Transliterated Name | Source | Name |
---|---|---|
Migdal | Hebrew | מגדל |
al-Majdal | Arabic | المجدل |
Magdala Nunayya | Aramaic in the Babylonian Talmud | מגדלא נוניה |
Magdala Sebaya | Jewish sources | |
Dalmanoutha | possibly in Mark 8:10 | |
Magadan | possibly in Matthew 15:39 | |
Taricheae | Greek | Ταριχαία or Ταριχέα |
Magdala | Aramaic | מגדלא |
Magdala was an ancient city on the shore of the Sea of Galilee - located ~ 3 km. north of Tiberias. Because it is referred to as Magdala Nunayya - "Tower of Fishes" - in the Babylonian Talmud, it may also be the location of Taricheae - "the place of processing fish" in Greek. The Migdal synagogue, the oldest synagogue found thus far in the Galilee, was discovered here and Jesus' disciple and possible companion Mary of Magdala (popularly known as Mary Magdalene) is reputed to have been born here. The harbor of Magdala was uncovered during the 2007–2011 Magdala Project archaeological campaigns and appears to exhibit three phases of use: late Hellenistic (2nd–1st centuries B.C.), Early-Middle Roman (1st–3rd century A.D.) and Byzantine (6th–7th centuries A.D.) (deLuca and Lena, 2014).
Period | Dates |
---|---|
Early Hellenistic | 332-167 BC |
Late Hellenistic | 167-63 BC |
Early Roman | 63 BC-70 AD |
Middle Roman | 70-270 AD |
Late Roman | 270-350 AD |
Early Byzantine | 350-450 AD |
Middle Byzantine | 450-550 AD |
Late Byzantine | 550-650 AD |
Early Arab I | 650-800 AD |
Early Arab II | 800-1000 AD |
Middle Arab I | 1000-1200 AD |
Middle Arab II | 1200-1400 AD |
The pottery classification of the site follows the typology set out by S. Loffreda (2008a–c)- Lena (2013)
Stratum | Period | Dates | Description |
---|---|---|---|
III | Late Roman to the Islamic | a level of abandonment, consisting of an accumulation of very fine and dusty clayey soil with few ceramic inclusions, dating from the Late Roman to the Islamic periods. | |
II | Late Roman | A hard packed conglomerate layer of non-worked stones, including cobblestones,
pebbles, limestone and basalt flakes, bonded with light mortar, was discovered
only in the entrance hall. This layer, which was bound by a barrier of blocks
and stones before the arch, closed up the earlier entrance from south and
raised the pavement of the entrance hall up to the level of the most recent entrance The findings give a terminus post quem of the Late Roman period. A layer of waste, containing fragments of ochre, reddish, pearl-white, and turquoise green painted plaster that was probably used for decoration with stripes and floral patterns, was identified in the basin. In addition, a few pieces of egg-and-dart stucco were collected. The same context yielded a group of rare wooden findings, exceptionally preserved in the water-saturated mud, including pieces of bars, planks and muntins with nails, joints and wedges. These wooden pieces, which may have been parts of a trellis for false ceilings, were placed in overlapping horizontal strips that apparently crossed and ended a little below in long and very thin panels. A mat of intertwined canes and vegetable materials, such as vine-leaves, thin canes, olive branches and palm, bound by lime mortar has been found in several places between woods and frame. The mortar contained lake sand, small shells, fruit stones and vegetable frustules. |
|
I | end of the Hellenistic to the end of the Early Roman (1st Jewish War) | The collapse of the wooden structure covered a layer of abandonment (thickness 0.5–0.6 m) where several findings
were found, including glass aryballoi, soft limestone vessels, a fish-hook, cramp-irons, blades, nails, faunal remains
and a remarkable assemblage of pottery dating from the end of the Hellenistic to the end of the Early Roman periods.
Among the forms to be noted are Kefar Hananya type globular cooking pots, Pent10 (Loffreda 2008a:184–185), Pent11
(Loffreda 2008a:185–186), and Pent12 (Loffreda 2008a:186–187), cooking bowls, Teg12 (Loffreda 2008a:204–205), and
Teg14 (Loffreda 2008a:206–207), two intact unguentaria, amphorae, Anf12 (Loffreda 2008a:125–126), and Anf13
(Loffreda 2008a:126–127), stone vessels, and Herodian oil lamps (Loffreda 2008a:42–45). Moreover, the mud
fill contained an extraordinary group of wooden vessels, including a plate, a small cup and two rounded cups,
which have been transferred, together with the comb from E11, to Pisa to be consolidated and restored at the
Centro di Restauro del Legno Bagnato del Cantiere delle Navi Antiche. Therefore, the homogeneous pottery assemblage from this stratum testifies to a phase of use preceding the sudden destruction that occurred before the end of the first century CE and is ascribed to the violent conquest of Magdala by Titus and Vespasianus. |
The pottery classification of the site follows the typology set out by S. Loffreda (2008a–c)- Lena (2013)
Stratum | Period | Dates | Description |
---|---|---|---|
I | Whitish beaten earth and rubble (L325), leveled over the upper horizon where, amongst the finds, a Constantius II coin (350–361 CE) was found | ||
II | A collapse layer (L329) below Layer I is composed of worked stones mostly dressed, rubble and several fragments of colored plaster, especially in proximity to the wall. The coins retrieved from the collapse dated from Alexander Jannaeus to Herod the Great | ||
III | A layer of lime sand with pebbles and shell remains, which is characterized by the absence of any ceramic or other anthropogenic remains. The sediments’ surfaces follow the west–east direction in the south and north sections, and south–north direction in the east section | ||
IV | A cobble pavement (L331) of various sized natural pebbles placed in correspondence with W317. Potsherds from the Hellenistic–Early Roman periods were discovered in the ballast, as well as two coins from the first century CE. The ballast’s surface, slanting from west to east, was partially affected by the collapse of roughly-hewn lime blocks before being buried | ||
V | A dark clayey layer, containing pre-Roman material (L401), before both L331 and apparently W317 were placed. |
de Luca and Lena (2014:139) dated a collapse layer in Area F to the 363 CE earthquake.
For causes yet unknown, the harbor basin was silted by 45–60 cm lacustrine sandy deposits covered by conglomerates of gravel (Units 3–4) typical of beaches areas, rich in mollusc shells and byoclasts (in particular melanopsis are copious). The imbrication of clasts, principally oriented eastwards and only partially toward the west, reveals the strongest water motion, typical of upper beach/foreshore environment. The potsherds from the conglomerates date back to the Middle-Late Roman (3rd century A.D.) period and give a terminus post quem for its formation (cf. Figs. 10 and 20 - see above). On this layer of pebbles, probably due to the earthquake of 363 A.D., there was the collapse of the elevation of the eastern portico to which several architectural elements – voussoirs, worked wall stones, corbels – belong. A great quantity of fragments of wall plasters with traces of paintings in vermilion red hues, burned ochre, yellow ochre, copper green, black and Egyptian blue, have been uncovered in context with pieces of ochre, red and caeruleum pigments, as well as coins and potsherds from the 3rd–4th century A.D.
De Luca (2009:352) hypothesized that the collapse and relative abandonment of the buildings in sector
H
was a consequence of the earthquake that affected the region in 363 AD
while noting that the most precise chronological indicators seem to stop around a forty years
earlier
. De Luca (2009:352) reports that from the entire excavation of areas H1, H2 and H3
no finds from the Byzantine period
were found - not even a single sherd
.
... With the new excavation, an area of approximately 500 m2 was investigated (cf. Table 6), divided into three quadrangular trenches named from South to North:
An in-depth study was carried out inside collapse US 91-94, delimited by the square (5 x 5 m) formed by USM 16, USM 17 (at an altitude of -205.70 m), USM 57 (at altitude of -205.85 m) and USM 93, south-east of the trench. This environment, with walls 35 to 40 cm thick, as a whole is to be considered prior to the Middle Roman period, when it was completely hidden by the compacted gypsum and lime pavement US 86 (at an altitude of - 206 m, 04), rich in faunal remains (see Figure 10). The numerous ceramic fragments contained in US 86 - of which a witness was left near the south-east corner of the box (see Figure 12) - are easily datable and include an assortment of common tableware ceramics, of the usual Kefar Hanania typologies of the 1st, 2nd and early 3rd centuries. AD, associated with rarer materials such as lamps of the Luc1.2 type (50 BC-50 AD) and Luc3 type (middle Roman period), amphorae of the Anf10, Anfll types and four coins, among which one is by Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC) and another Roman provincial from the 2nd - mid 3rd century AD. US 86, on which, at USM 95, two bottoms of large, thick-walled preserving jars were also found, affected the entire eastern sector of the trench, starting from USM 45 and USM 16.
USM 15 extends for over 6 m (at an average altitude of -205.15 m) from South-West to North-East in the North-West quadrant of the trench (see Figures 20- 21). The masonry structure is composed of roughly squared ashlars, sometimes flattened on the exposed face, placed in fairly horizontal and parallel rows, also thanks to horizontal interventions. The lithic elements, mainly basaltic, of medium-large size, are assembled with a core of light mortars and small stones. Its axis rotates a few degrees coinciding with the edge junction with USM 40 (2.2 x 0.5 m, at an altitude of -205.20 m) towards the North. In fact, along the southern face of the western section of USM 15, a tooth protruding from it cm. 30, probably referable to its first phase.
At the top of the center of the south face of USM 15, a deep sondage was dug to verify the stratigraphy (see Figure 22). The survey (1.3 x 1.5 x 1.5 m) made it possible to document the following:
In the central probe H2 was exposed for 16 m a stretch of via pasolata 6 m wide, USM 5 (see Figure 27), which runs from the South-West to the North-East (from an average altitude of -205.45 m to one of -204.59 m). Its axis seems to have determined the orientation of the buildings set on it, both those that emerged in H3 and those in H1, an orientation which, moreover, is consistent with the topographical layout of the city as can be observed from the East district. Ideally extending it the route towards this direction, in fact, the new paved road joins with the northern stretch of the cardo maximus (V1) near Area B, therefore classifying it as one of the decumani. On the opposite side, its route heads towards the Wadi Hamam pass which, in ancient times, was the main natural connection between the Lake and Western Galilee.
To the west of the conduit and to the south of the decumanus no structures have survived (see Figure 30), with the exception of a sort of floor preparation, US 52 (approximately 3 x 3.5 m, at a height of -205.97 m), consisting from flakes, pebbles and basalt processing waste arranged flat in a layer of not very tenacious lime-based mortar where a coin of Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC) was also found. Since no significant nuclei of mosaic tiles were found at the same time, it is difficult to interpret this preparation as the bed of a mosaic, although it possesses the characteristics.
The collapse to the west of USM 31 (see Figure 33), included to the south by the road and to the west by USM 29, was called US 10 (2.10 x 3 m). It refers to a rectangular room (4 x 3 m) of whose façade only the foundations were found in depth. USM 31 has the appearance of a dividing wall, its thickness does not exceed 40 cm. and a prutah by Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC) was found in the cracks of the proofs . Of the northern wall only a double-faced section (0.80 m) is visible near the cut of the section, which is at the corner with USM 29. In the central part of the USM 10 collapse, an alignment of ashlars belonging to an arch or a pillar, collapsed from West to East. The finds from the layer of disintegration of the collapse include late Roman ceramic fragments, with a prevalence of common table shapes, the intact upper element of a rectangular mill of the hopper and lever type (St 50 ) (Durante 2001, 78) found against USM 29 near the corner of the room and the following coins of: Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC), Aretas IV issued in Petra (9 BC-40 AD), Trajan of the mint of Rome (98-117 AD), Hadrian of the mint of Rome (119-122 AD), Trajan Decius-Volusianus of Caesarea Maritima (249-253 AD), Roman provincial mint (1-1 /2 III century AD), provincial Roman mint with oval male head countermark (perhaps 2nd century AD), provincial Roman mint with oval countermark le (II-1/2 to III century AD). The ground of the room, which can be reached by removing the collapse, should correspond to the support surface of the millstone, and thus be lower than road level.
The situation of the environments is formed by USM 25 (6 x 0.55 m, at an altitude of -205.73 m), USM 26 (4 x 0.50 m, at an altitude of -205 m), USM 27 (4 x 0.60 m, at an altitude of -205.76 m), and USM 29 (4.4 x 0.55 m, at an average altitude of -205.75 m). These are two rooms interconnected by the door in USM 26 and affected by a collapse, US 13, which is related to the USM 27 facade and which also occupies the passage space between the two (cf. Figures 34-35). The US 13 collapse, especially in the core near the South-West corner, is mainly made up of well-cut and also refined basaltic elements, typical of exposed curtain walls. The layer of decay that contains the collapse is distinguished by its white colour, its extreme compactness, its predominantly calcareous composition, and the ceramic inclusions from the middle Roman period and the beginning of the late Roman period, including many pieces of keeled pans of the Teg13 type (Pt 6959), and plates-pans of the Teg15, Teg16 and Teg17 types. Furthermore, the layer contained a Roman provincial issue from the first half of the 3rd century AD and a Tyrense coinage of Trajan (111-112 AD). Also in the upper interface, in contact with the US 4 surface layer, was a British Protectorate 1 mil piece (c. 1940).
The main wall alignment that emerged from the excavation is USM 8 which was exposed in the middle of the trench for a total stretch of 10.7 m (at an altitude between -206.21 m and -205.93 m). The wall is made up of regular rows of basalt ashlars, arranged alternately lengthwise and widthwise, with a central core of light binders for an average thickness of 60 cm. (cf. Figure 37,40). It was possible to verify that at least four courses with a regular and uniform horizontal trend survive. Towards the east the wall connects with USM 66, perhaps with USM 9 and with USM 48, built with a similar masonry technique. Towards the West, the USM 72 wall was doubled (or doubled?) and was linked to USM 70 and USM 68 was placed against it. It is therefore clear that it is a load-bearing wall, but it is not yet clear whether the rooms to the East and West are all part of the same building. Hidden under a stone of USM 8, 5.5 m from the southern corner, a storage room was discovered (see Figure 40) containing 18 coins which, in ancient times, must have been accessible from the eastern compartment. At a later time , in a nearby point, three other coins belonging to the same monetary deposit were found. The catalog of 21 pieces includes very contemporary bronzes, summed up due to prolonged use, originally beaten by the nearby autonomous cities between the 1st and the middle of the 2nd century AD, but which were put back into circulation after having been re-tariffed with a countermark still to be studied: a fine example of minting from Tiberias under Claudius (53 AD), one from Tyre (55 BC - 87 AD), two from Trajan, the one issued by Tiberias (99-100 AD) and the other by Sepphoris (98-117 AD), two by Marcus Aurelius issued in Gadara (161-180 AD) and perhaps in Abila (161-180 AD), one by Commodus in Nysa Schythopolis (182- 183 AD), one of Settimio Severo for Giulia Domna issued in Nysa Schythopolis (206-207 AD), seven of Elagabalus of which one was with a figure of the standing emperor (218-222 AD), three of the mint of Nysa Schythopolis (218-219; 220-221; 220-221), one from the mint of Antiochia ad Hippum (218-222 AD) and another from the mint of Petra (218-222 AD), five Roman provincial issues of 2nd-half of the 2nd century AD, two Roman provincial issues from the middle of the 2nd century AD, one from a mint of the Decapoli. It is hoped that a detailed study of the stamps will allow us to trace the emissary authority, perhaps opening up possible scenarios on the role of the city in the late Roman imperial military apparatus. At the moment, due to the context of discovery , the nest egg constitutes a decisive terminus post quem for fixing the date of destruction of the building, which roughly should be placed after the era of Diocletian (284-305 AD) who, with the fortification of the limes arabicus palestinensis, reorganized the territory militarily. This data is somehow supported by the monetary discoveries in the other sectors of the probe (the latest of which date back to the second half of the 3rd century AD) and by the study of dating materials, in particular by the ceramic forms typical of the century. III but which, in the region, are also attested in contexts that reach up to the century. IV.
The planimetric diagram relating to the rooms to the east of USM 8 (see Figure 37, 41) shows three rooms communicating with each other. The northern compartment is delimited by USM 8, USM 48, USM 47 (at the average altitude of -206.30 m) and is affected by the US 50 collapse (3.90 x 3.10 m). The collapse consists of two levels: an upper one, with large natural and rounded basalt boulders to the North-West, and a lower one, to the South, with parallelepiped-shaped ashlars arranged in a double row side by side with an undulating East-West/West-East towards the center of the room (see Figure 42). These are probably the results of a structural failure of wall pillars or the ruin of a double arch that fell from the key. When this occurred the door space in USM 48 had already been blocked by an array of rounded boulders. The USM 48 wall (at an altitude of -206.38 m) was initially made up of two pillars, one against USM 8 and the other against USM 47. A second building was added to the latter which reduced its opening from an original span of 1.60 m to a current one of 1 m. A prutah of Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC) was found between the cracks in the pillar .
First of all, what stands out is the attempt, which cannot be better defined, to reinforce USM 8 with heterogeneous stones, some of which are cut, placed against its western face (see Figure 38). This intervention did not find a logical explanation during the excavation, unless we hypothesize a false reuse of USM 8 after the total collapse of the buildings to which it belonged. Given the total absence of levels above our US 7, the available data do not currently allow us to say this with certainty. On the other hand, it is clear that an imposing and well-finished building work, USM 72 (1.35 x 3.15 m, at an altitude of -206.31 m), flanks the northern section of USM 8 on the western side. In the lower part of the smaller portion of this structure you can see large and well-finished blocks of basalt, at an altitude of -206.57 m, which could form part of a staircase to access the roof or upper floors. If this were the case, what is visible of USM 72, which was also built with the use of excellent mortars, would constitute its basic platform.
Close to the southern area, the [earlier] collapse was leveled and covered with crushed and pressed limestone of an Early Byzantine-Islamic building that was probably the service quarter of the monastery. The Byzantine structures were completely destroyed, greatly looted and consequently covered by a layer of pebbles, deposited by the lake which had dramatically risen toward the middle of the 8th century A.D., almost certainly due to the effect of the earthquake of 749 A.D. (cf. Fig. 15).
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
|
eastern portico including square F18 (units 3 and/or 4)
Fig. 4
Plan of the Harbors Structures. Magdala Project 2007–2011 Excavations Color Code
Courtesy of S. De Luca © Magdala Project 2011–2012 (S. De Luca – A. Ricci) De Luca and Lena (2014)
Fig. 5
Schematic Plan of the Byzantine Harbor of Magdala (Adapted from Raban 1988, fig. 7). Courtesy of S. De Luca © Magdala Project 2011–2012 (S. De Luca – A. Ricci) De Luca and Lena (2014)
Aerial View of Areas C,D, E, and F
click on image to open a high res magnifiable version in a new tab Used with permission from from biblewalks.com |
Fig. 10
Elevation and Sections of the Hasmonean Mooring Place and of the Early Roman Inner Basin, with mooring stones (MS 1 and 4) in situ. Courtesy of S. De Luca © Magdala Project (S. De Luca 2008) JW: See units 3-4 to the left of middle drawing (under F18) overlain by an apparent collapse layer De Luca and Lena (2014)
Fig. 20
Geological Space-Time Depositional Evolution Scheme of the Harbors of Magdala–Taricheae. Courtesy of G. Sarti, University of Pisa © Magdala Project – University of Pisa (G. Sarti 2011) De Luca and Lena (2014) |
|
|
Areas H1, H2, and H3
Plate 6
Plan of excavation areas H1, H2, and H3, at the end of the 2007 season of the Magdala Project (S. De Luca—A. Ricci; relief from M. Forgia, A. Faggi, and B. Stern). De Luca (2009
Plate 7
Magdala/Taricheae, Area H1. Survey of the wall structures and collapses with indication of the main US and USM (S. De Luca—M. Forgia). De Luca (2009
Plate 8
Magdala/Taricheae, Area H2. Survey of the wall structures and collapses with indication of the main US and USM (S. De Luca—A. Faggi). De Luca (2009
Plate 9
Magdala/Taricheae, Area H3. Survey of the wall structures and collapses with indication of the main US and USM (S. De Luca—B. Stern). De Luca (2009 |
Fig. 8
General photo of Area H1 at the end of the excavation. Towards the West (D. Zanetti © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009)
Fig. 25 (top)
General photo of Area H2 at the end of the excavation. Towards the East (D. Zanetti © Magdala Project) Fig. 26 (bottom) Aerial photo of Area H2 at the end of the excavation. (Skyview, © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009)
Fig. 39
Aerial photo of Area H3 at the end of the excavation. (Skyview © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009)
Fig. 28
Excavation documentation of Area H2 South East sector. Detail of the covered conduit USM 60-61-116 under the paved road USM 5. Towards the North (D. Zanetti © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009)
Fig. 30
Excavation documentation of Area H2 South East sector. On the left: behind the covered conduit USM 60-61-116, you can see the US 59 alignment, the US 52 floor preparation, covered by the US 34 layer. On the right : remains of the paving of the USM 5 street. Towards the West (D. Zanetti © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009)
Fig. 35
Excavation documentation of Area H2 North West sector. Detail of the particular elements of the US 13 collapse, in the US 24 destruction layer, against the USM 17 façade wall. Southward (Skyview © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009)
Fig. 42
Excavation documentation of Area H3 Northern sector. Detail of the collapsing structures USM 50, near USM 47 on the left, and USM 48 behind. Towards the South. (D. Zanetti © Magdala Project) De Luca (2009) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
eastern portico including square F18 (units 3 and/or 4)
Fig. 4
Plan of the Harbors Structures. Magdala Project 2007–2011 Excavations Color Code
Courtesy of S. De Luca © Magdala Project 2011–2012 (S. De Luca – A. Ricci) De Luca and Lena (2014)
Fig. 5
Schematic Plan of the Byzantine Harbor of Magdala (Adapted from Raban 1988, fig. 7). Courtesy of S. De Luca © Magdala Project 2011–2012 (S. De Luca – A. Ricci) De Luca and Lena (2014)
Aerial View of Areas C,D, E, and F
click on image to open a high res magnifiable version in a new tab Used with permission from from biblewalks.com |
Fig. 10
Elevation and Sections of the Hasmonean Mooring Place and of the Early Roman Inner Basin, with mooring stones (MS 1 and 4) in situ. Courtesy of S. De Luca © Magdala Project (S. De Luca 2008) JW: See units 3-4 to the left of middle drawing (under F18) overlain by an apparent collapse layer De Luca and Lena (2014)
Fig. 20
Geological Space-Time Depositional Evolution Scheme of the Harbors of Magdala–Taricheae. Courtesy of G. Sarti, University of Pisa © Magdala Project – University of Pisa (G. Sarti 2011) De Luca and Lena (2014) |
|
|
Avshalom-Gorni, D. and Najar, A. (2013) , Migdal, Hadashot Arkheologiyot Volume 125 Year 2013
de Luca, S. and Lena, A, (2014), The Harbor of the City of Magdala/Taricheaeon the Shores of the Sea of Galilee, from theHellenistic to the Byzantine Times. New Discoveries and Preliminary Results in
S. Ladstätter – F. Pirson – T. Schmidts (Hrsg.), Harbors and Harbor Cities in the Eastern Mediterranean, BYZAS 19 (2014) 113–163
De Luca, S. , (2008) Magdala Project 2007, Notiziario SBF. A.A. 2006/2007 (Jerusalem 2008) in Italian
Lena, A. (2013) Magdala 2008 Preliminary Report Hadashot Arkheologiyot v. 125
Loffreda S. (2008a). Cafarnao VI: Tipologie e contesti stratigrafici della ceramic (1968–2003). Milano.
Loffreda S. (2008b). Cafarnao VII: Documentazione grafica della ceramica (1968–2003). Milano.
Loffreda S. (2008c). Cafarnao VIII: Documentazione fotografica degli oggetti (1968–2003), Milano.
Magdala at BibleWalks.com - lots of high resolution photos
Magdala.org