Villa Earthquake
Two destructions were visited upon
Sepphoris in the
middle of the 4th century CE. In 351–352 CE, the
city was at the epicenter of the
Gallus Revolt.
According to several ancient authors including
Jerome,
Socrates
Scholasticus, and
Sozomen, the
city was burned, razed to the foundations, or
destroyed
(Strange et al.
2006:22–23). A little over a decade later, the
city was destroyed or damaged by an earthquake. In
a letter attributed to
Cyril of Jerusalem, we read
that "the whole of
Sepphoris
(SWPRYN) and its territory (χωρα)" was "overthrown"
by the northern
363 CE Cyril
Quake.
Meyers et al.
(1992:17) suggested that mid-4th century CE
rebuilding evidence in Sepphoris was largely due to
the
363 CE Cyril
Quake, adding that "the splendid villa with its
mosaics and perhaps even the adjacent theater were
buried in the collapse and went out of use at this
time." In contrast,
Strange et al.
(2006:63) argued that destruction debris in the
cavea of the theater was deliberately placed there
during cleanup after the city’s destruction or
damage stemming from the
Gallus Revolt.
They further opined that "while it is theoretically
possible that the earthquake of 363 C.E. destroyed
the Villa, it is not likely, for the simple reason
that no one repaired the Villa or rebuilt it, nor
did excavation reveal smashed stones or walls that
were thrown down"
(Strange et al.
2006:122). They added that "all of the rooms
that we probed were filled with erosion and
deliberate fill" and proposed that the Tower (the
Citadel) was constructed in the mid-4th century CE
after domestic structures on the summit were
destroyed during the
Gallus Revolt
(Strange et al.
2006:47).
In the excavation report of
Strange et al.
(2006), several mid-4th century CE destruction
layers were encountered. In Square I.12 of Field I,
they identified L12016, "a thick [50–78 cm.] layer
of soil with charcoal and ash" marking "the
destruction of the Villa"
(Strange et al.
2006:80), with coin evidence providing a
terminus post quem of 355–361 CE. They also found
"traces of destruction" in the east balk of Square
I.10
(Strange et al.
2006:98) and assigned abandonment or damage of
the villa to Phase 4, dated "between 351 and
361 C.E., judging from the stratigraphy and the
coins"
(Strange et al.
2006:122). In Square I.1 near the Tower, they
identified what may be two destruction layers:
Locus 1025, containing ash and charcoal "evidently
from a 4th century fire," and Locus 1024 above it,
"a 30 cm. thick destruction layer, dark with ash,
and containing
potsherds from the
Early Roman through the
Late Roman periods"
(Strange et al.
2006:47).
Waterman et al.
(1937) also reported mid-4th century CE
destruction evidence which they speculated could
have been caused by the
Gallus Revolt,
although the northern
Cyril Quake
could also have been partly or wholly responsible.
They noted that "large architectural fragments
belonging to the masonry of the theater" were found
"at various depths" and "nearer the top" of
cistern No. 8, and inferred a mid-4th century destruction
from the abundance of
Byzantine
sherds and the lack
of post-Byzantine material
(Waterman et al.
1937:30, n.52). They also found evidence of
burning, a disturbed and overturned floor,
uncharred human remains, and an uncharred pickaxe
in Room 10, with an 8–10 cm. burned layer extending
north of the room near the theater and in the
debris immediately south of it
(Waterman et al.
1937:30–31).
Although
Waterman et al.
(1937),
Meyers et al.
(1992), and
Strange et al.
(2006) differed in their interpretations of the
cause of destruction, the letter attributed to
Cyril of Jerusalem strongly suggests that at least
some seismic collapse occurred at the site.
JW: The villa of
Meyers et al.
(1992) and the villa(s) of
Strange et al.
(2006) may not refer to the same structure.