Open this page in a new tab

Baris, Kurucaova, and Sürgü-East Trenches

General Vicinity of Baris, Kurucaova, and Sürgü-East Trenches

click on image to explore this site on a new tab in Google Earth


Maps, Aerial Views, Trench Logs, Tables, and Photos
Maps, Aerial Views, Trench Logs, Tables, and Photos

Maps

Normal Size

  • Fig. 1 East Anatolian Active
    Fig. 1

    1. Location of the EAFZ on an active fault map of Türkiye
    2. The geometry and segmentation of the EAFZ and location of the study area (simplified from Duman and Emre (2013)

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Fault Zone Map from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 2 Simplified geological
    Fig. 2

    Simplified geological map of the study area

    (compiled from 1/100,000 scale sheets of MTA geology database (Bedi and Yusufoğlu, 2018; Çoban and Dalkılıç, 2018; Sümengen, 2014a and 2014b; Usta et al., 2018))

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    map of the Sürgü Fault Area from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 2 Simplified geological
    Fig. 2

    Simplified geological map of the study area

    (compiled from 1/100,000 scale sheets of MTA geology database (Bedi and Yusufoğlu, 2018; Çoban and Dalkılıç, 2018; Sümengen, 2014a and 2014b; Usta et al., 2018))

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    map of the Cardak Fault Area from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 3 Physiography of the
    Fig. 3

    1. Physiography of the Sürgü Fault and its segmentation into four sections (Sürgü-1 to -4)
    2. the sinistral offset of Tatlar creek on DEM

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Sürgü Fault and its segmentation into four sections (Sürgü-1 to -4) from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 3b Sinistral offset of
    Fig. 3b

    the sinistral offset of Tatlar creek on DEM

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Tatlar creek on DEM from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 4 Sürgü Fault between
    Fig. 4

    The Sürgü Fault between Kurucaova and Sürgü Dam

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Kurucaova and Sürgü Dam from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 6 Physiography of
    Fig. 6

    Physiography of the Çardak Fault segmented into two sections

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    the Çardak Fault segmented into two sections from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 1 East Anatolian Fault
    Fig. 1
    East Anatolian fault between Karlıova and Gulf of İskenderun; Major fault zones in the vicinity plotted in black (simplified from Emre et al. 2018). Inset map shows the active tectonic framework of the Eastern Mediterranean region (from Emre et al. 2018). Dashed polygon indicates the study area. Abbreviations:
    • NAFZ North Anatolian fault zone
    • EAFZ East Anatolian fault zone
    • NS Northern strand
    • SS Southern strand
    • PE Pontic Escarpment
    • LC Lesser Caucasus
    • GC Great Caucasus
    • WAEP West Anatolian Extensional Provence
    • CAP Central Anatolian Provence
    • WAEP Eastern Anatolian Compressional Provence
    • DSFZ Dead Sea fault zone
    • HA Hellenic arc
    • PFFZ Palmyra fold and fault zone
    • CA Cyprian arc
    • SATZ Southeast Anatolian thrust zone
    • SMFS Sürgü–Misis fault system
    • MKF Misis–Kyrenia fault
    • MF Malatya fault
    • SF Sarız fault
    • EF Ecemiş fault
    • DF Deliler fault
    1. Karlıova fault segment
    2. Ilıca fault segment
    3. Palu fault segment
    4. Pütürge fault segment
    5. Erkenek fault segment
    6. Pazarcık fault segment
    7. Amanos fault segment
    8. Sürgü fault segment
    9. Çardak fault segment
    10. Savrun fault segment
    11. Çokak fault segment
    12. Toprakkale fault segment
    13. Karataş fault segment
    14. Yumurtalık fault segment
    15. Düziçi–Osmaniye fault zone;
    16. Misis fault segment
    17. Engizek fault zone
    18. Maraş fault zone
    Duman et al. (2020)
    Map from Duman et al. (2020)
  • Fig. 2 Historical and    
    Fig. 2

    Distribution of both historical (a) and instrumental (b) earthquakes along the western segments of Sürgü–Misis fault (SMF) system around the Gulf of İskenderun (simplified from Duman and Emre, 2013). Thick red and black lines indicate the SMF system (north strand) and south strand of the East Anatolian fault zone, respectively. The locations of historical earthquakes are from Tan et al. (2008), Ambraseys (1988), Ambraseys and Jackson (1998) and Başarır Baştürk et al. (2017). The instrumental data are from Kalafat et al. (2011), Aktar et al. (2000), Ergin et al. (2004) and Kadirioğlu et al. (2018). The focal mechanisms are from Kılıç et al. (2017). The letter inside boxes refers to the source for the historical earthquakes as given by Tan et al. (2008).
    • ST Shebalin and Tatevossian (1997)
    • KU Kondorskaya and Ulomov (1999)
    • EG Guidoboni et al. (1994)
    • EG2 Guidoboni and Comastri (2005)
    • AM Ambraseys (1988)
    • AJ Ambraseys and Jackson (1998)
    • MFS Misis fault segment
    • KFS Karataş fault segment
    • YFS Yumurtalık fault segment
    • DİFZ Düziçi–İskenderun fault zone
    • AFS Amanos fault segment
    • YEFS Yesemek fault segment
    • AFFS Afrin fault segment
    • NFZ Narlı fault zone
    • MFZ Maraş fault zone
    • EFZ Engizek fault zone
    • ÇOFS Çokak fault segment
    • SAFS Savrun fault segment
    • TFS Toprakkale fault segment
    • ÇFS Çardak fault segment
    • SFS, Sürgü fault segment

    Duman et al. (2020)
    Instrumental earthquakes along the western Sürgü–Misis fault (SMF) system from Duman et al. (2020)

Magnified

  • Fig. 1 East Anatolian Active
    Fig. 1

    1. Location of the EAFZ on an active fault map of Türkiye
    2. The geometry and segmentation of the EAFZ and location of the study area (simplified from Duman and Emre (2013)

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Fault Zone Map from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 2 Simplified geological
    Fig. 2

    Simplified geological map of the study area

    (compiled from 1/100,000 scale sheets of MTA geology database (Bedi and Yusufoğlu, 2018; Çoban and Dalkılıç, 2018; Sümengen, 2014a and 2014b; Usta et al., 2018))

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    map of the Sürgü Fault Area from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 2 Simplified geological
    Fig. 2

    Simplified geological map of the study area

    (compiled from 1/100,000 scale sheets of MTA geology database (Bedi and Yusufoğlu, 2018; Çoban and Dalkılıç, 2018; Sümengen, 2014a and 2014b; Usta et al., 2018))

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    map of the Cardak Fault Area from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 3 Physiography of the
    Fig. 3

    1. Physiography of the Sürgü Fault and its segmentation into four sections (Sürgü-1 to -4)
    2. the sinistral offset of Tatlar creek on DEM

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Sürgü Fault and its segmentation into four sections (Sürgü-1 to -4) from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 3b Sinistral offset of
    Fig. 3b

    the sinistral offset of Tatlar creek on DEM

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Tatlar creek on DEM from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 4 Sürgü Fault between
    Fig. 4

    The Sürgü Fault between Kurucaova and Sürgü Dam

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Kurucaova and Sürgü Dam from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 6 Physiography of
    Fig. 6

    Physiography of the Çardak Fault segmented into two sections

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    the Çardak Fault segmented into two sections from Balkaya et al. (2023)
  • Fig. 1 East Anatolian Fault
    Fig. 1

    East Anatolian fault between Karlıova and Gulf of İskenderun; Major fault zones in the vicinity plotted in black (simplified from Emre et al. 2018). Inset map shows the active tectonic framework of the Eastern Mediterranean region (from Emre et al. 2018). Dashed polygon indicates the study area. Abbreviations:
    • NAFZ North Anatolian fault zone
    • EAFZ East Anatolian fault zone
    • NS Northern strand
    • SS Southern strand
    • PE Pontic Escarpment
    • LC Lesser Caucasus
    • GC Great Caucasus
    • WAEP West Anatolian Extensional Provence
    • CAP Central Anatolian Provence
    • WAEP Eastern Anatolian Compressional Provence
    • DSFZ Dead Sea fault zone
    • HA Hellenic arc
    • PFFZ Palmyra fold and fault zone
    • CA Cyprian arc
    • SATZ Southeast Anatolian thrust zone
    • SMFS Sürgü–Misis fault system
    • MKF Misis–Kyrenia fault
    • MF Malatya fault
    • SF Sarız fault
    • EF Ecemiş fault
    • DF Deliler fault
    1. Karlıova fault segment
    2. Ilıca fault segment
    3. Palu fault segment
    4. Pütürge fault segment
    5. Erkenek fault segment
    6. Pazarcık fault segment
    7. Amanos fault segment
    8. Sürgü fault segment
    9. Çardak fault segment
    10. Savrun fault segment
    11. Çokak fault segment
    12. Toprakkale fault segment
    13. Karataş fault segment
    14. Yumurtalık fault segment
    15. Düziçi–Osmaniye fault zone;
    16. Misis fault segment
    17. Engizek fault zone
    18. Maraş fault zone
    Duman et al. (2020)
    Map from Duman et al. (2020)
  • Fig. 2 Historical and    
    Fig. 2

    Distribution of both historical (a) and instrumental (b) earthquakes along the western segments of Sürgü–Misis fault (SMF) system around the Gulf of İskenderun (simplified from Duman and Emre, 2013). Thick red and black lines indicate the SMF system (north strand) and south strand of the East Anatolian fault zone, respectively. The locations of historical earthquakes are from Tan et al. (2008), Ambraseys (1988), Ambraseys and Jackson (1998) and Başarır Baştürk et al. (2017). The instrumental data are from Kalafat et al. (2011), Aktar et al. (2000), Ergin et al. (2004) and Kadirioğlu et al. (2018). The focal mechanisms are from Kılıç et al. (2017). The letter inside boxes refers to the source for the historical earthquakes as given by Tan et al. (2008).
    • ST Shebalin and Tatevossian (1997)
    • KU Kondorskaya and Ulomov (1999)
    • EG Guidoboni et al. (1994)
    • EG2 Guidoboni and Comastri (2005)
    • AM Ambraseys (1988)
    • AJ Ambraseys and Jackson (1998)
    • MFS Misis fault segment
    • KFS Karataş fault segment
    • YFS Yumurtalık fault segment
    • DİFZ Düziçi–İskenderun fault zone
    • AFS Amanos fault segment
    • YEFS Yesemek fault segment
    • AFFS Afrin fault segment
    • NFZ Narlı fault zone
    • MFZ Maraş fault zone
    • EFZ Engizek fault zone
    • ÇOFS Çokak fault segment
    • SAFS Savrun fault segment
    • TFS Toprakkale fault segment
    • ÇFS Çardak fault segment
    • SFS, Sürgü fault segment

    Duman et al. (2020)
    Instrumental earthquakes along the western Sürgü–Misis fault (SMF) system from Duman et al. (2020)

Aerial Views

  • General Vicinity of Sürgü–Çardak
    General Vicinity of Baris, Kurucaova, and Sürgü-East Trenches

    click on image to explore this site on a new tab in Google Earth
    Fault System in Google Earth

Trench Logs, Tables, and Photos

Barış-1 Trench (Cardak Fault)

Location Maps

Satellite Image (Fig. 7 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 7

Google Earth image showing the 70-m stream offset through Barış village. White arrows indicate the sinistral deflection emphasized by the stream bed.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Geologic Map (Fig. 16 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 16

Location of the Barış trenches on the geological map of the eastern section of the Çardak Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Log (Fig. 18 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 18

Log of the east wall of the Barış-1 trench (see Figure 16 for trench location).

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Photos

Meters -3 to -4 on the eastern wall (Fig. 19 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 19

The traces of bedrock faults (red dashed lines) at meters -3 to -4 on the eastern wall of the Barış-1 trench

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Meters -15 to -17 on the eastern wall (Fig. 20 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 20

The fault strands (red dashed lines) between the meters-15 and -17 on the eastern wall of the Barış-1 trench

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Surface Photo of Fault Scarp (Fig. 17 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 17

The fault scarp along the Çardak Fault, west of the Barış trenches (looking towards SW)

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Fault Scarp and Offset Stream in Barış village (Fig. 8 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 8

Topographic elevation difference and stream offset in Barış village (looking towards SE). The yellow dashed line shows the fault line, the blue dashed lines show the offset on channel edges, and the white arrows show the elevation difference.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

OxCal Bayesian Analysis (Radiocarbon) for Barış-1 and Barış-2 trenches (Fig. 24 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 24

The graphic shows calibration of the collected samples from the Barış-1 and Barış-2 trenches using OxCal v4.4.4 and the time interval of earthquakes detected on the Çardak Fault (Bronk Ramsey, 2017; Reimer et al., 2020). BB6, BB7 and BB8 represent the sample numbers of samples taken from the Barış-1 trench, yet BB2 and BB4 indicate the sample numbers taken from Barış-2 trench

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Radiocarbon results from paleoseismic sites (Barış-1 and Barış-2 trenches) on Çardak Fault (Table 3 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Table 3

The 14C dating results from paleoseismic sites on Çardak Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Barış-2 Trench (Cardak Fault)

Location Maps

Satellite Image (Fig. 7 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 7

Google Earth image showing the 70-m stream offset through Barış village. White arrows indicate the sinistral deflection emphasized by the stream bed.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Geologic Map (Fig. 16 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 16

Location of the Barış trenches on the geological map of the eastern section of the Çardak Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Log (Fig. 21 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 21

Log of the east wall of the Barış-2 trench (see Figure 16 for trench location).

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Photos

Meters -18 to -21 on the eastern wall (Fig. 22 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 22

The fault strands between meters -18 and -21 of the eastern wall of the Barış-2 trench. The red dashed lines show the faults.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Surface Photo of Fault Scarp (Fig. 17 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 17

The fault scarp along the Çardak Fault, west of the Barış trenches (looking towards SW)

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Fault Scarp and Offset Stream in Barış village (Fig. 8 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 8

Topographic elevation difference and stream offset in Barış village (looking towards SE). The yellow dashed line shows the fault line, the blue dashed lines show the offset on channel edges, and the white arrows show the elevation difference.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

OxCal Bayesian Analysis (Radiocarbon) for Barış-1 and Barış-2 trenches (Fig. 24 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 24

The graphic shows calibration of the collected samples from the Barış-1 and Barış-2 trenches using OxCal v4.4.4 and the time interval of earthquakes detected on the Çardak Fault (Bronk Ramsey, 2017; Reimer et al., 2020). BB6, BB7 and BB8 represent the sample numbers of samples taken from the Barış-1 trench, yet BB2 and BB4 indicate the sample numbers taken from Barış-2 trench

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Radiocarbon results from paleoseismic sites (Barış-1 and Barış-2 trenches) on Çardak Fault (Table 3 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Table 3

The 14C dating results from paleoseismic sites on Çardak Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Kurucaova Trench (Surgu Fault)

Location Map (Fig. 10 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 10

Trench locations in the eastern part of the Sürgü Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Log (Fig. 12 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 12

Log of the west wall of the Kurucaova trench (see Figure 10 for trench location)

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Photos

Meter -9 on the western wall of the Kurucaova Trench (Fig. 13 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 13

The fault (red dashed line) at meter-9 on the western wall of the Kurucaova trench.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

General view of Kurucaova trench site (Fig. 11 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 11

General view of Kurucaova trench site (looking towards SW). Red arrows indicate fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Sürgü Fault Outcrop (Fig. 5 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 5

The Sürgü Fault in exposure, cutting Late Quaternary deposits in Sürgü district (view to west)

Balkaya et al. (2023)

OxCal Bayesian Analysis (Radiocarbon) for Sürgü-East and Kurucaova trenches (Fig. 23 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 23

The graphic shows calibration of the collected samples from the Sürgü-East and Kurucaova trenches using OxCal v4.4.4 and the time interval of earthquakes detected on the Sürgü Fault (Bronk Ramsey, 2017; Reimer et al., 2020). KC1, KB5 and KB6 represent the sample numbers of samples taken from the Kurucaova trench, yet B1, B2 and B3 indicate the sample numbers taken from Sürgü-East trench.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Radiocarbon results from paleoseismic sites (Sürgü-East and Kurucaova trenches) on Sürgü Fault (Table 2 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Table 2

The 14C dating results from paleoseismic sites on Sürgü Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Sürgü-East Trench (Surgu Fault)

Location Map (Fig. 10 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 10

Trench locations in the eastern part of the Sürgü Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Log (Fig. 14 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 14

Log of the east wall of the Sürgü-East trench (see Figure 10 for trench location).

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Trench Photos

Infill On The East Wall Of The Sürgü-East Trench (Fig. 15 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 15

The view of infill on the east wall of the Sürgü-East trench and the locations of the samples..

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Sürgü Fault Outcrop (Fig. 5 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 5

The Sürgü Fault in exposure, cutting Late Quaternary deposits in Sürgü district (view to west)

Balkaya et al. (2023)

OxCal Bayesian Analysis (Radiocarbon) for Sürgü-East and Kurucaova trenches (Fig. 23 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Fig. 23

The graphic shows calibration of the collected samples from the Sürgü-East and Kurucaova trenches using OxCal v4.4.4 and the time interval of earthquakes detected on the Sürgü Fault (Bronk Ramsey, 2017; Reimer et al., 2020). KC1, KB5 and KB6 represent the sample numbers of samples taken from the Kurucaova trench, yet B1, B2 and B3 indicate the sample numbers taken from Sürgü-East trench.

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Radiocarbon results from paleoseismic sites (Sürgü-East and Kurucaova trenches) on Sürgü Fault (Table 2 from Balkaya et al., 2023)

Table 2

The 14C dating results from paleoseismic sites on Sürgü Fault

Balkaya et al. (2023)

Photos of 100-km long surface rupture on Çardak Fault (Baris Trenches) in 6 Feb. 2023 Ekinözü earthquake (13.24; MW 7.6)

Normal Size

  • Supplementary Figure - Surface
    Supplementary Figure

    1. The trace of the surface rupture formed after the 6 February 2023 earthquake in the west of Barış village
    2. Trace of the surface rupture that offset the Barış-1 trench and the adjacent field border by 5.4 ± 0.30 m left-laterally
    3. 6.5 ± 0.25 m offset in a small channel at 80 m east of the Barış-2 trench (looking towards south). Red arrows show offset at the small channel.

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    ruptures from 6 Feb. 2023 Ekinözü earthquake in the vicnity of the Baris Trenches from Balkaya et al. (2023)

Magnified

  • Supplementary Figure -
    Supplementary Figure

    1. The trace of the surface rupture formed after the 6 February 2023 earthquake to the west of Barış village
    2. Trace of the surface rupture that offset the Barış-1 trench and the adjacent field border by 5.4 ± 0.30 m left-laterally
    3. 6.5 ± 0.25 m offset in a small channel 80 m east of the Barış-2 trench (looking towards south). Red arrows show offset of the small channel.

    Balkaya et al. (2023)
    Surface ruptures from 6 Feb. 2023 Ekinözü earthquake in the vicnity of the Baris Trenches from Balkaya et al. (2023)

Chronology
Older Event in Baris-1 and Baris-2 Trenches along the Çardak Fault - 10615 BCE and 5715 BCE

Balkaya et al. (2023:415) concluded that the older seismic event, which had expression as fault strands indicative of strike-slip motion in both the Baris-1 and Baris-2 Trenches, struck between 10520±95 BCE and 5780±65 BCE - i.e. between 10615 BCE and 5715 BCE. Dating was based on 2σ modeled radiocarbon ages.

Seismic Event in the Surgu-East Trench on the Sürgü Fault - ~3400 BCE

Balkaya et al. (2023:411-413) identified a discontinuity in the form of a a 5–6 cm wide fissure with 15–18 cm of vertical motion along the south block. Three radiocarbon samples were taken from the infill in the fissure, the unit covering the infill, and the unit cut by the fissure. These were modeled in OxCal and produced an age estimate for the event of 3400-3340 BCE which the authors approximated to around 3400 BCE.

Seismic Event in the Kurucaova Trench on the Sürgü Fault - between 2150 BCE and 770 BCE

Balkaya et al. (2023:410-411) identified two fault strands between meters-7 to -9 in the trench. Stratigraphic units in the faulted section were found to be dipping to the north. Away from the fault zone, these units were flat lying. 2 radiocarbon samples were taken from the unit covering the fault strands and another sample was taken from the faulted unit. Balkaya et al. (2023:410-411) concluded that at least one surface rupturing earthquake event was present in the trench. They dated this event, the most recent event, to between 790 ± 20 BCE and 2085 ± 65 BCE - i.e. between 2150 BCE and 770 BCE. Balkaya et al. (2023:410-411) noted that it is possible that a fault strand at meter-7 relates to an older earthquake event.

Younger Event in Baris-1 and Baris-2 Trenches along the Çardak Fault - between 3330 BCE and 880 CE

Balkaya et al. (2023:415) concluded that the younger seismic event, which had expression as fault strands indicative of strike-slip motion in both the Baris-1 and Baris-2 Trenches, struck between 3215±125 BCE and 825±55 CE - i.e. between 3330 BCE and 880 CE. Dating was based on 2σ modeled radiocarbon ages. Balkaya et al. (2023:415-418) suggested that this seismic event may be correlated with the 584/587 CE earthquake (Guidoboni et al., 1994; Ambraseys, 2009) that caused extensive destruction in Elbistan, but it is also possible an older one due to large time span for the last earthquake.

Master Seismic Events Table
Master Seismic Events Table

Baris Trenches (Cardak Fault)

Kurucaova and Sürgü-East Trenches (Surgu Fault)

References
References

Balkaya et al. (2023) Paleoseismology of the Sürgü and Çardak faults - splays of the Eastern Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye January 2023 Turkish Journal Of Earth Sciences 32(3):402-420 - open access at Turkish Journal Of Earth Sciences

Balkaya et al. (2023) Paleoseismology of the Sürgü and Çardak faults - splays of the Eastern Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye January 2023 Turkish Journal Of Earth Sciences 32(3):402-420 - research gate