Open this page in a new tab

ICDP Cores

Location of Core 5017-1

click on image to explore this site on a new tab in Google Earth


Maps, Aerial Views, Charts, and Tables
Maps, Aerial Views, Charts, and Tables

Maps

Normal Size

  • Location Map from Lu et al. (2020)

Magnified

  • Location Map from Lu et al. (2020)

Aerial Views

  • Location of Core 5017-1 in Google Earth

Charts

PGA vs Thickness and Deformation Chart

Figure 3

Numerical simulation on in situ folded layer and intraclast breccia structures in the Dead Sea sedimentary sequences.
  1. Typical structures from Dead Sea depocenter Core 5017-1
  2. Typical structures from Dead Sea onshore outcrops (Fig. 1B)
  3. Schematic diagrams based on snapshots from the numerical simulations demonstrating the four structures
  4. Quantitative estimation of the accelerations that are needed to initiate the four structures with different thicknesses; the deformations normally occurred when Richardson number ≤ 0.125
click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Tables

Ages used to reconstruct age model

Table S1

Ages used to reconstruct age model and calculate timing of the seismites in the ICDP Core 5017-1 (22, 23).

click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Constraints on shaking intensities for individual events via computational fluid dynamics modeling

Table S2

Constraints on shaking intensities for individual events in the core via computational fluid dynamics modeling.

click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Magnitude (MW) constraint for the paleo-events in the ICDP Core 5017-1

Table S3

Magnitude (MW) constraint for the paleo-events in the ICDP Core 5017-1.

click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Test of Magnitude (MW) conversion versus known historic earthquakes on the central Dead Sea Fault.

Table S4

Test of Magnitude (MW) conversion versus known historic earthquakes on the central Dead Sea Fault.

click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Paleoseismic Chronology
Event A - 267-361 CE

Discussion

Discussion

References
Lu et al. (2020)

Abstract

Large earthquakes (magnitude ≤ 7.0) are rare, especially along slow-slipping plate boundaries. Lack of large earthquakes in the instrumental record enlarges uncertainty of the recurrence time; the recurrence of large earthquakes is generally determined by extrapolation according to a magnitude-frequency relation. We enhance the seismological catalog of the Dead Sea Fault Zone by including a 220,000-year-long continuous large earthquake record based on seismites from the Dead Sea center. We constrain seismic shaking intensities via computational fluid dynamics modeling and invert them for earthquake magnitude. Our analysis shows that the recurrence time of large earthquakes follows a power-law distribution, with a mean of 1400 ± 160 years. This mean recurrence is notably shorter than the previous estimate of 11,000 years for the past 40,000 years. Our unique record confirms a clustered earthquake recurrence pattern and a group-fault temporal clustering model, and reveals an unexpectedly high seismicity rate on a slow-slipping plate boundary.

Results

Earthquake indicators and paleoevents

As an ultimate repository for mass wasting (24) with an average sedimentation rate of 2 mm year−1 (25), the Dead Sea depocenter provides the most complete record of earthquake shaking along the plate boundary. Alternating laminae of white aragonite and dark detritus that characterize the sedimentary sequence of the ICDP Core 5017-1 serve as sensitive markers for identifying earthquake- induced deformation (24, 26). We identify in situ folded layers and intraclast breccia layer as earthquake indicators (seismites), based on their resemblance to outcrop observations of seismites that are known to be earthquake induced (4, 1216).

In situ folded layers

Figure 3

Numerical simulation on in situ folded layer and intraclast breccia structures in the Dead Sea sedimentary sequences.
  1. Typical structures from Dead Sea depocenter Core 5017-1
  2. Typical structures from Dead Sea onshore outcrops (Fig. 1B)
  3. Schematic diagrams based on snapshots from the numerical simulations demonstrating the four structures
  4. Quantitative estimation of the accelerations that are needed to initiate the four structures with different thicknesses; the deformations normally occurred when Richardson number ≤ 0.125
click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Similar to the structures preserved in the Dead Sea margin outcrops, the folded layers in the drilling core from the Dead Sea depocenter also appear as folded aragonite-detritus laminae in various forms of (i) linear waves (Fig. 2, A and B), (ii) asymmetric billows (Fig. 2, C to F), and (iii) coherent vortices (Fig. 2, G to J) (18). These delicate aragonite laminae are well preserved and can be traced in the strata, indicating that the layers are deformed in situ and have not undergone any notable transportation. That is, notable transportation would disaggregate and destroy the delicate submillimeter-thick aragonite laminae. Layer-parallel displacements characterize these in situ folded layers. The ICDP Core 5017-1 is positioned in the center of the Dead Sea abyssal plain. This makes improbable postdepositional causes for layer-parallel shears such as sloping substrates or downhill water flow above the sediments. In total, we identify 367 in situ folded layers in the ICDP Core 5017-1 (table S2). Figure S2 shows more examples of in situ folded layers in the drilling.

Intraclast breccia layer

Similar to the structures preserved in the Dead Sea margin outcrops, this type of layer from the Dead Sea depocenter consists of mixed aragonite-detritus laminae fragments (Fig. 2, K to M). The in situ deformation process of this type of layer is recognized by (i) the lack of erosion processes at the base of the layer and (ii) some remaining parts of in situ folded layer can be observed directly in the base of the intraclast breccia layer (Fig. 2, K to M, and fig. S3). Together, these features provide evidence for the evolution of the intraclast breccia texture under seismic shaking and differentiate it from any other detrital layers with laminae fragments that formed by secondary sedimentary processes such as mass transport. In total, we identify 46 intraclast breccia layers in the ICDP Core 5017-1 (table S2). Figure S3 shows more examples of intraclast breccia layers in the core.

Our observations reveal that some in situ deformed layers have been re-deformed by a latter deformation within a short core section. Using geophysical and chemical datasets and careful sedimentary structure analysis, we recognize these redeformed seismites. The potential uncertainties in thickness measurements (for redeformed seismites) that are induced by the redeformation range from a few millimeters to several centimeters and therefore have no notable effects on shaking intensity estimation. In addition, regarding the latter in situ deformations, the shape and thickness of total folded sediments constrain the intensity of seismic shaking regardless of the type and thickness of the redeformed seismites. In total, we identify 413 independent seismic shaking markers from the Dead Sea center.

Ground acceleration constraint for deformed layers

Figure 3

Numerical simulation on in situ folded layer and intraclast breccia structures in the Dead Sea sedimentary sequences.
  1. Typical structures from Dead Sea depocenter Core 5017-1
  2. Typical structures from Dead Sea onshore outcrops (Fig. 1B)
  3. Schematic diagrams based on snapshots from the numerical simulations demonstrating the four structures
  4. Quantitative estimation of the accelerations that are needed to initiate the four structures with different thicknesses; the deformations normally occurred when Richardson number ≤ 0.125
click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


We update the previous computational fluid dynamics modeling of Wetzler et al. (18) by extending the upper limit of layer thickness and ground acceleration from 0.5 m and 0.6g to 1.0 m and 1.0g, respectively (Fig. 3; Materials and Methods). We run a series of two-dimensional numerical simulations using the physical properties of the soft sediments at the bottom of the Dead Sea based on the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability mechanism. According to the numerical simulations, formation of a layer of (i) linear waves, (ii) asymmetric billows, (iii) coherent vortices, and (iv) intraclast breccia requires a minimum acceleration of 0.13, 0.18, 0.34, and 0.50g, respectively (Fig. 3). Also, our numerical simulations indicate that the thickness of the deformed layer scales with acceleration (Fig. 3 and fig. S4). Because we could not directly determine the Reynolds number of an individual unstable layer at the time of seismic shaking, we constrain only the lower boundary of acceleration needed to initiate deformation of a layer with a certain thickness. By considering both the shape and thickness of the deformed layers, we identified 18, 67, 139, 141, 240, and 413 events with acceleration of ≥0.65g, ≥0.50g, ≥0.34g, ≥0.26g, ≥0.18g, and ≥0.13g, respectively (table S2).

Discussion

Lower-bound magnitude determination forthe paleoevents

Because of the intrinsic geometrical spreading, dissipation, and possibly dispersion of the seismic energy, ground motion effects of a moderate earthquake nearby generate similar shaking intensities to those generated by a large earthquake farther away. Therefore, determining the location of an earthquake along the length of the Dead Sea Fault or on other nearby faults is the key for the magnitude constraint. It follows that magnitude estimation based on a single station is difficult and dependent on the location of possible source faults. For this sinistral boundary between the African and Arabian plates, we model the potential source region of earthquakes as having a fixed width and a length of a few hundred kilometers (Fig. 1). The nearest faults are ~5 km from the Core 5017-1 drilling site.

We apply three empirical attenuation relations (28–31) developed for the Dead Sea region to constrain the lower magnitude limit of paleoseismic events that the ICDP Core 5017-1 records (Materials and Methods). Among them, two attenuation relations (28–30) are described by macroseismic intensity, magnitude, and epicentral distance (D), and one relation (31) is described by peak ground acceleration (PGA), magnitude, and epicentral distance. To apply the two attenuation relations that are described by seismic intensity, we convert accelerations into seismic intensity via the linear relationships between PGA and the modified Mercalli intensity scale (MMI) that Wald et al. (32) proposed (table S2). According to the three regional empirical attenuation relations, PGA ≥ 0.13g or MMI ≥ VI½ corresponds to Mw ≥ 5.5, 5.3, and 5.7, by taking Dmin = 5 km (table S3). Therefore, we interpret the lower-bound magnitude of the recorded PGA ≥ 0.13g (MMI ≥ VI½) events as Mw ≥ 5.3. Considering that the incompleteness of moderate earthquakes in the paleoseismic record, we infer that the mean recurrence of Mw ≥ 5.3 earthquake on the central Dead Sea Fault Zone is <530 ± 40 years. This value is much shorter than the previously obtained mean recurrence of ~1600 years for the same magnitude, based on the paleoseismic record between 60 and 14 ka ago (4).

Magnitude constraint for strong seismic shaking events

The ICDP Core 5017-1 records 139 strong seismic shaking events with PGA ≥ 0.34g (MMI ≥ VIII) (table S2). According to the regional empirical attenuation relations (28–31), one felt intensity, for example, MMI ≥ VIII (PGA ≥ 0.34g) at the drill site, will require a moderate earthquake (6.0 < Mw < 7.0) with a D between 5 and 30 km, an Mw ≥ 7.0 earthquake with a D of 30 km, or an Mw ≥ 8.0 earthquake with a D of up to 150 km. We adopt a maximum magnitude in the region of Mw 8.0, which will require a rupture of ~300 km along a major fault. Therefore, we consider only large earthquakes with D ≤ 150 km (the central Dead Sea Fault Zone) as triggers of the strong seismic shaking events (MMI ≥ VIII) that Core 5017-1 records. On this slow-slipping plate boundary, the Dead Sea Fault (zone) is the only real contributing fault because most of the transform margin slip rate is on the Dead Sea Fault, and the other faults were either far away or had low slip rates. Within the Dead Sea region, no other major faults have sufficient length and slip rate to materially contribute to the rate of Mw ≥ 7 earthquakes. The historic earthquake catalog from the region shows that the 1822, 1712, 1408, 1170, 1139/1140, and 859/860 CE Mw ≥ 7.0 earthquakes occurred with distance to the drill site ≥300 km north of the Dead Sea (the northern Dead Sea Fault Zone). However, none of them have an expression in the Dead Sea Core 5017-1 record.

The spatial distribution of instrumental and historic moderate and large earthquakes on the central Dead Sea Fault Zone during the past 2 ka do supply additional clues for magnitude constraint for these strong seismic shaking events. The instrumental (33) and historical (5, 34–36) earthquake catalogs reveal that during the past 2 ka, all major earthquakes (Mw ≥ 6.0) occurred with D ≥ 30 km from the drilling site (Fig. 1B). By taking the past 2 ka earthquake scenario as an analogy for the paleoseismic record, we assume that most Mw ≥ 6.0 earthquakes occurred with D ≥ 30 km from the drilling site. Under this basic assumption and the three regional empirical attenuation relations, (i) an intensity of MMI ≥ VIII (PGA ≥ 0.34g) requires an earthquake with Mw ≥ 7.0, ≥7.0, and ≥7.3; (ii) an intensity of MMI ≥ VIII½ (PGA ≥ 0.50g) requires an earthquake with Mw ≥ 7.4, ≥7.3, and ≥7.6; and (iii) an intensity of MMI ≥ IX (PGA ≥ 0.65g) requires an earthquake with Mw ≥ 7.8, ≥7.6, and ≥7.8 (Fig. 4E and table S3). Therefore, we interpret the corresponding lower-bound magnitudes of strong seismic shaking events in the ICDP Core 5017-1 to be Mw ≥ 7.0, 7.3, and 7.6, respectively.

We test our magnitude conversion versus known historic earthquakes on the central Dead Sea Fault Zone. Six seismites in Core 5017-1 dated at −2 ± 44 years before the present (yr B.P.), 42 ± 44 yr B.P., 148 ± 44 yr B.P., 1248 ± 44 yr B.P., 1555 ± 47 yr B.P., and 1626 ± 47 yr B.P. correspond to the 1956 CE (Mw 5.5; D, ~5 km), 1927 CE (Mw 6.25; D, ~30 km), 1834 CE (Mw ~ 6; D, ~60 km), middle 8th century (Mw > 7; D, ~100 km), 419 CE (Mw ~ 6; D, ~40 km), and 363 CE (Mw ~ 6.8; D, ~70 km) earthquakes, respectively (table S4) (36). According to the regional empirical attenuation relations, we constrain the magnitudes of the six paleoearthquakes (seismites) with intensities of VII (0.18g), VI½ (0.13g), VI (0.09g), VII (0.18g), VI (0.09g), and VII (0.18g) as Mw 5.6, Mw 6.1, Mw 6.2, Mw 7.1, Mw 6.0, and Mw 6.9, respectively, which are in line with recorded historic magnitudes (table S4). This test supports our magnitude conversion based on the regional empirical ground motion attenuation relations.

Table S4

Test of Magnitude (MW) conversion versus known historic earthquakes on the central Dead Sea Fault.

click on image to open in a new tab

Lu et al. (2020)


Event B - 390-484 CE

Discussion

Discussion

Event C - 658-746 CE

Discussion

Discussion

Event D - 1753-1841 CE

Discussion

Discussion

Event E - 1864–1952 CE

Discussion

Discussion

Event F - 1908–1996 CE

Discussion

Discussion

Master Seismic Events Table
Master Seismic Events Table



References
References