Earthquake V Open this page in a new tab

Area J-East in the archaeological site of Aila preserves one of the most detailed archaeoseismic records along the southern Dead Sea Transform. Located approximately 500 m north of the modern shoreline of the Gulf of Aqaba and about 500 m northwest of the later Islamic city of Ayla, the Nabatean, Roman, Byzantine, and Early Islamic occupation sequence spans from the first century CE through the Early Islamic period. Aila occupies a tectonic setting at the northern end of the Gulf of Aqaba where left-lateral motion on the Aqaba Fault is transferred westward across the Wadi Arabah by a series of shoreline-parallel normal cross faults. One of these active faults (CF-5) intersects the western part of Area J-East, providing a rare opportunity to document repeated surface faulting, structural damage, repair, and stratigraphic displacement within a well-dated archaeological sequence.

Thomas et al. (2007) identified earthquake destruction (Earthquake V) within a collapse layer that they correlated with the 363 CE Cyril Quake. A terminus post quem of 360 CE was established from coins and pottery. They reported that “thin wall construction and surface layers produced pottery from the mid to late fourth century A.D.” They further noted that “the latest pottery dates from about A.D. 360 onward (based on several examples of African Red Slip form 67, introduced ca. A.D. 360; Hayes 1972).” In addition, “over 100 coins were found on the final floor of this phase. The majority of these coins were found associated with the remains of a broken box in Room 2. The latest coins date to the reign of Constantius II, who reigned from A.D. 337 to 361 (Parker 1999a), and provide a terminus post quem for this building phase."

Thomas et al. concluded that “the very refined pottery and coin dates give a secure post A.D. 360 date for the Earthquake V event.” They further observed that “the scarcity of post A.D. 360 pottery and the location of the coin hoard at the interface between occupation surface and collapse horizon indicate that this event cannot have occurred long after A.D. 360.” On this basis, they interpreted the destruction as “the historically attested earthquake of May 19, A.D. 363,” which is listed in this catalog as one of the 363 CE Cyril Quakes.

Powers (2010) provides additional archaeological context, noting that “at the end of the troubled third century, the Legio X Fretensis was transferred from Jerusalem to bolster the Limes Arabicus, with the effect that the population increased substantially and the city emerged as a regional centre.” He further states that “a church was built in c. 300, one of the oldest in the world, testifying to the early progress of Christianity in Palestine; it was apparently destroyed by the earthquake of 363 and subsequently covered by the new city wall.”

Thomas et al. (2007:64,66) reported a "more severe reactivation of Faults C and D" during Earthquake V although "along a slightly different rupture plane (through the Room 20 north wall) than during EQ VI." They estimated that Earthquake V produced at least 23 cm of dip-slip together with a "maximum of 30 cm of left-lateral strike-slip." The measured strike-slip, recorded where Fault D displaced wall J.1:53, reflects cumulative movement from Earthquakes VI, V, and IV. However, the authors concluded that "the majority of the lateral slip across Fault D is likely to have occurred predominantly in Earthquake V," consistent with the substantially greater structural damage produced by this event. Thomas et al. (2007) reported that "the collapse layer for Earthquake V exceeds 90 cm in places." They observed that the tumble was "more evenly distributed throughout the site than was the case for the earlier Earthquake VI, with a bias to the north side of collapsing walls." They concluded that "this thick collapse horizon across the site suggests Earthquake V was stronger in intensity compared with Earthquake VI."
  • Fig. 1b Quaternary Geologic Map of the Southern Arava from Thomas et al (2007)
  • Fig 2.8 b Map showing location of location of Area J-east from Niemi (2014)
  • Fig. 2.15 Plan of Area J-east from Thomas et al (2007)
  • Fig. 3 Composite columnar stratigraphic section for J-east site from Thomas et al (2007)
  • Fig. 4 Section drawing of Wall 26 and Wall 48 showing earthquake damage and fault offsets from Thomas et al. (2007)
  • Fig. 5 Section C stratigraphic section showing mapped faults from Thomas et al. (2007)
  • Fig. 5 Section B stratigraphic section showing mapped faults from Thomas et al. (2007)
  • Fig. 5 Section A stratigraphic section showing mapped faults from Thomas et al. (2007)
Deformation Map

click on image to open in a new tab

Modified by JW from Fig. 2 of Thomas et al (2007)
By Jefferson Williams