Open this page in a new tab

Ayla

Aerial view of Ayla

APAAME

  • Reference:APAAME_
    20141020
    _DLK-0014.jpg
  • Credit: Aerial Photographic Archive for Archaeology in the Middle East
  • Copyright: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)


Click photo for high res magnifiable image


Introduction
Introduction

Around 650 CE, a new Islamic city was established outside the walls of the old Byzantine town. The new town was known as Ayla. Located near the coastline of the modern city of Aqaba, Ayla was excavated starting in 1993 ( S. Thomas Parker and Donald S. Whitcomb in Meyers et al, 1997). Ayla is likely subject to a site effect due to it susceptibility to liquefaction.

Aqaba/Elat - Introduction Webpage

Maps, Aerial Views, Plans, and Photos
Maps, Aerial Views, Plans, and Photos

Maps

Normal Size

  • Fig. 2.15 - Location Map for Aqaba and environs from Allison (2013)
  • Map showing location of Islamic Ayla and Byzantine Aila (aka Ailana) from Whitcomb (1988)
  • Fig. 2 Map showing location of Islamic Ayla and Byzantine Aila from Whitcomb (1997)

Magnified

  • Fig. 2.15 - Location Map for Aqaba and environs from Allison (2013)

Aerial Views

  • Ayla in Google Earth

Plans

Normal size

  • Fig. 2 Plan of Islamic Ayla from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
  • Fig. 1 Site Plan with Excavation Areas of the Aqaba Archaeological Project from Damgaard and Jennings (2013)
  • Fig. 2 Plan of Area IM of the Aqaba Archaeological Project from Damgaard and Jennings (2013)

Magnified

  • Fig. 2 Plan of Islamic Ayla from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
  • Fig. 1 Site Plan with Excavation Areas of the Aqaba Archaeological Project from Damgaard and Jennings (2013)
  • Fig. 2 Plan of Area IM of the Aqaba Archaeological Project from Damgaard and Jennings (2013)

Photos

Normal Size

  • Fig. 5 - Photo of tilted Sea Wall in Islamic Ayla from Niemi (2009)
  • Fig. 4 - Displaced Wall from Galli and Galadini (2001)

Magnified

  • Fig. 5 - Photo of tilted Sea Wall in Islamic Ayla from Niemi (2009)
  • Fig. 4 - Displaced Wall from Galli and Galadini (2001)

Chronology
Phasing

Whitcomb (1994) divided up the stratigraphy of Ayla into 5 phases as did Damgaard (2011) and Damgaard (2013). Damgaard (2011) and Damgaard (2013)'s phasing are accessible on tabs in the spreadsheet below.



First Earthquake - 7th - 8th centuries CE

Plans and Photos

Plans and Photos

Plans

Normal size

  • Fig. 2 Plan of Islamic Ayla from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Magnified

  • Fig. 2 Plan of Islamic Ayla from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Photos

  • Fig. 9 Negative profile ('Robber Trench') from Damgaard (2008)
  • Fig. 10 Mud-brick collapse from Damgaard (2008)

Discussion

The first earthquake was revealed in the constructions built during the late Rashidun period (644-656 A.D.) ( al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov, 2007) thus providing a terminus post quem of 644-656 A.D.. A terminus ante quem of ~750 CE was provided by the Early Abbasid structures built after the first seismic destruction. This suggests that the seismic damage was caused by the Jordan Valley Quake of 659/660 CE (less likely due to distance) or one of the mid 8th century CE earthquakes.

In reporting on excavations in 2008, Damgaard (2008) observed substantial infilling and leveling in Phase 3 which based on its artefactual yield, must be considered Abbasid in date and corresponds roughly to Whitcomb's `Phase B'. Damgaard (2008) suggested that this levelling appears to be associated with a period of widespread reconstruction following a significant collapse - most probably due to the 748 CE earthquake. Of particular interest was an east-west running wall perpendicular to a north-south running wall (L57/W13). Only the negative profile of this wall remains - i.e. it is a robber trench (Fig. 9). Although nothing of its foundation remains, the fact that the remnants of a wall [are] now gone was confirmed by a patterned collapse of mud-brick (including a carbonised wooden beam) on its south side. (Fig 10). Damgaard (2011, Appendices:12) also reports a collapse layer in Tower 2 dated to the mid 8th century. Thus, it appears that the terminus ante quem is fairly reliable for this archeoseismic evidence and suggests a mid 8th century CE earthquake. Khouri and Whitcomb (1988) report that the earlier Abbasid houses were fine stone and brick residences.

Second Earthquake - 1068 CE

Plans

Plans

Normal size

  • Fig. 2 Plan of Islamic Ayla from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Magnified

  • Fig. 2 Plan of Islamic Ayla from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Discussion

The second earthquake was revealed in structures restored and/or built during the Fatimid period (1050-1116 A.D.) ( al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov, 2007) thus providing a terminus post quem of 1050-1116 AD. A number of authors report that Ayla was damaged during the 1068 CE Quake(s). Abu Ali ibn al-Banna and Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi reports that in Ayla all but 12 people who had gone fishing survived. al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) note that Donald Whitcomb discovered a destruction layer associated with this earthquake which he presumes led to abandonment of the village due to its destruction.

Seismic Effects
Archaeoseismic Survey in Ayla

al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) undertook an archaeoseismic investigation in Ayla and saw evidence for two different earthquakes. The first earthquake struck in the 7th or 8th centuries CE and the second struck in 1068 CE. Their work was done at a restored site initially excavated by Donald Whitcomb.

First Earthquake - 7th - 8th centuries CE

Evidence type Station Location Figure Comments
Wall Repairs 3 near N corner of Ayla City Wall
8 poor quality repairs of the Ayla city wall - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Wall Repairs 6 City quarter D
9 clear mismatch between the lower row of stones and the upper wall fragment. The height of the lower row is 40 cm above the bottom of the excavated trench, where the height of the upper wall fragment is 160 cm. The azimuth of the lower row is 34°, while that of the upper wall fragment is 25° showing a difference of 9°. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Supporting Walls 7 City Quarter D
10 Wall perpendicular to the city wall has a supporting wall on its NE side. The latter wall was built later in order to strengthen the original one that was tilted toward the NE. The height of the original wall is 300 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench has a declination azimuth of 41° and a tilt angle of 83°. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Supporting Walls 21 W corner of city wall
4b
  • short secondary wall was built in order to support (apparently) a deformed column. Deformation of the column possibly occurred during the 748 Umayyad earthquake. Subsequently, both column and supporting wall were tilted toward SSW during the second-Fatimid earthquake of 1068. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
  • Tens of supporting walls were observed in the ruins of Ayla, suggesting the hypothesis that during the first Umayyad period earthquake the city was seriously damaged. Building elements were tilted, shifted, distorted, and special supporting walls were subsequently built in order to reinforce damaged constructions. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Secondary use of building materials
in Early Abbasid buildings
7 City quarter D
11a column drum which is now inside of the street wall - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Secondary use of building materials
in Early Abbasid buildings
13 City quarter F
11b two column drums belonging to a column likely damaged during the Umayyad earthquake. Another column drum (left in Fig. 11b) was later used in order to support the damaged column, while during the Fatimid earthquake, the column was finally destroyed and both drums were shifted out from their previous position. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Collapsed Walls n/a an east-west running wall perpendicular to a north-south running wall (L57/W13) in Area IM as defined by Damgaard (2008)


the remnants of a wall [are] now gone [robber trench in Fig. 9] was confirmed by a patterned collapse of mud-brick (including a carbonised wooden beam) on its south side [Fig. 10] - Damgaard (2008)

Second Earthquake - 1068 CE

Evidence type Station Plan Figure Comments
Systematic tilting of walls 20
21

4a
4b
4c
4d
At Ayla, a wall in the southern room of the Sea Gate building complex K (Station 20 in Fig. 2 - Plan) is tilted toward SSW at an angle of up to 66° (in its central part) with a declination azimuth of 213° (Fig. 4a). Another example of the same damage pattern is in station 21 (in the western corner of the city wall), where a fragment of the wall is tilted at an angle of 72° with a declination angle of 210° (Fig. 4b).

The data of surveyed cases of tilting are summarized in Table 2 and in Fig. 4c. A 24 cases of tilting were observed at walls trending between 105° and 145°, 19 out of these are tilted toward SW and only 5 are tilted towards NE (Fig. 4c). In contrast, only 11 cases of tilting were observed in the perpendicular walls, with a 10°-45° trend, and no systematic tilting was observed.
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Lateral shifting of building elements 1
5a
5b
5c
5d
In Ayla, a 75 cm wide wall attached and perpendicular to a major city wall (station no. 1 — close to the northern corner of the city wall) has an original trend of 120°. Its upper part is shifted towards SSW (210°) of about 16 cm (Fig. 5a). The lower and undisturbed portion of the wall is 44 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. The height of the preserved shifted fragment is 18 cm. The wall is composed of cemented sandstone and granite blocks.

The upper part of the highly deformed wall attached and perpendicular to the city wall (Station 3 in city Quarter E) was shifted 7 cm toward SSW. The wall trend is 115°, while the direction of shifting is 205°. Total height of the wall is 81 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. At a later stage, a supporting wall of 84 cm width was built from the southern side in order to impede the collapse from the original wall.

Other seven cases of clear shifting were observed (Fig. 5b). Most of them are in walls trending 105°-120°. Three wall fragments were pushed toward the SSW and in one case the wall part was moved towards the opposite direction.
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Rotation of wall fragments around a vertical axis 2
10 or 12

6a
6b
6c
In Ayla, there is a rotation pattern in the northwestern wall of the 4th city tower (station no. 2). The height of the remaining wall is 139 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. The trend of the undisturbed wall is 124°, while the strike of the rotated wall fragment is 115°, this suggesting a counterclockwise rotation on 9° with maximum degree of rotation for the lower row of the wall (Fig. 6a). The maximum horizontal offset between two wall fragments is 8 cm.

Another example is at station no. 12 (Ayla's city quarter A), where the upper part of the wall was rotated 15° clockwise by (Fig. 6b). The strike of the undisturbed wall is 117° and the strike of the rotated wall is 132°. The height of the undisturbed wall fragment is 40 cm, while the rotated part is 60 cm high. Width of the wall is 40-50 cm; its length is 2 m.

Walls striking 20°-45° revealed six cases of rotation and out of them five are counterclockwise and only one is clockwise (Fig. 6c). The perpendicular walls, trending 115°-130° revealed five cases of rotation, out of which two cases are counterclockwise and three cases are clockwise. Thus, a systematic picture of rotations is obtained: counterclockwise in NNE trending walls and clockwise in ESE walls (Fig. 6c).
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
Fractures across walls 20
2

7
6a
Long through fissures cutting a whole wall are common phenomena among earthquake damage patterns (Stiros 1996; Korjenkov and Lemzin 2000). Several such patterns were also observed in Ayla. For example, a secondary wall attached and perpendicular to the main city wall (Station 3 in city Quarter E) was cut by a joint. The 55 cm long joint (left one in Fig. 7) crosses two stones of a 121° trending wall.

Another joint (Fig. 6a, shown by arrows) cutting through two adjacent stones which are located in the northwestern wall of the 4th city tower (station No. 2). The height of the wall is 139 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. The trend of the wall fragment is 124°.

The described damage pattern occurred during last strong 1995 earthquake (I = VDT, Al-Tarazi 2000), was strong enough to cause significant damage in weak remnants of ancient buildings, especially those already excavated. Local site effects like liquefaction and subsidence could have increased the damage level.
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Deformation Maps
First Earthquake - 7th - 8th centuries CE

Deformation Map

Modified by JW from Fig. 2 of al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) and Fig. 2 of Damgaard and Jennings (2013)

Second Earthquake - 1068 CE

Deformation Map

Modified by JW from Fig. 2 of al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Archaeoseismic Analysis
First Earthquake - 7th - 8th centuries CE

The percentage of collapsed buildings of the Rashidun town is hard to estimate as most of the buildings have been cleared away and rebuilt. Nevertheless, an estimate can be done because most of the second floors or upper parts of high structures were rebuilt at the Umayyad and Early Abbasid stage leading to the estimate that at least 15% of the buildings were destroyed by the earthquake occurred at the end of the Umayyad period. According to the EMS-98 an earthquake intensity of IX or more is inferred.

Second Earthquake - 1068 CE

Figures
Figures

  • Fig. 4d Types of propagation during the Nuweiba 1995 earthquake from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

Discussion

A clear preference of southwest tilting is observed at the ruins of Ayla. Accordingly, the seismic shock likely arrived from the SW (Fig. 4d). As it is known the DST is a sinistral strike-slip fault and Ayla is located on the eastern block that moves northwards during strong earthquakes. Therefore, the building constructions are tilted to opposite direction because of inertia (Fig. 4d).

... Based on the above description of shifted building elements, the seismic shocks arrived from the SSW and the movements were transmitted from the ground to the building foundations, causing the upper wall fragments to move in an opposite direction due to inertia.

... The analysis of the clockwise and anticlockwise rotations supports a likely NNE-SSW direction of the seismic motion.

... Through-going joints are likely formed as a result of high intensity earthquake, while high energy is necessary to overcome the stress shadow of free surfaces at the stone margins (i.e., the free space between adjacent stones).

... The percentage of collapsed buildings of the Fatimid town can be well estimated as the ruins were left untouched. The survey disclosed that at least 15% of the well-built stone buildings of Fatimid Ayla collapsed and in practice no second floor structures survived with no severe damage. Again an EMS-98 intensity of IX or more is assumed.

Intensity Estimates
First Earthquake - 7th - 8th centuries CE

Intensity Estimate from the Earthquake Archaeological Effects (EAE) Chart

Evidence type Station Location Figure Comments Intensity
Displaced Walls indicated by Wall Repairs 3 near N corner of Ayla City Wall
8 poor quality repairs of the Ayla city wall - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) VII+
Displaced Walls indicated by Wall Repairs 6 City quarter D
9 clear mismatch between the lower row of stones and the upper wall fragment. The height of the lower row is 40 cm above the bottom of the excavated trench, where the height of the upper wall fragment is 160 cm. The azimuth of the lower row is 34°, while that of the upper wall fragment is 25° showing a difference of 9°. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) VII+
Tilted Walls indicated by Supporting Walls 7 City Quarter D
10 Wall perpendicular to the city wall has a supporting wall on its NE side. The latter wall was built later in order to strengthen the original one that was tilted toward the NE. The height of the original wall is 300 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench has a declination azimuth of 41° and a tilt angle of 83°. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) VI+
Tilted Walls indicated by Supporting Walls 21 W corner of city wall
4b
  • short secondary wall was built in order to support (apparently) a deformed column. Deformation of the column possibly occurred during the 748 Umayyad earthquake. Subsequently, both column and supporting wall were tilted toward SSW during the second-Fatimid earthquake of 1068. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
  • Tens of supporting walls were observed in the ruins of Ayla, suggesting the hypothesis that during the first Umayyad period earthquake the city was seriously damaged. Building elements were tilted, shifted, distorted, and special supporting walls were subsequently built in order to reinforce damaged constructions. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
VI+
Broken columns indicated by Secondary use of building materials in Early Abbasid buildings 7 City quarter D
11a column drum which is now inside of the street wall - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) VI or VII +
Broken columns indicated by Secondary use of building materials in Early Abbasid buildings 13 City quarter F
11b two column drums belonging to a column likely damaged during the Umayyad earthquake. Another column drum (left in Fig. 11b) was later used in order to support the damaged column, while during the Fatimid earthquake, the column was finally destroyed and both drums were shifted out from their previous position. - al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) VI or VII +
Collapsed Walls n/a an east-west running wall perpendicular to a north-south running wall (L57/W13) in Area IM as defined by Damgaard (2008)


the remnants of a wall [are] now gone [robber trench in Fig. 9] was confirmed by a patterned collapse of mud-brick (including a carbonised wooden beam) on its south side [Fig. 10] - Damgaard (2008) VIII +
The archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224).

Seismic Parameters from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) estimated an intensity of IX or more for the Umayyad period earthquake and surmised that the epicenter was close - a few tens of kilometers away. They estimated that the epicenter was to the NE.

Although based on limited observations the direction of tilt and resystematic block towards NE during Umayyad (748 A.D) and Fatimid (1086 A.D.) earthquakes are likely evidence of seismic motions radiated from the earthquake sources located NE of Ayla.

Second Earthquake - 1068 CE

Intensity Estimate from the Earthquake Archaeological Effects (EAE) Chart

Evidence type Station Plan Figure Comments Intensity
Systematic tilting of walls 20
21

4a
4b
4c
4d
At Ayla, a wall in the southern room of the Sea Gate building complex K (Station 20 in Fig. 2 - Plan) is tilted toward SSW at an angle of up to 66° (in its central part) with a declination azimuth of 213° (Fig. 4a). Another example of the same damage pattern is in station 21 (in the western corner of the city wall), where a fragment of the wall is tilted at an angle of 72° with a declination angle of 210° (Fig. 4b).

The data of surveyed cases of tilting are summarized in Table 2 and in Fig. 4c. A 24 cases of tilting were observed at walls trending between 105° and 145°, 19 out of these are tilted toward SW and only 5 are tilted towards NE (Fig. 4c). In contrast, only 11 cases of tilting were observed in the perpendicular walls, with a 10°-45° trend, and no systematic tilting was observed.
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
VI+
Lateral shifting of building elements 1
5a
5b
5c
5d
In Ayla, a 75 cm wide wall attached and perpendicular to a major city wall (station no. 1 — close to the northern corner of the city wall) has an original trend of 120°. Its upper part is shifted towards SSW (210°) of about 16 cm (Fig. 5a). The lower and undisturbed portion of the wall is 44 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. The height of the preserved shifted fragment is 18 cm. The wall is composed of cemented sandstone and granite blocks.

The upper part of the highly deformed wall attached and perpendicular to the city wall (Station 3 in city Quarter E) was shifted 7 cm toward SSW. The wall trend is 115°, while the direction of shifting is 205°. Total height of the wall is 81 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. At a later stage, a supporting wall of 84 cm width was built from the southern side in order to impede the collapse from the original wall.

Other seven cases of clear shifting were observed (Fig. 5b). Most of them are in walls trending 105°-120°. Three wall fragments were pushed toward the SSW and in one case the wall part was moved towards the opposite direction.
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
VIII+
Rotation of wall fragments around a vertical axis 2
10 or 12

6a
6b
6c
In Ayla, there is a rotation pattern in the northwestern wall of the 4th city tower (station no. 2). The height of the remaining wall is 139 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. The trend of the undisturbed wall is 124°, while the strike of the rotated wall fragment is 115°, this suggesting a counterclockwise rotation on 9° with maximum degree of rotation for the lower row of the wall (Fig. 6a). The maximum horizontal offset between two wall fragments is 8 cm.

Another example is at station no. 12 (Ayla's city quarter A), where the upper part of the wall was rotated 15° clockwise by (Fig. 6b). The strike of the undisturbed wall is 117° and the strike of the rotated wall is 132°. The height of the undisturbed wall fragment is 40 cm, while the rotated part is 60 cm high. Width of the wall is 40-50 cm; its length is 2 m.

Walls striking 20°-45° revealed six cases of rotation and out of them five are counterclockwise and only one is clockwise (Fig. 6c). The perpendicular walls, trending 115°¬130° revealed five cases of rotation, out of which two cases are counterclockwise and three cases are clockwise. Thus, a systematic picture of rotations is obtained: counterclockwise in NNE trending walls and clockwise in ESE walls (Fig. 6c).
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
VIII+
Fractures across walls 20
2

7
6a
Long through fissures cutting a whole wall are common phenomena among earthquake damage patterns (Stiros 1996; Korjenkov and Lemzin 2000). Several such patterns were also observed in Ayla. For example, a secondary wall attached and perpendicular to the main city wall (Station 3 in city Quarter E) was cut by a joint. The 55 cm long joint (left one in Fig. 7) crosses two stones of a 121° trending wall.

Another joint (Fig. 6a, shown by arrows) cutting through two adjacent stones which are located in the northwestern wall of the 4th city tower (station No. 2). The height of the wall is 139 cm above the bottom of the excavation trench. The trend of the wall fragment is 124°.

The described damage pattern occurred during last strong 1995 earthquake (I = VDT, Al-Tarazi 2000), was strong enough to cause significant damage in weak remnants of ancient buildings, especially those already excavated. Local site effects like liquefaction and subsidence could have increased the damage level.
- al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)
VI+
The archeoseismic evidence requires a minimum Intensity of VIII (8) when using the Earthquake Archeological Effects chart of Rodríguez-Pascua et al (2013: 221-224).

Seismic Parameters from al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007)

al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) estimated an intensity of IX or more and the epicenter was some distance from the site. They estimated that the epicenter was to the NE.

Although based on limited observations the direction of tilt and resystematic block towards NE during Umayyad (748 A.D) and Fatimid (1086 A.D.) earthquakes are likely evidence of seismic motions radiated from the earthquake sources located NE of Ayla.

Site Effect
Liquefaction susceptibility

al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) suggest that the severity of seismic destruction at Ayla was significantly increased because of site effects. Citing Mansoor, N. (2004), they noted that the location lies in an area of high liquefaction susceptibility, due to the presence of saturated sands at shallow depth. Although previous speculation suggested that an active fault ran through the site, this was apparently disaffirmed by trenching performed by Rucker and Niemi (2005). al-Tarazi and Khorjenkov (2007) also reported that they did not discover offset and rotations affecting the NW town wall as described by Galli and Galadini (2001) and interpret the site history in terms of liquefaction and differential subsidence in agreement with Rucker and Niemi (2005). Ayla's location near the beach and shore strongly suggest that it is subject to liquefaction.

Notes and Further Reading
References

Articles and Books

Allison, A. J. (2013). Paleoseismology and Archaeoseismology along the Southern Dead Sea Transform in Wadi 'Arabah Near the municipality of Aqaba, Jordan, University of Missouri - Kansas City. PhD.

Damgaard, K., 2008. Final Report: The 2008 Season of the Islamic Aqaba Project. Circulated, unpublished report

Damgaard, K., Abu-Laban, A., Jennings, M.D., Lorien, P., Seye, C., 2010. Jordan's Port on the China Sea: a preliminary report on the 2010 field campaign of the Aylah Archaeological Project.

Damgaard, K., 2011. Modelling mercantilism: an archaeological analysis of Red Sea trade in the early Islamic period (650-1100 CE). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Damgaard, K., 2011. Appendices

Damgaard, K., Jennings, M.D., 2013. Once more unto the beach: a report on renewed archaeological investigations at Aylah. Annual of the Department of Antiquities in Jordan 57.

Galli and Galadini (2001) Surface faulting of archaeological relics. A review of case histories from the Dead Sea to the Alps Tectonophysics 335 291-312

Khouri, R. G. and D. S. Whitcomb (1988). Aqaba: Port of Palestine on the China Sea, Al Kutba.

Korzhenkov, A. and E. Al-Tarazi (2007). "Archaeoseismological investigation of the ancient Ayla site in the city of Aqaba, Jordan." Natural Hazards 42: 47-66.

Mansoor, N. (2004). "A GIS-Based Assessment of Liquefaction Potential of the City of Aqaba, Jordan." Environmental & Engineering Geoscience - ENVIRON ENG GEOSCI 10: 297-320.

Rucker, J. D. and T. M. Niemi (2005). "New excavations of the city wall at Islamic Ayla in ʻAqaba, Jordan." Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 49: 501-508.

Thomas, et al. (2007). "Structural damage from earthquakes in the second-ninth centuries at the archaeological site of Aila in Aqaba, Jordan: PERA." Bull Am Sch Orient Res 346: 59-77.

Whitcomb, D. (1994). Art and Industry in the Islamic Port of Aqaba. Special Publications. Chicago, IL, Oriental Institute, University of Chicago: 32.