The South foundation of Room 32 was used, after the
abandonment of the NW house, by the builders of the
Umayyad period. Their activity occasioned a new
arrangement of the whole area. A staircase was laid
upon the stone tumble, leading North to a level 2.4 m
above bedrock (Pl. VA). The eastern side of the steps
is retained by a wall built to keep in place a large
terrace which also leans against the North wall of the
house. It was filled with practically sterile soil up to
the topmost level of the steps. At bottom level, we
have found a coin of Constans II (641–668 A.D.) and
contemporary pottery, also in the fabric of the retaining
wall.
The steps, separated in two flights by a landing, ended
at a door opening onto a platform around the corner of
the NE building above the Byzantine fill, delimited by
walls parallel to both sides of it. To the West, the
upper flight of steps was also bordered by a retaining
wall of another terrace above Room 31.
The stairs
were found covered with eighth century deposits which
also extended to the West (Pl. IVA). Even before
these had accumulated, the Umayyad house was already
below ground level on the North and West. A
foundation trench with the early seventh century fill on
the northern side reaches only to the upper courses of
the preserved wall, the lower parts of it having been
built, after clearing, against the rubble left outside.
All the evidence recovered points to the middle of the
seventh century as the date of the construction.
While
only a few walls were retained on the lower ground
level near the Decumanus, the layers immediately
below the floors of the house provide consistent
evidence. Byzantine sherds and coins, mostly of the
sixth century, were found under Rooms 10, 21, 22 and
24, as well as under the courtyard pavement (loc. 16
and 23). A coin of Constans II already mentioned
dates the filling of the terrace East of the staircase.
Other coins of the same emperor are the latest in the
rubble of the NW house.
Below the level of Room 7 and above the Roman wall
buried about 400 A.D. there were found, in two
clusters, eight coins known as Arab-Byzantine, in this
case imitations of the folles of Justin II minted in
Scythopolis (Bēth Shean) and, in one instance, in
Jerash itself (Pl. XV AB). The period of their issue is
not exactly known, but it is reasonable to assume that
they were gradually replacing Byzantine currency in
the first decades of the Islamic government. It is
probably not by chance that the original issues of
Justin II (565–578 A.D.) are most numerous among the
Byzantine coins found; their large circulation induced
the Islamic mints to imitate in the first place these,
rather than any other types.
The latest genuine Byzantine issues are very poor,
usually clipped coins of Constans II; we may conclude
that the imitation coins are to be dated roughly in the
same time, about the middle of the seventh century.
Accordingly, the house was built at the beginning of
the Umayyad period, about 660 A.D. or slightly later.
As its construction is likely to have followed an
earthquake, it is tempting to link it with the tremor of
June 658 A.D., which caused extensive destruction in
Palestine and Syria.
The colonnaded street apparently remained in use
since Roman times. The sidewalk does not seem to
have been built over in the early Umayyad period,
serving its original purpose along the line of shops.
However, the shops themselves were entirely restored,
including the upper foundation courses in the fill of the
cistern (loc. 43), yet without any major change in plan
(Pl. V B).
The Umayyad house extends northwards
behind four of these shops for 23 m. Although
utilizing some earlier foundations as indicated above,
it is an entirely new building. It is laid around a courtyard with the main entrance
through a passage from the street between shops loc. 29
and 13 (Pl. VI A); another door opened on the opposite
end into the staircase. An earlier sewage drain winds
its way from the far end of the courtyard and beneath
the entrance.
The irregular form of the courtyard (loc.
18, 16, 23, 9) is determined by the position of
foundations, inherited from the Roman period, under
Rooms 17, 24 and 25. There is a pavement rising
gradually northwards, employed for a lengthy span of
time at the same level.
The rooms are arranged in two wings, West and East of
the courtyard. The western one consists of a row of
rooms sharing a straight rear wall with no openings, its
outside face being buried in the early seventh century
fill, the same that extends in and over the NW house.
Some parts of this wall may have been borrowed from
older buildings, while the northern wall, though built
against the still earlier rubble, is certainly contemporary
with the house.
The rooms of the West wing differ in
depth as a result of adjustments to the situation the
builders found in the area. Thus, the northernmost
Room 7 (Pl. VII D) is longer than others, so as to allow
an entrance from the courtyard, in line with the door of
the staircase. The room is 9.5 m long and only 2.9 m
wide.
It was below ground level on two sides and lit, as far as
we know, by a single window opening above the steps,
opposite the terrace to the East and its retaining wall.
Allowing for the usual proportions of the window, the
ceiling could not be lower than about 3.5 m above the
floor, and this is further substantiated by the NW corner
of the room, still standing to a height of 4.2 m above
the floor level. However, an arch springing from two
piers set against the long walls of the room was only
about 3 m high and must have carried a partition wall
at that level; it was clearly irrelevant as a support for
transverse beams, but there are no other hints of a
storey above.
The floor of the room, level with the courtyard in front
of it, was once covered with a mosaic of which only
displaced fragments and a large amount of single cubes
have been recovered from the corresponding layer. At
far end, there was a stone bench against the wall.
The main room of the house extends to the South of
Room 7. It is shorter but much wider (7 m by 7.6 m)
and divided in the middle by an arch spanning an
opening 4 m wide from East to West (Pl. VIII). Both
halves of the room (loc. 10 and 20) were covered
separately using this support, with a minimum height
of about 3 m above the floor, but actually probably
higher. An upper storey is again possible, if its
entrance was from the higher ground level outside to
the West, but no proof of it has survived.
The flour Is sunk about 0.7 m below the level of the courtyard;
four steps inside the worn lead down from the entrance which
opens against the arched partition Into loc. 10. To the right
and left. there are win¬dows only 0.4 m wide. 1.2 m above
the courtyard pavement, each one Illuminating half of the room.
The earthen floor is formed by a compact red soil layer
0.5 m thick, covering bedrock in which a pit in loc. 10
contained a large amount of late Byzantine pottery. The
fill below the floor also yielded some typical seventh
century forms, such as animal-head lamps, white-
painted lugs and black-ware basins. An Abbasid dinar
dated to 170/771 A.H. (Pl. XV C) proves that the room
was used at the same general level at least as late.
Further South. Room 17 intruded into the courtyard
space. It was doubled in the Umayyad period by Room
19 behind, in line with the common western wall of the
house. The partition between Room 19 and 20 extends
along the earlier Room 17, being built against its
northern wall. As a result, Rooms 17 and 19 are not on
the same axis.
Room 17 was cleared in the Umayyad period down to
bedrock, laying bare the earlier foundations. There are,
however, traces of a pavement some 0.2 m above the
uneven rock. Some Byzantine sherds, but also much
earlier finds, e.g. a Ptolemaic coin and another of
Agrippa (42/43 A.D.), come from below that level,
while on the other hand a pit in the bedrock contained a
typical Umayyad storage basin.
There are two steps
down from the courtyard and a window, once secured
with iron bars, which opens 1.0 m above the floor but
level with the exterior pavement to the South.
Room 19 has roughly the same floor level, in places at
the very base of the walls; beneath, there were some
early seventh century deposits within the undulations of
the rock. The room had apparently no window, the
door to Room 17 being the only opening in its walls
preserved up to a height above the floor.
Further South, Room 22 opened from the passage
leading to the street and had an earthen floor above
Byzantine and Roman layers into which its foundations
are set.
The opposite, eastern wing of the house is not
symmetrical. In its northern part, it consists of four
rooms facing the large Room 16, 20 across the
courtyard. The walls are for a considerable part
Roman, cut to the South by the retaining wall of the
described terrace; coins dated about early A.D. were
found beneath this wall and the pavement of the rooms.
Room 25 was entered from the West and Room 24
from the South through an admitted Roman doorway.
The former has a stone bench and a retaining border
along its northern wall used probably for storing
household utensils. From each room there was access to
another room behind (loc. 36 and 37), the latter with a
completely preserved arch in the middle.
The larger part of the courtyard (loc. 16) opposite
Room 17 extended further East, ending in line with the
rooms of the eastern wing. A small sunken space (loc.
26), reached by several steps (Pl. VI B), led to a cellar
(loc. 27) and an open recess at the same level, above the
filled cistern loc. 41, from which other steps led down
to an artificial cave dug out in the rock beneath the
shop loc. 42. This storage complex was delimited from
the courtyard (loc. 16) by a stone fence.
The walls of the house, with the exception of fragments
inherited from earlier times, are built of reused stones
varying in size but roughly arranged in courses, with
stone chips and mud between them. There is usually no
core fill between the faces and no bonding stones. The
walls were probably mud-plastered, the roofs certainly
made of wooden beams. The presence of a second
storey, while not excluded, could not be ascertained.
It seems that grouping of rooms in pairs was a constant
habit in relation to the pattern of family life in the
Umayyad period. There are three sets of two-room
suites (loc. 17-19, 25-36 and 24-37), with the room
behind apparently windowless. These could have served
as living quarters for subdivisions of the family, the
front room being in each case devoted to daily
activities and the other, darker one, for sleeping. Room
10/20 and 7 apparently served the whole household for
common meals, receptions and the like.
It is remarkable that no kitchen could be identified in
this otherwise preserved house (all the ovens found
belong to a later phase), these installations must have
been quite rudimentary. The only sanitary facility is the
covered sewer channel in the courtyard.