Transliterated Name | Language | Name |
---|---|---|
Monastery of Euthymius | English | |
Laura of Euthymius | English | |
Lavra of Euthymius | English | |
Khan el-Ahmar | Arabic |
Euthymius' Monastery (Khan el-Ahmar) is located in the industrial zone of Mishor Adummim, about 10 km (6 mi.) east of Jerusalem (map reference 1819.1333). Cyril of Scythopolis (Beth-Shean), the biographer of Euthymius, provides an exact topographical description of the monastery. It was located, according to him, on a small hill surrounded on the east and west by two especially beautiful valleys that meet and converge on the south side.
The Monastery of Saint Euthymius was founded in 428 as a laura (q.v. Monasteries). This laura was unique in its status and central location, and the number of its monks quickly rose to fifty. According to Cyril's description, a garden containing a reservoir was planted next to the laura's church and the bakery. In accordance with Saint Euthymius' will, the monastery was reestablished as a cenobium , containing a church and a refectory, as well as a tower, and surrounded by a wall. The cenobium was dedicated in 482 CE.
Summarizing the history of the monastery of Euthymius, four main dates of construction are clear:
TThe Monastery of Saint Euthymius was the first monastery in the Judean Desert in which archaeological excavations were conducted. It was excavated from 1927 to 1930 by D. Chitty, on behalf of the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem. Chitty concentrated on uncovering the church and the structure of the adjoining crypt. In the 1970s, Y. Meimaris excavated here, extending the previously excavated areas. In 1987, excavations were resumed by Y. Hirschfeld and R. Birger-Calderon, on behalf of the Institute of Archaeology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The monastery's successive stages were uncovered and the tower structure in its north wing was partially excavated.
Hirschfeld (1993:354) reported on the results of excavations at the Monastery of Euthymius. He dated seismic destruction based on reconstruction evidence and the report of its destruction in the Maronite Chronicle (see Textual Evidence section).
The severity of the destruction in the monastery of Euthymius may be deduced from the results of the excavations. During our excavation at the site, it became clear that most of the monastery – except for the crypt, whose vaults remained intact, and another vault which survived at the north end of the church – was rebuilt after the earthquake of 659. At this stage, the basilical church was reconstructed over the vaults; the latter are not Byzantine, as Chitty suggests, but early Muslim.39 The floor of the church was decorated with fine mosaic patterns. These have also been dated, on the basis of their style, to the early Muslim period, i.e., following the earthquake of 659. Reconstruction of the monastery probably took place not long after the earthquake, in the second half of the 7th century.Footnotes39. Chitty seems to have dated the church to 482, even before beginning the excavation, see: Chitty and Jones, “The Church” (above, note 1), pp. 175-176. This was done despite the fact that the mosaics of the church were dated by the Dominican archaeologist Père Savignac to the 7th-8th centuries (ibid.). The early dating of the church was reiterated by Chitty later, see: Chitty, “The Monastery” (above note 1), p. 194
The Maronite Chronicle lists three earthquakes
a violent earthquake in Palestinewhere many places collapsed.
an earthquake and a violent tremorwhere
the greater part of Jericho fell, including all its churches, the
House of Lord John at the site of our Saviour’s baptism in the Jordanwas overthrown, and
the monastery of Abba Euthymius as well as many convents of monks and solitaries and many other places also collapsed.
/p. 69/ .. .Mu'awiya, Hudhayfa, the son of his sister, and Mu'awiya gave orders that he be‘put to death.
133 Arabic sources say he was killed at a mosque in Kufa; ‘Ali is,
however, described as governor of al-Hira by a Palestinian Christian
writing c.680 (Brock, ‘An early Syriac’Life’, p. 313/319). [R.H.]
134 Arabic sources are generally agreed that ‘Ali was killed in
Ramadan 40 (January 661 = AG 972). Our chronicler may have been
misled by the fact that ‘the Syrians acknowledged Mu'awiya as caliph
in Dhu ’l-Qa‘da 37 (April 658=969)’ (Tabari, 11, p. 199), or he may
be better informed than we. Theophanes, p. 347 also places ‘Ali’s
death earlier than the accepted date, in 659/60. [R.H.]
135 By this is probably meant the glancing gesture of right palm
against right palm by which Arabs today seal a contract; see text No.
10 under AG 967.
136 7 June, AD 659.
137 {Syr. SBKWT).
138 Literally: ‘those of the House of Lord Maron.’
139 Literal1y he made himself a legator of Mu'awiya {Syr. wa-'bad napseh mawr' tono d-Mu'awiya}.
140 9 June, AD 659, was indeed a Sunday.
141 Allegiance was rendered to Mu'awiya in Jerusalem after the death
of ‘Ali in the year 40 (February 661=972: Tabari, II, p. 4); ‘the
people as a whole’ recognized him after ‘Ali’s‘ son, Hasan had made
peace with him and turned matters over to him in the year 41, five days
before the end of the month of Rabi' I (31 July 661=972)
(Tabari,
II, p. 199). Again, our chronicler may have inside information, but
one suspects that he has brought forward Mu'awiya’s accession and
tour in Jerusalem to coincide with the earthquake of 659, the latter
being in his mind an evident indication of God’s disapproval of the
former event. Note that the entry for ‘the following year’, a severe
frost, falls in 662, not 660. [R.H.]
142 The weekday shows that this was AD 662
(1) 658-659 CE.
(2) He is the Patriarch of Antioch (649-667). Cf. B. H. C. E. I., p. 282.
(3) Bishop of Kennesrin, B. H. C. E., p. 276. - One can believe that the Maronites then made
use of the questions written by Jean Maron against the Jacobites and which we have translated above.
(4) The 9th of this month was indeed a Sunday. N.
(5) Theophanes also places this murder in 658-659 CE. N.
(6) Cf. B. H. C. S., p. 106, 1. 17-27.
(7) He retired to Rome and Syracuse.
(8) June.
(9) April.
Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
10 am Friday 7 June 659 CE | In AG 970, the 17th year of Constans, on a Friday in June, at the second hour, there was a violent earthquake in Palestine, and many places there collapsed |
none | The first earthquake occurred in the second hour (~8 am) on a Friday in June (Haziran) during A.G. (aka Seleucid Year - A.S.) 970 (1 Oct. 658 to 30 Sept. 659 CE) which (in June) corresponds to 659 CE. However, the year for this event is also specified as the 17th year of Constans II's rule which dates to May 657 - Aug. 658 CE and thus places the year in 658 (for June). Due to the correct date and weekday presented below, it would appear that 659 CE is the correct year. |
Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
~2 pm Sunday 9 June 659 CE | On the ninth of the same month in which the disputation with the Jacobites took place, on a Sunday at the eighth hour, there was an earthquake |
none | A second earthquake is described as occurring in the 8th hour (~2 pm) on Sunday 9 June the month when the Jacobite Bishops went to Damascus to visit Mu'awiyah I and complain about/debate the Maronites. Julian day calculations indicate that 9 June 659 CE fell on a Sunday and the text indicates that the second earthquake occurred in the same month and year as the first earthquake. This dates the first earthquake to Friday 7 June 659 CE. This second earthquake could be an aftershock to the first earthquake. The author also specifies that the earthquake took place during the same year in which Constans II killed his brother which historians seem to date to 659 or 660 CE. |
Year | Reference | Corrections | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
660 CE | In AG 971, Constans’s 18th year, many Arabs gathered at Jerusalem and made Mu'awiya king ... when the Arabs were assembled there with Mu'awiya, there was an earthquake and a violent tremor |
none | The third earthquake suffers from chronological inconsistencies and, unlike the first two earthquakes, does not specify details such as hour, day of the week, and date.
The earthquake is described as taking place a year later during A.S. 971 (1 Oct. 659 to 30 Sept. 660 CE), during Constan II's eighteenth year
(May 658 - Aug. 659 CE), and when Mu'awiyah I was declared King. This describes his accession as
Caliph on Haram esh-Sharif (aka Temple Mount) in Jerusalem - presumably in the Congregational Mosque of the time.
Ambraseys (2009) following Grumel (1958: 380) and others date this accession to
A.H. 41 (May 661 to April 662).
Marsham (2013)
also places the accession in 661 CE at the conclusion of the
First Fitna (aka the first Muslim Civil War).
Marsham (2013)
further suggests that the Maronite Chronicler may have moved
Mu'awiyah I's accession from 661 CE to 660 CE to make it coincide with the earthquake. In Palmer et al (1993)'s translation, the date for the spring frost (specified as occurring in the following year) is specified as Wednesday 13 April. 13 April fell on a Wednesday in 662 CE (confirmed via CHRONOS). Moving back a year, this would then place Mu'awiyah I's accession in 661 CE in agreement with most historians. This in turn supports the thesis that the Maronite Chronicle moved Mu'awiyah I's accession from 661 CE to 660 CE to make it coincide with the earthquake. |
the accession rituals of Muʿāwiya appear to have deliberately been juxtaposed with natural disasters — earthquakes follow two of the pledges of allegiance and a withering spring frost, which destroyed grapevines, is placed adjacent to a third account. The use of natural disasters to indicate God’s disapproval is a common feature of late antique and early medieval chronography. Indeed, here it appears that the compiler may have altered both his chronology and selection of material in order to achieve this effect. However, selecting and organizing material for polemical reasons is different from fabricating it, and there are good reasons to think that the account is accurate in most of its details.
Hoyland, R. (2019). Seeing Islam as others saw it, Gorgias Press.
Marsham (2013) The Architecture of Allegiance in Early Islamic Late Antiquity: The Accession of Mu‘awiya in Jerusalem, ca. 661 CE
in Beihammer, A., et al. (2013). Court Ceremonies and Rituals of Power in Byzantium and the Medieval Mediterranean: Comparative Perspectives, Brill.
Nau, F. (1899). "Opuscules maronites." Revue de l'Orient chrétien 4.
Palmer, A., et al. (1993). The Seventh Century in the West-Syrian Chronicles, Liverpool University Press.
Penn, M. P. (2015). When Christians First Met Muslims: A Sourcebook of the Earliest Syriac Writings on Islam, University of California Press.
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Structures | Most of the monastery
Plan of Euthymius Monastery
Used with permission from BibleWalks.com |
The severity of the destruction in the monastery of Euthymius may be deduced from the results of the excavations. During our excavation at the site, it became clear that most of the monastery – except for the crypt, whose vaults remained intact, and another vault which survived at the north end of the church – was rebuilt after the earthquake of 659.- Hirschfeld (1993:354) |
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Structures including walls | Most of the monastery
Plan of Euthymius Monastery
Used with permission from BibleWalks.com |
The severity of the destruction in the monastery of Euthymius may be deduced from the results of the excavations. During our excavation at the site, it became clear that most of the monastery – except for the crypt, whose vaults remained intact, and another vault which survived at the north end of the church – was rebuilt after the earthquake of 659.- Hirschfeld (1993:354) |
VIII + |
Hirschfeld (1993:354) EUTHYMIUS AND HIS MONASTERY
IN THE JUDEAN DESERT Liber Annus 43 339-371 - open access at archive.org - also available at the wayback machine
Meimaris,Y. E. (1989) The Monastery of Saint Euthymios the Great at Khan el-Ahmar, in the
Wilderness of Judaea: Rescue Excavations and Basic Protection Measures, 1976-1979, Preliminary
Report, Athens 1989.
Y. E. Meimaris, The Monastery of Saint Euthymios the Great at Khan el-Ahmar, in the
Wilderness of Judaea: Rescue Excavations and Basic Protection Measures, 1976-1979, Preliminary
Report, Athens 1989.
D. J. Chitty and A. H. M. Jones, PEQ 61 (1929), 98-102, 175-178; 62 (1930), 43-47, 150-
153; 64 (1932), 188-203
Y. Hirschfeld, ESI 3 (1984), 80; id., The Judean Desert Monasteries in the
Byzantine Period, New Haven (in prep.)
R. Birger and Y. Hirschfeld, ESI7-8 (1988-1989), 110
Y. E. Meimaris (Review), LA 40 (1990), 524-526.
Y. Hirschfeld, The Judean Desert Monasteries in the Byzantine Period, New Haven CT 1992; id., LA 43
(1993), 339–371
V. Eshed, Paleoanthropological Research on Four Byzantine Populations (M.A. thesis),
Tel Aviv 1993
I. Hershkovitz (et al.), LA 43 (1993), 373–385; id. (& R. Yakar), International Journal of
Osteoarchaeology 5 (1995), 61–77
J. Patrich, Abas, Leader of Palestinian Monasticism: A Comparative
Study in Eastern Monasticism, 4th to 7th Centuries (Dumbarton Oaks Studies 32), Washington, D.C. 1995,
162–163
H. Goldfus, Tombs and Burials in Churches and Monasteries of Byzantine Palestine (324–628
A.D.), 1–2 (Ph.D. diss.), Ann Arbor, MI 1998, 176–205
S. Santelli et al., Les Dossiers d’Archéologie 240
(1999), 86–87
F. Mébarki, MdB 131 (2000), 60
L. Di Segni, The Sabaite Heritage in the Orthodox Church
from the 5th Century to the Present (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 98; ed. J. Patrich), Leuven 2001, 31–36
P. Donceel-Voûte, La mosaïque gréco-romaine 9: Actes du 9. Colloque International pour l’Étude de la
Mosaïque Antique et Médiévale, Roma, 5–10.11.2001, Paris 2002, 151–170.