Event E is one of six palaeoseismic events identified in the Tekieh trench system which intersects the Serghaya Fault in the southern Zebadani Valley of Syria. The event was recognized in a trench system excavated across and parallel to a ~4–4.5 m-high fault scarp where Late Pleistocene lacustrine sediments on the upthrown eastern block are juxtaposed against Holocene alluvial deposits on the downthrown western block. Event E is represented by Wedge 2, a colluvial wedge observed in fault perpendicular Trench 1.
The fault at this location displays predominantly left-lateral strike-slip motion with a possibility of a smaller dip-slip component. Although displacement for Event E was not measured directly, approximately 4 m of left-lateral displacement is associated with the pair of earthquakes represented by Events D and E, implying an average displacement of roughly 2 m for each event.
Using Wells and Coppersmith (1994) slip-to-magnitude scaling relationships, Gomez et al. (2003) estimated that approximately 2 m of coseismic slip corresponds to an earthquake of about MW 7.0–7.2. Event E was therefore probably a large surface-rupturing earthquake of similar magnitude, although this estimate is inferred from average slip per event rather than from a direct displacement measurement.
Event E is dated by stratigraphic relationships, buried channel chronology, and radiocarbon ages. It post-dates the filling of Channel C3, whose combined radiocarbon samples before calibration yielded an age of 4460–4250 BCE ( 2σ). It also pre-dates deposition of Wedge 2, which was dated with a "Soil organics" sample T1-110Nbk to an age of 4050–3100 BCE ( 2σ). Gomez et al. (2003:670) further refined the upper age limit of Wedge 2 to 4050–3250 BCE by using Bayesian analysis. Consequently, Event E is constrained to sometime between 4460 and 3250 BCE at the 2σ confidence level.
- Fig. 2 Tectonic Location
Map from Gomez et al. (2003)- Fig. 3 Geologic Location
Map from Gomez et al. (2003)![]()
Fig. 3
Geology of the southern Zebadani Valley (Syria). See Fig. 2 for location. Stereonet depicts fault planes and associated striations from faulted Late Pleistocene lake sediments. The dotted line depicts the catchment for the hillslope drainage at the trench site (white square). The white star denotes the excavation of the upper colluvial wedge described in Gomez et al# (2001). White discs denote small drainage deflections (values in metres), including the example shown in Fig. 4. Topographic contour interval = 50 m.
click on image to open in a new tab
Gomez et al (2003)- Fig. 5a Detailed Location
Map from Gomez et al. (2003)- Fig. 5c Extremely Detailed Location
Map from Gomez et al. (2003)![]()
Fig. 5c
Enlarged map of the trench site depicting the positions of the present channel (C1) and the precise locations of the buried channels (C2 and C3). Solid black lines indicate where the buried channels were observed and dashed lines indicate where buried channels were inferred. The patterns are consistent with Fig. 5(a).
click on image to open in a new tab
Gomez et al (2003)- Fig. 12 3D Drawing of Trenches 1 and 2
from Gomez et al. (2003)Figure 8
Trench log for the northern wall of Trench 1 (see Fig. 7), exposing colluvial wedges, undifferentiated alluvium and Late Pleistocene lake sediments. Calibrated radiocarbon ages are shown.
click on image to open in a new tab
Gomez et al. (2003)
Figure 10
Trench log for the east wall of Trench 2. A sequence of three incised and filled channels is shown, with a northward sense of younging. Black discs denote the positions of samples for radiocarbon dating. The profile above the trench log depicts the hillslope channel morphology east of the fault zone. The relative positions of the channel mouth and the buried channels were mapped using a total station. Apparent offsets of the buried channels are shown.
click on image to open in a new tab
Gomez et al. (2003)
![]()