Open this page in a new tab

Tel Ashdod

Aerial View of Tel Ashdod Aerial View of Tel Ashdod

Click on Image for high resolution magnifiable map

from www.govmap.gov.il


Names
Transliterated Name Source Name
Ashdod Hebrew אאַשְׁדּוֹד
Asdud Arabic أسدود
Isdud Arabic إسدود
Azotus Koine Greek Ἄζωτος
Asdud Philistine
Introduction
Identification

Tel Ashdod, about 6 km (3.5 mi.) south of modern Ashdod, is inland from the Mediterranean Sea (map reference 118.129). It is difficult to determine the exact extent of the mound because the remains of the ancient settlement were partly destroyed by the cultivation of its fields over many generations and by building activity on the site. The two main parts of the mound can be clearly distinguished: the acropolis, with an area of approximately 20 a., and the lower city, with at least 70 a. The mound is about 50 m above sea level and rises about 15 m above the surrounding area. Ashdod was a major city mainly in the Late Bronze and the Iron ages. Its name is preserved in the name of the Arab village of lsdud, 14.5 km ( 9mi. ) northeast of ancient Ashkelon and 6 km (3.5 mi.) southeast of modern Ashdod.

History

The city and its inhabitants are first mentioned in several written sources from the Late Bronze Age II discovered at Ugarit. An Akkadian text relates that a merchant, Sukuna, received six garments and other merchandise, including two thousand shekels (weight) of purple wool from Ashdod. This indicates that Ashdod was a textile center from which purple dyed garments were traded in the Late Bronze Age II. An alphabetic text from Ugarit. names an Ashdodite, Aryn, who belonged to a group of tin merchants. Among the long list of Ashdodites (add [y] ) mentioned in Ugaritic texts, most seem to be West Semitic, while a few maybe Hurrian. The Ashdodites never appear as a separate legal entity in the documents, perhaps indicating that they were merely maritime traders who happened to operate in Ugarit. Another Akkadian document from Ugarit provides evidence that three Canaanite cities were involved in trade with Ugarit-Acco, Ashkelon, and Ashdod. However, only the Ashdodites are known to have both traded with Ugarit and to have lived there or in its port town, Minet el-Beida.

Although Ashdod is not directly mentioned in Egyptian sources from the New Kingdom, it seems that the inscription engraved on a fragment of the city's gate relates to one of the Amarna letters (no. 263). Ashdod is also mentioned in the list of place names composed by the Egyptian Amenope in the eleventh century BCE. Ashdod appears many times in the Bible: "Ashdod, its towns and its villages" is included in the list of the cities of Judah (Jos. 15:47), but the date of this source is controversial. Nothing is said in the Masoretic text of Judges 1:18 about its conquest, but according to the Septuagint version of this passage, it can be argued that Ashdod was conquered by the tribe of Judah. Ashdod was almost always a non-Israelite town, being one of the five cities of the "rulers of the Philistines" (Jos. 11:22, 13:3). The Ark of the Covenant was brought to the temple of Dagon at Ashdod (I Sam. 5). Uzziah, king of Judah, broke down "the wall of Ashdod; and he built cities in the territory of Ashdod and elsewhere among the Philistines" (2 Chr. 26:6). The judgment of Amos on Ashdod (Am. 1 :8) probably relates to the same period. Isaiah (20:1) states that Sargon [II], the Assyrian king, sent Tartan (his commander-in-chief) against Ashdod and he conquered the city. This episode and the relations between Assyria and Ashdod are described in detail in the Assyrian prism inscription of the annals and in the display inscription of Sargon II.

According to Assyrian sources, Ashdod revolted against the king of Assyria. During the Assyrian military reprisal, Azuri, king of Ashdod, was dethroned and replaced by his brother, in 712 BCE. One year later, Ashdod again revolted, under the leadership of Iamani (a Greek, probably from Cyprus), and Sargon [II], once again put down the revolt. The rebel fled to Egypt, the town was conquered and sacked, and the territory of Ashdod was annexed by the Assyrians.

The kings Mitinti and Ahimelech are known to have governed Ashdod as vassals of Sennacherib and Esarhaddon of Assyria. Herodotus (II, 157) relates that, after the downfall of Assyria, the city was besieged by the Egyptian king Psamtik I for twenty-nine years. It is possible, in light of the letter from Mezad Hashavyahu, that King Josiah ruled the city for some time. When the Babylonians conquered the country, the king of Ashdod was taken prisoner and the region became a Babylonian province. The destruction of Ashdod in the Babylonian period is referred to by the prophets Jeremiah (25:20), Zephaniah (2:4), and Zechariah (9:6). After the return of the exiles from Babylon, the Persian province of Ashdod became an enemy of Judah, although some men of Judah married Ashdodian women, as reported in the book of Nehemiah (13:23-24). Silver coins from this period were found bearing the city's name.

The history of the city in the Hellenistic and Roman periods, when it was known as Azotus, is well documented, especially in the books of the Maccabees and the works of Josephus. Jonathan the Hasmonean demolished the temple of Dagon in Ashdod (I Mace. 10:84). The town was held by Alexander Jannaeus at the beginning of his reign (Josephus, Antiq. XIII, 395), and it is thus assumed that the city was conquered by John Hyrcanus. Pompey separated the city from Judea (Josephus, War I, 156), and Gabinius reconstructed it (War I, 165-166). Herod was granted Ashdod by Augustus. He willed it to his sister Salome, who left it to the empress, Livia. It thus became part of an imperial estate. During the First Jewish Revolt, Ashdod surrendered to Titus (War IV, 130). Eusebius speaks of Azotus as being only "a townlet of a certain importance" (Onom.18, 20:11, 22). By that time Ashdod-yam, the harbor city (Azotus Paralius), had begun to replace the inland city (Azotus Mesogaeus) as a local center.

Excavations

Excavations from 1962-1971

Nine seasons of excavations have been carried out so far (1962, 1963, 1965, a small-scale sounding in 1967, and from 1968 to 1972), first as a joint project of the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, the Pittsburgh Carnegie Museum, and the Israel Department of Antiquities and, after 1965, as a joint project of the last two institutions. During the two early seasons D. N. Freedman, J. Swauger, and M. Dothan directed the excavations. After 1965 Swauger and Dothan headed the project, with Dothan as director of excavations. In the first season, excavations were conducted in four areas: A, B, C, and D. Area B is a continuation of area A. However, at the beginning of the excavations, the level of area A was 6 m higher, because the upper section of the mound containing area B had been removed by modern settlers. In the second season (1963), excavations were carried out in areas A, B, D, and G, and during the third season (1965) in areas D, G, H, and K. Trial soundings were also made in areas E and F, to determine the extent of the mound. Small-scale soundings in area D were conducted in 1967.

Areas G, H, and K were the main areas of work during the fourth and fifth seasons. In 1969, area M was also opened. Areas M and G were further excavated in 1970. Work on area M continued in 1971 and 1972. Areas A, B, G, H, and K are on the acropolis; areas D, C, and M in the lower city; and area E on a hill northeast of the acropolis. Area F forms a part of a cemetery located approximately 1.5 km (1 mi.) east of the mound. Altogether more than 1.5 a. (6,500 sq m) were excavated.

Salvage Excavations from 2003-2004

Subsequent to preparatory work for the laying of railroad tracks for a line between Ashdod and Ashkelon, a salvage excavation was conducted by the Israel Antiquities Authority near Tel Ashdod. The first season took place in November 2003–January 2004, under the direction of E. Kogan-Zehavi, and the second in April–June 2004, under the direction of E. Kogan-Zehavi and P. Nahshoni. Other small-scale excavations were conducted by D. Varga in 2003, in an arched tomb from stratum 2, a cist tomb from stratum 7, and a furnace from stratum 3. The excavation area is located some 200 m northwest of Tel Ashdod, and as based on previous knowledge, outside the area of the mound. Four excavation areas (A, B, C, D) were opened during the excavation, yielding archaeological remains from five periods—the Iron Age and the Persian, Hellenistic, Late Roman, and Byzantine periods—described below from the earliest to the latest

Aerial Views and Plans
Aerial Views and Plans

Aerial Views

  • Tel Ashdod in Google Earth
  • Tel Ashdod on govmap.gov.il

Plans

  • Map of the mound and 1962-1971 excavation areas from Stern et. al. (1993 v. 1)
  • Map of 2003-2004 excavation areas from Stern et. al. (2008)

Chronology
Stratigraphy

Entire Tel

Stratigraphy on the Mound Stratigraphy on the Mound

Stern et. al. (1993 v. 1)


Area A

Stratum Period Dates Description
8 Iron Age Finds predating the Assyrian palace were sought in a small probe excavated in Area B, at the northern end of the site. Building remains from three phases, whose elevation and different mud bricks indicated that they preceded the construction of the palace, were uncovered (Fig. 3). The earliest phase comprised a wall built of rectangular mud bricks. A section excavated into the mud-brick wall and the fill to its west revealed fragments of pottery vessels, mostly from the tenth–eighth centuries BCE, as well as some potsherds from the Late Bronze Age. It was unclear whether a burnt layer that overlaid the wall was contemporaneous with it or belonged to a later phase, the second phase, which comprised a collapse of fieldstones and mud-brick fragments. The third, upper phase was atop the burnt layer and included a wall, bisecting the square from east to west, built of a row of rectangular mud bricks and preserved a single course high. The pottery vessels from the fills alongside the wall were dated to the eighth century BCE.
7 Iron Age

A large public building, probably an Assyrian palace from the eighth century BCE, built upon a square podium (W11; height c. 2 m), was exposed in Area A. The palace and the podium were constructed from the same square brownish-red mud bricks (0.38 × 0.38 m, height 0.1 m). The eastern side of the podium was preserved to its full height (c. 2 m; Fig. 4) in the northern part of the excavation. North of the podium, layers of ash fill that served as part of bedding for an open courtyard, were deposited. The ceramic finds recovered from the foundation of W11 and the fill to its north indicated that the podium was not established prior to the eighth century BCE.

A large public building was erected atop the podium. Its foundations (W1, W3, W8–10, W12; 2.8 m thick, preserved height 1.3 m) were built of square grayish-brown mud bricks (0.38–0.39 m, 0.11 m high). The width of the walls evidenced the fortified nature of the building, which included a large courtyard, delineated by W1 and W3 in the southwest. A mud-brick wall whose southern face was exposed enclosed the courtyard in the north. It was built on top of fills and not above the podium, indicating that part of the building and definitely the courtyard were founded above fills that were intentionally deposited for that purpose. Three elongated halls, oriented east–west and delineated by Walls 8, 10, 12, were exposed south of the courtyard. A floor (L114) that was composed of square gray mud bricks, whose size was identical to those of the walls, abutted the building’s walls. The floor’s bedding consisted of a layered ground kurkar fill, overlain with alternating mud-brick surfaces and kurkar layers (Fig. 5). This bedding’s composition enabled the raising of the floors to impressive heights above surface. The numerous pottery fragments recovered from the bedding demonstrated that the building was not set up before the eighth century BCE. Mud-brick collapse and remains of a mighty conflagration in all the rooms bear witness to the overwhelming destruction of the building.

A mud-brick wall (width c. 3 m), oriented east–west, was discovered in Area B. It was abutted from the north by mud-brick walls (width 1.2 m), built on top of the podium. The walls formed four elongated rooms that probably served as storerooms in the basement level of the palace. One of the rooms, excavated completely, was destroyed by an intense fire.

A section of the podium, overlaid with remains of walls that delineated the palace from the west, as well as a mud-brick floor, was exposed in Area C (Fig. 6). The walls were poorly preserved due to erosion. Two plastered rooms, which contained a stone and two ceramic bathtub-like vats, were discovered in the eastern part of the area (Fig. 7). A ceramic vat, probably used as a bathtub (Fig. 8), was found in the eastern room, which was only partially exposed and entirely coated with waterproof plaster. The bathtub was reinforced on all sides with small stones bonded with plaster. This is a first-time evidence for a bathroom with a bathtub. A wall and a pillar, whose lower sections were lined with flat ashlar stones, were found in a small section of another room that was exposed to the south of the bathroom (Fig. 9).

The southern end of the compound was sought in Area D. The southern face of a mud-brick wall, aligned east–west, was discovered. A floor’s bedding of square mud bricks arranged in orderly layers, one atop the other, was observed to the south of the wall. Probing trenches dug by a backhoe c. 20 m south of the wall were devoid of archaeological remains.

The finds from the palace included a multitude of pottery fragments, a ceramic figurine, a clay mold for casting figurines (Fig. 10) and animal bones, dating to the eighth–seventh centuries BCE.

6 Iron Age

The building continued in use, undergoing several alterations. In Area A, Walls (W5–7, W15, W16) composed of square dark brown mud bricks, larger than those of the former stratum (0.42 m) and having sand-filled interstices, were added above and next to the bases of the building’s existing walls. A long corridor bounded by Walls 5–7 (Fig. 11) on its east, north and west was preserved from this construction. Its gray plaster floor was overlaid with an ash layer that evidenced fire. The corridor was probably covered with vaults built of fired mud bricks. Walls 15 and 16 in the southern part of the excavation area belonged to a building or room that extended further south. The finds included a ceramic figurine in the image of a bearded man and pottery vessels that dated this phase of the building to the seventh century BCE.

5 Iron Age

Scant building remains, which were ascribed to the period following the destruction of the palace, were exposed in Areas C and D. Tamped-earth floors and walls, whose foundations were built of fieldstones, were discovered. The walls were preserved a single course high and probably bore mud-brick superstructures. Large numbers of pottery fragments from the seventh century BCE were found on the floors.

4 Persian Period

Meager remains, including refuse pits in Areas B, as well as the foundation of a fieldstone-built wall and a pit that was probably a favissa in Area C, were exposed. The favissa pit contained fragments of ceramic cultic stands, adorned with figures of men and women and two imported lekythoi. This layer was destroyed by the construction of the Hellenistic period at the site.

3 Hellenistic Period

Four circular potter’s kilns (1–4; a fifth kiln was excavated by D. Varga) were uncovered in the south and west of Area A. Kilns 2 and 3 were exposed for the purpose of documenting their shape and size, whereas Kilns 1 and 4 were excavated. A column or an arch that supported the curved roof was built in the center of each kiln and the vessels, which dated to the Hellenistic period, were placed on the floor. The large number of kilns in such a small area testifies to an industrial zone.

The fieldstone-built foundations of two walls (W2, W4) were unearthed. Wall 2 was built on the eastern end of W1 and W4 was built on top of the western end of W6. The dating of these walls was inconclusive because no floors associated with them were found. Mixed ceramic finds, dating to the Persian and Hellenistic periods, were associated with the walls.

2 Roman–Byzantine Period

An arcosolium tomb excavated by D. Varga (HA-ESI 117) was ascribed to this stratum.

1 Byzantine or Early Islamic Periods

Three rectangular tombs (5–7; two were exposed by D. Varga) built of dressed kurkar slabs were uncovered at the western end of the excavation area. The tombs were not excavated and could not be dated, due to objections by representatives of the Ministry of Religious Affairs. The tombs were inserted into the mud-brick walls of the Assyrian public building. Judging by their size, two of the tombs (5, 7) were for adult individuals and an infant possibly occupied the third tomb (6). It seems that these tombs and those discovered in the trial excavation were part of a cemetery in this area. Tombs of this type are known from the Roman, Byzantine and Early Islamic periods.

Notes and Further Reading
References

Bibliography from Stern et. al. (1993)

Main Publications

M. Dothan et al., Ashdod 1 (1962) ('Atiqot 7), Jerusalem 1967

Ashdod 2-3 (1963-1965) ('Atiqot 9-10), Jerusalem 1971

Ashdod 4 ('Atiqot 15), Jerusalem 1982.

Other Studies

H. Tadmor JCS 12 (1958) 79-80

M. Dothan, IEJ 12 (1962), 147-148

13 (1963), 340-342; 14 (1964), 79-95

15 (1965), 259-260

18 (1968), 253-254

21 (1971), 175

22 (1972), 166-167, 243-244

23 (1973), 1-17

id. (with D. N. Freedman), RB 71 (1964), 401-405

74 (1967), 78-80

79 (1972), 419-421; id., BTS 71 (1965), 8-16

id., Archaeology 20 (1967), 178-186

Ashdod 4 (Review), Archiv fiir Orientforschung 33 (1986), 113-114

id., New Directions in Biblical Archaeology (eds. D. N. Freedman andJ. Greenfield), Garden City, N.Y. 1971, 16

id., BA 40 (1977), 38-39

id., Proc., 6th World Congress of Jewish Studies I, Jerusalem 1977, 89-91

id., ASOR Symposia (ed. F. M. Cross, Jr.), Cambridge, Mass. 1979, 125-134

id., Society and Economy, 295-303

id.,AASOR49(1989), 59-70

D. N. Freedman, BA 26 (1963), 134-139

F. M. Cross, Jr., and D. N. Freedman, BASOR 175 (1964), 48-50

B. Lifshitz, Euphrosyne n.s. 6 (1973-1974), 32-34

J. L. Swauger, Carnegie Magazine 50 (1976), 312-313

A. Ben David, Ugarit-Forschungen 11 (1979), 29-30

J. L. Bacharach, 'Atiqot 14 (1980), 83-92

G. L. Mattingly, Near East Archaeological Society Bulletin 17 (1981), 47-64

M. W. Prausnitz, Ph6nizier im Westen, Mainz 1982, 31-44

L. E. Stager, EI 18 (1985), 56-64

J. Kaplan, IEJ 37 (1987), 51-53; A. Mazar, ibid. 38 (1988), 224-226

id., Society and Economy, 251-260

Weippert 1988 (Ortsregister); M. Burdajewicz, The Aegean Sea Peoples and Religious Architecture in the Eastern Mediterranean at the Close of the Bronze Age (BAR/IS 558), Oxford 1990, 59

A. Lemaire, Revue Numismatique VIe Serie/32 (1990), 257-263

E. Stern, Centre and Periphery: Proceedings of the Groningen 1986 Achaemenid History Workshop (Achaemenid History 4), Leiden 1990, 221-226

D. Ussishkin, BASOR277-278 (1990), 71-91; G. J. Wightman, ibid., 5-22.

Bibliography from Stern et al (2008)

Main Publications

M. Dothan et al., Ashdod 1 (1962) ('Atiqot 7), Jerusalem 1967

Ashdod 2-3 (1963-1965) ('Atiqot 9-10), Jerusalem 1971

Ashdod 4 ('Atiqot 15), Jerusalem 1982.

Other Studies

H. Tadmor JCS 12 (1958) 79-80

M. Dothan, IEJ 12 (1962), 147-148

13 (1963), 340-342; 14 (1964), 79-95

15 (1965), 259-260

18 (1968), 253-254

21 (1971), 175

22 (1972), 166-167, 243-244

23 (1973), 1-17

id. (with D. N. Freedman), RB 71 (1964), 401-405

74 (1967), 78-80

79 (1972), 419-421; id., BTS 71 (1965), 8-16

id., Archaeology 20 (1967), 178-186

Ashdod 4 (Review), Archiv fiir Orientforschung 33 (1986), 113-114

id., New Directions in Biblical Archaeology (eds. D. N. Freedman andJ. Greenfield), Garden City, N.Y. 1971, 16

id., BA 40 (1977), 38-39

id., Proc., 6th World Congress of Jewish Studies I, Jerusalem 1977, 89-91

id., ASOR Symposia (ed. F. M. Cross, Jr.), Cambridge, Mass. 1979, 125-134

id., Society and Economy, 295-303

id.,AASOR49(1989), 59-70

D. N. Freedman, BA 26 (1963), 134-139

F. M. Cross, Jr., and D. N. Freedman, BASOR 175 (1964), 48-50

B. Lifshitz, Euphrosyne n.s. 6 (1973-1974), 32-34

J. L. Swauger, Carnegie Magazine 50 (1976), 312-313

A. Ben David, Ugarit-Forschungen 11 (1979), 29-30

J. L. Bacharach, 'Atiqot 14 (1980), 83-92

G. L. Mattingly, Near East Archaeological Society Bulletin 17 (1981), 47-64

M. W. Prausnitz, Ph6nizier im Westen, Mainz 1982, 31-44

L. E. Stager, EI 18 (1985), 56-64

J. Kaplan, IEJ 37 (1987), 51-53; A. Mazar, ibid. 38 (1988), 224-226

id., Society and Economy, 251-260

Weippert 1988 (Ortsregister); M. Burdajewicz, The Aegean Sea Peoples and Religious Architecture in the Eastern Mediterranean at the Close of the Bronze Age (BAR/IS 558), Oxford 1990, 59

A. Lemaire, Revue Numismatique VIe Serie/32 (1990), 257-263

E. Stern, Centre and Periphery: Proceedings of the Groningen 1986 Achaemenid History Workshop (Achaemenid History 4), Leiden 1990, 221-226

D. Ussishkin, BASOR277-278 (1990), 71-91; G. J. Wightman, ibid., 5-22. et al., ESI 112 (2000), 101*–103*

S. Vargon, Jerusalem and Eretz Israel (A. Kindler Fest.

eds. J. Schwartz et al.), Ramat Gan 2000, 10–29

K. Dallibor, Mitteilingen der Sudanarchäologischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin 11 (2001), 41–50

A. Fantalkin, TA 28 (2001), 131–136

I. Finkelstein & L. Singer-Avitz, TA 28 (2001), 231– 259

31 (2004), 122–135

B. Halpern, David’s Secret Demons (The Bible in its World), Grand Rapids, MI 2001

P. Nahshoni, ASOR Annual Meeting Abstract Book, Boulder, CO 2001, 43

id., ESI 113 (2001), 107*– 108*

M. R. Whincop, BH 37–38 (2001–2002), 25–44

M. Görg, BN 111 (2002), 16–17

H. M. Niemann, Kein Land für sich allein, Freiburg 2002, 70–91

A. Yasur-Landau, Social Aspects of Aegean Settlement in the Southern Levant in the End of the 2nd Millennium bce (Ph.D. diss.), Tel Aviv 2002

T. Barako & A. Yasur-Landau, BAR 29/2 (2003), 24–39, 64, 66–67

D. Ben-Shlomo, TA 30 (2003), 83–107

id., ASOR Annual Meeting 2004, www.asor.org/AM/am.htm

id., BASOR 335 (2004), 1–35

id., Pottery Production Centers in Iron Age Philistia: An Archaeological and Archaeometric Study (Ph.D. diss.), Jerusalem 2005

J. J. M. Roberts, Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology: The First Temple Period (Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 18

eds. A. G. Vaughn & A. E. Killebrew), Leiden 2003, 265–283

T. W. Burgh, NEA 67 (2004), 128–136

Y. Elitzur, Ancient Place Names in the Holy Land: Preservation and History, Jerusalem 2004, 103–110

Y. Goren et al., Inscribed in Clay, Tel Aviv 2004, 292–294

J. Sudilovsky, BAR 30/6 (2004), 12

A. Berman & L. Barda, Map of Nizzanim-West (87)

Map of Nizzanim-East (88) (Archaeological Survey of Israel), Jerusalem 2005

P. Reynolds, Late Roman Coarse Wares, Cooking Wares and Amphorae in the Mediterranean: Archaeology and Archaeometry. 1st International Conference, Barcelona 2002 (BAR/IS 1340

eds. J. M. Gurt Esparraguera et al.), Oxford 2005, 563–612

The Philistines and Other Sea Peoples (eds. A. Killebrew & G. Lehmann), Winona Lake, IN (in prep.).

Wikipedia pages

Ashdod



Isdud (Tel Ashdod)