Transliterated Name | Source | Name |
---|---|---|
Damiya | Arabic | |
Damieh | Arabic | |
Damiyeh | Arabic | |
Tall Damiyah | Arabic | |
Adam Ha-ir | Hebrew |
Petit & Kafafi (2016:18) note that
Tall Damiyah, located
in the Central Jordan Valley, is identified by most scholars with the historical city of
Adama,
an important town destroyed by Pharaoh Shoshenq I
in the late tenth century B.C.E.
They also note that
Adama is mentioned in the Old Testament along with sites like Sodom and Gomorrah, and was ruled by a
king.
However, as pointed out by Petit & Kafafi (2016:18),
the minute dimensions of Tell Damiyah – only a few hectares at its greatest extent – make this identification and
description, at least at first sight, not very likely
.
Tell Damiyah is identified by most scholars as Adama, a place name mentioned in two sources. According to the Old Testament (e.g., Gen. 14:2; Joshua 3:16), Adama is attested as an important royal town near one of the few fords of the Jordan River and close to Zarethan, Sodom, and Gomorra. Although the existence of the last two cities remains obscure, the biblical city of Zarethan has most frequently been located at Tell es-Sa’idiyeh (fig. 1). Adama is also mentioned on the victory stele of Shoshenq I in Karnak. Ths topographic list from the late tenth century B.C.E. enumerates the names of annexed towns in the Southern Levant (Kitchen 1973: 293–300). One of these towns happens to be ỉdmỉ, which is generally accepted to be Adama. Together with neighboring sites like Succoth, Penuel, and Mahanaim – all of these places are said to be located in the area immediately north of Tell Damiyah – this apparent town was captured and possibly destroyed. However, looking at the size of Tell Damiyah, one could question its identification as Adama. On the Tell itself, there seems to be only space for a few houses, let alone a city with a royal palace, and recent excavations at the foot of the Tell has not yet revealed evidence of a lower city. Thus, either the identification supported by most scholars is wrong, or the character of the site was different to what biblical and Egyptian sources described.
The archaeological site of Tall Damiyah is situated in the Zor, directly south of the confluence of the Zarqa and the Jordan Rivers (Lat. 32.1040000915527; Lon. 35.5466003417969). The site is surrounded from three sides by Katar-hills (the Ras Zaqqum, the Sha'sha'a and the Damiyah Katar), and is 500 meters east of the Jordan River. Across the river, on the western side, are the Jiftik and the Marj en-Najeh, which belong to the Nablus district of Palestine. Tall Damiyah is considered to be the most southern settlement which has Iron Age occupation in the Jordan Valley, other than tells (or tails) which are situated in oases (e.g. Jericho, Tall Nimrin and Tall Hammam). The site covers an area of approximately 3 hectares at the base, and has relatively steep slopes all around, rising approximately 17 meters above today's ground level. It consists of two parts; an upper tell and a lower terrace which occupies the western and southern sides. The upper tall in particular occupies a strategic position, and today overlooks the Prince Muhammad (General Al-Linbi) Bridge across the Jordan River. In addition, it dominates the N-S road through the Jordan Valley and the E-W road which connects ancient Ammon with the Wadi Far`ah. This area is very fertile and currently irrigated for intensive farming.
Victor Guerin was the first to recognize the importance of Tall Damiyah (Guerin 1869:238¬40), although others, such as Irby and Mangles in 1818, William Lynch in 1848 and Charles van de Velde in 1851 must have directly passed the site during their travels (Irby and Mangles 1823: 325-26; Lynch 1855: 249-50; Van de Velde 1854: 321). John William McGarvey, who visited the site in 1879, mentioned the ruins of a building on its summit near the eastern end (1881:350). He was also one of the first scholars to equate Tall Damiyah with Adam(ah), a city mentioned several times in the Old Testament (e.g. Joshua 3:16, I Kings 7:46, II Chr. 4:17) and on the victory stele of Shoshenq I in Karnak. From 1880 onwards, the site was visited and surveyed many times (e.g. Albright 1926: 47; Glueck 1951: 329-31; Yassine et al. 1988: 191). The survey teams found pottery from the following major periods: LB II, Iron I, Iron II, Persian, Early Roman, Byzantine and Islamic.
Age | Dates | Comments |
---|---|---|
Early Bronze IA-B | 3300-3000 BCE | |
Early Bronze II | 3000-2700 BCE | |
Early Bronze III | 2700-2200 BCE | |
Middle Bronze I | 2200-2000 BCE | EB IV - Intermediate Bronze |
Middle Bronze IIA | 2000-1750 BCE | |
Middle Bronze IIB | 1750-1550 BCE | |
Late Bronze I | 1550-1400 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIA | 1400-1300 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIB | 1300-1200 BCE | |
Iron IA | 1200-1150 BCE | |
Iron IB | 1150-1100 BCE | |
Iron IIA | 1000-900 BCE | |
Iron IIB | 900-700 BCE | |
Iron IIC | 700-586 BCE | |
Babylonian & Persian | 586-332 BCE | |
Early Hellenistic | 332-167 BCE | |
Late Hellenistic | 167-37 BCE | |
Early Roman | 37 BCE - 132 CE | |
Herodian | 37 BCE - 70 CE | |
Late Roman | 132-324 CE | |
Byzantine | 324-638 CE | |
Early Arab | 638-1099 CE | Umayyad & Abbasid |
Crusader & Ayyubid | 1099-1291 CE | |
Late Arab | 1291-1516 CE | Fatimid & Mameluke |
Ottoman | 1516-1917 CE | |
Phase | Dates | Variants |
---|---|---|
Early Bronze IA-B | 3400-3100 BCE | |
Early Bronze II | 3100-2650 BCE | |
Early Bronze III | 2650-2300 BCE | |
Early Bronze IVA-C | 2300-2000 BCE | Intermediate Early-Middle Bronze, Middle Bronze I |
Middle Bronze I | 2000-1800 BCE | Middle Bronze IIA |
Middle Bronze II | 1800-1650 BCE | Middle Bronze IIB |
Middle Bronze III | 1650-1500 BCE | Middle Bronze IIC |
Late Bronze IA | 1500-1450 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIB | 1450-1400 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIA | 1400-1300 BCE | |
Late Bronze IIB | 1300-1200 BCE | |
Iron IA | 1200-1125 BCE | |
Iron IB | 1125-1000 BCE | |
Iron IC | 1000-925 BCE | Iron IIA |
Iron IIA | 925-722 BCE | Iron IIB |
Iron IIB | 722-586 BCE | Iron IIC |
Iron III | 586-520 BCE | Neo-Babylonian |
Early Persian | 520-450 BCE | |
Late Persian | 450-332 BCE | |
Early Hellenistic | 332-200 BCE | |
Late Hellenistic | 200-63 BCE | |
Early Roman | 63 BCE - 135 CE | |
Middle Roman | 135-250 CE | |
Late Roman | 250-363 CE | |
Early Byzantine | 363-460 CE | |
Late Byzantine | 460-638 CE | |
Early Arab | 638-1099 CE | |
Crusader & Ayyubid | 1099-1291 CE | |
Late Arab | 1291-1516 CE | |
Ottoman | 1516-1917 CE | |
remains of of an older, rectangular buildingwas discovered with wide walls made of square clay bricks. Petit & Kafafi (2020:52-54) report that
although not burnt, collapse debris suggest some sort of destruction, although the team could not exclude deliberate dismantling.They also report the discovery of broken pottery -
sherds of a large pithos(a storage container >1 m in diameter) found on the floor and painted
with a “tree of life” and two bulls or zebus. Petit & Kafafi (2018b:35-36) report that
the wall and associated finds, such as a typical Iron Age II bowl, were dated to the 8th century B.C. (Fig. 31).
The most extensively excavated occupation phase on the summit (Stratum VII) dates provisionally to Iron Age IIc – around 700 B.C.E. – and consists of at least two mud brick buildings (fig. 5). Both structures were completely destroyed by a very intense fire, and a thick debris layer sealed off all utensils on the floors and surfaces. The reason for this seemingly site-wide destruction is unclear, but a similar event seems to have been detected at Tell Deir ‘Alla (Phase VII) and Tell al-Mazar (Phase V). The remains at Tell Damiyah were unfortunately heavily damaged in post Iron Age times, the latest disturbance being by a bulldozer in the early 2000’s. A few more buildings can be expected towards the north and west of these structures, but all together the settled area during Iron Age IIc is intriguingly small.
Excavation work at the site, headed by the author, was conducted from the 30th of September until the 8th of November 2012. ... four excavation units were opened: three 5x5m squares and one 5x4m trench (fig. 3).
Excavation work at Tall Dāmiyah continued in the autumn of 2015, between October 4 and November 5. ... The work was carried out in two areas: Area A on the summit (Squares IV, VIII, IX and XII) and Area B on the western lower terrace (Squares XIII and XIV) (Fig. 2).
A few skeletons from the Ottoman and Byzantine Period were excavated during this season, most of them discovered during the removal of the baulks. Two Ottoman graves were encountered and studied in Square VII; both were covered by stone slabs (Fig. 3). The discovery of an Ottoman pipe in the fill above these slabs in 2014 dates those burials to the latest occupation phase at Tall Dāmiyah. Over the five seasons, more than 50 skeletons have been carefully excavated and studied; results will be published in the nearby future.
The identification of Adama in biblical and Egyptian sources as an important town (Petit and Kafafi 2016), does not fit the situation found at Tall Dāmiyah, a small settlement mound with space for only a few buildings. Either the identification is wrong, or the remains of the town must be located elsewhere; for example, at the foot of the ‘acropolis’. Two squares were opened at the elevated south-western foot of Tall Dāmiyah (Fig. 2). Historical photographs suggest that it is part of a peninsula of white Qatar material that connect Tall Dāmiyah with the eastern Qatar hills.
The excavation results of 2015 at Tall Dāmiyah have resulted in a better picture of the occupation during the late 8th and 7th century BC, as well as of the occupation remains at the foot of the settlement mound. Although heavily disturbed by Persian and Hellenistic pits, as well as later burials, the remains of two rectangular buildings on the summit, dated to the Late Iron Age, were further investigated. A clear relationship existed with the NeoAssyrian Empire, as well as with Ammon and the western areas. However, the role Tall Dāmiyah played in this period is still unknown, and needs further research. Was this building some sort of trading post, or an Assyrian fort, as was previously thought (Petit 2009a)? Or was Tall Dāmiyah a religious centre with the white-plastered building functioning as a sanctuary? The material culture especially, such as the complete figurines, statues and animal skulls, are strong evidence to assume religious activities at the site. However, in contemporary layers, especially in and around the southern building, cooking pots and loom weights were found, implying that around 700 BC, Tall Dāmiyah was more than just a sanctuary. At least in the southern building, people were living, hunting, farming, producing textiles and possibly trading.
Excavations in 2016 were carried out in three squares on the summit and aimed at investigating the southwestern corner of the sanctuary, unravelling its relationship with a domestic building located to the south, and studying older occupation phases. The area southwest of the sanctuary was unfortunately heavily disturbed by later burials and pits, making it hard to add new information to the already existing plan (Petit and Kafafi 2016: Figure 5). It is, however, clear from results encountered during previous seasons that this area was part of a street or courtyard between the sanctuary and the southern domestic building. Part of it was most likely roofed since several clay loom weights were encountered on the surface in 2016 (Fig. 32). The complete difference of the inventories of the two buildings is intriguing. It is suggested here that the southern building was primarily used as a living area, whereas the main rectangular building on the summit was intended for cultic purposes. Some of the finds from this phase, such as an Iron Age I figurine, advocate that Tall Damiyah was also used as a cultic place before Iron Age IIC.
In the autumn of 2018, the RMO and the Jordanian Yarmouk University organized the eighth excavation season at Tell Damiyah. This time most attention was paid to the layers beneath the sanctuary of 700 BC. Due to the strategic and special location of the site, the archaeologists suspected that Tell Damiyah had also been built earlier, i.e. in the early eighth century BC, had a religious function. Beneath the sanctuary, the archaeologists found the remains of an older, rectangular building. The walls were wide and made of square clay bricks. Unlike the later sanctuary, this structure had a main entrance on the north side. On the floor were the shards of a gigantic earthenware storage vessel with a diameter of more than one meter (fig. 7 - same photo as Fig. 2 of Petit & Kafafi, 2020). The red and black painting, mainly animal and plant motifs, is very similar to the decoration on a jar found in a shrine in the south of Israel. More research needs to be done on this building, but it is likely that Tell Damiyah was indeed used for a long time as a religious center for travelers and traders.
Excavations at Tall Damiyah were resumed during the falls of 2018 and 2019. These field seasons had two aims: to investigate the role of Tall Damiyah during earlier phases and to determine the extent of the Iron Age IIC sanctuary. In order to reach the second goal, the Jordanian-Dutch team opened several squares north of the main sanctuary building. First considered to be a freestanding construction, this turned out to be part of an extensive complex that had covered large parts of the summit. Not only was the main cultic room with the two altars destroyed by fire, the newly discovered rooms also showed traces of burning. Unfortunately, many graves and Persian-Hellenistic pits had wreaked havoc on these Iron Age layers, destroying much of the original floor deposits. Nevertheless, the team was able to uncover three additional rooms and a possible courtyard. Two of the rooms were in use for storage (Fig. 1). Numerous large kraters filled with burnt organic material, such as barley, were found in these rooms, preserved considerably well under a thick burnt debris layer. Other items, such as metal sickles and knives, suggest that the few occupants of Tall Damiyah were not only storing food but also harvesting. It is to be investigated whether this surplus was a donation of worshippers, was used for feeding visitors, or was a stockpile for the inhabitants to overcome arid periods. Much of the evidence point to a function as a caravanserai, where traders and travelers could eat, sleep, and worship.
In this study, we investigate quartz-based luminescence optical dating of Iron Age deposits at the archaeological site of Tell Damiyah in the Jordan valley. Ten samples, taken from different occupation layers from two different excavation areas, proved to have good luminescence characteristics (fast-component dominated, dose recovery ratio 1.032 ± 0.010, n=24). The optical ages are completely consistent with both available 14C ages and ages based on stylistic elements; it appears that this material was fully reset at deposition, although it is recognised that the agreement with age control is somewhat dependent on the assumed field water content of the samples. Further comparison with different OSL signals from feldspar, or investigations based on dose distributions from individual grains would be desirable to independently confirm the resetting of this material. It is concluded that the sediments of Tell Damiyah are very suitable for luminescence dating. Despite the relatively large associated age uncertainties of between 5 and 10%, OSL at tell sites has the potential to provide ages for material very difficult to date by conventional methods, and to identify reworked mixtures of older artifacts in a younger depositional setting.
Tell Damiyah is located ~500 m east of the Jordan River in the Zor region and is surrounded by the Katar Hills (Figure 1). Tell Damiyah is an exceptional archaeological site for the Central Jordan valley; it is one of the few which show evidence of continuous occupation during the Iron Ages (1200–600 BCE) (Petit and Kafafi 2016). Other sites, such as the nearby Tell Deir ‘Alla, reveal numerous occupational gaps, e.g. in the 10th and 8th century BCE (van der Kooij 2001). These periods without anthropogenic activity are simultaneous with dry climate stages, and it is argued elsewhere that the occupational pattern in the central Jordan Valley is closely related to these environmental factors (Petit 2009). Iron Age sites in this area are located mainly along major routes such as the North-South road through the Jordan Valley (Figure 1) and especially along the East-West road between ancient Ammon and the Wadi Far’ah. Tell Damiyah seems to have been a central point on these routes, close to one of the few fords across the Jordan River. Recent excavation results suggest that the apparently continuous occupation history of Tell Damiyah had much to do with a cultic function of this site. The small settlement seems to have remained occupied even during periods of harsh climate and after destructive earthquakes (Petit and Kafafi 2016, 2018; Kafafi and Petit 2018).
Calculated equivalent doses and ages from the two profiles are listed in Table 3. Random uncertainties (σr) are based primarily on OSL and gamma ray counting statistics, and OSL curve fitting (Duller 2007). The systematic uncertainties (σsys), shared across all samples, originate from gamma spectrometry calibration, beta source calibration and water content estimates.
The luminescence characteristics of quartz extracted from these geo-archaeological sediments are very satisfactory. The OSL signal is dominated by the fast-component, and when used with a SAR protocol, it shows good recycling (0.971 ± 0.009; n=292) and low recuperation (2.0 ± 0.4% of the natural signal; n=292). The dose recovery ratio of 1.032 ± 0.010 (n=24) indicates that our chosen protocol is able to accurately measure a known dose given before any prior thermal treatment. Thus we have no reason to doubt the accuracy of our measured doses. The resulting OSL ages (Table 3) for each unit are, on average, in excellent agreement with expectations (OSL age /expected age = 0.99 ± 0.01; n=5), with 4 out of 5 expected ages lying within the 66% confidence interval of the corresponding OSL age. The largest deviation between OSL and expectation is 8% for Phase V (OSL 2.45 ± 0.11 ka compared with an expected age of 2.65 ka); in this case the expected age still lies within the 95% confidence interval of the OSL age.
is consistent and clearly Iron Age IIC, including a number of Assyrian Palace Ware and Ammonite sherds. Radiocarbon dates and OSL dates from Stratum VII dated to 2.80 ± 0.02 ka (n=4) cal BP and 2.82 ± 0.17 ka respectively ( al Khasawneh et al., 2020:8).
the average age of the two OSL samples taken from Phase VII and attributed to the sanctuary structure is 2.82 ± 0.17 kaand
the average of the 14C ages from the same unitwas 2.80 ± 0.02 ka (n=4) cal BP. The radiocarbon dates were not Bayesian modeled and the OSL dates were sensitive to an estimated lifetime burial water content in the sediments (20 ± 5%) - for every 1% increase in water content, there is a a 1% increase in age.
The most extensively excavated occupation phase on the summit (Stratum VII) dates provisionally to Iron Age IIc – around 700 B.C.E. – and consists of at least two mud brick buildings (fig. 5). Both structures were completely destroyed by a very intense fire, and a thick debris layer sealed off all utensils on the floors and surfaces. The reason for this seemingly site-wide destruction is unclear, but a similar event seems to have been detected at Tell Deir ‘Alla (Phase VII) and Tell al-Mazar (Phase V). The remains at Tell Damiyah were unfortunately heavily damaged in post Iron Age times, the latest disturbance being by a bulldozer in the early 2000’s. A few more buildings can be expected towards the north and west of these structures, but all together the settled area during Iron Age IIc is intriguingly small.
Excavation work at the site, headed by the author, was conducted from the 30th of September until the 8th of November 2012. ... four excavation units were opened: three 5x5m squares and one 5x4m trench (fig. 3).
Excavation work at Tall Dāmiyah continued in the autumn of 2015, between October 4 and November 5. ... The work was carried out in two areas: Area A on the summit (Squares IV, VIII, IX and XII) and Area B on the western lower terrace (Squares XIII and XIV) (Fig. 2).
A few skeletons from the Ottoman and Byzantine Period were excavated during this season, most of them discovered during the removal of the baulks. Two Ottoman graves were encountered and studied in Square VII; both were covered by stone slabs (Fig. 3). The discovery of an Ottoman pipe in the fill above these slabs in 2014 dates those burials to the latest occupation phase at Tall Dāmiyah. Over the five seasons, more than 50 skeletons have been carefully excavated and studied; results will be published in the nearby future.
The identification of Adama in biblical and Egyptian sources as an important town (Petit and Kafafi 2016), does not fit the situation found at Tall Dāmiyah, a small settlement mound with space for only a few buildings. Either the identification is wrong, or the remains of the town must be located elsewhere; for example, at the foot of the ‘acropolis’. Two squares were opened at the elevated south-western foot of Tall Dāmiyah (Fig. 2). Historical photographs suggest that it is part of a peninsula of white Qatar material that connect Tall Dāmiyah with the eastern Qatar hills.
The excavation results of 2015 at Tall Dāmiyah have resulted in a better picture of the occupation during the late 8th and 7th century BC, as well as of the occupation remains at the foot of the settlement mound. Although heavily disturbed by Persian and Hellenistic pits, as well as later burials, the remains of two rectangular buildings on the summit, dated to the Late Iron Age, were further investigated. A clear relationship existed with the NeoAssyrian Empire, as well as with Ammon and the western areas. However, the role Tall Dāmiyah played in this period is still unknown, and needs further research. Was this building some sort of trading post, or an Assyrian fort, as was previously thought (Petit 2009a)? Or was Tall Dāmiyah a religious centre with the white-plastered building functioning as a sanctuary? The material culture especially, such as the complete figurines, statues and animal skulls, are strong evidence to assume religious activities at the site. However, in contemporary layers, especially in and around the southern building, cooking pots and loom weights were found, implying that around 700 BC, Tall Dāmiyah was more than just a sanctuary. At least in the southern building, people were living, hunting, farming, producing textiles and possibly trading.
Excavations in 2016 were carried out in three squares on the summit and aimed at investigating the southwestern corner of the sanctuary, unravelling its relationship with a domestic building located to the south, and studying older occupation phases. The area southwest of the sanctuary was unfortunately heavily disturbed by later burials and pits, making it hard to add new information to the already existing plan (Petit and Kafafi 2016: Figure 5). It is, however, clear from results encountered during previous seasons that this area was part of a street or courtyard between the sanctuary and the southern domestic building. Part of it was most likely roofed since several clay loom weights were encountered on the surface in 2016 (Fig. 32). The complete difference of the inventories of the two buildings is intriguing. It is suggested here that the southern building was primarily used as a living area, whereas the main rectangular building on the summit was intended for cultic purposes. Some of the finds from this phase, such as an Iron Age I figurine, advocate that Tall Damiyah was also used as a cultic place before Iron Age IIC.
In the autumn of 2018, the RMO and the Jordanian Yarmouk University organized the eighth excavation season at Tell Damiyah. This time most attention was paid to the layers beneath the sanctuary of 700 BC. Due to the strategic and special location of the site, the archaeologists suspected that Tell Damiyah had also been built earlier, i.e. in the early eighth century BC, had a religious function. Beneath the sanctuary, the archaeologists found the remains of an older, rectangular building. The walls were wide and made of square clay bricks. Unlike the later sanctuary, this structure had a main entrance on the north side. On the floor were the shards of a gigantic earthenware storage vessel with a diameter of more than one meter (fig. 7 - same photo as Fig. 2 of Petit & Kafafi, 2020). The red and black painting, mainly animal and plant motifs, is very similar to the decoration on a jar found in a shrine in the south of Israel. More research needs to be done on this building, but it is likely that Tell Damiyah was indeed used for a long time as a religious center for travelers and traders.
Excavations at Tall Damiyah were resumed during the falls of 2018 and 2019. These field seasons had two aims: to investigate the role of Tall Damiyah during earlier phases and to determine the extent of the Iron Age IIC sanctuary. In order to reach the second goal, the Jordanian-Dutch team opened several squares north of the main sanctuary building. First considered to be a freestanding construction, this turned out to be part of an extensive complex that had covered large parts of the summit. Not only was the main cultic room with the two altars destroyed by fire, the newly discovered rooms also showed traces of burning. Unfortunately, many graves and Persian-Hellenistic pits had wreaked havoc on these Iron Age layers, destroying much of the original floor deposits. Nevertheless, the team was able to uncover three additional rooms and a possible courtyard. Two of the rooms were in use for storage (Fig. 1). Numerous large kraters filled with burnt organic material, such as barley, were found in these rooms, preserved considerably well under a thick burnt debris layer. Other items, such as metal sickles and knives, suggest that the few occupants of Tall Damiyah were not only storing food but also harvesting. It is to be investigated whether this surplus was a donation of worshippers, was used for feeding visitors, or was a stockpile for the inhabitants to overcome arid periods. Much of the evidence point to a function as a caravanserai, where traders and travelers could eat, sleep, and worship.
The ninth excavation season at Tall Dāmiyah took place from the 29th of September until the 31st of October, 2019. It was a joint project between the Dutch National Museum of Antiquities, represented by Lucas Petit, and the Yarmouk University, represented by Zeidan Kafafi. Work was carried out in 5 squares on the summit of the tall. The main goal was to study the late 8th and 7th century BC levels and to relate the findings to other Iron Age sites in the vicinity. During the 2019 season adjacent rooms of the sanctuary were excavated resulting in the discovery of the main storage area of the complex. The team encountered numerous restorable vessels that were used to store mainly organic material such as barley and wheat. In the most northern squares late Iron Age layers were investigated, suggesting that after the destructive conflagration in the early 7th century BC, people remained at the site. During the 2019 season also some Persian-Hellenistic silos and Byzantine and Ottoman period graves were investigated
In this study, we investigate quartz-based luminescence optical dating of Iron Age deposits at the archaeological site of Tell Damiyah in the Jordan valley. Ten samples, taken from different occupation layers from two different excavation areas, proved to have good luminescence characteristics (fast-component dominated, dose recovery ratio 1.032 ± 0.010, n=24). The optical ages are completely consistent with both available 14C ages and ages based on stylistic elements; it appears that this material was fully reset at deposition, although it is recognised that the agreement with age control is somewhat dependent on the assumed field water content of the samples. Further comparison with different OSL signals from feldspar, or investigations based on dose distributions from individual grains would be desirable to independently confirm the resetting of this material. It is concluded that the sediments of Tell Damiyah are very suitable for luminescence dating. Despite the relatively large associated age uncertainties of between 5 and 10%, OSL at tell sites has the potential to provide ages for material very difficult to date by conventional methods, and to identify reworked mixtures of older artifacts in a younger depositional setting.
Tell Damiyah is located ~500 m east of the Jordan River in the Zor region and is surrounded by the Katar Hills (Figure 1). Tell Damiyah is an exceptional archaeological site for the Central Jordan valley; it is one of the few which show evidence of continuous occupation during the Iron Ages (1200–600 BCE) (Petit and Kafafi 2016). Other sites, such as the nearby Tell Deir ‘Alla, reveal numerous occupational gaps, e.g. in the 10th and 8th century BCE (van der Kooij 2001). These periods without anthropogenic activity are simultaneous with dry climate stages, and it is argued elsewhere that the occupational pattern in the central Jordan Valley is closely related to these environmental factors (Petit 2009). Iron Age sites in this area are located mainly along major routes such as the North-South road through the Jordan Valley (Figure 1) and especially along the East-West road between ancient Ammon and the Wadi Far’ah. Tell Damiyah seems to have been a central point on these routes, close to one of the few fords across the Jordan River. Recent excavation results suggest that the apparently continuous occupation history of Tell Damiyah had much to do with a cultic function of this site. The small settlement seems to have remained occupied even during periods of harsh climate and after destructive earthquakes (Petit and Kafafi 2016, 2018; Kafafi and Petit 2018).
Calculated equivalent doses and ages from the two profiles are listed in Table 3. Random uncertainties (σr) are based primarily on OSL and gamma ray counting statistics, and OSL curve fitting (Duller 2007). The systematic uncertainties (σsys), shared across all samples, originate from gamma spectrometry calibration, beta source calibration and water content estimates.
The luminescence characteristics of quartz extracted from these geo-archaeological sediments are very satisfactory. The OSL signal is dominated by the fast-component, and when used with a SAR protocol, it shows good recycling (0.971 ± 0.009; n=292) and low recuperation (2.0 ± 0.4% of the natural signal; n=292). The dose recovery ratio of 1.032 ± 0.010 (n=24) indicates that our chosen protocol is able to accurately measure a known dose given before any prior thermal treatment. Thus we have no reason to doubt the accuracy of our measured doses. The resulting OSL ages (Table 3) for each unit are, on average, in excellent agreement with expectations (OSL age /expected age = 0.99 ± 0.01; n=5), with 4 out of 5 expected ages lying within the 66% confidence interval of the corresponding OSL age. The largest deviation between OSL and expectation is 8% for Phase V (OSL 2.45 ± 0.11 ka compared with an expected age of 2.65 ka); in this case the expected age still lies within the 95% confidence interval of the OSL age.
Effect | Location | Image (s) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Broken or Crushed Pottery | Area A - beneath the Stratum VII sanctuary
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 2
Contour map of Tell Damiyah with excavation areas Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fragments of a painted pithos [large storage container] on the floor of a rectangular freestanding building. JW: This is the same photo as shown in Fig. 7 of Petit & Kafafi (2019) Petit & Kafafi (2020) |
|
Crushed Pottery | Area A - beneath the Stratum VII sanctuary ?
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 2
Contour map of Tell Damiyah with excavation areas Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 31
Fig. 31
A crushed pottery bowl found next to the remains of a mudbrick building. In the left corner are the remains of a tabun (photo courtesy of Lucas Petit) Petit & Kafafi (2018) |
|
Effect | Location | Image (s) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Destruction Layer and Fire | Area A - Sanctuary and Domestic Structure
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 5
Top plan of the Iron Age IIc occupation (Stratum VII) at Tell Damiyah Drawing by Lucas Petit Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Comments
|
|
Collapsed Roof and Fallen Roof Roller | Area A - Sanctuary
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 5
Top plan of the Iron Age IIc occupation (Stratum VII) at Tell Damiyah Drawing by Lucas Petit Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
White Plastered Wall and the Roof Roller from the 7th Century BC Kafafi & Petit (2018) Fig. 11
Fig. 11
A stone roof roller from roof debris in square VIII. Petit (2013) |
Comments
|
Broken or Crushed Pottery | Area A - Domestic structure
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 5
Top plan of the Iron Age IIc occupation (Stratum VII) at Tell Damiyah Drawing by Lucas Petit Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
One of the storage rooms in the east part of the late Iron Age complex Petit & Kafafi (2020) |
|
Effect | Location | Image (s) | Comments | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Broken or Crushed Pottery | Area A - beneath the Stratum VII sanctuary
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 2
Contour map of Tell Damiyah with excavation areas Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fragments of a painted pithos [large storage container] on the floor of a rectangular freestanding building. JW: This is the same photo as shown in Fig. 7 of Petit & Kafafi (2019) Petit & Kafafi (2020) |
|
VII + |
Crushed Pottery | Area A - beneath the Stratum VII sanctuary ?
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 2
Contour map of Tell Damiyah with excavation areas Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 31
Fig. 31
A crushed pottery bowl found next to the remains of a mudbrick building. In the left corner are the remains of a tabun (photo courtesy of Lucas Petit) Petit & Kafafi (2018) |
|
VII + |
Effect | Location | Image (s) | Comments | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Destruction Layer and Fire | Area A - Sanctuary and Domestic Structure
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 5
Top plan of the Iron Age IIc occupation (Stratum VII) at Tell Damiyah Drawing by Lucas Petit Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Comments
|
VIII + | |
Collapsed Roof and Fallen Roof Roller | Area A - Sanctuary
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 5
Top plan of the Iron Age IIc occupation (Stratum VII) at Tell Damiyah Drawing by Lucas Petit Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
White Plastered Wall and the Roof Roller from the 7th Century BC Kafafi & Petit (2018) Fig. 11
Fig. 11
A stone roof roller from roof debris in square VIII. Petit (2013) |
Comments
|
VII + |
Broken or Crushed Pottery | Area A - Domestic structure
Figure 4 Inset
Location of squares in red (dark gray in this black and white image) Drawing by Muwaffaq Bataineh Petit et al. (2023)
Figure 5
Top plan of the Iron Age IIc occupation (Stratum VII) at Tell Damiyah Drawing by Lucas Petit Petit & Kafafi (2016) |
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
One of the storage rooms in the east part of the late Iron Age complex Petit & Kafafi (2020) |
|
VII + |
Al Khasawneh, S., Murray, A., Kafafi, Z., & Petit, L. (2020). Luminescence Dating of the Iron Age Deposits from Tell Damiyah in the Jordan Valley
. Radiocarbon, 62(1), 1-12.
Kafafi, Zeidan & Petit, Lucas (2018) Lucas Recycling the Valley Preliminary Report: Tall Damiyah Excavations 2014
Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 59
Petit, L. P., (2009) Settlement Dynamics in the Middle Jordan Valley during the Iron Age II. British
Archaeological Reports: International Series 2033. - accessible at the Getty
Petit, Lucas (2013) Recycling the Valley Preliminary report of the 2012 excavations at Tall Dāmiyah
Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 57
Petit, Lucas & Kafafi, Zeidan (2016). Beyond the River Jordan: A Late Iron Age Sanctuary at Tell Damiyah.
Near Eastern Archaeology, 79(1), 18–26.
Petit, Lucas & Kafafi, Zeidan (2018b). Tall Damiyah (2016-2017)
ACOR pp. 35-36
Petit, Lucas & Kafafi, Zeidan Lucas (2018a) Recycling the Valley: Preliminary Report of the 2015 Excavations at Tall Damiyah
Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 59
Petit, Lucas & Kafafi, Zeidan (2019) Tell Damiyah - Een onopgemerkt pareltje in de Jordaanvallei
RMO magazine nummer 47 voorjaar 2019
Petit, Lucas & Kafafi, Zeidan Lucas (2020) Tell Damiyah
ACOR Newsletter Archaeology in Jordan 2020
Petit, L. P., et al. (2023) Recycling the Valley Tall Damiyah Excavations 2019
Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 61
Ambraseys, N. and I. Karcz (1992). “The earthquake of 1546 in the Holy Landz” Terra Nova 4(2): 254-263.
Ambraseys, N. (2009). Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East: a multidisciplinary
study of seismicity up to 1900. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
Amiran, D. H. K., Arieh, E. and Turcotte,T. (1994). “Earthquakes in Israel and adjacent areas: macroseismic
observations since 100 B.C.E.” Israel Exploration Journal 44: 260-305.
Avni, R. (1999). The 1927 Jericho Earthquake. Comprehensive Macroseismic Analysis
Based on Contemporary Sources (in Hebrew). Beer Sheva, Israel, Ben Gurion University of the Negev.
Avni, R., et al. (2002). “Erroneous interpretation of historical documents related
to the epicenter of the 1927 Jericho earthquake in the Holy Land.” Journal of Seismology 6(4): 469-476.
Ben-Menahem, A. (1979). “Earthquake catalogue for the Middle East (92 BC-AD 1980)” B
ollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata 21: 245-313.
Braslavski, J. (1938), ‘The earthquake that blocked the Jordan in 1546’, Zion, 3 (4), 323-336.
Braslavski, J. (1956), ‘The earthquake of the year 1546’, Eretz Israel, Bull. Isr. Explor. Soc.,19,230-235.
Drew, C. and Han, W. (2010)
Dynamics of Wind Setdown at Suez and the Eastern Nile Delta, PLOS ONE -
open access at PLOS ONE
Kenyon, K. (1957). Digging up Jericho. London - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
Klein, S. (1939), ‘Remarks on the article by J. Braslavski’, Zion, N.S, 4, 90
Watson:, C. C. M. (1895). “The Stoppage of the River Jordan in A.D. 1267.”
Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly Statement: 253-261. - open access at Google Books