Event B1
The
551 CE Beirut earthquake was likely
generated offshore Lebanon on the
Mount Lebanon Thrust, a
submarine thrust system identified by
Elias et al. (2007). Their interpretation links historical reports of
destruction and tsunami activity with
radiocarbon-dated
marine fossils, fresh submarine
fault scarps
mapped along the
continental slope.
The coastal evidence comes from
uplifted benches
along the Lebanese coast, especially between
Beirut
and Tripoli. Previous researchers had suggested
that these fossil benches were produced by past
earthquake activity.
Morhange et al. (2006) dated fossil
vermetids preserved on the tops of these
benches in order to determine when they last lived
near mean sea level. Elias et al. (2007) then
combined these dates with offshore geophysical
evidence and concluded that the lowest bench,
B1, was raised by about 80 ± 30 cm during the
551 CE event.
The offshore component of the interpretation was
based on geophysical data collected during the
SHALIMAR survey. Elias et al. (2007) identified
an approximately 160 km long offshore thrust
system, which they named the Mount Lebanon
Thrust. The
deep-towed sonar data revealed fresh
west-facing scarps cutting the otherwise smooth
seafloor. These scarps lie near the base of
larger cumulative bathymetric escarpments and
were interpreted as submarine seismic ruptures
on the offshore thrust system.
Elias et al. (2007) emphasized the seismic
character of these scarps, stating that "given
their
geomorphic resemblance to sub-aerial,
seismic
dip-slip ruptures, and their position
near the foot of cumulative bathymetric
escarpments, the seismic origin of such submarine
breaks is not in doubt, although assessing
whether they result from one or several
earthquakes will require further investigation."
This statement is important because it identifies
the scarps as earthquake-related features, while
also leaving open whether the observed scarps
record a single rupture or multiple events.
For the 551 CE earthquake, Elias et al. (2007)
estimated a rupture length of at least 100 km,
and possibly as much as 150 km if the
Rankine-Aabdeh
lateral ramp was involved. They
argued that raising the Tabarja benches by
80 ± 30 cm required about 1.5-3 m of seismic
slip on east-dipping ramps in the upper 20 km of
the crust, using elastic half-space dislocation modeling after
Okada (1985). For a thrust rupture of this
length, they estimated a
moment magnitude of
about Mw 7.4-7.6, consistent with the
historical scale of destruction and with a
tsunamigenic offshore source.
This offshore thrust interpretation also argues
against the
Yammouneh Fault as the source of the
coastal uplift and makes it less likely that the uplift
resulted from other major earthquakes in the region that may not have originated on
the Mount Lebanon thrust,
including the
303–306 CE Eusebius Martyr earthquake,
the 347/348/349 CE Beirut Conversion earthquake,
the 450–457 CE Tripoli earthquake,
or the 502 CE Fire in the Sky earthquake.
Elias et al. (2007) noted that
strike-slip motion on the Yammouneh Fault
produces only small local uplift, less than about
1 m over approximately 10,000 years, citing
Daëron et al. (2005). They therefore ruled out
the Yammouneh Fault as the mechanism responsible
for uplifting the Lebanese shoreline north of
Beirut. The coastal vermetid ages also indicate
that the 1202 CE earthquake did not produce
uplift along this shoreline, and that the
eleventh- to fourteenth-century earthquake
sequence did not rupture the offshore Mount
Lebanon Thrust system.
Elias et al. (2007) further suggested that their
survey showed no evidence for a large local
submarine landslide and therefore argued that a
large landslide could be ruled out as the source
of historical tsunamis along the Lebanese coast,
including the 551 CE tsunami. This conclusion
should be treated cautiously. The available
side-scan sonar coverage was limited, and the
textual sources for the 551 CE Beirut earthquake
describe an initial
ebbing of the sea, a detail
that may suggest tsunami generation by a large
submarine landslide or at least by a mechanism
that included significant seafloor displacement.
Even so, the geographic coincidence between the
uplifted coastal benches and the offshore scarps
strongly supports the Mount Lebanon Thrust as a
major source of ancient earthquakes and tsunamis
along the Lebanese coast.
Taken together, the evidence suggests that the
551 CE earthquake was a large offshore thrust
event, probably Mw ~7.5, involving
roughly 100-150 km of rupture on the Mount
Lebanon Thrust. The earthquake uplifted parts of
the Lebanese coast, killed
intertidal vermetids
that had previously lived near sea level, and
generated a tsunami recorded in historical
sources.