7. Paleoseismology
The aim of the paleoseismic study was to gain more
information about seismic events related to young tectonic
activity along the western marginal fault of the DSR.
Three
trenches were excavated along the scarp, two located above
subsurface faults detected in a high resolution seismic
reflection survey. A fault was found only in trench TR1.
7.1 The site of Tel Rehov trench (TR-1)
Trench TR1 is located north of Tel Rehov across the
southern part of the Bet She'an fault. In this area, a
gentle slope, 40-50 m high, separates the tufa plateau in
the west from a lower surface capped by soil in the east
(Fig. 15). The site of the trench is located where a steep
escarpment is visible in air photos taken by the British
authorities in 1945. The morphological expression of this
fault can be traced northward to Kibbutz 'En haNaziv where
it forms a clear step. Several springs are located along
the trace of the fault: En Neshev, some 200 m north of the
trench and En Naftali and En Yehuda, in Kibbutz 'En
haNaziv. North of 'En haNaziv, the steps of the fault merge
with the 40 m high escarpment that runs northward toward
Bet She'an.
The subsurface fault exposed in the trench was detected by
a short (500 m), shallow, high resolution seismic reflection
line, shot across the escarpment and a 1800 long, deep, high
resolution seismic reflection line, which was shot across
the entire morphological step (Bruner et al., 2002). The
main stem of the marginal fault was detected some 500 m east
of the trench site, exhibiting a dip of 70° eastward (Fig.
7). A low angle (30-40°) array of listric faults splits
from the main fault to the west, forming a fault belt that
extends up to 100 m east of the trench. The fault crossed
by the trench is visible up to a depth of 0.5 sec (TWT),
near the top of the Miocene Hordos Formation.
7.2 The stratigraphic units in trench TR-1
The trench exposed a scarp about 3 m high (Fig. 16), built
of tufa. It is overlain by a silty gray-brown sequence
consisting mainly of reworked soils and tufa fragments,
which contain pieces of pottery (Figs. 17, 18).
7.2.1 The tufa unit
This unit is composed of homogeneous, yellowish, soft
chalky tufa (Figs. 16, 17). It consists of small (2-5 mm),
angular and rounded tufa clasts, embedded in calcareous
silt. A crude sub-horizontal layering is noted among the
tufa clasts. The upper part of the tufa in the uplifted
block contains allochthonous coarse fragments (20-30 cm)
derived from phytotherm tufa. A few of these are embedded
in the chalky tufa, but most are scattered on the eroded
surface at the top of the tufa. The ages of the tufa are
645 ka in the upper block, and 322.5 ka in the lower block
(determined by U/Th method).
The top of the tufa of the upper block is eroded and marked
by a microrelief of 20-30 cm. It is covered by hard angular
tufa fragments, some derived from nearby phytotherm tufa and
some from hardpan (calcrete?), which developed on an exposed
tufa surface. The fragments are embedded in a gray matrix of
silt and clay, which compose the overlying sediment. The
size of the fragments decreases upward to a few cm. The
thickness of this weathering mantle is up to 40 cm.
The top of the tufa in the lower block does not contain
fragments of phytotherm tufa and the contact with the
overlying sediment is smooth and fresh. It is covered with a
thin unit (up to 15 cm) of tufa clasts (0.5-2 cm), mostly
rounded, in a white-yellowish calcareous silt matrix. In
some places, very shallow channels filled by
oncolites (1-2 cm) can be observed. The most developed channel, which
is 10-30 cm deep and 40-50 cm wide, is found at the foot of
the scarp. This unit passes upward to brown-gray silt with
some clay, which is covered by unit 1.
7.2.2 Colluvial unit 1
This consists of angular tufa fragments (up to 10 cm),
embedded in a brown-gray silty matrix. It also contains
small (1-2 cm) rounded oncolites, mostly weathered, pieces
of pottery, charcoal fragments, and landsnails. The size of
the tufa fragments decreases eastward down to 2-3 cm near
datum 14. From datum 14 eastward, only a few tufa fragments
are found in the silty matrix. The fragments derived mainly
from hard tufa and are similar to those that cover the upper
block. A dark calcic paleosol that appears near the outlet
of the trench seems to correlate with this unit. The top of
the unit is characterized by incipient soil, which contains
rhizolithes and a primary soil-profile.
Three charcoal samples collected from this unit (for
location see Fig. 18) yielded ages ranging between
2706 ± 49 BP (TR1.10) at the base to 2856 ± 48 (TR1.12) and
2963 ± 96 BP (TR 1.7) at the top. A radiocarbon age
of 2843 ± 66 (TR. 1.11) was determined for the upper
edge of the colluvial unit near the scarp. It is suggested
that this inverse stratigraphy (Fig. 19) reflects the trend
of erosion of the hillslopes above the scarp. The first to
be eroded was the uppermost sediment, which naturally was
the younger and contains the most recent charcoal. This
young sediment was the first to be deposited on the
downfaulted block. The older parts of the sequence of the
hill were next to be exposed and eroded and, thus, formed
the upper part of unit 1. Based on the above erosion
scenario, we conclude that the age of this unit is
represented by the youngest charcoal age, around the 7th
century B.C.E.
7.2.3 Colluvial unit 2
The transition from unit 1 to unit 2 is gradual. Unit 2
contains scattered tufa fragments, a few centimeters in
size, floating in a gray silty matrix. The tufa fragments
are similar to those of unit 1, their size decreasing from
the scarp eastward and their amount decreasing both upward
in the sequence and eastward. The unit also contains
rounded oncolites, pottery pieces, freshwater gastropods
(melanopsis) and landsnails. On the lower block it is
about 1.5 m thick while on the upper block it is reduced
to 20-40 cm. Unit 2 passes gradually to the overlying
unit 3.
The upper part of the scarp, covered by unit 2 is eroded,
indicating a slow deposition of unit 2 on the downfaulted
block. The low deposition rate is also manifested by the
lack of any sedimentary structure in unit 2, probably due
to intensive bioturbation and continuous cultivation.
Seven samples were dated in this unit using the radiocarbon
method: two charcoal, two land snails and three melanopsis
shells (for location see Fig. 17). A charcoal sample
collected from the lower part of the sequence yielded an
age of 3222 ± 54 Y.B.P. (TR 1.13). Another charcoal sample
from the middle part of the unit yielded an age of
2614 ± 47 Y.B.P. (TR 1.17). A nearby land snail sample
yielded an age of 4482 ± 51 Y.B.P. (TR 1.16a). Three
melanopsis samples collected from the upper part of the
unit were dated at 7882 ± 53 Y.B.P. (TR 1.9),
7560 ± 52 Y.B.P. (TR 1.4), and 8350 ± 51 Y.B.P. (TR 1.3).
A land snail sample collected from the upper part yielded
an age of 3277 ± 49 Y.B.P. (TR 1.14).
The radiocarbon ages in unit 2 show the same inverse
pattern as that in unit 1 (Figs. 17, 18), presumably
resulting from a similar process of differential erosion
of the hillslopes above the uplifted block. However, some
of the samples are older than those found in unit 1,
indicating that the ongoing erosion of the upper block
exposed older units to weathering processes. The melanopsis
shells at the top of the unit yielded the oldest age,
reflecting a remote source of water-laid sediment, probably
some type of tufa. The youngest radiocarbon age in this
unit is younger by 100 years than the age of unit 1,
supporting the pedological data that suggests a short break
between the depositions of the two colluvial units.
7.2.4 The upper gray unit (Unit 3)
Unit 3 was deposited on both the lower and the upper blocks,
forming a continuous cover on the previous tectonic relief.
It is homogeneous, without any sedimentary structure, and
consists of gray silt with some clay. It contains scattered
oncolites but no hard, angular tufa fragments such as those
found in the lower units. It also contains fresh melanopsis
shells, sometimes with the original pinkish color, and
pieces of pottery. A few thin, sub-horizontal lenses
(2-5 cm thick and 20-100 cm long) of small (1-3 cm)
well-rounded and well-sorted oncolites are scattered in the
lower part of this unit.
A sample of land snail collected from the contact between
units 2 and 3 yielded an age of 5282 ± 89 YBP (TR 1.18),
and a melanopsis shell sample from the upper part yielded
an age of 1005 ± 56 (TR 1.1).
The inverse stratigraphy manifests the ongoing erosion of
the upper block and the continuous removal of the upper
young sequence resulting in the exposure of the lower and
older units to weathering. It is assumed that the source of
the fresh melanopsis shells are historical irrigation canals
that criss-crossed the cultivated area.
7.2.5 The upper soil
The slope is covered with a gray O-horizon, 20-40 cm thick.
There is no clear soil profile, probably as a result of
continuous bioturbation and cultivation of this area.
7.3 The fault
The escarpment of the fault in the tufa units is highly
weathered as a result of the low resistivity of the soft
tufa to erosion processes. There is no clear fault plane
and the low gradient of the upper part of the escarpment
suggests rapid slope degradation. However, two sets of
vertical fractures can be distinguished in the soft tufa:
one at the base of the scarp and a second two meters to the
east. From each fracture zone there is one fracture that can be traced up to the lower
part of unit 3 (Figs. 17, 18). No offset was detected
along these two fractures.
7.4 Interpretation
The fault exposed in trench TR-1 is only one branch of the
wide fault belt associated with the western marginal fault
of the DSR. The total vertical displacement along this
fault zone is manifested by the separation between the
upper tufa surface west of the fault (altitude ~ -120 m.)
and the lower surface east of the fault (altitude ~ -180 m),
i.e., at least 50-60 m. It is assumed that this
displacement post-dated the deposition of the tufa, e.g.,
post-20 ka according to Kronfeld et al. (1988) or post
30 ka according to the age of the tufa exposed in the
trench. Therefore, the displacement manifested by the fault
exposed in the trench reflects only a small portion of the
total displacement along the marginal fault belt.
7.4.1 The pre-alluvial-colluvial sequence faulting
events
The ~30 ky difference between the ages of the tufa units
on both sides of the fault in the trench reflect a long
period of tectonic activity that predated the three
tectonic events detected in the colluvial sequence. This
tectonic activity was associated with an unknown number of
vertical displacements. The age difference between the
upper and the lower blocks suggests that a sequence of
tufa that was deposited between 60 and 30 ka was removed
by erosion from the uplifted block before the formation of
the present escarpment (Fig. 20a-c).
The amount of the total displacement cannot be reconstructed
at present since the thickness of the post 64 ka tufa
sequence eroded from the upper block is not known. However,
in the quarry dated by Kronfeld et al. (1988), 2 km north
of the trench, 18 m of tufa were deposited during a period
of 20 ky (between 40 ka and 20 ka), indicating an average
deposition rate of 1 m/1000 years. Since the upper part of
the tufa forms a continuous flat surface all the way from
the quarry to the trench site, and the stratigraphy is
sub-horizontal, it might be argued that a correlation can
be made between the two sites. Therefore, it is estimated
that the eroded sequence was some 30-40 m thick and this
is also the minimum total displacement.
Each seismic event was followed by an erosion period, which
removed the tufa sequence from the uplifted block. However,
the sharp contact between the tufa and the colluvium of the
lower block, which shows no evidence of weathering,
suggests that this block was also exposed to erosion.
Assuming that the age of the upper part of the sequence in
the trench is the same as in the Rehov quarry (about 20 ka),
the thickness of the tufa eroded from the lower block is
estimated to be some 10 m. The shallow channels filled by
tufa oncolites found on the top of this block, suggest that
at least part of this erosion can be related to fluvial
environments.
The number of seismic events represented by the vertical
offset along the branch exposed in the trench (about 30 m)
is dependent on the estimated offset allocated to each
event. If for example, we assume an average offset of 1 m
per event, then 30 earthquakes with average magnitudes of
M 6.5 and recurrence intervals of 1000 y can be reconstructed
for the last 30 ky.
7.4.2 Faulting event I
The first event is represented by unit 1, which was
deposited above the downfaulted block and the newly formed
fault scarp (Fig. 20d). The minimum vertical displacement,
represented by the height of the colluvial unit is 1.2 m.
This seismic event occurred in the 7th century B.C.E. The
formation of the escarpment was followed by erosion of the
upper slope of the hill above the escarpment and deposition
of colluvium, which contains coarse tufa fragments. It also
contains reworked sediments originated from 3 ky old units
exposed by erosion on the upper block. An undeveloped
profile at the top of this unit indicates that it was
stabilized for a short period before the deposition of
unit 2 (Fig. 20e). The minimum magnitude of this earthquake,
deduced from the vertical displacement is M 6.5-6.6 (Wells
and Coppersmith, 1994).
7.4.3 Faulting event II
The second event is represented by unit 2, which covers the
scarp and the upper block (Fig. 20f). The scarp formed in
the second event was at least 1.5 m high, and it was partly
eroded before the deposition of unit 2. This event occurred
in the 6th century B.C.E., a short time after the previous
one. The ongoing erosion on the upper block exposed 7-8 ky
old units, which contributed reworked sediments to unit 2.
The magnitude of this earthquake is estimated as 6.6-6.7
(Wells and Coppersmith, 1994).
7.4.4 Faulting event III
This event is represented by the fractures that cross
units 1-3 (Fig. 20h). It is not associated with vertical
displacement and might reflect a more distant earthquake
that reactivated the marginal fault. The age of this event
is not clear, but it could be related to the A.D. 743
earthquake that destroyed Bet She'an.
7.5 Summary and conclusion
The Tel Rehov trench (TR-1) exposes the western branch of
a normal fault-belt, which is part of the marginal fault of
the DSR. The total vertical offset along this segment,
which is represented by the morphological scarp along its
trace, is 50-60 m. This amount of displacement occurred
during the last 20-30 ky, after the deposition of the tufa
sequence that builds the scarp. The time period lasted
between the deposition of the upper part of the tufa and
the colluvial sediments exposed in the trench (i.e., almost
30 ky), is not represented in the sequence. This
sedimentary hiatus is related to the location of the trench
on a growing morphological step, which was under an
erosional regime during most of this period.
The fault scarp exposed in the trench is about 3 m high and
was formed during two seismic events that occurred in the
7th and the 6th centuries B.C.E. These two earthquakes
were of magnitude M 6.5-6.7 and probably caused extensive
destruction in the Bet She'an and the Jordan valleys. The
length of the surface rupture is still unknown, but
empirical data suggest that earthquakes of similar
magnitude are associated with surface rupture 20-30 km long
(Wells and Coppersmith, 1994).
Only one strong earthquake from this period is mentioned in
historical catalogues (Ben Menahem, 1991). This earthquake,
which is also mentioned in the book of Amos, occurred in
759 B.C.E. and caused great damage in the Galilee,
Samaria and Judea. The magnitude of this earthquake is
estimated as ML 7.3 and it is assumed that the epicenter
was located some 140 km north of Jerusalem, probably near
Hazor (Ben Menahem, 1991).