Transliterated Name | Source | Name |
---|---|---|
Beth Yerah | Hebrew | בית ירח |
Khirbet al-Karak | Arabic | خربة الكرك |
Sennabris | Hebrew | סנבראי |
al-Sinnabra | Hebrew | צינבריי ? |
al-Sinnabra | Arabic | |
Sinn en-Nabra | Arabic | سينن ينءنابرا |
Philoteria | Ancient Greek | φιλοτέρα |
Sennabris | Ancient Greek | |
Sinnabri | Aramaic | |
Senbra | Early Frankish | |
Ablm-bt-Yrh | Canaanite | |
Ablm | Canaanite |
Beth Yerah is located ~6 km. south of Tiberias where the Sea of
Galilee drains into the Jordan River. The site shows signs of habitation from The Early Bronze Age until the Arab periods
(Ruth Hestrin in Stern et al, 1993).
The adjacent twin city of Al-Sinnabra contains the remains of a
Qasr built by
Mu'awiya I - the first Umayyad Caliph. Unfortunately, the Qasr
was thoroughly dismantled after its abandonment thus obscuring much potential archeoseismic evidence.
There are no roof tiles, floor deposits, or collapse deposits - virtually nothing remains above foundation levels
(Raphael Greenberg, personal communication, 2021). In addition, earlier excavations in the 1940's and 1950's removed soil layers
on top of the Qasr which led to a loss of untold quantities of evidence from the uppermost soil layers and severed the
connection between walls and floors, fills and debris layers
Da'adli (2017:133).
Although a detailed artifact inventory was prepared from these earlier excavations, almost all post-Hellenistic finds
from the layer atop
the Qasr's foundations appear to have been lost Da'adli (2017:133).
The principal post-Bronze Age structure exposed on the site comprises a fort enclosing a basilical building, with a bathhouse attached to the enclosure's southern wall( Da'adli, 2017: 125 ). In addition, there are some ancillary structures outside the fort. Excavations undertaken in the 1950's
established a seventh-century CE terminus post quem for the central fortified structure and an eighth-century CE terminus post quem for the bathhouse(Da'adli, 2017 citing Greenberg and Paz, 2010). Based on historical sources, the Qasr was first constructed between 639 and 680 CE (Da'adli, 2017:126).
Location | Page | Discussion |
---|---|---|
Basilica | 147-153 | A limited number of mosaics were found in the Basilica; some of which were defaced (Iconoclasm)
suggesting occupation which is dated to the 1st half of the 8th centurynote. |
Southern Annex |
156-157 | Wall 162 (excavated in 2013 as W1698): A wall connecting Tower 2 and the southern addition was first excavated in 1950. As revealed in the 2009 and 2013 excavations, Channel GB 156 (excavated in 2013 as SA 1699) [part of the water system] was built into this wall, which did not have deep foundations. We may therefore assume that both the wall and the channel belong to the renovation phase of the southern annex (Fig. 8.30; Plan 8.8). A post-reform Umayyad coin (Chapter 9: Cat. No. 14) was found in the channel in 2013. The post-reform coin from Channel GB 156/SA 1699 indicates the period of use. Sanchez (2015:324) in Erdkamp, (2015) dates Umayyad post reform fals to after 696/700 CE. |
Channel GB 159 (the water system} |
158-159 | In addition to the post-reform coin described above, from Channel GB 156/SA 1699, an oil lamp was found in one of the short drainage channels (GB 5; Fig. 8.37; see Plan 8.2); it is described as mold-decorated and the excavator proposed an "Arab" date. A complete lamp found in the IAA storerooms may be the artifact in question (see Fig. 8.60:4). This lamp type is dated to the sixth-eighth centuries CE at Jerash, while it was in use until the beginning of the ninth century CE elsewhere (Hadad 2002:68-71). Near Channel GB 5 and W4 a buff handle dated to the eighth—eleventh centuries CE was found (Fig. 8.60:3; Stacey 2004:130-132). The rim of a white-painted gray bag-shaped storage jar, dated to the fifth-eighth centuries CE, was discovered in a pit just north of the southern fortification wall (Fig. 8.60:5; Stacey 2004:126). The excavations of 2009-2010 within the enclosure yielded a mere handful of small ceramic fragments, all of either buff-ware or white-splashed jars. |
Western Annex |
157 | Three rectangular rooms were uncovered on the western side of the basilica, numbered GB 102, GB 103 and GB 104, from north to south (see Plan 8.2). A small rectangular room abuts the western wall of Room GB 102. Channel GB 160 [the water system] splits off from Channel GB 159 [the water system] and enters the annex to Room GB 102 from the south, exiting through its western wall. The channel and the walls appear to have been built together, in a single stage (Fig. 8.32). Glazed pottery was found 0.1 m below the top of the walls in Room GB 103. Walmsley (2013:52) states that glazed wares, in Syria-Palestine [were] generally not introduced until the later eighth century at the earliest [and] always represented a small minority in the ceramic assemblage throughout the early Islamic period |
Eastern and Northern Annex |
157 | A stylobate (W51) running parallel to the eastern side of the basilical structure supports a series of built pillar bases (0.9 x 0.6 m), placed at somewhat irregular intervals (2.55, 2.75, 2.80, 2.90 m; Fig. 8.33). This wall is built in the same method as the southern addition.12 note 12 - The excavator thought the southern rooms and stylobate to be Roman in date. Furthermore, the excavator writes that W19 was built in a different method, and that it is earlier than W51. On May 17,1950, a bronze coin was reported near W51, probably Cat. No. 21 in Chapter 9 - an Umayyad post-reform fals. Sanchez (2015:324) in Erdkamp, (2015) dates Umayyad post reform fals to after 696/700 CE. |
Bathhouse | 169 | Finds from the bathhouse include two Umayyad coins found on the floor of the main hall (Maisler, Stekelis and Avi-Yonah 1952:222) and a chlorite vessel of eighth—tenth-century CE type (Stacey 2004:94) found near the western wall of the bathhouse (Fig. 8.60:6). During the 2009 excavation season, a portion of the northern wall of the frigidarium, which is in effect part of the curtain wall of the fortified enclosure, was sectioned. An Umayyad post-reform coin was found inside the core of the wall (Chapter 9: Cat. No. 15), apparently providing a terminus post quem for both the bath and the fortification. Sanchez (2015:324) in Erdkamp, (2015) dates Umayyad post reform fals to after 696/700 CE. |
Kilns | 169 | Glass slag as well as a glazed ring-base was found inside Kiln GB 73. |
Dar Unit | 171 | Isolated from the main enclosure and the bathhouse, another building or unit was exposed by Delougaz to the north of the fortified enclosure, above the remains of the tri-apsidal Byzantine church. |
Location | Page | Discussion |
---|---|---|
2-3 rooms over the bathhouse | 171 | A green glazed rim was found near W1 in Sq 02, which is on the eastern side of the wall. During the cleaning of the walls, an Islamic coin was discovered.21 note 21 - Description from December 25, 1945. A coin marked 25/2 or 2512, of Mamluk date, may be the one noted in the diary. See Chapter 9: Cat. No. 29. |
the historical record offers more details, at this point, than those provided by archaeology(Da'adli, 2017:175). However, the archaeology is in agreement with 7th and 8th century dates (Da'adli, 2017:175)).
the earliest material that can be associated with the fortified structure, ceramic, numismatic or otherwise, is consistently attributable to the seventh and eighth centuries CE. This includes the few ceramics—white-painted gray bag-shaped storage jars, buff-ware jugs with plastic knobs attached to the handle, and the molded lamp (Avissar 1996:147-149, 157; Haddad 2002:68-71), the chlorite bowl (Stacey 2004:94) and about 15 coins (see Chapter 9).The iconophobic defacing of mosaics in the Basilica was dated by Da'adli (2017:176) to the mid 8th century CE which suggests a date for the final renovation of the palace. Although historical sources indicate different phases of settlement at al-Sinnabra,
there is little surviving archeological evidencefor this (Da'adli, 2017:176). However, there may be
more facilites or sections that once were part of a palatial complexthat await excavation - e.g. between the Fort and the Dar (Da'adli, 2017:176).
tower (Tower 12) and adjoining fortification walls extending east and northwhich was described by Da'adli (2017:176).
This unit could be part of some kind of citadel that may have had more towers and walls to the north and east. These might be Ayyubid in date, but hard evidence for such a date is lacking. The manner in which they overlie the earlier remains shows that the earlier, palatial structure was largely dismantled in antiquity.
Direct unambiguous evidence that one of the 749 CE Sabbatical Year Quakes (the Holy Desert Quake) caused damage to the site was not found as the site had been dismantled down to the foundations long before archaeological excavations began. Greenberg, Tal, and Da'adli (2017:217) described what they saw.
It is not clear, either from historical documents or from the evidence on the ground, what brought Umayyad al-Sinnabra to an end. Whatever the case may be, and whether its abandonment was sudden (in wake of the 749 CE earthquake?) or gradual, by the time the builders of the later structures—particularly of Tower 12 and the enceinte of which it seems to have been a part — came on the scene, the Umayyad remains had disappeared from sight, dismantled down to their foundations.However, this negative evidence appears to be the evidence that shows that al-Sinnabra was in the epicentral region when the Holy Desert Quake of the Sabbatical Year sequence struck. The complete and total collapse of the structure is what allowed it to be so easily looted. It was no longer a palace. It was a pile of dressed stones - a quarry for any building project in the area. Eventually, every stone was taken. Only the foundation cracks unearthed by Greenberg and Paz (2010) remained to tell the story of it's total destruction.
Area GB-T
A new aspect of the 2009 excavations is our attempt to re-excavate and reinterpret the huge fortified complex cleared by Bar-Adon and Guy in the early 1950s but never fully published. Originally identified as a synagogue and then as a Roman or Byzantine fort, the most recent suggestion has been to identify the complex with the Early Islamic palace of al-Sinnabra. The area has been obscured for decades by the thick subtropical vegetation that characterizes the mound. Because the structure was largely dismantled in antiquity, leaving only wall and floor foundations intact, and due to the summary excavation methods used in the original excavations, our principal aim was to identify sealed or otherwise datable contexts, such as foundation trenches and subfloor deposits. Additionally, the surviving portions of the superstructure had to be revisited and recorded.
Thus far, the southwest tower of the enceinte and parts of the southern annex adjoining the large apse have been reinvestigated, two large mosaic floor segments recorded (Fig. 12), and a portion of the central floorbed removed. Some preliminary observations may be made:We are therefore confident that the Umayyad palace of al-Sinnabra has been found.
- The original wall foundations of the external fortifications, the adjoining bathhouse, and the central structure are all equally massive and deep, indicating a high level of investment, similar building concepts in all parts of the complex, and the likelihood that the superstructure was quite substantial.
- There is multiple evidence for the existence of at least two building phases in the main structure. The later phase involved wall demolition and replacement, as well as repairs in the mosaic pavements.
- We have begun to see evidence of earthquake damage; this could eventually aid in the dating of the structure.
(Fig. 13).Figure 13
Area GB-T, foundations in the southern part of the central palace structure; foundation trenches and evidence for earthquake damage in south wall (at right), looking south.
Greenberg and Paz (2010)- A second fortified enclosure was built over part of the main enclosure. This later enclosure was never reported by the excavators.
- Although finds are sparse, the Early Islamic dating does appear to be confirmed by coins found beneath the floor of the central hall and in the foundation trench of the bathhouse.
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Huge amounts of collapsed masonry | Tower 3
Plan 8.2
Detailed plan of the al-Sinnabra palace JW: Basilica is in the center surrounded by rectangular fortified walls and guard towers at the corners. Bathhouse is bottom right attached to the southern wall of the fort Da'adli (2017) |
|
|
Foundation cracks | Wall W121
Plan 8.2
Detailed plan of the al-Sinnabra palace JW: Basilica is in the center surrounded by rectangular fortified walls and guard towers at the corners. Bathhouse is bottom right attached to the southern wall of the fort Da'adli (2017) |
Figure 8.27
Room GB 34, looking south. Wall 122, left, lacks foundations, in contrast to W121 (center) and W120 (right). Scale is in foundation trench of the original eastern wall. Note large crack in right part of W121 (2009 excavations). In Greenberg and Paz (2010) the caption for this photo was: Area GB-T, foundations in the southern part of the central palace structure; foundation trenches and evidence for earthquake damage in south wall (at right), looking south. Da'adli (2017)
Figure 8.31
The southern face of W121, looking north. Note crack at right (2010 excavations). Da'adli (2017) |
|
Missing Section of Wall | Umayyad Bathhouse
Plan 8.2
Detailed plan of the al-Sinnabra palace JW: Basilica is in the center surrounded by rectangular fortified walls and guard towers at the corners. Bathhouse is bottom right attached to the southern wall of the fort Da'adli (2017) |
Figure 8.3
Parts of the palace cleaned and partly re-excavated in 2009-2010. At center, the basilica apse and rooms to its south; looking west (photographed in 2015). Da'adli (2017) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapsed Walls - Huge amounts of collapsed masonry | Tower 3
Plan 8.2
Detailed plan of the al-Sinnabra palace JW: Basilica is in the center surrounded by rectangular fortified walls and guard towers at the corners. Bathhouse is bottom right attached to the southern wall of the fort Da'adli (2017) |
|
VIII + | |
Foundation cracks | Wall W121
Plan 8.2
Detailed plan of the al-Sinnabra palace JW: Basilica is in the center surrounded by rectangular fortified walls and guard towers at the corners. Bathhouse is bottom right attached to the southern wall of the fort Da'adli (2017) |
Figure 8.27
Room GB 34, looking south. Wall 122, left, lacks foundations, in contrast to W121 (center) and W120 (right). Scale is in foundation trench of the original eastern wall. Note large crack in right part of W121 (2009 excavations). In Greenberg and Paz (2010) the caption for this photo was: Area GB-T, foundations in the southern part of the central palace structure; foundation trenches and evidence for earthquake damage in south wall (at right), looking south. Da'adli (2017)
Figure 8.31
The southern face of W121, looking north. Note crack at right (2010 excavations). Da'adli (2017) |
|
|
Collapsed Walls ? - Missing Section of Wall | Umayyad Bathhouse
Plan 8.2
Detailed plan of the al-Sinnabra palace JW: Basilica is in the center surrounded by rectangular fortified walls and guard towers at the corners. Bathhouse is bottom right attached to the southern wall of the fort Da'adli (2017) |
Figure 8.3
Parts of the palace cleaned and partly re-excavated in 2009-2010. At center, the basilica apse and rooms to its south; looking west (photographed in 2015). Da'adli (2017) |
|
VIII + |
Bar-Adon, Pessah. "Beth Yerah." Israel Exploration Journal 2 (1952):
142; 3 (1953): 132; 4 (1954): 128-129 ; 5 19955): 273-
Bar-Adon, Pessah. "Beth Yerah." Revue Biblique 62 (1955): S5-S8 .
Delougaz, Pinhas, and Richard C. Haines. A Byzantine Church at Khirbat al-Karak. Oriental Institute Publications, 85. Chicago, i960.
Eisenberg, Emmanuel. "Beth Yerah" (in Hebrew). Hadashot Arkeologiyot (1981): 1-13 .
Greenberg (2005) Tel Bet Yerah Hadashot Arkheologiyot Vol. 117
Greenberg and Paz (2010) Tel Bet Yerah 2007, 2009 Preliminary report Hadashot Arkheologiyot Vol. 122
Greenberg, R. (2019). The Archaeology of the Bronze Age Levant: From Urban Origins to the Demise of City-States, 3700-1000 BCE. India: Cambridge University Press.
Maisler [Mazar], Benjamin, et al. "The Excavations at Beth-Yerah
(Khirbet el-Kerak), 1944-1946. " Israel Exploration Journal 2 (1952):
165-173 , 218-229.
Ussishkin, David. "Beth Yerah. " Revue Biblique 75 (1967): 266-268.
Yeivin, Shmuel. Archaeological Activity in Israel (1948-1955). Jerusalem,
1955-
Schiirer, HJP, I, 228, no. 31
Reeg, Ortsnamen, 58~59, 109~110, 547~548.
P. Delougaz and R. C. Haines, A Byzantine Church of Khirbet al-Karak, Chicago 1960.
Other studies: L.A. Mayer, IEJ 2 (1952), 183~187
B. Maisler (Mazar) et al., IEJ 2 (1952), 165~173,
218~229
P. Bar-Adon, ibid. 3 (1953), 132
4 (1954), 128~129
5 (1955), 273
id., Roman Frontier Studies
1967, Tel Aviv 1971, 185
P. Delougaz, BASOR 165 (1962), 46~47
J. Mellaart, The Chalcolithic and
Early Bronze Ages in the Near East and Anatolia, Beirut 1966, 73~90
D. Ussishkin, RB 75 (1968), 266~
268
I. A. Todd (C. H. Gordon Fest.) (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 22), Kevelaer 1973, 181~206
M. Avi-Yonah, Archaeology (Israel Pocket Library), Jerusalem 1974, 68~72
R. Amiran and C. Cohen,
Israel Museum News 12 (1976), 61~62
R. Amiran, Anatolia and the Ancient Near East (T. Ozgiic Fest.),
Ankara 1989, 9~10
V. Sussman, BASOR 238 (1980), 75~77
D. L. Esse, "Beyond Subsistence: Beth
Yeral
l and Northern Palestine in the Early Bronze Age" (Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Chicago 1982)
id., EJ 2!
(1990), 27*~34*
id., Subsistence, Trade and Social Change in Early Bronze Age Palestine (Studies in
Ancient Oriental Civilizations 50), Chicago 1991
L. Ratti, MdB 35 (1984), 38~40
U. Worschech, LA
34 (1984), 445~447
0. Yogev and E. Eisenberg, ESI 4 (1985), 14~16
J.D. Currid, BA 49 (1986), 20~
24
D. T. Ariel, IEJ 38 (1988), 31~35
Weippert 1988 (Ortsregister)
E. Braun, PEQ 121 (1989), 1~43
C.
Burney, L'Urbanisation de Ia Palestine a /'Age du Bronze Ancien (Actes du Colloque d'Emmaiis, 1986
BAR/IS 527, ed. P. de Miroschedji), Oxford 1989, 331~339
H. de Coutenson, ibdid., 317-329.
R. Amiran, EI 20 (1989), 196*
id., Aspects of Art and Iconography (Nimet Özgüc Fest.
eds. M. J. Mellink
et al.), Ankara 1993, 23–24
A. Mazar, Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
10 (1990), xix–xx
id., Studies in the Archaeology of Israel and Neighboring Lands, Chicago, IL 2001,
447–464
D. R. Edwards, ABD, 1, New York 1992, 699–700
A. T. Oekse, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 43 (1993),
133–146
G. Philip (& D. Baird), Levant 25 (1993), 13–36
id., JMA 12 (1999), 26–57
W. E. Rast, BASOR
292 (1993), 121–122 (Review)
N. Getzov, AJA 100 (1996), 731
id., ESI 18 (1998), 20–21
id. (et al.),
Shifting Urban Landscapes during the Early Bronze Age in the Land of Israel, Tel Aviv 2001
id., The 1995
Excavations at Bet Yerah (‘Atiqot), Jerusalem (forthcoming)
R. Greenberg, The Hula Valley from the Beginning of the Early Bronze Age to the End of the Middle Bronze Age IIA (Ph.D. diss.), Jerusalem 1996
id. (&
E. Eisenberg), Egypt and the Levant, London 2002, 213–222
id. (& S. Paz), IEJ 54 (2004), 1–23
id. (& Y.
Paz), Levant 37 (2005), 81–103
A. H. Joffe, OEANE, 1, New York 1997, 312–214
C. Marro, La Culture du
Haut-Euphrate au Bronze Ancien (Varia Anatolica 8), Istanbul 1997
Ceramics and Change, Sheffield 2000
P. De Miroschedji, Chronologie des pays du Caucase et de l’Euphrate aux IVe–IIIe millénaires (Varia Anatolica 9), Paris 2000, 231–254
P. Graham & A. R. Millard, ibid., 279–296
N. Marchetti, ICAANE, 1, Roma
2000, 869–902
M. Peilstöcker, ibid., 1327–1343
K. N. Sowada, ibid., 1527–1540
P. Kaplony, Egypt and
the Levant, London 2002, 464–485
O. Negbi, EI 27 (2002), 288*
Z. Winogradov, The Aqueducts of Israel,
Portsmouth, RI 2002, 295–304
G. Palumbi, Ancient Near Eastern Studies 40 (2003), 80–133
S. Bunimovitz
& R. Greenberg, BASOR 334 (2004), 19–31
L. D. Morenz, ZDPV 120 (2004), 1–12.
H. Goldfus, Tombs and Burials in Churches and Monasteries of Byzantine Palestine (324–628
A.D.), 1–2 (Ph.D. diss.), Ann Arbor, MI 1998, 211–216
A. Ovadiah, Atti del Congresso Internationale di
Archeologia Cristiana 13 (1998), 77–96
Y. Tepper, TA 26 (1999), 271–282
B. Bagatti, Ancient Christian
Villages of Galilee (SBF Collectio Minor 37), Jerusalem 2001, 57.
D. Milson, LA 41 (1992), 449–454
R. Reich, ‘Atiqot 22 (1993), 137–144
D. S. Whitcomb, Al-‘Usur al-Wusta: Bulletin of the Middle East Medievalists 14/10
(2002), 1–8
id., Oriental Institute Annual Report 2002–2003, 81–86.