the A.D. 749 earthquakenoting that:
It can be seen in Figure 2e how the displacement of the column base and the foundation socle (as a result of the quake tremor) broke the water channel running beside it. The poor compacting of the fills, as well as the design itself of the building, were the reasons for this displacement of the column foundation and the consequent collapse of the building.Arce (2000:135-140) reported on the following architectural elements found in
A.D. 749 earthquake debris
This piece combines arch, panel and colonnettes, with the same height but slightly wider (59 centimeters) than the average (48 centimeters). The panel does not have any carved decoration; perhaps a painted or mosaic decoration was applied on it (Figure 3h).
This piece includes also an archivolted arch. The panel bears a huge trefoil motif that occupies the whole area of the arch. The height of the arch is 37 centimeters (Figure 3i).
The panel decoration of this already known piece has a composite tree with a zig-zag stem and alternating half-palmettes, medlar leaves, and a pomegranate on a ground of three semicircles (Northedge 1992: figure 54.4 and plate 28f; Bartoccini 1933: 14, no.i) (Figure 3j).
The panel from this new piece has a composite tree with a central stem and alternating half-palmettes pointing downwards and bunches of grapes. The ground has the typical three semicircles (Figure 3k). A single colonnette of the same series and another small fragment were found in the undisturbed debris from the mosque collapse in the west street/ziyada.
There is an important characteristic of this set of niches that contrasts with the standard type (consisting of double engaged colonnettes, archivolted arches, and decorated panels). In the standard freezes, the decoration is displayed on a separate panel that is placed between two double-engaged colonnette pieces. Each of these pieces—with colonnettes—support two different neighboring archivolted arches. Therefore, we have an alternating vertical joint building system that provides more strength to the whole. In this other case, the elements are not three but two (and in some cases just one): the archivolted arches and the blocks that bring together the decorated panel are flanked by single colonnettes. Thus each niche stands on its own pair of colonnettes and decorated panel, without any link to the neighbouring ones. The standard set was designed to tie together its pieces as structural weight-carrying elements that formed part of the ashlar masonry fabric. In the small set case, the mechanical characteristics seem not to be so demanding.
Another important feature is the scale of the pieces and consequently the place they were designed for. After knowledge achieved from the restoration of the vestibule, it can be asserted that the higher or more distant a decorated niche is away from the observer, the bigger it is in size.17 In our case, their smaller dimension would indicate that they were intended to be seen close up, as would be the case in a narrow street. This evidence would indicate that these small-scale pieces could have belonged to the lateral façades of the mosque, or even to its interior, being placed in between the buttresses.
Several pieces of carved stucco were found on the mosque courtyard floor and inside its cisterns. Therefore, it could be inferred that while the outside façades were decorated with carved stone the interior of the mosque was mainly decorated with carved stucco.
Among the collapsed debris from the 749 earthquake at the base of the west wall of the mosque a piece of great interest was found. It is a fragment of a marble slab with a carved Kufic inscription. Each line of the text was alternatively painted with red and pale blue pigments. Being Kufic, the inscription does not have diacritical marks. It has a carved edge that fitted into a supporting groove. On the rear another, much rougher, inscription can be seen, also in Arabic, indicating the block was reused. In both inscriptions the only complete word that can be read is "Allah" (Figures 4i, 4j). Other noticeable inscriptions are those scratched on the third step in front of the mosque; only "Allah 'umma" and also "Illa[..]" can be read.
Effect | Location | Image (s) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Displaced Column Base and Broken Water Channel | Umayyad Mosque
Figure 1
Congregational Mosque and Souq Square at Amman Citadel:
Arce (2000) |
Figure 2 e
Channel broken by the A.D. 749 earthquake. Arce (2000) |
displacement of the column base and the foundation socle (as a result of the quake tremor) broke the water channel running beside it.- Arce (2000) |
Debris indicating wall and arch or semi dome collapse | Umayyad Mosque
Figure 1
Congregational Mosque and Souq Square at Amman Citadel:
Arce (2000) |
Arce (2000) reports that the earthquake debris included Cornices indicating wall collapse, niches indicating arch collapse or semi dome vault collapse, carved stucco decoration from interior walls, and carved inscriptions in marble indicating wall damage or collapse (the inscription would have presumably been attached to a wall) |
Effect | Location | Image (s) | Comments | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Displaced Column Base and Broken Water Channel | Umayyad Mosque
Figure 1
Congregational Mosque and Souq Square at Amman Citadel:
Arce (2000) |
Figure 2 e
Channel broken by the A.D. 749 earthquake. Arce (2000) |
displacement of the column base and the foundation socle (as a result of the quake tremor) broke the water channel running beside it.- Arce (2000) |
VIII + |
Debris indicating wall and arch or semi dome collapse | Umayyad Mosque
Figure 1
Congregational Mosque and Souq Square at Amman Citadel:
Arce (2000) |
Arce (2000) reports that the earthquake debris included Cornices indicating wall collapse, niches indicating arch collapse or semi dome vault collapse, carved stucco decoration from interior walls, and carved inscriptions in marble indicating wall damage or collapse (the inscription would have presumably been attached to a wall) | VIII + |