Open this page in a new tab

Petra - Urn Tomb

The Urn Tomb in Petra Urn Tomb

Click on image to open in a new tab

Photo by Jefferson Williams - 21 Jan. 2026


Names
Transliterated Name Source Name
Urn Tomb
al-Mahkamah Arabic الءماهكاماه
Introduction
Introduction

  • from Chat GPT 5.2, 14 January 2026
The Urn Tomb is located on the East Ridge (also known as the East Cliff) of Jabal Khubtha. Its elevated position above the Petra Valley gives it a commanding presence within the city’s funerary landscape. The monument is generally interpreted as a royal tomb and is thought to have belonged to a Nabataean king, possibly Aretas IV (r. 9 BCE - 40 CE) or Malchus II (r. 40–70 CE). Its scale and prominent placement distinguish it from many other rock-cut tombs at Petra and support its association with the highest levels of Nabataean authority.

Petra - Introduction Webpage

Maps, Aerial Views, 3D Imagery, and Photos
Maps, Aerial Views, 3D Imagery, and Photos

Maps and Aerial Views

  • Location Map from Jones (2021)
  • Urn Tomb in Google Earth

Photos

Normal Size

  • Urn Tomb photo by JW
  • Urn Tomb from wikipedia

Magnified

  • Urn Tomb photo by JW
  • Urn Tomb from wikipedia

Archaeoseismic Chronology
House II Earthquake - 5th-6th Century CE

Discussion

Discussion

References
Notes by JW

Jones (2021) argues that al-Zantur I Spatromisch II ceramics, rather than dating from 363 CE - 419 CE, should date to at least a century later. If true, this would negate archaeoseismic evidence for an earthquake reported in 419 CE (i.e. the Monaxius and Plinta Quake) at ez-Zantur and other sites in Petra such as in a structure outside the Urn Tomb, and in Structure I of the NEPP Project. Jones (2021) suggests instead that the causitive earthquake was more likely the late 6th century CE Inscription At Areopolis Quake. Jones (2021) provides a discussion below:

Within Petra, the 418/419 earthquake has been suggested as the cause for the destruction of three structures:
  • al-Zantur I, specifically the end of Bauphase Spatromisch II
  • one of the structures outside of the Urn Tomb, House II
  • North-Eastern Petra Project (NEPP) Structure I
At the Urn Tomb, a 363 earthquake destruction has been suggested for a cave below the tomb (Zayadine 1974: 138) as well as House II, which was partially rebuilt afterwards and by the 6th century was being `used as a quarry' (Zeitler 1993: 256-57). Taking this quarrying as evidence for a 5th century abandonment of House II, Kolb (2000: 230; 2007: 154-55) suggests a second destruction in the 418/419 earthquake, primarily based on analogy to al-Zantur I. As only a preliminary report has appeared for House II, it is not possible to evaluate the archaeological evidence for this attribution, but a 5th century abandonment of House II may instead be related to the modification of the Urn Tomb for use as a church in 446 (Bikai 2002: 271).

Archaeoseismic Effects
House II Earthquake - 5th-6th Century CE

Effect Location Image(s) Description/Comments
Destruction (Collapsed Walls) House II Within the Urn Tomb complex, earlier interpretations had proposed earthquake destruction in multiple loci, including damage attributed to a 363 event in a cave below the tomb and in House II. House II was then partly rebuilt, and by the 6th century it was reportedly being “used as a quarry” (Zeitler 1993:256–257, as discussed by Jones 2021). Kolb’s proposal of a second destruction in 419 relied largely on analogy with al-Zantur I, but Jones notes that the archaeological evidence for House II cannot be independently evaluated because only a preliminary report has appeared. Jones further raises an alternative historical explanation for a 5th-century shift in House II’s use: it may relate to the modification of the Urn Tomb for use as a church in 446 (Bikai 2002:271, as summarized by Jones 2021), rather than requiring a discrete 419 earthquake destruction horizon.

Archaeoseismic Intensity Estimates
House II Earthquake - 5th-6th Century CE

Effect Location Image(s) Description/Comments Intensity
Destruction (Collapsed Walls) House II Within the Urn Tomb complex, earlier interpretations had proposed earthquake destruction in multiple loci, including damage attributed to a 363 event in a cave below the tomb and in House II. House II was then partly rebuilt, and by the 6th century it was reportedly being “used as a quarry” (Zeitler 1993:256–257, as discussed by Jones 2021). Kolb’s proposal of a second destruction in 419 relied largely on analogy with al-Zantur I, but Jones notes that the archaeological evidence for House II cannot be independently evaluated because only a preliminary report has appeared. Jones further raises an alternative historical explanation for a 5th-century shift in House II’s use: it may relate to the modification of the Urn Tomb for use as a church in 446 (Bikai 2002:271, as summarized by Jones 2021), rather than requiring a discrete 419 earthquake destruction horizon. VIII+
The archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224).

Notes and Further Reading
References