Photos 12.208–12.209). This plaster was identical to that found under the floor of Rooms 10506 and 11451, as well as on most of the walls in this building; it was concentrated in the area between the lower western end of Wall 10409 on the north and along the line of Oven 10430, just north of Wall 10405, on the south (the contours of this plaster are marked on the plan; Fig. 12.52a). Depressions in the plaster accommodated the rounded contour of the stone mortar, as well as two of the pottery vessels just north of Oven 10430. The plaster-bedding layer was laid on top of a layer of soft light brown earth with very few sherds (11461), which seems to have been a leveling fill laid above the C-1b remains.

The room was full of a layer of burnt destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained 23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found just to the southwest of the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the northwestern corner of the room, above the lower western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo 12.214); a few additional loomweights were found dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454 along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this bench was a dense concentration of finds that included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos (Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it (Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars (Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35, No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north (Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498) in the western part of the room included a few small upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well as several loomweights and sherds.

Room 10476

The southern central room measured internally 3.6×4.6 m (16.6 sq m) (Photo 12.215). The main entrance to this room was from Room 11451 on the east, while two other entrances led into Rooms 10506 and 9450, the latter creating a connection to the northern wing of the building (Photos 12.189– 190, 12.203, 12.215). Since Room 9450 was joined to Room 9449, one could pass between the southern and northern parts of the building by way of these two small rooms.

Room 10476 was bordered on the east by the southern end of Wall 10462 and its continuation to the south, which was designated a separate number (10485) because it was built of discernible bricks, as opposed to the terre pisé of 10462; it was preserved higher than the latter and its northern end was covered with molded plaster (Photo 12.216). The southern wall of the room (10457) ran along 12.2 m; it was located 0.5 m north of the southern wall of adjoining Building CL on the west, indicating that although they ran more or less along the same line, these were two separate walls. The northern wall (10405) separated the two large central rooms. All these walls were found standing to a height of 0.6–1.0 m and were covered with mud plaster.

The floor was made of soft reddish-brown earth, interspersed with black ash. Just below the floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219). Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part, most of the bricks were missing, although it is not clear whether this area had never been constructed or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and, in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo 12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468 was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms 10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to have been a building technique intended to provide reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to protect against rodents in certain places (compare a similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room 8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor above it (Photo 12.221).

Benches were constructed along the northern and western walls. Bench 10466, 3.6 m long, 0.6 wide and ca. 0.25 m high, ran along the northern wall (10405); the plaster on this wall joined the plaster that covered the bench. This bench was built directly above C-1b Wall 11472, utilizing the top of this wall as its foundation. On this bench were three cooking pots (Figs. 13.147:1, 3; 13.149:6), one jug (Fig. 13.155:4), four juglets (Fig. 13.156:19, 24– 25) and two loomweights (Photo 12.217). Bench 10467, 1.7 m long, 0.5 m wide and ca. 0.15 m high, was rather poorly preserved along the western wall (10480); a jug (Fig. 13.155:7), a seal (Chapter 30, No. 32), a bead, a loomweight and a scoria scraper were found on it (Photo 12.218). In the northeastern corner of the room, Installation 10468 was composed of bricks set on their narrow side around a circular mud-plastered receptacle (Photo 12.217). Inside the plastered depression were two cooking pots stacked together, a very small one (Fig. 13.148:9) on the bottom and a medium-sized one (Fig. 13.148:4) on top of it.

Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster, ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix (Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the destruction debris were found in situ (some intact) on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds (Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the southern half of the room (10493) contained much less pottery than in the north and center, mostly concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall 10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room 10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the same wall in the southwestern corner of Room 10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos 12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with 0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup.6 It was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base, and contained a large amount of charred grain (Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221– 12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the east of the pithos was a concentration of 85 loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains of charred wood here might represent a loom. A few vessels were found in the entrance leading from the east, mostly against the plastered southern doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large and heavy stone was found upside down, just under topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451 (Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small depression carved out of part of its top, in which some substance was probably ground, judging by the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room 11451 to the east, described above.

The Western Rooms – 9449, 9450, 10506

Room 9449

This was the northern room in the western wing (internal measurements 2.3×2.8 m; 6.4 sq m) (Photos 12.207, 12.225). The northern wall (9415) was also the southern wall of Building CQ3; it cornered with Wall 9406 on the west and with Wall 9448 on the east. Notably, this wall was not on line with the northern wall (10409) of the large room to the east, but ran 0.25 m to its north. A 0.5 m-wide and 0.35 m-high brick bench (9443) was attached to the southern face of Wall 9415, which was, in fact, the direct continuation of the line of Wall 10409. Its top level was ca. 0.1 m lower than the western end of this wall and it is possible that it constituted the (as of yet unexposed) western end of Stratum C-1b Wall 11458 (Fig. 12.48), whose extant top was used as a bench in this room. At its juncture with Wall 9406, the bench had an extension, protruding to the south, 0.4×0.6 m, 0.35 m high, with slightly sloping sides. The walls of the room, as well as the bench and its extension, were all covered with the same fine mud plaster. The eastern face of Wall 9406 in this room was very damaged and burnt, as opposed to its excellent preservation further to the north (in Building CQ3) and south, as well as on its western face in Building CL, as described below. The room had two entrances. A 1.0-m-wide entrance in the southern end of the eastern wall (9448) connected this room with the large room (10458) on the east (Photos 12.189–191, 12.196). Since the floor of the room to the east was 0.35–0.4 m higher than that of Room 9449, there was a small step here (Photos 12.196, 12.207). Some charred wooden pieces found in the entranceway might be remnants of a step, doorjamb or door. The bench (10454) with the pottery altar and bowl in Room 10458 to the east adjoined the southern doorjamb of this entrance. A second entrance, 0.9 m-wide, was located in the middle of the southern wall, connecting this room with Room 9450. The floor of the room (9449) was composed of red clay mixed with soft black burnt material.

The room was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418, 9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were found in this small room, among them 11 storage jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east, but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell from a second floor. A special find in this room was an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See Table 12.24 for other finds.

Room 9450

The middle room in the western wing (internal measurements 2.4×2.4; 5.76 sq m) was accessed both from Room 9449 to its north and from the large room to the east (10476) through a 1.0 m-wide entrance in its southeastern corner (Photo 12.207). The walls were covered with fine mud plaster. The floor (9450) was composed of red clay mixed with soft black burnt material. In the southwestern corner of the room was a square brick bin (9434) (internal measurements 1.0 sq m; 0.6 m high) (Photos 12.226–12.227). It was coated with a fine plaster that continued from the surrounding walls down to line the floor as well. Inside was an intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig. 13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10, 13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812 BCE (2σ).

The entire room was filled with very burnt destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43 restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig. 13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of the pottery in this room, in particular the storage jars (like in the previous room), were found smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ on the floor. This situation may hint that much of this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher shelves. A special item in this room was a horned pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo 12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar was a complete brick, but it appears that this was fallen and not meant as a support. For additional finds from this room, see Table 12.24.

Room 10506

The southern room of the western wing (internal measurements 2.15×2.5 m; 5.4 sq m) (Photos 12.215, 12.229–12.230) could be entered only from the large room to its east (10476) (Photos 12.203, 12.229). An intact juglet (Fig. 13.156:18) found leaning against the threshold just inside the room appeared to have been intentionally placed there before the floor was laid (Photo 12.233). The western wall of the room (10513) was the poorly preserved continuation of Wall 9406 to its north. The other walls, 9421 on the north, 10457 on the south and 10480 on the east, were well preserved; all the walls were covered with fine mud plaster (Photo 12.229–12.231).

The floor was composed of soft dark earth, except for the northwestern part, which was composed of the same mud plaster as the surrounding walls, recalling the plaster in the western part of Room 10458. This plastered area was 0.15 m higher than the rest of the room (Photos 12.229– 12.230). Below the earthen floor in the southeastern part of the room, against Wall 10457 and just underneath the floor where the pottery bin and pottery ‘bucket’ were found (see below), was a brick construction (11464), similar to the sub-floor bricks found in Rooms 10510 and 10476 (Fig. 12.52c). Like in those rooms, this seems to have been an element related to the construction phase of the building. A low (0.1 m high) bench (10504) composed of crumbly brown bricks was built along part of the western wall (Photo 12.230).

A pottery bin (10501) was set in the southwestern corner of the room (Photos 12.215, 12.223, 12.229–12.232); it was very similar to Bin 10488 in Room 10476, 3.0 m to its east and set against the same wall (10457). It stood 0.75 m high, which was shorter than the other bin; 0.15 m of its base was sunk into the floor makeup. Like the latter bin, it was made with thick slabs and restoration showed it to be trapezoid, with the wider part on top (Photo 12.232; Fig. 13.160:12); it had no base or lid, although 0.1 m above its bottom was a layer of low-fired clay that was laid down as a kind of floor. Inside the bin (capacity-93 liters) was a small amount of burnt grain.

Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484), including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed against the center of the southern wall (Photos 12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round container with a matching lid to its east (Fig. 13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken. Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those found attached to the altar fragment from Building CF.

Summary of Building CP

Building CP, with its eight rooms, was the largest and most complex building excavated at Tel Rehov. Many unique features characterized its plan, including the two eastern entrances, the symmetric division into a western and eastern wing flanking central rooms, the plan of circulation, the benches along the walls, the sub-floor brick constructions and the molded plaster on the doorjambs. It contained a large amount of unique pottery items, such as two altars, the Elisha ostracon, containers with lids, a ‘bucket’, a strainer, two free-standing bins, a figurine mold, a stand with petals, and an incense burner with a lid, as well as more than 230 pottery vessels of a wide variety of types (see Chapters 24, 45), all indicating that this building had some special function. The integral relation of Building CP to the smaller buildings to its north (CQ3, CX) and the spacious Building CL to its west, shows that it was part of a greater complex. For further discussion and interpretation, see Mazar (2015) and Chapter 4.

Building CL — Stratum C-1a

Plans, Sections, and Photos
Plans, Sections, and Photos

  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.53 - Plan of Building CL, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.234 - Walls of Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.235 - Walls in section of C-1a Building CL above C-1b apiary destruction debris (collapsed walls) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.236 - Wall 4443 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.237 - Burnt material (9432) on Floor 9435 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.238 - Burnt oily material (5435) on Floor 5482 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Photo 12.239 - Eastern wing and Floor 5446 in C-1a Building CL from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
  • Plans: Figs. 12.19, 12.50, 12.53
  • Sections: Figs. 12.73–12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87
  • Photos 12.234–12.239
  • Pottery: Figs. 13.125–13.129
Introduction

Building CL was constructed above the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos 12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235) and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73– 12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner of this building was built above a leveling fill (4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for two superimposed destructions in Area C.

Building CL was composed of two wings, each comprising two rooms: the external measurements of the western wing were 3.3×6.5 m (not including Wall 4443) and those of the eastern wing were 6.5×11.5 m (including walls). The total floor space was 63 sq m. Although the walls were found standing to a height of 1.2–1.5 m, no entrances were located. A passage from the western wing to the eastern wing may have existed in Wall 4443, close to its corner with Wall 4481, since here the former wall was preserved very low. In such a case, the threshold would have been 0.3 m above the floor. However, this cannot be determined with certainty and the location of entrances in this building remained enigmatic. This building was excavated in parts during several seasons; the excavated parts were removed in order to reach Stratum C-1b below and thus, no general photograph could be taken.

The southern wall of Building CL ran 0.5 m to the south of the line of that of Building CP. However, since the two buildings shared a wall (9406), it is likely that they were built together. All the walls of Building CL were founded 0.4–1.0 m lower than the foundation of Stratum C-1b Wall 1438 in Squares Y/1–2 to the west. This might be explained by the fact that they were built above the apiary, which was on a lower level than the surrounding buildings. Perhaps the deeper foundations were also the result of the need to stabilize these walls, which were built directly above the collapsed bricks and burnt debris that covered the destroyed apiary.

The area to the west and north of Building CL remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west (Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep, covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417.

The Western Wing — Rooms 4435 and 5432

The western wing of the building was about half the size of the eastern wing, and adjoined only its southern part. It was composed of a long room on the north (4435; internal measurements 2.7×3.5 m; 9.45 sq m) and a broad room on the south (5432; internal measurements 1.5×2.9 m; 4.35 sq m). As noted above, there was no entrance between the two.

The western wall (2413) ran for 6.5 m and was preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235) and also cut the eastern end of Wall 2426 of Building CH (Figs. 12.73–12.74; Photos 12.146– 12.147). The northern wall (2504) was 3.2 m long; its eastern end was preserved almost 1.0 m higher than Wall 4443 with which it cornered on the east (Photos 12.235–12.236); the reason for this was not clear. The southern wall (5423 on the west, 9424 on the east; Photo 12.237) was also the southern wall of the eastern wing; it was exposed over 7.6 m and apparently continued to the east to corner with Wall 10513, although this end remained unexcavated.

Wall 4443, joining the eastern and western wings, ran along 11 m and was preserved to a height of 1.5 m on its northern half, although up to only 0.5 m on the south (Squares Y/1, 20) (Photos 12.236, 12.238). The foundation level of this wall (85.40 m) was 0.3–0.4 m lower than that of Walls 2413 and 2504 (Figs. 12.73, 12.86–12.87). Wall 4481, which separated the two rooms in this wing, was built directly on top of the concentration of cult objects (the pottery altar and petal chalice) in the apiary below.

Both rooms had a distinct floor (4435 in the northern room, 5432 in the southern room) made of a 0.3-m-thick layer of soft light-red clay at levels 86.20–85.90 m (Fig. 12.86). A clay female figurine that most probably had belonged to an altar was found on the floor in the northeastern corner of Room 5432. An almost identical figurine was found in Locus 5446 in the northwestern part of the eastern wing (Chapter 35, Nos. 6a–b); it is possible that these two figurines had originally belonged to the same altar. Room 4435 was filled with burnt debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig. 13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed with some whitish material, that was concentrated mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall 4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing (Photo 12.236). This was further evidence that the southern end of this wall had been deliberately razed during the course of the use of Building CL, thus joining the two southern spaces. Alternatively, the southern end of Wall 4443 had been originally built as a low screen wall.

The Eastern Wing — Rooms 5449 and 5482

The eastern wing was composed of two large rooms or open spaces: 5449 on the north (measuring internally 5.0×5.35 m; ca. 27 sq. m) and 5482 on the south (measuring internally 4.2×5.3 m; 22.2 sq m). Wall 5418, the northern wall, was well preserved to 11 courses, built of gray, brown and yellow bricks (Photo 12.142), yet it was found severely tilted to the south, perhaps due to seismic activity (Photos 12.150, 12.152). As noted above, the southern wall of the eastern wing (9424) continued that of the western wing. The eastern wall (9406) was also the western wall of adjoining Buildings CP and CQ3 (Photo 12.192). This latter wall, preserved 14 courses high on its western face, was built directly above the eastern closing wall (9453) of the Stratum C-1b apiary (Photos 12.152–12.153, 12.234). Wall 5453, a well-built wall preserved nine courses high (Photos 12.150–12.153), separated the northern from the southern room, with no entrance joining them.

The floor of both rooms was made of the same soft red clay as the western rooms; it was 0.4 m thick in the north and center (85.70–86.10 m), but only 0.1 m thick near Wall 5453 (85.65 m) (Figs. 12.83–12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.150–12.151, 12.239). The floor in the southern room (5482), at levels 85.60–85.70 m, sealed the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Fig. 12.83; Photo 12.150). As noted above, the same black burnt oily substance mixed with white material that was found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237– 12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the northern part of Room 5449 not burnt.

Both rooms were full of a thick layer of destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs. 13.127–13.128), as were several other objects (Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239).

A curious feature found in the eastern wing of Building CL was a 0.7–1.1 m-thick layer of light gray debris (5419 in Square Z/2 and 5427 in Square Z/1) that sloped down from south to north (Fig. 12.83; Photos 12.150, 12.152). This layer, revealed just under topsoil, was virtually sterile. It appears to be either an intentional fill placed in the room following its destruction or possibly, erosion following the destruction and abandonment of the lower city; the latter explanation seems to be more plausible. In the topsoil (5402) just above this layer in Square Z/2 was a fragment of a very large pottery altar horn (Chapter 35, No. 28).

One has to question whether the two eastern spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m, appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar bases or any other roof support were found, it may be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed.

Summary of Building CL

The unique plan of Building CL and lack of domestic installations rule out it having been a dwelling, and it most likely served for some administrative, industrial or storage function. The large amount of bones, as well as their special nature, might allude to some relationship to the cultic practices in the adjacent Building CP. It is difficult to explain the lack of entrances in this building, especially in light of the fact that in the adjacent buildings to the east, entrances were found in all the rooms. A similar lack of entrances was also observed in Building CG (possibly a granary) and in the outer walls of Building CQ2. One possibility is that the excavated rooms were part of a basement floor, entered from a higher level. But such a hypothesis is contradicted by the level of the floors in the adjacent buildings on the east (CQ3, CX, CP), which were only slightly higher than the floors in Building CL. Alternatively, the rooms were entered from the roof by way of ladders or from the roofs of the adjacent buildings. In such a case, the entire ground floor of this building would have been sealed from the outside. All these features indicate the exceptional function of this building.

Summary of the Stratigraphy, Architecture and Main Features

Plan
Plan

Fig. 12.54

Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata C-3–C-1a (1:250)

Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Discussion
Continuity and Change in the Occupational Sequence

The architectural sequence of Strata C-4 to C-1a, ranging from the 11th to the 9th centuries BCE, demonstrated both continuity and change. This sequence, however, was not necessarily related to destruction episodes, as some buildings continued almost unchanged following their destruction, while others were demolished and new ones built in their stead. On the one hand, the use of brick as the only building material, the general orientation of the units, the rebuilding of some walls on the same line, and the density of construction, are continuing features. On the other hand, innovations included changes in the type of bricks (but rarely the size) and the introduction of wooden beams for the construction of wall and floor foundations in Stratum C-1b.

The substantial and well-preserved building remains of the two phases of Stratum C-3 in Squares S/2–4, attributed to Iron IB, are evidence for a well-constructed and planned city, as also found in Strata D-5 and D-4 in Area D (Chapter 15). No evidence for a violent destruction of this level was found. A number of Stratum C-3 walls, characterized by gray bricks and light-colored mortar, were rebuilt in Stratum C-2 of the early Iron IIA on the same lines, but with hard yellow bricks, as in the cases of Walls 2507, 2506 and 8418 in Squares S/2–4. This indicates urban continuity from the late Iron I to the early Iron IIA.

The two pits found in Square R/4 recall a similar feature in Area D (Stratum D-3) in Squares N, P/4–5 and Q/4, where ca. 45 pits were found above and cutting through Stratum D-4 architecture; they were explained as a local feature in this area. Such pits were not found in any other part of Area C, except for a few in the apiary (Squares Y/1–2) in relation to a floor which appears to have originally belonged to Stratum C-3. Thus, the two pits in Square R/4 are understood to have belonged to the same phenomenon as those in Area D at the end of Iron IB. Above the pits and the floor was a thin layer of debris, followed by Locus 1555b, a pottery concentration in the lowest level of a room attributed to a Stratum C-2 (see above).

The division of the Iron IIA into three strata (C-2, C-1b, C-1a) was first and foremost based on a clear differentiation between Strata C-2 and C-1 in terms of overall plan and building techniques. The well-preserved walls of Stratum C-2 (general Stratum VI), sometimes standing to a height of 18 courses, were made of typical hard-packed yellow bricks, differing in their texture from the bricks of Strata C-1b and C-1a (Tables 12.28–12.30). The lack of stone foundations and the almost total absence of wood in the construction were also typical of this stratum. In certain places, we observed architectural continuity between Strata C-2 and C-1b, such as in the transition from Building CA to Building CD, in some of the walls of Building CE, and, to some extent, between the upper phases of Building CT, as well as one wall in Building CZ. In other places, the builders of Stratum C-1b ignored the earlier walls of Stratum C-2 (Fig. 12.16).

In the area of Building CH and the apiary in Squares T–Z/1–2, Stratum C-1b units were founded right on top of Stratum C-3 structures of Iron IB, and even reused walls and floors from this period. This seems to have occurred due to the intentional removal of building remains of Stratum C-2 by the builders of the apiary, who sought to establish it on a lower level than the rest of the buildings in the area to its west (CG and CH) and north (CM).

The differentiation between Strata C-1b and C-1a (general Strata V and IV) was clear in some cases and unclear in others. These two stratum numbers refer to the same city that underwent local destruction and rebuilding in certain places. A major feature of Stratum C-1b was the incorporation of wooden beams in the foundations of walls and floors. Often these beams were laid directly on top of Stratum C-2 structures. Buildings CJ, CF, CW, CQ1, CQ2 and CG, as well as the room in Square R/4, were founded, in our view, in Stratum C-1b, and continued to be in use with only few or no changes in Stratum C-1a. In contrast, Building CH and the apiary were used only in Stratum C-1b and, following a severe destruction, were replaced by Building CL. Building CD of Stratum C-1b went out of use and was replaced by an open area in Stratum C-1a. Likewise, Building CM was destroyed at the end of C-1b and was replaced by Piazza 2417 in C-1a. In the southeastern block, Building CZ of Stratum C-1b went out of use and was replaced in Stratum C-1a by two new buildings (CQ3, CX). As discussed in detail above, the possibility that Building CZ could be attributed to Stratum C-2 was considered, particularly due to the similarity of its levels to those of the remains under Building CQ1 to its south that we ascribed to Stratum C-2. If this was the case, then Building CQ3 and CX too would have been established in Stratum C-1b and continued unchanged into Stratum C-1a, although there is no tangible evidence for this, such as wooden foundations (except in their thresholds) or floor raisings. Ultimately, we rejected this possibility and prefer to attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b. To its south, Building CP of Stratum C-1a was a rebuild of an earlier building of Stratum C-1b, although this early stage is insufficiently known due to lack of excavation.

In a few instances, an extra phase was discerned, demonstrating the complexity of the stratigraphy in the three main Iron IIA levels. For example, an earlier phase of Building CR (Squares Y–Z/6) in Stratum C-1b was detected above the well-preserved remains of C-2 Building CT. A later phase was identified in the remains east of Stratum C-2 Building CB (Squares Y–Z/4). Additional phases in the courtyard devoted to cooking activity in Square T/4 were a typical feature of such an open area. This diversity indicates that each building had its own history; some continued with no change from Stratum C-1b to C-1a and others underwent modifications of varying degrees. The clearest change between these two strata was in the vicinity of the apiary and its surroundings in the southeastern part of Area C.

Destruction Episodes

No evidence for violent destruction was found at the end of Strata C-3 and C-2, and therefore most of the floors of these levels were found virtually lacking complete vessels (except in the case of Locus 1555b in Square R/4). There were some indications for severe damage to Stratum C-2 buildings by an earthquake, including layers of complete fallen bricks, but this was not a sudden collapse of the buildings which would have buried vessels, and perhaps human bodies, below a massive layer of debris. Rather, it could have been an earthquake that was strong enough to cause severe damage to the houses, resulting in their abandonment, with the inhabitants able to evacuate their possessions and return shortly afterwards to rebuild the new city of Stratum C-1b.

Evidence of severe destruction by fire in Stratum C-1b was found in the apiary and in Buildings CH, CG (the southern room), CM, CF and CE. In Building CG, it remained unclear whether the destruction of the northern rooms should be attributed to Stratum C-1b or C-1a. All of these buildings, except for CF and CE, contained large amounts of in situ pottery and other objects. Notably, these structures were located along a north-south axis running through the center of Area C, while buildings to the east and west of this `belt’, as well as Stratum V buildings in other excavation areas, did not show signs of destruction or burning. Perhaps the heavy destruction noted in these buildings was caused by a local event, such as deliberate or unintentional burning by human agency, or by an earthquake. The latter possibility is suggested in Chapter 54, based on paleomagnetic testing.

As opposed to this, Stratum C-1a came to an end in a sudden violent destruction that involved a fierce conflagration, evidenced in each of the excavated buildings revealed just below topsoil. The temperature must have been more than 500 degrees, since it caused partial firing of the brick courses and the mud plaster in many of the walls. In several cases, pottery vessels cracked and became distorted, with much calcification; for example, the large pottery crate in Building CF was so distorted by the fire that it was extremely difficult to restore. The incredible quantity of pottery vessels and other objects found in the houses indicates the sudden destruction, although a human skeleton was found in only one place. There was no activity in this area following the destruction, except one deep pit (6498 in Square Y/6) which cut through most of the Iron IIA strata, and possibly, a gray fill, devoid of finds, in Square Z/1 above part of Building CL.

An interesting question concerning site formation is what happened to the layers of brick debris and collapse of the buildings of Stratum C-1a? The walls of this stratum were preserved 0.7–1.0 m above the floors and their tops were discovered flat and leveled, just a few centimeters below topsoil. While many fallen bricks and ceiling material were found inside the destroyed buildings, it would seem that there would have been a larger quantity if they had stood to a normal height of ca. 1.8–2.0 m and perhaps even had second floors. We suggest that the disappearance of masses of brick debris resulted from severe erosion in this highest part of the lower mound. Layers of collapse and fallen bricks were probably washed to the southeast towards the gulley that separates the upper from the lower mound. A less feasible explanation would be that bricks were deliberately removed from the walls of the destroyed lower city by the inhabitants of the upper city, perhaps when they built the fortification wall in Area B (see Chapter 8).

Urban Planning

Area C was densely built in all three Iron Age IIA strata, C-2, C-1b and C-1, with houses attached to one another in what can be defined as pre-planned insulae, separated by only a few open spaces.

Open Spaces

An open space in Squares S–T/3–4 in Stratum C-2 was at least partly occupied by Building CM in Stratum C-1b (although the eastern part of this area remained unexcavated). In Stratum C-1b, an open area was located south of Building CD, above Building CB of Stratum C-2. In Stratum C-1a, this latter area was expanded and to its east, beyond Building CG, another piazza was created, with a 3.0-m-wide street leading into it from the east, and a somewhat irregular alley from the south. These open spaces seem not to have been related to an individual unit, but rather served as small piazzas surrounded by several buildings. Few installations were located in these open courtyards, for example, ovens found in the cooking area in Square T/4, which was in use throughout all three strata, and a stone formation in the center of Piazza CK in Stratum C-1a.

Central Planning and Orientation

Evidence for central urban planning can be seen mainly in the plan of Strata C-1b and C-1a. Two major walls traverse the entire area from south to north in a straight line: on the west was Wall 1413, which ran along 19.8 m and continued both to the south and the north of the excavated area. In the eastern part of the area (along the line of Squares A/20, 1–6), Walls 9453/9406+6408+6497 created a continuous straight line, intersected by the street in Squares Z, A–C/4. These two long backbone walls were not parallel to one another: the western one ran on a northwest–southeast alignment, while the eastern wall was due north–south. The distance between them (outer faces) was 19 m on the south and 21.5 m along the northern line of Squares R–Z, A/4, ca. 20 m to the north.

The blocks of houses in all three strata were oriented along virtually the same lines: almost exactly east–west and north–south, with minor deviations in the western part of the area, causing trapezoidshaped spaces in the seam between the eastern and western parts, such as the alley between Walls 2413 and 1438 in Squares T–Y/1–2 in Stratum C-1a or the passage from the open area in Squares S–T/2–3 to the north, towards the cooking area in Squares S– T/4 in Stratum C-1b. Evidence of central planning is also seen in the sharing of walls and the back-toback construction of many units, as discussed in the next section.

Fortifications

No evidence for the existence of fortifications was found along the western perimeter of the mound in Areas C and D, nor along the northern perimeter, where a probe was excavated in Square Y/9. The westernmost structures of all Iron IIA strata continued into Squares Q/4–5 of Area D (defined there as Strata D-1a, D-1b and D-2), located on the upper slope of the mound, where they disappeared with the erosion line. Although the slope of the mound suffered from severe erosion, as shown by the fact that the eastern sides of the buildings in Area D were missing, it is improbable that an entire city wall was eroded away, and we thus concluded that the city remained unfortified during this entire period.

Building Plans, Size and Function

Throughout all three main Iron IIA strata, a notable characteristic is the uniqueness of the architecture. Not only are the buildings quite unlike most of the typical Iron Age structures known from proximate, as well as more distant regions, but they also do not resemble each other. While certain technical features are repeated, such as size and type of bricks and the use of double walls, each unit was unique in its plan, except for three very similar buildings (CQ1, CQ2, CQ3).

In the discussion of individual buildings, we presented several parallels: Building CF was compared to part of Building 2081 at Megiddo Stratum VA–IVB, and Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 were compared to several buildings from 13th–11th centuries BCE contexts at Hazor Stratum XIII, Tell Abu-Hawam Stratum IV, Tel Batash Stratum VI and Aphek Stratum X11. Building CA was compared to part of Building 200 at Hazor Strata X–IX, and Building CY (and to some extent, also Building CZ) to a type of building with a central space flanked by rooms on two sides, known from Hazor, Samaria and Megiddo in the Iron Age II.

Although individual parallels such as these may be cited, the general concept of the architecture, in both building techniques and plans, as well as in architectural details, deviates from the common architecture in Iron Age II Israelite cities. Notably, none of these buildings recall the so-called ‘Four-Room’ or ‘Three-Room’ houses or pillared buildings that were so typical. No stone pillars were found and wooden posts were used only in the case of Building CX and seen in scant remains of Stratum C-2 under Building CZ.

An unresolved question is whether the buildings had a second story. The double walls, up to 1.1 in width, could easily have supported a second story, but even the narrow walls of 0.6 m width could have been used for such a purpose. Evidence for staircases was not found, except perhaps in the case of the eastern part of Building CY of Stratum C-2. In other buildings, wooden ladders could have led to upper stories or to the roofs, where daily activities could have taken place, such as in the case of Building CP, where large grinding stones were found fallen from a second story or a roof.

Table 12.26 compares the external dimensions and floor space of the buildings excavated in Area C, showing the diversity, which might have had social and cultural implications. The larger buildings, CF and CP, had an average floor space of ca. 62 sq m, while Buildings CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3 had an average floor space of ca. 20 sq m. Building CX contained 34 sq m. In case of the existence of a second story, these numbers should be potentially doubled.

The number of persons that such houses could accommodate can only be guessed, based on various analyses. Narroll’s (1962) often-cited coefficient of 10 sq m per person would suggest two to five inhabitants in such houses if they had one story and four to ten persons if they had two. Yet, there are different variables that should be considered, and it is doubtful whether Narroll’s coefficient can be taken for granted. Thus, Schloen (e.g., 2001: 180) suggested a coefficient of 8.0 sq m per person in Israelite houses; following a detailed discussion, he estimated that the average Israelite “jointfamily” included seven to ten persons (Schloen 2001: 135–183). It seems that the larger houses, such as Building CY in Stratum C-2, as well as Buildings CW, CF and CP in Stratum C-1a, were inhabited by families of eight to twelve persons, while the smaller houses, such as Building CA in Stratum C-2 and CQ1, C2 and CQ3 in Stratum C-1a, served much smaller units, perhaps nuclear families or other social groups. It should be noted, however, that the function of these buildings as regular dwellings is not obvious; several of the buildings, such as CA in Stratum C-2 and CF and CP in Strata C-1a–b, may have had special functions, based on their plans and assemblages of finds. Building CF could have been an elite residence that incorporated administrative, domestic and cultic activities. Building CP in Stratum C-1a may have served specific functions related to religious rituals, such as shared meals/feasts and perhaps, the activity of a “man of god”, such as the biblical Elisha. The possible special functions of Buildings CF and CP are further discussed in Chapter 4 and Mazar 2015: 103–117. The small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, and perhaps also CX, may have belonged to groups or families of special status, perhaps related to or under the control of the elites in Buildings CF and CP. It should be noted that all these buildings yielded large numbers of finds, including an incredible amount of pottery vessels, considering the size of the buildings. In each building there was at least one loom and one or more grinding installations. Yet, cooking facilities were found only in Buildings CF and CP, as well as in the open piazza to the west. This, again, may emphasize the different status of the residents of the small houses, such as CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3.

Several buildings in Area C certainly served functions other than dwelling. Thus, Stratum C-2 Building CB, with its large hall, could have had some public function. Building CG in Stratum C-1 is interpreted as a granary, and Building CL as a storage facility or an or industrial structure, possibly servicing other buildings in the eastern quarter.

The clustering of the buildings in Stratum C-1a is a notable feature. An interesting configuration is the group of small buildings, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3, and Building CW, flanking an east–west street, as well as the location of larger buildings, CF and CP, adjoining and beyond this cluster. This arrangement may reflect social ranking of some sort.

Levels

Differences in the founding levels of various buildings in the different strata were noted. In Stratum C-2, Wall 8467 in Building CY in the northeastern corner of the area was founded at 85.00 m, while the southwesternmost wall (1470) was founded at 85.57 m. The westernmost wall (1563 in Square R/4) was founded at 85.61 m and the easternmost wall (8467 in Square C/6), at 85.00 m. In Stratum C-1b, the foundations of all the buildings, except the apiary and Building CZ, ranged between 85.90 m in the northeastern corner of the area to 86.50 m in the southwestern corner, over a distance of 39 m. In Stratum C-1a, there was a 1.0 m difference between the foundation level of the northeastern wall (8424; 86.10 m) as opposed to the southwestern wall (1431; 87.10 m), and a 1.6 m difference between the westernmost wall (1413; 87.60 m) and the easternmost wall (10490; 86.00 m) along Squares S–Z, A–C/2. The difference in level of almost 1.7 m between Buildings CG, CH, CM and the apiary was a deliberate choice, as discussed in detail above.

A tilt from west to east/southeast was defined in all strata at Tel Rehov, and may have been the result of both the natural topography and seismic or tectonic activity during historical periods, causing tilts even inside structures.

Construction and Building Features

Double Walls

In many cases, adjacent buildings had their own outer walls, even when they were attached to one another, so that back-to-back double walls were created, with total thickness reaching 1.0–1.1 m. This feature can be seen in many of the units in all three strata, although the buildings in the southeastern block, CQ3, CX, CP and CL, had shared walls of regular width (0.5 m), perhaps reflecting their construction as one integral unit for social or functional reasons. The existence of an individual outer wall for each house, even in cases of attached buildings, may have had practical, as well as symbolic social meaning. Practically, it may represent building phases, indicating that each building was constructed independently, perhaps at a somewhat different time, and then, an adjacent unit was added. Double walls added to the strength of the buildings and their resistivity to earthquakes, as well as facilitating the construction of a second story. Faust (2012: 39–117) noted the rarity of double walls in Israelite domestic architecture and the social significance of this feature: individual walls for each house that create double walls together appear mainly in houses of elite families. This may be the case at Tel Rehov as well, where double walls were much more common than in any other known Iron Age II city

Building Techniques

All the Iron Age IIA buildings were constructed exclusively of bricks, with no stone foundations. This is an unusual feature in the Land of Israel, where most brick walls were laid on stone socles. At Tel Rehov itself, stone socles for brick walls were common in Late Bronze IIB and Iron Age I, and the lack of such foundations in Iron IIA is an unusual feature that remains unexplained.

Most of the bricks were made of brown, gray or yellow clay. In Stratum C-3, all of the walls were constructed with distinct gray bricks of friable consistency, laid with a light-colored mortar between them and covered with a plaster of the same composition as the mortar. In the walls of Strata C-1b and C-1a, a wider variety of bricks was used; in most cases, they were made of light gray-brown clay, and more rarely, of a dark brown soil taken from the nearby colluvium. See Tables 12.27–12.30 for details of brick sizes and materials in most of the walls. The size deviations are small, indicating a great deal of standardization in the size and manufacturing technique, if not the composition, of the bricks.

In some cases, mud plaster was preserved on walls, some 0.02–0.03 m thick and sometimes nicely smoothed. Whitish plaster of higher quality than the mud plaster was used only in the entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP, where the plaster was molded to a rounded profile.

Wood Foundations

The use of wood for wall and floor foundations at Tel Rehov is a unique feature. This is a novelty of Stratum C-1b, but there is one such case in Stratum C-2 (Building CU) and isolated cases in Stratum C-1a (e.g., Building CQ3). A similar construction technique was found in two buildings of Stratum B-5 in Area B, as well as in a building in Area G, attributed to Stratum G-1b. Hence, this technique appears to have been utilized contemporaneously in various buildings throughout the city. The purpose of this wood construction is as yet to be clarified. One possible explanation is that it was intended to stabilize the buildings in the event of earthquakes. This might have been the outcome of what we surmise was the cause of the destruction of Stratum C-2, namely, seismic activity. This function of the wood is illustrated mainly by the way circular beams (their charred remains usually no more than .05–0.1 m in diameter) were often laid at intervals of 0.1–0.2 m, perpendicular to the brick wall, below its lowest brick course. In several cases (i.e., Wall 1438), two or more layers of such beams were found. In this way, the wood could serve as a ‘shock absorber’. Prof. David Yankelevsky, head of the National Building Research Institute in the Technion, Haifa, who visited the site, compared this building technique to modern engineering, when steel cylinders are laid below the foundations of massive structures where the danger of damage by earthquakes is at high risk, such as in nuclear plants. This explanation, if accepted, would point to a technological innovation intended to protect structures against the hazards of earthquakes in a location so close to the Syro-African fault, where the threat of such activity was more acute than anywhere else in the country.

Floors

In most cases, floors were composed of beaten earth or clay. In Stratum C-1b, wooden branches and beams were incorporated into the foundation of some floors; these were usually arranged rather haphazardly below the earth floor. The wood itself was embedded into a matrix of soft red clay that was often similar to, or served as, the floor makeup itself. Stone floors were found only in Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, and perhaps Building CJ, all in Stratum C-1a. In a few places, floors incorporated pebbly gravel, such as in the western part of C-1a Building CX, or in the open space in Stratum C-1a Building CW. In Building CP, as well as in two rooms in Building CY of Stratum C-2, a brick construction was found under the red clay floors in a few rooms, while in other rooms, a mud-plaster foundation was laid under these floors.

The distinct composition of the floor of the Stratum C-1b apiary should be mentioned. It was composed of three different matrices, each apparently serving a different purpose, particularly the very hard thick white tufa floor surrounding the hives, most likely meant to be a permeable surface to protect against spillage or to possibly fend off rodents and insects.

Wooden Posts

The use of wooden posts on unworked stone bases was a rare feature that was found only in Building CX of Stratum C-1a, where there was a line of five post-holes above stone bases, and in the Stratum C-2 level under Building CZ.

Various Installations

Benches

Benches built of bricks or terre pisé were found in several instances in Stratum C-1 buildings. In Building CF of Stratum C-1a, they were found along almost all the walls of the three western chambers. In Building CW of Strata C-1a–b, they were located along the walls of the western rooms. Benches ran along some of the walls of the inner rooms of Buildings CQ1 and CQ2, as well as in Buildings CX and CP, where benches were located along the walls of four of the rooms. The benches could be used for sitting, but their main purpose was probably placement of items. A number of vessels were found on Benches 10466 and 10467 in Building CP, including a very large cooking pot. A pottery altar and bowl were found on Bench 10454 in this building.

Silos, Bins and Other Installations

Several storage installations made of packed-clay walls or bricks were found. In Building CP of Stratum C-1a, a corner of Room 9450 was enclosed by two narrow walls, creating a bin (9434) which contained an intact Hippo jar full of grain, as well as other finds. Other storage installations were Silo 7514 in Building CY of Stratum C-2 and plastered Pit 11456 in Building CZ of Stratum C-1b. An exceptional feature was the two rectangular pottery bins, made without a base and standing on their narrow side against the southern wall of Building CP. These bins, found with grain, have no parallels elsewhere.

The installation occupying the western part of the northern room of Building CQ3 in Stratum C-1a (10505) is unusual in its size and shape, although its function could not be determined; it seems that it had some industrial role. Yet another installation with a hard plaster surface was found against the southern wall of the southwestern room in this building, but it was too damaged to determine its function. Other installations include a mud-plastered semi-circle (11452) attached to the wall inside the western entrance to the southeastern room of Building CP in Stratum C-1a, and a brick with a depression on top inside the entrance to Room 2489 in Building CE in Stratum C-1b (2477); both were possibly used as stands for vessels, perhaps for drinking, positioned just inside the entrance to the rooms.

Ovens

Twenty-two ovens were excavated in Area C. Such ovens (tannur, often denoted ‘tabun’) were found in many houses, as well as in open areas. The ovens were always circular, 0.4–0.6 m in diameter; in most cases, only the lower part was preserved. Ovens were constructed with a clay wall ca. 4–5 cm thick, that was, in many cases, coated with pottery sherds on the outside. The most outstanding example is Oven 7428 in Building CU of Stratum C-2, which was completely preserved from base to rim, with an opening at the bottom and an incised mark on its exterior (Fig. 12.13). It was 0.56 m in diameter at its base, 0.56 m tall, with a 0.3 m-wide opening at its top and a small opening at its bottom, used for inserting fuel. It was coated on the outside by large sherds of restorable pottery vessels, a feature found in other ovens, but not as well preserved as this one (Mazar 2011). Ovens were also found in Stratum C-2 Building CY and in the rooms north of Building CA (Stratum C-2) and Building CD (Stratum C-1b), as well as in Buildings CF, CJ, and CP of Stratum C-1a. In several of these cases, the spaces where the ovens were found could have been unroofed areas (e.g., Buildings CY and CU), although this could not be determined with certainty. In certain cases, the location of the oven was quite certainly inside a roofed space (e.g., Building CF). An open space containing a succession of ovens throughout all the Iron IIA strata was found in Square T/4. The lack of ovens in certain buildings should be noted, in particular, Stratum C-1a Buildings CX, CQ1, CQ2 and CQ3. It is assumed that residents of these houses shared ovens located in open spaces, or that they belonged to a specific social organization in which people cooked and ate together, for example, in Building CP, where the evidence points to communal meals.

Stones

In several cases, flat stones were located on the floor or on benches along and close to walls. The latter was the case in Building CY of Stratum C-2, where 13 such stones were found along the walls, and in its successor, Building CW of Stratum C-1a, where eight such stones were found in the western rooms, placed on top of the benches lining the walls. It is difficult to explain them as a constructional feature; perhaps they were used as solid bases for objects such as water or oil jars, leather containers, etc.

Another feature was isolated cases of hard mizi stones of considerable size inside buildings. Examples include the very large stone found in Building CB of Stratum C-2, two large stones found in Building CF (one in the large hall in the eastern wing in Stratum C-1b and the second in the entrance corridor in Stratum C-1a, possibly used as a butcher block), a stone in the southern part of Building CM in Stratum C-1b and stones in Buildings CQ2 and CX of Stratum C-1a. Notable also is a large smoothed-top limestone placed at an angle to the east of the oven in the large northern room of Building CP in Stratum C-1a. Such stones could have served as working surfaces in places where a hard surface was needed. They are outstanding in light of the relatively rare use of stones in Iron Age IIA contexts at the site.

Grinding Tools and Installations

Slab-shaped lower grinding stones, loaf-shaped upper grinding stones, hammerstones, pestles, and mortars were numerous in Area C (see Chapter 43). A notable feature in Stratum C-1a were grinding installations of two basic types. The first comprised a large lower grinding stone enclosed by a low hard-clay rounded parapet; the slab is tilted towards a low area on the edge into which the ground flour could be collected; loaf-shaped upper grinding stones were found in association with it. Two very well-preserved installations of this type were found in Building CF and less well-preserved examples in Buildings CE, CQ1, and CQ2. The second type of grinding installation comprised a similar large lower grinding stone set at a slight angle and directed to a hard clay round receptacle, which was most likely meant to contain the ground flour. In Building CX, where two such installations were found, the better-preserved example had a narrow brick bordering the grinding stone on one side and built against the wall on the other. Upper grinding stones were found in association with the lower stone. In Building CP, very large lower and upper grinding stones were found in the destruction debris, 0.8 m above the floor of Room 11451, most probably fallen from the roof or an upper story of the building. Likewise, a very large stone with a small depression in its top that was smoothed from use, and might have been used as a mortar, was found just under topsoil and above the thick destruction debris in this room, suggesting that it, too, originally had been positioned on the roof or upper story.

Looms

Numerous loom weights, mostly made of stone and less so, of clay, were found in concentrations in most of the Stratum C-1a buildings; many of these contained dozens of loom weights each. Remains of charred wood in proximity to such caches, such as in Buildings CP, CR, CX, CF and CE, indicate the presence of one or two looms in the houses. See details and discussion in Chapter 39.

Notes

  1. The word ‘beam’ refers to a worked piece of wood, often squared, used as a support in construction. In the present chapter, we use it to denote the wood that was commonly found in the wall and floor foundations, mainly in Stratum C-1b, although in many cases, these were tree trunks and branches that did not seem to have been worked.

  2. Locus 2466 was related to Stratum C-2, although its absolute levels corresponded with Locus 2487 in Square S/2, which was related to Stratum C-3. This is because the C-2 walls in Square T/2 continued down, while in Square S/2, the C-3 walls began at this level.

  3. The phenomenon of cut walls was also seen in Stratum C-1b Wall 1464 in Square S/4 and Stratum C-2 Wall 2481 in Square T/3.

  4. An additional two Hippo jars were found in Locus 11425, but were not restored or drawn.

  5. The photos showing the early phase of Building CP appear together with those of its later phase in Stratum C-1a, when the entire building was exposed.

  6. At the time of writing, this bin was not restored.

Partial Collection of Plans and Sections

Plans

  • Figure 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.24 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.25 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.27 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.28 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.29 - Building CE, Stratum C-1b; corner of Walls 2454 and 1491 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.33 - Plan of Building CR, early phase of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.34 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.35 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.36 - Plan of Building CF, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.39 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.40 - Plan of Buildings CG, CH, CM and apiary, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.44 - Plan of Building CH and apiary from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.48 - Plan of Building CZ, Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.50 - Plan of Stratum C-1a, south-center and southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.51 - Plan of Buildings CQ3 and CX, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52a - Plan of Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52b - Isometric reconstruction, Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.52c - Plan of sub-floor brick construction in Building CP, Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Sections

  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.57 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.58 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.59 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.60 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.61 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.65 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.66 - Section 12 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.67 - Section 13 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.68 - Section 14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.69 - Section 15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.70 - Section 16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.72 - Section 18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.73 - Section 19 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.74 - Section 20 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.75 - Section 21 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.76 - Section 22 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.77 - Section 23 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.78 - Section 24 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.79 - Section 25 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.80 - Section 26 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.81 - Section 27 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.82 - Section 28 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.83 - Section 29 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.84 - Section 30 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.85 - Section 31 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.86 - Section 32 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.87 - Section 33 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.88 - Section 34 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.89 - Section 35 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.90 - Section 36 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.91 - Section 37 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.92 - Section 38 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.94 - Section 40 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.95 - Section 41 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Figure 12.97 - Section 43 (Square R/4, looking north) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Chapter 15 - Area D: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1           Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2           Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1           Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2           Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Discussions
Chapter 15A - Introduction

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 15.1 - Area D at the end of 1997 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.2 - Area D at the end of 1998 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.3 - Area D at the end of 2000 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4 - Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5 - Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Discussion

Area D was a step trench dug in the northern part of the western slope of the lower mound, from the bottom of the tell to the uppermost level (Fig. 15.2). The area was excavated during seven seasons (1997–1998, 2000, 2005, 2007–2008, 2010). In 1997 and 1998, the area was excavated as a 4.0 m wide trench extending westwards from the northwestern square of Area C (R/4) and running five squares (25 m) down the slope (Squares Q/4–L/4) (Photos 15.1–15.2). In 2000 and 2005, the trench was extended by one square to the north (L–Q/5), while only minor probes were conducted in the original trench (Photos 15.3–15.4). Starting from 2005, Area D was divided into two sub-areas: the upper (eastern) portion of the slope (Squares P– Q/4–5) was excavated as Area D1 and the lower (western) portion (Squares L–N/4–5) as Area D2. These terms are not retained in this chapter and are replaced by Area D East (the upper part of the trench) and Area D West (the lower part of the trench) respectively. Both areas were excavated in 2005, 2007 and 2008 (Photo 15.5), while in the 2010 season, and for a few days in April 2011 (Squares N/4–5), work was carried out only in Area D West (Photo 15.6). The actual width of the excavated step trench was 9.0 m (Fig. 15.1). In addition to the manual excavation, two backhoe trenches were excavated from the base of the mound westwards, towards the present agricultural field, intended to reveal geological features and geomorphological processes at the base of the mound. In the first three seasons (1997, 1998, 2000) Area D was supervised by Amir Sumaka'i Fink, together with Yoav Schur in 1997–1998. In 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2011), Area D East was supervised by Yael Rotem and Area D West by Uri Davidovich.

The present chapter is divided between the two parts of the area: the western (lower) part and eastern (higher) part.

The goal of the excavation of Area D was to study the occupation history, stratigraphic sequence, formation processes and potential fortification lines in the lower mound. Based on results of previous surveys (see Chapter 3) and the shape of the steep, homogeneous western and northern slopes of the lower mound, it was assumed that this formation was created by an earthen rampart, possibly constructed during the Middle Bronze Age. However, excavation has unequivocally shown that the lower mound was first settled in Late Bronze I, a phenomenon which is almost unparalleled at other sites in the Southern Levant.

Continuous occupation was detected in Area D from Late Bronze I to Iron IIA, a time span of some 600 years. The excavation concentrated on defining the various strata and occupation phases and their architectural remains, as well as the nature of the transition between them. Eleven main strata and several sub-phases were defined along the slope, with an accumulation reaching 11.45 m (between levels 76.45 m and 87.90 m) (Fig. 15.2). No fortifications were found along the entire step trench and no major destruction events were identified between the strata. The correlation between Strata D-2 and D-1 to the stratigraphy in nearby Area C was a key to anchoring the local stratigraphy of Area D in relation to the rest of the tell, although the issue of the precise correlation between the Iron IB strata in Area D and those in Area C remains unresolved and is further discussed below in this chapter. Table 15.1 presents the stratigraphic sequence and suggested correlation to strata in Area C, as well as periodization and approximate dates of the various strata.1
Footnotes

1 The terminology in this chapter follows Mazar 1990: 30 and NEAEHL: 1529. The period Iron IA (first half of the 12th century BCE) is called Late Bronze III by several scholars in recent years. See discussion in Chapter 4 and by Mazar in TBS III: 23–24.

Site Formation Processes

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

The initial understanding of the formation processes of the site assumed that Tel Rehov in general, and the lower mound in particular, developed on a natural spur which protruded slightly above the level of the surrounding fields. This assumption was presumably corroborated later by the results of the geoseismic survey, which showed that both parts of the mound were built on an elevated, eastward-tilted tufa block (Zilberman et al. 2002; Chapter 2, this volume). It was also assumed that the level of the field to the west of the mound remained fairly unchanged during the time span that elapsed from the first settlement in the lower mound to the present day. The low natural hill inferred from the geoseismic survey (Zilberman et al. 2002) was not found during the excavation. In fact, the excavation in Area D has shown that the lower mound was built of successive, almost horizontal strata which show almost no terracing, beginning at a level even lower than that of the current field.

Evidence gathered both by excavation at the base of Area D (see below) and during the geoseismic survey indicates that a geological fault, probably of a stepped structure, borders the mound on the west (Chapter 2 and Zilberman et al. 2004). Young tectonic activity along this fault, which postdates at least the earlier strata of the lower mound, is indicated by the missing western portion of the monumental building of Stratum D-10 (see below), as gravitational erosion cannot account for this observation. This tectonic activity has created, together with the continuous occupation of the site east of the fault line, a clear demarcation between the mound and the down-faulted block to its west, a process which possibly enhanced post-depositional erosion on the western slope of the mound. It is hypothesized, based on the plans of most strata (e.g., the buildings of Strata D-5 and D-4), that the scale of erosion (i.e., the missing portions of most strata) is no greater than a few meters. Thus, it seems untenable to assume that fortification systems could have been entirely eroded. Combined with the evidence gathered in Areas C and E, it is concluded that the lower mound was probably never fortified.

The young tectonic activities, both in the aforementioned fault and in other faults surrounding the mound (Zilberman et al. 2004; Chapter 2, this volume), could also have caused the tilting of layers and structures towards the southeast (towards the center of the mound) that was noted in both Areas D and C. This post-depositional tilting could have occurred during the occupational sequence, either close in time to the creation of the tilted features, or much later (see Chapter 3 and below, discussion of Strata D-11 and D-10).

Based on a backhoe trench excavated in the present-day field west of the mound, it is clear that the down-faulted block is covered with at least 4.3 m of dark brown colluvium which accumulated in the last 1000–1500 years, as indicated by the appearance of worn Roman-Byzantine or later sherds which must have originated in the Late Antiquity settlement of Rehob, located ca. 700 m to the northwest of Area D (Vitto 1993). The top level of the present field is ca. 2.0 m higher than the bedrock of the uplifted tufa block, as was exposed at the base of the excavation in Area D (Fig. 15.17b, and further below).

Chapter 15B - Area D West, Strata D-11 TO D-6:Late Bronze to Iron IA

Geo-Archaeological Investigations at the Base of Area D

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Sections: Fig. 15.17a–b
Discussion

Apart from studying the earliest part of the stratigraphic sequence of the lower mound, the excavations at the base of Area D had two additional goals: to clarify the outline of the natural topography, whether bedrock or virgin soil, which predated the first human activity in this area, and to explore the relationship between the formation processes of the lower mound in its initial phases and of the nearby plain located to the west of the mound. These investigations were carried out in three deep manually excavated probes and in two narrow backhoe trenches, all located at the lowermost part of the step trench.

Three probes were dug in order to explore the constructional fill of Stratum D-10 and occupation layers of Stratum D-11 (Fig. 15.3):

  • Probe I, located at the northwestern corner of Square L/4 (excavated in 1998, 1.0×2.0 m)
  • Probe II, located at the southwestern corner of Square M/4 (excavated in 2008 and 2010, ca. 1.0×2.5 m)
  • Probe III, located at the southern part of Square M/5 and northern part of Square M/4 (excavated in 2010, ca. 9.0 sq m).


A 17 m-long backhoe trench, 0.7 m wide and up to 4.0 m deep, was first dug in 1998 in Squares K–L/5 (4.0 m long) and was extended and deepened during the 2005 and 2008 seasons, along the line of Squares J–M/5 (Fig. 15.3, lower part of Fig. 15.17a). The purpose of this trench was to examine the depth and extent of the 2.0 m-deep artificial fill of Stratum D-10 (which, at the time, was thought to be a natural phenomenon), as well as to uncover geological features related to the edge of the mound and its relation to the colluvial field to the west. During the 2008 season, another short trench (1.0 m wide, 2.5 m long, 4.3 m deep) was dug in this field (Squares H–G/5) (Fig. 15.17a). Although done with a backhoe, the work was closely supervised, with pottery collected and assigned to the various layers. Yet, most of this trench contained either topsoil wash (Squares J–K/5) or a deep fill devoid of finds (Squares L–M/5).

Bedrock, reached at the bottom of Probes I and III, as well as in the backhoe trench (Squares L– M/4–5) (Figs. 15.3, 15.17a, 15.18a), is composed of chunky yellowish tufa, belonging most probably to the Beth-Shean formation of the Late Pleistocene, at the margins of the tilted, uplifted block detected in the geoseismic survey (Chapter 2 and Zilberman et al. 2002). The tufa bedrock forms a roughly horizontal surface, detected at level 76.15 m in Squares K–M/5 in the backhoe trench, at 76.30 m at the bottom of Probe I, and at 75.95 m at the bottom of Probe III. In the western portion of the backhoe trench, at the eastern side of Square J/5, a natural fault was observed in the tufa bedrock. The fault, 1.3 m high, separates an eastern uplifted block from a down-faulted area to its west, where bedrock forms a horizontal surface at level 74.85 m (Figs. 15.17a–b). This fault may constitute only one branch of a wider, stepped fault, since the continuation of the long backhoe trench, dug in the field ca. 8.0 m to the west of the aforementioned fault, was excavated to level 73.85 m without reaching bedrock (Fig. 15.17a). This level is lower by ca. 1.0 m compared to the bedrock level of the down-faulted block detected in the long trench, thus implying a step-like fault zone west of the mound, which is probably part of the fault bordering Tel Rehov on the west, detected during the geoseismic survey (Chapter 2). Regarding the possibility of young tectonic activity along this fault line and its implications for the formation of the lower mound, see discussion above and further below.

The field which lies to the west of the lower mound, intensively cultivated in the last decades, gradually slopes from the west (near today’s Road 90) to the east, towards its lowest part just at the foot of the mound, where a north–south dirt road currently runs. The present level of the field at the base of Area D is 78.50 m, ca. 2.3 m above the uplifted tufa bedrock surface described above. As already mentioned, the short backhoe trench that was dug in the field ca. 8.0 m west of the aforementioned fault (Fig. 15.17a; Photo 15.7), descended from the surface of the field to level 73.85 m (4.3 m deep) without reaching bedrock.

The first anthropogenic activity in Squares K– L/4–5 seems to have taken place immediately above bedrock. Considering that the uplifted tufa bedrock had been exposed above ground when the first occupants arrived, the field would have been at least 2.0 m below its present level. However, due to the possibility of young tectonic activities, discussed above, the actual level of the field could have been much lower with regard to the initial occupation.

Stratum D-11

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.3 - Plan of Stratum D-11b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.4 - Plan of Stratum D-11a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13 - Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.3–15.4
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17–15.20
  • Photos 15.6, 15.8–15.13
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.1–16.3
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-11 is known only from the three probes (I–III) in Squares L–M/4–5, where a 1.0 m-thick deposit of occupation debris and architectural elements (walls, installations, fireplaces and floor patches) was found above bedrock and below the tufa fill that was ascribed to Stratum D-10. Two phases were determined here, termed D-11b and D-11a.

Stratum D-11b

Stratum D-11b was the earliest occupation phase detected in Area D (Fig. 15.3). In Probe I (Square L/4, 1.0×2.0 m), the lowest levels excavated (76.47–76.95 m, Locus 2839) may belong to this phase. In Probe II (Square M/4, 1.0×ca. 1.3 m; Photo 15.12), Locus 9931, in the western half of the probe, consisted of a 0.6 m-deep accumulation of dark brown earth containing meager finds, at levels 76.41–77.00 m. A few consolidated tufa chunks in the center of the probe (unnumbered) might have formed part of a wall or installation.

A narrow east–west brick wall (1927) was found at the bottom of Probe III (Squares M/4–5) (Figs. 15.3, 15.18a; Photo 15.9). It was 3.3 m long, 0.4 m wide and preserved to 0.4 m; its gritty compacted yellowish-brown bricks were barely distinguishable from the surrounding accumulation. No mortar lines were discernible between the bricks and thus, the building technique might have been packed clay. Its foundation was probably detected at level 76.28 m, ca. 0.35 m above bedrock at this point.

The area north of Wall 1927 was not excavated, while the area south of the wall, excavated only ca. 0.2 m down, seems to have constituted an open area. The floor here was apparently represented by discontinuous patches of a thin whitish layer (1921) at levels 76.55–76.60 m. Two small fire installations or hearths were related to this layer at a distance of ca. 1.3 m apart (Photo 15.9). The western one (1925) was circular, ca. 0.55 m in diameter, while the eastern one (1926) was elliptical, 0.35×0.6 m. Both were built of limestone pebbles around the circumference with fragments of broken basalt grinding stones in the center and were somewhat concave. Some stones were clearly burnt, while others showed signs of soot and thus, they are explained as fireplaces. Above Floor 1921 and the fireplaces/hearths was an accumulation of very decayed brown brick debris that contained only a few bones and sherds.

Stratum D-11a

Immediately above the remains of Stratum D-11b and sealed below the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10, an upper building phase was detected in Probes II and III, designated Stratum D-11a (Figs. 15.4, 15.18a–b). It consisted of brick walls (1923, 1929, 1930), creating at least two units (1913, 9917), which were partly excavated.

In Probe III, part of an open space was excavated (1913; Photo 15.10), bordered on the north by Wall 1923 and extending throughout the probe; on the south, it may have been limited by Wall 1929 (exposed in Probe II). Wall 1923 was oriented slightly northeast–southwest and was made mainly of pinkish clayey bricks, resembling some of those used in Walls 1929 and 1930 in Probe II. It was preserved unevenly to a maximum height of four courses (76.65–77.04 m; Photo 15.11). This open space, at least 3.5×4.0 m, had a whitish beaten-earth floor (1913) which covered the aforementioned components of Stratum D-11b.

Three features were related to Floor 1913. The first was a section of a stone wall (1915) located in the southeastern corner of the probe, above a Stratum D-11b fireplace/hearth (1926) (Photo 15.10). It was oriented slightly northwest–southeast and ended abruptly on the north, ca. 1.2 m north of the southern edge of the probe. The wall was built of one course of small- and medium-sized limestone and tufa cobbles, in addition to a few basalt grinding stones in secondary use. It seems to have functioned as some kind of low partition in an open area. The second feature was a circular hearth (1924) made of densely arranged, small burnt limestone pebbles; only its eastern half was inside the probe boundaries, above Wall 1927 of Stratum D-11b. This hearth was 0.9 m in diameter, larger and flatter than the hearths of Stratum D-11b (above), but seems to have served a similar function as an open fireplace, possibly for baking or cooking. The third element was an amorphic heap of ash and charcoal (1919), ca. 1.0 m in diameter, found slightly to the north of Wall 1915 (Photo 15.10). This ash may have been related to a fireplace like 1924, perhaps located beyond the borders of the probe to the east. The hearths of Strata D-11b and D-11a recall three circular hearths with pebble floors found in an open area of Stratum R-4 (late MB II) at Tel Beth-Shean, although the latter were larger (TBS II: 54–59, Fig. 3.6; Photos 3.6, 3.8).

The accumulation above Floor 1913 comprised a 0.2–0.3 m-thick deposit of compacted gritty brown earth, mixed with some decayed bricks and gray ashy patches. Above it, Locus 1907 constituted another layer of debris which was entirely sealed by the thick tufa fill of Stratum D-10 and penetrated by the foundations of the massive walls of the D-10 building above it. Locus 1907 (Photo 15.11) was characterized by dark brown, moderately compacted layered sediments with patches of burning (indicated by burnt bones) concentrated in the northern and western portions of the probe, and gritty brown soil with some large bones in the eastern and southern portions. A similar layer was observed in Probe I (2839).

In Probe II (Square M/4; Fig. 15.18b), the southern and eastern faces of two brick walls (1929 and 1930 respectively) were uncovered just below Walls 2886 and 2890 of Stratum D-10. Both walls were comprised of two types of bricks, namely clayey whitish-pink and brown silty bricks, which were clearly distinguishable from the gray bricks of the Stratum D-10 walls. Both walls seem to have been slightly embedded into the Stratum D-11b accumulation of Locus 9931, although no foundation trenches were noted. The walls were preserved to a height of five to six courses (up to 0.6 m, 76.71–77.30 m). The courses of Wall 1929 sloped slightly to the east. The width of these walls was unknown, since the northern face of Wall 1929 was not found below the northern face of Wall 2886 of Stratum D-10, as it was probably narrower than the latter.

Wall 1929 was abutted by a patch of a floor, built of large and medium-sized flat stones of limestone and basalt, found in the eastern half of Probe II, at the bottom of the ca. 0.15 m-thick accumulation of brown earth (9917) (Photo 15.12). The stones were covered with a 0.03 m-thick layer of soft pinkish matrix, suspected as being the actual floor level. While the stones ended abruptly along a clear line in the middle of the probe, the pinkish layer continued westwards to abut the eastern face of Wall 1930. Both elements extended eastwards and southwards beyond the borders of the probe and covered D-11b Locus 9931. A broken cooking pot (Fig. 16.2:8) was found in the northeastern corner of the probe, immediately above the floor, which was otherwise almost devoid of finds.

The material remains deriving from the few contexts associated with Stratum D-11 were limited and fragmentary. The pottery presented in Figs. 16.1–16.3 resembles that from Strata R-2 and R-1b at Tel Beth-Shean and should be dated to LB I and the LB I–II transition

Trench in Squares K–M/5

The 0.7 m-wide trench dug in the northern edge of Squares K–M/5 was intended to answer the question whether the thick tufa fill below the floor of Stratum D-10 was a natural or anthropogenic feature (see below). Earlier work in Probe I raised the hypothesis that the tufa layer was created in a water body (pond or small lake), above deposition of dark earth within a paludal environment (a marsh) (Mazar 1999: 11; see also Rozenbaum 2009 for the high frequency of such environments in the BethShean Valley during the Holocene). The backhoe trench described above, which preceded the manual excavation of Probes II–III, revealed anthropogenic layers below the thick tufa fill of D10 (2814). This was an accumulation of layered, finely sorted silts and clays of alternating gray and brown, totaling ca. 1.0 m in thickness (7923, 9910, 9911, 9913; Fig. 15.17b). No architectural elements were noted in these layers and no sub-phases were observed. This area may have been part of a large open space. The finds included sherds, bones, flints, oven fragments, a broken bronze earring and an almost complete ceramic plaque figurine (Chapter 33; Fig. 33.1).

Stratum D-10

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.5 - Plan of Stratum D-10 constructional fills from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.6 - Plan of Stratum D-10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4 - Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5 - Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6 - General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13 - Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.14 - Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.15 - Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.16 - Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.18 - Squares L–M/4 at end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.19 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.20 - Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.21 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.22 - Square M/5, Buttress 8938 and Wall 8942 abutted by D-10 Courtyard 8934 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27 - Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.5–15.6
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17–15.20
  • Photos 15.4–15.6, 15.8–15.16, 15.18–15.27, 15.37–15.38
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.4–16.8
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-10 constituted the earliest architectural phase detected on a relatively large scale in Area D, consisting of a large brick building (DA), apparently of public nature, erected simultaneously with the placement of massive constructional fills which elevated the ground level by some 2.0 m compared with the top level of the accumulation associated with Stratum D-11. The building and its related fills were exposed over an area of ca. 125 sq m in Squares L–M/4–5 and in the western half of Squares N/4–5. The building extended beyond the excavation area to the north, east and south, while the western part is probably missing due to young tectonic activity along the fault line, discussed above. Based on the associated ceramic assemblage and other finds, Stratum D-10 was dated to the LB IIA (14th century BCE).

Building DA

Introduction

The exposed portion of Building DA was composed of three integrated walls (8942, 2886, 2890), each 1.1 m wide and constructed of rectangular bricks which varied in dimensions, hardness, color, and manner of placement. These massive well-built walls were preserved 2.2–2.5 m high (16–18 courses). Their foundations were slightly embedded in the upper part of the Stratum D-11 accumulation or laid directly on top of earlier walls (as was the case of Walls 2886 and 2890, which were built on top of Walls 1929 and 1930 respectively). Three buttresses were constructed along Walls 2886 and 8942, facing the open space to their west (Photos 15.8, 15.10, 15.14–15.15, 15.18, 15.21– 15.24). Two of them, 1902 and 2889, protruded northwards from Wall 2886; in fact, 1902 continued the line of Wall 2890, which continued southwards beyond the excavated area. A third buttress (8938) projected westwards from Wall 8942 opposite Buttress 9929 (see further discussion of 9929 below). All the buttresses shared the exact same dimensions, protruding 0.85 m from the wall face and measuring 1.1 m in width, equal to the width of the walls. They were rather evenly spaced: Buttress 8938 was located 2.25 m to the north of the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942, while Buttress 2889 was located 2.4 m to the west of the aforementioned corner. Buttress 1902 was located 2.7 m farther to the west from 2889. It should be emphasized that the buttresses were bonded with the walls and thus, both elements were erected simultaneously. An additional possible buttress was 1903 (Square L/4), although it can also be regarded as the western end of Wall 2886. It was identical in dimensions to the other three buttresses and appears to have had a similar function. Nevertheless, it can be argued that 1903 may have functioned as a pier flanking an entrance, the parallel pier of which is to be found further to the west. As such a parallel pier was not found in Square L/4, this hypothesis can be maintained only if assuming an entrance of at least 3.0 m wide. The first option — viewing 1903 as a fourth buttress — is thus preferable (but see below). Two architectural elements were located east of Wall 8942. The first was Buttress 9929, which adjoined the eastern face of Wall 8942 immediately opposite Buttress 8938, and had exactly the same dimensions as the other buttresses. The second, 2.2 m to its south, was the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 (unnumbered), which protruded ca. 1.05 from the eastern line of Wall 8942. It seems likely that this feature was not a buttress, but rather, a pier flanking a doorway within the building, the opposite pier of which lies beyond the excavated area. A narrow wall (1937) extending to the south of this pier is the only inner partition wall uncovered within the building.

Courtyard 8934 and Its Constructional Fill

The area bounded by Walls 2886 and 8942 on the south and east respectively was an open courtyard, covering at least 6.0×8.0 m and extending to the north and west beyond the limits of the excavation. Immediately after the erection of the wall system, the area of the courtyard was covered with a ca. 2.0 m-deep constructional fill (2814) made of two distinct layers of tufa (2814a and 2814b), each ca. 1.0 m thick (Figs. 15.5, 15.17–15.19a; Photos 15.8, 15.10–15.11, 15.13–15.14). This fill was excavated manually in Probes I (1.0×2.0 m) and III (ca. 9.0 sq m), as well as in a shallower probe west of Buttresses 1902 and 1903 in Square L/4 (ca. 4.0 sq m).2 In addition, this fill was uncovered in the long backhoe trench, where it extended ca. 12 m to the west of Wall 8942, before being eroded and replaced with deposits associated with the nearby field (Fig. 15.17a–b). The erosion line was found 3.0 m east of the geological fault described above, and it is probable that the western part of the courtyard disappeared due to young tectonic activity along this fault.

The lower layer of the massive tufa fill (2814b, levels 77.30/77.15–78.25/78.10 m) comprised compacted, homogeneous clayey yellowish tufa. At the bottom of this layer, a ca. 0.2 m-thick deposit of less-compacted chunky tufa was found; the latter also filled an elongated depression within the upper part of Stratum D-11, observed in Probe III (above). The upper tufa layer (2814a, levels 78.10–79.20 m) had a very loose and crumbly matrix and consisted of unsorted tufa chunks that included angular, subangular and sub-rounded cobbles and pebbles, granules, sands and silts. The light tan color of this matrix was lighter than the lower tufa layer. In the lower portion of 2814a, moist brown brick material appeared in isolated chunks (levels 78.10–78.40 m) and included sherds, bones, oven fragments, and one complete bowl (Fig. 16.4:11), found in Probe I. Such remains were virtually non-existent in the other portions of the thick fill, which contained only a few isolated sherds. The contact between the two layers was abrupt and virtually horizontal (Photo 15.11).

When first encountered, before the relation to the surrounding walls was established, it was suggested that this thick tufa deposition, or at least the compacted lower layer, was the result of natural sedimentation within a water body (Mazar 1999: 11; 2008: 2014). It was suspected that Building DA, then assigned to Stratum D-9, was built on top of the tufa deposit. However, in the 2008 season, it became clear that the tufa layers abutted the wall system from the west for the entire 2.0 m height of the fill. No separation whatsoever existed between the tufa layers and the brick walls and buttresses and the latter do not show any signs of erosion related to water. Thus, it is now clear that the tufa layers constituted an artificial fill, intended probably to support the foundations of the building, as well as to raise the ground level.3

In order to study the extent of the tufa fill, a short backhoe trench was opened, ca. 25 m to the north of Area D, at the foot of the mound in Square M/10 (Photo 15.17). This trench (0.7×3.0 m) was excavated in 1998 and examined again in 2010. It revealed a massive deposition of tufa, at least 3.6 m deep, yet its bottom was not reached. This layer was devoid of finds. It remains unclear whether this deposition was a continuation of the same artificial tufa fill found in Stratum D-10 in Area D and if so, whether it also indicates continuation of the complex of Building DA to that line. If indeed it was related to the same building, then the tufa fill, and perhaps the courtyard which it supported, was at least 29 m long from north to south, creating an immense constructional feature. The total area of the fill could thus have reached a minimum of ca. 700 sq m and, assuming a thickness of 2.0 m on the average, the minimal total volume would be 1400 m3. Such a major construction project seems to have necessarily involved some kind of a central administration, adding to the notion of the building’s public nature based on its architectural traits.

The tufa fill most probably served as a raised platform for a wide open courtyard in the interior part of the building. This option would have necessitated the construction of additional walls to the west and north of the exposed segment of the building, beyond the excavated area, which would provide the boundaries for the tufa fill. A thin beaten-earth floor was laid on top of the fill (79.10– 79.20 m; Fig. 15.6; Photos 15.22–15.25). This floor was uncovered in an area of ca. 40 sq m, north of Wall 2886 and west of Wall 8942. It was excavated as Locus 8934 in Square M/5, where it was characterized by soft gray-brown soil mixed with ash patches (0.05–0.1 m), covered by a debris layer, ca. 0.3 m thick (the locus number refers to both the occupation-debris layer and the floor). The remains of this floor were evident mainly near the corner of Walls 2886 and 8942 (Photo 15.27) and north of Buttress 2889. In the eastern part of Square L/5, the floor (7917) was located at level 79.15 m, yet, here, the layers above the floor were somewhat disturbed by erosion and porcupine burrows.

The occupation layer (8934) was covered by two higher layers (8940 and 8930), creating a total accumulation of 0.55–0.7 m between the floor of Stratum D-10 and that of D-9b. The layers above 8934 were characterized by compact brick debris and discontinuous layers of tufa (0.1–0.2 m thick). The central-western part of the area was severely damaged by porcupine burrowing. The brick fragments, which constituted the main volume of the accumulation, were mostly of friable gray and brown material and resembled the bricks used in the surrounding walls and buttresses. A fairly large amount of pottery, including some restorable kraters, was found in these loci, especially in the lower levels (Figs. 16.5–16.6). Most of this pottery was not found in primary deposition, but were fragments distributed throughout the different loci (i.e., at different levels) that turned out to be parts of the same vessels. One almost complete spouted krater (Fig. 16.5:2) was found in situ immediately on top of the tufa layer in Locus 7917. This accumulation was eroded at the base of the mound, west of the line of Buttresses 1902 and 1903. The brick debris should be regarded as collapse related to Building DA. In this respect, it remains unclear whether a human or natural agent initiated the collapse of the building.

In the upper part of the aforementioned accumulation (8930), an exceptional scarab was found. It was defined by Arlette David as a funerary scarab bearing the name of a high Egyptian official — “Scribe of (the) house of (the) overseer of (the) Treasury, Amenemhat repeating life” (Chapter 30B). The 18th Dynasty date of this scarab accords with its stratigraphic context. This scarab may allude to the importance of Building DA, from which it most probably originated.
Footnotes

2 Note that the locus number 2814 refers to the same fill in all three probes.

3 One more argument may be raised against the ‘pond hypothesis’. The possible time span for the deposition of the tufa can be no longer than 100 years, when comparing the pottery assemblages from below and above it, and not 200–300 years as previously assumed (see Mazar 1999: 11; Zilberman et al. 2004: 19). This time span is too short for the deposition of 2.0 m-thick tufa sediments or even of the lower layer alone (compare the 1m/1000 years sedimentation rate for the Beth-Shean tufa given in Zilberman et al. 2004: 27).

The Southern and Eastern Wings of Building DA

The area south of Wall 2886, designated 8939, was bordered by Wall 2890 on the west and by a narrow partition wall (1937) on the east. The latter differed considerably from all other D-10 walls: it was 0.55 m thick, built of a western row of dark gray bricks laid on their narrow side and an eastern row of mixed bricks laid as stretchers. The wall was traced ca. 1.7 m southwards of Wall 2886, below Wall 1904 and Oven 9918 of Stratum D-9b. Only the uppermost courses of the wall were excavated. Space 8939, which was 7.2 long and at least 3.0 m wide, was excavated over most of the area down to the floor level at 79.10 m, except in Probe II (Square M/4), where the deep foundations of Walls 2886 and 2890 were exposed (Fig. 15.18b). The foundation levels of both walls were abutted by a thick sequence of gray sediments (9905, 9914), which were composed of various matrices of brick material, containing very few sherds and other finds (Photos 15.19–15.20). The total thickness of these sediments, which sealed the Stratum D-11 accumulation of 9917, reached 1.74 m near Wall 2886. The top level of Locus 9905 sloped down from north to south (79.04 m to 78.66 m near the southern section), perhaps due to young tectonic activity (Photos 15.12, 15.19). The layers in Loci 9914 and 9905 may be explained as a constructional fill, intended to elevate the level of Building DA, resembling in function the tufa fill (2814) north of Wall 2886, although composed of different material.

Locus 9905 was topped by a 0.65 m-thick series of sloping layers, excavated as Loci 8941 and 8939. Both loci comprised soft light-colored striations, each 0.01–0.1 m thick, separated by thin dark-colored layers, the most prominent of which was a dark ashy layer which denoted the bottom of Locus 8939 (Photo 15.20). All layers sloped to the south, in accordance with the sloping top level of Locus 9905 (Photo 15.19). The thick beige layer at the bottom of Locus 8941, immediately above the thick fill of Loci 9905 and 9914, was possibly a floor level related to Building DA. Both loci contained a relatively small amount of sherds. This sequence of striations was topped by a Stratum D-9b floor (8919).

Most of the area east of Wall 8942 (Squares N/4–5) remained unexcavated to the depths of Stratum D-10, apart from the top of a few architectural elements, as noted above. In the area east of Walls 8942 and 1937, layers of brown soil mixed with a few brick fragments, semi-complete bricks and concentrations of charred material were excavated; in Square N/5, this layer (1936) was excavated down to level 78.40 m, about 0.9 m below Floor 9925 of Stratum D-9b and the top of D-10 Wall 8942, and no floor surface was detected. In Square N/4, only the top of this layer was exposed (1933).

Summary of Building DA

Building DA, with its massive sub-floor fills, wide walls, deep foundations and elaborate arrangement of buttresses, must have been a public structure of some sort, whether a palace or an administrative building. It appears that the excavated remains constituted just a small part of a much larger LB IIA building, which extended in all directions, whose nature and size remain mostly unknown.

The buttresses probably served both as decorative elements and as constructional supports for the building, which might have had several storys. Parallels for similar buttresses, albeit in stone and with different dimensions, can be seen in several other cases in the second millennium BCE Levant. At Megiddo, a line of buttresses appear on the southern (inner) side of the city wall of Stratum XI of the Middle Bronze Age II (Loud 1948: Fig. 379) and on the northern (outer) side of Strata VIIB– VIIA Palace 2041 of the 13th–12th centuries BCE, where there are eight such buttresses (Loud 1948: Fig. 383). In the northeastern corridor (2160) in Square J8 that leads to the palace of Stratum VIIB, the alignment of buttresses recalls our Buttresses 1902 and 1903. At Ugarit, similar buttresses appeared at several locations: four along the outer side of the northern wall of the main palace, facing a street, four along the eastern and southern walls of Courtyard V, and one along the eastern wall of the same courtyard, facing the outside of the palace (Yon 2006: 37, Fig. 20). At Alalakh, three buttresses (ca. 2.0 m wide each) appeared along the southern wall of the “Fort” of Levels IV to IIB of the Late Bronze II (late 15th–13th centuries BCE; Woolley 1955: 166 Fig. 59; Sumakaºi-Fink 2010: 8–10, 77). These parallels support the interpretation of the building remains of Stratum D-10 as belonging to a much larger public building of some sort.

There is no clear evidence for a sudden or violent destruction of this building, although very little of its interior was excavated. It is possible that the building went out of use due to deterioration, damage by earthquakes or other natural causes. It is also possible that the building was abandoned as part of socio-political changes in the city during the transition between the 14th and 13th centuries BCE.

Stratum D-9

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.7 - Plan of Stratum D-9b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.8 - Plan of Stratum D-9a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18a - Section 2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.18b - Section 2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25 - Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27 - Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29 - Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31 - Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.32 - Squares N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.33 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.34 - Detail of bronze-melting canal (8921) with fragments of bellow, charcoal, and metal object in situ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.35 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.36 - Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37 - Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.39 - Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42 - Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.43 - Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.44 - Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.7–15.8
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17, 15.18b, 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.23–15.44
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.9–16.15
Discussions
Stratigraphy of Strata D-9 and D-8: Methodological Issues

Following the apparent abandonment of the monumental Building DA of Stratum D-10, the area underwent a major change, albeit with some continuation in architectural orientation. Strata D-9b and D-9a, together with Stratum D-8, form a complex and dense stratigraphic sequence, in which different lines of development can be traced in each excavated unit. The remains were excavated mainly in four squares (M–N/4–5), as well as in the southeastern part of Square L/4 (Stratum D-9b only). The sequence was dated to the Late Bronze IIB (13th century BCE) based on the associated finds.

Several obstacles hinder a clear reconstruction of the stratigraphy of Strata D-9 and D-8. The major problem is related to the identification of floor levels. All the floors, except one (2855, made of stones), were beaten-earth layers which were especially difficult to trace. These layered accumulations consisted of relatively thin striations, making it difficult to differentiate floors from other types of layered accumulation, e.g., phytolith layers or striations deposited in times of abandonment due to winter rains. Another problem was that the suspected floors did not clearly relate to architectural elements (walls and installations) due to the fact that, in most cases, only one or two courses of the stone foundations were preserved and their brick superstructure was almost entirely eroded away. In fact, the superstructure was preserved only in the southernmost end of Wall 8943 (Square N/4, Stratum D-9b) and in Wall 8932 (Squares N/4–5, Strata D-9a–D-8). It is assumed that the original floor levels abutted the brick superstructure, yet the possibility that certain floors abutted the stone foundations is also plausible. Another complication was the ancient robbing of parts of stone-built elements (e.g., the eastern part of Stratum D-9a Floor 2855), which prevented the possibility of linking some of the elements to each other. Finally, as in the previous stratum, some of the floor levels and wall foundations were severely tilted to the south and east, possibly due to young tectonic activity.

In each of the four relevant squares (M–N/4–5), a slightly different stratigraphic sequence was observed within the general sequence of Strata D-9–8. For example, in Square M/4, four floor levels were clearly detected in relation to these strata: 8919 — beaten-earth floor, D-9b; 2855 — stone floor, D-9a; 2825 — plaster floor slightly above 2855, D-9a; 2824 — D-8. Square M/5 contained only two such floors: 7951 (D-9a–b) and 7944 (D-8), and, possibly, a higher floor, 7938 (D-8').

With these caveats in mind, we present the data related to Strata D-9 and D-8 within the framework of the simplest stratigraphic scheme possible. Nevertheless, other interpretations are possible in places; some will be mentioned below.

Stratum D-9b: Building DB

Introduction

In Stratum D-9b, a new building complex (Building DB) was erected on the ruins of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Fig. 15.7). The building was composed of two adjacent units, separated by a long north–south wall (8943). The eastern unit was partially divided into two sub-units (9927, 9925), while the western unit was probably a spacious courtyard which was divided into an open area in the north (7951) and a roofed area in the south (8919).

The Eastern Units — 9925 and 9927

Two units, either rooms or courtyards, were delineated by three walls (8943, 9923, 1904) (Photos 15.28–15.31). The eastern and northern walls were not found, probably located beyond the borders of the excavated area. Wall 8943 crossed the excavated area on a slightly northwest to southeast line and was mostly preserved only at the stone-foundation level. The northern part of Wall 8943 was built above Wall 8942 of Stratum D-10 and its stones were embedded into the latter, as if using the earlier massive brick wall as a stabilizer. On the southernmost end, the lowermost course of the brick superstructure of Wall 8943 was preserved, made of one row of bricks laid as headers. The stone foundation, preserved one to two courses high, was made of two rows of medium-sized limestone and basalt stones, with some small stones to fill the gaps. Some parts of the foundation, mainly in the southern portion, were missing, probably due to ancient robbing.

Two walls, 1904 and 9923, cornered with Wall 8943 on the east; both were preserved only as high as their stone foundation. Wall 1904 had only one clear row of stones, while its southern row was mostly beyond the excavated area and its eastern part was damaged by Pit 8916 of Stratum D-7b. Wall 1904 probably served as the southern boundary of the unit. Wall 9923 was a 3.2 m-long wall segment which partially divided the eastern unit into two sub-units. It sloped considerably to the east, with a difference of up to 0.4 m in elevation of the lower level over its length. Like other tilted features in this area, this possibly resulted from young tectonic activity. The wall ended abruptly on the east, without a clear edge, and with a slight protrusion to the south, the nature of which remained unclear. Perhaps there was an opening here connecting the two spaces, 9925 and 9927, to the north and south of the wall. Space 9925 was at least 3.0 m long, continuing to the north beyond the excavation area, while Space 9927 in the south was 4.5 m long. Both sub-units were at least 3.5 m wide, as their eastern boundary was beyond the excavated area.

The beaten-earth floor (9925) in the northern space was characterized by a 0.1–0.2 m-thick accumulation of slanted, deformed striations of alternating gray and brown layers, which sloped to the north and east (levels ca. 79.20–79.30 m), and was clearly recognized only in the southwestern portion of this space. The bricks in the top level of Stratum D-10 Buttress 9929 were shaved down and integrated into the floor. On top of the latter, and close to Wall 9923, was a circular oven (9924), measuring 0.7 m in diameter and built of a 0.02–0.03 m thick coating of red clay which was not as solidly baked as in similar installations. It was partially bordered on the north and west by small and medium-sized stones. The oven was filled with whitish ashy powder and soft reddish burnt earth; gray ashy material was spread over part of the floor around it. Its foundations were slightly tilted to the east, in accordance with Floor 9925 and Wall 9923. This northern space may have been an open courtyard.

The floor of the southern space (9927) consisted of a sequence of thin earthen layers, sloping from west (levels 79.41–79.56 m) to east (levels 79.20–79.45 m), containing a large amount of ash and associated with several features. As in the northern unit, Floor 9927 made use of the top of earlier brick walls (the eastern continuation of Wall 2886 and Wall 1937) as part of the floor; no clear floor could be discerned in the northern part of this space (9920). An oven (9918) in the southwestern corner of this space was similar to Oven 9924 in the northern space. The oven was 0.85 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.3 m; its foundations were supported by small pebbles and its wall was made of baked reddish clay covered on the outside by layers of large sherds (Photo 15.32). At its base, remains of up to four different discontinuous layers of baked clay mantles were visible, a possible indication of earlier phases of the oven that were built at the same spot. A small circular plastered basin (1905), 0.24 m in diameter and made of 0.02 m thick whitish lime plaster, was embedded in Floor 9927, 0.55 m to the northeast of the oven. Two similar installations (2883, 8936) were found in the western part of Building DB, in relation to a metallurgical workshop described below. A third feature, a small pit (1934) lined with small burnt limestone pebbles, was found in the southeastern corner, just north of Wall 1904. This peculiar installation, found full of charcoal, in addition to sherds of a cooking pot, clearly related to cooking activities. A fourth feature associated with Floor 9927 was a small pit (1935), ca. 0.7–0.8 m in diameter, which only slightly protruded from the eastern balk southeast of the edge of Wall 9923. This southern space could have been an unroofed courtyard, although it is possible that it had been roofed, providing that there was a closing wall to the east of the excavated area. It seems clear that both these spaces served as working areas, associated, among other things, with food preparation.

The Western Courtyard 7951 and Metallurgical Activity

In the western part of Building DB was a large courtyard, 0.7 m above that of Stratum D-10 Building DA. As no openings connecting the eastern unit with this courtyard were identified, the linkage between them is only tentative; the opening might have been north of the limit of the excavated area. The courtyard (7951, 8919) was excavated in an area of 8.0×9.0 m, between Wall 8943 and the erosion line to the west. Its northern boundary was beyond the excavated area, while its southern limit was Wall 2816 and a line of pillar bases to its east. South of this wall and pillar bases there was an additional space (8919), ca. 2.5 m wide and at least 9.0 m long, bounded on the south by Wall 1906 that protruded along the southern section of Squares M– N/4.

Floor 7951, the northern and main part of the courtyard, contained several installations, notably, one used for the recycling of copper/bronze objects. This was a generally horizontal floor (average 79.85 m), sometimes hard to define (especially in the south), composed of layered brown soil alternating with patches of compacted brick debris. The floor was laid on top of the brick debris related to Building DA of Stratum D-10. In the northeastern corner of the courtyard, near Wall 8943, it seems that the floor was somewhat sunken or had been laid at a lower level (8930; 79.64 m). The western portion of the floor was severely damaged by porcupine burrows (7933).

The main feature associated with Floor 7951 was an elongated installation (8921) used for the melting of copper-based objects (Photos 15.33– 15.34). The installation comprised a long (2.5 m), narrow (0.15–0.25 m) and shallow (0.1–0.15 m) canal, oriented north–south, that was built of the same matrix as the beaten-earth floor, showing that both elements were created simultaneously. The shallow canal was filled with charred wood pieces and contained a large number of copper/bronze prills and a few bronze objects ready to be remelted. In addition, a complete tuyère and fragments of other tuyères and crucibles were found in the canal and next to it. More prills were found scattered on the floor around the installation (Chapter 40C).

Several other installations were related to Floor 7951, although their function and possible connection to the metal industry remained unclear. To the west of the northern tip of Canal 8921, a rounded flat stone, 0.45 m in diameter, was embedded in Floor 7951, surrounded by a circle of small pebbles (Photo 15.35). This installation (8925), which did not contain any finds, could have served as a working platform of some sort, possibly for crushing. To the south of the southern tip of 8921, a concentration of heavily burnt bones was found, with a small pit, 0.25 m in diameter, cutting into the burnt-bone pile. A limestone slab, found broken into two pieces to the south of Installation 8921 possibly functioned as another working platform. Three small plastered basins (2883, 8936 and an unnumbered one south of Installation 8921) were found in the courtyard; these are similar to 1905 in Floor 9927, described above. One of them (8936) was embedded in the lower-level part of the floor in the north and surrounded at the base by small stones (Photo 15.36). In the northwestern corner of the excavated area, a row of two bricks oriented slightly northwest–southeast protruding from the northern section were denoted Wall 7916; they possibly served as a local partition within the large open area.

Area 8919

This area, to the south of Courtyard 7951, was separated from it by two different features, both located on top of the earlier Stratum D-10 architecture. In the western part (Squares L–M/4), Walls 2816 and 2892 appeared to be an attempt to rebuild Wall 2886 and Buttresses 1902 and 1903 (Photos 15.23, 15.25–15.26, 15.37). Wall 2816, preserved along 4.3 m and one course high, was constructed of small- and medium-sized tufa stones. It was built directly on top of Wall 2886 and Buttress 1903 in its eastern part and on top of the tufa fill 2814 in its western part, where it continued westwards beyond the limits of the erosion line. It seems that when the D-9b walls were built, the architectural elements of Stratum D-10 were shaved to a relatively low level (79.05–79.10 m), essentially to that of the thick tufa fill (2814). Wall 2816 was abutted by 2892, made of larger tufa stones, which was built over Buttress 1902 of Stratum D-10. Although these two features constituted an attempt to rebuild part of Building DA of Stratum D-10, their peculiar construction, and the fact that Wall 2816 extended further to the west, indicated changes compared with the original plan of the building in D-10. Wall 2816 must have supported a brick superstructure. The reason for it being lower by 0.8–0.9 m than the line of pillar bases to its east (8935, see below) was perhaps due to the way this part of Stratum D-10 Building DA (Wall 2886, Buttresses 1902, 1903) was destroyed; these elements were possibly damaged more than the eastern part, so that the builders of Stratum D-9b found a depression or step in the ruined wall which they used as foundations for their new construction.

The continuation of the line of Wall 2816 to the east was comprised of six limestone and basalt stones (8935) with relatively flat tops, placed on top of the ruined Wall 2886 of Stratum D-10, which was preserved here at a much higher level compared to the western part (79.80–79.94 m; Photo 15.40). One of these six stones was found somewhat to the south of the main line, but it perhaps was moved in antiquity from its original location. Apparently, these six stones functioned as a line of pillar bases. They were clearly related to the stone floor (2855) of Stratum D-9a, as they ran along the line of its edge. However, they might have originated already in Stratum D-9b, since the stones were placed directly on top of Stratum D-10 Wall 2886. Thus, both Wall 2816 and pillar bases 8935 could be part of a partition, separating Courtyard 7951 from Area 8919 to its south.

Area 8919 was bounded on the north by Wall 2816 and pillar bases 8935, on the east by Wall 8943, and on the south by Wall 1906, while its western limit remained unknown. The southern wall (1906), a continuation to the west of Wall 1904, is known only from a small section of its northern face (Photo 15.38). It was composed of two courses of stone foundation and one to two courses of brick superstructure. Thus, Area 8919 was about 2.3 m wide and at least 9.0 m long. The floor (8919) sloped down considerably towards the southern section, in accordance with the layers of Stratum D-10 and the other tilted layers in Area D, as explained above (Fig. 15.18b). This part of the floor was characterized by a thick build-up of thin soft whitish-pink striations (Photo 15.26). Below the southeastern corner of the floor, near the corner of Walls 8943 and 1906, was a foundation deposit composed of a lamp (Fig. 16.14:30) covered with a broken basalt bowl (Photo 15.39). This deposit was the earliest of its kind found in Area D (several similar deposits were uncovered in later strata, see below). The occupation debris above Floor 8919 contained partly restorable pottery and large animal bones, as well as a large fragment of a crucible filled with traces of melted copper, indicating its contemporaneity with the melting activity in Courtyard 7951.

Stratum D-9a

In Stratum D-9a, Building DB was replaced by new architectural features which partially preserved the outline of previous elements, although the overall plan and nature of this stratum was fairly different (Fig. 15.8). It seems that the builders of Stratum D9a were very familiar with the previous stratum and utilized earlier constructions. They may even have been partly responsible for the dismantling and removal of the brick superstructure of the Stratum D-9b walls, as no brick debris was found in the deserted units of the latter. Stratum D-9a was a kind of transitional phase in the process of deterioration in this area, from the elaborate architecture of Stratum D-10, through the less substantial Stratum D-9b building, to the large open area of the following Stratum D-8.

The main new feature was Wall 8932 and the pillar bases (1912) that continued its line to the north, crossing the eastern part of the excavated area from north to south (Photos 15.29–15.30). Wall 8932 was built of two rows of a stone foundation laid in two courses, on top of which was a brick superstructure made of compacted off-white bricks, preserved to a maximum height of seven courses (ca. 1.0 m) (Photo 15.41). The wall, preserved to 4.5 m, abruptly ended on both edges. While its southern end might have been cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916, its northern end was planned and the continuation of the wall line to the north was in the form of a line of three wooden pillars laid on medium-sized basalt stones with flat tops (1912). The holes formed by the pillars were clearly preserved in a layer of brick debris (1914); they were filled with loose brown sediment, which most probably penetrated into the holes created when the wood decayed, thus preserving their negative within the layer of brick debris (Photos 15.29– 15.30). The southern pillar base was, in fact, an in situ stone of Stratum D-9b Wall 9923 which was no longer in use and after its brick superstructure had been dismantled. In the northern section of Square N/5, a single brick located on line with the pillar bases could have been the beginning of a wall that continued Wall 8932. Wall 8932 and pillar bases 1912 partly damaged and partly superimposed Stratum D-9b Floors 9927 and 9925 respectively.

In Squares N/4–5, east of Walls 8932 and 1912, only a narrow space could be excavated, containing a thick sequence of brown debris layers. Thin whitish patches might represent a floor level at approximately 79.60–79.70 m (1910, 1917); these were associated with three large flat stones found immediately east of Wall 8932 (Photos 15.29– 15.30).

West of Wall 8932/1912, an elongated, probably roofed space, was created. It was bordered on the west by a row of three large stones which most probably served as pillar bases, erected immediately on top of the stone foundation of Wall 8943, after its brick superstructure was deliberately dismantled. The supposedly wooden pillars were freestanding and evenly spaced at intervals of 2.8 m. The floor of this space (9912 in Square N/5 and 9901 in Square N/4; level 79.85 m) was a thin, patchy, soft brown earth layer. On the northern portion of the floor (9912), an intact storage jar (Fig. 16.13:4) was found leaning against the brick material (1914) related to pillar bases 1912. The floor of this space covered the thin layer of debris (9915, 9916, 9921) which rested on Floors 9925 and 9927 of Stratum D-9b.

Flimsy architectural elements were found on both ends of Floor 9912/9901. A small section of a wall or other stone construction (9922) ran along the central part of the southern section of Square N/4, above D-9b Wall 1904. This feature was built of two rows of medium-sized stones arranged in two courses; its relation to other elements could not be established. Its eastern end was cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916.

In the northwestern edge of Square N/5, another flimsy stone construction was defined as Wall 1916. It comprised two rows of medium-sized stones preserved to one course. While on the east it ended abruptly, on the west it might have been connected to a possible north–south wall (1918), of which only a few stones projected from the northern section. However, these elements might have been remains of a stone floor, similar to Floor 2855, described below. To the north of the stones of 1916 was a beaten-earth floor (1911) with the meager remains of an oven (1920) protruding from the northern section, surrounded by ash deposits. The gap between 1916 and Wall 1912 might have served as a passage to 1911 from 9912, yet all these remains at the northern edge of Square N/5 were very scanty and not well understood.

In Square M/4, a major change was noted, where Stratum D-9b Floor 8919 was replaced with a fine floor (2855) made of flat stones, with a polished sheen from use (Photos 15.26, 15.42–15.43). The floor was very well preserved from the erosion line on the west to a distance of 4.1 m, and isolated patches of it continued further to the east, totaling 5.6 m. The floor continued beyond the excavation area to the south; on the north, it was bounded by the row of six large stones (8935), probably a row of pillar bases, described above as possibly having been first built in Stratum D-9b. Floor 2855 was laid above a layer of debris which leveled this south-sloping area, so that it sloped only slightly to the southeast (Photo 15.44). On top of the stones of the floor was a layer of beaten earth (2825), which might represent a somewhat later phase of activity still within Stratum D-9a. The possibility that Wall 2816 (west of 8935 in Square L/4) of Stratum D-9b continued to be in use in this stratum cannot be ruled out.

In Square M/5, where the metal workshop existed in Stratum D-9b (Floor 7951), no clear floor level related to Stratum D-9a was found. On top of Floor 7951 was a 0.2–0.3 m-thick layer containing a large amount of small to medium fieldstones. Although the stones do not seem to create any clear pattern, they might be the remains of yet another stone floor, similar to Floor 2855, or a disturbed western continuation of Walls 1916 and 1918, located in the northwest corner of Square N/5. Alternatively, this can be defined as debris that accumulated on top of Floor 7951 after its abandonment. It was sealed by Floor 7944, which was assigned to Stratum D-8. Thus, it seems that two options regarding Square M/5 during Stratum D-9a may be considered: either Floor 7951 and its related installations continued to be in use, or it was abandoned and gave way to an open area of unclear nature.

The pottery and finds from Strata D-9a–b (Figs. 16.9–16.15) point to a date in LB IIB (13th century BCE).

Stratum D-8

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.9–15.11
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17b, 15.19–15.21
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.16–16.23
Discussion

In Stratum D-8, a large open area covered with a thick white beaten-earth floor replaced the halfopen spaces of Stratum D-9a, while the main wall line of the latter (8932 and row of pillar bases 1912) continued to be in use. The function of this spacious courtyard was hard to define, as only its eastern border was found within the excavated area and it was totally devoid of installations.

The white floor (2824 in Square M/4, 7944 in M/5, 8933 in N/4 and 9909 in N/5) extended over an area of ca. 70 sq. m and was cut by the erosion line in the west. The floor sloped in various directions at levels between 80.06 m–80.27 m, the former only 0.2–0.4 m above the floors that were attributed to Stratum D-9a, described above. It also covered the two rows of pillar bases of the previous stratum, as well as Wall 9922 in the southern part of Square N/4. The floor abutted Wall 8932 and perhaps also the wooden pillars that had stood on the stone bases 1912 (although the bases were now ca. 0.7 m lower than the new floor). The southeastern corner of the floor was cut by Stratum D-7b Pit 8916. A large complete krater (Fig. 16.18:4) was found leaning against Wall 8932 and a complete Mycenaean IIB stirrup jar (Fig. 16.22:5) was found on Floor 7944 (Square M/5). It should be noted that while the floor was clearly observed in most parts, the northern and northeastern portion of it, near the pillar bases (1912) and the northern section of Squares M–N/5, was harder to discern, possibly as the floor there was thinner or less well preserved.

In the narrow strip excavated east of Wall 8932 and pillar bases 1912, was a ca. 0.5 m-thick layer (1908, 1909) comprised mostly of brown layered sediments that might have been floors, with bones and sherds (Figs. 16.16–16.17, 16.19–16.22). An almost-complete small jug (Fig. 16.21:1) was found on top of a rather continuous thin whitish layer which might represent a floor level (79.73– 79.84 m).

The ceramic assemblage of Stratum D-8 that included several Mycenaean and Cypriot imports is typical of LB IIB and should be dated to the 13th century BCE.

Stratum D-8'

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

The Stratum D-8 floor to the west of Wall 8932 was covered with a 0.3–0.4 m-thick layer of brick debris, containing compacted whitish brick fragments, which most probably originated from Wall 8932. In Square M/5, this debris layer was superimposed by a 0.01–0.02 m-thick pinkish clay layer (7938; Figs. 15.10, 15.17), which was covered by a thick (0.05–0.1 m) layer of dark gray ash. This layer sloped from west (80.40 m) to east (80.26 m); it extended into the northern section of the square, but faded away in its southern part, as well as in Square N/5 (9908; Fig. 15.10). On 7938 was a 0.15–0.2 m-thick accumulation, rich in sherds and animal bones, which may be explained as some kind of a localized ephemeral activity, post-dating Stratum D-8 and pre-dating Stratum D-7b; this phase was denoted D-8'. No evidence for this activity was found in Squares M–N/4.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 (Figs. 16.16–16.22), and is dated to LB IIB.

Layer between Strata D-8 and D-7b (Post D-8)

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.10
Discussion

Covering the brick debris and walls related to Stratum D-8, a 0.35–0.6 m-thick layered accumulation was found all over the excavated area (2826 in Square M/4, 7915 and 7937 in M/5, 8927 and 8929 in N/4, 9904 in N/5) (Fig. 15.11). It was characterized by a soft brown layered matrix containing a few brick fragments, very rich in charred material (charcoal and grain), as well as sherds, bones, and fine plaster fragments of unknown origin. The layering of this accumulation was more pronounced in the eastern part, where the layers sloped down into the eastern section of Squares N/4–5. Several thin layers consisted of grayish material, possibly the remains of ash or decayed organics.

No architectural elements were noted in association with this thick accumulation. It clearly sealed the remains of Stratum D-8 and was superimposed by Stratum D-7b elements, most of which were pits dug into the aforementioned accumulation (see below). Therefore, it seems to belong to a post-D-8 and pre-D-7 phase. Nevertheless, it is difficult to suggest any clear explanation for such a thick accumulation, unless a gap in occupation enabled natural forces of sedimentation to operate undisrupted for an unknown time span. Another option is that this layer was a constructional fill related to the building of Stratum D-7b. Although no substantial architecture was found in the latter, the small size of the excavated area does not allow us to reach secure conclusions, and this option remains viable.

Pottery from loci attributed to this layer is presented together with that of Stratum D-8 in Figs. 16.16–16.23.

Stratum D-7

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.12 - Plan of Stratum D-7b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.13 - Plan of Stratum D-7a (encircled numbers denote foundation deposits as listed in the text) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.14 - Plan of Stratum D-7a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17a - Section 1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.17b - Section 1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40 - Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41 - Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42 - Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45 - Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46- Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47- Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49- Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a- Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b- Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55- Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.12–15.14
  • Sections: Figs. 15.17b, 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.40–15.42,15.45–15.57
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.24–16.33
Discussions

Stratum D-7 comprised two main and one local stratigraphic phases, denoted D-7b, D-7a and D-7a'.
Stratum D-7b

Stratum D-7b signifies the first occupation phase related to the Iron Age IA in Area D (Fig. 15.12). It comprised a few installations and pits related to floor patches spread over the four excavated squares (M–N/4–5), without any walls or other architectural elements. The relatively thin accumulation associated with this stratum was quickly replaced by a new building phase (Stratum D-7a), to which much more substantial remains were assigned. Thus, it seems that Stratum D-7b constituted a rather ephemeral occupation that will not necessarily be found in other parts of the site. See Photo 15.45 for a general view of the area and accumulation in the section up to Stratum D-7a.

Floor segments and installations related to Stratum D-7b were found mainly in Squares M/5 and N/4. In the former, above the accumulation of the post-D-8 layer (7915, 7937), was a compacted thin yellowish layer, probably a beaten-earth floor made of local clays or tufa, 0.02–0.03 m thick, and covered by a thin layer of ash (7903). Both layers were clearly visible in the northern two-thirds of the square, but faded to the east and south. Like the earlier layers in Strata D-9 and D-8, this floor sloped slightly from west to east (levels 81.05 m and 80.95 m respectively). The thin ash layer was superimposed by a layer containing a large concentration of small pebbles, which served as the basis for the Stratum D-7a Floor 7902 above. The thin accumulation below the pebbles (7903, 9903) contained partly restorable pottery and a large amount of bones. The ash layer of 7903 was clearly sealed by Wall 7906 of Stratum D-7a.

Two installations were associated with Floor 7903. One was an oven (7924) found in the northeastern part of the locus. Only its base and a few supporting stones around it were preserved, probably due to its deliberate dismantling by the founders of Stratum D-7a, who placed the red-clay fragments of the oven walls in its center and covered them with pebbles, as part of the foundation of Floor 7902. A lamp-and-bowl deposit associated with the construction of the latter floor and Wall 7906 in Stratum D-7a was placed immediately beside the dismantled oven (Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14); see further below.

A second installation (7919) was composed of a small segment of a stone pavement (1.0×1.2 m), slightly sloping from west to east (81.02–81.19 m) towards a large sunken intact bowl (Fig. 16.26:2; Photo 15.47). The pavement was made of limestones and basalt stones, including a grinding stone fragment in secondary use, as well as broken pottery. Another grinding stone fragment and a few sherds lined the eastern part of the bowl’s rim. This installation must have had something to do with liquid processing, but no specific function could be defined.

Floor 7903 continued into Square N/5 as Floor 9903, which was patchy and disappeared in the eastern part of the square, where relatively deep foundations of the Stratum D-7a architecture damaged it.

In Square N/4, a thick beaten-earth floor (8914) and three pits (8916, 8926, 9932) were attributed to this phase. Floor 8914 was composed of 0.05–0.15 m-thick striations of alternating colors (81.07– 81.15 m), including one whitish layer observed in the southeast portion of the square (Photo 15.48). The floor and the 0.1–0.2 m-thick accumulation on it were almost devoid of finds.

Three pits were dug from Floor 8914 into earlier deposits. Pit 8926, dug into the debris of Locus 8929 (Fig. 15.11), was elliptical (0.7×0.9 m), ca. 0.7 m deep (80.44–81.07 m). It was unlined and filled with loose brown debris and a few stones. A small collection of objects was found in this pit, including a group of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapter 39). A second pit (8916) was found in the southeastern corner of the square and extended into the southern and eastern sections. This large deep rounded pit (0.9 m in diameter) cut through Strata D-8 and D-9 to a total depth of ca. 1.6 m (79.39–81.02 m). It was filled with a layered accumulation of various colors and matrices, including ashes, and contained a large quantity of tiny charred fragments. Few sherds (Fig. 16.33:14– 16) and objects were retrieved from this pit. Attached to the upper part of the pit on the north was another small pit (9932) in the eastern section of the square, ca. 0.6 m in diameter and 0.3 m deep (80.65–80.94 m), and full of ash. No clear remains related to Stratum D-7b were found in Square M/4, perhaps due to erosion.

The features attributed to Stratum D-7b point to a relatively meager occupation of short duration, with no significant architecture. It might be suggested that the post Stratum D-8 fills described above should be merged with Stratum D-7b features, the fills being a levelling operation for the construction of Stratum D-7b floors and installations. This issue is related to the definition of Stratum D-7b as either the last phase of LB IIB or the earliest phase of Iron IA, a question further discussed in Chapters 4 and 23.

Stratum D-7a

Introduction

In an excavated area of ca. 80 sq m, three units built of brick walls with stone foundations were found, denoted Building DC, although their attribution to a single building remains uncertain (Fig. 15.13). All brick superstructures except one (2842) were built of one row of gritty yellowish bricks laid as headers, with thin (0.02 m) gray mortar between them. This type of brick, which had similar dimensions in most walls (0.58×0.36×0.12 m), was unique to Stratum D-7a. The brick superstructure rested on top of a one-course stone foundation which was made of two rows of stones with a gap between them, filled with gray-brown debris. The stone foundations were slightly wider than the brick superstructure, measuring 0.75 m as opposed to the 0.6 m-wide brick wall, and thus, they protruded on both faces. The stones were mediumsized basalt and limestone and included occasional basalt grinding stone fragments in secondary use. Floors were found to abut the top level of the stone foundation or the lower courses of the brick superstructure.

The three units of Building DC were not completely excavated: the northern (7902, 9906) and southwestern (2871) units were cut by the erosion line in the west, while the southeastern unit (8907) extended beyond the excavated area to the east and south. As a whole, Building DC might also have extended to the north, as indicated by the opening in Wall 7906. Although not completely exposed, it seems that the nature of the three units excavated can be defined. The spacious northern rectangular unit probably served as an open courtyard, its eastern portion (9906) separated from its main western part (7902) by a row of pillar bases (9907) to enable its roofing. The southeastern unit (8907) contained several installations in close proximity to one another and appears to have been some kind of a working area, probably roofed. The southwestern room (2871) was roofed, although its exact function could not be determined. It is assumed that all units belonged to the same building, although no clear entrance was found connecting Room 2871 with the other components; such an opening might have been located to the west, beyond the line of erosion.

Building DC was built partly into and on top of the remains of Stratum D-7b. At some places, mainly below the southwestern and northeastern units, no elements or floor levels related to the previous stratum were found, possibly due to their removal by the Stratum D-7a builders. In Square M/5, the floor of Stratum D-7a (7902) was just 0.1 m above that of Stratum D-7b (7903), while in Square N/4, a 0.3 m-thick accumulation separated the two strata. Thus, the floors of the different units of Stratum D-7a were on somewhat different levels. Although a relatively large domestic area, Stratum D-7a did not yield rich assemblages of occupation remains, probably due to the fact that the structures were not destroyed abruptly, but were gradually abandoned. Some minor changes, concentrated in the northeastern part of the excavated area, have led us to designate a local phase (D-7a') that followed the initial construction (see Fig. 15.14 and below). The artifactual assemblages are broadly dated to the first half of the 12th century BCE.

A prominent feature of Stratum D-7a was the multiplicity of foundation deposits that were placed in foundations of walls and floors. The six deposits (marked as Nos. 1–6 in the text below and in Fig. 15.13) are of the lamp-and-bowl type; in two cases, the lamp was inside a bowl and covered by another bowl and in four cases, one lamp was located inside a bowl. Discussion of this phenomenon appears in the summary of this chapter. Following is a list of the deposits.
  1. Fig. 16.24:1–3: Reg. No. 18548, Locus 1856, south of Wall 4856; two bowls, one lamp.
  2. Fig. 16.24:4–6: Reg. No. 18698, Locus 1856, found near the western end of Wall 1818, below a large stone; two bowls, one lamp.
  3. Fig. 16.24:7–8: Reg. No. 79389, Wall 1818, attached to the northern side of the eastern part of the wall (Square N/4); one bowl, one lamp.
  4. Fig. 16.24:9–10: Reg. No. 79307, embedded into Stratum D-7b Locus 7903, near the western end of Wall 7906 (Square M/5); one bowl, one lamp.
  5. Fig. 16.24:11–12: Reg. No. 19048, attached to Wall 7906, east of entrance in Square N/5; one bowl, one lamp.
  6. Fig. 16.24:13–14: Reg. No. 79198, embedded into Stratum D-7b Locus 7903, related to the construction of Wall 7906, south of its central side; one bowl, one lamp.

The Northern Unit

This unit was bounded by Wall 7906 to the north and Walls 4856 and 8917 to the south (Fig. 15.13). The western boundary was eroded, while the eastern one was beyond the excavation area.

Wall 7906 was oriented slightly southwest– northeast, preserved along 8.0 m. A 0.75 m-wide opening in this wall led northwards, beyond the excavated area. The wall ended on the west with the erosion line (Photo 15.49). It was preserved to a height of four–five brick courses (81.62 m at the western end, 81.37–81.45 m at the eastern end) above a foundation made of medium-sized stones laid at the western part above Stratum D-7b Locus 7903 at levels 80.95–81.01 m. The foundation of the eastern part was less carefully built of somewhat smaller stones. The opening had a beaten-earth threshold (ca. 81.10 m), covered by a 0.1–0.15 m-thick accumulation of gray material of unclear nature.

Three lamp-and-bowl foundation deposits were associated with Wall 7906, each comprised of one lamp and one bowl, the latter usually placed above the former. The westernmost deposit (No. 4, Fig. 16.24:9–10) was found below the northern row of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 where the brick superstructure was missing due to erosion (Fig. 15.13). The second deposit (No. 6, Photo 15.46; Fig. 16.24:13–14) was found immediately to the south of the stone foundation of Wall 7906 in the eastern portion of Square M/5. This deposit was placed when Oven 7924 of Stratum D-7b was already dismantled, as it was found leaning against its red-clay wall (see above). It is possible that this foundation deposit had shifted slightly from its original position, as the lamp and bowl were found at an angle and not horizontally laid. The third deposit (No. 5, Fig. 16.24:11–12) was found below the southern row of the stone foundation of Wall 7906, ca. 0.5 m east of the opening in the wall.

Walls 4856 and 8917 separated the northern and southern units. Wall 8917 (Photo 15.50) was parallel to Wall 7906 and its foundation also tilted to the east (80.84–81.05 m along the 2.3 m exposed part of the wall). It had a foundation of small stones and four brick courses were preserved (81.05– 81.57 m). A 0.75 m-wide opening was located between the western edge of this wall and Wall 4856, which enabled passage between the northern and the southeastern units. This opening was on line with the opening in Wall 7906, thus creating access to the various parts of the building.

Wall 4856 was built on an east–west axis, at a slightly different angle compared to the aforementioned walls. It extended along 4.1 m and ended with the erosion line on the west, where it was also partly damaged by animal burrowing. The wall was preserved to a maximum height of eight courses (81.13–82.48 m), including the stone foundation, which was much higher than in the other walls in this stratum. The southern row of the stone foundation was higher by 0.1–0.15 m compared to the northern row, possibly an intentional technique related to drainage arrangements. The northern face of the wall was plastered with a 0.01–0.02 m-thick mud plaster, but it was not clear whether the same technique was applied to the southern face as well.

The western part of the northern unit was a 3.5– 3.8 m-wide open area, stretching from a row of pillar bases (9907) ca. 5.8 m westwards, where it was eroded on the slope of the mound. This area, 7902 and 9902 in Squares M/5 and N/5 respectively, was characterized by a 0.1–0.2 m-thick build-up of floor material (81.12–81.31 m in the western part, 81.10–81.20 m in the eastern part). This accumulation abutted the top of the stone foundations of the surrounding walls and their brick superstructure’s lowermost course. Locus 7902 contained a large amount of small (LT 0.1 m) limestone pebbles scattered in the north-central part of the locus and embedded in the floor foundations; these pebbles were laid above Stratum D-7b Locus 7903 and Oven 7924. A medium-sized flat stone was found in the middle of the floor (top level 81.31 m), possibly serving as a working platform. The floor striations contained a relatively small amount of sherds and bones, but were rich in charred wooden pieces; a broken jug (Fig. 16.31:19) was the only find associated with the top level of the floor. At the western edge of the floor, the lower portion of an oven (4874) was found, surrounded by small stones (including broken basalt grinding stones in secondary use), some large sherds, and ashy deposits. The eastern portion of this space, excavated as Locus 9902, served as the main area of movement between the units along the axis linking the two openings discussed above.

The open area of Floor 7902/9902 was bordered on the east by a row of pillar bases, designated 9907 (80.93–81.18 m), located somewhat to the east of the aforesaid openings in Walls 7906 and 8917. Each of the four pillar bases was composed of one medium-sized field stone with a relatively flat top which was supported by a few smaller stones (Photos 15.50–15.51). These pillar bases were not evenly spaced, with a larger gap between the northernmost one and the rest. The row of pillar bases was abutted on the east by a stone floor (9906) which also abutted the stone foundation of Wall 8917 and the brick superstructure of Wall 7906. The floor was made of basalt and limestone fieldstones, cobbles and pebbles, with occasional basalt grinding stone fragments. The floor sloped down to the east (80.92–81.07 m), in accordance with the foundations of Walls 7906 (eastern part) and 8917, possibly due to post-depositional processes, such as young tectonic activities.

The Southeastern Unit

The opening between Walls 8917 and 4856 led to the southeastern unit, characterized by a rather thick floor build-up (8907, levels 81.45–81.60 m) that was related to a dense concentration of installations (Fig. 15.13). The floor was ca. 0.3–0.4 m higher than Floor 7902/9902 of the northern unit and this gap was bridged by a step built of two bricks (levels 81.35–81.60 m) which were found immediately to the southwest of Wall 8917 (shown on the plan of Stratum D-7a', Fig. 15.14), although it is unclear whether these two bricks were placed during the initial construction phase of Stratum D-7a or during the later phase, D-7a'. Floor 8907 extended 4.2 m to the south of Wall 8917 up to the southern section of Square N/4, and 3.5–4.0 m on an east–west axis from Wall 2842 to the eastern section. This appears to have been an open courtyard, although two medium-sized stones with flat tops embedded in the upper part of the floor striations, 2.4–2.5 m to the south of Wall 8917, may have served as pillar bases for a lightweight roof.

Seven features were found in association with Floor 8907.
  1. Oven 7946 (Photo 15.53). This oven, 0.6 m in diameter, was located in the southeastern part of Square N/4. It was comprised of three mantles — very low-fired red clay walls, sherds lining the outer wall, and compacted yellowish clayey material which encircled the latter. The oven was preserved to a height of 0.2 m (top level 81.90 m), but its lower portion remained unexcavated and thus its foundation level was unknown.

  2. Circular Installation 8902 (Photo 15.53). This installation was located to the south of Oven 7946, but was preserved at a much lower level (81.69 m); its bottom was not excavated. It was built of two concentric mantles, the inner one made of 0.02 m thick off-white clay material (plaster?) mixed with dark-colored inclusions. This inner coat created an ellipse, 0.35×0.45 m. The outer mantle consisted of a 0.05–0.07 m-thick layer of red-brown very low-fired clay. It seems that this installation was used for cooking.

  3. Pit 8945. This pit, 0.7×0.8 m and 0.4 m deep, was located ca. 0.4 m southwest of Installation 8902 and penetrated into the southern section of the square. The pit was filled with soft gray and brown striations containing numerous charred pieces; the bottom was made of harder brown soil. It may have served as refuse pit for the nearby cooking installations, although only part of the accumulation seems to be comprised of decayed ash. The pit was covered by the upper portion of the Floor 8907 buildup and probably was filled at an early phase of the use of this floor.

  4. Pit 8915. Located 1.0 m west of Pit 8945, this was a rather irregularly shaped pit, 0.4×0.7 m and 0.6 m deep, that was filled with three different layers. The bottom, 0.2 m thick, was a relatively hard brown soil. The middle layer was pure decayed ash, some 0.25 m thick. The upper layer was light brown fill. All three layers were almost devoid of material remains. As in the case of Pit 8945, Pit 8915 was covered by the upper part of the Floor 8907 buildup.

  5. Installation 8908. This semi-circular installation, located immediately to the north of Pit 8915, was built against the eastern face of Wall 2842. It was shaped as a shallow basin with an elevated outer tip composed of soft brown clay (81.50–81.63 m). Its complete form was not known, since its northern part was damaged when Installation 7947 was built (see below). The remaining portion was somewhat peculiar, since its tip was slightly lower than the basin’s bottom; however, this sinkage may be the result of post-depositional processes. The function of this installation was not clear.

  6. Installation 7947. This square installation (inner dimensions ca. 0.6×06 m) was attached to the eastern face of Wall 2842 and cut the northern part of Installation 8908. The installation was built of three bricks placed on their narrow side; the northern and eastern bricks remained intact, while a large fragment of the southern brick was found to the south of the installation. The installation was full of soft ashy material and it may have served as a small bin or as some kind of cooking facility.

  7. Installation 8906. Located in the middle of the northern part of Floor 8907, this was the largest feature associated with it (Photo 15.52). This rectangular brick construction (external measurement 1.4×1.85; inner measurement 0.85×1.3 m) was sunken from the floor into earlier deposits (80.89– 81.54 m). The construction was flimsy, using bricks of varying sizes, possibly in secondary use, and sometimes placed with gaps between them or not on the exact same line. The average thickness of the walls was 0.25–0.3 m, except for the western wall, which was only 0.1 m thick. Most of the bricks were brown-orange and of a homogenous compact matrix, while those used in the western wall were friable gray bricks. Traces of a thin (0.01–0.02 m) white clay plaster were found on the inside of the western wall, but might have originally coated the entire interior. A few curving plaster patches found at ca. 80.92 m indicated the floor level of this basin, but the rest of the floor was not detected. The upper 0.15 m of the accumulation inside the installation was characterized by many small, fist-size stones and brick fragments dispersed among ashy gray material. Below this layer, the accumulation contained mostly layered gray debris. A bronze rod and a loomweight were among the few objects found in the installation, although it seems that they were not related to its original function which might have been for storage.

The multiplicity of installations indicates that the southeastern space was used primarily to perform various tasks, such as cooking, refuse collection and possibly storage. Nevertheless, it was clear that not all features were in use simultaneously; Installation 8908 was damaged by Installation 7947 and Pits 8915 and 8945 were covered by the latest floor build-up. This indicates a rather prolonged period of use of this floor, an assumption corroborated by the thick accumulation of floor striations. These observations are in accordance with the possibility that Floor 8907 continued to be in use when Wall 8917 was leveled and Wall 8904 was erected slightly to its south, as part of the minor changes that occurred in the later stage of Stratum D-7a (see below, D-7a').

The Southwestern Unit

Room 2871 was bounded by Walls 2842, 4856 and 1818 (Photo 15.57, upper right); its western boundary was eroded away (Fig. 15.13). The room measured 3.1 m in width (north–south) and at least 3.8 m in length (east–west). A marked peculiarity in Room 2871 was the significant difference in wall foundation levels and, as a result, the irregular relationship between the walls, an issue which clearly pertains to the history of the room’s construction. Wall 1818 was the deepest of the three. Its stone foundation, 0.7–0.9 m wide, was carefully built of two rows of medium- and large-sized flat stones, the largest of which were in the western portion of the foundation. The foundation extended 3.6 m from the erosion line to the east, where it abruptly ended ca. 0.4 m west of Wall 2842, while its brick superstructure abutted the latter wall. Two foundation deposits were found below the northern row of stones: the western one (No. 2; Fig. 16.24:4–6; see Fig. 15.20, Photo 15.54a), placed below a large flat limestone, was composed of two bowls placed rim to-rim, enclosing a lamp. The second deposit (No. 3; Fig. 16.24:9–10, Photo 15.54b) was ca. 1.5 m to the east of the former and consisted of one lamp and one bowl. The brick superstructure built on top of the stone foundation was preserved five to six courses high (0.8–0.9 m), composed of the typical yellowish gritty bricks of Stratum D-7a, on top of which three to five courses of gray-brown friable bricks were placed (top preserved level: 82.50 m). The upper part resembled Wall 2842 and was probably erected with the latter. It should be noted that the lower part of the brick superstructure of Wall 1818 was built of different-sized bricks compared to other Stratum D-7a walls, placed as either headers or stretchers; the overall width of the wall ranged from 0.55 m in the east to 0.7 m in the west.

A peculiar feature was found in the corner of Walls 4856 and 2842, where the yellowish bricks of Wall 4856 turned southwards and comprised the first ‘column’ of bricks in the northern end of Wall 2842. Only 0.3 m to the south of the line of Wall 4856 did the real construction of Wall 2842 begin, using carelessly placed gray, brown and white bricks. These bricks were preserved up to eight or nine courses above a flimsy stone foundation built of rather large irregularly shaped fieldstones, with smaller stones filling the gaps between them (Photo 15.52). This stone foundation was ca. 0.15–0.3 m higher than that of Walls 4856 and 1818, in accordance with the slope of the mound. Wall 2842 extended into the southern section of Square N/4 and was preserved to a height of over 1.1 m above the floor in Room 2871; it clearly continued to be in use during Stratum D-6b (see below). In the central part of the brick superstructure, just west of Installation 7947 (above), the wall was damaged by animal burrowing.

The observations detailed above are not easy to interpret stratigraphically. It seems probable that Walls 1818 and 4856 were built simultaneously. The peculiar eastern corner of the latter with Wall 2842 may imply that originally there had been a yellow-brick north–south wall that was later entirely dismantled for some reason. In its place, a new wall (2842) was erected at a slightly higher level compared to the existing walls and its join with these walls was modified in a rather flimsy way. At that time, Wall 1818 was rebuilt with bricks similar to those used in Wall 2842. It is possible that a similar case happened with Wall 4856, where only traces of gray and white bricks appeared in the top part of the wall.

The main problem with the suggested scenario is that only one clear floor sequence was found in the space enclosed by the aforementioned walls — a thick accumulation of floor build-up (2871 in Square N/4 and 1856 in Square M/4; Fig. 15.19). The floor sloped down towards the west, its higher area near the stone foundation of Wall 2842 (81.56 m and 81.65 m in the east, down to 81.39 m in the west). The floor striations were characterized by compacted brown layers which contained large amounts of charred material and whitish patches (phytoliths?). The tilt of the floor to the west hindered full understanding of its relation to the surrounding walls.

A few features were found related to Floor 2871. A small, deep (80.36–81.41 m) bell-shaped pit (1846) with a slightly collapsed perimeter was found in the north-central part of the room. The pit was presumably lined with bricks, but only a few remained attached to the pit contour; inside was a layered accumulation covered by ashy material. The pit was sealed by the upper part of the floor striations which sloped inwards in the vicinity of the pit (compare Pit 8945 of the southeastern unit), meaning that the pit went out of use before the end of Stratum D-7a. Just northeast of the pit and south of Wall 4856 (in the confines of Locus 1856), another foundation deposit of two bowls and a lamp (No. 1; Fig. 16.24:1–3), similar to the one found below the western part of Wall 1818, was found embedded in the floor make-up (81.39 m). A third feature, found north of Wall 1818, ca. 2.0 m southeast of the pit, was a construction of one course of four bricks, 0.8 sq m (2893, 81.23–81.39 m; not on the plan) whose purpose remained unclear. Floor 2871 was covered by a 0.2 m-thick layer of occupation debris (2854) and the latter by a thick layer of brick debris (2843).

Stratum D-7a'

Minor changes in the northeastern part of the excavated area were attributed to this phase (Fig. 15.4); these changes might correspond to the upper layers of the floor build-up that accumulated in the other spaces in Stratum D-7a, discussed above.

The most obvious change was the replacement of flagstone Floor 9906 in Square N/5 with a beaten-earth floor (8912; 81.16–81.30 m). In addition, the row of pillar bases (9907) was replaced with a new row (8944), built on the exact same line, on a slightly higher level (81.20–81.46 m) (Photo 15.55). This row was built of four stones; the southern two were regular large limestone fieldstones, while the northern two consisted of a complete basalt bowl placed upside down and a large lower basalt grinding stone. It is possible that a concentration of smaller stones close to Wall 7906 constituted a fifth pillar base. West of this row, the continuation of the beaten-earth floor was found (8920, 81.20–81.30 m), which gradually integrated with Floor 7902 to the west. The floor abutted the brick superstructure of Walls 7906 and 4856. Floor 8912 was covered with 0.2–0.3 m of layered debris, containing discontinuous patches of phytoliths, ash mixed with many olive pits and tilted striations of varied colors (excavated partly as Locus 8909).

In the southern part of this area, Wall 8917 of D-7a was now replaced with a new wall (8904), built slightly to the south and partly covering its southern face, although the northern face perhaps continued to be used as bench in this phase. Wall 8904 was preserved to six courses (81.50–82.23 m) of white and gray bricks placed as stretchers in one row, thus making it rather narrow (0.35 m wide). The wall extended from the eastern section to ca. 1.0 m east of the corner of Walls 4856 and 2842, thus maintaining the passage that was here in Stratum D-7a. Two bricks found in the passage somewhat to the north of the wall line were preserved and used as a threshold; in fact, they may also be attributed to the original opening in Stratum D-7a. The northern wall of Installation 2874 of Stratum D-6b was built right on top of Wall 8904 (Fig. 15.21).

It seems that no architectural changes occurred in this phase in Squares M–N/4, where D-7a walls and installations continued to be in use. Occupation debris found above the thick floor striations in this area should be regarded as contemporary with Phase D-7a' in Square N/5. Above Floor 2871/1856, was a 0.2–0.3 m layer of such debris (2854, 1831; Fig. 15.19) containing partly restorable pottery (Figs. 16.25–16.32), bones and grinding stones. Similar debris (7948) was found above Floor 8907, containing pottery (Figs. 16.25– 16.26, 16.30–16.33), as well as a few small finds.

Building DC of Stratum D-7a collapsed and the occupation layers were covered by brick debris, although no evidence for a violent destruction and fire was found. The collapse layer, ranging in depth from 0.3 m to 1.2 m, was excavated as different loci in the various parts of the building: 2843 in the southwestern unit, 7945 in the southeastern unit, 7935/8903 in the southern and western parts of Square N/5, and 4847/4817/4812 in the northwestern part. The collapse contained brick fragments of both the typical yellowish bricks of the initial phase of Stratum D-7a and other types of bricks (white, gray, brown, reddish) used in this stratum and its later phase. These collapse layers were found immediately below topsoil in Squares M–N/4 and below floor levels related to Stratum D-6b in Squares M–N/5. In the main part of Square N/5, installations of Stratum D-6b penetrated considerably into the earlier deposits (Figs. 15.20– 15.21), removing much of the brick debris of Stratum D-7.4

The pottery assemblage of Stratum D-7a–b is similar to that of Strata S-4 and S-3 at Beth-Shean (TBS III: Chapter 5) and should be dated to the 12th century BCE (Iron IA).
Footnotes

4 In the locus index, these debris layers are marked as either D-7a or D-7a'.

Stratum D-6

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Plans: 15.15–15.16
  • Sections: : Figs. 15.19–15.21
  • Photos 15.56–15.62
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.34–16.37
Discussions
Introduction

Possibly the most complicated stratigraphic sequence in the western part of Area D was found above Stratum D-7a and below the Iron IB Strata D-5–D-4. Inside this 1.5 m-deep accumulation, excavated over an area of approximately 60 sq m (in Squares M/5, N/4–5, and the southwestern portion of P/4), numerous installations and built elements were uncovered, each with a different foundation and preservation level. In-between these installations, as well as partly above and below several of them, was a thick accumulation of striations, found in all areas except for the western and northern portions of Squares M–N/5. These striations, which totaled ca. 0.9 m (82.10–83.00 m), represented both floor build-up and natural accumulation of layered sediments. However, the distinction between different depositional processes during the excavation was impossible due to the overall homogenous nature of the striations and the absence of concentrations of material remains within the sequence. The striations must have accumulated during a relatively long time-span, in which man-made features were built and went out of use intermittently. The correlation of different features found at various elevations along the sequence was often complicated. We tentatively divided this stratum into two main phases, although in certain places, this division was arbitrary: a lower phase (D-6b; Fig. 15.15) and an upper phase (D-6a; Fig. 15.16).

Stratum D-6b

The lowest level in which the striated accumulation appeared in Square N/4 was 82.10–82.20 m, designated Locus 1876 (above brick debris 7936 of Stratum D-7a; Figs. 15.19–15.21). In Loci 7935 and 7950, excavated at the same levels in Square N/5, no clear continuation of these striations was observed and, instead, the top of the brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' was found (Fig. 15.21). Only in the southeastern corner of Square N/5, within Locus 7935 (82.10–82.23 m), a local layered accumulation was noted, which included large cattle bones and an associated gray-ash accumulation.

The only architectural element which was clearly abutted by these lower striations was Wall 2842 of Stratum D-7a, which appeared to be in use in Stratum D-6b as well (Figs. 15.19–15.20; Photo 15.57). This is evident by the fact that the sequence of striations either abutted Wall 2842 or ended at the line of the wall, above the uppermost level of its preservation. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the wall stood much higher when the striations were deposited and only at a later stage its upper courses collapsed. It is less clear whether the entire southwestern unit of Stratum D-7a, including Walls 4856 and 1818, continued to be in use in Stratum D-6b.

Three rectangular brick installations were associated with the floor striations in this area. The two northern ones (7931, 7939), in the northern part of Square N/5 (Photos 15.4, 15.56–15.58), were almost identical in dimensions (1.07×1.87 m and 1.1×1.75 m, respectively) and were built along different axes (east–west and north–south, respectively). Although they were contemporary, it seems that Installation 7939 had been attached to 7931 at a slightly later stage. The walls were built of homogeneous compact gray bricks of fairly standard dimensions (0.5–0.55 m long, 0.3–0.35 m wide, 0.12–0.14 m thick), laid as stretchers in one row and preserved to a height of seven courses. The walls were plastered on their interior and exterior faces with yellow clay, 0.03–0.05 m thick. The western wall of Installation 7939 also functioned as the eastern wall of Installation 7931; its eastern face was thus covered with two layers of plaster. The floor levels of both installations were damaged, partly due to animal burrowing, mainly in 7939. However, the yellow clay floor of Installation 7939 was clearly observed in the eastern section of Square N/5 (Fig. 15.21), sloping slightly from north (81.70 m) to south (81.61 m). The floor of Installation 7931 might have been slightly higher (ca. 81.90 m), as indicated by patches of reddish clay preserved in two of its corners. The accumulation inside the installations consisted of loose graybrown soil, with occasional brick chunks and isolated sherds (Figs. 16.34–16.36). The function of these installations and another described below (2874) remained unclear.

Installations 7931 and 7939 cut into Stratum D-7a brick debris (7941, 7949 below their floors and Loci 8903, 8905, 7950 around the installations). A floor related to the installations was found mainly to the south (7935, 82.10 m); no clear floor was found to the west. To the north of Installation 7931, a possible floor was found in the form of a thin gray layer, sloping slightly eastwards (8911, 82.37–82.47 m). This layer covered brick debris related to Stratum D-7a' (8924), which was cut near the installation wall by a foundation trench of the installation and filled with brick fragments (8923). It seems probable that the upper part of both installations protruded above the surrounding floor levels. This was also indicated by the fact that Installation 7939 was preserved to its original top level (82.60 m), as evidenced by the yellow clay plaster which covered the uppermost bricks; it is assumed that Installation 7931 was of the same height. North of Installation 7939 and at approximately the same level, a brick wall (8922) was found protruding along the northern section. It perhaps was the southern wall of yet another installation or a room located beyond the excavated area to the north (Fig. 15.21).

A third rectangular brick installation was 2874 in Square N/4 (Photo 15.59), located ca. 2.0 m to the south of Installation 7939. Its northern wall was built exactly on top of Wall 8904 of Phase D-7a' and was preserved to a higher level (82.92 m) than the other walls and elements. The inner dimensions were 0.85×1.25 m and its inner corners were slightly rounded. The foundation level of its walls was 82.15–82.20 m and its patchy plaster floor was found at 82.25 m. The aforementioned levels were 0.4–0.5 m higher than the parallel values of Installations 7931 and 7939, which may suggest that Installation 2874 was erected at a later stage (D-6a). The installation was built of compact greenish bricks and was plastered inside and outside with a similar matrix; it was abutted on all sides by the thick accumulation of striations. Attached to the northern wall on its outer face at 82.45–82.55 m was a small semi-circular patch of baked red clay (7932), resembling oven ware, 0.43 m in diameter and 0.03–0.05 m thick. A small quantity of charcoal and olive pits were found on top of this feature, as well as in its vicinity; its function was evidently connected with fire. The same type of red clay was found in small patches inside Installation 7931 and in another patch (7925) above Wall 7926 of Stratum D-6a (see below).

To the west of Installation 2874 was a thick layer of ash, mixed with many olive pits, found at the bottom level of the striations in Locus 7935. This layer, and earlier deposits below it, were cut by a small round pit (7930), 0.53 m in diameter, its top level at ca. 82.45 m and its depth ca. 0.35 m. It was unlined and filled with loose brown debris. The pit was covered by striations 7921 and 1876 of Stratum D-6a.

To the south of Installation 2874, two ovens (2877, 2878) were embedded in the striations of 1876. Oven 2877 (82.40–82.97 m) comprised a circular outline (0.6 m in diameter) of burnt red material alongside several oven wall fragments. Oven 2878 (82.42–82.77 m), located 0.8 m to the east, was slightly larger (0.8 m in diameter). Both ovens were poorly preserved due to the fact that they were later replaced by new ones in Stratum D-6a (2851 and 2841 respectively). Built-up floors were found in the southern part of Square N/4 (1876, 2852; Photo 15.60).

Wall 4833 in Square M/5 was made of white and brown bricks, preserved to a maximum height of seven courses near the eastern section of Square M/5 (81.64–82.48 m) and extending 4.2 m until the erosion line. The wall was built on top of and slightly to the south of Stratum D-7a Wall 7906, on a slightly different orientation, and thus should be seen as an attempt to rebuilt Wall 7906. No floor was found to abut this wall.

Stratum D-6a

The later phase of Stratum D-6 was characterized by the continued accumulation of striations in Square N/4 (the top of 1876, Photo 15.60), as well as in the southern (7921) and eastern (7922) parts of Square N/5, at levels 82.80–83.00 m (Fig. 15.6).

In Square N/5, Installations 7931 and 7939 went out of use and were covered with striations (7922) mixed with some brick debris. Above Installation 7939, three whitish bricks oriented north– south were embedded in the striations of 7922, most probably a constructed feature rather than fallen bricks. To the west of these bricks, parallel to the northern section, a new wall was erected (7926) on top of the gray layer 8911, presumably a Stratum D-6b floor which related to Installation 7931. It was ca. 1.8 m in length and 0.4 m in width. Above its eastern portion was a patch of baked red clay resembling oven material (7925, 82.93 m) that recalled those found in Stratum D-6b Loci 7931 and 7932. In the western part of Square N/5, a narrow wall (7929) was built perpendicular to Wall 7926 and slightly to its west (82.62–82.96 m). It was preserved to a height of three courses and 1.5 m long, and did not clearly relate to any other feature. It should be noted that the striations did not abut either of these walls, thus preventing their clear stratigraphic association.

In Square N/4, Installation 2874 possibly continued to be in use in Stratum D-6a, although it was finally covered by the striations, as was clearly observed in the southeastern portion of 7921. To the south of this installation, the two adjacent ovens (2877, 2878, Stratum D-6b) were replaced with two new ones (2851 founded at 82.97 m and 2841 founded at 82.81 m, respectively; Photos 15.61, 15.64), that were embedded in the upper part of the striations (1876). Both ovens were attached to the outer face of a brick wall (4853).

Room 4848 was bounded by Wall 4853 on the north, Wall 4868 on the west, Wall 7953 on the east, and extended into the southern section. All three walls were founded at 82.60–82.56 m and were preserved to maximal height of ca. 1.0 m; they were poorly preserved due to animal burrowing. A thick lime plaster still adhered to the inner corner of Walls 4853 and 7953, probably indicating that the entire room had been plastered.

Stratum D-6a, and the entire sequence of the Stratum D-6 striations in Squares N/4–5, were covered by a 0.7–0.9 m-thick debris layer which continued eastwards below the floors and walls of Stratum D-5. This layer might constitute a constructional fill, placed to support the massive new architecture in the subsequent stratum, D-5.

Chapter 15C - Area D East Strata D-5 to D-1: Iron IB–IIA

Introduction

Discussion

The eastern (higher) part of the step trench in Area D revealed a sequence of five strata and several sub-phases dated to Late Iron I and Early Iron IIA (11th–10th centuries BCE) (Photos 15.1–15.5, 15.63). While the 11th century strata were well preserved, those of the Iron IIA, exposed on the uppermost part of the slope, were very damaged. Erosion caused the disappearance of Stratum D-5 and later strata west of the middle of Squares N/4–5, those of Stratum D-2 west of the middle of Squares P/4–5, and those of Strata D-1a–c west of Squares Q/4–5. See Table 15.1 for the stratigraphic sequence.

Stratum D-5

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.22 - Plan of Stratum D-5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45 - Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57- Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63- Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64- Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65- Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66- Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67- Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68- Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69- Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70- Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71- Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73- Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74- Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75- Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77- Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plan: Fig. 15.22
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19–15.21; 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.45, 15.56–15.57, 15.61, 15.63–15.77, 15.88
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.38–16.40; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47)
Discussions
Introduction

Architectural remains attributed to Stratum D-5 included Buildings DD and DE in the east, bordered on the west by a north–south street, and partially preserved elements to the west of the street that could have been either part of a unit presently eroded away or a subterranean support for the architecture above it. Based on the founding levels of the walls flanking the street, it seems that the buildings of this stratum were terraced to some extent, with an upper terrace to the east of the street and a lower one to its west, following the gradient of the slope.

Wall 2882 and Features to Its West

Several features in Squares P–N/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-5, including Wall 2882 and a layer of brick debris to its west.

Wall 2882, running slightly northeast to southwest, was exposed over 9.5 m, crossing the entire excavation area and continuing into the northern and southern balks (Figs. 15.21–15.22, 15.33– 15.34; Photos 15.56–15.57, 15.64). It was preserved to a height of five brick courses with no stone foundation and was superimposed by Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. A difference of 0.6 m along a distance of 8.0 m was found in the foundation level of the wall from north to south, perhaps due to tectonic activity. One possible explanation of Wall 2882 is that it was a sub-structure and functioned as a terrace wall against which a presently non-preserved western unit was built in Stratum D-5, while the fill to its east supported the earliest phase of the street that would continue to exist in Stratum D-4.

Close to the erosion line west of Wall 2882, thick layers of compact brick debris were detected at levels 82.90–83.80 m, abutting the western face of the wall (1855, 2836 in Square N/4 and 7904, 7907, 7908, 7912–7914 in Square N/5). This layer was sealed by Building DF of Stratum D-4. This brick debris layer can be explained as either the collapse of Wall 2882 or as a deliberate fill below the floors of D-4 Building DF.

Street East of Wall 2882

Between Wall 2882 on the west and Building DD on the east ran a north–south street for 9.25 m; it continued into the northern and southern balks. Its width in the south was 1.0–1.2 m, while in the north it was ca. 2.35 m (between Walls 2882 and 8878 in Square P/5).

The eastern face of Wall 2882 was very blurred and irregular; the bricks were not even in shape or size and fieldstones appeared occasionally between the bricks. The layers east of the wall were excavated only in a few probes; the lower layer was composed of fieldstones (9810, levels 82.92–83.09 m; Photo 15.65), covered by layers of gravel, brick debris, sherds (mostly worn, including some Early Bronze sherds) and bones (9808, 9802; levels 83.09–83.84 m). These layers appeared to be a deliberate fill supporting the street surface (2870), although, in fact, no clear surface of Stratum D-5 could be identified.

The situation here raised an unresolved stratigraphic quandry. In the process of excavation and analysis, it was considered that Building DF west of the street was founded in Stratum D-5 and reused in Strata D-4b and D-4a. One of the reasons for this was the situation seen in Figs. 15.33–15.34, where the street surface (2870) abutted Wall 1883 of D-4 Building DF on the west and Wall 2881 (attributed to Stratum D-5) on the east. The problem with this interpretation is that Wall 1883, the eastern wall of Building DF, was constructed above Wall 2882. Assignment of Building DF to Stratum D-5 would leave this wall an ‘orphan’ in terms of stratigraphic attribution, unless it would be explained as a terrace wall supporting Wall 1883. However, the fact that Wall 1883 had a stone foundation, while Wall 2882 below it was a brick wall without one, seems to contradict such an explanation. The solution presented here leaves unresolved questions; while it seems to be the preferred scenario, the alternative interpretation should not be entirely ruled out.

The Eastern Unit: Buildings DD and DE

Introduction

The eastern unit in Stratum D-5 was not fully exposed, since some of the walls of Stratum D-4 which were built directly on top of Stratum D-5 structures were not dismantled. The exposed remains were sufficient to show that these were massive buildings that housed special activity. The area was divided into two units: Building DE in the north and DD to its south (Photos 15.69–15.77). The northern unit included two rooms with an unclear connection between them; both continued to the north and east beyond the border of the excavation. The southern unit comprised two large rooms paved with well-preserved brick floors. The exact relationship between the two units remained obscure, since the juncture between them was covered by later walls that were not dismantled.

Building DE (Squares P–Q/5)

Introduction

Building DE was comprised of two rooms, separated by north–south Wall 8861, preserved to five brick courses. The upper two courses were built of dark gray friable bricks, the two courses below them of white bricks, and the lowermost course was again dark gray. The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same wall was typical of this stratum, such as in Walls 8884 and 8854 of Building DD, described below. Later walls covered the northern and southern ends of Wall 8861, but it is most likely that it had cornered with Wall 8884 on the south.

Room 8865

East of Wall 8861 was a partially excavated room that contained massive brick debris, including large complete fallen bricks (8865) (Photos 15.71– 15.72); no floor was reached. The rest of the walls surrounding this room were not exposed, due to D-4 walls that superimposed them.

Room 8874

West of Wall 8861 was a room, 2.8 m long and at least 2.0 m wide (Photo 15.73), whose northern part was covered by a Stratum D-4 wall. The room was bounded by Wall 8878 on the west and Wall 8884 on the south, which was, in fact, the lower part of D-4 Wall 8821. Wall 8878, built of dark gray bricks, made a corner with Wall 8884. The beatenearth floor of this room (8874, 83.59 m) was covered by brick debris and collapse (8872); it was higher near the southern wall (8884, 83.70 m). Two brick steps (8879) built above the floor were attached to Wall 8878 on the western end of the room; two complete bricks were laid on both sides of the steps (Photo 15.73). Five complete bowls were found in the layer of fallen bricks above the floor (Fig. 16.38:4–5, 9–10, 20) and a complete goblet (Fig. 16.38:26) was found on the top step. These finds point to this area as having had some cultic function.

Building DD (Squares P–Q/4–5)

Introduction

This was part of a massive building whose eastern and western walls were 1.25 m wide each, composed of two rows of bricks. While the eastern wall (8848) was comprised of two rows, the western wall seems to have been made of two adjoining walls (8855, 2881) which were constructed separately: the eastern side (8855) had a stone foundation which was lacking in the western side (2881). Wall 2881 apparently continued to be in use in the subsequent stratum, D-4b, when it abutted the newly built Wall 1860 on the west (see below). Wall 2881 was poorly preserved, perhaps since it was in use longer than Wall 8855. The northern wall (8884) was apparently just as wide as the western and eastern walls, based on a small part of its northern face exposed in Square P/5; the rest of the northern part of the wall was covered by D-4b walls. The eastern wall (8848) appeared to have been the outer wall of the entire building, although this could not be ascertained due to the limited excavation area. If this is correct, then the external width of the building was ca. 6.7 m (for the possibility that this complex continued to the east into Area C, see below). It seems that the southern wall (8852) of the eastern room was an internal wall, since the parallel room to the west continued south beyond the border of the excavation. Thus, the length of the building was at least 6.0 m and it probably continued beyond the southern limit of the area.

Room 8867

This was a long narrow room (inner measurements 1.7×4.5 m) separated into two sections by a brick installation (9805) in its northern half (Photos 15.63, 15.69–15.70, 15.74–15.75). Wall 8848, the eastern wall of the room, was composed of two rows of compacted whitish bricks with gray mortar lines. Its southern part was eroded, but presumably had cornered with Wall 8852. An entrance to the room might have existed here, but this area was poorly preserved and partly damaged by Pit 8883. The western wall of the room was Wall 8854, revealed directly below D-4 Wall 4878. This wall was preserved to five courses, the upper two made of pinkish-orange bricks and the three lower of compacted whitish bricks. Such a mixture of different brick materials in the same wall was already observed in Walls 8861 and 8884. The northern wall of the room was Wall 8853, a number given to the southern face of this wall in Square Q/5, although probably it was the same wall as 8884, whose northern face was exposed in Square P/5. This wall, as well as the northern parts of Walls 8848 and 8854, were partially exposed due to superimposed D-4 walls which were not dismantled.

Room 8867 was paved with a well-preserved brick floor (8867, level 83.42 m), composed of three clear lines of bricks and possibly a fourth one in the eastern part of the room. The floor abutted Walls 8852, 8848 and 8854, but did not continue into the northern section of the room, where another brick floor was exposed on a lower level (see below). In the northern part of the room, a square installation (9805), bounded by three brick walls, was laid directly on top of Floor 8867. The walls (0.14 m wide), composed of bricks placed on their narrow side and preserved to two courses, were 1.0 m long, creating an inner space of 0.85 sq m. As in some of the walls of this building, the installation was built of different types of bricks: the southern and western walls of black friable bricks and the northern wall of whitish bricks; traces of plaster were found on both faces. This appears to have been a storage bin. A ca. 0.55 m wide passage west of Installation 9805 led to the northern part of the room, where brick Floor 8867 terminated on line with the northern wall of the installation. In the northern part of the room (1.05×1.6 m), a less-well-constructed brick floor (9804) was laid, lower by more than 0.4 m than Floor 8867 and Installation 9805. This floor abutted Walls 8848 and 8853, but did not reach Wall 8854 on the west. It was difficult to determine whether this difference in levels between the two parts of the room was due to function or whether the lower northern floor belonged to an earlier phase of D-5 (see below). A thick layer of debris (8839) rested on Floor 9804; two complete bricks fallen on top of each other were found in this debris at 83.71 m and on top of them were several complete vessels, including seven small bowls, perhaps votive (Fig. 16.38:6, 11–12, 14–15, 18–19), a chalice (Fig. 16.38:24), a juglet (Fig. 16.39:19) and a lamp (Fig. 16.39:21). It seems like the bricks and the vessels had fallen from a higher spot, perhaps a shelf.

In the southeastern corner of the room was a large bell-shaped pit (8883; Photos 15.69–15.70); its eastern part adjoined the western face of Wall 8848, whose foundation level could be seen in the pit. It was apparently dug sometime during the course of use of this room, as it was sealed by the D-4b occupation above. The pit contained ash and brick debris, sherds and one complete juglet (Fig. 16.39:20). South of Wall 8852, a small segment of a floor (8882) was found at level 83.86 m, perhaps belonging to an adjacent room of the same building.

Room 8871

Room 8871 was the western room of Building DD (Photos 15.69, 15.76–15.77). Its inner size was ca. 2.0×at least 5.2 m, as its southern end was beyond the limit of the excavation area. In the north, the excavation almost reached the presumed southern face of Wall 8884. The floor (levels 83.55–83.74 m) was made of four to five rows of bricks, like the floor of Room 8867 to its east. It abutted Walls 8855 and 8854. The bricks of the floor were covered by 0.25 m-deep striated layers of soft earth and plaster, which were sealed by Floor 8816 of Stratum D-4b. Although the level of the floor in this room was 0.5–0.6 m higher than that in the eastern room, it was clear that the two rooms belonged to the same building. A similar situation was observed in Stratum D-4b Building DG (see below).

Three pits were detected in Room 8871, sealed by D-4b architectural elements and thus perhaps dug either when the building was still in use or a short time afterwards, before the construction of D-4b, similar to Pit 8883 in Room 8867.

Pit 8876 was a round shallow pit, ca. 0.3 m deep and 0.44 m in diameter located south of the center of the room and discerned at level 83.73 m (Photo 15.69). It contained ashy material and a small amount of sherds. Pit 8873 was a semicircular shallow pit, 0.2 m deep and 0.45 cm in diameter, located in the eastern part of the room and attached to Wall 8854 at level 83.79 m. It contained loose ashy material with charcoal pieces and a few sherds. Pit 8880 was round, 0.45 m in diameter and of unknown depth, located in the southeastern part of the room, discerned at level 83.74 m. It could not be fully excavated due to D-4 Wall 1884, which was built on top of its southern part. Its continuation below Wall 1884 of D-4 was further proof that this room extended further to the south, beyond the excavated area.

Summary of Stratum D-5

The building remains of Stratum D-5, although limited, indicated dense urban planning and the existence of well-planned structures. Wall 2882, which crossed the entire area from north to south, represented a degree of central planning, although it remained unclear as to what unit it had been belonged. Initially, it had been considered that this wall was a foundation intended to support the slope during the construction of Wall 1883 of Stratum D-4 Building DF. According to this suggestion, Building DF would have been founded in Stratum D-5 and continued to be in use, with slight changes, in Strata D-4b and D-4a. However, it was finally decided in favor of the stratigraphic separation as suggested here, namely, that Wall 2882 represented an independent phase, attributed to Stratum D-5, and that it was an isolated element, with no structural remains belonging to this stratum to its west.

Building DD was an unusual structure which must have had a special function; the two elongated spaces with brick floors may be explained as storerooms that perhaps were part of a much larger administrative building. This may be compared to similar elongated storage rooms in Building L at Tell Qasile, probably founded in Stratum X (Mazar 1951: 20). The wide walls of Building DD suggest that this had been a tall building, perhaps of two or more storeys. The building continued south beyond the limits of the excavated area and perhaps also to the east, possibly related to Building CS of Stratum C-3b in Area C (Chapter 12). The western wall of the latter (8520) was well preserved, but its width was unknown. The eastern face of this wall was parallel to the walls of Building DD at a distance of 5.7 m and the floor of the spaces to its east were almost at the same level as those of Building DD. It may be suggested, although with great caution, that these walls belonged to one large architectural complex (Fig. 15.25a). Alternatively, these were two separate structures, possibly with a street between them.

Building DE to the north of Building DD was hardly known; its massive western wall recalled those of Building DD and the two could belong to one structure, although in that case, the connection between the two parts must have been to the east of the excavated area.

No evidence for a violent destruction at the end of Stratum D-5 was detected. It seems that the buildings went out of use due to either deterioration or earthquake damage and were rebuilt in the following Stratum D-4. The pottery and artifacts from Stratum D-5 point to their date in Iron IB, perhaps the early part of the 11th century BCE.

Stratum D-4

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 15.1 - Stratigraphy and chronology in Area D, with correlation to Area C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 15.2 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.1 - Location of section drawings on superimposed plan of Strata D-11–D-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.2 - Schematic section of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 15.19 - Section 3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.20 - Section 4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.21 - Section 5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.23 - Plan of Stratum D-4b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.24 - Plan of Stratum D-4a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.25a - Iron IB remains in Areas D and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.25b - Iron IB remains in Areas D and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.32 - Section 6 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.33 - Section 7 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.34 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Figure 15.35 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63- Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64- Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65- Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66- Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71- Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77- Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.78- General view of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.79- Squares N–P/4,from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.80- Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.81- Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.82- Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.83- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.84- Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.85- Squares P–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.86- Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.87- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.89- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.90- Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.95 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.96 - Square P/5, looking west; D-4a Building DJ, debris and vessels in Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.97 - Smashed Pottery in Square P/5 D-4a Building DJ, Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.98 - Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.99 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.101 - Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.102 - Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.111 - Square P/5, looking south at reed impressions (ceiling collapse?) on plaster layer from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.112 - Closeup of layer in Photo 15.111 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.113 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.114 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.116 - Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

  • Plans: Figs. 15.23–15.25
  • Sections: Figs. 15.19a–15.21, 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.61, 15.63–15.66, 15.71–15.72, 15.77–15.90, 15.95–15.99, 15.101–15.102, 15.111–15.114, 15.116;
  • Pottery: Buildings: Figs. 16.48–16.54; Street: Figs. 16.41–16.47
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-4 was the most extensively exposed stratum in Area D, revealed in six excavation squares (N–P–Q/4–5). Although new structures replaced the massive Buildings DD and DE of Stratum D-5, and Building DF was built west of the street, the general outline of Stratum D-5 was maintained, with the north–south street continuing to separate the eastern and the western units.

In the area west of the street, Building DF was built above Wall 2882 and the layers attributed to D-5 to its west. The area east of the street was rebuilt on a different plan: in the early phase of Stratum D-4, denoted D-4b, Buildings DE and DD were replaced with Buildings DH and DG, thus retaining the general spatial division of Stratum D-5; several of the walls of the new buildings were constructed on top of the earlier walls. In a later phase, denoted D-4a, the two units together created a larger building (Building DJ). Apart from this significant change, several other minor changes occurred inside the rooms during each of these phases and the street level was raised.

The Western Unit: Building DF (Strata D-4b and D-4a)

Introduction

To the best of our understanding, Building DF was built in Stratum D-4, although as explained above, there was a slight possibility that it was founded already in Stratum D-5 (see above). The building included two rows of rooms running parallel to the slope of the mound west of the street and comprised two terraces, separated by Wall 4866 and its possible southern extension (Photos 15.78–15.82). The eastern line of rooms included 4839, 1845 and 2840 and the western line included 4871 and 4879; the latter were destroyed by erosion and only their eastern ends were preserved. It is not certain that all these rooms belonged to the same building, but it is clear that this was a well-planned structure adjoining the north–south street on its west.

Room 2840

Walls 1811, 2822 and 2846 created the northern end of a 2.5 m-wide room that continued to the south (Squares N–P/4). They were a rebuild of the walls found in the same place in Stratum D-6a, described above (Room 4848). East–west Wall 1811 in Squares N–P/4 was comprised of two rows of bricks, 1.0 m wide and well preserved for the most part. The wall had a stone foundation comprised of small- and medium-sized stones, with one row seen along the northern face, although these stones were not visible under the southern face; the foundation was dug into the brick collapse (1855) below. Inside this room was a hard-packed earth floor (2840; level 84.08 m) set on a bedding of pebbles. A shallow pit (2828) was partially excavated in the northwestern part of the room. The floor of this room was raised and a higher floor (2823) was constructed at level 84.20 m in Stratum D-4a.

Courtyard/Room 1845

The space between the rooms on the north and the south was probably a courtyard, paved with stones (1845), with a series of plaster floors accumulated above it (1836) (Squares N–P/4–5; Photos 15.80– 15.82). This space was 4.0 m long and at least 3.0 m wide. It was bordered on the east by Wall 1883, on the west by the supposed continuation of Wall 4866 along the erosion line of the slope, on the south by Wall 1811, and on the north by Wall 4813. Wall 1883 was built above Wall 2882 of Stratum D-5. It had a three-course stone foundation that protruded beyond the face of the wall towards the east and seven courses of its brick superstructure were preserved; the uppermost three tilted strongly to the west (Fig. 15.33). From its corner with Wall 1811, the wall continued ca. 7.5 m to the north, running into the balk. The southern end of the wall (termed 2846) was slightly curved and served as the eastern wall of Room 2840.

On the western edge of this space was a layer of fallen and decayed brick debris (1826) which might represent the damaged southern continuation of Wall 4866. This was also indicated by how stone Floor 1845 ended on a straight line in the northwest, perhaps on line with the inner face of the missing western wall. A series of floors was found in this space. The lowest was a stone floor (1845) which had a partial bedding of smaller stones; the northern part of the floor consisted of a row of closely laid stones arranged in a row along Wall 4813. The stone floor was partly covered by a layer of pebbles (1842) which could be either an independent floor or a constructional fill meant to support the build-up of plaster floors (1836) above, which was 0.40 m thick. The uppermost floor (1825) was composed of earth and a few small stones and was covered by brick debris and collapse (1806), with several large undressed stones. These upper surfaces were attributed to Stratum D-4a. In the south of the building, west of Wall 2822, was an area paved with small stones and earth (1822), that might have been the continuation of Space 1845 or a paved alleyway.

Rooms 4839, 4879 and 4871

In Square N/5 were remains of one complete room (4839) and segments of two additional rooms (4879, 4871), arranged on two levels, with a floorlevel difference of 0.65 m: Room 4839 on an upper terrace, which was on the same level as 1845 and 2840 to its south, and Rooms 4879 and 4871 on a lower terrace to the west. Wall 4866, 1.0 m wide, which was common to all these rooms, served as a retaining wall for the terrace above it. The latter wall was not preserved entirely, but most likely had cornered with Wall 4861.

The inner dimensions of Room 4839 were 2.3×2.7 m; its outer walls (4813, 4866, 4861, 1883) were well preserved, although two of them were damaged by Stratum D-3 pits: 4810 was dug into Wall 1883 and 4811 into Wall 4813. It seems that Wall 4861 was also damaged by pits, but it was not possible to ascertain this, since the wall was only partially excavated. A section in this wall was examined in the eastern balk of Square N/5, where it could be seen that the wall had no stone foundation and its bottom bricks reached the top of Wall 4833 of Stratum D-6b.

Floor 4839 was a pinkish clay floor covered by an accumulation (4855) containing sherds (Fig. 16.48) and one almost complete juglet (Fig. 16.48:20). A flat stone found adjacent to Wall 4866 on the east may have served as work surface. A thick layer (up to 1.2 m) of decayed brick debris (4807) covered the accumulation on this floor.

The lower terrace (Rooms 4879, 4871) was severely eroded on the west. Wall 4870, separating the two lower rooms, was preserved to a length of 1.05 m. The northern room (4879) had a stone floor preserved only in its southeastern corner, where a lower grinding stone was sunk into the floor and an upper grinding stone was found in another part of the floor. The preserved segment of the stone floor (83.10 m) could be interpreted as a domestic working area. A row of small stones and two larger stones aligned to their east along Wall 7918 may have been steps. The northern wall of the room was Wall 4861, which continued from Room 4839 to the east. North of this wall, in the northwestern corner of Square N/5, a small segment of a stone floor (7928), similar to Floor 4879, was located at level 83.15 m just below topsoil. A lamp-and-bowl foundation deposit (Fig. 16.48:1–2) was found just below this floor.

Room 4871 to the south, filled with brick collapse, was mostly ruined by erosion.

The Street in Stratum D-4

The north–south street of Stratum D-5 in Squares P/4–5 continued to be in use through Stratum D-4, when it was ca. 1.85–2.0 m wide (Photos 15.83– 15.84). The street surface was gradually raised, with striations accumulating between Wall 1883 (which stood to a height of 1.5 m) in the west and the western walls of Buildings DH and DG (in Stratum D-4b) and DJ (in Stratum D-4a).

It seems that in Stratum D-4b, the lowest street surface (2870; Square P/4), which was already in use in Stratum D-5, abutted the stone foundation of Wall 1883 on the west and Wall 2881 on the east, which is explained as a re-use of a Stratum D-5 wall, now serving as a bench along the western wall of Building DG. The accumulation above 2870 contained several floors, rich in pottery, bones, organic material and gravel, to a total depth of ca. 1.83 m (2870, 2864, 2835, 1882, 2807, 1873, 1871; levels 83.74–85.39 m) and in two separate sequences in Square P/5 (8803, 7805, 7804 and 7829, 7828, 7822, 7807; levels 83.89–85.14 m). The lower floors were attributed to D-4b and the higher ones to D-4a, related to Building DJ. The uppermost floors were much higher than those in the adjacent buildings.

The stratified accumulation was quite homogeneous, although several sporadic or loosely arranged complete bricks were revealed occasionally on both the western and eastern margins of the street. These could have been either steps that led to the rooms in the eastern and western units (such as the case with the step leading to Room 8816 in Stratum D-4b), fallen bricks, or remains of benches. In Square P/5, a layer of bricks was found tilted against the Wall 1883 (7847 against the stone foundation and 7846 against the brick superstructure). The bricks, alternatively dark brown and white, were irregularly placed, with gaps between them. Their function could not be determined; perhaps this was a ruined bench or a brick collapse.

Among the upper stratified street striations, a pavement (7805) comprising a concentration of small field stones and cobbles with a large amount of sherds, was revealed at level 85.15 m in Square P/5 and attributed to Stratum D-4a. The pavement

The Eastern Unit in Stratum D-4b: Buildings DG and DH

Introduction

To the east of the street were two units, Buildings DG and DH, attributed to Stratum D-4b, built above D-5 Building DG.

Building DG

Introduction

This building comprised three rooms, two of which were completely excavated, and part of a fourth unexcavated room which continued into the eastern balk (Photo 15.85). The excavated part measured 5.8×6.9 m, but the building apparently continued to the east and perhaps also to the south, beyond the limit of the excavation area.

Room 8816

The western room in the building (inner dimensions 2.0×4.7 m, 9.4 sq m) was a rebuild of the previous Room 8871 of Stratum D-5. Each of its four well-preserved walls was built of dark gray bricks with distinctive whitish mortar between them (recalling the Stratum C-3 bricks in Area C; see Chapter 12). The western wall of the room (1860) was founded directly on top of Wall 8855 of Stratum D-5, but about 0.5 m north of the entrance, there was an earth layer separating these two walls. The entrance into Room 8816 was through an opening in the southern part of Wall 1860. West of the entrance was a plastered stone step, 0.75 m long (2866) at level 84.46 m, constructed above the stump of D-5 Wall 2881, leading from the street into the room.

The room had a thick white plaster floor that had been laid above a foundation of bricks (8816), discerned at levels 84.45–84.64 m (ca. 0.7 m above the floor of Stratum D-5 in the room below). Such white plaster had not been exposed in any of the other rooms in the building and it may indicate some special function of this room. In the center of the room were two adjoining pits, coated with the same white plaster as the floor. Pit 8823 was 0.2 m deep and 0.5 m in diameter and contained ash and a relatively large amount of olive pits. Pit 8822, slightly to the south, was 0.7 m in diameter and 0.6 m deep and contained ash and many sherds (Figs. 16.49–16.50, 16.53) and bones, as well as a relatively large amount of charred olive pits. In the accumulation (8813) above Floor 8816 remains of bronze production were found, including a tuyère, a crucible and two prills (see Chapter 40C).

In the middle of the eastern part of the room and attached to Wall 4878 was Installation 8824, composed of a square brick, in which the lower part of a storage jar was sunk (Fig. 16.51:22; Photo 15.86). The installation was attached to a line of complete white bricks which seem to have been laid against Wall 4878, coating its western face. A similar installation (2891), related to Phase D-4a, was attached to the southern wall (1884) of the room (see below).

No opening leading from this room to the eastern rooms of the building was discerned, in spite of the good preservation of the eastern wall (4878).

Space 8841

The southeastern space in Building DG was perhaps an open courtyard, 3.5 m wide and at least 3.5 m long (at least 12.25 sq m); it continued eastward beyond the limit of the excavated area and thus, its full length could not be determined. Its northern wall (4859) was composed of white bricks and had an opening leading to Room 8830 to its north. The southern wall (4862), also built of white bricks, was exposed only along 1.5 m, since its western part was disturbed; there could have been an opening here leading to another room in the south.

The beaten-earth floor in this space (8841), revealed at levels 84.07–84.33 m, was preserved mainly in the southern part, abutting Walls 4862 and 4878. A small patch of a white plaster floor (8832) was preserved in the center of the room, at level 84.26 m. It seems that both were part of a series of successive floors used during the lifetime of Building DG in Stratum D-4b (8814; levels 84.26–84.40 m). Pit 8840, located in the southern part of the room, 1.0 m in diameter and ca. 0.6 m deep, was full of gray ash and was sealed by a thick layer of debris found in the room. The pit damaged Wall 8848 of Stratum D-5.

Space 8841 continued to be in use in the following Stratum D-4a with minor changes.

Space 8830

This small room (inner dimensions 1.45×1.9 m) was entered from Space 8841 to its south. Its northern, eastern and southern walls were built of white bricks, while on the west it was bounded by Wall 4878, built of dark gray bricks. The 0.6 m-wide corner entrance had a brick threshold at level 84.44 m. It is notable that such a corner entrance was also found in Room 8816 and perhaps also in 8841.

A series of successive beaten-earth floors was revealed in Room 8830 at levels 84.18–84.38 m. In the northeastern corner of the room was an installation (8837), comprising three complete bricks, measuring 0.7×1.2 m (Photo 15.87). Two of the bricks were laid parallel to each other, with their narrow sides attached to Wall 8828, the northern wall of this room. The third brick was perpendicular to them, its narrow side attached to Wall 8805, the eastern wall of the room. The installation had a rounded depression in its center, similar to the one in Installation 8824 in the room to the west and to Installations 2891 and 8859 of Stratum D-4a (see below). These can be explained as stands for jars containing water or other liquids.

Wall 8805, the eastern wall of the room, was well preserved on its western face, but much less so on the east. To the east of Wall 8805 was yet another room, which was not excavated due to a mass of bricks covering it.

Summary of Building DG

It remained unclear whether the three rooms described above (and the fourth unexcavated one) belonged to the same unit. Since no entrance leading from Room 8816 to the eastern rooms was found, it may be that this room was independent and accessed directly from the street, perhaps serving as a storage space or workshop, while Rooms 8841 and 8830 belonged to a separate building entered from the east or the south. Space 8841 could be part of an open courtyard, while Room 8830 and the unexcavated room to its east could be small living spaces.

The use of two different kinds of bricks in the same building should be noted: dark gray bricks in Wall 1860 and white bricks in all the other walls. This phenomenon was noted in other buildings as well.

Building DH

Introduction

The northern building in the eastern unit comprised two rooms and perhaps a third unexcavated room on the east. Its southern wall (8821) adjoined Building DG on the south.

Room 8844 (Photos 15.88–15.91)

The inner dimensions of this room were 1.80×2.55 m (4.6 sq m, including the area of Bench 8860). A corner entrance with a brick threshold at level 84.29 m at the northern end of Wall 8849 connected Rooms 8844 and 8842. Another opening (8886) was detected in the eastern wall of the room (7851), just on line with the latter entrance. The opening in Wall 7851 was preserved to its full height, standing 1.25 m high and 0.8 m wide. The beaten-earth floor of this room (8844) covered a strip of bricks (8870) that ran along the western face of Wall 7851; these bricks were wider than the wall and were possibly placed in order to support the floor near the entrance. Wall 7851 was preserved to a height of 16 courses and continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a. Wall 8860 was a line of bricks adjoining the northern face of Wall 8821; yet, while Wall 8821 was preserved to a height of four courses, 8860 was preserved to only one course and was abutted by Floor 8844. Thus, 8860 was interpreted as a bench.

In the western part of the room was a standing brick lying on its narrow side (not on the plan) that created an enclosed area in the corner of the room. Between the brick and Bench 8860, on a level just below Floor 8844, was an incomplete jar (Fig. 16.51:13) with a broken goblet (Fig. 16.49:28) inside it.

This room continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a with some architectural alterations, although with the same floor.

Room 8842 and Installation 8810

Room 8842 was the western room of Building DH (Photos 15.63, 15.73, 15.92). This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.6×1.8 m, 2.88 sq m) had a beaten-earth floor (8842) abutting the walls at levels 84.28–84.34 m. A row of five stones (8856) lined the western side of the room; to its west was Installation 8810 (Photos 15.63, 15.66, 15.73, 15.92). This enigmatic feature included three large flat pinkish limestone blocks and a large basalt basin, located east of the street, on the same line as the supposed western wall of Room 8842 and above D-5 Wall 8878. The southernmost limestone was a large rectangular block (0.3×0.6×0.97 m). The middle limestone was whitish/pinkish and almost square (0.3×0.6×0.6 m). The northernmost stone was 0.5 m wide and at least 0.5 m long. A basalt basin (8807) was located south of and on the same line as these three stones. This was a large oval-shaped basalt stone, 0.8–0.9 m in diameter, with a rounded shallow flat depression in its center, 0.5 m in diameter and 0.12 m deep. Grinding marks could be seen inside the depression. A flat limestone was found to the south of this basin. The tops of these stones were at levels 84.56–84.66 m, ca. 1.0 m higher than the floor of Stratum D-5 Room 8874 and 0.3–0.4 m above the floor of Room 8842 of Stratum D-4b, both to the east of the stones. The street west of this installation was wider than it was further to the south, thus providing convenient access to the installation.

The installation was covered by several stones laid in disorder, by a line of stones that created the western side of Room 4858 in Stratum D-4a, and by the foundations of Wall 4819 of Stratum D-2.

The function of this installation remained obscure. It could have been an olive-oil press. Olives could have been crushed in the basalt basin and then placed in baskets on top of the central stone. The two side stones could serve as a foundation for a wooden frame that would hold some kind of stone weights (although no such weights were actually found). The setup recalls to some degree the installation at Tel Dan Area T, explained by Biran (1994: 176, Fig. 137) as a water-libation installation and by Stager and Wolff (1981) as an olive-oil press. A less probable explanation is that the stones of 8810 were in secondary use and served as part of a solid foundation for the western wall of Building DH or the later Building DJ. A possible support for this suggestion are a few bricks found to the west and north of the installation which appeared to have been placed when the stones were laid.

The Eastern Unit in Stratum D-4a: Building DJ

Introduction

The term Building DJ refers to the area of Buildings DG and DH, which underwent several major internal changes. Although no opening was found to connect the southern and northern wings, some of the renovations indicate that the entire area was considered as part of one architectural system. Many of the previous walls continued to be in use (4859, southern part of 4878, 4862, 1884, 1860, 4876, 8828, 8834), while others were cancelled or replaced. Thus, the double wall separating Building DG from DH in Stratum D-4b (8821, 8828) was replaced by a single wall (8828/8834) and the eastern wall (7851) of D-4b Room 8844 was extended to the south (denoted here 7848), cancelling the earlier wall (8805) to its west and becoming the eastern wall of the new room (7855), thus widening D-4b Room 8830 by 0.9 m. In the center of the building, Wall 7852 was built directly over Wall 8849 of D-4b, abutting the northern wall of D-4b Building DG (8828, 8834), which continued to be in use. At this time, the western part of Wall 8821 was cancelled, so that the previous space of Room 8842 was enlarged, but was now divided by a narrow wall (4877) into two separate chambers (4858, 4872). On the west, Wall 8850 was constructed above Installation 8810 and served as the western wall of the building, facing the street.

Seven rooms belonged to Building DJ. North– south Walls 7852, 7861 and 4878 functioned as the backbone wall through the center of the building, with three rooms to their east and four rooms to their west.

Room 8844

This room of Building DH in Stratum D-4b continued to be in use in Stratum D-4a, with the same floor and walls on the north and east. However, architectural changes occurred in the other two walls; on the west, a new wall (7852) was constructed on top of Wall 8849, preserved to seven courses. On the south, Wall 8821 of Stratum D-4b was cancelled and the room was now bordered by Wall 8828, which continued to be in use from Stratum D-4b. The inner dimensions of the new room were 2.4×2.6 (6.24 sq m). All the walls’ interiors were coated with a thick layer of white plaster. Floor 8844, attributed to D-4b and probably continuing in D-4a, was covered by destruction debris (8833) and fallen roof material (8829), the latter covered by a layer of brick debris (7853) reaching an uppermost level of 85.64 m, 1.25 m above the original floor.

Rooms 4858 and 4872

D-4b Room 8842 was now extended to the south and divided into two chambers by a narrow partition wall (4877) (Photos 15.94–15.97). To the north, Room 4858 was a narrow space with inner dimensions of 1.0×2.3 m. Traces of thick white plaster were preserved on Walls 4876, 7852 and 4877. No floor was traced, but since Wall 4877 floated at level 85.07 m, almost 0.8 m above the floor of the Stratum D-4b, such a floor must have existed.

Room 4872, located south of Room 4858, had inner dimensions of 1.2×2.4 m (2.9 sq m). Plaster was preserved on its northern (4877) and eastern (7852) walls. In a small area south of Wall 4877, a floor (4872) was found at level 84.72 m, 0.56 m above the floor of Stratum R-4b in the same place.

The western wall of these two rooms (8850) was not very clear. Installation 8810 of the previous phase was covered by scattered stones, on which this wall was constructed. No entrance was detected, yet since both faces of Wall 8850 were not well preserved, it is possible that there had been an opening from the street. The solid patch of a pebble-stone pavement (7805) revealed in the street at level 85.04 m, opposite the supposed entrance to Room 4872, might indicate that it led into the room. No evidence for any connection between Room 4872 and the other rooms of the building was detected.

A concentration of complete vessels, including bowls, a pyxis, cooking pots and other small vessels (Fig. 16.54), was found in this room in a destruction layer containing fallen bricks and burnt wooden beams.

Room 7855

Replacing D-4b Room 8830 of Building DG was a new room that was enlarged to the east (inner dimensions 1.4×2.8 m, 3.92 sq m), entered from the south through the same entrance used in D-4b. No floor was detected in this room. The brick debris layer in this room (7855, 8806) was cut by Stratum D-3 Pits (7858, 7860, 7863).

Room 8820

This small chamber (inner dimensions 1.25×1.45 m, 1.8 sq m) was created by constructing a narrow partition wall (1868) in the northern part of D-4b Room 8816. The eastern wall (7861), composed of dark gray bricks and coated on the exterior with a layer of unique white bricks, was preserved to a height of six courses. This outer coating of bricks decreased the room’s length by ca. 0.3 m. This chamber had a stone floor at level 84.80 m (0.1 m above Floor 8816 of D-4b), covered by a beatenearth floor (8820) at level 84.83 m, about 0.3 m higher than D-4b floor in the same location. Along the western side of the chamber was a brick bench or installation (8859), composed of three white bricks. The northern one was 0.4×0.5 m and the narrow middle brick (0.3×0.45 m) was laid with its long side against the northern brick. The southernmost brick had the same dimensions as the northern one, with a round depression in its southern part (diameter 0.4 m) which could have served as a base for a jar. The installation/bench was surrounded by ashy material and a large amount of charred olive pits.

Finds in the debris (8826) on Floor 8820 included a scaraboid (Chapter 30, No. 3) and two small lentoid pieces of unfired clay with a textile impression that might have been lids.

Space 4863

The previous Space 8841, possibly an open courtyard, continued with almost no change in Stratum D-4a. No floor was detected in this later phase, although it probably existed, since a large oven (4851) was found in the northwestern corner of the room with a foundation level at 84.75 m, ca. 0.5 m above the floor of Stratum D-4b. Three stones running on a diagonal line at levels 84.70–84.81 m were found in the northeastern part of the room (8838).

Room 2869

This room (inner dimensions 2.1×3.0 m, 6.3 sq m) was the southern part of D-4b Room 8816, after its division by a narrow partition wall (1868) (Photos 15.98–15.99). Its walls were covered with white plaster. The western wall (1860) was preserved to six to seven courses, the southern wall (1884) to at least nine courses, and the northern wall (1868) up to seven courses in the west, yet its eastern part was severely damaged by Stratum D-3 pits (see below).

The 1.1 m-wide entrance to Room 2869 from the street was in its southwestern corner. The door jambs were covered with white plaster. Beatenearth floor accumulations (2869) were revealed in this room at levels 84.71–84.81 m. The upper floor, composed of white plaster, seemed to slope up to Wall 1860 and abut it, but Wall 1868 floated above it, as if this wall was a later addition.

In the southeastern corner of the room, a row of bricks, 1.2 m long, was attached to Wall 1884 (4840); its function remained elusive. An installation made of light gray bricks (2891, not on the plan) was built against this construction, opposite the entrance to the room. Inside the installation was an almost complete storage jar, lacking its rim (Fig. 16.54:10). This installation perhaps belongs to a late phase in Stratum D-4a, as it almost blocked the entrance, suggesting that it was constructed after the entrance went out of use.

The function and nature of Building DJ cannot be determined with any certainty. The small size of most of the chambers could hardly have been functional in a dwelling and the plan does not resemble any known building of the period (Iron IB). It also remained unclear whether the two parts of the building on both sides of Walls 8834/8828 comprised one unit (as we are inclined to think) or belonged to two separate buildings (a northern one with three rooms and a southern one with four rooms, as in Stratum D-4b). Both these units were probably accessed from the east.

Summary of Stratum D-4

In Stratum D-4b, the general layout of the excavated area continued from Stratum D-5, but substantial changes occurred in each individual building. West of the street, Building DF was founded at this stage, although the possibility that it was founded in Stratum D-5 should not be ruled out. East of the street, the massive Buildings DD and DE of the previous stratum were replaced by new buildings (DG and DH). Building DG appeared to have contained a square courtyard surrounded by rooms at least on the north and west (although no entrance from the courtyard to the western rooms was found); its full plan on the east and south remained unknown. The northern building, DH, included only two rooms entered from the east, although they may have been part of a larger building extending to the east and perhaps to the north.

The installation on top of the western wall of Building DH raises questions as to its function and stratigraphy. If it had been contemporary with the building, the wall on which it was founded could not have functioned as an actual wall, but rather as a podium for the installation, which might have been related to olive-oil production. Alternatively, it could be explained as being in secondary use as a foundation for the western wall of Building DH.

In Stratum D-4a, the former plan of the area west of the street remained unchanged, while east of the street, the basic plan was retained, with inner changes. It seems most likely that this area became one large building (DJ), although it is possible that it was divided between two adjacent building, as in the previous phase.

Stratum D-3

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.26–15.27
  • Sections: Figs. 15.21, 15.33–15.35
  • Photos 15.100–15.107
  • Pottery: Figs. 16.55–16.58
Discussions
Introduction

Stratum D-3 was characterized by a series of 45 pits found in an open area in Squares N–P–Q/4–5 between levels 84.95–86.60 m. They post-dated Stratum D-4 elements and pre-dated the construction of Walls 1809, 1820 and 2820 of Stratum D-2. However, they could have been either contemporary with or earlier than Walls 4808 and 4809, attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/5, since the latter had deep foundations on the same level and even lower than the pits and rest on top of Stratum D-4 walls and debris (see further on this subject below). Two additional pits were located in Square R/4 in Area C (Stratum C-3; Chapter 12), thus establishing a good correlation between the stratigraphic sequences in these two areas.

The pits were cut into debris (1806, 1850) and brick walls of Stratum D-4a. In several places, two and sometimes three phases of pits cut one another. In light of the sheer density of the pits, graphic considerations required their presentation in two plans (Figs. 15.26–15.27).

Table 15.3 provides a list of the pits and their levels, while the plans show their location without levels.

The pits ranged in diameter from 0.3 to 1.0 m (except 2834, discussed below); some were very shallow (at least their preserved height), while others were over a meter deep. They can be divided into two groups: pits lined with thick pink plaster, probably used as silos, some of which yielded large amounts of olive stones, and unplastered pits, which could have been used for refuse. None of the pits which cut into the D-4a brick collapse had a pink plaster floor. This does not necessarily mean they were not used as silos, but rather that the compacted brick material perhaps supplied a sufficiently hard and sealed bedding for storage. Indeed, a couple of these pits contained olive stones and grain.

In the following description, the pits are listed from south to north, starting with the plastered ones, followed by the unplastered ones. The text below includes only some of the pits, while others are recorded only in the table and plans.

Plastered Pits

In Square Q/4, just north of the southern balk, Pit 2833 was a deep pit that was not completely excavated. It cut Pit 2868 to its east. East of these pits, 2804 cut into Pits 4815 and 4834. Further east was Pit 2829, continuing into the eastern section, with Pit 4841 below it. Pit 2834 differed from the other pits, being larger (diameter 1.9 m) and amorphic in shape. This pit was cut by a plastered pit (2844).

In the central and northern parts of Square Q/4, the number of pits and the density of their phasing increased. An exception was Pit 2808, 0.6 m in diameter and only 0.17 m deep, surrounded by bricks. Additional pits in this dense concentration were 2850, 2857, 2858, 2862, 2872 and 2885.

Unplastered Pits

Eight pits in Square Q/4 were unplastered (4805, 4806, 4814, 4815, 4821, 4834, 4835, 4865). Most of these belonged to the lower layer of pits (Table 15.3; Fig. 15.26). Some of them contained organic material, such as (in order of frequency) olive stones, wood charcoal, charred grain and chickpeas. In some of the pits were large sherds, including bases of jars (e.g., 4814).

Three additional unplastered pits were located on the southern edge of Square Q/5 (7858, 7860, 7863). They were dug into a compact accumulation of Stratum D-4a (7855) and were the northernmost pits in this concentration. All three contained loose dark soil with a large quantity of olive pits, charcoal and grains. Pit 7863 was a small shallow pit (diameter ca. 0.6 m). Pit 7860 was ca. 1.0 m in diameter and contained several layers of ash; in addition to the organic remains, it contained some sherds and bones, mixed with plaster chunks and brick fragments. Both these pits were cut by Pit 7858, a round shallow pit, ca. 1.0 m in diameter.

On the western edge of Square Q/4 and the eastern side of P/4 were several additional unplastered pits that cut into one another. Pit 2885 was 1.1 m long and about 0.7 m wide; it cut the shallow Pit 2832 to its north. North of this, Pit 2815 cut into a large and deep plastered pit (1858), which cut D-4 Wall 1868.

Nine pits were dug into the collapsed-brick layers of Stratum D-4 in the western part of Square P/4 and in Squares N/4–5 (1838, 1848, 1849, 1859, 1867, 4810, 4811, 4846, 8804). Pit 1848 in Squares P/4–5 was sealed by Wall 1809 of Stratum D-2 and cut the corner of Walls 1860 and 1868 of Stratum D-4a. In the center of Square P/4, Pit 1838, which was cut by another very poorly preserved pit, cut collapse and debris layer 1850 down to the level of the street surface (1873) of Stratum D-4a. The burnt organic material which covered the center of the square in D-4a was visible in the sides of this pit. Three additional pits, excavated in the western part of Square P/4, cut into a D-4a collapse layer (1806): Pit 1849 (only its rounded bottom was preserved) and Pits 1865 and 1859 to its north; olive stones found in many of these pits raised the possibility that local olive-oil production took place nearby.

Pits in Area C. Two additional pits were excavated in Square R/4 of Area C, adjacent to Area D. These were Pits 11438 and 11439, found at levels which corresponded to the lower pits in Area D (Fig. 15.27; see also Fig. 12.5). They were sealed by Stratum C-2 (=VI) walls and floors (Chapter 12). The finds in these pits were scanty and included a few olive pits and sherds.

Summary of D-3 Pits

The numerous pits in Stratum D-3 were bounded on the north by the line of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 in the middle of Squares P–Q/5. North of this line, no pits nor any other elements of Stratum D-3 were found and the structures of Stratum D-2 were built right on top of D-4 elements. It should be noted that the foundations of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2 (=VI) were sunk to levels 85.20–85.50 m, which corresponded to the level of the pits. This wall was constructed on top of Stratum D-4a Building DJ. Similarly, the foundation of Stratum C-2 (=VI) Wall 1563 in the balk between Squares Q–R/4 was at level 85.70 m, which fits the upper level of most of the pits. However, elsewhere in Area C, no such pits were found in contexts dated to the transition from Iron I to Iron IIA, and architectural continuity predominated.

The D-3 pits thus represent a local phenomenon entailing special activity of short duration, post-dating the destruction of Stratum D-4 and established before the construction of Stratum VI (local Strata D-2 and C-2). A discussion of their possible function, either for food storage or as refuse pits, as well as a comparative analysis, is presented in the summary and conclusions at the end of this chapter. For an alternative interpretation suggesting that the pits, in fact, belonged to Stratum D-2, see below in the discussion of Stratum D-2. Even if this alternative is not accepted, it should be noted that seven pits were found in Stratum D-2, in Squares Q–P/4, just above the pits attributed to Stratum D-3. It was unclear whether an additional pit, 2829, belonged to D-3 or D-2.

The area around the pits and slightly above them was denoted Locus 2817 in Square Q/4 and in the eastern part of Square P/4. This was a layer of soft brown earth between levels 86.16–85.60 m that might have been either the D-3 occupation layer from which the pits were dug or the top layer of decayed debris of D-4 into which the pits were cut. Locus 1823 in Square P/4 (85.67–86.10 m) was higher by ca. 0.4–0.9 m than the D-3 pits in this square; since this square was on the slope of the mound just below walls of Stratum D-2, this layer might be explained as levelling in preparation for the construction of the D-2 walls (see below). Pottery from these two loci (2817, 1823) is presented in Figs 16.57–16.58.

Stratum D-2

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plan: Fig. 15.28
  • Sections: Figs. 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.108–15.115
  • Pottery: Fig. 16.59
Discussions
Introduction

Several architectural features were assigned to Stratum D-2 in Squares P–Q/4–5 that were interpreted as being later than the D-3 pits of Iron IB and preceding the Stratum D-1a–c architecture found in Square Q/5 (an alternative interpretation is suggested below). These remains are thought to be contemporary with those of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and thus are shown on the same plan (Chapter 12; Figs. 12.7–12.8).

Remains in Squares P–Q/4

Three narrow brick walls (1820, 1809, 4827) created a small chamber in Square P/4 (4826; 1.7 m wide, length unknown), close to the erosion line which cut it on the west. This room (Photo 15.108) was built above a layer of D-4a burnt brick debris and collapse (1850) which seems to have been levelled in preparation for the construction of the new building and above the D-3 pits. A fragmentary floor (4826) was found at level 86.08 m, continuing below Wall 4827 to the north (4825) and thus, the wall was probably a secondary partition constructed on top of the floor. Floor 4825 was cut in a straight line by Trench 4860, which was either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal trench burrowed from the nearby slope on the west; the latter possibility is more plausible. The southern and eastern walls, preserved up to four courses high and lacking stone foundations, were covered with mud plaster — Wall 1809 on both faces and Wall 1820 on the northern face only. To the east of the chamber, a floor (1886) abutted Wall 1809 at 86.34 m, higher than the floor inside the chamber. The mud plaster on Wall 1809 continued down to coat one of the bricks below this floor level as well.

Below Floor 1886, and on the level of the lowest brick of Wall 1809, was an earth layer (1823) at levels 86.10–85.67 m, which was higher than the pits attributed to Stratum D-3 in this square and thus, may be explained as either the upper layer of Stratum D-3 or a fill intended to level the area on the slope of the mound for the construction of Walls 1820, 1809 and 4827 of Stratum D-2. This stratigraphic attribution is significant due to the fact that four radiocarbon dates of olive stones from this layer were measured (Chapter 48; Samples R21– R22) that point to the last quarter of the 10th century BCE in the 68.2% probability range and somewhat earlier in the 95% probability range.

South of Wall 1820, Locus 1802 probably marked an open area where thick striated layers of occupation debris between levels 86.11–87.19 m covered a layer of burnt brick collapse of Stratum D-4a (1850) and two pits of Stratum D-3. Among the finds from this area was a small stone seal depicting a scorpion (Chapter 30A, No. 1). Six radiocarbon dates of olive pits from this locus (Chapter 48; Sample R23) provide dates that cover most of the 10th century BCE.

A poorly preserved brick wall (2820) was exposed along 2.0 m, cut by Pit 2818 on the north and Pit 2805 on the south. Floor 1886 was found west of Wall 2820 at level 86.34 m, although it did not abut this wall. In the northern part of the square was a plaster floor at level 86.51 m (7837) and to the east of Wall 2820 was a thick layer (1837) containing a large amount of pottery (Figs. 16.60– 16.62), several fallen bricks, bones and some charcoal; a number of beads were found here as well. Among the finds was one Philistine Bichrome sherd (Fig. 16.60:15). This apparently had been a refuse dump in an open area, similar to Locus 1802 to the southwest of the wall, although it might have been a fill laid in preparation for construction of the subsequent D-1 structures.

Building 4828 in Squares P–Q/5

In Squares P–Q/5, two walls (4808, 4819), preserved to 1.15–1.6 m, formed part of a unit that continued to the east. Trench 4860 to the south of these walls cut the remains of Phase D-4. As mentioned above, this could be either a foundation trench of Wall 4808 or an animal burrow. A layer of reed impressions in clay found below the foundation of Wall 4808 (Photo 15.111) may be explained as either related to the construction of this wall or as the roof collapse of Building DJ of Stratum D-4 (the top of the latter’s walls were ca. 0.5 m lower). A third wall (4869), observed in the topsoil of Square P/6 north of the limits of the excavation area, seems to have belonged to the same building as Walls 4808 and 4819, creating a space 3.25 m wide and at least 5.5 m long. Inside this space was a brick debris layer (4828) that rested on a possible floor at level 86.08 m. This was exactly the same level as the floor in Room 4826 to the south. If this indeed was the floor, then the foundations of the walls consisted of six to seven brick courses below the floor level, with no stone foundation. These deep foundations imply that this had been a sturdy, well-built structure. The light yellow and compacted matrix of the bricks of these walls was typical of Stratum VI construction elsewhere in the site. The pottery recovered from Locus 4828 included some red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, typical of this stratum. Thus, this room might be correlated on the basis of architectural, stratigraphic and pottery indicators to Stratum C-2 (=VI); see, however an alternative interpretation below.

Squares Q–R/4

Dismantling the balk between Squares Q/4 and R/4 revealed Wall 1563, a north–south wall preserved to a height of 1.6 m; its foundation was at levels 85.61–85.70 m, higher than that of Wall 4808 in Square P/5 (Fig. 15.28). Wall 1563 was built of the same yellowish bricks typical of Stratum VI and was found tilted to the east (in the opposite direction of the nearby slope of the mound), perhaps due to seismic damage. It was the western wall of a room of Stratum VI exposed in Area C, Square R/4, whose floor was at level 85.60 m (Chapter 12, Fig. 12.9). It made a corner on the south with Wall 1572, which was preserved only four courses high and to a length of ca. 1.0 m. Abutting Wall 1563 on the west was a layer of debris on an earthen layer (1556) at level 85.70 m, which may have been a floor, although this identification remained unsure. The eastern half of a pit (1567) was uncovered, dug into Floor 1556. The relationship between this floor and the deep debris of Locus 1837 to its west (see above) remained unclear, since the levels of 1837 and the foundations of Wall 2820 further to the west were higher than the supposed floor (1556). These discrepancies may be explained as a result of the layers tilting towards the east, as observed in several strata at Tel Rehov. As noted, Debris 1837 may have been a constructional fill for Stratum D-1 floors, which may explain its rather high level compared to Floor 1556. A third possible explanation is that Floor 1556 (if indeed correctly identified as a floor) belonged to a late phase of Stratum D-3 and was not related to Wall 1563 (although this was not the impression during the excavation).

No evidence for the nature of the end of Stratum D-2 was found. Floors, as much as they were revealed, were found empty of finds in situ and the remains were damaged by erosion, especially on the west. This level is correlated with Stratum C-2 based on the stratigraphic continuity with Square R/4 and thus, should be dated to the early to middle 10th century BCE.

An Alternative Interpretation

Yael Rotem, field supervisor of Area D East, suggested that the northern structure in Stratum D-2 (Walls 4808, 4819, 4869) was contemporary with the Stratum D-3 pits, based on the fact that none of the D-3 pits were found below or north of Wall 4808 and that the latter wall was founded just above Stratum D-4a walls and occupation debris. In its center, Wall 4808 stands to a height of up to 1.6 m between levels 85.27 and 87.06 m, while the pits were between levels 85.23 and 86.50 m, corresponding to the lower part of this wall. Thus, the possibility that the pits and the wall were contemporary should not be ruled out. In that case, the walls belonging to this unit should be attributed to Stratum D-3 at the end of the Iron Age I. This is not contradicted by the few sherds that were related to these walls.

In the western part of Square R/4, Wall 1563, attributed to Stratum D-2, was founded at level 85.61 m, which may indicate that this wall, too, was contemporary with at least some of the D-3 pits (Fig. 15.28). The concentration of restorable pottery found in Locus 1555b east of this wall (Figs. 13.10–13.11) is typical of late Iron I or Early Iron IIA at Tel Rehov. However, stratigraphically, this locus is attributed to Stratum C-2 because of its relation to D-2 Wall 1563 and C-2 walls to its east. It is above a thin debris layer that covered a floor with two pits that are similar to those in Stratum D-3 (see details in Chapter 12).

A. Mazar pointed out the following difficulties in accepting Y. Rotem’s suggestion:
  1. the short and fragmentary walls (1809, 1820, 4827, 2820) and related floors that were attributed to Stratum D-2 in Squares R–Q/4 were on a higher level and were later than the D-3 pits. A floor related to these structures (4825) was cut on its north by a trench that ran along the southern side of Wall 4808. If this was the foundation trench of this wall, then it would have been later than the D-3 pits. However, as noted above, it seems more likely that this trench represented animal burrowing and thus, these stratigraphic conclusions would be inaccurate.
  2. Pits 11438 and 11439 in Square R/4 (excavated as part of Area C; see Fig. 15.27 and Chapter 12, discussion of Strata C-3 and C-2 in Square R/4, Figs. 12.5, 12.9) were earlier than the pottery concentration in Locus 1555b, which abutted the lowest level of Walls 1563, 4458 and 1567 of Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI). The floor with the two pits could be contemporary with the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (see Table 15.3). In any event, the Stratum D-3 pits would be earlier than the architecture of Stratum C-2, which appears to correspond with Room 4828 of Stratum D-2.
  3. Locus 1837, a 1.0 m thick debris layer with Iron IIA pottery in Square Q/4, may allude to an Iron IIA date of Wall 4808 to the north (although this debris layer may also be explained as a fill laid prior to the construction of D-1 structures).
  4. As mentioned above, the technical features of the walls in Room 4828 fit those of Stratum VI in other excavation areas.
We thus present Y. Rotem’s suggestion as a remote possibility. If correct, it would require attributing Room 4828 to Stratum D-3 and leaving Stratum D-2 with almost no architectural remains.

Stratum D-1

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 15.29–15.31
  • Sections: Figs. 15.32–15.35
  • Photos 15.115–15.122
  • Pottery: Fig. 16.60
Discussions
Introduction

Several fragmentary architectural elements at the top of the slope in Squares P–Q/4–5 were assigned to Stratum D-1 (Strata V and IV). Although they were close to topsoil and the erosion line and were poorly preserved, they indicated dense building activity which can be divided into three phases, denoted D-1c, D-1b and D-1a; these can be correlated with similar phases uncovered in the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C (Chapter 12). Like in Area D, the lower two levels in the latter square were identical in terms of architecture and the difference between them was only in floor raising, while the upper phase, C-1a, showed a substantial change in terms of plan and architecture. This similarity between the two adjacent squares enabled a secure correlation between the two areas.

Stratum D-1c

This phase comprised several architectural features in Squares Q/4–5, which superimposed Stratum D-2 architecture (Fig. 15.29; Photos 15.115– 15.116). The walls appeared to belong to one building, the western part of which was destroyed by erosion.

The most substantial element of Phases D-1c and D-1b was Wall 7803, preserved to a height of more than 1.5 m. This east–west wall in Square Q/5 had a stone foundation only at its eroded western end (Square P/5), where the brick superstructure had disappeared due to erosion. This rather massive stone foundation was intended to support the wall close to the steep slope of the mound. Such a stone foundation is notable, as it was not found in other buildings of Strata VI–IV in all other excavation areas. Wall 7803 was bonded with north–south Wall 7824, which was narrower and probably served as an inner partition wall. Some 2.0 m north of its corner with Wall 7803, Wall 7824 made a corner with Wall 4809, which extended to the west and disappeared at the erosion line after 1.1 m. To the north of this corner, Wall 7811 continued the line of Wall 7824. It was built of dark friable bricks, preserved two courses high. It may have been a later addition to the building, since its foundation level was somewhat higher than the rest of the walls in this structure. These walls created three separate rooms or spaces.

The space east of Wall 7824 (7837) was at least 3.0×3.7 m, continuing east and north beyond the limits of the excavation area. A plaster floor (7837) was exposed in this space at level 86.49 m; on top of it was an accumulation of striations, sealed underneath a massive brick collapse.

The space to the west of Wall 7824 and limited by Wall 4809 on the north was badly eroded on the slope. In the corner of Walls 7824 and 4809 was a semi-circular brick bin (7820), comprising two courses of narrow bricks. It covered the top of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2.

Square Q/4 remained a large open space. On the western edge of this area very fragmentary remains were detected close to the erosion line, including part of a circular line of bricks with a floor (1834), perhaps a silo, located above the D-2 remains. The installation was bordered on the north by a fragment of a stone foundation (1852) bearing a single brick, which was all that remained of its superstructure. To the north of the wall, the stones continued into Square Q/5, where they functioned as a foundation for Wall 7803.

It seems that the end of this phase was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse.

Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C, which consisted of a few narrow walls and a floor (4483, level 86.70 m; Chapter 12).

Stratum D-1b

Stratum D-1b refers to a later phase of the previous occupation, when the buildings continued to be in use, but slight changes were made in floors and installations (Fig. 15.30; Photos 15.117–15.120). In Square Q/5, two phases of partially preserved ovens (7825, 7817) were found east of Wall 7811, related to a floor (7812). Their foundations were at levels 86.87 m and 86.78 m respectively, ca. 0.3 m above the floor of Stratum D-1c. Two intact oil lamps (Fig. 16.61:8–9) were found in the debris (7809) west of the ovens. In the corner of Walls 4809 and 7811, a thin clay floor (7827) was found at level 86.71 m.

Square Q/4 continued to be an open space (1807) as in the previous phase. Three ovens were found in the southwestern corner of this square, just below topsoil: 1813 (87.26–87.47 m), 1827 (87.11– 87.38 m) and 1817 (87.13–87.28 m). Two of them (1813, 1827) continued into the southern balk. The level of these ovens was slightly lower than the foundation of Wall 1808 of Stratum D-1a to the east (Fig. 15.31) and thus, they were attributed to D-1b.

In spite of the above description, the division between D-1c and D-1b must be viewed with reservation: the three ovens attributed to D-1b in Squares Q–P/4 could also be attributed to D-1c and thus, the separation between these two phases would be limited to the construction of the two ovens in Square Q/5, ca. 0.3 m above Floor 7837.

Stratum D-1a

In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.

In the southeastern corner of Square Q/5, a fragmentary east–west wall (7806), 1.2 m long and preserved to 0.6 m, can be attributed to this phase. A single brick (7823) found to its west may be its continuation, although it might just be a fallen brick.

Islamic Period Burial 4829

In Square P/5, a burial of an adult (4829) was dug into D-1c–b Wall 4809. The grave was covered with a line of bricks taken from the wall. The body was lying on its back, the skull in the northeast and the feet in the southwest. The skull was slightly tilted, with the eye sockets facing the feet, approximately towards the south. No finds were found in relation to this burial. This was most probably an Islamic burial, similar to the ones found in Area B (Chapter 8).

Chapter 15D - Summary and Conclusions

Settlement History and Architecture

Figures and Tables

Figures and Tables

Discussions
The Available Data

It should be recalled that only a limited area of ca. 150 sq m, and in many cases much less, was excavated in Area D in each phase. This is a very tiny sample compared to the entire area of the site, which is ca. 100,000 sq m; thus, the available sample comprised only ca. 0.15%. Since the Late Bronze/Iron I sequence was hardly excavated in other parts of the tell, caution must be exercised when making generalizations based on the available data. Phases with poor architectural remains should not be taken as representing the entire site. For example, although the building remains of Strata D-2 and D-1 were fragmentary and unimpressive, we know that they belonged to a densely built and well-planned Iron IIA city, as uncovered in the adjacent Area C and other excavation areas.

Settlement Continuity

The most prominent result of the excavation in Area D was the observation of continued occupation throughout the 600 years spanning Late Bronze I to Iron IIA. Eleven main strata from this time span were defined and several of them have two sub-phases (D-11, D-9, D-7, D-6, D-4) or even three sub-phases (D-1). No major widespread destruction layers were detected in the entire sequence in Area D; an occupation gap may have separated Stratum D-8 from D-7b, as evidenced by the 0.5 m thick accumulation between these two strata, yet this could not be confirmed. Thick accumulations of floor striations in open areas and streets in most strata were evidence for continued activity over a long time. In terms of architecture, the large public building of Stratum D-10 (14th century BCE) and the urban planning and architecture of Strata D-5 and D-4 of Iron IB, should be noted.

Summary of the Stratigraphy and Architecture by Period

The Late Bronze Age

The foundation of the city in Late Bronze I (Stratum D-11b) is an exceptional phenomenon in the Southern Levant, as there are almost no new cities founded in this period, which is considered as a period of decline following the Egyptian conquest of Canaan. The low elevation of the earliest stratum compared to the present-day field west of the mound shows that the level of the colluvial field must have risen considerably during the historical periods. It is hypothesized that the earliest settlement was founded at approximately the same level as the adjacent field, or somewhat higher than the field west of the mound, while young tectonic activities were responsible for later geomorphological processes in this area. This, again, is an exceptional feature in Canaanite cities, which were most often located on raised topography. This earliest occupation had a later phase, denoted D-11a, although both these phases are little known, due to limited exposure.

The builders of Building DA of Stratum D-10 (most probably in the 14th century BCE) found it necessary to raise the level of the floors by erecting deep buttressed foundation walls and a 2.0 m-deep constructional fill. We assume that only a small part of this substantial building was excavated; not enough was excavated to define its function with any certainty. It may have served as a palace or elite residence, or as an administrative building. Its brick buttresses were a rare phenomenon in this period, known only from public architecture at a few other sites like Ugarit, Alalakh and Megiddo, mostly in stone.

Strata D-9 and D-8 were later occupation phases of Late Bronze IIB (late 14th and 13th centuries BCE). In Stratum D-9b, a new building (DB) was built above Building DA of Stratum D-10, with some continuity between the two, as demonstrated by several walls retaining the outline of the former building. However, the building techniques changed and the new building appeared to have been much less elaborate than its predecessor. An important feature was the bronze-melting installation in the form of a canal, which recalls Egyptian metallurgical technology of the 13th century BCE (Chapter 40C). Stratum D-9a demonstrated a radical architectural change; some of the older walls went out of use and a new wall, stone floor and pillar bases were added. In the last LB IIB phase, Stratum D-8, architectural continuity is seen in the eastern side of the excavated area, while the rest of the area remained an open space.

Iron Age IA

A thick accumulation separated the open area of Stratum D-8 from that of the subsequent Stratum D-7b which can be securely dated to the early 12th century BCE. One small pit contained a cache of Aegean-type spool loomweights (Chapters 4, 39). In the following phase (D-7a), the area was redesigned as a dwelling with a stone floor and several installations, some of which were densely concentrated in one of its units; a prominent feature in this phase was the six foundation deposits of the lampand-bowl type (see discussion below). In part of the area, a still higher phase was detected (D-7a'), when a new line of pillar bases was built above the previous stone pavement.

In Stratum D-6b, two of the older walls continued to be in use, but new floors, installations and ovens were constructed. The location of the ovens above earlier ones indicated continuity in the function of this area in the transition from D-7a to D-6b. Two of the installations were plastered basins that perhaps were used for some industrial purpose, such as linen dyeing or processing. Stratum D-6a marks further changes; much of the previous architecture went out of use, although one installation continued and two new ovens replaced the previous ones. Two samples submitted to 14C dating (Samples R2, R3, measured four times) provided a date in the 12th–11th centuries BCE and additional considerations narrow it down to the second half of the 12th century (see Chapters 4, 48).

Iron Age IB

Iron IB Strata D-5 and D-4 were preserved only in Squares N–Q/5 in the eastern part of the area. In both, a street crossed the area from north to south. The street surfaces were raised during the course of Strata D-5 and D-4 by almost 1.0 m, evidence for continuous intensive use and dumping of refuse into the street. Substantial buildings flanked the street on the east and west. Building DD of Stratum D-5 was a massive structure with elongated rooms and brick floors. It appeared to have had some public or administrative function, perhaps storage. A room to the north of this building may have been used for domestic cult.

In Stratum D-4, some substantial changes occurred in the planning of the area east of the street, now divided between two buildings: DG and DH. Building DG, based on the outlines of the previous building, DD, may have been a dwelling with a small square courtyard, surrounded by rooms on at least two sides. Building DH is little known, as only two rooms were exposed. An unusual feature attributed to this phase was an installation composed of three large stones, one with a shallow depression, located on top of the eastern wall. Its function and the reason for its strange location remain unknown. Building DF, west of the street, was another dwelling or parts of two attached dwellings, of which only the eastern part was preserved, including a stone-paved area (courtyard?) and parts of three rooms. In the later Stratum D-4a, it appears that Buildings DG and DH were combined into one, since the double wall between the two was replaced by a single brick wall. The new building, denoted DJ, retained the basic features of the previous two buildings, yet new partition walls and floors were constructed in several of the rooms. Building DF west of the street continued to be in use and the floors above the stone-paved area in the southern part of this complex were raised several times. A suggested reconstruction of the area, combined with building remains in Area C (Fig. 15.25), indicates a well-planned and densely built area, perhaps representative of other parts of the city as well. Radiocarbon dates from Stratum D-4 point to an 11th century BCE date (Chapter 48).

Stratum D-3 indicates a substantial change in the occupational history of this area; the buildings of Stratum D-4 went out of use and were replaced by 45 pits cut into the brick debris of the Stratum D-4 buildings. Probably used as refuse or storage pits, they continued into the adjacent Square R/4 in Area C to the east. However, a similar phenomenon was not found in other parts of Area C and thus, the pits were probably a local phenomenon, while elsewhere in Area C, Iron IB buildings continued unchanged. A large number of radiocarbon dates from the pits provided a wide range, from the 11th to the 10th/9th centuries BCE (Chapters 4, 48).

Iron Age IIA

Strata D-2 and D-1 of the Iron IIA were preserved only on the upper part of the slope (Squares Q/4–5 and the eastern side of P/4–5). Stratum D-2 is correlated with Stratum C-2 (Stratum VI) and marks the westernmost structures of this well-planned Early Iron IIA city, well known in Area C (Table 15.1 and Chapter 12). In the north of the area were remains of a substantial building and in the south were fragmentary structures and an open area with pits (for an alternative proposal which would combine the building in Squares P–Q/5 and the pits of Stratum D-3 into a single stratum; see above).

Strata D-1c and D-1b should be correlated with Stratum C-1b (Stratum V; Table 15.1). The building of D-2 in the northern part of the area was replaced with a new building comprising two stratigraphic phases; the later one included two ovens. In the southern part, the open area continued to be in use with higher floors and three new ovens. Stratum D-1a marks yet another architectural change; a new structure with narrow brick walls was built in the southern part of the area, perhaps part of a dwelling continuing into Square R/4 of Area C to the east.

Discussion of Various Features

Erosion, Tectonic Changes and Lack of Fortifications

The excavation in Area D provided important information concerning the impact of environmental factors, such as erosion and tectonic movements, on site formation. The lower (western) edge of the mound was buried under layers of colluvium created during the last three thousand years. Each of the strata was damaged by erosion, although its extent is unknown; it may have demolished only narrow parts of the western slope or, combined with tectonic movements, a somewhat larger part. Nevertheless, it seems likely that erosion could not have been so extensive, and that there were no fortifications during the periods excavated in Area D. This was confirmed also along the northern edge of the mound in Areas C and E concerning the Iron IIA strata.

Tectonic movements caused walls, floors and occupation layers to tilt from west to east or to the southeast, as opposed to the direction of the outer slope of the mound. Such tilting was clearly related to tectonic movements which occurred both during the occupation of the lower mound and subsequently (Chapter 2). The location of the tell on top of the Western Marginal Fault of the Dead Sea Transform was thus significant in regard to site formation processes.

Destruction, Continuity and Change

No evidence for violent destruction was found in any of the strata in Area D, except in part of Building DJ, Stratum D-4a, where limited ash debris and restorable pottery in situ were detected. It appeared that the transition between strata was peaceful and was the result of damage caused by prolonged use, earthquakes, etc. In spite of marked changes between strata, there was continuity in the outlines of buildings, continuous use of certain walls and installations, and the construction of new ovens more or less in the same location of earlier ones.

Building Techniques

The walls of the Late Bronze Strata D-11 and D-10 were constructed of bricks without stone foundations; Stratum D-11b Wall 1927 might have been made of packed-earth construction (pisé). In Strata D-9–D-4, most walls had stone foundations of one or two courses that bore a brick superstructure. In the Iron IIA strata (D-2 and D-1), brick walls were constructed without stone foundations, as in contemporary strata in the other excavation areas across the mound.

The 2.0 m-thick constructional fill and buttresses of Building DA in Stratum D-10 were an exceptional feature found only in this specific building, which was clearly of a public nature. The thick fills were possibly necessary due to the low location of the building close to the surrounding fields.

Most floors were made of beaten earth or plaster. In several cases, such as in the courtyard of Building DA of Stratum D-10, the floor was white, probably the result of using crushed tufa and/or lisan-formation huwar. In a few cases, floors were made of a light pink clay. In Strata D-11a, D-9a, D-7a and D-4b, cobblestone floors were found in specific rooms or courtyards.

Lines of pillar bases were detected in Strata D-9b, D-9a, D-8, D-7a and D-7a'. The bases were made of flattened basalt and limestone, and sometimes large pebbles were used, as well as broken grinding stones. These bases must have supported wooden pillars. In one case in Stratum D-9a, postholes were preserved above the stone bases.

No evidence for terraced construction on the slope was found, except for Stratum D-4, where a difference of 0.5–0.7 m was observed between the floors of rooms east and west of the street. A difference of 0.7 m in floor levels between Rooms 4879 and 4839, both west of the street, was also observed.

Nature of the Archaeological Deposits

Two main types of archaeological deposits were found in all the strata: debris related to the collapse of brick walls and occupation debris composed of thin accumulated layers, sometimes laminated in appearance (denoted ‘striations’) that contained many pottery sherds and animal bones. Such striations were especially common in the street layers of Strata D-5 and D-4 and open spaces in Strata D-8 to D-6. These layers are explained as resulting from intentional raising of floor levels and dumping refuse into open spaces.5
Footnotes

5 Natural causes for the creation of such layers were also considered, such as water flow and the deposition of chemical sediments (e.g., evaporites) or silts and clays which originated from nearby exposures of earlier strata, in a mechanism resembling ‘winter-wash’ deposits accumulating inside the squares between the excavation seasons. Based on field observations only, it seems that continuous human activity was the main cause for these laminations.

Foundation Deposits

Eight foundation deposits of the lamp-and-bowl type were found in Area D. The subject was discussed by Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993), who cited all examples known at the time of writing (for two additional ones from a 12th century BCE context at Tel Beth-Shean, see TBS III: 19); the earliest known examples are dated to the 13th century BCE. Our example from Stratum D-9b is tentatively dated to the late 14th or early 13th century BCE and thus, is one of the oldest known deposits of this type. It included a basalt bowl (unlike all the later foundation deposits that have a ceramic bowl) and a single lamp. Six deposits were discovered in Stratum D-7a Building DC of the 12th century, the heyday of this phenomenon, representing one of the densest concentrations of such deposits to be found in a single structure. A single deposit found in Stratum D-4 is one of the latest, dating to the late 11th century BCE. Our deposits contain either one bowl and one lamp or two bowls placed rim to rim, with a lamp between them. No other finds or material such as ash were detected in these deposits. Most of these were located either below a wall or close to its foundation (Fig. 15.13) and must have been related to the construction of the building. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni (1993: 123) emphasized the southern distribution of such deposits (Shephelah, western Negev, southern coastal plain and Egyptian fortresses in northern Sinai and Gaza). The only northern site they could cite was Pella. The examples from Tel Beth-Shean and Tel Rehov enlarge this distribution map to include the Beth-Shean Valley. However, the lack of such deposits in major northern sites such as Dan, Hazor and Megiddo remains a fact. Bunimovitz and Zimhoni defined the phenomenon as “an Egyptian inspired local Canaanite custom”, which appeared mainly during the height of Egyptian control in Canaan, as well as in the Philistine city, Ekron (Tel Miqne). These foundation deposits must have been an expression of beliefs related to the construction of buildings, perhaps to ward off evil spirits.

Hearths and Ovens

Two hearths, a cooking installation and 16 ovens (tabuns) were found in Area D.

Two hearths (1925, 1926) were found in LB I Stratum D-11. They were circular (diameter 0.55 m) or oval (0.4×0.6 m), with a floor made of limestone pebbles and broken basalt grinding stones covered by black soot, and must have been used for cooking or roasting. They recall three hearths found in MB II levels at Tel Beth-Shean, although those were much larger, 1.3–1.5 m diameter (TBS II: 55–57, Fig. 3.6). A different type of cooking installation was found in Stratum D-7a (8902), which was a poorly preserved small fireplace, surrounded by clay.

Most of the 16 baking ovens were located in open spaces, with the possible exception of Space 9927 in Stratum D-9b. Most of the ovens were preserved less than 0.1 m high and were made of a number of clay layers; in several cases, an outer coating of pottery sherds was found. Stratum D-2 Oven 8818 was large (diameter 0.85 m) and well constructed. Another large oven (diameter 1.0 m, somewhat irregular in shape) was in the inner courtyard of Stratum D-4 Building DJ. Its construction may have been related to the unification of the previous buildings, DH and DG, into one large (family?) unit. All other ovens were smaller, 0.5– 0.6 m in diameter. Ovens did not appear in Strata D-10 and D-5, when cooking and baking must have been conducted in an area beyond the borders of the excavation.

Continuity in the location of ovens between several strata indicates continuity in the location of cooking areas. This was observed in two cases: Strata D-7 to D-6 and Strata D-2 to D-1b. In Stratum D-7a, Oven 7946, 0.6 m in diameter, was located in an open space near the installations in the southeastern corner of the area. It was replaced by a similar oven in Stratum D-6b, when a second oven was added slightly to its west. In Stratum D-6a, a new oven was built above the eastern one and thus, three superimposed ovens were found here. In Iron IIA Stratum D-2, an oven was found in the open space at the southern side of the area. In Stratum D-1b, five ovens were found, three more or less in the same area where the previous oven stood and two in the northern part of the area.

Installations

Various additional installations were found in Area D.

In Stratum D-9b, a bronze-melting installation in the form of a canal was found. Near it, a large circular flat stone surrounded by small stones and three plastered circular depressions in the floor were probably part of this workshop. A similar plastered depression was found in the eastern unit of the building.

Several plastered rectangular brick installations were found, one in Stratum D-7a, three in Stratum D-6b and one of which continued to be in use in Stratum D-6a. It may be suggested that these installations were used in some industrial function, such as textile production.

A square brick installation with traces of plaster inside that was probably used for storage was found in Building DD of Stratum D-5. Such bins were common in the 12th century BCE Strata S-4 and S-3 at Tel Beth-Shean (TBS III: 104, Fig. 4.3a, Building SA; 132–135, Buildings SH, SM).

Installation 8810 in Stratum D-4b was composed of four large basalt stones, one of them with a rounded depression; it might have been used for oil production.

Pits

Pits are a common feature in any excavation and their function for refuse, drainage or storage often remains obscure. In Area D, single pits were found in Strata D-7b and D-7a in open areas. In Strata D-5 and D-4, several pits of various sizes were found inside massive buildings. In Building DD, one large and three small pits were dug from the brick floors and in Building 8816 of Stratum D-4b, a large pit was located in the inner courtyard and two smaller pits in Room DG. These pits must have functioned in the house when it was in use, perhaps for refuse or to drain sewage.

A most outstanding phenomenon was the large group of 45 pits in Stratum D-3, (and two in Square R/4 in Area C, Stratum C-3), most likely used for refuse or storage. Most were unlined, containing few pottery sherds, olive pits and some ash. In several cases, such pits cut one another. These may be compared to a similar phenomena of multiple pits in a good number of Iron Age I sites, in particular those that were related to the ‘Israelite settlement’ (for a summary until 1988, see Finkelstein 1986: 124–128; 1988: 264–269, with references to Iron I contexts at Dan, Tel Zeror, Shiloh, Izbet ¥artah, Tell en-Na§beh, Tell Beit Mirsim, Beer Sheba, and Iron IIA Aphek). Finkelstein explained these pits as grain silos. Yet, a distinction should be made between stone-lined pits and unlined pits. Stonelined pits could indeed be used as silos for grain storage. Many of the pits at Dan V–VI were so used, while others were not stone lined and were perhaps used as refuse pits (Biran 1994: 126–135). Many pits were found at Izbet Sartah (seven in Stratum III, 43 in Stratum III, 10 in Stratum I; Finkelstein 1986: 5–28, 124–128), Shiloh (Finkelstein, Bunimovitz and Lederman 1993: 47– 48), Tell en-Nasbeh and Tell Beit Mirsim (ca. 20 pits in Stratum B; Albright 1943: Pl. 2). In Stratum XII/XI at Hazor, ca. 70 pits, ca. 1.0 m in diameter, comprised the bulk of the Iron I remains at this site. Most of them contained only pottery sherds and broken stone vessels; some were sealed with stones. They were explained as refuse pits (BenAmi and Ben Tor 2012: 18–21, 24–25). At Tell Deir ªAlla in the eastern Jordan Valley, 14 pits were found in Phase A, 20 in Phase B and 10 in Phase C, all dated to the 12th century BCE (Franken 1969: 3–45). At Tel Zeror, over 20 unlined pits dating to Iron I, possibly used for refuse, were found (Ohata 1996: 24–25, Pl. III). Our pits seem to belong to this latter group, although several were coated with a thin white plaster, which may have rendered them suitable for food storage. This matter remains open.

While at most of these sites, the pits appeared throughout the Iron Age I, in our case, they were a cluster only in the latest phase of that period, probably representing some short-term activity. On the dating of these pits, see Chapters 4 and 48.

Four pits were attributed to Early Iron IIA Stratum D-2; they were not different from those of Stratum D-3 and their stratigraphic attribution is based only on levels.

Plans and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 15.1          Area D at the end of 1997 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.2          Area D at the end of 1998 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.3          Area D at the end of 2000 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.4          Area D at the end of 2005 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.5          Aerial view, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.6          General view, end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.7          General view, with backhoe digging a trench in the alluvial plain west of the mound, end of 2008 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.8          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.9          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.10          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.11          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.12          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.13          Backhoe trench in Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.14          Probe III in Squares M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.15          Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.16          Detail of Probe III from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.17          Backhoe trench in Square M/10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.18          Squares L–M/4 at end of 2010 season from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.19          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.20          Probe II in Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.21          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.22          Square M/5, Buttress 8938 and Wall 8942 abutted by D-10 Courtyard 8934 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.23          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.24          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.25          Squares L–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.26          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.27          Squares M–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.28          Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.29          Squares M–N/4–5, from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.30          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.31          Squares N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.32          Squares N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.33          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.34          Detail of bronze-melting canal (8921) with fragments of bellow, charcoal, and metal object in situ from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.35          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.36          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.37          Squares L–M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.38          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.39          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.40          Squares M–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.41          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.42          Squares L–N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.43          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.44          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.45          Squares N–M/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.46          Northeast corner of Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.47          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.48          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.49          Square M/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.50          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.51          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.52          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.53          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54a          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.54b          Square M/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.55          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.56          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.57          Squares N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.58          Square N/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.59          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.60          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.61          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.62          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.63          Squares N–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.64          Square N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.65          Probe in street, Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.66          Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.67          Squares P/4–5; fallen bricks (7847) along eastern face of Wall 1883 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.68          Square P-5, looking west at Wall 1883; foreground: brick collapse in street from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.69          Squares P–Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.70          Squares Q/4–5, looking north at D-5 Room 8867 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.71          Square Q/5, looking west at D-4 Building DG; lower right: brick collapse 8865 in D-5 Building DE from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.72          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.73          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.74          Squares Q/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.75          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.76          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.77          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.78          General view of Area D from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.79          Squares N–P/4,from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.80          Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.81          Square N/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.82          Squares N–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.83          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.84          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.85          Squares P–N/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.86          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.87          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.88          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.89          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.90          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.91          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.92          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.93          Squares Q–P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.94          Square Q/5, looking east; D-4a Building DJ, brick collapse in Room 7853 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.95          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.96          Square P/5, looking west; D-4a Building DJ, debris and vessels in Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.97          Smashed Pottery in Square P/5 D-4a Building DJ, Room 4872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.98          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.99          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.100          Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.101          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.102          Squares P–Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.103          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.104          Square Q/4, D-3 Pit 2808 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.105          Squares P–Q/4, looking west at upper D-3 pits from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.106          Square Q/4, looking south at D-3 Pit 2872 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.107          Square Q/4, looking west at D-3 Pit 2850 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.108          Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.109          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.110          Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.111          Square P/5, looking south at reed impressions (ceiling collapse?) on plaster layer from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.112          Closeup of layer in Photo 15.111 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.113          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.114          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.115          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.116          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.117          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.118          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.119          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.120          Square Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.121          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.122          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)
  • Photo 15.123          Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 15)

Chapter 17 - Area E: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Table 17.1          Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2          Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.1          Schematic plan of Areas E and F; Iron IIA Stratum F-1 in black from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2a          Plan of Stratum E-3 (Square E/15) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2b          Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3          Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.4          Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5          General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.13          Location of section drawings marked on schematic plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Discussions
Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

Area E was located in the northeastern part of Tel Rehov in main grid square 16 (Chapter 3) at the highest point of the eastern part of the lower mound, although it was 13.5 m lower than the highest point in Area C in the northwestern part. The area was close to the northern and eastern edges of the mound, reaching the top of the steep northern slope in only one narrow probe (Squares E/20, E/1). The area included fourteen fully excavated squares and four half squares, a total of 400 sq m, and an additional narrow trench of 25 sq m north of the main area. The topsoil slightly descended southwards, creating an elevation difference of 0.82 m over a distance of 20 m between the northern and southern ends of the area.

The goal of the excavation was to determine the occupational history of the uppermost strata in this part of the mound. It turned out that most of this area can be interpreted as a sacred precinct or sanctuary during the Iron Age IIA, comprising a large open courtyard, a raised platform, several installations and two structural units which can be related to this sanctuary (Buildings EA and EB). On the western edge of the area, part of a dwelling was excavated (Building EC)

The excavation in Area E began in 1997 in six squares: E–F/13–15. During the 1998 season, the area was extended to the north (Squares D–E/15– 16, F/16). In 2000, the area was extended to Square D/14, the northern half of D/13, and 2.0 m-wide probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16, intended to locate the edge of the open courtyard in the northern part of the area. In 2001, three new squares were opened (C/14–16) and a 2.5 m-wide probe was excavated in Squares E/20 and E/1 (in main grid square 20), intended to answer the question whether there were fortifications along the northern edge of the mound (Photos 17.1–17.3).

The excavations in Area E were supervised by Se Jin Koh (1997–1998, 2000) and James Paul Cowie, Diana Edelman and Naama Yahalom-Mack (2001).

Area F, located 5.0 m south of Area E, was directly related to the latter (Fig. 17.1; see Chapter 19).

Stratum E-3 (perhaps to be correlated with general Stratum VII) is known from only one debris layer in a narrow probe in Square E/15. Stratum E-2 (correlated with general Stratum VI) was examined in only a few probes in Squares D–F/15, E/13–14 and the nature of the area in that stratum remains virtually unknown. The few floors from this phase were 0.7–1.0 m below those of Stratum E-1b, at levels 71.07–71.30 m.

The main feature in this area was an architectural complex which we define as an open-air sanctuary, attributed to Strata E-1b and E-1a, correlated with general Strata V and IV. In Stratum E-1a, the heart of this complex was Building EB, containing a platform with masseboth at its northeastern corner. This building was preceded by Building ED of Stratum E-1b, although only one room and a few fragmentary walls of the latter were excavated. A spacious courtyard east and north of Buildings ED and EB was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a. Outer walls of this courtyard, located in Squares E/17–18 and G/16, appear to have been in use in both strata. In the courtyard, floors with an accumulation of debris that contained pottery, animal bones, various artifacts and installations, as well as ovens, circular clay bins and benches, were found in a total accumulation of almost 1.0 m. It was sometimes difficult to define which of these layers and installations belonged to Stratum E-1b and which to E-1a, as the courtyard continued to be in use throughout both these strata, with occasional alterations. Floors of Stratum E-1a seem to have been eroded in certain parts of the courtyard (in Squares E/17–18, F–G/16) but were well defined close to Building EB in Squares D–E/15–16. In certain cases, it was difficult to determine whether a certain installation was founded in E-1b or E-1a. Building EA in the southeastern part of the area was an auxiliary structure which, in fact, may have included parts of two or three different buildings. It was founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, with a few changes and floor raisings.

Building EC in the western part of the area was a partly excavated dwelling located west of the sanctuary; it is known from Stratum E-1a, but was perhaps founded in E-1b.

Strata E-1b and E-1a

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Schematic plans: Figs. 17.1, 17.4
  • Detailed plans: Figs. 17.3, 17.5–17.9
  • Sections: Figs. 17.14–17.22;
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.3–18.21
The designation Strata E-1b and E-1a (general Strata V and IV respectively) refers to the same architectural complex which underwent modifications and changes. The structures belonging to these strata were oriented northeast–southwest and they are all parallel or perpendicular to one another, indicating central planning.

Five architectural units were defined:
  1. Building EA in Squares E–F/13–1 4, Strata E-1b and E-1a.
  2. Building ED in Squares D–E/15. This building preceded Building EB; only one room and parts of additional walls were excavated.
  3. Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 and E/15, Stratum E-1a.
  4. Open area/courtyard in Squares E–F/14–16, D/16, E/17–18, Strata E-1b and E-1a.
  5. Building EC in Squares C/13–16, Stratum E-1a.
In our view, the courtyard, Building EB, and perhaps also Buildings EA and ED, belonged to a sanctuary complex that might have been first established in Stratum E-1b, but whose main phase of use was in Stratum E-1a.

In the following discussion, the stratigraphic development and architectural features of both Strata E-1a and E-1b in each architectural unit are described according to the order of the main units defined above.

Building EA (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3 - Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.4 - Schematic plan of Stratum E-1a, marked with location of sub-plans from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.6 - Stratum E-1a in Squares D–F/13–15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.1 - General view of Area E, end of 1997 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.10 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.11 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.12 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.13 - Building EA, Square F/14, looking west; E-1a Floor 1677 with pottery in destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.14 - Building EA, detail of Room 1701 and compartments 1666 and 1700 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.15 - Building EA, detail of compartments 1666 and 1700 and double wall 1618/1612 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.16 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking east, E-1b Room 2651 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.17 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking east; right: E-1a–b Wall 1629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.18 - Building EA, Square E/13, looking southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.19 - Squares E/13–14, Building EA, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20 - Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.3–17.6
  • Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.9–17.20
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.3–18.5
Discussions
Introduction

Building EA included all the structural remains in Squares E–F/13–14, although the possibility exists that these remains may have belonged to two or three independent buildings, as described below This complex existed in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, with some architectural changes made between them. The topsoil in this area descended to the south, towards the ravine that separated the lower from the upper mound. There was a distinct difference between the preservation in Squares F/13–14, as opposed to E/13–14. While the building remains in F/13–14 were found just below topsoil and were well preserved to a height of ca. 0.8 m, those in Squares E/13–14 were poorly preserved on a much lower level and were covered by a thick layer of eroded wash. Thus, the difference in the height of the top of Wall 1689 in E/13 (71.32 m) and Wall 1629 in F/13 (72.27 m) was 1.07 m, although they were only 3.0 m apart. This lower preservation of the walls in Squares E–F/13 seems to have been caused by severe erosion towards the ravine south of the excavation area, as well as due to a violent destruction in this area, as evidenced by the fallen bricks in Squares E–F/13. It seems that the walls uncovered in the southern part of Square E/13 belonged to Stratum E-1b only and that almost no remains of E-1a were preserved in this square, due to erosion.

Most of the walls were constructed of one row of bricks laid as headers. In two places, two walls were attached to one another (1661+1619 in Squares F/13–14 and 1618+1612 in Square F/13), creating a double wall, 1.2–1.4 m wide. In the case of Walls 1661 and 1619, the narrow space between them was filled with brick material. These double walls may have been the result of constructing adjoining buildings in the same insula, a common practice in Area C (Chapter 12). If this assumption is correct, then the structural remains in this unit belonged to three separate buildings, each excavated only partly:
  1. The northern part: Rooms 1704 and 2639 in Stratum E-1b and Room 1677 in Stratum E-1a.

  2. The southern part: Rooms 1701, 1699, 2651, 2663 in Stratum E-1b; 1701 and 1605 in Stratum E-1a.

  3. An eastern building: Room 1662, Stratum E-1b and Room 1646, Stratum E-1a.

Examples of brick sizes used in the construction of this building are 0.52×0.34×0.13 m (Wall 1689), 0.52×0.32×0.15 m (Wall 1618), 0.54×0.32×0.14 m (Wall 1619) and 0.56×0.37×0.14 m (Wall 1661). In general, the color of the bricks was light grayish brown and light yellow/off-white. In most cases, the foundation level of the walls was not reached, but those that were, lacked stone foundations.

The Northern Part of Building EA: Rooms 1704 and 2639 (Stratum E-1b) and 1677 (Stratum E-1a)

In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north.

E-1b Room 1704 was reused in Stratum E-1a with some architectural changes (Fig. 17.6). Wall 1687 went out of use and the floor of the new room (1677), that now extended to the north, covered it. The northern wall of the new room was 1688, preserved to one course only, its top level flush with the floor. Although the levels of this wall were almost identical to those of Wall 1687 to its south, Floor 1677 of Stratum E-1a covered Wall 1687 and appeared to be related to the top of Wall 1688, and thus the two walls were attributed to separate phases. The top of the western wall of the previous phase (1669) was also almost flush with the floor of the new room, so much so that it was not clear whether the floor covered the wall or whether the wall continued in use in this phase as well. The latter possibility was accepted as more reasonable and so the wall is included in the plan of Stratum E-1a. Thus, Room 1677 had inner dimensions of 2.8×3.7 m; its entrance could have been from the northeastern side, which was beyond the limits of the excavated area. The floor (1677) was made of hard-packed beaten-earth of a creamy color (77.17–72.08 m).

Room 1677 was destroyed by a severe fire at the end of Stratum E-1a and some of the brick debris was burnt and hardened to the consistency of fired ceramic. Above the beaten-earth floor was a thin ash layer (1652), which was covered by a 0.4 m-deep layer of destruction debris (1610) with restorable pottery (Photo 17.13), including a Phoenician Bichrome jug (Fig. 18.5:5), four cooking pots (Fig. 18.4–7), four chalices (Fig.18.3:16–19), and a large four-handled krater (Fig. 18.4:1). A large Hippo jar was standing in a spot between this room (1677) and Locus 1670 to the west (Fig. 18.5:1); three more such jars were found farther west in Locus 1670 (Fig. 18.5:2–4) (see description of the courtyard, below).

The Southern Part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b: Rooms 1701, 1699, 2651, 2663

Room 1701

Room 1701 (Square F/13) had inner dimensions of ca. 2.4 sq m (Photos 17.1–17.2, 17.14–17.15). Its four walls (1628, 1619, 1618, 1629) were identical in their construction technique, including the samesize light yellow bricks. The walls appeared ca. 0.2 m below the topsoil and were preserved to a height of five courses (0.7–0.8 m). A 0.8 m-wide entrance led to the room from Room 1664 on the west. Another entrance in the western end of the southern wall (1629) was found blocked by bricks laid lengthwise (Photo 17.15), yet the door jambs of this blocked entrance could be easily detected. The blocking of the entrance may have taken place between Strata E-1b and E-1a. In the eastern part of this room were two storage compartments (1666 and 1700), created by narrow walls (up to 0.1 m wide) made of whitish clay (Photos 17.14–17.15). The northern compartment (1666) was almost square (inner dimensions 0.9×1.0 m), while the southern one (1700) was rectangular (inner dimensions 1.0×1.4 m). A small hole (ca. 0.11 m in diameter) in the partition between the northern compartment and the western part of Room 1701 was located somewhat above the floor level. The compartments may have served as grain bins; the lack of plaster and the very thin walls precluded their use to store liquids.

The floor of both the room and the compartments was hard packed and smooth. Above this floor was mostly brown earth containing brick fragments and occasional finds, mainly flint and sherds. Only one phase was identified in this room and it was attributed to both Strata E-1a and E-1b. It may be suggested that the compartments were added in Stratum E-1a to the existing room, yet this could not be securely ascertained.

Rooms 1699 and 2651

The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.

Wall 1657, the northern wall of Room 1699, was 2.7 m-long, made of dark gray bricks, unlike the other bricks in this area. On its eastern end, the wall was preserved to a height of five courses; its western end bordered the street to its west. This wall was a continuation of Wall 1619 and in fact, they may be defined as one wall. Wall 1656, the western wall of this room, was poorly preserved. Its two rows of bricks were 1.0 m wide and preserved to a height of two courses at the southern edge of Square E/14, although six courses were seen in the northern section of E/13. On the south, this space was enclosed by Walls 1690 and 1689 (Square E/13); the latter was attached to another wall (2667), only the top of which was uncovered in the excavation. This double wall, 1.2 m wide, was perhaps the southern limit of Building EA; Wall 2667 might represent the northern wall of a separate unit to the south.

In the northern part of this room in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.

In the northern part of Square E/13, Locus 1699 was the continuation of Locus 2661. It contained occupation debris above a 0.01 m-thick, hard whitish plaster floor which sloped down from east to west (average level, 71.39 m). The accumulation on the plaster floor included small pieces of wall plaster and brick debris.

This area was bounded on the south by a narrow partition wall (1672), extending on a diagonal line from Wall 1690 on the east to the northwestern corner of the square, where it seemed to have made a corner with Wall 1656 or was embedded in the latter wall, which was not detected along the rest of Square E/13 south of Wall 1672 (Photos 17.17–17.19). This was an exceptional wall, since its orientation, width and brick sizes (0.36×0.22 m and 0.42×0.40 m) differed from all other walls in this area. A break in this wall served as a passage between Rooms 1699 and 2651. It seems that this was a secondary partition wall, dividing the larger rectangular space; based on its levels, this division must have been constructed during the earliest use of the building in Stratum E-1b. This wall was constructed slightly above the brick platform (2657) and installation (2666), which were attributed to Stratum E-2. The space south of Wall 1672 had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).

Room 2663

The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665.

The Southern Part of Building EA in Stratum E-1a: Rooms 1701, 1605 and 1635

We assume that the southern part of the building continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, yet erosion destroyed much of the evidence.

Room 1701 continued to be used in E-1a with no change, as noted above, where it was suggested that perhaps the double bin (1700/1666) was added at this stage.

In the southern part of Square E/14, Locus 1605 was a destruction layer on what might be a beaten-earth floor which was difficult to detect, as it was found just below topsoil (level 72.25 m; 0.75 m above the assumed E-1b floor, 2661). The tops of Walls 1657 and 1656 were not revealed until a level lower than this destruction layer, yet, since the destruction was limited to the area bounded by the contours of these walls, it may be assumed that they were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The same assumption was made in relation to Room 1701 and its compartments, as described above. In Square E/13, this destruction debris was not very clear. The outline of a 0.65 m-wide brick wall (1694) was seen in the western section of the square, standing 0.5 m high from level 71.80 m, ca. 0.6 m higher than the E-1b floor in this area (Fig. 17.14). In the northern section of the square, Wall 1695, 0.8 m-wide, was preserved in the section to a height of 0.4 m; its foundation was at 72.15 m, which could fit Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.20). These two wall stubs may have been part of one wall that replaced the older wall (1656) in this square and represent a rebuild or alteration in Building EA at this time; however, their poor preservation makes it difficult to reconstruct the plan. Locus 1626 in the center of the square represents an occupation layer at level 72.00 m, which should be seen as a continuation of 1605 further to the north. It was covered by brick debris (1617) just below topsoil and sealed layers of ash (1641), perhaps marking the floor here. The poor preservation and erosion in this area prevented a more detailed analysis of the Stratum E-1a remains.

In the southern part of Squares E–F/13, above E-1b Rooms 2663, 2665 and 1662, was a layer of fallen bricks (1635) below topsoil (1609); yet the attribution of this layer to either E-1a or E-1b could not be clarified.

Summary of Building EA

The southeastern part of Area E was densely built up and the architectural remains belonged perhaps to two or three independent buildings, attached to one another and forming one complex. This area was first built in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use, with modifications, in Stratum E-1a. This unit continued beyond the limits of the excavation area to the east and south, where its possible continuation can be determined in Area F (Fig. 17.1).

Building ED (Strata E-2/E-1b)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.2b - Plan of Stratum E-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.3 - Plan of Stratum E-1b in Squares D–F/13–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20 - Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22 - General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.2b – 17.3
  • Photos 17.2, 17.20, 17.22, 17.59
Discussions
Introduction

Building ED, attributed to E-1b (and possibly to E-2), pertains to a partly uncovered structure located in Squares D–E/15, below Building EB of Stratum E-1a.

The excavated part of this building included only one room (4653) in Square D/15, (inner dimensions 2.2×2.8 m) that was discovered below Room 2629 of Stratum E-1a Building EB (Fig. 17.17). All the walls were made of brittle gray bricks with white inclusions; the eastern wall (4632) was preserved to a height of ca. 1.0 m (nine brick courses from level 70.90–71.95 m), yet its foundation course was not reached. In the other walls (4635, 5658, 4650), the uppermost levels were similar or slightly higher (72.00–72.20 m), while the lowest visible brick courses were at 71.41 or 71.67 m. Wall 4658 was disturbed by a narrow trench of a later period (Photo 17.20). The only floor in the room (4653) was at levels 71.11–71.25 m, somewhat lower than the bottom of these walls (Photo 17.20). This may be explained either due to the nature of the bricks, which were difficult to detect, or perhaps due to a tilt in the walls which made it hard to reach the face of the walls in their lower parts. Floor 4653 was composed of 0.14 m thick striations, ca. 1.5 m below E-1a Floor 2629 (Fig. 17.14a), ca. 0.9 m lower than the floor (1648) attributed to Stratum E-1b in Square E/15 to the east, and even slightly lower than Floor 4661, attributed to Stratum E-2 in Square E/15 to the east. Therefore, we tentatively suggest that this room was founded in Stratum E-2 and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1b, although only one floor was found (see further below). Yet, as mentioned above, the relationship between the floor and the three other walls of the room (4635, 4658, 4650) remained questionable, since the lower part of these brick walls was unclear and no bricks could be determined at the floor level (Fig. 17.17; Photo 17.20). Thus, these three walls may be defined as possibly belonging to a later phase in the use of this space. If so, then only Wall 4632 and Floor 4653 may be attributed to Stratum E-2, while the other walls were added in Stratum E-1b. The difficulty with this explanation is that no independent floor later than Floor 4653 was detected. In light of these uncertainties, we show the room on the plan of Stratum E-1b, while on the plan of Stratum E-2 only the floor and Wall 4632 are shown. Two scarabs were found on Floor 4653 (Chapter 30A, Nos. 30, 43).

Floor 4653 was covered by a 0.8 m-thick debris layer (4634). Finds from this layer included a number of vessels (Figs. 18.1–18.2), as well as several grinding stones. No sign of burning or violent destruction was found in this room. Above this layer, a layer of brick detritus, 0.35 m thick, (4618) was covered by the make-up of the floor (2645) in E-1a Room 2629. It should be noted that while the western wall (4658) was rebuilt in Stratum E-1a with no break between the two phases, all other walls of the room were covered by a thick layer of debris (4618) before the construction of the new walls of Room 2629 in Stratum E-1a, on the same lines as those of the earlier walls of Room 4653.

In the area south of this room was a layer of brick debris (4633); excavation stopped at level 71.75 m.

Below E-1a Platform 1624 (Square E/15)

Excavation along the northern and eastern faces of Platform 1624 in Square E/15 (the focal point of the sanctuary of Stratum E-1a, see below) revealed earlier wall lines (4623, 4624) attributed to Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.34, 17.37). They appeared at levels 71.75–71.81 m and stood one or two courses high. These two walls were slightly to the north and east of the outer lines of the Stratum E-1a platform. Hardly any brick lines could be detected in the northern wall (4624) and it is possible that it was constructed of compacted mud. These walls were most probably contemporary with Room 4653 further to the west and with the early phase of the open space to the north and east, including the circular installations found in the eastern part of Square E/15, Oven 1649, and the layers in the lower part of Locus 1647, all attributed to Stratum E-1b (see below). A shallow debris layer separated the top of these walls from the bottom of the E-1a platform. A major question is whether these two walls belonged to an earlier platform. In order to clarify this point, we dismantled most of the platform (except for the area of the standing stones). The excavation reached level 71.64 m (5623), 0.85 m below the top of the brick platform of E-1a, revealing only brick debris and a large number of random bricks, mostly haphazardly placed (Photo 17.21). No evidence for an earlier platform was found and thus, the function of Walls 4623 and 4624 remained enigmatic.

Below E-1a Room 4654 (Square D/14)

A 1.5×2.5 m probe conducted below Floor 4654 of E-1a Building EB contained fallen and decayed bricks (5629) attributed to E-1b. The excavation stopped at level 71.69 m, almost 1.0 m below the top of 4654. Among the finds from this lower layer was a sherd of a Greek Late Protogeometric/SubProtogeometric krater (Fig. 18.2:12).

Building EB (Stratum E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.7 - Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.3 - General view of Area E, end of 2001 season, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22 - General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23a - Destruction debris in Locus 5621 in the western part of Space 2641 in Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23b - Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.24 - Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.25 - Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.26 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.27 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.28 - E-1a Building EB, Room 2629, destruction debris and fallen roof material from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.29 - E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.30 - Destruction debris in eastern part of E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.31 - Grinding stone leaning on wall 5609 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.32 - Destruction debris in southeastern corner of E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.33 - Seal impressions on plaster of Room 4616 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.34 - E-1a Building EB, Platform 2654, looking south; below platform: E-1b Walls 4634 and 4623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.35 - Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.36 - Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.37 - Section below Platform 2654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.5, 17.7,
  • Photos 17.2–17.3, 17.22–17.37
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.6–18.14
Discussions
Introduction

Building EB in Squares C–D/13–16 was founded in Stratum E-1a. The northern room (2629) was built above Room 4653 of E-2/E-1b Building ED and the platform in the northeastern corner of the building was higher than the E-1b floors to its north and east. The outer measurements of the building were 7.7×9.8 m and it comprised a central space with an enclosed room or alcove at its eastern end, a rectangular room at the southern side and a smaller room in the northwestern corner. A unique feature in this building was the design of its northeastern corner, which included a rectangular brick platform (2654) topped by a smaller stone platform with standing stones (1624), facing a courtyard to its north and east. This platform was the focal point of what we identify as an open-air sanctuary, which included Building EB and a spacious courtyard with installations to its north and east.

Four openings connected the central space (2641) with the three rooms surrounding it. On the western side, two of these openings were located opposite one another, leading into Rooms 2629 on the north and 4616 on the south. In the southeast of the space was an entrance that also led into Room 4616 and on the east into Room 4654. There was most likely also an entrance connecting this space with the platform (2654) in the northeast.

The location of the main entrance to this building remained enigmatic. The building was attached on its western side to Building EC and thus, the entrance could not have been there. The northern, eastern and southern walls were preserved high enough to exclude the possibility of an entrance through these three sides. One possibility is that the entrance was along the western side of the platform, directly into the central space, although this would have been a very narrow approach.

Space 2641

This is the central space in the building (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.

Excavation below Floor 2641 in the northwestern corner of the room (southern part of Square D/15) revealed a layer of brick debris (2652 and 4618 below it) which was the top of Stratum E-1b in this area. In the rest of the room, excavation stopped at the floor level of Stratum E-1a.

Room 4654

This room (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).

It was difficult to determine whether there was a direct connection between Room 4654 and the platform to its north; on the west, they were adjoining, while on the east, there was a wall separating them (unnumbered in the plan), preserved to the same level as the top of the platform (72.40 m). A probe below the floor revealed the top of Stratum E-1b debris, as described above.

Room 2629

This small rectangular room (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.

As mentioned above, there was a gap of ca. 0.6–0.7 m between the top of the earlier walls of E-1b Building ED on the north, south and east (4635, 4650, 4632) and the foundation level of the new walls of Room 2645 (2632, 2633, 2634), while on the west, there was no such gap (Fig. 17.17).

Room 4616

This was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.

Two entrances led into this room from Room 2641 to its north. The eastern one was 1.0 m wide and on the west, it was strengthened by a plastered pilaster (4631). A narrower entranceway, 0.67 m wide, was at the northwestern corner of the room. This western entrance was enigmatically blocked by a bench (unnumbered) built along Wall 2646 and thus its function as an entrance may be questioned. The identification of the floor in this room was difficult, particularly in the western part of the room, where there was no evidence for fire. The identified beaten-earth floor in the east (4616) was at level 72.00 m, covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris with occasional burnt and fallen bricks (4609 in the eastern part of the room, and 5614 and 5605 in the western part). The destruction debris in the eastern part contained a large amount of pottery vessels (Photo 17.32). Among them was a Hippo storage jar with an incised inscription on its shoulder that reads טע ... עם (Fig. 18.11:1; Chapter 29A, No. 8). A unique feature in this room was fragments of plaster impressed with seal impressions, found close to the pilaster at the eastern entrance (Photo 17.33; Chapter 30D). These impressions served as architectural decorations that are unparalleled elsewhere; they perhaps were made with wooden seals, showing a lotus bloom flanked by high buds below a volute motif, which recalls Proto-Aeolic capitals. Such consecutive impressions stamped on the mud plaster would have created a decorative frieze on the wall interiors. A fragment of roofing material made of clay with reed impressions was also found in this room. In the southeastern corner of the room was a clay bulla with a seal impression made by an Egyptian Middle Bronze Age scarab (Chapter 30A, No. 40). These finds allude to the important function of this room.

The Platform and Standing Stones

The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).

The platform was constructed of well-defined square bricks, best seen at its western part. On top of the eastern side of the brick platform was a smaller square platform (1624; 1.0×1.2 m) made of one to two courses of basalt fieldstones and large river pebbles, rising to a height of 0.33 m (uppermost level, 72.60 m). This stone platform was well preserved on its southern and western sides, while its northeastern corner was damaged. On its southern side were three standing stones, the two eastern ones elongated and standing on their narrow side. The eastern stone was 0.37 m high and 0.3 m wide, the central stone was 0.41 m high and 0.3 m wide, and the western stone was only 0.2 m high and 0.4 m wide. The eastern stone was of hard smoothed limestone, while the central and western stones were rough unworked travertine. Due to its small dimensions, a fourth limestone at the western end apparently was not another standing stone, but rather part of the construction of the platform. These three stones are interpreted as sacred standing stones (masseboth), facing a spacious courtyard to the north (see below). On the western side of the platform, almost at the center of the second line of bricks from the west, was a posthole, ca. 0.14 m in diameter and 0.1 m deep, which may have held a wooden pole. A basalt mortar adjoined the western face of the platform close to its top level, just opposite this posthole, and was covered by burnt brick debris. Just opposite the platform to its north was a large flat limestone which was understood to have been an offering table (Photos 17.49–17.50); see below.

It appears that this platform was part of an open area that continued into the spacious courtyard to the north and east. Yet, in that case, one might ask how a single-course brick platform would have survived the elements. It must have been protected by either thick plaster which was not preserved or covered during harsh climate conditions by some kind of seasonal roofing, although no traces of this were found, as it would have been constructed from perishable materials. As noted above, the platform was preceded by an earlier structure of undetermined shape (Photo 17.37).

Summary of Building EB

The plan of Building EB is exceptional. Although in its size and building techniques, it does not differ from dwellings at Tel Rehov, its unique plan was apparently suited to a specific function related to the open-air sanctuary of which it was a part, with the platform and standing stones occupying the northeastern corner of this structure. The decorated plaster found at the entrance to the southern elongated room emphasizes the importance of this room, which was perhaps the seat of a priest, scribe or other functionaries related to the cultic activity in this area.

The Courtyard (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 17.3–17.9
  • Photos 17.2, 17.38–17.53
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.17–18.19
Discussions
Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

Building EC (Stratum E-1a)

Figures, Photos, and Tables

Figures, Photos, and Tables

  • Table 17.1 - Locus and basket numbers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Table 17.2 - Correlation of the Iron Age stratigraphic sequence in Areas C, D, E, and F from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.5 - General plan of Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Figure 17.7 - Squares C–E/13–16 in Stratum E-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.55 - Squares C–D/15–16, Building EC (right) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.56 - E-1a Building EC, circular installations in Room 5637 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.57 - E-1a Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Bin 5630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.58 - Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Oven 5632 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

  • Plans: Figs. 17.5, 17.7
  • Photos 17.55–17.59
  • Pottery: Figs. 18.15–18.16
Discussions
Introduction

The eastern part of a dwelling of Stratum E-1a, denoted Building EC, was excavated west of and attached to Building EB, in Squares C/14–16. The excavated part included a courtyard (5637), a room to its southeast (5613), and two corners of additional rooms on the west. Like the others in Area E, this building was also oriented northwest–southeast. It was built as an independent building and thus, most of its eastern wall (2647) was attached to Wall 2546 of Building EB (with a slight gap between them), thus creating a double wall, like in many other buildings of this period at Tel Rehov.

This building was probably founded in Stratum E-1b, as evidenced in a small probe, 0.5 m wide, in Square D/16, along the eastern side of Wall 2647 (not shown on the plan). The probe revealed that the wall stood to a height of 1.06 m (eight courses, floating level at 71.93 m). Its foundation was 0.65 m below the level of the Stratum E-1a floor inside the building, which was only slightly higher than that of Wall 4658 of Building ED of Stratum E-2/E1b to its east and lower than the foundation level of nearby Wall 2646 of Building EB of Stratum E-1a (72.70 m). This may indicate that Wall 2647 (and perhaps the entire building) was founded in Stratum E-1b, and continued to be in use (perhaps with a higher floor) in Stratum E-1a. This remains unknown, as the excavation of this building stopped at the level of E-1a.

Space 5637

This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens.

Room 5613

Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room.

Room 5639

Locus 5639 represented the northeastern corner of a room in Building EC, west of Room 5613 (Square C/15). It was bounded by Walls 5640 on the north and 5606 on the east. This small area was excavated to 72.82 m, revealing a layer of brown earth (Photo 17.59).

Destruction of Stratum E-1a

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

The end of Stratum E-1a was accompanied by a heavy fire that resulted in thick burnt destruction debris. In Buildings EA (Room 1677 and Locus 1670 to its west), EB and EC, large groups of restorable vessels and other objects were found below a tumble of bricks and burnt debris with fallen roof material, all evidence for this violent end. In the courtyard, the evidence for fire and violent destruction was less clear, yet the upper layer in Squares E–F/15–16, just below topsoil, was composed of soft gray ash, 0.15–0.20 m thick, and in the southern section of Square F/15, a thick black ash line and burnt wood could be seen above the floor (Fig. 17.18a). In Square F/15, fire had burnt the fallen bricks to a hard consistency and reddish color. Some roof material of laminated clay with reed impressions were mixed in the brick debris, also hardened and reddened by fire. Another sign of the violent and apparently man-made destruction was the pottery altar in Square E/15 that had been deliberately smashed to many small pieces.

Post-Stratum E-1a Activity in Space 5637

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Evidence for a brief re-occupation of Space 5637 after the destruction of Stratum E-1a was provided by Ovens 5611 and 5631 and Bench/Wall 5638 (Fig. 17.10), which were built within the brick collapse resulting from the Stratum E-1a destruction, ca. 0.15 m above the E-1a floor level. Bench/Wall 5638 was built 0.4 m north of Wall 5640 and consisted of a single row of bricks preserved along 1.6 m (top level: 73.27 m, bottom level: 73.09 m) that were set directly on top of the destruction debris in the courtyard. This was the only evidence for any activity that post-dated the destruction of Stratum E-1a. It may be explained as a short phase of squatters, perhaps the inhabitants of the ruined city returning briefly, following the destruction of this house.

A Probe in Squares E/20, E/1

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Schematic plans: Fig. 17.11
  • Photos 17.60–17.61
A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).

Summary

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion

The open space, Building EB, and perhaps Building EA, can be interpreted as belonging to a sanctuary or high place (the biblical bamah) that served the neighborhood. The platform and standing stones, that can be interpreted as masseboth, were the focal point of this sanctuary in Stratum E-1a. In the spacious courtyard to the north and east of this platform, ovens and the circular bins were perhaps used in relation to feasting. Although they were attributed to late Stratum E-1b, they possibly continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The flat stone in front of the platform can be explained as an offering table and the pottery altar could have been used for burning offerings, including incense or small animals, such as pigeons. The rectangular area with benches in Squares F–E/14–15 could have been used for public feasting.

It could not be securely determined whether the area served as a sanctuary in Stratum E-1b, as it did in Stratum E-1a. Yet, the architectural continuity in the courtyard and surrounding buildings alludes to a similar function in both phases. Alterations in Stratum E-1a were needed due to the rise of floor levels in the courtyard. This may explain the need to rebuild Building ED of Stratum E-1b (of which only one room was exposed) as Building EB in Stratum E-1a. The continuity between these two buildings was demonstrated in the similar plan and location of Rooms 4653 (E-1b) and 2629 (E-1a). The platform and standing stones, which were the focal point of cult in Stratum E-1a, were preceded by an earlier structure defined by Walls 4624 and 4623, yet its nature could not be clarified. Building EA in the southeastern part of the area appears to have been founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a, with only minor modifications.

This is a rare example of an Iron Age II openair sanctuary. The concept of a small cult place which served a local neighborhood is known from approximately the same time at Lachish (Stratum V Cult Room 49), Megiddo (Stratum VA–IVB Building 2081) and perhaps at Ta'anach (Dever 1983; Holladay 1987: 249–299; Zevit 2001: 213– 266). Yet, all three differ from our sanctuary in many aspects; they are either an independent cult room (Lachish),1 a cult room in a large building (Megiddo), or a cult corner in a dwelling (Ta'anach). None of these sites have standing stones (masseboth) and a platform (bamah). Platforms and standing stones are known from several Iron Age public cult places, such as at Bethsaida (Zevit 2001: 149–152) and the 9th century BCE temple at Khirbet 'Atarus ('Atarot) in Moab (Ji 2012).2 Standing stones of a similar rough shape and small size as ours are known from the city gate area at Dan (Biran 1994: 244, Photos 203–204; Zevit 2001: 191–196). Our sanctuary, if correctly identified, is the most complete example in Israel of an open-air sanctuary with a platform, standing stones, a spacious courtyard with cooking and food-preparation facilities, and auxiliary rooms. The cultic paraphernalia included a pottery altar, an offering table, and artifacts such as clay figurines. Other special objects included the impressed plaster and the painted Phoenician-style storage jar. The evidence of metal and flint-scraper production in the center of the open courtyard (although attributed to Stratum E-1b) is striking, since the combination of industry with a cult place is known in other cases as well, such as the copper industry at Timna' (Rothenberg 1988: 276–278) and at Kition in Cyprus (Karageorghis 1985: 253), the olive oil industry at Tel Miqne-Ekron (Gitin 2003), and the apiary in Area C at Tel Rehov (Chapters 12, 14A). The large quantity of animal bones found in the open area in front and east of the platform may be taken as evidence for sacrifices and sacred meals (marzeah) that took place in this sanctuary (see Chapter 49; cf., Greer 2013).
Footnotes

1 For negation of the Lachish Stratum V cult room as such, see Ussishkin 2003.

2 The ethnic affiliation of the temple at Khirbet 'Atarus ('Atarot) should be addressed. If this is the town mentioned in the Mesha inscription (lines 10–11) as being part of the land of Gad and built by the king of Israel, then it could be that the temple belonged to an Israelite or Israelite-related population

Tables, Plans, and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 17.1          General view of Area E, end of 1997 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.2          General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.3          General view of Area E, end of 2001 season, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.4          Squares D–E/15, excavated to level of Strata E-2–E-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.5          South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.6          Probe in Square F/15, looking north; E-2 Floor 2662 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.7          Southeastern corner of Square E/14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.8          Building EA, general view, end of 1997 season, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.9          Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.10          Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.11          Building EA, Square F/14, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.12          Building EA, Square F/14, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.13          Building EA, Square F/14, looking west; E-1a Floor 1677 with pottery in destruction debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.14          Building EA, detail of Room 1701 and compartments 1666 and 1700 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.15          Building EA, detail of compartments 1666 and 1700 and double wall 1618/1612 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.16          Building EA, Square E/13, looking east, E-1b Room 2651 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.17          Building EA, Square E/13, looking east; right: E-1a–b Wall 1629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.18          Building EA, Square E/13, looking southeast from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.19          Squares E/13–14, Building EA, looking south from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.20          Room 4653, Square D/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.21          Squares D–E/15, section through E-1a Platform 2654 with brick collapse below platform from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.22          General view of Stratum E-1a Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23a          Destruction debris in Locus 5621 in the western part of Space 2641 in Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.23b          Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.24          Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.25          Building EB, Floor 4654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.26          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.27          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.28          E-1a Building EB, Room 2629, destruction debris and fallen roof material from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.29          E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.30          Destruction debris in eastern part of E-1a Building EB, Room 4616 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.31          Grinding stone leaning on wall 5609 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.32          Destruction debris in southeastern corner of E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.33          Seal impressions on plaster of Room 4616 in E-1a Building EB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.34          E-1a Building EB, Platform 2654, looking south; below platform: E-1b Walls 4634 and 4623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.35          Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.36          Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.37          Section below Platform 2654 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.38          Probe in Squares E/17–18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.39          Probe in Square E/18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.40          Probe in Square E/18 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.41          Oven 4608, Square E/17 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.42          Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.43          E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.44          Buildings EB and EA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.45          Square E/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.46          Square E/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.47          Square E/15 detail from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.48          Square E/15 detail from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.49          Square E/15 with debris from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.50          Detail of stone 1623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.51          Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.52          Squares E–F/15–16 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.53          Square F/15 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.54          Square E/14 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.55          Squares C–D/15–16, Building EC (right) from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.56          E-1a Building EC, circular installations in Room 5637 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.57          E-1a Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Bin 5630 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.58          Building EC, Room 5637, detail of Oven 5632 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.59          Buildings EB and EC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.60          Probe in Squares E/20, E/1 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)
  • Photo 17.61          Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 17)

Chapter 20 - Area G: Stratigraphy and Architecture

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

Discussion
Introduction

Table and Photos
Table and Photos

Discussion

Area G was located at the western edge of the lower mound, near the foot of the upper mound. The area occupies a small hillock, bordered on the north and the south by small ravines which presently serve as approach roads to the tell. The goals of excavating this area were:
  1. to examine the prominent small hill in that area in order to determine architectural or other features that caused this element, such as a city gate
  2. to examine the stratigraphic sequence and nature of settlement in this part of the tell.
Excavation of Area G commenced in 2000 and lasted six weeks (Photo 20.1). Six squares were opened (P–Q/5–6 and P/3–4), located in main grid square 13 (Chapter 3). In 2001, the excavation continued for four weeks and two additional squares were opened (Q/3–4; Photo 20.1). In 2007, the excavation continued for three weeks in Squares P– Q/3–5. The total area excavated is 200 m.

The supervisors were Adi-Ziv Esudri (2000) and Naama Yahalom-Mack (2001, 2007).

The excavation in Area G uncovered an Iron Age IIA domestic area with two major strata, each divided into two sub-phases. Table 20.1 shows the stratigraphic correlation to Area C and to the general strata numbers in Tel Rehov. Table 20.2 specifies the locus and basket numbers given in the three seasons.

The large architectural units revealed in Stratum G-2 were part of larger buildings of unknown plans. An open courtyard in the eastern and northern parts of the area included many installations and storage pits; the walls were preserved to a height of up to 1.0 m and in Square Q/3, up to 2.0 m. The buildings of Stratum G-2 were abandoned in a similar way as those of Stratum VI in Areas B and C and the floors were found almost empty of finds. One possibility is that the buildings suffered from an earthquake; possible evidence for this can be seen in the severe tilt eastwards of Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Fig. 20.17). In Stratum G-1b, new buildings were constructed, which continued to be in use in Stratum G-1a with slight changes. Here too, only parts of buildings were excavated and no complete plan of a single building is known. In all strata, brick walls without stone foundations were the common building practice; only one wall attributed to Stratum G-1b (5040) had a stone foundation. Extensive use of wooden beams was made in the foundations of Stratum G-1b walls and floors, similar to the situation in Areas B and C. Stratum G-1a (Stratum IV) ended in violent destruction, evidenced in particular in Building GG in Squares P–Q/3.

Stratum G-2

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. 20.1–20.2
This stratum comprises the earliest architecture encountered in this area, including part of a large structure oriented southwest–northeast (Building GB), the beginning of a building to its west (Building GA), parts of additional buildings to the east (Building GD) and rooms in the north (Building GC) and south which probably belonged to additional buildings. In most places, two stratigraphic phases were encountered, denoted G-2b and G-2a, with a clear distinction between them; in G-2a, additional walls were constructed in Building GB and higher floors were laid in many parts of the area. In one square (Q/5), a later phase was identified, designated G-2a'. The following discussion includes both phases in each of the buildings

Building GA

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P–Q/4–5, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.4 - Collapsed mudbricks on left corner in G-2b Building GA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Only the eastern edge of this building was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). These two walls were parallel to Wall 5061 of Building GB (Photos 20.3–20.4) and together, they created a double-wall system, an architectural feature common at Tel Rehov that, in most cases, designated the outer walls of attached individual buildings. In our case, the top preserved level of the two walls was separated by a V-shaped gap, 0.1 m wide on the south and up to 0.7 m on the north (Photo 20.3). These walls had apparently separated as a result of seismic movement, perhaps an earthquake, at the end of Stratum G-2, with Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west. The gap between the walls was filled with brick debris (5058). After the gap was excavated to a depth of 1.0 m, the walls appeared closer together until, at the lower courses, the two walls were only a few centimeters apart. Wall 5044 was preserved to a height of at least 0.85 m, although its bottom level could not be determined due to its strong tilt to the west. Wall 5048 joined Wall 5044, enclosing the corner of a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.

Building GB

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

The designation Building GB was given to the large space bounded by Wall 5061 on the west and Wall 8030 (in Square Q/4) on the east, and perhaps also Room 8038, as well as the area to its west in Squares P–Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). Its northern border remained unclear. Significant changes occurred here between the two phases of Stratum G-2 and the definition of this area as a single building is insecure. In fact, one can define the spaces between Walls 5064 and 5061 as a single unit, while the open space with installations between Walls 5064 and 8030 may have been part of an L-shaped area that continued in Squares P– Q/6. This alternative understanding should be kept in mind when reading the following analysis.

Phase G-2b

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space, 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.

Phase G-2a

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.5 - Tilted Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.7 - Building GA, G-2 Building GB, and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.8 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.9 - Wall 5064 and G-2a courtyard from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.10 - G-2b and G-2a circular bins from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This phase is much better known than the previous one due to wider exposure. The large courtyard of the previous phase was divided by Wall 5064, a poorly preserved north–south wall which divided the open area into two roughly equal parts, eastern and western (Fig. 20.2; Photos 20.7–20.9). The wall was preserved up to 0.38 m and its bottom was at 85.52–85.58 m, higher by 0.9 m than Oven 8063 of Phase G-2b to its west. In the northern end of Square Q/5, the wall cornered with Wall 8064, of which only a small segment of its southern face was excavated, preserved to 86.15 m. It may be conjectured that Wall 8056 in Square P/4 was a continuation of Wall 5064.

Room 8035, bounded by Walls 5061, 8064, 5064 and 8055, had inner dimensions of 2.35×6.55 m (Photo 20.7). The floor (8035) was at level 85.60 m, at least 0.75 m (and perhaps more) above the assumed floor of G-2b in the same place.

In Square P/4, a corner of two short walls (8055 and 8056; Photos 20.5–20.6) created a small room with an entrance leading from Room 8035 to its north. A floor in this room (8023), located at level 85.64 m, was sealed by the brick platform (5069) of Stratum G-1b. Wooden beams (4071) found close to the top of the walls of this room at levels 85.82– 85.92 m (Fig. 20.3) were related to the construction of Stratum G-1b.

The area east of Wall 5064, bounded on the south by Wall 8039 in Squares P–Q/3 and on the east by Wall 8030 in Square Q/4, served as a spacious courtyard, ca. 4.0–4.5 m wide and up to 13 m long (if continuing until Wall 4029 in Square Q/6 on the north). In fact, in Square Q/6, this open area continued to the west, thus creating an L-shaped open space.

In Squares Q/4–5, several plastered surfaces were identified, alongside other floor types, with some 13 related installations that were not all used contemporaneously; note an additional one (8047) that was attributed to Phase G-2b (see above). The installations comprise mainly two types: plastered circular or oval bins and clay ovens (Table 20.3; Photos 20.2, 20.7–20.10, 20.16).

In Square Q/4, three superimposed plaster floors (8053 at level 85.76 m, 8024 at level 86.07 m and 8008 at level 86.27 m) were exposed above the earlier floor (8044) attributed to Phase G-2b. The floors were exposed mainly in the northern half of the square, with three related plastered bins (8060, 8051, 8059) and a single poorly preserved oven (8025). The plastered bins were exposed between 85.99 and 85.88 m, while the oven was exposed at level 86.19 m (Photos 20.8, 20.10). In the southern half of the square, only one floor was detected (8041), sloping from east to west; it was attributed to Stratum G-2b, yet probably continued to be in use in G-2a.

In Square Q-5, two superimposed plaster floors were exposed between levels 86.28 and 85.98 m. Related to these floors were four circular bins and two superimposed ovens (Table 20.3; Photos 20.7– 20.9). None of the floors clearly abutted the poorly preserved Wall 5064.

Small circular bins of the type found here (as well as in Squares P–Q/6; see below) were also found in Areas B (Chapter 8) and E (Chapter 17). Their capacity was ca. 10 liters or slightly more; thus, the seven bins found in these two squares may have been used for storing ca. 70–100 liters, perhaps of grain used for baking in the three ovens found nearby. However, it was difficult to attribute these installations to each of the several floor surfaces found here and thus, it remains unknown whether all of them served at the same time. At least in one instance, it seems that there was subphasing here, where Oven 4074 cut Oven 4084. In any case, this appears to have been an area used for intensive baking.

Open Area with Circular Bins in Squares P–Q/6

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.13 - Stratum G-2a Square P/6 and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.14 - Stratum G-2a Floors 4016 and 5004 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB and bounded on the north by Building GC. The width of this area was ca. 2.5 m and its length was at least 9.0 m.

The lowest floor found here in Square P/6 was a clay floor (5050) at level 85.46 m. It was covered by a 0.15 m-deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036); the latter was covered by a brick debris layer (5043). These layers were all attributed to Stratum G-2b, since they were lower than Floors 5026 and 5004 and the installations of Phase G-2a.

In the eastern part of the square, a floor comprised of striations (5004 and 5026 to its north) was found above G-2b layer 5021, between levels 85.92–86.28 m; the top of this layer (4016) appeared to be a continuation of Floor 4022 in Square Q/6 (level 86.28 m). No floor could be identified in the western part of the square (4011, 4012).

In Square Q/6, excavation stopped at the level of the uppermost floor (4022) (level 86.30 m); the floor was exposed over most of the square, comprising patches of grayish-white plaster and beaten earth with pottery sherds mixed with small stones.

Eleven bins of various sizes were found in this area, four in Square Q/6 and seven in Square P/6 (Table 20.4, Photos 20.12–20.14). Most of these were exposed along one line in the central part of Square P/6, while the others were scattered along the southern part of Squares P–Q/6 and one was located in Building GC. The definition of these installations as bins is the most reasonable one, although they could have been used for other purposes as well, such as for some industrial activity that was conducted in the courtyard.

These plaster-lined installations were cut into the floor. They were oval to round, with a diameter of 0.45–0.70 m (except 4018, which was 1.2 in diameter) and a depth of 0.30–0.38 m, although the state of preservation does not allow an exact measurement. Thus, the average capacity of the smaller bins was ca. 33 liters (based on an average diameter of 0.55 m and depth of 0.35 m). All were lined with a very friable greyish-white plaster. The thickness of the walls was 0.02–0.04 m, aside from reinforcements which were added where two neighboring bins were close together. These installations contained grayish earth mixed with light-colored brick debris, as well as a few sherds, flint fragments and bones; no grain or organic materials were recovered.

Like in Squares Q/4–5, the bins marked several successive construction phases and thus, not all of them were in use at the same time. Three (4008, 4009, 5009) appear to be contemporary and earlier than the others (Photos 20.12–20.14). They were all exposed at approximately level 86.20 m; Bins 4008 and 4009 share a wall. Bin 4008 appears to cut into a very poorly preserved wall or built installation (5014, not on the plan), chipped along its southern face, of which only one course was preserved.

Bin 4010 abutted 4019 on the west and appears to be contemporary with it, while 4019 cut into 4009 and thus replaced it. Bin 4018 was the largest (diameter 1.2 m) and latest of all, as it cut into 4010; it was 0.96 m deep. Its walls were plastered and it contained crumbly grayish-brown earth mixed with pieces of brick, as well as many sherds, flint, bones, shells and some charcoal. In the eastern side of Square P/6, Bin 4032 (Fig. 20.8) was 0.9 m wide; it may have been contemporary with the large bin (4018).

At least two successive floors were located in Square P/6 (5004, 4016) above Floor 5050 of Phase G-2b. They were difficult to trace, but were identifiable by their related plastered installations. Contemporary Bins 5009, 4008 and 4009 apparently were related to the earliest floor. Installations 4019, 4010 and 4032 were possibly contemporary and related to a later floor. Bin 4018, which was larger than the others, apparently coexisted with the similar installation (4032) near the eastern balk of the square and was related to the latest floor.

The attribution of these installations and floors to Stratum G-2a was based on their levels compared to similar remains in Square Q/5. However, it should be noted that the building remains and installations in Squares P–Q/6 were exposed below topsoil, with no stratigraphic elements above them. Their attribution to Stratum G-2a means that Stratum G-1 was completely eroded away in Squares P–Q/6. Indeed, Wall 4014 of G-1a–b in Square P/5 was founded at its northern end at level 86.48 m, which was higher than the bins and Building GC. The continuation of Wall 4014 and other elements of G-1a in Squares P–Q/6 were eroded away and thus, Squares P–Q/6 are not shown on the plans of Stratum G-1a–b.

Building GC

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The remains defined as Building GC in Squares P– Q/6 (Photos 20.1, 20.13, 20.15) included the southern part of a building that continued to the north beyond the borders of the excavated area. The excavated part of the building included three walls (4029, 5056, 4028), all composed of similar greybrown bricks and preserved 0.25–0.4 m high. Inside, a compact clay floor (5035) was exposed near the corner of Walls 4029 and 5056 at level 85.44 m, covered by brick debris (5027). A beatenearth floor (4050) was exposed in Square Q/6 at level 85.48 m, abutting Wall 4029, covered by a brick debris layer (4027) and a layer of collapsed bricks (4024), found against Wall 4028. Both small segments of floors were empty of finds and no evidence for violent destruction was found. It seems that the building was constructed in Stratum G-2b, together with the earliest floor of the open space to its south (5050, level 85.46 m). It probably continued in use in Phase G-2a with the same floors, at the time when the floor of the open area to the south was raised and the bins were constructed; at that time, Bin 4037 was constructed inside the building.

Like the open space and installations to the west and south in Squares P–Q/6, Building GC was exposed immediately below topsoil, with no later stratigraphic features, and its attribution to Stratum G-2 was based on its relation to the open space to its south.

Room 8038/4090 and Space 8061/4087

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Squares P–Q/3, to the south of Building GB (and to the west of Building GD, see below) was a room (8038/4090) and what seems to have been an open space (8061/4087) that might have belonged to Building GB or might have been part of a separate unit (Figs. 20.1–20.2). Since the wide double wall (5012/4047) of Stratum G-1 was not dismantled, it is unknown whether there was an earlier wall of Stratum G-2 below that would have belonged to another building to the south of Building GB.

Room 8038/4090

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The room to the west of the southern room of Building GD was bounded by Walls 4081, 8027 and 8039, while its southern wall was beyond the limit of the excavation area. It was 2.2 m wide and at least 3.0 m long. Wall 8027 created a double wall with Wall 5063 of Building GD to the east. The northern wall (8039) was narrower than the other walls of the room and perhaps served as a narrow partition with an opening towards the north, which might have led to the courtyard of Building GB. The western wall (4081) was preserved 1.4 m high and perhaps had two construction phases; the earlier one (G-2b) comprising the lower 1.0 m (as seen from the west) and the upper one (G-2a) consisting of the uppermost two or three brick courses. The seam between these two phases can be clearly seen (Photos 20.20–20.21).

Inside this room was a layer of brick collapse (8038) that was exposed down to level 85.28 m. This locus was attributed to Stratum G-2b, although a floor was not reached. A higher patchy floor in this room (4090) at level 85.66 m is attributed to Stratum G-2a.

Space 8061/4087

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Wall 4081 in Square P/3 was preserved to at least 1.4 m (Photos 20.20–20.21). Abutting this wall on the west were several floors attributed to Stratum G-2b. The lowest was Floor 8061, covered by phytoliths, at levels 84.39–84.45 m. Above it was a thin layer of brick debris with some scattered phytoliths (8057) and a build-up of brown patchy clay floors (8049, levels 84.52–84.84 m). The uppermost floor was sealed by a layer of brick collapse (8012). A clay plaque figurine showing a female drummer (Chapter 34, No. 5) was found at level 85.54 m, which is just at the top of the brick debris (5034) attributed to phase G-2b, under the G-2a floor (4087). The figurine was found very close to the erosion line and thus, its attribution to the G-2b layer is insecure.

A new floor (4087), beaten-earth and ash, was laid at 85.61 m; it did not clearly abut Wall 4081. This floor is attributed to Stratum G-2a, but might be related to Stratum G-1 Building GG, since destruction layer 4065 of that building is directly above it.

Building GD

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.1 - Plan of Stratum G-2b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2a - Plan of Stratum G-2a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.2b - Plan of Stratum G-2a' from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.7 - Superposition of walls in Area G with location of section drawings from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.18 - Section 11 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This building (Squares Q/3–4) was bounded on the west by Wall 8030 (found below Wall 5018 of Stratum G-1a, see below) and Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). The latter created a double wall together with Wall 8027 of Room 8030/4090 to the west. The walls were preserved to a considerable height; in a probe in the northeastern corner of Square Q/3 (Photos 20.16–20.18), Walls 5063 and 5062 stood to a height of almost 2.0 m. Wall 5063 tilted considerably eastwards (Fig. 20.17), possibly as a result of the same seismic event that caused Walls 5044 and 5061 to separate, as described above. Parts of two rooms were excavated south and north of the dividing Wall 5062.

In the northern room, a clear distinction between Strata G-2b and G-2a could be made (Figs. 20.17–20.18; Photo 20.18). The lowest layer reached was a beaten-earth floor (8046) exposed in a small area at level 84.16 m, which appeared to abut the foundation of Walls 5062 and 5063. This floor was covered by a layer of small chunks of brick debris (8040) and a higher layer of large collapsed bricks (8018). Note that the floor in Room 8046 was much lower than the surrounding floors of the same phase, 8041/8044 in Square Q/4 west of Wall 8030, as well as Floor 8017 to the south. Thus, it may be suggested that Room 8046 was, to some extent, subterranean.

In Phase G-2a, new floor composed of soft red and gray striations (5053) accumulated between levels 85.00–85.68 m, sloping to the north and sealing the earlier brick collapse (Figs. 20.17– 20.18; Photo 20.18). Many pottery sherds (some restorable) were found here (Figs. 21.6–21.7), as well as three clay loomweights.

In the southern room, a series of at least three successive floors (8017) attributed to Stratum G-2b was found at levels 84.95–85.35 m; a soft brown floor, a reddish floor and a grey floor with bits of plaster and ash, all containing many sherds, bones and olive pits. The highest floor was covered by a layer of brick debris (8004). A patchy clay floor (5047) at level 85.69 m covering the brick debris layer was attributed to Stratum G-2a. Its relation to Walls 5063 and 5062 was insecure, although very likely.

Phase G-2a'

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

In Square Q/5, a localized transitional phase between the end of G-2a and the construction of the G-1b structures may be suggested (Fig. 20.2b), based on a white plaster floor (5067) at level 86.39 m that was related to a circular installation (4062; Photos 20.22–20.23); the latter was 0.19 m deep and had a thick clay-plastered wall. It resembled Installation 4064 of Stratum G-1 (see below) and two grinding installations in Area C, Building CF, Stratum C-1a. Floor 5067 at levels 86.30–86.50 m in the southern part of the square may belong to the same phase. These floors and the installation sealed the bins and ovens attributed to G-2a, and was sealed by layer 5024 and the wooden beams of Stratum G-1b (see below). We thus attribute these elements to a late phase of G-2, denoted G-2a', an intermediate phase between G-2a and G-1b.

Stratum G-1

Introduction

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

  • Plans: Figs. Figs. 20.3–20.5
Following Stratum G-2a, the area was rebuilt on a new plan. None of the previous walls continued to be in use, although the new walls retained the same northeast–southwest orientation and a few of them (4014, 5018, 5008) were constructed on top of earlier walls from Stratum G-2. A new feature introduced in Stratum G-1b was the use of wooden beams as foundations of walls and floors, also known in Stratum C-1b in Area C (Chapter 12) and Stratum B-5 in Area B (Chapter 8).

Two major architectural units were detected: Building GF in the central and northern part of the area and Building GG in the southern part, separated by a double wall (4047/5012). The eastern wall of the northern building (5017) was attached to another wall (5018), which probably belonged to an adjacent building to the east, beyond the limits of the excavation area. In the southwestern part of Area G, erosion destroyed much of Building GG.

In Building GG, very few changes were made between Strata G-1a and G-1b. The building was destroyed in G-1a by heavy fire, probably corresponding to the destruction of Stratum C-1a in Area C and E-1a in Area E. In Building GF, distinctions between the two strata could be observed in several cases, but since no violent destruction layer was detected, it might be conjectured that most of the Stratum G-1a floors in this building were eroded away, although this remains an open question. As noted above, building remains of Stratum G-1 were eroded away in Squares P–Q/6, the floors were almost completely eroded away in Squares P–Q/5, and erosion also destroyed the G-1 structures in the southwestern corner of the area in Square P/3.

The Wooden-Beam Foundations

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.24 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.27 - Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.28 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.29 - Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Charred wooden beams served as foundations for floors and walls of Stratum G-1 structures and sealed Stratum G-2 architecture in most of Area G (Fig. 20.3; Photos 20.22–20.30). The following is a description of this wooden construction in each of the excavation squares.

Square P/5

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Wooden beams were exposed in at least two consecutive layers in the east of the square (4020, 4031). They were arranged in a crisscross pattern, in an area 2.7 m wide and 0.4–0.6 m deep, below and to the east of Wall 4014, on both sides of Wall 4017 that extended from it. Both of these walls were related to Stratum G-1 (Photos 20.22–20.24, 20.30). The beams were used as foundations for both these walls, as well as for the related floors. The section created below Wall 4014 (Fig. 20.10) showed two layers of beams. East of this wall, there were three layers of beams; in the lower and upper layers, the beams were laid perpendicular to Wall 4014, while in the middle layer (4031), the beams were laid parallel to this wall. The beams of the lowest level ranged from 0.15–0.3 m in diameter. Of the beams in the middle layer, the longest was 2.4 m and the diameter ranged from 0.1–0.16 m. The dimensions of the beams in the upper layer (4020) were more modest, the largest being 1.4 m long and 0.1 m in diameter. Their top level was at 86.54 m.

It should be noted that when the poorly preserved bricks of Wall 4014 were dismantled, a 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris was revealed, separating the wall from the wooden beams described above (Fig. 20.10). This raised questions as to the relationship of the wooden beams to the construction of the wall; however, since the connection of the beams to other G-1 walls was established with great certainty, we maintain that Wall 4014 was supported by the wooden beams and that this crumbly brick layer was created during the heavy conflagration which strongly affected the lowest brick courses of the wall, because of its proximity to the wood.

Square Q/5

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

The wooden beams exposed in the eastern part of the square were embedded into a light reddish-pink layer (5024), which sealed the latest plaster floor (5067) of the Stratum G-2 courtyard (Fig. 20.11). The beams were arranged in two layers, the lower beams running north–south (4079) and the upper beams running northwest–southeast (5020). The top of the upper beams was at level 86.63 m and their bottom was at level 86.56 m. Two additional north–south beams were exposed in the southeastern corner of the square (continuing into Square Q/4) at 86.53 m. The beams in this area appear to be a foundation for a beaten-earth floor that disappeared, which was possibly a continuation of 5024 in the middle of the square.

Squares P/4

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26 - Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Wall 5012 of Stratum G-1in Squares P–Q/3–4 had a wooden foundation, seen in the section created below its northern face (Photos 20.27–20.28). The beams (8003) were perpendicular to the wall and continued northwards to serve as a foundation for a brick floor or platform (5069) and possibly for a floor that was not preserved east of this platform, between Walls 5012 and 4083 (Fig. 20.4). This layer of beams, oriented northeast–southwest, was between levels 85.79–85.91 m, extending from the top of Wall 5061 of Stratum G-2 on the west until the eastern end of the square. In fact, the top of Wall 5061 appears to have been reused, defining the brick platform on the west. East of the platform was a higher layer of beams (4066) that was laid perpendicularly to the lower layer, at levels at 86.08–86.44 m. (Photo 20.26)

In the northeastern corner of the square was a layer of beams laid at a northeastern–southeastern orientation (4071, between 86.53–86.29 m) that was the continuation of the southern group of beams (4020) in Square P/5, described above (Photo 20.25). Two elongated beams were located just on top of G-2 Wall 5061 at levels 86.03–86.28 m, serving as a foundation for the new wall (4070) built on the same line. West of this wall was a group of five beams which were perpendicular to the wall at level 86.00 m, probably serving as foundation for a floor that was not preserved in the small area that was excavated.

Wooden beams were also found in the foundation of Wall 4047, which created a double wall with Wall 5012, mentioned above (Fig. 20.16; Photo 20.31).

Square Q/4

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

After removing Wall 5017 of Stratum G-1 (see below), wooden beams were found below its lowest brick courses, among brick debris (5016); a section through Wall 5018 (attached to Wall 5017 on the east) revealed a foundation of beams perpendicular to the wall below its lowest course (Fig. 20.13; Photos 20.29, 20.40). A few beams found in the northeastern corner of the square continued those found in Square Q/5 to the north.

Square Q/3

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

A 0.46 m-thick layer of charred beams (5029) at levels 85.68–86.14 m sealed both Wall 5063 and the abutting floor build-up (5053) of Stratum G-2 in the northeastern corner of this square (Photos 20.17–20.18, 20.34–20.35). The beams appeared in several courses laid crosswise, at an east–west and north–south orientation; some appeared to be in disorder as if moved from their original location (perhaps due to seismic activity). This layer continued below the double brick wall (5017, 5018), which was founded some 0.3 m above the beams (Fig. 20.17) and extended ca. 1.3 m to the south of Wall 5017/5018 (Photo 20.40). It appears that the beams served as a foundation for a floor that was not preserved.

It should be noted that in several places there was a considerable gap of up to 0.5 m between the uppermost beams and the lowest brick course of the wall above (i.e., the case of Wall 4014, noted above) while in other places (such as the foundations of Walls 5012 and 4047), it was clear that the beams served as a foundation for the wall, as was the case in Area C. It appears that even where there was a gap, the wood served as such a foundation and the gap was created by seismic activity or the burning of the lowest bricks until melting point during the destruction.

Building GF

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.15 - Section 8 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.11 - Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.32 - Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.33 - Square Q/5 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The excavated remains attributed to this building in Squares P–Q/4–5 were 8.5×9.0 m, bordered by Walls 4014/4070 on the west, 5012 on the south and 5017 on the east (Photo 20.1). No closing wall on the north was uncovered and it seems that it was beyond the present limit of the excavation. In Square P/5, the western wall (4014) was built above G-2 Wall 5061, with wooden beams separating them, as described above (Photos 20.12, 20.22–20.23, 20.30, 20.32). It was exposed along 5.0 m in Square P/5 and its edge in Square P/4 was very poorly preserved to less than one course high. A strip of reddish-brown crumbly earth (4033), 0.4–0.5 m wide, exposed to the west of the wall, might be an indication of a foundation trench, although this is far from certain. The conflagration that destroyed the building burnt the bricks to a pinkish-orange hue. Wall 4017 extended from Wall 4014 towards the east (Photos 20.12, 20.22); only a brick and a half were preserved to one course high. This wall probably divided the area of Square P/5 east of Wall 4014 into two spaces, although no additional details of this assumed division further to the east were preserved.

In Square Q/5, no floors of Stratum G-1b were preserved above the constructional beams. In the eastern part of the square, a stone floor (4049), 3.5 m long and ca. 0.5–1.3 m wide, was exposed just below topsoil at levels 86.90–86.97 m, unrelated to any other feature (Photos 20.22, 20.33); this floor was attributed to Stratum G-1a. It is possible that this part of the building was an open courtyard. In the rest of the square, brick debris mixed with collapsed burnt bricks and grayish-brown and black ash (4007, 4013) found below topsoil, appeared to be related to the destruction of the building.

In Squares P–Q/4, Walls 4083 and 5019 were two segments of partition walls that comprised the southern border of the space described above, although they appeared to belong to two subsequent phases: Wall 4083 was founded in Stratum G1b, built on top of a wooden-beam foundation that separated it from the earlier wall (8055) of Stratum G-2 (Photo 20.11). Wall 5019 in the eastern part of Q/4 was narrower and higher; its foundation was 0.33 m higher than that of Wall 4083 and fit the level of the plaster floor (5023) to its north and was thus attributed to Stratum G-1a. It seems that in Squares Q–P/4–5 in Stratum G-1b, we may reconstruct a large space (inner dimensions 3.2×7.0 m) enclosed by Walls 4014, 4017, 4083 and an extension of Wall 5018 to the north (Photo 20.34). An element found in this space that remained enigmatic was Wall 5040, a 3.5 m-long and ca. 0.7 m wide stone foundation in the northern part of Square Q/4 (Photos 20.1, 20.32, 20.34), which was architecturally detached from the other walls of the building. It was attributed to Stratum G-1b, since it was covered by G-1a plaster floor 5023, which covered much of the northern part of Square Q/4. The nature of Wall 5040 was even more enigmatic in light of the lack of stone foundations in the Iron IIA levels at Tel Rehov. This element remains architecturally unexplained, although perhaps it served as a bench.

Plaster Floor 5023 in the northern part of Square Q/4 (levels 86.65–86.72 m) was composed of two thin superimposed layers of plaster; it did not clearly abut any wall, although it most likely did reach Wall 5019. Although it was somewhat lower than the stone floor (4049) in Square Q/5, it appears that both these floors were contemporary and belonged to Stratum G-1a.

In Square P/4, a single-course brick platform or floor (5069, 1.3×1.8 m), covered with a thick layer of plaster, was built above the wooden beams in the space between the short segment of Wall 4083 on the north and Wall 5012 on the south (Fig. 20.15; Photos 20.1, 20.11, 20.32, 20.34). Approach to this platform/floor could be through a possible opening in Wall 4083 to the north, where the bricks of this wall were found at the same level as the top of the platform (86.10 m). Note that the lowest brick course of Wall 5012 south of the platform was at level 86.26 m, 0.18 m above the top of the brick platform, but the wooden foundations of this wall started at level 85.72 m, which fit the wooden beams under the platform. It thus appears that the platform/floor and Wall 5012 were constructed at the same time. Brick debris with some small pebbles (4055, 4088) had accumulated on top of the platform. It appears that the platform/floor went out of use in Stratum G-1a, although no clear stratigraphic element was found above it, except for a small segment of an unnumbered wall, which made a corner with Wall 5012 and may be attributed to Stratum G-1a. The function of this brick platform/floor remained obscure.

Summary of Building GF

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

Two phases were identified in Building GF, Strata G-1b and G-1a. In Stratum G-1b, the preserved parts of the building included a northern and a southern space. The northern space was probably an open courtyard with floor striations, resembling the open space that was here in the previous Stratum G-2, but lacking installations, such as ovens, bins and pits. It remained unclear whether Wall 4017 in Square P/5 continued to the east and divided this large space into two smaller spaces (in both strata). In the southern end of the building was a narrow elongated space with a brick platform or floor at its western end, yet its function, as well as that of the stone foundation 5040, remained obscure. In any event, the building does not appear to have been a regular dwelling and perhaps was utilized as a public space of some sort. In Stratum G-1a, it appears that inner changes were made; the wall segment that made a corner with 5012 perhaps continued northwards to create a corner with an assumed continuation to the west of the new Wall 5019, thus creating a room (inner dimensions 2.0×4.3 m) in the southeastern part of this building. However such a reconstruction is, to a large extent, hypothetical.

Building GG

Introduction

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Building GG refers to the northern part of a structure whose southern and western parts disappeared due to erosion. The remains were exposed under topsoil on the southern slope of the hillock. The northern wall of the building was Wall 4047, a brick wall attached to Wall 5012, the southern wall of Building GF, together comprising a wide double wall. The plastered wall, 0.5 m wide and exposed along 7.0 m, was founded on round wooden beams laid perpendicularly (Fig. 20.16). Two construction phases in this wall could be discerned: the lower one (comprised of three brick courses) was attributed to G-1b, while the upper one (two brick courses protruding about 0.1 m to the south of the earlier courses), were attributed to G-1a (Photo 20.31). An alternative explanation would be that the two upper courses shifted from their original location due to seismic activity, although this is less plausible. On its western end, the wall made a corner with Wall 4068, of which only a single brick was preserved to one course high. The eastern wall (5008) was built on top of G-2 Walls 8027 and 5063 (Photo 20.18). It was exposed along 3.8 m, built of a single row of hard white bricks and was preserved to the height of three courses (Photos 20.34–20.35).

Room 4089

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.36 - Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.37 - Squares P–Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

The eastern room (4089) was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, Wall 5008 on the east and Wall 4060 on the west; the southern end of this space was eroded away. Its width was 3.2 m and its length at least 3.0 m until the erosion line. Two installations were found in this room: 5031 and 4064, both related to food production.

A reddish-brown beaten-earth floor (4089) was exposed west of Installation 5031 at level 85.92 m. A 1.0 m-long charred wooden beam was found on the floor, perhaps part of a loom that stood nearby (see below). Floor 5038 was a pinkish clay surface with small ash patches that abutted Installation 5031 on its west and Wall 5008 on its east at level 85.87 m. The remains of an orange-clay oven were exposed near Wall 4047 to the north (not shown on the plan). No floor was found south of Installation 5031, where only extremely decayed debris was found due to the intense erosion.

Installation 5031 in the middle of this space was an oval of standing bricks coated inside and outside with white plaster (Fig. 20.6; Photos 20.34, 20.36, 20.40). Four open channels were carved in the upper part of the northern and southern walls of the installation, with plaster preserved inside three of these channels. The floor of the installation was composed of stones of various types and sizes, including a grinding stone fragment. A deep krater (Fig. 21.8:8) was embedded in the southwestern corner of the installation, its rim more or less flush with the stone floor and possibly used to collect liquid (olive oil?) that was processed or gathered inside the installation. Inside the installation, a layer of soft dark ashy earth contained two cooking jugs, a bowl and a krater (Figs. 21.8:7–8; 21.9:1–2).

An elongated plastered open channel north of the installation was covered by four large hard limestones (5071; Photos 20.34, 20.37, 20.40); the stones were chipped and cracked as a result of extensive heat. The largest one measured 0.38× 0.51×0.73 m. The bottom of these large stones were ca. 0.15 m above the top of the open channel and chips from these stones were found in the accumulation above Floor 4089 to the west. The stones appeared to be related to the installation and perhaps were used as weights, possibly hung on the wooden beam found lying in the destruction debris to the west of the installation. A roughly worked stone mortar was found close the large stones (Photo 20.37).

The elongated plastered channel to the north of the installation, the four open channels carved into the top of the installation’s walls and the sunken vessel, all indicate that this installation was used in the processing of liquid, perhaps olive oil. The four sunken depressions on top of the installation’s wall were perhaps intended to hold two wooden beams, which somehow were used in the operation. However the exact identification of the function and operation of this installation remains elusive.

The second installation (4064), just 0.4 m to the west of 5031, was an elongated, almost elliptical semi-circle (Photos 20.34; 20.37–20.40, 20.42), built against Wall 4060 and on top of Floor 4089, just on top of Wall 4081 of the previous stratum. It was constructed of small bricks that were covered inside and outside with a thick gray plaster; the center of the installation apparently also had been plastered, although none of this plaster was preserved. Two stones were set at the southern edge of the installation, which may be explained as a grinding installation with a mud-plastered parapet of the type found in Area C (Chapters 12, 43). This suggestion is supported by the find of an upper and a lower grinding stone in the destruction layer (4059) east and north of this installation (Photo 20.39).1

The room was destroyed in a heavy conflagration, creating a layer of burnt bricks and black ash. The thick destruction layer on top of Floor 4089 in the western part of the room (4059) included vessels (Figs. 21.8–21.13) and upper and lower grindstones. A few loomweights found near Installation 5031 were perhaps related to the cache of loomweights found to the west of the entranceway in Wall 4060 (see below). The wooden beam found on the floor could be related to Installation 5031 or to a loom that stood near the entrance to Room 5037. No separate floor that could be attributed to a later phase was found in this room and thus, it appears in identical form in the plans of both Strata G-1b and G-1a (Figs. 20.4–20.5).
Footnotes

1 A narrow cylindrical gap in the middle of Wall 4060 had remains of plaster. This was interpreted during the excavation as a channel conducting liquids from the room to the west into the installation. However, the parallels to the grinding installations in Area C are more convincing and we tend to reconstruct 4064 as such.

Room 5037

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Table 20.1 - Correlation of strata – Areas G and C from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.3 - Plan of wooden beams in the foundations of Stratum G-1 walls from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.4 - Plan of Stratum G-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Figure 20.5 - Plan of Stratum G-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.41 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.42 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.43 - Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.44 - Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

This small square room (inner dimensions 2.2×2.3 m) was in the northwestern corner of the extant part of Building GG. It was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, poorly preserved Wall 4068 on the west, and Walls 4067 and 4060 on the south and east (Photos 20.40–20.45). A 0.9 m-wide entranceway led to this room from the eastern space (4089) at the northern end of Wall 4060. At least two floors were exposed. The early floor attributed to Stratum G-1b was preserved in three areas. Two small segments were exposed near Wall 4047 (8011, 8022) at level 85.75 m, abutting the lowest course of Wall 4047. On top of the western patch (8022), a scaraboid was found (Chapter 30A, No. 17). In the central part of the room was a compact clay floor (5037) at level 85.82 m, abutting Wall 4060.

A higher floor (4088) made of hard gray plaster was identified in the central and northern parts of the room, between levels 85.91–86.00 m, ca. 0.1– 0.2 m higher than the earlier floor. This higher floor is related to Stratum G-1a and appears to have abutted all four walls of the room, although this was not clearly seen.

Destruction debris (4052) that covered the floor consisted of burnt bricks, light gray ash, charcoal pieces and burnt earth that contained 47 restorable vessels (Photos 20.41–2.44; Figs. 21.8–21.14). A large number of these vessels were sunk into the floor against Wall 4067. Over 80 gypsum loomweights were found in the northeastern corner of the room, near the entranceway. They were piled up, covering an area 1.5 m long and 0.65 m wide. Their configuration and dimensions apparently indicate the size and shape of the loom that stood here. Note the abovementioned possibility that the wooden beam in the room to the east might have belonged to this loom. The location of a loom at the entrance of a room recalls a similar situation at Tell Qasile Stratum X, where concentrations of about 80 loomweights each were found at the entrances of several rooms (Mazar 2008).

In the southern part of Square P/3, Loci 4065 and 4069 contain the same destruction layer, although it is slightly lower due to the topography and damaged by the erosion line.

Summary and Conclusions

Figures and Tables
Figures and Tables

There are two major strata in Area G: G-2 and G-1, each with two phases in several locations. The architectural data from both strata is fragmentary and the complete plans of the buildings remain unknown. In Stratum G-2, Buildings GC, GD and GA could be parts of regular dwellings, although Building GB appears to have had a public function. In Stratum G-2b, it might have been a wide open space, about 7.0×13.3 m, while in Stratum G-1b, it was divided into an elongated roofed(?) space on the west and an L-shaped open space on the east and north, with numerous clay bins and pits, as well as several ovens. This open space perhaps was used for food storage or processing and baking, serving several adjacent dwellings; it thus may have belonged to a clan composed of several nuclear families living in the houses around this open area.

As elsewhere in Tel Rehov, no violent destruction was observed at the end of Stratum G-2, yet hints at an earthquake which caused considerable damage were found in the form of tilted and split walls. Such damages may have been the reason for abandoning the Stratum G-2 structures and for the foundation of the new buildings of Stratum G-1. The construction of Stratum G-1 was accompanied by laying wooden foundations for both walls and floors, as was detected also in Areas C and B. About half of this wood was composed of olive tree branches (Chapter 52).

Architectural continuity between Strata G-2 and G-1 was found in several places (i.e., Wall 4014 on top of Wall 5061, Wall 8030 on top of Wall 5018, Wall 5008 on top of Wall 5063), while the general plan of the structures differed from that of Stratum G-1. The new double wall 5012/4047 was a major feature, separating Building GG on the south from Building GF on the north. Both of these buildings are only partly known. Building GF continued the tradition of Building GB of the previous period in its being composed of large open spaces, although no food processing or storage installations were found in it and thus, its function may have changed. Architectural changes between Strata G-1b and G-1a were also observed. A unique feature was the brick platform/floor (5069), which perhaps served as a base for storage facilities. The preserved part of Building GG contained two installations of particular interest: a possible grinding installation with a plaster parapet and perhaps an oil-extracting installation with stone weights, which was rather rare in this period. A loom with some 80 gypsum weights apparently stood at the entrance to the small chamber (5037) and a wooden beam found outside this room might have belonged to the loom.

The dramatic destruction of Stratum G-1a yielded a rich pottery assemblage and other finds. This can be correlated to the general destruction of the city of Stratum IV in the 9th century BCE, as evidenced in other areas at Tel Rehov.

Plans and Sections

Photos

  • Photo 20.1        Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.2        Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.3        Squares P–Q/4–5, looking north from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.4        Collapsed mudbricks on left corner in G-2b Building GA from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.5        Tilted Wall from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.6        G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.7        Building GA, G-2 Building GB, and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.8        G-2 Building GB from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.9        Wall 5064 and G-2a courtyard from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.10        G-2b and G-2a circular bins from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.11        Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.12        G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.13        Stratum G-2a Square P/6 and Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.14        Stratum G-2a Floors 4016 and 5004 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.15        Building GC from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.16        Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.17        Squares Q–P/3–4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.18        Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.19        Square Q/3 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.20        Tilted G-2 Wall 4081 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.21        Closeup on Tilted G-2 Wall 4081 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.22        Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.23        Squares P–Q/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.24        Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.25        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.26        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.27        Squares Q–P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.28        Square P/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.29        Square Q/4 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.30        Square P/5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.31        Tilted G-1b Wall 4047 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.32        Squares P/4–5 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.33        Square Q/5 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.34        Squares P–Q/3–4 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.35        Square Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.36        Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.37        Squares P–Q/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.38        Square P/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.39        Square P/3 – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.40        General view of Area G – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.41        Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.42        Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.43        Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.44        Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)
  • Photo 20.45        Room 4088 floor below G-1a destruction layer (4052) – from Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3: Chapter 20)

Chapter 54 - Reconstructing a Seismic Destruction at Tel Rehov: Insights from a Paleomagnetic Fold Test on Tilted Walls in Area C, Stratum V

Figures, Tables, and Photos
Figures, Tables, and Photos

  • Fig. 54.1                     Visualization of the Earth's Magnetic Field from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.2                     Paleomagnetic fold test as applied to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.3                     Sampling locations in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.1                     Samples in Burnt Wall 2454 of Building CE from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.2                     Samples in Tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Table 54.1                     Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.4                     Zijderveld diagrams of the AF demagnetization of samples from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.5                     Equal area projection of measured directions from Buildings CE and CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.6                     Equal area projection of measured directions from Buildings CE and CG after tilt correction from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Discussion
Introduction

The architectural remains uncovered at Tel Rehov throughout the occupation history of the site (15th—8th centuries BCE) are dominated by mudbricks; during the Iron Age IIA (Strata VI-IV, 10th-9th centuries BCE), the brick walls typically lack stone foundations. In Stratum V of Iron IIA, wooden beams were used on a large-scale as foundations for the walls or were incorporated in the floor makeup. A destruction that involved intense fire was identified at the end of Stratum V (local Stratum C-1b) in the eastern and northern parts of Area C: Buildings CG, CH, CM, and CE (see Chapter 12), but not in other parts of the area. A later violent destruction of Stratum IV (local Stratum C-1a) was found across the entire site (Mazar 2003; 2008; Chapter 4 and various stratigraphic chapters).

The current study focuses on the local destruction of parts of Stratum C-lb, which is dated by radiocarbon and ceramic typology to the late 10th until the early 9th century BCE (Chapters 4, 24, 48).

The mudbricks are sun dried, and their firing during the destruction process is the basis for the archaeomagnetic investigation that was undertaken in Area C. The question at hand is whether the partial destruction of the Stratum C-lb buildings was caused by a military campaign, local fire, or, given the geological setting of the site (Chapter 2), by an earthquake. The latter is supported by extensive segments of strongly tilted walls; however, it is possible that in this earthquake-frequented region, the earthquake that tilted the walls of Stratum C-lb occurred independently of the fire, sometime after the site was destroyed by the intense conflagration indicated by the color and texture of the mudbricks.

The active faulting at the site is reflected in many other tilted floors and occupation layers, dated to the Late Bronze Age I onwards, particularly in Area D (where the direction of the tilt is towards the southeast; see Chapters 4, 15). Deducing a causal relationship of tilting and fire events based only on field observations is a difficult task; the current case study demonstrates how archaeomagnetic investigation can provide decisive observations regarding this relationship, and how it can be used in the reconstruction of destruction processes.

In 2003, we investigated the relationship between the tilting of the walls and the fire by an archaeomagnetic study of the burnt mudbricks of two Stratum C- lb walls that were found tilted. The samples were collected in collaboration with A. Mazar and measured at the Paleomagnetic Laboratory of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.1
Footnotes

1 The measurements were done with the help of R. Granot.

Research Methods

Archaeomagnetism

The case study presented in this paper belongs to the wider field of archaeomagnetism — the application of paleomagnetic methods in archaeology, which consists of various techniques. Some are aimed solely to reconstruct the geomagnetic field itself during archaeological times (e.g., Korte et al. 2011) and others, to answer archaeological questions, mostly by using archaeomagnetic data as a dating tool (e.g., Eighmy and Sternberg 1990; Lanos 2003; Pavon-Carrasco et al. 2011). The most typical recorders of the geomagnetic field in archaeological contexts are heat-impacted clayey materials (e.g., pottery, kilns and ovens, mudbricks and metallurgical installations). The full vector information of the geomagnetic field (declination, inclination and intensity; Fig. 54.1) might be retrieved by sampling materials found in their original cooling position. In addition to reconstructing the properties of the geomagnetic field, the experiments are designed to evaluate the reliability of the material as a geomagnetic recorder (Tauxe 2010); they also provide information regarding the thermal history of the samples.

The geomagnetic field vector consists of three components (Fig. 54.1):
  1. declination (D) — its direction in respect to the geographic north
  2. inclination (I) — its direction in respect to the horizon
  3. intensity (its strength)
For each point on the earth's surface, the geomagnetic field can be represented as a vector, and, as all components change constantly with time, regional reference curves can be used as a dating tool. The case study presented here makes use only of the directional components of the geomagnetic field, which are relatively easy to reconstruct in the paleomagnetic laboratory when the magnetic properties of the sample are stable.

Methods and Sampling

Figures and Photos
Figures and Photos

  • Fig. 54.1           Visualization of the Earth's Magnetic Field from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.2           Paleomagnetic fold test as applied to mudbricks walls from Tel Rehov from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Fig. 54.3           Sampling locations in Area C from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.1           Samples in Burnt Wall 2454 of Building CE from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)
  • Photo 54.2           Samples in Tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG from Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Discussion

The archaeomagnetic study was designed to provide conclusive evidence for one of the two following possible scenarios:2
  1. An earthquake is the main cause for the partial destruction of Stratum C-lb and the tilting of the buildings' walls, and is also responsible for the fire.
  2. A fire is the main cause for the destruction of the Stratum C-lb buildings; after this, during a period in which the site was abandoned, an earthquake tilted the walls.
As the two main segments of the tilted walls are facing opposite directions, creating an anticlinal fold structure, we applied the paleomagnetic "fold test" (Tauxe 2010: 177) to test the relationship between the folding (tilting) and the magnetization of the mudbricks (the result of the fire) (Fig. 54.2). In this test, the geomagnetic directions (D and I [Fig. 54.1]) are reconstructed from the two opposite flanks of the fold (the two opposing burnt mudbricks walls) and their statistical averages are compared. If they are similar, the fire had to occur during or after the tilting, implying option (1) above (Fig. 54.2a). If they are statistically different, then the fire had to occur before the tilting, implying option (2) above (Fig. 54.2b). To enhance statistical evaluation of similarity, the directions are corrected for their respective tilt; sparser directional cluster after correction indicates option (1) and tighter directional cluster, option (2).

We collected ten samples of burnt mudbricks from the two opposing tilted walls (Fig. 54.3): six samples from the western (inner) face of Wall 2454, which served as the eastern wall of Building CE (Photo 54.1; Chapter 12; Fig. 12.27), and four from the eastern (outer) face of Wall 2411, the eastern wall of Building CG (Photo 54.2; Figs. 12.39-12.40). The sampling was done by cutting out oriented chunks of clay bricks into small (~8 cm3) plastic boxes using a Brunton compass.3 The tilting direction of the walls (their dip) was measured on flat surfaces in various locations and an average was calculated. The paleomagnetic experiments were done using alternating field (AF) demagnetization (Tauxe 2010: 127) in steps of 5µT to 40µT or 10µT to 90µT. As the signal was consistent and stable, the samples were not fully demagnetized.
Footnotes

2 The options that the fire occurred later than and independent of the earthquake (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable from option 1), or that the fire caused the tilting (archaeomagnetically indistinguishable from option 2) are much less likely and are not discussed here.

3 The mudbricks were too fragile for drilling, thus an alternative sampling method was improvised.

Results

Both walls are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall of Building CE towards the north and the wall of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold.

The demagnetization data are presented in Fig. 54.4. Two samples (C3 and C6) from Wall 2454 were rejected, as they demonstrated an unstable magnetization (Fig. 54.4). The mean vectorial direction was calculated for the two clusters of samples using Fisher statistics. The results are presented in Table 54.1 and Fig. 54.5; Fig. 54.6 presents the results after tilt correction.

Table 54.1

Mean geomagnetic direction for each of the tilted walls in Area C

Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5)

Conclusions

AF demagnetization of eight of the ten samples from the two tilted mudbrick walls in Buildings CE and CG (Stratum V, C-1b) demonstrated stable, single-component magnetization, indicating a simple thermal history of only one major heating event. This result is an objective and conclusive confirmation of the field observation that both walls were subjected to the same intense fire.4 The directions retrieved from the samples indicate that the fire took place after or simultaneously with the tilting. We therefore argue that the simplest explanation for the destruction process of Stratum V is an earthquake that triggered an intense fire (option [1] above). The symmetric anticlinal structure observed in the deformed structures of both walls (~18° each flank), together with the discrete quality of the damage (destruction is observed only in certain locations in Area C), supports destruction by the on-fault effect of an earthquake, as classified by Rodríguez-Pascua et al. (2011: 22). Area C is located directly on a fault line (Zilberman, Chapter 2) and the deformation caused by the fault scarp is expressed by the tilting (folding); the ductile reaction of the structures (rather than brittle, e.g., Altunel 1998: Fig. 5), is most probably the result of the quality of building materials and construction techniques, including the use of wooden beams. Finally, the possibility that an earthquake occurred after and independently from the fire (option [2] above) is entirely excluded by the magnetic results (Fig. 54.2b).

As the region is prone to earthquakes and the tell itself is located directly on a major segment of the Dead Sea Transform (Zilberman, Chapter 2), the site most probably suffered from frequent earthquake-triggered destructions of different magnitudes. This might be sustained by the use of wooden beams as part of the construction techniques, and, in the case of Stratum V, also by the fast recovery and organic reconstruction of the city, in many cases of the same buildings, in Stratum IV. This process of close continuity between the two strata may also explain the absence of trapped bodies and other features typical of massive destruction by earthquakes.5

In addition to specific insights regarding the destruction process of Stratum C-lb at Tel Rehov, the study presented here demonstrates the feasibility and potential of archaeomagnetic studies on burnt mudbricks. The stable and strong magnetization provides opportunity for studies regarding all aspects of archaeomagnetism, including establishing dating references and other related applications.
Footnotes

4 The most common carrier of magnetic remanence in baked clay is magnetite; thus, most probably both walls were subjected to at least 585°C, the temperature at which magnetite loses its permanent magnetization (Curie temperature).

5 At an earlier stage of the research, A. Mazar suggested attributing the destruction of Stratum V to the military campaign of Pharaoh Shoshenq I to Canaan around 925 BCE (Mazar 2003: 317). This destruction date and its cause were challenged by Finkelstein and Piasetzky (2003), who argued for a later date and rejected the destructive quality of Shoshenq I's campaign to the region. Later excavation seasons since 2003 made it clear that the violent destruction of Stratum V occurred only in a certain part of Area C, and this result led to the reevaluation of the previous conclusions (see Chapters 4 and 12). If, indeed, an earthquake was the cause of the partial destruction of Stratum V in Area C, it excludes the possibility that the destruction was caused by the campaign of Shoshenq I.

Seismic Effects
Stratum VI Earthquake - Early Iron IIA - 10th century BCE

Area C - Stratum C-2

Deformation Map

Stratum C-2 Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.7 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

  • Fig. 12.7 - Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Area C
Building Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
Square R/4 1555 1562, 4458, and 1563 apparently southward All walls tilted - esp. 4458
Description(s)

  • Room 1555 in Square R/4 was ca. 2.6 m wide and at least 2.9 m long, bordered by Walls 1562 on the east, 4458 on the south and 1563 on the west; the northern wall was beyond the excavation limits (Photo 12.23). The southern wall (4458) was the western continuation of Wall 4438, the northern wall of Building CA (see below). The western wall (1563) was preserved to ten courses (Photo 12.24), although its eastern face was very damaged. All the walls, and particularly Wall 4458 on the south, were found tilted, apparently the result of seismic activity. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

Square R/4 1555 Debris
Description(s)

  • The 18 restored vessels from Locus 1555b (Figs. 13.10–13.11; photo on p. 270) were attributed to Room 1555 of Stratum C-2, based on the relation of the debris layer (1555a) and the top of the pottery layer (1555b) to the surrounding walls. As such, this would be the only case where an assemblage of restorable vessels could be attributed to Stratum C-2 and the only evidence for a sudden destruction at the end of this occupation level, although no traces of fire were found; the cause might have been an earthquake. Yet, there is a certain dilemma concerning this pottery group. Unlike much of the other pottery from Stratum C-2, the vessels lacked red slip and burnish, and several were painted in a style typical of the Iron IB pottery at Tel Rehov. Typologically as well, the vessels suit an Iron IB date, although most forms also continued into Early Iron IIA. These factors, as well as the fact that the main bulk of the pottery was found at level 85.60 m, which is somewhat lower than the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (general Stratum VII) in the adjacent Square Q/4, raised initial doubts as to the attribution of this locus. If this pottery was on a layer relating to the debris of Locus 1555a and abutting the bottom of the room’s walls, it must belong to Stratum C-2. However, the possibility remains that this pottery concentration should be attributed to Stratum C-3a, the last Iron IB phase, in which case the thin debris layer 11428 might have been the surface on which the assemblage rested. In that case, Floor 11436 and Pits 11438 and 11439 would be attributed to an earlier phase, denoted Stratum C-3b, corresponding to the lower pits of Stratum D-3; if so, then the pottery concentration preceded the walls of the room as defined above. This is not entirely impossible when considering the location of this pottery concentration in relation to the bottom of these walls (see section, Fig. 12.97). However, in that case, Room 1555 would remain without a floor, despite the good preservation of its walls. Another problem with this explanation is that floors attributed to Stratum C-2 east of Room 1555 (in Square S/4) are almost at the same level or even lower than the pottery in Locus 1555b. Ultimately, this unique assemblage was assigned to Stratum C-2, while acknowledging that the pottery types could be either Iron IB or Early Iron IIA, demonstrating the continuity between these two periods, as discussed in Chapter 24. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

CA 4420 4439 northward Bulged Wall
Description(s)

  • .... The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo 12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses high and was poorly preserved, especially on the northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that the main damage to the building, whatever the cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6 m, although a thickening identified in its lower courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m. There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

Just east of CA 1506 eastward Support Wall ?
Description(s)

  • A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3 m and was composed of the same hard yellow bricks as the other walls in this building, although here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses of its eastern face protruding; this might have been the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).

    The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was not certain; it abutted the southern half of the poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA (4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where it was abutted by an open area in which cooking and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a retainer built to buttress the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b Building CD, terminated just at the point where the northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:

    1. Wall 1506 was built as a retaining wall to support the damaged southern end of the eastern wall of Building CA during some later phase of Stratum C-2, and was subsequently reused in Stratum C-1b, when the building was rebuilt

    2. Wall 1506 was constructed in Stratum C-1b as part of the renovation of Building CA as Building CD

    It seems that the first option is preferable for the following reasons

    1. layers attributed to C-2 in the open area to the north and east of the wall abutted its lowest exposed courses

    2. there was an alternative entrance into Building CB, so the blockage of the northern entrance did not cancel this building

    3. it was built of yellow bricks typical only of Stratum C-2.

    The end of Building CA was perhaps the result of an earthquake, as evidenced by the damaged and cracked state of the walls and the large amount of complete fallen bricks above the floors. Preservation was especially poor on the eastern side of the building. It is possible that earlier seismic damage ravaged the building during the course of its use and there was some evidence of attempts to repair and continue to use it, such as Wall 1506. However, the final event put the building out of use, to be leveled, deliberately filled-in, and rebuilt in Stratum C-1b (Building CD). The fact that the floors of the building were relatively empty of finds may suggest that it was abandoned before its final devastation.
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

CA All rooms Debris
Description(s)

  • .. The rooms [of Bldg. CA] were found full of complete fallen yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash, and brown soil. There were relatively few finds, mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs. 13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426 (Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18), yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ) CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were made of beaten earth and for the most part, their level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible makeup. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

CB 1520 1442 and 1483 probably southward Split Wall
Description(s)

CB 1520 Debris
Description(s)

  • ... The interior of the room [1520 in Bldg. CB] contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from 84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474, 2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these striations represented the accumulation of floors in this hall, although it was difficult to separate these thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels might have been a fill. Some layers contained large patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes, such as one long, rope-like configuration found lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers, most of which were sherds or fragments of small vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots, kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs. 13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking facilities were found here.

    ... Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5 m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks (1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake, either during the time it was still in use or some time after the building was abandoned.

    Although it was considered that this room could have been a basement, this possibility was ruled out since there was no constructed element above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran beneath the later Building CG
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:31-35)

CB 1520 Excavators suggested it fell eastward or northward. Due to it's size and weight, I suggest it did not fall far and likely fell to the south from the split walls which probably split in a southerly direction due to a force from the north. Fallen stone
Description(s)

  • ... A large, roughly squared mizi limestone (0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south of the entranceway [to Room 1520] in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35, 12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we assume that the smooth bottom side had originally been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position of this large stone in front of the entranceway in Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this was not its original position and that it had tumbled over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location during the assumed earthquake that terminated this occupation phase. ... - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:31-35)

CE 6464 Debris
Description(s)

  • ... A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443) that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504) was floating above this floor, although a protruding course of bricks found just about on level with Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded a layer of sandy material with some brick debris (6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:36-38)

CE Spaces north of Room 6464 in Squares Y/5-6 Debris
Description(s)

  • Spaces to the north of Room 6464

    Three spaces were attributed to this building in Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between them was found, due to overlying elements that remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43). Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.

    The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5 was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1 Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east– west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).

    The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433) and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south) and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall 6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship between these walls. At some later stage, east–west Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added, dividing the space into two; in the north were the upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:36-38)

CY 6506, 7512, and 8488 (?) 7511 eastward - tilt most pronounced on W end of the wall Tilted Wall
Description(s)

  • Wall 7511 [of Bldg. CY] was preserved at a tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of this wall was built of segments, with two vertical seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a mode of construction which might have been aimed at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake. Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which closed the building on the east. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

CY Central courtyard 7512 Debris
Description(s)

  • The central courtyard [7512 of Bldg. CY] was 3.1 m wide and at least 5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig. 12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505) resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level 85.15–85.25 m. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

CY 8470 and 6506 Debris
Description(s)

  • Room 6506 [of Bldg. CY], the southern room, was bordered by Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506 on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square (2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellow earth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1 Building CW.

    Room 8470 [of Bldg. CY], the northern room, was bordered on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner, leading from the central courtyard. A smooth yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three nicely worked limestones were set in a row along Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of dark organic material, similar to that in the southern room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW (Fig. 12.55).
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

CY 8488 Debris
Description(s)

  • Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room 6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458 on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m, was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14; Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not proceed down below the floor, it seems that this was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer above the floor (8466) included complete fallen yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34– 13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones, including horns. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area C
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
Damaged and tilted walls + Debris including smashed vessels
  • Photo 12.24 - Square R/4 — Room 1555 - Damaged eastern face of Wall 1563 in Room 1555
  • Photo 12.25 - Square R/4 — Room 1555 - Smashed vessels in Room 1555
Description(s)

  • Room 1555 in Square R/4 was ca. 2.6 m wide and at least 2.9 m long, bordered by Walls 1562 on the east, 4458 on the south and 1563 on the west; the northern wall was beyond the excavation limits (Photo 12.23). The southern wall (4458) was the western continuation of Wall 4438, the northern wall of Building CA (see below). The western wall (1563) was preserved to ten courses (Photo 12.24), although its eastern face was very damaged. All the walls, and particularly Wall 4458 on the south, were found tilted, apparently the result of seismic activity.

    The 18 restored vessels from Locus 1555b (Figs. 13.10–13.11; photo on p. 270) were attributed to Room 1555 of Stratum C-2, based on the relation of the debris layer (1555a) and the top of the pottery layer (1555b) to the surrounding walls. As such, this would be the only case where an assemblage of restorable vessels could be attributed to Stratum C-2 and the only evidence for a sudden destruction at the end of this occupation level, although no traces of fire were found; the cause might have been an earthquake. Yet, there is a certain dilemma concerning this pottery group. Unlike much of the other pottery from Stratum C-2, the vessels lacked red slip and burnish, and several were painted in a style typical of the Iron IB pottery at Tel Rehov. Typologically as well, the vessels suit an Iron IB date, although most forms also continued into Early Iron IIA. These factors, as well as the fact that the main bulk of the pottery was found at level 85.60 m, which is somewhat lower than the uppermost pits of Stratum D-3 (general Stratum VII) in the adjacent Square Q/4, raised initial doubts as to the attribution of this locus. If this pottery was on a layer relating to the debris of Locus 1555a and abutting the bottom of the room’s walls, it must belong to Stratum C-2. However, the possibility remains that this pottery concentration should be attributed to Stratum C-3a, the last Iron IB phase, in which case the thin debris layer 11428 might have been the surface on which the assemblage rested. In that case, Floor 11436 and Pits 11438 and 11439 would be attributed to an earlier phase, denoted Stratum C-3b, corresponding to the lower pits of Stratum D-3; if so, then the pottery concentration preceded the walls of the room as defined above. This is not entirely impossible when considering the location of this pottery concentration in relation to the bottom of these walls (see section, Fig. 12.97). However, in that case, Room 1555 would remain without a floor, despite the good preservation of its walls. Another problem with this explanation is that floors attributed to Stratum C-2 east of Room 1555 (in Square S/4) are almost at the same level or even lower than the pottery in Locus 1555b. Ultimately, this unique assemblage was assigned to Stratum C-2, while acknowledging that the pottery types could be either Iron IB or Early Iron IIA, demonstrating the continuity between these two periods, as discussed in Chapter 24.
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

Bulged Wall + Debris
  • Photo 12.28 - Bldg. CA — Room 4420 - Wall 4439 - Bulged southern E-W wall
  • Photo 12.27 - View from above and looking south at Bldg. CA - Seated person is in the room with the wall bulge
Description(s)

  • .... The southern wall (4439) was preserved ten courses high; its exact width was not known, since C-1b Wall 1448 covered it (Photo 12.28). The eastern wall (4434) stood nine courses high and was poorly preserved, especially on the northeast (Figs. 12.66–12.67). This suggests that the main damage to the building, whatever the cause, was focused in the east and particularly, the northeast. The original width of Wall 4434 was 0.6 m, although a thickening identified in its lower courses on the south reached a width of 0.85 m. There was obviously a need to reinforce this eastern wall, perhaps after a seismic tremor, and it seems that Wall 1506, built adjoining the southern part of the eastern face of Wall 4434, played such a role during the lifetime of this building (see further discussion below).

    ... The rooms were found full of complete fallen yellow bricks, chunks of brick debris, some ash, and brown soil. There were relatively few finds, mainly red-slipped and red-painted sherds (Figs. 13.13–13.14), as well as bones and flint. An intact bowl (Fig. 13.13:7) with a small amount of burnt grain nearby was found on the floor in Room 4426 (Photo 12.29); this grain was submitted for 14C analysis (Chapter 48, Table 48.4, Sample R18), yielding average calibrated dates 968–898 (1σ) CalBC, 974–848 (2σ) CalBC. A seal was found in Room 4429 (Chapter 30A, No. 14). The floors were made of beaten earth and for the most part, their level was determined by the bottom of the surrounding walls and not by any distinct discernible makeup.
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

Support Wall ?
  • Fig. 12.68 - Just east of Bldg. CA — N-S Wall 1506 - Section 14
Description(s)

  • A north–south wall (1506) in Square T/3, adjoining the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, was rather enigmatic. It stood to a height of 1.3 m and was composed of the same hard yellow bricks as the other walls in this building, although here they were only 0.4 m wide, since they were laid so that their width, rather than length, composed the width of the wall. The wall was preserved on a rather precarious slant, with the lower courses of its eastern face protruding; this might have been the result of seismic activity (Fig. 12.68).

    The stratigraphic attribution of this wall was not certain; it abutted the southern half of the poorly preserved eastern wall of Building CA (4434) (Photos 12.27, 12.30) and terminated abruptly in the balk between Squares S–T/4, where it was abutted by an open area in which cooking and food preparation took place in Strata C-2 and C-1b (see below). This wall may be understood as a retainer built to buttress the southern part of the eastern wall of Building CA, which might have suffered damage during the course of its use in Stratum C-2. On the other hand, it should be noted that the southern end of Wall 1506 blocked most of the northern entranceway leading into C-2 Building CB. Wall 2495, the eastern wall of Stratum C-1b Building CD, terminated just at the point where the northern end of Wall 1506 was located, suggesting that Wall 1506 was used, or reused, as the eastern closing wall of this building during Stratum C-1b (Fig. 12.24). Two explanations may be suggested:

    1. Wall 1506 was built as a retaining wall to support the damaged southern end of the eastern wall of Building CA during some later phase of Stratum C-2, and was subsequently reused in Stratum C-1b, when the building was rebuilt

    2. Wall 1506 was constructed in Stratum C-1b as part of the renovation of Building CA as Building CD

    It seems that the first option is preferable for the following reasons

    1. layers attributed to C-2 in the open area to the north and east of the wall abutted its lowest exposed courses

    2. there was an alternative entrance into Building CB, so the blockage of the northern entrance did not cancel this building

    3. it was built of yellow bricks typical only of Stratum C-2.

    The end of Building CA was perhaps the result of an earthquake, as evidenced by the damaged and cracked state of the walls and the large amount of complete fallen bricks above the floors. Preservation was especially poor on the eastern side of the building. It is possible that earlier seismic damage ravaged the building during the course of its use and there was some evidence of attempts to repair and continue to use it, such as Wall 1506. However, the final event put the building out of use, to be leveled, deliberately filled-in, and rebuilt in Stratum C-1b (Building CD). The fact that the floors of the building were relatively empty of finds may suggest that it was abandoned before its final devastation.
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:27-31)

Split Wall
  • Photo 12.35 - Bldg. CB — Room 1520 - Split between E-W Walls 1442 and 1483
Description(s)

  • ... The external measurements of this hall [1520] were 5.0×7.5 m (floor space, 22.2 sq m). Three of its walls (the southern, western, and at least part of the northern wall) were constructed directly on top of the gray-brick walls in the southern part of C-3 Building CS (Photos 12.15–12.16); the eastern wall was superimposed by Stratum C-1 Building CG (Fig. 12.69; Photos 12.31–12.33). The walls were: 1470 on the south (preserved to 14 courses; Photos 12.16, 12.34), 1463 on the west (preserved to 12 courses; Photo 12.15) and 2505 on the east (preserved to 13 courses); an entrance was located at the southern end of this latter wall, at its juncture with Wall 1470, leading to the eastern part of this building (Photos 12.31–12.34). The northern wall, preserved to 12–18 courses, was given two separate numbers due to a clear split in the middle, which was possibly the result of seismic activity (Photo 12.35)

    ... The two entrances that accessed this hall from the east and the north were used concurrently. Both were 0.9 m wide and preserved ca. 1.6 m high. It is clear that the top of the northern entrance was intact (Photos 12.35–12.36). However, it appears that the top of the eastern entranceway in Wall 2505 was subjected to some damage, particularly on its western face, when Stratum C-1b Wall 1416 was built above it (Photos 12.31–12.34).

    The interior of the room contained a ca. 0.9 m deep accumulation of striated red-clay and gray-ash layers, interspersed with decayed brick debris, from 84.80–85.69 m (1520, 2456, 2457, 2466, 2474, 2482; Figs. 12.65, 12.69).2 We assumed that these striations represented the accumulation of floors in this hall, although it was difficult to separate these thin layers and possibly, at least the lower levels might have been a fill. Some layers contained large patches of phytolith, often with distinct shapes, such as one long, rope-like configuration found lying near three stones laid in a diagonal row, just above the top of Stratum C-3 Wall 2462. A moderate amount of pottery was found in these layers, most of which were sherds or fragments of small vessels, representing bowls, chalices, cooking pots, kraters, jugs and juglets, but no storage jars (Figs. 13.15–13.17); many were red slipped and hand burnished and some were painted in red. No cooking facilities were found here.

    ... Above the striated layers in the room was a 1.5 m-deep layer of complete fallen yellow bricks (1469, 1478, 1497). No traces of burning were identified nor were there the tell-tale signs of a sudden destruction, such as complete vessels and other finds, suggesting that these fallen bricks represented the collapse of the surrounding walls at the end of Stratum C-2, probably due to an earthquake, either during the time it was still in use or some time after the building was abandoned.

    Although it was considered that this room could have been a basement, this possibility was ruled out since there was no constructed element above it and its eastern continuation clearly ran beneath the later Building CG
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:31-35)

Fallen stone
  • Photo 12.37 - Bldg. CB — Room 1520 - Large tumbled stone
  • Photo 12.35 - Bldg. CB — Room 1520 - Large tumbled stone visible in lower right
Description(s)

  • ... A large, roughly squared mizi limestone (0.25×0.65×0.7 m), was found 1.0 m to the south of the entranceway [to Room 1520] in Wall 1483 (Photos 12.35, 12.37), its bottom face polished smooth, apparently from use. It was found tilted, with its northern end higher by 0.45 m than its southern end, and we assume that the smooth bottom side had originally been on top. The red-clay and gray-ash striations in this room (2456, 2466) abutted the stone, supporting the idea that at least some of these layers were not living floors, but rather a fill. The position of this large stone in front of the entranceway in Wall 1483 was baffling. It is quite certain that this was not its original position and that it had tumbled over from either the west or the south. It could possibly have stood in the center of the room and served as a pillar base or some work surface; it perhaps flipped over, reaching its present location during the assumed earthquake that terminated this occupation phase. ... - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:31-35)

Fallen bricks in debris
  • Photo 12.42 - Bldg. CE — Room 6464 - fallen bricks and debris
Description(s)

  • ... A layer of collapsed bricks and debris (6443) that rested on a reddish floor interspersed with gray ash (6464) abutted the eastern and southern walls (Fig. 12.64); this debris was sealed by Stratum C-1b Floor 2489. Curiously, the northern wall (6504) was floating above this floor, although a protruding course of bricks found just about on level with Floor 6464 might represent the lower part of this wall, or the top of an even earlier wall. Excavation of a probe (6503) 0.35 m below Floor 6464 yielded a layer of sandy material with some brick debris (6503) that penetrated below Wall 6460. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:36-38)

Debris
  • Figure 12.62 - Section 8 - Bldg. CE — Spaces to the north of Room 6464
  • Figure 12.63 - Section 9 - Bldg. CE — Spaces to the north of Room 6464
  • Figure 12.64 - Section 10 - Bldg. CE — Spaces to the north of Room 6464
Description(s)

  • Spaces to the north of Room 6464

    Three spaces were attributed to this building in Squares Y/5–6, although no connection between them was found, due to overlying elements that remained unexcavated (Fig. 12.12; Photo 12.43). Only the eastern part of these rooms was excavated.

    The western part of Wall 6524 in Square Y/5 was revealed below the wooden foundation of C-1 Wall 2454, protruding 0.25 m to the west. An east– west wall (6521) comprised of large bricks and preserved to only one course, abutted Wall 6524. The area enclosed by these walls contained a layer of debris (6495, 6519) (Fig. 12.63).

    The space to the north of Wall 6521 in Square Y/6 had two phases. In the earlier phase, it contained layers of thin red and gray striations (7433) and was bordered on the east by Wall 7513 (south) and 7478 (north); this line continued that of Wall 6524 to the south. Pit 6498 cut the relationship between these walls. At some later stage, east–west Wall 7485, preserved two courses high, was added, dividing the space into two; in the north were the upper layers of 7473 and to the south of the wall was a layer of brick debris (7455). It was not clear whether Wall 7513 continued in use in this later phase (Photos 12.43, 12.87).
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:36-38)

Tilted Wall
  • Photo 12.59 - Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 - Bldg. CY — Wall 7511
  • Photo 12.60 - Closeup on Wall 7511 in Stratum C-2 - Bldg. CY — Wall 7511
Description(s)

  • Wall 7511 [of Bldg. CY] was preserved at a tilt, especially visible on its western end, possibly the result of seismic activity. The eastern part of this wall was built of segments, with two vertical seams visible in its northern face (Photo 12.59), a mode of construction which might have been aimed at ensuring stability in the event of an earthquake. Wall 7511 made a corner with Wall 10461, which closed the building on the east. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

Fallen bricks in debris
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 - Bldg. CY — central courtyard 7512 - Fallen bricks in debris
Description(s)

  • The central courtyard [7512 of Bldg. CY] was 3.1 m wide and at least 5.4 m long. It contained a layer of fallen bricks (Fig. 12.55) above a layer of occupation debris (7505) resting on a yellow-earth floor (7512) at level 85.15–85.25 m. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

Fallen bricks in debris
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 - Bldg. CY — Room 8470 - Fallen bricks in debris
  • Figure 12.56 - Section 2 - Bldg. CY — Room 6506 - Fallen bricks in debris
Description(s)

  • Room 6506 [of Bldg. CY], the southern room, was bordered by Walls 8457 on the west, 6505 on the north and 7506 on the east, all preserved 0.65–1.0 m above the floor level. A 1.0 m-wide entrance in the southern end of Wall 7506 accessed this room from the central courtyard (Fig. 12.56). The room was square (2.3×2.3 m, 5.3 sq m.) and had a smooth yellow earth floor (6506) at 85.10 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks which contained a large amount of pottery. A pile of dark organic material was concentrated in the northern part of the room. This room was sealed by Room 6451 of Stratum C-1 Building CW.

    Room 8470 [of Bldg. CY], the northern room, was bordered on the south by Wall 6505, on the west by the northern part of Wall 8457 and on the east by the northern part of Wall 7505; its northern part was beyond the border of the excavation area. Exactly like Room 6506, this room was 2.3 m wide and had a 1.0 m wide entrance at its southeastern corner, leading from the central courtyard. A smooth yellow-earth floor (8470) was found at level 85.16 m, covered by a layer of fallen whole bricks. Three nicely worked limestones were set in a row along Wall 8457 on the floor level, recalling the stones along the walls in the central courtyard. A pile of dark organic material, similar to that in the southern room, was found here as well. This room was covered by Room 6462 of Stratum C-1 Building CW (Fig. 12.55).
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

Fallen bricks in debris
  • Figure 12.55 - Section 1 - Bldg. CY — Room 8470 - Fallen bricks in debris
  • Photo 12.58 - Bldg. CY — View of Bldg. CY from above
  • Photo 12.62 - Bldg. CY — blocked entrance to Room 8479
  • Photo 12.63 - Bldg. CY — View of Bldg. CY from above
Description(s)

  • Room 8488 was exactly symmetric with Room 6506 of the western wing. The room was bordered by Walls 7511 on the south, 8467 on the north, 8458 on the west, and 10461 on the east (internal measurements 2.5×2.5 m; 6.25 sq m). The 1.0 m-wide entrance was exactly on line with the entranceway into Room 6506. The floor (8488), at level 85.15 m, was composed of smooth yellow earth, in which the tops of large yellow bricks were visible (Fig. 12.14; Photos 12.58, 12.63). Although excavation did not proceed down below the floor, it seems that this was a layer of complete fallen bricks, just like that under Floor 7512 in the central space. The layer above the floor (8466) included complete fallen yellow bricks and ashy debris that contained much pottery, some of it partially restorable (Figs. 13.34– 13.37), as well as a very large amount of bones, including horns.

    North of Room 8488 was a narrow space (8479), 1.0 m wide and 2.4 m long, between Walls 8467 and 8475. A 0.8 m-wide entrance in the eastern end of Wall 8467 was partially blocked by bricks, leaving only a narrow gap (ca. 0.4 m) that made passage from Room 8488 to Room 8479 impossible. It seems that this blockage was secondary. This entrance was sealed on top by C-1b Wall 8426. A curious feature of this narrow space was what looked like an intentional blockage on its western end that was composed of three parts (Photos 12.62–12.63). The westernmost component was a row of narrow bricks (0.15 m wide), spanning the entrance from the central space, and preserved up to 0.7 m above the floor. The second component (8486) was ca. 0.1 m to its east, preserved some 0.2 m lower and ca. 0.3 m wide; it was not clear whether this was yet another row of bricks laid to span the corridor or fallen bricks. Just 0.1 m to their east was yet another apparent blockage (8485), although it was more typical of a regularly built wall in width, preserved five to six courses high (its base was not reached) and 0.5 m wide. None of these rows of bricks bonded with either Wall 8475 on the north or with Wall 8467 on the south. No clear floor level was identified in this narrow space, although it was excavated down to the same level (85.10 m) as the floors in the rest of the building. A large patch of soft pinkish material (phytolith?) was concentrated against the eastern face of Blockage 8485. It is possible that this narrow space was a staircase leading to a second story, with Walls 8485 and 8486 serving as the foundations for wooden stairs. If this interpretation is correct, it would be the only case in which a staircase was identified at Tel Rehov.

    To the north of Space 8479 was a corner of two walls (8475, 8481) enclosing a room that continued to the north; it measured 2.0 m from east to west. The entrance to this room was blocked by a narrow row of bricks, identical to the westernmost blockage in Room 8479. The blockage was preserved up to 0.6 m above a yellow-earth floor (8487), which was reached at level 85.23 m. Several smooth pink mizi limestones were found just inside the entrance on the south. Only a few sherds and flints were found in the debris (8468) above the floor (Fig. 12.55). The eastern wall (8481) was located only 0.5 m to the west of Wall 10461, the outer wall of the building. This narrow area joined Room 8479 at a right angle. If the latter was a staircase, as mentioned above, the narrow corridor (10503) could have been a foundation for the continuation of this staircase, leading to an upper story.
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:47-53)

Area G - Stratum G-2

Deformation Map

Stratum G2 Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 20.1 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

Area G
Building
[Square(s)]
Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
GD (Q/3) 5047 5063 Eastward
  • Figure 20.17 - Square Q/3 - Building GD - Room 5047 - Wall 5063 - Wall Tilted Eastward
  • Photo 20.16 - Building GD - Room 5047 - Wall 5063 - View from above of G-2 Wall 5063 Tilted Eastward (lower left part of frame)
Tilted Wall
Description(s)

GB and GA 5061 and 5044 5061 tilts E
5044 tilts W
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P/4-5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 - Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west
  • Photo 20.4 - Squares P/5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 - Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west - mud brick collapse evident in upper left corner (NW corner) of frame [locus 8052]
Separated and titled Walls
Description(s)

  • Only the eastern edge of this building was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). These two walls were parallel to Wall 5061 of Building GB (Photos 20.3–20.4) and together, they created a double-wall system, an architectural feature common at Tel Rehov that, in most cases, designated the outer walls of attached individual buildings. In our case, the top preserved level of the two walls was separated by a V-shaped gap, 0.1 m wide on the south and up to 0.7 m on the north (Photo 20.3). These walls had apparently separated as a result of seismic movement, perhaps an earthquake, at the end of Stratum G-2, with Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west. The gap between the walls was filled with brick debris (5058). After the gap was excavated to a depth of 1.0 m, the walls appeared closer together until, at the lower courses, the two walls were only a few centimeters apart. Wall 5044 was preserved to a height of at least 0.85 m, although its bottom level could not be determined due to its strong tilt to the west. Wall 5048 joined Wall 5044, enclosing the corner of a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

    Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:394-395)

GA 8052 W of G2-b Wall 5044 Eastward
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P/4-5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 with collapsed mudbricks in Rooms
  • Photo 20.4 - Squares P/5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 - Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west - mud brick collapse evident in upper left corner (NW corner) of frame [locus 8052]
Debris - Collapsed mudbricks
Description(s)

  • Only the eastern edge of this building [GA] was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). ... The gap between the walls [5044 and 5061] was filled with brick debris (5058). ... a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

    Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:394-395)

GB (G2-b) 8062 probably westward
  • Photo 20.3 - Building GB - collapse debris
  • Photo 20.8 - Building GB - collapse debris
  • Photo 20.10 - Building GB - circular bins
  • Photo 20.25 - Building GB - Square P/4
Debris - Collapsed mudbricks
Description(s)

  • Phase G-2b

    In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space [designated as Building GB], 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

    In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

    In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:395-399)

GB (G-2b or G-2a) Floor 8041 tilts east to west
  • Photo 20.3 - Building GB - collapse debris
  • Photo 20.8 - Building GB - collapse debris and G-2 floor 8041
  • Photo 20.10 - Building GB - circular bins
  • Photo 20.25 - Building GB - Square P/4
  • Photo 20.16 - Building GB - Tilted G-2 Floor 8041 on right
Tilted Floor
Description(s)

  • Phase G-2b

    In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space [designated as Building GB], 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

    In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

    In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:395-399)

  • Phase G-2a

    In the southern half of the square [Q/4], only one floor was detected (8041), sloping from east to west; it was attributed to Stratum G-2b, yet probably continued to be in use in G-2a. - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:399-400)

Open Area
Squares P-Q/6
5050 (G2-b) a 0.15 m- deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036) which in turn was covered by a brick debris layer (5043)
Description(s)

  • The open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB and bounded on the north by Building GC. The width of this area was ca. 2.5 m and its length was at least 9.0 m.

    The lowest floor found here in Square P/6 was a clay floor (5050) at level 85.46 m. It was covered by a 0.15 m- deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036); the latter was covered by a brick debris layer (5043). These layers were all attributed to Stratum G-2b, since they were lower than Floors 5026 and 5004 and the installations of Phase G-2a.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:400-405)

GC 4050
  • Photo 20.1 - Room 4050 in Bldg. GC contained brick debris (5027) where no evidence for violent destruction was found - Aerial shot of Area G which includes Bldg. GC to the right (north)
  • Photo 20.13 - View from above of Floor 4050 of Bldg. GC to the left
  • Photo 20.15 - Close view of Floor 4050 of Bldg. GC
Debris (not necessarily with a seismic origin)
Description(s)

  • The remains defined as Building GC in Squares P– Q/6 (Photos 20.1, 20.13, 20.15) included the southern part of a building that continued to the north beyond the borders of the excavated area. The excavated part of the building included three walls (4029, 5056, 4028), all composed of similar greybrown bricks and preserved 0.25–0.4 m high. Inside, a compact clay floor (5035) was exposed near the corner of Walls 4029 and 5056 at level 85.44 m, covered by brick debris (5027). A beatenearth floor (4050) was exposed in Square Q/6 at level 85.48 m, abutting Wall 4029, covered by a brick debris layer (4027) and a layer of collapsed bricks (4024), found against Wall 4028. Both small segments of floors were empty of finds and no evidence for violent destruction was found. It seems that the building was constructed in Stratum G-2b, together with the earliest floor of the open space to its south (5050, level 85.46 m). It probably continued in use in Phase G-2a with the same floors, at the time when the floor of the open area to the south was raised and the bins were constructed; at that time, Bin 4037 was constructed inside the building.

    Like the open space and installations to the west and south in Squares P–Q/6, Building GC was exposed immediately below topsoil, with no later stratigraphic features, and its attribution to Stratum G-2 was based on its relation to the open space to its south.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:405)

E of GD 4081 Southward
  • Photo 20.20 - Tilted Wall 4081 between Rooms 4087 and 4090 in space just east of Bldg. GD - both phases of G-2 can be seen in the wall (see seam between walls) and both phases are tilted
  • Photo 20.21 - another view of Tilted Wall 4081 between Rooms 4087 and 4090 in space just east of Bldg. GD
Tilted Wall (Phases G2-b and G2-a tilted)
Description(s)

  • The western wall (4081) [of Room 8038] was preserved 1.4 m high and perhaps had two construction phases; the earlier one (G-2b) comprising the lower 1.0 m (as seen from the west) and the upper one (G-2a) consisting of the uppermost two or three brick courses. The seam between these two phases can be clearly seen (Photos 20.20–20.21).

    Inside this room [8038 in Square P/Q/3] was a layer of brick collapse (8038) that was exposed down to level 85.28 m. This locus was attributed to Stratum G-2b, although a floor was not reached. A higher patchy floor in this room (4090) at level 85.66 m is attributed to Stratum G-2a.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406)

  • Wall 4081 in Square P/3 was preserved to at least 1.4 m (Photos 20.20–20.21). Abutting this wall on the west were several floors attributed to Stratum G-2b. The lowest was Floor 8061, covered by phytoliths, at levels 84.39–84.45 m. Above it was a thin layer of brick debris with some scattered phytoliths (8057) and a build-up of brown patchy clay floors (8049, levels 84.52–84.84 m). The uppermost floor was sealed by a layer of brick collapse (8012). A clay plaque figurine showing a female drummer (Chapter 34, No. 5) was found at level 85.54 m, which is just at the top of the brick debris (5034) attributed to phase G-2b, under the G-2a floor (4087). The figurine was found very close to the erosion line and thus, its attribution to the G-2b layer is insecure.

    A new floor (4087), beaten-earth and ash, was laid at 85.61 m; it did not clearly abut Wall 4081. This floor is attributed to Stratum G-2a, but might be related to Stratum G-1 Building GG, since destruction layer 4065 of that building is directly above it.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406)

E of GD 8038 and 8061
  • Photo 20.20 - Tilted Wall 4081 between Rooms 4087 and 4090 in space just east of Bldg. GD - both phases of G-2 can be seen in the wall (see seam between walls) and both phases are tilted
  • Photo 20.21 - another view of Tilted Wall 4081 between Rooms 4087 and 4090 in space just east of Bldg. GD
Debris - brick collapse in Rooms 8038 and 8061 (both attributed to G-2b)
Description(s)

  • The western wall (4081) [of Room 8038] was preserved 1.4 m high and perhaps had two construction phases; the earlier one (G-2b) comprising the lower 1.0 m (as seen from the west) and the upper one (G-2a) consisting of the uppermost two or three brick courses. The seam between these two phases can be clearly seen (Photos 20.20–20.21).

    Inside this room [8038 in Square P/Q/3] was a layer of brick collapse (8038) that was exposed down to level 85.28 m. This locus was attributed to Stratum G-2b, although a floor was not reached. A higher patchy floor in this room (4090) at level 85.66 m is attributed to Stratum G-2a.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406)

  • Wall 4081 in Square P/3 was preserved to at least 1.4 m (Photos 20.20–20.21). Abutting this wall on the west were several floors attributed to Stratum G-2b. The lowest was Floor 8061, covered by phytoliths, at levels 84.39–84.45 m. Above it was a thin layer of brick debris with some scattered phytoliths (8057) and a build-up of brown patchy clay floors (8049, levels 84.52–84.84 m). The uppermost floor was sealed by a layer of brick collapse (8012). A clay plaque figurine showing a female drummer (Chapter 34, No. 5) was found at level 85.54 m, which is just at the top of the brick debris (5034) attributed to phase G-2b, under the G-2a floor (4087). The figurine was found very close to the erosion line and thus, its attribution to the G-2b layer is insecure.

    A new floor (4087), beaten-earth and ash, was laid at 85.61 m; it did not clearly abut Wall 4081. This floor is attributed to Stratum G-2a, but might be related to Stratum G-1 Building GG, since destruction layer 4065 of that building is directly above it.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406)

GD 8046 and 8017
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 - showing eastward tilted wall 5063
  • Figure 20.18 - Section 11
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3
Debris (brick collapse) attributed to G2-b
Description(s)

  • This building (Squares Q/3–4) was bounded on the west by Wall 8030 (found below Wall 5018 of Stratum G-1a, see below) and Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). The latter created a double wall together with Wall 8027 of Room 8030/4090 to the west. The walls were preserved to a considerable height; in a probe in the northeastern corner of Square Q/3 (Photos 20.16–20.18), Walls 5063 and 5062 stood to a height of almost 2.0 m. Wall 5063 tilted considerably eastwards (Fig. 20.17), possibly as a result of the same seismic event that caused Walls 5044 and 5061 to separate, as described above. Parts of two rooms were excavated south and north of the dividing Wall 5062.

    In the northern room, a clear distinction between Strata G-2b and G-2a could be made (Figs. 20.17–20.18; Photo 20.18). The lowest layer reached was a beaten-earth floor (8046) exposed in a small area at level 84.16 m, which appeared to abut the foundation of Walls 5062 and 5063. This floor was covered by a layer of small chunks of brick debris (8040) and a higher layer of large collapsed bricks (8018). Note that the floor in Room 8046 was much lower than the surrounding floors of the same phase, 8041/8044 in Square Q/4 west of Wall 8030, as well as Floor 8017 to the south. Thus, it may be suggested that Room 8046 was, to some extent, subterranean.

    In Phase G-2a, new floor composed of soft red and gray striations (5053) accumulated between levels 85.00–85.68 m, sloping to the north and sealing the earlier brick collapse (Figs. 20.17– 20.18; Photo 20.18). Many pottery sherds (some restorable) were found here (Figs. 21.6–21.7), as well as three clay loomweights.

    In the southern room, a series of at least three successive floors (8017) attributed to Stratum G-2b was found at levels 84.95–85.35 m; a soft brown floor, a reddish floor and a grey floor with bits of plaster and ash, all containing many sherds, bones and olive pits. The highest floor was covered by a layer of brick debris (8004). A patchy clay floor (5047) at level 85.69 m covering the brick debris layer was attributed to Stratum G-2a. Its relation to Walls 5063 and 5062 was insecure, although very likely.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406-407)

  • In Square Q/5, a localized transitional phase between the end of G-2a and the construction of the G-1b structures may be suggested (Fig. 20.2b), based on a white plaster floor (5067) at level 86.39 m that was related to a circular installation (4062; Photos 20.22–20.23); the latter was 0.19 m deep and had a thick clay-plastered wall. It resembled Installation 4064 of Stratum G-1 (see below) and two grinding installations in Area C, Building CF, Stratum C-1a. Floor 5067 at levels 86.30–86.50 m in the southern part of the square may belong to the same phase. These floors and the installation sealed the bins and ovens attributed to G-2a, and was sealed by layer 5024 and the wooden beams of Stratum G-1b (see below). We thus attribute these elements to a late phase of G-2, denoted G-2a', an intermediate phase between G-2a and G-1b. - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:407-408)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area G
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
General Comments on possible earthquake at end of Stratum G-2 Area G - no violent destruction was observed at the end of Stratum G-2, yet hints at an earthquake which caused considerable damage were found in the form of tilted and split walls.
Description(s)

  • As elsewhere in Tel Rehov, no violent destruction was observed at the end of Stratum G-2, yet hints at an earthquake which caused considerable damage were found in the form of tilted and split walls. Such damages may have been the reason for abandoning the Stratum G-2 structures and for the foundation of the new buildings of Stratum G-1. The construction of Stratum G-1 was accompanied by laying wooden foundations for both walls and floors, as was detected also in Areas C and B. About half of this wood was composed of olive tree branches (Chapter 52). - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:422)

Tilted Wall 5063 (eastward)
  • Figure 20.17 - Square Q/3 - Building GD - Room 5047 - Wall 5063 - Wall Tilted Eastward
  • Photo 20.16 - Building GD - Room 5047 - Wall 5063 - View from above of G-2 Wall 5063 Tilted Eastward (lower left part of frame)
Description(s)

Separated and titled Walls
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P/4-5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 - Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west
  • Photo 20.4 - Squares P/5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 - Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west - mud brick collapse evident in upper left corner (NW corner) of frame [locus 8052]
Description(s)

  • Only the eastern edge of this building was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). These two walls were parallel to Wall 5061 of Building GB (Photos 20.3–20.4) and together, they created a double-wall system, an architectural feature common at Tel Rehov that, in most cases, designated the outer walls of attached individual buildings. In our case, the top preserved level of the two walls was separated by a V-shaped gap, 0.1 m wide on the south and up to 0.7 m on the north (Photo 20.3). These walls had apparently separated as a result of seismic movement, perhaps an earthquake, at the end of Stratum G-2, with Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west. The gap between the walls was filled with brick debris (5058). After the gap was excavated to a depth of 1.0 m, the walls appeared closer together until, at the lower courses, the two walls were only a few centimeters apart. Wall 5044 was preserved to a height of at least 0.85 m, although its bottom level could not be determined due to its strong tilt to the west. Wall 5048 joined Wall 5044, enclosing the corner of a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

    Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:394-395)

Debris - Collapsed mudbricks
  • Photo 20.3 - Squares P/4-5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 with collapsed mudbricks in Rooms
  • Photo 20.4 - Squares P/5 - Building GA - separated and tilted walls 5044 and 5061 - Wall 5061 tilting to the east and Wall 5044 to the west - mud brick collapse evident in upper left corner (NW corner) of frame [locus 8052]
Description(s)

  • Only the eastern edge of this building [GA] was excavated in Squares P/4–5, bounded on the east by Walls 5044 and 8032 (together, 7.5 m long) (Figs. 20.1–20.2). ... The gap between the walls [5044 and 5061] was filled with brick debris (5058). ... a partly exposed space (8052), of which an area of 2.0×2.2 m was excavated. A floor buildup of compact clay striations was exposed in this area at levels 84.36–84.43 m (Photo 20.4). Finds from this floor included 12 doughnut-shaped loomweights and a spindle whorl, a grinding stone and a mortar, a clay stopper and a bead, as well as pottery (Figs. 21.1–21.4). The floor probably abutted Wall 5044 as well, although the bottom of this wall could not be detected due its strong tilt to the west, as noted above. The floor was covered by a layer of collapsed brown bricks (5072, 5049). South of Wall 5048, only a small space containing brick collapse (8045) was excavated until 84.75 m.

    Floor 8052 and the various debris layers above it are attributed to Phase G-2b. It seems that Building GA went out of use in Phase G-2a, since an upper floor (4039, level 86.20 m) covered Wall 5044 and possibly also Wall 5061, although this could not be securely determined.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:394-395)

Debris - Collapsed mudbricks
  • Photo 20.3 - Building GB - collapse debris
  • Photo 20.8 - Building GB - collapse debris
  • Photo 20.10 - Building GB - circular bins
  • Photo 20.25 - Building GB - Square P/4
Description(s)

  • Phase G-2b

    In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space [designated as Building GB], 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

    In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

    In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:395-399)

Tilted Floor 8041 - tilts east to west
  • Photo 20.3 - Building GB - collapse debris
  • Photo 20.8 - Building GB - collapse debris and G-2 floor 8041
  • Photo 20.10 - Building GB - circular bins
  • Photo 20.25 - Building GB - Square P/4
  • Photo 20.16 - Building GB - Tilted G-2 Floor 8041 on right
Description(s)

  • Phase G-2b

    In Phase G-2b, the entire area between Walls 5061 and 8030 was an open space [designated as Building GB], 7.0 m wide and 10–13 m long, that seems to have continued to the west in Squares P–Q/6, south of Building GC (see below).

    In Square P/5, just east of Wall 5061, the top of a large completely preserved oven (8063) was exposed at 84.90 m, surrounded by a layer of black ash and brick debris (8062) excavated until level 84.84 m; the bottom of the oven and the related floor were not reached Above the accumulation in 8062 was a layer of brick debris (8036), sealed by a Phase G-2a floor (8035). In Square P/4, a floor (8054) was detected at level 85.50 m in the area enclosed by G-2a Walls 8055 and 8056. This was a reddish-brown clay floor with pottery and bones found on it. A layer of brick debris and chunks of collapsed bricks (8028) above this floor separated it from a higher floor (8023) attributed to Stratum G2a (Photo 20.25).

    In the southern part of Square Q/4 was a beaten-earth floor (8041) which tilted drastically from east to west (85.34–85.74 m). Near the center of this area was a unique installation (8048) built of plastered bricks with a rounded hollow (Photos 20.3, 20.8). In the east, the floor had been disturbed and so it is not possible to determine whether or not it initially abutted Wall 8030. The attribution of this floor to either G-2b or G-2a, or to both, remains enigmatic. In the northern part of Square Q/4, a series of floors was found between levels 85.71– 86.27 m. The upper three were attributed to Phase G-2a (see below), while the lowest (8044 at level 85.71 m) was tentatively attributed to G-2b, although the separation between these two phases was not certain. Floor 8044 was made of clay, which differed from the matrix of Floor 8041 to its south, although they are at the same height and no architectural feature separated them. A plastered circular bin (8047), 0.55 m in diameter and 0.37 m deep, was related to this floor (Photo 20.10). It was perhaps the earliest in a series of such installations, mostly attributed to Phase G-2a, described below.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:395-399)

  • Phase G-2a

    In the southern half of the square [Q/4], only one floor was detected (8041), sloping from east to west; it was attributed to Stratum G-2b, yet probably continued to be in use in G-2a. - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:399-400)

Debris open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB and bounded on the north by Building GC - Floor 5050 was covered by two layers attributed to Stratum G2-b; a 0.15 m- deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036) which in turn was covered by a brick debris layer (5043).
Description(s)

  • The open area with bins continued in Squares P– Q/6, creating an L-shaped area surrounding Buildings GA and GB and bounded on the north by Building GC. The width of this area was ca. 2.5 m and its length was at least 9.0 m.

    The lowest floor found here in Square P/6 was a clay floor (5050) at level 85.46 m. It was covered by a 0.15 m- deep accumulation containing sherds and bones (5036); the latter was covered by a brick debris layer (5043). These layers were all attributed to Stratum G-2b, since they were lower than Floors 5026 and 5004 and the installations of Phase G-2a.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:400-405)

Debris (not necessarily with a seismic origin)
  • Photo 20.1 - Room 4050 in Bldg. GC contained brick debris (5027) where no evidence for violent destruction was found - Aerial shot of Area G which includes Bldg. GC to the right (north)
  • Photo 20.13 - View from above of Floor 4050 of Bldg. GC to the left
  • Photo 20.15 - Close view of Floor 4050 of Bldg. GC
Description(s)

  • The remains defined as Building GC in Squares P– Q/6 (Photos 20.1, 20.13, 20.15) included the southern part of a building that continued to the north beyond the borders of the excavated area. The excavated part of the building included three walls (4029, 5056, 4028), all composed of similar greybrown bricks and preserved 0.25–0.4 m high. Inside, a compact clay floor (5035) was exposed near the corner of Walls 4029 and 5056 at level 85.44 m, covered by brick debris (5027). A beatenearth floor (4050) was exposed in Square Q/6 at level 85.48 m, abutting Wall 4029, covered by a brick debris layer (4027) and a layer of collapsed bricks (4024), found against Wall 4028. Both small segments of floors were empty of finds and no evidence for violent destruction was found. It seems that the building was constructed in Stratum G-2b, together with the earliest floor of the open space to its south (5050, level 85.46 m). It probably continued in use in Phase G-2a with the same floors, at the time when the floor of the open area to the south was raised and the bins were constructed; at that time, Bin 4037 was constructed inside the building.

    Like the open space and installations to the west and south in Squares P–Q/6, Building GC was exposed immediately below topsoil, with no later stratigraphic features, and its attribution to Stratum G-2 was based on its relation to the open space to its south.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:405)

Tilted Wall + Debris (brick collapse in Rooms 8038 and 8061)
  • Photo 20.20 - Tilted Wall 4081 between Rooms 4087 and 4090 in space just east of Bldg. GD - both phases of G-2 can be seen in the wall (see seam between walls) and both phases are tilted
  • Photo 20.21 - another view of Tilted Wall 4081 between Rooms 4087 and 4090 in space just east of Bldg. GD
Description(s)

  • The western wall (4081) [of Room 8038] was preserved 1.4 m high and perhaps had two construction phases; the earlier one (G-2b) comprising the lower 1.0 m (as seen from the west) and the upper one (G-2a) consisting of the uppermost two or three brick courses. The seam between these two phases can be clearly seen (Photos 20.20–20.21).

    Inside this room [8038 in Square P/Q/3] was a layer of brick collapse (8038) that was exposed down to level 85.28 m. This locus was attributed to Stratum G-2b, although a floor was not reached. A higher patchy floor in this room (4090) at level 85.66 m is attributed to Stratum G-2a.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406)

  • Wall 4081 in Square P/3 was preserved to at least 1.4 m (Photos 20.20–20.21). Abutting this wall on the west were several floors attributed to Stratum G-2b. The lowest was Floor 8061, covered by phytoliths, at levels 84.39–84.45 m. Above it was a thin layer of brick debris with some scattered phytoliths (8057) and a build-up of brown patchy clay floors (8049, levels 84.52–84.84 m). The uppermost floor was sealed by a layer of brick collapse (8012). A clay plaque figurine showing a female drummer (Chapter 34, No. 5) was found at level 85.54 m, which is just at the top of the brick debris (5034) attributed to phase G-2b, under the G-2a floor (4087). The figurine was found very close to the erosion line and thus, its attribution to the G-2b layer is insecure.

    A new floor (4087), beaten-earth and ash, was laid at 85.61 m; it did not clearly abut Wall 4081. This floor is attributed to Stratum G-2a, but might be related to Stratum G-1 Building GG, since destruction layer 4065 of that building is directly above it.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406)

Debris (brick collapse) in Bldg. GD
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10 - showing eastward tilted wall 5063
  • Figure 20.18 - Section 11
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west
  • Photo 20.2 - Area G at the end of 2007 season, looking northwest
  • Photo 20.16 - Squares Q–P/3–4
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3
Description(s)

  • This building (Squares Q/3–4) was bounded on the west by Wall 8030 (found below Wall 5018 of Stratum G-1a, see below) and Wall 5063 in Square Q/3 (Figs. 20.1–20.2). The latter created a double wall together with Wall 8027 of Room 8030/4090 to the west. The walls were preserved to a considerable height; in a probe in the northeastern corner of Square Q/3 (Photos 20.16–20.18), Walls 5063 and 5062 stood to a height of almost 2.0 m. Wall 5063 tilted considerably eastwards (Fig. 20.17), possibly as a result of the same seismic event that caused Walls 5044 and 5061 to separate, as described above. Parts of two rooms were excavated south and north of the dividing Wall 5062.

    In the northern room, a clear distinction between Strata G-2b and G-2a could be made (Figs. 20.17–20.18; Photo 20.18). The lowest layer reached was a beaten-earth floor (8046) exposed in a small area at level 84.16 m, which appeared to abut the foundation of Walls 5062 and 5063. This floor was covered by a layer of small chunks of brick debris (8040) and a higher layer of large collapsed bricks (8018). Note that the floor in Room 8046 was much lower than the surrounding floors of the same phase, 8041/8044 in Square Q/4 west of Wall 8030, as well as Floor 8017 to the south. Thus, it may be suggested that Room 8046 was, to some extent, subterranean.

    In Phase G-2a, new floor composed of soft red and gray striations (5053) accumulated between levels 85.00–85.68 m, sloping to the north and sealing the earlier brick collapse (Figs. 20.17– 20.18; Photo 20.18). Many pottery sherds (some restorable) were found here (Figs. 21.6–21.7), as well as three clay loomweights.

    In the southern room, a series of at least three successive floors (8017) attributed to Stratum G-2b was found at levels 84.95–85.35 m; a soft brown floor, a reddish floor and a grey floor with bits of plaster and ash, all containing many sherds, bones and olive pits. The highest floor was covered by a layer of brick debris (8004). A patchy clay floor (5047) at level 85.69 m covering the brick debris layer was attributed to Stratum G-2a. Its relation to Walls 5063 and 5062 was insecure, although very likely.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:406-407)

  • In Square Q/5, a localized transitional phase between the end of G-2a and the construction of the G-1b structures may be suggested (Fig. 20.2b), based on a white plaster floor (5067) at level 86.39 m that was related to a circular installation (4062; Photos 20.22–20.23); the latter was 0.19 m deep and had a thick clay-plastered wall. It resembled Installation 4064 of Stratum G-1 (see below) and two grinding installations in Area C, Building CF, Stratum C-1a. Floor 5067 at levels 86.30–86.50 m in the southern part of the square may belong to the same phase. These floors and the installation sealed the bins and ovens attributed to G-2a, and was sealed by layer 5024 and the wooden beams of Stratum G-1b (see below). We thus attribute these elements to a late phase of G-2, denoted G-2a', an intermediate phase between G-2a and G-1b. - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:407-408)

Stratum V Earthquake - Late Iron IIA - late 10th until the early 9th century BCE

Area C - Stratum C-1b

Deformation Map

Stratum C1-b and D1-c Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.18 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

  • Fig. 12.18 - Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Area C
Building Room(s) Wall Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
CR 6491 6512 east-west strike-slip displaced blocks
Notes

  • Square Z/6

  • The eastern end of this room [6491] underwent a more pronounced change, where the wall was replaced by several rows of narrow bricks on a north–south line (6512). Although it seems that this was an intentional arrangement, these bricks might represent a fallen wall or a feature whose function remained unknown (Photo 12.88). These brick rows ended 1.0 m west of Building CW (see below), creating a rather narrow corridor that led into Building CF to the south. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:80-82)

CE 2489 2454 northward tilted wall
Notes

  • Square Y/3

  • Both walls [2411 and 2454] are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall [2454] of Building CE towards the north and the wall [2411] of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold. - Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5:670)

CG 2441 2439 eastward wall collapse Square Y/2 - The wall collapsed into the Apiary
CG 2441 2439 eastward tilted wall
Notes

  • Squares T/2 and Y/2

  • most of the eastern and southern walls of this room [2441] had collapsed towards the southeast - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

  • The collapse of the southeastern corner of Room 2441 created a huge pile of fallen bricks, 3.0 m high (Photos 12.131–12.133), that collapsed on the floor of the northwestern corner of the apiary, which was ca. 1.3 m lower than the foundation of the walls. The discrepancy between the foundation levels of the walls of Room 2441 and the bottom of the collapse might indicate the existence of a basement or some other hollow space below this room, perhaps enclosed on the west by Wall 2505, reused from Stratum C-2. The layers of charred wood found here may have been related to the construction of such a basement, as in Building CH (see below), and it might have been open towards the apiary on the east and south. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

CG 2460 and 2444 2411 southward tilted wall
Notes

  • Square Y/3

  • Both walls [2411 and 2454] are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall [2454] of Building CE towards the north and the wall [2411] of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold. - Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5:670)

  • An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the result of the same seismic activity that caused the collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:122)

CG 2441 2411 eastward wall collapse and folding
CH 2455 1437 eastward wall collapse and folding Squares T–Y/1–2
CH 2455 2426 eastward wall collapse and folding
Notes

  • Square Y/1

  • The eastern end of Wall 2426 was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the southeastern corner of Building CG - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • The eastern part of Building CH collapsed down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the southeastern end of Building CG to the north. ... Although none was found, it is possible that there had been an eastern closing wall to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood, that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden partition might have closed off this end of the room that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a higher level than the apiary floor below. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • 1.0 m from the corner of Wall 2426 with Wall 1438, it [Wall 2426] collapsed towards the east at an acute angle; the difference between the level and fallen parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a, as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have been partly built above this basement, which would explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74). The destruction of this structure and the bricks of Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created the slope of this layer as found. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

The Apiary 8469 southward wall collapse Squares Y/2
The Apiary appears mostly southward collapsed wall debris Square Y/1
The Apiary debris
Notes

  • Squares Z/1 and Z/2

  • The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to east, while the same level of destruction debris found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.150–12.151). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • The apiary was surrounded (at least) on three sides by built units, and was established on a lower level than those structures on its west and north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining units were built more or less on the same level, judging by the floor levels. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

CZ 11457, 11449, 11426, 11408, and 11404 are described - debris was probably present in all rooms debris
Notes

  • In the area to the north of Wall 10518 (the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a 0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris (11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds, many of them red slipped and hand burnished. There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and, in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of the courtyard (Photo 12.167). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

  • The floors in the two western rooms [11449 and 11457] were made of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in the eastern part of the building. They were covered by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

  • Room 11404 contained a large amount of fallen bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

  • It was deliberated whether Building CZ might be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. ... we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area C
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
Collapsed Walls Plan of Bldgs. CL and others in C1-b

Plan of Bldg. CL in overlying C1-a showing location of Fill 5430

Wider view of Plan of Bldgs. around CL in overlying C1-a - shows location of Fill 5430
  • Photo 12.135 - Bldg. CG - Collapsed C1-b mudbricks beneath C1-a fill 5430 adjacent to Wall 4443 of C1-a Building CL
Description(s)

  • JW: Location of collapsed mudbrick to the east of Building CG indicates that the wall fell to the east

  • The buildings adjoining Building CG underwent alteration in C1a. In Stratum C-1b, Building CM abutted it on the east, Building CH on the south, the apiary on the southeast, and the open area south of Building CD on the west. In Stratum C-1a, although still adjoining Building CE on the north, the areas to the east and west of Building CG became open spaces (Piazza 2417 to the east and Piazza CK to the west). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

Collapsed Wall
  • Photo 12.133 - Bldg. CG - Collapsed Wall 2439 in Room 2441
Description(s)

  • ... most of the eastern and southern walls of this room [2441] had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72; Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall 2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). ... the lower courses of the wall [2439 in Room 2441] are seen fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to Stratum C-1b - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

  • most of the lower level of this sub-floor wooden construction [in C1-b Room 2441] was horizontal, as opposed to the higher levels of the wood [in C1-b Room 2441], which sloped down towards the east, having collapsed with the southeastern corner of the room. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

Collapsed Walls
  • Photo 12.131 - Bldg. CG - Collapse and slippage of lower brick courses in Wall 2411 of Room 2441
  • Photo 12.132 - Bldg. CG - Collapse and slippage of lower brick courses in Wall 2411 of Room 2441 (closeup)
Description(s)

  • ... most of the eastern and southern walls of this room [2441] had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72; Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall 2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

  • ... In the severely burnt destruction debris of fallen bricks and wood in Room 2441 were 57 restorable vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), as well as other finds (Table 12.19), and a concentration of burnt grain. All the finds were concentrated within the area enclosed by the surmised lines of the collapsed walls and did not continue to the east or south. ... - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

  • The collapse of the southeastern corner of Room 2441 created a huge pile of fallen bricks, 3.0 m high (Photos 12.131–12.133), that collapsed on the floor of the northwestern corner of the apiary, which was ca. 1.3 m lower than the foundation of the walls. The discrepancy between the foundation levels of the walls of Room 2441 and the bottom of the collapse might indicate the existence of a basement or some other hollow space below this room - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

  • It was difficult to securely determine whether this collapse occurred as a result of human activity (war, unintentional burning, etc.) or was caused by a severe earthquake. The latter possibility seems more likely, based on paleomagnetic testing (Chapter 54). This destruction by fire and collapse is attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b. Five 14C dates measured on the grain found in the collapse layer (Chapter 48, Sample R26) provided the following calibrated average dates: 926–898 BCE (1σ) and 970–850 BCE (2σ). These early dates fit the destruction of Stratum C-1b, as confirmed also by dates from the apiary to the east - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

Collapsed Wall
  • Photo 12.144 - Bldg. CH - Eastward Brick collapse of Wall 1437 in Room 2455 - wide shot from the south
  • Photo 12.146 - Bldg. CH - View from above and looking east at eastward Brick collapse of Wall 2426 in Room 2455
  • Photo 12.147 - Bldg. CH - Closeup of Eastward Brick collapse of Wall 2426 in Room 2455
  • Photo 12.129 - Bldg. CH - Eastward Brick collapse of Wall 2426 in Room 2455 on left in background - view from the north
  • Figure 12.74 - Bldg. CH - Section 20 illustrating eastward collapse of Wall 2426 in Room 2455
Description(s)

  • The eastern end of Wall 2426 was a massive collapse of burnt bricks fallen down towards the east (Fig. 12.72; Photo 12.144), representing the collapsed end of this wall and of the southeastern corner of Building CG - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • The eastern part of Building CH collapsed down onto the floor of the apiary, evoking the southeastern end of Building CG to the north. ... Although none was found, it is possible that there had been an eastern closing wall to Rooms 2455 and 2451, built above the wood, that collapsed entirely. Alternatively, some wooden partition might have closed off this end of the room that faced the apiary, as it is difficult to imagine that the upper rooms were simply open to the east, on a higher level than the apiary floor below. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • 1.0 m from the corner of Wall 2426 with Wall 1438, it [Wall 2426] collapsed towards the east at an acute angle; the difference between the level and fallen parts of the wall was 0.5 m (Fig. 12.74; Photos 12.146–12.147). The bricks from this wall fell onto the apiary floor and were subsequently covered on their eastern end by Building CL of Stratum C-1a, as noted above. The stratigraphic sequence in this area is very clear and, in fact, determined the attribution of Building CH to Stratum C-1b. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • While the eastern part of Building CH was covered by Building CL in Stratum C-1a, its western part remained in ruins, apparently an open area that was not accessed from Building CL and was perhaps used for refuse. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

  • The eastern part of Wall 2426 could have been partly built above this basement, which would explain its sharp collapse towards the east, to a level below its foundation further west (Fig. 12.74). The destruction of this structure and the bricks of Wall 2426 and their collapse into the apiary, created the slope of this layer as found. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:125-132)

Collapsed Wall
  • Photo 12.154 - The Apiary - Collapsed western part of Wall 8469 abutting tilted Wall 2411 of Building CG. The wall collapsed in a mostly southerly direction.
  • Photo 12.155 - The Apiary - Collapsed western part of Wall 8469 - View from the south (inside the Apiary). The wall collapsed in a mostly southerly direction.
  • Photo 12.157 - The Apiary - Collapsed Wall 8469
Description(s)

  • Wall 8469 was best preserved near its corner with Wall 2411 (top level 86.45 m), where it suffered severe collapse represented by a tumble of bricks (Photos 12.154–12.155). This suggests that at this point near Building CG, the wall was built of bricks as a regular wall, as opposed to its center and eastern end that adjoined the three rows of hives, where it appears to have been built of packed clay and not of actual bricks. This part was lower and extremely damaged, burnt to a pulverized white and pinkish color, and no brick courses could be discerned (Photos 12.156–12.157). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • Wall 8469 on the north of the apiary ran ca. 9.0 m from its junction with Wall 2411 of Building CG until its assumed corner with Wall 9453 on the east. This was not a regular wall, but rather a narrow, 0.35 m wide retaining wall or partition - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • The apiary was surrounded (at least) on three sides by built units, and was established on a lower level than those structures on its west and north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining units were built more or less on the same level, judging by the floor levels. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

Collapsed Walls
  • Photo 12.235 - The Apiary - Collapsed Wall destruction debris of the C1-b Apiary underneath (sealed by?) Stratum C-1a Walls 2413 and 2504 in Room 4435 of Building CL
Description(s)

  • The [Stratum C1-a] western wall (2413) [of Room 4435 - also Stratum C1-a] ran for 6.5 m and was preserved to a height of 1.3 m; it was constructed directly on top of the burnt destruction debris and collapsed bricks of Stratum C-1b (Photo 12.235) - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

Tilted Wall
  • Photo 12.129 - Bldg. CG - Eastward tilted Wall 2439 in Room 2441
  • Photo 12.128 - Bldg. CG - Eastward tilted Wall 2439 in Room 2441
Description(s)

  • most of the eastern and southern walls of this room [2441] had collapsed towards the southeast (Figs. 12.69, 12.72; Photo 12.133), leaving only stumps, each 0.7 m long: Wall 2439 on the south and the end of Wall 2411 on the east (Photo 12.127). Note that the eastern end of Wall 2439, as preserved, ends in a straight vertical line (Photos 12.127, 12.143). This straight ending raised a suspicion that this was a door jamb of an opening leading to the room from Building CH on the south. However, this is not certain, since the lower courses of the wall are seen fallen in the same collapse that is attributed to Stratum C-1b. It might be that this supposed entrance belonged to a rebuild of this room in Stratum C-1a, although this is far from certain. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

  • In the severely burnt destruction debris of fallen bricks and wood in Room 2441 were 57 restorable vessels of various types (Figs. 13.52–13.55), as well as other finds (Table 12.19), and a concentration of burnt grain. All the finds were concentrated within the area enclosed by the surmised lines of the collapsed walls and did not continue to the east or south. This further supports the idea that this originally had been a closed room like the two others in this building. The destruction debris rested on a layer of powdery white lime that apparently had been the floor; this floor was found to be horizontal on the west (86.30 m), but fallen towards the east, underneath the brick collapse described above (Photo 12.131). The lowest level to which this white floor was traced was 85.05 m (2471), just in the area where the assumed southeastern corner of the room is reconstructed. Most of the restorable pottery vessels were found in the collapse down to the east, so that their levels were below that of the horizontal section of the white floor in the west, but they were clearly related to this floor.

    The collapse of the southeastern corner of Room 2441 created a huge pile of fallen bricks, 3.0 m high (Photos 12.131–12.133), that collapsed on the floor of the northwestern corner of the apiary, which was ca. 1.3 m lower than the foundation of the walls. The discrepancy between the foundation levels of the walls of Room 2441 and the bottom of the collapse might indicate the existence of a basement or some other hollow space below this room, perhaps enclosed on the west by Wall 2505, reused from Stratum C-2. The layers of charred wood found here may have been related to the construction of such a basement, as in Building CH (see below), and it might have been open towards the apiary on the east and south.

    It was difficult to securely determine whether this collapse occurred as a result of human activity (war, unintentional burning, etc.) or was caused by a severe earthquake. The latter possibility seems more likely, based on paleomagnetic testing (Chapter 54). This destruction by fire and collapse is attributed to the end of Stratum C-1b. Five 14C dates measured on the grain found in the collapse layer (Chapter 48, Sample R26) provided the following calibrated average dates: 926–898 BCE (1σ) and 970–850 BCE (2σ). These early dates fit the destruction of Stratum C-1b, as confirmed also by dates from the apiary to the east.
    - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:113-120)

Tilted Walls

  • Photo 12.39 - Bldg. CG - Wall 2411
  • Photo 12.40 - Bldg. CE - Wall 2454
Description(s)

  • Both walls [2411 and 2454] are tilted at approximately 18°, the wall [2454] of Building CE towards the north and the wall [2411] of Building CG towards the south (dips 18°±3/360°±10 [n=5], 18°±1/175°±15 [n=4] respectively), demonstrating a symmetrical anticlinal fold. - Ben-Yosef and Ron in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 5:670)

  • An interesting feature was a pronounced drop down towards the south, visible in the eastern face of the southern end of Wall 2411 of Building CG, where it bordered Room 4445 (Photo 12.139); this apparently was the result of the same seismic activity that caused the collapse of the southeastern corner of Building CG - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:122)

Fractured and Displaced Blocks (mudbricks) - Steps (?) or a wall remnant
  • Photo 12.88 - Bldg. CR - Rows of N-S aligned bricks (6512) in Room 6491 in a late phase of C-1b
Description(s)

  • The eastern end of this room [6491] underwent a more pronounced change, where the wall was replaced by several rows of narrow bricks on a north–south line (6512). Although it seems that this was an intentional arrangement, these bricks might represent a fallen wall or a feature whose function remained unknown (Photo 12.88). These brick rows ended 1.0 m west of Building CW (see below), creating a rather narrow corridor that led into Building CF to the south. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:80-82)

  • Building CR had three sub-phases, the two early ones attributed to Stratum C-1b and the latest to Stratum C-1a. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:80-82)

Debris
  • Figure 12.83 - The Apiary - Section 29 illustrating C1-b debris in the Apiary
Description(s)

  • The second type of floor was made of very hard-packed crushed white tufa, 0.25 m thick, found in the aisle between the eastern and middle rows of hives and in the northern part of the aisle between the middle and western rows of hives (Fig. 12.82; Photos 12.152, 12.158). ... The destruction debris in the apiary, including a large amount of collapsed bricks, rested directly on this floor. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • The fallen bricks and burnt debris found in the western part of the apiary, which originated in C-1b Buildings CG and CH, sloped down from west to east, while the same level of destruction debris found in the center and east of the apiary was horizontal (Figs. 12.73, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.150–12.151). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • The apiary was surrounded (at least) on three sides by built units, and was established on a lower level than those structures on its west and north. On the east, it seems as though the adjoining units were built more or less on the same level, judging by the floor levels. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

  • The northwestern corner of the apiary was bordered by the southeastern corner of Building CG; part of the collapse of this corner was found on the apiary floor here. Wall 2411 was floating at level 85.90 m, much above the level of the apiary floor (Photos 12.158– 12.160). This is explained as the result of the construction of the apiary on a lower level, while penetrating into and removing Stratum C-2 remains, as noted above. The thick wooden construction in the foundation of the walls of Room 2441, the southern room of Building CG, might have been related to the need to buttress this height discrepancy or, as suggested above, could have been part of a subterranean space under the room that had faced the apiary. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:132-139)

Debris
  • Photo 12.166 - Bldg. CZ - C1-b debris on Floor 11426 sealed by C1-a Wall 10464
  • Photo 12.167 - Bldg. CZ - pillar bases of C-1a Building CX set directly on top of fallen bricks of C1-b stratum
  • Figure 12.94 - Bldg. CZ - Section 40 - Illustration of Stratum C1-b debris in Room 11457
Description(s)

  • In the area to the north of Wall 10518 (the eastern segment of the L-shaped space) was a 0.9 m-deep layer of fallen bricks and burnt debris (11402, 11414) that contained a few grinding stone fragments and a small amount of bones and sherds, many of them red slipped and hand burnished. There was no clear floor makeup, so that the floor level (11408, 85.36 m) was determined mainly by the bottom of this debris; a two-sided mortar surrounded by three pestles was found on this lower level. Wall 10464 and the floor of Stratum C-1a Building CX sealed this layer (Photo 12.166) and, in fact, the pillar bases in the floor of Building CX were set directly into the fallen bricks and debris of the courtyard (Photo 12.167). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

  • The floors in the two western rooms [11449 and 11457] were made of red clay and were 0.25–0.3 m lower than those in the eastern part of the building. They were covered by a 1.0 m-deep layer of complete and partial fallen bricks, burnt debris (11410 in the southern room and 11423 in the northern room; Fig. 12.94) with large fragments of charcoal and a large amount of sherds (particularly in the northern room). The pottery included many red-slipped and hand-burnished sherds, although in the northern room, a relatively large proportion of the pottery can be dated to Iron Age I (i.e., Fig. 13.161:2–4) and might have originated in earth dumped here as a fill between the fallen bricks, in preparation for the construction of Stratum C-1a Building CQ3. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

  • Room 11404 contained a large amount of fallen bricks with very few sherds and bones. The floor was not well defined, just like in Locus 11408 to the north, and was determined mainly by the bottom of the latter layer and the floating level of the L-shaped walls - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

  • It was deliberated whether Building CZ might be attributed to Stratum C-2 rather than to C-1b. ... we attribute Building CZ to Stratum C-1b and remain aware of the stratigraphic ambivalence. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:140-145)

Area D - Stratum D1-c

Deformation Map

Stratum C1-b and D1-c Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.18 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

Area D
Building
[Square(s)]
Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
Square Q/5 7837 7803 northward
  • It seems that the end of this phase [D-1c] was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse. ... Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C. ...
  • Photo 15.115 - Square Q/5
  • Photo 15.116 - Square Q/5
Tilted Wall
Description(s)

  • The most substantial element of Phases D-1c and D-1b was Wall 7803, preserved to a height of more than 1.5 m. This east–west wall in Square Q/5 had a stone foundation only at its eroded western end (Square P/5), where the brick superstructure had disappeared due to erosion. This rather massive stone foundation was intended to support the wall close to the steep slope of the mound. Such a stone foundation is notable, as it was not found in other buildings of Strata VI–IV in all other excavation areas. Wall 7803 was bonded with north–south Wall 7824, which was narrower and probably served as an inner partition wall. Some 2.0 m north of its corner with Wall 7803, Wall 7824 made a corner with Wall 4809, which extended to the west and disappeared at the erosion line after 1.1 m. To the north of this corner, Wall 7811 continued the line of Wall 7824. It was built of dark friable bricks, preserved two courses high. It may have been a later addition to the building, since its foundation level was somewhat higher than the rest of the walls in this structure. These walls created three separate rooms or spaces.

    The space east of Wall 7824 (7837) was at least 3.0×3.7 m, continuing east and north beyond the limits of the excavation area. A plaster floor (7837) was exposed in this space at level 86.49 m; on top of it was an accumulation of striations, sealed underneath a massive brick collapse.

    The space to the west of Wall 7824 and limited by Wall 4809 on the north was badly eroded on the slope. In the corner of Walls 7824 and 4809 was a semi-circular brick bin (7820), comprising two courses of narrow bricks. It covered the top of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2.

    Square Q/4 remained a large open space. On the western edge of this area very fragmentary remains were detected close to the erosion line, including part of a circular line of bricks with a floor (1834), perhaps a silo, located above the D-2 remains. The installation was bordered on the north by a fragment of a stone foundation (1852) bearing a single brick, which was all that remained of its superstructure. To the north of the wall, the stones continued into Square Q/5, where they functioned as a foundation for Wall 7803.

    It seems that the end of this phase was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse.

    Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C, which consisted of a few narrow walls and a floor (4483, level 86.70 m; Chapter 12).
    - Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:92-93)

Square Q/5 7837 ?
  • It seems that the end of this phase [D-1c] was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse. ... Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C. ...
  • Photo 15.115 - Square Q/5
  • Photo 15.116 - Square Q/5
Wall Collapse Debris
Description(s)

  • The most substantial element of Phases D-1c and D-1b was Wall 7803, preserved to a height of more than 1.5 m. This east–west wall in Square Q/5 had a stone foundation only at its eroded western end (Square P/5), where the brick superstructure had disappeared due to erosion. This rather massive stone foundation was intended to support the wall close to the steep slope of the mound. Such a stone foundation is notable, as it was not found in other buildings of Strata VI–IV in all other excavation areas. Wall 7803 was bonded with north–south Wall 7824, which was narrower and probably served as an inner partition wall. Some 2.0 m north of its corner with Wall 7803, Wall 7824 made a corner with Wall 4809, which extended to the west and disappeared at the erosion line after 1.1 m. To the north of this corner, Wall 7811 continued the line of Wall 7824. It was built of dark friable bricks, preserved two courses high. It may have been a later addition to the building, since its foundation level was somewhat higher than the rest of the walls in this structure. These walls created three separate rooms or spaces.

    The space east of Wall 7824 (7837) was at least 3.0×3.7 m, continuing east and north beyond the limits of the excavation area. A plaster floor (7837) was exposed in this space at level 86.49 m; on top of it was an accumulation of striations, sealed underneath a massive brick collapse.

    The space to the west of Wall 7824 and limited by Wall 4809 on the north was badly eroded on the slope. In the corner of Walls 7824 and 4809 was a semi-circular brick bin (7820), comprising two courses of narrow bricks. It covered the top of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2.

    Square Q/4 remained a large open space. On the western edge of this area very fragmentary remains were detected close to the erosion line, including part of a circular line of bricks with a floor (1834), perhaps a silo, located above the D-2 remains. The installation was bordered on the north by a fragment of a stone foundation (1852) bearing a single brick, which was all that remained of its superstructure. To the north of the wall, the stones continued into Square Q/5, where they functioned as a foundation for Wall 7803.

    It seems that the end of this phase was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse.

    Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C, which consisted of a few narrow walls and a floor (4483, level 86.70 m; Chapter 12).
    - Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:92-93)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area D
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
  • Wall 7803 tilted towards the north
  • Thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5 above Floor 7837
  • It seems that the end of this phase [D-1c]was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse. ... Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C. ...
  • Photo 15.115 - Square Q/5
  • Photo 15.116 - Square Q/5
Description(s)

  • The most substantial element of Phases D-1c and D-1b was Wall 7803, preserved to a height of more than 1.5 m. This east–west wall in Square Q/5 had a stone foundation only at its eroded western end (Square P/5), where the brick superstructure had disappeared due to erosion. This rather massive stone foundation was intended to support the wall close to the steep slope of the mound. Such a stone foundation is notable, as it was not found in other buildings of Strata VI–IV in all other excavation areas. Wall 7803 was bonded with north–south Wall 7824, which was narrower and probably served as an inner partition wall. Some 2.0 m north of its corner with Wall 7803, Wall 7824 made a corner with Wall 4809, which extended to the west and disappeared at the erosion line after 1.1 m. To the north of this corner, Wall 7811 continued the line of Wall 7824. It was built of dark friable bricks, preserved two courses high. It may have been a later addition to the building, since its foundation level was somewhat higher than the rest of the walls in this structure. These walls created three separate rooms or spaces.

    The space east of Wall 7824 (7837) was at least 3.0×3.7 m, continuing east and north beyond the limits of the excavation area. A plaster floor (7837) was exposed in this space at level 86.49 m; on top of it was an accumulation of striations, sealed underneath a massive brick collapse.

    The space to the west of Wall 7824 and limited by Wall 4809 on the north was badly eroded on the slope. In the corner of Walls 7824 and 4809 was a semi-circular brick bin (7820), comprising two courses of narrow bricks. It covered the top of Wall 4808 of Stratum D-2.

    Square Q/4 remained a large open space. On the western edge of this area very fragmentary remains were detected close to the erosion line, including part of a circular line of bricks with a floor (1834), perhaps a silo, located above the D-2 remains. The installation was bordered on the north by a fragment of a stone foundation (1852) bearing a single brick, which was all that remained of its superstructure. To the north of the wall, the stones continued into Square Q/5, where they functioned as a foundation for Wall 7803.

    It seems that the end of this phase was the result of a seismic event, which caused Wall 7803 to tilt towards the north, thus exposing the lower courses of this wall (shown on the plan, Fig. 15.29, as if it was a separate wall). This also resulted in the thick accumulation of fallen bricks in Square Q/5. No traces of burning were found in this collapse.

    Stratum D-1c may be correlated with an early phase of C-1b in Square R/4 in Area C, which consisted of a few narrow walls and a floor (4483, level 86.70 m; Chapter 12).
    - Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:92-93)

Area E - Stratum E1-b(?)

Deformation Map

Stratum E1-b Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 17.3 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

Area E
Building
[Square(s)]
Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
EA Room 1704
  • Although the [E1-b] room [1704 in Bldg. EA] was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce.
Brick Debris (not necessarily of seismic origin)
Description(s)

  • In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:271-274)

EA Rooms 1699 and 2651
  • In the northern part of this room [1699 in E1-b Bldg. EA] in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.
  • The space south of Wall 1672 [i.e. Room 2651 in E1-b Bldg. EA] had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season
Brick Debris
Description(s)

  • The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.

    Wall 1657, the northern wall of Room 1699, was 2.7 m-long, made of dark gray bricks, unlike the other bricks in this area. On its eastern end, the wall was preserved to a height of five courses; its western end bordered the street to its west. This wall was a continuation of Wall 1619 and in fact, they may be defined as one wall. Wall 1656, the western wall of this room, was poorly preserved. Its two rows of bricks were 1.0 m wide and preserved to a height of two courses at the southern edge of Square E/14, although six courses were seen in the northern section of E/13. On the south, this space was enclosed by Walls 1690 and 1689 (Square E/13); the latter was attached to another wall (2667), only the top of which was uncovered in the excavation. This double wall, 1.2 m wide, was perhaps the southern limit of Building EA; Wall 2667 might represent the northern wall of a separate unit to the south.

    In the northern part of this room in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.

    In the northern part of Square E/13, Locus 1699 was the continuation of Locus 2661. It contained occupation debris above a 0.01 m-thick, hard whitish plaster floor which sloped down from east to west (average level, 71.39 m). The accumulation on the plaster floor included small pieces of wall plaster and brick debris.

    This area was bounded on the south by a narrow partition wall (1672), extending on a diagonal line from Wall 1690 on the east to the northwestern corner of the square, where it seemed to have made a corner with Wall 1656 or was embedded in the latter wall, which was not detected along the rest of Square E/13 south of Wall 1672 (Photos 17.17–17.19). This was an exceptional wall, since its orientation, width and brick sizes (0.36×0.22 m and 0.42×0.40 m) differed from all other walls in this area. A break in this wall served as a passage between Rooms 1699 and 2651. It seems that this was a secondary partition wall, dividing the larger rectangular space; based on its levels, this division must have been constructed during the earliest use of the building in Stratum E-1b. This wall was constructed slightly above the brick platform (2657) and installation (2666), which were attributed to Stratum E-2. The space south of Wall 1672 had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:275-277)

EA Room 2663
  • A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached [in Room 2663 in E1-b Bldg. EA].
Brick Debris
Description(s)

  • The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:277)

Courtyard throughout





Photos and Sections

  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.5 - South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.38 - Probe in Squares E/17–18
  • Photo 17.39 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.40 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.41 - Oven 4608, Square E/17
  • Photo 17.42 - Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.43 - E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665
  • Photo 17.44 - Buildings EB and EA
  • Photo 17.45 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.46 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.47 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.48 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.49 - Square E/15 with debris
  • Photo 17.50 - Detail of stone 1623
  • Photo 17.51 - Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623
  • Photo 17.52 - Squares E–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.53 - Square F/15
  • Figure 17.15a - Section 2
  • Figure 17.15b - Section 2
  • Figure 17.16a - Section 3
  • Figure 17.16b - Section 3
  • Figure 17.18a - Section 5
  • Figure 17.18b - Section 5

Debris (not necessarily of a seismic origin) found throughout the courtyard
Description(s)

Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.60 - Probe in Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.61 - Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone
Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1
Description(s)

  • A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

    The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

    In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

    An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:301-302)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area E
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
Debris (not necessarily of seismic origin)
  • Although the [E1-b] room [1704 in Bldg. EA] was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce.
Description(s)

  • In the northern part of the building in Square F/14, two phases were detected, assigned to Strata E-1b and E-1a. In Stratum E-1b, Walls 1669, 1687, 1637 and 1661 created a room (1704) with inner dimensions of 2.2×2.8 m (Fig. 17.3). The walls were built of hard light yellow bricks and preserved to a height of 1.1 m, their foundations at levels 71.03–71.12 m. The entrance to the room was probably at its northeastern corner. Although the room was completely excavated, no floor was detected under the layer of brick debris (1704) and the finds were scarce. The excavation in this room continued somewhat below the foundation of the walls, until level 70.93 m; thus, the lowest layer excavated here perhaps belonged to Stratum E-2. The southeastern corner of the room was disturbed by a late circular pit (1654, attributed to Stratum E/0; Fig. 17.12). The western wall (1669) was a single brick wide, preserved along 2.0 m to a height of 1.25 m; it continued into the wide balk that separated Square F/15 from F/14, where it might have made a corner with a wall that would have enclosed Room 2639 on the north. The southern wall (1661) adjoined Wall 1619 to its south, thus creating a double-wall system. The northern wall (1687) separated Room 1704 from Room 2639 to the north. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:271-274)

Brick Debris
  • In the northern part of this room [1699 in E1-b Bldg. EA] in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.
  • The space south of Wall 1672 [i.e. Room 2651 in E1-b Bldg. EA] had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season
Description(s)

  • The western wing of the southern part of Building EA in Stratum E-1b included a rectangular space (inner dimensions ca. 2.8×6.0 m), divided by a narrow diagonal wall (1672) into two rooms: 2661 on the north and 2651 on the south (Fig. 17.3). This area was enclosed by Walls 1690, 1689, 1656, 1657, 1628 and 1627. The entrance to this wing was probably at its northwestern corner through Wall 1656, leading from an open area or street to the west. What appeared to have been a brick threshold here was disturbed by a later pit (1680; Fig. 17.12; Photo 17.9). The entrance into Room 2651 was from Room 1699 to its north.

    Wall 1657, the northern wall of Room 1699, was 2.7 m-long, made of dark gray bricks, unlike the other bricks in this area. On its eastern end, the wall was preserved to a height of five courses; its western end bordered the street to its west. This wall was a continuation of Wall 1619 and in fact, they may be defined as one wall. Wall 1656, the western wall of this room, was poorly preserved. Its two rows of bricks were 1.0 m wide and preserved to a height of two courses at the southern edge of Square E/14, although six courses were seen in the northern section of E/13. On the south, this space was enclosed by Walls 1690 and 1689 (Square E/13); the latter was attached to another wall (2667), only the top of which was uncovered in the excavation. This double wall, 1.2 m wide, was perhaps the southern limit of Building EA; Wall 2667 might represent the northern wall of a separate unit to the south.

    In the northern part of this room in Square E/14 was a layer of occupation debris (2661) above a floor that was not well detected at level 71.49 m. A layer of brick debris (1664, 2655) covered this occupation debris/possible floor, and was sealed by a destruction layer and (possible) Floor 1605 of Stratum E-1a.

    In the northern part of Square E/13, Locus 1699 was the continuation of Locus 2661. It contained occupation debris above a 0.01 m-thick, hard whitish plaster floor which sloped down from east to west (average level, 71.39 m). The accumulation on the plaster floor included small pieces of wall plaster and brick debris.

    This area was bounded on the south by a narrow partition wall (1672), extending on a diagonal line from Wall 1690 on the east to the northwestern corner of the square, where it seemed to have made a corner with Wall 1656 or was embedded in the latter wall, which was not detected along the rest of Square E/13 south of Wall 1672 (Photos 17.17–17.19). This was an exceptional wall, since its orientation, width and brick sizes (0.36×0.22 m and 0.42×0.40 m) differed from all other walls in this area. A break in this wall served as a passage between Rooms 1699 and 2651. It seems that this was a secondary partition wall, dividing the larger rectangular space; based on its levels, this division must have been constructed during the earliest use of the building in Stratum E-1b. This wall was constructed slightly above the brick platform (2657) and installation (2666), which were attributed to Stratum E-2. The space south of Wall 1672 had a clay floor (2651) at levels 71.06–71.20 m, covered by a 0.8 m-thick layer of brick debris and eroded material (from bottom to top: 1693, 1679, 1663, 1651).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:275-277)

Brick Debris
  • A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached [in Room 2663 in E1-b Bldg. EA].
Description(s)

  • The southeastern part of Building EA (Squares E– F/13), consisted of a large room (2663), entered from Room 1699 to its west, through an opening in the northern end of Wall 1690. A layer of brick debris was excavated until level 71.36 m, but a floor was not reached. In the southwestern part of this excavated space was a low narrow rounded parapet (1692) that created a small bin attached on one end to Wall 1690 (1702; Photo 17.17). In the eastern part of the area, a narrow partition wall (2664) separated Room 2663 from 2665. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:277)

  • Debris (not necessarily of a seismic origin) found throughout the courtyard






Photos and Sections

  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.5 - South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.38 - Probe in Squares E/17–18
  • Photo 17.39 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.40 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.41 - Oven 4608, Square E/17
  • Photo 17.42 - Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.43 - E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665
  • Photo 17.44 - Buildings EB and EA
  • Photo 17.45 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.46 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.47 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.48 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.49 - Square E/15 with debris
  • Photo 17.50 - Detail of stone 1623
  • Photo 17.51 - Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623
  • Photo 17.52 - Squares E–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.53 - Square F/15
  • Figure 17.15a - Section 2
  • Figure 17.15b - Section 2
  • Figure 17.16a - Section 3
  • Figure 17.16b - Section 3
  • Figure 17.18a - Section 5
  • Figure 17.18b - Section 5

Description(s)

Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.60 - Probe in Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.61 - Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone
Description(s)

  • A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

    The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

    In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

    An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:301-302)

Stratum IV Destruction - Late Iron IIA - ~9th-8th century BCE

Area C - Stratum C-1a

Deformation Map

Stratum C1-a and D1-a Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.19 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

  • Fig. 12.19 - Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
Area C
Building Room Wall Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
CF 5498, 6435, and 5460 debris
Description(s)

  • On the floor [of Room 5498 in Stratum C-1a] was a 0.7 m-thick layer of very burnt destruction debris (5416, 5429, 5439), containing fallen bricks, burnt brick debris, ash and charcoal, ceiling collapse, and 49 complete (restorable and intact) vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95; Photo 12.96). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

  • On the floor [of Room 6435] was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401) that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an exceptionally large amount considering the small space - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

  • Destruction debris (5425 on the east and 5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and the benches [of Room 5460] (Photo 12.111) - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

  • Based on the width of the walls [of Building CF in Stratum C-1b and C-1a], we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris ... The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

CL 5449, 5482, and to the west and north of Bldg. CL debris
Description(s)

  • Both [eastern] rooms [5449 and 5482] were full of a thick layer of destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs. 13.127–13.128), as were several other objects (Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239). ... One has to question whether the two eastern spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m, appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar bases or any other roof support were found, it may be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

  • Building CL was constructed above the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos 12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235) and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73– 12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner of this building was built above a leveling fill (4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for two superimposed destructions in Area C. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

  • The area to the west and north of Building CL remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west (Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep, covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

CL 4435 4443 debris + collapsed walls (?)
Description(s)

  • Room 4435 was filled with burnt debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig. 13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed with some whitish material, that was concentrated mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall 4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing (Photo 12.236). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

  • the same black burnt oily substance mixed with white material that was found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237– 12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the northern part of Room 5449 not burnt. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

  • Building CL was constructed above the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos 12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235) and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73– 12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner of this building was built above a leveling fill (4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for two superimposed destructions in Area C. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

CW 6411 and Courtyard Area debris
Description(s)

  • The room [6411] was full of heavily burnt destruction debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris, including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs, juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig. 13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in the debris above the benches that lined the walls (Photo 12.117) - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105)

  • A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401), revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire courtyard area [of C-1a Building CW], comprising hard burnt brick debris with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash. Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97– 13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig. 13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table 12.16). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105

  • Unlike most other Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this [Building CW] appears to have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least on one side. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105)

Square C/6 east of Wall 8424 of C-1a Building CW collapsed wall (fell on a human)
Description(s)

  • A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105)

CQ1 6483 and 6436 debris
Description(s)

  • The floor [of Room 6483] was covered with a layer of extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris (6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo 12.121). ... This room [6483] contained 26 vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects (Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • On the floor [of Room 6436] was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

CQ2 All rooms - 7500, 7490, and 8431 debris
Description(s)

CQ2 7500 7413 southward tilted wall
Description(s)

  • Room 7500 [whose western wall 7413 was tilted southwards] was full of very dense burnt destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos 12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of fine small closed vessels. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to the south, see below) are exceptional among the Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small overall size and the even smaller size of the inner rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms. It may be assumed that these houses had a second story, thus their functional space could have been double, although no evidence for steps was found and access must have been from the outside of the building. This possibility may explain the lack of an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the lower storey of this building was entered by a wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact, there was such an entrance in Building CQ1, despite the higher street level to its south. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an extremely large amount for such a small building, even when taking into account the existence of a second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in Chapter 45. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • The eastern wall (7416) [of Building CQ1] created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

CQ3 10452 and 10460 debris
Description(s)

  • The floor (10452) [of Room 10452] was composed of red clay interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of) Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen bricks was found against the southern and eastern walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo 12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular plastered depression located along the center of the southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo 12.179). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

  • The floor [of Room 10460] was less well preserved than in the other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights that were concentrated mainly along the western wall and near the entrance. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

CQ3 10460 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south wall stumps - collapsed wall ?
Description(s)

  • Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room 10460 and were flush with the floor level in Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could have been done at some point during the lifetime of the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such an opening was part of the original plan of both buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall 10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3 was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately left at a low level in order to allow for passage between the buildings; see also Wall 10464 (described below). According to A. Mazar, the low levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part) resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely damaged during the final destruction of this building or suffered from a late intrusion which could not be observed in the excavation. According to this explanation, there had been no passage between Buildings CP and CQ3. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

CQ3 10494 damaged wall + debris
Description(s)

  • The walls [of Room 10494], preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

CX All rooms debris
Description(s)

  • Like the other units, Building CX was found full of very burnt destruction debris, with fallen bricks, charcoal pieces, ash, and large a amount of pottery, with 122 complete or almost-complete vessels, many of them in situ (Figs. 12.88, 13.136– 13.142; Photos 12.185–12.186). Just inside and west of the entrance, a cooking jug (Fig. 13.138:8) and part of a storage jar were found (Fig. 13.140:17; Photo 12.183). Concentrations of loomweights here, to the south of Installation 10509, and just west of the northern end of the row of pillar bases, found along with fragments of burnt wood beams (Photos 12.181, 12.187–12.188), indicate these had belonged to one, or possibly two looms. Altogether, 164 loomweights were found in this building, mostly in the northern part (Chapter 39). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:153-157)

  • A large concentration of grain was found inside a storage jar in the southern part of the building ([Locus] 10431 [possibly shown in Photo 12.86]). The grain was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R36). One of the two measurements provided the calibrated dates 978–848 BCE (1σ) and 996–838 BCE (2σ); the other was way too high and was defined as an outlier. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:153-157)

CP 11451, 9449, 9450, 10458, 10476, 10506, 10510, and 11441 debris
Description(s)

  • Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor [of Room 11451] contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • The room [9449] was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418, 9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were found in this small room, among them 11 storage jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east, but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell from a second floor. A special find in this room was an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See Table 12.24 for other finds. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • The entire room [9450] was filled with very burnt destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43 restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig. 13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of the pottery in this room, in particular the storage jars (like in the previous room), were found smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ on the floor. This situation may hint that much of this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher shelves. A special item in this room was a horned pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo 12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar was a complete brick, but it appears that this was fallen and not meant as a support. For additional finds from this room, see Table 12.24. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-189)

  • Inside3 [Room 9450] was an intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig. 13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10, 13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812 BCE (2σ). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster, ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix (Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the destruction debris were found in situ (some intact) on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds (Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the southern half of the room (10493) contained much less pottery than in the north and center, mostly concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall 10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room 10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the same wall in the southwestern corner of Room 10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos 12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with 0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup. It was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base, and contained a large amount of charred grain (Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221– 12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the east of the pithos was a concentration of 85 loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains of charred wood here might represent a loom. A few vessels were found in the entrance leading from the east, mostly against the plastered southern doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large and heavy stone was found upside down, just under topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451 (Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small depression carved out of part of its top, in which some substance was probably ground, judging by the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room 11451 to the east, described above. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • The room [10458] was full of a layer of burnt destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained 23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found just to the southwest of the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the northwestern corner of the room, above the lower western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo 12.214); a few additional loomweights were found dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454 along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this bench was a dense concentration of finds that included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos (Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it (Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars (Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35, No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north (Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498) in the western part of the room included a few small upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well as several loomweights and sherds. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484), including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed against the center of the southern wall (Photos 12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round container with a matching lid to its east (Fig. 13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken. Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those found attached to the altar fragment from Building CF. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • The room [10510] was full of burnt destruction debris (10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact four-legged incense burner with a matching lid (Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458, apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items were found above the sub-floor brick construction in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the room. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

  • The floor (11441) [of Room 11441] was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

CP 10476 fractured floor
Description(s)

  • Just below the floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219). Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part, most of the bricks were missing, although it is not clear whether this area had never been constructed or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and, in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo 12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468 was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms 10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to have been a building technique intended to provide reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to protect against rodents in certain places (compare a similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room 8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor above it (Photo 12.221). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

CP 10458 collapsed wall ?
Description(s)

  • The preservation of the northern and eastern walls [of Room 10458] was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north (which was also the southern wall of Building CX) was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length, but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower western end adjoined the southern face of Wall 10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved to the same low height. As mentioned above in the discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to explain this feature: either there was a deliberate lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458 into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation was due to damage caused by the destruction or by some unrecognized later intrusion. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

CP 9449 9406 damaged wall
Description(s)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area C
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.96 - Bldg. CF - Broken Pottery on floor of Room 5498
Description(s)

  • On the floor [of Room 5498 in Stratum C-1a] was a 0.7 m-thick layer of very burnt destruction debris (5416, 5429, 5439), containing fallen bricks, burnt brick debris, ash and charcoal, ceiling collapse, and 49 complete (restorable and intact) vessels (Figs. 13.80–13.95; Photo 12.96). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

  • Based on the width of the walls [of Building CF in Stratum C-1b and C-1a], we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris ... The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.126 - Bldg. CQ2 - Western half of Room 7500
  • Photo 12.124 - Bldg. CQ2 - Western half of Room 7490
Description(s)

  • Room 7500 was full of very dense burnt destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos 12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of fine small closed vessels. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • This room [7490] was filled with burnt destruction debris (7444), including many fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.126), as well as 66 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119) and other finds (Table 12.18). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.121 - Bldg. CQ1 - Destruction debris 6439 in Room 6483 and Destruction debris 6413 in Room 6436
  • Photo 12.122 - Bldg. CQ1 - View from above showing destruction debris in Room 6483
Description(s)

  • The floor [of Room 6483] was covered with a layer of extremely burnt and heavy destruction debris (6423, 6439, 7420) (Fig. 12.57) that included fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling, charcoal, ash, plaster fragments and parts of a clay installation, possibly an oven, that could not be reconstructed (Photo 12.121). ... This room [6483] contained 26 vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107), as well as other objects (Table 12.17), notably 52 loomweights. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • On the floor [of Room 6436] was heavy burnt destruction debris with fallen bricks and ceiling material (6413; Photo 12.121). This small room contained 34 complete or partial vessels (Figs. 13.103–13.107) and 107 loomweights, which indicate that a loom stood in this room, along with many other finds (Table 12.17). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris

  • Photo 12.205 - Bldg. CP - Destruction debris in Room 11451
Description(s)

  • Heavy burnt destruction debris on the floor [of Room 11451] contained 18 restorable pottery vessels and a concentration of loomweights, mainly in the center-north part of the room. In the southeastern part was a large pile of fallen bricks and burnt debris that contained a very large lower grinding stone and a large upper grinding stone on top of it, revealed just under topsoil, suggesting that they had fallen from a second floor or from the roof (Photo 12.205; Chapter 43). Attached to the northern wall just inside the western entrance was a raised, semi-circular bench or shelf (11452), 0.85 m long and with a 0.4 m radius, standing to a height of 0.4 m above the floor. Its upper part had a shallow depression, as if it was intended to hold something, such as a vessel, or perhaps it served as a seat (Photos 12.202–12.03, 12.205–12.206). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris

  • Bldg. CP - Room [9449] had an 0.8 m-deep layer of dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling material and complete fallen bricks
Description(s)

  • The room [9449] was full of a 0.8 m-deep layer of dense burnt destruction debris with fallen ceiling material and complete fallen bricks (9410, 9418, 9438) (Photo 12.225); 31 pottery vessels were found in this small room, among them 11 storage jars near the eastern wall, where shelves might have been hung, and in the entrance leading to the east, but it is also possible that some of this pottery fell from a second floor. A special find in this room was an ostracon with an inscription mentioning the name Elisha (Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 306–307; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 9). See Table 12.24 for other finds. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris

  • Photo 12.228 - Bldg. CP - Horned Pottery altar in destruction debris (9420) in Room 9450
  • Photo 12.226 - Bldg. CP - Bin 9434 in destruction debris in Room 9450
Description(s)

  • The entire room [9450] was filled with very burnt destruction debris (9420, 9437), including many complete fallen bricks, pieces of plaster, ceiling material, charcoal and ash (Photo 12.228), with 43 restorable pottery vessels, including 15 storage jars. Two exceptional pottery items in this room were an oval container with a matching lid (Fig. 13.160:1) and a strainer (Fig. 13.160:3). Most of the pottery in this room, in particular the storage jars (like in the previous room), were found smashed to pieces in a thick layer of debris above the floor; relatively little pottery was found in situ on the floor. This situation may hint that much of this pottery fell from a second floor or from higher shelves. A special item in this room was a horned pottery altar with incised decoration, found broken in the corner of Walls 9436 and 9448 (Photo 12.228; Chapter 35, No. 2). Underneath the altar was a complete brick, but it appears that this was fallen and not meant as a support. For additional finds from this room, see Table 12.24. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-189)

  • Inside3 [Room 9450] was an intact Hippo storage jar (Fig. 13.151:5; see photo in Chapter 3, p. 68) full of burnt grain, alongside another storage jar (Fig. 13.152:9), a jug (Fig. 13.154:1) and three juglets (Figs. 13.156.9–10, 13.157:4), an unbaked clay stopper, and a stone scale weight. The grain found inside the intact jar was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R37); the average calibrated dates of three measurements were 890–809 BCE (1σ) and 992–812 BCE (2σ). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris

  • Photo 12.217 - Bldg. CP - Broken Vessels in Room 10458 (top) and Room 10476 (bottom). There is a bench in Room 10476 with broken vessels on it and in the debris below it
  • Photo 12.218 - Bldg. CP - Broken Vessels on or close to the floor and near to Bench 10467 in Room 10476
  • Photo 12.221 - Bldg. CP - Destruction debris in Room 10476
  • Photo 12.222 - Bldg. CP - Fractured Bin 10488 and krater-pithos in Room 10476
  • Photo 12.224 - Bldg. CP - Fractured Bin 10488 in Room 10476
  • Photo 12.232 - Bldg. CP - Restored Bin 10488 from Room 10476
  • Photo 12.220 - Bldg. CP - Large and heavy stone found upside down, just under topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction debris in Room 10476 which had apparently fallen from the roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room 11451 to the east
Description(s)

  • Room 10476 was full of burnt destruction debris (10426), including fallen bricks, plaster, ceiling pieces, charcoal and ash to a total depth of ca. 0.8 m. The room contained 53 restorable vessels, concentrated mostly in the northern half of the room near Bench 10466, in a gravelly matrix (Photos 12.217–12.218). Some of the vessels in the destruction debris were found in situ (some intact) on the floor, while others were smashed and dispersed throughout the room, as were the other finds (Table 12.24). The destruction debris in the southern half of the room (10493) contained much less pottery than in the north and center, mostly concentrated against the center of Wall 10457. A unique pottery bin (10488) was found against Wall 10457, 0.65 m to the east of the entrance to Room 10506; a similar bin (10501) was found along the same wall in the southwestern corner of Room 10506, 3.0 m to the west (described below) (Photos 12.221–12.224). Bin 10488 was preserved to its top, ca. 0.9 m high, and measured 0.4×0.5 m, with 0.17 m of its bottom sunk into the floor makeup. It was built of thick clay slabs, without a lid or a base, and contained a large amount of charred grain (Photo 12.224). Just to its east was a very large pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), found lying on its side, its upper part smashed to small pieces (Photos 12.221– 12.222); a stone was located under the pithos and against the wall of the silo (Photo 12.223). To the east of the pithos was a concentration of 85 loomweights (84 of stone and one of clay), with a concentration of unworked stones nearby. Remains of charred wood here might represent a loom. A few vessels were found in the entrance leading from the east, mostly against the plastered southern doorjamb of Wall 10485 (Photo 12.216). A large and heavy stone was found upside down, just under topsoil in the uppermost level of the destruction debris, just west of the entrance from Room 11451 (Photos 12.215, 12.220). This stone had a small depression carved out of part of its top, in which some substance was probably ground, judging by the shiny surface. It had apparently fallen from the roof, similar to the large grinding stones in Room 11451 to the east, described above. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris

  • Photo 12.211 - Bldg. CP - Broken pottery vessels in destruction debris in Room 10458
  • Photo 12.212 - Bldg. CP - Broken pottery vessels in destruction debris in Room 10458
  • Photo 12.213 - Bldg. CP - Broken pottery vessels in destruction debris in Room 10458
Description(s)

  • The room [10458] was full of a layer of burnt destruction debris (10410, 10422) with hard eroded brick material and complete fallen bricks, collapsed ceiling fragments, charcoal and ash, and contained 23 complete or almost-complete pottery vessels and other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found just to the southwest of the entranceway to Room 10510. A concentration of 22 small stone loomweights was found in the northwestern corner of the room, above the lower western end of Wall 10409 and partially under the brick in the corner of Walls 10409 and 9448 (Photo 12.214); a few additional loomweights were found dispersed throughout the room. On Bench 10454 along Wall 9448 was an intact pottery altar found upside down (Photo 12.210; Chapter 35, No. 3) and a bowl (Fig. 13.143:25). Just to the east of this bench was a dense concentration of finds that included the bottom half of a large krater-pithos (Fig. 13.153:7) with an intact cooking pot inside it (Fig. 13.148:7; Photo 12.213), and to its east, a large oven (10430), adjoined on its east by a smooth flat-topped stone, slightly angled down towards the oven. To the north of the pithos was a group of vessels, including two Hippo storage jars (Fig. 13.151:6–7) and a small red-slipped stand adorned with petals (Fig. 13.144:11; Chapter 35, No. 44) (Photos 12.211–12.212). An upper grinding stone was laid above a well-worked mortar set into the floor, with a small smooth stone to its north (Photo 12.213). Finds on the plaster floor (10498) in the western part of the room included a few small upper grinding stone fragments and pestles, as well as several loomweights and sherds. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Collapsed Walls, Fallen Ceilings, and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.239 - Bldg. CL - Eastern wing with rooms 5449 and 5482
Description(s)

  • Both [eastern] rooms [5449 and 5482] were full of a thick layer of destruction debris with many fallen bricks, charcoal, fallen ceiling pieces and ash. Many large body sherds of storage jars and pithoi, mostly unrestorable, were found in this debris (Figs. 13.127–13.128), as were several other objects (Table 12.25). Most of the finds were concentrated in the eastern part of Room 5449, including a brick with a dog paw imprint (Photo 12.239). ... One has to question whether the two eastern spaces were roofed. In particular, the northern room, whose smallest inner span was 5.0 m, appears to have been too wide to be roofed by regular wooden beams from local trees; since no pillar bases or any other roof support were found, it may be conjectured that at least this space was unroofed. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris Bldg. CW - Courtyard Area
Description(s)

  • A 0.6 m-deep destruction layer (7401), revealed below topsoil, was found in the entire courtyard area [of C-1a Building CW], comprising hard burnt brick debris with complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash. Fifty-one vessels were found here (Figs. 13.97– 13.102), including a large flask (Fig. 13.102:1) and two sherds of Cypriot Black on Red bowls (Fig. 13.102:8–9), as well as numerous other finds (Table 12.16). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105

  • Unlike most other Iron IIA buildings at Tel Rehov, this [Building CW] appears to have been a variation of a courtyard house, with a large open courtyard surrounded by rooms, at least on one side. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105)

Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris Bldg. CQ2 - Room 8431 - Phase C-1a
Description(s)

Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.185 - Bldg. CX - Vessels in destruction debris in center of Room 10507, against Bench 10502
  • Photo 12.186 - Bldg. CX - Vessels in burnt destruction debris, Locus 10431 (south side of Bldg.)
  • Figure 12.88 - Bldg. CX - Section 34 - Stratum C1-a debris in Square B/2 to the right of Wall 10464 all the way to the far right side of the drawing in Square C/2
Description(s)

  • Like the other units, Building CX was found full of very burnt destruction debris, with fallen bricks, charcoal pieces, ash, and large a amount of pottery, with 122 complete or almost-complete vessels, many of them in situ (Figs. 12.88, 13.136– 13.142; Photos 12.185–12.186). Just inside and west of the entrance, a cooking jug (Fig. 13.138:8) and part of a storage jar were found (Fig. 13.140:17; Photo 12.183). Concentrations of loomweights here, to the south of Installation 10509, and just west of the northern end of the row of pillar bases, found along with fragments of burnt wood beams (Photos 12.181, 12.187–12.188), indicate these had belonged to one, or possibly two looms. Altogether, 164 loomweights were found in this building, mostly in the northern part (Chapter 39). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:153-157)

  • A large concentration of grain was found inside a storage jar in the southern part of the building ([Locus] 10431 [possibly shown in Photo 12.86]). The grain was submitted to 14C dating (Chapter 48, Sample R36). One of the two measurements provided the calibrated dates 978–848 BCE (1σ) and 996–838 BCE (2σ); the other was way too high and was defined as an outlier. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:153-157)

Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris

Bldg. CP - Deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484) in Room 10506, including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels
Description(s)

  • Room 10506 contained a deep layer of burnt destruction debris (10484), including complete fallen bricks, charcoal and ash, as well as 29 pottery vessels, including an intact Cypriot Black on Red juglet (Fig. 13.157:2). Among the unique pottery items was a round ‘bucket’ (Fig. 13.160:2), placed against the center of the southern wall (Photos 12.223, 12.229, 12.231), and a large heavy round container with a matching lid to its east (Fig. 13.159:1); the bucket was intact, found 0.50 m to the east of Bin 10501 and the container was broken. Among the special finds in this room was a complete pottery mold for manufacturing figurines of a naked female (Chapter 35, No. 9), identical to those found attached to the altar fragment from Building CF. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Collapsed Walls and Broken Pottery in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.236 - Bldg. CL - Wall 4443 with layer of black oily material in Room 4435
  • Photo 12.237 - Bldg. CL - Burnt material (9432) on Floor 9435 in Room 5482
  • Photo 12.237 - Bldg. CL - Burnt oily material (5435) on Floor 5482 in Room 5482
  • Figure 12.80 - Bldg. CL - Section 26 - C1-a burnt oily material in section continuing to slightly above western wall 4443 of Room 4435
  • Figure 12.84 - Bldg. CL - Section 30 - C1-a burnt oily material in section in Room 5482 and coming close to Wall 9424
  • Figure 12.86 - Bldg. CL - Section 32 - C1-a burnt oily material in section in Room 4435 making contact with wall 2504
Description(s)

  • Room 4435 was filled with burnt debris and fallen bricks (4415), with fragments of cooking pots (Fig. 13.126:7, 11) and a pithos (Fig. 13.128:11). An exceptional feature in this room was a layer of a burnt black oily substance, mixed with some whitish material, that was concentrated mainly on the eastern side (Figs. 12.80, 12.84, 12.86; Photos 12.236–12.238). This layer continued to the east over the low extant top of Wall 4443 into the southern part of the eastern wing (Photo 12.236). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

  • the same black burnt oily substance mixed with white material that was found in Room 5432 to the west continued into the southern part of the eastern wing. It was found in the southern part of Room 5449 and in most of Room 5482, where it fanned out from the southeastern corner towards the north (Photos 12.237– 12.238). This burnt area contained an unusually large amount of bones, some very burnt and of a selective type (see Chapter 49B), as well as gray ash and pieces of charcoal. The burn line ended near the northern balk of Square Z/1, leaving the northern part of Room 5449 not burnt. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

  • Building CL was constructed above the fallen bricks and destruction debris of the apiary (Photos 12.142, 12.150–12.153, 12.158, 12.234–12.235) and the eastern side of Building CH (Figs. 12.73– 12.74, 12.80, 12.83–12.87; Photos 12.143–12.144, 12.146–12.147, 12.149). The northwestern corner of this building was built above a leveling fill (4408, 5430) that was laid above the collapse of the C-1b structures to the west (Photo 12.135). This was the one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for two superimposed destructions in Area C. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.106 - Bldg. CF - Destruction debris 6401 in Room 6435
  • Photo 12.107 - Bldg. CF - Destruction debris 6401 in Room 6435
Description(s)

  • On the floor [of Room 6435] was a 0.4 m thick layer of destruction debris (6401) that contained 41 smashed and intact vessels, an exceptionally large amount considering the small space - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

  • Based on the width of the walls [of Building CF in Stratum C-1b and C-1a], we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris ... The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.111 - Bldg. CF - Smashed vessels on floor of Room 5460
Description(s)

  • Destruction debris (5425 on the east and 5428 on the west) covered the white lime floor and the benches [of Room 5460] (Photo 12.111) - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

  • Based on the width of the walls [of Building CF in Stratum C-1b and C-1a], we may assume that the house had a second story, although no evidence for a staircase was found; a wooden ladder or steps could have been located near the entrance or in the entrance corridor. Such a second story could accommodate private living rooms in this building. We assume that all the spaces in both strata were roofed, based on the fragments of fallen ceiling material found in the debris ... The construction of this building in Stratum C-1b and its renovation in Stratum C-1a, are a process known from other structures in Area C, such as Buildings CE, CR, CQ1 and CQ2. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:83-100)

Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.117 - Bldg. CW - Room 6411
Description(s)

  • The room was full of heavily burnt destruction debris (6411) that both covered and abutted the benches. Twenty vessels were found in this debris, including chalices, cooking pots, storage jars, jugs, juglets, and a large krater with grain (Fig. 13.97:15); most of the vessels were concentrated in the debris above the benches that lined the walls (Photo 12.117) - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105)

Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris
  • Photo 12.178 - Bldg. CQ3 - Smashed pottery and destruction debris against southern wall 9415 of Room 10452
Description(s)

  • The floor (10452) [of Room 10452] was composed of red clay interspersed with dark burnt material and was covered by a thick layer of fallen bricks, burnt debris and charcoal (9417) that contained 44 complete or almost-complete restorable pottery vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), including a storage jar restored from dozens of sherds, with an incised inscription on its shoulder — אלצד ק שחלי Elisedek (son of) Shahli (Fig. 13.133:4; Mazar and Ahituv 2011: 304–305; Ahituv and Mazar 2014; Chapter 29A, No. 7), as well as other finds (Table 12.22). A particularly large concentration of whole burnt fallen bricks was found against the southern and eastern walls. A concentration of smashed vessels (Photo 12.178) was found above a shallow rectangular plastered depression located along the center of the southern wall, bordered by narrow bricks (Photo 12.179). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris

  • Photo 12.198 - Bldg. CP - Smashed Pottery in Room 10510
  • Photo 12.199 - Bldg. CP - Smashed Objects on the floor of Room 10510
Description(s)

  • The room [10510] was full of burnt destruction debris (10492) that contained 17 complete or almost-complete vessels (Photo 12.198), including an intact four-legged incense burner with a matching lid (Fig. 13.158:5; Photo 12.199), as well as other finds (Table 12.24). A large lower grinding stone was found in the entrance leading west to Room 10458, apparently not in situ. Notably, none of the items were found above the sub-floor brick construction in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the room. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Smashed Vessels in Destruction Debris

  • Photo 12.201 - Bldg. CP - Smashed Pottery in destruction debris in Room 11441
Description(s)

  • The floor (11441) [of Room 11441] was composed of reddish clay with black ashy material and sloped down from west to east (85.98–85.75 m), so that its eastern entrance was almost 0.25 m lower than the center of the room, in accordance with the tilt from west to east/southeast observed in many cases at Tel Rehov. On the floor was a 0.4 m-thick layer of heavy burnt destruction debris (11418), with a concentration of seven complete restorable vessels in the center-western part of the room (Photo 12.201). These were the only finds in this room, other than a fragmentary loomweight and a spindle whorl. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Fractured stones of sub-floor construction

  • Photo 12.219 - Bldg. CP - Fractured stones of sub-floor construction 11468 of Room 10476
  • Photo 12.189 - Bldg. CP - Wider shot from above of sub-floor construction 11468 of Room 10476
  • Photo 12.194 - Bldg. CP - Shot from the side showing sub-floor construction 11468 "floating on top of debris (11474)" of Room 10476
  • Photo 12.221 - Bldg. CP - Destruction debris on top of sub-floor construction 11468 of Room 10476
  • Figure 12.52c - Bldg. CP - Plan of sub-floor brick constructions in Building CP
Description(s)

  • Just below the floor of the southern half of the room was a subfloor brick construction (11468), composed of closely laid bricks, found along the entire side of the room (Fig. 12.52c; Photos 12.189, 12.219). Five lines of bricks could be discerned in the central part of this area, yet, in the southeastern part, most of the bricks were missing, although it is not clear whether this area had never been constructed or if the bricks had been subsequently removed. On the western side, where the bricks were well preserved, they slanted down from north to south and, in fact, they abutted the upper courses of the walls belonging to the C-1b phase of this building (Photo 12.194). However, these bricks were floating on top of debris (11474) that clearly abutted Stratum C-1b Wall 11472. It thus seems most likely that 11468 was a sub-floor construction of Stratum C-1a, like the others revealed just below the floors of Rooms 10510 and 10506 (Fig. 12.52c). This appears to have been a building technique intended to provide reinforcement of the floors, and perhaps also to protect against rodents in certain places (compare a similar feature in Stratum C-2, Building CY, Room 8488). Indeed, the brick sub-floor construction in this room supported a very heavy pithos (Fig. 13.146:4), a loom with many loomweights, and a unique pottery bin, that were all set on the red floor above it (Photo 12.221). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Tilted Walls
  • Photo 12.125 - Bldg. CQ2 - Southward Tilted Wall 7413 in Room 7500
  • Photo 12.123 - Bldg. CQ2 - Wider shot showing southward tilting Wall 7413 with standing person in front of this wall
  • Photo 12.120 - Bldg. CQ2 - Even wider shot showing southward tilting Wall 7413 in the direction of street
Description(s)

  • Room 7500 [whose western wall 7413 was tilted southwards] was full of very dense burnt destruction debris (7442), with large chunks of collapsed ceiling and many fallen bricks (Photos 12.124, 12.126). In this debris were 88 vessels (Figs. 13.108–13.119), among them a number of fine small closed vessels. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • Buildings CQ1 and CQ2 (and also Building CQ3 to the south, see below) are exceptional among the Iron Age houses in Israel in their relatively small overall size and the even smaller size of the inner rooms, which could hardly be used as living rooms. It may be assumed that these houses had a second story, thus their functional space could have been double, although no evidence for steps was found and access must have been from the outside of the building. This possibility may explain the lack of an entrance in Building CQ2; it is possible that the lower storey of this building was entered by a wooden ladder from an upper floor. Yet, this is a hypothesis that has no factual support and, in fact, there was such an entrance in Building CQ1, despite the higher street level to its south. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • Building CQ2 contained 165 vessels, an extremely large amount for such a small building, even when taking into account the existence of a second story. Building CQ1, more or less the same size, contained 66 vessels. See further discussion in Chapter 45. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

  • The eastern wall (7416) [of Building CQ1] created a double wall with Wall 7413 of Building CQ2. The wall was skewed towards the southeast, perhaps as a result of seismic activity, judging by the rather acute drop visible in its southern part (Photo 12.125). The walls of this building were preserved to 0.7–1.2 m above the floors. Note that the floor levels were 0.7–0.8 m lower than those of the adjacent Building CW, but were almost identical to those in the eastern part of Building CF. Such a discrepancy must reflect the existing topography; it seems that when these buildings were constructed, there was a slope from the northwestern corner of the mound towards the southeast. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:105-111)

Collapsed Walls ?

Bldg. CP - Room 10458
Description(s)

  • The preservation of the northern and eastern walls [of Room 10458] was not consistent. Wall 10409 in the north (which was also the southern wall of Building CX) was preserved 0.9 m high along most of its length, but was much lower on its western end, 2.0 m before its corner with Wall 9448. The difference was 0.7 m, and, in fact, the western end was flush with the floor level of Room 10458. This lower western end adjoined the southern face of Wall 10482 of Building CQ3, which also was preserved to the same low height. As mentioned above in the discussion of Building CQ3, there are two ways to explain this feature: either there was a deliberate lowering of the two walls in order to create a passage from the northwestern corner of Room 10458 into Building CQ3 on the north, or this situation was due to damage caused by the destruction or by some unrecognized later intrusion. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:157-179)

Wall Stumps - Collapsed Walls ?
Bldg. CQ3 - Wall 10482 in Room 10460 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south in Bldg. CP
Description(s)

  • Curiously, both Wall 10482 and the section of Wall 10409 that was attached to it on the south were preserved only 0.2 m higher than the floor in Room 10460 and were flush with the floor level in Building CP to the south (Photos 12.169–12.170, 12.173). We may offer two explanations for this situation. N. Panitz-Cohen suggested that the walls were deliberately razed in order to allow for passage between Buildings CQ3 and CP; this could have been done at some point during the lifetime of the buildings. Alternatively, it is possible that such an opening was part of the original plan of both buildings, since, in fact, the low segment of Wall 10409 here was the top of C-1b Wall 11458 (Photo 12.193). If so, then Wall 10482 of Building CQ3 was not a newly built wall, but rather, the top of C-1b Wall 11421, and both walls were deliberately left at a low level in order to allow for passage between the buildings; see also Wall 10464 (described below). According to A. Mazar, the low levels of Walls 10482 and 10409 (western part) resulted from the state of preservation; perhaps this corner (see also Wall 10464, below) was severely damaged during the final destruction of this building or suffered from a late intrusion which could not be observed in the excavation. According to this explanation, there had been no passage between Buildings CP and CQ3. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

Damaged Wall

  • Photo 12.192 - Bldg. CP - The eastern face of Wall 9406 in Room 9449 was very damaged and burnt Bldgs. CL and CP - View from above showing Wall 9406 dividing Building CL (mostly removed, left) and Building CP (right)
  • Photo 12.234 - Bldg. CL - Smooth relatively undamaged wall 9406 on the Bldg. CL side
Description(s)

Debris and burnt and damaged walls
  • Photo 12.170 - Bldg. CQ3 - Debris (10450) on the Floor and and burnt and damaged walls in Room 10494 - this is on the right part of Bldg. CQ3 in the photo
Description(s)

  • The walls [of Room 10494], preserved to a height of 0.8– 1.0 m, were burnt and damaged in their upper part, but well preserved in their lower courses. The floor (10494 in the east and 10495 in the west) was covered by a 0.7 m-deep layer of burnt debris (10450) that contained 37 complete or almost-complete vessels (Figs. 13.130–13.135), as well as flint and bones and a number of other items (Table 12.22). - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

Debris
  • Photo 12.115 - Bldg. CW - Thick debris on Floor 8430 in courtyard area
Description(s)

Debris
  • Figure 12.88 - Bldg. CQ3 - Section 34 illustrating Stratum C1-a debris 10460 on the left side of the drawing in Room 10460
Description(s)

  • The floor [of Room 10460] was less well preserved than in the other rooms and the reddish-brown earth that characterized the other floors was ephemeral here. The room was full of complete fallen bricks and burnt brick debris (10460) (Fig. 12.88). The finds included only a cooking pot (Fig. 13.131:6), a storage jar (Fig. 13.133:6) and several loomweights that were concentrated mainly along the western wall and near the entrance. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:147-153)

Debris
  • Bldg. CL - A thin (0.2 m deep) layer of hard brick debris (4505, 4509) was found covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of Building CH in the area to the west and north of Building CL
Description(s)

  • The area to the west and north of Building CL remained unbuilt in Stratum C-1a. To the west (Squares T–Y/20, 1–2), there was only a thin layer of hard brick debris (4505, 4509), 0.2 m deep, covering the burnt destruction layer in the rooms of Building CH. To the north was Piazza 2417. - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:179-184)

Human Remains
  • Photo 12.119 - Square C/6 east of Wall 8424 of C-1a Building CW - Skeleton
Description(s)

  • A narrow area (ca. 0.9 m) was excavated to the east of the building in Square C/6, in which a layer of soft debris resting on a plaster floor (8428) was found at level 86.14 m, attributed to Stratum C-1a. A human skeleton (8472; Photo 12.119) was found on the northern end of this plaster floor, at a spot where there was possibly an entrance in Wall 8424. This was the only case of a human skeleton found in Area C (see Chapter 46B), evidence of the sudden violent end of the Stratum C-1a city - Panitz-Cohen and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2:100-105)

Area D - Stratum D-1a (?)

Deformation Map

Stratum C1-a and D1-a Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.19 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

Area D
Building
[Square(s)]
Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
Square Q/4 1804 possibly east (downslope)
  • In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.
  • Photo 15.121 - Square Q/4
  • Photo 15.122 - Square Q/4
Collapsed and Burnt Bricks
Description(s)

  • In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.

    In the southeastern corner of Square Q/5, a fragmentary east–west wall (7806), 1.2 m long and preserved to 0.6 m, can be attributed to this phase. A single brick (7823) found to its west may be its continuation, although it might just be a fallen brick.
    - Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:94-95)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area D
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
Collapsed and Burnt Bricks
  • In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.
  • Photo 15.121 - Square Q/4
  • Photo 15.122 - Square Q/4
Description(s)

  • In Square Q/4, under a thin layer of topsoil (1801), two walls were exposed: north–south Wall 1808 and east–west Wall 1816, which abutted the former (Fig. 15.31; Photos 15.121–15.122). These walls were preserved one to two courses high and no floors were found in relation to them. Their orientation and nature suggested that they belonged to the same building as walls of Stratum C-1a in Square R/4 in Area C to the east. Collapsed and burnt bricks were found in all three loci in this area, especially 1804.

    In the southeastern corner of Square Q/5, a fragmentary east–west wall (7806), 1.2 m long and preserved to 0.6 m, can be attributed to this phase. A single brick (7823) found to its west may be its continuation, although it might just be a fallen brick.
    - Rotem, Sumaka'i Fink, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3 Ch.15:94-95)

Area E - Stratum E-1a

Deformation Map

Stratum E1-a Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 17.5 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

Area E
Building
[Square(s)]
Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
EA (Square F/14) Room 1677 and Locus 1670
  • Photo 17.13 - - Building EA - Square F/14 - E-1a Room 1677 - E-1a Floor 1677 - Pottery in destruction debris
Smashed pottery in destruction debris
Description(s)

  • Room 1677 [of Bldg. EA] was destroyed by a severe fire at the end of Stratum E-1a and some of the brick debris was burnt and hardened to the consistency of fired ceramic. Above the beaten-earth floor was a thin ash layer (1652), which was covered by a 0.4 m-deep layer of destruction debris (1610) with restorable pottery (Photo 17.13), including a Phoenician Bichrome jug (Fig. 18.5:5), four cooking pots (Fig. 18.4–7), four chalices (Fig.18.3:16–19), and a large four-handled krater (Fig. 18.4:1). A large Hippo jar was standing in a spot between this room (1677) and Locus 1670 to the west (Fig. 18.5:1); three more such jars were found farther west in Locus 1670 (Fig. 18.5:2–4) (see description of the courtyard, below). - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:271-274)

EA Loci 1626, 1605, and 1635 of Rooms 1701, 1605, and 1635 respectively
  • In E1-a Bldg. EA, collapse debris was found in Loci 1626, 1605, and 1635 of Rooms 1701, 1605, and 1635 respectively. Although the final report cited the section drawings shown below, these drawings do not do an effective job of illustrating the collapse layers.
  • Figure 17.14a - Section 1
  • Figure 17.14b - Section 1
  • Figure 17.20 - Section 7
  • Whether fallen bricks 1635 in Squares E-F/13 should be assigned to E-1a or E1-b could not be clarified.
Collapse Debris
Description(s)

  • In the southern part of Square E/14, Locus 1605 was a destruction layer on what might be a beaten-earth floor which was difficult to detect, as it was found just below topsoil (level 72.25 m; 0.75 m above the assumed E-1b floor, 2661). The tops of Walls 1657 and 1656 were not revealed until a level lower than this destruction layer, yet, since the destruction was limited to the area bounded by the contours of these walls, it may be assumed that they were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The same assumption was made in relation to Room 1701 and its compartments, as described above. In Square E/13, this destruction debris was not very clear. The outline of a 0.65 m-wide brick wall (1694) was seen in the western section of the square, standing 0.5 m high from level 71.80 m, ca. 0.6 m higher than the E-1b floor in this area (Fig. 17.14). In the northern section of the square, Wall 1695, 0.8 m-wide, was preserved in the section to a height of 0.4 m; its foundation was at 72.15 m, which could fit Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.20). These two wall stubs may have been part of one wall that replaced the older wall (1656) in this square and represent a rebuild or alteration in Building EA at this time; however, their poor preservation makes it difficult to reconstruct the plan. Locus 1626 in the center of the square represents an occupation layer at level 72.00 m, which should be seen as a continuation of 1605 further to the north. It was covered by brick debris (1617) just below topsoil and sealed layers of ash (1641), perhaps marking the floor here. The poor preservation and erosion in this area prevented a more detailed analysis of the Stratum E-1a remains.

    In the southern part of Squares E–F/13, above E-1b Rooms 2663, 2665 and 1662, was a layer of fallen bricks (1635) below topsoil (1609); yet the attribution of this layer to either E-1a or E-1b could not be clarified.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:277-278)

EB Space 2641
  • Photo 17.23a - Building EB - western part of Space 2641 - Destruction debris in Locus 5621
  • Photo 17.23b - Building EB - Space 2641 - Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630
  • Photo 17.31 - E-1a Building EB- Space 2641 - Wall 5609 - Grinding stone leaning southward on wall 5609
Collapse Debris
Description(s)

  • Space 2641 is the central space in the building [EB] (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.

    Excavation below Floor 2641 in the northwestern corner of the room (southern part of Square D/15) revealed a layer of brick debris (2652 and 4618 below it) which was the top of Stratum E-1b in this area. In the rest of the room, excavation stopped at the floor level of Stratum E-1a.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:281-282)

EB Room 4654
  • Photo 17.24 - Building EB - Room 4654 - Floor 4654 - Debris?
  • Photo 17.25 - Building EB - Room 4654 - Floor 4654 -Debris
  • Photo 17.44 - Buildings EB and EA - Strata E1-a and E1-b - wide view
Collapse Debris
Description(s)

  • This room [4654] (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).

    It was difficult to determine whether there was a direct connection between Room 4654 and the platform to its north; on the west, they were adjoining, while on the east, there was a wall separating them (unnumbered in the plan), preserved to the same level as the top of the platform (72.40 m). A probe below the floor revealed the top of Stratum E-1b debris, as described above.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:282)

EB Room 2629
  • Photo 17.26 - E-1a Building EB - Room 2629 - debris
  • Photo 17.27 - E-1a Building EB - Room 2629 - debris
  • Photo 17.28 - E-1a Building EB - Room 2629 - destruction debris and fallen roof material
  • Figure 17.17 - Section 4
Collapse Debris
Description(s)

  • This small rectangular room [2629] (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.

    As mentioned above, there was a gap of ca. 0.6–0.7 m between the top of the earlier walls of E-1b Building ED on the north, south and east (4635, 4650, 4632) and the foundation level of the new walls of Room 2645 (2632, 2633, 2634), while on the west, there was no such gap (Fig. 17.17).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:282-284)

EB Room 4616
  • Photo 17.29 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616
  • Photo 17.30 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616 - destruction debris in eastern part
  • Photo 17.32 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616 - destruction debris in southeastern corner
  • Photo 17.33 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616 - Seal impressions on plaster
Collapse Debris
Description(s)

  • Room 4616 was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.

    Two entrances led into this room from Room 2641 to its north. The eastern one was 1.0 m wide and on the west, it was strengthened by a plastered pilaster (4631). A narrower entranceway, 0.67 m wide, was at the northwestern corner of the room. This western entrance was enigmatically blocked by a bench (unnumbered) built along Wall 2646 and thus its function as an entrance may be questioned. The identification of the floor in this room was difficult, particularly in the western part of the room, where there was no evidence for fire. The identified beaten-earth floor in the east (4616) was at level 72.00 m, covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris with occasional burnt and fallen bricks (4609 in the eastern part of the room, and 5614 and 5605 in the western part). The destruction debris in the eastern part contained a large amount of pottery vessels (Photo 17.32). Among them was a Hippo storage jar with an incised inscription on its shoulder that reads טע ... עם (Fig. 18.11:1; Chapter 29A, No. 8). A unique feature in this room was fragments of plaster impressed with seal impressions, found close to the pilaster at the eastern entrance (Photo 17.33; Chapter 30D). These impressions served as architectural decorations that are unparalleled elsewhere; they perhaps were made with wooden seals, showing a lotus bloom flanked by high buds below a volute motif, which recalls Proto-Aeolic capitals. Such consecutive impressions stamped on the mud plaster would have created a decorative frieze on the wall interiors. A fragment of roofing material made of clay with reed impressions was also found in this room. In the southeastern corner of the room was a clay bulla with a seal impression made by an Egyptian Middle Bronze Age scarab (Chapter 30A, No. 40). These finds allude to the important function of this room.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:284-286)

EB Platform 2654 and environs
  • Photo 17.21 - E-1a Building EB- Platform 2654 with brick collapse below
  • Photo 17.34 - E-1a Building EB- Platform 2654
  • Photo 17.35 - E-1a Building EB - Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624)
  • Photo 17.36 - E-1a Building EB - Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654)
  • Photo 17.37 - E-1a Building EB - Section below Platform 2654
  • Photo 17.49 - Square E/15 with debris
  • Photo 17.50 - Detail of stone 1623
  • Figure 17.8 - - Detailed plan and elevations of Platform 2654 and standing stones
  • Figure 17.18a - Section 5
  • Figure 17.18b - Section 5
Damaged Corner of a Platform (not necessarily due to seismic activity) and surrounding brick collapse
Description(s)

  • The Platform and Standing Stones

    The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).

    The platform was constructed of well-defined square bricks, best seen at its western part. On top of the eastern side of the brick platform was a smaller square platform (1624; 1.0×1.2 m) made of one to two courses of basalt fieldstones and large river pebbles, rising to a height of 0.33 m (uppermost level, 72.60 m). This stone platform was well preserved on its southern and western sides, while its northeastern corner was damaged. On its southern side were three standing stones, the two eastern ones elongated and standing on their narrow side. The eastern stone was 0.37 m high and 0.3 m wide, the central stone was 0.41 m high and 0.3 m wide, and the western stone was only 0.2 m high and 0.4 m wide. The eastern stone was of hard smoothed limestone, while the central and western stones were rough unworked travertine. Due to its small dimensions, a fourth limestone at the western end apparently was not another standing stone, but rather part of the construction of the platform. These three stones are interpreted as sacred standing stones (masseboth), facing a spacious courtyard to the north (see below). On the western side of the platform, almost at the center of the second line of bricks from the west, was a posthole, ca. 0.14 m in diameter and 0.1 m deep, which may have held a wooden pole. A basalt mortar adjoined the western face of the platform close to its top level, just opposite this posthole, and was covered by burnt brick debris. Just opposite the platform to its north was a large flat limestone which was understood to have been an offering table (Photos 17.49–17.50); see below.

    It appears that this platform was part of an open area that continued into the spacious courtyard to the north and east. Yet, in that case, one might ask how a single-course brick platform would have survived the elements. It must have been protected by either thick plaster which was not preserved or covered during harsh climate conditions by some kind of seasonal roofing, although no traces of this were found, as it would have been constructed from perishable materials. As noted above, the platform was preceded by an earlier structure of undetermined shape (Photo 17.37).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:286 - 288)

Courtyard throughout but particularly in the southern end, in Squares E/15, F/15, and the N part of E-F/14





Photos and Sections

  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.5 - South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.38 - Probe in Squares E/17–18
  • Photo 17.39 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.40 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.41 - Oven 4608, Square E/17
  • Photo 17.42 - Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.43 - E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665
  • Photo 17.44 - Buildings EB and EA
  • Photo 17.45 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.46 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.47 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.48 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.49 - Square E/15 with debris
  • Photo 17.50 - Detail of stone 1623
  • Photo 17.51 - Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623
  • Photo 17.52 - Squares E–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.53 - Square F/15
  • Figure 17.15a - Section 2
  • Figure 17.15b - Section 2
  • Figure 17.16a - Section 3
  • Figure 17.16b - Section 3
  • Figure 17.18a - Section 5
  • Figure 17.18b - Section 5

  • Debris (not necessarily of a seismic origin) found throughout the courtyard
  • a smashed pottery altar (thought to be smashed due to human agency) found in debris in Square E/15 slightly east of the platform
  • collapsed bricks in Square F/15 and the N part of E-F/14
Description(s)

Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

EC Space 5637 and Room 5613
  • Photo 17.55 - Building EC (right) - Squares C–D/15–16
  • Photo 17.56 - E-1a Building EC - Room 5637 - circular installations
  • Photo 17.57 - E-1a Building EC - Room 5637 - detail of Bin 5630
  • Photo 17.58 - Building EC - Room 5637 - detail of Oven 5632
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC
Debris (Fallen Bricks)
Description(s)

  • Space 5637 - This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:298-299)

  • Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:298-299)

Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.60 - Probe in Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.61 - Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone
Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1
Description(s)

  • A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

    The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

    In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

    An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:301-302)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area E
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
General comments on destruction of Stratum E-1a
  • Fig. 17.18a - Section 5 (Squares E–F/15, looking south) - E-1a destruction debris, "just below topsoil", in the southern end of the courtyard next to Bldg.s EA and EB
  • The end of Stratum E-1a was accompanied by a heavy fire that resulted in thick burnt destruction debris. In Buildings EA (Room 1677 and Locus 1670 to its west), EB and EC, large groups of restorable vessels and other objects were found below a tumble of bricks and burnt debris with fallen roof material, all evidence for this violent end. ...
Description(s)

  • The end of Stratum E-1a was accompanied by a heavy fire that resulted in thick burnt destruction debris. In Buildings EA (Room 1677 and Locus 1670 to its west), EB and EC, large groups of restorable vessels and other objects were found below a tumble of bricks and burnt debris with fallen roof material, all evidence for this violent end. In the courtyard, the evidence for fire and violent destruction was less clear, yet the upper layer in Squares E–F/15–16, just below topsoil, was composed of soft gray ash, 0.15–0.20 m thick, and in the southern section of Square F/15, a thick black ash line and burnt wood could be seen above the floor (Fig. 17.18a). In Square F/15, fire had burnt the fallen bricks to a hard consistency and reddish color. Some roof material of laminated clay with reed impressions were mixed in the brick debris, also hardened and reddened by fire. Another sign of the violent and apparently man-made destruction was the pottery altar in Square E/15 that had been deliberately smashed to many small pieces. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:300)

Smashed pottery in destruction debris
  • Photo 17.13 - - Building EA - Square F/14 - E-1a Room 1677 - E-1a Floor 1677 - Pottery in destruction debris
Description(s)

  • Room 1677 [of Bldg. EA] was destroyed by a severe fire at the end of Stratum E-1a and some of the brick debris was burnt and hardened to the consistency of fired ceramic. Above the beaten-earth floor was a thin ash layer (1652), which was covered by a 0.4 m-deep layer of destruction debris (1610) with restorable pottery (Photo 17.13), including a Phoenician Bichrome jug (Fig. 18.5:5), four cooking pots (Fig. 18.4–7), four chalices (Fig.18.3:16–19), and a large four-handled krater (Fig. 18.4:1). A large Hippo jar was standing in a spot between this room (1677) and Locus 1670 to the west (Fig. 18.5:1); three more such jars were found farther west in Locus 1670 (Fig. 18.5:2–4) (see description of the courtyard, below). - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:271-274)

Collapse Debris
  • In E1-a Bldg. EA, collapse debris was found in Loci 1626, 1605, and 1635 of Rooms 1701, 1605, and 1635 respectively. Although the final report cited the section drawings shown below, these drawings do not do an effective job of illustrating the collapse layers.
  • Figure 17.14a - Section 1
  • Figure 17.14b - Section 1
  • Figure 17.20 - Section 7
  • Whether fallen bricks 1635 in Squares E-F/13 should be assigned to E-1a or E1-b could not be clarified.
Description(s)

  • In the southern part of Square E/14, Locus 1605 was a destruction layer on what might be a beaten-earth floor which was difficult to detect, as it was found just below topsoil (level 72.25 m; 0.75 m above the assumed E-1b floor, 2661). The tops of Walls 1657 and 1656 were not revealed until a level lower than this destruction layer, yet, since the destruction was limited to the area bounded by the contours of these walls, it may be assumed that they were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a. The same assumption was made in relation to Room 1701 and its compartments, as described above. In Square E/13, this destruction debris was not very clear. The outline of a 0.65 m-wide brick wall (1694) was seen in the western section of the square, standing 0.5 m high from level 71.80 m, ca. 0.6 m higher than the E-1b floor in this area (Fig. 17.14). In the northern section of the square, Wall 1695, 0.8 m-wide, was preserved in the section to a height of 0.4 m; its foundation was at 72.15 m, which could fit Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.20). These two wall stubs may have been part of one wall that replaced the older wall (1656) in this square and represent a rebuild or alteration in Building EA at this time; however, their poor preservation makes it difficult to reconstruct the plan. Locus 1626 in the center of the square represents an occupation layer at level 72.00 m, which should be seen as a continuation of 1605 further to the north. It was covered by brick debris (1617) just below topsoil and sealed layers of ash (1641), perhaps marking the floor here. The poor preservation and erosion in this area prevented a more detailed analysis of the Stratum E-1a remains.

    In the southern part of Squares E–F/13, above E-1b Rooms 2663, 2665 and 1662, was a layer of fallen bricks (1635) below topsoil (1609); yet the attribution of this layer to either E-1a or E-1b could not be clarified.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:277-278)

Collapse Debris
  • Photo 17.23a - Building EB - western part of Space 2641 - Destruction debris in Locus 5621
  • Photo 17.23b - Building EB - Space 2641 - Detail of cooking amphora in Locus 4630
  • Photo 17.31 - E-1a Building EB- Space 2641 - Wall 5609 - Grinding stone leaning southward on wall 5609
Description(s)

  • Space 2641 is the central space in the building [EB] (Squares C– D/14–15). Its inner dimensions were 3.4×4.6 m (15.6 sq m) up to the narrow partition wall (4617) on the east. It remains unclear whether this was an open courtyard or a roofed area; the latter possibility is more plausible. The floor of this space (2641) sloped slightly from west to east (levels 72.27–72.50 m) and was made of beaten earth, with a plastered area in the western part. The floor was covered by a ca. 0.3 m-thick layer of dark ash and fallen bricks, indicating a violent destruction: 2630 in the center/east, 5634 in the west, and 4630 in the southeast, near the entrance leading to the southern room. The northwestern part of this space was filled with chunks of fallen whitish plaster and brick material above a distinct layer of black ash, which was clearly visible in the southern and western sections of Square D/15 (Fig. 17.18b). Many restorable pottery vessels were found in this debris and on the floor of this space (Figs. 18.6– 18.9; 18.12–18.14; Photo 17.23). Two large grinding stones were found, one of which was leaning against the southern wall of this space (5609), near the western entrance (Photo 17.31). A concentration of finds in the southeastern part of the room, close to the eastern entrance to Room 4616, included three complete vessels — two cooking pots (Fig. 18.10:1, 4) and a juglet (Fig. 18.14:11). This occupation layer was sealed by a layer of brick and plaster debris (2623 in the center, 5604 in the west and 4609 in the southeast) between levels 72.80–73.10 m.

    Excavation below Floor 2641 in the northwestern corner of the room (southern part of Square D/15) revealed a layer of brick debris (2652 and 4618 below it) which was the top of Stratum E-1b in this area. In the rest of the room, excavation stopped at the floor level of Stratum E-1a.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:281-282)

Collapse Debris
  • Photo 17.24 - Building EB - Room 4654 - Floor 4654 - Debris?
  • Photo 17.25 - Building EB - Room 4654 - Floor 4654 -Debris
  • Photo 17.44 - Buildings EB and EA - Strata E1-a and E1-b - wide view
Description(s)

  • This room [4654] (inner dimensions 1.5×3.2 m, 4.8 sq m) was found to the east of the central space (2641) and south of the brick platform (2654). It was separated from the central space by a narrow partition wall (4617) constructed of bricks laid on their narrow sides; it was preserved to only 0.35 m high. It seems that this had been a low screen wall, and, in fact, this room was an inner part of the central space, serving as a kind of side alcove. A narrow passage at the northern end of Wall 4617 led from the central space to this alcove. Floor 4654, found at level 72.43–72.67 m, was made of a layer of various rounded stones, including basalt, travertine, limestone and large river pebbles, arranged somewhat haphazardly in the central part of the room and close to its walls, although not covering the entire area (Photos 17.24–17.25, 17.44). It is difficult to define these stones as a pavement, since their upper part appears too rough to have been used as floor, yet we have no better explanation for this stone layer. The size and shape of the stones recalled those used for the construction of the small stone platform (1624) to the north of this room (see below). The stone layer was covered by a layer of black ash (4612) that was, in turn, covered by the same brick debris (4609) just below topsoil as found in the central space. These two layers contained a large amount of restorable vessels (Figs. 18.6:8; 18.7:5; 18.8:1; 18.10:5, 7; 18.11:4; 18.14:6, 9, 12, 22) and other finds, including a clay bulla (Chapter 30A, No. 41).

    It was difficult to determine whether there was a direct connection between Room 4654 and the platform to its north; on the west, they were adjoining, while on the east, there was a wall separating them (unnumbered in the plan), preserved to the same level as the top of the platform (72.40 m). A probe below the floor revealed the top of Stratum E-1b debris, as described above.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:282)

Collapse Debris
  • Photo 17.26 - E-1a Building EB - Room 2629 - debris
  • Photo 17.27 - E-1a Building EB - Room 2629 - debris
  • Photo 17.28 - E-1a Building EB - Room 2629 - destruction debris and fallen roof material
  • Figure 17.17 - Section 4
Description(s)

  • This small rectangular room [2629] (inner dimensions 2.0×3.35 m, 6.7 sq m) was the northern room of Building EB, located to the west of the brick platform that occupied the northeastern corner of the building in Squares D/15–16. The room was exposed just below topsoil (Photos 17.26–17.27); its brick walls were preserved to a height of only ca. 0.2 m in the eastern part and 0.11 m in the western part; its western wall (2646) was constructed on top of E-1b Wall 4658 (Fig. 17.17). A 1.1 m-wide entrance leading from the central space was located in its southwestern corner. The southern border of the room was on line with that of the platform to its east, but it appears to have been technically constructed after this platform already was standing, since the eastern wall of the room (2633) overlapped the western edge of the platform by ca. 0.05 m. On the eastern end of the room were two flat stones attached to the northern and southern walls that perhaps were used to support wooden posts (Photo 17.27). A 0.2 m-thick burnt destruction layer (2629) above the beaten-earth floor (2645), mostly in the western part of the room, contained a grinding stone and loomweights, as well as many pottery vessels, some of them restored together with sherds found in the central space of the building to the south (2630, 2641) (Figs. 18.6– 18.14). The burnt destruction debris was sealed by a layer of brick debris and roof collapse, composed of reed impressions on clay lumps, at levels 72.80– 73.04 m, just below topsoil (Photo 17.28). The destruction debris (2629) rested on a compact beaten-earth floor (2645) that sealed the brick debris layer (2652) in Building ED Room 4653, described above.

    As mentioned above, there was a gap of ca. 0.6–0.7 m between the top of the earlier walls of E-1b Building ED on the north, south and east (4635, 4650, 4632) and the foundation level of the new walls of Room 2645 (2632, 2633, 2634), while on the west, there was no such gap (Fig. 17.17).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:282-284)

Collapse Debris
  • Photo 17.29 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616
  • Photo 17.30 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616 - destruction debris in eastern part
  • Photo 17.32 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616 - destruction debris in southeastern corner
  • Photo 17.33 - E-1a Building EB - Room 4616 - Seal impressions on plaster
Description(s)

  • Room 4616 was the southern room of Building EB (inner dimensions 2.2×6.2 m, 13.6 sq m; Photo 17.29). Its 0.5 m-wide bricks walls were preserved up to 0.6 m above the floor and their foundations were not reached in the excavation. Many parts of the walls were covered with mud plaster. A burnt wooden beam was found along Wall 4619 at the bottom of the plastered level. The walls were mostly constructed of bricks, yet in some segments, bricks were not detected and it seemed that the walls were partly made of packed mud.

    Two entrances led into this room from Room 2641 to its north. The eastern one was 1.0 m wide and on the west, it was strengthened by a plastered pilaster (4631). A narrower entranceway, 0.67 m wide, was at the northwestern corner of the room. This western entrance was enigmatically blocked by a bench (unnumbered) built along Wall 2646 and thus its function as an entrance may be questioned. The identification of the floor in this room was difficult, particularly in the western part of the room, where there was no evidence for fire. The identified beaten-earth floor in the east (4616) was at level 72.00 m, covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris with occasional burnt and fallen bricks (4609 in the eastern part of the room, and 5614 and 5605 in the western part). The destruction debris in the eastern part contained a large amount of pottery vessels (Photo 17.32). Among them was a Hippo storage jar with an incised inscription on its shoulder that reads טע ... עם (Fig. 18.11:1; Chapter 29A, No. 8). A unique feature in this room was fragments of plaster impressed with seal impressions, found close to the pilaster at the eastern entrance (Photo 17.33; Chapter 30D). These impressions served as architectural decorations that are unparalleled elsewhere; they perhaps were made with wooden seals, showing a lotus bloom flanked by high buds below a volute motif, which recalls Proto-Aeolic capitals. Such consecutive impressions stamped on the mud plaster would have created a decorative frieze on the wall interiors. A fragment of roofing material made of clay with reed impressions was also found in this room. In the southeastern corner of the room was a clay bulla with a seal impression made by an Egyptian Middle Bronze Age scarab (Chapter 30A, No. 40). These finds allude to the important function of this room.
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:284-286)

Damaged Corner of a Platform (not necessarily due to seismic activity)
  • Photo 17.21 - E-1a Building EB- Platform 2654 with brick collapse below
  • Photo 17.34 - E-1a Building EB- Platform 2654
  • Photo 17.35 - E-1a Building EB - Brick platform (2654) and stone platform with standing stones (1624)
  • Photo 17.36 - E-1a Building EB - Detail of stone platform (1624) and standing stones, on top of brick platform (2654)
  • Photo 17.37 - E-1a Building EB - Section below Platform 2654
  • Photo 17.49 - Square E/15 with debris
  • Photo 17.50 - Detail of stone 1623
  • Figure 17.8 - - Detailed plan and elevations of Platform 2654 and standing stones
  • Figure 17.18a - Section 5
  • Figure 17.18b - Section 5
Description(s)

  • The Platform and Standing Stones

    The northeastern corner of Building EB comprised a rectangular brick platform, measuring 2.5×3.2 m (2654). Its top was at 72.37 m, ca. 0.6 m above the original courtyard surface of Stratum E-1b (1647, 1675) to its east and north, where it can be seen that the brick platform stood to only one course (Fig. 17.8; Photos 17.21, 17.34–17.35).

    The platform was constructed of well-defined square bricks, best seen at its western part. On top of the eastern side of the brick platform was a smaller square platform (1624; 1.0×1.2 m) made of one to two courses of basalt fieldstones and large river pebbles, rising to a height of 0.33 m (uppermost level, 72.60 m). This stone platform was well preserved on its southern and western sides, while its northeastern corner was damaged. On its southern side were three standing stones, the two eastern ones elongated and standing on their narrow side. The eastern stone was 0.37 m high and 0.3 m wide, the central stone was 0.41 m high and 0.3 m wide, and the western stone was only 0.2 m high and 0.4 m wide. The eastern stone was of hard smoothed limestone, while the central and western stones were rough unworked travertine. Due to its small dimensions, a fourth limestone at the western end apparently was not another standing stone, but rather part of the construction of the platform. These three stones are interpreted as sacred standing stones (masseboth), facing a spacious courtyard to the north (see below). On the western side of the platform, almost at the center of the second line of bricks from the west, was a posthole, ca. 0.14 m in diameter and 0.1 m deep, which may have held a wooden pole. A basalt mortar adjoined the western face of the platform close to its top level, just opposite this posthole, and was covered by burnt brick debris. Just opposite the platform to its north was a large flat limestone which was understood to have been an offering table (Photos 17.49–17.50); see below.

    It appears that this platform was part of an open area that continued into the spacious courtyard to the north and east. Yet, in that case, one might ask how a single-course brick platform would have survived the elements. It must have been protected by either thick plaster which was not preserved or covered during harsh climate conditions by some kind of seasonal roofing, although no traces of this were found, as it would have been constructed from perishable materials. As noted above, the platform was preceded by an earlier structure of undetermined shape (Photo 17.37).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:286 - 288)

  • Debris (not necessarily of a seismic origin) found throughout the courtyard
  • a smashed pottery altar (thought to be smashed due to human agency) found in debris in Square E/15 slightly east of the platform
  • collapsed bricks in Square F/15 and the N part of E-F/14






Photos and Sections

  • Photo 17.2 - General view of Area E, end of 2000 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.5 - South section of probe in Square F/15, with E-1b–2 layers
  • Photo 17.9 - Building EA, general view, end of 1998 season, looking east
  • Photo 17.38 - Probe in Squares E/17–18
  • Photo 17.39 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.40 - Probe in Square E/18
  • Photo 17.41 - Oven 4608, Square E/17
  • Photo 17.42 - Courtyard in Squares D–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.43 - E-1b Floor 2618 with pits in 4665
  • Photo 17.44 - Buildings EB and EA
  • Photo 17.45 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.46 - Square E/15
  • Photo 17.47 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.48 - Square E/15 detail
  • Photo 17.49 - Square E/15 with debris
  • Photo 17.50 - Detail of stone 1623
  • Photo 17.51 - Square E/15, foundation stones under stone 1623
  • Photo 17.52 - Squares E–F/15–16
  • Photo 17.53 - Square F/15
  • Figure 17.15a - Section 2
  • Figure 17.15b - Section 2
  • Figure 17.16a - Section 3
  • Figure 17.16b - Section 3
  • Figure 17.18a - Section 5
  • Figure 17.18b - Section 5

Description(s)

Introduction

A spacious open area was excavated in the northern and central parts of Area E (Squares E–F/14–15, D/16, G/16, E/17–18), measuring ca. 15 m from west to east and 13 m from north to south, with extensions to the south. This large area contained various features, including several ovens, six round clay installations, and benches. A succession of floors was found in parts of this area, each covered by occupation debris, to a total depth of ca. 1.0 m. Our stratigraphic observations led to the conclusion that the courtyard was in use in both Strata E-1b and E-1a, yet the division between these two strata was not always clear and was based on changes in the floors and cancellation or rebuilding of various installations. In fact, there is great deal of continuity between these two strata, as the floors were raised slowly over time; this can clearly be seen in two sections excavated in order to clarify the outer parts of the courtyard in Squares G/16, E/17–18. The following description of the various parts of the courtyard is arranged from north to south; in each square the stratigraphic components are described and an attempt to divide them between Strata E-1b and E-1a is made.

Probe in Squares E/17–18

A 2.3×6.5 m probe was excavated in the eastern part of Squares E/17–18, with the intention of locating the northern edge of the open courtyard of the sanctuary area (Figs. 17.5, 17.9; Photos 17.38– 17.42). A floor was found in this probe at level 72.04 m (4622, 4651, 4652). Floor 4622 was made of compact reddish clay and covered the entire southern part of the trench. On the floor was a 0.2 m-thick layer of brown earth with a few broken bricks made of hard white clay (4621). Above this was a 0.5 m-thick layer that contained decayed and broken bricks, gray earth and many pieces of white plaster (4605). On Floor 4622 was a very well-preserved oven (4608), standing almost to its rim (0.56 m high, 0.51 m rim diameter) (Photos 17.38, 17.41). The inner wall of this oven was made of reddish-brown clay and the outer wall was laminated with white plaster. Inside were several cooking pot fragments. On the floor near the oven was a flat smoothed stone which could have served as a working surface. Some ash lines could be seen on the clay floor.

In the northern part of the probe, two walls were found (4644, 4625), made of whitish bricks, similar to those in the walls of Building EA in southeastern part of the area (Photos 17.39–17.40). The walls were preserved to an average height of 0.5 m (four courses). It appears that Wall 4644 (0.6 m wide) was part of the northern boundary of the courtyard. A 0.9 m-wide entrance in this wall had a threshold made of two narrow bricks (top level, 72.14 m). Attached to the wall to the west of the entrance was a plastered clay bin (4641) preserved to a depth of 0.2 m. Wall 4625 was perpendicular to this entrance; it was preserved to a length of 3.0 m, yet its southern end terminated abruptly. It perhaps was intended to delineate the entrance into the courtyard from the north. A line of bricks standing on their narrow end to the east of this wall (4646) was perhaps part of a large bin. A beaten-earth floor was found to the north and south of Wall 4644 (4652 and 4651 respectively) at 72.05 m; Floor 4651 was covered by a 0.65 m-thick layer of brick collapse (4626).

The stratigraphic assignment of these remains to either Stratum E-1b or E-1a, or to both, requires consideration. Since the excavation did not continue below the floors in this probe, it remains unknown whether there was an earlier phase that could be assigned to E-1b. It should be noted that in the adjacent square (E/16), a floor (2611) of Stratum E-1a was located close to topsoil at level 72.66 m, namely, 0.64 m higher than the floors in the probe; below this E-1a floor was an earlier floor (4665) at level 71.97 m that was assigned to E-1b. This level was almost the same as the floors in the probe in Squares E/17–18. It thus may be suggested that there had been a similar Stratum E-1a floor here which eroded away. Another possibility is that the same floors uncovered in the probe continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a with no change, yet this is somewhat difficult to accept, in light of the higher floor level in Square E/16.

Square D/16 (Figs. 17.3, 17.5)

The earliest feature reached in a probe in the eastern part of this square was a 0.35 m-thick layer of brown earth (5624) excavated to level 72.02 m, which was the same as the floors assigned to Stratum E-1b in the adjacent squares (Fig. 17.3; Photo 17.3). No floor was reached here. A ceramic bull head was found in this layer (Chapter 34, No. 41). The layer above 5624, attributed to E-1a (2625), had a matrix of gravel and decayed bricks typical of the open area further east. In the center of the square, a pit was embedded in this matrix; its upper part was denoted 2635 and its lower part, 2640, with an ash layer in which a goat skull was found. Layer 2625 abutted E-1a Wall 2632 of Building EB and Wall 2647 of Building EC.

An oval area paved with stones (2606; Fig. 17.12) found above Locus 2625, just below topsoil in the southern part of the square, could be either a remnant of a late Stratum E-1a pavement or a late construction of undetermined date, similar to Locus 4604 in Square E/17.

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1b)

The lowest feature reached in Square E/16 was a thin layer of brown earth with many pottery sherds and animal bones (4648), excavated in a 2.0 mwide probe in the eastern part of this square until level 71.64 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.15b; Photo 17.42); no floor was detected in the south. In the northern part of this probe was a compact clay floor (4665) at level 71.97 m which was probably the continuation of Floor 4622 in the adjacent square to the north, described above (Photo 17.43). Several stones at the northeastern corner of the square might have belonged to an installation relating to this floor. Four pits in this area, ca. 0.3 m deep and lined with hard gray clay, were cut from Floor 4665. Two of these (4636, 4643) were most probably fire pits which could have been used for cooking; some large animal bones were found at the bottom of Pit 4636. Two additional pits were found further to the south: Pit 4638, 1.1 m in diameter and 0.2 m deep, its floor made of compact clay with some ash spots, and Pit 4647, perhaps a refuse pit, 0.23 m deep. The proximity of these pits to Oven 4608, located 2.0 m to their north, indicated that this was a cooking and baking area in the courtyard.

Floor 4665 and the debris of 4648 were covered by a thick accumulation of occupation debris, containing lenses of dark earth, decayed bricks and ash (2618) at levels 71.75–72.45 m. These layers yielded a large amount of pottery (Figs. 18.17– 18.18), bones, grinding stones and olive pits; the latter were submitted for 14C measurement (see Chapter 48).

Square E/16 (Stratum E-1a)

Locus 2611 was a 0.2 m-thick layer found throughout the entire square, between levels 72.45–72.66 m, containing gravel, pebbles, much pottery (1840 small sherds were counted from this area) and bones, typical of an accumulation in an open area or a street (Figs. 17.7, 17.9, 17.15b). The southern part of this square was damaged by thick topsoil vegetation (1612). This matrix sealed layer 2618 of E-1b, which did not differ much in nature; both resulted from continuous accumulation of occupation debris and re-flooring in an open space. The floor was covered by a layer of brick debris, pebbles and organic material (2607) below topsoil. A special find in Locus 2607 was a uniquely painted Phoenician jar (Fig. 18.20) found in fragments widely scattered through levels 72.86–72.70 m. It might have been an offering vessel in the sanctuary.

Square F/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

The lowest layer reached in a 2.0 m-wide trench in the eastern half of this square was a layer of brown earth (2626, 2627) between levels 71.61–72.21 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.16a; Photos 17.2, 17.42), attributed to Stratum E-1b. It was covered by a ca. 0.15 m thick layer of brown earth (2622) containing sherds, bones and flints, typical of an accumulation in an open area (Fig. 17.9; Photo 17.42); this was the continuation of Locus 2611 from Square E/16 to the west. No clear floor was defined here, yet these layers probably represent Stratum E-1a in this area. The northern part of this layer was cut by a large deep pit lacking any datable finds (2616; Fig. 17.12). Locus 2622 was covered by a 0.16 m-thick layer of decayed brick debris (2605, 2617, levels 72.43–72.56 m). Special finds in the upper layer (2605) were a conical stamp seal (Chapter 30A, No. 8) and a faience amulet (Chapter 31, No. 17).

Square G/16 (Strata E-1b–E-1a)

A 2.0 m-wide trench was excavated in the southern half of this square in order to locate the eastern limit of the courtyard. This eastern border appears to have been Wall 4628, 0.5 m wide and plastered on both faces, which appeared at level 72.10 m and was traced along 2.5 m. (Figs. 17.5, 17.9). It had the same orientation as Wall 1669 of Building EA in Square F/14, although Wall 4628 was slightly to the east of the latter. On its eastern side there were probably rooms, as indicated by a segment of an east–west wall (4664). The area between these walls contained decayed bricks (4606, 0.35 m deep), covering occupation striations (4610, 71.91 m). These layers tilted slightly from east to west. Based on the levels, it is possible that these walls were founded in Stratum E-1b and continued in use into Stratum E-1a, yet no separate floors of E-1a were uncovered; these may have been eroded away in this area

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1b)

Floors 1648 and 1647b were detected in the northern part of Square E/15, slightly sloping from west to east, from level 72.00 to 71.85 m (Figs. 17.3, 17.14a, 17.17–17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.44– 17.52); 1647b continued to the southern end of the square, where it descended to level 71.60 m. It was laid above Locus 4649 of Stratum E-2. In the northwestern corner of the square, north of Wall 4624, the floor covered a layer of hard whitish brick material. The floor matrix consisted of compact earth mixed with gravel, and contained many sherds and bones. The same matrix continued into E/16 (2618), F/15 (1675) and F/16 (2627); this appears to have been the original floor of the courtyard in Stratum E-1b. This floor was raised consistently throughout the duration of Strata E-1b and E-1a, resulting in an accumulation of ca. 1.0 m for both strata in Square E/15, which contained layers of compact earth mixed with gravel and many small sherds and bones. The main locus in this square was 1647 (71.40–72.40 m), which was divided into two phases: 1647b attributed to Stratum E-1b and 1647a to Stratum E-1a; the border between them was at 72.00–72.20 m, although, as noted above, the floors were tilted from west to east and thus the exact levels fluctuated throughout the square.

The debris layers yielded pottery and several objects, such as fragments of zoomorphic and anthropomorphic clay figurines, that all seem to have been discarded as refuse in this open area. A head of a bronze bull was found in Locus 1648, close to Wall 4624 at level 71.95 m, between the top of this E-1b wall and the floors of E-1a. Evidence for a metal industry, as well as for flint production, was revealed in this area, in particular in the lower levels attributed to Stratum E-1b (Chapters 40C, 44).

Several activities in this square could be attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Oven 1649 in the northwestern part of the square was built ca. 0.2 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b and ca. 0.30 m below Oven 1614 of Stratum E-1a (Fig. 17.6). A series of circular installations, perhaps bins (1685, 1671, 1681, 1682, 4637 in Square E/15 and 1683, 1684 in Square E/14), were oriented along a strip bounded on the west by Wall 4623 and on the east by a bench(?) (1674). They were set into the compact matrix described above, although some of them were higher than the original floor (1647b) of Stratum E-1b (Photos 17.42, 17.44– 17.48, 17.52). The bins were ca. 0.4–0.8 m in diameter and 0.27–0.4 m deep and can be compared to similar installations found in Area G„ Stratum G-2 (Chapter 20). Bins 1671 and 1681 (the latter oval in shape) were attached, forming a double bin; the same can be said of Bins 4637 and 1682. The walls and floors of the bins were made of whitish plaster, similar to the partitions of the square bins (1666 and 1700) in Building EA. They differed from ovens, which were built of clay that was semi-fired and were usually lined with pottery on the exterior or interior. The bins contained a few animal bones and some ash (mainly in 1683 and 1684), but no evidence of fire or burning was found. It is conjectured that these installations were used for some sort of food preparation or storage in the sanctuary’s courtyard.

An additional bin of the same type (4629) was located somewhat to the west of the others in Square E/15, its top at 71.59 m (almost level with Floor 1647b) and penetrating into Stratum E-2 layers to 72.23 m. It was full of soft brown earth, sherds, flint and bones.

It should be noted that although in the eastern part of Square E/15, the bins were the highest stratigraphic element below topsoil, in the central and western part of the same square there were higher elements, attributed to a later phase (E-1a). The top level of Bin 4629 in E/15 and Bin 1683 in E/14 (Fig. 17.19; Photo 17.54) fits E-1b levels and they can be safely attributed to that phase.

In the southeastern corner of the square, a small segment of an oven (4663) was found protruding from the balk, full of ash; its rim at level 71.75 m would fit Stratum E-1b levels,

Square E/15 (Stratum E-1a)

Remains of this stratum were found just below topsoil in the western part of the square (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.49). A new oven (1614) was constructed slightly to the east and above E-1b Oven 1649 and a large flat limestone slab (1623; 0.5×0.7 m; top level 72.96 m) was located in front of the platform with standing stones, slightly less than 0.5 north of its center. The stone (Photos 17.49–17.50), supported by five small stones (Photo 17.54), could have been used as an offering table, north of the platform. North of this stone was an irregular area with a plaster floor at the juncture of Squares D–E/15–16 (1625, 2644). This plaster floor was found at an average level of 72.60 m, ca. 0.6 m above Floor 1648 of Stratum E-1b. The flat stone, oven and plaster floor were almost flush with the upper level of the small stone platform (1624) constructed on top of the brick platform (2654) to the south.

A 0.5 m-tall square pottery altar was restored from many fragments found in a heap of debris slightly to the east of the platform (Chapter 35, No. 5). This heap, located just below topsoil at levels 72.50–72.64 m, was ca. 1.5 in diameter and contained brick debris, stone chips and the aforesaid fragments of the altar. It appears that the altar was deliberately smashed; its upper parapet (most probably including corner horns) and feet are missing. As noted above, the round bins at the eastern side of E/15 may have continued to be in use alongside Wall/Bench 1674 throughout Stratum E-1a.

Square F/15 and the Northern Part of E–F/14 (Strata E-1b and E-1a)

In Square F/15, an L-shaped construction was created by the corner of two benches, 0.4–0.6 m wide, made of compact earth and bordered on the outside by narrow rows of small travertine stones (Figs. 17.3, 17.6, 17.15a, 17.16a, 17.18a; Photos 17.2, 17.9, 17.42, 17.44, 17.52–17.53). The north–south bench (1674) was traced along 2.0 m, yet it was probably longer, bordering the circular bins in Square E/15. The east–west line (1673) was exposed along 4.0 m and continued beyond the edge of the excavation to the east. No lines of bricks were defined and it appears that these benches were constructed of compacted earth, abutted by the rows of small stones. The area enclosed by these benches (1620 in E-1b) descended to the east from 71.60 to 71.40 m and was covered by a 0.6–0.7 m thick layer of occupation debris and fallen bricks. The latter layer is sealed by a floor (1606) covered with dark ash and burnt debris at level ca. 72.00 m, which was slightly higher than the level of the benches. This floor was clearly seen in the southern balk of Square F/15 (Fig. 17.18a; Photo 17.5) and must have been the continuation of Floor 1670 of E-1a in Square F/14 (Fig. 17.19). However, this floor was not detected in the excavation of the area between the benches, perhaps because this area was disturbed by an Islamic burial (1631). A poorly preserved oven (1660) found next to Bench 1673 below collapsed bricks may indicate a floor at level 72.05 m, which could be the continuation of E-1a Floor 1606.

It appears that this L-shaped configuration was the northern part of a rectangular area bordered by Walls 1657 and 1669 of Building EA in Squares E– F/14 (Photo 17.9), although a 1.0 m-wide unexcavated balk that separated Squares E–F/15 and E–F/14 made the correlation somewhat difficult. According to the levels, it appears that the L-shaped benches (1674, 1673) were founded in Stratum E-1b and perhaps continued to be in use in Stratum E-1a, since no higher stratigraphic element was found above them that could be attributed to E-1a.

In the northeastern part of Square E/14, Stratum E-1b was represented by an ash layer (2660) at level 71.42 m, covered by a layer of brick debris (2655). To Stratum E-1a we can attribute a line of small stones and perhaps a poorly preserved brick wall to its west, enclosing an area to their east paved with stones (1678, level 72.09 m). This floor continued eastwards into the northern part of Square F/14, where a floor was found at level 72.11 m (1670) with a large oven (1668) in the southern corner of the area, close to Building EA Wall 1669 (Photo 17.10). The oven was ca. 0.9 m in diameter, preserved to a height of 0.16 m. This floor was the continuation of Floor 1606 in the southern balk of Square F/15 mentioned above.

It may be suggested that the area enclosed by Wall 1669 on the east (Square F/14), Wall 1657 on the south (Square E/14) and the benches (1674, 2656) on the north (Square F/15) created a rectangular space with inner dimensions of 3.3×6.6 m (22 sq. m) (Photo 17.9). This seems to have been an enclosed area, related to the large courtyard on the west and north in Stratum E-1b. Yet, it remains unclear whether this was the situation in Stratum E-1a, since it is not certain that the benches continued to be in use. If indeed they did, then the combination of elongated benches, two ovens, and a well-paved area in the southern part, indicate that this rectangular space was used for cooking and consuming food, just a few meters east of the platform, which was the focal point of the cult in this sanctuary.

Northwestern Part of Square E/14 (A Street?)

The floor matrix of the courtyard continued from Square E/15 (1647) into the northwestern part of Square E/14 (1653; 71.68–72.27 m). The 0.6 m of accumulation in Locus 1653, attributed to both Strata E-1b and E-1a, like 1647 to the north, resulted from continuous accumulation of debris and floors throughout this period. In Stratum E-1a, with the construction of Building EB, this area became a 2.6 m-wide passageway between Buildings EA and EB. In Stratum E-1b, Floor 1653 was located at level 71.68 m (above an earth and ash layer, 4660, attributed to Stratum E-2); it was made of compact earth and gravel, as well as sherds, shells, flint and bones (Photo 17.54). Occupation debris and re-surfacing of this floor created an accumulation 0.47 cm thick, representing Strata E-1b (the lower floors) and E-1a (the upper floors). Two circular clay bins (1683, 1684), similar to those found in Square E/15, were sunken from level ca. 71.88 m and were thus attributed to an advanced stage of Stratum E-1b. Bin 1683 was 0.5 m deep and 1684, 0.32 m deep. Both contained animal bones and charcoal. The highest floor in Locus 1653, attributed to E-1a, was at 72.10 m. A narrow line of ash was found at the top of this layer (Fig. 17.14a). The top of this accumulation was covered by a 0.3 m-deep layer of brown-gray earth mixed with brick debris (1616), below topsoil.

Squares D/13–14, C/14

In Square D/14, the continuation of the matrix of small stones and sherds from Square E/14 was reached in the southeastern corner, where only its top was excavated until level 72.04 m (4620). Excavation in the northern halves of Squares D/13 and C/14 was meant to locate the southern side of Building EB, but did not proceed below the uppermost level of brick debris, ending at level 72.40 m (Fig. 17.6; Photo 17.44).

Summary of the Open Area

The open area was composed of a layer of compact gravel and debris, covered by a thick accumulation of floors extending over Squares E–F/15, D–E/14– 15, running northeast–southwest in alignment with Buildings EA and EB in its southern part and opening to a wide courtyard in its northern part in Square E/15; it extended into Squares D–G/16 and E/17–18 as well (Plan 17.5). The accumulation of floors with pottery, bones and other objects, to a total depth of 0.6–1.0 m found in most of this area, was evidence for a long time of use, continuing from Stratum E-1b into Stratum E-1a. The walls found in the narrow probes in Squares E/17–18 and G/16 were considered to have been the outer walls bordering this courtyard. We assume that Wall 4628 in G/16 may have continued to the northeast and met the continuation of Wall 4644 somewhere in Square G/17. If this assumption is correct, the courtyard was at least 13 m wide from west to east (its western limit remained unknown) and 13 m long, until the northern edge of the raised platform, or 14.7 m until Wall 1657 in Square E/14. Thus, the area enclosed by the courtyard was at least 200 sq m and perhaps as much as 230–250 sq m in Stratum E-1a. Installations in this open space included a rectangular area with benches in the southeastern part, eight circular clay bins in the south-center, two ovens, and a stone slab which could serve as an offering table. The distinction between Strata E-1b and E-1a in this area was difficult, although it seems that most of the installations were constructed during Stratum E-1b and continued to be in use in E-1a. The stone offering table (1623) and oven (1614) next to it were constructed in Stratum E-1a, together with the brick platform (2654) and its stone topping with standing stones (1624).

Debris (Fallen Bricks) in Space 5637 and Room 5613 of Building EC
  • Photo 17.55 - Building EC (right) - Squares C–D/15–16
  • Photo 17.56 - E-1a Building EC - Room 5637 - circular installations
  • Photo 17.57 - E-1a Building EC - Room 5637 - detail of Bin 5630
  • Photo 17.58 - Building EC - Room 5637 - detail of Oven 5632
  • Photo 17.59 - Buildings EB and EC
Description(s)

  • Space 5637 - This was the northern space of Building EC in Square C/16. It was bordered by Wall 2648 on the north, Wall 2647 on the east and Walls 5617 and 5640 on the south; the former was also the northern wall of Room 5613 (Photo 17.55). The western part of this space was beyond the limits of the excavation area. This was probably an open courtyard, measuring 4.07 m from north to south and more than 5.36 m from east to west (at least 22 sq m). Its floor, with ashy patches at level 72.57 m, was covered by a ca. 0.1 m-thick layer of occupation debris. In the north were two ovens (5632, 5635) and a plastered bin (5630) (Photos 17.56–17.58). Both ovens were built on top of several fist-sized stones placed directly on the courtyard surface and had an interior diameter of ca. 0.5 m; their 0.02 m-thick clay walls were preserved to a height of 0.06–0.14 m. Bin 5630 was 0.45 m in diameter and 0.27 m deep; its walls and floor were coated with a 0.02 m thick mud plaster, like the bins in Square E/15. A few stones along the southern face of Wall 2648 near Oven 5632 may have been related to the cooking activity in this area. A few olive pits were found west of Oven 5632. A 0.5 m-thick layer of fallen bricks (5618, 5628) covered the floor and ovens. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:298-299)

  • Room 5613, in the eastern side of Building EC (Square C/15), measured 2.2×3.5 m (inner dimensions 7.7 sq m). The entrance to the room was from Courtyard 5637, through an opening in the western end of Wall 5617. Although the contours of this room were revealed, it was only partly excavated. A small probe in the southern third of the room excavated to level 72.24 m revealed a few restorable vessels (Fig. 18.16), although no floor was detected (Photo 17.59). A layer of eroded brick debris with some ashy pockets and occasional fallen and burnt bricks filled this room. - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:298-299)

Debris - (not necessarily due to seismic activity and with unresolved stratigraphic relationships) found in a probe in Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.60 - Probe in Squares E/20, E/1
  • Photo 17.61 - Probe in Square E/1 with Oven 5903 and large stone
Description(s)

  • A 2.0 m-wide and 8.0 m-long probe was excavated in 2001 in Squares E/20–E/1 on the edge of the mound, 10 m north of the northern edge of Area E proper, with the intention of checking whether there was a fortification line along this side of the mound. After five days, the work was stopped when it became clear that there had been no fortification wall in this probe. A similar conclusion was reached in a parallel probe excavated north of Area C at the edge of the lower mound, as well as in Area D on the western side of the lower mound.

    The probe was located on the upper part of the northern slope of the mound, whose top was at level 72.30 m in the southwestern corner of Square E/20 and descended to 70.77 m in the northeastern corner of Square E/1, 10 m to the north. The loose topsoil contained Iron IIA and Early Islamic pottery sherds. A layer of yellowish-white brick debris (5902) was uncovered, although no individual bricks were discernible. In the southern end of Square E/20, the probe revealed that the brick debris continued to a depth of 0.85 m, until level 71.42 m, which may correspond with Stratum E-1b in the northern part of Area E.

    In Square E/1, fragmentary remains of an oven (5903) were found on top of this debris layer at level 71.05 m (Photo 17.61), although no floor could be discerned. The walls of this oven were only partly preserved to a height of 0.03–0.06 m; the interior diameter was ca. 0.65 m. A few Iron IIA pottery sherds were found inside the oven, which appears to post-date the brick debris layer and thus, may signify a post E-1a activity, like Oven 5611 in Building EC, although it could be that the brick debris layer marked the top of Stratum E-1b and the oven was constructed in Stratum E-1a; this was impossible to determine due to the limited excavation.

    An exceptionally large stone, 0.57×0.87×1.6 m, was found protruding from the floor in the northeastern corner of the probe, where the slope of the mound began (Photo 17.61). A probe dug along the faces of this stone indicated that it was isolated and not part of a wall line, although it seemed to be deliberately positioned on a foundation of five small stones (0.2–0.3 m in length) underneath it. The top of these smaller stones was at level 70.40 m. Since stones are generally lacking in the architecture of the Iron IIA city at Tel Rehov, this large stone may have had a special significance that eludes us. This may be compared to several large stones found in Area F, just south of Area E (Chapter 19).
    - Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:301-302)

Area G - Stratum G-1a

Deformation Map

Stratum G1 Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 20.4 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Damage

Area G
Building
[Square(s)]
Room(s) Wall(s) Plan(s) Collapse
Direction
Image (s) Destruction
Type
Notes
Square P/5 E of and abutting Wall 4014
  • Figure 20.10 - Section 3 - 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.24 - Square P/5
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 - closeup on debris below wood beam foundation E of G-1 Wall 4014
Burnt Brick debris below wood foundations
Description(s)

  • ... when the poorly preserved bricks of Wall 4014 [in Square P/5] were dismantled, a 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris was revealed, separating the wall from the wooden beams described above (Fig. 20.10). This raised questions as to the relationship of the wooden beams to the construction of the wall; however, since the connection of the beams to other G-1 walls was established with great certainty, we maintain that Wall 4014 was supported by the wooden beams and that this crumbly brick layer was created during the heavy conflagration which strongly affected the lowest brick courses of the wall, because of its proximity to the wood. - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:408)

Square Q/4 5018
  • Figure 20.13 - Section 6 Brick Debris 5016 below wood beam foundation at bottom of Wall 5018
Brick Debris below wood beam foundation at bottom of Wall 5018
Description(s)

Square Q/3
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G
Disordered wood beam foundation
Description(s)

  • A 0.46 m-thick layer of charred beams (5029) at levels 85.68–86.14 m sealed both Wall 5063 and the abutting floor build-up (5053) of Stratum G-2 in the northeastern corner of this square (Photos 20.17–20.18, 20.34–20.35). The beams appeared in several courses laid crosswise, at an east–west and north–south orientation; some appeared to be in disorder as if moved from their original location (perhaps due to seismic activity). This layer continued below the double brick wall (5017, 5018), which was founded some 0.3 m above the beams (Fig. 20.17) and extended ca. 1.3 m to the south of Wall 5017/5018 (Photo 20.40). It appears that the beams served as a foundation for a floor that was not preserved.

    It should be noted that in several places there was a considerable gap of up to 0.5 m between the uppermost beams and the lowest brick course of the wall above (i.e., the case of Wall 4014, noted above) while in other places (such as the foundations of Walls 5012 and 4047), it was clear that the beams served as a foundation for the wall, as was the case in Area C. It appears that even where there was a gap, the wood served as such a foundation and the gap was created by seismic activity or the burning of the lowest bricks until melting point during the destruction.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:413)

GF
Square Q/5
  • Figure 20.15 - Section 8
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west
  • Photo 20.11 - Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5
  • Photo 20.32 - Squares P/4–5
  • Photo 20.33 - Square Q/5
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
Burning and destruction of Building GF
Description(s)

  • The excavated remains attributed to this building in Squares P–Q/4–5 were 8.5×9.0 m, bordered by Walls 4014/4070 on the west, 5012 on the south and 5017 on the east (Photo 20.1). No closing wall on the north was uncovered and it seems that it was beyond the present limit of the excavation. In Square P/5, the western wall (4014) was built above G-2 Wall 5061, with wooden beams separating them, as described above (Photos 20.12, 20.22–20.23, 20.30, 20.32). It was exposed along 5.0 m in Square P/5 and its edge in Square P/4 was very poorly preserved to less than one course high. A strip of reddish-brown crumbly earth (4033), 0.4–0.5 m wide, exposed to the west of the wall, might be an indication of a foundation trench, although this is far from certain. The conflagration that destroyed the building burnt the bricks to a pinkish-orange hue. Wall 4017 extended from Wall 4014 towards the east (Photos 20.12, 20.22); only a brick and a half were preserved to one course high. This wall probably divided the area of Square P/5 east of Wall 4014 into two spaces, although no additional details of this assumed division further to the east were preserved.

    In Square Q/5, no floors of Stratum G-1b were preserved above the constructional beams. In the eastern part of the square, a stone floor (4049), 3.5 m long and ca. 0.5–1.3 m wide, was exposed just below topsoil at levels 86.90–86.97 m, unrelated to any other feature (Photos 20.22, 20.33); this floor was attributed to Stratum G-1a. It is possible that this part of the building was an open courtyard. In the rest of the square, brick debris mixed with collapsed burnt bricks and grayish-brown and black ash (4007, 4013) found below topsoil, appeared to be related to the destruction of the building.

    In Squares P–Q/4, Walls 4083 and 5019 were two segments of partition walls that comprised the southern border of the space described above, although they appeared to belong to two subsequent phases: Wall 4083 was founded in Stratum G1b, built on top of a wooden-beam foundation that separated it from the earlier wall (8055) of Stratum G-2 (Photo 20.11). Wall 5019 in the eastern part of Q/4 was narrower and higher; its foundation was 0.33 m higher than that of Wall 4083 and fit the level of the plaster floor (5023) to its north and was thus attributed to Stratum G-1a. It seems that in Squares Q–P/4–5 in Stratum G-1b, we may reconstruct a large space (inner dimensions 3.2×7.0 m) enclosed by Walls 4014, 4017, 4083 and an extension of Wall 5018 to the north (Photo 20.34). An element found in this space that remained enigmatic was Wall 5040, a 3.5 m-long and ca. 0.7 m wide stone foundation in the northern part of Square Q/4 (Photos 20.1, 20.32, 20.34), which was architecturally detached from the other walls of the building. It was attributed to Stratum G-1b, since it was covered by G-1a plaster floor 5023, which covered much of the northern part of Square Q/4. The nature of Wall 5040 was even more enigmatic in light of the lack of stone foundations in the Iron IIA levels at Tel Rehov. This element remains architecturally unexplained, although perhaps it served as a bench.

    Plaster Floor 5023 in the northern part of Square Q/4 (levels 86.65–86.72 m) was composed of two thin superimposed layers of plaster; it did not clearly abut any wall, although it most likely did reach Wall 5019. Although it was somewhat lower than the stone floor (4049) in Square Q/5, it appears that both these floors were contemporary and belonged to Stratum G-1a.

    In Square P/4, a single-course brick platform or floor (5069, 1.3×1.8 m), covered with a thick layer of plaster, was built above the wooden beams in the space between the short segment of Wall 4083 on the north and Wall 5012 on the south (Fig. 20.15; Photos 20.1, 20.11, 20.32, 20.34). Approach to this platform/floor could be through a possible opening in Wall 4083 to the north, where the bricks of this wall were found at the same level as the top of the platform (86.10 m). Note that the lowest brick course of Wall 5012 south of the platform was at level 86.26 m, 0.18 m above the top of the brick platform, but the wooden foundations of this wall started at level 85.72 m, which fit the wooden beams under the platform. It thus appears that the platform/floor and Wall 5012 were constructed at the same time. Brick debris with some small pebbles (4055, 4088) had accumulated on top of the platform. It appears that the platform/floor went out of use in Stratum G-1a, although no clear stratigraphic element was found above it, except for a small segment of an unnumbered wall, which made a corner with Wall 5012 and may be attributed to Stratum G-1a. The function of this brick platform/floor remained obscure.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:414-415)

GG 4047 and 5008 Wall 4047 is folded and bowed in Phases G1-b and G1-a
Wall 5008 is tilted E
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3
Wall 4047 is folded and bowed in Phases G1-b and G1-a
Wall 5008 is tilted E
Description(s)

  • Building GG refers to the northern part of a structure whose southern and western parts disappeared due to erosion. The remains were exposed under topsoil on the southern slope of the hillock. The northern wall of the building was Wall 4047, a brick wall attached to Wall 5012, the southern wall of Building GF, together comprising a wide double wall. The plastered wall, 0.5 m wide and exposed along 7.0 m, was founded on round wooden beams laid perpendicularly (Fig. 20.16). Two construction phases in this wall could be discerned: the lower one (comprised of three brick courses) was attributed to G-1b, while the upper one (two brick courses protruding about 0.1 m to the south of the earlier courses), were attributed to G-1a (Photo 20.31). An alternative explanation would be that the two upper courses shifted from their original location due to seismic activity, although this is less plausible. On its western end, the wall made a corner with Wall 4068, of which only a single brick was preserved to one course high. The eastern wall (5008) was built on top of G-2 Walls 8027 and 5063 (Photo 20.18). It was exposed along 3.8 m, built of a single row of hard white bricks and was preserved to the height of three courses (Photos 20.34–20.35). - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:415-417)

GG 4089
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
  • Photo 20.36 - Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031
  • Photo 20.37 - Squares P–Q/3
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G
Destruction layer in Room 4089
Description(s)

  • The room [4089] was destroyed in a heavy conflagration, creating a layer of burnt bricks and black ash. The thick destruction layer on top of Floor 4089 in the western part of the room (4059) included vessels (Figs. 21.8–21.13) and upper and lower grindstones. A few loomweights found near Installation 5031 were perhaps related to the cache of loomweights found to the west of the entranceway in Wall 4060 (see below). The wooden beam found on the floor could be related to Installation 5031 or to a loom that stood near the entrance to Room 5037. No separate floor that could be attributed to a later phase was found in this room and thus, it appears in identical form in the plans of both Strata G-1b and G-1a (Figs. 20.4–20.5). - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:417-420)

GG 5037 + Loci 4065 and 4069 (all G1-b)
  • Photo 20.41 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
  • Photo 20.42 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
  • Photo 20.43 - Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
  • Photo 20.44 - Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
Destruction layers including smashed pottery and fallen objects
Description(s)

  • This small square room [5037] (inner dimensions 2.2×2.3 m) was in the northwestern corner of the extant part of Building GG. It was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, poorly preserved Wall 4068 on the west, and Walls 4067 and 4060 on the south and east (Photos 20.40–20.45). A 0.9 m-wide entranceway led to this room from the eastern space (4089) at the northern end of Wall 4060. At least two floors were exposed. The early floor attributed to Stratum G-1b was preserved in three areas. Two small segments were exposed near Wall 4047 (8011, 8022) at level 85.75 m, abutting the lowest course of Wall 4047. On top of the western patch (8022), a scaraboid was found (Chapter 30A, No. 17). In the central part of the room was a compact clay floor (5037) at level 85.82 m, abutting Wall 4060.

    A higher floor (4088) made of hard gray plaster was identified in the central and northern parts of the room, between levels 85.91–86.00 m, ca. 0.1– 0.2 m higher than the earlier floor. This higher floor is related to Stratum G-1a and appears to have abutted all four walls of the room, although this was not clearly seen.

    Destruction debris (4052) that covered the floor consisted of burnt bricks, light gray ash, charcoal pieces and burnt earth that contained 47 restorable vessels (Photos 20.41–2.44; Figs. 21.8–21.14). A large number of these vessels were sunk into the floor against Wall 4067. Over 80 gypsum loomweights were found in the northeastern corner of the room, near the entranceway. They were piled up, covering an area 1.5 m long and 0.65 m wide. Their configuration and dimensions apparently indicate the size and shape of the loom that stood here. Note the abovementioned possibility that the wooden beam in the room to the east might have belonged to this loom. The location of a loom at the entrance of a room recalls a similar situation at Tell Qasile Stratum X, where concentrations of about 80 loomweights each were found at the entrances of several rooms (Mazar 2008).

    In the southern part of Square P/3, Loci 4065 and 4069 contain the same destruction layer, although it is slightly lower due to the topography and damaged by the erosion line.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:420)

Table of Seismic Effects with Figures, Plans, and Photos - sorted by type of effect(s)

Area G
Effect Plan(s) Location(s) + Image(s) Description(s)
General comments on destruction of Stratum G-1a The dramatic destruction of Stratum G-1a yielded a rich pottery assemblage and other finds. This can be correlated to the general destruction of the city of Stratum IV in the 9th century BCE, as evidenced in other areas at Tel Rehov.
Description(s)

Burnt Brick debris below wood foundations and abutting Wall 4014 in Square P/5
  • Figure 20.10 - Section 3 - 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.24 - Square P/5
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5 - closeup on debris below wood beam foundation E of G-1 Wall 4014
Description(s)

  • ... when the poorly preserved bricks of Wall 4014 [in Square P/5] were dismantled, a 0.5 m-thick layer of burnt orange brick debris was revealed, separating the wall from the wooden beams described above (Fig. 20.10). This raised questions as to the relationship of the wooden beams to the construction of the wall; however, since the connection of the beams to other G-1 walls was established with great certainty, we maintain that Wall 4014 was supported by the wooden beams and that this crumbly brick layer was created during the heavy conflagration which strongly affected the lowest brick courses of the wall, because of its proximity to the wood. - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:408)

Brick Debris below wood beam foundation at bottom of Wall 5018 in Square Q/4
  • Figure 20.13 - Section 6 Brick Debris 5016 below wood beam foundation at bottom of Wall 5018
Description(s)

Disordered wood beam foundation in Square Q/3
  • Figure 20.17 - Section 10
  • Photo 20.17 - Squares Q–P/3–4
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G
Description(s)

  • A 0.46 m-thick layer of charred beams (5029) at levels 85.68–86.14 m sealed both Wall 5063 and the abutting floor build-up (5053) of Stratum G-2 in the northeastern corner of this square (Photos 20.17–20.18, 20.34–20.35). The beams appeared in several courses laid crosswise, at an east–west and north–south orientation; some appeared to be in disorder as if moved from their original location (perhaps due to seismic activity). This layer continued below the double brick wall (5017, 5018), which was founded some 0.3 m above the beams (Fig. 20.17) and extended ca. 1.3 m to the south of Wall 5017/5018 (Photo 20.40). It appears that the beams served as a foundation for a floor that was not preserved.

    It should be noted that in several places there was a considerable gap of up to 0.5 m between the uppermost beams and the lowest brick course of the wall above (i.e., the case of Wall 4014, noted above) while in other places (such as the foundations of Walls 5012 and 4047), it was clear that the beams served as a foundation for the wall, as was the case in Area C. It appears that even where there was a gap, the wood served as such a foundation and the gap was created by seismic activity or the burning of the lowest bricks until melting point during the destruction.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:413)

Burning and destruction of Building GF
  • Figure 20.15 - Section 8
  • Photo 20.1 - Area G at the end of 2000 season, looking west
  • Photo 20.11 - Squares Q–P/3–4 looking southwest
  • Photo 20.12 - G-2a courtyard, G-2 Building GC, and G-1 Building GF
  • Photo 20.22 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.23 - Squares P–Q/5
  • Photo 20.30 - Square P/5
  • Photo 20.32 - Squares P/4–5
  • Photo 20.33 - Square Q/5
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
Description(s)

  • The excavated remains attributed to this building in Squares P–Q/4–5 were 8.5×9.0 m, bordered by Walls 4014/4070 on the west, 5012 on the south and 5017 on the east (Photo 20.1). No closing wall on the north was uncovered and it seems that it was beyond the present limit of the excavation. In Square P/5, the western wall (4014) was built above G-2 Wall 5061, with wooden beams separating them, as described above (Photos 20.12, 20.22–20.23, 20.30, 20.32). It was exposed along 5.0 m in Square P/5 and its edge in Square P/4 was very poorly preserved to less than one course high. A strip of reddish-brown crumbly earth (4033), 0.4–0.5 m wide, exposed to the west of the wall, might be an indication of a foundation trench, although this is far from certain. The conflagration that destroyed the building burnt the bricks to a pinkish-orange hue. Wall 4017 extended from Wall 4014 towards the east (Photos 20.12, 20.22); only a brick and a half were preserved to one course high. This wall probably divided the area of Square P/5 east of Wall 4014 into two spaces, although no additional details of this assumed division further to the east were preserved.

    In Square Q/5, no floors of Stratum G-1b were preserved above the constructional beams. In the eastern part of the square, a stone floor (4049), 3.5 m long and ca. 0.5–1.3 m wide, was exposed just below topsoil at levels 86.90–86.97 m, unrelated to any other feature (Photos 20.22, 20.33); this floor was attributed to Stratum G-1a. It is possible that this part of the building was an open courtyard. In the rest of the square, brick debris mixed with collapsed burnt bricks and grayish-brown and black ash (4007, 4013) found below topsoil, appeared to be related to the destruction of the building.

    In Squares P–Q/4, Walls 4083 and 5019 were two segments of partition walls that comprised the southern border of the space described above, although they appeared to belong to two subsequent phases: Wall 4083 was founded in Stratum G1b, built on top of a wooden-beam foundation that separated it from the earlier wall (8055) of Stratum G-2 (Photo 20.11). Wall 5019 in the eastern part of Q/4 was narrower and higher; its foundation was 0.33 m higher than that of Wall 4083 and fit the level of the plaster floor (5023) to its north and was thus attributed to Stratum G-1a. It seems that in Squares Q–P/4–5 in Stratum G-1b, we may reconstruct a large space (inner dimensions 3.2×7.0 m) enclosed by Walls 4014, 4017, 4083 and an extension of Wall 5018 to the north (Photo 20.34). An element found in this space that remained enigmatic was Wall 5040, a 3.5 m-long and ca. 0.7 m wide stone foundation in the northern part of Square Q/4 (Photos 20.1, 20.32, 20.34), which was architecturally detached from the other walls of the building. It was attributed to Stratum G-1b, since it was covered by G-1a plaster floor 5023, which covered much of the northern part of Square Q/4. The nature of Wall 5040 was even more enigmatic in light of the lack of stone foundations in the Iron IIA levels at Tel Rehov. This element remains architecturally unexplained, although perhaps it served as a bench.

    Plaster Floor 5023 in the northern part of Square Q/4 (levels 86.65–86.72 m) was composed of two thin superimposed layers of plaster; it did not clearly abut any wall, although it most likely did reach Wall 5019. Although it was somewhat lower than the stone floor (4049) in Square Q/5, it appears that both these floors were contemporary and belonged to Stratum G-1a.

    In Square P/4, a single-course brick platform or floor (5069, 1.3×1.8 m), covered with a thick layer of plaster, was built above the wooden beams in the space between the short segment of Wall 4083 on the north and Wall 5012 on the south (Fig. 20.15; Photos 20.1, 20.11, 20.32, 20.34). Approach to this platform/floor could be through a possible opening in Wall 4083 to the north, where the bricks of this wall were found at the same level as the top of the platform (86.10 m). Note that the lowest brick course of Wall 5012 south of the platform was at level 86.26 m, 0.18 m above the top of the brick platform, but the wooden foundations of this wall started at level 85.72 m, which fit the wooden beams under the platform. It thus appears that the platform/floor and Wall 5012 were constructed at the same time. Brick debris with some small pebbles (4055, 4088) had accumulated on top of the platform. It appears that the platform/floor went out of use in Stratum G-1a, although no clear stratigraphic element was found above it, except for a small segment of an unnumbered wall, which made a corner with Wall 5012 and may be attributed to Stratum G-1a. The function of this brick platform/floor remained obscure.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:414-415)

Folded and bowed walls in Building GG
  • Figure 20.16 - Section 9
  • Photo 20.18 - Square Q/3
  • Photo 20.31 - Tilted G-1b Wall 4047
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
  • Photo 20.35 - Square Q/3
Description(s)

  • Building GG refers to the northern part of a structure whose southern and western parts disappeared due to erosion. The remains were exposed under topsoil on the southern slope of the hillock. The northern wall of the building was Wall 4047, a brick wall attached to Wall 5012, the southern wall of Building GF, together comprising a wide double wall. The plastered wall, 0.5 m wide and exposed along 7.0 m, was founded on round wooden beams laid perpendicularly (Fig. 20.16). Two construction phases in this wall could be discerned: the lower one (comprised of three brick courses) was attributed to G-1b, while the upper one (two brick courses protruding about 0.1 m to the south of the earlier courses), were attributed to G-1a (Photo 20.31). An alternative explanation would be that the two upper courses shifted from their original location due to seismic activity, although this is less plausible. On its western end, the wall made a corner with Wall 4068, of which only a single brick was preserved to one course high. The eastern wall (5008) was built on top of G-2 Walls 8027 and 5063 (Photo 20.18). It was exposed along 3.8 m, built of a single row of hard white bricks and was preserved to the height of three courses (Photos 20.34–20.35). - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:415-417)

Destruction layer in Room 4089 of Building GG
  • Photo 20.6 - G-2 Building GB
  • Photo 20.34 - Squares P–Q/3–4
  • Photo 20.36 - Squares P–Q/3, G-1 Installation 5031
  • Photo 20.37 - Squares P–Q/3
  • Photo 20.40 - General view of Area G
Description(s)

  • The room [4089] was destroyed in a heavy conflagration, creating a layer of burnt bricks and black ash. The thick destruction layer on top of Floor 4089 in the western part of the room (4059) included vessels (Figs. 21.8–21.13) and upper and lower grindstones. A few loomweights found near Installation 5031 were perhaps related to the cache of loomweights found to the west of the entranceway in Wall 4060 (see below). The wooden beam found on the floor could be related to Installation 5031 or to a loom that stood near the entrance to Room 5037. No separate floor that could be attributed to a later phase was found in this room and thus, it appears in identical form in the plans of both Strata G-1b and G-1a (Figs. 20.4–20.5). - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:417-420)

Destruction layer in Room 5037 of Building GG
  • Photo 20.41 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
  • Photo 20.42 - Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
  • Photo 20.43 - Closeup of Smashed pottery in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
  • Photo 20.44 - Closeup of Smashed pottery and loomweights in G-1a destruction layer (4052)
Description(s)

  • This small square room [5037] (inner dimensions 2.2×2.3 m) was in the northwestern corner of the extant part of Building GG. It was bounded by Wall 4047 on the north, poorly preserved Wall 4068 on the west, and Walls 4067 and 4060 on the south and east (Photos 20.40–20.45). A 0.9 m-wide entranceway led to this room from the eastern space (4089) at the northern end of Wall 4060. At least two floors were exposed. The early floor attributed to Stratum G-1b was preserved in three areas. Two small segments were exposed near Wall 4047 (8011, 8022) at level 85.75 m, abutting the lowest course of Wall 4047. On top of the western patch (8022), a scaraboid was found (Chapter 30A, No. 17). In the central part of the room was a compact clay floor (5037) at level 85.82 m, abutting Wall 4060.

    A higher floor (4088) made of hard gray plaster was identified in the central and northern parts of the room, between levels 85.91–86.00 m, ca. 0.1– 0.2 m higher than the earlier floor. This higher floor is related to Stratum G-1a and appears to have abutted all four walls of the room, although this was not clearly seen.

    Destruction debris (4052) that covered the floor consisted of burnt bricks, light gray ash, charcoal pieces and burnt earth that contained 47 restorable vessels (Photos 20.41–2.44; Figs. 21.8–21.14). A large number of these vessels were sunk into the floor against Wall 4067. Over 80 gypsum loomweights were found in the northeastern corner of the room, near the entranceway. They were piled up, covering an area 1.5 m long and 0.65 m wide. Their configuration and dimensions apparently indicate the size and shape of the loom that stood here. Note the abovementioned possibility that the wooden beam in the room to the east might have belonged to this loom. The location of a loom at the entrance of a room recalls a similar situation at Tell Qasile Stratum X, where concentrations of about 80 loomweights each were found at the entrances of several rooms (Mazar 2008).

    In the southern part of Square P/3, Loci 4065 and 4069 contain the same destruction layer, although it is slightly lower due to the topography and damaged by the erosion line.
    - Yahalom-Mack, Ziv-Esudri, and Mazar in Mazar et. al. (2020 v. 3:420)

Deformation Maps
Stratum VI Earthquake - Early Iron IIA - 10th century BCE

Stratum C-2 Deformation Map

Stratum C-2 Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.7 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Stratum G2 Deformation Map

Stratum G2 Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 20.1 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Stratum V Earthquake - Late Iron IIA - late 10th until the early 9th century BCE

Stratum C1-b and D1-c Deformation Map

Stratum C1-b and D1-c Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.18 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Stratum E1-b Deformation Map

Stratum E1-b Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 17.3 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Stratum IV Destruction - Late Iron IIA - ~9th-8th century BCE

Stratum C1-a and D1-a Deformation Map

Stratum C1-a and D1-a Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 12.19 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Stratum E1-a Deformation Map

Stratum E1-a Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 17.5 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Stratum G1 Deformation Map

Stratum G1 Deformation Map

modified by JW from Fig. 20.4 of Mazar et. al. (2020 v.3)

Intensity Estimates
Stratum VI Earthquake - Early Iron IIA - 10th century BCE

Plans

Plans

  • See Seismic Effects for descriptions of damage and/or photos
  • Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224)
Effect Location Comments Intensity
Collapsed Walls
  • Area C - Bldg. CY and CE, Room 1555 in Square R/4
  • Area G - Collapse Debris found in Bldg,.s GA, GB, GC (?), GD, and the open area in Square P-Q/6
VIII+
Broken Pottery found in fallen position
  • Area C - Room 1555 in Square R/4
  • Area G -
VII+
Tilted Walls
  • Area C - Bldg. CA, Square R/4
  • Area G - Walls 5063, 4081, 5044, 5061
VI+
Folded Walls
  • Area C - Bldg. CA
Bulged Wall in Area C VII+
Displaced Walls
  • Area C - Bldg. CB
  • Area G - Walls 5044 and 5061
Split Wall in Area C, Separated Walls in Area G VII+
Seismic Uplift/Subsidence
  • Area G - Tilted Floor 8041
VI+
This archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224). There is likely a construction related site affect for all the Iron Age II structures at Tel Rehov as the damaged structures were made entirely of mudbricks with wood beam foundations.

Stratum V Earthquake - Late Iron IIA - late 10th until the early 9th century BCE

Plans

Plans

  • See Seismic Effects for descriptions of damage and/or photos
  • Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224)
Effect Building(s) Comments Intensity
Collapsed Walls
  • Area C - CG, CH, Apiary
  • Area D - Square Q/5
  • Area E - Bldg.s EA (Rooms 1704, 2651, 2663, and Square E/14), and various parts of the courtyard BUT all of this debris may not have a seismic origin
VIII+
Tilted Walls
  • Area C - CG, CE
  • Area D - Wall 7803
VI+
Displaced Blocks
  • Area C - CR
Intensity Estimate downgraded from VIII+ to VI+ since the displacement in Bldg. CR of Area C was in mudbricks rather than stones (masonry) as specified in the EAE Chart VI+
This archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224). There is likely a construction related site affect for all the Iron Age II structures at Tel Rehov as the damaged structures were made entirely of mudbricks with wood beam foundations.

Stratum IV Destruction - Late Iron IIA - ~9th-8th century BCE

Plans

Plans

  • See Seismic Effects for descriptions of damage and/or photos
  • Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224)
Effect Building(s) Comments Intensity
Collapsed Walls
  • Area C - Bldg.s CF, CQ1, CQ2, CQ3, CP, CL, CW, CX
  • Area D - Square Q/4
  • Area E - Bldg.s EA, EB, and EC
  • Area G - Bldg. GG
VIII+
Tilted Walls
  • Area C - Bldg. CQ2
  • Area G - Bldg. GG
VI+
Folded Walls
  • Area G - Bldg. GG
VII+
Broken Pottery (some apparently in fallen position)
  • Area C - Bldg.s CF, CQ1, CQ2, CQ3, CP, CL, CW, CX
  • Area E - Bldg. EA (Room 1667) and EB (Space 2641 and Room 4616)
  • Area G - Bldg. GG
VII+
This archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224). There is likely a construction related site affect for all the Iron Age II structures at Tel Rehov as the damaged structures were made entirely of mudbricks with wood beam foundations.

Surveys
Surveys

Archaeoseismic Surveys

Maps and Plans

Maps and Plans

Area C

  • Fig. 12.7              Plan of Stratum C-2 from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.18              Plan of Stratum C-1b from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.19              Plan of Stratum C-1a from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)
  • Fig. 12.23              Isometric view of Area C, Stratum C-1a, looking northwest from Mazar et. al. (2020 v.2)

Area G

Table
Effect Image(s) Location Description
Collapsed and folded wall Collapsed and folded wall

Collapsed and folded wall - Digital Theodolite

Link to Lidar 3D scan of Collapsed and Folded Western Wall in Area G
Western Wall of Area G
Anticline limb
(mostly north limb)

Area C
Parted Walls
Area C Wall to the right tilts
Warped E-W Wall
Area C
Anticlinal folding
Area C
Tilted Wall
Area C
Downdropped block
Area C possibly a blocked entrance

Orthophotos

Entire Tel

Drone Orthophoto Tel Rehov Orthophoto of Tel Rehov (entire Tel)

Click on Image for high resolution magnifiable image

From Drone Survey by Jefferson Williams 11 June 2023

Area C

Drone Orthophoto Tel Rehov Orthophoto of Area C at Tel Rehov

Click on Image for high resolution magnifiable image

From Drone Survey by Jefferson Williams 11 June 2023

Lidar Scans

Description Scan Date Scanner Processing Link opens a new tab
Collapsed and folded western wall in Area G 11 June 2023 iPhone 14 - Jefferson Williams Detail Mode Collapsed and Folded Western Wall in Area G

Downloadable Files

Drone Surveys

Description Flight Date Pilot Processing Downloadable Link
Entire Site 11 June 2023 Jefferson Williams ODM - no GCPs Right Click to download. Then unzip
Area C 11 June 2023 Jefferson Williams ODM - no GCPs Right Click to download. Then unzip

Lidar Scans

Description Scan Date Scanner Processing Downloadable Link (las format)
Collapsed and folded western wall in Area G 11 June 2023 Jefferson Williams Detail Mode Right Click to download

Notes and Further Reading
References

Articles and Books

Bruins, H.J., van der Plicht, J., Mazar, A., Bronk Ramsey, Ch. and Manning, S.W. 2005. The Groningen Radiocarbon Series from Tel Reov: OxCal Bayesian Computations for the Iron IB–IIA Boundary and Iron IIA Destruction Events. Pp. 271–293 in Levy, T. and Higham, T. (eds.). The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. London. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org

Bruins, H., Mazar, A. and van der Plicht, J. 2007. The End of the 2nd Millennium BCE and the Transition from Iron I to Iron IIA: Radiocarbon Dates from Tel Rehov, Israel. Pp. 79–100 in Bietak, M. and Czerny, E. (eds.). The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C. III: Proceedings of the SCIEM 2000 — 2nd Euro Conference. Vienna.

Bruins, van der Plicht and Mazar (2003a) 14C Dates from Tel Rehov: Iron-Age Chronology, Pharaohs, and Hebrew Kings, Science Vol. 300 11 April 2003 315-318

Bruins, H., van der Plicht, J. and Mazar, A. 2003b. Response to Comment on “14C Dates from Tel Rehov: Iron-Age Chronology, Pharaohs and Hebrew Kings”. Science 302 (24 October 2003): 568c.

Finkelstein I. and Piasetzky, E. 2010. Radiocarbon Dating the Iron Age in the Levant: A Bayesian Model for Six Ceramic Phases and Six Transitions, Antiquity 84: 374–385. - full copy on academia.edu

Finkelstein, I. 2013. The Forgotten Kingdom. Atlanta. - full copy on academia.edu

Finkelstein, I. 2013. The Forgotten Kingdom. Atlanta. - can be borrowed with a free account on archive.org

Finkelstein, I. 2017. What the Biblical Authors Knew About Canaan Before and in the Early Days of the Hebrew Kingdom. Ugarit Forschungen 48: 173–198. - full copy on academia.edu

Gorner, Aaron BY, (2023) Mazar's Modified Modified Chronology: The Preservation of Solomonic Possibilities, BYU Scholars Archive

Levy, Thomas., Higham, Thomas. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org

Mazar, A. (1992). Archaeology of the Land of the Bible: 10,000-586 B.C.E, Yale University Press. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org

Mazar, A. and E. Stern (2001). Archaeology of the Land of the Bible, Doubleday. - there may be two volumes to this

Mazar, Amihai, Bruins, H. J., Panitz-Cohen, N., and van der Plicht, J. , (2014:193-255) 13 Ladder of Time at Tel Rehov - Stratigraphy, archaeological context, pottery and radiocarbon dates in Levy, Thomas., Higham, Thomas. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. - full text at academia.edu - Roberts (2012:169-170) highlighted page 218

Mazar, Amihai, Bruins, H. J., Panitz-Cohen, N., and van der Plicht, J. , (2014:193-255) 13 Ladder of Time at Tel Rehov - Stratigraphy, archaeological context, pottery and radiocarbon dates in Levy, Thomas., Higham, Thomas. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2014. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org - Roberts (2012:169-170) highlighted page 218

Raphael, Kate and Agnon, Amotz (2018). EARTHQUAKES EAST AND WEST OF THE DEAD SEA TRANSFORM IN THE BRONZE AND IRON AGES. Tell it in Gath Studies in the History and Archaeology of Israel Essays in Honor of Aren M. Maeir on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday.

Vaknin, Y., et al. (2023). Tel Beth-Shean in the Tenth–Ninth Centuries BCE: A Chronological Query and Its Possible Archaeomagnetic Resolution. in “And in Length of Days Understanding” (Job 12:12): Essays on Archaeology in the Eastern Mediterranean and Beyond in Honor of Thomas E. Levy. E. Ben-Yosef and I. W. N. Jones. Cham, Springer International Publishing: 787-810.

Excavation Reports

Excavation Reports on JSTOR and other sites

Mazar, A. (1999) The 1997–1998 Excavations at Tel Reḥov: Preliminary Report Amihai Mazar Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1/2 (1999), pp. 1-42 (42 pages)

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME I: INTRODUCTIONS, SYNTHESIS AND EXCAVATIONS ON THE UPPER MOUND." Qedem 59: III-416.

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen, N. (2020), Chapters 3-4 Introductions, Synthesis and Excavations on the Upper Mound in "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME I: INTRODUCTIONS, SYNTHESIS AND EXCAVATIONS ON THE UPPER MOUND." Qedem 59: III-416.

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME II: THE LOWER MOUND: AREA C AND THE APIARY." Qedem 60: III-658.

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). Chapter 12 Area C : Stratigraphy and Architecture in "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME II: THE LOWER MOUND: AREA C AND THE APIARY." Qedem 60: III-658.

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME III: THE LOWER MOUND: AREAS D, E, F AND G." Qedem 61: III-466.

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME IV: POTTERY STUDIES, INSCRIPTIONS AND FIGURATIVE ART." Qedem 62: III-640.

Mazar, A. and N. Panitz-Cohen (2020). "TEL REḤOV: A BRONZE AND IRON AGE CITY IN THE BETH-SHEAN VALLEY VOLUME V: VARIOUS OBJECTS AND NATURAL-SCIENCE STUDIES." Qedem 63: III-683.

Bibliography from Stern et al (2008)

S. Kunath, BN 64 (1992), 14–16

P. Beck & U. Zevulun, BASOR 304 (1996), 67

D. C. Browning, Jr. & A. Mazar, ASOR Newsletter 47/2 (1997), 24–25

A. Mazar, AJA 102 (1998), 775–777; id., ESI 109 (1999), 42*–43*; 114 (2002), 38*–40*; id., IEJ 49 (1999), 1–42; 53 (2003), 29–48; 54 (2004), 24–36; id. (& J. Camp), BAR 26/2 (2000), 38–51, 75; 29/2 (2003), 60–61; id., International Radiocarbon Conference, 17, Judean Hills, Israel, 18–23.7.2000, Abstracts, Tel Aviv 2000, 81; id., ASOR Annual Meeting Abstract Book, Boulder, CO 2001, 3, 9; id. (& I. Carmi), Radiocarbon 43 (2001), 1333–1342; id., MdB 146 (2002), 30–32; id., EI 27 (2003), 287*–288*; id., Saxa Loquentur, Münster 2003, 171–184; M. Pritchard, BAIAS 16 (1998), 131–132; S. A. Kingsley, Minerva 14/4 (1999), 3–4; R. A. Mullins (& J. A. Montgomery), ASOR Newsletter 49/1 (1999), 7–9; id., Papers Presented at the Albright Appointee’s Colloquium at ACOR in Amman, Jordan, Amman 1999

Y. Garfinkel, Studies in the Archaeology of Israel and Neighboring Lands, Chicago, IL 2001, 143–159

N. Panitz-Cohen, ASOR Annual Meeting Abstract Book, Boulder, CO 2001, 9; A. Sumaka ’i Fink, ibid., 8–9

Y. Goren et al., TA 29 (2002), 221–227; id., Inscribed in Clay, Tel Aviv 2004, 248–255

E. A. Knauf, BN 112 (2002), 21–27

E. Zilberman et al., Geological Survey of Israel, Current Research 13 (2002), 9–18; BAR 29/1 (2003), 58

H. J. Bruins et al., Science 300/11.4.2003, 315–318

N. Coldstream (& A. Mazar), IEJ 53 (2003), 29–48; id., TA 30 (2003), 247–258

I. Finkelstein (& E. Piasetzky), Antiquity 77/298 (2003), 771–779; id., Symbiosis, Symbolism and the Power of the Past, Winona Lake, IN 2003, 75–83; id. (& E. Piasetzky), TA 30 (2003), 283–295; id., Levant 36 (2004), 181–188

H. M. Niemann, UF 35 (2003), 439–442 (421–485)

T. Fries, ASOR Newsletter 54/3 (2004), 16–17

E. Boaretto et al., Radiocarbon 47 (2005), 39–55.

Bibliography from Stern et. al. (1993)

0. Yogev, 'Atiqot 17 (1985), 90-113.



The synagogue (and halakhic inscription)

D. Bahat, IEJ 23 (1973), 181-183

F. Vitto, Archeologia 110 (1977), 72; id., JEJ 30 (1980), 214-217; id., ASR, 90-94; id., Temples and High Places in Biblical Times, Jerusalem 1981, 164-167; id., RB 88 (1981), 584-586; id., BAlAS I (1982), 11-14; id., Jahrbuch der Osterreichischen Byzantinistik 32 (1982), 361-370

z. Safrai, lmmanue/8 (1978), 48-57

A. Demsky, IEJ29 (1979), 182-193

R. Frankel, ibid., 194-196

Y. Liebermann, Moria 8/8-9 (1979), 59-68

J. Sussman, ASR, 146-153

D. Chen, LA 36 (1986), 239-240

G. Foerster, Actes du Xle Congres International d'Archeologie Chrhienne (21-28 Sept. 1986), Rome 1989, 1809-1820.

Wikipedia pages

Tel Rehov



Amihai Mazar



kmz's for Site Visits
kmz's