Figure 2B
Figure 1
Figure 2A
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2A
Figure 4
Figure 2C
Figure 2C
Figure 3
Figure 3
On 9 July A.D. 551, a large earthquake, followed by a tsunami, destroyed most of the coastal cities of Phoenicia (modern-day Lebanon). Tripoli is reported to have “drowned,” and Berytus (Beirut) did not recover for nearly 1300 yr afterwards. Geophysical data from the Shalimar survey unveil the source of this event, which may have had a moment magnitude (Mw) of 7.5 and was arguably one of the most devastating historical submarine earthquakes in the eastern Mediterranean: rupture of the offshore, hitherto unknown, ~100–150-km-long active, eastdipping Mount Lebanon thrust. Deep-towed sonar swaths along the base of prominent bathymetric escarpments reveal fresh, west-facing seismic scarps that cut the sediment-smoothed seafloor. The Mount Lebanon thrust trace comes closest (~8 km) to the coast between Beirut and Enfeh, where, as 13 14C-calibrated ages indicate, a shoreline-fringing vermetid bench suddenly emerged by ~80 cm in the sixth century A.D. At Tabarja, the regular vertical separation (~1 m) of higher fossil benches suggests uplift by three more earthquakes of comparable size since the Holocene sea level reached a maximum ca. 7–6 ka, implying a 1500−1750 yr recurrence time. Unabated thrusting on the Mount Lebanon thrust likely drove the growth of Mount Lebanon since the late Miocene.
Figure 1
1 GSA Data Repository item 2007190, Figures DR1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 (photo, maps, plot, and numerical model output); items DR3 (historical and archeological data) and DR6 (biology of vermetid benches); and Table DR6 (vermetid samples specifications), is available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2007.htm, or on request from editing@geosociety.org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301 USA.
The historical earthquakes that were most strongly felt along the coast of Lebanon belong to two “sequences” separated by 500 yr of apparent quiescence. The so-called seismic crisis of the fourth to fifth century A.D. included five events (local magnitude, Ml, in parentheses): 303–306, Tyre-Saida (~7.1?); 348/349, Beirut (~7?); 450–457, Tripoli; 502, Acre (Akka) (~7?); and 551, Beirut-Tripoli (7.3–7.8?) (Plassard, 1968; Guidoboni et al., 1994). Of the events of the great eleventh to fourteenth century A.D. sequence that ruptured the entire Levant fault system from Aqaba to Antioch, culminating in the A.D. 1202, Ml~7.5 disaster on the Yammouneh fault (e.g., Ellenblum et al., 1998; Daëron et al., 2005), only three caused destruction on the coast, mostly in Tripoli and the Aakkar plain: 1063, Tripoli, Arqa, up to Antakya and Tyre (~7.1?); 1170, northwest Syria (7.5–7.9?), an event known to have primarily ruptured the Myssiaf fault (Meghraoui et al., 2003); and 1339, Tripoli (Plassard and Kogoj, 1981; Ben-Menahem, 1991).
Figure 1
Figure 2A
The discovery of active offshore thrusts sheds new light on the Quaternary geomorphology of coastal Lebanon. The stairs of abandoned, marine-cut terraces between Tripoli and Beirut (Sanlaville, 1977), whose heights in central Lebanon (up to 500 m near Tabarja) are unmatched either north or south, are most simply interpreted to reflect long-term Quaternary uplift resulting from the thrust-driven rise of Mount Lebanon (Elias et al., 2003). As documented in other regions of active tectonic uplift (e.g., Lajoie, 1986), such high terrace levels likely record ancient marine highstands coeval with warm interglacials/-stadials (Sanlaville, 1977).
The source of the A.D. 551 earthquake and the processes responsible for shoreline uplift in Lebanon have long been debated. Sanlaville (1977), who first questioned whether the raised trottoirs might be related, in part, to the A.D. 551 earthquake, finally chose to interpret this relative sea-level change as a “brief, positive eustatic movement” (“Tabarjan”). Pirazzoli et al. (1991) later attributed prominent shoreline uplift around much of the eastern Mediterranean to a regional “seismic crisis,” the “Early Byzantine Tectonic Paroxysm” (EBTP), including the great A.D. 365 subduction earthquake offshore Crete (Guidoboni et al., 1994). Darawcheh et al. (2000) speculated that the A.D. 551 event ruptured a postulated extension of the Roum fault at sea, which the Shalimar survey has now demonstrated not to exist. More recently, on the basis of onland tectonic and geomorphic evidence, we proposed that the inferred Tripoli-Roum thrust—now mapped offshore as the Mount Lebanon thrust—was the most likely source of the A.D. 551 and 1063 earthquakes (Elias et al., 2001; 2003). Morhange et al. (2006) discuss the latter hypothesis in the light of their new vermetid ages, but fail to conclude on the relative roles of the EBTP, Tripoli-Roum thrust, and Yammouneh fault.
Twenty-nine 14C dates of precise biological sea-level indicators from the Lebanese coast show evidence for two significant regional crustal uplift episodes during the past 6000 years. We elucidate: (1) an upper shoreline at ca. +120 to +140 cm, which lasted from ca. 6000 to 3000 BP; and (2) a lower shoreline at +80 ± 40 cm, developed between the fifth century BC and the sixth century AD. These movements are associated with: (1) two major seismic crises along the Yammuneh fault and the Roum-Tripoli Thrust (RTT); and (2) subsequent seismic events on a series of second-order ENE trending dextral transpressive faults. Vertical movements affected north Lebanon, whilst the coasts of south Lebanon generally underwent crustal downlift. This is in contrast with relative stability in northern Israel, suggesting an area of stationary tectonic conditions west of the Dead Sea–Rosh Hanikra/ Ras Nakoura fault. The main 14C age cluster, corresponding to the second uplift event, may have resulted from fault movements during the “Early Byzantine Tectonic Paroxysm” (EBTP), between ca. 1750 and 2000 BP. Relative sea level stabilised to present level around 1000 BP.
The most active tectonic structure along the eastern shore of the Mediterranean is the north–south trending left-lateral Levant fault system, the plate boundary between Arabia and Africa. In Lebanon, it forms a 160 km restraining bend responsible for the uplift of Mount Lebanon (Daëron et al., 2004). The study of relative sea-level mobility can provide quantitative constraints for crustal deformation along the Lebanese coast Dead Sea Transform Fault and more particularly the role of the Roum-Tripoli Thrust (RTT). The coast of Lebanon is characterized by well-developed uplifted subtidal bioconstructions e.g. Dendropoma petraeum. Our new data allow us to: (1) test the Early Byzantine Tectonic Paroxysm (EBTP) hypothesis (Pirazzoli, 1986a,b; Pirazzoli et al., 1996); and (2) interpret relative sea-level changes in terms of crustal deformation notably the roles of the Roum, Yammuneh and Serghaya faults in connection with the RTT.
Lebanon coincides with a restraining bend of the left-lateral Dead Sea fault system that marks the transform boundary between the African and Arabian plates (Fig. 1). The fault system, which stretches from the Gulf of Aqaba in the south up to the East Anatolian fault in the north, has propagated across the Levantine regions since the early Pliocene (Garfunkel, 1981). The restraining bend of the transform fault system, which controls the first-order topography of the mountainous areas of Lebanon and Syria, is not confined to a simple fault trace (Fig. 2). It is a fan-shaped fault system resulting from the split of the Dead Sea fault north of the Hula pull-apart in northern Israel (Zilberman et al., 2000), into three main splay faults that are, from west to east, the Roum, Yammuneh and Serghaya faults (Walley, 1988, 1998). Recent research suggests that the RTT might correspond to an offshore thrust system linking the Roum fault and the Tripoli thrust (Elias et al., 2003; Daëron et al., 2005).
Fossil biological and geomorphological indicators have been used to identify and estimate former sea-level positions (see Laborel and Laborel-Deguen, 1994 for detailed discussion). The limit between the midlittoral and subtidal zones is marked by a sudden increase in species diversity, which corresponds to biological sea level. This benchmark, which incorporates tidal variations and wave exposure, appears as a line between the lower cupulae of midlittoral limpet erosion and the subtidal bioconstructions (e.g., a vermetid rim). Bioconstructions, on the outer edge of the abrasion platform, are built by the close association of two species: the vermetid gastropod D. petraeum and the coralline alga Neogoniolithon notarisii (Lipkin and Safriel, 1971; Safriel, 1975; Tzur and Safriel, 1978; Barash and Zenziper, 1985). Thus, the upper surface of Dendropoma rims precisely marks the upper limit of the subtidal zone (Laborel and Laborel-Deguen, 1994). They are accurate markers of mean sea level. When colonies of elevated in situ Dendropoma rims were found capping the rock, their flat upper surface was used as a fossil sea-level indicator (accuracy of ± 10 cm to ± 20 cm). The lower limit of the bioconstructions is much less constant relative to wave exposure. The present vertical range of the living species varies from 10 cm in sheltered areas to 40 cm, sometimes more, at exposed sites. The accuracy and precision of the upper limit of this indicator are therefore appropriate for estimating the elevation of uplifted remains.
The sites investigated are presented from north to south. Radiocarbon data are given in Table 1 and sample locations are indicated on Fig. 2.
It is critical to discuss two main issues: (1) the timing of relative sea-level changes since 6000 BP, and (2) the spatial distribution of the former sea-level markers with respect to the tectonic pattern.
Fig. 10 shows two main episodes of relative sea-level variations. The first peak corresponds to an older and upper elevated shoreline (ca. 2700–2200 BP) and appears to belong to Sanlaville's (1970) so-called "Zennadian" episode. The second peak comprises a younger shoreline (ca. 2100–1800 BP or 300–650 cal. AD) at a lower elevation. This pronounced peak is composed of 12 14C dates (i.e. 36% of the radiocarbon data) and appears to belong to the so-called "Tabarjan" episode (Sanlaville, 1970).
Evidence for elevated beach deposits were discovered near the village of Cheikh Zennad, close to the Syrian border (Sanlaville et al., 1997). These were tentatively dated to 2000–1500 BC and ascribed to a former elevated sea level called the "Zennadian", the elevation of which remained uncertain. A vermetid sample collected from Ile du Palmier at +220 cm and dated 3490 ± 80 BP (MC-145) may indicate the elevation of this upper raised shoreline. However, our systematic survey did not reveal any geomorphological or biological evidence for a shoreline at +220 cm on Ile du Palmier, or even elsewhere along the Lebanese coast. Instead, we identified various marks of an elevated shoreline at ca. +120 to +140 cm. This elevated shoreline is poorly preserved, but its remains are clearly distinguished from those of the slightly lower raised shoreline.
Along the Syrian and Lebanese coast, a +60 cm corrosion platform is very frequent. In Lebanon, this episode was dated to between ca. 1900 and 2000 BP (Sanlaville, 1977). Fig. 10 shows a peak between 2100 and 1800 BP, which correlates Sanlaville's "Tabarjan" episode. This pattern consists of an end-peak corresponding to vermetids having developed just before the EBTP event and an irregular tail of older biological remains.
The younger radiocarbon ages, ca. 1100 BP (LIB 2000-11, LIB 2002-19) obtained near Bouar and north of Tyre show evidence for an event similar to that reported from Syria (Dalongeville et al., 1993). At Ras Ibn Hani, after the 6th century AD uplift, sea level stabilised promoting the development of a Dendropoma rim at present sea level dated 550 to 770 AD. Some centuries later, however, evidence for relative sea-level rise is provided by marine crusts preserved at Ras el- Bassit at +60 ± 20 cm. These are constrained by six consistent radiocarbon measurements to between the 10th and the 11th centuries AD (Sanlaville et al., 1997). The two Lebanese samples from Bouar and Khaizerane seem to provide evidence for a similar rapid relative sea- level rise, of probable tectonic origin, that reached several decimetres in amplitude.
Our results constrain relative sea-level stability along the Lebanese coast to 1000 BP and later. This stability is documented by two types of indicators. The first include in situ coastal archaeological remains located at present sea level, such as fish tanks and sea walls. Along the Israeli coast, similar remains testify to a general sea-level stabilisation during historical times (Raban and Galili, 1985; Galili et al., 1988; Galili and Sharvit, 1998; Sivan et al., 2001). In Lebanon, this evolution explains the important development of present midlittoral abrasion platforms and the bioconstruction of large Dendropoma rims. Radiometric dating (in progress) of the contact between the base of these bioconstructions and the substratum, consistently shows dates younger than 1000 BP along the Lebanese and Israeli coasts. This relative stability suggests the block, bounded to the east by the Dead Sea and Roum faults and containing the Carmel fault, remained stationary throughout this period.
At a regional scale, the fact that the lower raised shoreline is found almost along the entire Lebanese coast suggests its distribution may be related to uplift of a large tectonic domain driven by slip along the Yammuneh fault (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, our data question the role of the RTT. The majority of the evidence for uplifted shorelines around 2100–1800 BP is located east of the inferred offshore trace of the RTT. Therefore, it appears that the NNW trending extension of the Roum fault, which essentially marks the southern boundary of the EBTP shorelines, is consistent with coastal uplift caused by slip on the RTT. In conclusion, our data provide compelling evidence for the key role of the RTT in late Holocene tectonic uplift of the northern and central Lebanese coasts.
It is difficult to ascertain whether uplift of the lower shoreline resulted from a single seismic event or from several large earthquakes between the 4th century AD to the mid-7th century AD (Stiros, 2001). The Levantine coast does, however, seem to have been particularly affected by the 551 AD earthquake (Plassard, 1968; Russel, 1985), suggesting a debatable unique seismic origin for each of the raised shorelines. For instance, the differential finite uplift documented by the lower shoreline (Fig. 2) calls into question the hypothesis of a single coseismic event. On the one hand, the lower shoreline episode corresponds to an age cluster of radiocarbon dates which evokes a relatively short period of intense seismic activity. Conversely, given the overall extent and diversity of the uplifts, more than 500 km coastwise, it is difficult to invoke a single-earthquake EBTP scenario. The question remains open to debate.
The limit of elevated late Holocene shorelines along the Levant coast coincides with the trace of the Rosh Hanikra/Ras Nakoura fault (Fig. 1) that bounds two domains (the Tyre–Saida block to the north and Galilee to the south) with contrasted relative sea-level patterns. This suggests that the Rosh Hanikra/Ras Nakoura fault was activated during seismotectonic episodes. South of that fault, relative sea-level stability during historical times suggests that the block bounded to the east by the Dead Sea fault and to the north by the Rosh Hanikra/Ras Nakoura fault and containing the Carmel fault, remained stationary during this period. In contrast, RSL and archaeological data from Tyre manifest ca. 3 m of tectonic collapse since Roman times (Marriner et al., 2006). Therefore the Galilee crustal block could be interpreted as a fixed boundary condition to the Levantine restraining bend at a time intense seismic activity and tectonic movements were taking place along the Yammuneh fault, the RTT and second-order transverse faults.
The Lebanese coast provides evidence for two main elevated Holocene sea levels: (1) an upper shoreline at ca. +1.2 to +1.4 m, which lasted from ca. 6000 to 3000 BP. On the nearby coasts of Syria and Turkey, this upper shoreline suggests the occurrence of seismotectonic displacement(s) around 3000 BP, decreasing in amplitude from Turkey to southern Lebanon; (2), a lower shoreline at +0.8 ± 0.4 m, developed between 2700 BP and the 6th century AD, at the time of the EBTP. These uplifted shoreline remains result from the activation of the Yammuneh and the RTT, as well as slip along transverse faults. The Rosh Hanikra/Ras Nakoura fault marks the southern boundary of the Levantine vertical displacements, with no evidence for coastal uplift being reported from Israel during the Holocene.
Elias et al. (2007) examined
uplifted benches on the Lebanese coast between Sarafand and
Tripolis, including areas near
Tabarja (~20 km NE of Beirut). They estimated
that ~80 cm of uplift occurred on the lowest bench (B1) in the
6th century CE. Deep-towed sonar data collected offshore showed
fresh west-facing fault scarps cutting across the otherwise
smooth seafloor, which they associated with seismic activity
along the newly identified offshore Mount Lebanon Thrust Fault
system. They concluded that ~100–150 km of this fault ruptured
in 551 CE, generating an earthquake with a moment magnitude
(Mw) of ~7.5.
Previous researchers had suggested that elevated fossil benches
along the Lebanese coast (mostly between Beirut and Tripolis)
were formed by past earthquake activity.
Morhange et al. (2006) used
radiocarbon dating of fossil
vermetids on the tops
of these benches to determine when they were last in the subtidal
zone (approximately mean sea level). By integrating these dates
with seismic evidence,
Elias et al. (2007) concluded
that the well-documented 551 Beirut earthquake caused 80 ± 30 cm
of uplift of the lowest bench (B1) during that seismic event.
Figure DR7
Elias et al (2007)
discovered an ~160 km. long offshore thrust system in the process of collecting and analyzing their geophysical data. They termed this new thrust fault system the
the Mount Lebanon Thrust.
Figure 2agiven their geomorphic resemblance to sub-aerial, seismic dip-slip ruptures, and their position near the foot of cumulative bathymetric escarpments, the seismic origin of such submarine breaks is not in doubt, although assessing whether they result from one or several earthquakes will require further investigation.
Figure 3Elias et al (2007) estimated a moment magnitude (Mw) of ~7.4-7.6 for the 551 CE Beirut Quake and offered the following discussion:
To raise the Tabarja trottoirs [benches] 80 ± 30 cm above the LMSL [Local Mean Sea Level], simple dislocation modeling in an elastic half-space (Okada, 1985) requires 1.5-3 m of seismic slip on these ramps, assuming they dip -45° eastward in the upper 20 km of the crust (Data Repository item DR8). Such slip amounts are consistent with the estimated magnitude of the A.D. 551 earthquake, and sufficient to account for the tsunami observed. Historical evidence combined with the extent of vermetid death in the sixth century A.D. implies a rupture length of at least -100 km, and possibly up to 150 km if the Rankine-Aabdeh lateral ramp was involved (Figs. 1 and 4), as suggested by two ages on Palmier Island (Table DR6). For such rupture lengths on thrust faults, empirical scaling laws predict an Mw of ~7.4-7.6 (Wells and Coppersmith, 1994), consistent with macroseismic estimates. Because strike-slip motion on the Yammouneh fault has been shown to produce only small local uplift (less than ~1 m in ~10,000 yr; Daeron et al., 2005), the inference that events on this fault might raise shorelines north of Beirut (Morhange et al., 2006) can be safely ruled out. The coastal 14C vermetid ages confirm that the great A.D. 1202 earthquake, for instance, produced no uplift along the Lebanese shoreline. That benches offshore Tripoli are older than the seventh century A.D. in fact excludes the possibility that any of the earthquakes of the eleventh to fourteenth century A.D. sequence, including the A.D. 1063 event, ruptured the offshore Mount Lebanon thrust system. Hence, the destruction of Tripoli and Arqa by the latter earthquake may have been caused by slip on the Aakkar and/or Tripoli thrusts (Fig. 4).![]()
Figure 4
Most likely sources of A.D. 551 (open star—inferred epicenter, this study) and other large historical earthquakes in Lebanon (modifi ed from Daëron et al., 2005). Colored patches enclose areas where macroseismic intensities >VIII were reported. Blue color corresponds to A.D. 551. (VIII isoseismal from Sieberg, 1932).
Elias et al (2007)
| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Uplift | Lebanese Coast |
Figure 3On the northern part of IIe du Phare (Tripoli), marks of a double raised bench have been preserved. The lowest step, at approx. +1 m (above present MSL), comprises Dendropoma dated 2630 ± 35 BP (403-265 cal. BC). The outer part of the upper step, at approx. +1.2 m, has been dissected by erosion, but on the inner part, that corresponds to the base of a tidal notch, a thin cover of in situ Dendropoma petraeum shells have been collected and dated 5975 ± 40 BP (4514-4339 cal. BC). Click on image to open in a new tab Morhange et al. (2006b) |
|
| Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Uplift | Lebanese Coast |
Figure 3On the northern part of IIe du Phare (Tripoli), marks of a double raised bench have been preserved. The lowest step, at approx. +1 m (above present MSL), comprises Dendropoma dated 2630 ± 35 BP (403-265 cal. BC). The outer part of the upper step, at approx. +1.2 m, has been dissected by erosion, but on the inner part, that corresponds to the base of a tidal notch, a thin cover of in situ Dendropoma petraeum shells have been collected and dated 5975 ± 40 BP (4514-4339 cal. BC). Click on image to open in a new tab Morhange et al. (2006b) |
|
IX |
Figure 2C
Source - Wells and Coppersmith (1994)
| Variable | Input | Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| km. | Fault Break | ||
| km. | Fault Break | ||
| Variable | Output - not considering a Site Effect | Units | Notes |
| unitless | Moment Magnitude for Min. Rupture Length | ||
| unitless | Moment Magnitude for Max. Rupture Length |
| Variable | Input | Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| cm. | Seismic slip on the ramps | ||
| cm. | Seismic slip on the ramps | ||
| Variable | Output - not considering a Site Effect | Units | Notes |
| unitless | Moment Magnitude for Avg. Displacement | ||
| unitless | Moment Magnitude for Max. Displacement |
Daëron, M., et al. (2005). "Sources of the large
A.D. 1202 and 1759 Near East earthquakes."
Geology 33(7): 529-532.
Elias, A., et al. (2007). "Active thrusting offshore
Mount Lebanon: Source of the tsunamigenic A.D.
551 Beirut-Tripoli earthquake." Geology 35(8):
755-758.
Morhange, C., et al. (2006). "Late Holocene
relative sea-level changes in Lebanon, Eastern
Mediterranean." Marine Geology 230(1): 99-114.
Okada, Y. (1985). "Surface deformation due to
shear and tensile faults in a half-space."
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
75: 1135-1154.
Sanlaville, P., Dalongeville, R., Bernier, P.,
Evin, J. (1997). "The Syrian coast: a model of
Holocene coastal evolution." Journal of Coastal
Research 13(2): 385-396. - JSTOR
Sarieddine, K. (2022). Seismic Interpretation
and Analysis of the Messinian Salt System
Offshore Lebanon. MSc Thesis, American
University of Beirut, 121 p.
SHALIMAR Oceanographic Cruise (27 September 2003
- 26 October 2003) Data Page.
Sivan, D., Schattner, U., Morhange, C.,
Boaretto, E. (2010). "What can a sessile mollusk
tell about neotectonics?" Earth and Planetary
Science Letters 296(3): 451-458.