Event ZT4 in Tell Saidiyeh Trench 4
Event ZT4 was identified in Trench T4
at Tell Saidiyeh, a site situated along the
Jordan Valley
Fault. Unlike the purpose-excavated
Trench T3, Trench T4 originated as a cut made
during agricultural leveling works and trends
northwest–southeast, oblique to the fault trace.
The exposure was subsequently widened and
cleaned by
Ferry et al.
(2011). The trench exposes a
well-developed fault zone affecting both late
Pleistocene
and
Holocene
deposits. Because the trench is oriented
approximately 45° to the fault, the deformation
zone appears wider than in a perpendicular
exposure and provides an unusually detailed
record of repeated surface ruptures.
The evidence for Event ZT4 consists
of three major fault splays, designated FZ1,
FZ3, and FZ4, that rupture almost the entire
stratigraphic sequence exposed in the trench.
According to
Ferry et al.
(2011:54), these splays extend upward to
within approximately 20–30 cm of the present
ground surface. The clearest measurable
displacement occurs on FZ3, where vertical
offset reaches about 5 cm. The rupture does not
cut the shallowest units b and c, demonstrating
that faulting ceased before their deposition.
Event ZT4 is interpreted
as the youngest clearly identified
surface-rupturing earthquake preserved in
Trench T4.
The chronology of Event ZT4 is
constrained by its occurrence after deposition
of unit d and before deposition of unit c.
Ferry et al.
(2011:54) report a nominal age bracket of
87–1920 CE for the event. However, the lower
bound is derived from a
snail-shell date
that appears significantly older than the
surrounding sediments. Ferry et al. therefore
consider the event more likely to have occurred
substantially later, probably after about
500 CE. Based on this interpretation, they
correlate Event ZT4 with one or both
of the major historical earthquakes known to
have affected the Jordan Valley, namely the
749 CE
earthquake and the
1033/4 CE
earthquake. The 659/660 CE Jordan
Valley earthquake(s) is also a plausible candidate. They conclude that the available
radiocarbon evidence alone cannot distinguish
between these candidates and cannot determine
whether the trench records rupture from one of
these earthquakes or from both events combined
into a single stratigraphic expression.
An alternative interpretation discussed by
Ferry et al.
(2011:54) is that unit c exhibits
approximately 25 cm of warping across the main
fault zone and that unit b thickens downslope in
a manner resembling a
colluvial wedge. If these features are
coseismic, they may instead record a more recent
earthquake, possibly the
1927 Jericho
earthquake. This interpretation is further supported
by a possible modern
fissure-fill feature exposed on the
northwestern side of Trench T4, where it
appears to be associated with fault splay FZ1. Consequently, although
Event ZT4 clearly represents the most
recent surface rupture preserved in the trench,
its precise correlation with a specific
historical earthquake remains uncertain.