Open this page in a new tab

Khirbet al-Batrawy

  Left

Aerial View of Khirbet al-Batrawy

Nigro (2008)



Right

Aerial View of Khirbet al-Batrawy

APAAME 20141012 REB-0046 CC BY-NC-ND 2.0


Names

Transliterated Name Source Name
Khirbet al-Batrawy Arabic
The City Of Copper Axes English
Introduction
Khirbet al-Batrawy

Brief summary of occupational history

Extensive archaeological activities along the northern fortifications brought to light a composite system made of fortifications brought to light a composite system made of four lines of defense, the continuous development of which neatly epitomizes the life of the city itself:
  • foundation at the beginning of Early Bronze II (3000 BC)
  • collapse caused by a severe earthquake at the end of the period (2800 BC)
  • urban floruit during the Early Bronze IIIA–B (2800–2500 – 2300 BC)
  • final destruction due to a fierce conflagration at the end of Early Bronze IIIB
  • reoccupation of the ruins by an Early Bronze IVB rural village (2200–2000 BC)

Introduction

The city of Khirbet al-Batrawy represents a rare example of an early urban centre arising in a peripheral area of the ancient Near East at the dawn of urban civilization in the 3rd millennium BC. The discovery of Batrawy in 2004 by the Expedition to Jordan of Rome «La Sapienza» University and the discovery of its Royal Palace in 2009 opened up new perspectives on the settlement of these fringe regions, especially in the period before the domestication of the camel.

Exploration of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" and the quadruple fortification lines

The site of Khirbat al-Batrawy, the previously unknown city of the third millennium BC discovered in 2004, has been systematically explored by the Expedition to Palestine & Jordan of Sapienza University of Rome since 2005. Archaeological investigations and restoration works were carried out under the aegis of the Department of Antiquities of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, with the support of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research.

Batrawy was founded as the outcome of a synecistic process which characterized the early urban phenomenon in the Southern Levant. The EB II-III (3000-2300 BC) city was in a strategic position, at the same time, for the exploitation of cultivable land and water resources, and for long-distance trade network connecting the site of Batrāwī with the main urban civilizations of the third millennium BC. The discoveries in the “Palace of the Copper Axes” revealed the central role played by the fortified city of Batrāwy at the junction of the east-west route which crosses the Syro-Arabic Desert to Mesopotamia and the Arabian Peninsula and the south-north main route, later on named "King's' Highway", running upon the Jordanian Highlands from the Sinai, the Gulf of ‘Aqaba and Wadi 'Araba.

The planning activities for exploration on the northern slope of the site (Area B North) moved from the discovery in 2009 of the Royal Palace (the "Palace of the Copper Axes"), a public building of the 3rd millennium BC which has provided a wealth of data and findings in an extraordinary state of preservation. A second aim of the Expedition has been the exploration of the well-preserved massive fortification system, just north of the Royal Palace. The excavations revealed quadruple lines of fortifications with its projecting towers and bastions.

Maps, Aerial Views, Plans, Illustrations, and Photos
Maps, Aerial Views, Plans, Illustrations, and Photos

Maps

Normal Size

  • Khirbet al-Batraway in OSM from Pleaides
  • Fig. 2 Map of Upper and Middle Wadi az-Zarqa with visited Early Bronze Age sites, dolmens and archaeological feature from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 2 Map of region of Al Batrawi with the contemporary sites from Nigro (2025)

Magnified

  • Khirbet al-Batraway in OSM from Pleaides
  • Fig. 2 Map of Upper and Middle Wadi az-Zarqa with visited Early Bronze Age sites, dolmens and archaeological feature from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 2 Map of region of Al Batrawi with the contemporary sites from Nigro (2025)

Aerial Views

  • Fig. 3 Aerial view of the ancient territory under Batrawy control from Nigro (2008)
  • Khirbet al-Batrawy in Google Earth

Plans and Illustrations

Site Plans

Normal Size

  • Fig. 1.2 Topographical plan of Khirbet al-Batrawy from Nigro (2008)

Magnified

  • Fig. 1.2 Topographical plan of Khirbet al-Batrawy from Nigro (2008)

Area Plans and Illustrations

B North - North City Walls

Normal Size

  • Fig. 3.19 EB II city-wall and gate from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.23 Schematic reconstruction of a stretch of Batrawy II city-wall from Nigro (2008)

Magnified

  • Fig. 3.19 EB II city-wall and gate from Nigro (2008)

Eastern Pavilion of the "Palace of the Copper Axes"

Normal Size

  • Fig. 5 Plan of the South-Eastern Unit of the Eastern Pavilion of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)

Magnified

  • Fig. 5 Plan of the South-Eastern Unit of the Eastern Pavilion of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)

E - South City Walls

Normal Size

  • Fig. 6.10 Plan of Batrawy II (EB II) city-wall and related floor inside the city from Nigro (2008)

Magnified

  • Fig. 6.10 Plan of Batrawy II (EB II) city-wall and related floor inside the city from Nigro (2008)

F - EB II and EB III Temple

Normal Size

  • Fig. 16 Reconstruction of Temple F1 with its forecourt (Phase 4, Early Bronze II) from Nigro and Sala (2009)

Magnified

  • Fig. 16 Reconstruction of Temple F1 with its forecourt (Phase 4, Early Bronze II) from Nigro and Sala (2009)

Photos

Normal Size

  • Fig. 2.5 Collapsed stones in Area A West from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.18 EB II-III fortification walls in Area B North from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.24 Street along the outer side of Batrawy II city-wall from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.37 Earthquake cracks on eastern jamb of city gate from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.38 City Gate after blockage (probable earthquake repair) from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.7 Collapsed stones in Area B South from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 7.7 Collapsed stones in Area F from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 15 EB II-III broad room temple and round platform in Area F from Nigro and Sala (2009)
  • Fig. 3 Early Bronze Age II-III Main Inner Wall (left) and Outer Wall (right) of northern fortifications from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 4 Early Bronze Age II-III Main Inner Wall and Outer Wall of northern fortifications from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 6 South-Eastern Unit of the Eastern Pavilion of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 7 Eastern wall W.1737 of the South-Eastern Unit of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 8 Aerial view of the South-Eastern Unit of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)

Magnified

  • Fig. 2.5 Collapsed stones in Area A West from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.18 EB II-III fortification walls in Area B North from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.24 Street along the outer side of Batrawy II city-wall from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.37 Earthquake cracks on eastern jamb of city gate from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.38 City Gate after blockage (probable earthquake repair) from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 3.7 Collapsed stones in Area B South from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 7.7 Collapsed stones in Area F from Nigro (2008)
  • Fig. 15 EB II-III broad room temple and round platform in Area F from Nigro and Sala (2009)
  • Fig. 3 Early Bronze Age II-III Main Inner Wall (left) and Outer Wall (right) of northern fortifications from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 4 Early Bronze Age II-III Main Inner Wall and Outer Wall of northern fortifications from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 6 South-Eastern Unit of the Eastern Pavilion of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 7 Eastern wall W.1737 of the South-Eastern Unit of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)
  • Fig. 8 Aerial view of the South-Eastern Unit of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" from Nigro (2025)

Archaeoseismic Chronology
Stratigraphy

Site-wide

Nigro (2025)

Table 1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphic phases at Kirbat Al Batrawi

Nigro (2025)


Nigro and Sala (2010)

Table 1

Architectural and stratigraphic phasing of Khirbat al-Batråwi

Nigro and Sala (2010)


Nigro and Sala (2009)

Table 1

Chronology, stratigraphy and structures at Khirbat al-Batråwi

Nigro and Sala (2009)


Nigro (2008)

Table 1.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphic phases of Khirbet al-Batrawy.

Nigro (2008)


Areas

A West

Table 2.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area A West

Nigro (2008)


B North

Table 3.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area B North.

Nigro (2008)


B South

Table 4.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area B South.

Nigro (2008)


E

Table 6.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area E

Nigro (2008)


F

Table 7.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area F

Nigro (2008)


Time Periods

Time periods from Stern et al (1993)

Age Dates Comments
Early Bronze IA-B 3300-3000 BCE
Early Bronze II 3000-2700 BCE
Early Bronze III 2700-2200 BCE
Middle Bronze I 2200-2000 BCE ‎EB IV - Intermediate Bronze
Middle Bronze IIA 2000-1750 BCE
Middle Bronze IIB 1750-1550 BCE
Late Bronze I 1550-1400 BCE
Late Bronze IIA 1400-1300 BCE
Late Bronze IIB 1300-1200 BCE
Iron IA 1200-1150 BCE
Iron IB 1150-1100 BCE
Iron IIA 1000-900 BCE
Iron IIB 900-700 BCE
Iron IIC 700-586 BCE
Babylonian & Persian 586-332 BCE
Early Hellenistic 332-167 BCE
Late Hellenistic 167-37 BCE
Early Roman 37 BCE - 132 CE
Herodian 37 BCE - 70 CE
Late Roman 132-324 CE
Byzantine 324-638 CE
Early Arab 638-1099 CE Umayyad & Abbasid‎
Crusader & Ayyubid 1099-1291 CE
Late Arab 1291-1516 CE Fatimid & Mameluke‎
Ottoman 1516-1917 CE

Time periods from Meyers et al (1997)

Phase Dates Variants
Early Bronze IA-B 3400-3100 BCE
Early Bronze II 3100-2650 BCE
Early Bronze III 2650-2300 BCE
Early Bronze IVA-C 2300-2000 BCE Intermediate Early-Middle Bronze, Middle Bronze I‎
Middle Bronze I 2000-1800 BCE ‎Middle Bronze IIA
Middle Bronze II 1800-1650 BCE ‎Middle Bronze IIB‎
Middle Bronze III 1650-1500 BCE ‎‎Middle Bronze IIC
Late Bronze IA 1500-1450 BCE
Late Bronze IIB 1450-1400 BCE
Late Bronze IIA 1400-1300 BCE
Late Bronze IIB 1300-1200 BCE
Iron IA 1200-1125 BCE
Iron IB 1125-1000 BCE
Iron IC 1000-925 BCE Iron IIA‎
Iron IIA 925-722 BCE Iron IIB‎
Iron IIB 722-586 BCE ‎Iron IIC
Iron III 586-520 BCE Neo-Babylonian‎
Early Persian 520-450 BCE
Late Persian 450-332 BCE
Early Hellenistic 332-200 BCE
Late Hellenistic 200-63 BCE
Early Roman 63 BCE - 135 CE
Middle Roman 135-250 CE
Late Roman 250-363 CE
Early Byzantine 363-460 CE
Late Byzantine 460-638 CE
Early Arab 638-1099 CE
Crusader & Ayyubid 1099-1291 CE
Late Arab 1291-1516 CE
Ottoman 1516-1917 CE

Batrawy IIb Earthquake - ~2700 BCE (End of Early Bronze IIB)

Discussion

Discussion

References
Nigro (2025)

Introduction

... This preliminary report focuses on the discoveries of the sixteenth—eighteenth seasons (2020-2022), which were carried out under the threat of the coronavirus, and which were devoted to the exploration of the eastern wing of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" and of the easternmost stretch of the impressive fortification system on the northern slope of the site.

Khirbat Al Batrawi: a 3rd-Millennium BC City in Connection with Syria, Egypt, and Mesopotamia

... Eighteen seasons of excavations at Khirbat al-Batrawi made it possible to reconstruct the history of this settlement from its first occupation at the eve of the 4th millennium BCE (Batrawi I, Early Bronze I, 3300–3000 BCE), through the erection of massive city walls and its transformation into a fortified urban centre during Early Bronze II (Batrawi II, EB II, 3000–2700 BCE), when a major temple was built on the easternmost terrace (Nigro 2008: 276–293; Nigro 2007: 338–339; 2009: 665–666; 2010c; 2013a: 494–496; 2017b; Nigro and Sala 2009: 381–383).

This early city suffered a major destruction caused by a tremendous earthquake around 2700 BCE, which left cracks in the earliest MIW. The city was promptly rebuilt with a monumental layout during Early Bronze IIIA (Batrawi IIIa, EB IIIA, 2700–2500 BCE)
(Nigro 2007: 349–358, fig. 8; 2008: 87–90, 245–268, fig. 3.37; 2009: 666–667; 2010a: 38; 2010b: 437; 2017b; Gallo 2014: 150, fig. 4).

This flourishing phase, which included the so-called “Palace of the Copper Axes,” was again rebuilt around 2500 BCE at the beginning of Batrawi IIIb (EB IIIB, 2500–2300 BCE). The final and most prosperous city—fortified with up to four lines of defensive walls along the northern slope—was destroyed by a fierce conflagration around 2300 BCE (end of Batrawi IIIb, EB IIIB, 2300 BCE) (Nigro 2008: 141–142; 2012b: 163–165; 2010a: 71–110; 2012d: 228; 2014d: 77–78; 2017b: 164; Nigro and Sala 2011: 88–89; 2012: 49–50; Nigro et al. 2010a; 2011; Gallo 2014: 158–160).

After a hiatus of roughly a century (2300–2200 BCE), a small rural village occupied the ruins during the final century of the 3rd millennium BCE (Batrawi IV, EB IVB, 2200–2000 BCE) (Nigro 2006a: 37–40; 2010b: 441–442; 2011: 73; 2012c: 616–617; 2021; Nigro et al. 2010a). Later, the khirbah was briefly re-occupied in the Late Iron Age and again by nomadic groups during the Umayyad and Abbasid periods. This chronological sequence, supported by stratigraphy and the absence of superimposed layers, establishes Khirbat al-Batrawi as a key reference site for the Early Bronze Age in the Levant1.
Footnotes

1. Radiocarbon dates provide a chronology higher by about two centuries for EB III (Nigro et al. 2019). It is a choice of the present author to keep traditional chronology, awaiting new sampling and excavations at the site that may clarify the absolute chronology anchorage of the stratigraphy.

Defensive Works on the Northern Flanks of the khirbah

The defensive works are a major feature of the site of Al Batrawi (Nigro 2006a: 153-223, 2008: 65-125, 2012b: 38-52, 2006b: 240-246, 2007: 349-358, 2009: 663-667, 2010a: 241, 2010b: 437-439, plan II, 2013a: 491-495 fig. 7, 2016b: 136-139, 2017b: 164-165, 2020: 49-50; Nigro and Sala 2009: 374-377; Nigro and Gallo 2022: 164-169). They run in parallel on three different terraces on the northern slope of the site from the central area of Gate L.160 to the huge outwork Bastion B.830 which protected the northwestern corner of the city and Gate L.860. On the opposite side of the fortification, the Main Inner Wall, built on the rocky edge of the hill, and the Outer Wall W.155, erected some meters down on the slope, gradually converged (Nigro 2009: 663-664, 2010b: 434-436, 2011: 64-66, 2012c: 613-617, 2020: 49-50, 2006: 175-177, 2008: 63-87; Nigro and Gallo 2022: 167-169; Nigro et al. 2010b).

During the three seasons 2020-2022 a 15 m long stretch of the fortification was brought to light in this easternmost stretch (FIG. 3). The MIW turns slightly northwards 10.67 m from Gate L.160, and then it runs for another 16 m to the east. As the originally parallel Outer Wall does not turn, the latter gradually joins the outer face of the MIW. In the last 7m so far exposed, the two walls run adjoined, and the Outer Wall has a walkway on top, the clayish floor of which was in some spots still preserved (FIG. 4). This may explain double/flanked city-walls known from several fortified centers of Early Bronze II-III Southern Levant (e.g., Khirbat Az Zayraqun, Tall Tiannak (Douglas 2007: 30, figs. 4, 14-18, 26, plans 6-9, phase 2; Lapp 1964: 7-12; Nigro 2008: 93-94, 2012b: 41).

Under a thick layer of collapsed stones (F.1552) and limestone squared blocks, sometimes cut through by pits, the MIW was preserved at a height of about 3 m, possibly because it was supported by the Outer Wall leaning against it
. The lower foundation course of the Outer Wall was brought to light at the bottom of the structure, showing that the wall gently turns southwards to join with the Main Inner Wall (FIG. 4).

Ceramic finds, albeit scanty, have confirmed the already consolidated reconstruction of the development of the city of Al Batrawi fortifications: the Main Inner Wall was the first built defensive line and it was erected at the beginning of Early Bronze II (ca. 3000 BC); the Outer Wall was added to the former after a terrible earthquake had struck it and brought the superstructure made of bricks down at the beginning of EB IIIA (ca. 2700 BC). A further fortification structure ( Scarp Wall W.165) was added in Early Bronze IIIB (2500-2300 BC), partly incorporating a round outwork or tower (W.185) overlooking the entrance to the city built in EB IIIA (ca. 2700 BC) and fallen out of use2.

After the final destruction and the abandonment of the city, its ruins were regularized when a new group settled it in EB IVB (2200-2000 BC). The huge collapsed city-walls were transformed into a stone-revetted rampart and a series of dwellings arose on the hilltop. The new settlers were shepherds and agriculturalists (Nigro 2011: 73, 2012c: 616-617, 2021: 295-298; Nigro et al. 2010a). We do not know their necropolis—as for the former inhabitants of Al Batrawi, it has been suggested that the burial place of the EB II-III city elite was in a village to the west, where the funerary rites reserved to high rank people were performed (Nigro et al. 2010a; Nigro 2021: 299). dividuals were carried out (Nigro et al. 2010a; Nigro 2021: 299).
Footnotes

2 Such a round tower is comparable to a similar defensive structure at Khirbat Al Karak (Fortification C; Greenberg and Paz 2005: 94-96, figs. 1-2, 5-6; Greenberg et al. 2006: 249-267; Nigro and Gallo 2022: 167-169).

Further Exploration of the "Palace of the Copper Axes"

Introduction

Excavations in Area B South-East revealed the southern limit of Courtyard L.1046 and allowed the exploration of the easternmost unit of the complex organized on court L.936 and Hall L.1730/L.1740/L.1750 (FIG. 5), originally identified during the first seasons at the site (Nigro 2008: 158-162, figs. 4.53-4.60, 2012b: 169-188, 2007: 353, 2009: 668-669, fig. 13, 2010b: 440, 2011: 70-72; Nigro and Sala 2010: 248). This space was accessible from Courtyard L.1046 and from a secondary passage (L.464) connecting it to the street running beside the Main Inner Wall (Nigro 2008: 160-162, figs. 4.58-4.60, 2012b: 176).

During the 2021 season, the southern wall (W1289) of Courtyard L.1046 was further explored. It was a terrace wall, leaning against a step cut in the bedrock. Courtyard L.1046 was a rectangular open space which was the centre of the Eastern Pavilion of the palace, accessible through central corridor L.1050 with a rectangular hall on its northern side (L.430) (Nigro 2013b: 198-204, 2016b: 139-149, 2017b: 162-164, 2012b: 179-181). The floor of the court was made of a layer of yellowish beaten clayish marl and by the emerging bedrock and lasted in use for the whole life of the palace.

The eastern wall of the courtyard, W1187, was further explored in its southern extension, where a blocked door (L.992) was identified (with two yellowish bricks indicating the threshold on its eastern side: W1759), connecting Court L.1046 with Hall L.1750. W1187 was then interrupted and joined a curved structure (W969) abutting into the southeastern corner of L.1046, and encompassing a blind chamber (L.976), possibly hosting a wooden staircase or a light well. The small chamber (0.95 x 0.94 m) was delimited by the round wall (W969) to the north, and by wall W973 to the west, and wall W983 to the east.

In the 2022 season, the expansion of the dig eastwards allowed it to explore almost completely the southern half of the second row of rooms of the Eastern Pavilion. Here, courtyard L.936, with the two semi-circular installations, oven T.413 and silo S.931 (Nigro 2007: 353, 2009: 668-669, fig. 13, 2010b: 444, 2008: 158-159, figs. 4.53-4.57, 2012b: 175-176) opened towards a rectangular room (L.1750 in Phase 5, L.1740/L.990 in Phase 4, and L.1730 in Phase 3) with a double pillared entrance. In Phase 4, in the southwestern portion of the hall a rectangular (4.2 x 2.1 m) room (L.980) was built (FIG. 6). This room was built using the southern wall of the pavilion (W989) as the rear wall. Its eastern wall (W.1715) rested upon two previous structures: an original Phase 5 partition wall or bench (W1733) and a Phase 4 structure (W1719). Room L.980 had two flat bases inside to support wooden pillars for the ceilings (W9853 and W1757) and was connected to the upper floor of the palace in this courtyard (L.990/L.1740, L.1730). Another bench or a step made of two bricks (W.1751) was set against a substantial wall (W1735), with an adjoined oblique wall (W1739), leaning on bench W1733. In the eastern section of the dig, wall W1737 was uncovered, made of regularly cut stones and re-employed bricks, parallel to W1187 and attributed to Phase 4 (EB IIIA); it rested upon an earlier structure (W.1755) made of bricks and laying on floor L.936. This structure was the eastern limit of the unit (FIG. 7).

Two corresponding offsets protruded respectively from wall W1737 and W1187, framing a 7 m wide porch, with two pillars in the passage, set on 0.5 m long limestone slabs, and each placed at 1.5 m from the 0.5 m thick offset and at a distance of 3 m from one another (FIG. 8).

The excavation of the Pillared Unit L.1750 in the southeastern half of the Eastern Pavilion of the "Palace of the Copper Axes" provided a full stratigraphy of the palace, showing that while courtyards kept the same floor across phases, rooms were rebuilt by raising their pavements during at least three main stages of use (Batrawi IIb, IIIa, IIIb).
Footnotes

3. Slab W985 measured 0.39x0.41m and lay 1.40m north of wall W989. It was interpreted as a pillar base.

Stratigraphy of the Eastern Pavilion

In the South-Eastern Unit the earliest floor was that of L.936 and L.1750 (inside the pillared room), which apparently was in use during the latest part of the Early Bronze II (Batrawi IIb, EB IIB, 2850-2700 BC). After the collapse of the building, following the earthquake which destroyed the city at the end of Batrawi II, a debris layer with ashes (F.1748/F.988) was sealed by a compact floor made of gray clay (F.1740/L.990). This was further raised by a stratum of pebbles and smashed bricks (F.1744/F.987) and covered by the last floor of the L-shaped space, L.1730. The upper floor (L.980) lays 0.52 m above the lower one (L.980 at 657.49 m, and L.990/L1740 at 656.97 masl). The stratigraphy of Courtyard L.980/L.990 has thus shown three main phases of the palace: the original one, in period Batrawi II, one referable to Batrawi IIIa, and the other to Batrawi IIIb.

Finds

Finds from Hall L.1730/L.1740 are basically limestone (KB.21.20; KB.21.28) and marble mortars (KB.21.38) of relatively small dimensions devoted to grinding and pulping for food transformation (FIG. 9). Two spindle whorls (KB.21.19, KB.21.36) made of pottery and four bone awls (KB.21.10, KB.21.31, KB.21.32, 10.22.72) also suggest weaving and sewing activities (FIG. 10). A broken worked bone (KB.22.70), a goat metacarpal decorated with transversal and crossed bands of parallel incisions, might be a piece of a magic wand or a flute. A fragmentary nacreous shell (KB.22.66) is an import from the Red Sea.

A peculiar find, retrieved in L.976, is a fragmentary rim of a hole-mouth jar made of a reddish-brown local fabric with an incised sign (FIG. 11), possibly depicting an animal (a bee or a catfish, fishes that in antiquity were living in the Az Zarqa" River)4.
Footnotes

4.

Conclusions

The sixteenth (2020), seventeenth (2021), and eighteenth (2022) seasons at Khirbat al-Batrawi contributed to a deeper and more detailed knowledge of this ancient city of Jordan, of its monumental defensive system, its palace, and its inner general layout, as well as its history, economy, and social organization in the Early Bronze Age II-III. The Batrawi IVb village has provided a wide set of finds illustrating the material culture of the Intermediate Bronze Age in the Upper Wadi Az Zarqa' (TABLE 1).
Footnotes

4. The similarity with the catfish sign used to write part of Narmer's name (cfr. Umm al-Qaab, Abydos (Kayser and Dreyer 1982: 263, fig. 14-15, nr. 40); Zawiyet al-Aryan t. Z401 jar fr. (Dunham 1978: 26, Pl. XVIb 2/2-4; Kayser and Dreyer 1982: 263, fig. 14-15, nr. 37; Van den Brink 2001); Hierakonpolis jar fr. (Kayser and Dreyer 1982: 263, fig. 14-15, nr. 43), as exemplified by the one from Tall al Areini (Yeivin 1963: 207-208, fig.1-2; Kayser and Dreyer 1982: 263, fig. 14-15, nr. 41; Weinstein 1984: 64), cannot be proven because the hypothesized head of the catfish is broken. Animals such as snakes and scorpions were present in the imagery of pottery in the "Palace of the Copper Axes" (KB.11.B.1054/4 and KB.11.B.1054/1; Nigro 2013b: 201, 2016b: 143, fig.12-13, 2010a: 103, sherd 1054/79).

Nigro (2008)

3. Area B North: the EB II-III fortification system

Introduction

Archaeological investigations in Area B (fig. 3.1) during the second (2006) and third (2007) seasons were extended towards the north, the south and the west, subdividing the area into two main sectors, north and south of the main city-wall; what follows is, thus, the report on monuments excavated north of the latter, while Area B South is illustrated in chapter 4. Area B North, outside the main city-wall (W.103 + W.105), included squares BnII4 (eastern half) + BoII4 + BpII4 + BoII5 + BpII5 + BoII6 + BpII6 + BqII6, in order to accomplish a comprehensive exploration of the northern slope of the hill (fig. 3.2). Here, excavation reached the earliest defensive works at the site, dating back from Early Bronze II, and allowed to identify the main city-gate of this period (§ 3.2.1.), as well as the successive lines of fortifications (§§ 3.2.2.-3.2.3.), with several annexed structures, which lasted in use until the end of the Early Bronze IIIB, and which will be described in detail below, according to their stratigraphic and constructive sequence.

3.1. Stratigraphy of Area B North

Table 3.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area B North.

Nigro (2008)


...

3.1.5. Phase 5: stratigraphy of Batrawy II fortification system

Phase 5 is basically constituted by the destruction layer (Activity 5a) marking the end of the Batrawy II city, and the original constructional phase (Activity 5b).

Activity 5a: destruction of Batrawy II city-gate and city-wall

A layer around 0.2-0.3 m thick preserved only in two spots in the excavated area, namely in square BoII5 (to the west) F.168 (fig. 3.16) and within the gate passage (F.172), including fragmentary grayish mud-bricks and small pebbles, illustrates the collapse and destruction of the city-gate and earliest city-wall of Batrawy II (fig. 3.17).

Activity 5b: construction of Batrawy II city-gate and city-wall

The earliest city-wall and city-gate L.160 were erected directly over the bedrock and included the two doorjambs (W.183 to the east, W.156 to the west), entrance step L.182, marking the passage into the gate, floor L.186 into the passage, and street L.144b outside the gate. All features were linked each other.

3.2. Architecture & finds: the EB II city-gate and the EB II-III triple line of fortifications

Excavations in the area north of the main city-wall reached the bedrock, thus thoroughly illustrating the progressive transformation of the defensive system in this strategic spot of the town (fig. 3.18), from the earliest city wall of the Early Bronze II (2900-2700 BC) up to the last urban defence – the outer scarp-wall of the EB IIIB (2300 BC) –, and to the latest embankment of the EB IVB (2200-2000 BC) village (see below).

3.2.1. The earliest city-wall and city-gate (Period Batrawy II, Early Bronze II)

The earliest defence of Batrawy (fig. 3.19) was a solid wall 2.9-3.2 m wide, consisting of a lower foundation made of huge limestone blocks and boulders (some exceeding 1.5 m in length by 1.0 in width) on the northern outer face (W.103c+W.163c; figs. 3.20-3-21), and of big blocks (0.5 x 0. 6 m) on the southern inner curtain (W.105c+W.161c; fig. 3.22). The inner core of the wall (W.104c) was made by medium size undressed stones laid in regular layers with pebbles, limestone chops and mud mortar. The outer (W.103c+W.163c) and inner (W.105c+W.161c) walls were carefully set into the bedrock16, and the outer wall exhibited a battering foot in order to make firmer the whole structure17.

This imposing stone foundation was 2.3 m high around the gate and 2 m in the rest of the area; it supported a mud-brick superstructure up to 4 m high18 with battering sides, reaching on top a hypothetical width of 2.2 m, presumably with a wooden coronation and a continuous parapet slightly protruding from the façade (fig. 3.23). The city-wall was built in separated stretches of 6-8 m length in order to prevent dangerous effects of earthquakes19, a technique also attested to in other Early Bronze urban sites in Palestine and Jordan20.

Street L.144 (Period Batrawy II, Early Bronze II)

A street (L.144b) run along the city-wall on its outer side (figs. 3.24 3.25)21, paved with a layer of a gritty chalk plastering the bedrock and regularizing its surface (at some spots also stone fillings were used to make the street floor more regular). The collapse layer lying over the street, F.168, preserved only in square BoII5 (§ 3.1.4.), included EB II sherds (pl. XXI), a stone blade22, and various fragments of greyish mud-bricks.

The city-gate of Period Batrawy II (Early Bronze II)

In spite of the monumentality of the city-wall, the EB II gate was a simple opening, 1.6 m wide, since the town was approachable only by pedestrians and equids (onagers or donkeys) through the street (L.144b) which flanked the wall (figs. 3.26-3-28). A 0.27 m step (B.182) marked the entrance (figs. 3.29-3.30)23 to the passage, paved with a plastered floor (L.186), and flanked by reinforced door-jambs made of bigger and carefully intermingled blocks, which supported a monolithic capstone (2.4 x 0.7 x 0.35 m) on the outer side and a wooden beam on the inside (as it is indicated by burnt traces on the faces of the stones in between the beams were inserted). At least four wooden beams were presumably employed in the ceilings of the gate passage and supported the brick superstructure (fig. 3.56). The eastern jamb (W.183) was made, on its outer side, by a series of alternately superimposed cubic and rectangular limestone blocks (figs. 3.31-3.32); the western jamb (W.156) was reinforced by a large slab on its fourth course of stones, linked to a huge bock visible on the northern façade of the main wall (figs. 3.33-3.34, 3.36). Such a strengthening device was set in the wall just above a protruding buttress (W.187), preserved only at the lowest course of stones over the bedrock (fig. 3.35), perhaps to be connected with a passage through the street running along the city-wall (L.144b). In spite of its apparently simple layout, the EB II gate at Batrawy accomplished mainly defensive purposes, since due to its dimensions (the passageway was a corridor 1.6 m wide and 3.2 m long), it was easy to be looked out and to be locked in case of enemy attack; it was, anyhow, the main access to the town, as its location on the city perimeter and the organization of spaces inside and outside it testifies to.

Nonetheless, the plan of gate L.160 finds several comparison in contemporary EB II defensive architecture of the region, such as at Khirbet Kerak24, Tell el-Far‘ah North25, et-Tell/‘Ai26, Arad27, Khirbet ez-Zeraqon28, and, later on in EB III, also at Bab edh-Dhra‘29.

There is no evidence for the presence of towers adjoined to this early gate, even though the area was completely reconstructed when the gate was blocked and an outer wall (W.155) was added to the defense at the beginning of the Early Bronze IIIA (see below § 3.2.2.).

Two sharp earthquake cracks on the eastern jamb (fig. 3.37) testify to the destruction of the lintels and possibly of the capstone of the passageway, which presumably caused a general collapse, so that the gate went out of use at the end of the Early Bronze II30.

3.2.2. The double city-wall of Period Batrawy IIIa (Early Bronze IIIA)

After the destruction which caused the partial collapse of the gate and brought to a sudden end the EB II city, the defensive system in Area B North, at the most sensitive and exposed side of the town, underwent a general reconstruction. The gate was blocked by a solid wall made31 with big stones (W.157; figs. 3.38-3-40)32, and the superstructure of the main city-wall (W.103b+163b + W.104b+ W.105b+W.161b) was rebuilt em ploying medium size stones up to a height of around 4.0-5.0 m; only the upper section of the structure was built up with reddish mud-bricks up to 8 m. The original stretches in which the main wall was subdivided33 were tied up one to the other (on its outer face this indicates in several spots the height from which the wall was reconstructed).
Footnotes

16 Usually the elevation of the inner foot of the main city-wall is around 0.5-1 m higher than that of the outer one.

17 Nigro ed. 2006, 175-176, fig. 4.32.

18 Actually, there is no information on the dimension of this brick superstructure. Fragments of greyish mud-bricks were retrieved in the destruction layers of Period Batrawy II, however even the dimensions of the bricks is uncertain (0.6 x 0.4 x 0.16 m), while the height of the superstructure has been calculated according to the presumed height of the later EB III city-wall, suggested by a flight of steps of a staircase discovered inside wall W.105b+W.161b (staircase W.181, § 3.2.2.).

19 Nigro ed. 2006, 176-177, note 26.

20 See below note 27.

21 This street was already partially identified in the first season (Nigro 2006a, 245, fig. 26; Nigro ed. 2006, 191, figs. 4.53-4.54).

22 KB.06.B.74 (pl. XXI).

23 The elevation outside the gate is 54.49 m, while the floor inside the gate was 55.01 m.

24 The South-East Gate in Wall A (2.5 m wide; Greenberg - Paz 2005, 84, 86-89, fig. 8, 10-14; Greenberg et al. 2006, 239-244, plans 6.2, 6.4).

25 De Vaux 1962, 221-234, pls. XIX-XXI.

26 The Citadel Gate at Site A (around 1 m wide and 4.5 m long; Callaway 1980, 63-65, figs. 38, 41); the Postern Gate (around 1 m wide; Callaway 1980, 72-73, figs. 48-49, 51) and the Lower City Gate (around 1 m wide; Callaway 1980, 114 115, figs. 74-75) at Site L.

27 The Western Gate in Area T (2.50-2.70 m wide), the Gate in Area N (2.10 m wide), and the Postern Gate in Area K (0.80 m wide): Amiran - Ilan 1996, 20-22, pls. 68-70, 78, 85-86, 90-93.

28 The City-Gate in the Lower City fortifications (around 2.0-2.5 m wide; Douglas 2007, 9, figs. 3, 6-12, pls. 1-5; phase 4g-a; EB II). Just 7 m north-west of the main city-gate a postern 0.80 m wide (sortie-postern) was opened across the city wall W1 (Douglas 2007, 10). According to excavators, it was closed after a little while already during the Early Bronze II (Douglas 2007, 14; phase 4d).

29 The EB III West Gate in Fields IV and XIII, also blocked during the Early Bronze III (Rast - Schaub 2003, 272-280, fig. 10.12). A possible EB III postern (around 1.50 m wide) at Tell Ta‘annek, detected on the western side of the site (Lapp 1964, 12, fig.4), exhibited instead a bent-axis plan.

30 Nigro 2007a, 352; in press a, § 6. This was the case of other centres of the North-Central Jordan Valley: Pella/Tell el-Husn, Tell Abu Kharaz and Tell es Sa‛idiyeh, which were apparently destroyed in the same period and by a similar agent (Bourke 2000, 233-235). Such a conflagration apparently caused by an earthquake is attested to also at Megiddo (Finkelstein, Ussishkin and Peersmann 2006, 49-50), ‘Ai (Callaway 1980, 147; 1993, 42), Jericho/Tell es-Sultan (Kenyon 1957, 175-176, pl. 37a; 1981, 373, pls. 200-201, 343a; Nigro 2006c, 359-361, 372-373). Also at Khirbet ez-Zeraqon, phase 3 (EB II) ends in a fierce conflagration (Douglas 2007, 27-28), though it is not surely ascribable to an earthquake.

31 EB II city-gates at ‘Ai were partly blocked already in the late Early Bronze II (the Citadel Gate and the Postern Gate; Callaway 1980, 113-115), partly at the beginning of the Early Bronze III (the Lower City Gate; Callaway 1980, 152-154). Also at Khirbet Kerak, EB II south-east gate in Wall A was possibly blocked at the beginning of the Early Bronze III (Greenberg - Paz 2005, 89, figs. 13-14; Greenberg et al. 2006, 245, fig. 6.18, plan 6.5). The same happened in the Early Bronze III at the City-Gate of the Lower City at Khirbet ez-Zeraqon (Douglas 2007, 35-38, figs. 5, 19-20, plans 10-11; phase 1, Early Bronze IIIB).

32 Only a few pottery sherds were retrieved in wall W.157 dating back from EB II/early EB IIIA (pl. XXI).

33 Nigro ed. 2006, 176-177.

6. Area E: the Early Bronze II city-wall and related layers on the southern side of the hill

Introduction

A probe (4 × 2 m) was opened inside the main Batrawy II-III city-wall roughly at the middle of the southern fortification line (fig. 6.1), in squares CdIII9 + CeIII9 (also excavating baulk CdIII9/CeIII9), with the aim of checking the architecture, stratigraphy and chronology of the city-wall on this side of the mound1.

In Area E the main city-wall was cleaned for a length of around 10 m, and the sounding was opened just aside a small ravine (fig. 6.2), which cut through it in correspondence of a joint between two separated sections of the defensive structure2, at a change of its orientation (fig. 6.3).

A major achievement of this sounding was the confirmation that the city wall preserved here dates back from the Early Bronze II (2900-2700 BC)e3, since the later EB III reconstructions collapsed and were almost completely obliterated by erosion, and that the fortified town of Batrawy was founded at the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC.
Footnotes

1 Nigro 2007a, 357-358, figs. 1, 17.

2 The Batrawy II city-wall was built in separated juxtaposed stretches (each around 8 m long), as it was also evident in Area B North (in trench BrII7 + BsII7 excavated in 2005), where a junction between two of such sectors (named wall W.103c to the west and wall W.101c to the east) was visible on the northern outer face of the main city-wall (Nigro 2006a, 243; Nigro ed. 2006, 176-177, note 26, fig. 4.35, pl. IV). For a detailed analysis of this well-known building technique from EB II-III defensive systems in Southern Levant see Area B North, §§ 3.2.1.-3.2.3.; Nigro 2006c, 370-371; 2006e, 9; 2007a, 352, 357; in press, §§ 4.2.-4.3.

3 Nigro 2007a, fig. 18.

6.1. Stratigraphy

Area E suffered drastic erosion, and, at least along the southern edge of cliff, also pillage of large limestone blocks from the city-wall, that is preserved only in the lower courses of its boulders set into the bedrock and belonging to the original defence line erected all around the site in Early Bronze II.

Strata were all eroded according to the slope of the khirbet and they illustrated four main phases (tab. 6.1; fig. 6.4), from the topmost shallowest layer of humus to the earliest strata related to the destruction of Batrawy II city-wall, founded directly upon the bedrock (Phase 4). Structures and finds from destruction layers of Phase 4 will be thoroughly described in § 6.2.

Table 6.1

Archaeological periodization and stratigraphy of Area E

Nigro (2008)


...

6.1.4. Phase 4: stratigraphy of Batrawy II fortification system

Phase 4 illustrates the erection (Activity 4b), first utilization and sudden end, testified to by a thick collapse layer in the fillings inside the town (Activity 4a), of Batrawy II fortification system during the Early Bronze II.

Activity 4a: destruction of Batrawy II fortification system

Deposits of Period Batrawy II have been clearly identified in the sounding inside the southern line of the main Batrawy city-wall (W.705), where a thick layer of destruction and collapse was accumulated on a floor lying directly over the bedrock. Here, an upper stratum (F.704) of grey clayish sandy soil, 20-25 cm high, with ashy lenses, charcoals and small limestone chops probably from the Batrawy II city-wall superstructure, as well as scattered animal bones (samples KB.06.FR.106 and KB.06.FR.123) and pottery sherds (pl. LIII), covered a greyish layer (F.706), 20 cm thick, basically composed of compacted charcoals, ash and crushed greyish mud bricks, with numerous limestone grits, chops and mud mortar from the EB II city-wall collapsed superstructure (§ 6.2.), as well as a few pottery sherds (pl. LIV). Both these layers sloped from north to south and from west to east according to the natural slope of the bedrock.

Activity 4b: erection of Batrawy II fortification system

Activity 4b represents the erection of Batrawy II city-wall, the earliest phase of the Batrawy fortification system, similarly detected in Area B North (§ 3.1.4.). It is illustrated by the inner face of city-wall W.705 and the earliest floor exposed inside the town (L.710), lying directly upon the bedrock, in trench CdIII9 + CeIII9 (§ 6.2.), and by the inner face of the westerner juxtaposed stretch of city-wall W.707, further to the west.

6.2. Architecture & Finds: the EB II city-wall on the southern side of the site

Though badly eroded, the main EB II-III city-wall was preserved along the whole southern side of the khirbet (figs. 6.9-6.10). Since the later Early Bronze III reconstructions collapsed and were almost completely obliterated by erosion, the original EB II foundation of the city wall and the related passage inside the city were reached and brought to light in Area E.

The defensive work, consisting of a single wall running on the very edge of the cliff, was strongly eroded on the outer side, where its outer face was preserved only for the lower courses of limestone boulders directly set into the bedrock (fig. 6.11). Conversely, the inner face of the wall was preserved on four superimposed courses of unworked stones, tied up with mortar and small limestone chops (figs. 6.12-6-13).

As well documented in the EB II main city-wall in Area B North (§ 3.2.1.), the Batrawy II city-wall was built in separated juxtaposed stretches (each around 6-8 m long)12, according to a well-known technique attested to in many Early Bronze fortified sites in Palestine and Transjordan, in order to prevent dangerous effects of earthquakes13.

Inside city-wall W.705, where the sounding was opened, a well refined floor (L.710) of limestone marl and small pebbles, lying directly over the bedrock (fig. 6.14), was uncovered after the removal of a thick heavy destruction layer (F.704, F.706). From the latter layer, scattered fragments of EB II common wares were retrieved14, as well as some specimens of EB II typical specialized productions, such as Red Burnished15 and Red Polished16 vessels (pls. LIII-LIV). A flint blade17 and a Canaanean blade18 were also retrieved in layer F.706.

A typical feature of this phase was the presence of fragmentary light greyish mud-bricks in the layers of collapse, belonged to the superstructure of the EB II city-wall. The greyish mud-bricks of the city-wall superstructure were split over the stone foundations and left a thick stratum of greyish dump all around the defences, especially visible on the southern inner side of the khirbet.

The Batrawy II fortifications in Area E show that a violent earthquake brought to a sudden end the earliest city. Traces of such a dramatic event were detected both on the northern and southern city-wall, in Areas B North (§ 3.2.1.) and E. It provoked almost the full collapse of the mud brick superstructure and seriously damaged the 2 m high stone foundations of the Batrawy II city-wall, as it is clearly documented in the cracks and inner collapses detected in the EB II city-wall and city-gate in Area B North (§§ 3.1.4., 3.2.1.).
Footnotes

12 In trench BrII7+BsII7 excavated in 2005 a junction between two of such sectors (named wall W.103c to the west and wall W.101c to the east) was visible on the northern outer face of the main city-wall (Nigro ed. 2006, 176, fig. 4.35, pl. IV).

13 Nigro ed. 2006, 176-177, in particular note 26.

14 Two fragments of storage jars with Grain Wash decoration from layer F.706 can be noticed (KB.06.E.706/7, KB.06.E.706/8; pl. LIV).

15 A platter (KB.06.E.704/1) and a bowl (KB.06.E.704/6) from layer F.704 (pl. LIII), and three platters (KB.06.E.706/1, KB.06.E.706/2, KB.06.E.706/3) from layer F.706 (pl. LIV).

16 Three jugs (KB.06.E.704/7, KB.06.E.704/14, KB.06.E.704/15) from layer F.704 (pl. LIII), and a jar (KB.06.E.706/5) from layer F.706 (pl. LIV).

17 KB.06.E.86 (pl. LIV).

18 KB.06.E.102 (pl. LIV).

Nigro and Sala (2009)

Introduction

... During the fourth season5, excavation and restoration was focused on three areas (Area B North, Area B South and Area F), respectively located in the middle of the northern side of the tall, both outside and inside the main city wall, and on the easternmost terrace of the site (Fig. 2; Nigro 2008b).
Footnotes

5. In previous seasons (Nigro 2006a, 2006b, 2006c, 2007a, 2007b, 2008a, 2008b; Nigro ed. 2006, 2008), the main chronological, topographical and architectural features of the site were established (Nigro 2006a: 233-236, 2007a: 346-347, tab. 1; Nigro ed. 2006: 9-36, ig. 1.2, 2008: 7-8), and ive areas opened, respectively on the Acropolis (Area A: Nigro 2006a: 236-240, 2007a: 347- 349; Nigro ed. 2006: 63-102, plan II, 2008: 9-63), the northern slope (Areas B North and South: Nigro 2006a: 240-246, 2007a: 349-354; Nigro ed. 2006: 153-196, plans III-IV, 2008: 65-240, plans I-II), at the northwestern and south-western corners (respectively Area C: Nigro ed. 2006: 25-27, igs. 1.27-1.31 and Area D: Nigro 2007a: 355-357; Nigro ed. 2006: 32-33, igs. 1.38-1.41; 2008: 241-244), on the southern side (Area E: Nigro 2007a: 357-358; Nigro ed. 2008: 245-268) and on the easternmost terrace of the Khirbat (Area F: Nigro 2007a: 358-359; Nigro ed. 2006: 22, ig. 1.25, 2008: 269-316, plans III-IV).

4. Area B North: the Early Bronze II - III Fortiication System

4.1 Stratigraphy of Area B North

Excavations in Area B North provided a detailed insight into the occupational and architectural sequence, not only of the fortiication system, but also of the city as a whole9:
  • Phase 1: Topsoil, representing natural erosion and dust accumulation following the final abandonment of the site around 2000 BC.
  • Phase 2: Consisting of stone embankment W.199, which stabilised the collapsed defensive structures of the Early Bronze IIIB city in order to support and protect the Early Bronze IVB dwellings erected within the main city wall in Area B South.
  • Phase 3: The most recent, Early Bronze IIIB urban phase which includes:
    • Event 3a: the abandonment and progressive collapse of destroyed defensive structures.
    • Event 3b: violent destruction, with burned layers of dark grey ash, charcoal and reddish-yellow mudbrick fragments, which marks the end of the third millennium BC city; excavated between the main city wall and outer wall W.155, between outer wall W.155 and scarp wall W.165, and to the north of the latter.
    • Event 3c: the final rebuild of the Batrawy IIIb fortification system, in which the main city wall and outer wall W.155 were retained from the previous phase, with the addition of new scarp wall W.165.
  • Phase 4: The Early Bronze IIIA reconstruction of the defensive system, which includes:
    • Event 4a: again represented by a violent destruction layer excavated between the main city wall and outer wall W.155.
    • Event 4b: blocking of the collapsed Phase 5 city gate with wall W.157 and the erection of outer wall W.155 with associated curvilinear outwork W.185.
  • Phase 5: Earliest phase of the city, including:
    • Event 5a: collapse of the main city wall and gate, attested to by a thick layer of compact yellowish-grey soil with limestone chippings, and fragments of greyish mudbricks found outside the main city wall on the plastered floor of street L.144b, which lies directly over bedrock.
    • Event 5b: erection of the main city wall and gate, marking the foundation of the city.
Footnotes

9. For the stratigraphy of Area B North up to and including the third, 2007 season see Nigro ed. 2008: 66-76.

4.3. Early Bronze IIIB Triple Fortiication Line (Batrawy Period IIIb)

In Area B North, on the northern slope of the hill, the initial urban fortiication was a triple line of defence with several associated outworks, demonstrating that the city reached its most heavily defended state towards the end of the Batrawy III period (Nigro 2007a: 351-352; Nigro ed. 2008: 100-102, plan III). A further structure, scarp wall W.165, was added to the outer side of the original main city wall, now reinforced by outer wall W.155. Scarp wall W.165 was characterized by the placement of large, irregular stones on a foundation of medium-sized stones. It had already been exposed to the west, in square BoII4, during 2006. In 2008, it was followed eastwards through three more squares, BpII5, BqII5 and BrII5, where its five courses of stone attained a height of 1.2m, and westwards into BnII4, where its eleven courses attained 1.8m. Between scarp wall W.165 and outer wall W.155, was a rubble fill10 which was fully excavated in BnII4 (Fig. 5). Scarp wall W.165 strengthened the outer line of fortiication and incorporated dismantled EB IIIA curvilinear outwork W.185 (see below).

The EB IIIB triple fortiication line underwent a violent destruction. Several burned strata of ash and charcoal were identiied:

F.802 in BnII5 (Fig. 6) and F.194 in BrII6, BrII7 and in the baulk between squares BqII6 and BrII6, that is to say between the main city wall and the outer wall; F.807 between the outer wall and scarp wall; F.804 on the outer slope, north of the scarp wall.
Footnotes

10. This rubble fill was designated F.808 to the west, in BnII4, and F.193 to the east, in BpII5 and BqII5.

4.4. Doubling the Line of Fortiication: The Early Bronze IIIA Reconstruction of the Main City Wall and Addition of Outer Wall W.155 Batrawy Period IIIa)

At the beginning of Early Bronze IIIA, after the dramatic destruction of the EB II city in a violent earthquake (Nigro ed. 2008: 87, 255), the main city wall was reconstructed by blocking the collapsed city gate and rebuilding the superstructure of the wall, as clearly illustrated during the 2008 season by excavations in square BnII5 and in the baulk between squares BqII6 and BrII6. This baulk was at the intersection of two separate stretches of the original city wall, which were incorporated into the EB IIIA reconstruction.

In addition to this reconstruction of the main city wall, an outer wall, W.155, was constructed using boulders on its outer face and large stones on its inner face. The stretch excavated so far (Fig. 7), runs parallel to and 1.7m in front of the main city wall.

In square BnII5, the space between the main city wall and the outer wall was filled with a destruction layer of ash and charcoal, designated F.805 (Figs. 8 and 9). In squares BrII6 and BrII7, a further section of outer wall W.155 was exposed in 2008, which showed how a fill of limestone pebbles and chippings, F.803, had been deliberately deposited in order to regularize a step in the bedrock (Fig. 10). Just above it was a fill of loose brown soil and rubble, F.196.

A major curvilinear outwork, W.185, abutted the outer wall, strengthening and protecting the north side of the city, the direction from which it was most easily approached.

5. Area F: the Early Bronze II - III Broad Room Temple

Introduction

During 2008, archaeological activities in Area F were focused on completing the excavation of the Early Bronze II - III broad room temple discovered in 2006, roughly in the middle of Terrace V (Nigro 2007a: 359). This monumental structure, though badly eroded and truncated at its north-eastern corner by later Early Bronze IVB dwellings, could still be understood in terms of its two major constructive phases, attributed to Early Bronze II and III respectively (Fig. 15)11. Three soundings dug within the temple cella and complete excavation of its western side clariied the transformation this religious building underwent when it was reconstructed at the beginning of Early Bronze III, around 2700 BC.
Footnotes

11. For a comprehensive illustration of stratigraphy, Nigro ed. 2008: 269-275.

5.1. The Early Bronze II Broad Room Temple F1

The original temple was erected directly over the bedrock, by filling in a shallow depression under the approximate centre of the building with virgin soil and small rock fragments (Nigro ed. 2008: 276-282, plan III). The presence of this depression weakened the central part of the structure, which in fact collapsed during the tremendous earthquake, which brought about the end of the Early Bronze II city.

The original walls of the temple were preserved along its southern, main façade (W.563E and W.563W) and its western (W.586) and northern (W.521) sides. The eastern wall was completely truncated by an Early Bronze IVB domestic building, which obliterated all previous structures. Only the south-eastern corner of the cella was preserved, but this allowed us to reconstruct the eastern wall (W.561) of the temple. The width of these walls varies from 1.0 to 1.2m, being wider on the western side where the temple abuts the bedrock step between terraces IV and V. The rear wall of the temple was excavated all the way to its western end, which led to the discovery of a curvilinear structure (W.587) connected with the north-western corner of the building. This may represent a boundary wall, similar to the one known from the Early Bronze II temple at at-Tall / ‘Ayy (Sala 2008b: 135-140, Fig. 40).

The cella itself was a broad room measuring 2.7m in width and 12.5m in length, with the entrance (L.592) two thirds of the way along its length. The entrance was in the form of a passage 1.4m wide. Four stone bases were aligned along the main axis of the cella, as supports for the wooden pillars, which would have held up the roof. Facing the entrance, which opened out on to a forecourt, and in the rear wall of the temple was a niche (L.562), 1.3m wide, 0.8m deep and with an internal bench 0.2m high. A small slab, with two circular depressions, at the northwest corner of the bench suggests that the niche was the cult focus of the temple.

In the forecourt, facing the entrance, was a circular altar (S.510) with a central slab with a small cup mark in the middle, and a light of three steps made of stone slabs by which to approach the altar from east. About 1m west of the altar, some stones set vertically into the ground (S.503) probably served as the base for a betyl (Fig. 16; Nigro ed. 2008: 283-284).

5.2. The Early Bronze III Bent Axis Temple F2

At the end of Early Bronze II, the earthquake, which destroyed the city of al-Batrawi badly, damaged the temple in Area F. The collapse of the central part of the façade led to the reconstruction of the temple entrance at the beginning of Early Bronze III (Fig. 17; Nigro ed. 2008: 285-290, plan IV). The new front wall was wider and more carefully built than its predecessor. The reconstructed part of the wall (W.505) was offset from the previous line by about 0.2m, and the entrance (L.550) included a small step 0.1m high. The rear wall was partly rebuilt and the niche facing the entrance closed off. The ceiling of the cella consisted of wooden beams spanning its entire width, as the pillar bases of the previous phase had been buried under the new floor of the room. The cult focus was shifted to the western side of the cella, which was reoriented (Fig. 18). A platform (B.585) 0.2m high was provided with a new style of raised niche (L.580), lanked by two vertical slabs and located in the middle of the western side. Against the southern wall of the cella was a stone-lined basin, delineated by stones set vertically into the platform, paved with lagstones and ending in a large slab. In front of the niche and its two antae, two round bases may indicate the location of two betyls (Fig. 19). A bench was placed against the northern side of the cella.

The transformation of this structure from a classic broad room temple into a bent axis cult place, where the religious symbols were grouped at the end of the short side to the left of the entrance, perhaps reflects the same gradual transformation of the deeply rooted tradition of southern Levantine religious architecture attested to at the contemporary sanctuary of Båb adh-Dhrå‘12.
Footnotes

12. Rast - Schaub 2003: 157-166, 321-335. For a general appraisal on the Early Bronze Age sacred architecture in the Southern Levant see Sala 2008b.

Notes by JW

Nigro (2008:251–255) reports that the Batrawy II fortifications show that a violent earthquake brought to a sudden end the earliest city. Archaeoseismic evidence was uncovered along both the northern and southern city walls—in Areas B North and E. The earthquake provoked almost the full collapse of the mudbrick superstructure and seriously damaged the 2 m high stone foundations of the Batrawy II city-wall, as clearly documented by the cracks and inner collapses detected in the EB II city-wall and city-gate in Area B North.

Nigro and Sala (2009:377) reported that the Early Bronze II Broad Room Temple F1 collapsed during the same earthquake in a collapse that may have been exacerbated by poor construction practices. The original temple was erected directly over the bedrock, by filling in a shallow depression under the approximate centre of the building with virgin soil and small rock fragments (Nigro ed. 2008: 276–282, plan III). Nigro and Sala (2009:377) further noted that the presence of this depression weakened the central part of the structure, which in fact collapsed during the tremendous Batrāwī II EB II earthquake.

Nigro (2008:87 n. 30) noted that centres of the North-Central Jordan Valley such as Pella/Tell el-Husn, Tell Abu Kharaz and Tell es Sa‛idiyeh [...] were apparently destroyed in the same period and by a similar agent (Bourke 2000, 233–235). Nigro (2008:87 n. 30) also pointed to similar destruction at:

  • Megiddo – Such a conflagration apparently caused by an earthquake is attested to also at Megiddo (Finkelstein, Ussishkin and Peersmann 2006, 49–50)
  • ‘Ai (Callaway 1980, 147; 1993, 42)
  • Jericho/Tell es-Sultan (Kenyon 1957, 175–176, pl. 37a; 1981, 373, pls. 200–201, 343a; Nigro 2006c, 359–361, 372–373)
  • Khirbet ez-Zeraqon – phase 3 (EB II) ends in a fierce conflagration (Douglas 2007, 27–28), though it is not surely ascribable to an earthquake

Archaeoseismic Effects
Batrawy IIb Earthquake - ~2700 BCE (End of Early Bronze IIB)

Effect Location Image(s) Description
  • Collapsed Walls                     
  • through-going cracks
  • lintel destruction
  • possible capstone destruction
  • foundation damage
Area B North (north city-wall)



  • Two sharp earthquake cracks on the eastern jamb (fig. 3.37) testify to the destruction of the lintels and possibly of the capstone of the passageway, which presumably caused a general collapse, so that the gate went out of use at the end of the Early Bronze II - Nigro (2008:87)

  • [The earthquake] provoked almost the full collapse of the mud brick superstructure and seriously damaged the 2 m high stone foundations of the Batrawy II city-wall, as it is clearly documented in the cracks and inner collapses detected in the EB II city-wall and city-gate in Area B North - Nigro (2008:87)
  • Collapsed Walls                     
Area B North (north city-wall)


  • Fig 3.24 of the Street along an outer city wall shows stone and wall collapse on right side of the photo closest to the viewer
  • Collapsed Walls                     
  • foundation damage
Area E (south city-wall)


  • [The earthquake] provoked almost the full collapse of the mud brick superstructure and seriously damaged the 2 m high stone foundations of the Batrawy II city-wall - Nigro (2008:87)
  • Collapsed Walls                     
Area F - Early Bronze IIB Broad Room Temple F1


  • The original temple was erected directly over the bedrock, by filling in a shallow depression under the approximate centre of the building with virgin soil and small rock fragments (Nigro ed. 2008: 276-282, plan III). The presence of this depression weakened the central part of the structure, which in fact collapsed during the tremendous earthquake, which brought about the end of the Early Bronze II city. - Nigro and Sala (2009:377)

  • At the end of Early Bronze II, the earthquake, which destroyed the city of al-Batrawi badly, damaged the temple in Area F. The collapse of the central part of the façade led to the reconstruction of the temple entrance at the beginning of Early Bronze III (Fig. 17; Nigro ed. 2008: 285-290, plan IV). - Nigro and Sala (2009:381)
  • Collapsed Walls                     
Eastern Pavillion in Area B South also known as the Palace of the Copper Axes (Pillared Unit L.1750)



  • "In the South-Eastern Unit the earliest floor was that of L.936 and L.1750 (inside the pillared room), which apparently was in use during the latest part of the Early Bronze II (Batrawi IIb, EB IIB, 2850-2700 BC). After the collapse of the building, following the earthquake which destroyed the city at the end of Batrawi II, a debris layer with ashes (F.1748/F.988) was sealed by a compact floor made of gray clay (F.1740/L.990)" - Nigro (2025:528)

Archaeoseismic Deformation Maps
Batrawy IIb Earthquake - ~2700 BCE (End of Early Bronze IIB)

Deformation Map

Modified by JW from Fig. 1.2 from from Nigro (2008)

Archaeoseismic Intensity Estimates
Batrawy IIb Earthquake - ~2700 BCE (End of Early Bronze IIB)

Effect Location Image(s) Description Intensity
  • Collapsed Walls                     
  • through-going cracks
  • lintel destruction
  • possible capstone destruction
  • foundation damage
Area B North (north city-wall)



  • Two sharp earthquake cracks on the eastern jamb (fig. 3.37) testify to the destruction of the lintels and possibly of the capstone of the passageway, which presumably caused a general collapse, so that the gate went out of use at the end of the Early Bronze II - Nigro (2008:87)

  • [The earthquake] provoked almost the full collapse of the mud brick superstructure and seriously damaged the 2 m high stone foundations of the Batrawy II city-wall, as it is clearly documented in the cracks and inner collapses detected in the EB II city-wall and city-gate in Area B North - Nigro (2008:87)
  • VIII+
  • VI+
  • VI+
  • VI+
  • IX+
  • Collapsed Walls                     
Area B North (north city-wall)


  • Fig 3.24 of the Street along an outer city wall shows stone and wall collapse on right side of the photo closest to the viewer
  • VIII+
  • Collapsed Walls                     
  • foundation damage
Area E (south city-wall)


  • [The earthquake] provoked almost the full collapse of the mud brick superstructure and seriously damaged the 2 m high stone foundations of the Batrawy II city-wall - Nigro (2008:87)
  • VIII+
  • IX+
  • Collapsed Walls                     
Area F - Early Bronze IIB Broad Room Temple F1


  • The original temple was erected directly over the bedrock, by filling in a shallow depression under the approximate centre of the building with virgin soil and small rock fragments (Nigro ed. 2008: 276-282, plan III). The presence of this depression weakened the central part of the structure, which in fact collapsed during the tremendous earthquake, which brought about the end of the Early Bronze II city. - Nigro and Sala (2009:377)

  • At the end of Early Bronze II, the earthquake, which destroyed the city of al-Batrawi badly, damaged the temple in Area F. The collapse of the central part of the façade led to the reconstruction of the temple entrance at the beginning of Early Bronze III (Fig. 17; Nigro ed. 2008: 285-290, plan IV). - Nigro and Sala (2009:381)
  • VIII+
  • Collapsed Walls                     
Eastern Pavillion in Area B South also known as the Palace of the Copper Axes (Pillared Unit L.1750)



  • "In the South-Eastern Unit the earliest floor was that of L.936 and L.1750 (inside the pillared room), which apparently was in use during the latest part of the Early Bronze II (Batrawi IIb, EB IIB, 2850-2700 BC). After the collapse of the building, following the earthquake which destroyed the city at the end of Batrawi II, a debris layer with ashes (F.1748/F.988) was sealed by a compact floor made of gray clay (F.1740/L.990)" - Nigro (2025:528)

  • VIII+
This archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224 big pdf). The collapsed walls of Temple F1 may have been worsened by poor construction practices, particularly the decision to build atop uncompacted fill. Excavators reported that the roughly 2 m-high stone wall in Area B South exhibited fracturing, which they interpreted as having a seismic origin. If any portion of this stone wall served as a foundation, the presence of foundation cracks could suggest that Khirbet al-Batrawy lay within the epicentral zone of the earthquake and local Intensity was IX (9) or higher.

Notes and Further Reading
References

Wikipedia pages

Khirbet al-Batrawy (in Italian)