Tel Yokneam| Transliterated Name | Source | Name |
|---|---|---|
| Tel Yokneam | Hebrew | תֵּל יָקְנְעָם |
| Yoqne'am, Jokneam | Hebrew | |
| Tell Qamun | Arabic | تل قامون |
| Caymont, Cain Mons, Kaym Mons, Kaim Monte | Crusader Names | |
| Chateau d'El Kireh | French | |
| 'En-qn'mu | ||
| Kammona | ||
| Cimona | ||
| Qaymun | Arabic |
Jokneam (Tel Yogneʿam), a large mound rising above the surrounding plain and covering an area of 10 a., is situated at a point along the abutment of Mount Carmel and the Jezreel Valley, near the debouchment of Naḥal Yoqneʿam (map reference 1604.2289) and at the northern outlet of Wadi Milt (Naḥal Tut), on one of the major routes cutting across the Carmel Range. Via the Coastal Plain, the route passes close to Acco and then runs toward Phoenicia and other centers to its northwest.
Jokneam is first mentioned in a list recording Thutmose III's campaign in Canaan, conducted in the first third of the fifteenth century BCE. The site, number 113 on that list, is mentioned in the form ʿnqnʿm, apparently with reference to the spring or springs of Jokneam: there are two water sources near the site, one to the west and the other to the northeast.
Biblical map – Canaanite and Israelite periods (based on Bible Mapper 3.0)
Biblical map – Canaanite and Israelite periods (based on Bible Mapper 3.0)
Annotated Google Satellite View of Tel Yokneam
Annotated Google Satellite View of Tel Yokneam
Biblical city model – courtesy of the archaeological park (located on the north west side)
Biblical city model – courtesy of the archaeological park (located on the north west side)
Photo III.20
Photo III.20
Area A4 (Plans III.I–5) is the more southerly of the two excavation areas opened on the western slopes of the mound outside the Iron Age fortification complex. Immediately below the remains of the earliest Iron Age I stratum (XVIII), two strata were exposed, both dated to the Late Bronze Age. Each of these strata revealed two construction phases: XXb–a and XIXb–a. The stratigraphic sequence, together with the ceramic assemblage, indicates that Stratum XXb should be dated to the MB IIC/LB I transition, and Stratum XXa within LB I. In contrast, both Strata XIXb and XIXa are dated to the second half of the Late Bronze Age. Because the Late Bronze Age architectural remains are better preserved in Area A4 than in Area A1, the discussion begins with the findings from Area A4 and then turns to the remains in Area A1.
The depth of the fill (about one meter) which accumulated over the remains of Stratum XX is an indication that after its destruction the site remained deserted for some time until its reoccupation during the LB II. Stratum XIX witnessed a completely new architectural complex built over the remains of the former settlement. As in Stratum XX, the architectural remains include a number of rooms comprising part of a large dwelling structure. Two phases of construction (Strata XlXa and XlXb) were discerned, the later phase characterized mainly by the raising of the floor level in c
This phase represents the end of the Late Bronze Age at Yoqneʿam. Beneath about one meter of brick collapse and residues of conflagration, the Stratum XXa floors and structure were exposed. The structure preserves the plan of the previous phase, differing only in raised floor levels and minor architectural alterations.
LB II (1400-1200 BCE)
The location of the massive Iron Age IIA and B fortifications (Strata XIV and XII) has restricted the excavation of the early strata to limited, physically discontinuous areas. Nonetheless, the remains from Iron Age I strata, however fragmentary, allow for a reconstruction of the settlement during that period (the second half of the twelfth century BCE and the eleventh century BCE). In most of these strata (as well as in those assigned to the Middle Bronze Age II and Late Bronze Age), the inhabited areas extend beyond the boundaries of the Iron Age IIA and B cities; moreover, they are built along the same orientation, which changes only in Stratum XIV.
This area was excavated with the aim of exposing early Iron Age I and Bronze Age remains in a locality where excavation was not restricted by the Iron Age IIA or B city wall (Squares M–N/20–21; Plan 1.4; Sections A–A1, A2–A3).
This stratum is represented by a packed earth floor, L.2325 (incorporating L.60; Fig. 1.11), tilted steeply to the west. No walls ascribed to this stratum were uncovered. Several objects were found on this floor, including a cooking jug and an iron knife (Fig. 1.1).
This stratum is represented by architectural remains of a fragmentary nature, displaying no continuity with the previous stratum. These include several walls: W.21, running east–west, perpendicular to W.26 to the south and W.27 to the north. It is difficult to determine the plan of this structure. A floor of pebbles and packed earth, L.2258 (incorporating L.63; Fig. 1.2), was also exposed, with stone paving to the south. Part of the latter may have functioned as a foundation for a mudbrick wall (a great number of such bricks were found within collapses all around); such a wall, however, could not be readily discerned. This floor, like the one from the previous stratum, is tilted westward.
This stratum is clearly distinguishable from the previous Persian and Hellenistic strata, as well as from the succeeding Crusader strata, in three important respects. First is the overall settlement plan, i.e. the orientation of buildings and streets and the extent of the built-up area. Second, the architecture and methods of construction are characteristic: the buildings of this period not only differ from those of the strata immediately above and below (see Plan IV.7), but are in fact unique in the entire architectural history of Tel Yoqne'am. Third, there is not a single instance in which an Early Islamic structure makes use of a previous period's wall as a foundation, or, for that matter, functions as a foundation for a wall of a later period. This seems to reflect the fact that, with the exception of two isolated buildings of the Hellenistic period, no construction had taken place in this area since the end of the Persian period, some 1000 years earlier. On the other hand, it indicates an occupational gap, though not nearly as long as the previous one, between the Early Islamic settlement of stratum IV and the Crusader one of stratum III.
No city wall belonging to this Early Islamic settlement has been discovered, and the settlement seems to have been unfortified (Plans IV.2, IV.4). Indeed, the absence of such a wall, which would have served at the same time as a retaining wall, resulted in the complete erosion of the buildings which originally stood at the edge of the slope. This Early Islamic settlement was however not a sparsely populated one: the impression is of a centrally planned settlement, though it is not clear so far whether the excavated remains in area A represent part of an urban settlement extending over the entire surface of the mound, or whether this settlement was confined to the northwestern part of the mound. A final resolution of this question will be possible only after more extensive excavations in other parts of Tel Yoqne'am are carried out.
The ceramic evidence (see Chapter XIII) indicates that Stratum IV was constructed sometime in the second half of the 9th century CE. It may be connected with one of several efforts by Egyptian rulers to stabilize their control over the coastal zone of Palestine and adjacent regions. For much of this period the country experienced political instability, partly due to frequent conflicts between Egyptian rulers and their northern opponents.
| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area A4 |
Photo III.20
The destruction layer of the final Late Bronze Age city, looking south. Broken vessels and an ash layer are clearly visible. Note the accumulation of debris over remains of Stratum XIXa and below the foundations of Iron Age I walls (Stratum XVIII). click on image to explore in a new tab Ben-Tor et al. (2005b) |
|
| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area A1 |
|
| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area A |
|
Earthquake Archeological Effects (EAE)| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description(s) | Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area A4 |
Photo III.20
The destruction layer of the final Late Bronze Age city, looking south. Broken vessels and an ash layer are clearly visible. Note the accumulation of debris over remains of Stratum XIXa and below the foundations of Iron Age I walls (Stratum XVIII). click on image to explore in a new tab Ben-Tor et al. (2005b) |
|
|
Earthquake Archeological Effects (EAE)| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description(s) | Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area A1 |
|
|
Earthquake Archeological Effects (EAE)| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description(s) | Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area A |
|
|
Ben-Tor, A., Portugali, Y., & Avissar, M. (1979).
The Second Season of Excavations at Tel Yoqneʿam, 1978: Preliminary Report. Israel Exploration
Journal 29(2): 65–83. – at JSTOR
Ben-Tor, A., Portugali, Y., & Avissar, M. (1983).
The Third and Fourth Seasons of Excavations at Tel Yoqneʿam, 1979 and 1981: Preliminary Report.
Israel Exploration Journal 33(1/2): 30–54. – at JSTOR
Ben-Tor, A., Portugali, Y., & Avissar, M. (1996).
Yoqneʿam I: The Late Periods. Qedem Reports,
3, 1–262.
– at JSTOR
Ben-Tor, A., Zarzecki-Peleg, A., & Cohen-Anidjar,
S. (2005a). Yoqneʿam II: The Iron Age and the
Persian Period — Final Report of the
Archaeological Excavations (1977–1988).
Qedem Reports, 6, iii–421.
– at JSTOR
Ben-Tor, A., Ben-Ami, D., & Livneh, A.
(2005b). Yoqneʿam III: The Middle and Late
Bronze Ages — Final Report of the
Archaeological Excavations (1977–1988).
Qedem Reports, 7, III–435.
– at JSTOR
Ben-Tor, A. (1970). 'Atiqot 6: 9*–10*.
Ben-Tor, A. & Rosenthal, R. (1978). Israel Exploration Journal 28: 57–82.
Ben-Tor, A. et al. (1979). Israel Exploration Journal 29: 65–83.
Ben-Tor, A. (1983). Israel Exploration Journal 33: 30–54.
Ben-Tor, A. (1978). Revue Biblique 85: 96–100.
Ben-Tor, A. (1980). Biblical Archaeology Review 6/2: 30–44.
Ben-Tor, A. Recherches Archéologiques en Israel: 149–154.
Ben-Tor, A. (1987–1988). Excavations and Surveys in Israel 6: 103–106.
Ben-Tor, A. & Zarzeeld, A. (1988–1989). Excavations and Surveys in Israel 7–8: 195–196.
Applebaum, S. et al. (1981–1982). Scripta Classica Israelica 6: 100.
MdB 23 (1982): 38.
Hunt, M. L. (1985; 1991). The Iron Age Pottery of the Yokneam Regional Project (Ph.D. diss., Berkeley; Ann Arbor).
Weippert (1988). Ortsregister.
Poulin, J. (1989). MdB 61: 58–61.
Van Beek, G. W. (1991). Excavations and Surveys in Israel 10: 52, 170–171.
Van Beek, G. W. (1992). Anchor Bible Dictionary, vol. 3. New York: 676–678.
Van Beek, G. W. (1992). Eretz-Israel 23: 4*–9*.
Van Beek, G. W. (1996). Eretz-Israel 25: 1*–8*.
Van Beek, G. W. (1993). BATH. Jerusalem: 575–580.
Van Beek, G. W. (1997). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East, vol. 3. New York: 213–215.
Melson, W. G. & Van Beek, G. W. (1992). Geoarchaeology 7: 121–147.
Naveh, J. (1992). Atiqot 21: 49–53.
Milevski, I. (1993). Revista de Arqueologia 13/142: 60–61.
Tsoar, H. & Yekutieli, Y. (1993). Israel Journal of Earth-Sciences 41: 209–216.
Renz, J. (1995). Die Althebräischen Inschriften I (Handbuch der Althebräischen Epigraphik). Darmstadt: 176–177, 253–256, 443–445.
Reich, R. (1996). Eretz-Israel 25: 98*.
Wapnish, P. (1996). Retrieving the Past. Winona Lake, IN: 285–296.
Wapnish, P. (1997). The Hyksos: New Historical and Archaeological Perspectives, ed. E. D. Oren. Philadelphia: 336–367.
Lemaire, A. (1999). Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 115: 12–23.
Bienkowski, P. (2000). The Archaeology of Jordan and Beyond. Winona Lake, IN: 41–58.
Bietak, M. & Kopetzky, K. (2000). Synchronisation. Wien, vol. III.
Kolska Horowitz, L. & Milevski, I. (2001). Studies in the Archaeology of Israel and Neighboring Lands. Chicago, IL: 283–305.
Herzog, Z. (2003). Saxa Loquentur. Münster: 85–100.
Goren, Y. et al. (2004). Inscribed in Clay. Tel Aviv: 299–301.
Manuelli, F. (2004). Orient Express: 49–52.
Na'aman, N. (2004). N.A.B.U. 2004/3: 73.
Hassell, J. (2005). Levant 37: 133–162.