Ball et al (1986) reported on excavations from the north Tetrapylon along the Decumanus to the North Theater. A collapse layer in the North Theater was dated to the mid to late 6th century.
Phase | Period | Date | Discussion |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Byzantine ? | early 5th century CE ? | Decumanus Foot-tracks (early 5th century AD?). The earliest of the three phases of Area JNT-C is the most difficult to date. This phase is confined to the northern half of Trenches II, V and VII as well as Trench VIII, and is represented by a series of at least three limestone chip surfaces, probably foot-tracks. These were laid over a number of successive gravel levels that covered the paving of the Decumanus and southern sidewalk. The origin and purpose of these gravel levels is uncertain. The small amounts of pottery recovered are fragmentary and water eroded, suggesting it was brought in from elsewhere and deliberately deposited over the Decumanus paving. Why it was felt necessary to do this is a mystery. Dating is equally difficult, though the pottery and considerable number of coins recovered point to a late 4th early 5th century date. As these foot-tracks extend to the staircase leading to the Theatre and in part cover it, the Theatre was probably still in use at this time. |
2 | Byzantine | 6th century CE | The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult. |
3 | Umayyad | 1st half of the 8th century CE | The Umayyad Period (first half of the 8th century). In addition to the annex room built as part of the kiln complex of Area JNT-B3, a small kiln some 1.50m. in diameter preserved to a height of 45 cm. was uncovered in the Portico of the Theatre (Trench JNT-C III, see PI.II). The walls of this kiln were constructed of pebble and clay bricks measuring 33x 13x 14 cm. Further support of the walls was provided by rough stone retaining walls on the south, east and west sides, with a fill between the kiln wall and the retaining walls. F ew other structural details of the kiln have been preserved. |
Phase | Period | Date | Discussion |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Early Roman/Late Roman | Late 1st century CE |
Discussion
The original walls built to flank the North Decumanus were identified in CI (north of the street, CI. 002) and BI (south of the street, BI.053).
These were rebuilt above ground level at a later date (see below, Phase 5). In BI a foundation trench (074) was exposed, 1 m. wide and dug from virgin soil (Fig.7b).
A small sounding of 1m. square establishes its depth to be just over 2m. The trench was sealed by the cement floor of a plastered cistern (067) built beneath
the ground-level floor of the original building (plan, Fig.8b . There are no remains of this floor or roof of the cistern. A short wall (063) extends
south for 2.5 m., abutting at right angles the Decumanus wall 053 and apparently in the middle of the cistern (the full length and width of which was not exposed).
This wall stands 1.7 m. above the cistern floor and the plaster on its west face continues around its southern end. Plaster is evident on the east face but is
obscured by a later construction (066, Phase 2). The eastern half of the cistern has been more disturbed. Some traces of plaster remain on wall 053
(running behind the later construction 066), but the cement floor has disappeared. Its level is indicated by a distinct change in deposit (from 073 to 061, Fig. 7b)
and the damage is attributed to the construction of feature 066. The short wall 063 probably functioned to support the cistern roof, perhaps based on a system
of arches. A stone projection, cantilevered out from wall 053, 2.38 m. above the cistern floor and 0.60 m. west of wall 063, may also have contributed
to the support of the roof. The threshold of a doorway (054) which opened onto the Decumanus was exposed. This was built across in the rebuilding of Phase 5. |
2 | Late Roman | Late 2nd - Early 3rd century CE |
Discussion
During this period the cistern roof/ground floor of the building in BI was dismantled, although will 053 remained intact. A massive stone structure (066) was
built abutting the east face of mid-cistern wall 063, 2.60 m. high (as extant) and 1.68 m. wide (plan, Fig. 8b, section, Fig. 7a). Its full length was not exposed
and its purpose remains unknown. It is a rough construction with uneven courses of reused stone (some faced with monochrome painted plaster of a fine quality),
and loosely packed with rubble and clay mortar. The top courses overhang towards the east. Clay deposit 073 is probably a foundation trench associated with its
construction (thereby destroying the cistern floor). The remaining cistern space was then filled to the top of wall 063 (loci 065 and 061) and a crushed lime
surface laid. Thin occupation deposits 064 and 060 accumulated upon this surface. They were only traced west of wall 063: the rebuilding activities of Phase 5
obliterated the contemporary deposits east of this line (Fig. 7a). Dump material in CI (010, 011, 012, 013,014) directly corresponds with the finds from BI Phase 2. |
3 | Late Roman/Early Byzantine | 2nd half of the 3rd century - 2nd half of the 4th century CE |
Discussion
Gravelled clay (059) beneath a homogeneous deposit of yellow clay and crushed plaster fragments (049) overlies the occupation levels of phase 2. They seem to be a
packing for a series of thin plaster floors interleaved with ashy occupation debris (045). The floors were patchy but at least two were clearly identified and
there may have been more. |
4 - destruction | Early Byzantine | Late 4th century, perhaps in the last quarter |
Discussion
Overlying the Phase 3 floors was a comparatively thick deposit (047), some of which had been dug away in Phase 5 (Fig. 7a). It contained much charcoal,
carbonized wood and burnt limestone. The latest plaster surface of 045 had clearly suffered overall burning and a major destruction of phase 3 by fire is indicated. |
5 - Rebuilding | Early Byzantine | Late 4th/Early 5th century CE |
Discussion
The destruction of Phase 4 may have been the direct cause of the major rebuilding evident in phase 5. Foundation trench 044/062 cuts the
destruction deposit and the earlier occupation surfaces (Fig. 7b) and the south well of the Decumanus (053) was completely rebuilt from the
ground level upwards. The doorway north to the Decumanus was omitted. Wall 063 was partly dismantled as was structure 066.
Levelling fills 070, 069, 048 and 043 were laid. The remains of a large square of rectangular plastered basin (046) over I.75 square
metres were found above the fill. Some stones of one side wall were left in situ, one with the plaster floor of the basin continuing up
the side of the stone. The floor associated with this basin had been removed by building activity in phase 6. |
6 | Late Byzantine | 5th century to Early 6th Century |
Discussion
During this period a substantial paved floor was laid covering the eastern half of the northern room in BI and partly overlying the basin 046.
The western half of this room has a clay floor containing two rectangular areas made up of small unshaped flat stones (features 039 and 040,
plan Fig. 8a, section Fig. 7a). They are interpreted as bases of foundation platforms for some unknown apparatus. A massive base (057)
measuring 85 x 60 cm. and 68 cm. high, consisted of three thick ashlar blocks laid on a more substantial foundation course. It sits
directly on basin 046 in the middle of the room and is set within the phase 6 floor matrix. It must have supported a considerable weight. A
reasonable interpretation of the arrangement of the northern room is that the western half of the room functioned as a small production area
containing some sort of machinery, while the eastern half of the room, opening on to the
cardo at a major intersection, was reserved for
retail and display purposes. The smaller southern room in BI was completely paved and opened on to the cardo. The building in BITI was also
built at this time but there is no evidence of any paved floor. |
7 | Late Byzantine | Last quarter of the 6th century CE |
Discussion
A decline in civil activities at the north end of the cardo is reflected in the changed function of the BI building. The door to the cardo
in the northern room was blocked and the middle section of the wall dividing the northern and southern rooms (wall 050) was dismantled to floor
level (plan, Fig. 8a; Pl. IV). Platforms 20-30 cm. high were built the length of the east and west walls of the northern room (032 and 034) and
along the south wall (the existence of which is inferred) of the southern room (035). They consist of a retaining face of large squared stones in a
single course, filled with red clay rubble and surfaced with yellow clay. The southern half of the west platform was two courses high. A small bin
(033) was built upon the northern end of the east platform. Numerous tie-holes were gouged through the wall stones, between 75 cm. and 1.45 m. above
the phase 7 floor level and clustering round the platform areas. A thick floor (030) of fist-sized rubble stones and a homogeneous yellow clay was
laid upon the phase 6 surface, running over the dismantled section of wall 050 (Figs. 7a and 7b). |
8 | Late Byzantine | Before Justin II |
Discussion
The stable seems to have undergone a period of disuse prior to a substantial collapse of the building. A large animal bone dump (016, 022) containing sheep, goat, pig and species of bird, especially chicken, was deposited in the middle of the stable, and an ash dump (028) partly blocked the doorway 056. The coins identified from this and subsequent in BI do not post-date Justin II. |
9 - collapse | Late Byzantine/Early Umayyad | 7th Century |
Discussion
Sometime during the seventh century the upper walls of BI (013, 015, 012, 027, 029) the BI and BIII buildings collapsed. The collapse deposit consisted of the red clay and rubble mortar common to the walls of the Byzantine rebuilding interspersed with large stone tumble. |
10 - use as a dump | Early and Late Umayyad | 7th century to Early 8th century CE |
Discussion
Following this collapse, BI was used as a general dump. Distinct layers of deposit have been discerned. One consists of a large mass of cement and a concentration of red hypocaust tiles pierced by a central hole (009, 010, 025), and another (the latest dump material, 002, 004) is distinguished by the extraordinary amount of roof tiles it contained. Neither the coins nor the pottery suggest a date later than the seventh century. In BIII however, the coins and pottery clearly indicate the continued use of this area as a dump into the first quarter of the eighth century.. |
The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase [2 of of the Portico of the North Theater - Area JNT-C] represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult.
Effect | Location | Images | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapse layer | overlying the remaining foundations of the paving
Figure 10
General Plan of the area of excavations JW: Excavation areas and trenches are denoted by a capital Letter followed by a Roman Numeral Ball et al (1986) |
Plate I
The portico stairs in Area JNT-C Ball et al (1986) |
The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase [2 of of the Portico of the North Theater - Area JNT-C] represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult.- Ball et al (1986) |
Collapsed Wall - Fallen architectural blocks and core rubble | North wall of the Theatre
Figure 10
General Plan of the area of excavations JW: Excavation areas and trenches are denoted by a capital Letter followed by a Roman Numeral Ball et al (1986) |
The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase [2 of of the Portico of the North Theater - Area JNT-C] represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult.- Ball et al (1986) |
|
Fallen Colonnade and architrave pieces | Portico
Figure 10
General Plan of the area of excavations JW: Excavation areas and trenches are denoted by a capital Letter followed by a Roman Numeral Ball et al (1986) |
The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase [2 of of the Portico of the North Theater - Area JNT-C] represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult.- Ball et al (1986) |
Effect | Location | Images | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Fallen entablature, pediment and attic storey |
foot of the west facade of the
Tetrapylon
Figure 10
General Plan of the area of excavations JW: Excavation areas and trenches are denoted by a capital Letter followed by a Roman Numeral Ball et al (1986) |
Plate VIII
Fallen entablature, pediment and attic storey at the foot of the west facade of the Tetrapylon < Ball et al (1986) |
Phase 9 (?) of Area B: The Cardo-Decumanus Corner - Sometime during the seventh century the upper walls of BI (013, 015, 012, 027, 029) the BI and BIII buildings collapsed. The collapse deposit consisted of the red clay and rubble mortar common to the walls of the Byzantine rebuilding interspersed with large stone tumble.- Ball et al (1986) |
Effect | Location | Images | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Wall - Fallen architectural blocks and core rubble | North wall of the Theatre
Figure 10
General Plan of the area of excavations JW: Excavation areas and trenches are denoted by a capital Letter followed by a Roman Numeral Ball et al (1986) |
The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase [2 of of the Portico of the North Theater - Area JNT-C] represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult.- Ball et al (1986) |
VIII+ | |
Collapsed arches - Fallen Colonnade and architrave pieces | Portico
Figure 10
General Plan of the area of excavations JW: Excavation areas and trenches are denoted by a capital Letter followed by a Roman Numeral Ball et al (1986) |
The Byzantine Period (6th century AD). This phase [2 of of the Portico of the North Theater - Area JNT-C] represents the robbing and subsequent collapse of the North Theatre following its abandonment as a public building. At some time, but definitely post-dating the laying down of the foot-tracks of Phase 1, the paving stone of the upper flight of stairs and the Portico was robbed out (Pl. I). Overlying the remaining foundations of the paving rested a substantial collapse layer, consisting of architectural blocks and core rubble from the north wall of the Theatre, and Colonnade and architrave pieces of the Portico. The little pottery recovered from this layer dates to the second half of the 6th century AD, suggesting a mid to late 6th century date for the destruction of the Theatre, though whether by earthquake or as the result of the quest for building stone we cannot be certain. The robbing must have taken place sometime before this, probably in the earlier part of the 6th century AD, as once the north wall of the Theatre had collapsed into the Portico, access to the paving would have been quite difficult.- Ball et al (1986) |
VI+ |
Balderstone, S. (1985) Archaeology in Jordan - the North Theatre at Jerash, Historic Environment IV 4
Ball, W., et al. (1986). The North Decumanus and North Tetrapylon at Jerash: An Archaeological and Architectural Report
in Jerash Archaeological Project 1, 1981–1983. ed. F. Zayadine. Amman, Department of Antiquities Jordan: 351-409.
Pottery associated with the Umayyad Kiln in Area C date was dated to the 2nd quarter of the 8th century CE based on comparison to Pottery in Pella where Umayyad coins precisely dated an analogous layer to the 2nd quarter of the 8th century CE (Ball et al, 1986:357).