Layer | Date | Comments |
---|---|---|
3 | Byzantine | layer of greenish-gray clay, very compact and strongly mixed with plant materials (wood, herbs, etc.) and some bones of small animals (birds, goats, etc.). This deposit, homogeneous, laminated, and thick of about 1.50 m, is the result of an accumulation by settling in an aqueous medium of suspended organic materials. It is particularly remarkable for the extraordinary amount of ceramic material it contained. In the excavated part alone, 232 ribbed jars, 25 pots, 8 lamps, etc. were collected, intact or broken. Many objects of glass, bronze and bone were associated with them, as well as 36 coins. All these objects were evenly distributed in height in the clay mass. They were therefore abandoned gradually, for the duration of the layer 3 |
2 | Umayyad | level of compact red clay soil mixed with small stones. This stratum, 0.25 to 0.30 m thick, completely covered layer 3. Practically horizontal, it was set up, like the previous one in an aquatic environment. It contained little material. This stratum was itself sealed by a small level (2A) of powdered mortar and boulders from the collapse of part of the ceiling. The blocks, sometimes bulky (80, 100 kg) were only slightly sunk into the red clay layer, indicating that the tank was dried up at the time of their fall, as the clay and underlying deposits had time to harden. |
1 | Umayyad | unlike the previous ones, this layer did not correspond to an accumulation in an aqueous medium and had kept a conical shape, the maximum thickness (0.60 m) being normally located above the opening of the tank. It was formed of dark brown earth, very loose, mixed with stones and especially bones of various animals (sheep, goats, etc.), sometimes remained in anatomical connection (legs, fragments of spine, etc.). The remains of a human skeleton were found mixed with these animal bones. The finds included two coins, a large quantity of ceramics and glass and above all a rich set of objects in bone, ivory, soapstone, and bronze. Fragments of Ionic capitals, window railings, frieze blocks, etc., from the facades of the sanctuary were also found. |
Rasson and Seigne (1989) reported on
excavations of a cistern at the
Temple of Zeus. Two distinct
seismic destruction events were
identified—one in the 7th century CE and another in the 8th.
The earlier event caused partial collapse of the cistern roof.
Beneath this collapse layer, ceramics from the
Umayyad period indicated the earthquake
likely struck in the mid-7th century CE.
Gawlikowski (1992:358) reported further
evidence for a 7th-century CE earthquake from a
vaulted corridor on the lower terrace,
where a herd of goats and a kid goat were buried. The presence of a
Byzantine coin with an Arab countermark
suggests the event occurred after the start of Muslim rule.
According to Gawlikowski, the age of a kid indicates that the
cataclysm took place in May–June
. These findings support the
interpretation that the earlier earthquake corresponds to the
Jordan Valley Quake(s).
Rasson and Seigne (1989) reported on
excavations of a
cistern beneath the
Temple of Zeus at Jerash. Two episodes of
seismic destruction were identified—
one in the 7th century CE, and a more violent one in the 8th.
The second collapse event left a destruction layer filled with
architectural fragments, animal bones,
and a human skeleton. Following this event, the cistern was
hermetically sealed and abandoned.
A rich set of objects
was uncovered beneath the collapse
layer, including ceramics dating up to the first half of the 8th
century CE and an Umayyad coin minted in Jerash between 694 and
710 CE. The destruction layer also included
fragments of Ionic capitals, window railings,
frieze blocks, etc., from the facades
of the sanctuary
.
Tholbecq (2000:154-155) describes what was likely a residential struture in the lower terrace of the Temple of Zeus
which had one occupation phase, "interrupted by what appears to have been a violent destruction of the building."
He further notes that "levels containing medieval ceramics were discovered beneath the collapse
of the eastern façade of the lower terrace," a finding that, in his view,
"implies that, as with the northern part of the hippodrome,
part of the monument survived the 8th-century earthquake and only collapsed much later". Based on this,
Tholbecq (2000:154-155) concludes that "in these various sectors [Hippodrome and Temple of Zeus],
the excavators in fact identified two levels of
violent destruction: the first appears to have resulted from military action (arrowheads), the second from an earthquake".
c) The Oval Plaza, excavated by G.L. Harding, was occupied by “Umayyad structures and remains from the Ayyubid-Mamluk period.”8 To my knowledge, the attribution of these ruins to the Ayyubid-Mamluk period is based solely on the associated ceramics. There is no doubt that these structures are related to the installations excavated in the lower temenos of the Sanctuary of Zeus. Based on our current knowledge, these structures seem to constitute the core of a medieval reoccupation in the heart of the ancient city.
8 L. Harding, The Antiquities of Jordan (1967), p. 81; F. Zayadine, Jerash Archaeological
Project, 1981–1983, I (Amman, 1986), p. 18: “(...) extensive occupation of the Umayyad
period was excavated by G.L. Harding in the oval Plaza, together with Ayyubid-Mamluk
remains.” Some photographs of these now-vanished buildings are preserved
at the Department of Antiquities (Amman).
9 J. Seigne, Special Report No. 1 for 1986, a lot of so-called Mamluk ceramics, unpublished.
10 J. Seigne, Special Report No. 7 for 1985, a lot of so-called Mamluk ceramics, unpublished.
11 J. Seigne, Special Report No. 3 for 1987, a lot of Mamluk ceramics (new
evidence for the dating of earthquakes at Jerash), unpublished.
12 J. Seigne, Special Report No. 5 for 1988, Mamluk ceramics, unpublished.
c) La place ovale, dégagée par G.L. Harding, était occupée par des établissements « omeyyades et des vestiges d’époque ayyoubide-mamelouke ».8 À ma connaissance, l’attribution de ces ruines à l’époque ayyoubide-mamelouke repose uniquement sur la céramique associée. Il ne fait pas de doute que ces structures sont à rapprocher des établissements fouillés dans le téménos inférieur du sanctuaire de Zeus. Dans l’état actuel de nos connaissances, ces structures semblent constituer le noyau d’une réinstallation médiévale au cœur de l’antique cité.
8 L. Harding, The Antiquities of Jordan (1967), p. 81 ; F. Zayadine, Jerash Archaeological
Project, 1981–1983, I (Amman, 1986), p. 18 : « (…) extensive occupation of the Umayyad
period was excavated by G.L. Harding in the oval Plaza, together with Ayyubid-Mamluk
remains. » Quelques photographies de ces bâtiments aujourd’hui disparus sont conservées
au Department of Antiquities (Amman).
9 J. Seigne, Rapport spécial n° 1 pour 1986, un lot de céramique dite mamelouke, non publié.
10 J. Seigne, Rapport spécial n° 7 pour 1985, un lot de céramique dite mamelouke, non publié.
11 J. Seigne, Rapport spécial n° 3 pour 1987, un lot de céramique mamelouke (nouvelles
évidences pour la datation des tremblements de terre survenus à Jérash), non publié.
12 J. Seigne, Rapport spécial n° 5 pour 1988, céramique mamelouke, non publié.
d) Some 200 meters south of the Temple of Zeus, the hippodrome has preserved a few signs of occupation from the same period. Medieval archaeological traces were observed in destruction layers located above rooms to the north and northeast of the building. This part of the structure was the last to collapse, following an earthquake. Based on the ceramics, Antoni Ostrasz did not rule out the possibility that the disaster occurred during the “Mamluk” period. These traces are evidence of a light, episodic presence, linked to agricultural activities which the excavator imagined were carried out in the northern third of the hippodrome by the inhabitants of the hamlet located further north.
À quelque deux cent mètres au sud du temple de Zeus, l’hippodrome a conservé quelques témoignages d’une occupation de la même époque. Les traces archéologiques médiévales ont été observées dans des niveaux de destruction situés au-dessus de chambres au nord et au nord-est du bâtiment. Cette partie de l’édifice est la dernière à s’être ruinée, suite à un tremblement de terre. Sur base de la céramique, Antoni Ostrasz n’excluait pas que la catastrophe ait pu se produire à l’époque « mamelouke ». Ces traces sont le témoignage d’une présence légère, épisodique, liée à des activités agricoles que le fouilleur imaginait avoir été pratiquées dans le tiers septentrional de l’hippodrome par les habitants du hameau situé plus au nord.
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
|
Cistern |
|
|
|
vaulted corridor of the lower terrace |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
|
architectural collapse from the facades of the sanctuary found in the Cistern |
|
|
|
the Cistern |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cistern |
|
VIII + | |
|
vaulted corridor of the lower terrace |
|
VIII + |
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
architectural collapse from the facades of the sanctuary found in the Cistern |
|
|
Gawlikowski, M. (1992). "Installations Omayyades à Jérash." Studies in the history and archaeology of Jordan.
Department of Antiquities, Amman, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan-Amman. Vol. 4 04.
Rasson, A.M. and Seigne, J. and (1989). "Une citerne byzantino-omeyyade
sur le sanctuaire de Zeus." Syria. Archéologie, Art et histoire: 117-151.
SEIGNE, Jacques. Limites des espaces sacrés antiques : permanences et évolutions, quelques exemples orientaux
In: Espaces sacrés dans la Méditerranée antique [online]. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2016
Tholbecq, L. (2000) Une installation d'époque médiévale dans la sanctuaire de Zeus de Jérash (Jordanie)
, in Sh. Abuzayd (Ed.), The Mamluks and the Early Ottoman Period in Bilad al-Sham: History and Archaeology,
Aram 8-9, 2000, p. 153-179.