Open this page in a new tab

Byblos

Satellite View of Byblos Byblos

click on image to explore this site on a new tab in Google Earth


Names

Transliterated Name Source Name
Bublos Greek Βύβλος
Byblus Latin
Jubayl Arabic جبيل
Jebeil Arabic جبيل
Gibelet Crusades
Giblet Crusades
gbl Syriac ܓܒܠ
Gebal Phoenician
Geval, Gebal Hebrew Bible גבל
Kebny Egyptian hieroglyphic records going back to the 4th-dynasty pharaoh Sneferu
kbn, kpny, kbny Egyptian
Gubla Akkadian cuneiform Amarna letters to the 18th-dynasty pharaohs Amenhotep III and IV.
Gubla Babylonian
Introduction
Introduction

Byblos is located on the Phoenician coast and has a long history of occupation dating back more than 7000 years. The city played an important role in Mediterranean trade and cultural exchange. The very name for the Bible is derived from Byblos, as Egyptian papyrus was shipped to Greece via this port ( Martha Sharp Joukowsky in Meyers et al. 1997). Byblos thus occupies a unique place in Near Eastern archaeology and intellectual history, serving as a nexus between Egypt, the Levant, and the Greek world.

Identification and Exploration

Byblos is a seaport located in Lebanon, on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, at the foot of the Lebanese mountains 60 km (25 mi.) north of Beirut on the Tripoli highway, (approx. 34° N, 36° E). The site has been known throughout its long history in several variants on its name: in modern Arabic as Jebail, Jebeil, Jubail; by the Crusaders as Gibelet; in biblical Hebrew as Gebal (1 Kgs. 5:18,32, Ez. 2 7:9, Jos. 13:5) in Egyptian as kbn, kpny, kbny; and in Babylonian as Gubla. The Greeks probably gave the city its name at about the end of the second millennium BCE — the Greek bublos, "papyrus scroll." Egyptian papyrus came to Greece through Phoenicia and Byblos for transshipment to the Aegean area. The English word Bible is derived through medieval Latin from the Greek ta Biblia, "the books".

In Naples, Italy, in 1881, a sandstone bust from Byblos surfaced in the antiquities market. It was of Osorkon I, pharaoh of the twenty-second dynasty (924-889 BCE), and it had on it a cartouche and a Phoenician alphabetic dedicatory inscription by King Elibaal of Byblos. It was sold in Paris in 1910 and subsequently donated to the Louvre Museum (where it remains); in 1925 Rene Dussaud translated the inscription. Also in the Drehem archives (the Ur III archives in Drehem, just south of Nippur) and dated to about 2050 BCE is the earliest cuneiform economic text referring to Byblos, mentioning Ibdadi, the ensi (a title meaning "ruler" in Sumerian) of Byblos (Ward, 1963).

In 1860 the French savant Ernest Renan, representing Napoleon III's mission in Phoenicia, located Byblos, made several soundings (even though twenty-nine houses occupied the site), and sketched the site and the sacred spring, the arched and roofed "Pool of the Phoenician Princess." In 1864 he published his findings and inscriptions, including the Renan bas-relief now also in the Louvre. The city was recognized as Byblos certainly by 1899. French archaeologist Pierre Montet undertook four campaigns (1921-1924) there, which uncovered the so-called Egyptian and Syrian temples (later identified as the single Temple of Baalat Gebal), along with three mutilated limestone colossi and many Egyptian Old Kingdom inscriptions, which he published in 1928 (Montet, 1928). A landslide in 1922 revealed the sarcophagus of a Byblite king with gifts from the Egyptian pharaoh Amenemhat III (c. nineteenth century BCE); eight other tombs were excavated in this royal necropolis. In 1930 the Lebanese government expropriated the houses built on the site. In 1926 the commissioner of France in Syria re­opened the excavations, sponsored by the Lebanese government and the French Academy of Inscriptions and under the direction of French archaeologist Maurice Dunand. Dunand excavated from 1928 until the Lebanese civil war in the 1970s, under the auspices of the Lebanese government and the Louvre.

Maps, Aerial Views, Drawings, and Photos
Maps, Aerial Views, Drawings, and Photos

  • Fig. 2 Simplified structural map of Lebanon from Morhange et al (2006)
  • Byblos in Google Earth
  • Fig. 3 Drawing of Raised Benches at Ilot du Phare (Tripoli) from Morhange et al (2006)
  • Fig. 4 Photo of raised shoreline at Ilot du Phare from Morhange et al (2006)
  • Panoramic View of Byblos - Photo by Garen Bosnoyan (2022)

Textual/Archaeoseismic Chronology
Survival of Apollodorus Earthquake - 2nd - early 4th century CE

Discussion

Discussion

References
Ambraseys (2009)

Ambraseys (2009) discussed an inscription found in Byblos which may allude to the 303–306 CE Eusebius Martyr Quake,

There is also an inscription from an altar in Byblus that records the survival of one Apollodorus after an earthquake Dussaud (1896:299). The inscription is dated by Seyrig to the second or third century, which would seem to indicate that it is not connected with this earthquake (H. Seyrig, personal communication 5 July 1972). However, since provincial epigraphy is often slower to change than that in major centres, and there is no other earthquake recorded for this location during the second or third century, the inscription has been very tentatively allocated to this event.

Tsunamigenic Chronology
Potential Historical Tsunami Date Assignments from Megablocks

It is an oversimplification to attribute the tsunami triggering mechanism solely to earthquake-induced seabed faulting. In some areas sediment slides may be the dominant factor of tsunami generation. In other areas, extreme storm surges leave facies which cannot be unequivocally differentiated from tsunami signatures. For example in Haifa, northern Israel a huge block was projected onto the beach during the severe storm of 2002 (Galili, pers. commun., Fig. 14). Although present day storms in the Mediterranean may displace blocks of significant size, a tsunami origin seems a feasible explanation for most of the megablocks encountered on the Lebanon coasts.

A review of the vertical movements having affected Lebanon during the late Holocene shows that tectonic uplift of the coastal areas occurred around 3000 yr BP, in the 6th century AD, and possibly in the 10th to 11th centuries AD (Pirazzoli 2005, Morhange et al., submitted). It is important to note that none of these periods coincides with the megablock dates. This suggests that they were possibly projected by waves coming from outer tsunamigenic areas. It is surprising to note that the 4th and 5th centuries AD (e.g. the tsunami of 365 AD), a period of tectonic paroxysm in the eastern Mediterranean (Pirazzoli 1986, Pirazzoli et al. 1996), are not represented by the dated megablocks.

Correlation with chronicled tsunami events is given in Table 1. Tsunami and earthquake catalogues do not provide any information on the mid-Holocene date from Ile du Palmier. Conversely, displacement of the Byblos megablocks are consistent with the 1456 AD, and 1534 or 1546 AD tsunami events, whereas the dated Senani island megablock could have been projected by any of the tsunami events reported in the area in 1752,1759,1822,1856, or 1870 AD.

Arcehoseismic Evidence in Petra Table 1

Tentative correlation between radiocarbon dates obtained from megablocks sampled on the Lebanon coast and historical tsunamis reported by catalogues for the Eastern Mediterranean (coastal areas indicated by catalogues as tsunami-affected are added in brackets).

Morhange et al (2006)

Paleoseismic Chronology
11th century BCE Coastal Uplift

Discussion

Discussion

References
Notes by JW

Morhange et al. (2006:91) noted that

A review of the vertical movements having affected Lebanon during the late Holocene shows that tectonic uplift of the coastal areas occurred around 3000 yr BP, in the 6th century AD, and possibly in the 10th to 11th centuries AD (Pirazzoli 2005, Morhange et al., submitted).

6th century CE Coastal Uplift

Discussion

Discussion

References
Notes by JW

Carayon et al. (2011) discussed 6 cores taken in Byblos — 2 in the northern harbor and 4 in the bay of El-Skhiny. The study focused on geomorphic evolution of the harbor. Core profiles were not presented. There is no mention of tsunamogenic evidence.

Morhange et al. (2006:91) noted that

A review of the vertical movements having affected Lebanon during the late Holocene shows that tectonic uplift of the coastal areas occurred around 3000 yr BP, in the 6th century AD, and possibly in the 10th to 11th centuries AD (Pirazzoli 2005, Morhange et al., submitted).

10th - 11th century CE Coastal Uplift

Discussion

Discussion

References
Notes by JW

Morhange et al. (2006:91) noted that

A review of the vertical movements having affected Lebanon during the late Holocene shows that tectonic uplift of the coastal areas occurred around 3000 yr BP, in the 6th century AD, and possibly in the 10th to 11th centuries AD (Pirazzoli 2005, Morhange et al., submitted).

Paleoseismic Effects
11th century BCE Coastal Uplift

Effect Location Image(s) Description
Coastal Uplift                Levantine Coast from Turkey to Lebanon
  • Morhange et al. (2006a:112) report that "seismotectonic displacement(s)" uplifted the northern Levantine coast "around 3000 BP," with the amplitude of uplift progressively decreasing from levantine Turkey toward southern Lebanon. Morhange et al. (2006a:111) further note that on the Syrian coast an uplifted shoreline occurs between "+0.7 and +2.8 m and is dated to ca. 2900–2800 BP (Dalongeville et al., 1993)," while in the Orontes delta region of Turkey the coast was uplifted by approximately "+2 m around 3000 BP (Pirazzoli et al., 1991)." They add that "south of Lebanon, from Israel to Gaza and the Sinai, no evidence is found for an elevated shoreline above present MSL (Galili et al., 1998; Sivan et al., 2001)," indicating that "only the northern Levant coast was uplifted around 3000 BP."

6th century CE Coastal Uplift

Effect Location Image(s) Description
Coastal Uplift                Lebanese Coast

  • Morhange et al. (2006a) dated fossil vermetids on uplifted benches to establish when they were last situated in the subtidal zone (close to mean sea level). These data, when combined with the structural evidence, strongly support attributing the uplift of ~80 ± 30 cm to the 551 CE Beirut earthquake.

10th - 11th century CE Coastal Uplift

Effect Location Image(s) Description
Coastal Uplift                Lebanese and Syrian Coast
  • Morhange et al. (2006a:111) reported that following the 6th century CE coastal uplift associated with the 551 CE Beirut earthquake, sea level remained relatively stable until a subsequent rise was recorded by marine crusts preserved at Ras el-Bassit (Syria), located at an elevation of +60 ± 20 cm. above MSL (Mean Sea Level). These crusts are dated by six consistent radiocarbon measurements to between the 10th and 11th centuries CE (Sanlaville et al. 1997).

  • Morhange et al. (2006a:111) further observed that two samples from Bouar and Khaizerane in Lebanon indicate a comparable, rapid, and likely tectonic relative sea-level rise of several decimetres. In a complementary study, Morhange et al. (2006b:91) suggested that “tectonic uplift of the coastal areas” may have taken place during the 10th–11th centuries CE (Pirazzoli 2005; Morhange et al., submitted).

Paleoseismic Intensity Estimates
11th century BCE Coastal Uplift

  • Earthquake Environmental Effects (ESI 2007)
Effect Location Image(s) Description Intensity
Coastal Uplift                Levantine Coast from Turkey to Lebanon
  • Morhange et al. (2006a:112) report that "seismotectonic displacement(s)" uplifted the northern Levantine coast "around 3000 BP," with the amplitude of uplift progressively decreasing from levantine Turkey toward southern Lebanon. Morhange et al. (2006a:111) further note that on the Syrian coast an uplifted shoreline occurs between "+0.7 and +2.8 m and is dated to ca. 2900–2800 BP (Dalongeville et al., 1993)," while in the Orontes delta region of Turkey the coast was uplifted by approximately "+2 m around 3000 BP (Pirazzoli et al., 1991)." They add that "south of Lebanon, from Israel to Gaza and the Sinai, no evidence is found for an elevated shoreline above present MSL (Galili et al., 1998; Sivan et al., 2001)," indicating that "only the northern Levant coast was uplifted around 3000 BP."
VIII
Since Morhange et al. (2006a:112) reports that the amplitude of seismotectonic displacement(s) "around 3000 BP" progressively decreased from levantine Turkey toward southern Lebanon, Intensity is estimated at VIII using the the ESI-2007 Earthquake Environmental Effects Chart.

6th century CE Coastal Uplift

  • Earthquake Environmental Effects (ESI 2007)
Effect Location Image(s) Description Intensity
Coastal Uplift                Lebanese Coast

  • Morhange et al. (2006a) dated fossil vermetids on uplifted benches to establish when they were last situated in the subtidal zone (close to mean sea level). These data, when combined with the structural evidence, strongly support attributing the uplift of ~80 ± 30 cm to the 551 CE Beirut earthquake.
IX
The paleoseismic evidence suggests an Intensity of IX (9) when using the ESI-2007 Earthquake Environmental Effects Chart.

10th - 11th century CE Coastal Uplift

  • Earthquake Environmental Effects (ESI 2007)
Effect Location Image(s) Description Intensity
Coastal Uplift                Lebanese and Syrian Coast
  • Morhange et al. (2006a:111) reported that following the 6th century CE coastal uplift associated with the 551 CE Beirut earthquake, sea level remained relatively stable until a subsequent rise was recorded by marine crusts preserved at Ras el-Bassit (Syria), located at an elevation of +60 ± 20 cm. above MSL (Mean Sea Level). These crusts are dated by six consistent radiocarbon measurements to between the 10th and 11th centuries CE (Sanlaville et al. 1997).

  • Morhange et al. (2006a:111) further observed that two samples from Bouar and Khaizerane in Lebanon indicate a comparable, rapid, and likely tectonic relative sea-level rise of several decimetres. In a complementary study, Morhange et al. (2006b:91) suggested that “tectonic uplift of the coastal areas” may have taken place during the 10th–11th centuries CE (Pirazzoli 2005; Morhange et al., submitted).
VIII
The paleoseismic evidence suggests an Intensity of VIII (8) when using the ESI-2007 Earthquake Environmental Effects Chart.

Notes and Further Reading
References

Bibliography from Meyers et al (1997)

Albright, William Foxwell. "The Eighteenth-Century Princes of Byblos and the Chronology of thee Middle Bronze. " Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no . 17 6 (Nov. 1989): 38-46.

Breasted, James H, Ancient Records of Egypt: Historical Documents from the Earliest Times to the Persian Conquest. 5 vols. Chicago, 1906-1907.

Dunand , Maurice. Fouilles de Byblos. 5 vols. Paris, 1937-1958.

Dunand , Maurice. "Rapport preliminaire sur les fouilles de Byblos." Bulletin duMusiede Beyrouth 9 (1949-1950): 53-74 ; 12 (1955): 7-23 ; 13 (1956): 73-86 ; 16 (1964): 69-85. Reports by the site's most prolific excavator.

Dunand , Maurice. Byblos: Its History, Ruins, and Legends. 2d ed. Beirut, 1968.

Jidejian, Nina. Byblos through the Ages. Beirut, 1968. Comprehensive history of Byblos through tine ages, with strong coverage of ancient, classical, and contemporary references. Includes a good bibliography through the late 1960s.

Joukowsky, Mardia Sharp. The Young Archaeologist in the Oldest Port City in the World. Beirut, 1988, Children's book exploring the history and archaeology of Byblos

Montet, Pierre. Byblos et I'Egypte: Quatre campagnes de fouilles d Gebeil 1021-1024. Paris, 1929. Comprehensive publication of four early expeditions.

Pritchard, James B. Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Tes~ lament. 3d ed, with supp. Princeton, 1978.

Renan, Ernest. Mission de Phenicie. Paris, 1864. One of the earliest works on Phoenician sites.

Tufhell, Olga, and William A. Ward. "Relations between Byblos, Egypt, and Mesopotamia at the End of the Third Millennium B.C. " Syria 43 (1966): 165-241 . Specialized study of the Montet jar and its contents; see Ward and Dever (below) for a recent study of the jar.

Ward, William A. "Egypt and the East Mediterranean in the Early Second Millennium B. C. " Or 30 (1961): 22-45 , 129-155.

Ward, William A. "Egypt and the East Mediterranean from Pre-Dynastic Times to die End of the Old Kingdom. " Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 6 (1963): 1-57. Survey of political and cultural relations between Egypt, Asia, and the Aegean world.

Ward, William A., and William G. Dever. Studies on Scarab Seals. Vol. 3, Scarab Typologies and Archaeological Context. San Antonio, 1994. See chapter 4 for the most recent study of the Montet jar and its contents.

Mega Blocks

Photos of Mega Blocks on the Coast

Description Image Source
Ilot du Palmier megablock Fig. 5 - Morhange et al (2006)
Senani island megablock Fig. 6 - Morhange et al (2006)
Senani island megablock Fig. 7 - Morhange et al (2006)
South of Enfe megablock Fig. 8 - Morhange et al (2006)
Byblos megablock Fig. 9 - Morhange et al (2006)
Byblos megablock Fig. 10 - Morhange et al (2006)

Abstract of Morhange et al (2006) - Megablock tsunami evidence

Summary. We present new evidence of megablocks left by extreme waves around the Tripoli islands and Byblos, northern Lebanon. On Ile du Palmier, megablocks have been projected a distance of 50 to 100 m from the shoreline. A Dendropoma bioconstruction was sampled from the outer part of one of the blocks, approx. 3.5 m3 in size and located 60 m from the shore. It dates a mid-Holocene event (5155 ± 40 14C years BP, or 3639-3489 cal. yr BC) deriving from the west. On the nearby island of Senani, numerous megablocks are scattered on the flat island surface. Their position again suggests projection by westerly waves. One of the blocks, approx. 30 m3 in size and 10 m from the shoreline, yielded a radiocarbon age of 525 ± 40 BP (1690-1950 cal. AD). Further south, at Byblos, a 5.5 m3 block projected towards the base of the ancient sea wall, was encrusted with upper subtidal vermetid shells, constrained to 855 ± 30 yr BP (1436-1511 cal. AD). A nearby 20 m3 conglomerate block was dated 710 ± 30 yr BP (1528-1673 cal. AD). A tsunami origin seems a feasible explanation for most of the megablocks encountered. Review of the vertical movements having affected the Lebanese coast during the late Holocene shows that major uplift of coastal areas occurred around 3000 yr BP, in the 6th century AD, and possibly in the 10th to 11th centuries AD. None of these periods coincide with the megablock dates, suggesting that the tsunami waves derived from outer tsunamigenic areas.

Wikipedia pages

Byblos



Byblos syllabary



Sampling Info from Morhange et al. (2006a)

Table 1

Table

Field Ref Material Elevation (cm) Radiocarbon Age (BP) Cal. BC/AD Lab Ref Latitude (°) Longitude (°)
LIB 2000-23 Dendropoma petraeum 100 ± 20 2630±35 403–265 BC Ly 10447 34.49667 35.76050
LIB 2000-22 Dendropoma petraeum 110 ± 20 5975±40 4514–4339 BC Lyon 1467 (GrA 18402) 34.50000 35.75000
MC 146 *Vermetus sp. 60 1880±50 427–651 AD MC 146 34.48333 35.76667
MC 145 *Vermetus sp. 220 (?) 3490±80 1596–1220 BC MC 145 34.48333 35.76667
LIB 2000-21 Dendropoma petraeum 80 ± 10 1810±35 548–676 AD Ly 10446 34.49583 35.77417
LIB 2000-24 Dendropoma petraeum 35 ± 15 2195±30 96–253 AD Ly 10448 34.30000 35.66667
LIB 2001-11 Vermetus gigas 40 ± 15 1930±25 410–550 AD Lyon 2090 (Poz) 34.29767 35.67017
LIB 2000-20 Vermetus sp. 20 ± 15 2075±35 235–414 AD Ly 10445 34.28467 35.66033
LIB 2001-18 Dendropoma petraeum 50 ± 10 2615±25 400–250 BC Lyon 2091 (Poz) 34.28467 35.66033
LIB 2000-19 Dendropoma petraeum 60 ± 15 2585±35 375–191 BC Ly 10444 34.28367 35.65867
LIB 2000-18 Dendropoma petraeum 0 ± 15 2750±35 631–387 BC Ly 10443 34.28367 35.65867
LIB 2000-18A Dendropoma petraeum 0 ± 15 2600±30 381–214 BC Ly 11580 34.28367 35.65867
LIB 2000-9 Dendropoma petraeum 100 ± 10 2485±35 270–70 BC Ly 10439 34.20983 35.64733
LIB 2000-10 Dendropoma petraeum 110 ± 10 2340±30 62 BC–85 AD Ly 10440 34.20800 35.64333
LIB 2000-10A Dendropoma petraeum 110 ± 10 2410±45 180 BC–34 AD Ly 11576 34.20800 35.64333
LIB 2001-27 Dendropoma petraeum 80 ± 10 1995±25 320–460 AD Lyon 2092 (Poz) 34.20200 35.63717
F1 Dendropoma petraeum 50 ± 10 3020±35 896–776 BC Ly 9832 34.09550 35.65100
LIB 2001-10 Vermetus sp. 60 ± 10 2065±40 237–429 AD Ly 11575 34.05467 35.63733
LIB 2000-17 Neogoniolithon notarisii 80 ± 10 3195±35 1127–922 BC Ly 10442 34.04983 35.63417
LIB 2000-11 Balanus sp. 80 ± 10 1160±30 1207–1302 AD Lyon 1468 (GrA 18404) 34.04533 35.63050
LIB 2000-3 Dendropoma petraeum 60 ± 10 1960±35 380–548 AD Ly 10386 34.03517 35.59183
LIB 2000-8 Dendropoma petraeum 80 ± 10 1975±45 328–550 AD Ly 10438 34.03333 35.58333
MC 63 *Vermetus sp. 60 2035±130 65–563 AD MC 63 34.03333 35.61667
MC 64 *Vermetus sp. 60 1960±40 363–555 AD MC 64 34.03333 35.61667
LIB 2000-7 Dendropoma petraeum 60 ± 10 1970±35 364–533 AD Ly 10437 34.02667 35.62267
LIB 2000-4 Dendropoma petraeum 80 ± 10 1585±35 729–906 AD Ly 10387 34.02900 35.62350
LIB 2000-6 Algal crust 50 ± 10 2220±35 64–240 AD Ly 10388 34.02699 35.62300
LIB 2001-8 Dendropoma petraeum 120 ± 10 1805±30 560–676 AD Ly 11574 34.02417 35.62217
LIB 2001-27 (Tyre) Pirenella conica 50 ± 20 2210±50 46–267 AD Lyon 2007 (GrA 22126) 33.57317 35.36800
LIB 2000-1 Vermetus triqueter 50 ± 20 2230±35 58–230 AD Lyon 1466 (GrA 18401) 33.46367 35.29317
LIB 2000-2 Vermetus triqueter 70 ± 20 2525±35 341–135 BC Ly 10385 33.39883 35.25750
LIB 2002-19 Dendropoma petraeum 40 ± 10 1095±30 1259–1341 AD Ly 11947 33.38333 35.26667
LIB 2002-20 Dendropoma petraeum 0 ± 5 450±50 Modern Ly 11948 33.26667 35.16667

Table Image

Table 1

14C ages of uplifted marine organisms from the Lebanese coast

click on image to open in a new tab

Morhange (2006a)