Transliterated Name | Source | Name |
---|---|---|
Beit Alpha | Hebrew | בית אלפא |
Bet Alpha | Hebrew | בית אלפא |
Beth Alpha | Hebrew | בית אלפא |
The ancient synagogue of Beth Alpha is situated at the foot of the northern slopes of the Gilboa Mountains, east of the Jezreel Valley. The site was named after the adjacent ruin of Khirbet Beit Ilfa, which possibly preserves an ancient name. The place is now occupied by the kibbutzim Beth Alpha and Hephzibah. In the course of digging a channel for conveying water to the fields, members of Kibbutz Hephzibah came upon a mosaic floor. In 1929, E. L. Sukenik, assisted by N. Avigad, began excavations at the spot on behalf of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. They uncovered the remnants of a synagogue and its mosaic floor. Exploratory excavations in the vicinity of the synagogue, conducted in 1962 by the Israel Department of Antiquities, succeeded in exposing remains of buildings.
The synagogu eat Beth Alpha is among the synagogues of the later type found in Palestine. The distinctive features of this type are the division into a courtyard, narthex, and nave; an apse facing Jerusalem as a permanent repository for the ark; and a mosaic floor. The synagogue is not built of dressed stone, nor is it as monumental as the earlier synagogues found in Galilee. The highly variegated mosaic floor is surprisingly well preserved. In its magnificent decoration three basic motifs are displayed: ritual objects, astrological symbols, and a biblical scene. The style of the mosaic is naive and has all the charm of folk art. The two artisans, father and son, who perpetuated their names in the mosaic, seem to have worked throughout the district. Their names are also found in the mosaic floor discovered at Beth-Shean. A highly important feature here is an inscription indicating that the floor was laid in the sixth century. This is one of the few synagogues in the country for which a date has been found epigraphically.
The stones from the pillars differing as they do in shape and especially in colour from the other stones scattered among the debris, made it plain before we had been at work a fortnight how this ancient synagogue had been destroyed. These basalt blocks were in every case found east and west of the pillar bases, Fig 7, showing how these stones fell which belonged to the second pillar from the south in the east aisle, indicates the results of a strong earth-tremor, the direction of which was approximately west to east.Below the pillar-debris, Sukenik (1932:14) found more debris including plaster and what appeared to be roof tiles.
When we had cleared away the debris and reached the floor of the building we found, particularly in the central nave, a great many fragments of tiles of two different types of clay, one reddish and the other greyish-brown, and a thick layer of plaster (20 to 25 cm.) covering the floor's surface. There was also a layer of plaster in the side aisles but not so thick; but here no tiles were found. This layer of plaster which, as we have seen, covered all parts of the building inside the synagogue, and which was the first to fall to the floor as a result of the shaking by the earthquake.Beneath the debris, Sukenik (1932:48) reports that that 36 bronze coins were found in
Most of the tile fragments were found above the plaster or in it's upper layer, and the fragments of only one complete tile was found lying on the actual surface of the mosaic, to the south near the platform.
the hollow built into the floor of the apse on the south side of the synagoguebut only seven survived
in better condition. The earliest coin dated to the reign of Constantine the Great (306-337 CE) and the two latest coins dated to the reign of Justinian I (518-527 CE). The latest coins and the Aramaic inscription commemorating construction of one of the mosaics, also dated to the reign of Justinian I (518-527 CE), provide a terminus post quem for the major seismic destruction reflected in the pillar debris.
Item | Location/Context | Image | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Jar | western nave near the door |
Fig. 42
Fig. 42
Earthenware vessel found at Beth Alpha Sukenik (1932) |
pieces from a jar with thin, ribbed sides found in the western nave near the door (Fig. 42). The jar was made from fine reddish, well-baked clay. One side of it was flat and the other markedly convex, and in [its] general shape it resembled a bee-hive. This type also appears at much earlier periods. Its shape makes it easy to move about from place to place. Similar vessels were found at Beisan in the uppermost stratum of the mound. |
glass fragments | ? | Certain glass fragments which we found had belonged to the stems of oil lamps. |
|
bracelet | ? |
Fig. 43
Fig. 43
Brass bracelet Sukenik (1932) |
Mention may here be made of two other objects found after our excavations, by Mr. Isser Unger. One is a small bronze bracelet (Fig. 43) with surface decorated with thin lines scratched between three egg-shaped protuberances. |
Arabic vessel | ? |
Fig. 44
Fig. 44
Fragment of Arabic vessel Sukenik (1932) |
Mention may here be made of two other objects found after our excavations, by Mr. Isser Unger. ... More interesting is the other object - a piece of the 'neck' and 'shoulder' of a pre-crusade Arab earthenware vessel (Fig. 44). This was made of yellowish clay mixed with small portions of white limestone. The surface was covered with a thin layer of yellowish paint and on this were arrangements of pale reddish stripes. On the lighter parts of the surface on the 'shoulder' were 'swastika'-shaped crosses. The present writer knows of no similar examples among Arab pottery found in Palestine. |
Arab pottery | top layer of debris which covered the ruins of the synagogue | A few fragments of Arab pottery were also found in the top layer of debris which covered the ruins of the synagogue. |
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Collapse and fallen columns | second pillar from the south in the east aisle
Beth Alpha: Plan of the Synagogue
Stern et al (1993) |
Fig. 7
Condition of pillar-debris as found at the time of the excavation. To the right the foundations of the central pillar of the eastern row are seen; and close by, the bench constructed later than the mosaic pavement Sukenik (1932) |
|
Fallen Plaster and collapsed roof | floor of the Synagogue, particularly in the central nave
Beth Alpha: Plan of the Synagogue
Stern et al (1993) |
|
Effect | Location | Image(s) | Description | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Collapse and fallen columns indicating collapsed walls and fallen broken columns | second pillar from the south in the east aisle
Beth Alpha: Plan of the Synagogue
Stern et al (1993) |
Fig. 7
Condition of pillar-debris as found at the time of the excavation. To the right the foundations of the central pillar of the eastern row are seen; and close by, the bench constructed later than the mosaic pavement Sukenik (1932) |
|
VIII+ |
E. L. Sukenik, The Ancient Synagogue at Beth Alpha, Jerusalem 1932.
E. L. Sukenik, Rabinowitz Bulletin 2 (1951), 26
Goodenough, Jewish Symbols 1, 241-253
3,
638-641
M. Avi-Yonah, Archaeology (Israel Pocket Library), Jerusalem 1974, 43-45
J. Wilkinson,
Journal of Jewish Art 5 (1978), 16-28
Judaica Post 7 (1979), 946-950
L. Dequeker, Bijdragen 47 (1986),
2-30
H.-P. Stiihli, Antike Synagogenkunst, Stuttgart 1988, 55-68.
J. Gutmann, Bulletin of the Asia Institute 6 (1992), 79–85
id., OEANE, 1, New York 1997, 299–300
M.
Bachmann, Neukirchener Theologische Zeitschrift 9 (1994), 168–191
O. Hess, Israel Magazine 58 (1994),
27, 29, 3–34
M. Bregman, The Sacrifice of Isaac in the Three Monotheistic Religions: Proceedings of
a Symposium on the Interpretation of the Scriptures, Jerusalem 16–17.3.1995 (SBF Analecta 41
ed. F.
Manns), Jerusalem 1995, 127–145
R. Hachlili, ZDPV 113 (1997), 92–122
L. A. Roussin, Archaeology and
the Galilee: Texts and Contexts in the Graeco-Roman and Byzantine Periods (South Florida Studies in the
History of Judaism 143
eds. D. R. Edwards & C. T. McCollough), Atlanta, GA 1997, 83–96
id., BAR 27/2
(2001), 52–56
H. Mack, Cathedra 88 (1998), 180–181
G. Stemberger, Jahrbuch für Biblische Theologie
13 (1998), 145–170
A. E. Killebrew, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 3/1–2 (1999),
17–32
Y. Englard, Cathedra 98 (2000), 172–173
E. Kessler, From Dura to Sepphoris, Portsmouth, RI 2000,
73–81
J. Magness, Symbiosis, Symbolism and the Power of the Past, Winona Lake, IN 2003, 363–389,
553–554
S. S. Miller, JQR 94 (2004), 27–76.
Sukenik (1932:16) discerned multiple phases of construction one of which he surmised may have been a repair due to a previous earthquake.