segregated by a perdition wall. The Mosque was built on top of an earlier structure - a bathhouse.
in chronological terms, occupational phases are well documented for the 7th-10th centuries, with scarcer bodies of evidence dating to the 11th-13th centuries available from the general excavation area, but with limited stratigraphic grounding.
Area | Description |
---|---|
MO | congregational mosque on the southwest corner of the Roman tetrakionion |
GO | adjoined domestic quarters to the west of MO |
SO | south of the mosque qibla wall in an alleyway bordering the ruins of the Roman macellum |
EA | eastern side of the main north-south thoroughfare |
ED | close to the eastern edge of the current antiquities area |
Phase | Date | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | ca. 725-735 CE | an event dated by post-reform Umayyad coinage and ceramics recovered from under-floor fills, and through a comparative study of other mosques datable from the seventh to tenth centuries AD. The building of a mosque could not commence until a three-hundred-year-plus bathhouse had been cleared from the site — which, above all, indicates that the social and commercial centrality of the position, rather than any previous sanctity, determined the choice of the location. |
2 | mid-eighth to mid-tenth/early-eleventh centuries AD | This phase, the longest and most complex of the three, sees numerous adaptations in the arrangement of space in and around the mosque and the probable function of these areas resulting from their redesign. The chronology of these changes is not as clear-cut as Phase 1, and there is no evidence to suggest that the different structural rearrangements happened as one event; rather, the changes would seem to represent a progressive and longterm alteration to the role and function of the mosque in central Jerash over several centuries. Sadly, the very disturbed condition of the archaeological deposits within the mosque enclosure was not conducive to providing a distinct stratigraphic framework for dating the Phase 2 (and Phase 3) changes; by and large, the chronology has been developed primarily from Hugh Barnes’s observed architectural sequence. The long history of Phase 2 ended with the catastrophic collapse of the prayer hall and the subsequent salvaging of building materials. During excavation, many pieces of ceramic roof tile were recovered from the prayer-hall area; only a few were discovered unbroken, suggesting the area was picked over to recover usable tile. finds associated with the collapse deposits, including a distinctive coarse-wear lamp found intact, suggests Phase 2 ended sometime in the late tenth to early/mid-eleventh centuries AD. |
3 | into the thirteenth century AD or later | A smaller occupation into the thirteenth century AD or later, based on finds recovered from the terminal phase of the mosque floor. Most of the evidence for this phase was recovered from the smaller western room of the prayer hall. The condition and function of the rest of the mosque enclosure area in Phase 3 is unclear due to the complete loss of archaeological deposits through erosion and later interventions. Phase 3 ended with the collapse of the roofing, followed by widespread evidence for subsequent stone removal, pit digging, and agricultural terracing, all of which entailed significant effort. It is about this time that the mamlūk-period mosque was built at the nearby village of suf, using spolia sourced from Jerash. In general terms, while stone removal and farming are activities usually associated with the setting up of a Circassian settlement in Jerash at the end of the nineteenth century, these activities should not be discounted as being practised earlier during Mamlūk and early Ottoman times (c. fourteenth/fifteenth centuries AD and later). |
Label | Period | Dates | Discussion |
---|---|---|---|
Material resilience and political novelties | ca. 650-749 CE |
Discussion
The surrender of north Jordan to the armies of `Umar in the 630ies left most of the urban principalities in the Jordan highlands and around the
Dead Sea largely untouched by the political upheavals of the day. At an archaeological level, a tangible divide between the old and the new
certainly escapes us (Avni 2014: 101-106; Walmsley 2007a: 46-47). |
|
The earthquake of 749 - and its aftermath | ca. 750-900 |
Discussion
available archaeological evidence from Jarash demonstrates that whereas the earthquake of 749 may have brought about destruction at an unprecedented scale,
local communities and civic institutions alike proved able to withstand and overcome the disaster that had befallen them. The congregational mosque was
rebuilt to match its former grandeur, in a form that remained in use for perhaps two centuries. As will be shown in more detail below, residential quarters
in Area GO underwent significant remodelling, seeing new and extensive housing structures erected that remained occupied until the end of the 9th century
at the very least. Commercial areas around the tetrakionion remained in use for a comparable span of time (Simpson 2008: 116), and while only partially
excavated, a large compound with spacious, paved rooms east of the crossing in Area EA also seems to have been reused (Blanke et al. 2010: 317-320).
Most recently, survey and excavation further afield from the mosque suggest that not only the centre, but also the city's entire southwest district
saw continuous occupation into at least the 9th century (Blanke et al. 2015: 236; Blanke forthcoming). |
|
Urban change, contraction, and dissolution | ca. 900-1000 CE |
Discussion
Following another round of structural collapse in the late 9th or early 10th century, the mosque was rebuilt to house a much more modest congregation, utilising only the westernmost third of the prayer hall, and leaving the spacious courtyard in a dilapidated state. Wall collapse clogged the laneway along the northwest perimeter wall of the mosque courtyard, blocking access from the main westward street, and was, apparently, never removed. Curiously enough, this collapse layer was not found in the passageway between the mosque's western entrance and its southwest corner, suggesting that access to the prayer hall from the residential units was maintained for a longer span of time. |
|
Dissolving urban fabrics | ca. 1000-1200 CE |
Discussion
Moving into the late 10th century and beyond, structural remains in the IJP excavation area in general come to a halt. The exact lifespan of the third
and final phase of the mosque still poses a series of questions, which will be addressed more thoroughly in a forthcoming article by Hugh Barnes and Alan Walmsley.
The cache of 12th-14th century Ayyubid and Mamluk wares retrieved from the mosque prayer hall derives from later intrusions (Walmsley et al. 2008: 134)
and bears no clear relation to the structure itself, which was, apparently, an abandoned ruin at this time. |
|
Subtle continuities: Jarash in the Early and Middle Islamic Ages |
Discussion
While a proper understanding of Jarash in succeeding centuries, namely during the Crusades and the Ayyubid and Mamluk periods, is still a work in progress, recent findings by the Northwest Quarter Project indicates the presence of agglomerated housing units, perhaps farmsteads, o n the plateau to the northwest (Lichtenberger and Raja 2016; Peterson 2017). Considered together with traces of Mamluk occupation in the southern part of the city near the Temple of Zeus (Tholbecq 1997-1998), there are certainly indications of continued activity throughout Jarash even in the Middle Islamic Period. |
Currently, excavation within GO numbers six 10 by 10 metres excavation units (GO/1-6) of which all but GO/3 have seen regular excavation over the years. As such, excavations within the GO constitute two separate areas, being GO/1-2 in the southeastern and GO/4-6 in the northeastern quadrant. The former has been excavated from 2005-2007, while investigations in the latter area started in 2007. So far, excavations within GO/4-6 have established a preliminary sequence of four consecutive building phases spanning the Late Umayyad-Early Abbasid periods
Phase | Period | Dates | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | unknown | unknown | |
2 | Early Abbasid | 800 - 850 CE | GO/4-5: The Later Phases (1-2) - Preliminary dating of phase 2 suggests mid/late 9th century AD, based on a number of Abbasid Kerbschnitt Ware sherds found whilst excavating the contents of the pit located in the northern courtyard, mentioned above. |
3/II | Abbasid | 750 - 800 CE | GO/6: Abbasid Foundations and Cistern - No architectural features within the rectangular GO/6 structure were identified, and excavation only encountered a thick and fairly uniform layer of building stones, stemming either from collapse or used as fill. |
3/I | Early Abbasid | 750 - 800 CE | GO/4-5-6: The Early Abbasid Levels (Phase 3/I-II) |
4 | Late Umayyad | 700- 750 CE | GO/4-5: The Late Umayyad House (Phase 4) - It should be noted that we have yet to properly verify the termination of the phase 4 structures as contemporary with the earthquake of 749, even though this seems a tempting link to draw from present evidence. |
Excavations in EA have confirmed the existence of shops along with a large building located east of the cardo, behind the shops. As such, the excavation area was quickly separated into two distinct areas. One area consists of the shops, the other, of the large building, which in the present article will be referred to as Building A.
Phase | Period | Dates | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | unknown | Construction of Building A - The building appears to have been emptied and partly reconstructed, making it difficult to determine the date of its original construction. Its origin may will be in the Umayyad period, although the possibility of an earlier date is not dismissed. The high proportion of tumble uncovered throughout the excavation of EA suggests to a potential second storey. | |
2 | Umayyad - Abbasid | Shops - Ceramic evidence from this shop suggests an occupation period ranging from the Umayyad to the Abbasid period. | |
3 | Abbasid | about the tenth century | Reconstruction of Building A - The dating of the reconstruction of Building A is, for now, set to the Abbasid period (about the tenth century), based on a characteristic piece of blue glazed ceramic that was found associated with wall 5's foundation trench, thus providing a terminus post quem. |
4 | Medieval | Reuse of Building A | |
5 | Modern | The top layers |
Sealed numismatic and ceramic finds have dated the construction of the bathhouse to the late third to early fourth century and its demise to the early eight century (Blanke et al. 2007: 196). The Central Baths went out of use when the area was redeveloped for the construction of a mosque.
... Excavations were carried out in an area covering 30 by 17 metres within five excavation units (MO/12, MO/16, MO/18, MO/19 and MO/21)
Phase | Period | Dates | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 |
numismatic and ceramic finds date the construction of the [central] bathhouse to the late 3rd or early 4th c. and suggest that it was dismantled in theearly 8th c. during the reorganization of the area for the construction of a congregational mosque.13
13 A coin of Elagabalus (r. 218–22 CE) in the bathhouse’s foundation along with a 3rd-c. ceramics assemblage provides the terminus post quem for the building’s construction (Blanke et al. 2007, 182). Umayyad-period pre-reform coins (ca. 660–80 CE) were retrieved from the last phases of use, and both pre- and post-reform coins were found in the infill of the hypocaust and the levelling done in preparation for the construction of the mosque (Blanke et al. 2007, 190–96). See also Walmsley 2018.
Built around AD 300, the Central Bathhouse took up a space almost equal to that of the mosque and comprised bathing rooms, a service area, a sizable public latrine, and street-side shops. The excavation of the bathhouse (2002–10) revealed how it developed through five main phases until demolished, leaving only the foundations that were filled in to create a strong platform for the mosque builders. The final phase of the bathhouse saw a building much reduced in size, with only few heated rooms in use and bathing reduced to individual bathtubs; however, the evidence recovered reveals that social practices in the bathhouse remained the same. Large numbers of ceramic sherds, bones, jewellery, coins, and gaming pieces reveal a lively bathing culture that continued without a break into the early Islamic period. The excavation of the Central Bathhouse and the careful study of its associated finds offer a rare opportunity to access the daily lives of the people who inhabited Jerash from Roman to early Islamic times, foreshadowing and providing vital information on the rise of the Islamic ḥammām.
The discovery of a row of shops along the eastern wall of the Phase-2 mosque (above), and in them a number of marble tablets with shopkeepers’ accounts in proficient Arabic, revealed the central role played by the mosque in the daily operation of the marketplace.Walmsley (2018:251) discussed the Residential Complex
To the west of the mosque, separated from it by a narrow street (fig. 16.8), a large residential complex has been exposed that existed well before the construction of the mosque and continued as residences, with successive modifications, contemporaneously with the mosque. The three courtyard buildings uncovered were constructed around a network of streets and directly connected to the mosque by way of doorways in the west enclosure wall, thereby revealing that this residential quarter was fully integrated in the life of the mosque, most notably in Phase 2
The congregational Mosque of Jerash was uncovered in the 2000s and is located in the south half of Jerash just north of the Oval Plaza. Rattenborg and Blanke (2017) and Walmsley and Daamgaard (2005) both date construction to ~725 CE. Barnes et al (2006:295) identified an apparent single event collapse layer in the Qiblat Hall of the Mosque but did not supply a date. The collapse layer appears to be related to a 9th-10th century collapse layer found in nearby excavations of the Southwest Hill. Thus it appears that there is only rebuilding evidence for a mid 8th century CE earthquake in the Umayyad Congregational Mosque and environs. Blanke et al (2010:320) wrote the following about the termination of Phase 4 in excavation area GO (GO/4-5) which uncovered shops and housing east of the congregational mosque.
GO/4-5: The Late Umayyad House (Phase 4) - It should be noted that we have yet to properly verify the termination of the phase 4 structures as contemporary with the earthquake of 749, even though this seems a tempting link to draw from present evidence.Blanke and Walmsley (2022:95-97) described the effects of the earthquake at the Umayyad Congregational Mosque and elsewhere in Jerash
In 749, after only a few decades of use, the mosque along with most of Jarash’s urban fabric was devastated by one or more massive seismic events.108 The damage caused by the earthquake and the following discontinuation of structures is well documented throughout Jarash and has led scholars to assume a total abandonment of the town – a sentiment that still lingers today.109 The excavations within north-west Jarash have generally identified a discontinuation after the mid-eighth century. This is evident, for example, in and around the North Theatre, the Artemis precinct and the Propylaeum Church, and further west on the plateau behind the Temple of Artemis and along sections of the south transverse street.110El-Isa (1985) noted that the Umayyad mosque [of Jerash] appears to have been demolished and removed and with a relic of its Mihrab the only indications left of its existence. This does not appear to refer to the Umayyad Mosque but to a a structure in northeastern Jerash that was discovered and identified as a mosque in 1981 (Naghawi, 1982) but whose identification is now considered
It is worth noting, however, that sporadic evidence of post-earthquake activities has been found throughout the town. Among these are a coin hoard found within the North Theatre which included a Ṭūlūnid dinar dated to 894 as well as ninth-to eleventh-century housing found south-east of the theatre’s exterior wall.111 Some traces of Abbāsid-period occupation of the Macellum adds to the evidence as does pottery finds that suggest some continuous activity in the Temple of Zeus.112
Yet the evidence for continuous occupation after 749 is by far the strongest in Jarash’s commercial and religious centre at the intersection of the two main thoroughfares and in the south-west district. Recent archaeological investigations in Jarash’s south-west district suggests that this area was crucial to maintaining the central functions of urban life and therefore, the financial investment in the restoration of the town and the efforts put towards reconstruction were concentrated here.113
After the earthquake of 749, the mosque was rebuilt to its former dimensions, but its main entrance was blocked as was its central miḥrāb.114 Instead, a new entrance was constructed on the axial street on the east side of the mosque, while a smaller doorway was set into the mosque’s western wall giving access to the porticoed courtyard with an ablution feature set immediately inside the doorway. The prayer hall was subdivided into two with a smaller section set apart in the western end. A new miḥrāb was constructed centrally in the shortened prayer hall, while another was added to the western enclosure. At some point a minaret was added to the north-east interior corner of the courtyard. Following the rebuilding of the mosque, shops were added to its east façade, just south of the new entrance and also across the axial street on its east side. Here, a large building that may have served an administrative purpose was rebuilt using the walls of an earlier building as foundations.115 The reconfiguation of the mosque marks not only a substantial investment in the built environment after 749, but also allows us to identify a reduction in the importance of the western section of the south transverse street. Instead, the mosque was now accessed from the markets (to the east) and the habitation (to the west).116Footnotes108 See summary of textual sources pertinent to this earthquake in Ambraseys, Earthquakes, 230–238.
109 Most recently in 2019, Lichtenberger and Raja have questioned the accuracy of the Islamic Jarash Project's interpretation of an extensive Abbasid-period rebuilding of the mosque. They have also questioned the results of the excavation of the Umayyad House on the north side of the south transverse street, which documented continuous usage into the ninth century Lichtenberger and Raja states that `for now, we need to return to the view that the earthquake of 749 indeed had a catastrophic impact on Jerash, and if anything survived, it was only a shadow of the city's former grandeur: Lichtenberger and Raja, `Defining borders', 282.
110 North theatre: Ball et al., `The North Decumanus', 365; Clark and Bowsher, `The Jerash north theatre'; the Artemis precinct and the Propylaeum Church: Brizzi et al., `Italian excavations at Jarash', 357-358; Plateau behind the Temple of Artemis: see, for example, Lichtenberger and Raja, `Defining borders'; the south transverse street: Barghouti, `Urbanization of Palestine and Jordan', 219-221.
111 Clark and Bowsher, `The Jerash north theatre', 237-238,241-243.
112 Macellum: Uscatescu and Martin Bueno, `The Macellum of Gerasa', 82-84; Uscatescu and Marot, `The Ancient Macellum of Gerasa', 297-299; Temple of Zeus: Bessard, `The urban economy', 411 and fig. 14.
113 Some of this ground is also covered in Blanke, 1Re)constructing Jarash' and in Rattenborg and Blanke, lard in the Islamic Ages'. See also Blanke, Abbasid Jerash Reconsidered'; Blanke et al., `The 2011 season of the Late Antique Jarash Project'; Blanke et al., `Excavation and magnetic prospection'; Blanke et al., A millennium of unbroken habitation'; Pappalardo, `The Late Antique Jerash Project'.
114 This paragraph is summarised from Walmsley, `Urbanism at Islamic Jarash', 248-250.
115 Blanke et al., ‘Changing cityscapes in central Jarash’; Rattenborg and Blanke, ‘Jaraš in the Islamic Ages’.
116 For the markets, see Simpson, ‘Market Buildings at Jarash’. For the habitation, see Rattenborg and Blanke, ‘Jaraš in the Islamic Ages’ and also work by Blanke reporting the usage of the southwest hilltop.
somewhat doubtful( Walmsley and Daamgaard, 2005:364) - i.e. the '1981' mosque is now thought not to have been a mosque.
Rattenborg and Blanke (2017:11) report the following:
The later phase of occupation in the domestic complexes, bracketed between 800-900, saw the addition of steps in several outer doorways to prevent refuse and accumulated soil on exterior surfaces from slipping into living quarters. This corroborates the long period of usage inferable from architectural alterations. Occupation was punctuated by another round of structural collapse, which is associated with the abandonment of two rooms in the northern wing of Building B and with the collapse and subsequent infilling of the subsurface compartment around the cistern shaft in the courtyard of the same structure. Finds of discarded fragments of reduction-fired roof tiles in subsurface packing of the latest phase of domestic occupation in Area GO can be associated with identical material retrieved from underneath a substantial wall collapse in the laneway between the mosque west wall and Building A, and suggest that the dwellings in Area GO may have had tiled roofs. These strata likely relate to the same event that marked the termination of the penultimate phase of the congregational mosque.Rattenborg and Blanke (2017:13) add:
Given the prolonged usage of the Area GO housing units and the nature of the subsequent collapse, this event should be dated to the latter half of the 9th century at the earliest, perhaps corresponding with the collapse of the residential units on the [Southwest] hilltop (Blanke forthcoming). Associated structural collapse, outside the mosque qiblat wall and within and around the domestic complexes to the east, is less imposing than the mid-8th century collapse layers, but a number of potentially significant earthquakes in the area are known from the late 9th and 10th centuries (see Ghawanmeh 1992: p. 56 Table I; Sbeinati et al. 2005: pp. 365-367 and Table II; also el-Isa 1985: pp. 232-233 and Table 1 JW: I suggest cross-checking catalogues of Ambraseys, 2009, Guidoboni et. al., 1994, and this one instead). Pottery finds from paved floors of GO Phase 3/II in Building A provides a good range of material characteristic of a late 8th — 9th century date with painted red terracotta and cream and pale orange wares well represented, accentuating the changing horizons of Early Islamic material culture (Walmsley 1995: 668; 2001b: 310). A nearly complete decorated Cream Ware jug was retrieved from below wall collapse overlying a paved floor in the eastern part of Building A. Comparable material is available from the Abbasid housings further north (Gawlikowski 1986: Plates XII-XIII; also Gawlikowski 1995), and finds further parallels e.g. in the assemblage from Area Z at Umm Qais (Gadara) (el-Khouri and Omoush 2015: 17-20).
Following another round of structural collapse in the late 9th or early 10th century, the mosque was rebuilt to house a much more modest congregation, utilising only the westernmost third of the prayer hall, and leaving the spacious courtyard in a dilapidated state. Wall collapse clogged the laneway along the northwest perimeter wall of the mosque courtyard, blocking access from the main westward street, and was, apparently, never removed. Curiously enough, this collapse layer was not found in the passageway between the mosque's western entrance and its southwest corner, suggesting that access to the prayer hall from the residential units was maintained for a longer span of time.Based on the above, it appears that the collapse layer described (below) but not dated by Barnes et al (2006:295) fell during the 9th or 10th centuries CE.
The Qiblat Hall (IRS)Rattenborg and Blanke (2017:15) noted that
... So far over five tonnes of roof tile pieces have been found within the Qiblat hall. The oblong plan of the hall, with its qiblat wall, the double colonnade and the row of entrance piers, suggests a long triple-gabled roof covered the qiblat hall. The tile fragments have mostly been recovered from a thick dark layer that is largely uniform throughout the qiblat hall. No complete roofing tiles have been found, probably because any roof tiles that had not smashed were taken for reuse elsewhere after the initial collapse of the roof. Other salvageable building materials were also taken and only a few small areas of the paved floor remain. Post-collapse salvaging activity would explain the disturbance of the collapse layer.
There is a great deal of stone tumble lying outside the mosque walls from the collapse of the qiblat hall. Much less stone is found inside the hall, which shows that the walls fell outwards, pushed by the force of the heavy roof. The pattern of the fallen outer walls, the uniformity of the collapse layer and abundance of roof tile fragments indicate that the roof and some of the mosque walls collapsed in one event.
the extant archaeological record of the 9th-11th centuries is notoriously meagre and marred by an unstaisfactory degree of chronological control.
It appears that archaeoseismic evidence for the mid 8th century CE earthquake at the Congregational Ummayad Mosque and surroundings is based on rebuilding evidence rather than observed and dated seismic destruction layers. The second Mihrab, supposedly built after this earthquake, suggests that an extensive rebuild was required and that the Mosque was heavily damaged during the earthquake.
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
|
GO area - two rooms in the northern wing of Building B and subsurface compartment around the cistern shaft in the courtyard of the same structure
(note that Building B is to the west of building A)
Figure 7
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 750-850 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 11
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 950-1000 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 3
Islamic Jerash Project Excavation Areas 2002-2013 Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 1
Overview of Islamic Jarash Project following excavations in 2009 (by Hugh Barnes). Blanke et al (2010) |
Fig. 8
Figure 8
Raised bench with mosaic floor paving and adjoining basin along north wall of GO Building B during excavations in 2013, view facing east (IJP_D_15356) (© Islamic Jarash Project 2017) Rattenborg and Blanke (2017) |
|
|
GO area - laneway between the mosque west wall and Building A, eastern interior of Building A, and possibly square GO/6 (note that Building B is to the west of building A)
Figure 7
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 750-850 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 11
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 950-1000 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 3
Islamic Jerash Project Excavation Areas 2002-2013 Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 1
Overview of Islamic Jarash Project following excavations in 2009 (by Hugh Barnes). Blanke et al (2010) |
Fig. 15
Figure 15
GO/6 at the end of the 2009 season, seen from the west. Note the cistern drain in the bottom of the picture (by IJP). Blanke et al (2010) |
|
|
Congregational Mosque - qiblat Hall
Figure 4
Plan of the mosque, showing excavated areas to 2004 Barnes et al (2006)
Figure 3
Preliminary outline plan of the Umayyad mosque of Jarash (as after 2004 season). Walmsley and Daamgaard (2005)
Figure 3
Islamic Jerash Project Excavation Areas 2002-2013 Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 1
Overview of Islamic Jarash Project following excavations in 2009 (by Hugh Barnes). Blanke et al (2010)
Figure 1
General plan of the excavations in central Jarash, to end of 2007 season (Barnes mod. Walmsley) Walmsley et al (2008) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
GO area - two rooms in the northern wing of Building B and subsurface compartment around the cistern shaft in the courtyard of the same structure
(note that Building B is to the west of building A)
Figure 7
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 750-850 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 11
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 950-1000 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 3
Islamic Jerash Project Excavation Areas 2002-2013 Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 1
Overview of Islamic Jarash Project following excavations in 2009 (by Hugh Barnes). Blanke et al (2010) |
Fig. 8
Figure 8
Raised bench with mosaic floor paving and adjoining basin along north wall of GO Building B during excavations in 2013, view facing east (IJP_D_15356) (© Islamic Jarash Project 2017) Rattenborg and Blanke (2017) |
|
VIII+ (collapsed walls) |
|
GO area - laneway between the mosque west wall and Building A, eastern interior of Building A, and possibly square GO/6 (note that Building B is to the west of building A)
Figure 7
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 750-850 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 11
Early Islamic Jerash ca. 950-1000 CE Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 3
Islamic Jerash Project Excavation Areas 2002-2013 Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 1
Overview of Islamic Jarash Project following excavations in 2009 (by Hugh Barnes). Blanke et al (2010) |
Fig. 15
Figure 15
GO/6 at the end of the 2009 season, seen from the west. Note the cistern drain in the bottom of the picture (by IJP). Blanke et al (2010) |
|
VIII+ (collapsed walls) |
|
Congregational Mosque - qiblat Hall
Figure 4
Plan of the mosque, showing excavated areas to 2004 Barnes et al (2006)
Figure 3
Preliminary outline plan of the Umayyad mosque of Jarash (as after 2004 season). Walmsley and Daamgaard (2005)
Figure 3
Islamic Jerash Project Excavation Areas 2002-2013 Rattenborg and Blanke (2017)
Figure 1
Overview of Islamic Jarash Project following excavations in 2009 (by Hugh Barnes). Blanke et al (2010)
Figure 1
General plan of the excavations in central Jarash, to end of 2007 season (Barnes mod. Walmsley) Walmsley et al (2008) |
|
VIII+ (collapsed walls) |
Barnes, H. et al. (2006) From ‘Guard House’ to Congregational Mosque. Recent Discoveries on the Urban History of Islamic Jarash, in: Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 50,
285 – 314.
Blanke, L. / P. D. Lorien / R. Rattenborg (2010) Changing Cityscapes in Central Jarash –
between Late Antiquity and the Abbasid Period, in: Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 54, 311– 327.
Blanke, L. and Walmsley, A. (2010) Islamic Jarash Project
In Archaeology in Jordan, 2008 and 2009 seasons, edited by D. Keller and C. Tuttle. American Journal of Archaeology 114 505-545.
Blanke, L., et al. (2021). "Excavation and magnetic prospection in Jarash’s southwest district: The 2015 and 2016 seasons of the Late Antique Jarash Project." Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 60.
Blanke, L. and A. Walmsley (2022). Resilient cities: Renewal after disaster in three late antique towns of the East Mediterranean. Remembering and Forgetting the Ancient City, Oxbow Books: 69-109.
Blanke, L., et al. (2024b). "Down the drain: reconstructing social practice from the content of two sewers in a Late Antique bathhouse in Jerash, Jordan."
Journal of Roman Archaeology: 1-23. - open access
Naghaweh, A. (1982) An Umayyad Mosque at Jerash, in: Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan
26, 20 – 22 [Arabic].
Rattenborg, R. and L. Blanke (2017). "Jarash in the Islamic Ages (c. 700–1200 CE): a critical review." Levant 49(3): 312-332. - early manuscript - open access - page numbers differ from final publication
Rattenborg, R. and L. Blanke (2017). "Jarash in the Islamic Ages (c. 700–1200 CE): a critical review." Levant 49(3): 312-332. - final publication - behind a paywall - this is the document referred to on this webpage
Walmsley, A., Damgaard K., (2005) The Umayyad Congregational Mosque of Jarash in Jordan and Its Relationship to Early
Mosques, in: Antiquity 79, 362 – 378.
Walmsley, A. and F. Bessard, L. Blanke, K. Damgaard, A. Mellah, L. Roenje, I. Simpson. (2008) A Mosque, Shops and Bath in Central Jarash: The 2007 Season of the Islamic Jarash Project. ADAJ 52
Walmsley, A. (2018). Urbanism at Islamic Jerash: New Readings from Archaeology and History. in
The archaeology and history of Jerash : 110 years of excavations. A. R. R. Lichtenberger.