Flame Injections Event - ~1500-~1900 CE
At the Tanninim Creek dam site,
Marco et al. (2014:1449–1450) documented
abundant
liquefaction features at a
stratigraphic interface between an
overlying dark-colored
pedogenic
clay-rich layer and an underlying
lighter-colored
lacustrine clay and
silt-rich unit. Within this setting,
load structures were observed sinking
downward while
flame-shaped injections penetrate
upward across the interface. These complementary
structures reflect instability generated when
elevated pore-fluid pressures develop in the more
permeable silty layer but cannot dissipate through
the overlying
low-permeability clay layer, resulting in
vertical deformation and sediment mobilization.
Flame-shaped injections are most abundant and
largest within several meters of a
breach in the seaward face of an older
Byzantine dam, possibly formed by a
large wave (e.g. a tsunami).
The lower portions of these injections exhibit
zigzag geometries and a pronounced asymmetry,
with
southeastward vergence directed away from
the breach.
This asymmetry contrasts with typical
earthquake-induced sand blows, which are
generally vertical and symmetrical, and suggests directional shear associated with lateral
motion. The zigzag geometries are interpreted
as the product of oscillatory flow within the
impounded lake above, consistent with sloshing
triggered by sudden water displacement.
In addition, the size and frequency of these
injections decrease with distance, disappearing
entirely at ~100 m from the structure.
These observations suggest that tsunami processes
may have contributed to their formation.
These features formed within the
lacustrine deposits that accumulated
behind the dam, where
water-saturated silts and clays were
confined below relatively
stiff clay layers. In this setting,
rapid increases in
pore-fluid pressure in the silty layer could lead to
liquefaction, allowing silt to be
injected upward into overlying
strata. Marco et al. argue that such
overpressure could have been generated
either directly by seismic shaking or by a rapid
increase in
overburden pressure caused by a sudden rise in
water level.
A tsunami-related mechanism is favored based on the
features observed and their spatial distribution. A wave
breaching or impinging upon the dam could have
introduced several meters of additional water into
the reservoir, increasing
vertical stress by
~0.3 bars—sufficient to exceed the
confining strength of
the sediment package and trigger liquefaction. The
resulting shear between flowing water and
unconsolidated sediment would promote instability,
including
Kelvin–Helmholtz instability,
which provides a plausible explanation for the
observed zigzag geometries in the injections.
Marco et al. (2014) cited
comparative analogues to support this interpretation such as
asymmetric sand injections and similar deformation
structures documented in Thailand as a result of the
2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami and lacustrine sequences
associated with seiche or tsunami-induced
resuspension in the
Lisan Formation. These analogs
demonstrate that strong, directional water motion
can impose shear sufficient to deform and inject
water-saturated sediment in a consistent
orientation.
Despite this, a purely seismic origin cannot be
excluded.
Marco et al. (2014) noted that a M > 6.5 earthquake on the Dead Sea Fault, located
~60 km east of the site, would be capable of
triggering liquefaction at Tanninim. The
Carmel Fault (~25 km northeast) is considered less likely
due to the absence of evidence for significant
recent seismic activity. It can thus be concluded
that while earthquake shaking could have
initiated liquefaction, the morphology of the
structures and the damage to the dam favor the
involvement of a tsunami or tsunami-like hydraulic
forcing.
Stratigraphically, these deformation features
occur within a well-defined lacustrine sequence
consistently observed across multiple trenches
(T1–T5) and an excavation exposure (T6),
indicating laterally extensive conditions of
sedimentation. However, the
timing of the event remains uncertain.
The primary difficulty is that the soft-sediment
deformation features formed at some depth
below the soil–water or soil–air interface at
the time of their development.
This prevents direct dating of the top of the
lacustrine layer and the base of the overlying
clay-rich layer, thereby limiting the ability to
establish a tightly constrained chronological
bracket for the event.
Marco et al. (2014) used historical and
archaeological data to propose that one of the
1759 CE Safed and Baalbek Quakes is a
plausible candidate for the triggering event.
Assuming that the dam’s reservoir was filled at
the time the soft-sediment deformation features
formed,
Marco et al. (2014) examined evidence for the
duration of reservoir impoundment. They cited
nearby flour mills as indicating that the
reservoir remained active into the
Ottoman period, possibly extending into
the eighteenth century.
However, this interpretation is contradicted by
their own stratigraphic model (Fig. 3), which
places the end of deposition of the upper
lacustrine unit shortly after ~1400 CE. The
overlying clay-rich soil, interpreted as a
pedogenic horizon formed following
desiccation of the lake, nevertheless contains
fossils indicating intermittent inundation.
Marco et al. (2014:1457) also cite historical
accounts, referencing
Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989), who described
coastal effects during the
25 November 1759 CE earthquake, including
reports of "boats that were swept ashore from
the Akko harbor" and a seismic sea wave observed
as far south as the Nile Delta.
However, the primary sources underlying these
assertions in
Ambraseys and Barazangi (1989) could not be
independently verified, as they are not explicitly
cited in their work, and their
provenance remains
unclear.
Because the timing of these faetues are not precisely constrained, the assignment of the 1759 CE
earthquake as the triggering event, while plausible,
remains interpretative rather than definitive.