Transliterated Name | Language | Name |
---|---|---|
Da 'janiya | Arabic | دا 'جانييا |
The Castellum
of Da'Janiya is ~41 km. north of Ma'an and ~78 km. south of el-Lejjun. Godwin (2006:285) suggests that
initial construction of the fort was likely in the early 4th century CE. It may have been atop earlier structures. Formal occupation of the fort appears to have ended in the 6th century CE after
which occupation appeared transitory
- used intermittently for camping and as a cemetery
(Godwin, 2006:287). It was built atop basalt bedrock
(Godwin, 2006:276).
Stratum Period | Approximate Dates | Comments |
---|---|---|
Early Roman/Nabatean | ca. 63 BCE - 135 CE | Several Early Roman or Nabatean sherds were recovered from surface sherding (n=6) and excavation (n=14) of the structure (T.5) outside the fort's southeast wall suggesting use of the site during that period. The extramural structure was, however, firmly dated by excavation to the Late Roman/Early Byzantine period, and thus the Early Roman/EarlyNabatean sherds recovered there probably reflect secondary deposition |
Late Roman | 135-235 CE | a few sherds (n = 5) of this period were recovered from surface sherding of Da`janiya, but no coins or stratified pottery of this period were recovered in the excavation. |
Late Roman/Early Byzantine | 284-502 CE | The soundings suggested that the main occupation of the fort occurred in the fourth and fifth centuries. |
Late Byzantine | 500-551 CE | There was evidence for Late Byzantine occupation of Da`janiya from only two excavated squares, T.1 and T6. |
Late Byzantine - Ottoman | ca.551 CE - 1900 CE |
Ceramic finds from Parker's excavations was very rich with 225 sherds - 63 of which could be precisely dated. [24]
[24]
Parker, S. T. (1986). Romans and Saracens: A History of the Arabian Frontier.
United States: American Schools of Oriental Research. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
Number | Period | Dates |
---|---|---|
5 | early Roman IV | ca. 73-135 |
5 | late Roman I–II | circa 135-235 |
15 | late Roman III–IV | circa 235-324 |
21 | early Byzantine IV | circa 450-502 |
14 | Late Byzantine I | circa 502-527 |
3 | Mamluk/Ottoman | circa 1250-1918 |
Parker used a stratigraphic framework during his excavations of Limes Arabicus that produced simplified assignments for the secured Roman and Byzantine finds and findings. [45] [46] This framework was created up by archaeologist and ceramics expert James A. Sauer (1945–1999) in 1973 [47] and revised by Parker in 2006. [48]
[45] Samuel Thomas Parker, John Wilson Betlyon, Michael R. Toplyn: Preliminary Report on the 1987
Season of the Limes Arabicus Project (= Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.
Supplementary Studies 26). Preliminary Reports of ASOR-Sponsored Excavations 1983-1987,
The American Schools of Oriental Research, 1990, pp. 89-136; here: p. 90.
[46]
Parker, S. T. (1986). Romans and Saracens: A History of the Arabian Frontier.
United States: American Schools of Oriental Research. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
[47]
Sauer, J.A. (1973) Heshbon pottery 1971. A preliminary report on the
pottery from the 1971 excavations at Tell Ḥesbân (= Andrews University monographs 7),
Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs - used by Parker in Limes Arabicus excavations in Jordan - can be borrowed with a free account at archive.org
[48] Samuel Thomas Parker (ed.): The Roman Frontier in Central Jordan.
Final Report on the Limes Arabicus Project, 1980–1989 . Volume 2
(= Dumbarton Oaks Studies 40), Washington, DC, 2006, ISBN 978-0-88402-298-5 , p. 332.
Period | Approximate Dates |
---|---|
early Roman-Nabataean | about 63 BC -135 AD |
early Roman I | about 63 BC -37 B.C. Chr. |
early Roman II | about 37 BC -4 B.C. Chr. |
early Roman III | approx. 4 v. 73 AD |
early Roman IV | ca. 73-135 |
late Roman I | circa 135-193 |
late Roman II | circa 193-235 |
late Roman III | ca. 235-284 |
late Roman IV | circa 284-324 |
early Byzantine I | ca. 324-363 |
early Byzantine II | ca. 363-400 |
early Byzantine III | approx. 400-450 |
early Byzantine IV | circa 450-502 |
Late Byzantine I | circa 502-527 |
late Byzantine II | circa 527–551 |
late Byzantine III–IV | ca. 551-636 |
early islamic | ca. 636-1174 |
late islamic | circa 1174-1918 |
Layer | Thickness (m) | Description |
---|---|---|
T.7:001 Tumble Layer |
0.18 | highest layer of tumble mixed with topsoil (T.7:001). This layer yielded only five unidentifiable sherds, all from the same vessel, and an iron nail (Obj. #705). |
T.7:002 Tumble Layer |
0.77 | tumble (T.7:002), 0.77 m thick, but with few sherds. |
T.7:006 Tumble Layer |
1.05 | tumble layer T.7:006, 1.05 m thick and composed of soil and tumbled basalt blocks. This layer yielded 3 Late Byzantine, 6 Early Byzantine, 12 Late Roman, and 272 Late Roman/Early Byzantine sherds. The pottery from the earliest layer of tumble (T.7:006) suggested that the room's initial collapse may date to the earthquake of 502, that is, the transition from the Early Byzantine to the Late Byzantine period. |
T.7:007 Beaten Earth Floor |
0.25 | As in barrack rooms T.2 and T.3, ash layer T.7:008 was eventually covered by a thick (0.25 m) soil layer whose upper level was compacted into a beaten earth floor (T.7:007). This floor contained much artifactual evidence, probably representing secondary deposition, that is, debris transported from elsewhere for use as fill in the room. This included 132 animal bones and 13 Early Byzantine, 22 Late Roman, and 223 Late Roman/Early Byzantine sherds. An Early Byzantine coin (Coin #306) was found on floor T.6.007 [an equivalent layer in an adjoining room] providing a terminus post quem for the use of the floor. |
T.7:008 Ash |
0.33 | The earliest datable evidence from the inner room came from an ash layer (T.7:008) deposited on fill T.7:009. Ash layer T.7:008 averaged 0.33 m in thickness and covered the entire excavated portion of the room (2.00 x 4.60 m). It contained 15 Early Byzantine, 7 Late Roman, and 37 Late Roman/Early Byzantine sherds and a few goat and caprine bones. It also yielded an iron knife blade (Obj. #103). Ash layers were interpreted as a result of cooking |
T.7:009 Fill |
sterile soil smooth and highly compact surface suggest [it] once served [as a] temporary floor |
Layer | Description |
---|---|
T.1:001 Collapse Layer |
Late collapse This layer yielded 2 Modern, 3 Late Islamic, and a few earlier sherds, as well as an alabaster tessera (Obj. #344) see T.1:006 |
T.1:002 Collapse Layer |
see T.1:006 |
T.1:006 Soil layer and Collapse layer |
Squatter occupation followed by abandonment, earthquake induced collapse, occasional ephemeral occupation, and use as a burial site.A layer of soil (T1:006) ca. 0.31 m deep covered both T1:008, T1:009 and plaster floor T1:010 in the rest of the room. Soil layer T1:006 yielded 5 Byzantine, 2 Early Byzantine, 13 Late Roman, and 52 Late Roman/Early Byzantine sherds, 1 coin (Coin #272) dated Early Byzantine, 1 bead (Obj. #599), and 75 animal bones, including caprine, pig, and chicken. The upper portion of this layer contained several well preserved and substantial portions of unburned wooden planks and beams, evidence of the collapse of a plank and beam roof. The room walls appear to have stood for some time. Finally, the walls collapsed, as evidenced by a massive layer of tumbled stone in the upper portion of T1:006. The collapse was possibly due to the earthquake of 551. Within the upper levels of tumble layer T1:006 were concentrated patches of wood and dung ash and assorted faunal material (including caprine, pig, and bird) to suggest occasional ephemeral use but no long-term occupation of the room. The height of the surviving walls would have afforded some protection to travelers camping at the site. Further, there was an intrusive burial cut into T1:006 against the northwest wall. The burial was sealed by a second layer of collapsed masonry, T.1:002, in which a second intrusive burial was found. The burial within T1:002 was in turn sealed by a third layer of wall collapse, T. 1:001. As no grave goods, pottery, or coins were associated with these burials, it is difficult to determine the date of the burials, which would provide a terminus ante quem for the destruction layers in which they were set. What the series of collapse layers sealing the burials point out, however, is that further serious damage to the room, probably by an earthquake, occurred at least twice after the earthquake of 551. |
T.1:010 Plaster Floor |
survived only in patches no pottery was recovered from the floor Floor T.1:010 represented the latest phase of official use of the room. However, some short-term and nonofficial use of the room occurred shortly afterwards. In the southwest corner of the room, directly above plaster floor T.1:010, a heap of unburned dung (T.1:009) ca. 0.75 x 0.75 m and ca. 0.05 m thick was found. The size of this deposit suggests storage of fuel for cooking, Atop this dung heap was a patch of burned dung (T.1:008) containing a partially burned wooden plank, probably remains of a cooking fire. Its location within the sacred part of the principia suggests that this room no longer served its original function. Yet the roof was still intact, and thus the building was still suitable for shelter when this dung was deposited and partially burned. |
T.1:011 Soil layer |
earliest evidence of occupation in the aedes, probably due to a thorough clean-out of the room in the early sixth century. Soil layer T.1:011, a leveling layer over bedrock, yielded 3 Late Roman/Early Byzantine sherds and a nummus (Coin #560) dated 491-98, a terminus post quem for deposition of this layer. T.1:011 served as bedding for a plaster floor, T.1:010. Lack of earlier occupational material in the aedes does not preclude earlier use of the room. In line with its highly official and sacred character, the aedes almost certainly functioned throughout the history of the fort from the early fourth century. The thorough clean-out that preceded the deposition of fill T.1:011 and floor T.1:010 probably post-dated the 502 earthquake. |
Godwin (2006) identified two tumble layers after the first two earthquakes suggesting wall collapse at several locations in the Castellum of Da'Janiya. Both layers are undated.
Godwin (2006) identified two tumble layers after the first two earthquakes suggesting wall collapse at several locations in the Castellum of Da'Janiya. Both layers are undated.
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Tumble from curtain wall and other walls |
room T.7
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls | room T.1 (aedes)
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls | several locations in the
Castellum
of Da'Janiya
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls | several locations in the
Castellum
of Da'Janiya
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tumble from curtain wall and other walls |
room T.7
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
VIII + |
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls | room T.1 (aedes)
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
VIII + |
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls | several locations in the
Castellum
of Da'Janiya
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
VIII + |
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls | several locations in the
Castellum
of Da'Janiya
Fig. 17
Plan of the Roman castellum of Da'janiya Parker (1986) |
|
VIII + |
Bodzek, J, Kopij, K., Miszk, L., Cwiąkala, P. u. a. (2019) Results of ‘Archaeological Study of Dajaniya & Tuwaneh’ 2018 survey of Dajaniya (Ma’an-Husseiniyeh), Southern Jordan.
in Piotr Kolodziejczyk (Hrsg.): Discovering Edom. Polish archaeological activity in southern Jordan. Krakau, S. 51–67
Freeman, P. (1990:191) “Recent work on a Roman fort in south Jordan” in
Akten des. 14. Internationalen Limeskongresses 1986 in Carnuntum. (1990).
Akten des. 14. Internationalen Limeskongresses 1986 in Carnuntum. (1990). Austria: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademic der Wissenschaften.
Parker, S. T. (1986). Romans and Saracens: A History of the Arabian Frontier.
United States: American Schools of Oriental Research. - can be borrowed with a free account from archive.org
Parker, S. T. (1988). Preliminary Report on the 1985 Season of the Limes Arabicus Project.
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Supplementary Studies, 25, 131–174.
Parker, S. T. (1990) The Limes Arabicus Project: The 1989 Campaign ADAJ 34
Parker, S. T., Betlyon, J.W., and Toplyn, M.R. (1990) Preliminary Report on the 1987
Season of the Limes Arabicus Project (= Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.
Supplementary Studies 26). Preliminary Reports of ASOR-Sponsored Excavations 1983-1987,
The American Schools of Oriental Research, pp. 89-136
Parker, S. T. (1991). Preliminary Report on the 1989 Season of the Limes Arabicus Project.
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Supplementary Studies, 27, 117–154.
Sauer, J.A. (1973) Heshbon pottery 1971. A preliminary report on the
pottery from the 1971 excavations at Tell Ḥesbân (= Andrews University monographs 7),
Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs - used by Parker in Limes Arabicus excavations in Jordan - can be borrowed with a free account at archive.org
Parker, S.T. (2006) The Roman Frontier in Central Jordan:
Final Report on the Limes Arabicus Project, 1980–1989, Washington
Parker, S. T. (ed.) (2006) The Roman Frontier in Central Jordan.
Final Report on the Limes Arabicus Project, 1980–1989 . Volume 2
(= Dumbarton Oaks Studies 40), Washington, DC, 2006, ISBN 978-0-88402-298-5.