End of Stratum IV Earthquake
The village of Meiron experienced steady demographic growth from the
Late Hellenistic period, accelerating after the Roman wars, and reached
its most productive phase during the third and fourth centuries CE.
Its economic orientation was primarily northward, toward the port of
Tyre, and prosperity appears to have continued into the mid-fourth
century. According to
Eric M. Meyers in Stern et al. (1993),
political instability beginning with the
revolt of Gallus Caesar (351–352 CE), combined with broader regional stresses culminating in
the earthquake of 363 CE, created conditions that ultimately resulted
in systematic abandonment.
Excavations by
Meyers, Meyers, and Strange (1974),
Meyers, Strange, and Meyers (1978),
and
Meyers and Meyers (1978)
interpreted Meiron as abandoned rather than violently
destroyed in the mid-fourth century CE. However,
Russell (1980)
noted that the archaeological record may also be consistent with
seismic destruction associated with the northern
Cyril earthquake of 363 CE.
A thick destruction layer was identified in multiple rooms of the
lower city (Site M I) and in the northern suburb (Site M II). In the
so-called “Patrician House,” crushed storage jars were found in a sealed
room, some still containing carbonized food remains, a context that was
potentially ritualized but that also remains relevant
to an archaeoseismic interpretation
(
Eric M. Meyers in Stern et al. 1993).
Numismatic and ceramic evidence was originally used to argue that
occupation ended around 360 CE. In particular,
Meyers, Strange, and Groh (1978)
reported that no stratified coins later than 360 CE were found in
Stratum III. This chronology was later revised by
Magness (2012),
with the full ceramic and numismatic analysis presented in
Magness and Schindler (2015).
They argued that several post-363 CE coins and ceramics previously
dismissed as intrusive are in fact stratigraphically valid, implying
that construction and occupation extended into the later fourth and
early fifth centuries CE. Under this revised chronology, Meiron may
have survived the 363 CE earthquake, with abandonment occurring
substantially later, leaving unresolved the balance between seismic
destruction, recovery, and eventual decline.