Open this page in a new tab

Jerash - City Walls

 Western City Walls in Jerash

click on image to open in a new tab

Photo by Jefferson Williams - 23 June 2025


Introduction
Introduction

Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019) excavated a number of trenches from 2000-2002 along Jerash's city walls in order to determine their date of construction.

ChatGPT Introduction

The city walls of Jerash (ancient Gerasa) form an enclosing fortification system dated primarily to the 4th–6th centuries CE. Excavation and architectural analysis indicate that their construction—carried out with considerable care and planning— may have occurred as early as the 4th century, during the reign of Constantius II (337–361 CE), or perhaps later in the 6th century under Emperor Justinian. The walls were built in massive courses using large, well-cut limestone ashlars and incorporated reused architectural fragments from earlier structures, including capitals and pedestals from Roman monuments.

The circuit included towers, parapets, and multiple gates, integrating older roads and urban features. The East City Wall was particularly well preserved and featured double-wall construction in places. The North and South Gates marked the main entrances to the city, aligned with the decumanus and cardo streets.

Substantial remains of tumble and collapsed masonry, especially in Trench 400 of the East Wall, reveal episodes of damage, including a sudden collapse of the parapet—possibly triggered by a seismic event in the 6th century CE. Stratigraphic evidence shows that this collapse occurred after the wall's original construction but before the accumulation of Islamic-period debris, offering a terminus ante quem for the wall's failure.

In addition to its defensive role, the wall functioned as an urban boundary during late antiquity, with modifications over time including gate blockages, repairs, and potential earthquake-induced reconstructions. As such, the city wall is a key feature in understanding the urban topography, chronology, and seismic history of Jerash.

Jerash - Introduction Webpage

Plans and Photos
Plans and Photos

Plans

Normal Size

  • Site Plan of Jerash from Wikipedia
  • Fig. 1 - Jerash City Walls and Trench locations from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Magnified

  • Site Plan of Jerash from Wikipedia
  • Fig. 1 - Jerash City Walls and Trench locations from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Photos

Normal Size

  • Plate 1:10 - Lower city wall tumble layers from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Magnified

  • Plate 1:10 - Lower city wall tumble layers from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Archaeoseismic Chronology
Stratigraphy

Period Label Date
Late Hellenistic unstated -63 BCE
BC/AD 63 BCE - 135 CE
Roman 135 CE - 193 CE
Late Roman 193 BCE - 324 CE
Byzantine 324 BCE - 636 CE
Late Byzantine unstated - 636 CE
Islamic 636 CE - unstated

Trench 400 Earthquake - 6th century CE

Plans and Photos

Plans and Photos

Plans

Normal Size

  • Site Plan of Jerash from Wikipedia
  • Fig. 1 - Jerash City Walls and Trench locations from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Magnified

  • Site Plan of Jerash from Wikipedia
  • Fig. 1 - Jerash City Walls and Trench locations from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Photos

Normal Size

  • Plate 1:10 - Lower city wall tumble layers from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Magnified

  • Plate 1:10 - Lower city wall tumble layers from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Discussion
Discussion

References
Notes by JW

Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019:21) found a tumble layer (Plate 1:10) in the Trench 400 of the East Wall which they described as follows:

At some time after the dumping of 405,407 and 411, a sudden partial collapse from the face of the City Wall occurred, resulting in the distribution of six rows of facing masonry (406) in the main trench. The facing stones had fallen into neat rows, a little way from the base of the Wall, and clearly had not been disturbed since the event. Most of the stones had vertical faces, and most had at least one dimension that was close to 0.45m or 0.4m, similar to the dimensions on the uppermost extant courses of the City Wall. It seems highly probable that the six rows represent the fallen rear parapet of the City Wall of Gerasa.

... The presence of the Byzantine pottery strongly suggests that the City Wall survived intact into the Byzantine period. The sudden collapse of the rear parapet into the fallen rows of 406 may have been caused by an earthquake.
Kehrberg-Ostrasz in Savage et al (2003:458) dated this seismic destruction to the 6th century
The upper layers consisted of mixed soil with residual contemporary and Late Islamic pottery and glass sherds, as well as charred bones and other debris, clearly indicating a gradual accumulation of rubbish. This rubbish tip rested on neat rows of courses of the wall, which had fallen face down onto the western rocky slope already littered with residual rubbish. The pottery and glass under this tumbled wall section showed that the collapse must have occurred during the Late Byzantine period, probably the result of an earthquake that was responsible for the destruction of other city buildings in the sixth century.

Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

Chat GPT Summary of Archaeoseismic Evidence

  • from Chat GPT 4o, 22 June 2025
  • from Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)
  • Excavations in Trench 400 along the east City Wall of Jerash revealed a distinctive collapse layer (406) composed of six rows of large facing stones from the City Wall. These stones had fallen in organized, undisturbed rows near the base of the wall. Their uniform dimensions—typically 0.40 to 0.45 m in at least one direction—matched those of surviving upper courses of the wall. The excavators interpreted this as the parapet collapse, most likely from the rear (west-facing) side of the wall. The presence of Byzantine pottery in deposits below the collapse suggests that the wall remained intact into the Byzantine period.

    Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley argue that this sudden collapse, undisturbed since the event, was likely caused by an earthquake. The fall direction, neat arrangement of stones, and absence of post-collapse disturbance all support this interpretation. They date the destruction tentatively to the Late Byzantine period.

    Kehrberg-Ostrasz in Savage et al. (2003)

    Chat GPT Summary of Archaeoseismic Evidence

    Excavation in Trench 400 along the East City Wall exposed a sudden wall collapse that Kehrberg-Ostrasz in Savage et al. (2003) attributes to a 6th century CE earthquake.

    Rows of upper courses from the city wall were found face-down on the slope west of the wall, undisturbed since their fall.

    Beneath these, sealed contexts yielded pottery and glass sherds dating to the Late Byzantine period, establishing a terminus post quem for the collapse. The authors note that this event "can probably be attributed to the earthquake(s) which caused the destruction of other major buildings of Jarash in the sixth century AD."

    No mention is made of visible seismic effects such as fractures or faulting. However, the preservation and distribution of the wall tumble—six rows of facing stones lying in order—suggest an abrupt and undisturbed collapse, likely seismic in origin.

    The presence of consistent dating materials in sealed layers beneath the fallen masonry strengthens the interpretation of earthquake destruction.

    Archaeoseismic Effects
    Trench 400 Earthquake - 6th century CE

    Effect Location Image(s) Description
    Collapsed Walls             East Wall - Trench 400
    • At some time after the dumping of 405,407 and 411, a sudden partial collapse from the face of the City Wall occurred, resulting in the distribution of six rows of facing masonry (406) in the main trench. The facing stones had fallen into neat rows, a little way from the base of the Wall, and clearly had not been disturbed since the event. Most of the stones had vertical faces, and most had at least one dimension that was close to 0.45m or 0.4m, similar to the dimensions on the uppermost extant courses of the City Wall. It seems highly probable that the six rows represent the fallen rear parapet of the City Wall of Gerasa. ... The sudden collapse of the rear parapet into the fallen rows of 406 may have been caused by an earthquake. - Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019:21)

    • This rubbish tip rested on neat rows of courses of the wall, which had fallen face down onto the western rocky slope already littered with residual rubbish. The pottery and glass under this tumbled wall section showed that the collapse must have occurred during the Late Byzantine period, probably the result of an earthquake that was responsible for the destruction of other city buildings in the sixth century. - Kehrberg-Ostrasz in Savage et al (2003:458)

    Archaeoseismic Deformation Maps
    Trench 400 Earthquake - 6th century CE

    Deformation Map

    Click on image to open in a new tab

    Modified by JW from Fig. 1 of Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019)

    Archaeoseismic Intensity Estimates
    Trench 400 Earthquake - 6th century CE

    Effect Location Image(s) Description Intensity
    Collapsed Walls             East Wall - Trench 400
    • At some time after the dumping of 405,407 and 411, a sudden partial collapse from the face of the City Wall occurred, resulting in the distribution of six rows of facing masonry (406) in the main trench. The facing stones had fallen into neat rows, a little way from the base of the Wall, and clearly had not been disturbed since the event. Most of the stones had vertical faces, and most had at least one dimension that was close to 0.45m or 0.4m, similar to the dimensions on the uppermost extant courses of the City Wall. It seems highly probable that the six rows represent the fallen rear parapet of the City Wall of Gerasa. ... The sudden collapse of the rear parapet into the fallen rows of 406 may have been caused by an earthquake. - Kehrberg-Ostrasz and Manley (2019:21)

    • This rubbish tip rested on neat rows of courses of the wall, which had fallen face down onto the western rocky slope already littered with residual rubbish. The pottery and glass under this tumbled wall section showed that the collapse must have occurred during the Late Byzantine period, probably the result of an earthquake that was responsible for the destruction of other city buildings in the sixth century. - Kehrberg-Ostrasz in Savage et al (2003:458)
    VIII +
    The archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224).

    Notes and Further Reading
    References