AM 5533
Year 33 of the divine Incarnation
This year AM 5533 was our Saviour's thirty-third year of age
according to the flesh, the 213th year of the eleventh revolution of
the 532-year cycle, in the nineteenth year of Tiberius Caesar.
...
although blameless, he was crucified on the 27th of the month of Phamenoth
...
From Africanus concerning the events associated with the passion of the Saviour and the life-bringing Resurrection1
Concerning each of his deeds and his cures, both of bodies and souls, and the secrets of his knowledge, and his Resurrection from the dead,
this has been explained with complete adequacy by his disciples and the apostles before us. A most terrible darkness fell over all the world,
the rocks were torn apart by an earthquake, and many places both in Judaea and the rest of the world were thrown down2.
In the third book of his Histories, Thallos dismisses this darkness as a solar eclipse.
3 In my opinion, this is nonsense.
For the Hebrews celebrate the Passover on Luna 14, and what happened to the Saviour occurred one day before the Passover
4. But an eclipse of the
sun takes place when the moon passes under the sun. The only time when this can happen is in the interval between the first day of the new moon and
the last day of the old moon, when they are in conjunction
5. How then could one believe an eclipse took place when the moon was almost in opposition
to the sun? So be it. Let what had happened beguile the masses, and let this wonderful sign to the world be considered a solar eclipse through an optical (illusion).
Phlegon records that during the reign of Tiberius Caesar there was a complete solar eclipse at full moon from the sixth to the ninth hour;
it is clear that this is the one
6. But what have eclipses to do with an earthquake, rocks breaking apart, resurrection of the dead,
and a universal disturbance of this nature?
1a
Certainly an event of such magnitude has not been recalled for a long time. But it was a darkness created by God, because it happened
that the Lord experienced his passion at that time. And reason proves that the seventy weeks of years mentioned in Daniel were completed in this time.
...
From Eusebios Pamphilou concerning the same matter7
In accordance with the prophecies about him, Jesus Christ, the
son of God, our Lord, went forth to his passion in the nineteenth
year of the reign of Tiberius.
8 At that time, we have found the
following events recounted verbatim in other Greek historical
records as well: 'There was a solar eclipse.
Bithynia was shaken
by an earthquake. Many sites in Nikaia collapsed.' These reports also correspond with the events associated with the passion of our
Saviour. Phlegon, who composed a record of the Olympiads, also writes about these same events in his 13th book, with the
following words: 'In the fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad, there was an eclipse of the sun, greater than any that had been
previously known. And night fell at the sixth hour of the day, so
that the stars appeared in the sky.
A great earthquake occurring
throughout Bithynia overturned many sites in Nikaia.
9 This is
the witness of the man just mentioned.
Footnotes
1 Routh, fr. 5o. This excerpt from Africanus comprises three segments:
- an exposition of the meaning of the miraculous events narrated by
Matthew at the time of Jesus' crucifixion (Matt. 27.45-54) see also Kedr. i.
331.9-332.15
- an extended chronological interpretation of the
7o-week prophecy of Dan. 9.24-7; see also Eus. DE 8.2.45-54
- a summary of Africanus' 5531-year chronology from Adam up to the time of
Jesus' crucifixion.
2 Matt. 27.45, 51. In the discussion that follows, Africanus challenges a
widespread effort by Christian chroniclers and apologists to validate
Matthew's story of the darkness and the earthquake from pagan historians,
chiefly Phlegon's account of a great earthquake and solar eclipse during the
reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius; for proponents of this view, see
Origen, Contra Celsum 2.33; Eus. 2.1744 (= Synk. 394.1-22); Joh. Mal.
240.17-22; Chi-on. pasch. 412.7-15; 417.9-15. Africanus' chief argument is
that Jesus' crucifixion occurred during the celebration of the Passover, that
is around the middle of the month of Nisan, when the sun and moon are in
opposition. Since solar eclipses only occur when the sun and moon are in
conjunction, the darkness at noon described in Matthew was not a naturally occurring and predictable astronomical phenomenon; it was rather an
extraordinary event, 'created by God'. Africanus was not the only Christian
writer to express doubts that the darkness over the earth at the time of the
crucifixion was a solar eclipse; see Origen, Scholia in Matthaeum (PG
17.309); Joh. Philop. De opif. mundi 2.21.
3 Thallos, FGrH 256 F I.
4 Exod. 12.6; John 19.31.
5 Text: [Greek Text] Cf. Kedr. i.
331.24: [Greek Text] ('new moon') instead of [Greek Text].
6 Phlegon, FGrH 257 F 16. This sentence is full of inconsistencies.
It is hard to imagine why, after previously discounting the solar eclipse
explanation, Africanus suddenly embraces Phlegon's eclipse as 'clearly' the
same one described in Matthew. Phlegon's dating of the eclipse is also at
odds with Africanus' own chronology of Jesus' ministry. According to
Eusebios (2.1744 = Synk. 394.8-15), Phlegon dated the solar eclipse in
the '4th year of the 202nd Olympiad (quarto ... anno CCII olympiadis)', corresponding to 18 Tiberius. Since Jesus' ministry commenced in 15
Tiberius (see Luke 3.1), Eusebios concluded that Phlegon's report established that 'Jesus preached for a period of 3 years'. But as Synk. states
repeatedly, Africanus assigned only one year (5530/1) to Jesus' ministry; see
below, pp. 471, 472, 473 (= Moss. 393.28-30; 394.25-7; 395.19-22). That would mean that Jesus' crucifixion occurred in 16, not 18, Tiberius. Finally,
the description of the eclipse that Africanus ascribes to Phlegon conflicts
with Eusebios'. According to the latter writer, Phlegon stated only that
'there was an eclipse of the sun greater than any previously known, and it became night on the sixth hour of the day.' There is no suggestion here
about a three-hour solar eclipse at full moon. Routh (478 n. ad loc.) thus suggests that the above sentence might be an editorial corruption either by
Synk. or an intermediary. In any case, the eclipse intended must be that of
24 November 29 = 01. 202.1; at some point, before or after Phlegon, A' was
corrupted to Δ'.
1a Text. [Greek Text]. Following Di. and Routh, [Greek Text] emended
to [Greek Text].
Lit. 'What is the connection between eclipses and an earthquake, rocks
breaking apart', etc. But since in the preceding discussion Africanus
attempts to prove that the events described in Matt. 27 were not evidence
of a solar eclipse, the translation given above better conveys Africanus'
argument.
7 Eus. 2.174d
8 Cf. Eus. 2.174.16 (18 Tiberius). Synk.'s date, also attested in the
Armenian version of the Canons (2.213Arm), is the preferable reading. In this
same excerpt, Eusebios puts Jesus' crucifixion in 01. 202.4 (= 19 Tiberius).
Jerome's version perhaps emended the 19th year to the 18th year, in order
to conform with the accepted chronology of Jesus' ministry (three years,
beginning in 15 Tiberius).
9 Phlegon, FGrH 257 F 16.